File size: 76,992 Bytes
6fa4bc9 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 | {
"paper_id": "R13-1013",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T14:56:24.834808Z"
},
"title": "Automatic Extraction of Contextual Valence Shifters",
"authors": [
{
"first": "No\u00e9mi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Boubel",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "ILC (Universit\u00e9 catholique de Louvain",
"location": {
"settlement": "Cental"
}
},
"email": "noemi.boubel@uclouvain.be"
},
{
"first": "Thomas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fran\u00e7ois",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "ILC (Universit\u00e9 catholique de Louvain",
"location": {
"settlement": "Cental"
}
},
"email": "thomas.francois@uclouvain.be"
},
{
"first": "Hubert",
"middle": [],
"last": "Naets",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "ILC (Universit\u00e9 catholique de Louvain",
"location": {
"settlement": "Cental"
}
},
"email": "hubert.naets@uclouvain.be"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "In opinion mining, many linguistic structures, called contextual valence shifters, may modify the prior polarity of items. Some systems of sentiment analysis have tried to take these shifters into account, but few studies have focused on the identification of all these structures and their impact on polarized words. In this paper, we describe a method that automatically identifies contextual valence shifters. It relies on a chi-square test applied to the contingency table representing the distribution of a candidate shifter in a corpus of reviews of various opinions. The system depends on two resources in French-a corpus of reviews and a lexicon of valence terms-to build a list of French contextual valence shifters. We also introduce a set of rules used to classify the extracted contextual valence shifters according to their impact on polarized words. They make use of the Pearson residuals in contingency tables to filter candidate shifters and classify them. We show that the technique reaches an F-measure of either 0.56 or 0.66, depending on how the categories of shifters are defined.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "R13-1013",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "In opinion mining, many linguistic structures, called contextual valence shifters, may modify the prior polarity of items. Some systems of sentiment analysis have tried to take these shifters into account, but few studies have focused on the identification of all these structures and their impact on polarized words. In this paper, we describe a method that automatically identifies contextual valence shifters. It relies on a chi-square test applied to the contingency table representing the distribution of a candidate shifter in a corpus of reviews of various opinions. The system depends on two resources in French-a corpus of reviews and a lexicon of valence terms-to build a list of French contextual valence shifters. We also introduce a set of rules used to classify the extracted contextual valence shifters according to their impact on polarized words. They make use of the Pearson residuals in contingency tables to filter candidate shifters and classify them. We show that the technique reaches an F-measure of either 0.56 or 0.66, depending on how the categories of shifters are defined.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Most opinion mining systems rely on the extraction of sentiment words to detect opinions. These words, which we will rather refer to as polarized words, convey useful information about the semantic orientation (positive or negative) of a text. However, the context in which these words appear may modify their valence in many ways. Although being of importance, this issue has been investigated only recently and is now the object of an increasing attention. Polanyi and Zaenen (2004) first postulated the existence of contextual valence shifters, which are contextual phenomena altering the prior polarity of a term. Afterwards, some of these phenomena (such as negative or conditional syntactic structures) were dealt with on a case by case basis (Das and Chen, 2001; Na et al., 2004; Popescu and Etzioni, 2005; Pang et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2006; Councill et al., 2010) . Studies addressing the phenomenon as a whole flourished later. They aimed at best modelling the expression of opinions (Polanyi and Zaenen, 2004; Taboada et al., 2011; Hatzivassiloglou and Wiebe, 2000; Morsy and Rafea, 2012; Musat and Trausan-Matu, 2010) , before embedding those in a classification system. The main purposes of these studies are to determine a list of contextual valence shifters that impact the polarity of a term as well as to define the nature of this impact. However, these lists are often manually built from linguistic intuitions and not learned from language data. Works relying on a corpus of texts to develop resources that best reflect the actual role played by the linguistic context for opinion mining are few. Li et al. (2010) suggested a technique to automatically select polarityshifting features in order to improve a sentiment classification system based on a machine-learning approach.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 459,
"end": 484,
"text": "Polanyi and Zaenen (2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 749,
"end": 769,
"text": "(Das and Chen, 2001;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 770,
"end": 786,
"text": "Na et al., 2004;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
},
{
"start": 787,
"end": 813,
"text": "Popescu and Etzioni, 2005;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 814,
"end": 832,
"text": "Pang et al., 2002;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
},
{
"start": 833,
"end": 853,
"text": "Wilson et al., 2005;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 854,
"end": 874,
