File size: 100,920 Bytes
6fa4bc9 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 | {
"paper_id": "S13-2001",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T15:41:42.720318Z"
},
"title": "SemEval-2013 Task 1: TEMPEVAL-3: Evaluating Time Expressions, Events, and Temporal Relations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Naushad",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "naushad@cs.rochester.edu"
},
{
"first": "Hector",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "University of Alicante",
"location": {
"country": "Spain"
}
},
"email": "hllorens@dlsi.ua.es"
},
{
"first": "Leon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Derczynski",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Marc",
"middle": [],
"last": "Verhagen",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Brandeis University",
"location": {
"country": "USA"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [],
"last": "Allen",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pustejovsky",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Brandeis University",
"location": {
"country": "USA"
}
},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "Within the SemEval-2013 evaluation exercise, the TempEval-3 shared task aims to advance research on temporal information processing. It follows on from TempEval-1 and-2, with: a three-part structure covering temporal expression, event, and temporal relation extraction; a larger dataset; and new single measures to rank systems-in each task and in general. In this paper, we describe the participants' approaches, results, and the observations from the results, which may guide future research in this area.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "S13-2001",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "Within the SemEval-2013 evaluation exercise, the TempEval-3 shared task aims to advance research on temporal information processing. It follows on from TempEval-1 and-2, with: a three-part structure covering temporal expression, event, and temporal relation extraction; a larger dataset; and new single measures to rank systems-in each task and in general. In this paper, we describe the participants' approaches, results, and the observations from the results, which may guide future research in this area.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "The TempEval task (Verhagen et al., 2009) was added as a new task in SemEval-2007 . The ultimate aim of research in this area is the automatic identification of temporal expressions (timexes), events, and temporal relations within a text as specified in TimeML annotation (Pustejovsky et al., 2005) . However, since addressing this aim in a first evaluation challenge was deemed too difficult a staged approach was suggested.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 18,
"end": 41,
"text": "(Verhagen et al., 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 69,
"end": 81,
"text": "SemEval-2007",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 272,
"end": 298,
"text": "(Pustejovsky et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "TempEval (henceforth TempEval-1) was an initial evaluation exercise focusing only on the categorization of temporal relations and only in English. It included three relation types: event-timex, event-dct, 1 and relations between main events in consecutive sentences.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "TempEval-2 (Verhagen et al., 2010) extended TempEval-1, growing into a multilingual task, and consisting of six subtasks rather than three. This included event and timex extraction, as well as the three relation tasks from TempEval-1, with the addition of a relation task where one event subordinates another. TempEval-3 (UzZaman et al., 2012b ) is a follow-up to TempEval 1 and 2, covering English and Spanish. TempEval-3 is different from its predecessors in a few respects:",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 11,
"end": 34,
"text": "(Verhagen et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 310,
"end": 343,
"text": "TempEval-3 (UzZaman et al., 2012b",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "1 DCT stands for document creation time Size of the corpus: the dataset used has about 600K word silver standard data and about 100K word gold standard data for training, compared to around 50K word corpus used in TempEval 1 and 2. Temporal annotation is a time-consuming task for humans, which has limited the size of annotated data in previous TempEval exercises. Current systems, however, are performing close to the inter-annotator reliability, which suggests that larger corpora could be built from automatically annotated data with minor human reviews. We want to explore whether there is value in adding a large automatically created silver standard to a hand-crafted gold standard.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "End-to-end temporal relation processing task: the temporal relation classification tasks are performed from raw text, i.e. participants need to extract their own events and temporal expressions first, determine which ones to link and then obtain the relation types. In previous Tem-pEvals, gold timexes, events, and relations (without category) were given to participants.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Temporal relation types: the full set of temporal relations in TimeML are used, rather than the reduced set used in earlier TempEvals.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Platinum test set: A new test dataset has been developed for this edition. It is based on manual annotations by experts over new text (unseen in previous editions).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Evaluation: we report a temporal awareness score for evaluating temporal relations, which helps to rank systems with a single score.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "In TempEval-3, we reviewed and corrected existing corpora, and also released new corpora.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "We considered the existing TimeBank (Pustejovsky et al., 2003) and AQUAINT 2 data for TempEval-3. TempEval- 1 and TempEval-2 had the same documents as TimeBank but different relation types and events. For both TimeBank and AQUAINT, we, (i) cleaned up the formatting for all files making it easy to review and read, (ii) made all files XML and TimeML schema compatible, (iii) added some missing events and temporal expressions. In TimeBank, we, (i) borrowed the events from the TempEval-2 corpus and (ii) borrowed the temporal relations from TimeBank corpus, which contains a full set of temporal relations. In AQUAINT, we added the temporal relations between event and DCT (document creation time), which was missing for many documents in that corpus. These existing corpora comprised the highquality component of our training set.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 36,
"end": 62,
