| <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
|
| "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
|
| <html lang="en">
|
|
|
| <head>
|
| <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
|
|
|
|
|
| <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
|
| <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
|
| <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
|
| <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
|
|
|
| <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
|
| <script>
|
| window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
|
| function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
|
| gtag('js', new Date());
|
| gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
|
| </script>
|
|
|
| <TITLE>Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Ram @ Guddu Kumar Ram vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opposite ... on 20 February, 2023</TITLE>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| </head>
|
| <body class="docpage">
|
|
|
| <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
|
|
|
| <header class="main-header" role="banner">
|
| <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
|
| <div class="header-container">
|
|
|
|
|
| <div class="header-logo">
|
| <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
|
|
|
|
|
| <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| </a>
|
| </div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <div class="header-search" role="search">
|
| <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
|
| <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
|
| <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
|
| <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
|
| placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
|
| value="" autocomplete="off">
|
| <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
|
| </form>
|
| </div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <div class="header-nav">
|
|
|
| <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
|
| <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
|
|
|
| <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
|
| <div class="premium-dropdown">
|
| <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
|
| Premium
|
| <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
|
| <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
|
| </svg>
|
| </button>
|
| <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
|
| <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
|
|
|
| </div>
|
| </div>
|
| <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
|
| <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
|
|
|
| <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
|
|
|
|
|
| </nav>
|
|
|
|
|
| <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
|
| <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
|
| <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
|
| <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
|
| <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
|
| </svg>
|
| </button>
|
| </div>
|
| </div>
|
|
|
|
|
| <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
|
| <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
|
| <div class="mobile-menu-content">
|
|
|
| <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
|
| <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
|
| <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
|
| <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
|
|
|
| </div>
|
| <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
|
| <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
|
|
|
| <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
|
|
|
|
|
| </div>
|
| </nav>
|
| </header>
|
|
|
| <main id="main-content" role="main">
|
|
|
|
|
| <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <div class="maindoc">
|
| <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
|
| <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
|
| <div id="structuralanal"></div>
|
| <div id="citetextdash"></div>
|
| </aside>
|
| <article class="middle_column" role="article">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <div class="ad_doc">
|
| <a href="/members/signup/">
|
| <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
|
| alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
|
| </a>
|
|
|
|
|
| </div>
|
|
|
|
|
| <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
|
| <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
|
| <form method="POST" action="/doc/121023934/" class="button-form">
|
| <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="BhZkb5D4MsWTU4wkW3GBBWzuoTYdS0kVZlac4jTpVTaNTKaCPPWGm3Dhd2itkVkO">
|
| <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
|
| <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
|
| </form>
|
| <form method="POST" action="/doc/121023934/" class="button-form">
|
| <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="BhZkb5D4MsWTU4wkW3GBBWzuoTYdS0kVZlac4jTpVTaNTKaCPPWGm3Dhd2itkVkO">
|
| <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
|
| <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
|
| </form>
|
|
|
| <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/121023934/" class="button-form">
|
| <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="BhZkb5D4MsWTU4wkW3GBBWzuoTYdS0kVZlac4jTpVTaNTKaCPPWGm3Dhd2itkVkO">
|
| <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
|
| <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
|
| </form>
|
|
|
| </nav>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <div class="judgments">
|
|
|
|
|
| <div class="covers">
|
| <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:121023934">38</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:121023934">0</a>]</span>
|
|
|
| </div>
|
|
|
| <h3 class="docsource_main">Jharkhand High Court</h3>
|
| <h2 class="doc_title">Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Ram @ Guddu Kumar Ram vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opposite ... on 20 February, 2023</h2>
|
|
|
| <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:rajesh-kumar">Rajesh Kumar</a></h3>
|
|
|
| <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:rajesh-kumar">Rajesh Kumar</a></h3>
|
|
|
| <pre id="pre_1"> IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| B. A. No. 11701 of 2022
|
| ....
