(400, 400, new Bgr(0, 0, 0)); MCvFont f = new MCvFont(FONT.CV_FONT_HERSHEY_TRIPLEX, 1.2, 1.2); img.Draw(\"EMGUcv\", ref f, new System.Drawing.Point(135, 180), new Bgr(0, 255, 0)); pictureBox1.Image = img.ToBitmap(); }\n\nNow you have your project, run it and test it, fix any bugs as you want your project template to be running as soon as it is opened.\n\n## Creating the Project Template\n\nCreating a project template is made incredibly simple, just left click File=>Export Template. If you have not saved your changes, you will be prompted to do so before continuing. We want to do things properly so we are not exporting our project as a vsix just yet.\n\nThe Export Template Wizard will now appear we want to export the whole Project Template so just select Next >.\n\nYou can now set up the template details such as:\n\n* Template Name\n* Template Description\n* Icon Image\n* Preview Image\n\nYou can leave these blank, however you may find you want to add your own else some default ones are used that are less desirable. It also makes thing more desirable. In this example, we will use an EMGU icon and a screen shot that was prepared earlier. If need be, you can select cancel at this point, gather your items and repeat the last few steps.\n\nOnce you have selected your item, ensure you deselect the “Automatically import the template into Visual Studio” checkbox. We will test that we can use the project later but if you forget, skip to “Installing and Uninstalling on a Client Machine” section to remove the project.\n\nThe template will be saved in a default location as a zip file, you can see that there are several templates that were made for the EMGU template project release. The default directory will open automatically in Windows explorer but should you close it, they are located here: \\Documents\\Visual Studio 2010\\My Exported Templates.\n\nYou can explorer the project folder using an appropriate tool to ensure all your files have transferred correctly. Repeat this process for multiple templates as required until you have all your required templates.\n\n## Creating the VSIX Export Template\n\nNow that we have our project template, we are going to create a VSIX project so in VS, select New Project. Look for the Sub-Contents of Extensibility, you should see a VSIX project option as shown below:\n\nIf you do not see this project type, make sure you have installed Microsoft Visual Studio Service 1 SDK, links are under the “Pre-Requisites” heading.\n\nWhen your VSIX project opens, you will be instantly presented with the source extension manifest file. Fill in the basic Fields such as Product Name, Author, Version and Description. The ID will have a long string of random characters leave these as they are a unique identifier but you can edit the text pre-ceding them.\n\nYou now need to select the editions your project template will work with, this is vital, the default will be the version you are using. You may want to limit the use to just Professional version of VS or allow multiple languages to use the template.\n\nWe are now at the stage of adding the content to out VSIX project, our project template. Left click the “Add Content” button and a pop up will appear to guide you through. Select the contents type as a “Project Template”.\n\nThen select File and navigate to your custom project template .zip file we generated in the last section.\n\nNow if we have several project templates we will want to create the all under a sub-directory for a New project creation. To do this, enter the name you wish to use in the Add to subfolder field. If you wish to add the custom project template to the root directory and leave it blank. If you want to do both, then you will need to add two identical project files one with no sub-folder set and with the sub-folder you desire. In this example, a Custom Project sub-folder will be used.\n\nYou will now see your project file within the Solution Explorer window. You can always reorganise the structure of you VSIX project here.\n\nContinue adding your project templates as required until you have the structure you would like. Once complete, it is time to build the solution, so select menu item Build=>Build Solution or press F6.\n\nNavigate to the Bin directory if your project, you will now see within it a .vsix project file. If you want to view inside the file, rename the extension to .zip, you can arrange directories here as well but this is where errors can occur. The VSIX file is all you need, so copy and paste this to the desktop and now an installation test can be carried out\n\n## Installing and Un-Installing on a Client Machine\n\n### Installing\n\nTo install the VSIX project on a machine, ensure that VS 2010 is installed and exited. You can install the VSIX template with VS still open, however it won’t appear until you close and restart VS. You will be presented with an Installation wizard asking which version of VS to install the templates projects to, select the appropriate ones and click Install. If you have generated all the files correctly, a success message will be shown:\n\nNow re-open VS and select new project navigate to your chosen sub-directory if you used one or look down the list of available templates and you should see your nested happily within them.