ACL-OCL / Base_JSON /prefixP /json /P97 /P97-1045.json
Benjamin Aw
Add updated pkl file v3
6fa4bc9
{
"paper_id": "P97-1045",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T09:15:47.360744Z"
},
"title": "Automatic Extraction of Aspectual Information from a Monolingual Corpus",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Akira",
"middle": [],
"last": "Oishi",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Nara Institute of Science and TechnologT",
"location": {
"postCode": "8916-5, 630-01",
"settlement": "Takayama, Ikoma",
"region": "Nara",
"country": "Japan"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Yuji",
"middle": [],
"last": "Matsumoto",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Nara Institute of Science and TechnologT",
"location": {
"postCode": "8916-5, 630-01",
"settlement": "Takayama, Ikoma",
"region": "Nara",
"country": "Japan"
}
},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "This paper describes an approach to extract the aspectual information of Japanese verb phrases from a monolingual corpus. We classify Verbs into six categories by means of the aspectual features which are defined on the basis of the possibility of co-occurrence with aspectual forms and adverbs. A unique category could be identified for 96% of the target verbs. To evaluate the result of the experiment, we examined the meaning of-leiru which is one of the most fundamental aspectual markers in Japanese, and obtained the correct recognition score of 71% for the 200 sentences.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "P97-1045",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "This paper describes an approach to extract the aspectual information of Japanese verb phrases from a monolingual corpus. We classify Verbs into six categories by means of the aspectual features which are defined on the basis of the possibility of co-occurrence with aspectual forms and adverbs. A unique category could be identified for 96% of the target verbs. To evaluate the result of the experiment, we examined the meaning of-leiru which is one of the most fundamental aspectual markers in Japanese, and obtained the correct recognition score of 71% for the 200 sentences.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Aspect refers to the internal temporal structure of events and is distinguished from tense, which has a deictic element in it, of reference to a point of time anchored by the speaker's utterance. There is a voluminous literature on aspect within linguistics and philosophy. Recently, computational linguists also have joined in the act within the context of machine translation or text understanding etc. For example, consider the following Japanese sentences (quoted from (Gunji, 1992) ).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 473,
"end": 486,
"text": "(Gunji, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "(a). Ken-wa ima tonarino heya-de kimono-wo ki-te-i-ru.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Ken-TOP now next room-LOC kimono-ACC puton-PRES 'Ken is now putting on kimono in the next room.' (b). Ken-wa kesa-kara zutto axto kimono-wo ki-te-i-ru. Ken-TOP this morning-since always that kimono-ACC weax-PRES 'Ken has been wearing that kimono since this morning.' (e). Ken-wa ano kimono-wo san-nen maeni ki-te-i-ru. Ken-TOP that kimono-ACC three-year before wear-PRES 'Ken has the experience of wearing that kimono three years ago.'",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Notice that English translations use separate lexical items (put on for (a) and wear for (b), (c)) and different aspectual configurations (the progressive for (a), the perfect progressive for (b), and another for (c)), while all Japanese sentences contain the same verbal form ki-te-i-ru. Thus. when the system tries to translate these sentences, it must be aware of the difference among them.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "This paper describes an approach to extract the aspectual information of Japanese verb phrases from a monolingual corpus. In the next section, we will classify Japanese verbs into six categories by means of aspectual features following the framework of (Bennett et al., 1990) . The aspectual forms land adverbs are defined as the functions which operate on verbs' aspectual features and changes their values. By using the constraints of the applicability of the functions, we can identify a unique category for each verb automatically. If one can acquire aspectual properties of verbs properly and know how the other constituents in a sentence operate on them, then the aspectual meaning of the whole sentence will be determined monotonically. To evaluate the result of the experiment, we will examine the meaning of -teiru which is one of the most fundamental aspectual forms, since the classification itself is difficult to evaluate objectively.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 253,
"end": 275,
"text": "(Bennett et al., 1990)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We consider that the whole aspectual meaning of verb phrases is determined in the following order: verbs ---, arguments ~ adverbs ~ aspectual forms, Adverbs and aspectual forms are defined as indicators of such cognitive processes as \"zooming\" and \"focusing\" which operate on the time-line representation. They are sinfilar to the notions \"aspectual coercion\" (Moens and Steedman, 1988) or I The term \"form\" refers to grammatical morphemes which axe defined in terms of derivation. In this paper, we refer to the aspectual morphemes which follow verbs as \"aspectual forms\", including compound verbs such as .hazimevu(begin), suffixes with epenthetic -re such asteiru, and aspectual nominals such as -bakaviOust now) etc.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 360,
"end": 386,
"text": "(Moens and Steedman, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Realization Process of Aspectual Meaning",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "\"views\" (Gunji, 1992) . We explain each in turn. A number of aspectually oriented lexical-semantic representations have been proposed. ~Ve adopt and extend the feature-based framework proposed by (Bennett et al., 1990) in the spirit of (Moens and Steedman, 1988) . They uses three features: \u00b1dynamic, \u00b1telic, and \u00b1atomic. We add two more features: \u00b1process and \u00b1gradual.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 8,