"text": "(Pustejovsky et al., 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Reviewing Existing Corpora",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "We created two new datasets: a small, manuallyannotated set over new text (platinum); and a machineannotated, automatically-merged dataset based on outputs of multiple systems (silver).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "New Corpora",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "The TempEval-3 platinum evaluation corpus was annotated/reviewed by the organizers, who are experts in the area. This process used the TimeML Annotation Guidelines v1.2.1 (Saur\u00ed et al., 2006) . Every file was annotated independently by at least two expert annotators, and a third was dedicated to adjudicating between annotations and merging the final result. Some annotators based their work on TIPSem annotation suggestions . The GATE Annotation Diff tool was used for merging (Cunningham et al., 2013) , a custom TimeML validator ensured integrity, 3 and CAVaT (Derczynski and Gaizauskas, 2010) was used to determine various modes of TimeML mis-annotation and inconsistency that are inexpressable via XML schema. Post-exercise, that corpus (TempEval-3 Platinum with around 6K tokens, on completely new text) is released for the community to review and improve. 4 Inter-annotator agreement (measured with F1, as per Hripcsak and Rothschild (2005) ) and the number of annotation passes per document were higher than in existing TimeML corpora, hence the name. Details are given in Table 1 . Attribute value scores are given based on the agreed entity set. These are for exact matches.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 171,
"end": 191,
"text": "(Saur\u00ed et al., 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 479,
"end": 504,
"text": "(Cunningham et al., 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 552,
"end": 553,
"text": "3",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 564,
"end": 597,
"text": "(Derczynski and Gaizauskas, 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 864,
"end": 865,
"text": "4",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 918,
"end": 948,
"text": "Hripcsak and Rothschild (2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1082,
"end": 1089,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "New Corpora",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "The TempEval-3 silver evaluation corpus is a 600K word corpus collected from Gigaword (Parker et al., 2011) . We automatically annotated this corpus by TIPSem, TIPSem-B and TRIOS (UzZaman and Allen, 2010). These systems were retrained on the corrected TimeBank and AQUAINT corpus to generate the original TimeML temporal relation set. We then merged these three state-of-the-art system outputs using our merging algorithm . In our selected merged configuration all entities and relations suggested by the best system (TIPSem) are added in the merged output. Suggestions from other systems (TRIOS and TIPSem-B) are added in the merged output, only if they are also supported by another system. The weights considered in our configuration are: TIPSem 0.36, TIPSemB 0.32, TRIOS 0.32.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 86,
"end": 107,
"text": "(Parker et al., 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "New Corpora",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "For Spanish, Spanish TimeBank 1.0 corpus (Saur\u00ed and Badia, 2012) wads used. It is the same corpus that was used in TempEval-2, with a major review of entity annotation and an important improvement regarding temporal relation annotation. For TempEval-3, we converted ES-TimeBank link types to the TimeML standard types based on Allen's temporal relations (Allen, 1983) . Table 2 summarizes our released corpora, measured with PTB-scheme tokens as words. All data produced was annotated using a well-defined subset of TimeML, designed for easy processing, and for reduced ambiguity compared to standard TimeML. Participants were encouraged to validate their submissions using a purposebuilt tool to ensure that submitted runs were legible. We called this standard TimeML-strict, and release it separately (Derczynski et al., 2013) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 41,
"end": 64,
"text": "(Saur\u00ed and Badia, 2012)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 354,
"end": 367,
"text": "(Allen, 1983)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 803,
"end": 828,
"text": "(Derczynski et al., 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 370,
"end": 377,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "New Corpora",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "The three main tasks proposed for TempEval-3 focus on TimeML entities and relations:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Tasks",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Determine the extent of the timexes in a text as defined by the TimeML TIMEX3 tag. In addition, determine the value of the features TYPE and VALUE. The possible values of TYPE are time, date, duration, and set; VALUE is a normalized value as defined by the TIMEX3 standard.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A (Timex extraction and normalization)",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Determine the extent of the events in a text as defined by the TimeML EVENT tag and the appropriate CLASS.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task B (Event extraction and classification)",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "This is the ultimate task for evaluating an end-to-end system that goes from raw text to TimeML annotation of entities and links. It entails performing tasks A and B. From raw text extract the temporal entities (events and timexes), identify the pairs of temporal entities that have a temporal link (TLINK) and classify the temporal relation between them. Possible pair of entities that can have a temporal link are: (i) main events of consecutive sentences, (ii) pairs of events in the same sentence, (iii) event and timex in the same sentence and (iv) event and document creation time. In addition to this main tasks, we also include two extra temporal relation tasks:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task ABC (Annotating temporal relations)",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Task C (Annotating relations given gold entities) Given the gold entities, identify the pairs of entities that have a temporal link (TLINK) and classify the temporal relations between them.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task ABC (Annotating temporal relations)",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Task C relation only (Annotating relations given gold entities and related pairs) Given the temporal entities and the pair of entities that have a temporal link, classify the temporal relation between them.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task ABC (Annotating temporal relations)",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "The metrics used to evaluate the participants are:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation Metrics",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "To evaluate temporal entities (events and temporal expressions), we need to evaluate, (i) How many entities are correctly identified, (ii) If the extents for the entities are correctly identified, and (iii) How many entity attributes are correctly identified. We use classical precision and recall for recognition.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "How many entities are correctly identified: We evaluate our entities using the entity-based evaluation with the equations below.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "P recision = |Sysentity\u2229Refentity| |Sysentity| Recall = |Sysentity\u2229Refentity| |Refentity|",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "where, Sys entity contains the entities extracted by the system that we want to evaluate, and Ref entity contains the entities from the reference annotation that are being compared.