ACL-OCL / Base_JSON /prefixJ /json /J76 /J76-4011.json
Benjamin Aw
Add updated pkl file v3
6fa4bc9
{
"paper_id": "J76-4011",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T02:51:06.976870Z"
},
"title": "Les. Presses de llUniveksite d e Montrgal",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Montrgal",
"middle": [],
"last": "H3c 357'",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Dinneen",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "3 f Kansas Lawrence 66045 S e u t i n has succeeded in c o n d e n s i n g h i s 600-page d i s s e r t ation into a useful grammatical description o f t h e F r e n c h spoken on t h e Ile-aux-C0udre.s (IAC) in the St: Lawrence. Structurali s t and rigidly descriptive., it l i s~s forms, frequenqies of occurrence, and variants, with few and isnlated e x p l a n a t o r y comments. Desplee a discussion in the introduction ro the second part o f the need for a d i f f e r e n t approach to syntax, t h e second like tne f i x s t p~rt-consists of a straighc presenta-. t f o n. o f d a t a i n n a structuralist~framework The ~n l y harm in this is t h a t S e u t i n seems t o be t r y i n g t o do something d i f f er e n t. There is no need. the data gathered are significant in themselves and are presented in such a way as to be useful to",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "J76-4011",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "3 f Kansas Lawrence 66045 S e u t i n has succeeded in c o n d e n s i n g h i s 600-page d i s s e r t ation into a useful grammatical description o f t h e F r e n c h spoken on t h e Ile-aux-C0udre.s (IAC) in the St: Lawrence. Structurali s t and rigidly descriptive., it l i s~s forms, frequenqies of occurrence, and variants, with few and isnlated e x p l a n a t o r y comments. Desplee a discussion in the introduction ro the second part o f the need for a d i f f e r e n t approach to syntax, t h e second like tne f i x s t p~rt-consists of a straighc presenta-. t f o n. o f d a t a i n n a structuralist~framework The ~n l y harm in this is t h a t S e u t i n seems t o be t r y i n g t o do something d i f f er e n t. There is no need. the data gathered are significant in themselves and are presented in such a way as to be useful to",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "researcners in d i a l e c t study,.histbrical and comparative ling'uisrirs, sociolinguistic8 and other subdisciplines.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "seutin not only d e s c r k b e b 'the, m~rphology~ and syntax. of IACbu$ h e cofipaoes the usage in the' isLqnd with that of standard French as, described in F r a n o a i s Fondamental (-FF) He recogn k e s and agcounks for the diff-erences between each corpus and avoids making generalizatidns when the two cannot be reasonably compared. Hb d o e s , however, seem to forget from time to time that FF is not as \"colloquial\" as his corpus, *even though he mentions more than once the need for a current description of \"familiar\" French.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The work i s a good e x a m p l e of the use of the computer f o r recording and scoring grammatical and lexical data and, more interesting, for searching and analyzing the corpus and comparing data from other sources. Little description is given of the program but the results indicate that Seutin and his colleagues were able to handle a very large corpus and extract from it the data in which they were interested. It would appear that most of the syntactic analysis was done by hand, but once forms were encoded, the program could f i n d all examples of each structure being studied and prirlt them out in a usable format. Since, as in most concordances, forms are (can be)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "printed out in conzext, including an i n d i c a t o r of the speakerr, the same data could and should be used in the f~t u r r for many different kinds of studies. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"text": "Description Gk-amma ti c a l e 96 One finds discussion of #a n w b e r of particular but unrelated pnenomena, with some excellent insights, but no general summary of projects that might be undertaken in coqsiderationof these phenomena On pages 372-3, S . speaks of the relatively high frequency of occurrence of propositions n o m i n a l e s in IAC, b u t does n o t pursue the matter further, possibly because the traditional framework does not encourage any generalizations. In the lengthy list of words in the beginning of the second part, many specific comments would be of great interest to semanticians and sociolingui's~. For those interested in de-acquisition, the lFst of losses ar significant decreases ir use of certain verb forms on page 305, as well as many other statements on disappearing forms, would be of much use. This is a model description: m o r e studies, of v a r i o u s French dialects, following the same basic pattern, should be undertaken.",
"uris": null
}
}
}
}