"text": "Wilson et al., 2006;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 875,
"end": 897,
"text": "Councill et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 1019,
"end": 1045,
"text": "(Polanyi and Zaenen, 2004;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 1046,
"end": 1067,
"text": "Taboada et al., 2011;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 1068,
"end": 1101,
"text": "Hatzivassiloglou and Wiebe, 2000;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
},
{
"start": 1102,
"end": 1124,
"text": "Morsy and Rafea, 2012;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 1125,
"end": 1154,
"text": "Musat and Trausan-Matu, 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 1641,
"end": 1657,
"text": "Li et al. (2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction and State of the Art",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "All these studies agree that contextual valence shifters can have diverse impacts on polarized words. They classify them according to the nature of this impact (Polanyi and Zaenen, 2004; Quirk et al., 1985; Kennedy and Inkpen, 2006) : inversers invert the polarity of a polarized item, intensifiers intensify it and attenuators diminish it.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 160,
"end": 186,
"text": "(Polanyi and Zaenen, 2004;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 187,
"end": 206,
"text": "Quirk et al., 1985;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
},
{
"start": 207,
"end": 232,
"text": "Kennedy and Inkpen, 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction and State of the Art",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "This study, based on a French corpus, focuses on the issue of contextual valence shifters and pursues two main objectives: (1) propose an automatic method that efficiently models contextual valence shifters, with the aim of improving performance of opinion mining systems (especially those based on a term-counting method); (2) clarify the linguistic structures constituting a hindrance to current classification systems. From these two perspectives, our approach differs from the work of Li et al. (2010) . Moreover, we are interested in describing the effect of all kind of modifiers (inversers, but also intensifiers and attenuators). We restricted our study to all lexicosyntactic patterns located in the immediate context of a polarized term and impacting the valence of this term. This restriction means dealing with individual words. However, it should be noted that contextual shifters may sometimes be phrases too. Our approach also relies on the assumption that contextual shifters are in direct syntactic relation with the polarized word, which has to be confirmed.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 489,
"end": 505,
"text": "Li et al. (2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction and State of the Art",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Based on the results of previous works (Boubel, 2012; Boubel and Bestgen, 2011) , we propose here a system that automatically extracts modifiers (in the form of lexico-syntactic patterns) and classifies them according to their semantic impact. The general methodology is detailed in Section 2 and we report the evaluation of the method in Section 3. The paper concludes with Section 4, discussing some issues we faced, in particular the problem of the attenuating valence shifters.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 39,
"end": 53,
"text": "(Boubel, 2012;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 54,
"end": 79,
"text": "Boubel and Bestgen, 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction and State of the Art",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "In order to identify valence shifters along with their semantic impact on polarized words, we propose to exploit two different pieces of information regarding the expression of polarity in a text: (1) the overall polarity t of the text, i.e. the score assigned to it on a scale from very negative to very positive, and (2) the polarity p (positive or negative) of a polarized word which appears in the text. We noticed that the distribution of the patterns related to polarized words (i.e. potential modifiers) is influenced by the values of p and t. Intuitively, we can consider three cases:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Key principle",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 patterns in which p is of opposite polarity than t will mitigate or reverse the valence of their associated term;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Key principle",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 patterns that reinforce the polarity of a word will appear especially when p and t share the same polarity;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Key principle",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 finally, a larger number of expressions having an attenuating effect on p will be found when t is around the middle of its scale (texts presenting a nuanced view).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Key principle",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "Based on this principle, we developed a system able to automatically detect and classify modifiers. It relies on two resources: (1) a corpus containing evaluative texts whose global polarity t is known and (2) a lexicon of terms whose polarity p is also known.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The system",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "Our system performs a two-fold process. First, applying a parser to a corpus, we extract all syntactic dependency relationships that links a polarized term with another term (see Section 2.3). A statistical analysis is then performed to detect, among those, valence shifter candidates (see Section 2.3).