| { |
| "paper_id": "T75-1004", |
| "header": { |
| "generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0", |
| "date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:43:26.615028Z" |
| }, |
| "title": "~YNTACTIC PROCESSING AND ~UNCTIONAL SENTENCE PERSPECTIVE", |
| "authors": [ |
| { |
| "first": "Martin", |
| "middle": [], |
| "last": "Kay", |
| "suffix": "", |
| "affiliation": { |
| "laboratory": "", |
| "institution": "XEROX PARC", |
| "location": {} |
| }, |
| "email": "" |
| } |
| ], |
| "year": "", |
| "venue": null, |
| "identifiers": {}, |
| "abstract": "", |
| "pdf_parse": { |
| "paper_id": "T75-1004", |
| "_pdf_hash": "", |
| "abstract": [], |
| "body_text": [ |
| { |
| "text": "completely specified words or phrases and, if there is a path through the chart from one edge to another, it is because the first precedes the second in temporal, or left-to-right, sequence.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "If there is no path from one to another, then they belong to alternative hypotheses about the structure of of the sentence. So, the sentence \"they are flying planes\" has, let us say, two analyses, each consisting of a noun phrase followed by a verb phrase. But there is no path between the phrases in one analysis and those in the other.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "The verb phrase in one analysis consists of the verb \"are\" followed by the noun phrase \"flying planes\", which are therefore adjacent on the same path, but there is no path from either of them to the verb phrase they make up because this is an alternative analysis of the same set of words. if it is left, then arcs incident to the state must be followed.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "interpreter uses the scheduling rules to chose an item on the agenda which it then carries out.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "The", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "If all the tasks that were ever put on the agenda in the course of generation or analysis were carried out in an arbitrary order, then all results that the grammar allowed would be obtained sooner or later. The scheduling rules formalize strategie~ of one kind and another. They are presumably designed so as to shorten the time required to reach a result which is, in some sense, acceptable, at which time the remaining entries on the agenda can simply be abandoned.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "The", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "The typical task is an attempt to apply an arc from the grammar to an edge in the chart.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "The", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "If the arc applies successfully, ~ome new material will be added to the chart.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "The", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "In generation, the new material typically consists of one or two new edges constituting a sequence with the same end points as those of the initial edge. usually, no more than one of the newly introduced edges will be incomplete. Thus, there might be a task in which an arc was applied to the noun-phrase edge representing \"the big black dog\" and which resulted in the complete article \"the\" and the incomplete noun phrase \"big black dog\". In parsing, the task specifies one or two", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "The", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "i3.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "The", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "euges, one of which is incomplete. following that one for each of the initial arcs in the subnetwork in the hope that this will lead to the creation of a new complete edge that the \"category\" arc can be successfully applied to.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "The", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "The principal problem with this simple plan, when applied to reversible grammars, is that the registers cannot be guaranteed to have the necessary contents at the time required.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "One of the strengths of the ATN formalism is that it allows the parser to \"change its mind\".", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "The canonical example is the passive construction.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "The first verb phrase in the sentence is assigned to the subject register. But when a passive verb--part of the verb \"be\" and a transitive past participle--has been encountered, the contents of the subject register are simply transferred to the object register. If a \"by\" phrase follows, its object will later go into the subject register.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "In this way, a great deal of backing up is avoided.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "In generating a passive sentence, it is clear that the first step cannot be to deposit the contents of the subject register in the first position.", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "An alternative might be to decide which register to use in filling the first position by examining a \"voice\" register, using the object instead of the subject register if its value is \"passive\".", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "But this would require us to assign a value to the voice register in parsing before the relevant evidence is in. It would work only if the contents of the voice register were changed at the same time as the passive verb was recognized and the contents of the subject register were moved to the object register. ", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "THE USE OF REGISTERS", |
| "sec_num": "3." |
| } |
| ], |
| "back_matter": [ |
| { |
| "text": " (I) John did all the work, but they gave the reward to Bill. (2) John did all the work, but they gave Bill the reward.(3) They were so impressed with the work that they gave Bill a reward. 4They were so impressed with the work that they gave a reward to Bill.I claim that (2) and (4) are less natural than (I) and(3) when read with even intonation.Sentence 5, with underlining for stress, is, of course, quite natural, and (6) is questionable. 5John did all the work, but they gave Bill the reward. 6They were so impressed with the work that they gave a reward to Bill. / Indir-obj:Mary] => \"It was Mary that John gave the candy to\"[Subject:John Dir-obj:(the candy) / Verb:gave Indir-obj:Mary] => \"What John did with the candy was give it to Mary\"", |
| "cite_spans": [ |
| { |
| "start": 1, |
| "end": 4, |
| "text": "(I)", |
| "ref_id": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "start": 62, |
| "end": 65, |
| "text": "(2)", |
| "ref_id": null |
| } |
| ], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "annex", |
| "sec_num": null |
| } |
| ], |
| "bib_entries": { |
| "BIBREF0": { |
| "ref_id": "b0", |
| "title": "On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis", |
| "authors": [ |
| { |
| "first": "J", |
| "middle": [], |
| "last": "Firbas", |
| "suffix": "" |
| }, |
| { |
| "first": "V", |
| "middle": [], |
| "last": "Mathesius", |
| "suffix": "" |
| } |
| ], |
| "year": 1929, |
| "venue": "Archiv fuer das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen", |
| "volume": "I", |
| "issue": "", |
| "pages": "202--210", |
| "other_ids": {}, |
| "num": null, |
| "urls": [], |
| "raw_text": "Firbas, J. \"On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis\", Travaux Linguistiques d_ee Pragu_ee, Vol. I, pp 267-280, 1964. Kaplan, Ronald M. A General Syntactic Processor in Randall Rustin(ed.) \"Natural Language Processing\", New York, Algorithmics Press, 1973. Mathesius, V. \"Zur Satzperspektive in modernen English\", Archiv fuer das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen, Vol. 155, pp. 202-210, 1929.", |
| "links": null |
| } |
| }, |
| "ref_entries": {} |
| } |
| } |
