ACL-OCL / Base_JSON /prefixC /json /C82 /C82-1005.json
Benjamin Aw
Add updated pkl file v3
6fa4bc9
{
"paper_id": "C82-1005",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T13:12:52.413633Z"
},
"title": "",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Leonard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bolc",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Tomasz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Strzalkowski",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "This paper presents an attempt of elaboration of a full parsing system for Polish natural language which is being worked out in the Instlt~te of Informatics of Warsaw University. Our system was adapted to the parsing of the corpus of real medical texts whici= concern a subdomain of medicine. We made use of the experience of such famous authors as (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (1~).",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "C82-1005",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "This paper presents an attempt of elaboration of a full parsing system for Polish natural language which is being worked out in the Instlt~te of Informatics of Warsaw University. Our system was adapted to the parsing of the corpus of real medical texts whici= concern a subdomain of medicine. We made use of the experience of such famous authors as (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (1~).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "The system described below could be used as an interface of natural language information systems, natural question-answering systems, expert systems or automatic understanding of texts. The authors paid close attention to the syntactical and semantical constraints of medical dialogue so that the system would be used by physicians without previous preparation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Although a subdomain of medicine is a current system application, the change or development of the conversation field may be facilitated. It requires only that a new dictionary will be established and some expert parts of semantical interpreter will be changed.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Our system contains two stages: syntactical analysis and semantical interpretation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Both stages cooperate with each other in such a way that the second stage checks up on the correctness of syntactical structures which have been built by the first one. Finally, the parser produces a formula of First Order Predicate Calculus which corresponds to the input sentence. Other outputs as MINSKY frames or FUZZY formulas are considered.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We used the CATN method (Cascaded ATN) (lk) to implement the system. The CATN possesses ali of the advantages which proved true in natural language processing.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 39,
"end": 43,
"text": "(lk)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A high degree of universality is a very important feature of the system. A Cascaded Augmented Transition Network looks like two or more \"cascades\" which succesively perform the same information. Each of them is an ATN grammar (1) which has, In addition,, a new action called TRANSMIT. The TRANSMIT action may be set on every arc and causes a piece of Information to be sent from the current \"cascade\" to the lower one. Whenever a TRANSMIT occurs each information about the current \"cascade '= is saved on the stack while the parser operates on the lower \"cascade\" until new information or data is required. Then the higher \"cascade\" is activated from the same point It has been stopped.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Two stages of our parsing system correspond to the CATN-casc~des. In the present realisation the struct\u00a2 re popped from the syntactical stage is TRANSMITed into semantic ~nterpretation because a free wordorder of Polish sentences prohibits another solution. Partlculary, the places of the subject and the main verb in the sentence may be varying.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "If the second stage is not able to find an appropriate interpretation for syntactical structure the first stage is activated to build an alternative parsing. I/hen such a parsing cannot be rebuilt the parser fails.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In the other Implementation of CATN we used the Earley's algorithm, a well-known context-free parsing method (10) . In this case the syntactical analyser produces all possible p~rslngs at once. The semantical interpreter has to verify them and reject each meaning-less parsing. It is very Important for the parser to know each lex~cal parameter of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, numbers, preposltlons etc. These parameters are number, gender, case, person and de~ree. They are carrled over the whole phrase and decide about the role of the phrase in the sentence. A flexlonal form of the main verb also influences the construction of the sentence. Especlally, however, the flexlonal properties of the main verb could help the parser to find out the subject and the direct object.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 109,
"end": 113,
