ACL-OCL / Base_JSON /prefixR /json /R19 /R19-1045.json
Benjamin Aw
Add updated pkl file v3
6fa4bc9
{
"paper_id": "R19-1045",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T15:01:55.088389Z"
},
"title": "On a Chatbot Providing Virtual Dialogues",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Boris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Galitsky",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Oracle Inc. Redwood Shores CA",
"location": {}
},
"email": "boris.galitsky@oracle.com"
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dmitry Ilvovsky",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "National Research University Higher School of Economics",
"location": {}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Elizaveta",
"middle": [],
"last": "Goncharova",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "National Research University Higher School of Economics",
"location": {}
},
"email": "egoncharova@hse.ru"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "We present a chatbot that delivers content in the form of virtual dialogues automatically produced from the plain texts that are extracted and selected from the documents. This virtual dialogue content is provided in the form of answers derived from the found and selected documents split into fragments, and questions that are automatically generated for these answers based on the initial text.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "R19-1045",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "We present a chatbot that delivers content in the form of virtual dialogues automatically produced from the plain texts that are extracted and selected from the documents. This virtual dialogue content is provided in the form of answers derived from the found and selected documents split into fragments, and questions that are automatically generated for these answers based on the initial text.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Presentation of knowledge in dialogue format is a popular way to communicate information effectively. It has been demonstrated in games, news, commercials, and educational entertainment. Usability studies have shown that for information acquirers, dialogues often communicate information more effectively and persuade stronger than a monologue most of times (Cox et al., 1999 , Craig et al., 2000 .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 358,
"end": 375,
"text": "(Cox et al., 1999",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 376,
"end": 396,
"text": ", Craig et al., 2000",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We demo a chatbot that delivers content in the form of virtual dialogues automatically produced from plain texts extracted and selected from documents. Given an initial query, this chatbot finds documents, extracts topics from them, organizes these topics in clusters according to conflicting viewpoints, receives from the user clarification on which cluster is most relevant to her opinion, and provides the content for this cluster. This content is provided in the form of a virtual dialogue where the answers are derived from the found and selected documents split into fragments, and questions are automatically generated for these answers.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Once the proper piece of content is identified, users frequently like to consume it in the form of frequently asked question pages, discussion forums and blogs, rather then formal lengthy document. However, for the majority of knowledge domains, from legal and medical to engineering, most reliable information is only available as documents and web pages. Hence we convert plain documents into dialogues, imitating multiple people conversing on the specific topic of interest.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "A virtual dialogue is defined as a multi-turn dialogue between imaginary agents obtained as a result of content transformation. It is designed with the goal of effective information representation and is intended to look as close as possible to a genuine dialogue. Virtual dialogues as search results turn out to be more effective means of information access in comparison with original documents provided by a conventional chatbot or a search engine. Piwek et al. (2007) were pioneers of automated construction of dialogues, proposing Text2Dialogue system. The authors provided a theoretical foundation of the mapping that the system performs from RST structures to Dialogue representation structures. The authors introduced a number of requirements for a dialogue generation system (robustness, extensibility, and variation and control) and reported on the evaluation of the mapping rules.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 452,
"end": 471,
"text": "Piwek et al. (2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "An important body of work concerns tutorial dialogue systems. Some of the work in that area focuses on authoring tools for generating questions, hints, and prompts. Typically, these are, however, single utterances by a single interlocutor, rather than an entire conversation between two agents. Some researchers have concentrated on generating questions together with possible answers such as multiple choice test items, but this work is restricted to a very specific type of question-answer pairs (Mitkov et al., 2006) . 2",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 498,
"end": 519,
"text": "(Mitkov et al., 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Systems",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Conversion a text into a dialogue is different from the dialogue generation problem; the former is a training set-based foundation for the latter. Response generation for dialogue can be viewed as a source-to-target transduction problem. (Sordoni et al., 2015) rescores the outputs of a phrasal machine translation-based conversation system with a neural model incorporating prior context. Recent progress in sequence-to-sequence models has been leveraged to build end-to-end dialogue systems that firstly applies an utterance message to a distributed vector representation using an encoder, then generates a response from this representation. (Li et al., 2016) simulate dialogues between two virtual agents, using policy gradient methods to reward sequences that display three useful conversational properties: \"informativity\", coherence, and ease of answering.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 238,
"end": 260,
"text": "(Sordoni et al., 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 644,
"end": 661,
"text": "(Li et al., 2016)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Systems",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "We measured comparable dialogue effectiveness, properties such as the speed of arrival to a search result, a decision and domain coverage, in the current study.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Systems",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Dialogue acts are an important source which differentiates between a plain text and a dialogue. Proposed algorithm of virtual dialogues can assist with building domain-specific chatbot training datasets. Recently released dataset, DailyDialog (Li et al., 2017) , is the only dataset that has utterances annotated with dialogue acts and is large enough for learning conversation models.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 243,
"end": 260,