\n\n### Un-Installing\n\nNow if you have just done a test project and you want to remove the template, it is extremely simple. Select menu option Tool=>Extension Manager.\n\nThe Extension Manager will appear showing all your extensions such as your custom template projects. Simply select the extension and select the Uninstall button. A prompt will appear to make sure you wish to uninstall it, simply click Yes. No restart of VS is required.\n\n## History\n\n* [1] 12/03/2012: Beta Release of EMGU project templates\n* [2] 27/032012: Official Release and article published",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4458639/Re-webpage-has-resulted-in-too-many-redirects.aspx",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00708-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\nCodeProject is currently in read-only mode. During this time discussion forums will not, unfortunately, be available.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Questions/534442/CallplusformplusmethodplusfromplususerplusControl?PageFlow=FixedWidth",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00708-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\n65,938 articles CodeProject is changing. Read more . Do not try and find the page. That’s impossible. Instead only try to realise the truth There is no page.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Tips/264570/Recycling-application-pools-on-shared-hosting",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00849-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\nI recently signed up for ASP.NET hosting on a server that uses LAMP as a front-end and proxies ASP.NET requests to a back-end IIS server. The setup actually works fine, and with a few hiccups (ASP.NET routing doesn't work, so I had to configure mod_rewrite instead), my site is working OK.\n One of the advantages to hosting on a pure IIS server is that it monitors filesystem activity, and when a page or assembly is modified, it reloads that file.\n This doesn't work with an Apache front-end, so the quickest workaround is to touch web.config.\n That's fine for forcing a re-read of a file, but if you need to clear the cache, or you have static variables that are persisting data and you want them cleared, you need to unload the running assembly.\n Alberto Venditti[^] wrote an excellent article, Recycling IIS 6.0 application pools programmatically[^] which proposes one programatic way to recycle the application pools; however, his approach requires knowing the name of the site as it is configured in IIS, and some other information to which you might not have access.\n My approach is simpler, and consists of a short Web Form:\n <%@ Page Language=\"C#\" AutoEventWireup=\"true\" CodeFile=\"recycle.aspx.cs\" Inherits=\"utility_recycle\" %> Unload AppDomain \n using System; using System.Web; public partial class utility_recycle : System.Web.UI.Page { public string Message; protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { HttpRuntime.UnloadAppDomain(); Message = \"Success\"; } catch (Exception ex) { Message = \"Failed: \" + ex.Message; } } }\n\nI recently signed up for ASP.NET hosting on a server that uses LAMP as a front-end and proxies ASP.NET requests to a back-end IIS server. The setup actually works fine, and with a few hiccups (ASP.NET routing doesn't work, so I had to configure mod_rewrite instead), my site is working OK.\n\nOne of the advantages to hosting on a pure IIS server is that it monitors filesystem activity, and when a page or assembly is modified, it reloads that file.\n\nThis doesn't work with an Apache front-end, so the quickest workaround is to `touch` web.config.\nThat's fine for forcing a re-read of a file, but if you need to clear the cache, or you have static variables that are persisting data and you want them cleared, you need to unload the running assembly.\n\nAlberto Venditti[^] wrote an excellent article, Recycling IIS 6.0 application pools programmatically[^] which proposes one programatic way to recycle the application pools; however, his approach requires knowing the name of the site as it is configured in IIS, and some other information to which you might not have access.