"text": "(10)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "INTRODUCTION",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "These problems and several others as post-modifiers problem, wh-movement, conjunction, etc. were solved succesfully.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The syntactical analysis comprises a wlde subset of Polish language eg. simple affirmative sentences and questions, complements and relatlve clauses and certain types of complex sentences. We had to take into account a number of speclal properties of the medical dialect which rarely occur in a common conversation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The grammar is able to parse not only the common Polish but the \"medical\"",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Polish as well. It means, among others, a great deal of participles, gerunds, modal verbs (eg. moze -could, powinien -should) and vague adverbs (eg. prawdopodobnle -propably, czesto -frequently, rzadko -rarely, czasamisometimes). The maln predicative element of this structure (eg. VERB/ACTION or OBJECT) creates one or more Instances of framework descrlbing an event. That Framework looks like a pattern-concept pair (8) , (12) , nevertheless there are more framelndicating verbs (7). For example the FOllowing verbs and verb expressions: powodowac (cause), stymulowac (stimulate), prowadzlc do (conclude), byc przyczyna (to be a cause), byc skutkiem (to be a result), etc. refer to the conceptualization #IMPLY and podac (to give), stosowac (to apply), etc. to the conceptuallzatlon #APPLY.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 418,
"end": 421,
"text": "(8)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 424,
"end": 428,
"text": "(12)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The pattern determines which phrases may be expected round the predicate and which of them must occur. The interpretation process is driven by such a pattern so It Is called e~oectatioD-drlve~.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "It may be called structure-driven too because there are structural conditions in the pattern which must hold true during the parsing tlme. where TYPE Is an indicator which points out that the described event is a treatment. AGT, OBJ, HANNER determine that there may be three phrases round the predlc~te, but only one of them must occur In an utterance. (OBL means obligatory parameter, OPT -optional one). None of these phrases could have a preposition before it -(). The AGT-phrase (agent that applies something) must be a human; the OBJ-phrase (object which is applied) must be a medicament; the MANNER slot may be filled when the wanner ~f appllcatlon is specified (eg. doustnle -per os). The CONCEPT indicator describes the way an atomic formula has to be built. As It is seen above, we shall receive a 5-nary pre-dicate ca]led #APPLY which arguments w111 be constructed during the Interpretation process. The BUILDQ function ls a special ATN form which provides BUILDing of Quoted expressions (see (1) for details).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A filling of frame slots is done after the syntactical and semantical requirements were satisfied.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "When the who]e pattern were completed an atomic formula would be generated. Therefore, the interpretation process is an attempt to saueeze the syntactical structure of a sentence into one or more Instances of framework of an event. Beside the maln predlcate(s), a great deal of additional information would be joined the output formula. These facts are stored In part in pattern-concept pairs and in expert subnets of interpreter.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "They create a system knowledge. It is necessary for the system to have such a knowledge because none of the real text corps is able to describe comp]etely a domain of the real world.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A great deal of context information may also be used from the special context stack. It helps to solve the problems of pronoun references and elllpsls.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "If the \"squeezing\" could not be made the First Stage is actvated again.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "In addition, the semantical dictionary is appended to the Second Stage. It keeps al1 patterns of frameworks mentioned above. It contains some special entities too for Indicating the reference between verbs and patterns.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The Second Stage also contains the main ATN net named FORMULA. It guides the interpretation process and controls the semantical correctness of utterances.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "There are aslo some expert nets which can recognize special medical expressions (eg. names of sicknesses and symptoms organs, treatments, etc.). These subnets are a changeable part of the system and they decide about the system knowledge. The expert subnets may communicate with the main net through the middle ]eve1 of interpreter -the CASES net. Thls net handles nomimai phrase structures eg. prepositions, conjunctions and post-modiflers.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The Second Stage produces a formula of the First Order Predicate Calculus corresponding to the input sentence. The formula has an implicative form where the main predicate of the utterance is a conclusion and other generated facts are presumptions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Two generated formulas are given below. First of them is an assertion, the remaining one denotes a question. They are In LISP notation so a clarlflcation is needed. IMPLSYM and KONJSYM marks are the logical operators IMPLY (=>) and ArID (&). Pn integer just after the KONJSYM mark indicates how many factors were joined. Each predicate name is preceded by a hash-mark (#) and followed by an integer to indicate a number of arguments. Arguments look like a oair or rrlole which determines the type of argument, the name of a varlable and a constant (if any) respectlvely.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A1kohol zwieksza wydzlelanie soku trzustkowego. (Alcohol Increases pancreatic juice secretion.) (IMPLSYM (KONJSYM 3 ((#BADMEDIC 1)(MEDIC X0002585)) ((#MEDICAMENT 2)(MEDIC X0002585)(mname X0002586 ALKOHOL))",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "THE FIRST STAGE -SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "The parser can also produce other kinds of formal representation of natural lamguage.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "annex",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The parsing system described above is an attempt to build an universal parser for natural language analysis,The authors incline to the fashionable thesis thet the syntactical and semantical componemts should act in the same time, nevertheless with a domination of the syntax over the semantics. This remark is an important one for the Polish language. This approach, however, provides no less efficiency of the parsing process than in the semantic-dominate systems (7), (8) (11), (12) ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 480,