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1"> Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Ram @ Guddu Kumar Ram .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_2"> CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 05/20.02.2023 The applicant who is in custody since 11.07.2022 has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_2"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with POCSO Case No.66/2022 arising
|
| out of Panki P.S. Case No.69/2022, for the offence under <a href="/doc/1279834/" id="a_1">Sections 376</a>/ <a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_2">34</a> of IPC
|
| and <a href="/doc/26275631/" id="a_3">Sections 4</a> and <a href="/doc/188860642/" id="a_4">8</a> of the POCSO Act and cognizance has been taken under
|
| <a href="/doc/619940/" id="a_5">Sections 363</a>/ <a href="/doc/9545/" id="a_6">376D</a> of IPC and <a href="/doc/183539218/" id="a_7">Section 6</a> read with <a href="/doc/179053037/" id="a_8">section 5(g)</a> of the POCSO Act.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_3"> The applicant is an accused of committing rape.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_4"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_5"> Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
|
| participation in the trial. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_6"> Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant and
|
| submitted that the victim girls have supported the allegation in their statements
|
| recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C.
|
| </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_7"> Considering the materials available on record, I am not inclined to
|
| enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail of the
|
| applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_8"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1"> B. A. No. 11727 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_3"> Albert Topno .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kr. Rai, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. S.K.Tiwari, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 05/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 21.06.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_9"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Torpa P.S. Case No.62/2022,
|
| corresponding to G.R. No.453/2022, for the offence under <a href="/doc/144724096/" id="a_9">Sections 25</a>(1-B)a/
|
| 25(6)/ 26/ 35 of the <a href="/doc/1934415/" id="a_10">Arms Act</a> and <a href="/doc/1732853/" id="a_11">Section 17</a> of the C.L.A. Act.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_10"> The applicant has been apprehended with one country made loaded pistol
|
| and one mobile phone.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_11"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_12"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that this applicant has no criminal antecedent. On above basis, prayer for
|
| bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_13"> Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the period of custody and the fact that the applicant has no
|
| criminal antecedent, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the
|
| applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bond of
|
| Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
|
| satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Khunti in connection with Torpa P.S. Case
|
| No.62/2022, corresponding to G.R. No.453/2022, on the condition that the
|
| applicant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit
|
| his mobile number before the learned court below which he will always keep active
|
| and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the
|
| court.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_14"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_2"> B. A. No. 11730 of 2022</span>
|
| ....</p><pre id="pre_4">
|
| Shivu Munda @ Shibu Munda @ Shiba Munda .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Chaturvedy, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Spl. P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 05/20.02.2023 The applicant who is in custody since 24.05.2022 has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_15"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Maranghada P.S. Case
|
| No.29/2022, corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No.48/2022, for the offence under
|
| <a href="/doc/1046310/" id="a_12">Sections 15(C)</a>/ <a href="/doc/263398/" id="a_13">22</a>/ <a href="/doc/1089586/" id="a_14">25</a> of the N.D.P.S. Act.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_16"> The applicant has been apprehended with 1473.7 kgs Doda.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_17"> Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
|
| participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant
|
| that as per allegation he was loading the said narcotics and he is simple labourer
|
| and he was not aware regarding the contents of the material. Further, the applicant
|
| has no criminal antecedent. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_18"> Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant and
|
| submitted that commercial quantity was being loaded for the purpose of
|
| transportation and as such the applicant is not entitled for relief as per the mandate
|
| of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_15">Section 37</a> of the N.D.P.S. Act.
|
| </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_19"> Having heard learned counsel for the parties and from perusal of record,
|
| it appears that the applicant has been caught with commercial quantity of narcotics.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_20"> Considering the mandate of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_16">Section 37</a> of the N.D.P.S. Act, I am not
|
| inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail
|
| of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_21"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_3"> B. A. No. 11733 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_22"> 1. Raman Bhuiyan
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_23"> 2. Sandip Kumar @ Sandip Bhiuyan @ Sandeep Kumar .... Petitioners
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_5"> CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioners : Mr. B.K.Dubey, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mrs. Mahua Palit, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicants, who are in custody since 01.07.2022, have approached
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_24"> this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Mayurhand P.S. Case
|
| No.41/2022, corresponding to G.R. No.2095/2022, for the offence under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_17">Sections
|
| 302</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_18">34</a> of IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_25"> The applicants are accused of committing murder.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_26"> Innocence of the applicants have been claimed and undertaking have
|
| been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel
|
| for the applicants that as per the allegation, nine person have been made accused
|
| for throwing bricks and stones and one stone has hit the deceased that is the cause
|
| of her death. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_27"> Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicants.