"text": "(Li et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Systems",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "To form a dialogue from text sharing information or explaining how to do things, we need to split it into parts which will serve as answers. Then for each answer a question needs to be formed. The cohesiveness of the resultant dialogue should be assured by the integrity of the original text; the questions are designed to \"interrupt\" the speaker similar to how journalists do interviews.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "We employ a general mechanism of conversion of a paragraph of text of various styles and genres into a dialogue form. The paragraph is split into text fragments serving as a set of answers, and questions are automatically formed from some of these text fragments. The problem of building dialogue from text T is formulated as splitting it into a sequence of answers",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "A = [A 1 \u2026A n ] to form a dialogue [A 1 , <Q 1 , A 2 >, \u2026,<Q n-1 , A n >],",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "where A i answers Q i-1 and possibly previous question, and \uf0c8A i = T. Q i-1 needs to be derived from the whole or a part of A i by linguistic means and generalization; also some inventiveness may be required to make these questions sound natural. To achieve it, we try to find a semantically similar phrase on the web and merge it with the candidate question.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The main foundation of our dialogue construction algorithm is Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST, Mann and Thompson, 1988 A dialogue is formed from text by the following rule: once nucleus EDU is finished, and before satellite EDU starts, questions against this satellite EDU is inserted. In terms of dialogue flow between a text author and a person asking question, the latter \"interrupts\" the author to ask his question such that the satellite EDU and possibly consecutive text would be an answer to this question. The question is supposed to be about the entity from the nucleus, but this nucleus does not contain an answer to this question. The person asking questions only interrupts the text author when his question sounds suitable; it does not have to be asked for any nucleus-satellite transition.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 96,
"end": 119,
"text": "Mann and Thompson, 1988",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Once we split a text into EDUs, we know which text fragments will serve as answer to questions: satellites of all relations. Elaboration rhetorical relation is default and What-question to a verb phrase is formed. Background relation yields another What-question for the satellite '\u2026as <predicate>-<subject>'. Finally, Attribution relation is a basis of \"What/who is source\" question.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "A trivial approach to question generation would be to just convert satellite EDU into a question. But it would make it too specific and unnatural, such as 'the linchpin of its strategy handled just a 384 3 small fraction of the tests then sold to whom?'. Instead, a natural dialogue should be formed with more general questions like 'What does its strategy handle?'.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "An example of converting a text into a virtual dialogue is shown in Fig. 1 . Answers are obtained by splitting text into EDUs, and questions are inserted in text before satellite EDUs. Questions are shown in angle brackets and bolded. Each rhetorical relation in this example such as contrast ranges over a nucleus and a satellite. Each leave of this discourse tree starts with 'TEXT' (Fig. 1) .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 68,
"end": 74,
"text": "Fig. 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
},
{
"start": 385,
"end": 393,
"text": "(Fig. 1)",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "The reader of a virtual dialogue might feel that the interviewer is guessing what the speaker is going to answer for each question. A discoursetree based approach does not deliver most natural dialogues however it is a systematic method of building ones without distorting the logical flow of answers.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dialogue Construction from Plain Text",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "<who provided the evidence of responsibility> TEXT: Dutch accident investigators say TEXT: that evidence points to pro-Russian rebels as being responsible for shooting down plane.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "elaboration (LeftToRight) attribution (RightToLeft)",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "contrast (RightToLeft) attribution (RightToLeft) TEXT: The report indicates joint TEXT: where the missile was fired from elaboration (LeftToRight) <what else does report indicate?> TEXT: and identifies TEXT: who was in control and pins the downing of the plane on the pro-Russian rebels . elaboration (LeftToRight) attribution (RightToLeft) TEXT: However , the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation believes elaboration (LeftToRight) TEXT: that the plane was hit by a missile from the air <where was it produced?> TEXT: which was not produced in Russia . attribution (RightToLeft) TEXT: At the same time, rebels deny <who denied about who controlled the territory> TEXT: that they controlled the territory from which the missile was supposedly fired . ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "elaboration (LeftToRight) attribution (RightToLeft)",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "System Architecture for building a dialogue from text is shown in Fig. 2 . Each paragraph of a document is converted into a dialogue via building a communicative discourse tree for it and then building questions from its Satellite Elementary Discourse Units. Current chatbot is a development of the previously built tool that conducted task-oriented conventional dialogues (Galitsky et al., 2017) . ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 373,
"end": 396,
"text": "(Galitsky et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 66,
"end": 72,
"text": "Fig. 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "System Architecture",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Evaluating the effectiveness of information delivery via virtual dialogues, we compare the conventional chatbot sessions where users were given plain-text answers, and the ones where users were given content via virtual dialogues.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation of Effectiveness",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "We present the results on comparative usability of conventional dialogue and virtual dialogue. We assess dialogues with respect to following usability properties.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation of Effectiveness",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "The speed of arriving to the sought piece of information. It is measured as a number of iteration (a number of user utterances) preceding the final reply of the chatbot that gave an answer wanted by the user. We measure the number of steps only if the user confirms that she accepts the answer.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation of Effectiveness",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "The speed of arriving to a decision to commit a transaction such as purchase or reservation or product selection. A user is expected to accumulate sufficient information, and this information such as reviews should be convincing enough for making such decision;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation of Effectiveness",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "We also measure how many entities (in linguistic sense) were explored during a session with the chatbot. We are interested in how thorough and comprehensive the chatbot session is, how much a user actually learns from it. This assessment is sometimes opposite to the above two measures but is nevertheless important for understanding the overall usability of various conversational modes. We do not compare precision and recall of search sessions with either dialogue mode since the same information is delivered, but in distinct modes.