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The system",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "In the second step (see Section 2.4), a rulebased classifier further removes bad candidates and assigns a label to remaining modifiers that should correspond to their impact on polarized terms.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The system",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "In order to identify valence shifter candidates using statistical tests, the initial corpus -made up of evaluative texts whose polarity t is known -is first processed by a syntactic parser to obtain the list of all syntactic dependency relationships including a polarized term. Such relationships take the form of a pair of words (the polarized term and the candidate modifier), along with the nature of this relation (e.g. NP(<NOM:d\u00e9ception>,<ADJ:total>)). For each element of the list, three pieces of information are available: (1) the pattern itself, (2) the valence p of the term included in the structure, and (3) the score t of the text.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Statistical processing",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "Then, we generalize over the relationships extracted, removing the polarized term and keeping only the valence shifter candidate and the syntactic relation linking it to its polarized term (e.g. NP(<NOM:>,<ADJ:total>)). This allows us to determine the frequency of each of these patterns in our corpus, in relation to two variables: the type of the pattern and the score t of the text. Based on these two variables, we build a contingency table for the patterns associated with positive terms and a second table for patterns in the context of a negative term 1 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Statistical processing",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "Then, for a given pattern g, we compute a chi-square test (Agresti, 2002) 2 where the distribution of g over the five possible values of t is compared with the distribution of all patterns except g. The chi-square value obtained is then used to decide whether the distribution of pattern g in the evaluative texts (t) is independent from the type of pattern. When the chi-square score is significant (based on a threshold \u03b1 1 ), we consider the pattern as a valuable valence shifter candidate. Table 1 examplifies this analysis for the adjective total modifying a positive noun (e.g. \"C'est une r\u00e9ussite totale.\", it is a total success.). This pattern gets a chi-square of 139.67 (p < 0.001) and it stands out even more clearly when associated to a negative noun (\u03c7 2 = 741.35 ; p < 0.001), which confirms its interest as a good valence shifter candidate (e.g. \"d\u00e9ception totale.\", a total disappointment.).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 58,
"end": 73,
"text": "(Agresti, 2002)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 494,
"end": 501,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Statistical processing",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "At the end of our first step, we obtain a list of valence shifter candidates, selected on the basis of their chi-square score. In the second phase of our method, we apply rules primarily to identify the impact of each candidate on valence terms, but also to further filter the candidate list.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "The idea is to rely on the adjusted residuals (Agresti, 2002) , computed for the two contingency tables available for a candidate pattern (with negative and positive terms). Adjusted residuals corresponds to a z-score, and high values (based on a threshold \u03b1 2 ) means that the pattern g is either over-represented in texts with a given value of t, or is under-represented. These residuals can sometimes display specific and interesting patterns of under-representation or overrepresentation throughout the range of scores t possible for the texts. In previous work (Boubel, 2011) , we analyzed the distributions of the adjusted residuals and we identified three typical profiles. Then, we were able to connect these profiles with their semantic role in the language, distinguishing three groups of modifiers: (1) \"intensifiers\", (2) \"inversers\", and (3) \"concessive structures\".",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 46,
"end": 61,
"text": "(Agresti, 2002)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 566,
"end": 580,
"text": "(Boubel, 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "These findings were translated into a set of rules that automatically classify valence shifter candidates according to their impact on polarized terms.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "Rules are based on the patterns of over-/underrepresentation and assign a score for each of the three classes of modifiers described above. At this stage, it is possible to apply a filtering threshold f s to remove the patterns that received a low score for all classes.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "We can summary the whole set of rules as the three following trends :",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "1. Structures that are over-represented in situations where the valence of p is similar to that of t, regardless of the nature of the term polarity p (positive or negative), obtain a high score in the intensification category;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "2. Structures that are over-represented in situations where p is the opposite of t obtain a high score in the inversion category (attenuating or an inversing role);",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "3. Finally, structures over-represented in reviews reporting a nuanced view (e.g. when t = 3 for texts rated on a scale from 1 to 5) obtain a high score in the concession category.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "Following this method, the adjective \"total\" modifying a noun phrase is given a score of 8 as an \"intensifier\", 0 as an \"inverser\" and 2 as a \"concessive\". It is indeed under-represented with a positive noun while the text is negative and overrepresented while it is positive (see Table 1 ). As a consequence, this pattern is classified as an intensifier.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 281,