|
| Considering the narratives and period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge
|
| the applicants on bail. Accordingly, the applicants are directed to be released on
|
| bail, on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two
|
| sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Chatra
|
| in connection with Mayurhand P.S. Case No.41/2022, corresponding to G.R.
|
| No.2095/2022, on the condition that the applicants will submit self-attested
|
| photocopy of their Aadhaar Card and also submit their mobile number before the
|
| learned court below which they will always keep active and will not change it
|
| during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_28"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_4"> B. A. No. 11737 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_6"> Manish Chandravanshi .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Chaturvedi, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant who is in custody since 23.07.2022 has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_29"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Rehla P.S. Case No.84/2022,
|
| corresponding to G.R. Case No.1459/2022, for the offence under <a href="/doc/1279834/" id="a_19">Section 376</a> of
|
| IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_30"> The applicant is an accused of committing rape upon the victim and the
|
| applicant is close relative to her.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_31"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_32"> Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
|
| participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant
|
| that both the parties are major and there is no independent witness. Further, the
|
| parties have settled their dispute also. On above basis, prayer for bail has been
|
| made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_33"> Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the statement of the victim and the relationship between the
|
| parties, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly prayer for
|
| bail of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_34"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_5"> B. A. No. 11743 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_7"> Jitendra Biyar .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 02.07.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_35"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.294/2021 arising out of
|
| Ramna P.S. Case No.46/2021, for the offence under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_20">Sections 302</a>/ <a href="/doc/386021/" id="a_21">201</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_22">34</a> of IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_36"> The applicant is an accused of committing murder.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_37"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that F.I.R. is against unknown. He has been roped in on the confession of
|
| the co-accused and subsequently, he has been arrested and self-confession has been
|
| extracted. The co-accused facing the split-up trial has already been enlarged on
|
| bail. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_38"> Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the fact that except confession, there is no material against
|
| this applicant, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the
|
| applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bond of
|
| Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
|
| satisfaction of learned Addl. District Judge, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection
|
| with S.T. No.294/2021 arising out of Ramna P.S. Case No.46/2021, on the
|
| condition that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card
|
| and also submit his mobile number before the learned court below which he will
|
| always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without
|
| prior permission of the court.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_39"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_6"> B. A. No.11797 of 2022</span>
|
| ....</p><pre id="pre_8">
|
| Deepak Kumar @ Bhikhan Ganjhu .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Chaturvedi, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 14.07.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_40"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case No.38/2020,
|
| for the offence under <a href="/doc/1258372/" id="a_23">Sections 147</a>/ <a href="/doc/763672/" id="a_24">148</a>/ <a href="/doc/999134/" id="a_25">149</a>/ <a href="/doc/1208971/" id="a_26">353</a>/ <a href="/doc/455468/" id="a_27">307</a>/ <a href="/doc/1133601/" id="a_28">325</a> and <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_29">333</a> of IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_41"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_42"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that this applicant has been roped in on the basis of confession of the co-
|
| accused. Some of the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail. On
|
| above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_43"> Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the above fact, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.
|
| Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail
|
| bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
|
| satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Chatra in connection with Piparwar P.S. Case
|
| No.38/2020, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy
|
| of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the learned court
|
| below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of
|
| this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_44"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_7"> B. A. No.11808 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_9"> Ritesh Lugun @ Natwar .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 28.07.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_45"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Arki P.S. Case No.14/2022,
|
| corresponding to G.R. No.356/2022(A), for the offence under <a href="/doc/1089586/" id="a_30">Sections 25</a>(1-B)a/
|
| 25(6)/ 26 of the <a href="/doc/1934415/" id="a_31">Arms Act</a> and <a href="/doc/1732853/" id="a_32">Section 17</a> of the C.L.A. Act.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_46"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_47"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that this applicant has been roped in on the basis of confession of the
|
| apprehended co-accused. The said apprehended co-accused has already been
|
| enlarged on bail. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_48"> Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the above fact, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.