"end": 21,
"text": "(Gunji, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 197,
"end": 219,
"text": "(Bennett et al., 1990)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 237,
"end": 263,
"text": "(Moens and Steedman, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 49,
"end": 135,
"text": "A number of aspectually oriented lexical-semantic representations have been proposed.",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Realization Process of Aspectual Meaning",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The feature dynamicity distinguishes between states(-d) and events(+d), and atomicity distinguishes between point events(+a) and extended events(-a). The duration described by verbs is twofold: an ongoing process and a consequent state.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "The feature process concerns an ongoing process and distinguishes whether events described by verbs have the duration for which some actions unfold. The feature telicity distinguishes between culminative events(+t) and nonculminative events(-t).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "It presupposes a process. The feature graduality characterizes events in which some kind of change is included and the change gradually develops.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "We can classify verbs by means of different combinations of the five features. Since there are dependences between features, only subsets of the combinatorially possible configurations of features are defined as shown in the Table 1.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "In the Table 1 , 1.stative verbs are those that are not dynamic. 2.atomic verbs are those that express an atomic event. 3.resultative verbs express a punctual event followed by a new state which holds over some interval of time. 4.process+result verbs are those that express a complex situation consisting of a process which culminates in a new state. 5.non-gradual process verbs are those that express only processes and not changes of state. 6.gradual process verbs are those that have graduality. Although the verbs of the categories 5 and 6 don't contain telicity, the arguments of the verbs or some kinds of adverbs can set up the endpoint of the process as discussed later. In Vendlerian classification, states correspond to 1, achievements to 2 and 3, accomplishments to 4 and 6, activities to 5, respectively (Vendler, 1957) . Tenny points out that internal argument of a verb can be defined as that which temporally delimits or measures out the event (Tenny, 1994) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 817,
"end": 832,
"text": "(Vendler, 1957)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 960,
"end": 973,
"text": "(Tenny, 1994)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 7,
"end": 14,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "The direct internal argument can aspectually \u2022 'measure out the event\" to which the verb refers. To clarify what is meant by \"'mesuring-out\", she gives examples of three kinds of measuring-out: incremental theme verbs (eat an apple, build a house etc.), change-of-state verbs (ripen the fruit etc.) and path objects of route verbs (climbed the ladder, play a sonata etc.).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "On the other hand, the indirect internal argument can provide a temporal terminus for the event described by the verb. The terminus causes the event to be delimited as in push the car to a gas station.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "There is only one kind of internal argument, in terms of thematic roles, that does provide an event terminus, and that is a goal.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "In terms of the current framework, both of them add the telicity to the verb which does not inherently contain the telicity. They play a role of framing the interval on which the focus should be brought.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Categories of Verbs",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "In general, adverbs focus on the subpart of the event described by a verb and give a more detailed description. According to the discussion in (Moriyama, 1988) , adverbs can be classified as follows in terms of the subpart on which they focus.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 143,
"end": 159,
"text": "(Moriyama, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adverbs",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "Processes modifiers modify verbs which have process (+p). This class includes reduplicative onomatopoeia such as gasagasa, batabata, suisui, sesseto, butubutu, etc., which are expressing sound or manner of directed motion, and rate adverbs such as yukkuri(slowly), tebayaku(quickly), etc., which express the speed of motions. They focus on the ongoing process of events described by verbs. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Adverbs",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "Atomic adverbs make any events instantaneous, such as satto, ponto, gatatto, potarito, syunkan, etc., which express instantaneous sound emission or an instant. When these adverbs co-occur with verbs, the events are understood as instantaneous. This doesn't necessarily imply that the verb itself is instantaneous.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "korosu(kill), Urn(put on~wear), ake,' (open) aruku(walk), in(say), utau(sing) kusaru(turn sour), takamaru(become high)",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Quantity regulators measure out events, such as gokiro aruku(walk 5kin). gojikan seizasita(sit straight for 5 hours), etc. These include time, distance, and any quantity of contents. End state modifiers express the consequent state of events, such as mapputatuni(into two exact halves), konagonani(into pieces), pechankoni(be fiat), barabarani(come apart), etc. They focus on the resultant state. So far we have described adverbs which concern a single event, but some adverbs regulate the multiple events which involves iteration of a single event. By iteration, the whole process of a collective event can be taken up regardless of the inherent features of verbs.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "korosu(kill), Urn(put on~wear), ake,' (open) aruku(walk), in(say), utau(sing) kusaru(turn sour), takamaru(become high)",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "There are two kinds of Repetition adverbs: one regulates the whole quantity of the iteration of events such as san-kai(three times) or nandomo(many times) etc., and the other describes the habitual repetition of events such as itumo (always) or syottyuu(very often) etc. Both describe many events each of which involves one person's act.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 233,