"end": 288,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "It is worth noting that the classification underlying this approach does not match the one commonly used in the field, which draws a distinction between intensifiers, shifters, and diminishers. Our second category \"inversers\" includes both shifters and diminishers, since these two classes have similar statistical properties according to our method. On the contrary, the analysis of the statistical behavior of some valence shifter candidates highlights a particular semantic behavior which is not dealt with as such in the literature: it corresponds to patterns connecting several polarized terms of different polarities and having an impact on the polarity value of the whole expression. These are the patterns gathered in the third category: the \"concessive structures\". We observe that using statistical properties from the contingency tables to identify categories of valence shifters has limitations in terms of qualitative approach of the ,047 other patterns with positive noun 283,069 588,073 1,507,934 5,454,541 4,188,908 12,022,525 283,090 588,097 1,508,000 5,454,941 4,189,444 12,023,572 Table 1: A contingency table for the adj. total. The adjusted residuals are significant for \u03b1 2 = 0.05 task, but also helps to uncover interesting phenomena. We will come back to the insightful of this classification further in the paper.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 947,
"end": 1156,
"text": ",047 other patterns with positive noun 283,069 588,073 1,507,934 5,454,541 4,188,908 12,022,525 283,090 588,097 1,508,000 5,454,941 4,189,444 12,023,572 Table 1: A contingency table for the adj.",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Validation and classification of the candidates",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "The evaluation of our technique was carried out according to three steps. First, we collected the resources required by the approach, namely a corpus of evaluative texts classified according to their judgment (t), a valence lexicon, and a list of dependencies relationships in which modifiers have been annotated (our gold standard). They are further described in Section 3.1. Then, we carried out a quantitative evaluation of the technique, comparing its predictions to our gold standard (see Section 3.2). Finally, in Section 3.3, we conducted a qualitative analyse of the results, in order to better understand the way our technique works.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "To implement our approach, the first resource needed is a corpus of texts ranked according to the opinion they express (t). The corpus we used was provided by the NOMAO company 3 , which proposes a web and mobile application helping people to find, share and discover new places. It is made of 2,200,000 internet user reviews in French relative to restaurants or hotels (7,571,730 sentences). Every text has been given a score from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good) by the author of the text.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The second resource needed is a valence lexicon, in which the polarities p of words are labelled. NOMAO also provided us with a such lexicon. It has been manually built and it includes 3,683 polarized French words relative to the domain of restaurant reviews (2,425 negative words and 1,258 positive words).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Finally, for evaluation purposes, a gold standard \"corpus\" was required, in which dependencies relationships containing a polarized words and a contextual valence shifter have been annotated. Since, there was no such corpus available, we randomly selected 500 sentences from the whole NO-3 http://fr.nomao.com/ MAO corpus and discarded them from this corpus, that was therefore considered as the training corpus. The 500 sentences contained abount 2,000 dependency relationships including a polarized word 4 . These relationships were manually annotated with a two-fold procedure: (1) decide whether the term associated to a polarized word is a contextual valence shifter or not, and (2) describe its impact on the polarized word, according to one of the available categories.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Regarding the categories, we decided to use a finer-grained system than the one based on statistical properties (see Section 2.4), because the category of attenuators, introduced in previous studies, intuitively stood out. This allowed us to discuss in Section 4 the relevance of the concession category we had statiscally identified. We therefore defined the four following classes: (1) intensifiers (INT) emphasize the valence of their associated term; (2) inversers (INV) inverse the valence of their associated term; (3) attenuators (ATT) mitigate the valence of their associated term; and (4) concessives (CONC) articulate terms or phrases of opposite polarities.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The list of dependency relationships were annotated by two experts in accordance with these four categories. In order to estimate their interrater agreement, we computed the Fleiss' kappa (Fleiss, 1971) and obtained a substantial agreement (kappa = 0.716) for the annotations. Finally, this corpus was equally divided into a development set -used to select the best set of parameters -and a test set, to assess the performance of the best model.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 188,
"end": 202,