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "If the extents for the entities are correctly identified:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "We compare our entities with both strict match and relaxed match. When there is a exact match between the system entity and gold entity then we call it strict match, e.g. \"sunday morning\" vs \"sunday morning\". When there is a overlap between the system entity and gold entity then we call it relaxed match, e.g. \"sunday\" vs \"sunday morning\". When there is a relaxed match, we compare the attribute values.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "How many entity attributes are correctly identified: We evaluate our entity attributes using the attribute F1-score, which captures how well the system identified both the entity and attribute (attr) together.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Attribute Recall =",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "|{\u2200x | x\u2208(Sysentity\u2229Refentity)\u2227Sysattr(x)==Refattr(x)}| |Refentity| Attribute Precision = |{\u2200x | x\u2208(Sysentity\u2229Refentity)\u2227Sysattr(x)==Refattr(x)}| |Sysentity|",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Attribute F1-score = 2 * p * r p+r Attribute (Attr) accuracy, precision and recall can be calculated as well from the above information. Attr Accuracy = Attr F1 / Entity Extraction F1 Attr R = Attr Accuracy * Entity R Attr P = Attr Accuracy * Entity P",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Entity Extraction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "To evaluate relations, we use the evaluation metric presented by UzZaman and Allen (2011). 5 This metric captures the temporal awareness of an annotation in terms of precision, recall and F1 score. Temporal awareness is defined as the performance of an annotation as identifying and categorizing temporal relations, which implies the correct recognition and classification of the temporal entities involved in the relations. Unlike TempEval-2 relation score, where only categorization is evaluated for relations, this metric evaluates how well pairs of entities are identified, how well the relations are categorized, and how well the events and temporal expressions are extracted.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Relation Processing",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "P recision = |Sys \u2212 relation \u2229Ref + relation | |Sys \u2212 relation | Recall = |Ref \u2212 relation \u2229Sys + relation | |Ref \u2212 relation |",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Relation Processing",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "where, G + is the closure of graph G and G \u2212 is the reduced of graph G, where redundant relations are removed. 6 We calculate the P recision by checking the number of reduced system relations (Sys \u2212 relation ) that can be verified from the reference annotation temporal closure graph ) . This metric evaluates Task ABC together. For Task C and Task C -relation only, all the gold annotation entities were provided and then evaluated using the above metric.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 111,
"end": 112,
"text": "6",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 284,
"end": 285,
"text": ")",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Relation Processing",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "Our evaluation toolkit that evaluated TempEval-3 participants is available online. 7",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Temporal Relation Processing",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "The aim of this evaluation is to provide a meaningful report of the performance obtained by the participants in the tasks defined in Section 3.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation Results",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Furthermore, the results include TIPSem as reference for comparison. This was used as a pre-annotation system in some cases. TIPSem obtained the best results in event processing task in TempEval-2 and offered very competitive results in timex and relation processing. The best timex processing system in TempEval-2 (HeidelTime) is participating in this edition as well, therefore we included TIPSem as a reference in all tasks.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation Results",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "We only report results in main measures. Results are divided by language and shown per task. Detailed scores can be found on the task website. 8 7 See http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/naushad/temporal 8 See http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/semeval-2013/task1/ 5.1 Results for English",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation Results",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "We had nine participants and 21 unique runs for temporal expression extraction task, Task A. Table 3 shows the results. Details about participants' approaches can be found in Table 4 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 93,
"end": 100,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF4"
},
{
"start": 175,
"end": 182,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF6"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "We rank the participants for Task A on the F1 score of most important timex attribute -Value. To get the attribute Value correct, a system needs to correctly normalise the temporal expression. This score (Value F1) captures the performance of extracting the timex and identifying the attribute Value together (Value F1 = Timex F1 * Value Accuracy).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Participants approached the temporal expression extraction task with rule-engineered methods, machine learning methods and also hybrid methods. For temporal expression normalization (identifying the timex attribute value), all participants used rule-engineered approaches.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Observations: We collected the following observations from the results and from participants' experiments.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Strategy: Competition was close for timex recognition and the best systems all performed within 1% of each other. On our newswire corpus, statistical systems (ClearTK) performed best at strict matching, and ruleengineered system best at relaxed matching (NavyTime, SUTime, HeidelTime).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Strategy: post-processing, on top of machine learningbase temporal expression extraction, provided a statistically significant improvement in both precision and recall (ManTIME).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Data: using the large silver dataset, alone or together with human annotated data, did not give improvements in performance for Task A. Human-annotated gold standard data alone provided the best performance (ManTIME).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Data: TimeBank alone was better than TimeBank and AQUAINT together for Task A (ClearTK).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Features: syntactic and gazetteers did not provide any statistically significant increment of performance with respect to the morphological features alone (ManTIME).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "Regarding the two sub-tasks of timex annotation, recognition and interpretation/normalisation, we noticed a shift in the state of the art. While normalisation is currently (and perhaps inherently) done best by ruleengineered systems, recognition is now done well by a variety of methods. Where formerly, rule-engineered timex recognition always outperformed other classes of approach, now it is clear that rule-engineering and machine learning are equally good at timex recognition.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task A: Timexes",
