ACL-OCL / Base_JSON /prefixR /json /R19 /R19-1012.json
Benjamin Aw
Add updated pkl file v3
6fa4bc9
{
"paper_id": "R19-1012",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T15:01:39.140340Z"
},
"title": "Using a Lexical Semantic Network for the Ontology Building",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nadia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bebeshina-Clairet",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Lirmm",
"middle": [
"/"
],
"last": "Limics",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "Building multilingual ontologies is a hard task as ontologies are often data-rich resources. We introduce an approach which allows exploiting structured lexical semantic knowledge for the ontology building. Given a multilingual lexical semantic (non ontological) resource and an ontology model, it allows mining relevant semantic knowledge and make the ontology building and enhancement process faster.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "R19-1012",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "Building multilingual ontologies is a hard task as ontologies are often data-rich resources. We introduce an approach which allows exploiting structured lexical semantic knowledge for the ontology building. Given a multilingual lexical semantic (non ontological) resource and an ontology model, it allows mining relevant semantic knowledge and make the ontology building and enhancement process faster.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Nowadays, termino-ontological resources are increasingly rich in terms of data they rely upon. The scientific community works intensively on data acquisition for the ontology building. In particular, the NeOn project 1 has been set up to provide a methodology for the ontology engineering by integrating preexisting knowledge resources into an ontology building process. The NeOn methodology contains a consistent framework for modular ontology building as well as for setting up ontology networks. Here we focus on exploiting Lexical Semantic Networks (LSNs) to enrich an ontology or accompany the ontology building process. We assume that LSNs represent knowledge as it is expressed through the human language whereas ontologies provide a formal description (specification) of a conceptualization (concepts and relationships between those concepts) shared by a community of agents. A con-1 http://neon-project.org/nw/About_NeOn.html cept corresponds to a set of individuals sharing similar characteristics and may or may not be lexicalized. Thus, the ontology labels cannot be polysemous. The strength of ontologies is in their formal consistency. The weaknesses are linked to their coverage, size (as stated in (Raad and Cruz, 2015) , \"large ontologies usually cause serious scalability problems\"), and human effort needed for their building. The potential of the LSNs is linked to the large amount of explicit semantic information they contain. However, a filtering process is needed to discriminate irrelevant information (polysemy, noise).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1214,
"end": 1235,
"text": "(Raad and Cruz, 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The opportunity of ontology construction empowered by the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and tools has been explored for more than 20 years. Among the achievements, one can distinguish the tools which take into account the difference between the lexical term and the ontology concept (differentiated tools) and those that do not make such distinction. Differentiated tools and methods suggest extracting the terminological units from texts and organizing them as a network using a set of hierarchical and equivalence relation types. Such network guides the ontology expert through the conceptualisation and ontology building process. Such process relies on an intermediary structure, a termino-ontology (for instance, the Terminae suite, (Szulman, 2012) ). Undifferentiated tools use some statistical information to suggest the can-didate concepts. They exploit such methods as formal concept analysis (Mondary, 2011) or knowledge based methods (for instance, TextToOnto ). \"Lexical ontologies\" (Abu Helou et al., 2014) are successfully used for ontology building. Numerous approaches targeted at high level ontology or information retrieval ontology based on general knowledge (such as (Marciniak, 2013) ) rely on PWN. Others use PWN and domain specific semantic lexicons for forming the concepts (Turcato et al., 2000) . Many other ontology learning techniques use distributional semantics to learn lightweight ontologies, for example, (Wong, 2009) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 759,
"end": 774,
"text": "(Szulman, 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
},
{
"start": 1016,
"end": 1040,
"text": "(Abu Helou et al., 2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 1208,
"end": 1225,
"text": "(Marciniak, 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
},
{
"start": 1319,
"end": 1341,
"text": "(Turcato et al., 2000)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 1459,
"end": 1471,
"text": "(Wong, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "State of the Art",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "In the framework of corpora based approaches to the ontology building such as described in (Kietz et al., 2000) , the idea of notable (salient, relevant) element or relevant piece of knowledge (RPK) has been introduced. It corresponds either to the frequent terms appearing in a corpus and to the tacit knowledge contained in texts. Such tacit knowledge corresponds to the semantic relationships (subsomption relationship and other specialized relationships). Their presence in texts may take the form of \"indices\". In contrast, the explicit elements may reveal the presence of concepts. The main drawback such definition of RPKs is that it relies on the features defined or recorded for a particular language. In addition, statistical criteria are often preferred and it is difficult to qualify such RPKs from the semantic point of view and in a language independent manner. In this paper, we will detail the experiments we conducted to provide a new definition of the RPKs based on the structured lexical semantic information and describe the way so defined RPKs can be used to help the top down ontology building process.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 91,
"end": 111,