"text": "(Fleiss, 1971)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Regarding the evaluation, the first issue was to define an adequate evaluation metric, since the task is a multiclass case. We opted for two different approaches commonly used in the literature. The first split the problem into a detection problem and a classification problem. It computes classic measures such as precision, recall, and F-measure (to which we will refer to as the F-measure 1) regarding the model's ability to detect a modifier, whatever its label. Then, the classification rate is computed through conditional accuracy (Abney, 2008) . The second approach consists in computing the precision, recall and F-measure for each category independently, before averaging them to obtain a global estimation (we will refer to as the F-measure 2).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 538,
"end": 551,
"text": "(Abney, 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Another issue was the slight discrepancy between the set of labels from the manual annotation and the models. Manual annotation uses INT, ATT, INV, CONC, while the automatic classification uses INT, INV, CONC. For evaluation purposes, we had to project the four-label system onto the three-class one, considering that the category ATT (attenuator) was included into the category INV (inverser) (as it is already supposed in Section 2.4).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Once these two problems were sorted out, we had to perform an optimization step. Three metaparameters can indeed be manipulated: \u03b1 1 , \u03b1 2 , and f s. \u03b1 1 is the criterion for the selection of candidate modifiers, since it determines the significance level of the chi-square test. \u03b1 2 is the significance threshold for the residuals; decreasing it makes it more difficult for a given structure to match a classification rule. f s is the filtering score assigned for each structure.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "In order to limit the number of experiments, the following values were tested for both \u03b1 1 , \u03b1 2 : 0.0001, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.05, while f s was kept constant (f s\u2265 5). Once the best model according to \u03b1 1 , \u03b1 2 was selected, values ranging from 5 to 9 were experimented for f s. The evaluation metric for all models were computed as follows: a list of modifiers included in a dependency relationship were extracted from the training corpus and used to classify the relationships from the development set. It appeared that the optimal parameters are \u03b1 1 = 0.05 and \u03b1 2 = 0.005, as long as we want to exploit the whole training corpus.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "These optimal parameters were used to select 10,503 patterns, whose chi-square scores were significant among a total of 328,308 patterns. Then, the application of our classification rules further filtered those patterns, yielding a list of 6,612 contextual valence shifter candidates: 2,607 were labeled as INT, 2,677 were identified as INV, 1,328 were classified as CONC, and 216 were assigned to more than one categories 5 . However, among those candidates, only 1,147 structures received a score of 5 or higher. More strikingly, if we set f s to 9, then no more than 113 patterns are selected, among which are 66 INT and 47 INV, but no CONC.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Manipulating the filtering score f s reveals that the number of extracted valence shifters largely varies. We used the test corpus from Section 3.1, which contains 171 valence shifters (102 INT, 16 CONC and 23 INV or ATT) , to estimate the recall, the precision, the conditional accuracy, and the two F-measures for our model trained on the training corpus (see Table 2 ).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 185,
"end": 194,
"text": "(102 INT,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 195,
"end": 221,
"text": "16 CONC and 23 INV or ATT)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 362,
"end": 369,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "The F-measure 1 (which represents the capacity of the model to rightly detect shifters) starts from 0.49 for patterns with a score of 5 or higher and reaches 0.64 when f s \u2265 9. This corresponds to a recall of 0.86 and a precision of 0.37. It is obvious that our system considers too many patterns as valence shifters. This F-measure can however be improved if we use a stricter filtering score. It appears that the chi-square is less efficient than the classification rules to filter valence shifters.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "The F-measure 2 is globally better than Fmeasure 1 and reaches 0.57 when filtering the patterns with intermediate scores. Interestingly, it decreases strongly for f s \u2265 9. This can be explained by the fact that the system extracts less \"concessive structure\" and globally assigns a lower score to that type of structure. Only 6 CONC patterns are correctly classified for f s \u2265 5 and the system does not detect any patterns of this type when f s \u2265 9. As a result, the recall and precision for this category equals 0.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Finally, it is worth noting that the system obtains a very good conditional accuracy (85.9 for f s \u2265 5 and 97.6 for f s \u2265 9). This is a very interesting finding, since it shows that the classification rules we developed are relevant.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "To further analyze the efficiency of our extraction method, we submitted the list of the 260 shifters with a score of 8 or higher to a qualitative evalua-",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Score (f s) \u2265 5",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2265 6 \u2265 7 \u2265 8 \u2265 9 F-Measure 1 (recall, prec.) 0.49 (.86, .34 tion. The analysis confirms the conclusions drawn above: the system tends to consider too many patterns as shifters, but most of the actual shifters get the correct label, according to experts judgment. After cleaning manually the list, it appears that the system has correctly classified 85 patterns among 260, most of them being incorrectly recognized as valence shifters. Some limitations of our method could explain these errors. First, it happens that the object of the judgment, also associated with polarized words, is extracted (e.g. NP(<ADJ:>,<NOM:accueil>)).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 49,