"end": 484,
"text": "(12)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "CONCLUSION",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Knowledge-Based Parslng",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [
"V"
],
"last": "Gershman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1979,
"venue": "",
"volume": "156",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gershman, A.V., Knowledge-Based Parslng,(Reaearch Rep. 156, Yale University, Dept. of Comp. Scl, 1979)",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Adaptation of Montague Grammar to the qequirements of Parsing, (reprint from MC Tract 136, Formal Methods in the Study of Language",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Landsbergen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1981,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Landsbergen, J., Adaptation of Montague Grammar to the qequire- ments of Parsing, (reprint from MC Tract 136, Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J.A.G. Groenendijk, T.M.V. dassen, M.B.J. Stokhof (eds.) 1981).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Preliminary Analysis of a Breadth-First Parslmg Algorlthm",
"authors": [
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Martin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [
"W"
],
"last": "Church",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": ".",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Pattl",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1981,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Martin, N.A., Church, K.W., Pattl, q.S., Preliminary Analysis of a Breadth-First Parslmg Algorlthm, (MIT Laboratory for Comp. Scl., 1981).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Integrated Partial Parsing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [
"C"
],
"last": "Schank",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lebowitz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "~irnbaum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1978,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Schank, R.C., Lebowitz, M.,~irnbaum, L.A., Integrated Partial Parsing, (Research Rep. 143, Yale Unlv., Dept. of Comp. Sci.1978)",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "PHRAN -A Knowledge-Based Approach to Natural Language Analysls",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wilensky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Arens",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Wilensky, R., Arens, Y., PHRAN -A Knowledge-Based Approach to Natural Language Analysls,(Dept. of Comp. Sci., Univ. of Cali- fornia, Berkeley 1980).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "An Experlmental Parsing Syntem for Transition Network Grammars",
"authors": [
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Woods",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1972,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Woods, W.A., An Experlmental Parsing Syntem for Transition Net- work Grammars, (BBN Rep. No. 2362, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. Cambridge MA, =1972).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Cascaded ATN Grammars, (in Amerlcan drnl",
"authors": [
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Woods",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "Comp. Llnguistlcs",
"volume": "6",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Woods, W.A., Cascaded ATN Grammars, (in Amerlcan drnl. of Comp. Llnguistlcs, vol. 6, no. 1, 1980).",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"uris": null,
"num": null,
"text": "The syntactical analyser transforms an input sentence into an unflexional and ordered form. Sorle examples of the output of the First Stage are given be]ow. The I-hark divides the whole sentence into phrases. An empty p|ace between two Is points out a missing phrase. TheS and END flags indicate the beginning and the ending of each simple clause in the sentence. If the DCL fla~ occurs just after S-mark in the top-level clause the sentence is dealt as an assertion. In a question there are one or more question words instead. The MODIFIERS fla~ divides a direct object (if any) into the main phrase and post modifiers. This last flag ls an Important one because the head word of a direct object phrase nay be a predicative e]ement of the clause. (eg. byc przyczyna -to be a cause). Notice, that a predicative element of the top-level clause becomes the main predicative element of the whole sentence. alkohol podany doustnie powoduje wzmozone wydzielanie gastryny. (alcohol given per os cause greater secretion of gastrin.) (S DCL I I I POWODOWAC I I ALKOHOL I S I I I PODAC IDOUSTN* I I ALKOHOL MODIFIERS I I I END I S l I I WYDZIELANIE I WZMOZON* I I GASTRYNA MODIFIERS I I I END I I I END) I I I ZWIEKSZAC I I ALKOHOL I S I I I NYDZIELANIE I I I",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF1": {
"uris": null,
"num": null,
"text": "concept is a notation t~t represents the meaning of a clause. Together this pair associates different forms of an utterance with Its meaning",
"type_str": "figure"
}
}
}
}