"sec_num": "5.1.1"
},
{
"text": "For event extraction (Task B) we had seven participants and 10 unique runs. The results for this task can be found in Table 6 . We rank the participants for TaskB on the F1 score of most important event attribute -Class. Class",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 118,
"end": 125,
"text": "Table 6",
"ref_id": "TABREF8"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task B: Events",
"sec_num": "5.1.2"
},
{
"text": "Training data Classifier used Data-driven ATT-1, 2, 3 TBAQ F1 captures the performance of extracting the event and identifying the attribute Class together (Class F1 = Event F1 * Class Accuracy).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "System",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "All the participants except one used machine learning approaches. Details about the participants' approaches and the linguistic knowledge 9 used to solve this problem, and training data, are in Table 5 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 194,
"end": 201,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF7"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "System",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Observations: We collected the following observations from the results and from participants' experiments.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "System",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Strategy: All the high performing systems for event extraction (Task B) are machine learning-based.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "System",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Data: Systems using silver data, along with the human annotated gold standard data, performed very well (top three participants in the task -ATT, KUL, KUL-TE3RunABC). Additionally, TimeBank and AQUAINT together performed better than just TimeBank alone (NavyTime-1, ClearTK-3,4).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "System",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Linguistic Features: Semantic features (ls and ss) have played an important role, since the best systems (TIPSem, ATT1 and KUL) include them. However, these three are not the only systems using semantic features. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "System",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "For complete temporal annotation from raw text (Task ABC -Task C from raw text) and for temporal relation only tasks (Task C, Task C relation only), we had five participants in total.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "For relation evaluation, we primarily evaluate on Task ABC (Task C from raw text), which requires joint entity extraction, link identification and relation classification. The results for this task can be found in Table 7 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 214,
"end": 221,
"text": "Table 7",
"ref_id": "TABREF9"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "While TIPSem obtained the best results in task ABC, especially in recall, it was used by some annotators to pre-label data. In the interest of rigour and fairness, we separate out this system. For task C, for provided participants with entities and participants identified: between which entity pairs a relation exists (link identification); and the class of that relation. Results are given in Table 8 . We also evaluate the participants on the relation by providing the entities and the links (performance in Table 9 ) -TIPSem could not be evaluated in this setting since the system is not prepared to do categorization only unless the relations are divided as in TempEval-2. For these Task C related tasks, we had only one new participant, who didn't participate in Task A and B: UTTime.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 395,
"end": 402,
"text": "Table 8",
"ref_id": "TABREF11"
},
{
"start": 511,
"end": 518,
"text": "Table 9",
"ref_id": "TABREF12"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "Identifying which pair of entities to consider for temporal relations is a new task in this TempEval challenge. The participants approached the problems in data-driven, rule-based and also in hybrid ways ( the other hand, all the participants used data-driven approaches for temporal relations (Table 11) . Observations: We collected the following observations from the results and from participants' experiments.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 294,
"end": 304,
"text": "(Table 11)",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "Strategy: For relation classification, all participants used partially or fully machine learning-based systems.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "Data: None of the participants implemented their systems training on the silver data. Most of the systems use the combined TimeBank and AQUAINT (TBAQ) corpus.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "Data: Adding additional high-quality relations, either Philippe Muller's closure-based inferences or the verb clause relations from Bethard et al. (2007) , typically increased recall and the overall performance (ClearTK runs two and four).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 132,
"end": 153,
"text": "Bethard et al. (2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "Features: Participants mostly used the morphosyntactic and lexical semantic information. The best performing systems from TempEval-2 (TIPSem and TRIOS) additionally used sentence level semantic information. One participant in TempEval-3 (UTTime) also did deep parsing for the sentence level semantic features.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "Features: Using more Linguistic knowledge is important for the task, but it is more important to execute it properly. Many systems performed better using less linguistic knowledge. Hence a system (e.g. ClearTK) with basic morphosyntactic features is hard to beat with more semantic features, if not used properly. Classifier: Across the various tasks, ClearTK tried Mallet CRF, Mallet MaxEnt, OpenNLP MaxEnt, and LI-BLINEAR (SVMs and logistic regression). They picked the final classifiers by running a grid search over models and parameters on the training data, and for all tasks, a LIBLINEAR model was at least as good as all the other models. As an added bonus, it was way faster to train than most of the other models.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Task C: Relation Evaluation",
"sec_num": "5.1.3"
},
{