"end": 241,
"text": "(always)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "korosu(kill), Urn(put on~wear), ake,' (open) aruku(walk), in(say), utau(sing) kusaru(turn sour), takamaru(become high)",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Finally, we shall mention Time in the past adverbs. There are cases where the form -teiru, which marks the present tense, can co-occur with temporal adverbs describing the past. (See the exan~ple (lc) in the introduction.) It describes the experiential fact of an event. Such adverbs as katute(once), mukasi(in the past) and izen(be/ore) determine the temporal structure of the event related with tense.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "korosu(kill), Urn(put on~wear), ake,' (open) aruku(walk), in(say), utau(sing) kusaru(turn sour), takamaru(become high)",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The ability of aspectual forms to follow verbs is constrained by the inherent features of verbs. We briefly describe some of aspectual forms used in the experiment.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Forms",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "The forms -you-to-suru(be going to) and kakeru(be about to) take up the occurrence of events.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Forms",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "They can follow the verbs which are dynamic(+d).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Forms",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "The form -tuzukeru(continue)can follow the verbs which have duration(-a). It can take up either the ongoing process or the resultant state. The formhajimeru(begin) can follow the verbs which have process(-bp) and takes up the start time of the process.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Forms",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "On the other hand, the forms -owaru(cease) andoeru(finish) can follow the verbs which are telic (+t) and takes up the end point of the process. However, these constraints on the inherent features of verbs are only concerned with a single event. By iteration, the whole process of a collective event can be taken up regardless of the inherent features of verbs, as mentioned above.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 96,
"end": 100,
"text": "(+t)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Forms",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "The forms -tutuaru(be in progress), -tekuru(come into state) and -teiku(go into state) focus on the gradual process of change. -Tutuaru(be in progress) takes up it as a kind of state, -tekuru(come into state) views it from the end state of change while -teiku(go into state) from the initial state of change. Both of -tekuru and -teiku have usages other than aspect, as in mot-tekuru(bring) or mot-teiku(take).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Aspectual Forms",
"sec_num": "2.4"
},
{
"text": "We carried out an experiment to classify Japanese verbs into six categories in the Table 1 by means of corpus data.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 83,
"end": 90,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "As shown in the Figure 1 , each category is defined in terms of the ability to co-occur with aspectual forms. However, the discrimination of the categories needs negative evidence which we cannot use by definition. A corpus only provides positive evidence. Furthermore, some forms can be used regardless of the features and have usages other than aspect as discussed in the previous section. ~Ve must establish a method which takes into these facts into account. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 16,
"end": 24,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "We used the EDR Japanese Corpus and the EDR Japanese Co-occurrence Dictionary (EDR, 1995) as material to extract syntactic clues in the experiment. The corpus contains 220,000 sentences from various genres of text. The results of the parsing analysis of these sentences indicates that the constituents of the sentence have a dependency struc-STEP:I Pick out the items of which the governing and dependent words are a verb and an adverb from the EDR Co-occurrence Dictionary and store them with the frequency in an array called PAIRS (cf. Table 2 ). STEP:2 For each adverb in PAIRS, give an adverb class label (the initial letter of the class name) on the basis of the discussion in sec. 2.3 and store them in an array called ADVERBS (cf. Table3 and Table4). STEP:3 For each verb in PAIRS, add up the frequency of the co-occurrence with the adverbs contained in the array ADVERBS. If the sum is greater than 4, store the verb in a list called VERBS. STEP:4 For each sentence in the corpus, find a verb and if it is contained in VERBS, then: STEP:4\u00b0I If the form following the verb is contained in the predefined list (Table5), make an array FORMS[/,j] positive (where i is the position of the verb in the list VERBS and j is the position of the form in the Table 5 , see Table6) , provided that the verb is not modified by repetition adverbs(R). When the form is -tekuru or -teiku, put it on record only if the verb is modified by gradual change indicators(G). STEP:4-2 If the verb is modified by the adverbs contained in the array ADVERBS, refer to the adverb class label and add 1 to an array MODIFIED[i, k] (where i is the position of the verb in the list VERBS and k is the position of the adverb class label in the Table4. When the adverb is continuous one(C), distinguish the cases where the verb is followed by -teiru(C1) from the other eases(C2), see Table7), provided that the verb is not followed by negative forms such as -nai or -zu, nor the forms which change the voice such as -reru(the passivizer) or -seru(the causativizer), since they affect the aspeetual properties of the attached verb. STEP:5 For each verb in VERBS: STEP:5-1 Narrow down the candidates by means of the array FORMS (on the basis of possible categories shown in Table 5 ). STEP:5-2 In the ease where the category of the verb cannot be uniquely identified in STEP:5-1, i.e., other than the category 6, determine it by means of the array MODIFIED as follows:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 538,