"end": 58,
"text": "(.86, .34",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Second, grammatical words, such as articles, auxiliary verbs, etc. tend to be captured by the system because they are very frequent in texts. Most of these patterns are not relevant, but some others are important to extract because they can negate or reverse the valence of a polarized word (e.g. NP(<NOM:>,<_DET:aucun>)).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Also, the choice of using syntactic dependency relationships entails some limitations: the expression acting as the valence shifter is sometimes not extracted as a wole. Moreover, parsing errors frequently happen, extracting wrong patterns.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Finally, it happens that some words incorrectly recognized as valence shifters are actually polarized words missing from the valence lexicon.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "To conclude this analysis, some characteristics emerge out of the correctly-classified structures. On the one hand, intensifiers (mostly adverbs and adjectives) often have a direct semantic impact on the polarized word to which they are related. On the other hand, the patterns belonging to the INV and CONC categories are more complex and heterogeneous (e.g. AP(<ADJ:loin de>,<ADV:>)) and often impact a phrase or a whole sentence, not directly a lexical item. As a consequence, the effect can be hard to model and it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between the patterns from these two classes, either manually or automatically.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "In this paper, a new methodology for the automatic extraction and classification of valence shifters has been proposed. It reaches a very good accuracy for the classification, although it tends to extract too many structures. An interesting side of the method lies in its ability to identify relevant structures that are often not considered in other studies. In further work, it will be necessary to integrate the lexicon we obtained into a sentiment analysis system to check whether or not taking modifiers into may improve the performance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discussion and conclusion",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Beyond this applicative goal, our methodology also stressed issues in the categories used to organize contextual valence shifters. The class of diminishers (or downtoners), as it is commonly referred to in the opinion mining domain, is difficult to capture in an automatic way. In our system, we defined three classes of shifters on the basis of three different statistical profiles. The INV class includes both diminishers and inversers, since their statistic profiles are very similar. The CONC class contains structures that often relates terms with different polarities. However, it is worth considering that diminishers are often used in concessive or rhetorical structures and assign them to the class CONC rather than to the class INV. The F-measure 2 for our model in this condition is interestingly better than the one reported above: 0.66 instead of 0.56 for the structures kept when f s \u2265 5.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discussion and conclusion",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In view of these results, it appears that ATT can belong either to the INV class or to the CONC. Our assumption on this matter is that there is actually two types of diminishers: (1) diminishers modifying the valence of a single lexical item, that have statistical profiles closer to the INV category, and (2) diminishers used in concessive structure to attenuate the overall polarity of a phrase or a sentence, which should be included in the CONC class. This hypothesis will be tested in further work, through the analysis of the statistical profiles of manually annotated diminishers.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discussion and conclusion",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "We only keep patterns with a frequency higher than 20.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We used chi-square test as a first approach. However, it would be valuable to try other statistical tests in the future.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "It is worth noting that each relationship was considered in the context of the sentence it was extracted from. Therefore, a pattern repeated in the gold standard could be annotated in more than one way. Moreover, since we only dealt with the structures that our methodology can extract, modifiers not syntactically related with a polarized word were not annotated.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "When the score used for filtering is low, a few structures can receive a same score for two classes. However, these cases disappear as soon as we filter with a score of 5.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "We thank the NOMAO company who kindly provide their resources. This research is supported by Wallonie-Bruxelles International.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgments",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Semisupervised Learning for Computational Linguistics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [
"P"
],
