anabaena commited on
Commit
25357a5
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): fccb7a1

Upload batch 400-450

Browse files
hc_bulk//IPC_9154149.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,851 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Is Examined As Pw.1 And His Wife I.E vs Nil on 2 August, 2022</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/9154149/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="hHHFuK6EfKMhuZXCTgYDuUoLYkz5FcaPJgelvh55mBO5EnnB9b2yndu5F3B9s949">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/9154149/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="hHHFuK6EfKMhuZXCTgYDuUoLYkz5FcaPJgelvh55mBO5EnnB9b2yndu5F3B9s949">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/9154149/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="hHHFuK6EfKMhuZXCTgYDuUoLYkz5FcaPJgelvh55mBO5EnnB9b2yndu5F3B9s949">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:9154149">11</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:9154149">0</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Bangalore District Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Is Examined As Pw.1 And His Wife I.E vs Nil on 2 August, 2022</h2>
187
+
188
+ <pre id="pre_1">1
189
+
190
+ KABC030596662018
191
+
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+ Presented on : 13-08-2018
196
+ Registered on : 16-08-2018
197
+ Decided on : 02-08-2022
198
+ Duration : 3 years, 11 months, 20 days
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ IN THE COURT OF THE XXXI ADDL. C.M.M., BENGALURU.
204
+
205
+ Dated this the 2nd day of August 2022.
206
+
207
+ Present: SRI.SHANKARAPPA B.MALASHETTI
208
+ B.com., LL.B.(Spl)
209
+ XXXI ADDL. C.M.M., BENGALURU.
210
+
211
+ C.C. NO.22475-2018
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ JUDGMENT U/S 355 OF THE <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_1">Cr.P.C</a>. 1973.
216
+ 1) Sl. No. of the Case 22475/2018
217
+
218
+ 2) The date of commission 11/10/2017
219
+ of the offence
220
+ 3) Name of the complainant Bagalagunte Police Station.
221
+
222
+ 4) Name of the accused 1.H.M.Prabhakar,
223
+ S/o.Maheshwarapa, 35 years.
224
+ 2.Manasa,W/o.H.M.Prabhakar, 25
225
+ years.
226
+ 3.A.R.Manjunath,W/o.A.C.Rudrappa,
227
+ 23 years.
228
+ All are R/at No.27/A, Belmar
229
+ Layout, Nelagadaranahalli Main
230
+ Road, Bengaluru.
231
+ 4.Mamatha,W/o. Nagarajappa, 35
232
+ years, No.160/1, 7th Cross,
233
+ Shettihalli Post, Anjanadri Nagara,
234
+ Bengaluru.
235
+ 2
236
+
237
+ 5) The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_2">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/267625/" id="a_3">324</a>, 504, r/w 34 of
238
+ of or proved <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_4">IPC</a>.
239
+ 6) Plea of the accused and Pleaded not guilty
240
+ his examination
241
+ 7) State represented by: Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
242
+ Bengaluru.
243
+ 8) Accused represented by: Sri.CB Advocate, Bengaluru.
244
+ 9) Final Order Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_5">Cr.PC</a>
245
+ Accused -1 to 4 are acquitted.
246
+
247
+ 10) Date of such order 02/08/2022
248
+ For the following:-
249
+ JUDGMENT
250
+ </pre>
251
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1"> The PSI, Bagalagunte Police Station has filed the charge sheet
252
+
253
+ against the accused persons for the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_6">sec.341</a>,
254
+
255
+ <a href="/doc/267625/" id="a_7">324</a>, 504, r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_8">IPC</a>.
256
+ </p>
257
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_2">
258
+
259
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_3"> 2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that:
260
+
261
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_1"> On 11.10.2017 at about 1.30 p.m. at Defense Colony,
262
+
263
+ within the jurisdiction of Bagalagunte Police Station accused - 1 to 4
264
+
265
+ in furtherance of common intention to commit an offence wrongfully
266
+
267
+ restrained CW.1, stabbed with knife and abused him and thereby
268
+
269
+ committed the alleged offences.
270
+ </blockquote>
271
+
272
+
273
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_4"> 3. Accused -1 to 4 are on bail. As required u/sec. 207 of <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_9">Cr.PC</a>, the
274
+
275
+ copies of the charge sheet papers were furnished to the accused. Charge
276
+
277
+ was framed for the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_10">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/267625/" id="a_11">324</a>, 504, r/w 34 of
278
+
279
+ <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_12">IPC</a>. Accused have pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial.
280
+ 3
281
+
282
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_5"> 4. In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution has
283
+
284
+ examined PWs.1 and 2 and got marked Ex.P.1 to Ex.P3. On closure of
285
+
286
+ the prosecution evidence, as there was no incriminating evidence against
287
+
288
+ the accused, the statement of the accused u/<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_13">sec.313</a> Cr.PC is dispensed
289
+
290
+ with.
291
+ </p>
292
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_6">
293
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_7"> 5. I have heard the arguments from both the sides.
294
+
295
+
296
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_8"> 6. The following points that arise for my consideration are:
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_2"> 1. Whether the prosecution proves
301
+ beyond all reasonable doubt that on
302
+ 11.10.2017 at about 1.30 p.m. at
303
+ Defense Colony, within the
304
+ jurisdiction of Bagalagunte Police
305
+ Station accused - 1 to 4 in
306
+ furtherance of common intention to
307
+ commit an offence wrongfully
308
+ restrained CW.1 and thereby
309
+ committed an offence punishable
310
+ U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_14">sec.341</a> r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_15">IPC</a>?.
311
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_3"> 2. Whether the prosecution further
312
+ proves beyond all reasonable doubt
313
+ that on the above said date, time and
314
+ place accused - 1 to 4 in
315
+ furtherance of common intention to
316
+ commit an offence stabbed with
317
+ knife on the left hand of CW.1
318
+ thereby caused bleeding injuries and
319
+ 4
320
+
321
+ thereby committed an offence
322
+ punishable U/<a href="/doc/267625/" id="a_16">sec.324</a> r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_17">IPC</a>.?.
323
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_4"> 3. Whether the prosecution further
324
+ proves beyond all reasonable doubt
325
+ that on the above said date, time and
326
+ place accused - 1 to 4 in
327
+ furtherance of common intention to
328
+ commit an offence abused CW.1
329
+ in filthy language knowingly such
330
+ insult will provoke breach of peace
331
+ and thereby committed the offence
332
+ punishable U/sec. 504 r/w 34 of
333
+ <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_18">IPC</a>.?.
334
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_5"> 4. What order?
335
+ </blockquote>
336
+
337
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_9"> 7.My finding on the above points are held as under:
338
+
339
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_6"> Point No.1 to 3: In the negative
340
+ Point No.4: As per final order
341
+ for the following:
342
+ </blockquote>
343
+
344
+
345
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_7"> REASONS
346
+
347
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_10"> 8.Point Nos.1 to 3:-
348
+ </p>
349
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_8"> The above points are inter linked to each other hence, I took the
350
+
351
+ points together for consideration in order to avoid repeatation.
352
+ </blockquote>
353
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_11"> 9.In order to substantiate the contents of complaint, very
354
+
355
+ complainant is examined as PW.1 and his wife i.e., CW.4 is examined as
356
+
357
+ PW.2, but they fully turned hostile to the case of prosecution. In their
358
+ 5
359
+
360
+ evidence they have deposed accused have neither wrongfully
361
+
362
+ restrained CW.1 nor abused him in filthy language. They further
363
+
364
+ deposed that, accused have not assaulted with any weapon. They
365
+
366
+ further deposed that, PW.1 had been to Police Station for some other
367
+
368
+ reason, wherein police took his signatures on documents as per Ex.P1
369
+
370
+ and P2. But he denied the contents of the complaint - Ex.P.1 and
371
+
372
+ Mahazar Ex.P2. PW.2 has denied for having given statement as per
373
+
374
+ Ex.P3.
375
+ </p>
376
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_12">
377
+
378
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_13"> 10. Even in the cross-examination by learned Sr.APP, PW.1 and 2
379
+
380
+ have not supported the case of the prosecution. PW.1 has specifically
381
+
382
+ denied about filing of complaint before the police as per Ex.P.1. It is
383
+
384
+ fatal to the case of the prosecution.
385
+ </p>
386
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_14">
387
+
388
+
389
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_15"> 11. As I discussed above, after evidence of PW.1 &amp; 2, learned Sr.APP
390
+
391
+ has prayed for issuance of summons to other witnesses. In this case,
392
+
393
+ PW.1 &amp; 2 being the complainant and victim have not supported the case
394
+
395
+ of the prosecution. Moreover, in the cross-examination PW.1 and 2 have
396
+
397
+ clearly admitted that matter is ended in compromise. Admittedly
398
+
399
+ investigating officer has filed charge sheet against accused for the
400
+
401
+ offence punishable U/<a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_19">sec.324</a> of IPC., which is non-compoundable in
402
+
403
+ nature. In my considered view, due to compromise, PW.1 and 2 might
404
+
405
+ have said goodbye to the case of prosecution.
406
+ 6
407
+
408
+
409
+
410
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_16"> 12.Apart from this, when PW.1 &amp; 2 being the complainant and
411
+
412
+ victim have not supported the case of the prosecution, mere issuance of
413
+
414
+ summons to other witnesses and examination of those witnesses would
415
+
416
+ not serve the purpose of the prosecution. Moreover, in order to maintain
417
+
418
+ cordial relationship between accused and complainant in future days
419
+
420
+ and to save the precious time of court, other witnesses were dropped
421
+
422
+ by rejecting the prayer of learned Sr.APP.
423
+ </p>
424
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_17">
425
+
426
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_18"> 13.In the absence of cogent, corroborative and material evidence
427
+
428
+ of the victim as well as other independent witnesses, it is not safe to
429
+
430
+ come to conclusion that prosecution has successfully proved guilt
431
+
432
+ against the accused. Accordingly, my answer to the above point Nos. 1
433
+
434
+ to 3 are in the negative.
435
+ </p>
436
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_19"> 14. Point No.4:- For the reasons discussed herein above, I proceed
437
+
438
+ to pass the following:
439
+ </p>
440
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_9"> ORDER
441
+
442
+
443
+ Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_20">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C., accused-1 to 4 are
444
+ hereby acquitted of the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_21">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_22">324</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_23">504</a>,
445
+ r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_24">IPC</a>.
446
+ </blockquote>
447
+
448
+
449
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_10"> Bail bonds of accused and their surety bonds stand
450
+ cancelled after six months from today.
451
+ 7
452
+
453
+ The property seized in PF.No.133/2017 dated 13.10.2017 is
454
+ worthless is ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
455
+ </blockquote>
456
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_11"> (Dictated to the stenographer, transcript thereof, corrected and
457
+ then pronounced by me in the open court this the 2 nd day of August
458
+ 2022.)
459
+
460
+
461
+ (Shankarappa B.Malashetti)
462
+ XXXI Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.
463
+ </blockquote>
464
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_12"> Annexure:
465
+ </blockquote>
466
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_13">1.List of Witnesses examined on behalf of the prosecution:
467
+ P. Ws:
468
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_14">1. Srinivasamurthy
469
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_15">2. Smt.Venkatalakshmamma.
470
+ </blockquote>
471
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_16">2.List of Documents marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
472
+ Ex.Ps:
473
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_17">1. Complaint
474
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_18">2. Mahazar.
475
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_19">3. Statement of PW.2
476
+
477
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_20">3.List of Material objects marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
478
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_21"> -NIL -
479
+ </blockquote>
480
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_22">4.List of witnesses and documents marked on behalf of the
481
+ accused: -NIL -
482
+ </blockquote>
483
+
484
+
485
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_20"> XXXI Addl. C. M. M. Bengaluru.
486
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_21"> 8
487
+
488
+
489
+
490
+
491
+ Judgment pronounced in the open court.
492
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_22"> (vide separate order):
493
+ </p>
494
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_23"> ORDER
495
+
496
+ Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_25">Section 248 (1)</a> of
497
+ Cr.P.C., accused-1 &amp; 2 are hereby acquitted
498
+ of the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_26">sec.341</a>,<a href="/doc/1011035/" id="a_27">323</a>,
499
+ <a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_28">324</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_29">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_30">506</a> r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_31">IPC</a>.
500
+ </blockquote>
501
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_24"> Bail bonds of accused and their surety
502
+ bonds stand cancelled after six months from
503
+ today.
504
+ </blockquote>
505
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_25"> The property seized in PF.No.180A/2017
506
+ dated 15.12.2017 is worthless is ordered to
507
+ be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
508
+ </blockquote>
509
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_26"> 31st Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.
510
+ 9
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+ Judgment pronounced in the open court.
516
+ (vide separate order):
517
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_27"> ORDER
518
+ Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_32">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,
519
+ accused-1 to 4 are hereby acquitted of the
520
+ offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_33">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_34">324</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_35">504</a>,
521
+ r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_36">IPC</a>.
522
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_28"> Bail bonds of accused and their surety
523
+ bonds stand cancelled after six months from
524
+ today.
525
+ </blockquote>
526
+ <pre id="pre_2"> The property seized in
527
+ PF.No.133/2017 dated 13.10.2017 is
528
+ </pre><blockquote id="blockquote_29"> worthless is ordered to be destroyed after
529
+ the appeal period is over.
530
+ </blockquote>
531
+
532
+
533
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_30"> XXXI Addl. C. M. M. Bengaluru.
534
+ </blockquote>
535
+ </div>
536
+ </article>
537
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
538
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
539
+ <div class="translate_container">
540
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
541
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
542
+ <button id="translatewarn"
543
+ type="button"
544
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
545
+ </div>
546
+
547
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
548
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
549
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
550
+
551
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:indian-penal-code">indian-penal-code</a></div></li>
552
+
553
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:appeal-to-superior-court">appeal-to-superior-court</a></div></li>
554
+
555
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:trial-of-persons-previously-convicted, coinage-stamp-law-or-property">trial-of-persons-previously-convicted, coinage-stamp-law-or-property</a></div></li>
556
+
557
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:cause-hurt">cause-hurt</a></div></li>
558
+
559
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:criminal-procedure-code">criminal-procedure-code</a></div></li>
560
+
561
+ </ul>
562
+ </nav>
563
+
564
+
565
+
566
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
567
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
568
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
569
+
570
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=no%20common%20intention">no common intention</a></div></li>
571
+
572
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20324">section 324</a></div></li>
573
+
574
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20bond">bail bond</a></div></li>
575
+
576
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=504">504</a></div></li>
577
+
578
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=324">324</a></div></li>
579
+
580
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=surety">surety</a></div></li>
581
+
582
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=324%2C504">324,504</a></div></li>
583
+
584
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=court%20should%20be%20open%20">court should be open </a></div></li>
585
+
586
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=surety%20bond%20">surety bond </a></div></li>
587
+
588
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Pf%20">Pf </a></div></li>
589
+
590
+ </ul>
591
+ </nav>
592
+
593
+
594
+
595
+ </aside>
596
+ </div>
597
+
598
+ </main>
599
+
600
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
601
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
602
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
603
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
604
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
605
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
606
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
607
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
608
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
609
+
610
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/9154149/" class="device-toggle">
611
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="hHHFuK6EfKMhuZXCTgYDuUoLYkz5FcaPJgelvh55mBO5EnnB9b2yndu5F3B9s949">
612
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
613
+ </form>
614
+ </div>
615
+ </footer>
616
+
617
+ <script>
618
+ (function() {
619
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
620
+
621
+ if (navigator.share) {
622
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
623
+
624
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
625
+ try {
626
+ await navigator.share({
627
+ title: document.title,
628
+ url: window.location.href
629
+ });
630
+ } catch (err) {
631
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
632
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
633
+ }
634
+ }
635
+ });
636
+ }
637
+ })();
638
+ </script>
639
+
640
+
641
+
642
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
643
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
644
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
645
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
646
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
647
+
648
+
649
+ <script type="text/javascript">
650
+ (function($) {
651
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
652
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
653
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
654
+ }
655
+ }
656
+
657
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
658
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
659
+ return $("<li></li>")
660
+ .append(
661
+ $("<div></div>")
662
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
663
+ .html(item.label)
664
+ )
665
+ .appendTo(ul);
666
+ };
667
+ }
668
+
669
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
670
+ if (!$input.length) {
671
+ return;
672
+ }
673
+
674
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
675
+
676
+ $input.autocomplete({
677
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
678
+ delay: 180,
679
+ minLength: 2,
680
+ appendTo: 'body',
681
+ position: {
682
+ my: "left top",
683
+ at: "left bottom+6",
684
+ collision: "flipfit"
685
+ },
686
+ classes: {
687
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
688
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
689
+ },
690
+ open: function() {
691
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
692
+ var offset = $input.offset();
693
+ $menu
694
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
695
+ .css({
696
+ left: offset.left,
697
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
698
+ });
699
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
700
+ },
701
+ close: function() {
702
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
703
+ },
704
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
705
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
706
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
707
+ event.preventDefault();
708
+ }
709
+ },
710
+ select: function(event, ui) {
711
+ event.preventDefault();
712
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
713
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
714
+ }
715
+
716
+ if ($form.length) {
717
+ $form.trigger('submit');
718
+ } else {
719
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
720
+ }
721
+ }
722
+ });
723
+
724
+ }
725
+
726
+ $(document).ready(function() {
727
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
728
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
729
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
730
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
731
+ });
732
+ })(jQuery);
733
+ </script>
734
+
735
+
736
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
737
+ <script type="text/javascript">
738
+ $(document).ready(function() {
739
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
740
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
741
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
742
+
743
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
744
+ signupForDownload();
745
+ e.preventDefault();
746
+ return false;
747
+ });
748
+
749
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
750
+ e.preventDefault();
751
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
752
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
753
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
754
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
755
+ });
756
+ });
757
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
758
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
759
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
760
+ if (!translateContainer) {
761
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
762
+ return;
763
+ }
764
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
765
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
766
+ return;
767
+ }
768
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
769
+
770
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
771
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
772
+ if (!translateEl) {
773
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
774
+ return;
775
+ }
776
+
777
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
778
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
779
+
780
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
781
+ var node;
782
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
783
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
784
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
785
+ }
786
+ }
787
+
788
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
789
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
790
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
791
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
792
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
793
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
794
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
795
+ }
796
+ }
797
+ });
798
+ }
799
+
800
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
801
+ }
802
+ </script>
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
809
+ <script type="text/javascript">
810
+ $(document).ready(function () {
811
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
812
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
813
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
814
+ valid_ag: '',
815
+ is_valid: '',
816
+ is_auth: 'False',
817
+ is_agreement: '',
818
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
819
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
820
+ });
821
+ </script>
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
828
+ <script type="text/javascript">
829
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
830
+ window.is_auth = false;
831
+
832
+ // Document context for chatbot
833
+ window.documentContext = {
834
+ tid: 9154149,
835
+ title: "Is Examined As Pw.1 And His Wife I.E vs Nil on 2 August, 2022",
836
+ url: window.location.href,
837
+ isFragment: false
838
+ };
839
+
840
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
841
+ </script>
842
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
843
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
844
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
845
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
846
+
847
+
848
+
849
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c56f7b9ccbd5649',t:'MTc2OTY3MTIzMw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
850
+
851
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_10130168.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1003 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Rupa Gurung vs State Of Sikkim on 11 March, 2020</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/10130168/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GPSbDDg5MUhARqPIF0jGdj6nsKrs0iCHaZipA3oSOEa2XtfqXiISPnbNlXAFEWsi">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/10130168/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GPSbDDg5MUhARqPIF0jGdj6nsKrs0iCHaZipA3oSOEa2XtfqXiISPnbNlXAFEWsi">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/10130168/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GPSbDDg5MUhARqPIF0jGdj6nsKrs0iCHaZipA3oSOEa2XtfqXiISPnbNlXAFEWsi">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:10130168">15</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:10130168">2</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Sikkim High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Rupa Gurung vs State Of Sikkim on 11 March, 2020</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:m-m-rai">Meenakshi Madan Rai</a></h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:m-m-rai">Meenakshi Madan Rai</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <pre id="pre_1"> THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
193
+ (Criminal Jurisdiction)
194
+
195
+ DATED : 11th MARCH, 2020
196
+ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
197
+ SINGLE BENCH : THE HON&#x27;BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
198
+ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
199
+ Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020
200
+ Applicant/Accused : Rupa Gurung
201
+
202
+ versus
203
+
204
+ Respondent : State of Sikkim
205
+
206
+ Petition under Section 439 read with <a href="/doc/1679850/" id="a_1">Section
207
+ 482</a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
208
+ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
209
+ ppearance
210
+ Mr. K. T. Tamang, Advocate for the Appellant.
211
+
212
+ Mr. Hissey Gyaltsen Bhutia and Ms. Mukun Dolma Tamang,
213
+ Assistant Public Prosecutors for the State-Respondent.
214
+ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
215
+
216
+ ORDER
217
+ </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1"> Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.
218
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_2"> 1. The Petitioner seeks enlargement on bail by filing
219
+
220
+ the instant application. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner
221
+
222
+ submits that she was arrested on 18-01-2020 in connection
223
+
224
+ with Singtam Police Station, East Sikkim, FIR No.03/2020,
225
+
226
+ dated 18-01-2020, under <a href="/doc/54110090/" id="a_2">Section 7(a)(b)</a> and <a href="/doc/49203198/" id="a_3">14</a> of the Sikkim
227
+
228
+ Anti Drugs Act, 2006 (for short, SADA, 2006) and under
229
+
230
+ <a href="/doc/36765883/" id="a_4">Section 9(1)(b)</a> of the Sikkim Anti Drugs (Amendment) Act,
231
+
232
+ 2017, on allegations of selling controlled substances.
233
+
234
+
235
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_3"> 2. Consequent upon the Complaint lodged against her
236
+
237
+ a house search was conducted by the Singtam Police, wherein
238
+
239
+ controlled substances, i.e., ―Spasmo-Proxyvon plus‖ capsules,
240
+
241
+ and ―Nitrosun 10‖ tablets, were recovered from her residence.
242
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1"> Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020 2</span>
243
+
244
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_4"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="62949521" id="span_2"><a href="/doc/62949521/" id="a_5">Rupa Gurung vs. State of Sikkim
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ That</a>, the controlled substances so recovered are not of
250
+
251
+ commercial quantity besides there being an anomaly in the
252
+
253
+ quantity reflected in the FIR and the Seizure Memo. The
254
+
255
+ Petitioner has no criminal antecedents and her permanent
256
+
257
+ home is in Singtam, therefore the question of her attempting to
258
+
259
+ abscond or for that matter tamper with the Prosecution
260
+
261
+ evidence does not arise. That apart, her husband infact was
262
+
263
+ earlier arrested for possession/consumption of controlled
264
+
265
+ substances but the Policy inquiry in the instant matter did not
266
+
267
+ extend to him. That, she has several physical ailments such
268
+
269
+ hypertension and high uric acid levels, added to which her
270
+
271
+ daughter is on the family way for which her presence is
272
+
273
+ required. The penalty prescribed is not with death or
274
+
275
+ imprisonment of life but rigorous imprisonment for two years,
276
+
277
+ which may extend to five years. That, the Charge-Sheet has
278
+
279
+ not yet been filed despite a lapse of more than forty-five days
280
+
281
+ since the lodging of the FIR. Considering the above
282
+
283
+ circumstances, she may be enlarged on bail on any stringent
284
+
285
+ conditions.</span>
286
+ </p>
287
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_5">
288
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_6"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="62949521" id="span_3">3. Per contra, Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor
289
+
290
+ objecting to the petition for bail submits that the substances
291
+
292
+ were recovered not only from the house of the accused when
293
+
294
+ she was present therein, but large quantities were also
295
+
296
+ recovered from her next door neighbour in the same building,
297
+
298
+ who is co-accused in the matter. The said co-accused in the
299
+
300
+ instant matter is a habitual offender. That, the investigation is
301
+
302
+ being taken up expeditiously and the report of the controlled
303
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_4"> Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020 3</span>
304
+
305
+ <a href="/doc/62949521/" id="a_6">Rupa Gurung vs. State of Sikkim</a>
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ samples sent for testing to the RFSL Saramsa, East Sikkim, are
311
+
312
+ awaited which is likely to be completed within a few days. On
313
+
314
+ submission of the RFSL Report, the Charge-Sheet shall be filed
315
+
316
+ immediately. In view of the nature of the offence, the matter
317
+
318
+ may not be considered leniently and the petition for bail
319
+
320
+ rejected.</span>
321
+ </p>
322
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_7">
323
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_8">4. I have heard the rival contentions of Learned
324
+
325
+ Counsel at length and taken into consideration their
326
+
327
+ submissions. I have also perused the documents placed before
328
+
329
+ this Court.
330
+ </p>
331
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_9">
332
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_10">5. The facts are not disputed. The seizures of
333
+
334
+ controlled substances were made from the Petitioner&#x27;s house
335
+
336
+ allegedly kept for sale. It needs no reiteration that there is
337
+
338
+ rampant abuse of controlled substances by people of all ages in
339
+
340
+ the State especially by the youth. The law enforcement
341
+
342
+ agencies are embattled in their efforts to control the sale and
343
+
344
+ use of these substances which is spreading to gargantuan
345
+
346
+ proportions. The abuse of the substances is primarily on
347
+
348
+ account of easy availability and sale by unconscionable persons,
349
+
350
+ at exorbitant prices who having found an easy way of earning
351
+
352
+ money by luring the young and indulge in its sans conscience.
353
+
354
+ Besides the victim, the unsuspecting family of the victim bears
355
+
356
+ the brunt of these sales and purchases which strike at the root
357
+
358
+ of a stable family and society. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="62949521" id="span_5">In my considered opinion, no
359
+
360
+ misplaced sympathy ought to be extended to persons who
361
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_6"> Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020 4</span>
362
+
363
+ <a href="/doc/62949521/" id="a_7">Rupa Gurung vs. State of Sikkim</a>
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+ indulge in the sale and easy supply of controlled substances to
369
+
370
+ the impressionable youth.</span>
371
+ </p>
372
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_11">
373
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_12">6. In this thread, useful reference may be made to the
374
+
375
+ observations of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court which while
376
+
377
+ considering grant of bail under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_8">Narcotic Drugs and
378
+
379
+ Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985</a> (for short, <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_9">NDPS Act</a>) in
380
+
381
+ State of Kerala etc. vs. Rajesh etc.1 involving the sale of Hashish
382
+
383
+ Oil was pleased to observe that under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_10">Section 37</a> of the NDPS
384
+
385
+ Act bail can be granted in case there are reasonable grounds
386
+
387
+ for believing that the accused is not guilty of such offence and
388
+
389
+ that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The
390
+
391
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in Paragraph 18 of the Judgment supra
392
+
393
+ held as follows;
394
+ </p>
395
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1"> &quot;18. The jurisdiction of the Court to grant
396
+ bail is circumscribed by the provisions of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_11">Section
397
+ 37</a> of the NDPS Act. It can be granted in case
398
+ there are reasonable grounds for believing that
399
+ accused is not guilty of such offence, and that he
400
+ is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
401
+ It is the mandate of the legislature which is
402
+ required to be followed. At this juncture, a
403
+ reference to <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_12">Section 37</a> of the Act is apposite.
404
+ That provision makes the offences under the Act
405
+ cognizable and non-bailable. It reads thus:--
406
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_2"> &quot;37. Offences to be cognizable and non-
407
+ bailable.--(1) Notwithstanding anything
408
+ contained in the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_13">Code of Criminal
409
+ Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974),--
410
+ </blockquote><pre id="pre_2"> (a) every offence punishable
411
+ under this Act shall be
412
+ cognizable;
413
+ (b) no person accused of an
414
+ offence punishable for
415
+ [offences under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_14">section 19</a> or
416
+ <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_15">section 24</a> or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_16">section 27A</a> and
417
+ also for offences involving
418
+ commercial quantity] shall be
419
+ released on bail or on his own
420
+ bond unless--
421
+
422
+
423
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_7">1</span>
424
+ 2020 SCC OnLine SC 81
425
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_8"> Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020 5</span>
426
+
427
+ Rupa Gurung vs. State of Sikkim
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ (i) the Public Prosecutor
433
+ has been given an
434
+ opportunity to oppose
435
+ the application for such
436
+ release, and
437
+ (ii) where the Public
438
+ Prosecutor opposes the
439
+ application, the court is
440
+ satisfied that there are
441
+ reasonable grounds for
442
+ believing that he is not
443
+ guilty of such offence
444
+ and that he is not likely
445
+ to commit any offence
446
+ while on bail.
447
+ </pre><blockquote id="blockquote_3"> (2) The limitations on granting of bail
448
+ specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1)
449
+ are in addition to the limitations under the
450
+ <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_17">Code of Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of
451
+ 1974), or any other law for the time being
452
+ in force on granting of bail.‖
453
+ (emphasis supplied)&quot;
454
+ </blockquote>
455
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_13">In Paragraph 20, it was further observed as follows;
456
+
457
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_4"> &quot;20. The scheme of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_18">Section 37</a> reveals that
458
+ the exercise of power to grant bail is not only
459
+ subject to the limitations contained under
460
+ <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_19">Section 439</a> of the CrPC, but is also subject to the
461
+ limitation placed by <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_20">Section 37</a> which commences
462
+ with non-obstante clause. The operative part of
463
+ the said section is in the negative form
464
+ prescribing the enlargement of bail to any person
465
+ accused of commission of an offence under the
466
+ Act, unless twin conditions are satisfied. The first
467
+ condition is that the prosecution must be given an
468
+ opportunity to oppose the application; and the
469
+ second, is that the Court must be satisfied that
470
+ there are reasonable grounds for believing that
471
+ he is not guilty of such offence. If either of these
472
+ two conditions is not satisfied, the ban for
473
+ granting bail operates. [emphasis supplied]&quot;
474
+ </blockquote>
475
+
476
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_14">In Paragraph 21, it was held thus;
477
+ </p>
478
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_5"> &quot;21. The expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot;
479
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_15"> means something more than prima facie grounds.
480
+ It contemplates substantial probable causes for
481
+ believing that the accused is not guilty of the
482
+ alleged offence. The reasonable belief
483
+ contemplated in the provision requires existence
484
+ of such facts and circumstances as are sufficient
485
+ in themselves to justify satisfaction that the
486
+ accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="62949521" id="span_9">In the
487
+ case on hand, the High Court seems to have
488
+ completely overlooked the underlying object of
489
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_21">Section 37</a> that in addition to the limitations
490
+ provided under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_22">CrPC</a>, or any other law for the
491
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_10"> Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020 6</span>
492
+
493
+ <a href="/doc/62949521/" id="a_23">Rupa Gurung vs. State of Sikkim</a>
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+
498
+ time being in force, regulating the grant of bail,
499
+ its liberal approach in the matter of bail under the
500
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_24">NDPS Act</a> is indeed uncalled for.&quot;</span>
501
+ </p>
502
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_16">7. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1378939" id="span_11">In <a href="/doc/1378939/" id="a_25">Union of India vs. Ram Samujh and Another2</a> it was
503
+
504
+ held as follows;</span>
505
+ </p>
506
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_6"> &quot;7. It is to be borne in mind that the
507
+ aforesaid legislative mandate is required to be
508
+ adhered to and followed. It should be borne in
509
+ mind that in a murder case, the accused commits
510
+ murder of one or two persons, while those
511
+ persons who are dealing in narcotic drugs are
512
+ instrumental in causing death or in inflicting
513
+ death-blow to a number of innocent young
514
+ victims, who are vulnerable; it causes deleterious
515
+ effects and a deadly impact on the society; they
516
+ are a hazard to the society; even if they are
517
+ released temporarily, in all probability, they
518
+ would continue their nefarious activities of
519
+ trafficking and/or dealing in intoxicants
520
+ clandestinely. Reason may be large stake and
521
+ illegal profit involved. ...................