"text": "There were two participants for Spanish. Both participated in task A and only one of them in task B. In this case, TIPSemB-Freeling is provided as a state-of-the-art reference covering all the tasks. TIPSemB-Freeling is the Spanish version of TIPSem with the main difference that it does not include semantic roles. Furthermore, it uses Freeling (Padr\u00f3 and Stanilovsky, 2012) to obtain the linguistic features automatically. Table 12 shows the results obtained for task A. As it can be observed HeidelTime obtains the best results. It improves the previous state-of-the-art results (TIPSemB-F), especially in normalization (value F1). Table 13 shows the results from event extraction. In this case, the previous state-of-the-art is not improved. Table 14 only shows the results obtained in temporal awareness by the state-of-the-art system since there were not participants on this task. We observe that TIPSemB-F approach offers competitive results, which is comparable to results obtained in TE3 English test set.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 346,
"end": 375,
"text": "(Padr\u00f3 and Stanilovsky, 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 425,
"end": 433,
"text": "Table 12",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
},
{
"start": 635,
"end": 643,
"text": "Table 13",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
},
{
"start": 746,
"end": 754,
"text": "Table 14",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation Results (Spanish)",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "TempEval-2 Spanish test set is included as a subset of this TempEval-3 test set. We can therefore compare the performance across editions. Furthermore, we can include the full-featured TIPSem (Llorens et al., 2010) , which unlike TIPSemB-F used the AnCora (Taul\u00e9 et al., 2008) corpus annotations as features including semantic roles.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 192,
"end": 214,
"text": "(Llorens et al., 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 256,
"end": 276,
"text": "(Taul\u00e9 et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Comparison with TempEval-2",
"sec_num": "6.1"
},
{
"text": "For timexes, as can be seen in Table 15 , the original TIPSem obtains better results for timex extraction, which favours the hypothesis that machine learning systems are very well suited for this task (if the training data is sufficiently representative). However, for normalization (value F1), HeidelTime -a rule-engineered systemobtains better results. This indicates that rule-based approaches have the upper hand in this task. a partly data-driven normalization approach which, given the small amount of training data available, seemed less suited to the task. Table 16 shows event extraction performance in TE2 test set. TIPSemB-F and TIPSem obtained a similar performance. TIPSemB-F performed better in extraction and TIPSem better in attribute classification.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 31,
"end": 39,
"text": "Table 15",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
},
{
"start": 565,
"end": 573,
"text": "Table 16",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Comparison with TempEval-2",
"sec_num": "6.1"
},
{
"text": "In this paper, we described the TempEval-3 task within the SemEval 2013 exercise. This task involves identifying temporal expressions (timexes), events and their temporal relations in text. In particular participating systems were required to automatically annotate raw text using TimeML annotation scheme This is the first time end-to-end systems are evaluated with a new single score (temporal awareness). In TempEval-3 participants had to obtain temporal relations from their own extracted timexes and events which is a very challenging task and was the ultimate evaluation aim of TempEval. It was proposed at TempEval-1 but has not been carried out until this edition.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "The newly-introduced silver data proved not so useful for timex extraction or relation classification, but did help with event extraction. The new single-measure helped to rank systems easily.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "Future work could investigate temporal annotation in specific applications. Current annotations metrics evaluate relations for entities in the same consecutive sentence. For document-level understanding we need to understand discourse and pragmatic information. Temporal question answering-based evaluation (UzZaman et al., 2012a) can help us to evaluate participants on document level temporal information understanding without creating any additional training data. Also, summarisation, machine translation, and information retrieval need temporal annotation. Application-oriented challenges could further research in these areas.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "From a TimeML point of view, we still haven't tackled subordinate relations (TimeML SLINKs), aspectual relations (TimeML ALINKs), or temporal signal annotation (Derczynski and Gaizauskas, 2011) . The critical questions of which links to annotate, and whether the current set of temporal relation types are appropriate for linguistic annotation, are still unanswered.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 160,
"end": 193,
"text": "(Derczynski and Gaizauskas, 2011)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "See http://timeml.org/site/timebank/timebank.html",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "See https://github.com/hllorens/TimeML-validator",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In the ACL data and code repository, reference ADCR2013T001. See also https://bitbucket.org/leondz/te3-platinum",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We used a minor variation of the formula, where we consider the reduced graph instead of all system or reference relations. Details can be found in Chapter 6 of UzZaman (2012).6 A relation is redundant if it can be inferred through other relations.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Abbreviations used in the table: TBAQ -TimeBank + AQUAINT corpus ms -morphosyntactic information, e.g. POS, lexical information, morphological information and syntactic parsing related features; ls -lexical semantic information, e.g. WordNet synsets; ss -sentencelevel semantic information, e.g. Semantic Role labels.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "New abbreviation in the table, e-attr -entity attributes, e.g. event class, tense, aspect, polarity, modality; timex type, value.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "We thank the participants -especially Steven Bethard, Jannik Str\u00f6tgen, Nate Chambers, Oleksandr Kolomiyets, Michele Filannino, Philippe Muller and others -who helped us to improve TempEval-3 with their valuable feedback. The third author also thanks Aarhus University, Denmark who kindly provided facilities.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgments",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"F"
],
"last": "Allen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1983,
"venue": "Communications of the ACM",
"volume": "26",
"issue": "11",
"pages": "832--843",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. F. Allen. 1983. Maintaining knowledge about temporal in- tervals. Communications of the ACM, 26(11):832-843.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Timelines from text: Identication of syntactic temporal relations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bethard",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"H"
],
