Datasets:
Add dense architecture docs
Browse files- dense/README.md +28 -0
- dense/TRAINING_PLAN.md +19 -0
dense/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Dense Architecture
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
The Dense model is the control baseline for this dataset. It should use the
|
| 4 |
+
same tokenizer, data order, validation split, context length, and optimizer
|
| 5 |
+
family as MoE so architecture changes can be compared cleanly.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
## Recommended Structure
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
- Decoder-only Transformer.
|
| 10 |
+
- RMSNorm.
|
| 11 |
+
- RoPE positional encoding.
|
| 12 |
+
- Grouped-query attention for lower KV-cache cost.
|
| 13 |
+
- SwiGLU feed-forward blocks.
|
| 14 |
+
- Tied embedding/head only after validation.
|
| 15 |
+
- Native support for FIM tokens.
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
## Evaluation
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
Track:
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
- Next-token validation loss.
|
| 22 |
+
- FIM middle exact match.
|
| 23 |
+
- FIM edit distance.
|
| 24 |
+
- Syntax parse rate for languages where parsers are available.
|
| 25 |
+
- Completion latency and tokens/sec.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
If Dense does not learn a checkpoint cleanly, inspect data schema, tokenizer,
|
| 28 |
+
and objective mix before scaling MoE.
|
dense/TRAINING_PLAN.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Dense Training Plan
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
## Setup
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
Use the same JSONL checkpoint bundle as MoE. Keep random seed, batch token
|
| 6 |
+
target, learning-rate schedule, and validation split aligned.
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
## Curriculum
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
1. Start with short and medium records.
|
| 11 |
+
2. Add long FIM examples.
|
| 12 |
+
3. Add continuation/code generation records.
|
| 13 |
+
4. Evaluate FIM and next-token loss separately.
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
## Stop Conditions
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
- Validation loss diverges twice after LR reduction.
|
| 18 |
+
- FIM metrics regress while train loss improves.
|
| 19 |
+
- Tokenizer round-trip or special-token audit fails.
|