|
| Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail
|
| bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
|
| satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Khunti in connection with Arki P.S. Case
|
| No.14/2022, corresponding to G.R. No.356/2022(A), on the condition that the
|
| applicant will submit self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit
|
| his mobile number before the learned court below which he will always keep active
|
| and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the
|
| court.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_49"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_8"> B. A. No.11814 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_10"> Pawan Kumar .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Tapas Roy, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_50"> The applicant, who is in custody since 21.05.2022, has approached this
|
| Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Meharma P.S. Case No.125 of
|
| 2019, corresponding to G.R. No.324 of 2022, registered for the offence under
|
| <a href="/doc/105503/" id="a_33">Sections 417</a>/ <a href="/doc/988620/" id="a_34">406</a>/ <a href="/doc/556166/" id="a_35">468</a> & <a href="/doc/1436241/" id="a_36">420</a>/ <a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_37">34</a> of the Indian Penal Code.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_51"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_52"> It appears that the applicant has been made accused for taking money
|
| from the complainant for providing job. It has been alleged that neither the job has
|
| been provided nor the money has been returned to the complainant.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_53"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_54"> Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the
|
| applicant.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_55"> Considering the period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant
|
| on bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his
|
| furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
|
| amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda in
|
| connection with Meharma P.S. Case No.125 of 2019, corresponding to G.R.
|
| No.324 of 2022, on the condition that the applicant and the applicant will submit
|
| self-attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number
|
| before the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not
|
| change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_56"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_9"> B. A. No.11908 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_11"> Murshid Alam @ Lal Babu .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Yadu Nandan Mishra, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. V.S.Sahay, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 07/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 05.05.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_57"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.397/2022 arising
|
| out of Chauparan P.S. Case No.121/2022, corresponding to G.R. Case
|
| No.1407/2022, registered for the offence under <a href="/doc/1535430/" id="a_38">Section 328</a>/ <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_39">302</a>/ <a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_40">120B</a> & <a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_41">34</a> of
|
| IPC and charge sheet has been submitted under <a href="/doc/92983/" id="a_42">Section 306</a> of IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_58"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_59"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that as per the medical report, it is a case of poisoning and no external
|
| injury has been found. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_60"> Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the above fact, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.
|
| Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail
|
| bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
|
| satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI, Hazaribag in connection with S.T.
|
| Case No.397/2022 arising out of Chauparan P.S. Case No.121/2022, corresponding
|
| to G.R. Case No.1407/2022, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-
|
| attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before
|
| the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it
|
| during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_61"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_10"> B. A. No. 11975 of 2022</span>
|
| ....</p><pre id="pre_12">
|
| Sunil Chouhan @ Sunil Kumar Chauhan @ Sunil Chauhan .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, Sr. Adv.
|
| Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P.
|
| For the Informant : Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Adv.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant who is in custody since 04.07.2022 has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_62"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.300/2022 arising
|
| out of Kandi P.S. Case No.49/2022, corresponding to G.R. Case No.1374/2022, for
|
| the offence under <a href="/doc/653797/" id="a_43">Sections 304-B</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_44">34</a> of IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_63"> It has been submitted by learned senior counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_64"> Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
|
| participation in the trial. Referring to the case diary, it has been submitted by
|
| learned senior counsel for the applicant that the witnesses have clearly stated that it
|
| is a case of suicide. Further, no external injury has been found. On above basis,
|
| prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_65"> Learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the
|
| prayer for bail of the applicant and submitted that it is a case of unnatural death and
|
| there was continuous demand of dowry and the death has taken within a year of the
|
| marriage.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_66"> Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_67"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_11"> B. A. No. 11978 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_13"> Rohit Murmu .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Shekhar, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant who is in custody since 25.06.2022 has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_68"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Borio P.S. Case No.154/2022, for
|
| the offence under <a href="/doc/1089586/" id="a_45">Sections 25</a>(1-B)a/ 26 & 35 of the <a href="/doc/1934415/" id="a_46">Arms Act</a>.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_69"> The applicant has been apprehended with three country made rifles and