\n\nMy approach is simpler, and consists of a short Web Form:\n\n> <%@ Page Language=\"C#\" AutoEventWireup=\"true\" CodeFile=\"recycle.aspx.cs\" Inherits=\"utility_recycle\" %> Unload AppDomain \n> using System; using System.Web; public partial class utility_recycle : System.Web.UI.Page { public string Message; protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { HttpRuntime.UnloadAppDomain(); Message = \"Success\"; } catch (Exception ex) { Message = \"Failed: \" + ex.Message; } } }",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?fid=1159&df=90&mpp=25&sort=Position&view=Normal&spc=Relaxed&prof=True&select=5577235&fr=66726",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00849-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\nCodeProject is currently in read-only mode. During this time discussion forums will not, unfortunately, be available.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Questions/644204/How-to-display-text-line-by-line-in-vb-net",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00566-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\n65,938 articles CodeProject is changing. Read more . Do not try and find the page. That’s impossible. Instead only try to realise the truth There is no page.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/messages/4478883/re-csharp-file.aspx",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00154-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\nCodeProject is currently in read-only mode. During this time discussion forums will not, unfortunately, be available.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/6580/The-New-CodeProject-Web-Farm",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00197-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\nIntroduction\n With the server cluster in the office creaking alarmingly, and our fibre connection to the outside world almost warm to the touch we decided that we had to bite the bullet and move the entire mess into a true hosting centre that would provide 24/7 support, backup power, and redundant internet connections.\n\n Thorough Planning makes a difference\n\n The first step in the move was to upgrade the hardware in-house and test to ensure the new servers were up to the task. We priced the main players and soon realised that only by selling our kidneys could we ever afford the required hardware. Our other option was to purchase rack mounted cases and build the machines ourselves using quality parts at affordable prices. Sure - it meant some late nights and a bit of driving around, but we're all certified geeks and can build a box blindfold in under 6 minutes. A quick call to our local supplier - the one with the unmarked entrance at the back of a block of units in a distant industrial area - and the gear was on it's way.\n That's when the trouble began.\n We only received a single case and enough parts to make up 2 boxes if we did without some of the fancy stuff such as monitor support and Ethernet. Not good. We decided to move ahead and build what we had to at least ensure that the rest of the shipment, should it decide to turn up, would be suitable. Leading the charge was Peter, our resident hardware / network / sysadmin / all-round legend, who had the system mostly built in no time but then popped out for an extended lunch and decided, for some extremely bizarre reason, to ask Bianca to finish up. Bianca handles all advertising accounts and marketing, plus pretty much anything else thrown her way. She's amazing. She isn't, however, experienced in building servers. Hands up who can see what's wrong with this picture:\n A hint: those are wire cutters she's holding.\n So it was decided that those who have the most experience in building boxes should be the ones to, well, build the boxes. There were words. There was some pushing and shoving. There was a disaster.\n\n This can't be good\n \"Yeah, Hi. Ummm....\"\n\n A New Beginning\n We tried to get replacement hardware but in the end it was decided that the chances of us getting the servers we originally envisioned in any manageable timeline, within budget, was simply not possible. What then ensued was the biggest call-out we as a group had ever done in our four years or building CodeProject and we came up with Gold.\n\n Dave in front of some of the boxed iPaqs. They were piled up everywhere.\n\n A friend of a friend of a... (you know how these things work) had a massive stock of superceded iPaqs. One thousand of the little tikes, to be exact. They'd been purchased by one of the larger Real Estate companies for use by their employees to provide customers with up-to-date information on homes while on the road. The problem is that none of the agents could use the devices, the application they were meant to use was no longer supported (or even worked half the time) and they'd simply given up and shipped them back. They were paid for, no one wanted them, so we ended up with the lot.\n And what can an iPaq do by itself? Not a lot. But a thousand 64Mb 206MHz series 3700 iPaqs could really start to make a bit of noise.\n\n CodeProject is alive!