"text": "(Kietz et al., 2000)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "State of the Art",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "In the present section, we will describe the resources we used in our experiments.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Ressources",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The RezoJDM (Lafourcade, 2007) is a lexical semantic network (LSN) for French built using crowd-sourcing methods and, in particular, games with a purpose (GWAPS) such as JeuxDeMots 3 and additional games . This commons sense network has been built since 2007. It is a directed, typed and weighted graph. At the time of our writing, Rezo-JDM contains 2.7 millions of terms that are modeled as nodes of the graph and 240 millions of relations (arcs).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Ressources",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The MLSN (Bebeshina-Clairet, 2019) is a multilingual LSN (it covers French, English, Spanish, and Russian) with an interlingual pivot built for the cuisine and nutrition domain. This network is inspired by the RezoJDM in terms of its model. Structurally speaking, the MLSN is a directed, typed, and valuated graph. It contains k sub-graphs corresponding to each of the k languages it covers and a specific sub-graph which fulfills the role of the interlingual pivot. Similar to the RezoJDM, we call terms the nodes of the MLSN and relations -its typed, weighed, and directed arcs. The MLSN nodes may correspond to one of the following types : lexical items (garlic), interlingual items (pertaining to the interlingual pivot and also called covering terms), relational items (i.e. relationship reifications such as salad[r has part]garlic), and category items parts of speech or other morpho-syntactic features (i.e. Noun:AccusativeCase).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Ressources",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "As it has been difficult to set up the pivot using a multilingual embedding (joining multiple spaces, one per language) as well as to avoid pairwise alignment based on combinatorial criteria, the pivot has been started as a natural one using the English edition of DBNary (S\u00e9rasset, 2014) . It incrementally evolves to become interlingual. The pivot evolution relies on sense-based alignments between the languages of the MLSN and aims at taking into account the difference of sense \"granularity\" in different languages. For example, as stewin English can be translated as into French as pot-au-feu and rago\u00fbt. It reflects the conceptualization discrepancy as rago\u00fbt refers to saut\u00e9 the ingredients and then add water whereas pot-au-feu refers to boiling them together in a larger amount of water than used for the rago\u00fbt. In the MLSN pivot we have the interlingual term corresponding to stew (which covers the English term) with two hyponyms corresponding to 0rench terms. The alignments are progressively obtained through external resources or by inference. Thus it can be considered as a union of word senses lexicalized or identified in the languages covered by the MLSN. . Even though we assume the pivot as being interlingual, it is still close to a natural one. A relation r \u2208 R is a sextuplet r =< s, t, type, v, l s , l t > where s and t correspond respectively to the source and the target term of the relation. The relation type is a typical relation type. It may model different features such as taxonomic and part-whole relations (r isa, r hypo, r has part, r matter, r holo), possible predicate-argument relations (typical object r object, location r location, instrument r instr of an action), \"modifier\" relations (typical characteristic r carac, typical manner r manner) and more 4 . The relationship valuation v corresponds to the characteristics of the relation which are its weight, confidence score, and annotation. The relation weight may be negative in order to model noise and keep the information about erroneous relations easy to access programmatically so they could not affect the inference processes. The confidence score is a score attributed to a particular data origin (external resource, inference process). In practice, this feature is an array as different origins may provide the same relation. The confidence information is provided as an argument to the function that maps from some external knowledge resource to the MLSN. In case of relation calculated by an inference process, it corresponds to the precision evaluated on a sample of candidate relations returned by this process. To annotate a relation we add a complementary information that allows qualifying this relation. The figure 1 details and exemplifies the annotation scheme.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 272,
"end": 288,
"text": "(S\u00e9rasset, 2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Ressources",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The labels l s and l t correspond to the language (sub- 4 We also introduced more specific relation types such as r entailment, r cause, r telic role, r incompatible, r before, r after etc. MIAM (Despr\u00e8s, 2016) 5 is a modular terminoontology for the digital cooking. It provides knowledge necessary for the elaboration of general nutritional suggestions. The knowledge model of this ontology gathers expert knowledge on food, food transformation, cooking actions, relevant dishes that reflect french culinary tradition, recipes necessary to cook such dishes. MIAM contains about 7 000 nodes and 30 000 semantic (non subsumption/ontological is-a) relations.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 56,
"end": 57,