|
| one country made pistol.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_70"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_71"> Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
|
| participation in the trial. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_72"> Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the recovery, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_73"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_12"> B. A. No.11979 of 2022</span>
|
| ....</p><pre id="pre_14">
|
| Md. Saddam Ansari @ Saddam Ansari .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 28.07.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_74"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.712/2022 arising
|
| out of Jharia P.S. Case No.97/2022, corresponding to G.R. Case No.2118/2022, for
|
| the offence under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_47">Sections 302</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_48">34</a> & <a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_49">120-B</a> of IPC and <a href="/doc/1089586/" id="a_50">Sections 25</a>(1-B)a/ 26/ 27
|
| & 35 of the <a href="/doc/1934415/" id="a_51">Arms Act</a>.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_75"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_76"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown. Subsequently, this applicant
|
| has been roped in on the confession and as per the prosecution story, this applicant
|
| has given information regarding the movement of the deceased and for which he
|
| has received Rs.30,000/- as reward. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_77"> Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing
|
| bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
|
| to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI, Dhanbad in connection with
|
| S.T. Case No.712/2022 arising out of Jharia P.S. Case No.97/2022, corresponding
|
| to G.R. Case No.2118/2022, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-
|
| attested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before
|
| the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it
|
| during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_78"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_13"> B. A. No.11980 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_15"> Krishna Ganjhu .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 04/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 11.06.2021, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_79"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.315/2019 arising
|
| out of Basishth Nagar P.S. Case No.32/2010, for the offence under <a href="/doc/1258372/" id="a_52">Sections 147</a>/
|
| <a href="/doc/763672/" id="a_53">148</a>/ <a href="/doc/999134/" id="a_54">149</a>/ <a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_55">341</a>/ <a href="/doc/1243353/" id="a_56">342</a>/ <a href="/doc/1011035/" id="a_57">323</a>/ <a href="/doc/1133601/" id="a_58">325</a>/ <a href="/doc/455468/" id="a_59">307</a>/ <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_60">302</a> of IPC and <a href="/doc/1732853/" id="a_61">Sections 17(i)(ii)</a> of the C.L.A.
|
| Act.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_80"> The applicant is an accused of committing murder.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_81"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that general and omnibus allegation has been made against several
|
| persons. Further, the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail which
|
| has been brought on record. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_82"> Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the above facts and the period of custody, I am inclined to
|
| enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released
|
| on bail, on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties
|
| of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Chatra
|
| in connection with S.T. Case No.315/2019 arising out of Basishth Nagar P.S. Case
|
| No.32/2010, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-attested photocopy
|
| of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the learned court
|
| below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of
|
| this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_83"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_14"> B. A. No.11987 of 2022</span>
|
| ....</p><pre id="pre_16">
|
| Daroga Yadav @ Daroga Singh Yadav .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, Sr. Adv.
|
| Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. P.D.Agrawal, Spl. P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 05/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 03.07.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_84"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Garhwa Nagar P.S. Case
|
| No.254/2022, corresponding to G.R. Case No.1333/2022, for the offence under
|
| <a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_62">Sections 341</a>/ <a href="/doc/1011035/" id="a_63">323</a>/ <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_64">302</a>/ <a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_65">120-B</a> and <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_66">506</a> of IPC and <a href="/doc/244673/" id="a_67">Section 27</a> of the Arms Act.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_85"> It has been submitted by learned senior counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_86"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned senior counsel
|
| for the applicant that the F.I.R. of this case was lodged against eight named accused
|
| including the applicant with the allegations that the husband of the informant Shiv
|
| Singh Yadav was coming to his house from market by the motorcycle and at the
|
| distance of 100 metres from the house of informant adjoining to the newly
|
| constructed road Daroga Singh Yadav along with his two sons Pankaj @ Suraj and
|
| Rahul and also along with his three daughters Vandna Devi, Tara Devi and Chanda
|
| Devi and son-in-law Rakesh Yadav had already laid the way there. As the husband
|
| of the informant reached there, Daroga Singh Yadav exhorted to all the other
|
| accused to assault to the husband of the informant. All began to assault to the
|
| husband of informant. Pankaj @ Suraj opened fire. Informant reached to intervene
|
| there but she was intercepted by Tara Devi and Vandna Devi. Again son-in-law of
|
| Daroga Singh Yadav further exhorted and further firearm was opened and the
|
| Daroga Singh Yadav and his younger son Rahul both also verified whether the
|
| husband of informant was alive or dead after opening fire. This F.I.R. was lodged
|
| against all the named accused who had committed murder of the husband of
|
| informant under a conspiracy.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_87"> Learned senior counsel for the applicant has submitted that, as per F.I.R.
