Update README.md

README.md

@@ -48,6 +48,16 @@ configs:
   - split: noncommercial
     path: data/noncommercial-*
 pretty_name: Biomed-Enriched
+language:
+- en
+- fr
+- es
+- zh
+- de
+- it
+- pt
+- ko
+- ru
 ---
 ![Biomed-Enriched](logo.png)
 
@@ -115,27 +125,27 @@ The dataset was created using a two-stage annotation framework:
 
 1. **Initial Annotation by Large Language Model**:
 
-   * Annotated a subset of paragraphs for the following categories:
+* Annotated a subset of paragraphs for the following categories:
    
-     - **Document Type**: Categorizes the structure and purpose of the content.
-       - **Clinical Case**: Detailed report of symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of individual patients.
-       - **Study**: Research paragraph with methods, results, and discussion of experiments or observations.
-       - **Review**: Summary or synthesis of current knowledge on a specific topic.
-       - **Other**: Content not fitting above categories (editorials, commentaries, policy paragraphs).
-     - **Domain**: Identifies the subject area focus.
-       - **Clinical**: Content relating to patient care, clinical trials, case reports, or practice guidelines.
-       - **Biomedical**: Scientific aspects of medicine and biology.
-       - **Other**: Content mentioning biomedical topics but focusing on administrative, policy, or general communications.
-     - **Educational Quality**: Assesses pedagogical value for college-level biomedical learning on a scale from 1 (minimal value) to 5 (exceptional value) inspired by FineWeb-edu.
-       - **Score 1**: Basic information relevant to biomedical topics, may contain irrelevant content.
-       - **Score 2**: Addresses biomedical education elements but with limitations in coherence or depth.
-       - **Score 3**: Appropriate for college-level curricula, introduces key concepts with reasonable coherence.
-       - **Score 4**: Highly relevant educational content with clear writing style, minimal irrelevant information.
-       - **Score 5**: Outstanding educational value, detailed reasoning with profound insights for college-level learning.
+ - **Document Type**: Categorizes the structure and purpose of the content.
+   - **Clinical Case**: Detailed report of symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of individual patients.
+   - **Study**: Research paragraph with methods, results, and discussion of experiments or observations.
+   - **Review**: Summary or synthesis of current knowledge on a specific topic.
+   - **Other**: Content not fitting above categories (editorials, commentaries, policy paragraphs).
+ - **Domain**: Identifies the subject area focus.
+   - **Clinical**: Content relating to patient care, clinical trials, case reports, or practice guidelines.
+   - **Biomedical**: Scientific aspects of medicine and biology.
+   - **Other**: Content mentioning biomedical topics but focusing on administrative, policy, or general communications.
+ - **Educational Quality**: Assesses pedagogical value for college-level biomedical learning on a scale from 1 (minimal value) to 5 (exceptional value) inspired by FineWeb-edu.
+   - **Score 1**: Basic information relevant to biomedical topics, may contain irrelevant content.
+   - **Score 2**: Addresses biomedical education elements but with limitations in coherence or depth.
+   - **Score 3**: Appropriate for college-level curricula, introduces key concepts with reasonable coherence.
+   - **Score 4**: Highly relevant educational content with clear writing style, minimal irrelevant information.
+   - **Score 5**: Outstanding educational value, detailed reasoning with profound insights for college-level learning.
 
 2. **Annotation Scaling via Model Distillation**:
 
-   * These annotations were distilled into a XLM-RoBERTa-base model, enabling scalability to the entire PMC dataset.
+* These annotations were distilled into a XLM-RoBERTa-base model, enabling scalability to the entire PMC dataset.
 
 ## Annotation Statistics