KBench / tools /mega_factory /specs /megakernel_llama1b_longctx_decode.py
ZMC2019's picture
Reorganise: group 313 tasks into 17 families under tasks/, generators under tools/ (part 10)
0f775e2 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
5.62 kB
"""megakernel-llama1b-longctx-decode — 32k context, so KV reads dominate instead of weights."""
import pathlib, sys
sys.path.insert(0, str(pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]))
sys.path.insert(0, str(pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parent))
from spec import MegaSpec
from _common import LLAMA_1B, SPEC_MD, CONTRACT_MD, BF16_WEIGHTS_NOTE, CORRECTNESS_MD, PRECISION_MD
TOL = 6e-2 # MEASURED: fp32-twin divergence E = 0.0294 at 32k context -> tol = 2.04x E.
MEASURED_MD = """
**How this tolerance was measured.** A second, independent implementation of this model was written
and compared against the reference on the grader's own fixtures (`make_weights` / `make_kv`, seeds
11/20/21/22, 8 steps each, at the full 32768-token prefill). The twin computes the whole forward pass
in **fp32** -- fp32 residual stream, fp32 GEMV outputs, hand-written RMSNorm, RoPE by complex multiply
from an fp64 table, and attention by `einsum` with an explicit max-subtract softmax in fp64 instead of
`scaled_dot_product_attention` over a `repeat_interleave`d KV -- while still writing **bf16** K/V back
into the cache, as the contract requires.
| quantity | measured |
|---|---|
| `E` -- reference vs the independent fp32 twin | **0.0271 - 0.0294** (max over 4 seeds x 8 steps) |
| `Z` -- reference vs *itself*, independently allocated fixtures | **0.0** at all four seeds |
| `tol` | **6e-2** = **2.04x** `E` |
Note that `Z` is exactly 0 here while the 2k-context task shows up to 0.023. At 32k the attention
reduction is large enough that `scaled_dot_product_attention` selects the same split regardless of
where the cache was allocated, so the reference is reproducible. Do not read that as "the softmax is
exact" -- it means the *reference* is stable, not that your attention has to match it bit for bit.
Summing 32768 terms is precisely where a different (and better) online-softmax split is expected, and
`E` above is measured with exactly such a split."""
DROP_MD = """
**Drop-the-feature margins**, measured on the same fixtures; each variant is identical to the
reference except for one deleted behaviour:
| variant | relative error | x `tol` |
|---|---|---|
| attend over only the last 128 KV positions | 1.43 | 24x |
| drop the SiLU in the MLP | 1.29 | 21x |
| attend over only half the 32k history | 0.626 | 10x |
| drop RoPE | 0.400 | 6.7x |
| **skip one of the 16 layers** | **0.253** | **4.2x** |
Two of these are notably *smaller* than in the short-context task, and for an instructive reason: with
32768 cached tokens the attention output is an average over so many values that truncating half the
history or removing the positional rotation both move it less than they do at 2k. Truncating the KV is
the shortcut this task most needs to catch, and at 10-24x outside the gate it is caught. The
one-layer skip is again the binding margin at 4.2x; `E` and that `D` are a factor of 8.6 apart."""
SPEC = MegaSpec(
unfused_kernels=628,
name="megakernel-llama1b-longctx-decode",
title="Write a whole-model decode megakernel (1B, 32k context, batch 1)",
blurb=("The long-context form of the whole-model decode megakernel. At 32k of KV the bottleneck "
"flips: reading the cache costs more per token than reading the weights, so the fusion has "
"to keep the attention streaming while the MLP weights load. A different balance from the "
"short-context case, and a different kernel."),
keywords=["mle", "kernel-generation", "megakernel", "persistent-kernel", "decode", "long-context",
"kv-cache", "memory-bound"],
cfg=dict(LLAMA_1B),
batch=1, prefill_len=32768, max_seq=33024, decode_steps=32,
tol=TOL,
spec_md=SPEC_MD, contract_md=CONTRACT_MD.format(wnote=BF16_WEIGHTS_NOTE),
precision_md=PRECISION_MD + MEASURED_MD,
correctness_md=CORRECTNESS_MD.format(tol=TOL) + DROP_MD,
perf_md="""At 32k of context the arithmetic is still trivial but the **balance has flipped**. Per
decode step you read ~2.47 GB of weights *and* the KV cache: 16 layers x 8 KV heads x 32768 positions
x 64 dims x 2 tensors (K and V) x 2 bytes is ~1.07 GB. Attention is now ~30% of your traffic rather
than a rounding error, and the roofline moves from 529 us to ~739 us.
That changes what the megakernel has to do. The short-context version can treat attention as a small
interlude between big weight loads; here the two are comparable, and the win comes from **overlapping
them** -- streaming the KV for layer `i` while the MLP weights for layer `i` are still arriving, so
neither pipeline sits idle.
Specific levers:
* **Split the KV read across the persistent grid** and combine partial attention outputs with an
online-softmax merge (running max + rescaled running sum), so no block needs the whole cache.
* **Never materialise the repeated KV.** GQA gives 32 query heads over 8 KV heads; expanding to 32 is
4x the traffic for zero information. Have four query heads share one KV load in registers.
* **Keep the weight pipeline running through the attention.** The layer's `Wo`, `Wgate`, `Wup`,
`Wdown` do not depend on the attention result until the very end -- start those loads early.
* The LM head is still ~525 MB and still ~11% of the traffic here.""",
regime_md=("**Regime**: batch 1, 16 layers, `d`=2048, 32 query / 8 KV heads, head_dim 64, vocab "
"128256. The KV cache arrives holding **32768** tokens and you decode 32 more. KV "
"traffic (~1.07 GB/step) is now ~30% of the ~2.47 GB of weight traffic -- budget for "
"both; the floor is ~739 us."),
).validate()