"end": 545,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 1256,
"end": 1263,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
},
{
"start": 1270,
"end": 1277,
"text": "Table6)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 2246,
"end": 2253,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Algorithm",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "the category 6 the category 5 the category 4 the category 3 the category 2 the category 1 ambiguous ture. That is. the constituents have a governingdependent relation. It is these constituents that form the head phrases of the Japanese Co-occurrence Dictionary which describes collocational information in the form of binary relations. Each item in the Japanese Co-occurrence Dictionary consists of a governing word. a dependent word, the relator between the words, and supplementary co-occurrence item information which is composed of the frequency of the co-occurrence relation and a portion of the actual example sentence from which the co-occurrence relation was taken. The algorithm used for classifying verbs is shown in Figure 2 . PIGICl C2]AIQIE akkasuru(become worse) 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 nigiru(eatch) 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 anteisuru(become stable) 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 isikisuru(become conscious) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 kotonaru( differ) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 idousuru(move) 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 ijisuru(maintain) 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 tigau(differ) 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 sodatu(grow) 5 3 0 0 0 1 1 sodateru (bring up) 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 ittisuru(agree) 0 0 0 0 3 0 2",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1057,
"end": 1067,
"text": "(bring up)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 727,
"end": 735,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Algorithm",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The steps 1, 2 find 3 are the processes to determine the target verbs. There are 431 verbs modified by the classified adverbs more than 4 times. In step 2, we classify adverbs on the basis of the discussion in the previous section. Although the classification has been done by hand, it is much easier than that of verbs, since adverbs are fewer than verbs in number (2,563 vs. 12,766 in the corpus) and have higher \"iconicity\" --the isomorphism between form and meaning --than verbs. This classification of adverbs is used not only for determining the aspectual categories of verbs but also for examining the meaning of -teiru as mentioned later.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Algorithm",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The step 4 is a process to register the co-occurring forms and adverbs for each verb. By using these data, we identify the aspectual categories of verbs in the step 5. Since the categories cannot be uniquely identified by aspectual forms only, we use adverbs which can modify the only restricted set of verbs as shown in Table 8 . ,3,4,5,6 2,3,4,5,6 1,3,4,5,6 3, 4, 6",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 331,
"end": 359,
"text": ",3,4,5,6 2,3,4,5,6 1,3,4,5,6",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 321,
"end": 328,
"text": "Table 8",
"ref_id": "TABREF7"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Algorithm",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Out of 431 target verbs, we could uniquely identify categories for 375 verbs. As for the rest 56 verbs, 37 verbs were identified in the step 5-2 as the category which was not included in the set of categories outputted by the step 5-1. This seems to be due to the failure to detect the expression of repetition, therefore, we chose the category determined in the step 5-2. Table 9 shows the results.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 373,
"end": 380,
"text": "Table 9",
"ref_id": "TABREF8"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We confirmed that more than 80% of verbs are correctly classified. However, this is a subjective judgement. To evaluate the results of the classification more objectively, we focus on one evaluation metric; namely the automatic examination of the meaning of -teiru which can represent several distinct senses as described in the introduction.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The form -teiru indicates \"zoom in\" operation: it is a function that takes an event as its input and returns a type of states, which refers to unbounded regions i.e., a part of the time-line with no distinct boundaries. Figure 3 shows the time-line representation for each aspectual category of verbs. Aspectual distinctions correspond to how parts of the time-line are delineated. Since -teiru cannot include a time instant at which a state is drastically changed, it must denote one of the intervals depicted below the lines. The interval (1) in Figure3 designates a state which is a part of the state described by a lex_ical stative verb. It means a state holding before a speaker's eyes. It has been stated from (Kindaichi, 1976) that the form -teiru has three distinct senses: \"a simple state', 'a progressive state' and 'a consequent state'. 1corresponds to a simple state. 4and 7to a consequent state, (6), (9) and (11) to a progressive state. respectively. Though not represented in Figure 3 , a consequent state can be taken up with the verbs of categories 5 and 6 if the endpoints of the processes are set up by explicit expressions. Kudo (Kudo, 1982) has pointed out that there are inherent meaning and derivative meaning for both progressive and consequent states and has sorted out them as follows. (ii) is the above-mentioned process of a collective event; \"a line as a set of points\", so to speak. (iv) is a state where a speaker has an experience of the event described by a verb and corresponds to the intervals (2), (3), (5), (8), (10), (12) in Figure3. These derivative meanings are conditioned syntactically or contextually, that is, they are stipulated as derivative by explicit linguistic expressions such as adverbials etc., while not concerned with the inherent features of verbs --they can appear with most of verbs regardless of their aspectual categories.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 716,
