Datasets:
Remove obsolete 200GB target policy
Browse files
dataset_guide/TARGET_200GB_POLICY.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
# 200GB Dataset Target Policy
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
## Target
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
The final public dataset target is 200GB total, packaged as ten balanced
|
| 6 |
-
20GB-class checkpoints.
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
```text
|
| 9 |
-
dataset/
|
| 10 |
-
checkpoint_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS_bundleNN_20g/
|
| 11 |
-
dataset/
|
| 12 |
-
checkpoint_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS_bundleNN_20g.jsonl
|
| 13 |
-
```
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
Each checkpoint folder must contain exactly one dataset JSONL file. Tokenizer,
|
| 16 |
-
Dense, MoE, generation notes, reports, and checksums live outside checkpoint
|
| 17 |
-
folders.
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
## Current Contract
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
- Global duplicate policy: exact `text` duplicate count must be zero across the
|
| 22 |
-
curated stream.
|
| 23 |
-
- Bundle duplicate policy: in-bundle duplicate count must be zero.
|
| 24 |
-
- Format: JSONL only.
|
| 25 |
-
- Required field: non-empty `text`.
|
| 26 |
-
- Preferred metadata: `domain`, `difficulty`, `meta.lang`, `meta.source`,
|
| 27 |
-
repository/file context when available.
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
## Quality Order
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
Use this order when deciding what enters the 200GB target:
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
1. Real public code FIM from The Stack v2 family already staged in
|
| 34 |
-
`data/v2_shards`.
|
| 35 |
-
2. Verified high-quality Grok/Codex synthetic FIM and code completion records.
|
| 36 |
-
3. Deduped synthetic `code_gen` records with useful executable or idiomatic code.
|
| 37 |
-
4. Small public benchmark/instruction datasets only as a limited evaluation or
|
| 38 |
-
style slice, not as bulk pretraining data.
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
Avoid adding public datasets only because they are large. Do not use gated or
|
| 41 |
-
license-ambiguous sources as bulk input unless their access terms are explicitly
|
| 42 |
-
accepted and recorded.
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
## Target Mix
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
For a code completion/FIM model, prefer this approximate mix over the full
|
| 47 |
-
200GB:
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
| Source class | Target share | Reason |
|
| 50 |
-
|---|---:|---|
|
| 51 |
-
| Real public code FIM | 60-70% | Teaches real repository structure, APIs, style, imports |
|
| 52 |
-
| Synthetic FIM | 20-30% | Teaches clean middle reconstruction and tab-completion shape |
|
| 53 |
-
| High-quality code generation | 10-15% | Teaches continuation, algorithms, tests, and explanations |
|
| 54 |
-
| Bench/instruction slices | <=5% | Keeps reasoning formats visible without polluting pretraining |
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
The mix should be enforced by streaming selection and dataloader weights, not
|
| 57 |
-
by duplicating files on disk.
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
-
## SSD-Safe Build Rule
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
Never materialize the whole 200GB dataset twice. The safe loop is:
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
-
1. Keep source pools in hidden staging folders.
|
| 64 |
-
2. Stream records through the disk-backed `seen.db`.
|
| 65 |
-
3. Fill `data/curated_upload` only until there is enough for one 20GB bundle.
|
| 66 |
-
4. Build one checkpoint by streaming selected parts into
|
| 67 |
-
`dataset/<checkpoint>/dataset/<checkpoint>.jsonl` and deleting each source
|
| 68 |
-
part after it is appended.
|
| 69 |
-
5. Upload that checkpoint to Hugging Face.
|
| 70 |
-
6. Copy that checkpoint to Google Drive Desktop and wait for Drive sync.
|
| 71 |
-
7. Delete the local workspace checkpoint after HF is verified and Drive has a
|
| 72 |
-
local copy; delete the Drive local copy only after cloud sync is verified.
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
## Google Drive Verification Rule
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
Google Drive Desktop local copy is not the same as cloud upload completion.
|
| 77 |
-
Cloud completion is confirmed only when DriveFS metadata no longer shows local
|
| 78 |
-
placeholder IDs for the JSONL files and the Drive app has no pending sync/error
|
| 79 |
-
state for the checkpoint.
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
## Public HF Candidate Policy
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
Current HF Hub candidates observed for code data include:
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
-
- `bigcode/the-stack-v2`: high-priority real code, gated auto, license `other`.
|
| 86 |
-
- `bigcode/the-stack-v2-dedup`: high-priority dedup variant, gated auto.
|
| 87 |
-
- `bigcode/starcoderdata`: older high-volume code source, gated auto.
|
| 88 |
-
- `code-search-net/code_search_net`: smaller, useful for docstring/function
|
| 89 |
-
style and evaluation slices.
|
| 90 |
-
- `codeparrot/apps` and `deepmind/code_contests`: useful for algorithmic
|
| 91 |
-
problem-solving slices, not bulk repository pretraining.
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
Bulk additions from HF must pass license/access review, schema inspection,
|
| 94 |
-
secret filtering, exact dedup, and small-sample quality inspection before they
|
| 95 |
-
enter `data/curated_upload`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|