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation of Effectiveness",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "In the first and second rows, we assess the stand-alone systems. One can observe that virtual dialogues take less iteration on average for information access and about the same number of iterations for decisions as conventional dialogues do.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation of Effectiveness",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Notice that the bottom row, the chat scenario proceeds from right to left. In the bottom two rows, we observe the usability of the hybrid system. When a conventional dialogue is followed by a virtual one, a lower portion of users is satisfied by the first step in comparison to the inverse architecture, where virtual is followed by conventional.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation of Effectiveness",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "We present an exploratory session that combines information delivery in the form of traditional textual answers (conventional dialogue) and also in a form of a virtual dialogue. The dialogue starts from the user question, 'advantages and new features of 5G'. The chatbot consults the sources (in this case, public URLs) and extracts the content from each page (or 5 documents) expected to be relevant for the query. In this example, seven URLs were processed, from domain-specific to general knowledge portals like Quora.com. The chatbot forms the list of topics extracted from these search results so that the user might select one of his interest.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Sample Chatbot Session",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Once the chatbot forms the topics for clarification of the user search intent, it shows them as a list.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The user selects his topic of interest and requests a specific answer via the topic number of the topic expression. Once the answer is read, there are multiple options:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\uf0b7 navigate to the next answer from the chatbot list;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\uf0b7 navigate to a specific answer from the chatbot list;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\uf0b7 reject this answer and attempt to reformulate the query;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\uf0b7 reduce search to a specified web domain (such as quota.com, for example);",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\uf0b7 proceed in the same direction to more search results in the form of a virtual dialogue;",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\uf0b7 accept the answer and conclude the session.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The user selects the last option and the chatbot builds a virtual dialogue. It is a conversation between an imaginary people but the topic stays the same, matching the original query. Virtual dialogues are shown in frames. As long as an imaginary chatbot responds to the same person, the dialog is intended to stay cohesive; coreferences in the follow-up questions are maintained. The main dialogue can be viewed as a one in the meta-level, and the object-level dialogue is naturally embedded into the meta-level one.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Now the user can either browse the built virtual dialogue or search it to find a fragment of conversation which is relevant to the user current exploration intent. The user now types the query 'Are the features right for me?' and gets directed to the virtual dialogue fragment where some other users are discussing if the technology is 'right for them'. The search matches the query either against the fragments of an original text, generated questions or both.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Bot>ask a new question",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We proposed a novel mode of chatbot interaction via virtual dialogue. It addresses sparseness of dialogue data on one hand and convincingness, perceived authenticity of information presented via dialogues on the other hand. We quantitatively evaluated improvement of user satisfaction with virtual dialogue in comparison to regular chatbot replies and confirmed the strong points of the former. We conclude that virtual dialogue is an important feature related to social search to be leveraged by a chatbot.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusions",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Chatbot demo videos (please, check 10 min video) and instructions on how to use it are available at https://github.com/bgalitsky/relevance-based-onparse-trees in the \"What is new?\" section.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusions",
"sec_num": "6"
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "The article was prepared within the framework of the HSE University Basic Research Program and funded by the Russian Academic Excellence Project '5-100'.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgements",
"sec_num": "7"
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization",
"authors": [
{
"first": "William",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sandra",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thompson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "Text -Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse",
"volume": "8",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "243--281",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mann, William and Sandra Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text -Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(3):243-281.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Combining intra-and multi-sentential rhetorical parsing for documentlevel discourse analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Shafiq",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Joty",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Giuseppe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Carenini",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Raymond",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yashar",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mehdad",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "ACL (1)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "486--496",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Joty, Shafiq R, Giuseppe Carenini, Raymond T Ng, and Yashar Mehdad. 2013. Combining intra-and multi-sentential rhetorical parsing for document- level discourse analysis. In ACL (1), pages 486- 496.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Rhetoric Map of an Answer to Compound Queries",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Galitsky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ilvovsky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [
"O"
],
"last": "Kuznetsov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "681--686",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Galitsky, B, Ilvovsky, D. and Kuznetsov SO. 2015. Rhetoric Map of an Answer to Compound Queries. ACL-2, 681-686.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "A large-scale classification of English verbs",
"authors": [