"end": 733,
"text": "(Kindaichi, 1976)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
},
{
"start": 1149,
"end": 1161,
"text": "(Kudo, 1982)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 220,
"end": 228,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": "FIGREF4"
},
{
"start": 991,
"end": 999,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": "FIGREF4"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We carried out an experiment to examine the meaning of -teiru automatically by means of the classifications of verbs and adverbs obtained in the previous experiment. Table 10 shows the determination process of the meaning of -teiru. We checked the cases in Table 10 downward from the top. Table 11 shows the results obtained from running the process of Table 10 on 200 sentences containing -teiru which are randomly selected from the EDR Japanese Corpus.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 166,
"end": 174,
"text": "Table 10",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
},
{
"start": 257,
"end": 265,
"text": "Table 10",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
},
{
"start": 289,
"end": 297,
"text": "Table 11",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
},
{
"start": 353,
"end": 361,
"text": "Table 10",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The precision on the whole is 71%. Note that the sense (i) 'an ongoing process' has high recall but low precision, while (iii) 'a resultative state' and (iv) 'an experiential state' show the opposite. This is due to the fact that the test sentences contain many \"speech-act\" verbs such as syuchousuru(insist), setumeisuru(explain), hyoumeisuru( declare) etc. They are classified as 5.non-gradual process verbs, and by (1).the verb is modified by repetition (ii) an iteration adverbs( R} (2).the verb is modified by time in the past adverbs(P) or its category is 2. atomic verbs (3).the category of the verb is 1. stative verbs (4).the category of the verb is 3. resultative verbs (5).the verb is modified by process modifiers(P} or gradual change indicators (G} (6).the endpoint of the process is explicitly set up (the verb is modified by end state modifiers(E) ot quantity regulators(Q) or it takes a goal arsument i.e., ni(~o)-case etc. Table 10 , the senses of -teiru following them are determined as (i) 'an ongoing process'.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 940,
"end": 948,
"text": "Table 10",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "However, they takes a quotative to-case that marks the content of the statement and this measures out the event described by verbs. Therefore the resultative or experiential readings are preferred.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The other errors are caused by polysemous verbs such as kakaru (hangflie//all...) or ataru (hit/strike~be exposed/shine...).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Their aspectual properties are changed by the complements they take. The analysis of how complements influence the aspectual properties of their governing verbs is beyond the scope of this paper. It seems to be a matter of pragmatic world knowledge rather than sensesemantics (but see (Verkuyl, 1993) for English).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 285,
"end": 300,
"text": "(Verkuyl, 1993)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation and Discussion",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The approach proposed here is similar to that of Dorr's (Dorr, 1992 : Dorr. 1993 ), but different from it in scale and determinability of the categories. She adopts the four-way classification system following Vendler (Vendler, 1957) and utilizes Dowty's test (Dowty, 1991) for deternfining aspectual categories of English verbs. She reports the results obtained from running the program on 219 sentences of the LOB corpus. Although we cannot know how many verbs she tested because she has shown only a subset of the verbs, the program was not able to pare down the aspectual category to one in 18 cases out of 27 verbs. Brent (Brent, 1991) discusses an implemented program that automatically classifies verbs into two groups, stative vs. non-stative, on the basis of their syntactic contexts. He uses the progressive and rate- adverbs constructions in combination with some sort of statistical smoothing technique. He identified eleven verbs as purely stative, of the 204 distinct verbs occurring at least 100 times in the LOB corpus.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 49,
"end": 67,
"text": "Dorr's (Dorr, 1992",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 68,
"end": 80,
"text": ": Dorr. 1993",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 218,
"end": 233,
"text": "(Vendler, 1957)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 260,
"end": 273,
"text": "(Dowty, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 627,
"end": 640,
"text": "(Brent, 1991)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "We think that the extraction of aspectual information must be based on principles that are wellgrounded in linguistic theory. However, some sort of noise reduction technique such as the confidence intervals used by Brent may be needed to detect the cue more accurately.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In this paper, we have proposed a method for classifying Japanese verbs on the basis of surface evidence from a monolingual corpus, and examined the meaning of the form -teiru by means of the classifications of verbs and adverbs. The aspect of verb phrases provides not only the temporal configuration within a single event but also the information needed for processing temporal relation between multiple events (Dowty, 1986; Passonneau, 1988; Webber, 1988) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 413,
"end": 426,
"text": "(Dowty, 1986;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 427,
"end": 444,
"text": "Passonneau, 1988;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
},
{
"start": 445,
"end": 458,