522
+ </blockquote>
523
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_7"> 8. To check the menace of dangerous
524
+ drugs flooding the market, Parliament has
525
+ provided that the person accused of offences
526
+ under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_26">NDPS Act</a> should not be released on bail
527
+ during trial unless the mandatory conditions
528
+ provided in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_27">Section 37</a>, namely,
529
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_8"> (i) there are reasonable grounds for
530
+ believing that the accused is not
531
+ guilty of such offence; and
532
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_9"> (ii) that he is not likely to commit any
533
+ offence while on bail
534
+ are satisfied. The High Court has not given any
535
+ justifiable reason for not abiding by the aforesaid
536
+ mandate while ordering the release of the
537
+ respondent-accused on bail. Instead of attempting
538
+ to take a holistic view of the harmful socio-
539
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_17"> economic consequences and health hazards which
540
+ would accompany trafficking illegally in dangerous
541
+ drugs, the court should implement the law in the
542
+ spirit with which Parliament, after due
543
+ deliberation, has amended. [emphasis supplied]&quot;
544
+
545
+
546
+
547
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_18">8. On the bedrock of the ratiocination supra, it is
548
+
549
+ apposite to refer to the relevant provision of the SADA, 2006,
550
+
551
+ viz., <a href="/doc/325366/" id="a_28">Section 18</a>. <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_29">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act is embodied in
552
+
553
+ <a href="/doc/325366/" id="a_30">Section 18(2)</a> of the SADA, 2006, which reads as follows;
554
+
555
+
556
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_12">2</span>
557
+ (1999) 9 SCC 429
558
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_13"> Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020 7</span>
559
+
560
+ Rupa Gurung vs. State of Sikkim
561
+
562
+
563
+
564
+
565
+ &quot;18. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in
566
+ the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_31">Code of Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 -
567
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_19"> (a) every offence punishable under this Act
568
+ shall be cognizable;
569
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_20"> (b) no person accused of an offence
570
+ punishable under this Act shall be released
571
+ on bail or on his own bond unless -
572
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_21"> (i) the Public Prosecutor has been heard
573
+ and also given an opportunity to oppose
574
+ the application for such release, and
575
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_22"> (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes
576
+ the application, the court is satisfied that
577
+ there are reasonable grounds for believing
578
+ that he is not guilty of such offence and
579
+ that he is not likely to commit any offence
580
+ while on bail.
581
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_23"> (2) The limitations on granting of bail
582
+ specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1)
583
+ are in addition to the limitations under the
584
+ <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_32">Code of Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 or any
585
+ other law for the time being in force on
586
+ granting of bail. [emphasis supplied]&quot;
587
+
588
+
589
+
590
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_10"> It is clear that <a href="/doc/325366/" id="a_33">Section 18</a> of the SADA, 2006 lays down
591
+
592
+ the exact same requisites as <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_34">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act while
593
+
594
+ considering a petition for bail.
595
+ </blockquote>
596
+
597
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_11"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="62949521" id="span_14">9. After giving due consideration to the facts and
598
+
599
+ circumstances in the instant case despite the urging of Learned
600
+
601
+ Counsel for the Petitioner that she is 47 years old, a
602
+
603
+ grandmother who has no criminal antecedents, I find that
604
+
605
+ should this Court be inclined to grant bail for the offence, in all
606
+
607
+ likelihood she will revert back to the activities she was indulging
608
+
609
+ in vis-à-vis the controlled substances. The act of selling
610
+
611
+ controlled substances for monetary profits without looking into
612
+
613
+ deleterious effects it has on the health of the victim has to
614
+
615
+ stringently be discouraged. It is reiterated that such persons
616
+
617
+ strike at the very future of our society since most of the
618
+
619
+ consumers are the youth who are yet to have their feet on
620
+
621
+ terra-firma or to understand the consequences of the choices
622
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_15"> Bail Appln. No.02 of 2020 8</span>
623
+
624
+ <a href="/doc/62949521/" id="a_35">Rupa Gurung vs. State of Sikkim</a>
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+ that they are making and its long term effects besides throwing
630
+
631
+ away their future.</span> In consideration of the provisions of the
632
+
633
+ Statute there is no guarantee that the Petitioner will not repeat
634
+
635
+ the offence while on bail and for the present purposes there is
636
+
637
+ no reason to disbelieve the Prosecution case. Although I
638
+
639
+ hasten to add that this is a prima facie observation and will
640
+
641
+ have no bearing on the merits of the case, which includes the
642
+
643
+ evidence furnished by the Prosecution to establish its case.
644
+ </blockquote>
645
+
646
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_12"> 10. Consequently, the application for bail stands
647
+
648
+ rejected. However, the Investigating Officer shall file the
649
+
650
+ Charge-Sheet within the mandated period of limitation and the
651
+
652
+ Learned Trial court shall take not more than eight months
653
+
654
+ thereafter to dispose of the instant matter.
655
+ </blockquote>
656
+
657
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_13"> 11. Let the Superintendent of Police (Jails) ensure that
658
+
659
+ the blood pressure of the accused is measured on a daily basis
660
+
661
+ at the Clinic in the Jail. That, a blood sample of the accused,
662
+
663
+ subject to her consent, be drawn for checking her uric acid
664
+
665
+ levels. That Doctor concerned shall take necessary steps
666
+
667
+ accordingly.
668
+ </blockquote>
669
+
670
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_14"> 12. The Bail Appln. stands disposed of.
671
+ </blockquote>
672
+
673
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_15"> 13. Copy of this Order be made available to all the
674
+
675
+ <a href="/doc/50016649/" id="a_36">Special Judges (Sikkim Anti Drugs Act, 2006</a>) for information.
676
+ </blockquote>
677
+
678
+
679
+
680
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_16"> ( Meenakshi Madan Rai )
681
+ Judge
682
+ 11-03-2020
683
+
684
+
685
+
686
+ Approved for reporting : Yes
687
+ ds
688
+ </blockquote>
689
+ </div>
690
+ </article>
691
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
692
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
693
+ <div class="translate_container">
694
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
695
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
696
+ <button id="translatewarn"
697
+ type="button"
698
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
699
+ </div>
700
+
701
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
702
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
703
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
704
+
705
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:non-bailable-offences">non-bailable-offences</a></div></li>
706
+
707
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:criminal-procedure-code">criminal-procedure-code</a></div></li>
708
+
709
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:law-governing-narcotics">law-governing-narcotics</a></div></li>
710
+
711
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:contravention-in-relation-to-opium, punishment-for-opium-poppy">contravention-in-relation-to-opium, punishment-for-opium-poppy</a></div></li>
712
+
713
+ </ul>
714
+ </nav>
715
+
716
+
717
+
718
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
719
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
720
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
721
+
722
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=grant%20of%20bail">grant of bail</a></div></li>
723
+
724
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
725
+
726
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
727
+
728
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=state%20of%20sikkim">state of sikkim</a></div></li>
729
+
730
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotic%20drug">narcotic drug</a></div></li>
731
+
732
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=controlled%20substance">controlled substance</a></div></li>
733
+
734
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=the%20narcotic%20drugs%20and%20psychotropic%20substances%20act">the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act</a></div></li>
735
+
736
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotics%20and%20drugs%20act">narcotics and drugs act</a></div></li>
737
+
738
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20psychotropic%20drug"> psychotropic drug</a></div></li>
739
+
740
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Section%2037">Section 37</a></div></li>
741
+
742
+ </ul>
743
+ </nav>
744
+
745
+
746
+
747
+ </aside>
748
+ </div>
749
+
750
+ </main>
751
+
752
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
753
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
754
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
755
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
756
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
757
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
758
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
759
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
760
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
761
+
762
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/10130168/" class="device-toggle">
763
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GPSbDDg5MUhARqPIF0jGdj6nsKrs0iCHaZipA3oSOEa2XtfqXiISPnbNlXAFEWsi">
764
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
765
+ </form>
766
+ </div>
767
+ </footer>
768
+
769
+ <script>
770
+ (function() {
771
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
772
+
773
+ if (navigator.share) {
774
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
775
+
776
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
777
+ try {
778
+ await navigator.share({
779
+ title: document.title,
780
+ url: window.location.href
781
+ });
782
+ } catch (err) {
783
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
784
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
785
+ }
786
+ }
787
+ });
788
+ }
789
+ })();
790
+ </script>
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
795
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
796
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
797
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
798
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
799
+
800
+
801
+ <script type="text/javascript">
802
+ (function($) {
803
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
804
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
805
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
806
+ }
807
+ }
808
+
809
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
810
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
811
+ return $("<li></li>")
812
+ .append(
813
+ $("<div></div>")
814
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
815
+ .html(item.label)
816
+ )
817
+ .appendTo(ul);
818
+ };
819
+ }
820
+
821
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
822
+ if (!$input.length) {
823
+ return;
824
+ }
825
+
826
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
827
+
828
+ $input.autocomplete({
829
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
830
+ delay: 180,
831
+ minLength: 2,
832
+ appendTo: 'body',
833
+ position: {
834
+ my: "left top",
835
+ at: "left bottom+6",
836
+ collision: "flipfit"
837
+ },
838
+ classes: {
839
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
840
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
841
+ },
842
+ open: function() {
843
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
844
+ var offset = $input.offset();
845
+ $menu
846
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
847
+ .css({
848
+ left: offset.left,
849
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
850
+ });
851
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
852
+ },
853
+ close: function() {
854
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
855
+ },
856
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
857
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
858
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
859
+ event.preventDefault();
860
+ }
861
+ },
862
+ select: function(event, ui) {
863
+ event.preventDefault();
864
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
865
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
866
+ }
867
+
868
+ if ($form.length) {
869
+ $form.trigger('submit');
870
+ } else {
871
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
872
+ }
873
+ }
874
+ });
875
+
876
+ }
877
+
878
+ $(document).ready(function() {
879
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
880
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
881
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
882
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
883
+ });
884
+ })(jQuery);
885
+ </script>
886
+
887
+
888
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
889
+ <script type="text/javascript">
890
+ $(document).ready(function() {
891
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
892
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
893
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
894
+
895
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
896
+ signupForDownload();
897
+ e.preventDefault();
898
+ return false;
899
+ });
900
+
901
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
902
+ e.preventDefault();
903
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
904
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
905
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
906
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
907
+ });
908
+ });
909
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
910
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
911
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
912
+ if (!translateContainer) {
913
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
914
+ return;
915
+ }
916
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
917
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
918
+ return;
919
+ }
920
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
921
+
922
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
923
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
924
+ if (!translateEl) {
925
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
926
+ return;
927
+ }
928
+
929
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
930
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
931
+
932
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
933
+ var node;
934
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
935
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
936
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
937
+ }
938
+ }
939
+
940
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
941
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
942
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
943
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
944
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
945
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
946
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
947
+ }
948
+ }
949
+ });
950
+ }
951
+
952
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
953
+ }
954
+ </script>
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
961
+ <script type="text/javascript">
962
+ $(document).ready(function () {
963
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
964
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
965
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
966
+ valid_ag: '',
967
+ is_valid: '',
968
+ is_auth: 'False',
969
+ is_agreement: '',
970
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
971
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
972
+ });
973
+ </script>
974
+
975
+
976
+
977
+
978
+
979
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
980
+ <script type="text/javascript">
981
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
982
+ window.is_auth = false;
983
+
984
+ // Document context for chatbot
985
+ window.documentContext = {
986
+ tid: 10130168,
987
+ title: "Rupa Gurung vs State Of Sikkim on 11 March, 2020",
988
+ url: window.location.href,
989
+ isFragment: false
990
+ };
991
+
992
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
993
+ </script>
994
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
995
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
996
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
997
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c570813fc53aa33',t:'MTc2OTY3MTkwMy4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
1002
+
1003
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_105775295.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1101 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Sukhwant Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 November, 2021</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/105775295/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KSOv2wAiFpyfpM77Bgrb7lc83gjXwnbTpgcZeMfBszgTp4J8xYaz7OYdiFLc5N9J">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/105775295/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KSOv2wAiFpyfpM77Bgrb7lc83gjXwnbTpgcZeMfBszgTp4J8xYaz7OYdiFLc5N9J">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/105775295/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KSOv2wAiFpyfpM77Bgrb7lc83gjXwnbTpgcZeMfBszgTp4J8xYaz7OYdiFLc5N9J">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:105775295">21</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:105775295">4</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Punjab-Haryana High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Sukhwant Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 November, 2021</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:v-bahl">Vikas Bahl</a></h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:v-bahl">Vikas Bahl</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <pre id="pre_1">CRM-M-46920-2021 -1-
193
+
194
+ 206
195
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
196
+ CHANDIGARH
197
+
198
+ CRM-M-46920-2021
199
+ Date of decision : 15.11.2021
200
+
201
+ Sukhwant Singh
202
+
203
+ ...Petitioner
204
+
205
+ Versus
206
+
207
+ State of Haryana
208
+
209
+ ...Respondent
210
+
211
+ CORAM: HON&#x27;BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
212
+
213
+ Present: Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner.
214
+
215
+ Mr. Praveen Bhadu, AAG, Haryana.
216
+
217
+ ****
218
+
219
+ VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
220
+ </pre>
221
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1"> Prayer in the present petition is for grant of regular bail to the
222
+
223
+ petitioner in FIR No.72 dated 18.05.2021 registered under <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_1">Section 20</a> of
224
+
225
+ the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to
226
+
227
+ be referred as &quot;the Act of 1985&quot;), <a href="/doc/73862/" id="a_2">Section 25</a> of the Arms Act, 1959 and
228
+
229
+ <a href="/doc/1119707/" id="a_3">Sections 395</a>, <a href="/doc/222396/" id="a_4">427</a>, <a href="/doc/1865807/" id="a_5">216</a> and <a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_6">34</a> of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police
230
+
231
+ Station Satnali, District Mahendergarh (District Narnaul).
232
+
233
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_2"> The prosecution case is that secret information had been
234
+
235
+ received to the effect that one Canter had been parked near Village Barda
236
+
237
+ and since, there was suspicion that there were some intoxicant substances
238
+
239
+ in the same, and finding the said information to be credible, a police team
240
+
241
+ was formed to conduct the raid. Efforts were made to join witnesses from
242
+
243
+
244
+ 1 of 11
245
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:37:59 :::</span>
246
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_2"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -2-</span>
247
+
248
+ the public but the people showed their inability to do so and when the
249
+
250
+ police party reached near the Canter, no person was found present near it
251
+
252
+ and thereafter, a notice under <a href="/doc/1841395/" id="a_7">Section 42</a> of the Act of 1985 was prepared
253
+
254
+ and was forwarded to the Duty Magistrate. The Duty Magistrate reached
255
+
256
+ at the spot and in his presence, the search of the Canter was conducted.
257
+
258
+ During the search, 17 quintals 12 kg and 760 grams of huge quantity of
259
+
260
+ ganja was recovered from the said Canter. During the search of cabin of
261
+
262
+ the Canter, one Driving Licence issued in the name of Ravi Kumar son of
263
+
264
+ Om Parkash and one Aadhaar Card also, in the name of Ravi Kumar,
265
+
266
+ were recovered and the FIR was registered against the unidentified
267
+
268
+ persons. Thereafter, co-accused Sandeep, Ajit, Rohit and Kuldeep were
269
+
270
+ arrested. The present petitioner was also arrested on 25.05.2021.
271
+
272
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_3"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="160212071" id="span_3"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="135980046" id="span_4">Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the
273
+
274
+ petitioner was not named in the FIR and he has nothing to do with the
275
+
276
+ said occurrence inasmuch as neither he is the owner of the Canter nor is
277
+
278
+ alleged to be the driver of the Canter. It is further submitted that no
279
+
280
+ recovery has been effected from the petitioner nor the petitioner can be
281
+
282
+ stated to be in conscious possession of any intoxicant much less
283
+
284
+ intoxicant substance that has been recovered. It is argued that even as per
285
+
286
+ the alleged disclosure statement of the petitioner (Annexure P-2), only
287
+
288
+ role which has been attributed to the petitioner is that he had promised the
289
+
290
+ co-accused, who had allegedly brought Ganja from the State of Orissa, to
291
+
292
+ inform them about safe passage in the area of Satnali. It is further argued
293
+
294
+ that even as per the said disclosure statement (Annexure P-2), the
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+ 2 of 11
299
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_5"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
300
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_6"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -3-</span>
301
+
302
+ petitioner was not the person, who was either driving the Canter or was
303
+
304
+ even in the Canter and was stated to be in a Duster Car which was
305
+
306
+ following the Canter. It is contended that it is Ravi Kumar, who was the
307
+
308
+ driver of the Canter and the said Ganja was stated to be allegedly
309
+
310
+ purchased from State of Orissa, by Lakhmi and Kuldeep. It is further
311
+
312
+ contended that there is no allegation against the petitioner that he had
313
+
314
+ either purchased the intoxicant/narcotic substance or sold the same or was
315
+
316
+ in conscious possession of the same or was even present in the Canter in
317
+
318
+ which the said contraband was being carried. It is stated that no recovery
319
+
320
+ has been effected from the petitioner and thus, reliance has been placed
321
+
322
+ upon an order passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court dated
323
+
324
+ 17.06.2020 in CRM-M-12051-2020 titled <a href="/doc/135980046/" id="a_8">Mewa Singh Vs. State of
325
+
326
+ Punjab</a>, and an order of another Coordinate Bench dated 16.07.2021
327
+
328
+ passed in CRM-M-12997-2020 titled as <a href="/doc/160212071/" id="a_9">Daljit Singh Vs. State of
329
+
330
+ Haryana</a> to contend that in such like cases if a person has been proceeded
331
+
332
+ against only on the basis of disclosure statement and no recovery has
333
+
334
+ been effected from the petitioner, then he should be granted the benefit of
335
+
336
+ bail. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not involved in any other
337
+
338
+ case.</span></span>
339
+ </p>
340
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_4"> Learned Counsel for the petitioner has further contended that
341
+
342
+ the petitioner has been in custody since 25.05.2021 and the challan has
343
+
344
+ been presented and there are as many as 28 witnesses, out of which, none
345
+
346
+ have been examined as yet and thus, the conclusion of the trial is likely to
347
+
348
+ take a long time, moreso, in view of the COVID-19 pandemic.
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_5"> 3 of 11
353
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_7"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
354
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_8"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -4-</span>
355
+
356
+ Learned counsel for the petitioner, in order to overcome the
357
+
358
+ bar under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_10">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, has relied upon several
359
+
360
+ judgments. The said judgments have been collated hereinbelow:
361
+
362
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_1"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="78902633" id="span_9">i) Judgment of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal
363
+
364
+ No.965 of 2021 titled as <a href="/doc/78902633/" id="a_11">Dheeren Kumar Jaina v. Union of India</a>.</span>
365
+
366
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_2"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="88370417" id="span_10">ii) Judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench titled as <a href="/doc/88370417/" id="a_12">Ankush Kumar @ Sonu
367
+
368
+ v. State of Punjab</a> reported as 2018 (4) RCR (Criminal) 84; which
369
+
370
+ was further challenged in the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court vide SLP
371
+
372
+ (Criminal) Diary No.42609 of 2018 and the same was upheld.</span>
373
+
374
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_3"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155324943" id="span_11">iii) Judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench in CRM-M-20177-2020 titled as
375
+
376
+ <a href="/doc/155324943/" id="a_13">Narcotic Control Bureau v. Vipan Sood and another</a> and the same
377
+
378
+ was upheld by the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court vide order dated
379
+
380
+ 24.08.2021 in a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
381
+
382
+ No.5852/2021.</span>
383
+ </blockquote>
384
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_6"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="177690340" id="span_12">iv) Judgment of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal
385
+
386
+ No.668 of 2020 titled as &quot;<a href="/doc/177690340/" id="a_14">Amit Singh @ Moni v. Himachal
387
+
388
+ Pradesh</a>.</span>
389
+ </p>
390
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_7"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="50401054" id="span_13">v) Judgment of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in Criminal
391
+
392
+ AppealNo.827 of 2021 titled as <a href="/doc/50401054/" id="a_15">Mukarram Hussain v. State of
393
+
394
+ Rajasthan and another</a>.</span>
395
+ </p>
396
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_8"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="8920567" id="span_14">vi) Judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M 10343
397
+
398
+ of 2021 titled as &quot;<a href="/doc/8920567/" id="a_16">Ajay Kumar @ Nannu v. State of Punjab</a>&quot;.</span>
399
+
400
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_9"> Further, reliance has also been placed upon the judgment of a
401
+
402
+ Division Bench of this Court in CRM-8262-2021 in CRA-S-3721-SB of
403
+
404
+
405
+
406
+ 4 of 11
407
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_15"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
408
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_16"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -5-</span>
409
+
410
+ 2015 titled as, Harpal Singh v. National Investigating Agency and
411
+
412
+ another, dated 31.08.2021, wherein the Division Bench was pleased to
413
+
414
+ grant suspension of sentence in a case where the recovery was of
415
+
416
+ commercial quantity. It has been argued that in the said Division Bench
417
+
418
+ judgment, it had been noticed that the grounds for regular bail stand on
419
+
420
+ better footing than for suspension of sentence, which is after conviction.
421
+
422
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_10"> Notice of motion.
423
+ </p>
424
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_11"> On advance notice, Mr. Praveen Bhadu, AAG, Haryana,
425
+
426
+ appears and accepts notice on behalf of the State and stated that he is
427
+
428
+ fully prepared to argue the matter and assist this Court. He has opposed
429
+
430
+ the present petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner and has
431
+
432
+ submitted that the quantity recovered in the present case is a huge
433
+
434
+ quantity and there are call details between the petitioner and co-accused
435
+
436
+ Lakhmi. However, other averments and facts as stated by the learned
437
+
438
+ counsel for the petitioner, have not been disputed by him.
439
+
440
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_12"> This Court has considered the arguments of learned counsel
441
+
442
+ for the parties and perused the paper book.
443
+ </p>
444
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_13"> It is not in dispute that the petitioner was not named in the
445
+
446
+ FIR and even the documents recovered from the Canter in question, are
447
+
448
+ with respect to co-accused Ravi Kumar. The Canter, is neither owned nor
449
+
450
+ was being driven by the petitioner nor it is the case of the prosecution that
451
+
452
+ the petitioner was sitting/present in the Canter. The petitioner is neither
453
+
454
+ stated to be the person who had purchased the Ganja from the State of
455
+
456
+ Orissa nor the person who had sold the same. The only allegation against
457
+
458
+
459
+
460
+ 5 of 11
461
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_17"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
462
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_18"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -6-</span>
463
+
464
+ the petitioner, even as per his own disclosure statement (Annexure P-2),
465
+
466
+ is that the petitioner was giving information with respect to safe passage
467
+
468
+ for the said Canter while sitting in a Duster Car. The question i.e. as to
469
+
470
+ whether when the petitioner was not even sitting in the Canter in
471
+
472
+ question, the petitioner could be considered to be in conscious possession
473
+
474
+ of the contraband, is a moot point, which would be decided during the
475
+
476
+ course of trial. It is co-accused persons Lakhmi and Kuldeep, who have
477
+
478
+ been stated to bring Ganja from the State of Orissa and it is co-accused
479
+
480
+ Ravi Kumar, who was driving the Canter. Even, after the said disclosure
481
+
482
+ statement has been recorded, no recovery has been effected from the
483
+
484
+ petitioner. It is further not in dispute that the petitioner is not involved in
485
+
486
+ any other case. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 25.05.2021
487
+
488
+ and there are as many as 28 witnesses, out of which, none have been
489
+
490
+ examined as yet and, thus, the conclusion of the trial is likely to take
491
+
492
+ time, moreso in view of the COVID-19 pandemic.
493
+ </p>
494
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_14"> Learned counsel for the petitioner has also highlighted the
495
+
496
+ fact that in various cases where recovery of commercial quantity was
497
+
498
+ involved, the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court as well as this Court have, on the
499
+
500
+ basis of arguable points in the bail application as well as by considering
501
+
502
+ the period of custody and the merits of the case, granted bail/suspension
503
+
504
+ of sentence. Some of the said judgments are being discussed hereinafter.
505
+
506
+ <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="78902633" id="span_19">In Criminal Appeal No.965 of 2021 titled as <a href="/doc/78902633/" id="a_17">Dheeren Kumar Jaina v.
507
+
508
+ Union of India</a>, the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in a case where allegation in
509
+
510
+ the chargesheet was with respect to 120 kg of contraband i.e. &quot;ganja&quot;,
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+ 6 of 11
515
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_20"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
516
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_21"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -7-</span>
517
+
518
+ thus, being of commercial quantity, was pleased to grant bail after setting
519
+
520
+ aside the order of the High Court where the said application for grant of
521
+
522
+ regular bail had been rejected.</span>
523
+ </p>
524
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_15"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="88370417" id="span_22">A co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a detailed judgment
525
+
526
+ titled as <a href="/doc/88370417/" id="a_18">Ankush Kumar @ Sonu v. State of Punjab</a> reported as 2018 (4)
527
+
528
+ RCR (Criminal) 84, had considered the provision of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_19">Section 37</a> of the
529
+
530
+ NDPS Act in extenso and had granted bail in a case which involved
531
+
532
+ commercial quantity. The relevant portion of <a href="/doc/88370417/" id="a_20">the said judgment</a> is
533
+
534
+ reproduced as under:</span>
535
+ </p>
536
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_4"> &quot; xxx--xxx--xxx
537
+ But, so far as second part of <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_21">Section 37 (1) (b) (ii)</a>, i.e.
538
+ regarding the satisfaction of the Court based on reasons to
539
+ believe that the accused would not commit &#x27;any offence&#x27; after
540
+ coming out of the custody, is concerned, this Court finds that
541
+ this is the requirement which is being insisted by the State,
542
+ despite the same being irrational and being incomprehensible
543
+ from any material on record. As held above, this Court
544
+ cannot go into the future mental state of the mind of the
545
+ petitioner as to what he would be, likely, doing after getting
546
+ released on bail. Therefore, if this Court cannot record a
547
+ reasonable satisfaction that the petitioner is not likely to
548
+ commit &#x27;any offence&#x27; or &#x27;offence under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_22">NDPS Act</a>&#x27; after being
549
+ released on bail, then this court, also, does not have any
550
+ reasonable ground to be satisfied that the petitioner is likely
551
+ to commit any offence after he is released on bail. Hence, this
552
+ satisfaction of the Court in this regard is neutral qua future
553
+ possible conduct of the petitioner.&quot;
554
+ </blockquote>
555
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_16"> The Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No.42609 of
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+ 7 of 11
561
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_23"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
562
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_24"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -8-</span>
563
+
564
+ 2018 filed against the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench of
565
+
566
+ this Court, was dismissed by the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court.
567
+
568
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_17"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155324943" id="span_25">Further, vide order dated 25.02.2021 in CRM-M-20177-
569
+
570
+ 2020, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court granted regular bail to an
571
+
572
+ accused who was involved in a case wherein recovery was of 3.8 kgs of
573
+
574
+ &quot;charas&quot; (commercial quantity) after being in custody for 1 year and 7
575
+
576
+ months. The said order was upheld by the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court vide
577
+
578
+ order dated 24.08.2021 in a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
579
+
580
+ No.5852/2021 titled as &quot;<a href="/doc/155324943/" id="a_23">Narcotic Control Bureau v. Vipan Sood and
581
+
582
+ another</a>&quot;.</span>
583
+ </p>
584
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_18"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="177690340" id="span_26">The Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated
585
+
586
+ 12.10.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.668 of 2020 titled as &quot;<a href="/doc/177690340/" id="a_24">Amit
587
+
588
+ Singh @ Moni v. Himachal Pradesh</a>&quot; was pleased to grant regular bail in
589
+
590
+ a case involving 3 kg and 800 grams of &quot;charas&quot; primarily on the ground
591
+
592
+ of substantial custody and also, the fact that the trial would likely take
593
+
594
+ time to conclude.</span>
595
+ </p>
596
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_19"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="50401054" id="span_27">In Criminal Appeal No.827 of 2021 titled as <a href="/doc/50401054/" id="a_25">Mukarram
597
+
598
+ Hussain v. State of Rajasthan and another</a>, the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court vide
599
+
600
+ judgment dated 16.8.2021 was also pleased to grant bail wherein the
601
+
602
+ quantity of the contraband was commercial in nature.</span>
603
+
604
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_20"> A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M 10343 of 2021
605
+
606
+ titled as Ajay Kumar @ Nannu v. State of Punjaband other connected
607
+
608
+ matters, vide Order dated 31.03.2021, after taking into consideration the
609
+
610
+ stipulations of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_26">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, was pleased to grant regular
611
+
612
+
613
+
614
+ 8 of 11
615
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_28"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
616
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_29"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -9-</span>
617
+
618
+ bail in a case involving commercial quantity and a condition was imposed
619
+
620
+ on the petitioner therein while granting the said bail and the said
621
+
622
+ condition was incorporated in para 21 of the said judgment, which reads
623
+
624
+ as under:
625
+ </p>
626
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_5"> &quot;21. However, the petitioners are granted regular bail subject
627
+ to the condition that they shall not commit any offence under
628
+ the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_27">NDPS Act</a> after their release on bail and in case of
629
+ commission of any such offence by them after their release on
630
+ bail, their bail in the present case shall also be liable to be
631
+ cancelled on application to be filed by the prosecution in this
632
+ regard.&quot;
633
+ </blockquote>
634
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_21"> Further, a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated
635
+
636
+ 31.08.2021 passed in CRM-8262-2021 in CRA-S-3721-SB of 2015 titled
637
+
638
+ as, Harpal Singh v. National Investigating Agency and another, granted
639
+
640
+ suspension of sentence in a case where the recovery was of commercial
641
+
642
+ quantity. In the abovementioned order, the Division Bench had taken into
643
+
644
+ consideration the right vested with an accused person/convict under
645
+
646
+ <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_28">Article 21</a> of the Constitution of India with regard to speedy trial. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="57169485" id="span_30">Further,
647
+
648
+ the judgment of Hon&#x27;ble the Supreme Court in <a href="/doc/57169485/" id="a_29">State (NCT of Delhi) v.
649
+
650
+ Lokesh Chadha</a>; (2021) 5 SCC 724 was also taken into account and the
651
+
652
+ provisions of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_30">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act were considered and the sentence
653
+
654
+ of the applicant-appellant therein was suspended after primarily
655
+
656
+ considering the period of custody of the applicant-appellant therein and
657
+
658
+ also the fact that the appeal was not likely to be heard in near future.</span>
659
+
660
+ <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="74048108" id="span_31"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="74048108" id="span_32">Reference in the order was also made to the Division Bench judgment of
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+ 9 of 11
666
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_33"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
667
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_34"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -10-</span>
668
+
669
+ this Court in <a href="/doc/74048108/" id="a_31">Daler Singh v. State of Punjab</a>; 2007 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal)
670
+
671
+ 316 and the view taken in <a href="/doc/74048108/" id="a_32">Daler Singh</a>&#x27;s case (supra) was reiterated and
672
+
673
+ followed. In the above said judgment, it was also noticed that the grounds
674
+
675
+ for regular bail stand on a better footing than that of suspension of
676
+
677
+ sentence which is after conviction. It is apparent that to meet the
678
+
679
+ requirement of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_33">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, various Courts have taken
680
+
681
+ into consideration the merits of the case and the period of custody and
682
+
683
+ where, in a case there are arguable points on merits and the custody is
684
+
685
+ also adequate, the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme as well as various High Courts have
686
+
687
+ granted bail even in cases involving commercial quantity. This Court is
688
+
689
+ of the opinion that in the present case, there are several arguable points
690
+
691
+ which have been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
692
+
693
+ petitioner has been in custody since 25.05.2021 and all the abovesaid
694
+
695
+ factors are sufficient to entitle the petitioner for the concession of regular
696
+
697
+ bail. Moreover, this Court proposes to impose such conditions that would
698
+
699
+ meet the object of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_34">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act.</span></span>
700
+ </p>
701
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_22"> Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner
702
+
703
+ is directed to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail/surety
704
+
705
+ bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court/Duty Magistrate and
706
+
707
+ subject to him not being required in any other case. The petitioner shall
708
+
709
+ also abide by the following conditions:-
710
+ </p>
711
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_6">1. The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
712
+
713
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_7">2. The petitioner will not pressurize / intimidate the prosecution
714
+
715
+ witness(s).
