ZexiJia commited on
Commit
855884d
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): df79aea

Create README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +147 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ pretty_name: WeART
3
+ language:
4
+ - en
5
+ license: other
6
+ task_categories:
7
+ - image-retrieval
8
+ - image-classification
9
+ - text-image-retrieval
10
+ tags:
11
+ - icassp-2026
12
+ - art
13
+ - artistic-style
14
+ - style-retrieval
15
+ - benchmark
16
+ - computer-vision
17
+ - multimodal
18
+ - cultural-analysis
19
+ size_categories:
20
+ - 100K<n<1M
21
+ ---
22
+
23
+ # WeART
24
+
25
+ <div align="center">
26
+
27
+ ### A large-scale benchmark for artistic style analysis across diverse cultures, styles, and artists
28
+
29
+ **280K+ Artworks** • **152 Styles** • **1,556 Artists**
30
+ **Balanced Coverage** for **Style Retrieval**, **Clustering**, and **Generative Model Evaluation**
31
+
32
+ [📄 Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17697)
33
+
34
+ </div>
35
+
36
+ ---
37
+
38
+ ## Overview
39
+
40
+ **WeART** is a large-scale benchmark for **artistic style analysis**.
41
+
42
+ It is introduced to address major limitations in existing art datasets, including narrow cultural coverage, incomplete annotations, and weak support for robust style generalization. Compared with prior resources, WeART provides broader coverage of artistic categories, stronger balance across styles and artists, and cleaner curation for large-scale evaluation. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
43
+
44
+ It is designed for:
45
+
46
+ - artistic style retrieval
47
+ - artist-aware representation learning
48
+ - style clustering and visualization
49
+ - cross-cultural art analysis
50
+ - evaluation of generative models on stylistic fidelity
51
+
52
+ ---
53
+
54
+ ## Highlights
55
+
56
+ - **280,000+ artworks**
57
+ - **152 artistic styles**
58
+ - **1,556 artists**
59
+ - **~3× larger than WikiArt**
60
+ - **Only 3% artist overlap with WikiArt**
61
+ - Curated for **quality**, **balance**, and **broader cultural coverage** :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
62
+
63
+ ---
64
+
65
+ ## What makes WeART useful?
66
+
67
+ WeART is built to better reflect the real diversity of artistic expression.
68
+
69
+ Compared with existing benchmarks, it significantly improves coverage of underrepresented categories such as:
70
+
71
+ - children’s illustration
72
+ - digital art
73
+ - traditional Chinese painting
74
+
75
+ The dataset is also curated with:
76
+
77
+ - manual duplicate removal
78
+ - high-resolution scans
79
+ - a minimum of two works per artist
80
+ - strong artist coverage, with **88% of artists having five or more works** :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
81
+
82
+ This makes WeART a strong benchmark for evaluating whether visual representations truly capture **style**, rather than only semantic content.
83
+
84
+ ---
85
+
86
+ ## Dataset Content
87
+
88
+ Each sample typically corresponds to an artwork and may include metadata such as:
89
+
90
+ - **image**
91
+ - **artist**
92
+ - **style**
93
+ - **category**
94
+ - **source information**
95
+
96
+ WeART is especially suitable for studying:
97
+
98
+ - style-sensitive visual retrieval
99
+ - artist-level clustering
100
+ - style manifold discovery
101
+ - generalization to underrepresented artistic traditions
102
+ - stylistic evaluation of generated images
103
+
104
+ ---
105
+
106
+ ## Why WeART?
107
+
108
+ Many existing visual models struggle to separate **style** from **content**, especially when evaluated beyond familiar Western art distributions.
109
+
110
+ WeART was introduced as a more challenging benchmark for this setting. It supports evaluation on a broader range of artistic forms and enables more reliable analysis of stylistic similarity, clustering structure, and model robustness across cultures and artistic traditions. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
111
+
112
+ ---
113
+
114
+ ## Use Cases
115
+
116
+ WeART is intended for:
117
+
118
+ - benchmarking artistic style retrieval
119
+ - learning style-aware image representations
120
+ - analyzing artist and movement similarity
121
+ - studying cross-domain and cross-cultural generalization
122
+ - evaluating generative models for artistic style fidelity
123
+ - building new metrics for artistic similarity
124
+
125
+ ---
126
+
127
+ ## Paper
128
+
129
+ **StyleDecoupler: Generalizable Artistic Style Disentanglement**
130
+ **Zexi Jia, Jinchao Zhang, Jie Zhou**
131
+ **ICASSP 2026**
132
+
133
+ [arXiv: 2601.17697](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17697)
134
+
135
+ ---
136
+
137
+ ## Citation
138
+
139
+ If you use **WeART** in your research, please cite:
140
+
141
+ ```bibtex
142
+ @article{jia2026styledecoupler,
143
+ title={StyleDecoupler: Generalizable Artistic Style Disentanglement},
144
+ author={Jia, Zexi and Zhang, Jinchao and Zhou, Jie},
145
+ journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.17697},
146
+ year={2026}
147
+ }