"text": "4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Ressources",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "4 Method: Immersion -Projection",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Ressources",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Our method is built upon the idea of projecting a model (the MIAM model) onto a multilingual or monolingual LSN (respectively MLSN and Rezo-JDM) in order to extract an intermediary resource that can be used by ontology or domain experts in the scope of information retrieval or validation of the automatically suggested pieces of knowledge.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Summing up the Method",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Our method differs from others by the definition of the RPK and by the use of a non ontological semantically structured resource for ontology building. We define RPK as follows : \"a relevant piece of knowledge is either a term or a relation or a semantic structure which is known as qualified and qualifying\". Qualified refers to the possibility to describe the RPK in a discrete way (i.e. by enumerating the typed relations). If the RPK is a term, it needs to have a high in-degree (which reveals its conceptual role as it is used to define other terms of the network). If the RPK is a relation, it needs to be contextualized (through the annotation mechanism represented on the figure 1 or through the constraints put on source and/or target terms of the relation). If the presumed RPM is a graph structure (path, subgraph), it needs to possess a certain number of occurrences in the network. Qualifying refers to the possibility to use the candidate RPK for endogenous inference process. If the RPK is a term, it needs to have hypernyms, hyponyms, synonyms among its neighbours. It has to be aligned with other terms pertaining to the other languages of the LSN (if such LSN is multiligual). If the RPK is a relation, it must not be unique (other real or potential 6 relations must exist in the network). If the candidate RPK is a structure, its terms and relations must be qualifying.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Summing up the Method",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Here we detail the experiments that have been conducted on the basis of the MLSN in order to propose \"pseudo-class\" and \"pseudo-property\" candidate RPKs to enhance the MIAM ontology and those concerning the enrichment of an ontology draft using the monolingual LSN, RezoJDM (Lafourcade, 2007) . These experiments rely on lexical knowledge. Therefore, the resulting RPKs have no pretension to the ontological validity. The decision pertains to the human expert.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 261,
"end": 292,
"text": "LSN, RezoJDM (Lafourcade, 2007)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Summing up the Method",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "The projection of a given ontology model onto a LSN starts by the immersion of such model. The immersion mechanism uses a set of manually defined mapping rules. It is possible to generate them automatically for the ontological resources that exploit standard vocabularies (such as RDFS, SKOS and other machine readable formats). The input of the immersion algorithm is the reference ontology (MIAM) and the set of mapping rules whereas its 6 Relations that can be calculated using inference.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 440,
"end": 441,
"text": "6",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Immersion",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "output is the action of inferring terms and relations in the target LSN (MLSN, RezoJDM).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Immersion",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "In their general form, the mapping rules state: \"If x and y are respectively domain and range of an Object Property p of the ontology to be immersed and y is a subclass of C, then x has a relation R with y and y has a relation is-a with C in the receiving (target) LSN\". Such rules have been defined for the multilingual experiment for two reasons. First, for each of the 93 MIAM properties, we determined relevant MLSN semantic relation types (or set of types). Thus, the Object Property aPourProduitInitial (hasIni-tialProduct) corresponds to the substance and partwhole meronymy (MLSN relations typed r has part and r matter). Second, we mapped the ontology labels to the MLSN terms by coincidence (3 930 terms; i.e. poulet basquaise formally denotes a MIAM concept, a lexical item with the same label already exists in the MLSN) or by composition (4 135 terms, i.e.: unit\u00e9 mesure capacit\u00e9 doesn't correspond to any existing MLSN term because it doesn't correspond to any commonly used collocation in French; this label is split and integrated into MLSN with the semantic relations that link its parts.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Immersion",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "As part of the monolingual experiment, 115 descriptors have been automatically expressed in French on the basis of their Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) strings. All the terms except one were already present in the RezoJDM network. We exploited the relations typed r carac (typical characteristic) for this experiment. This relation has been annotated using the URIs of the ontology properties aPourDescripteurBruit (hasSoundDescriptor is immersed as follows: cro\u00fbte r carac :: bruit croustillant (\"cro\u00fbte has typical characteristic linked to the noise croustillant\" 7 ). The premises of the mapping rules rely on the contextualization of the LSN relations. Such contextualization is possible when using sets of hypernyms and neighborhood semantic relations of the source and target terms of a 96 relation. Meta-information attached to the LSN relations (annotations, weight) may also be used. For instance: p\u00e9trir r object p\u00e2te \u2227 p\u00e9trir r isa technique de base \u2227 p\u00e2te r isa pr\u00e9paration 8 ).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Immersion",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "As part of the immersion process the ontology labels become LSN terms that can be polysemous.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Immersion",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "In the MLSN context we set up several algorithms to discover relevant pieces of knowledge (RPK) of the types \"class/individual\" (ci) and \"ontology property\"(op). To discover the RPK(ci) we compare the neighborhood terms inside an hierarchical chain which goes up to a high level MIAM concept immersed into the LSN. For the RPK(op) we look for (real or possible) MLSN relations similar to the immersed MIAM properties. The inference scheme we use is the abduction scheme. When we have two similar terms (such as cohyponyms) the relations detained by one of them can be proposed for the other. For a term T, the abduction implies selecting a set of similar terms (according to some criteria) in order to propose the relations detained by those similar terms to T .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inference in the LSN Context",
"sec_num": "4.3.1"
},
{