"last": "Martin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klingenstein",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Bethard, J. H. Martin, and S. Klingenstein. 2007. Timelines from text: Identication of syntactic temporal relations. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Getting More Out of Biomedical Documents with GATE's Full Lifecycle Open Source Text Analytics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cunningham",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tablan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Roberts",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bontcheva",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "PLoS computational biology",
"volume": "9",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. Cunningham, V. Tablan, A. Roberts, and K. Bontcheva. 2013. Getting More Out of Biomedical Documents with GATE's Full Lifecycle Open Source Text Analytics. PLoS computational biology, 9(2):e1002854.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Analysing Temporally Annotated Corpora with CAVaT",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Derczynski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gaizauskas",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "398--404",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Derczynski and R. Gaizauskas. 2010. Analysing Temporally Annotated Corpora with CAVaT. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Eval- uation, pages 398-404.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "A Corpus-based Study of Temporal Signals",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Derczynski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gaizauskas",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 6th Corpus Linguistics Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Derczynski and R. Gaizauskas. 2011. A Corpus-based Study of Temporal Signals. In Proceedings of the 6th Corpus Lin- guistics Conference.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "TimeMLstrict: clarifying temporal annotation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Derczynski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Derczynski, H. Llorens, and N. UzZaman. 2013. TimeML- strict: clarifying temporal annotation. CoRR, abs/1304.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Agreement, the fmeasure, and reliability in information retrieval",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hripcsak",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Rothschild",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association",
"volume": "12",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "296--298",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "G. Hripcsak and A. S. Rothschild. 2005. Agreement, the f- measure, and reliability in information retrieval. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(3):296- 298.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "TIPSem (English and Spanish): Evaluating CRFs and Semantic Roles in TempEval-2",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saquete",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Navarro",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "284--291",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. Llorens, E. Saquete, and B. Navarro. 2010. TIPSem (En- glish and Spanish): Evaluating CRFs and Semantic Roles in TempEval-2. In Proceedings of the 5th International Work- shop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 284-291. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Merging Temporal Annotations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Allen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the TIME Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. Llorens, N. UzZaman, and J. Allen. 2012a. Merging Tem- poral Annotations. In Proceedings of the TIME Conference.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Automatic system for identifying and categorizing temporal relations in natural language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saquete",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Navarro-Colorado",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "International Journal of Intelligent Systems",
"volume": "27",
"issue": "7",
"pages": "680--703",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. Llorens, E. Saquete, and B. Navarro-Colorado. 2012b. Au- tomatic system for identifying and categorizing temporal re- lations in natural language. International Journal of Intelli- gent Systems, 27(7):680-703.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Applying Semantic Knowledge to the Automatic Processing of Temporal Expressions and Events in Natural Language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saquete",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Navarro-Colorado",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "formation Processing & Management",
"volume": "49",
"issue": "",
"pages": "179--197",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. Llorens, E. Saquete, and B. Navarro-Colorado. 2013. Ap- plying Semantic Knowledge to the Automatic Processing of Temporal Expressions and Events in Natural Language. In- formation Processing & Management, 49(1):179-197.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Padr\u00f3",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stanilovsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Padr\u00f3 and E. Stanilovsky. 2012. Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey, May. ELRA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "English Gigaword Fifth Edition. LDC catalog ref",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Parker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Graff",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kong",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Maeda",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2011--2018",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "R. Parker, D. Graff, J. Kong, K. Chen, and K. Maeda. 2011. English Gigaword Fifth Edition. LDC catalog ref. LDC2011T07.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "The TimeBank corpus",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pustejovsky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hanks",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saur\u00ed",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "See",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gaizauskas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Setzer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Radev",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sundheim",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Day",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ferro",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Corpus Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. Pustejovsky, P. Hanks, R. Saur\u00ed, A. See, R. Gaizauskas, A. Setzer, D. Radev, B. Sundheim, D. Day, L. Ferro, et al. 2003. The TimeBank corpus. In Corpus Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "The specification language TimeML. The Language of Time: A reader",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pustejovsky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ingria",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saur\u00ed",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Castano",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Littman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gaizauskas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Setzer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Katz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mani",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "545--557",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. Pustejovsky, B. Ingria, R. Saur\u00ed, J. Castano, J. Littman, R. Gaizauskas, A. Setzer, G. Katz, and I. Mani. 2005. The specification language TimeML. The Language of Time: A reader, pages 545-557.