"last": "Abney",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S.P. Abney. 2008. Semisupervised Learning for Com- putational Linguistics. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Ann Arbor, U.S.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Categorical Data Analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Agresti",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A. Agresti. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd edi- tion. Wiley-Interscience, New York.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Une proc\u00e9dure pour identifier les modifieurs de la valence affective d'un mot dans des textes",
"authors": [
{
"first": "No\u00e9mi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Boubel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yves",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bestgen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Actes de TALN11",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "137--142",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "No\u00e9mi Boubel and Yves Bestgen. 2011. Une proc\u00e9- dure pour identifier les modifieurs de la valence affective d'un mot dans des textes. In Actes de TALN11, volume 2, pages 137-142, Montpellier.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Extraction automatique de modifieurs de valence affective dans un texte",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Boubel",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Travaux du Cercle belge de Linguistique",
"volume": "6",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "N. Boubel. 2011. Extraction automatique de modi- fieurs de valence affective dans un texte. \u00c9tude ex- ploratoire appliqu\u00e9e au cas de l'adverbe. In Travaux du Cercle belge de Linguistique, volume 6.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Construction automatique d'un lexique de modifieurs de polarit\u00e9",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Boubel",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Actes de TALN12",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "N. Boubel. 2012. Construction automatique d'un lex- ique de modifieurs de polarit\u00e9. In Actes de TALN12, Grenoble.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "What's great and what's not: learning to classify the scope of negation for improved sentiment analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Isaac",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ryan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Councill",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Leonid",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mcdonald",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Velikovich",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the workshop on negation and speculation in natural language processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "51--59",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Isaac G Councill, Ryan McDonald, and Leonid Ve- likovich. 2010. What's great and what's not: learn- ing to classify the scope of negation for improved sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the workshop on negation and speculation in natural language processing, pages 51-59. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Yahoo! for amazon: Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Das",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 8th Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "37--56",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Das and M. Chen. 2001. Yahoo! for amazon: Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. In Proceedings of the 8th Asia Pacific Fi- nance Association Annual Conference, pages 37-56.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"L"
],
"last": "Fleiss",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1971,
"venue": "Psychological bulletin",
"volume": "76",
"issue": "5",
"pages": "378--382",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J.L. Fleiss. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agree- ment among many raters. Psychological bulletin, 76(5):378-382.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity",
"authors": [
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hatzivassiloglou",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wiebe",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "299--305",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "V. Hatzivassiloglou and J. M Wiebe. 2000. Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1, pages 299- 305.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Sentiment classification of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kennedy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Inkpen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Computational Intelligence",
"volume": "22",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "110--125",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A. Kennedy and D. Inkpen. 2006. Sentiment classi- fication of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters. Computational Intelligence, 22(2):110- 125.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Sentiment classification and polarity shifting",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [
"Y M"
],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhou",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "635--643",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Li, S.Y.M. Lee, Y. Chen, C.R. Huang, and G. Zhou. 2010. Sentiment classification and polarity shifting. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 635-643. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Improving documentlevel sentiment classification using contextual valence shifters. Natural Language Processing and Information Systems",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Morsy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rafea",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "253--258",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Morsy and A. Rafea. 2012. Improving document- level sentiment classification using contextual va- lence shifters. Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, pages 253-258.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "The impact of valence shifters on mining implicit economic opinions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Musat",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Trausan-Matu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "131--140",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "C. Musat and S. Trausan-Matu. 2010. The impact of valence shifters on mining implicit economic opin- ions. Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, pages 131-140.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Effectiveness of simple linguistic processing in automatic sentiment classification of product reviews",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"C"
