agentjudge-anon commited on
Commit
dc50927
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 9b289b4

docs: publish audited baseline prompt protocol

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. baseline_prompts.md +107 -0
baseline_prompts.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Audited baseline prompts and run protocol
2
+
3
+ Source: `general_agent_judge/graders/baselines.py`
4
+
5
+ Source SHA-256: `385e33c73a4c371876945380ce8bb1871cbd01ab1b584f2a41e14aed601fc9af`
6
+
7
+ ## Scope
8
+
9
+ The prompts below are extracted from the executable grader classes. The
10
+ configuration in this document defines the **new audited rerun protocol**. It
11
+ does not retroactively establish the model identifiers or sampling parameters
12
+ of the historical reported runs. In particular, the archived code does not
13
+ preserve a complete historical 8-pass harness, so no same-backbone or
14
+ prompt-invariant interpretation is claimed for the previously reported margin.
15
+
16
+ ## LLM-as-Judge
17
+
18
+ - Model ID for audited reruns: `qwen3.7-plus`
19
+ - Temperature: `0.1`
20
+ - Maximum output tokens: `256`
21
+ - Passes: `1`
22
+
23
+ System prompt:
24
+
25
+ ```text
26
+ You are an evaluator. Given a task description and an agent's response, determine whether the agent successfully completed the task.
27
+
28
+ Output ONLY a JSON object: {"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "confidence": 0.0-1.0, "reason": "brief explanation"}
29
+ ```
30
+
31
+ User prompt:
32
+
33
+ ```text
34
+ ## Task
35
+ {question}
36
+
37
+ ## Reference Answer
38
+ {reference_answer}
39
+
40
+ ## Agent Response
41
+ {agent_response}
42
+
43
+ ## Agent Status: success
44
+
45
+ Did the agent successfully complete the task? Respond with JSON: {"verdict": "pass"/"fail", "confidence": 0.0-1.0, "reason": "..."}
46
+ ```
47
+
48
+ ## Agent-as-Judge
49
+
50
+ - Model ID for audited reruns: `qwen3.7-plus`
51
+ - Temperature: `0.1`
52
+ - Maximum output tokens: `512`
53
+ - Passes: `1`
54
+
55
+ System prompt:
56
+
57
+ ```text
58
+ You are an expert evaluator assessing whether an AI agent successfully completed a given task. You will be provided with:
59
+ 1. The task description
60
+ 2. Reference answer / expected outcome
61
+ 3. Checkpoints that should be satisfied
62
+ 4. The agent's response and execution details
63
+
64
+ Evaluate thoroughly and output ONLY a JSON object:
65
+ {"verdict": "pass" or "fail", "score": 0.0-1.0, "confidence": 0.0-1.0, "checkpoints_met": [true/false for each], "reason": "detailed explanation"}
66
+ ```
67
+
68
+ User prompt:
69
+
70
+ ```text
71
+ ## Task
72
+ {question}
73
+
74
+ ## Reference Answer
75
+ {reference_answer}
76
+
77
+ ## Checkpoints (2 items)
78
+ - {checkpoint_1}
79
+ - {checkpoint_2}
80
+ ## Agent Response
81
+ {agent_response}
82
+
83
+ ## Execution Details
84
+ - Status: success
85
+ - Steps: 12
86
+ - Tokens: 3456
87
+ - Wall time: 7.8s
88
+
89
+ ## Tool Calls (1 total)
90
+ ✓ {tool_name}(123ms)
91
+
92
+ Evaluate whether the agent successfully completed the task. Respond with JSON.
93
+ ```
94
+
95
+ ## 8-pass ensemble
96
+
97
+ The ensemble repeats the LLM-as-Judge prompt exactly eight times.
98
+
99
+ - Model ID for audited reruns: `qwen3.7-plus`
100
+ - Temperature: `0.7`
101
+ - Maximum output tokens per pass: `256`
102
+ - Passes: `8`
103
+ - Aggregation: strict majority vote; a `4–4` tie is failure
104
+
105
+ This setting is implemented by `EightPassEnsembleBaselineGrader`. It is a
106
+ prospective, reproducible configuration and does not retroactively establish
107
+ the missing temperature or harness metadata for the historical reported runs.