sol-max-v2 complete (36 ckpts); -data/-record repos; serving note

README.md

@@ -104,6 +104,17 @@ context window, so its score is a **floor, not a measurement**. This is a packag
 not a capability difference, and it is not uniform across cells — grok is 0/59 correct while
 sol-high is 39/57. Comparing across that boundary measures packaging.
 
+## The baseline row
+
+`Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B-Base` is in the manifest as `cell = BASELINE`, `hour = 0`,
+`driver_tokens_at_hour = 0` — the untrained model every cell started from, measured under the
+**same stock pi harness** as everything else on both suites. It is the `baseline_score` in the
+cost formula below; without it a "gain" has no zero point.
+
+It is well packaged: `eos_token_id = [248044, 248046]` (correct) and its chat template lives
+inside `tokenizer_config.json` rather than a separate `chat_template.jinja`, so it needs no
+eos-fixed variant.
+
 ## Cost per point of gain
 
 ```python