|
| allegations, role of opening firearm is assigned to Pankaj @ Suraj though at the
|
| exhortation of Daroga Singh Yadav. Only presence of the applicant is shown. On
|
| above basis prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_88"> Learned Spl. P.P. has vehemently opposed the contentions made by the
|
| learned senior counsel for the applicant and contended that the informant wife of
|
| deceased is the eye-witness of the occurrence. As per F.I.R. allegations, she had
|
| seen the occurrence at the distance of 100 metres and all the accused persons 2 had
|
| assaulted the husband of informant. It was Pankaj @ Suraj who opened fire twice
|
| to the husband of informant. The applicant was very much present there and he
|
| actively participated in the occurrence. He along with his father also verified
|
| whether the husband of the informant had died or not on opening fire. The conduct
|
| of the applicant at the place of occurrence revealed that he shared common
|
| intention along with Pankaj @ Suraj and others co-accused. Moreover, independent
|
| eye-witness Marich Devi also corroborated the statement of informant. The post-
|
| mortem report also supports the prosecution story as the cause of death was firearm
|
| injury and there were two fire injuries on the body of deceased.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_89"> In view of the submissions made and materials on record, I am not
|
| inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail
|
| of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_90"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_15"> B. A. No. 11999 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_17"> Lalita Tirkey .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Adv.
|
| Mrs. Vani Kumari, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 05/20.02.2023 The applicant who is in custody since 14.04.2019 has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_91"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.152/2019 arising out of
|
| Simdega P.S. Case No.05/2019, corresponding to G.R. Case No.211/2019,
|
| registered for the offence under <a href="/doc/1279834/" id="a_68">Sections 376</a>/ <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_69">302</a>/ <a href="/doc/386021/" id="a_70">201</a> of IPC and charge sheet has
|
| been submitted under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_71">Sections 302</a>/ <a href="/doc/386021/" id="a_72">201</a> and <a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_73">34</a> of IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_92"> It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_93"> Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
|
| participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant
|
| that out of nine charge sheeted witnesses, six witnesses have already been
|
| examined. On that basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_94"> Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_95"> However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the
|
| same within three months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_96"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_16"> B. A. No. 12001 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_18"> Rajesh Banra .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kr. Tiwary Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant who is in custody since 20.06.2022 has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_97"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.277/2022 arising out of
|
| Muffasil (Pandrasali O.P.) P.S. Case No.95/2022, for the offence under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_74">Sections
|
| 302</a> of IPC.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_98"> The applicant is an accused of committing murder of his own father.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_99"> Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for
|
| participation in the trial. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_100"> Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant and
|
| submitted that there is eye-witness to the incident, who is the mother of the accused
|
| herself.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_101"> Considering the above facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_102"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_17"> B. A. No. 12017 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_19"> Ranjit Saw .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K.Chakraverty, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. V.K.Vashistha, Spl. P.P.
|
| For the Informant : Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Adv.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 02.08.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_103"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.111/2022,
|
| for the offence under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_75">Sections 302</a>/ <a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_76">120-B</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_77">34</a> of IPC and <a href="/doc/73862/" id="a_78">Sections 25</a>(1-B)a/ 26/ 27/
|
| 35 of the <a href="/doc/1934415/" id="a_79">Arms Act</a>.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_104"> The applicant is an accused of committing murder.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_105"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that this applicant has been roped in as a conspirator. As per the
|
| prosecution story, he has not played any active role. On above basis, prayer for bail
|
| has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_106"> Learned Spl. P.P. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the
|
| prayer for bail of the applicant and submitted that this applicant has several
|
| criminal antecedents.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_107"> Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing
|
| bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
|
| to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sonari
|
| P.S. Case No.111/2022, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-attested
|
| photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the
|
| learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during
|
| pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_108"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_18"> B. A. No. 12710 of 2022</span>
|
| ....
|
| </p><pre id="pre_20"> Taklu Lohar .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P.
