{
    "paper_id": "C69-1200",
    "header": {
        "generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
        "date_generated": "2023-01-19T12:31:55.496514Z"
    },
    "title": "",
    "authors": [
        {
            "first": "",
            "middle": [],
            "last": "Fa",
            "suffix": "",
            "affiliation": {
                "laboratory": "FOR ~]ANTI TATI VE LINOUI STI C5 Stockholm dO",
                "institution": "",
                "location": {
                    "postCode": "SWEDF2V"
                }
            },
            "email": ""
        }
    ],
    "year": "",
    "venue": null,
    "identifiers": {},
    "abstract": "",
    "pdf_parse": {
        "paper_id": "C69-1200",
        "_pdf_hash": "",
        "abstract": [],
        "body_text": [
            {
                "text": "The model that we arrive at is a particularly simple formulation of a discovery procedure for words. This formulation is part of n~ longer concern with the aetiology of ideas about linguistic units:",
                "cite_spans": [],
                "ref_spans": [],
                "eq_spans": [],
                "section": "",
                "sec_num": null
            },
            {
                "text": "why does a linguist feel a phrase is a phrase and a word is a word?",
                "cite_spans": [],
                "ref_spans": [],
                "eq_spans": [],
                "section": "",
                "sec_num": null
            },
            {
                "text": "The Word as a Distributional Unit",
                "cite_spans": [],
                "ref_spans": [],
                "eq_spans": [],
                "section": "",
                "sec_num": null
            },
            {
                "text": "The status of the word as a linguistic unit is best sunmmrized by Greenberg: (1957) The word as a unit occupies a paradoxical position in contemporary linguistic science. Such a unit, roughly coinciding in usage with its employment in everyday language and in the discourses of sciences other than linguistics~ occurs almost universally in practice of descriptive linguists as the dividing line between the two levels of morphological (intra-word) and syntactic (supra-werd) constructions.",
                "cite_spans": [
                    {
                        "start": 77,
                        "end": 83,
                        "text": "(1957)",
                        "ref_id": null
                    }
                ],
                "ref_spans": [],
                "eq_spans": [],
                "section": "",
                "sec_num": null
            },
            {
                "text": "Yet no generally accepted",
                "cite_spans": [],
                "ref_spans": [],
                "eq_spans": [],
                "section": "",
                "sec_num": null
            }
        ],
        "back_matter": [],
        "bib_entries": {},
        "ref_entries": {
            "FIGREF0": {
                "num": null,
                "type_str": "figure",
                "text": "I want to distinguish between the behavior of language and the behavior of linguists in analysing linguistic data. The paper concerns distributional approximations to the word as a sequence of sub-word units. I will argue on the basis of what a hypothetical linguist might do with hypothetical linguistic data-in this case the frequencies of sequences of morphemes. The behavior of the hypothetical linguist is formalized into a quantitative model, which in turn is applied to real linguistic data: a primer, a lower school reader, and a well known tract on the philosophy of language.",
                "uris": null
            }
        }
    }
}