"text": "In MIAM, the general axioms concern the disjunction between the MIAM classes which is the basis of the ontology consistence. To translate them in terms of MLSN, we considered the labels of the classes listed in the axioms in order to identify the criteria that could have determined the disjunction. We manually analyzed a subset of the MIAM axioms and came up with the following criteria: affiliation (r has part i.e. a specific label (organic)), transformation (r carac i.e. boiled mixture, cubed vegetable), composition (r matter i.e. produit\u00e0 base de poisson \"fish based product\"), category based distinctions (r hypo i.e. volaille type dinde \"turkey type 8 knead r object dough \u2227 knead r isa basic technique \u2227 dough r isa mixture poultry\"). This analysis allowed selecting a subset of relation types to consider during the experiment. The RPK(ci) inference includes two steps: validation of the hierarchical chain (figure 2) and RPK(ci) candidate suggestion. Figure 2 : Hierarchy chain validation. T i are the terms of the hierarchy chain. We check by triangulation their semantic relatedness and use a subset of relations types (such relations are noted R) for that.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 964,
"end": 972,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discovering the RPK(ci)",
"sec_num": "4.3.2"
},
{
"text": "We calculated and validated hierarchical chains corresponding to 1 322 top MIAM concepts pertaining to the Aliment module. First we obtained 132 213 chains. After filtering them by weight, the set has been reduced to 53 749 chains (40% of the initial set). Still, a certain number of redundancies may exist inside this statistically pre-filtered set since a long chain may include several shorter ones. The logical filtering by triangulation left us with a set containing 9 600 hierarchical chains (18% of the number of statistically filtered chains and 7% of the initial number of candidates).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discovering the RPK(ci)",
"sec_num": "4.3.2"
},
{
"text": "(1) \"baguette compl\u00e8te\u2192pain complet \u2192 pain\u2192ingr\u00e9dient de recette de cuisine\u2192aliment\" (2) \"ang\u00e9lique\u2192confiserie\u2192bonbon\". RPK(ci) examples: truffe chocolat subClassOf chocolat pomme\u00e0 cidre subClassOf pomme sucre de pomme subClassOf confiserie The analysis and validation of the hierarchical chains corresponds to the important memory load. The complexity of the algorithm depends on the importance of the MIAM concept being processed as well as on the length of the hierarchical chains that are considered. The use of a subset of the semantic relations types available in the MLSN reduces the number of combinations to process. Thus, given that the highest in-degree typed r isa in the French sub-graph of the MLSN is 5 264 (for the term aliment) and that the maximum length l = 9, the complexity in the worst case would be O(d l isa or O(5 264 9 ) = 3, 103436942 \u00d7 10 33 . automatic evaluation of the proposed RPK(ci) would mostly rely on similarity measures. However, the projection step implicitly relies on relatedness and similarity between the LSN terms. Thus, in our future work, the RPK(ci) evaluation will need human expert decisions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Hierarchical chain examples after filtering:",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The RPK(op) discovery seems to be particularly useful in the context of multilingual ontology building or localization of an existing ontology. In our experience, each module of the MIAM ontology has its own hierarchy of properties. While immersing them into the MLSN, these properties have been expressed in terms of semantic relations contextualized using annotations. The choice of the MLSN semantic relation type made for these properties allows us to distinguish the following cases for the MIAM Object Properties (OPs): composition based (aPourProduitInitial, \"hasInitialProduct\"); related to processes ( aPourMethodeDeConservation, \"has-ConservationMethod\"); temporal and spatial relation based (aPourMoisPrimeur, \"hasEar-lyMonth\"); characteristic based (aPourEtat, \"hasState\"); OPs with a specific sub-graph 9 (aPourAlimentAmi, \"hasFriendlyFoodItem\").",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The RPK(op) Discovery",
"sec_num": "4.3.3"
},
{
"text": "The MIAM ontology we try to enrich counts 21 565 instances of Object Properties. Once they are immersed into the MLSN, one could consider that we have the same number of inference rule instances that can be used for the cross-lingual RPK(op) discovery. A naive approach would be setting up a cross-lingual inference mechanism. However, such approach would be error-prone due to the potential alignment and polysemy issues. In addition, as MIAM has been built according to the top-down methodology by a community of domain experts, it contains a variable number of instances per property. The naive approach would reiterate this imbalance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The RPK(op) Discovery",
"sec_num": "4.3.3"
},
{
"text": "To refine the RPK(op) discovery, we experimented a rule based approach. First, the validity of the rule for the source language is calculated. Second, structures similar to those specified by the rule are being discovered in the MLSN (in other languages).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The RPK(op) Discovery",
"sec_num": "4.3.3"
},
{
"text": "The rule has the following form: property=aPourEtatPhysique (property name) src=?s (domain, set of terms) reltype=r_carac (relation type) tgt=?o(range, set of terms) source_isa=aliment(src hypernyms) target_isa=etat physique (tgt hypernyms) annotation=int:physical state (meta-information) src_feat=OUT/r_pos/int:Noun (in and out relations that characterize terms in the source set) tgt_feat=OUT/r_pos/int:Adj (in and out relations that characterize terms in the target set) If a given rule allowed detecting enough structures in the source language (at least, 2 structures), it is considered as a valid one and can generate the qualifying object. Thanks to this object, candidate structures are detected in the other language sub-graphs of the MLSN. The mechanism of RPK(op) discovery reveals the following elements that allowed discovering new pieces of knowledge : possibly annotated semantic relation (case of the properties such as aPresenceLactose, aPresenceGluten); specific pattern (defined by rules); complex structure for properties related to processes. The results obtained using possibly annotated relations(in particular, Data Properties)) are presented in the table 2. the potential improvement is estimated as an increase compared to the initial number of property instances (impr.%). Example of the output of the rule-based algorithm: ru:jarkoje aPourProduitDiscriminant podlivka (\"stew hasDiscriminatingProduct sauce\") and en:stew aPourProduitInitial en:vegetable (produce) (\"stew hasInitialProduct vegetable\"). Our rulebased RPK(op) experiment (given the actual state of the MLSN) yielded the results listed in the table 3.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The RPK(op) Discovery",
