---
license: cc-by-4.0
pretty_name: digitalmodel — Pipeline & Riser Integrity
tags:
- analysis-results
configs:
- config_name: wall_thickness
  data_files: wall_thickness.parquet
- config_name: wall_thickness_tension_moment
  data_files: wall_thickness_tension_moment.parquet
---

# digitalmodel — Pipeline & Riser Integrity

Analysis/computation results published for query + visualization via the Hugging Face
datasets-server API. Generated by `scripts/hf/save_results_to_hf.py`.

## Tables

| config | rows | cols |
|---|---|---|
| `wall_thickness` | 369 | 15 |
| `wall_thickness_tension_moment` | 354609 | 16 |

## Data-quality notes

Own computed analysis from the digitalmodel wall-thickness solver, reshaped to tidy rows by scripts/hf/build_capability_datasets.py. Reference pipe geometry only (323.9 mm OD, X65) - no client or project-specific data. wall_thickness: the original pressure-only sweep; per-check columns are sparse BY DESIGN because codes do not share a check set, so a null means the code defines no such check. wall_thickness_tension_moment (#1915): the same pipe swept over wall thickness x effective tension x bending moment across all nine codes, 354,609 rows; load ranges derived from capacity at the 18 mm mid-range wall (T_max = 0.6*T_y = 4.6498 MN, M_max = 0.6*M_y = 355.59 kN.m). It exists because the pressure-only sweep left the API-STD-2RD combined check at 0.0 everywhere; over these axes it spans 0 to 3.88 and GOVERNS at 30,855 points. Utilisation above 1.0 is retained deliberately. Screening only.

## Provenance

- Source repo: `vamseeachanta/digitalmodel`  ·  algorithm: `wall_thickness_screening+tension_moment_study`
- Schema version: `1.0.0`
- Source snapshots (sha256):

- `wall_thickness.json` — sha256 `8303ff5fdd91f15a…`
- `wall_thickness_tension_moment.json` — sha256 `f86193595d099087…`

Nulls are genuine missing values (non-finite floats were coerced to null). Load a table:
`pandas.read_parquet(hf_hub_download("aceengineer/digitalmodel-integrity", "<config>.parquet", repo_type="dataset"))`.