"text": "Webber, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Furthermore, the lexical aspect of verbs is closely related with their deep complement structures which may not be directly reflected on the surface argument structures. Therefore, by combining the aspectual categories of verbs and those that are defined in terms of their surface argument structures, we can obtain an elaborate classification based on semantic types of verbs. (Preliminary experiments on this issue can be seen in (Oishi and Matsumoto, 1996) .)",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 432,
"end": 459,
"text": "(Oishi and Matsumoto, 1996)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Thus, the information obtained here can be used for various applications.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "A computational model of aspect and verb semantics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [
"W"
],
"last": "Bennett",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Herlick",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hoyt",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lifo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Santisteban",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1990,
"venue": "Mashine",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "247--280",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. W. Bennett, T. Herlick, K. Hoyt, J. Lifo, and A. Santisteban. 1990. A computational model of aspect and verb semantics. Mashine 7~ranslation, 4(4):247-280.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Automatic semantic classification of verbs from their syntactic contexts: An implemented classifier for stativity",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "It",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Brent",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th ACL European Chapter",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "222--226",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. It. Brent. 1991. Automatic semantic classification of verbs from their syntactic contexts: An implemented classifier for stativity. In Proceedings of the 5th ACL European Chapter, pages 222-226.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "A parameterized approach to integrating aspect with lexical-semantic for machine translation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Dorr",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of ACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "257--264",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "B. J. Dorr. 1992. A parameterized approach to integrating aspect with lexical-semantic for machine translation. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of ACL. pages 257-264.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Machine Translation --A View from the Lezicon",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Dorr",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1993,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "B. J. Dorr. 1993. Machine Translation --A View from the Lezicon. The MIT Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Dowty",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1986,
"venue": "Linguistics and Philosophy",
"volume": "9",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "37--61",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "D. R. Dowty. 1986. The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1):37- 61.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar : The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Dowty",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy(SLAP)",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "D. R. Dowty. 1991. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar : The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ, volume 7 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy(SLAP). Kluwer Academic Publishers.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Japan Electronic Dictionary Research Institute Ltd. EDIt. 1995. the EDR Electronic Dictionary Technical Guide",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Japan Electronic Dictionary Research Institute Ltd. EDIt. 1995. the EDR Electronic Dictionary Technical Guide. (in Japanese).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "A proto-lexical analysis of temporal properties of japanese verbs",
"authors": [
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gunji",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Linguistics Studies on Natural Language, Kyung Hee Language Institute Monograph One",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "197--217",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "T. Gunji. 1992. A proto-lexical analysis of temporal properties of japanese verbs. In Linguistics Studies on Natural Language, Kyung Hee Language Institute Monograph One, pages 197- 217. Hanshin Publishing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Nihongo Dousi-no Asupekuto ('Aspect of Japanese Verbs'). Mugi Shobo",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kindaichi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1976,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. Kindaichi. 1976. Nihongo Dousi-no Asupekuto ('Aspect of Japanese Verbs'). Mugi Shobo. {in Japanese).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Siteiru-kei-no imi-kijutu ('the description of the meaning of the form -teiru')",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kudo",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1982,
"venue": "",
"volume": "13",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Kudo. 1982. Siteiru-kei-no imi-kijutu ('the description of the meaning of the form -teiru'). Muzashi University Jinbun Gakkai Zasshi, 13(4).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Temporal ontology and temporal reference",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moens",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Steedman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "14",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "15--28",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "M. Moens and M. Steedman. 1988. Temporal ontology and tem- poral reference. Computational Linguistics, 14(2):15-28.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Nihongo Doushi Jutsugobun no Kenkyuu ('A Study of Japanese Verb-pradicate Sentences'). Meiji Shoin",
"authors": [