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kipper",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Korhonen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ryant",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Palmer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Language Resources and Evaluation Journal",
"volume": "42",
"issue": "",
"pages": "21--40",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Kipper, K. Korhonen, A., Ryant, N. and Palmer, M. 2008. A large-scale classification of English verbs. Language Resources and Evaluation Journal, 42, pp. 21-40.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse: A controlled comparison",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Cox",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mckendree",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tobin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mayes",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1999,
"venue": "Instructional Science",
"volume": "27",
"issue": "",
"pages": "431--458",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Cox, R J. McKendree, R. Tobin, J. Lee, and T. Mayes. Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse: A controlled comparison. Instructional Science, 27:431-458, 1999.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "A neural network approach to context-sensitive generation of conversational responses",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Alessandro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sordoni",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Galley",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Auli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Brockett",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yangfeng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ji",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Meg",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mitchell",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jian-Yun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nie",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jianfeng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Bill",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dolan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "InProc. of NAACL-HLT",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Alessandro Sordoni, Michel Galley, Michael Auli, Chris Brockett, Yangfeng Ji, Meg Mitchell, Jian- Yun Nie, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2015. A neural network approach to context-sensitive generation of conversational responses. InProc. of NAACL-HLT, May-June.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Graesser, and the Tutoring Research Group. Overhearing dialogues and monologues in virtual tutoring sessions: Effects on questioning and vicarious learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Craig",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gholson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ventura",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education",
"volume": "11",
"issue": "",
"pages": "242--253",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Craig, S, B. Gholson, M. Ventura, A. Graesser, and the Tutoring Research Group. Overhearing dialogues and monologues in virtual tutoring sessions: Effects on questioning and vicarious learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11:242-253, 2000.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Dailydialog: A manually labelled multi-turn dialogue dataset",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Y",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hui",
"middle": [],
"last": "Su",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xiaoyu",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Wenjie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ziqiang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shuzi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Niu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"arXiv": [
"arXiv:1710.03957"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Li Y, Hui Su, Xiaoyu Shen, Wenjie Li, Ziqiang Cao, and Shuzi Niu. 2017. Dailydialog: A manually labelled multi-turn dialogue dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03957.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "T2D: Generating Dialogues Between Virtual Agents Automatically from Text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Paul",
"middle": [
";"
],
"last": "Piwek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hernault",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": ";",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hugo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Prendinger",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Helmut",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mitsuru",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ishizuka",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "161--174",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Piwek, Paul; Hernault, Hugo; Prendinger, Helmut and Ishizuka, Mitsuru (2007). T2D: Generating Dialogues Between Virtual Agents Automatically from Text. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 161-174.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "A computeraided environment for generating multiple-choice test items",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mitkov",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Ha",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "N",
"middle": [],
"last": "Karamanis",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Natural Language Engineering: Special Issue on using NLP for Educational Applications",
"volume": "12",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "177--194",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mitkov R, L. A. Ha, and N. Karamanis. A computer- aided environment for generating multiple-choice test items. Natural Language Engineering: Special Issue on using NLP for Educational Applications, 12(2):177-194, 2006.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Chatbot with a discourse structure-driven dialogue management",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Boris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Galitsky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dmitry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ilvovsky",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Boris Galitsky and Dmitry Ilvovsky. 2017. Chatbot with a discourse structure-driven dialogue management. EACL System Demonstrations.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"text": "A discourse tree for a paragraph of text with questions formulated for satellite EDUs as answers"
},
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"text": "Fig. 2. System architecture"
},
"FIGREF3": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null,
"text": "Chatbot session with conventional and virtual dialogue"
},
"TABREF0": {
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "). RST represents the flow of entities in text via Discourse Tree -a hierarchical structure that sets inter-relations between text fragments: what elaborates on what, what explains what, what is attributed to what, what is contradicting what, etc. Such text fragments are called elementary discourse units (EDUs). Most rhetorical relations are binary anti-symmetric, specifying which EDU has more important (nucleus) compared to less important (satellite).",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "Evaluation of comparative effectiveness of conventional and virtual dialogues",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null
}
}
}
}