\n\n We initially investigated whether or not it was possible for an iPaq to handle even part of the site's load and quickly realised that the units could handle everything that we required a desktop system to handle. We initially considered a reasonably radical move of installing Linux on the iPaq's and using mySQL as the backend, but instead chose to use vxWeb as a base for a webserver, and use any one of a number of plugin VBScript interpreters to quickly put together a lean and mean CE based ASP web server. On the backend it was decided that SQL Server CE was the obvious choice since it meant an easy port.\n A single iPaq was not going to be of much use. We needed to cluster! Initially we figured this was probably not going to be possible but a number of solutions ranging from traditional dual-NIC clustering to a more ambitious IR based cluster were found. We had a ton of USB adapter cables so after a bit of slicing and splicing, lots of fiddling about and copious swearing we were on our way.\n\n - This is never gonna work- Shuddup and get in the truck\n - OK. Maybe you're right.\n\n Initial development time was around 3 weeks, physical build time and testing was around 2 months and the entire move from the office to the hosting facility took around 8 hours. I was able to call on the help of Dundas Software who had tons of previous experience in CE based development, and we were also able to port the .NET parts of the site to the .NET Compact Framework with only mild swearing.\n The Facility\n CodeProject's new home is the Telus facility on Laird in Toronto. It's a monster. 8 foot thick walls, ram-raid protection, underground fuel tanks with enough fuel to power the entire facility, fully stocked with all lights on for 3 weeks. Biometric security, pressure sensitive floors, multiple connections to major internet backbones and some seriously grumpy security guards.\n\n CodeProject's new home\n\n Smile! Yes Dave - they mean you.\n\n Unfortunately we were banned from taking any pictures inside the hosting facility itself (other than the one of Dave and I in the loading dock looking dubiously at the boxes). The one pic of the rows of racks above was taken in the one place there were no security cameras, and at the expense of having Bianca sit through a 20 minute detailed explanation of the fire retardant system by our helpful, but hard to shake, escort.\n The units themselves are mounted in custom sliding trays that are attached to the racks using traditional sliding rails. We use dual firewalls capable of handling up to 100MBit each, with automatic failover and restart. All switches are 100MBit for the external network, 1Gbit for the internal traffic. Each unit has it's own screen and can easily be lifted out of it's position in the tray, making a supplementary Keyboard/Video/Mouse unit unnecessary.\n Performance\n The increase in server capacity and network bandwidth saw an almost immediate increase in throughput. We're now able to serve more pages simultaneously with faster load times than ever before.\n Scalability is a non-issue as units can either be added, or old units removed and replaced in situ without affecting the rest of the cluster. We've squeezed the thousand units into a single standard rack and will be looking to lease a second rack in the near future to expand again. After the initial teething problems it's been a great experience.\n Issues\n Obviously something this complex isn't all sweetness and light. Some of you will remember issues with had when we had 6 servers. Server number 2, you will remember, was always playing up and was, in the end, declared cursed and unsalvageable. Our current setup essentially multiplies these problems. Currently servers 45, 234, 294, 536 and 785 are all showing signs of early senility, and servers 239, 455 and 901 have been used in baseball batting practice. There is a limit to our patience.\n Heat is another issue. We've had to install several large fans inside the rack to ensure that the batteries in the units, while charging, don't overheat. This has also allowed us to solve the other problem we had, namely dusty LCD screens. Coming in each day to clean a thousand dusty, fingerprint'd iPaq screens is simply no fun, but the constant airflow at least minimises the dust buildup.\n Cables coming loose has been a surprising entrant in the 'Most Annoying Thing' competition of '04. A close runner up has been the dropping-the-stylus-into-the-lower-rack-cavity. We ended up using the old bankers trick of having a single stylus inside the rack cabinet attached to a very long string.\n Conclusion\n Overall it's been a wonderful experience. We have more room in the office, you get a faster, more reliable website and we get to say \"Happy April Fools Day\".\n\n## Introduction\n\nWith the server cluster in the office creaking alarmingly, and our fibre connection to the outside world almost warm to the touch we decided that we had to bite the bullet and move the entire mess into a true hosting centre that would provide 24/7 support, backup power, and redundant internet connections.