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moriyama",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "T. Moriyama. 1988. Nihongo Doushi Jutsugobun no Kenkyuu ('A Study of Japanese Verb-pradicate Sentences'). Meiji Shoin. (in Japanese).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Detecting the organization of semantic subclasses of Japanese verbs",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Oishi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Matsumoto",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1996,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "A. Oishi and Y. Matsumoto. 1996. Detecting the organization of semantic subclasses of Japanese verbs. Technical Iteport NAIST-IS-TIt96019, Nara Institute of Science and Technology.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "A computational model of the semantics of tense and aspect",
"authors": [
{
"first": ".",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "It",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Passonneau",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "14",
"issue": "",
"pages": "44--60",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "It. J. Passonneau. 1988. A computational model of the semantics of tense and aspect. Computational Linguistics, 14(2}:44-60.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Aspectual Roles and the Syntaz-Semantics Interface",
"authors": [
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [
"L"
],
"last": "Tenny",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1994,
"venue": "Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy(SLAP). Kluwer Academic",
"volume": "52",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "C. L. Tenny. 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntaz-Semantics Interface, volume 52 of Studies in Linguistics and Philoso- phy(SLAP). Kluwer Academic.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Verbs and times",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Z",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vendler",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1957,
"venue": "Philosophical Review",
"volume": "66",
"issue": "",
"pages": "143--160",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Z. Vendler. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66:143-160.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "A Theory of Aspectuality",
"authors": [
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [],
"last": "Verkuyl",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1993,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "H. Verkuyl. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge Uni- versity Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Tense as discourse anaphor",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [
"L"
],
"last": "Webber",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "14",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "61--73",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "B. L. Webber. 1988. Tense as discourse anaphor. Computational Linguistics, 14(2):61-73.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "The relation between categories of verbs and features",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "The algorithm for classifying verbs",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF3": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "verbs ......................... --\u00a3) .......................... ; ........ ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF4": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "The time-line representation for aspectual categories of verbs In Figure3, thick line segments signify regions, dashed line segments signify unbounded ends of regions and large open dots signify points in time boundaries or punctate events).",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF5": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": "(i) inherent meaning of 'a progressive state': an ongoing process (ii) derivative meaning of 'a progressive state': an iteration (iii) inherent meaning of 'a consequent state': a resultative state (iv) derivative meaning of 'a consequent state': an experiential state (v) otherwise: a simple state",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF6": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"text": ".the process cannot be taken up (the verb is modified by atomic adverbs(A) or sudeni(already), .the category of the verb is (i} an ongoing process 5. non-gradual process or 6. gradual process verbs (9).the category of the verb is ambiguous: (i) or (iii) 4. process+result verbs the case 8 in",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF0": {
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>: Aspectual categories of verbs</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF2": {
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">: A part of the array PAIRS</td><td/></tr><tr><td>I \"d~b</td><td>I verb</td><td>I r~q \u2022 I</td></tr><tr><td>an(like that)</td><td>tu(say)</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>an(like that) ai (mutually)</td><td>suru( do ) au(rneet )</td><td>1 1</td></tr><tr><td>a~kawarazu(as usual) aikawarazu(as usual)</td><td>iru(be) otituku(settle)</td><td>1 1</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">aituide(one after another) sannyuusuru(join)</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">aituide(one after another) seturitusuru(establish)</td><td>4</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF3": {
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">: A part of the array ADVERBS</td></tr><tr><td>adverb</td><td>I label ]</td></tr><tr><td>aikawarazu(as usual)</td><td>C</td></tr><tr><td>aegiaegi(gasping)</td><td>P</td></tr><tr><td>akaakato(brightly)</td><td>P</td></tr><tr><td>akuseku(busily}</td><td>P</td></tr><tr><td>atafuta(in a hurry}</td><td>P</td></tr><tr><td>atafutato(in a hurry}</td><td>P</td></tr><tr><td>attoiuma(in an instance)</td><td>A</td></tr><tr><td>ikiiki(vividly)</td><td>P</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF4": {