"sec_num": "4.3.3"
},
{
"text": "Fully automated structure-based evaluation such as described in (Fern\u00e1ndez et al., 2009 ) may be chosen to compare to other resources available on the Web such as (Dooley et al., 2018) . To address the ontology accuracy, completeness, conciseness, efficiency, consistency, and other features (Raad and Cruz, 2015) , a combination of methods is needed. In particular, gold standard ontology, specific tasks and corpora may be used for evaluation. A task-based evaluation such as semantic analysis (Bebeshina-Clairet, 2019), dietary conflict detection from dish titles (Clairet, 2017) have been used for the MLSN.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 64,
"end": 87,
"text": "(Fern\u00e1ndez et al., 2009",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 163,
"end": 184,
"text": "(Dooley et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 292,
"end": 313,
"text": "(Raad and Cruz, 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 567,
"end": 582,
"text": "(Clairet, 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The RPK(op) Discovery",
"sec_num": "4.3.3"
},
{
"text": "To evaluate the output of the immersion-projection method, we need to organize our triples into a fully structured ontology. This will be one of the priorities of our future work.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The RPK(op) Discovery",
"sec_num": "4.3.3"
},
{
"text": "To extend the RPK discovery experiment, we tried to automatically suggest pseudo ontology properties to be submitted to the domain and ontology human experts. We considered the ontology Senso-MIAM 10 for this experiment. This ontology is a MIAM module but we considered it as a \"draft\" ontology as the sensory aspect modeling is a flourishing research and development area and the Senso-MIAM could be improved. We used the monolingual LSN (RezoJDM). The SensoMIAM contains sensory descriptors such as DescripteurTact (\"TactileDescriptor\") = {astringent, filandreux, ..., nerveux}; DescripteurSubstance (\"Sub-stanceDescriptor\")= {a\u00e9r\u00e9, dense, . . . ,\u00e9pais}",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Towards the Automatic Suggestion of the RPKs(op)",
"sec_num": "4.3.4"
},
{
"text": "To calculate the RPK descriptors RPK(desc), we explored the semantics of the source terms of the relations typed r carac. If the set of outgoing relations of such terms connects them to a food item and if they have a set of typical characteristics shared with other terms with an hypernym \u2248 \"food\", the target term of their outgoing relations typed r carac that is not present in the Senso-MIAM can be suggested as a potential RPK(desc). The relation typed r carac is annotated. The process is represented on the figure 3. The experience allowed to suggest the RPK(desc) such as: DescripteurArome={sucr\u00e9-sal\u00e9, miell\u00e9, . . . , vinaigr\u00e9} or DescripteurTact = {\u00e9cailleux, spongieux,. . . , floconneux}.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Towards the Automatic Suggestion of the RPKs(op)",
"sec_num": "4.3.4"
},
{
"text": "We automatically suggested and semi-automatically validated 342 RPKs(desc). We explored the possibility of suggesting relevant RPKs to human experts. We defined 3 pseudo-properties for testing: aPourComposantFlaveur (\"hasFlavourComponent\"), aPourComposantToucher (\"hasTouchComponent\"), and aPourComposantAspect (\"hasAspect-Component\"). To populate them, we explored the RezoJDM relations typed r has part and r matter and considered the characteristics that can be shared Table 3 : Rule-based approach. m -name of module (Aliment (A), Preparation (P), Sensory (S)), prop -property, #in -MIAM triples, en, fr, es, ru -MLSN sub-graphs. #out -overall number of suggested RPK(op) after filtering, %augpotential improvement. by a \"whole\" and its \"parts\". We tried to generalize to the \"whole\" some of the characteristics of its parts. Automatically suggested toy triples: veau Orloff aPourComposantFlaveur lard from {gras, viande} \"veal Prince Orloff has a component that influences its flavour lard because they share fat, meat\"; gratin aPourComposantAspect fromage from {gratin\u00e9, gras, br\u00fbl\u00e9} \"gratin has a component that influences its aspect cheese as they share characteristics grilled, fat, burned\". We automatically suggested 1 709 RPKs(op) for the pseudoproperties we explored. They have been automatically validated by constraining the range of the pseudo-property (it must be related to the terms \"flavour\", \"touch\", and \"aspect\") and by checking the sufficient intersection size between the relation sets typed r carac of the \"whole\" and its \"part\".",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 472,
"end": 479,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Towards the Automatic Suggestion of the RPKs(op)",
"sec_num": "4.3.4"
},
{
"text": "We described a method that attaches an intermediary resource containing relevant pieces of knowledge harvested from semantically structured resources in different languages to the main building process. The method suits for other domains of knowledge and the amount of work necessary for the immersion process is proportional to the size and to the type of the ontological resource to be enhanced. It is also possible to use such resources as WordNets 11 as the basis for the intermediary resource. Among the difficulties linked to our method appear the differences between formal representation paradigms as well as the availability of well structured and semantically rich resources.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Perspectives",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "https://sourceforge.net/p/texttoonto/wiki/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://www.jeuxdemots.org",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://www-limics.smbh.univ-paris13.fr/ ontoMIAM/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A subset of MLSN terms connected through semantic relations.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "www-limics.smbh.univ-paris13.fr/sensoMIAM/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://globalwordnet.org/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Towards building lexical ontology via cross-language matching",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mamoun Abu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mustafa",