716
+ </blockquote>
717
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_8">
718
+
719
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_9"> 10 of 11
720
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_35"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
721
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_36"> CRM-M-46920-2021 -11-</span>
722
+
723
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_10">3. The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on the date fixed,
724
+
725
+ unless personal presence is exempted.
726
+ </blockquote>
727
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_11">4. The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of
728
+
729
+ which he is accused of, or for commission of which he is suspected.
730
+
731
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_12">5. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,
732
+
733
+ threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the
734
+
735
+ case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court
736
+
737
+ or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
738
+
739
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_23"> In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the
740
+
741
+ prosecution shall be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of
742
+
743
+ bail before this Court.
744
+ </p>
745
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_24"> However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final
746
+
747
+ expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the trial Court would
748
+
749
+ proceed independently of the observations made in the present case
750
+
751
+ which are only for the purpose of adjudicating the present bail
752
+
753
+ application.</p><pre id="pre_2">
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+ 15.11.2021 (VIKAS BAHL)
758
+ Pawan JUDGE
759
+
760
+
761
+ Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
762
+
763
+ Whether reportable:- Yes/No
764
+
765
+
766
+
767
+
768
+ 11 of 11
769
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_37"> ::: Downloaded on - 23-01-2022 19:38:00 :::</span>
770
+ </pre>
771
+ </div>
772
+ </article>
773
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
774
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
775
+ <div class="translate_container">
776
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
777
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
778
+ <button id="translatewarn"
779
+ type="button"
780
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
781
+ </div>
782
+
783
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
784
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
785
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
786
+
787
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:non-bailable-offences">non-bailable-offences</a></div></li>
788
+
789
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:law-governing-narcotics">law-governing-narcotics</a></div></li>
790
+
791
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:punishment-for-cannabis-use-cultivation-selling">punishment-for-cannabis-use-cultivation-selling</a></div></li>
792
+
793
+ </ul>
794
+ </nav>
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
799
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
800
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
801
+
802
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=grant%20of%20bail">grant of bail</a></div></li>
803
+
804
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=conscious%20possession">conscious possession</a></div></li>
805
+
806
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
807
+
808
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
809
+
810
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ganja">ganja</a></div></li>
811
+
812
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20granted">bail granted</a></div></li>
813
+
814
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=regular%20bail">regular bail</a></div></li>
815
+
816
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=disclosure%20statement">disclosure statement</a></div></li>
817
+
818
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotic%20drug">narcotic drug</a></div></li>
819
+
820
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=suspension">suspension</a></div></li>
821
+
822
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Crm-m">Crm-m</a></div></li>
823
+
824
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20%20duty%20magistrate%20"> duty magistrate </a></div></li>
825
+
826
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=the%20narcotic%20drugs%20and%20psychotropic%20substances%20act">the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act</a></div></li>
827
+
828
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotics%20and%20drugs%20act">narcotics and drugs act</a></div></li>
829
+
830
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Ravi">Ravi</a></div></li>
831
+
832
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20psychotropic%20drug"> psychotropic drug</a></div></li>
833
+
834
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20in%20all%20case">bail in all case</a></div></li>
835
+
836
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Section%2037">Section 37</a></div></li>
837
+
838
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=release%20on%20bail">release on bail</a></div></li>
839
+
840
+ </ul>
841
+ </nav>
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+ </aside>
846
+ </div>
847
+
848
+ </main>
849
+
850
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
851
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
852
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
853
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
854
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
855
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
856
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
857
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
858
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
859
+
860
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/105775295/" class="device-toggle">
861
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KSOv2wAiFpyfpM77Bgrb7lc83gjXwnbTpgcZeMfBszgTp4J8xYaz7OYdiFLc5N9J">
862
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
863
+ </form>
864
+ </div>
865
+ </footer>
866
+
867
+ <script>
868
+ (function() {
869
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
870
+
871
+ if (navigator.share) {
872
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
873
+
874
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
875
+ try {
876
+ await navigator.share({
877
+ title: document.title,
878
+ url: window.location.href
879
+ });
880
+ } catch (err) {
881
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
882
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
883
+ }
884
+ }
885
+ });
886
+ }
887
+ })();
888
+ </script>
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
893
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
894
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
895
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
896
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
897
+
898
+
899
+ <script type="text/javascript">
900
+ (function($) {
901
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
902
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
903
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
904
+ }
905
+ }
906
+
907
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
908
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
909
+ return $("<li></li>")
910
+ .append(
911
+ $("<div></div>")
912
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
913
+ .html(item.label)
914
+ )
915
+ .appendTo(ul);
916
+ };
917
+ }
918
+
919
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
920
+ if (!$input.length) {
921
+ return;
922
+ }
923
+
924
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
925
+
926
+ $input.autocomplete({
927
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
928
+ delay: 180,
929
+ minLength: 2,
930
+ appendTo: 'body',
931
+ position: {
932
+ my: "left top",
933
+ at: "left bottom+6",
934
+ collision: "flipfit"
935
+ },
936
+ classes: {
937
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
938
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
939
+ },
940
+ open: function() {
941
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
942
+ var offset = $input.offset();
943
+ $menu
944
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
945
+ .css({
946
+ left: offset.left,
947
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
948
+ });
949
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
950
+ },
951
+ close: function() {
952
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
953
+ },
954
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
955
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
956
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
957
+ event.preventDefault();
958
+ }
959
+ },
960
+ select: function(event, ui) {
961
+ event.preventDefault();
962
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
963
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
964
+ }
965
+
966
+ if ($form.length) {
967
+ $form.trigger('submit');
968
+ } else {
969
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
970
+ }
971
+ }
972
+ });
973
+
974
+ }
975
+
976
+ $(document).ready(function() {
977
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
978
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
979
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
980
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
981
+ });
982
+ })(jQuery);
983
+ </script>
984
+
985
+
986
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
987
+ <script type="text/javascript">
988
+ $(document).ready(function() {
989
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
990
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
991
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
992
+
993
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
994
+ signupForDownload();
995
+ e.preventDefault();
996
+ return false;
997
+ });
998
+
999
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
1000
+ e.preventDefault();
1001
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
1002
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
1003
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
1004
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
1005
+ });
1006
+ });
1007
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
1008
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
1009
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1010
+ if (!translateContainer) {
1011
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
1012
+ return;
1013
+ }
1014
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
1015
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
1016
+ return;
1017
+ }
1018
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
1019
+
1020
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
1021
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1022
+ if (!translateEl) {
1023
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
1024
+ return;
1025
+ }
1026
+
1027
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
1028
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
1029
+
1030
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
1031
+ var node;
1032
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
1033
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
1034
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
1035
+ }
1036
+ }
1037
+
1038
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
1039
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
1040
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
1041
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
1042
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
1043
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
1044
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
1045
+ }
1046
+ }
1047
+ });
1048
+ }
1049
+
1050
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
1051
+ }
1052
+ </script>
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
1059
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1060
+ $(document).ready(function () {
1061
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
1062
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
1063
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
1064
+ valid_ag: '',
1065
+ is_valid: '',
1066
+ is_auth: 'False',
1067
+ is_agreement: '',
1068
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
1069
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
1070
+ });
1071
+ </script>
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
1078
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1079
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
1080
+ window.is_auth = false;
1081
+
1082
+ // Document context for chatbot
1083
+ window.documentContext = {
1084
+ tid: 105775295,
1085
+ title: "Sukhwant Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 November, 2021",
1086
+ url: window.location.href,
1087
+ isFragment: false
1088
+ };
1089
+
1090
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
1091
+ </script>
1092
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
1093
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
1094
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
1095
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c571345fda6186d',t:'MTc2OTY3MjM2Mi4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
1100
+
1101
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_106325241.html ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
hc_bulk//NDPS_10749346.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1307 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Ashok Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 9 April, 2021</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/10749346/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KIe9s0oGu0TpVQecdrRygmpul6Icchb7YOJH9O6SVKYM6yJDkf023Y9Raeng8EtO">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/10749346/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KIe9s0oGu0TpVQecdrRygmpul6Icchb7YOJH9O6SVKYM6yJDkf023Y9Raeng8EtO">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/10749346/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KIe9s0oGu0TpVQecdrRygmpul6Icchb7YOJH9O6SVKYM6yJDkf023Y9Raeng8EtO">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:10749346">26</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:10749346">0</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Punjab-Haryana High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Ashok Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 9 April, 2021</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_citations">Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2021 P AND H 466</h3>
189
+
190
+ <pre id="pre_1"> IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA
191
+ AT CHANDIGARH
192
+
193
+ (1) CRM-M-12951-2020
194
+ Date of decision: 09.04.2021
195
+
196
+ Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner
197
+ Versus
198
+ State of Haryana .....Respondent
199
+
200
+ (2) CRM-M-7998-2020
201
+ Date of decision: 09.04.2021
202
+
203
+ Danvir Singh .....Petitioner
204
+ Versus
205
+ State of Haryana .....Respondent
206
+
207
+ (3) CRM-M-9957-2020
208
+ Date of decision: 09.04.2021
209
+
210
+ Bhim Singh .....Petitioner
211
+ Versus
212
+ State of Haryana .....Respondent
213
+
214
+ CORAM: HON&#x27;BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
215
+
216
+ Argued by : Mr. Sandeep Siwach, Advocate for
217
+ Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate
218
+ for the petitioner in CRM-M-12951-2020.
219
+
220
+ Mr. Deepan Sharma, Advocate
221
+ for the petitioner in CRM-7998-2020 and
222
+ CRM-9957-2020.
223
+
224
+ Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, Addl. A.G., Haryana
225
+ for the respondent-State.
226
+
227
+ (Order pronounced through video Conferencing).
228
+ ****
229
+
230
+ ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, J.
231
+ </pre>
232
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1">1. Petitioner-Ashok Kumar has filed CRM-M-12951-2020,
233
+
234
+ petitioner-Danvir Singh has filed CRM-M-7998-2020 and petitioner-
235
+
236
+ Bhim Singh has filed CRM-M-9957-2020 under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_1">Section 439</a> of the
237
+
238
+ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, &quot;the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_2">Cr.P.C</a>.&#x27;) for grant of
239
+
240
+ regular bail in case FIR No.194 dated 27.07.2019 registered under
241
+
242
+ <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_3">Section 20</a> of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+ 1 of 14
247
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
248
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_2"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -2-</span>
249
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
250
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
251
+
252
+ 1985 (for short, &quot;the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_4">NDPS Act</a>&quot;) at Police Station IMT Rohtak.
253
+
254
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_2">2. As per the prosecution version on 27.07.2019, the police
255
+
256
+ party headed by ASI Pankaj was present in official vehicle for
257
+
258
+ patrolling duty in the area of IMT Chowk, Rohtak. Secret information
259
+
260
+ was received that accused Ashok Kumar (petitioner in CRM-M-12951-
261
+
262
+ 2020), Danvir Singh (petitioner in CRM-M-7998-2020) and Bhim
263
+
264
+ Singh (petitioner in CRM-M-9957-2020), who were supplying
265
+
266
+ intoxicants would come from Delhi to Rohtak in car No.HR-26-AD-
267
+
268
+ 5275 with huge quantity of intoxicants and if the vehicle was searched
269
+
270
+ the same could be recovered. Intimation under <a href="/doc/1841395/" id="a_5">Section 42</a> of the NDPS
271
+
272
+ Act was sent and written information was also sent through EHC
273
+
274
+ Rakesh to Police Station IMT, Rohtak. ASI Pankaj also informed police
275
+
276
+ officers about the said facts and started checking the vehicles coming
277
+
278
+ from Delhi. Car No.HR-26-AD-5275 was stopped. Accused Bhim
279
+
280
+ Singh was driving the car while accused Danvir was sitting on the co-
281
+
282
+ driver seat and accused Ashok Kumar was sitting on the rear seat.
283
+
284
+ Notice under <a href="/doc/961083/" id="a_6">Section 50</a> of the NDPS Act was served on them
285
+
286
+ informing them about their right to search of car in the presence of
287
+
288
+ Gazetted Officer or Magistrate but the above said accused persons
289
+
290
+ consented to search by ASI Pankaj. ASI Pankaj searched the car and
291
+
292
+ recovered two plastic bags from dicky of the car. On weighing, both the
293
+
294
+ bags were found to contain ganja patti weighing 16 kilograms 100
295
+
296
+ grams and 17 kilograms 400 grams respectively totaling 33 kilograms
297
+
298
+ 500 grams. The car and the ganja patti were taken into possession by
299
+
300
+ the police. Written information was sent to the police station for
301
+
302
+
303
+
304
+ 2 of 14
305
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_3"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
306
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_4"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -3-</span>
307
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
308
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
309
+
310
+ registration of the FIR with the request to send another investigating
311
+
312
+ officer. The police arrested the petitioners and subsequently also
313
+
314
+ arrested co-accused Dharmender in view of the disclosure statement of
315
+
316
+ petitioner-Ashok Kumar and on completion of investigation charge-
317
+
318
+ sheeted them to face trial.
319
+ </p>
320
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_3">3. The petitioners being in custody have filed the present
321
+
322
+ petitions for grant of regular bail.
323
+ </p>
324
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_4">4. The petitions have been contested by the respondent-State
325
+
326
+ in terms of replies filed by way of affidavit of Narender Kumar, HPS,
327
+
328
+ Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sampla, District Rohtak in CRM-M-
329
+
330
+ 12951-2020 and CRM-M-7998-2020. However, no reply has been filed
331
+
332
+ by respondent-State in CRM-M-9957-2020.
333
+ </p>
334
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_5">5. I have heard arguments addressed by learned Counsel for
335
+
336
+ the petitioners and learned State Counsel and gone through the relevant
337
+
338
+ record.
339
+ </p>
340
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_6">6. Learned Counsel for the petitioners have argued that the
341
+
342
+ petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have
343
+
344
+ nothing to do with the alleged offence. In the present case mandatory
345
+
346
+ provisions of <a href="/doc/961083/" id="a_7">Section 50</a> of the NDPS Act have not been complied with.
347
+
348
+ ASI Pankaj gave joint notice to the petitioners informing them about
349
+
350
+ their right to search of the car in the presence of Gazetted Officer or
351
+
352
+ Magistrate but alleging giving of consent by the petitioners to search of
353
+
354
+ the car by him, himself conducted the search of the car. Giving of joint
355
+
356
+ notice to the petitioners regarding their right to search of the car in the
357
+
358
+ presence of Gazetted Officer or Magistrate and also subsequent search
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+ 3 of 14
363
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_5"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
364
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_6"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -4-</span>
365
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
366
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
367
+
368
+ of the car by ASI Pankaj on the basis of alleged consent of the
369
+
370
+ petitioners was violative of mandatory provisions of <a href="/doc/961083/" id="a_8">Section 50</a> of the
371
+
372
+ NDPS Act which vitiates the recovery and investigation and the
373
+
374
+ petitioners are entitled to grant of concession of regular bail on this
375
+
376
+ ground. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="173720727" id="span_7"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="795643" id="span_8"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="155481249" id="span_9">In support of their arguments, learned Counsel for the
377
+
378
+ petitioners have placed reliance on the observations in <a href="/doc/155481249/" id="a_9">State of
379
+
380
+ Rajasthan Vs. Parmanand and another</a> : 2014(2) R.C.R. (Criminal)
381
+
382
+ 40; <a href="/doc/795643/" id="a_10">State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh</a> : 1994(<a href="/doc/173720727/" id="a_11">1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 736
383
+
384
+ and Arif Khan @ Agha Khan Vs. State of Uttarakhand</a> : 2018(2)
385
+
386
+ R.C.R. (Criminal) 931.</span></span></span>
387
+ </p>
388
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_7">7. Learned Counsel for the petitioners have further argued
389
+
390
+ that as per the definition of ganja given in <a href="/doc/1164980/" id="a_12">Section 2(iii)(b)</a> of the NDPS
391
+
392
+ Act the same comprises of flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis
393
+
394
+ plant excluding the seeds and leaves. In the FSL report, the contraband
395
+
396
+ received in the sample parcel is mentioned to be greenish brown
397
+
398
+ vegetative material having flowering/fruiting tops and seeds etc. The
399
+
400
+ contents of the bags allegedly recovered from possession of the
401
+
402
+ petitioners also included seeds and leaves of the cannabis. In the FSL
403
+
404
+ report the percentage of seeds and leaves was not mentioned. In view of
405
+
406
+ the same actual quantity of ganja could not be ascertained and the
407
+
408
+ actual weight of ganja contained in the bags allegedly recovered from
409
+
410
+ the petitioners cannot be said to be the same as determined by the
411
+
412
+ investigating officer and to fall in the category of commercial quantity
413
+
414
+ as the possibility of the same being much lower and falling in the
415
+
416
+ category of non-commercial quantity could not be ruled out.
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_8"> 4 of 14
421
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_10"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
422
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_11"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -5-</span>
423
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
424
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
425
+
426
+ Consequently, the petitioners cannot be said to be in conscious
427
+
428
+ possession of commercial quantity of ganja and the petitioners are
429
+
430
+ entitled to grant of bail on this ground. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="45410866" id="span_12"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="56476824" id="span_13">In support of their arguments,
431
+
432
+ learned Counsel for the petitioners have placed reliance on the
433
+
434
+ observations in <a href="/doc/56476824/" id="a_13">Roshan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana</a> : 2019(3) R.C.R.
435
+
436
+ (Criminal) 692; <a href="/doc/45410866/" id="a_14">Sudhir Vs. State of Haryana</a> : 2008(4) R.C.R.
437
+
438
+ (Criminal) 385 and Manu Kumar (Manukumar M) and others Vs.
439
+
440
+ State of Karnataka : 2018(1) DC (Narcotic) 434.</span></span>
441
+
442
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_9">8. Learned Counsel for the petitioners have further argued
443
+
444
+ that ganja total weighing 33 kilograms 500 grams was allegedly
445
+
446
+ recovered from all the three petitioners and on apportionment none of
447
+
448
+ the petitioners can be said to be in conscious possession of ganja
449
+
450
+ weighing more than 20 kilograms falling in the category of commercial
451
+
452
+ quantity. All the three petitioners being in conscious possession of non-
453
+
454
+ commercial quantity of less than 20 kilograms of ganja are entitled to
455
+
456
+ grant of bail on this ground also. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="45410866" id="span_14">In support of this argument learned
457
+
458
+ Counsel for the petitioners have placed reliance on the observations in
459
+
460
+ <a href="/doc/45410866/" id="a_15">Sudhir Vs. State of Haryana</a> : 2008(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 385.</span>
461
+
462
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_10">9. Learned Counsel for the petitioners have further argued
463
+
464
+ that the petitioners are in custody since 27.07.2019. The Co-ordinate
465
+
466
+ Benches in similar cases have granted regular bail to the accused on the
467
+
468
+ basis of period of custody. Similarly placed co-accused Dharmender
469
+
470
+ has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 21.08.2020.
471
+
472
+ The trial is likely to take long time due to restrictions imposed to
473
+
474
+ prevent the spread of Covid-19 and no useful purpose will be served by
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+ 5 of 14
479
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_15"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
480
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_16"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -6-</span>
481
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
482
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
483
+
484
+ further detention of the petitioners in custody during trial. Therefore,
485
+
486
+ the petitioners may be granted regular bail.
487
+ </p>
488
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_11">10. On the other hand, learned State Counsel has argued that
489
+
490
+ recovery of ganja was made from dicky of the car in which the
491
+
492
+ petitioners were travelling together. The petitioners were in joint
493
+
494
+ conscious possession of commercial quantity of the contraband. The
495
+
496
+ petitioners cannot be said to be in possession of non-commercial
497
+
498
+ quantity of the contraband by applying the method of apportionment.
499
+
500
+ <a href="/doc/961083/" id="a_16">Section 50</a> of the NDPS applies to personal search and the same was
501
+
502
+ not applicable to search of the car and the recovery and investigation
503
+
504
+ are not vitiated on the ground of non-compliance with the same. As per
505
+
506
+ the FSL report the contraband recovered from the possession of the
507
+
508
+ petitioners was ganja and the total weight has to be taken into
509
+
510
+ consideration for determination of the quantity of the contraband.
511
+
512
+ Rigors of <a href="/doc/1241164/" id="a_17">Section 37(1)(b)</a> of the NDPS Act are applicable and regular
513
+
514
+ bail cannot be granted to the petitioners unless both the conditions
515
+
516
+ thereof are satisfied. In view of nature of accusation and gravity of the
517
+
518
+ offence, the petitioners do not deserve grant of regular bail. Therefore,
519
+
520
+ the petitions may be dismissed.
521
+ </p>
522
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_12">11. <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_18">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, which legislates the offences
523
+
524
+ under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_19">NDPS Act</a> to be cognizable and non bailable and embodies
525
+
526
+ the limitations on grant of bail for the specified offences, reads as
527
+
528
+ under:-
529
+ </p>
530
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1"> &quot;37. Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable. --
531
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_2"> (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_20">Code of
532
+ Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974),--
533
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_3"> (a) every offence punishable under this Act shall be
534
+
535
+ 6 of 14
536
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_17"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
537
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_18"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -7-</span>
538
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
539
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
540
+
541
+ cognizable;
542
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_13"> (b) no person accused of an offence punishable for 3
543
+ [offences under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_21">section 19</a> or <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_22">section 24</a> or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_23">section 27A</a>
544
+ and also for offences involving commercial quantity] shall
545
+ be released on bail or on his own bond unless--
546
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_14"> (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to
547
+ oppose the application for such release, and
548
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_15"> (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application,
549
+ the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for
550
+ believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is
551
+ not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
552
+ (2) The limitations on granting of bail specified in clause
553
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_16"> (b) of sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations
554
+ under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_24">Code of Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974)
555
+ or any other law for the time being in force on granting of
556
+ bail.&quot;
557
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_17">12. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="775230" id="span_19">In <a href="/doc/775230/" id="a_25">Union of India Vs. Rattan Mallik @ Habul</a> : (SC) :</span>
558
+
559
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_4">2009(1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 938 Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court observed as
560
+
561
+ under:-
562
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_18"> &quot;13. It is plain from a bare reading of the non-
563
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_19"> obstante clause in the Section and sub-section (2) thereof
564
+ that the power to grant bail to a person accused of having
565
+ committed offence under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_26">Narcotic Drugs And
566
+ Psychotropic Substances Act</a> is not only subject to the
567
+ limitations imposed under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_27">Section 439</a> of the Code of
568
+ Criminal Procedure, 1973, it is also subject to the
569
+ restrictions placed by sub-clause (b) of sub-section (1) of
570
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_28">Section 37</a> of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
571
+ Substances Act. Apart from giving an opportunity to the
572
+ Public Prosecutor to oppose the application for such
573
+ release, the other twin conditions viz; (i) the satisfaction of
574
+ the Court that there are reasonable grounds for believing
575
+ that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence; and
576
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_20"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="1648816" id="span_20">(ii) that he is not likely to commit any offence while on
577
+ bail, have to be satisfied. It is manifest that the conditions
578
+ are cumulative and not alternative. The satisfaction
579
+ contemplated regarding the accused being not guilty, has
580
+ to be based on &quot;reasonable grounds&quot;. The expression
581
+ &#x27;reasonable grounds&#x27; has not been defined in the said Act
582
+ but means something more than prima facie grounds. It
583
+ connotes substantial probable causes for believing that the
584
+ accused is not guilty of the offence he is charged with. The
585
+ reasonable belief contemplated in turn points to existence
586
+ of such facts and circumstances as are sufficient in
587
+ themselves to justify satisfaction that the accused is not
588
+
589
+
590
+ 7 of 14
591
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_21"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
592
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_22"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -8-</span>
593
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
594
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
595
+
596
+ guilty of the alleged offence. [<a href="/doc/1648816/" id="a_29">Vide Union of India v. Shiv
597
+ Shanker Kesari</a>, 2007(4) RCR (Criminal) 186 : 2007(5)
598
+ RAJ 134 : (2007)7 SCC 798]. Thus, recording of
599
+ satisfaction on both the aspects, noted above, is sine qua
600
+ non for granting of bail under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_30">Narcotic Drugs And
601
+ Psychotropic Substances Act</a>.&quot;</span>
602
+ </p>
603
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_21"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="17960688" id="span_23"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="16657776" id="span_24">13. Exercise of power to grant bail is not only subject to
604
+
605
+ limitations contained under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_31">section 439</a> of Cr.P.C., 1973 but is also
606
+
607
+ subject to limitations placed by <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_32">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act. No person
608
+
609
+ can be enlarged on bail for offences enumerated under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_33">Section 37</a> of the
610
+
611
+ NDPS Act unless twin conditions embodied therein are satisfied. The
612
+
613
+ finding mandated under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_34">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act in this regard is a
614
+
615
+ sine qua non for granting bail to the accused under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_35">NDPS Act</a>. (See
616
+
617
+ <a href="/doc/16657776/" id="a_36">Union of India Vs. Niyazuddin Sk., (SC</a>) : 2017(4) R.C.R.(Criminal)
618
+
619
+ 644; <a href="/doc/17960688/" id="a_37">Satpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab (SC</a>) : 2018(5)
620
+
621
+ R.C.R.(Criminal) 152 and State of Kerala Vs. Rajesh (SC) : 2020 (1)
622
+
623
+ R.C.R.(Criminal) 818.</span></span> Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court has also held in State of
624
+
625
+ Kerala Vs. Rajesh (SC) : 2020 (1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 818 that in the
626
+
627
+ matter of grant of bail in cases under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_38">NDPS Act</a> liberal approach is
628
+
629
+ uncalled for.
630
+ </p>
631
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_22">14. The facts and circumstances of the present case and
632
+
633
+ material on record have to be prima facie gone through for considering
634
+
635
+ as to whether the conditions laid down in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_39">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act
636
+
637
+ are satisfied in the present case to entitle the petitioners to grant of
638
+
639
+ regular bail.
640
+ </p>
641
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_23"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="173720727" id="span_25"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="795643" id="span_26"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155481249" id="span_27">15. As per the prosecution version two bags containing ganja
642
+
643
+ patti weighing 16 kilograms 100 grams and 17 kilograms 400 grams
644
+
645
+ total weight 33 kilograms 500 grams were allegedly recovered from the
646
+
647
+
648
+ 8 of 14
649
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_28"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
650
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_29"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -9-</span>
651
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
652
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
653
+
654
+ dicky of the car in which the petitioners were travelling. Admittedly,
655
+
656
+ joint notice informing the petitioners about their right to search of the
657
+
658
+ car in the presence of Gazetted Officer or Magistrate was served on the
659
+
660
+ petitioners and on the basis of their alleged consent search of the car
661
+
662
+ was conducted by ASI Pankaj. There is no dispute with the proposition
663
+
664
+ of law that the provisions of <a href="/doc/961083/" id="a_40">Section 50</a> of the NDPS Act are mandatory
665
+
666
+ as held in <a href="/doc/155481249/" id="a_41">State of Rajasthan Vs. Parmanand and another</a> : 2014(2)
667
+
668
+ R.C.R. (Criminal) 40; <a href="/doc/795643/" id="a_42">State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh</a> : 1994(<a href="/doc/173720727/" id="a_43">1)
669
+
670
+ R.C.R. (Criminal) 736 and Arif Khan @ Agha Khan Vs. State of
671
+
672
+ Uttarakhand</a> : 2018(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 931.</span></span></span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1988296" id="span_30">However, it is now well
673
+
674
+ settled that <a href="/doc/961083/" id="a_44">Section 50</a> of the NDPS Act applies to case of personal
675
+
676
+ search and does not apply to search of bag/briefcase/vehicle or
677
+
678
+ premises as held in <a href="/doc/1988296/" id="a_45">State of Punjab Vs. Baljinder Singh</a> : AIR 2019
679
+
680
+ (SC) 5298.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155481249" id="span_31">Therefore, search of the car by ASI Pankaj cannot be prima
681
+
682
+ facie said to be violative of mandatory provisions of <a href="/doc/961083/" id="a_46">Section 50</a> of the
683
+
684
+ NDPS Act and the petitioners are not entitled to grant of regular bail on
685
+
686
+ the ground that recovery and investigation are thereby vitiated and the
687
+
688
+ observations in <a href="/doc/155481249/" id="a_47">State of Rajasthan Vs. Parmanand and another</a> :</span>
689
+
690
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_5"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="795643" id="span_32">2014(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 40; <a href="/doc/795643/" id="a_48">State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh</a> :</span>
691
+
692
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_6"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="173720727" id="span_33">1994(<a href="/doc/173720727/" id="a_49">1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 736 and Arif Khan @ Agha Khan Vs. State
693
+
694
+ of Uttarakhand</a> : 2018(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 931 relied upon by
695
+
696
+ learned Counsel for the petitioners are not applicable and are not of any
697
+
698
+ help to the petitioners so far as the question of grant of regular to them
699
+
700
+ is concerned.</span>
701
+ </blockquote>
702
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_7">16. In the FSL report the contraband recovered was mentioned
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_24"> 9 of 14
707
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_34"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
708
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_35"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -10-</span>
709
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
710
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
711
+
712
+ to be greenish brown vegetative material having flowering, fruiting
713
+
714
+ tops/seeds etc. and it was also mentioned therein that on analytical
715
+
716
+ techniques applied the tests were positive for the presence of
717
+
718
+ tetrahydrocannabidiol and cannabidiol; characteristics trichomes of
719
+
720
+ ganja were present; and tests were positive for presence of ganja in the
721
+
722
+ samples. <a href="/doc/1164980/" id="a_50">Section 2(iii)(b)</a> of the NDPS Act defines ganja as &quot;the
723
+
724
+ flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant (excluding the seeds
725
+
726
+ and leaves when not accompanied by the tops), by whatever, name they
727
+
728
+ may be known or designated&quot;. As per the definition of ganja contained
729
+
730
+ in <a href="/doc/1164980/" id="a_51">Section 2(iii)(b)</a> of the NDPS Act, the seeds and leaves are excluded
731
+
732
+ from definition of ganja only when the same are not accompanied by
733
+
734
+ the tops. No doubt in the present case the contraband recovered from
735
+
736
+ the petitioners included the seeds and leaves but the same were
737
+
738
+ accompanied by the flowering/fruiting tops of the cannabis plant.
739
+
740
+ Therefore, in the present case prima facie seeds and leaves
741
+
742
+ accompanied by the flowering/fruiting tops of the cannabis plant would
743
+
744
+ fall in the definition of ganja and weight of the same would not be
745
+
746
+ liable to be excluded from the total weight of the contraband recovered
747
+
748
+ on the basis of definition of ganja. Therefore, the quantity of the
749
+
750
+ contraband allegedly recovered from the petitioners cannot be said to
751
+
752
+ fall in the category of non-commercial quantity on the ground of the
753
+
754
+ same being less than 20 kilograms by excluding assumed weight of
755
+
756
+ seeds and leaves and the petitioners are not entitled to grant of bail on
757
+
758
+ this ground. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="45410866" id="span_36"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="56476824" id="span_37">In these facts and circumstances of the case the
759
+
760
+ observations in <a href="/doc/56476824/" id="a_52">Roshan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana</a> : 2019(3) R.C.R.