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "TimeML Annotation Guidelines Ver",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saur\u00ed",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Littman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Knippen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gaizauskas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Setzer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pustejovsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "R. Saur\u00ed, J. Littman, B. Knippen, R. Gaizauskas, A. Setzer, and J. Pustejovsky. 2006. TimeML Annotation Guidelines Ver- sion 1.2.1.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Ancora: Multilevel annotated corpora for catalan and spanish",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Taul\u00e9",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Mart\u0131",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Recasens",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Taul\u00e9, M. A. Mart\u0131, and M. Recasens. 2008. Ancora: Mul- tilevel annotated corpora for catalan and spanish. In Pro- ceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2008).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "TRIPS and TRIOS system for TempEval-2: Extracting temporal information from text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Allen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "276--283",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "N. UzZaman and J. Allen. 2010. TRIPS and TRIOS system for TempEval-2: Extracting temporal information from text. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 276-283. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Temporal Evaluation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Allen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Proceedings of The 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "N. UzZaman and J. Allen. 2011. Temporal Evaluation. In Pro- ceedings of The 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Evaluating temporal information understanding with temporal question answering",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Allen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "N. UzZaman, H. Llorens, and J. Allen. 2012a. Evaluating tem- poral information understanding with temporal question an- swering. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "TempEval-3: Evaluating Events, Time Expressions, and Temporal Relations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Llorens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"F"
],
"last": "Allen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Derczynski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Verhagen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pustejovsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "N. UzZaman, H. Llorens, J. F. Allen, L. Derczynski, M. Ver- hagen, and J. Pustejovsky. 2012b. TempEval-3: Evaluating Events, Time Expressions, and Temporal Relations. CoRR, abs/1206.5333.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Interpreting the Temporal Aspects of Language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uzzaman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "N. UzZaman. 2012. Interpreting the Temporal Aspects of Lan- guage. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "The TempEval challenge: identifying temporal relations in text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Verhagen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gaizauskas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "F",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schilder",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hepple",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moszkowicz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pustejovsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Language Resources and Evaluation",
"volume": "43",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "161--179",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Verhagen, R. Gaizauskas, F. Schilder, M. Hepple, J. Moszkowicz, and J. Pustejovsky. 2009. The TempEval challenge: identifying temporal relations in text. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(2):161-179.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "SemEval-2010 task 13: TempEval-2",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Verhagen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saur\u00ed",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Caselli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pustejovsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "57--62",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Verhagen, R. Saur\u00ed, T. Caselli, and J. Pustejovsky. 2010. SemEval-2010 task 13: TempEval-2. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pages 57-62. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"uris": null,
"num": null,
"text": "In TempEval-3, TimeML relation are used, i.e.: BEFORE, AFTER, INCLUDES, IS-INCLUDED, DURING, SIMULTANEOUS, IMMEDIATELY AFTER, IMMEDIATELY BEFORE, IDENTITY, BEGINS, ENDS, BEGUN-BY and ENDED-BY.",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF1": {
"html": null,
"text": "Platinum corpus entity inter-annotator agreement.",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>Corpus</td><td># of words</td><td>Standard</td></tr><tr><td>TimeBank</td><td>61,418</td><td>Gold</td></tr><tr><td>AQUAINT</td><td>33,973</td><td>Gold</td></tr><tr><td>TempEval-3 Silver</td><td>666,309</td><td>Silver</td></tr><tr><td>TempEval-3 Eval</td><td colspan=\"2\">6,375 Platinum</td></tr><tr><td>TimeBank-ES Train</td><td>57,977</td><td>Gold</td></tr><tr><td>TimeBank-ES Eval</td><td>9,833</td><td>Gold</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF2": {
"html": null,
"text": "Corpora used in TempEval-3.",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF4": {
"html": null,
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF6": {
"html": null,