"middle": [],
"last": "Helou",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Matteo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jarrar",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ch",
"middle": [],
"last": "Palmonari",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fellbaum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "346--354",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mamoun Abu Helou, Mustafa Jarrar, Matteo Palmonari, and Ch Fellbaum. 2014. Towards building lexical ontol- ogy via cross-language matching. pages 346-354.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Natural Language Semantics. Blackwell",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Keith",
"middle": [],
"last": "Allan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Keith Allan. 2001. Natural Language Semantics. Black- well.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Construction d'une ressource termino-ontologique multilingue pour les domaines de la cuisine et de la nutrition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nadia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bebeshina-Clairet",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nadia Bebeshina-Clairet. 2019. Construction d'une ressource termino-ontologique multilingue pour les do- maines de la cuisine et de la nutrition. Theses, Universit\u00e9 Paris 13.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Ontology learning from text: A survey of methods",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Biemann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "LDV Forum",
"volume": "20",
"issue": "",
"pages": "75--93",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christian Biemann. 2005. Ontology learning from text: A survey of methods. LDV Forum 20:75-93.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Construction d'une ontologie modulaire. application au domaine de la cuisine num\u00e9rique. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nadia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Clairet",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "RANLP 2017. Sylvie Despr\u00e8s",
"volume": "30",
"issue": "",
"pages": "509--532",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.3166/ria.30.509-532"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nadia Clairet. 2017. Dish classification using knowledge based dietary conflict detection. In RANLP 2017. Sylvie Despr\u00e8s. 2016. Construction d'une ontolo- gie modulaire. application au domaine de la cuisine num\u00e9rique. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle 30(5):509- 532. https://doi.org/10.3166/ria.30.509-532.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Hownet and its computation of meaning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Zhendong",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dong",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Qiang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dong",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Changling",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hao",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "53--56",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Zhendong Dong, Qiang Dong, and Changling Hao. 2010. Hownet and its computation of mean- ing. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Demon- strations. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, COLING '10, pages 53-56.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Foodon: a harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, quality control and data integration. npj Science of Food 2",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Damion",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dooley",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Emma",
"middle": [],
"last": "Griffiths",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gurinder",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Gosal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pier",
"middle": [
"Luigi"
],
"last": "Buttigieg",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Robert",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hoehndorf",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Matthew",
"middle": [
"C"
],
"last": "Lange",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lynn",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Schriml",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fiona",
"middle": [
"S L"
],
"last": "Brinkman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "William",
"middle": [
"W L"
],
"last": "Hsiao",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1038/s41538-018-0032-6"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Damion Dooley, Emma Griffiths, Gurinder S. Gosal, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Robert Hoehndorf, Matthew C. Lange, Lynn M. Schriml, Fiona S. L. Brinkman, and William W. L. Hsiao. 2018. Foodon: a harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, qual- ity control and data integration. npj Science of Food 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-018-0032-6.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "What makes a good ontology? a case-study in fine-grained knowledge reuse",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Miriam",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fern\u00e1ndez",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chwhynny",
"middle": [],
"last": "Overbeeke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Marta",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sabou",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Enrico",
"middle": [],