\n\n| |\n |\n| Thorough Planning makes a difference |\n\nThe first step in the move was to upgrade the hardware in-house and test to ensure the new servers were up to the task. We priced the main players and soon realised that only by selling our kidneys could we ever afford the required hardware. Our other option was to purchase rack mounted cases and build the machines ourselves using quality parts at affordable prices. Sure - it meant some late nights and a bit of driving around, but we're all certified geeks and can build a box blindfold in under 6 minutes. A quick call to our local supplier - the one with the unmarked entrance at the back of a block of units in a distant industrial area - and the gear was on it's way.\n\nThat's when the trouble began.\n\nWe only received a single case and enough parts to make up 2 boxes if we did without some of the fancy stuff such as monitor support and Ethernet. Not good. We decided to move ahead and build what we had to at least ensure that the rest of the shipment, should it decide to turn up, would be suitable. Leading the charge was Peter, our resident hardware / network / sysadmin / all-round legend, who had the system mostly built in no time but then popped out for an extended lunch and decided, for some extremely bizarre reason, to ask Bianca to finish up. Bianca handles all advertising accounts and marketing, plus pretty much anything else thrown her way. She's amazing. She isn't, however, experienced in building servers. Hands up who can see what's wrong with this picture:\n\nA hint: those are wire cutters she's holding.\n\nSo it was decided that those who have the most experience in building boxes should be the ones to, well, build the boxes. There were words. There was some pushing and shoving. There was a disaster.\n\n| |\n |\n| This can't be good | \"Yeah, Hi. Ummm....\" |\n\n## A New Beginning\n\nWe tried to get replacement hardware but in the end it was decided that the chances of us getting the servers we originally envisioned in any manageable timeline, within budget, was simply not possible. What then ensued was the biggest call-out we as a group had ever done in our four years or building CodeProject and we came up with Gold.\n\n| |\n |\n\nDave in front of some of the boxed iPaqs. They were piled up everywhere.\n\nA friend of a friend of a... (you know how these things work) had a massive stock of superceded iPaqs. One thousand of the little tikes, to be exact. They'd been purchased by one of the larger Real Estate companies for use by their employees to provide customers with up-to-date information on homes while on the road. The problem is that none of the agents could use the devices, the application they were meant to use was no longer supported (or even worked half the time) and they'd simply given up and shipped them back. They were paid for, no one wanted them, so we ended up with the lot.\n\nAnd what can an iPaq do by itself? Not a lot. But a thousand 64Mb 206MHz series 3700 iPaqs could really start to make a bit of noise.\n\n| |\n |\n| |\n\nWe initially investigated whether or not it was possible for an iPaq to handle even part of the site's load and quickly realised that the units could handle everything that we required a desktop system to handle. We initially considered a reasonably radical move of installing Linux on the iPaq's and using mySQL as the backend, but instead chose to use vxWeb as a base for a webserver, and use any one of a number of plugin VBScript interpreters to quickly put together a lean and mean CE based ASP web server. On the backend it was decided that SQL Server CE was the obvious choice since it meant an easy port.\n\nA single iPaq was not going to be of much use. We needed to cluster! Initially we figured this was probably not going to be possible but a number of solutions ranging from traditional dual-NIC clustering to a more ambitious IR based cluster were found. We had a ton of USB adapter cables so after a bit of slicing and splicing, lots of fiddling about and copious swearing we were on our way.\n\n| |\n |\n| - This is never gonna work | - OK. Maybe you're right. |\n\nInitial development time was around 3 weeks, physical build time and testing was around 2 months and the entire move from the office to the hosting facility took around 8 hours. I was able to call on the help of Dundas Software who had tons of previous experience in CE based development, and we were also able to port the .NET parts of the site to the .NET Compact Framework with only mild swearing.\n\n## The Facility\n\nCodeProject's new home is the Telus facility on Laird in Toronto. It's a monster. 