"text": "Automated approaches for TE3 Timex Extraction",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>Strategy</td><td>System</td><td>Training data</td><td colspan=\"2\">Classifier used Linguistic</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td/><td/><td>Knowledge</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Data-driven ATT-1, 2, 3</td><td colspan=\"2\">TBAQ + TE3Silver MaxEnt</td><td>ms, ss</td></tr><tr><td/><td>ClearTK-1, 2</td><td>TimeBank</td><td>SVM, Logit</td><td>ms</td></tr><tr><td/><td>ClearTK-3, 4</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>SVM, Logit</td><td>ms</td></tr><tr><td/><td>JU-CSE</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>CRF</td></tr><tr><td/><td>KUL</td><td colspan=\"2\">TBAQ +TE3Silver Logit</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>KUL-TE3RunABC</td><td colspan=\"2\">TBAQ +TE3Silver Logit</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>NavyTime-1</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>MaxEnt</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>NavyTime-2</td><td>TimeBank</td><td>MaxEnt</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Temp : ESAfeature</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>MaxEnt</td><td>ms, ls, ss</td></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">Temp : WordNetfeature TBAQ</td><td>MaxEnt</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>TIPSem (TE2)</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>CRF/SVM</td><td>ms, ls, ss</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Rule-based FSS-TimEx (EN)</td><td>None</td><td>None</td><td>ls, ms</td></tr><tr><td/><td>FSS-TimEx (ES)</td><td>None</td><td>None</td><td>ls, ms</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF7": {
"html": null,
"text": "Automated approaches for Event Extraction",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>F1</td><td>P</td><td>R</td><td>class F1</td></tr><tr><td>ATT-1</td><td>81.05</td><td colspan=\"2\">81.44 80.67</td><td>71.88</td></tr><tr><td>ATT-2</td><td colspan=\"3\">80.91 81.02 80.81</td><td>71.10</td></tr><tr><td>KUL</td><td colspan=\"3\">79.32 80.69 77.99</td><td>70.17</td></tr><tr><td>ATT-3</td><td colspan=\"2\">78.63 81.95</td><td>75.57</td><td>69.55</td></tr><tr><td>KUL-TE3RunABC</td><td colspan=\"3\">77.11 77.58 76.64</td><td>68.74</td></tr><tr><td>ClearTK-3,4</td><td colspan=\"3\">78.81 81.40 76.38</td><td>67.87</td></tr><tr><td>NavyTime-1</td><td colspan=\"3\">80.30 80.73 79.87</td><td>67.48</td></tr><tr><td>ClearTK-1,2</td><td colspan=\"3\">77.34 81.86 73.29</td><td>65.44</td></tr><tr><td>NavyTime-2</td><td colspan=\"3\">79.37 80.52 78.26</td><td>64.81</td></tr><tr><td>Temp:ESAfeature</td><td colspan=\"3\">68.97 78.33 61.61</td><td>54.55</td></tr><tr><td>JU-CSE</td><td colspan=\"3\">78.62 80.85 76.51</td><td>52.69</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Temp:WordNetfeature 63.90 78.90 53.69</td><td>50.00</td></tr><tr><td>FSS-TimEx</td><td colspan=\"3\">65.06 63.13 67.11</td><td>42.94</td></tr><tr><td>TIPSem (TE2)</td><td colspan=\"3\">82.89 83.51 82.28</td><td>75.59</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF8": {
"html": null,
"text": "Task B -Event Extraction Performance.",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>F1</td><td>P</td><td>R</td></tr><tr><td>ClearTK-2</td><td>30.98</td><td>34.08</td><td>28.40</td></tr><tr><td>ClearTK-1</td><td>29.77</td><td>34.49</td><td>26.19</td></tr><tr><td>ClearTK-3</td><td colspan=\"3\">28.62 30.94 26.63</td></tr><tr><td>ClearTK-4</td><td colspan=\"3\">28.46 29.73 27.29</td></tr><tr><td>NavyTime-1</td><td colspan=\"3\">27.28 31.25 24.20</td></tr><tr><td>JU-CSE</td><td colspan=\"3\">24.61 19.17 34.36</td></tr><tr><td>NavyTime-2</td><td colspan=\"3\">21.99 26.52 18.78</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">KUL-TE3RunABC 19.01 17.94 20.22</td></tr><tr><td>TIPSem (TE2)</td><td colspan=\"3\">42.39 38.79 46.74</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF9": {
"html": null,
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF11": {
"html": null,
"text": "Task C -TLINK Identification and Classification.",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>F1</td><td>P</td><td>R</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">UTTime-1, 4 56.45 55.58 57.35</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">UTTime-3, 5 54.70 53.85 55.58</td></tr><tr><td>UTTime-2</td><td colspan=\"3\">54.26 53.20 55.36</td></tr><tr><td>NavyTime-1</td><td colspan=\"3\">46.83 46.59 47.07</td></tr><tr><td>NavyTime-2</td><td colspan=\"3\">43.92 43.65 44.20</td></tr><tr><td>JU-CSE</td><td colspan=\"3\">34.77 35.07 34.48</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF12": {
"html": null,
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF13": {
"html": null,
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>10 ). On</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF14": {
"html": null,
"text": "Automated approaches for TE3 TLINK Identification",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>Strategy</td><td>System</td><td>Training data</td><td>Classifier used</td><td>Linguistic</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td/><td/><td>Knowledge</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Data-driven ClearTK-1</td><td>TimeBank</td><td>SVM, Logit</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>ClearTK-2</td><td>TimeBank + Bethard et al. (2007)</td><td>SVM, Logit</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>ClearTK-3</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>SVM, Logit</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>ClearTK-4</td><td>TBAQ + Muller's inferences</td><td>SVM, Logit</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>JU-CSE</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>CRF</td><td/></tr><tr><td/><td>KULRunABC</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>SVM, Logit</td><td>ms</td></tr><tr><td/><td>NavyTime-1</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>MaxEnt</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>NavyTime-2</td><td>TimeBank</td><td>MaxEnt</td><td>ms, ls</td></tr><tr><td/><td>UTTime-1,4, 2</td><td>TBAQ</td><td>Logit</td><td>ms, ls, ss</td></tr><tr><td/><td>UTTime-3,5</td><td>TBAQ + inverse relations</td><td>Logit</td><td>ms, ls, ss</td></tr><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">TIPSem (TE-2) TBAQ</td><td>CRF/SVM</td><td>ms, ls, ss</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF15": {
"html": null,
"text": "Automated approaches for Relation Classification",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF17": {
"html": null,
"text": "Task A: Temporal Expression (Spanish).",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td/><td/><td/><td colspan=\"3\">class tense aspect</td></tr><tr><td/><td>F1</td><td>P</td><td>R</td><td>F1</td><td>F1</td><td>F1</td></tr><tr><td>FSS-TimEx</td><td colspan=\"3\">57.6 89.8 42.4</td><td>24.9</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">TIPSemB-F 88.8</td><td colspan=\"2\">91.7 86.0</td><td>57.6</td><td>41.0</td><td>36.3</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF18": {
"html": null,
"text": "Task B: Event Extraction (Spanish).",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF19": {
"html": null,
"text": "Task ABC: Temporal Awareness (Spanish).",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td/><td colspan=\"2\">entity extraction</td><td/><td colspan=\"2\">attributes</td></tr><tr><td/><td>strict</td><td/><td>relaxed</td><td/><td>val</td><td>type</td></tr><tr><td/><td>F1</td><td>F1</td><td>P</td><td>R</td><td>F1</td><td>F1</td></tr><tr><td>HeidelTime</td><td>86.4</td><td colspan=\"5\">89.8 94.0 85.9 87.5 89.8</td></tr><tr><td>FSS-TimEx</td><td>42.1</td><td colspan=\"5\">68.4 86.7 56.5 48.7 65.8</td></tr><tr><td>TIPSem</td><td>86.9</td><td colspan=\"5\">93.7 98.8 89.1 75.4 88.0</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">TIPSemB-F 84.3</td><td colspan=\"5\">89.9 93.0 87.0 82.0 86.5</td></tr></table>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF20": {
"html": null,
"text": "Task A: TempEval-2 test set (Spanish).",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
},
"TABREF22": {
"html": null,
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null
}
}
}
} |