"last": "Motta",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "The Semantic Web",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "61--75",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Miriam Fern\u00e1ndez, Chwhynny Overbeeke, Marta Sabou, and Enrico Motta. 2009. What makes a good ontology? a case-study in fine-grained knowledge reuse. In Asunci\u00f3n G\u00f3mez-P\u00e9rez, Yong Yu, and Ying Ding, editors, The Se- mantic Web. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, pages 61-75.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Improving ingredient substitution using formal concept analysis and adaptation of ingredient quantities with mixed linear optimization",
"authors": [
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gaillard",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lieber",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nauer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Computer Cooking Contest Workshop",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "E. Gaillard, J. Lieber, and E. Nauer. 2015. Improv- ing ingredient substitution using formal concept analysis and adaptation of ingredient quantities with mixed linear optimization. In Computer Cooking Contest Workshop.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [
"U"
],
"last": "Kietz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Maedche",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Volz",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "EKAW-2000 Workshop Ontologies and Text",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J.U. Kietz, A. Maedche, and R. Volz. 2000. A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate in- tranet. EKAW-2000 Workshop Ontologies and Text, Juan- Les-Pins, France, October 2000 .",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Making people play for Lexical Acquisition with the JeuxDeMots prototype",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mathieu Lafourcade",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "SNLP'07: 7th International Symposium on Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mathieu Lafourcade. 2007. Making people play for Lex- ical Acquisition with the JeuxDeMots prototype. In SNLP'07: 7th International Symposium on Natural Lan- guage Processing. Pattaya, Chonburi, Thailand, page 7. https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-00200883.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Lexique et analyse s\u00e9mantique de textes -structures, acquisitions, calculs, et jeux de mots. (Lexicon and semantic analysis of texts -structures, acquisition, computation and games with words",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mathieu Lafourcade",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mathieu Lafourcade. 2011. Lexique et analyse s\u00e9mantique de textes -structures, acquisitions, calculs, et jeux de mots. (Lexicon and semantic analysis of texts -structures, acquisition, computation and games with words). https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00649851.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "The role of frame-based representation on the semantic web",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ora",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lassila",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Deborah",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mcguinness",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ora Lassila and Deborah McGuinness. 2001. The role of frame-based representation on the semantic web. Techni- cal report, Knowledge Systems Laboratory Report KSL- 01-02, Stanford University, Stanford (USA).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Building wordnet based ontologies with expert knowledge",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jacek",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marciniak",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "LTC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jacek Marciniak. 2013. Building wordnet based ontolo- gies with expert knowledge. In LTC.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Construction d'ontologies a partir de textes. L'apport de l'analyse de concepts formels",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thibault Mondary",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2011,
"venue": "Theses, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Nord -Paris XIII. Equipe RCLN",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Thibault Mondary. 2011. Construction d'ontologies a partir de textes. L'apport de l'analyse de con- cepts formels.. Theses, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Nord -Paris XIII. Equipe RCLN. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel- 00596825.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "A Survey on Ontology Evaluation Methods",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Joe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Raad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christophe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cruz",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development, part of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management . Lisbonne, Portugal",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.5220/0005591001790186"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Joe Raad and Christophe Cruz. 2015. A Survey on On- tology Evaluation Methods. In Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Knowledge Engineering and On- tology Development, part of the 7th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engi- neering and Knowledge Management . Lisbonne, Portu- gal. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005591001790186.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Indexation and learning of terms and relations from reports of radiology. Theses, Universit\u00e9 de Montpellier",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lionel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ramadier",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Lionel Ramadier. 2016. Indexation and learning of terms and relations from reports of radiology. Theses, Uni- versit\u00e9 de Montpellier. https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/tel- 01479769.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Le terme et le concept : fondements d'une ontoterminologie",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christophe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Roche",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "TOTh 2007 : Terminologie et Ontologie : Th\u00e9ories et Applications. Annecy",