8 foot thick walls, ram-raid protection, underground fuel tanks with enough fuel to power the entire facility, fully stocked with all lights on for 3 weeks. Biometric security, pressure sensitive floors, multiple connections to major internet backbones and some seriously grumpy security guards.\n\nCodeProject's new home\n\n Smile! Yes Dave - they mean you.\n\nUnfortunately we were banned from taking any pictures inside the hosting facility itself (other than the one of Dave and I in the loading dock looking dubiously at the boxes). The one pic of the rows of racks above was taken in the one place there were no security cameras, and at the expense of having Bianca sit through a 20 minute detailed explanation of the fire retardant system by our helpful, but hard to shake, escort.\n\nThe units themselves are mounted in custom sliding trays that are attached to the racks using traditional sliding rails. We use dual firewalls capable of handling up to 100MBit each, with automatic failover and restart. All switches are 100MBit for the external network, 1Gbit for the internal traffic. Each unit has it's own screen and can easily be lifted out of it's position in the tray, making a supplementary Keyboard/Video/Mouse unit unnecessary.\n\n## Performance\n\nThe increase in server capacity and network bandwidth saw an almost immediate increase in throughput. We're now able to serve more pages simultaneously with faster load times than ever before.\n\nScalability is a non-issue as units can either be added, or old units removed and replaced in situ without affecting the rest of the cluster. We've squeezed the thousand units into a single standard rack and will be looking to lease a second rack in the near future to expand again. After the initial teething problems it's been a great experience.\n\n## Issues\n\nObviously something this complex isn't all sweetness and light. Some of you will remember issues with had when we had 6 servers. Server number 2, you will remember, was always playing up and was, in the end, declared cursed and unsalvageable. Our current setup essentially multiplies these problems. Currently servers 45, 234, 294, 536 and 785 are all showing signs of early senility, and servers 239, 455 and 901 have been used in baseball batting practice. There is a limit to our patience.\n\nHeat is another issue. We've had to install several large fans inside the rack to ensure that the batteries in the units, while charging, don't overheat. This has also allowed us to solve the other problem we had, namely dusty LCD screens. Coming in each day to clean a thousand dusty, fingerprint'd iPaq screens is simply no fun, but the constant airflow at least minimises the dust buildup.\n\nCables coming loose has been a surprising entrant in the 'Most Annoying Thing' competition of '04. A close runner up has been the dropping-the-stylus-into-the-lower-rack-cavity. We ended up using the old bankers trick of having a single stylus inside the rack cabinet attached to a very long string.\n\n## Conclusion\n\nOverall it's been a wonderful experience. We have more room in the office, you get a faster, more reliable website and we get to say \"Happy April Fools Day\".",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ViewDownloads.aspx?aid=6228&zep=CSharpMidiToolkitV5_demo%2FSanford.Multimedia.Midi%2FDevice+Classes%2FOutputDevice+Classes%2FMidiOutCaps.cs&rzp=%2FKB%2Faudio-video%2FMIDIToolkit%2F%2Fcsharpmiditoolkitv5_demo.zip&pageflow=FixedWidth",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00335-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\n65,938 articles CodeProject is changing. Read more . Do not try and find the page. That’s impossible. Instead only try to realise the truth There is no page.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Questions/592802/Handlepluspostthreadmessage-plusinsideplusaplusthr",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00566-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\n65,938 articles CodeProject is changing. Read more . Do not try and find the page. That’s impossible. Instead only try to realise the truth There is no page.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3212151/Why-doesnt-the-AllowDrop-property-work-with-a-Text.aspx",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00154-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\nCodeProject is currently in read-only mode. During this time discussion forums will not, unfortunately, be available.",
"content_format": "markdown"
},
{
"url": "https://www.codeproject.com/Questions/561188/GridplusPageplusIndexplusserialplusnoplusnotpluswo",
"domain": "codeproject.com",
"file_source": "part-00556-d9b45f53-efdc-4ae8-a3e4-b1d5d9e13869-c000",
"content": "# \n\nDate: \nCategories: \nTags: \n\n65,938 articles CodeProject is changing. Read more . Do not try and find the page. That’s impossible. Instead only try to realise the truth There is no page.",
"content_format": "markdown"
}
]