761
+
762
+
763
+
764
+ 10 of 14
765
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_38"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
766
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_39"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -11-</span>
767
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
768
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
769
+
770
+ (Criminal) 692; <a href="/doc/45410866/" id="a_53">Sudhir Vs. State of Haryana</a> : 2008(4) R.C.R.
771
+
772
+ (Criminal) 385 and Manu Kumar (Manukumar M) and others Vs.
773
+
774
+ State of Karnataka : 2018(1) DC (Narcotic) 434 relied upon by learned
775
+
776
+ Counsel for the petitioners are not of any help to the petitioners so far
777
+
778
+ as the question of grant of regular bail to the petitioners is concerned.</span></span>
779
+
780
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_25"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="45410866" id="span_40">17. Recovery of 33 kilograms 500 grams of ganja patti was
781
+
782
+ made from dicky of the car in which all the three petitioners were
783
+
784
+ travelling and prima facie the petitioners have to be considered to in
785
+
786
+ joint conscious possession of commercial quantity of the contraband
787
+
788
+ and in the absence of any statutory provision enabling apportionment in
789
+
790
+ such a case, the petitioners cannot be said to be in possession of non-
791
+
792
+ commercial quantity of the contraband by applying the method of such
793
+
794
+ apportionment. Consequently, general observations made by Co-
795
+
796
+ ordinate Bench of this Court in <a href="/doc/45410866/" id="a_54">Sudhir Vs. State of Haryana</a> : 2008(4)
797
+
798
+ R.C.R. (Criminal) 385 at the time of considering the question of grant
799
+
800
+ of bail to accused not being of any precedential value are not of any
801
+
802
+ help to the petitioners.</span>
803
+ </p>
804
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_26"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="45410866" id="span_41">18. Even though the petitioners are in custody since
805
+
806
+ 27.07.2019 but mere length of period of custody is by itself no ground
807
+
808
+ for grant of bail in a case involving alleged commission of cognizable
809
+
810
+ and non-bailable offence under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_55">NDPS Act</a> as apart from limitations
811
+
812
+ embodied in the provisions of <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_56">Cr.P.C</a>., limitations enacted in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_57">Section 37</a>
813
+
814
+ of the NDPS Act apply and anticipatory or regular bail cannot be
815
+
816
+ granted to accused without recording findings as to satisfaction of the
817
+
818
+ conditions <a href="/doc/45410866/" id="a_58">laid down in</a> <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_59">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act.</span>
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_27"> 11 of 14
823
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_42"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
824
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_43"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -12-</span>
825
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
826
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
827
+
828
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_28"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1851011" id="span_44">19. So far as argument of learned Counsel for the petitioners
829
+
830
+ regarding grant of bail by the Co-ordinate Benches in similar cases on
831
+
832
+ the basis of period of custody is concerned, it may be observed that in
833
+
834
+ <a href="/doc/1851011/" id="a_60">Gajanand Aggarwal Vs. State of Orissa and others</a> : 2006(4) R.C.R.
835
+
836
+ (Criminal) 311 it was held by Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court that orders of
837
+
838
+ bail are not necessarily orders of any precedent value. Orders passed by
839
+
840
+ Co-ordinate Benches where provisions of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_61">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act
841
+
842
+ were not referred to and findings as to satisfaction of the conditions
843
+
844
+ thereof were not given will not have any binding or even persuasive
845
+
846
+ value so far as the question of grant of regular bail to the petitioners is
847
+
848
+ concerned and will not be of any help to the petitioners.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="17960688" id="span_45"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="16657776" id="span_46">For judicial
849
+
850
+ precedents in this regard reference, at the cost of repetition, may be
851
+
852
+ made to <a href="/doc/16657776/" id="a_62">Union of India Vs. Niyazuddin Sk., (SC</a>) : 2017(4)
853
+
854
+ R.C.R.(Criminal) 644; <a href="/doc/17960688/" id="a_63">Satpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab (SC</a>) :</span></span>
855
+
856
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_8">2018(5) R.C.R.(Criminal) 152 and State of Kerala Vs. Rajesh (SC) :
857
+
858
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_9">2020 (1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 818).
859
+
860
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_29">20. In the present case prima facie there is no reasonable
861
+
862
+ ground for believing that the petitioners have not committed the alleged
863
+
864
+ offence. Admittedly, the petitioners are not involved in any other case
865
+
866
+ under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_64">NDPS Act</a> and in view of their antecedents there is
867
+
868
+ reasonable ground for believing that they would not commit any
869
+
870
+ offence under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_65">NDPS Act</a> in future. However, in the present case
871
+
872
+ first condition laid down in <a href="/doc/1241164/" id="a_66">Section 37(1)(b)</a> of the NDPS Act as to
873
+
874
+ there being reasonable ground for believing that the petitioners have
875
+
876
+ not committed the alleged offence is not satisfied. Therefore, the
877
+
878
+
879
+
880
+ 12 of 14
881
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_47"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
882
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_48"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -13-</span>
883
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
884
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
885
+
886
+ petitioners are not entitled to grant of regular bail in view of the
887
+
888
+ limitations contained in <a href="/doc/1241164/" id="a_67">Section 37(1)(b)</a> of the NDPS Act.
889
+
890
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_30">21. So far as the question of parity with co-accused
891
+
892
+ Dharmender, who has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order
893
+
894
+ dated 21.08.2020 is concerned, it is pertinent to observe that he was not
895
+
896
+ present on the spot, no recovery was made from him and he was
897
+
898
+ arrested on the basis of disclosure statement of petitioner-Ashok Kumar
899
+
900
+ naming him as the supplier of the contraband.
901
+ </p>
902
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_31">22. In view of the above discussion, I am of the considered
903
+
904
+ view that the petitioners do not deserve grant of regular bail and the
905
+
906
+ petitions are liable to be dismissed.
907
+ </p>
908
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_32">23. Accordingly, the petitions for grant of regular bail to the
909
+
910
+ petitioners are hereby dismissed.
911
+ </p>
912
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_33"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="99075271" id="span_49">24. However, in view of the facts and circumstances of the
913
+
914
+ case and observations made by Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in <a href="/doc/99075271/" id="a_68">Doongar
915
+
916
+ Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan</a> 2018 (1) RCR Criminal 256, State of
917
+
918
+ U.P. Vs. Shambhu Nath Singh and others, 2001 (2) R.C.R.
919
+
920
+ (Criminal) 390, Hussain and another Vs. Union of India 2017(2)
921
+
922
+ RCR Criminal 312 and Thana Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics
923
+
924
+ 2013(1) R.C.R(Criminal) 861, the trial Court is directed to expedite
925
+
926
+ trial and conclude prosecution evidence expeditiously preferably within
927
+
928
+ a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order by
929
+
930
+ conducting trial on day to day basis as far as possible and by allocating
931
+
932
+ block of dates for the trial as directed by Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court and by
933
+
934
+ issuing coercive process for securing presence of the witnesses, if so
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+ 13 of 14
939
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_50"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
940
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_51"> CRM-M-12951-2020 -14-</span>
941
+ CRM-M-7998-2020
942
+ CRM-M-9957-2020
943
+
944
+ required.</span>
945
+ </p>
946
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_34">25. In case of non-appearance of any of the prosecution
947
+
948
+ witnesses, the trial Court shall take appropriate action against the
949
+
950
+ concerned prosecution witness absenting without any lawful excuse by
951
+
952
+ filing complaint under <a href="/doc/456664/" id="a_69">Section 174</a> of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 or
953
+
954
+ taking proceedings under <a href="/doc/1721335/" id="a_70">Section 350</a> of the Cr.P.C. against him.
955
+
956
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_35">26. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for
957
+
958
+ requisite compliance.</p><pre id="pre_2">
959
+
960
+ 09.04.2021 (ARUN KUMAR TYAGI)
961
+ Vinay JUDGE
962
+ Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
963
+ Whether reportable : Yes
964
+
965
+
966
+
967
+
968
+ 14 of 14
969
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_52"> ::: Downloaded on - 05-06-2021 12:11:13 :::</span>
970
+ </pre>
971
+ </div>
972
+ </article>
973
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
974
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
975
+ <div class="translate_container">
976
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
977
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
978
+ <button id="translatewarn"
979
+ type="button"
980
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
981
+ </div>
982
+
983
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
984
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
985
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
986
+
987
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:non-bailable-offences">non-bailable-offences</a></div></li>
988
+
989
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:law-governing-narcotics">law-governing-narcotics</a></div></li>
990
+
991
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:conditions-for-search-of-persons">conditions-for-search-of-persons</a></div></li>
992
+
993
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:criminal-procedure-code">criminal-procedure-code</a></div></li>
994
+
995
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:special-power-of-high-court &lt; power-of-high-court-regarding-bail">special-power-of-high-court < power-of-high-court-regarding-bail</a></div></li>
996
+
997
+ </ul>
998
+ </nav>
999
+
1000
+
1001
+
1002
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
1003
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
1004
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
1005
+
1006
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20ndps%20act">bail ndps act</a></div></li>
1007
+
1008
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=grant%20of%20bail">grant of bail</a></div></li>
1009
+
1010
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%2037%20ndps%20act">section 37 ndps act</a></div></li>
1011
+
1012
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=conscious%20possession">conscious possession</a></div></li>
1013
+
1014
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Arif%20khan%20%40%20agha%20khan">Arif khan @ agha khan</a></div></li>
1015
+
1016
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
1017
+
1018
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20bail">ndps bail</a></div></li>
1019
+
1020
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=arif%20khan%20%40%20agha%20khan%20vs">arif khan @ agha khan vs</a></div></li>
1021
+
1022
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
1023
+
1024
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ganja">ganja</a></div></li>
1025
+
1026
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Ganja%20patti">Ganja patti</a></div></li>
1027
+
1028
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=fsl%20report">fsl report</a></div></li>
1029
+
1030
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=regular%20bail">regular bail</a></div></li>
1031
+
1032
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%5C%22imt%5C%22">\"imt\"</a></div></li>
1033
+
1034
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20all%20section%20of%20ndps%20act"> all section of ndps act</a></div></li>
1035
+
1036
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=REGULAR%20BAIL%20GRANTED">REGULAR BAIL GRANTED</a></div></li>
1037
+
1038
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20in%20ndps%20act%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20filter%3A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20Orissa%20high%20court">bail in ndps act filter: Orissa high court</a></div></li>
1039
+
1040
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotic%20drug">narcotic drug</a></div></li>
1041
+
1042
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=seed">seed</a></div></li>
1043
+
1044
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=cannabis">cannabis</a></div></li>
1045
+
1046
+ </ul>
1047
+ </nav>
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+ </aside>
1052
+ </div>
1053
+
1054
+ </main>
1055
+
1056
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
1057
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
1058
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
1059
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
1060
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
1061
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
1062
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
1063
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
1064
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
1065
+
1066
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/10749346/" class="device-toggle">
1067
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="KIe9s0oGu0TpVQecdrRygmpul6Icchb7YOJH9O6SVKYM6yJDkf023Y9Raeng8EtO">
1068
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
1069
+ </form>
1070
+ </div>
1071
+ </footer>
1072
+
1073
+ <script>
1074
+ (function() {
1075
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
1076
+
1077
+ if (navigator.share) {
1078
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
1079
+
1080
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
1081
+ try {
1082
+ await navigator.share({
1083
+ title: document.title,
1084
+ url: window.location.href
1085
+ });
1086
+ } catch (err) {
1087
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
1088
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
1089
+ }
1090
+ }
1091
+ });
1092
+ }
1093
+ })();
1094
+ </script>
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1099
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1100
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
1101
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
1102
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1106
+ (function($) {
1107
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
1108
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
1109
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
1110
+ }
1111
+ }
1112
+
1113
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
1114
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
1115
+ return $("<li></li>")
1116
+ .append(
1117
+ $("<div></div>")
1118
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
1119
+ .html(item.label)
1120
+ )
1121
+ .appendTo(ul);
1122
+ };
1123
+ }
1124
+
1125
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
1126
+ if (!$input.length) {
1127
+ return;
1128
+ }
1129
+
1130
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
1131
+
1132
+ $input.autocomplete({
1133
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
1134
+ delay: 180,
1135
+ minLength: 2,
1136
+ appendTo: 'body',
1137
+ position: {
1138
+ my: "left top",
1139
+ at: "left bottom+6",
1140
+ collision: "flipfit"
1141
+ },
1142
+ classes: {
1143
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
1144
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
1145
+ },
1146
+ open: function() {
1147
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
1148
+ var offset = $input.offset();
1149
+ $menu
1150
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
1151
+ .css({
1152
+ left: offset.left,
1153
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
1154
+ });
1155
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
1156
+ },
1157
+ close: function() {
1158
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
1159
+ },
1160
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
1161
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
1162
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1163
+ event.preventDefault();
1164
+ }
1165
+ },
1166
+ select: function(event, ui) {
1167
+ event.preventDefault();
1168
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1169
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
1170
+ }
1171
+
1172
+ if ($form.length) {
1173
+ $form.trigger('submit');
1174
+ } else {
1175
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
1176
+ }
1177
+ }
1178
+ });
1179
+
1180
+ }
1181
+
1182
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1183
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
1184
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
1185
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
1186
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
1187
+ });
1188
+ })(jQuery);
1189
+ </script>
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
1193
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1194
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1195
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
1196
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
1197
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
1198
+
1199
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
1200
+ signupForDownload();
1201
+ e.preventDefault();
1202
+ return false;
1203
+ });
1204
+
1205
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
1206
+ e.preventDefault();
1207
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
1208
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
1209
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
1210
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
1211
+ });
1212
+ });
1213
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
1214
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
1215
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1216
+ if (!translateContainer) {
1217
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
1218
+ return;
1219
+ }
1220
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
1221
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
1222
+ return;
1223
+ }
1224
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
1225
+
1226
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
1227
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1228
+ if (!translateEl) {
1229
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
1230
+ return;
1231
+ }
1232
+
1233
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
1234
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
1235
+
1236
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
1237
+ var node;
1238
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
1239
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
1240
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
1241
+ }
1242
+ }
1243
+
1244
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
1245
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
1246
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
1247
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
1248
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
1249
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
1250
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
1251
+ }
1252
+ }
1253
+ });
1254
+ }
1255
+
1256
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
1257
+ }
1258
+ </script>
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
1265
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1266
+ $(document).ready(function () {
1267
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
1268
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
1269
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
1270
+ valid_ag: '',
1271
+ is_valid: '',
1272
+ is_auth: 'False',
1273
+ is_agreement: '',
1274
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
1275
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
1276
+ });
1277
+ </script>
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+
1283
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
1284
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1285
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
1286
+ window.is_auth = false;
1287
+
1288
+ // Document context for chatbot
1289
+ window.documentContext = {
1290
+ tid: 10749346,
1291
+ title: "Ashok Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 9 April, 2021",
1292
+ url: window.location.href,
1293
+ isFragment: false
1294
+ };
1295
+
1296
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
1297
+ </script>
1298
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
1299
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
1300
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
1301
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+
1305
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c5712ab1afa5507',t:'MTc2OTY3MjMzNy4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
1306
+
1307
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_113308402.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,760 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Govind Prakash Pandey vs Directorate Of Enforcement Govt. India ... on 20 February, 2023</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/113308402/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="U8hEQYURNcdd5odjuZAumaG4EX3lJoBeKM9iY5gxYwnRlx1YGa2aRgCML6sgmdYl">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/113308402/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="U8hEQYURNcdd5odjuZAumaG4EX3lJoBeKM9iY5gxYwnRlx1YGa2aRgCML6sgmdYl">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/113308402/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="U8hEQYURNcdd5odjuZAumaG4EX3lJoBeKM9iY5gxYwnRlx1YGa2aRgCML6sgmdYl">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:113308402">37</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:113308402">1</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Allahabad High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Govind Prakash Pandey vs Directorate Of Enforcement Govt. India ... on 20 February, 2023</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:r-s-chauhan">Rajesh Singh Chauhan</a></h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:r-s-chauhan">Rajesh Singh Chauhan</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <pre id="pre_1">
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+ A.F.R.
202
+
203
+ Court No. - 11
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+ Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No.1943 of 2023
208
+
209
+
210
+
211
+ Applicant :- Govind Prakash Pandey
212
+
213
+ Opposite Party :- Directorate Of Enforcement Govt. India Represented By Its Assistant Director Lko.
214
+
215
+ Counsel for Applicant :- Aviral Raj Singh,Alok Kumar Singh,Dhruv Kumar Singh,Palash Banerjee,Ritwick Rai,Vaibhav Tiwari
216
+
217
+ Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rohit Tripathi
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Hon&#x27;ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
222
+
223
+ </pre><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_1">1. Heard Sri Jaideep Narain Mathur, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Ritwick Rai, Sri Rajiv Shaker Bhatnagar, Sri Birendra Kumar Mishra, Sri Anshuman Mohit Chaturvedi, Sri Agni Sen, Sri Vaibhav Tiwari and Sri Aviral Rai, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rohit Tripathi, learned counsel for the Enforcement Directorate.
224
+ </p>
225
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_2">2. Sri Rohit Tripathi has filed counter affidavit, the same is taken on record.
226
+ </p>
227
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_3">3. As per learned counsel for the applicant, the present applicant is in jail since 10.01.2023 in Sessions Case No.2791 of 2022, arising out of ECIR No.ECIR/04/PMLA/LZO/2012, under <a href="/doc/1283441/" id="a_1">Sections 3</a> &amp; <a href="/doc/1182345/" id="a_2">4</a> of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, currently pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, PMLA, Lucknow.
228
+ </p>
229
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_4">4. Brief facts of the case are that the present case pertains to the National Rural Health Mission (hereinafter referred to as &quot;NRHM&quot;) in the State of U.P., which was floated on the joint efforts of the Central Government and State Government. One M/s. Jagran Solutions was established in the year 2005 as a unit of Jagran Prakashan Ltd. (for short &quot;JPL&quot;). Jagran Solutions is a reputed concern involved in business activities of brand activation, Meetings Incentives Conferences and Events (for short &quot;M.I.C.E&quot;), retail &amp; ISP, Rural Marketing and Activation Consulting. Jagran Solutions has so far executed more than 4500 projects with total turn-over of over Rs.500 Crores and has to its credit, 63 National-level and 76 International-level Awards.
230
+ </p>
231
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_5">5. The Applicant joined Jagran Solutions in the year 2007 as Senior Accounts Manager and is presently working as the business head of Jagran Solutions. As a part of his official duties, the applicant undertook business development and client servicing for Jagran Solutions.
232
+ </p>
233
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_6">6. The Director General, Family Welfare, U.P., published an advertisement seeking private bidders to operate MMUs in selected districts of U.P. for a period of three years. Jagran Solutions submitted a proposal for providing MMUs in all 15 districts as advertised in the Request For Proposal (for short &quot;RFP&quot;). The financial proposal submitted by Jagran Solutions quoted a composite price (Capital Expenditure plus Recurring Expenditure) of INR 1,36,97,098/- as the cost per MMU. The financial proposals of Jagran Solutions were approved and the Firm entered into four different agreements with the Director General, Family Welfare. On the complaint of huge bungling, fraud and forgery in the issue relating to the NRHM, the matter was referred to the CBI and CBI registered preliminary enquiry on 19.11.2011 pursuant to the order being passed by the High Court in Writ Petitions No.3611 (MB) of 2011, 3301 (MB) of 2011 and 2647 (MB) of 2011, dated 15.11.2011. Pursuant to the report of preliminary enquiry, CBI registered FIR No.RC 04(A)/2012, SCU-V/SC-II, New Delhi (FIR) on 05.02.2012, inter alia, against M/s. Jagran Solutions, under <a href="/doc/1436241/" id="a_3">Section 420</a> IPC, <a href="/doc/1686268/" id="a_4">Sections 13(2)</a> r/w <a href="/doc/178303/" id="a_5">Section 13(1)(d)</a> of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as &quot;<a href="/doc/1331755/" id="a_6">PC Act</a>&quot;.
234
+ </p>
235
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_7">7. The Enforcement Directorate also registered ECIR/04/PMLA/LZO/2012 (ECIR) on 14.04.2012.
236
+ </p>
237
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_8">8. Notably, after some litigations at the High Court and the Apex Court, the present applicant was sent to the judicial custody on 03.07.2014 by the Special Judge, P.C. Act in relation to the predicate offence due to his non-appearance in the court on the date fixed owing to death of the father of the applicant. However, his counsel was duly appeared before the learned trial court. Thereafter, vide order dated 28.08.2015 passed in Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No.934 of 2015 (Annexure No.11), the present applicant was granted bail by this Court. In the aforesaid order dated 28.08.2015, this Court has observed that the applicant has throughout cooperated in the investigation, has not absconded and there is no likelihood of tampering with the evidence by the applicant. This Court further directed the applicant to deposit a sum of Rs.4.89 Crores, the alleged misappropriated amount before the learned trial court. The applicant has deposited the aforesaid amount of Rs.4.89 Crores in compliance of the order dated 28.08.2015.
238
+ </p>
239
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_9">9. Since the Enforcement Directorate (hereinafter referred to as &quot;E.D.&quot;) was continuing with its investigation under the <a href="/doc/1697463/" id="a_7">Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002</a> (hereinafter referred to as &quot;PMLA&quot;) in furtherance of ECIR, the applicant duly cooperated in the investigation and his statement was recorded by the E.D. under <a href="/doc/1395568/" id="a_8">Section 50</a> of PMLA on 23.12.2016 and 10.06.2019. Since the present applicant was properly cooperating in the investigation, therefore, he was not arrested by the E.D. under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_9">Section 19</a> of the PMLA during the course of the investigation.
240
+ </p>
241
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_10">10. After more than 10 years from the registration of ECIR, the E.D. on 05.12.2022 filed a prosecution complaint under <a href="/doc/1852805/" id="a_10">Section 44</a> read with <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_11">Section 45</a> of the PMLA, inter alia, making the present applicant and JPL as accused no.3 &amp; 4 therein. The Special Judge, PMLA took cognizance of the prosecution complaint on 17.12.2022 and issued summons on 22.12.2022 to the applicant for appearance on 10.01.2023, however, no proper service of summons was effected on the applicant and only a constructive service was effected. Learned Senior Advocate has stated that no property of the applicant or JPL has been attached by the E.D.
242
+
243
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_11">11. On 22.12.2022, summons have been issued against the applicant. Learned Senior Advocate has stated that the aforesaid summons issued to the applicant did not contain copy of the prosecution complaint filed by the E.D., copy of statements and relevant documents of the complaint, which is a clear cut violation of <a href="/doc/1997077/" id="a_12">Sections 204 (3)</a> &amp; <a href="/doc/206665/" id="a_13">208</a> Cr.P.C. For the convenience, <a href="/doc/1997077/" id="a_14">Sections 204 (3)</a> &amp; <a href="/doc/206665/" id="a_15">208</a> Cr.P.C. are being reproduced herein below:-
244
+ </p>
245
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1"> &quot;204. (3) In a proceeding instituted upon a complaint made in writing, every summons or warrant issued under sub- section (1) shall be accompanied by a copy of such complaint.
246
+ </blockquote>
247
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_2"> 208. Supply of copies of statements and documents to accused in other cases triable by Court of Session. Where, in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report, it appears to the Magistrate issuing process under section 204 that the offence is triable exclusively by the Court of Session, the Magistrate shall without delay furnish to the accused, free of cost, a copy of each of the following:-
248
+ </blockquote>
249
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_3"> (i) the statements recorded under section 200 or section 202, of all persons examined by the Magistrate;
250
+
251
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_4"> (ii) the statements and confessions, if any, recorded under section 161 or section 164;
252
+
253
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_5"> (iii) any documents produced before the Magistrate on which the prosecution proposes to rely:
254
+
255
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_6"> Provided that if the Magistrate is satisfied that any such document is voluminous, he shall, instead of furnishing the accused with a copy thereof, direct that he will only be allowed to inspect it either personally or through pleader in Court.&quot;
256
+ </blockquote>
257
+
258
+
259
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_12">12. Specific recital to this effect has been given in para-8 (xxix) of the bail application.
260
+ </p>
261
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_13"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="7148380" id="span_1">13. Sri Mathur has stated that the aforesaid fact has been admitted in the counter affidavit in para-37 thereof indicating that while proceedings were being conducted, the accused or his counsel never asked for the copies, however, the E.D. is always willing to provide copies of the documents to the accused-applicant and those copies can be collected from the office of E.D. As per Sri Mathur, despite the summons having not been served upon the applicant, he came to know the date, therefore, he appeared before the learned trial court on 10.01.2023 where he has been taken into custody. Admittedly, copies of the complaint and other relevant documents have not been provided to the applicant or his counsel. On the same date, the application for bail was pressed on behalf of the applicant; on that, learned counsel for the E.D. prayed time to file objection, therefore, the applicant pressed ad-interim bail apprising that the present applicant has not been arrested by the E.D. under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_16">Section 19</a> of the PMLA, he cooperated in the investigation, he never flouted the process of law and he further undertakes to cooperate with the proceedings, therefore, in the light of the dictum of the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_17">Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation &amp; Another</a>, (2022) 10 SCC 51, he may be given ad-interim bail but his ad-interim bail application was rejected by the learned trial court on 10.01.2023 and the applicant was sent to the judicial custody fixing the date as 18.01.2023. The regular bail application of the present applicant was rejected by the learned trial court on 24.01.2023 by observing that the twin conditions of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_18">Section 45</a> of PMLA are necessary and those conditions are not satisfied, therefore, the applicant is not entitled for bail.</span>
262
+ </p>
263
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_14"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="165846402" id="span_2">14. Sri Jaideep Narain Mathur, learned Senior Advocate, has submitted that the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/165846402/" id="a_19">Aman Preet Singh vs. C.B.I. Through Director</a>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 941, has held that if during investigation, the accused has cooperated in the investigation and has not been arrested by the Investigating Agency, merely because charge sheet has been filed, he should not be arrested. He has referred paragraphs 10, 11 &amp; 12 of the aforesaid judgment, which are as under:-</span>
264
+ </p>
265
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_7"> &quot;10. A reading of the aforesaid shows that it is the guiding principle for a Magistrate while exercising powers under <a href="/doc/1367808/" id="a_20">Section 170</a>, Cr.P.C. which had been set out. The Magistrate or the Court empowered to take cognizance or try the accused has to accept the charge sheet forthwith and proceed in accordance with the procedure laid down under <a href="/doc/1412034/" id="a_21">Section 173</a>, Cr.P.C. It has been rightly observed that in such a case the Magistrate or the Court is required to invariably issue a process of summons and not warrant of arrest. In case he seeks to exercise the discretion of issuing warrants of arrest, he is required to record the reasons as contemplated under <a href="/doc/449333/" id="a_22">Section 87</a>, Cr.P.C. that the accused has either been absconding or shall not obey the summons or has refused to appear despite proof of due service of summons upon him. In fact the observations in Sub-para (iii) above by the High Court are in the nature of caution.
266
+ </blockquote>
267
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_8">11. Insofar as the present case is concerned and the general principles under <a href="/doc/1367808/" id="a_23">Section 170</a> Cr.P.C., the most apposite observations are in sub-para (v) of the High Court judgment in the context of an accused in a non-bailable offence whose custody was not required during the period of investigation. In such a scenario, it is appropriate that the accused is released on bail as the circumstances of his having not been arrested during investigation or not being produced in custody is itself sufficient to entitle him to be released on bail. The rationale has been succinctly set out that if a person has been enlarged and free for many years and has not even been arrested during investigation, to suddenly direct his arrest and to be incarcerated merely because charge sheet has been filed would be contrary to the governing principles for grant of bail. We could not agree more with this.
268
+ </blockquote>
269
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_9"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="10745621" id="span_3">12. If we may say, the observation hereinabove would supplement our observations made in <a href="/doc/10745621/" id="a_24">Siddharth v. State of Uttar Pradesh</a>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 615 and must be read together with that judgment.</span>
270
+ </blockquote>
271
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_15"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="7148380" id="span_4">15. Sri Mathur has further drawn attention of this Court towards the dictum of the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_25">Satender Kumar Antil</a> (supra) referring para-2 where three categories have been indicated for applying the judgment; para-2 reads as under:-</span>
272
+ </p>
273
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_10"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155274324" id="span_5">&quot;2. After allowing the application for intervention, an appropriate order was passed on 7-10-2021 [<a href="/doc/155274324/" id="a_26">Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI</a>, (2021) 10 SCC 773 : (2022) 1 SCC (Cri) 153] .</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155274324" id="span_6"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="7148380" id="span_7">The same is reproduced as under : (<a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_27">Satender Kumar Antil</a> case [<a href="/doc/155274324/" id="a_28">Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI</a>, (2021) 10 SCC 773 : (2022) 1 SCC (Cri) 153] , SCC pp. 774-76, paras 2-11)
274
+
275
+ &quot;2. We have been provided assistance both by Mr S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General and Mr Sidharth Luthra, learned Senior Counsel and there is broad unanimity in terms of the suggestions made by the learned ASG. In terms of the suggestions, the offences have been categorised and guidelines are sought to be laid down for grant of bail, without fettering the discretion of the courts concerned and keeping in mind the statutory provisions.</span></span>
276
+ </blockquote>
277
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_11"> 3. We are inclined to accept the guidelines and make them a part of the order of the Court for the benefit of the courts below. The guidelines are as under:
278
+ </blockquote>
279
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_12">&#x27;&#x27;Categories/Types of Offences
280
+
281
+ (A) Offences punishable with imprisonment of 7 years or less not falling in Categories B &amp; D.
282
+
283
+ (B) Offences punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for more than 7 years.
284
+
285
+ (C) Offences punishable under Special Acts containing stringent provisions for bail like NDPS (<a href="/doc/298811/" id="a_29">Section 37</a>), PMLA (<a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_30">Section 45</a>), UAPA [Section 43-D(5)], <a href="/doc/1353758/" id="a_31">Companies Act</a>, [Section 212(6)], etc.
286
+
287
+ (D) Economic offences not covered by Special Acts.
288
+ </blockquote>
289
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_16">REQUISITE CONDITIONS
290
+
291
+ (1) Not arrested during investigation.
292
+ </p>
293
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_17"> (2) Cooperated throughout in the investigation including appearing before investigating officer whenever called.
294
+ </p>
295
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_18"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="181310747" id="span_8">(No need to forward such an accused along with the charge-sheet (<a href="/doc/181310747/" id="a_32">Siddharth v. State of U.P. [Siddharth</a> v. State of U.P., (2022) 1 SCC 676 : (2022) 1 SCC (Cri) 423])
296
+
297
+ CATEGORY A
298
+
299
+ After filing of charge-sheet/complaint taking of cognizance</span>
300
+
301
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_19"> (a) Ordinary summons at the 1st instance/including permitting appearance through lawyer.
302
+ </p>
303
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_20"> (b) If such an accused does not appear despite service of summons, then bailable warrant for physical appearance may be issued.
304
+ </p>
305
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_21"> (c) NBW on failure to appear despite issuance of bailable warrant.
306
+ </p>
307
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_22"> (d) NBW may be cancelled or converted into a bailable warrant/summons without insisting physical appearance of the accused, if such an application is moved on behalf of the accused before execution of the NBW on an undertaking of the accused to appear physically on the next date/s of hearing.
308
+ </p>
309
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_23"> (e) Bail applications of such accused on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided.
310
+ </p>
311
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_24">CATEGORIES B/D
312
+
313
+ On appearance of the accused in court pursuant to process issued bail application to be decided on merits.