"volume": "22",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--22",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christophe Roche. 2007. Le terme et le concept : fonde- ments d'une ontoterminologie. In TOTh 2007 : Ter- minologie et Ontologie : Th\u00e9ories et Applications. An- necy, France, pages 1-22. 22 pages. https://hal.archives- ouvertes.fr/hal-00202645.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "DBnary: Wiktionary as a Lemon-Based Multilingual Lexical Resource in RDF",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Gilles",
"middle": [],
"last": "S\u00e9rasset",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "Semantic Web -Interoperability",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gilles S\u00e9rasset. 2014. DBnary: Wiktionary as a Lemon- Based Multilingual Lexical Resource in RDF. Semantic Web -Interoperability, Usability, Applicability pages -. To appear. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00953638.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Representing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Robyn",
"middle": [],
"last": "Speer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Catherine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Havasi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012). European Languages Resources Association (ELRA), Istanbul",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "3679--3686",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Robyn Speer and Catherine Havasi. 2012. Represent- ing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012). Eu- ropean Languages Resources Association (ELRA), Istan- bul, Turkey, pages 3679-3686.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Logiciel Terminae -Version 2012. TERMINAE est une plateforme d'aid\u00e8 a la construction de ressources termino-ontologiques a partir de ressources textuelles",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sylvie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Szulman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sylvie Szulman. 2012. Logiciel Terminae -Ver- sion 2012. TERMINAE est une plateforme d'aid\u00e8 a la construction de ressources termino-ontologiques a partir de ressources textuelles. https://hal.archives- ouvertes.fr/hal-00719453.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Semantic Interoperability of Multilingual Lexical Resources in Lexical Linked Data. Theses, Universit\u00e9 Grenoble Alpes",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tchechmedjiev",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Andon Tchechmedjiev. 2016. Semantic Interoperability of Multilingual Lexical Resources in Lexical Linked Data. Theses, Universit\u00e9 Grenoble Alpes. https://tel.archives- ouvertes.fr/tel-01681358.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Piek Vossen. 2012. Ontologies. The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Davide",
"middle": [],
"last": "Turcato",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fred",
"middle": [],
"last": "Popowich",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Janine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toole",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fass",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Devlan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nicholson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gordon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tisher",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "ACL-2000 Workshop on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--11",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0025"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Davide Turcato, Fred Popowich, Janine Toole, Dan Fass, Devlan Nicholson, and Gordon Tisher. 2000. Adapting a synonym database to specific domains. In ACL-2000 Workshop on Recent Advances in Natural Language Pro- cessing and Information Retrieval. Association for Com- putational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China, pages 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3115/1117755.1117757. Piek Vossen. 2012. Ontologies. The Ox- ford Handbook of Computational Linguistics https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0025.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Learning lightweight ontologies from text across different domains using the web as background knowledge",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Wilson",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wong",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Wilson Wong. 2009. Learning lightweight ontologies from text across different domains using the web as back- ground knowledge. Ph.D. thesis.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Endogeneous Consolidation of Lexical Semantic Networks. Theses, Universit\u00e9 de Montpellier",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Manel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zarrouk",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Manel Zarrouk. 2015. Endogeneous Consolidation of Lexical Semantic Networks. Theses, Universit\u00e9 de Mont- pellier. https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/tel-01300285.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"uris": null,
"num": null,
"text": "MLSN: relationship annotation scheme. graph) labels. At the time of our writing, the MLSN contains 821 781 nodes and 2 231 197 arcs. It covers 4 languages : English, French, Russian, and Spanish.",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF1": {
"uris": null,
"num": null,
"text": "(1) relation annotation. (2) RPK(op) suggestion.",
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF0": {
"num": null,
"text": "The table 1 introduces the results obtained for the discovery of RPK(ci) related to the top level concept Aliment in the French sub-graph of the MLSN. The",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"5\">#candidates #valid %valid #new %new</td></tr><tr><td>11 520</td><td>11 289</td><td>98%</td><td>4 741</td><td>42%</td></tr></table>",
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF1": {
"num": null,
"text": "The RPK(ci) discovery.",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF3": {
"num": null,
"text": "The RPK(op) discovery on the basis of simple semantic relations.",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"type_str": "table"
}
}
}
}