"text": ", gasagasa, batabata, sui~ui, sesseto, butubutu,... 52 sidaini(gradually), masumasu(increasingly), jojoni(gradually)... 78 sonomama(as it is), zutto(for a long time), itumademo(forever)...294 satto, ponto, gatatto, potarito, syunkan(instantaneously)...12 180-do(180 degree), ippo(a step), ippai(a cup)... 86 mapputatuni(into two exact halves), konagonani(into powder)...",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">adverb class(label)</td><td/><td>: Results of the classification of adverbs ] total I examples</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">process modifiers (P) gradual change indicators (G) continuous adverbs (C) atomic adverbs (A) quantity regulators (Q) end state modifiers (E) repetition adverbs (R)</td><td>470 yukkuri(slowly)122 nandomo(many times), itumo(always), syottyuu(very often)...</td></tr><tr><td>' | U[|ll</td><td>I| I[| .~l~</td><td>I']~i .Ill|</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF5": {
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">: The aspectual forms used in the experiment</td></tr><tr><td>forms</td><td>followable verb categories</td></tr><tr><td>-you-to-suru(be going to),-kakeru(be about to)</td><td>2, 3, 4, 5, 6</td></tr><tr><td>-tuzukeru(continue)</td><td>3, 4, 5, 6</td></tr><tr><td>-hajimeru(begin)</td><td>4,5,6</td></tr><tr><td>-owaru(end) and -oeru(finish)</td><td>5,6</td></tr><tr><td>-tutuaru(be in progress), -tekuru(come into state),</td><td/></tr><tr><td>-teiku(go into state)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>verb</td><td/></tr><tr><td>akkasuru(become worse)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>nigiru(catch)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>anteisuru(become stable)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>isikisuru(become conscious)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>kotonaru(differ)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>idousuru(move)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ijisuru(maintain)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>tigau( differ)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>sodatu(grow)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>sodateru(bring up)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ittisuru(agree)</td><td/></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF6": {
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>: A part of the array MODIFIED</td></tr><tr><td>verb</td><td>adverb class labels</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF7": {
"text": "",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>:</td><td colspan=\"2\">Adverb classes and their modifiable verb</td></tr><tr><td>categories</td><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">adverb cl ass (Ta-b' e--i~</td><td>verb cate~</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">process modifiers (P)</td><td>4,5,6</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">gradual change indicators (G)</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">continuous adverbs (C)</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">atomic adverbs (A)</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">quantity regulators (Q)</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">end state modifiers (E)</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF8": {
"text": "The verb classification obtained by the experiment",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td>[ verb catel~ory</td><td colspan=\"2\">[ no. I examples</td></tr><tr><td>1.stative</td><td>30</td><td>mitumeru(stare) ijisuru(maintatn) sumu(live) sonzaisuru(ezist)</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>nagameru(view, damaru(be silent) kumkaesu(repeat) tukaeru(can be used) ...</td></tr><tr><td>2.atomic</td><td>19</td><td>nageru(throw) haneagaru(leap up) kizuku(notiee) mikakeru(happen to see)</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>gouisuru(arrive at an agreement) kireru(snap) furnikiru(launch out) ...</td></tr><tr><td>3.resultative</td><td>29</td><td>nureru(become wet) turnaru(become packed) tunagaru(make a connection) au(meet)</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>suwaru(sit down) tatamu(fold) kureru(get dark) atehamaru(fit) ...</td></tr><tr><td>4.process+result</td><td>30</td><td>tateru(build) nobasu(lengthen) rnatomeru(put together) narabu(form a line)</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>tutumu(wrap) majiwaru(associate) tiru(fall) torikakomu(surround) ...</td></tr><tr><td>5.non-gradual process</td><td>94</td><td>nomu(drink) hakobu(carry) tanosimu(enjoy) kansatusuru(observe) furueru(shake)</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>hibiku(ring) tobimawaru(fly about) taberu(eat) sugosu(spend)...</td></tr><tr><td>6.gradual process</td><td>210</td><td>akkasuru(get worse) tuyornaru(get strong) takarnaru(become raised)</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>sinkoukasuru(get more acute) seityousuru(grow up) kappatukasuru(make active) ...</td></tr><tr><td>ambiguous</td><td>19</td><td>kuwawaru(join) tutomeru(be employed) tomonau(accompany) tazuneru(visit)</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>rainitisuru(eome to Japan) uwamawaru(be more than) hokoru(boast) ...</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF9": {
"text": "The determination process of the meaning of -teiru",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table/>",
"html": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF10": {
"text": "The restdts of the evaluation ex)eriment the sense of",
"type_str": "table",
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>judgement</td><td>output of</td><td>number of</td><td>recall(%)</td><td>precision(%)</td></tr><tr><td>-te=ru</td><td>by human(a)</td><td>program(b)</td><td>agreements(c)</td><td>c/a x 100</td><td>c/b x 100</td></tr><tr><td>(i) an ongoing process</td><td>95</td><td>137</td><td>88</td><td>93</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>(ii) an iteration</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>50</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>(iii) a resultative state</td><td>29</td><td/><td/><td>48</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>(iv) an experiential state</td><td>39</td><td>15</td><td>14</td><td>36</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>(v) a simple state</td><td>19</td><td>19</td><td>15</td><td>79</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>ambiguous</td><td>14</td><td>12</td><td>9</td><td>64</td><td>75</td></tr><tr><td>total</td><td>200</td><td>200</td><td>142</td><td>71</td><td>71</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"num": null
}
}
}
}