314
+ </p>
315
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_25">CATEGORY C
316
+
317
+ Same as Categories B and D with the additional condition of compliance of the provisions of Bail under NDPS (<a href="/doc/298811/" id="a_33">Section 37</a>), <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_34">Section 45</a> of the PMLA, <a href="/doc/181588/" id="a_35">Section 212(6)</a> of the Companies Act, Section 43-D(5) of the UAPA, POSCO, etc.&#x27;
318
+
319
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_26"> 4. Needless to say that Category A deals with both police cases and complaint cases.
320
+ </p>
321
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_27"> 5. The trial courts and the High Courts will keep in mind the aforesaid guidelines while considering bail applications. The caveat which has been put by the learned ASG is that where the accused have not cooperated in the investigation nor appeared before the investigating officers, nor answered summons when the court feels that judicial custody of the accused is necessary for the completion of the trial, where further investigation including a possible recovery is needed, the aforesaid approach cannot give them benefit, something we agree with.
322
+ </p>
323
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_28"> 6. We may also notice an aspect submitted by Mr Luthra that while issuing notice to consider bail, the trial court is not precluded from granting interim bail taking into consideration the conduct of the accused during the investigation which has not warranted arrest. On this aspect also we would give our imprimatur and naturally the bail application to be ultimately considered, would be guided by the statutory provisions.
324
+ </p>
325
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_29"> 7. The suggestions of the learned ASG which we have adopted have categorised a separate set of offences as &quot;economic offences&quot; not covered by the special Acts. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1563495" id="span_9">In this behalf, suffice to say on the submission of Mr Luthra that this Court in <a href="/doc/1563495/" id="a_36">Sanjay Chandra v. CBI [Sanjay Chandra</a> v. CBI, (2012) 1 SCC 40 : (2012) 1 SCC (Cri) 26 : (2012) 2 SCC (L&amp;S) 397] has observed in para 39 that in determining whether to grant bail both aspects have to be taken into account:</span>
326
+ </p>
327
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_13"> (a) seriousness of the charge, and
328
+
329
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_14"> (b) severity of punishment.
330
+ </blockquote>
331
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_30">Thus, it is not as if economic offences are completely taken out of the aforesaid guidelines but do form a different nature of offences and thus the seriousness of the charge has to be taken into account but simultaneously, the severity of the punishment imposed by the statute would also be a factor.
332
+ </p>
333
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_31"> 8. We appreciate the assistance given by the learned counsel and the positive approach adopted by the learned ASG.
334
+ </p>
335
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_32"> 9. The SLP stands disposed of and the matter need not be listed further.
336
+ </p>
337
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_33"> 10. A copy of this order be circulated to the Registrars of the different High Courts to be further circulated to the trial courts so that the unnecessary bail matters do not come up to this Court.
338
+ </p>
339
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_34"> 11. This is the only purpose for which we have issued these guidelines, but they are not fettered on the powers of the courts.&quot;
340
+ </p>
341
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_35">16. Sri Mathur has stated that the present case is relating to the category &#x27;&#x27;C&#x27;, which has been dealt in para-86 of the judgment, which reads as under:-
342
+ </p>
343
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_15">&quot;Special Acts (Category C)
344
+
345
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_16"> 86. Now we shall come to Category C. We do not wish to deal with individual enactments as each special Act has got an objective behind it, followed by the rigour imposed. The general principle governing delay would apply to these categories also. To make it clear, the provision contained in Section 436-A of the Code would apply to the Special Acts also in the absence of any specific provision. For example, the rigour as provided under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_37">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act would not come in the way in such a case as we are dealing with the liberty of a person. We do feel that more the rigour, the quicker the adjudication ought to be. After all, in these types of cases number of witnesses would be very less and there may not be any justification for prolonging the trial. Perhaps there is a need to comply with the directions of this Court to expedite the process and also a stricter compliance of Section 309 of the Code.&quot;
346
+ </blockquote>
347
+
348
+
349
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_36"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="184371152" id="span_10">17. Sri Mathur has also drawn attention of this Court towards the judgment and order dated 09.01.2023 passed by the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/184371152/" id="a_38">Katar Singh Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, Petition</a>(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).12635 of 2022, to submit that the Apex Court protected the liberty of that accused considering the fact that the Investigating Agency did not arrest the accused under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_39">Section 19</a> of the PMLA when investigation begins. For the convenience, the order dated 09.01.2023 reads as under:-</span>
350
+ </p>
351
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_17"> &quot;Applications for exemption from filing documents/facts/annexures and exemption from filing O.T. are allowed.
352
+ </blockquote>
353
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_18"> Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have already suffered pre trial custody for more than four years in respect of the scheduled offence, the investigating agency did not arrest the petitioners under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_40">Section 19</a> PMLA when investigation begins, that they are senior citizens of approximately 66,70, 68 and 67 years of age respectively and properties of petitioners in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 12635/2022 and 12615/2022 have even attached worth Rs. 8,00,000/- and Rs. 5,50,000/- and petitioners in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 12646/2022 and 12919/2022 have deposited the alleged amount of Rs. 11,88,000/- and 50,00,000/- in the respective matters. It is further submitted that the total period of incarceration in case of conviction is only seven years and <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_41">Section 45</a> PMLA will not be applicable as it is pre-amendment.
354
+ </blockquote>
355
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_19"> Issue notice.
356
+ </blockquote>
357
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_20"> In the meantime, the petitioners be not arrested but shall continue to cooperate with further investigation.&quot;
358
+ </blockquote>
359
+
360
+
361
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_37"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="15639169" id="span_11">18. Sri Mathur has also referred the judgment of the High Court of Delhi in re; <a href="/doc/15639169/" id="a_42">Rana Kapoor Vs. Directorate of Enforcement</a>, 2022 SCC OnLine Del 4065, to submit that in more or less in similar facts and circumstances, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to the accused persons. The ratio of the judgment has been indicated in paras 33 &amp; 34, which reads as under:-</span>
362
+ </p>
363
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_21"> &quot;33. The applicant was not implicated in FIR bearing RC No.2232021A0005 registered by CBI. The applicant was implicated in present criminal complaint filed by the respondent/ED and arrayed as accused no 2. The investigating officer consciously did not arrest the applicant. The applicant participated in investigation as his three statements under <a href="/doc/1395568/" id="a_43">section 50</a> PMLA were recorded. The respondent also did not allege that the applicant neither participated nor cooperated in investigation. The concerned Special Court after taking cognizance on present criminal complaint ordered for summoning of the accused persons including the applicant. The investigating officer even after filing of present complaint did not apply for custody of the applicant. The co-accused Gautam Thapar was arrested consciously by the investigating officer during investigation and was denied bail by the Special Court and High Court and as such the applicant is standing on different footing from co-accused Gautam Thapar. The applicant was taken into custody due to dismissal of bail application vide order dated 20.01.2022 passed by the court of Sh. Sanjeev Aggarwal, Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-02 Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="15639169" id="span_12">The applicant primarily not seeking bail on merit but on basis of observation made by the Supreme Court in para no 65 of Satinder Kumar Antil decision and as such applicant is not required to pass the test of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_44">section 45</a> PMLA. The conditions as per <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_45">section 45</a> PMLA would be applicable, had the applicant filed an application either under section 439 of the Code after arrest during investigation or under section 438 of the Code apprehending his arrest during investigation. As mentioned in present criminal complaint filed by the respondent, the applicant was not arrested during investigation by the investigating agency. There is legal force in argument advanced by the learned Senior Counsel of the applicant that applicant is entitled to bail in view of observations/legal proposition as <a href="/doc/15639169/" id="a_46">laid down by</a> the Supreme Court in Satinder Kumar Antil. It is not mandate of section 170 of the Code that if the accused is not taken into custody or arrested during investigation can be arrested or taken into custody after appearance in court post summoning order particularly when neither investigation agency nor prosecution agency sought arrest of accused.</span>
364
+ </blockquote>
365
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_22"> 34. The arguments advanced by the learned Special Counsel for the respondent that the applicant has misinterpreted para no 65 of Satinder Kumar Antil is misplaced. There is no force in argument advanced by the learned Special Counsel for the respondent that the applicant before grant of bail required to pass test of 45 of PMLA. The position would have been different, had the applicant arrested during investigation. The investigating agency as mentioned hereinabove consciously preferred not to arrest the applicant during investigation or post filing of charge sheet. The arguments advanced and case law relied on by the Special Counsel for the respondent are considered in right perspective to the given facts and circumstances but they do not provide much legal help to the respondent in opposing present bail application.&quot;
366
+ </blockquote>
367
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_38"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="7148380" id="span_13"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="165846402" id="span_14">19. Therefore, to sum up, Sri Mathur, learned Senior Advocate, has submitted that while granting the bail to the present applicant in the predicate offence, this Court has observed that the applicant has never flouted the process of law and has cooperated in the investigation properly. The direction was issued to deposit a sum of Rs.4.89 Crore, which has been deposited by the applicant in the year 2015 itself. Since then, the applicant is cooperating in the investigation being conducted by the Enforcement Directorate as he has been called twice to record his statement under <a href="/doc/1395568/" id="a_47">Section 50</a> of the PMLA and the present applicant has recorded his statement. The E.D. did not arrest the applicant under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_48">Section 19</a> of the PMLA as the Investigating Agency did not find it appropriate to arrest the applicant during investigation as he was cooperating. After filing of the prosecution complaint, the learned trial court took cognizance and issued summons to the applicant without making compliance of the mandatory provisions of <a href="/doc/1997077/" id="a_49">Section 204 (3)</a> Cr.P.C. as neither copy of the complaint has been supplied to the applicant nor any relevant documents have been provided. Even when the present applicant appeared before the learned trial court on 10.01.2023, none of the documents either the prosecution complaint or its supporting documents have been provided. Not only the above, copies of statements and other documents have not been provided to the applicant in compliance of <a href="/doc/206665/" id="a_50">Section 208</a> Cr.P.C. when the applicant appeared before the learned trial court. The present applicant could have been given ad-interim bail in the light of the dictum of the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/165846402/" id="a_51">Aman Preet Singh</a> (supra) and <a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_52">Satender Kumar Antil</a> (supra), but his ad-interim bail application has been rejected and he has been sent to the judicial custody in a sheer illegal and unwarranted manner. Thereafter, his bail application has been rejected observing that the twin conditions of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_53">Section 45</a> of the PMLA are not being satisfied, without considering the relevant aspect that the Investigating Agency has never arrested the applicant under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_54">Section 19</a> of the PMLA nor any request was made before the learned trial court on 10.01.2023 when the applicant appeared before the learned trial court. Therefore, as per Sri Mathur, in such circumstances, the rigour of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_55">Section 45</a> of the PMLA would not be attracted in the present case. The present applicant undertakes that he shall cooperate in the trial proceedings and shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall abide by all terms and conditions of the bail order, if he is enlarged on bail.</span></span>
368
+ </p>
369
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_39">20. Per contra, Sri Rohit Tripathi, learned counsel for the E.D. has submitted that a person accused of the offence of money laundering can only be released when the conditions stipulated under <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_56">Section 45</a> of the PMLA are satisfied i.e. prosecution/E.D. is given an opportunity to oppose the release/bail of the accused applicant and if the accused is released, reasons have to be recorded that there is a reasonable satisfaction that the accused has not committed the offence of money laundering. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="14485072" id="span_15">In support of his aforesaid submission, he has <a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_57">placed reliance upon</a> paragraphs 398 &amp; 399 of the dictum of the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/14485072/" id="a_58">Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Others Vs. Union of India and Others</a>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929, which reads as under:-</span>
370
+ </p>
371
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_23"> &quot;398. Thus, it is well settled by the various decisions of this Court and policy of the State as also the view of international community that the offence of money-laundering is committed by an individual with a deliberate design with the motive to enhance his gains, disregarding the interests of nation and society as a whole and which by no stretch of imagination can be termed as offence of trivial nature. Thus, it is in the interest of the State that law enforcement agencies should be provided with a proportionate effective mechanism so as to deal with these types of offences as the wealth of the nation is to be safeguarded from these dreaded criminals. As discussed above, the conspiracy of money-laundering, which is a three-staged process, is hatched in secrecy and executed in darkness, thus, it becomes imperative for the State to frame such a stringent law, which not only punishes the offender proportionately, but also helps in preventing the offence and creating a deterrent effect.
372
+ </blockquote>
373
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_24"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="117859307" id="span_16">399. In the case of the 2002 Act, the Parliament had no reservation to reckon the offence of money-laundering as a serious threat to the financial systems of our country, including to its sovereignty and integrity. Therefore, the observations and in particular in paragraph 47 of <a href="/doc/117859307/" id="a_59">Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India</a>, (2018) 11 SCC 1, are in the nature of doubting the perception of the Parliament in that regard, which is beyond the scope of judicial review. That cannot be the basis to declare the law manifestly arbitrary.&quot;</span>
374
+ </blockquote>
375
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_40"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="134510951" id="span_17">21. Sri Tripathi has also cited para-37 of the judgment of the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/134510951/" id="a_60">Gautam Kundu v. Directorate of Enforcement (Prevention of Money-Laundering Act), Government of India</a> through Manoj Kumar, Assistant Director, Eastern Region, (2015) 16 SCC 1, which reads as under:-</span>
376
+ </p>
377
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_25"> &quot;37. We do not intend to further state the other facts excepting the fact that admittedly the complaint was filed against the appellant on the allegation of committing offence punishable under <a href="/doc/1182345/" id="a_61">Section 4</a> of PMLA. The contention made on behalf of the appellant that no offence under <a href="/doc/1293240/" id="a_62">Section 24</a> of the SEBI Act is made out against the appellant, which is a scheduled offence under PMLA, needs to be considered from the material collected during the investigation and further to be considered by the competent court of law. We do not intend to express ourselves at this stage with regard to the same as it may cause prejudice to the case of the parties in other proceedings. We are sure that it is not expected at this stage that the guilt of the accused has to be established beyond reasonable doubt through evidence. We have noted that in Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. CBI [Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. CBI, (2013) 7 SCC 439 : (2013) 3 SCC (Cri) 552] , this Court has observed that: (SCC p. 449, para 34)
378
+
379
+ &quot;34. ... The economic offences having deep-rooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds need to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing serious threat to the financial health of the country....&quot;
380
+ </blockquote>
381
+
382
+
383
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_41">22. On being confronted Sri Rohit Tripathi as to whether the Investigating Agency has ever thought to arrest the applicant during investigation on the basis of material, evidences and allegations against the applicant, Sri Tripathi has fairly stated that during investigation, the Investigating Agency did not think to arrest the applicant pursuant to the ECIR dated 14.04.2012. He has also submitted that the summons were issued to the applicant to cooperate in the investigation and to record his statement under <a href="/doc/1395568/" id="a_63">Section 50</a> of the PMLA and the applicant duly appeared before the E.D. on 23.12.2016 and 10.06.2019, therefore, Sri Tripathi has submitted that the present applicant has not been arrested under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_64">Section 19</a> of the PMLA.
384
+ </p>
385
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_42">23. On being further confronted as to why the applicant has not been provided copy of complaint and copies of statements and relevant documents to the applicant in compliance of <a href="/doc/1997077/" id="a_65">Section 204 (3)</a> and <a href="/doc/206665/" id="a_66">208</a> Cr.P.C., Sri Tripathi has stated that such copies have not been demanded by the applicant or his counsel, therefore, the same were not provided. However, he has submitted that the same shall be provided to the applicant or his counsel but at this juncture, he could not dispute that the mandatory compliance of <a href="/doc/1997077/" id="a_67">Sections 204 (3)</a> &amp; <a href="/doc/206665/" id="a_68">208</a> Cr.P.C. has not been made.
386
+ </p>
387
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_43">24. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
388
+ </p>
389
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_44"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="7148380" id="span_18"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="165846402" id="span_19">25. At the very outset, it would be apt to deal the rigours of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_69">Section 45</a> of the PMLA, which provides that before granting bail, the twin conditions have to be seen carefully. In the present case, this is an admitted case of the prosecution that after lodging the ECIR on 14.04.2012, the E.D. has not tried to arrest the present applicant under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_70">Section 19</a> of the PMLA. Even after release of the present applicant from jail in the predicate offence in the year 2015, the present applicant was called twice by the E.D. under <a href="/doc/1395568/" id="a_71">Section 50</a> of the PMLA to record his statement on 23.12.2016 and 10.06.2019 where the applicant appeared and recorded his statement but the E.D. has not arrested the applicant under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_72">Section 19</a> of the PMLA. Therefore, it is clear that considering the proper cooperation of the present applicant in the investigation and evidences, material and allegations against the applicant, the Investigating Officer did not find it proper to arrest the applicant under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_73">Section 19</a> of the PMLA. In other words, his arrest was not warranted during investigation. It is also clear from the records that after proper cooperation of the applicant in the investigation, the prosecution compliant was filed by the E.D. where the learned trial court took cognizance and issued summons to the applicant and the applicant appeared before the learned trial court pleading his bonafide conduct apprising each facts and circumstances seeking bail giving undertaking that he shall cooperate in the trial proceedings in the same manner as he has cooperated in the investigation, but on the request of learned counsel for the E.D. to file objection, the bail application was adjourned; then the applicant prayed for ad-interim bail making submission regarding his bonafide but ad-interim bail application of the applicant has been rejected without considering the dictums of the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/165846402/" id="a_74">Aman Preet Singh</a> (supra) and <a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_75">Satender Kumar Antil</a> (supra). Even his regular bail application has been rejected on the ground that the twin conditions of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_76">Section 45</a> of the PMLA are not being satisfied whereas in the present case, the applicant has not been arrested by the Investigating Agency under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_77">Section 19</a> of the PMLA and the counsel for the E.D. was properly heard by the trial court, therefore, rigours of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_78">Section 45</a> of the PMLA should not be made applicable in the present case.</span></span>
390
+ </p>
391
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_45"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="14485072" id="span_20">26. Sub-clause (2) of <a href="/doc/1852805/" id="a_79">Section 44</a> of PMLA provides that nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to affect the special power of the High Court regarding bail under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_80">Section 439</a> Cr.P.C. The Apex Court vide para 400 in re; <a href="/doc/14485072/" id="a_81">Vijay Madanlal Choudhary</a> (supra) has observed as under:-</span>
392
+ </p>
393
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_26"> &quot;400. It is important to note that the twin conditions provided under <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_82">Section 45</a> of the 2002 Act, though restrict the right of the accused to grant of bail, but it cannot be said that the conditions provided under <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_83">Section 45</a> impose absolute restraint on the grant of bail. The discretion vests in the Court which is not arbitrary or irrational but judicial, guided by the principles of law as provided under <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_84">Section 45</a> of the 2002 Act....&quot;
394
+ </blockquote>
395
+
396
+
397
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_46">27. Notably, the statutory rights of the present applicant defined under <a href="/doc/1997077/" id="a_85">Section 204 (3)</a> &amp; <a href="/doc/206665/" id="a_86">208</a> Cr.P.C. have been violated by the Investigating Agency inasmuch as he has not been provided copy of complaint, copy of statements and other relevant documents.
398
+ </p>
399
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_47"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="7148380" id="span_21"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="165846402" id="span_22">28. The Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/165846402/" id="a_87">Aman Preet Singh</a> (supra) and <a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_88">Satender Kumar Antil</a> (supra) has categorically observed that arrest of any person is not mandatory in each and every case but before curtailing the liberty of an accused person, the relevant facts and circumstances should be visualized. In the present case, prima facie, there was no requirement to take the applicant into custody when he appeared before the learned trial court pursuant to the summons being issued inasmuch as he has never flouted the process of law, he cooperated in the investigation throughout, the Investigating Agency has never thought to arrest him under <a href="/doc/1093594/" id="a_89">Section 19</a> of the PMLA despite he appeared before the E.D. to record his statement twice pursuant to the summons being issued under <a href="/doc/1395568/" id="a_90">Section 50</a> of the PMLA and there was no request of the E.D. before the learned trial court to the effect that arrest of the present applicant is warranted.</span></span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="7148380" id="span_23"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="165846402" id="span_24">Therefore, it appears that the learned trial court has taken the custody of the present applicant without following the settled proposition of law of the Apex Court in re; <a href="/doc/165846402/" id="a_91">Aman Preet Singh</a> (supra) and <a href="/doc/7148380/" id="a_92">Satender Kumar Antil</a> (supra).</span></span>
400
+ </p>
401
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_48">29. Therefore, in view of the above, the bail application is allowed.
402
+ </p>
403
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_49">30. Let applicant- Govind Prakash Pandey be released on bail in the aforesaid crime case on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each before the Trial Court concerned with the following conditions:-
404
+ </p>
405
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_27">(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
406
+ </blockquote>
407
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_28">(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under <a href="/doc/77781517/" id="a_93">Section 229-A</a> of the Indian Penal Code.
408
+ </blockquote>
409
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_29">(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under <a href="/doc/1598801/" id="a_94">Section 82</a> Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under <a href="/doc/119436650/" id="a_95">Section 174-A</a> of the Indian Penal Code.
410
+ </blockquote>
411
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_30">(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under <a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_96">Section 313</a> Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
412
+ </blockquote>
413
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_31">(v) The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
414
+ </blockquote>
415
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_50">31. Before parting with, it is made clear that I have not entered into merits of the issue, therefore, learned trial court shall conduct and conclude the trial without being influenced from any observation or finding of this order as the observations are only confined to the disposal of this bail application.
416
+ </p>
417
+
418
+
419
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_51">[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
420
+
421
+ Order Date :- 20.02.2023
422
+
423
+ RBS/-
424
+ </p>
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+
433
+
434
+
435
+  
436
+
437
+
438
+  
439
+
440
+
441
+ </div>
442
+ </article>
443
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
444
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
445
+ <div class="translate_container">
446
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
447
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
448
+ <button id="translatewarn"
449
+ type="button"
450
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
451
+ </div>
452
+
453
+
454
+
455
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
456
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
457
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
458
+
459
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=pmla%20">pmla </a></div></li>
460
+
461
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20204%283%29%20crpc%20">section 204(3) crpc </a></div></li>
462
+
463
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=grant%20of%20bail">grant of bail</a></div></li>
464
+
465
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=208%20crpc">208 crpc</a></div></li>
466
+
467
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=interim%20bail">interim bail</a></div></li>
468
+
469
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20application">bail application</a></div></li>
470
+
471
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20208%20CrPC">section 208 CrPC</a></div></li>
472
+
473
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=204%283%29%20crpc">204(3) crpc</a></div></li>
474
+
475
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
476
+
477
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=economic%20offences">economic offences</a></div></li>
478
+
479
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ad%20interim%20bail">ad interim bail</a></div></li>
480
+
481
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=45%20pmla">45 pmla</a></div></li>
482
+
483
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=2012%281%29%20scc%2040">2012(1) scc 40</a></div></li>
484
+
485
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=sec%2050%20PMLA">sec 50 PMLA</a></div></li>
486
+
487
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=satender%20kumar%20antil">satender kumar antil</a></div></li>
488
+
489
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=208%20Cr.P.C.">208 Cr.P.C.</a></div></li>
490
+
491
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
492
+
493
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=predicate%20offence">predicate offence</a></div></li>
494
+
495
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20208%20of%20cr.p.c">section 208 of cr.p.c</a></div></li>
496
+
497
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=money%20laundering">money laundering</a></div></li>
498
+
499
+ </ul>
500
+ </nav>
501
+
502
+
503
+
504
+ </aside>
505
+ </div>
506
+
507
+ </main>
508
+
509
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
510
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
511
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
512
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
513
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
514
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
515
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
516
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
517
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
518
+
519
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/113308402/" class="device-toggle">
520
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="U8hEQYURNcdd5odjuZAumaG4EX3lJoBeKM9iY5gxYwnRlx1YGa2aRgCML6sgmdYl">
521
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
522
+ </form>
523
+ </div>
524
+ </footer>
525
+
526
+ <script>
527
+ (function() {
528
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
529
+
530
+ if (navigator.share) {
531
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
532
+
533
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
534
+ try {
535
+ await navigator.share({
536
+ title: document.title,
537
+ url: window.location.href
538
+ });
539
+ } catch (err) {
540
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
541
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
542
+ }
543
+ }
544
+ });
545
+ }
546
+ })();
547
+ </script>
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
552
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
553
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
554
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
555
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
556
+
557
+
558
+ <script type="text/javascript">
559
+ (function($) {
560
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
561
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
562
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
563
+ }
564
+ }
565
+
566
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
567
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
568
+ return $("<li></li>")
569
+ .append(
570
+ $("<div></div>")
571
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
572
+ .html(item.label)
573
+ )
574
+ .appendTo(ul);
575
+ };
576
+ }
577
+
578
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
579
+ if (!$input.length) {
580
+ return;
581
+ }
582
+
583
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
584
+
585
+ $input.autocomplete({
586
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
587
+ delay: 180,
588
+ minLength: 2,
589
+ appendTo: 'body',
590
+ position: {
591
+ my: "left top",
592
+ at: "left bottom+6",
593
+ collision: "flipfit"
594
+ },
595
+ classes: {
596
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
597
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
598
+ },
599
+ open: function() {
600
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
601
+ var offset = $input.offset();
602
+ $menu
603
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
604
+ .css({
605
+ left: offset.left,
606
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
607
+ });
608
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
609
+ },
610
+ close: function() {
611
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
612
+ },
613
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
614
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
615
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
616
+ event.preventDefault();
617
+ }
618
+ },
619
+ select: function(event, ui) {
620
+ event.preventDefault();
621
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
622
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
623
+ }
624
+
625
+ if ($form.length) {
626
+ $form.trigger('submit');
627
+ } else {
628
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
629
+ }
630
+ }
631
+ });
632
+
633
+ }
634
+
635
+ $(document).ready(function() {
636
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
637
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
638
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
639
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
640
+ });
641
+ })(jQuery);
642
+ </script>
643
+
644
+
645
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
646
+ <script type="text/javascript">
647
+ $(document).ready(function() {
648
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
649
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
650
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
651
+
652
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
653
+ signupForDownload();
654
+ e.preventDefault();
655
+ return false;
656
+ });
657
+
658
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
659
+ e.preventDefault();
660
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
661
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
662
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
663
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
664
+ });
665
+ });
666
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
667
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
668
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
669
+ if (!translateContainer) {
670
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
671
+ return;
672
+ }
673
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
674
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
675
+ return;
676
+ }
677
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
678
+
679
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
680
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
681
+ if (!translateEl) {
682
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
683
+ return;
684
+ }
685
+
686
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
687
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
688
+
689
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
690
+ var node;
691
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
692
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
693
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
694
+ }
695
+ }
696
+
697
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
698
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
699
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
700
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
701
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
702
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
703
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
704
+ }
705
+ }
706
+ });
707
+ }
708
+
709
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
710
+ }
711
+ </script>
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+
716
+
717
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
718
+ <script type="text/javascript">
719
+ $(document).ready(function () {
720
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
721
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
722
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
723
+ valid_ag: '',
724
+ is_valid: '',
725
+ is_auth: 'False',
726
+ is_agreement: '',
727
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
728
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
729
+ });
730
+ </script>
731
+
732
+
733
+
734
+
735
+
736
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
737
+ <script type="text/javascript">
738
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
739
+ window.is_auth = false;
740
+
741
+ // Document context for chatbot
742
+ window.documentContext = {
743
+ tid: 113308402,
744
+ title: "Govind Prakash Pandey vs Directorate Of Enforcement Govt. India ... on 20 February, 2023",
745
+ url: window.location.href,
746
+ isFragment: false
747
+ };
748
+
749
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
750
+ </script>
751
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
752
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
753
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
754
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c57075d8c5c0997',t:'MTc2OTY3MTg3NA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
759
+
760
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_11442833.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,987 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Amritpal Singh vs State Of Punjab on 7 April, 2022</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/11442833/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GKIi4gFJ8SfNxPAEkquEHDiUdL96no6tEYsrVZY7fMkSCbfiwc9EastPByMzMADm">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/11442833/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GKIi4gFJ8SfNxPAEkquEHDiUdL96no6tEYsrVZY7fMkSCbfiwc9EastPByMzMADm">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/11442833/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GKIi4gFJ8SfNxPAEkquEHDiUdL96no6tEYsrVZY7fMkSCbfiwc9EastPByMzMADm">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:11442833">20</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:11442833">0</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Punjab-Haryana High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Amritpal Singh vs State Of Punjab on 7 April, 2022</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:b-s-walia">B.S. Walia</a></h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:b-s-walia">B.S. Walia</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <pre id="pre_1">163 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
193
+ AT CHANDIGARH
194
+
195
+ CRM-M-53334-2021
196
+ Date of Decision: 07.04.2022
197
+
198
+
199
+ Amritpal Singh ...Petitioner
200
+
201
+ vs.
202
+ State of Punjab ...Respondent
203
+
204
+ Coram : Hon&#x27;ble Mr. Justice B.S. Walia.
205
+
206
+ Present: Ms. Isha Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
207
+
208
+ Ms. Deepali Puri, Addl. AG, Punjab.
209
+ ***
210
+
211
+ B.S. Walia, J. (Oral)
212
+ </pre>
213
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1">1. Prayer in the second petition under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_1">Section 439</a> Cr.P.C. is
214
+
215
+ for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.140 dated
216
+
217
+ 23.10.2020, registered under <a href="/doc/1566465/" id="a_2">Sections 21</a>/<a href="/doc/1089586/" id="a_3">25</a>/<a href="/doc/1252855/" id="a_4">29</a>/<a href="/doc/833486/" id="a_5">61</a>/<a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_6">85</a> of the Narcotic
218
+
219
+ Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station City
220
+
221
+ STF, District SAS Nagar, Mohali, CRM-M-20923-2021, filed earlier
222
+
223
+ having been withdrawn vide order Annexure P/7 dated 26.10.2021, with
224
+
225
+ liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with law at appropriate stage,
226
+
227
+ if the circumstances of the case so warranted.
228
+
229
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_2">2. Learned counsel contends that more than 5 months have
230
+
231
+ lapsed and not even a single witness has been examined out of 20
232
+
233
+ prosecution witnesses, the petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2020,
234
+
235
+ challan has been presented on 15.03.2021, charges have been framed
236
+
237
+ besides co-accused, Varun, against whom identical allegations are there
238
+
239
+ was granted regular bail vide order Annexure P/8 dated 18.11.2021, in
240
+
241
+ `CRM-M-28023-2021, that recovery of 300 grams of heroin is marginally
242
+
243
+ above the commercial quantity i.e. 250 grams, trial is likely to take
244
+ 1 of 8
245
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
246
+ CRM-M-53334-2021 [2]
247
+
248
+
249
+ considerable period of time besides the petitioner was blessed with a son
250
+
251
+ on 07.10.2020 and said child was born with one kidney, therefore, is
252
+
253
+ required to be operated upon, that there is no male member or earning
254
+
255
+ member in the family to look after the child.
256
+ </p>
257
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_3">4. Learned Addl. AG, Punjab, on the other hand, contends that
258
+
259
+ the petitioner is involved in five other cases. In response thereto, learned
260
+
261
+ counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been implicated
262
+
263
+ in false cases as in three of the cases, the recovery is of 1.9 grams, 2
264
+
265
+ grams and 5 grams respectively while in two other cases, the recovery is
266
+
267
+ of 10 grams and 20 grams of contraband respectively. The same has not
268
+
269
+ been disputed by the learned Addl. AG, Punjab.
270
+
271
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_4">5. Learned Addl. AG, Punjab, by referring to the report U/s 42
272
+
273
+ of the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_7">NDPS Act</a>, dated 23.10.2020, contends that a telephonic call was
274
+
275
+ made to Mr. Vavinder Kumar, Deputy Superintendent of Police, on his
276
+
277
+ mobile and he was apprised about the information given by the special
278
+
279
+ informer, therefore there is compliance with <a href="/doc/1158106/" id="a_8">Section 42(2)</a>, NDPS Act.