],
"last": "Na",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sui",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Khoo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhou",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Advances in Knowledge Organization",
"volume": "9",
"issue": "",
"pages": "49--54",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J.C. Na, H. Sui, C. Khoo, S. Chan, and Y. Zhou. 2004. Effectiveness of simple linguistic processing in au- tomatic sentiment classification of product reviews. Advances in Knowledge Organization, 9:49-54.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vaithyanathan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing",
"volume": "10",
"issue": "",
"pages": "79--86",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learn- ing techniques. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 con- ference on Empirical methods in natural language processing-Volume 10, pages 79-86.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Contextual valence shifters",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Polanyi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zaenen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "106--111",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Polanyi and A. Zaenen. 2004. Contextual valence shifters. In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text, pages 106- 111.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Extracting product features and opinions from reviews",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Popescu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "O",
"middle": [],
"last": "Etzioni",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "339--346",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A.M. Popescu and O. Etzioni. 2005. Extracting prod- uct features and opinions from reviews. In Proceed- ings of the conference on Human Language Tech- nology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 339-346. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "A comprehensive grammar of the English language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Quirk",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Greenbaum",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Leech",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Svartvik",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Crystal",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1985,
"venue": "",
"volume": "397",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik, and D. Crystal. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language, volume 397. Cambridge Univ Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Taboada",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Brooke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tofiloski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Voll",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stede",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "37",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "267--307",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Taboada, J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll, and M. Stede. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2):267-307.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wilson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wiebe",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hoffmann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "347--354",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. 2005. Recog- nizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the conference on Hu- man Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 347-354.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Recognizing strong and weak opinion clauses",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Theresa",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wilson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Janyce",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wiebe",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rebecca",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hwa",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Computational Intelligence",
"volume": "22",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "73--99",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Rebecca Hwa. 2006. Recognizing strong and weak opinion clauses. Computational Intelligence, 22(2):73-99.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"TABREF1": {
"html": null,
"text": ") 0.51(.84, .37) 0.55(.82, .42) 0.52(.67, .43) 0.64(.60, .69)",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>Conditional accuracy</td><td>85.9%</td><td>85.5%</td><td>86%</td><td>92.5%</td><td>97.6%</td></tr><tr><td>F-Measure 2 (recall, prec.)</td><td>0.56(.51.62)</td><td>0.55(.50.62)</td><td>0.56(.50.63)</td><td>0.49(.38.69)</td><td>0.40(.32.56)</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF2": {
"html": null,
"text": "Evaluation measures for the model with filtering scores ranging from 5 to 9.",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
}
}
}
} |