|
| For the Informant : Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Adv.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 03/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 27.08.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_109"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.111/2022,
|
| for the offence under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_80">Sections 302</a>/ <a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_81">120-B</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_82">34</a> of IPC and <a href="/doc/73862/" id="a_83">Sections 25</a>(1-B)a/ 26/ 27/
|
| 35 of the <a href="/doc/1934415/" id="a_84">Arms Act</a>.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_110"> The applicant is an accused of committing murder.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_111"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that as per the prosecution story, this applicant has played role as
|
| conspirator. Save and except this fact, there is no other material against this
|
| applicant. On above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_112"> Learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the
|
| prayer for bail of the applicant and submitted that the fire arm which is used in the
|
| crime has been recovered.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_113"> Considering the recovery, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail, at this stage. Accordingly prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_114"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
|
| <span class="hidden_text" id="span_19"> B. A. No. 14111 of 2022</span>
|
| ....</p><pre id="pre_21">
|
| Rahul Chabbra @ Vicky Chabbra .... Petitioner
|
| Versus
|
| The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
|
| ....
|
| CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
|
|
|
| For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv.
|
| Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Adv.
|
| For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P.
|
| For the Informant : Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Adv.
|
| ....
|
|
|
| 04/20.02.2023 The applicant, who is in custody since 05.11.2022, has approached this
|
| </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_115"> Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.111/2022,
|
| for the offence under <a href="/doc/1560742/" id="a_85">Sections 302</a>/ <a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_86">120-B</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_87">34</a> of IPC and <a href="/doc/73862/" id="a_88">Sections 25</a>(1-B)a/ 26/ 27/
|
| 35 of the <a href="/doc/1934415/" id="a_89">Arms Act</a>.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_116"> The applicant is an accused of committing murder.
|
| It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that
|
| complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail
|
| application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
|
| </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_117"> Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been
|
| given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
|
| applicant that as per prosecution story, he has helped the accused after commission
|
| of crime. Except that, there is no other material. On above basis, prayer for bail has
|
| been made.
|
| </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_118"> Learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the
|
| prayer for bail of the applicant.
|
| </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_119"> Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on
|
| bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing
|
| bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
|
| to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sonari
|
| P.S. Case No.111/2022, on the condition that the applicant will submit self-attested
|
| photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number before the
|
| learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during
|
| pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
|
| </p>
|
|
|
| <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_120"> (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
|
| Shahid/
|
| </p>
|
| </div>
|
| </article>
|
| <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
|
| <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
|
| <div class="translate_container">
|
| <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
|
| <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
|
| <button id="translatewarn"
|
| type="button"
|
| aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
|
| </div>
|
|
|
| <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
|
| <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
|
| <ul class="sr-only-list">
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:murder">murder</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:common-intention">common-intention</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:arms">arms</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:criminal-conspiracy">criminal-conspiracy</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:punishment-for-allowing-premises-for-offence">punishment-for-allowing-premises-for-offence</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| </ul>
|
| </nav>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
|
| <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
|
| <ul class="sr-only-list">
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=aadhaar">aadhaar</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=grant%20of%20bail">grant of bail</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=how%20to%20oppose%20bail">how to oppose bail</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20302%20ipc">section 302 ipc</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=POCSO">POCSO</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20application">bail application</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=sec.34%20ipc">sec.34 ipc</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%22will%22%22attestation%22">"will""attestation"</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=attestation%20of%20will">attestation of will</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20302%20indian%20penal%20code">section 302 indian penal code</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=sec%20302/34%20of%20ipc">sec 302/34 of ipc</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=arms%20act">arms act</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=confession">confession</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=regular%20bail">regular bail</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%2034%20indian%20penal%20code">section 34 indian penal code</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=302/34">302/34</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=302%20201%20">302 201 </a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=exhorted">exhorted</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20criminal%20antecedents%20%20%20"> criminal antecedents </a></div></li>
|
|
|
| <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20376">section 376</a></div></li>
|
|
|
| </ul>
|