280
+
281
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_5">6. Learned counsel for the petitioner on the other hand refers to
282
+
283
+ the decision of Hon&#x27;ble the Supreme Court in Rajinder Singh vs. State of
284
+
285
+ Haryana, Criminal Appeal No.1051/2009 decided on 08.08.2011, as per
286
+
287
+ which, conviction of the accused was set aside on the ground that
288
+
289
+ information was not recorded in writing nor any information was sent to
290
+
291
+ the superior officers as required under Section 42(2) of the NPDS Act and
292
+
293
+ only a wireless message was sent to the DSP of the Police.
294
+
295
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_6">7. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that although the
296
+
297
+ State has placed before this Court a memo alleging compliance with
298
+
299
+ Section 42 of the NPDS Act, yet the same is not part of the challan,
300
+
301
+ therefore, its admissibility as also whether there was compliance with
302
+
303
+ 2 of 8
304
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_2"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
305
+ CRM-M-53334-2021 [3]
306
+
307
+
308
+ <a href="/doc/1841395/" id="a_9">Section 42</a> of the NDPS Act would be a matter of trial.
309
+
310
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_7"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="1939212" id="span_3">8. Learned counsel has referred to the decision of a Coordinate
311
+
312
+ Bench of this Court in CRM-M-54123-2021, in case titled as <a href="/doc/1939212/" id="a_10">Sandeep vs.
313
+
314
+ State of Haryana</a>, decided on 10.01.2022, involving recovery of 17
315
+
316
+ quintals, 12 kilograms and 760 grams of ganja, i.e. commercial quantity
317
+
318
+ being 20 kilograms and above. Relevant extract of the aforementioned
319
+
320
+ decision is reproduced as under:-</span>
321
+ </p>
322
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="78902633" id="span_4">In Criminal Appeal No.965 of 2021 titled as <a href="/doc/78902633/" id="a_11">Dheeren Kumar
323
+
324
+ Jaina v. Union of India</a>, the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in a case
325
+
326
+ where allegation in the chargesheet was with respect to 120 kg
327
+
328
+ of contraband i.e. &quot;ganja&quot;, thus, being of commercial quantity,
329
+
330
+ was pleased to grant bail after setting aside the order of the
331
+
332
+ High Court where the said application for grant of regular bail
333
+
334
+ had been rejected.</span>
335
+ </blockquote>
336
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_2"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="88370417" id="span_5">A co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a detailed
337
+
338
+ judgment titled as <a href="/doc/88370417/" id="a_12">Ankush Kumar @ Sonu v. State of Punjab</a>
339
+
340
+ reported as 2018 (4) RCR (Criminal) 84, had considered the
341
+
342
+ provision of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_13">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act in extenso and had
343
+
344
+ granted bail in a case which involved commercial quantity. The
345
+
346
+ relevant portion of <a href="/doc/88370417/" id="a_14">the said judgment</a> is reproduced as under:</span>
347
+
348
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_3"> &quot; xxx--xxx--xxx
349
+
350
+ But, so far as second part of <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_15">Section 37 (1) (b) (ii)</a>, i.e.
351
+
352
+ regarding the satisfaction of the Court based on reasons to
353
+
354
+ believe that the accused would not commit &#x27;any offence&#x27; after
355
+
356
+ coming out of the custody, is concerned, this Court finds that
357
+
358
+ this is the requirement which is being insisted by the State,
359
+
360
+ despite the same being irrational and being incomprehensible
361
+
362
+ 3 of 8
363
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_6"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
364
+ CRM-M-53334-2021 [4]
365
+
366
+
367
+ from any material on record. As held above, this Court cannot
368
+
369
+ go into the future mental state of the mind of the petitioner as to
370
+
371
+ what he would be, likely, doing after getting released on bail.
372
+
373
+ Therefore, if this Court cannot record a reasonable satisfaction
374
+
375
+ that the petitioner is not likely to commit &#x27;any offence&#x27; or
376
+
377
+ &#x27;offence under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_16">NDPS Act</a>&#x27; after being released on bail, then this
378
+
379
+ court, also, does not have any reasonable ground to be satisfied
380
+
381
+ that the petitioner is likely to commit any offence after he is
382
+
383
+ released on bail. Hence, this satisfaction of the Court in this
384
+
385
+ regard is neutral qua future possible conduct of the petitioner.&quot;
386
+
387
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_8"> The Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No.42609 of 2018
388
+
389
+ filed against the aforesaid judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench
390
+
391
+ of this Court, was dismissed by the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court.
392
+
393
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_9"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155324943" id="span_7">Further, vide order dated 25.02.2021 in CRM-M-
394
+
395
+ 20177- 2020, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court granted regular
396
+
397
+ bail to an accused who was involved in a case wherein recovery
398
+
399
+ was of 3.8 kgs of &quot;charas&quot; (commercial quantity) after being in
400
+
401
+ custody for 1 year and 7 months. The said order was upheld by
402
+
403
+ the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court vide order dated 24.08.2021 in a
404
+
405
+ Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5852/2021 titled
406
+
407
+ as &quot;<a href="/doc/155324943/" id="a_17">Narcotic Control Bureau v. Vipan Sood and another</a>&quot;.</span>
408
+
409
+ <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="177690340" id="span_8">The Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated
410
+
411
+ 12.10.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.668 of 2020 titled as
412
+
413
+ &quot;<a href="/doc/177690340/" id="a_18">Amit Singh @ Moni v. Himachal Pradesh</a>&quot; was pleased to
414
+
415
+ grant regular bail in a case involving 3 kg and 800 grams of
416
+
417
+ &quot;charas&quot; primarily on the ground of substantial custody and
418
+
419
+ also, the fact that the trial would likely take time to conclude.</span></p><pre id="pre_2">
420
+
421
+ 4 of 8
422
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_9"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
423
+ CRM-M-53334-2021 [5]
424
+
425
+
426
+ </pre><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_10"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="50401054" id="span_10">In Criminal Appeal No.827 of 2021 titled as <a href="/doc/50401054/" id="a_19">Mukarram
427
+
428
+ Hussain v. State of Rajasthan and another</a>, the Hon&#x27;ble Apex
429
+
430
+ Court vide judgment dated 16.8.2021 was also pleased to grant
431
+
432
+ bail wherein the quantity of the contraband was commercial in
433
+
434
+ nature.</span>
435
+ </p>
436
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_11"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="8920567" id="span_11">A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M 10343 of
437
+
438
+ 2021 titled as <a href="/doc/8920567/" id="a_20">Ajay Kumar @ Nannu v. State of Punjab</a> and
439
+
440
+ other connected matters, vide Order dated 31.03.2021, after
441
+
442
+ taking into consideration the stipulations of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_21">Section 37</a> of the
443
+
444
+ NDPS Act, was pleased to grant regular bail in a case involving
445
+
446
+ commercial quantity and a condition was imposed on the
447
+
448
+ petitioner therein while granting the said bail and the said
449
+
450
+ condition was incorporated in para 21 of <a href="/doc/8920567/" id="a_22">the said judgment</a>,
451
+
452
+ which reads as under:</span>
453
+ </p>
454
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_4"> &quot;21. However, the petitioners are granted regular bail
455
+
456
+ subject to the condition that they shall not commit any offence
457
+
458
+ under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_23">NDPS Act</a> after their release on bail and in case of
459
+
460
+ commission of any such offence by them after their release on
461
+
462
+ bail, their bail in the present case shall also be liable to be
463
+
464
+ cancelled on application to be filed by the prosecution in this
465
+
466
+ regard.&quot;
467
+ </blockquote>
468
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_12"> Further, a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment
469
+
470
+ dated 31.08.2021 passed in CRM-8262-2021 in CRA-S-3721-
471
+
472
+ SB of 2015 titled as, Harpal Singh v. National Investigating
473
+
474
+ Agency and another, granted suspension of sentence in a case
475
+
476
+ where the recovery was of commercial quantity. In the
477
+
478
+ abovementioned order, the Division Bench had taken into
479
+
480
+ 5 of 8
481
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_12"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
482
+ CRM-M-53334-2021 [6]
483
+
484
+
485
+ consideration the right vested with an accused person / convict
486
+
487
+ under <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_24">Article 21</a> of the Constitution of India with regard to
488
+
489
+ speedy trial. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="57169485" id="span_13">Further, the judgment of Hon&#x27;ble the Supreme
490
+
491
+ Court in <a href="/doc/57169485/" id="a_25">State (NCT of Delhi) v. Lokesh Chadha</a>; (2021) 5
492
+
493
+ SCC 724 was also taken into account and the provisions of
494
+
495
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_26">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act were considered and the sentence of
496
+
497
+ the applicant-appellant therein was suspended after primarily
498
+
499
+ considering the period of custody of the applicant-appellant
500
+
501
+ therein and also the fact that the appeal was not likely to be
502
+
503
+ heard in near future.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="74048108" id="span_14"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="74048108" id="span_15">Reference in the order was also made to
504
+
505
+ the Division Bench judgment of this Court in <a href="/doc/74048108/" id="a_27">Daler Singh v.
506
+
507
+ State of Punjab</a>; 2007 (1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 316 and the view
508
+
509
+ taken in <a href="/doc/74048108/" id="a_28">Daler Singh</a>&#x27;s case (supra) was reiterated and followed.
510
+
511
+ In the above said judgment, it was also noticed that the grounds
512
+
513
+ for regular bail stand on a better footing than that of suspension
514
+
515
+ of sentence which is after conviction. It is apparent that in order
516
+
517
+ to meet the requirement under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_29">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act,
518
+
519
+ various Courts have taken into consideration the merits of the
520
+
521
+ case and the period of custody and where, in a case there are
522
+
523
+ arguable points on merits and the custody is also adequate, the
524
+
525
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme as well as various High Courts have granted
526
+
527
+ bail even in cases involving commercial quantity. This Court is
528
+
529
+ of the opinion that in the present case, there are several arguable
530
+
531
+ points which have been raised by the learned counsel for the
532
+
533
+ petitioner and the petitioner has been in custody since
534
+
535
+ 25.05.2021 and all the abovesaid factors are sufficient to entitle
536
+
537
+ the petitioner to the concession of regular bail. Moreover, this
538
+
539
+ 6 of 8
540
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_16"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
541
+ CRM-M-53334-2021 [7]
542
+
543
+
544
+ Court proposes to impose such conditions that would meet the
545
+
546
+ object of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_30">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act.</span></span>
547
+ </p>
548
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_13"> Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the
549
+
550
+ petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his
551
+
552
+ furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned
553
+
554
+ trial Court/Duty Magistrate and subject to him not being
555
+
556
+ required in any other case.
557
+ </p>
558
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_14"> xx xx xx &quot;
559
+ </p>
560
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_15">
561
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_5"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="1939212" id="span_17">9. Accordingly, in view of the fact that the petitioner has been in
562
+
563
+ custody since 23.10.2020, challan has been filed on 15.03.2021, charges
564
+
565
+ have been framed and out of 20 prosecution witnesses, none has been
566
+
567
+ examined till date, co-accused against whom identical allegations are
568
+
569
+ there, has been released on bail vide order Annexure P/8 dated
570
+
571
+ 18.11.2021, recovery is of 300 grams of heroin, marginally higher than
572
+
573
+ the commercial quantity i.e. 250 grams and above, the other cases in
574
+
575
+ which the petitioner is involved, relate to small / non-commercial quantity
576
+
577
+ and the petitioner is on bail in the said cases, the petitioner has a one and a
578
+
579
+ half year old son, who requires treatment and surgery having been born
580
+
581
+ with one kidney, as also in view of the decision of the Coordinate Bench
582
+
583
+ in CRM-M-54123-2021, in case titled as <a href="/doc/1939212/" id="a_31">Sandeep vs. State of Haryana</a>,
584
+
585
+ decided on 10.01.2022, and the petitioner having made out arguable
586
+
587
+ points, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be
588
+
589
+ released on regular bail during the pendency of the trial, subject to his
590
+
591
+ furnishing bail / surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned CJM / Trial
592
+
593
+ Court / Duty Magistrate, concerned, provided he is not required in any
594
+
595
+ other case. The petitioner shall also abide by the following conditions:-</span>
596
+
597
+
598
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_16"> 7 of 8
599
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_18"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
600
+ CRM-M-53334-2021 [8]
601
+
602
+
603
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_17"> 1. The petitioner will not hamper with the evidence during
604
+
605
+ the trial.
606
+ </p>
607
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_18"> 2. The petitioner will not pressurize / intimidate the prosecution
608
+
609
+ witness(s).
610
+ </p>
611
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_19"> 3. The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on the date
612
+
613
+ fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
614
+
615
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_20"> 4. The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the
616
+
617
+ offence of which he is accused, or for commission of which he
618
+
619
+ is suspected.
620
+ </p>
621
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_21"> 5. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
622
+
623
+ inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
624
+
625
+ facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
626
+
627
+ facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the
628
+
629
+ evidence.
630
+ </p>
631
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_22"> In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the
632
+
633
+ prosecution shall be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail
634
+
635
+ before this Court. However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a
636
+
637
+ expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the trial Court would
638
+
639
+ proceed independently of the observations made in the present case which
640
+
641
+ are only for the purpose of adjudicating the present bail application.</p><pre id="pre_3">
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+ (B.S. Walia)
646
+ Judge
647
+ 07.04.2022
648
+ rajesh
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+ Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
653
+ Whether reportable : Yes/No
654
+
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+ 8 of 8
659
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_19"> ::: Downloaded on - 08-04-2022 22:23:34 :::</span>
660
+ </pre>
661
+ </div>
662
+ </article>
663
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
664
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
665
+ <div class="translate_container">
666
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
667
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
668
+ <button id="translatewarn"
669
+ type="button"
670
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
671
+ </div>
672
+
673
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
674
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
675
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
676
+
677
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:non-bailable-offences">non-bailable-offences</a></div></li>
678
+
679
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:law-governing-narcotics">law-governing-narcotics</a></div></li>
680
+
681
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:punishment-for-abetment, criminal-conspiracy">punishment-for-abetment, criminal-conspiracy</a></div></li>
682
+
683
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:special-power-of-high-court &lt; power-of-high-court-regarding-bail">special-power-of-high-court < power-of-high-court-regarding-bail</a></div></li>
684
+
685
+ </ul>
686
+ </nav>
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
691
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
692
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
693
+
694
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=grant%20of%20bail">grant of bail</a></div></li>
695
+
696
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
697
+
698
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
699
+
700
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20granted">bail granted</a></div></li>
701
+
702
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=regular%20bail">regular bail</a></div></li>
703
+
704
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=REGULAR%20BAIL%20GRANTED">REGULAR BAIL GRANTED</a></div></li>
705
+
706
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotic%20drug">narcotic drug</a></div></li>
707
+
708
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Crm-m">Crm-m</a></div></li>
709
+
710
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=the%20narcotic%20drugs%20and%20psychotropic%20substances%20act">the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act</a></div></li>
711
+
712
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotics%20and%20drugs%20act">narcotics and drugs act</a></div></li>
713
+
714
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20psychotropic%20drug"> psychotropic drug</a></div></li>
715
+
716
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20in%20all%20case">bail in all case</a></div></li>
717
+
718
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Section%2037">Section 37</a></div></li>
719
+
720
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=walia">walia</a></div></li>
721
+
722
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Section%2042">Section 42</a></div></li>
723
+
724
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=release%20on%20bail">release on bail</a></div></li>
725
+
726
+ </ul>
727
+ </nav>
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+ </aside>
732
+ </div>
733
+
734
+ </main>
735
+
736
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
737
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
738
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
739
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
740
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
741
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
742
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
743
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
744
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
745
+
746
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/11442833/" class="device-toggle">
747
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="GKIi4gFJ8SfNxPAEkquEHDiUdL96no6tEYsrVZY7fMkSCbfiwc9EastPByMzMADm">
748
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
749
+ </form>
750
+ </div>
751
+ </footer>
752
+
753
+ <script>
754
+ (function() {
755
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
756
+
757
+ if (navigator.share) {
758
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
759
+
760
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
761
+ try {
762
+ await navigator.share({
763
+ title: document.title,
764
+ url: window.location.href
765
+ });
766
+ } catch (err) {
767
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
768
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
769
+ }
770
+ }
771
+ });
772
+ }
773
+ })();
774
+ </script>
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
779
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
780
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
781
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
782
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
783
+
784
+
785
+ <script type="text/javascript">
786
+ (function($) {
787
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
788
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
789
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
790
+ }
791
+ }
792
+
793
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
794
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
795
+ return $("<li></li>")
796
+ .append(
797
+ $("<div></div>")
798
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
799
+ .html(item.label)
800
+ )
801
+ .appendTo(ul);
802
+ };
803
+ }
804
+
805
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
806
+ if (!$input.length) {
807
+ return;
808
+ }
809
+
810
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
811
+
812
+ $input.autocomplete({
813
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
814
+ delay: 180,
815
+ minLength: 2,
816
+ appendTo: 'body',
817
+ position: {
818
+ my: "left top",
819
+ at: "left bottom+6",
820
+ collision: "flipfit"
821
+ },
822
+ classes: {
823
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
824
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
825
+ },
826
+ open: function() {
827
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
828
+ var offset = $input.offset();
829
+ $menu
830
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
831
+ .css({
832
+ left: offset.left,
833
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
834
+ });
835
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
836
+ },
837
+ close: function() {
838
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
839
+ },
840
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
841
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
842
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
843
+ event.preventDefault();
844
+ }
845
+ },
846
+ select: function(event, ui) {
847
+ event.preventDefault();
848
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
849
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
850
+ }
851
+
852
+ if ($form.length) {
853
+ $form.trigger('submit');
854
+ } else {
855
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
856
+ }
857
+ }
858
+ });
859
+
860
+ }
861
+
862
+ $(document).ready(function() {
863
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
864
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
865
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
866
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
867
+ });
868
+ })(jQuery);
869
+ </script>
870
+
871
+
872
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
873
+ <script type="text/javascript">
874
+ $(document).ready(function() {
875
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
876
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
877
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
878
+
879
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
880
+ signupForDownload();
881
+ e.preventDefault();
882
+ return false;
883
+ });
884
+
885
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
886
+ e.preventDefault();
887
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
888
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
889
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
890
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
891
+ });
892
+ });
893
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
894
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
895
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
896
+ if (!translateContainer) {
897
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
898
+ return;
899
+ }
900
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
901
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
902
+ return;
903
+ }
904
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
905
+
906
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
907
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
908
+ if (!translateEl) {
909
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
910
+ return;
911
+ }
912
+
913
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
914
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
915
+
916
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
917
+ var node;
918
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
919
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
920
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
921
+ }
922
+ }
923
+
924
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
925
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
926
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
927
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
928
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
929
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
930
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
931
+ }
932
+ }
933
+ });
934
+ }
935
+
936
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
937
+ }
938
+ </script>
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
945
+ <script type="text/javascript">
946
+ $(document).ready(function () {
947
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
948
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
949
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
950
+ valid_ag: '',
951
+ is_valid: '',
952
+ is_auth: 'False',
953
+ is_agreement: '',
954
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
955
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
956
+ });
957
+ </script>
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+
962
+
963
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
964
+ <script type="text/javascript">
965
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
966
+ window.is_auth = false;
967
+
968
+ // Document context for chatbot
969
+ window.documentContext = {
970
+ tid: 11442833,
971
+ title: "Amritpal Singh vs State Of Punjab on 7 April, 2022",
972
+ url: window.location.href,
973
+ isFragment: false
974
+ };
975
+
976
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
977
+ </script>
978
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
979
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
980
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
981
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c5708bac992c9b2',t:'MTc2OTY3MTkzMC4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
986
+
987
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_115496714.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1372 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Bhanudas Vasantrao More @ Aditya Patil vs Union Of India And Anr on 5 February, 2024</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/115496714/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="oqFnR0bHMUNLPdNjZnJOWygJEyAh6KaoSERZ6ybjDwUT9h4PjrxaySjA38fQU8o5">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/115496714/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="oqFnR0bHMUNLPdNjZnJOWygJEyAh6KaoSERZ6ybjDwUT9h4PjrxaySjA38fQU8o5">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/115496714/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="oqFnR0bHMUNLPdNjZnJOWygJEyAh6KaoSERZ6ybjDwUT9h4PjrxaySjA38fQU8o5">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:115496714">13</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:115496714">0</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Bombay High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Bhanudas Vasantrao More @ Aditya Patil vs Union Of India And Anr on 5 February, 2024</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:n-j-jamadar">N. J. Jamadar</a></h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:n-j-jamadar">N. J. Jamadar</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <pre id="pre_1">2024:BHC-AS:7127
193
+
194
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
195
+
196
+
197
+
198
+
199
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
200
+ CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
201
+
202
+ BAIL APPLICATION NO.2581 OF 2023
203
+
204
+ Bhanudas Vasantrao More @ Aditya Patil ...Applicant
205
+ vs.
206
+ Union of India and Another ...Respondents
207
+
208
+ WITH
209
+ BAIL APPLICATION NO.2616 OF 2023
210
+
211
+ Manish Mathurbhai Serasia @ Rawal ...Applicant
212
+ vs.
213
+ Directorate of Revenue Intelligence,
214
+ Mumbai Zonal Unit, Mumbai ...Respondent
215
+
216
+ Mr. Taraq Sayed a/w. Ms. Ashwini Achari and Ms. Alisha Parekh,
217
+ for the Applicants.
218
+ Mr. Advait Sethna a/w. Mr. Rangan Majumdar i/b. Mr. Raju
219
+ Thakker, for Respondent No. 1-UOI.
220
+ Mr. M.G. Patil, APP, for the Respondent/State.
221
+
222
+ CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J.
223
+ DATE : FEBRUARY 5, 2024
224
+
225
+ P.C.:
226
+
227
+ 1. The applicants who are arraigned in C.R. No. 43 of 2017
228
+
229
+ registered with D.R.I., Mumbai Zonal Unit for the offences
230
+
231
+ punishable under <a href="/doc/1330288/" id="a_1">sections 8(c)</a>, <a href="/doc/34296573/" id="a_2">22(c)</a>, <a href="/doc/1089586/" id="a_3">25</a>, <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_4">27A</a> and <a href="/doc/1252855/" id="a_5">29</a> of the
232
+
233
+ Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_6">NDPS
234
+
235
+ Act, 1985</a>) seek to be enlarged on bail.
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+ 2. The applicants were arrested on 20th March, 2017. These
240
+
241
+ applications are preferred primarily on the ground of long
242
+
243
+
244
+ Vishal Parekar ...1
245
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+
250
+ incarceration of the applicants without a real prospect of the
251
+
252
+ conclusion of the trial in NDPS Special Case No. 79 of 2017 arising
253
+
254
+ out of C.R. No. 43 of 2017.
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ 3. The applicants are in custody for more than six years. The
259
+
260
+ applicants assert though charge has been framed in Special Case
261
+
262
+ No. 79 of 2017 yet till date not a single witness has been examined
263
+
264
+ by the prosecution. Therefore, the applicants deserve to be enlarged
265
+
266
+ on bail.
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ 4. The applicants have referred to a number of judgments of the
271
+
272
+ Supreme Court, this Court and other High Courts to lend support to
273
+
274
+ their claim that long incarceration without trial infringes their
275
+
276
+ fundamental right under <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_7">Article 21</a> of the Constitution of India and
277
+
278
+ thus they deserve to be released on bail.
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ 5. An affidavit in reply is filed (in BA No. 2581 of 2023) on behalf
283
+
284
+ of the respondent No.1- UOI. The applicant Bhanudas More is
285
+
286
+ alleged to be a known drug trafficker. He had been involved in many
287
+
288
+ drug trafficking cases. He was convicted and was detained in prison
289
+
290
+ till 2007. In another case, the applicant was declared an absconder.
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+ Vishal Parekar ...2
296
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ 6. The respondents contend that since both the applicants were
302
+
303
+ found manufacturing Mephedrone (MD) and a huge quantity of
304
+
305
+ contraband has been recovered from the possession of the
306
+
307
+ applicants, the rigor contained in section 37 of the NDPC Act, 1985
308
+
309
+ operates with full force. There is no ground to believe that the
310
+
311
+ applicants have not committed the alleged offences. Having regard
312
+
313
+ to the antecedents of the applicants, especially that of Bhanudas
314
+
315
+ More, the applicant in BA No. 2581 of 2023, the Court can not draw
316
+
317
+ an inference that, if released on bail, the applicants will not commit
318
+
319
+ identical offences. In the backdrop of the nature of the accusations
320
+
321
+ and the material against the applicant, according to the
322
+
323
+ respondents, mere long period of incarceration does not entitle the
324
+
325
+ applicants to bail.
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+ 7. I have heard Mr. Taraq Sayed, the learned counsel for the
330
+
331
+ applicants, Mr. Advait Sethna, the learned Spl. P.P. for respondent
332
+
333
+ No. 1-UOI and Mr. M.G. Patil, learned APP, for the respondent-State.
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ 8. To begin with, it may be necessary to note the nature of the
338
+
339
+ indictment against the applicants. It is alleged a specific intelligence
340
+
341
+ was received by the officers of DRI that the applicant Bhanudas
342
+
343
+ More along with Manish Serasia @ Rawal, the applicant in BA No.
344
+
345
+
346
+ Vishal Parekar ...3
347
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+ 2616 of 2023 and his associates Rauf Lulania and Wazhul
353
+
354
+ Chaudhary had hired a factory premises, Rainbow Paints, Palghar
355
+
356
+ Taluka Industrial Estate, Boisar Road, Palghar and were
357
+
358
+ clandestinely manufacturing Mephedrone (MD). A batch of MD in
359
+
360
+ slurry form was likely to be removed from the said premises on 19 th
361
+
362
+ March, 2017. Pursuant thereto, a search was conducted at the
363
+
364
+ premises of M/s. Rainbow Paints. 238.20 kgs. of slurry purported to
365
+
366
+ be containing MD was found thereat. The co-accused Rauff Lulania
367
+
368
+ (accused No. 3) and Manish Serasia (applicant/accused No. 4) were
369
+
370
+ also present in the factory premises and they were apprehended.
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+ 9. A search was conducted at the residential premises of the
375
+
376
+ applicant Bhanudas More at Pratik Row House, Rustomjee Global
377
+
378
+ City, Virar (w). Eight silver foil packets containing 8.126 kg black
379
+
380
+ coloured substance purported to be Ganja, 20 gms of brownish
381
+
382
+ coloured powder purported to be MD, one plastic box containing
383
+
384
+ brown coloured liquid and undissolved crystals purported to be MD,
385
+
386
+ one plastic bag containing white coloured substance in lump form
387
+
388
+ weighing 1.9 kg, which appeared to be raw material for
389
+
390
+ manufacturing of MD, and other incriminating articles were seized.
391
+
392
+ The applicants and co-accused came to be arrested on 20 th March,
393
+
394
+ 2017.
395
+
396
+
397
+ Vishal Parekar ...4
398
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ 10. Indisputably, the applicants are in custody for almost seven
404
+
405
+ years. Though charge has been framed in NDPS Special Case No. 79
406
+
407
+ of 2017, recording of evidence of witness has yet not commenced.
408
+
409
+
410
+
411
+ 11. In the backdrop of aforesaid position, Mr. Taraq Sayed,
412
+
413
+ learned counsel for the applicants, submitted that the prolonged
414
+
415
+ period of incarceration without the possibility of conclusion of trial
416
+
417
+ within a reasonable period has consistently been considered to be a
418
+
419
+ ground to set an accused at liberty even in cases in which there are
420
+
421
+ statutory restrictions in the matter of grant of bail, like under
422
+
423
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_8">section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, 1985.
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+ 12. Mr. Taraq Sayed urged that the slow pace of the trial can be
428
+
429
+ gauged from the fact that the charge came to be framed prior to six
430
+
431
+ months ago only and till date no witness has been examined. The
432
+
433
+ prosecution proposes to examine as many as 39 witnesses. It is
434
+
435
+ extremely unlikely that the trial can be concluded within a
436
+
437
+ reasonable period. In such a situation, conditional personal liberty
438
+
439
+ must out weigh the statutory restrictions in the matter of grant of
440
+
441
+ bail, urged Mr. Sayed.
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+ 13. To bolster up this submission, Mr. Sayed placed reliance on a
446
+
447
+
448
+
449
+ Vishal Parekar ...5
450
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
451
+
452
+
453
+
454
+
455
+ number of judgments of the Supreme Court and this Court. Making
456
+
457
+ reference thereto, it was urged that this Court has exercised the
458
+
459
+ discretion to release the accused on bail even in cases where the
460
+
461
+ period of incarceration of the applicant was relatively less. Mr.
462
+
463
+ Sayed would urge that the alleged gravity of the offences and
464
+
465
+ antecedent of Bhanudas More sought to be pressed into service on
466
+
467
+ behalf of respondent No. 1 do not preclude the Court from
468
+
469
+ exercising its discretion.
470
+
471
+
472
+
473
+ 14. It was submitted by Mr. Sayed that in NDPS Special Case No.
474
+
475
+ 49 of 2001, in which the applicant Bhanudas More was convicted by
476
+
477
+ the Special Judge, this Court by a judgment and order dated 31 st
478
+
479
+ January, 2018 has set aside the conviction and acquitted the
480
+
481
+ applicant Bhanudas More. In Special Case No. 226 of 2015 arising
482
+
483
+ out of C.R. No. 64 of 2015, the learned Special Judge has released
484
+
485
+ the applicant Bhanudas on bail, on merits. Therefore, the alleged
486
+
487
+ gravity of the offences and antecedents of the applicant Bhanudas
488
+
489
+ cannot be pressed into service to further curtail the personal
490
+
491
+ liberty of the applicant Bhanudas. Mr. Sayed would further urge
492
+
493
+ that there is no antecedent to the discredit of the applicant Manish
494
+
495
+ Serasia. Resultantly, it can be inferred that the applicant Manish
496
+
497
+ would not indulge in identical offences if released on bail.
498
+
499
+
500
+ Vishal Parekar ...6
501
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
502
+
503
+
504
+
505
+
506
+ 15. Mr. Sayed placed reliance, inter alia, on the judgments of the
507
+
508
+ Supreme Court in the cases of :
509
+
510
+ (i) Rabi Prakash vs. The State of Odisha1;
511
+ (ii) Mohd. Muslim @ Hussain vs. State (NCT of Delhi)2
512
+ (iii) Jitendra Jain vs. NCB and Anr.3
513
+ (iv) Tapan Das vs. Union of India4
514
+ (v) Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee Representing
515
+ Undertrial Prisoners vs. Union of India and Others5
516
+ And the decisions of this Court in the cases of
517
+ (i) Ellangal Shimjid vs. The State of Maharashtra6
518
+ (ii) Peter Okonkwo Igwedimma vs.The State of Maharashtra7
519
+ (iii) Ranjit Laxman Tanpure vs. Intelligence Officer and Anr.8
520
+ (iv) Ugochukwu Duke Ogboke vs. The State of Goa and Ors.9
521
+ (v) Pramod Krishna Pandey vs. The State of Maharashtra10
522
+
523
+
524
+ 16. In opposition to this, Mr. Sethna, learned Spl.P.P. for
525
+
526
+ respondent No. 1 laid emphasis on the fact that the nature of the
527
+
528
+ accusations against the applicants is grave. It is not a case of
529
+
530
+ conscious possession, but of manufacturing of contraband articles.
531
+
532
+ A huge quantity of MD was recovered from the factory premises of
533
+
534
+ Rainbow Paints, where the applicants were manufacturing MD.
535
+
536
+ 1 Sp.L.to Appeal (Cri.) No.4169 of 2023, Dt.13/07/23.
537
+ 2 2023 SCC OnLine SC 352.
538
+ 3 Sp.L.to Appeal (Cri.) No.8900/2022 Dt.16/12/22.