| </nav>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| </aside>
|
| </div>
|
|
|
| </main>
|
|
|
| <footer class="homepage-footer">
|
| <div class="homepage-footer-links">
|
| <a href="/about.html">About</a>
|
| <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
|
| <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
|
| <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
|
| <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
|
| <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
|
| <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
|
|
|
| <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&nextpage=/doc/121023934/" class="device-toggle">
|
| <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="BhZkb5D4MsWTU4wkW3GBBWzuoTYdS0kVZlac4jTpVTaNTKaCPPWGm3Dhd2itkVkO">
|
| <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
|
| </form>
|
| </div>
|
| </footer>
|
|
|
| <script>
|
| (function() {
|
| const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
|
|
|
| if (navigator.share) {
|
| shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
|
|
|
| shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
|
| try {
|
| await navigator.share({
|
| title: document.title,
|
| url: window.location.href
|
| });
|
| } catch (err) {
|
| if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
|
| console.error('Error sharing:', err);
|
| }
|
| }
|
| });
|
| }
|
| })();
|
| </script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
|
| <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
|
| <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
|
| <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
|
| <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
|
|
|
|
|
| <script type="text/javascript">
|
| (function($) {
|
| function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
|
| if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
|
| throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
|
| }
|
| }
|
|
|
| function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
|
| $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
|
| return $("<li></li>")
|
| .append(
|
| $("<div></div>")
|
| .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
|
| .html(item.label)
|
| )
|
| .appendTo(ul);
|
| };
|
| }
|
|
|
| function attachAutocomplete($input) {
|
| if (!$input.length) {
|
| return;
|
| }
|
|
|
| var $form = $input.closest('form');
|
|
|
| $input.autocomplete({
|
| source: "/qsuggest/",
|
| delay: 180,
|
| minLength: 2,
|
| appendTo: 'body',
|
| position: {
|
| my: "left top",
|
| at: "left bottom+6",
|
| collision: "flipfit"
|
| },
|
| classes: {
|
| "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
|
| "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
|
| },
|
| open: function() {
|
| var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
|
| var offset = $input.offset();
|
| $menu
|
| .width($input.outerWidth())
|
| .css({
|
| left: offset.left,
|
| top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
|
| });
|
| $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
|
| },
|
| close: function() {
|
| $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
|
| },
|
| focus: function(event, ui) {
|
|
|
| if (ui && ui.item) {
|
| event.preventDefault();
|
| }
|
| },
|
| select: function(event, ui) {
|
| event.preventDefault();
|
| if (ui && ui.item) {
|
| $input.val(ui.item.value);
|
| }
|
|
|
| if ($form.length) {
|
| $form.trigger('submit');
|
| } else {
|
| $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
|
| }
|
| }
|
| });
|
|
|
| }
|
|
|
| $(document).ready(function() {
|
| ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
|
| overrideGlobalRenderer();
|
| attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
|
| attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
|
| });
|
| })(jQuery);
|
| </script>
|
|
|
|
|
| <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
|
| <script type="text/javascript">
|
| $(document).ready(function() {
|
| $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
|
| $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
|
| $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
|
|
|
| $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
|
| signupForDownload();
|
| e.preventDefault();
|
| return false;
|
| });
|
|
|
| $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
|
| e.preventDefault();
|
| var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
|
| var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
|
| modify_dialog_params(params);
|
| $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
|
| });
|
| });
|
| function googleTranslateElementInit() {
|
| var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
|
| var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
|
| if (!translateContainer) {
|
| console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
|
| return;
|
| }
|
| if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
|
| console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
|
| return;
|
| }
|
| new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
|
|
|
| function removeUnwantedText() {
|
| var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
|
| if (!translateEl) {
|
| console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
|
| return;
|
| }
|
|
|
| var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
|
| var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
|
|
|
| var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
|
| var node;
|
| while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
|
| if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
|
| node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
|
| }
|
| }
|
|
|
| translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
|
| if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
|
| var text = el.textContent || '';
|
| if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
|
| el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
|
| if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
|
| el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
|
| }
|
| }
|
| });
|
| }
|
|
|
| setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
|
| }
|
| </script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
|
| <script type="text/javascript">
|
| $(document).ready(function () {
|
| $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
|
| $('.searchbox_top a').button();
|
| $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
|
| valid_ag: '',
|
| is_valid: '',
|
| is_auth: 'False',
|
| is_agreement: '',
|
| headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
|
| }, registerEmailAlert);
|
| });
|
| </script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
|
| <script type="text/javascript">
|
|
|
| window.is_auth = false;
|
|
|
|
|
| window.documentContext = {
|
| tid: 121023934,
|
| title: "Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Ram @ Guddu Kumar Ram vs The State Of Jharkhand .... Opposite ... on 20 February, 2023",
|
| url: window.location.href,
|
| isFragment: false
|
| };
|
|
|
|
|
| </script>
|
| <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
|
| <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
|
| <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
|
| <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c56a2802fd8a437',t:'MTc2OTY2Nzc0Mg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
|
|
|
| </html>
|
|
|