539
+ 4 Sp.L.to Appeal (Cri) No.5617/2021, Dt. 07/10/21
540
+ 5 (1994) 6 Supreme Court Cases, 731.
541
+ 6 BA No.2635/2022 Dt.19/07/2023
542
+ 7 BA No.2197/2022 Dt.07/01/2023.
543
+ 8 BA No.3062/2021 Dt.06/12/2022
544
+ 9 BA No.647/2021, Dt.24/02/2022.
545
+ 10 BA No.2103/2021 Dt.03/08/2021
546
+
547
+ Vishal Parekar ...7
548
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+ Moreover, contraband articles were also recovered from the
554
+
555
+ residence of the applicant Bhanduas More. Release of the applicants
556
+
557
+ on bail, in such circumstances, would run counter to the legislative
558
+
559
+ object of prescribing the restrictions under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_9">section 37</a> of the NDPS
560
+
561
+ Act, 1985 in the matter of grant of bail.
562
+
563
+
564
+
565
+ 17. Mr. Sethna laid emphasis on the fact that the rigor contained
566
+
567
+ in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_10">section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, 1985 operates with full force and
568
+
569
+ there is no ground for which the Court would be justified in
570
+
571
+ recording a finding that the applicants are not guilty of the offences
572
+
573
+ for which they have been charged and would not indulge in identical
574
+
575
+ offences if released on bail. On the contrary, the antecedents of the
576
+
577
+ applicant Bhanudas More suggest that there is a strong possibility
578
+
579
+ of accused again indulging in drug trafficking.
580
+
581
+
582
+
583
+ 18. Mr. Sethna, further submitted that despite accused having
584
+
585
+ been incarcerated for a long period, the Supreme Court and the
586
+
587
+ High Courts have declined to exercise the discretion in favour of the
588
+
589
+ accused where there is strong material to implicate them. Mr.
590
+
591
+ Sethna, placed reliance on the decisions of the Supreme Court in
592
+
593
+ the cases of
594
+
595
+ (i) Narcotics Control Bureau vs. Mohit Aggarwal11
596
+ 11 MANU/SC/899/2022
597
+
598
+ Vishal Parekar ...8
599
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+ (ii) Sheru vs. Narcotics Control Bureau12
605
+
606
+ (iii) Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh @ Pappu13
607
+
608
+ (iv) Union of India vs. Sujeet Khatua Etc.14
609
+
610
+ (v) Narcotics Control and Bureau vs. Bal Mukund Kumar
611
+
612
+ Nirala @ Rahul and Anr.15
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+ 19. To bolster up the submission that an accused who is charged
617
+
618
+ for the offences punishable under section <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_11">NDPS Act, 1985</a> in respect
619
+
620
+ of commercial quantity, cannot be released on bail without
621
+
622
+ recording a satisfaction that the twin test envisaged by <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_12">section 37</a>
623
+
624
+ of the NDPS Act,1985 stands satisfied, Mr. Sethna placed reliance
625
+
626
+ on the judgment of Mohit Aggarwal (supra).
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ 20. Mr. Sethna would urge that though the applicants have been
631
+
632
+ incarcerated for more than six years yet the prosecution deserves
633
+
634
+ an opportunity to make an effort to expeditiously conclude the trial.
635
+
636
+ In the circumstances of the case, according to Mr. Sethna, this
637
+
638
+ Court would be justified in expediting the trial instead of releasing
639
+
640
+ the accused on bail. To lend support to this submission, Mr. Sethna
641
+
642
+ invited attention of the Court to the decisions of the Supreme Court
643
+
644
+ in the cases of:
645
+ 12 MANU/SC/814/2020.
646
+ 13 Supreme Court, Cr.A.No.952/2023 Dt.28/03/2023
647
+ 14 Sp.L.to Appeal (Cri) Diary No. 34587/2023 Dt. 27/09/23
648
+ 15 Sp.L.to Appeal (Cri) No. 2521/2018.
649
+
650
+ Vishal Parekar ...9
651
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
652
+
653
+
654
+
655
+
656
+ (i) Union of India (NCB) Etc. vs. Khalil Uddin Etc.16
657
+
658
+ (ii) Sabit Ali Mondal vs. The State of West Bengal17
659
+
660
+ And the decisions of this Court, in the cases of
661
+
662
+ (i) Dhananjay Braj Narayanlal Srivastav vs. Union of India &amp; Anr.18
663
+
664
+ (ii) Mohamed Sikander Cheemu vs. Union of India and Anr.19
665
+
666
+ And the decision of Kerala High Court in the case of
667
+
668
+ Nandakumar N. vs. State of Kerala20
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ 21. <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_13">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, 1985 which begins with non-
673
+
674
+ obstante clause contains an interdict against releasing a person
675
+
676
+ accused of committing offences punishable under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_14">sections 19</a> or
677
+
678
+ <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_15">section 24</a> or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_16">section 27-A</a> and also for offences involving
679
+
680
+ commercial quantity, unless the public prosecutor has been given
681
+
682
+ an opportunity to oppose the application for such release and where
683
+
684
+ the public prosecutor opposes the application, the Court is satisfied
685
+
686
+ that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty
687
+
688
+ of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while
689
+
690
+ on bail.
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+ 22. Sub section (2) of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_17">Section 37</a> further emphasises that the
695
+
696
+ 16 Cr.A. No. 1841-1842/ 2022 Dt.21/10/2022.
697
+ 17 SLP (Cri) Diary No. 20289/2023, Dt. 29/05/2023
698
+ 18 BA No.2950/2022 Dt.31/01/2023.
699
+ 19 BA No.1618/2022, Dt.12/07/2023.
700
+ 20 BA No.5596/2022 Dt. 03/08/2023.
701
+
702
+ Vishal Parekar ...10
703
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+ limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of sub section
709
+
710
+ (1) are in addition to the limitations under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_18">Code of Criminal
711
+
712
+ Procedure</a>, 1973 or any other law for the time being in force, on
713
+
714
+ granting of bail.
715
+
716
+
717
+
718
+ 23. Parliament has incorporated such restrictions in the matter
719
+
720
+ of grant of bail to the person accused of grave offences under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_19">NDPS
721
+
722
+ Act, 1985</a> keeping in view the deleterious effect and devastating
723
+
724
+ impact those offences have on society. Satisfaction of the Court that
725
+
726
+ the accused will not indulge in identical offence becomes necessary
727
+
728
+ as there is an apprehension that the person released on bail may
729
+
730
+ again indulge in the nefarious activity of trafficking in drugs.
731
+
732
+ Parliament has thus used the expression, &quot;reasonable ground&quot;
733
+
734
+ which implies something more than prima facie ground. In the case
735
+
736
+ of State of Kerala vs. Rajesh and Others21 the Supreme Court
737
+
738
+ expounded the connotation of term, &quot;reasonable grounds&#x27; in the
739
+
740
+ context of restrictions contained in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_20">section 37</a> of the NDPS Act,
741
+
742
+ 1985, as under:-
743
+
744
+ The expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; means
745
+ something more than prima facie grounds. It
746
+ contemplates substantial probable causes for
747
+ believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged
748
+ offence. The reasonable belief contemplated in the
749
+
750
+ 21 MANU/SC/0084/2020.
751
+
752
+ Vishal Parekar ...11
753
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+ provision requires existence of such facts and
759
+ circumstances as are sufficient in themselves to
760
+ justify satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the
761
+ alleged offence. In the case on hand, the High Court
762
+ seems to have completely overlooked the underlying
763
+ object of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_21">Section 37</a> that in addition to the limitations
764
+ provided under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_22">CrPC</a>, or any other law for the time
765
+ being in force, regulating the grant of bail, its liberal
766
+ approach in the matter of bail under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_23">NDPS Act</a> is
767
+ indeed uncalled for.
768
+
769
+
770
+
771
+ 24. By a catena of judgments, the legal position is fairly
772
+
773
+ crystallized that the Court has no jurisdiction to grant bail to an
774
+
775
+ accused whose case falls within the ambit of <a href="/doc/192465/" id="a_24">section 37(1)</a> of the
776
+
777
+ NDPS Act, 1985 without recording a finding that the twin test
778
+
779
+ envisaged by sub clause (b) of sub section (1) of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_25">Section 37</a> of the
780
+
781
+ NDPS Act, 1985, adverted to above, stands satisfied.
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+ 25. In the case at hand, as noted above, the applicants are seeking
786
+
787
+ bail primarily on the ground of long incarceration. Even otherwise,
788
+
789
+ the allegations and material pressed into service against the
790
+
791
+ applicants are such that the interdict contained in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_26">section 37</a> of the
792
+
793
+ NDPS Act, 1985 is clearly attracted. In this proceeding, no
794
+
795
+ endeavour is made on behalf of the applicants to demonstrate that
796
+
797
+ the applicants may not be guilty of the offence for which they stand
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+ Vishal Parekar ...12
802
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+ charged. The claim for bail rests solely on prolonged incarceration.
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+ 26. Undoubtedly, there is a definite legislative purpose in
812
+
813
+ providing additional restrictions in the matter of grant of bail,
814
+
815
+ having regard to the gravity of the offences and the necessity to
816
+
817
+ arrest the menace of drug trafficking. The restrictions in the matter
818
+
819
+ of grant of bail under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_27">NDPS Act, 1985</a> and other enactments like
820
+
821
+ MCOCA and UAPA etc., are based on the premise that the trial in
822
+
823
+ such matters ought to be concluded expeditiously and that premise
824
+
825
+ has been held to constitute a justification for such stringent
826
+
827
+ provisions in the matter of grant of bail.
828
+
829
+
830
+
831
+ 27. As against this interest of society, long incarceration of an
832
+
833
+ accused, without a real prospect of conclusion of trial within a
834
+
835
+ reasonable period, gives rise to a competing interest of the accused
836
+
837
+ an account of unjustified deprivation of personal liberty for an
838
+
839
+ unreasonably long period as an under trial prisoner.
840
+
841
+
842
+
843
+ 28. It is in the context of these competing interests, it has been
844
+
845
+ held that the deprivation of right to speedy trial infringes the right
846
+
847
+ to life and personal liberty guaranteed under <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_28">Article 21</a> of the
848
+
849
+ Constitution of India. The statutory restrictions in the matter of
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Vishal Parekar ...13
854
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+
859
+ grant of bail melt down in the face of unreasonably long period of
860
+
861
+ incarceration.
862
+
863
+
864
+
865
+ 29. A useful reference in this context can be made to the decision
866
+
867
+ of the Supreme Court in the case of Supreme Court Legal Aid
868
+
869
+ Committee (supra) wherein the Supreme Court directed the release
870
+
871
+ of under trial prisoners who were accused of the offences
872
+
873
+ punishable under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_29">NDPS Act, 1985</a>, albeit as a one time direction,
874
+
875
+ with clarification that those directions were not intended to
876
+
877
+ interfere with the Special Court&#x27;s power to grant bail under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_30">section
878
+
879
+ 37</a> of the NDPS Act, 1985. It was, inter alia, observed that-
880
+
881
+ (ii) Where the undertrial accused is charged with an
882
+ offence(s) under the Act providing for punishment
883
+ exceeding five years and fine, such an undertrial shall
884
+ be released on bail on the term set out in (i) above
885
+ provided that his bail amount shall in no case be less
886
+ than Rs 50,000 with two sureties for like amount.
887
+
888
+
889
+
890
+ 30. In the case of Mohd. Muslim @ Hussain (supra), the Supreme
891
+
892
+ Court, inter alia, observed that grant of bail on ground of undue
893
+
894
+ delay in trial, cannot be said to be fettered by <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_31">Section 37</a> of the Act,
895
+
896
+ given the imperative of Section 436A which is applicable to offences
897
+
898
+ under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_32">NDPS Act</a> too.
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Vishal Parekar ...14
904
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+
909
+ 31. In the case of Rabi Prakash (supra), the Supreme Court
910
+
911
+ observed as under:-
912
+
913
+ 4] As regard to the twin conditions contained in
914
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_33">section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, learned counsel for the
915
+ respondent - State has been duly heard. Thus, the 1 st
916
+ condition stands complied with. So far as the 2 nd
917
+ condition re: formation of opinion as to whether there
918
+ are reasonable grounds to believe that the petitioner is
919
+ not guilty, the same may not be formed at this stage
920
+ when he has already spent more than three and a half
921
+ years in custody. The prolonged incarceration,
922
+ generally militates against the most precious
923
+ fundamental right guaranteed under <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_34">Article 21</a> of the
924
+ Constitution and in such a situation, the conditional
925
+ liberty must override the statutory embargo created
926
+ under <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_35">section 37(1)(b)(ii)</a> of the NDPS Act.
927
+
928
+
929
+
930
+ 32. As against this, there is a body of judgments, on which
931
+
932
+ reliance was placed by Mr. Sethna, wherein, it has been observed
933
+
934
+ that mere long period of incarceration cannot be a ground for grant
935
+
936
+ of bail in the face of statutory restrictions. In the case of Sheru vs.
937
+
938
+ NCB (supra) the Supreme Court, in the context of suspension of
939
+
940
+ sentence of a convict, observed that mere passage of time cannot be
941
+
942
+ a reason for bail.
943
+
944
+ 33. In the case of Union of India V/s. Sujeet Khatua Etc.22 while
945
+
946
+ granting bail in the case of Sujeet Khatua etc. V/s. Union of India,
947
+
948
+ 22 Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri.) Diary No.34587 of 2023 dt. 27 September 2023
949
+
950
+ Vishal Parekar ...15
951
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
952
+
953
+
954
+
955
+
956
+ the High Court had made the following observations :
957
+
958
+ &quot;...... To make it clear, the provision contained in
959
+ Section 436-A of Code would apply to the
960
+ special acts also in the absence of any specific
961
+ provision. For example, the rigour as provided
962
+ under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_36">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, would not
963
+ come in the way in such a case as we are
964
+ dealing with the liberty of a person....&quot;
965
+ 34. In the context of the aforesaid observations, the
966
+
967
+ Supreme Court observed as under :
968
+
969
+ &quot;Though we are not interfering with the
970
+ impugned order on merits, we make it clear
971
+ that we have not approved the aforesaid
972
+ observations.&quot;
973
+ 35. In a situation of this nature, in my considered view, the
974
+
975
+ gravity of the offences and the peculiar facts of the case must enter
976
+
977
+ the determination. The accusation against the Applicants deserves
978
+
979
+ to be kept in view. It is alleged, the applicants were involved in
980
+
981
+ manufacturing of MD and a large quantity of contraband was
982
+
983
+ recovered from the factory premises where the applicants were
984
+
985
+ allegedly manufacturing MD.
986
+
987
+ 36. I find substance in the submission of Mr. Sethna that it is not a
988
+
989
+ case where a drug peddler is found in possession of a commercial
990
+
991
+ quantity of the contraband. The gravity of the allegations can be
992
+
993
+ gauged from the fact that the applicants were allegedly indulging in
994
+
995
+
996
+ Vishal Parekar ...16
997
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+
1002
+ manufacturing of MD for a period of time before they were allegedly
1003
+
1004
+ apprehended. The alleged activity had, going by the allegations of
1005
+
1006
+ the prosecution, an element of continuity and repetitiveness with
1007
+
1008
+ the potential of having manufactured and supplied large quantity of
1009
+
1010
+ the contraband and thereby defeated the object of the Act, 1985
1011
+
1012
+ 37. In the aforesaid view of the matter, though the period of
1013
+
1014
+ incarceration is inordinate, the prosecution deserves an
1015
+
1016
+ opportunity to lead evidence to substantiate the grave indictment
1017
+
1018
+ against the applicants before they are released.
1019
+
1020
+ 38. In the totality of the circumstances, a direction for
1021
+
1022
+ expeditious conclusion of the trial with liberty to the applicants to
1023
+
1024
+ again move for bail in the event the trial is not concluded within the
1025
+
1026
+ stipulated period would be in consonance with the object of the Act,
1027
+
1028
+ 1985.
1029
+
1030
+ 39. Hence, the following order :
1031
+
1032
+ ORDER
1033
+ </pre>
1034
+ <pre id="pre_2">1] The applications stand rejected.
1035
+
1036
+ 2] The learned Special Judge seized with NDPS Case No.79 of
1037
+
1038
+ </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_1">2017 arising out of C.R.No.43 of 2017 registered with D.R.I. Mumbai
1039
+
1040
+ Zonal Unit is requested to conclude the trial in the said NDPS Case
1041
+
1042
+ as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six
1043
+
1044
+ months from the date of communication of this order.
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+ </p><pre id="pre_3">Vishal Parekar ...17
1048
+ 8-ba-2581-2023.doc
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+ 3] The learned Special Judge is requested to give due priority for
1054
+
1055
+ </pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_2"> hearing of the said NDPS Case having regard to the long period of
1056
+
1057
+ incarceration of the applicants, and, if possible, allocate time on at
1058
+
1059
+ least 2 to 3 days in a week for hearing of the said NDPS Case.
1060
+
1061
+ 4] The prosecution shall keep all the material witnesses present
1062
+
1063
+ for examination and shall not seek any adjournment.
1064
+
1065
+ 5] The accused shall also co-operate with the expeditious
1066
+
1067
+ conclusion of the trial and shall not seek adjournment.
1068
+
1069
+ 6] In the event the trial is not concluded within the said period of
1070
+
1071
+ six months, the applicants shall have the liberty to renew the
1072
+
1073
+ prayer for bail before this Court.
1074
+ </p>
1075
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_3"> 7] By way of abundant caution, it is clarified that the observations
1076
+
1077
+ made hereinabove are confined for the purpose of determination of
1078
+
1079
+ the entitlement for bail and they may not be construed as an
1080
+
1081
+ expression of opinion on the guilt or otherwise of the applicant and
1082
+
1083
+ the trial Court shall not be influenced by any of the observations
1084
+
1085
+ made hereinabove.</p><pre id="pre_4">
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+
1089
+
1090
+ (N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+ Vishal Parekar ...18
1096
+ Signed by: S.S.Phadke
1097
+ Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
1098
+ Date: 13/02/2024 20:57:52
1099
+ </pre>
1100
+ </div>
1101
+ </article>
1102
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
1103
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
1104
+ <div class="translate_container">
1105
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
1106
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
1107
+ <button id="translatewarn"
1108
+ type="button"
1109
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
1110
+ </div>
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+ </aside>
1117
+ </div>
1118
+
1119
+ </main>
1120
+
1121
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
1122
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
1123
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
1124
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
1125
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
1126
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
1127
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
1128
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
1129
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
1130
+
1131
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/115496714/" class="device-toggle">
1132
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="oqFnR0bHMUNLPdNjZnJOWygJEyAh6KaoSERZ6ybjDwUT9h4PjrxaySjA38fQU8o5">
1133
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
1134
+ </form>
1135
+ </div>
1136
+ </footer>
1137
+
1138
+ <script>
1139
+ (function() {
1140
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
1141
+
1142
+ if (navigator.share) {
1143
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
1144
+
1145
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
1146
+ try {
1147
+ await navigator.share({
1148
+ title: document.title,
1149
+ url: window.location.href
1150
+ });
1151
+ } catch (err) {
1152
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
1153
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
1154
+ }
1155
+ }
1156
+ });
1157
+ }
1158
+ })();
1159
+ </script>
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1164
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1165
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
1166
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
1167
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
1168
+
1169
+
1170
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1171
+ (function($) {
1172
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
1173
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
1174
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
1175
+ }
1176
+ }
1177
+
1178
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
1179
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
1180
+ return $("<li></li>")
1181
+ .append(
1182
+ $("<div></div>")
1183
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
1184
+ .html(item.label)
1185
+ )
1186
+ .appendTo(ul);
1187
+ };
1188
+ }
1189
+
1190
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
1191
+ if (!$input.length) {
1192
+ return;
1193
+ }
1194
+
1195
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
1196
+
1197
+ $input.autocomplete({
1198
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
1199
+ delay: 180,
1200
+ minLength: 2,
1201
+ appendTo: 'body',
1202
+ position: {
1203
+ my: "left top",
1204
+ at: "left bottom+6",
1205
+ collision: "flipfit"
1206
+ },
1207
+ classes: {
1208
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
1209
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
1210
+ },
1211
+ open: function() {
1212
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
1213
+ var offset = $input.offset();
1214
+ $menu
1215
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
1216
+ .css({
1217
+ left: offset.left,
1218
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
1219
+ });
1220
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
1221
+ },
1222
+ close: function() {
1223
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
1224
+ },
1225
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
1226
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
1227
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1228
+ event.preventDefault();
1229
+ }
1230
+ },
1231
+ select: function(event, ui) {
1232
+ event.preventDefault();
1233
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1234
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
1235
+ }
1236
+
1237
+ if ($form.length) {
1238
+ $form.trigger('submit');
1239
+ } else {
1240
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
1241
+ }
1242
+ }
1243
+ });
1244
+
1245
+ }
1246
+
1247
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1248
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
1249
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
1250
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
1251
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
1252
+ });
1253
+ })(jQuery);
1254
+ </script>
1255
+
1256
+
1257
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
1258
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1259
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1260
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
1261
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
1262
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
1263
+
1264
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
1265
+ signupForDownload();
1266
+ e.preventDefault();
1267
+ return false;
1268
+ });
1269
+
1270
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
1271
+ e.preventDefault();
1272
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
1273
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
1274
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
1275
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
1276
+ });
1277
+ });
1278
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
1279
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
1280
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1281
+ if (!translateContainer) {
1282
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
1283
+ return;
1284
+ }
1285
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
1286
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
1287
+ return;
1288
+ }
1289
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
1290
+
1291
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
1292
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1293
+ if (!translateEl) {
1294
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
1295
+ return;
1296
+ }
1297
+
1298
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
1299
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
1300
+
1301
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
1302
+ var node;
1303
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
1304
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
1305
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
1306
+ }
1307
+ }
1308
+
1309
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
1310
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
1311
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
1312
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
1313
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
1314
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
1315
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
1316
+ }
1317
+ }
1318
+ });
1319
+ }
1320
+
1321
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
1322
+ }
1323
+ </script>
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+
1329
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
1330
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1331
+ $(document).ready(function () {
1332
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
1333
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
1334
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
1335
+ valid_ag: '',
1336
+ is_valid: '',
1337
+ is_auth: 'False',
1338
+ is_agreement: '',
1339
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
1340
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
1341
+ });
1342
+ </script>
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
1349
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1350
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
1351
+ window.is_auth = false;
1352
+
1353
+ // Document context for chatbot
1354
+ window.documentContext = {
1355
+ tid: 115496714,
1356
+ title: "Bhanudas Vasantrao More @ Aditya Patil vs Union Of India And Anr on 5 February, 2024",
1357
+ url: window.location.href,
1358
+ isFragment: false
1359
+ };
1360
+
1361
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
1362
+ </script>
1363
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
1364
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
1365
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
1366
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
1367
+
1368
+
1369
+
1370
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c5705344ea25501',t:'MTc2OTY3MTc4NQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
1371
+
1372
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_117445212.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,703 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Deepak @ Chandan Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 July, 2021</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/117445212/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="lhpelvoV6t8uMBLjgOrDj1hxHAgCU6ALZrgYRVfCUDlYtPTtAEoAFoGzeh2iBPW6">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/117445212/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="lhpelvoV6t8uMBLjgOrDj1hxHAgCU6ALZrgYRVfCUDlYtPTtAEoAFoGzeh2iBPW6">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/117445212/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="lhpelvoV6t8uMBLjgOrDj1hxHAgCU6ALZrgYRVfCUDlYtPTtAEoAFoGzeh2iBPW6">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:117445212">3</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:117445212">32</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Madhya Pradesh High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Deepak @ Chandan Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 July, 2021</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:r-k-verma">Rajendra Kumar Verma</a></h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:r-k-verma">Rajendra Kumar Verma</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <pre id="pre_1"> THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
193
+ Cr.A.Nos.1217/2017 &amp; 1232/2017
194
+ 1
195
+
196
+ Jabalpur, Dated 19/07/2021
197
+ Shri Mayank Sharma, learned counsel for the
198
+ appellants.
199
+ Shri Anoop Sonkar, learned Panel Lawyer for the
200
+ State.
201
+ Heard on I.A.Nos.13674/2020 &amp; 13678/2020, third
202
+ applications on behalf appellant Deepak @ Chandan
203
+ Sahu in Cr.A.No.1217/2017 and on behalf of appellant
204
+ Kanhaiya Sahu in Cr.A.No.1232/2017 respectively for
205
+ suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail.
206
+ The appellants stand convicted for the offence
207
+ punishable under <a href="/doc/330464/" id="a_1">Section 20(b)(ii)(C)</a> of NDPS Act,1985
208
+ and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years with fine of
209
+ Rs.1,00,000/- also with default stipulation.
210
+ As per prosecution case, at the relevant point of time
211
+ Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ms. Shraddha Sonkar
212
+ who was posted as Probationary Station House Officer,
213
+ of Police Station Garhasarai on 26.01.2016 received in
214
+ information from the informant that Chandhan Sahu and
215
+ Kanhaiya Sahu had been transporting contraband
216
+ substance, who may be apprehended. On such
217
+ information, entry of the information was made in
218
+ Rojnamachasana. Panchnama to procedure search
219
+ warrant was also prepared which was also registered in
220
+ Rojnamachasanha. Constable Ganga Yadav went to the
221
+ office of Additional Superintendent of Police, Dindori to
222
+ procure search warrants, entry of the same was also
223
+ THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
224
+ Cr.A.Nos.1217/2017 &amp; 1232/2017
225
+ 2
226
+
227
+ made in Rojnamachasanha. Thereafter the police party
228
+ proceeded towards the alleged place of incident in a
229
+ government vehicle. Where a white colour Bolero Pickup
230
+ vehicle was seen coming from the side of Anuppur
231
+ bearing registration No.MP52 GA 0391 which was
232
+ stopped by the police, in which the appellants were
233
+ alleged to have sat. The appellants were informed about
234
+ the search and on search nothing objectionable was
235
+ found from their possession. Thereafter, the vehicle was
236
+ also searched, in which, 48 KG 550 gm contraband was
237
+ found in three bags and in a khaki colour cartoon.
238
+ Thereafter two samples, each of 50 gms were taken on
239
+ which signatures of the witnesses were also obtained. On
240
+ the aforesaid allegation, offence was registered against
241
+ the appellants and they were taken into custody. Vehicle
242
+ was also taken into custody by the police. After
243
+ registration of the FIR, charge-sheet was filed before the
244
+ trial Court and after the trial, the impugned judgment is
245
+ passed and the trial Court found the appellants guilty for
246
+ the aforesaid offence.
247
+ Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the
248
+ appellants have wrongly been convicted by the trial Court.
249
+ The circumstances so mentioned in the judgment do not
250
+ incriminate the appellants with the said offence. The bags
251
+ and the cartoon which are said to have been found in the
252
+ Bolero Pickup vehicle do not belong to him. There are
253
+ major contradictions, omissions and improvements in the
254
+ THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
255
+ Cr.A.Nos.1217/2017 &amp; 1232/2017
256
+ 3
257
+
258
+ testimony of the prosecution witnesses. There are major
259
+ contradictions in the version of the prosecution witnesses
260
+ about the seized quantity of the contraband.
261
+ Learned counsel for the appellants further submits
262
+ that independent witnesses of the seizure and search
263
+ have turned hostile. The police had not followed the
264
+ proper procedure while conducting search of the
265
+ appellants and the procedural mistakes apparent on the
266
+ face of record. There is no evidence on record to show
267
+ that the appellants had any intention to commit the
268
+ offence. The learned trial Judge has failed to appreciate
269
+ the prosecution evidence in its proper perspective
270
+ resulting into grave miscarriage of justice. It is also clear
271
+ from the circumstances that concocted and fabricated
272
+ evidence has been utilized for conviction of the
273
+ appellants.
274
+ Learned counsel for the appellants has further
275
+ submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against the
276
+ appellants and, therefore, there is no probability to repeat
277
+ such offence in future. He has further argued that the
278
+ appellants have suffered substantial jail sentence period
279
+ out of 10 years of conviction and if they are not released
280
+ on bail, purpose of filing the criminal appeal would be
281
+ frustrated. There is no possibility of early hearing of the
282
+ appeals especially because of COVID-19 pandemic. With
283
+ the aforesaid, he prays for allowing the said applications.
284
+ THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
285
+ Cr.A.Nos.1217/2017 &amp; 1232/2017
286
+ 4
287
+
288
+ On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer opposes
289
+ the prayer of the counsel for the appellants submitting
290
+ that earlier applications filed for the same purpose have
291
+ been rejected by the Court after considering each and
292
+ every aspect of the case. There is no change in
293
+ circumstances to consider these successive bail
294
+ applications. The contraband substance was seized from
295
+ the possession of the appellants.
296
+ Heard and perused the evidence on record.
297
+ On perusal, it is found that 48 kgs and 550 gms of
298
+ contraband substance (ganja) was seized from the Bulero
299
+ Pickup vehicle whereon the present appellants were
300
+ sitting. As per the prosecution, the appellants were
301
+ transporting the contraband substance. Prima facie, it
302
+ appears that the appellants were on the vehicle and the
303
+ vehicle and contraband substance were seized from the
304
+ possession of the appellants. The ground of falsely
305
+ implication of the appellants and non-compliance of
306
+ mandatory provisions of <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_2">NDPS Act</a>, prima facie, having no
307
+ force as it appears that the learned trial Court has
308
+ discussed about the compliance of mandatory provisions
309
+ of <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_3">NDPS Act</a> and prima facie, the case does not seem of
310
+ falsely implication.
311
+ The learned counsel for the appellant has also
312
+ expressed his anxiety about futility of purpose of filing the
313
+ appeals, if the appellants are not released on bail or the
314
+ appeal will not be heard finally. As per the appellants&#x27;
315
+ THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
316
+ Cr.A.Nos.1217/2017 &amp; 1232/2017
317
+ 5
318
+
319
+ counsel, the appellants have already suffered substantial
320
+ part of their jail sentence out of 10 years of conviction and
321
+ if they are not released on bail, the appeal would be in
322
+ vain.
323
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_4">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act restricts the bail of accused
324
+ for offence involving commercial quantity unless the Court
325
+ is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing
326
+ that he is not guilty of such offence.
327
+ In the case of Union of India v. Abdul Momin
328
+ reported in (2005) 13 SCC 144, after considering the
329
+ question of applicability of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_5">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act, the
330
+ Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court has held that merely on the ground
331
+ that there was no prospect of early hearing of appeal, bail
332
+ cannot be granted to the accused.
333
+ Further, in the case of Rasheed and others Vs.
334
+ State of Karnataka reported in 2007 Cri. L.J. 2316, the
335
+ High Court of Karnataka has held that under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_6">NDPS Act</a>,
336
+ &#x27;the negation of bail is rule and grant of bail is an
337
+ exception&#x27;. The Court discussed the provision of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_7">Section
338
+ 37</a> of NDPS Act and held that the expression &#x27;reasonable
339
+ ground&#x27; as used in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_8">Section 37</a> of the Act means
340
+ something more then prima facie ground.
341
+ In another case Ratan Kumar Vishwas v. State of
342
+ U.P. &amp; another reported in AIR 2009 SC 581, the Hon&#x27;ble
343
+ Apex Court has denied to suspend the jail sentence of the
344
+ appellant whose possession contraband substance was
345
+ seized. The Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court held that bail cannot be
346
+ THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
347
+ Cr.A.Nos.1217/2017 &amp; 1232/2017
348
+ 6
349
+
350
+ granted to accused unless there are reasonable ground
351
+ for holding that he is not guilty and not likely to commit
352
+ any offence while on bail.
353
+ Further, in the case of Union of India v. Ratan
354
+ Malik @ Habul reported in (2009) 2 SCC 624, the reason
355
+ of delay in conclusion of appeal and undergone period of
356
+ accused were citing before the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court for
357
+ granting bail but the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court did not found
358
+ said circumstances sufficient to satisfy the mandatory
359
+ requirements of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_9">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act.
360
+ A Full Bench of this Court in the case of Dhashrath
361
+ Vs. State of MP in Cr.A. No. 1248/2005, order dated
362
+ 26.04.2017</pre><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_1"> has already settled the principle that the
363
+ custody period of the accused is not a sole ground to
364
+ suspend jail sentence of accused and release him on bail.
365
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_2"> The record shows that the quantity of seized
366
+ substance is more than commercial quantity i.e. 48.550
367
+ kgs and same were seized from the possession of the
368
+ appellants. As discussed above, the trial Court found that
369
+ the appellants were fully aware with the fact that the
370
+ substance was kept in the Bulero Pickup vehicle,
371
+ therefore, prima facie, the involvement of accused is
372
+ found in the case and there is no sufficient reasonable
373
+ ground for believing that the appellants are not guilty of
374
+ such offence.
375
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_3"> Accordingly, I.A.Nos.13674/2020 &amp; 13678/2020 are
376
+ hereby rejected. However, the grounds raised by the
377
+ THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
378
+ Cr.A.Nos.1217/2017 &amp; 1232/2017
379
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1"> 7</span>
380
+
381
+ appellants&#x27; counsel are still kept alive for consideration
382
+ thereof while hearing the appeals finally. The appellants
383
+ may also approach the Appropriate Authority requesting
384
+ early final hearing of this appeal.
385
+ </p>
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_4"> (Rajendra Kumar (Verma))
390
+ Judge
391
+ SJ
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+ SUSHEEL KUMAR JHARIYA
397
+ 2021.07.20 16:34:10 +05&#x27;30&#x27;
398
+ </p>
399
+ </div>
400
+ </article>
401
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
402
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
403
+ <div class="translate_container">
404
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
405
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
406
+ <button id="translatewarn"
407
+ type="button"
408
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
409
+ </div>
410
+
411
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
412
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
413
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
414
+
415
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:non-bailable-offences">non-bailable-offences</a></div></li>
416
+
417
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:law-governing-narcotics">law-governing-narcotics</a></div></li>
418
+
419
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:contravention-relates-to-sub-clause-(b)">contravention-relates-to-sub-clause-(b)</a></div></li>
420
+
421
+ </ul>
422
+ </nav>
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
427
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
428
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
429
+
430
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
431
+
432
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
433
+
434
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=narcotic%20drug">narcotic drug</a></div></li>
435
+
436
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=the%20narcotic%20drugs%20and%20psychotropic%20substances%20act">the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act</a></div></li>
437
+
438
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20psychotropic%20drug"> psychotropic drug</a></div></li>
439
+
440
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Section%2037">Section 37</a></div></li>
441
+
442
+ </ul>
443
+ </nav>
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ </aside>
448
+ </div>
449
+
450
+ </main>
451
+
452
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
453
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
454
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
455
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
456
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
457
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
458
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
459
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
460
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
461
+
462
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/117445212/" class="device-toggle">
463
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="lhpelvoV6t8uMBLjgOrDj1hxHAgCU6ALZrgYRVfCUDlYtPTtAEoAFoGzeh2iBPW6">
464
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
465
+ </form>
466
+ </div>
467
+ </footer>
468
+
469
+ <script>
470
+ (function() {
471
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
472
+
473
+ if (navigator.share) {
474
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
475
+
476
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
477
+ try {
478
+ await navigator.share({
479
+ title: document.title,
480
+ url: window.location.href
481
+ });
482
+ } catch (err) {
483
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
484
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
485
+ }
486
+ }
487
+ });
488
+ }
489
+ })();
490
+ </script>
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
495
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
496
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
497
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
498
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
499
+
500
+
501
+ <script type="text/javascript">
502
+ (function($) {
503
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
504
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
505
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
506
+ }
507
+ }
508
+
509
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
510
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
511
+ return $("<li></li>")
512
+ .append(
513
+ $("<div></div>")
514
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
515
+ .html(item.label)
516
+ )
517
+ .appendTo(ul);
518
+ };
519
+ }
520
+
521
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
522
+ if (!$input.length) {
523
+ return;
524
+ }
525
+
526
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
527
+
528
+ $input.autocomplete({
529
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
530
+ delay: 180,
531
+ minLength: 2,
532
+ appendTo: 'body',
533
+ position: {
534
+ my: "left top",
535
+ at: "left bottom+6",
536
+ collision: "flipfit"
537
+ },
538
+ classes: {
539
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
540
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
541
+ },
542
+ open: function() {
543
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
544
+ var offset = $input.offset();
545
+ $menu
546
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
547
+ .css({
548
+ left: offset.left,
549
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
550
+ });
551
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
552
+ },
553
+ close: function() {
554
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
555
+ },
556
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
557
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
558
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
559
+ event.preventDefault();
560
+ }
561
+ },
562
+ select: function(event, ui) {
563
+ event.preventDefault();
564
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
565
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
566
+ }
567
+
568
+ if ($form.length) {
569
+ $form.trigger('submit');
570
+ } else {
571
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
572
+ }
573
+ }
574
+ });
575
+
576
+ }
577
+
578
+ $(document).ready(function() {
579
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
580
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
581
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
582
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
583
+ });
584
+ })(jQuery);
585
+ </script>
586
+
587
+
588
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
589
+ <script type="text/javascript">
590
+ $(document).ready(function() {
591
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
592
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
593
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
594
+
595
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
596
+ signupForDownload();
597
+ e.preventDefault();
598
+ return false;
599
+ });
600
+
601
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
602
+ e.preventDefault();
603
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
604
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
605
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
606
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
607
+ });
608
+ });
609
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
610
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
611
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
612
+ if (!translateContainer) {
613
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
614
+ return;
615
+ }
616
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
617
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
618
+ return;
619
+ }
620
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
621
+
622
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
623
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
624
+ if (!translateEl) {
625
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
626
+ return;
627
+ }
628
+
629
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
630
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
631
+
632
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
633
+ var node;
634
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
635
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
636
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
637
+ }
638
+ }
639
+
640
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
641
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
642
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
643
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
644
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
645
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
646
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
647
+ }
648
+ }
649
+ });
650
+ }
651
+
652
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
653
+ }
654
+ </script>
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
661
+ <script type="text/javascript">
662
+ $(document).ready(function () {
663
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
664
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
665
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
666
+ valid_ag: '',
667
+ is_valid: '',
668
+ is_auth: 'False',
669
+ is_agreement: '',
670
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
671
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
672
+ });
673
+ </script>
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+
679
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
680
+ <script type="text/javascript">
681
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
682
+ window.is_auth = false;
683
+
684
+ // Document context for chatbot
685
+ window.documentContext = {
686
+ tid: 117445212,
687
+ title: "Deepak @ Chandan Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 July, 2021",
688
+ url: window.location.href,
689
+ isFragment: false
690
+ };
691
+
692
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
693
+ </script>
694
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
695
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
696
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
697
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c57057adc63563c',t:'MTc2OTY3MTc5Ny4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
702
+
703
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_119273741.html ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
hc_bulk//NDPS_11993647.html ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
hc_bulk//NDPS_121259256.html ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
hc_bulk//NDPS_122402051.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1622 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Reserved On : 13.03.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 19 March, 2025</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/122402051/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="VoEJVSivgqVA6CWOmwQfZeIeI25KZDmuqAbT31M37U9x5KIDUsLqeZ74Ml9S80yM">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/122402051/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="VoEJVSivgqVA6CWOmwQfZeIeI25KZDmuqAbT31M37U9x5KIDUsLqeZ74Ml9S80yM">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/122402051/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="VoEJVSivgqVA6CWOmwQfZeIeI25KZDmuqAbT31M37U9x5KIDUsLqeZ74Ml9S80yM">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:122402051">29</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:122402051">0</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Himachal Pradesh High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Reserved On : 13.03.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 19 March, 2025</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:virender-singh-himachal_pradesh">Virender Singh</a></h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:virender-singh-himachal_pradesh">Virender Singh</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1"> 2025:HHC:6580
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.</p><pre id="pre_1">
198
+
199
+ CrMP(M) No.444 of 2025
200
+ Reserved on : 13.03.2025
201
+ Decided on: 19.03.2025
202
+
203
+
204
+ Ashok Kumar ...Applicant
205
+
206
+ Versus
207
+
208
+
209
+ State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent
210
+
211
+
212
+ Coram
213
+ </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_2">The Hon&#x27;ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
214
+ Whether approved for reporting?
215
+ </p>
216
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_3">
217
+ For the applicant : Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate.
218
+
219
+ For the respondent : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General,
220
+ with Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Mr. H.S.
221
+ Rawat and Mr. Mohinder Zharaick,
222
+ Additional Advocates General.
223
+ </p>
224
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_4">Virender Singh, Judge
225
+
226
+ By way of the present application, filed under
227
+
228
+ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
229
+
230
+ 2023 (hereinafter referred to as &#x27;BNSS&#x27;), applicant-Ashok
231
+
232
+ Kumar has sought his release, on bail, during the
233
+
234
+ pendency of the trial, in case FIR No.126 of 2023, dated
235
+
236
+ 01.08.2023, registered under Sections 21, 29-61-85 of the
237
+
238
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_1">Narcotic Drugs &amp; Psychotropic Substances Act</a> (hereinafter
239
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1"> 2</span>
240
+ 2025:HHC:6580
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+ referred to as the &#x27;<a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_2">NDPS Act</a>&#x27;), with Police Station Damtal,
246
+
247
+ District Kangra, H.P.
248
+
249
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_5">2. According to the applicant, he has falsely been
250
+
251
+ arrested by the police, in this case, on 01.08.2023, for
252
+
253
+ allegedly possessing contraband, weighing 261 gms of
254
+
255
+ chitta/heroin.
256
+ </p>
257
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_6">3. As per applicant, investigation, in the present
258
+
259
+ case, is complete and despite the fact that he is in custody
260
+
261
+ for the last 1 year and 7 months, charges have not yet been
262
+
263
+ framed. All these facts have been pleaded to show that the
264
+
265
+ chances of conclusion of trial against the applicant, in near
266
+
267
+ future, are not so bright.
268
+ </p>
269
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_7">4. According to the applicant, apart from the
270
+
271
+ present case, another case has also been registered against
272
+
273
+ him, vide FIR No.21/2019 dated 17.04.2019, under
274
+
275
+ <a href="/doc/1566465/" id="a_3">Section 21</a> of NDPS Act, with Police Station Damtal,
276
+
277
+ District Kangra, H.P., in which, the police had allegedly
278
+
279
+ shown the recovery of 10.84 gms of chitta/heroin from his
280
+
281
+ possession. The said case is also stated to be pending
282
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_2"> 3</span>
283
+ 2025:HHC:6580
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ adjudication in the competent Court of law and fixed for
289
+
290
+ consideration on charge.
291
+ </p>
292
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_8">5. According to the applicant, he had earlier tried
293
+
294
+ his luck by moving similar application, before the Court of
295
+
296
+ learned Special Judge-II, Kangra at Dharamshala, District
297
+
298
+ Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. However, the same was
299
+
300
+ dismissed vide order dated 23.12.2023.
301
+
302
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_9">6. It is the case of the applicant that thereafter, he
303
+
304
+ had tried his luck, before this Court, by moving CrMPs(M)
305
+
306
+ No.210, 1849 and 2395 of 2024, which were dismissed as
307
+
308
+ withdrawn, vide orders dated 29.02.2024, 29.08.2024 and
309
+
310
+ 12.11.2024, respectively.
311
+ </p>
312
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_10">7. Learned counsel for the applicant has
313
+
314
+ vehemently argued that keeping in view the period of
315
+
316
+ custody of the applicant i.e. 1 year 7 months, the applicant
317
+
318
+ is entitled for the relief, as claimed, in the application.
319
+
320
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_11"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="59082837" id="span_3"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="115934651" id="span_4"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="168160496" id="span_5"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="47714331" id="span_6"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="640713" id="span_7"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="19483715" id="span_8"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="139736498" id="span_9"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="127830481" id="span_10">8. To buttress his contention, learned counsel for
321
+
322
+ the applicant has relied upon the decisions of Hon&#x27;ble
323
+
324
+ Supreme Court in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)
325
+
326
+ No.3961/2022, titled as <a href="/doc/127830481/" id="a_4">&#x27;Abdul Majeed Lone Vs. Union</a>
327
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_11"> 4</span>
328
+ 2025:HHC:6580
329
+
330
+
331
+
332
+
333
+ Territory of Jammu and Kashmir&#x27;; Petition for Special
334
+
335
+ Leave to Appeal (Crl) No.5769/2022, titled as <a href="/doc/139736498/" id="a_5">&#x27;Nitin
336
+
337
+ Adhikary @Bapan Vs. The State of West Bengal</a>&#x27;; Criminal
338
+
339
+ Appeal No.245/2020, titled as <a href="/doc/19483715/" id="a_6">&#x27;Chitta Biswas @Subhas Vs.
340
+
341
+ The State of West Bengal</a>&#x27;; Petition for Special Leave to
342
+
343
+ Appeal (Crl) No.5187/2021, titled as <a href="/doc/640713/" id="a_7">&#x27;Kulwant Singh Vs.
344
+
345
+ The State of Punjab</a>&#x27;; Criminal Appeal No.1570/2021, titled
346
+
347
+ as <a href="/doc/47714331/" id="a_8">&#x27;Mahmood Kurdeya Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau</a>&#x27;;
348
+
349
+ Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No.5530/2022,
350
+
351
+ titled as <a href="/doc/168160496/" id="a_9">&#x27;Mohammad Salman Hanif Shaikh Vs. The State of
352
+
353
+ Gujarat</a>&#x27;; Criminal Appeal No.1169 of 2022, titled as <a href="/doc/115934651/" id="a_10">&#x27;Gopal
354
+
355
+ Krishna Patra @Gopalrusma Vs. Union of India</a>&#x27;; Petition
356
+
357
+ for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No.7115/2024, tilted as
358
+
359
+ &#x27;Sohrab Khan Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh&#x27; and
360
+
361
+ Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No.4648/2024,
362
+
363
+ tilted as <a href="/doc/59082837/" id="a_11">&#x27;Ankur Chaudhary Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh</a>&#x27;.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>
364
+
365
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_12">9. Learned counsel for the applicant has also
366
+
367
+ relied upon the decisions of the Coordinate Bench of this
368
+
369
+ Court in CrMP(M) No.586 of 2022, titled as &#x27;Mohan Kumar
370
+
371
+ Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh&#x27;, Neutral Citation No.2022
372
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_12"> 5</span>
373
+ 2025:HHC:6580
374
+
375
+
376
+
377
+
378
+ HHC 5832; CrMP(M) No.1592 of 2021, titled as &#x27;Raj Kumari
379
+
380
+ Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh&#x27;, Neutral Citation No.2021
381
+
382
+ HHC 8883 and CrMP(M) No.1462 of 2024, titled as &#x27;Tilak
383
+
384
+ Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh&#x27;, Neutral Citation
385
+
386
+ No.2025 HHC 2996.
387
+ </p>
388
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_13">10. Apart from this, learned counsel for the
389
+
390
+ applicant has given certain undertakings, on behalf of the
391
+
392
+ applicant, for which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in
393
+
394
+ case, ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency
395
+
396
+ of the trial.
397
+ </p>
398
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_14">11. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has
399
+
400
+ been made to allow the application.
401
+ </p>
402
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_15">12. When, put to notice, police has filed the status
403
+
404
+ report, disclosing therein, that on 01.08.2023, ASI Satinder
405
+
406
+ Singh, IO, Police Station Damtal, has submitted a ruqqa to
407
+
408
+ the Police Station, Damtal, through HC Vikas, for
409
+
410
+ registration of FIR, mentioning therein that on 01.08.2023,
411
+
412
+ IO, along with other police officials, was on patrolling duty
413
+
414
+ and duty to detect crime relating to excise and narcotics.
415
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_13"> 6</span>
416
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_16"> 2025:HHC:6580
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_17">13. It is the case of the police that at about 03:53
422
+
423
+ pm, police party had left Police Station and after visiting
424
+
425
+ Thapkor-Lodwa side, at about 05:10 pm, IO was present at
426
+
427
+ Excise Barrier, Chakki at Badrohea. In order to stop the
428
+
429
+ illegal activity in the area, he has put the picketing at that
430
+
431
+ place and started checking the vehicles coming from
432
+
433
+ Pathankot, Punjab side. Then, he noticed Activa scooter,
434
+
435
+ bearing registration No.HP97-2254, colour white, being
436
+
437
+ driven by its driver, coming from Pathankot side. Two
438
+
439
+ persons were found on it.
440
+ </p>
441
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_18">14. Thereafter, IO, after stopping the driver,
442
+
443
+ directed him to show the driving licence, upon which,
444
+
445
+ driver Yashpal S/o Ram Chand had produced the driving
446
+
447
+ licence and the person, who was the pillion rider, on
448
+
449
+ enquiry, disclosed his name as Suresh Kumar S/o Jagat
450
+
451
+ Ram. When, the IO was enquiring from the said persons,
452
+
453
+ meanwhile, a grey coloured Maruti 800 car, being driven
454
+
455
+ by its driver, was seen coming, which was signaled to stop
456
+
457
+ by HC Vikas. The driver has not stopped the vehicle and
458
+
459
+ taken the same away from there, upon which, Ct. Rishabh,
460
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_14"> 7</span>
461
+ 2025:HHC:6580
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+
466
+ who was present there, stopped the said car. Thereafter, IO
467
+
468
+ and other police officials also reached there. The
469
+
470
+ registration number of the said car was found to be PB35-
471
+
472
+ E-0318.
473
+ </p>
474
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_19">15. It is the further case of the police that
475
+
476
+ meanwhile, the persons, who came there on Activa, namely
477
+
478
+ Yashpal and Suresh Kumar, also reached there. On seeing
479
+
480
+ the suspicious activities of the driver of the said car, it has
481
+
482
+ been apprehended by the IO that some stolen articles may
483
+
484
+ be there in the car or the car driver may be involved in any
485
+
486
+ other illegal activity. As such, IO has associated said
487
+
488
+ Yashpal and Suresh Kumar as independent witnesses and
489
+
490
+ name of the driver of the said car was enquired. On
491
+
492
+ enquiry, driver disclosed his name as &#x27;Ashok Kumar&#x27;
493
+
494
+ (applicant).
495
+ </p>
496
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_20">16. Thereafter, IO directed Ashok Kumar (applicant)
497
+
498
+ to show the registration certificate of the vehicle, upon
499
+
500
+ which, Ashok Kumar (applicant) had opened the
501
+
502
+ dashboard of the vehicle and in this process, a black
503
+
504
+ coloured polythene envelope had fallen down.
505
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_15"> 8</span>
506
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_21"> 2025:HHC:6580
507
+
508
+
509
+
510
+
511
+ Subsequently, applicant has shown RC to the IO and the
512
+
513
+ same was found to be in the name of the applicant. On
514
+
515
+ enquiry, he could not give any satisfactory answer to the
516
+
517
+ IO, as to why, he had driven away the car and got
518
+
519
+ perplexed.
520
+ </p>
521
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_22">17. Thereafter, the black coloured envelope, which
522
+
523
+ had fallen down from the dashboard, was opened and on
524
+
525
+ opening the same, another transparent white coloured
526
+
527
+ envelope was found containing brown granule shaped and
528
+
529
+ powder like substance. When, the same was checked on
530
+
531
+ the drug detection kit, then, the same was found to be
532
+
533
+ chitta/heroin, which, on weighment, was found to be 261
534
+
535
+ gms. The same was taken into possession. Other codal
536
+
537
+ formalities were completed and accused/applicant was
538
+
539
+ arrested.
540
+ </p>
541
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_23">18. Later on, during investigation, the involvement
542
+
543
+ of co-accused Harkrishanjit Singh, S/o Balwinder Singh,
544
+
545
+ R/o Amritsar, Punjab, was also found and he was also
546
+
547
+ arrested.
548
+ </p><span class="hidden_text" id="span_16"> 9</span><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_24">
549
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_25"> 2025:HHC:6580
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_26">19. As per status report, another case, bearing FIR
555
+
556
+ No.21 of 2019 dated 17.04.2019, under <a href="/doc/1566465/" id="a_12">Section 21</a> of the
557
+
558
+ NDPS Act, has been found to have been registered against
559
+
560
+ the applicant, with Police Station Damtal, District Kangra,
561
+
562
+ H.P. The said case is still pending adjudication in the
563
+
564
+ Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I,
565
+
566
+ Dharamshala, District Kangra.
567
+ </p>
568
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_27">20. Lastly, it has been apprehended that in case,
569
+
570
+ the applicant is ordered to be released on bail, he may
571
+
572
+ again indulge in the same activity and also allured the
573
+
574
+ younger generation to involve in the said trade.
575
+
576
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_28">21. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has
577
+
578
+ been made that the bail application may be dismissed.
579
+
580
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_29">22. As stated above, learned counsel for the
581
+
582
+ applicant has relied upon the case laws, details of which
583
+
584
+ have been mentioned in the preceding para, in order to
585
+
586
+ support the case of the applicant for releasing him on bail.
587
+
588
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_30">23. Admittedly, the contraband, which has allegedly
589
+
590
+ been recovered, in the present case, falls within the
591
+
592
+ definition of &#x27;commercial quantity&#x27;. Once, this fact has been
593
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_17"> 10</span>
594
+ 2025:HHC:6580
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ stated by the police in the status report, then, admittedly,
600
+
601
+ rigors of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_13">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act are applicable in the
602
+
603
+ present case.
604
+ </p>
605
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_31">24. When, rigors of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_14">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act are
606
+
607
+ applicable, in that eventuality, before releasing the
608
+
609
+ applicant, on bail, it is incumbent upon this Court to give
610
+
611
+ findings, with regard to fulfilment of twin conditions, as
612
+
613
+ enumerated, under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_15">Section 37(b)</a> of the NDPS Act. These
614
+
615
+ conditions are (i) that the applicant has not committed the
616
+
617
+ offence, for which he has been arrested, and (ii) that while
618
+
619
+ on bail, he will not commit any offence.
620
+
621
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_32"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="182988" id="span_18"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1026836" id="span_19">25. The provisions of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_16">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act,
622
+
623
+ have been discussed and explained by a three-Judge
624
+
625
+ Bench of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court, way back in the year
626
+
627
+ 2004, in cases, titled as <a href="/doc/1026836/" id="a_17">Collector of Customs, New Delhi
628
+
629
+ versus Ahmadalieva Nodira</a>, reported in (2004) 3
630
+
631
+ Supreme Court <a href="/doc/182988/" id="a_18">Cases 549, and Narcotics Control
632
+
633
+ Bureau versus Dilip Pralhad Namade</a>, reported in
634
+
635
+ (2004) 3 Supreme Court Cases 619.</span></span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="182988" id="span_20">The relevant paras 9
636
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_21"> 11</span>
637
+ 2025:HHC:6580
638
+
639
+
640
+
641
+
642
+ to 11 of the judgment in <a href="/doc/182988/" id="a_19">Dilip Pralhad Namade</a>&#x27;s case
643
+
644
+ (supra), are reproduced, as under:</span>
645
+ </p>
646
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="10854990" id="span_22">&quot;9. As observed by this Court in <a href="/doc/10854990/" id="a_20">Union of India v.
647
+ Thamisharasi &amp; Ors. (JT</a> 1995(4) SC 253) clause</span>
648
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_2"> (b) of sub-section (1) of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_21">Section 37</a> imposes
649
+ limitations on granting of bail in addition to those
650
+ provided under the Code. The two limitations are
651
+ (1) an opportunity to the public prosecutor to
652
+ oppose the bail application and (2) satisfaction of
653
+ the Court that there are reasonable grounds for
654
+ believing that the accused is not guilty of such
655
+ offence and that he is not likely to commit any
656
+ offence while on bail.
657
+ </blockquote>
658
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_3"> 10. The limitations on granting of bail come in
659
+ only when the question of granting bail arises on
660
+ merits. Apart from the grant of opportunity to the
661
+ public prosecutor, the other twin conditions
662
+ which really have relevance so far the present
663
+ accused respondent is concerned, are (1) the
664
+ satisfaction of the Court that there are
665
+ reasonable grounds for believing that the
666
+ accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and
667
+ that he is not likely to commit any offence while
668
+ on bail. The conditions are cumulative and not
669
+ alternative. The satisfaction contemplated
670
+ regarding the accused being not guilty has to be
671
+ based for reasonable grounds. The expression
672
+ &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; means something more
673
+ than prima facie grounds. It contemplates
674
+ substantial probable causes for believing that
675
+ the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence.
676
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_33"> The reasonable belief contemplated in the
677
+ provision requires existence of such facts and
678
+ circumstances as are sufficient in themselves to
679
+ justify satisfaction that the accused is not guilty
680
+ of the alleged offence and he is not likely to
681
+ commit any offence while on bail. This nature of
682
+ embargo seems to have been envisaged keeping
683
+ in view the deleterious nature of the offence,
684
+ necessitates of public interest and the normal
685
+ tendencies of the persons involved in such
686
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_23"> 12</span>
687
+ 2025:HHC:6580
688
+
689
+
690
+
691
+
692
+ network to pursue their activities with greater
693
+ vigour and make hay when, at large. In the case
694
+ at hand the High Court seems to have completely
695
+ overlooked the underlying object of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_22">Section 37</a>
696
+ and transgressed the limitations statutorily
697
+ imposed in allowing bail. It did not take note of
698
+ the confessional statement recorded under
699
+ <a href="/doc/1752792/" id="a_23">Section 67</a> of the Act.
700
+ </p>
701
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_34"> 11. A bare reading of the impugned judgment
702
+ shows that the scope and ambit of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_24">Section 37</a> of
703
+ the NDPS Act was not kept in view by the High
704
+ Court. Mere non-compliance of the order passed
705
+ for supply of copies, if any, cannot as in the
706
+ instant case entitle an accused to get bail
707
+ notwithstanding prohibitions contained in
708
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_25">Section 37</a>.&quot;
709
+ </p>
710
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_35"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1648816" id="span_24">26. The term &#x27;reasonable&#x27; has elaborately been
711
+
712
+ discussed by the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court, in case, titled as
713
+
714
+ <a href="/doc/1648816/" id="a_26">Union of India versus Shiv Shanker Kesari</a>, reported in
715
+
716
+ (2007) 7 Supreme Court Cases 798. The relevant paras 8
717
+
718
+ to 11 of the judgment are reproduced, as under:</span>
719
+
720
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_4"> &quot;8. The word &quot;reasonable&quot; has in law the prima
721
+ facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those
722
+ circumstances of which the actor, called on to act
723
+ reasonably, knows or ought to know. It is
724
+ difficult to give an exact definition of the word
725
+ &quot;reasonable&quot;.
726
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_5"> &quot;7. ... In Strouds Judicial Dictionary, Fourth
727
+ Edition, page 2258 states that it would be
728
+ unreasonable to expect an exact definition of
729
+ the word &#x27;reasonable&#x27;. Reason varies in its
730
+ conclusions according to the idiosyncrasy of
731
+ the individual, and the times and
732
+ circumstances in which he thinks. The
733
+ reasoning which built up the old scholastic
734
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_25"> 13</span>
735
+ 2025:HHC:6580
736
+
737
+
738
+
739
+
740
+ logic sounds now like the jingling of a child&#x27;s
741
+ toy.
742
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_6">(See: Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/s Jagan
743
+ Nath Ashok Kumar and another (1987) 4 SCC
744
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_7"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1069282" id="span_26">497. and <a href="/doc/1069282/" id="a_27">Gujarat Water Supplies and Sewerage
745
+ Board v. Unique Erectors (Gujarat) Pvt. Ltd. and
746
+ another</a> [(1989) 1 SCC 532].</span>
747
+ </blockquote>
748
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_8">9. &quot;9. ...It is often said that &quot;an attempt to give a
749
+ specific meaning to the word &quot;reasonable&quot; is
750
+ trying to count what is not number and measure
751
+ what is not space&quot;. The author of Words and
752
+ Phrases (Permanent Edition) has quoted from Nice
753
+ &amp; Schreiber 123 F. 987, 988 to give a plausible
754
+ meaning for the said word. He says,
755
+ &#x27;the expression &quot;reasonable&quot; is a relative term,
756
+ and the facts of the particular controversy must
757
+ be considered before the question as to what
758
+ constitutes reasonable can be determined&#x27;.
759
+ It is not meant to be expedient or convenient but
760
+ certainly something more than that.&quot;
761
+ </blockquote>
762
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_36"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="136345" id="span_27">10. The word &quot;reasonable&quot; signifies &quot;in
763
+ accordance with reason&quot;. In the ultimate analysis
764
+ it is a question of fact, whether a particular act is
765
+ reasonable or not depends on the circumstances
766
+ in a given situation. (See: <a href="/doc/136345/" id="a_28">Municipal Corporation of
767
+ Greater Mumbai and another v. Kamla Mills Ltd.</a>
768
+ (2003) 6 SCC 315).</span>
769
+ </p>
770
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_37">11. The Court while considering the application for
771
+ bail with reference to <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_29">Section 37</a> of the Act is not
772
+ called upon to record a finding of not guilty. It is
773
+ for the limited purpose essentially confined to the
774
+ question of releasing the accused on bail that the
775
+ Court is called upon to see if there are reasonable
776
+ grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty
777
+ and records its satisfaction about the existence of
778
+ such grounds. But the Court has not to consider
779
+ the matter as if it is pronouncing a judgment of
780
+ acquittal and recording a finding of not guilty.&quot;
781
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_28"> 14</span>
782
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_38"> 2025:HHC:6580
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_39"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="35047711" id="span_29">27. This view has again been reiterated by the
788
+
789
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in a latest decision, in case, titled
790
+
791
+ as <a href="/doc/35047711/" id="a_30">State of Kerala and others versus Rajesh and
792
+
793
+ others</a>, reported in (2020) 12 Supreme Court Cases 122.
794
+
795
+ The relevant paras 18 to 21 of the judgment are
796
+
797
+ reproduced, as under:</span>
798
+ </p>
799
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_9"> &quot;18. This Court has laid down broad parameters
800
+ to be followed while considering the application
801
+ for bail moved by the accused involved in
802
+ offences under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_31">NDPS Act</a>. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1378939" id="span_30">In <a href="/doc/1378939/" id="a_32">Union of India Vs.
803
+ Ram Samujh and Ors.</a> 1999(9) SCC 429, it has
804
+ been elaborated as under:</span>
805
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_10"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1054146" id="span_31">&quot;7. It is to be borne in mind that the aforesaid
806
+ legislative mandate is required to be adhered
807
+ to and followed. It should be borne in mind
808
+ that in a murder case, the accused commits
809
+ murder of one or two persons, while those
810
+ persons who are dealing in narcotic drugs are
811
+ instrumental in causing death or in inflicting
812
+ deathblow to a number of innocent young
813
+ victims, who are vulnerable; it causes
814
+ deleterious effects and a deadly impact on the
815
+ society; they are a hazard to the society; even
816
+ if they are released temporarily, in all
817
+ probability, they would continue their
818
+ nefarious activities of trafficking and/or
819
+ dealing in intoxicants clandestinely. Reason
820
+ may be large stake and illegal profit involved.
821
+ This Court, dealing with the contention with
822
+ regard to punishment under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_33">NDPS Act</a>, has
823
+ succinctly observed about the adverse effect of
824
+ such activities in <a href="/doc/1054146/" id="a_34">Durand Didier v. Chief Secy.,
825
+ Union Territory of Goa</a> [(1990) 1 SCC 95)] as
826
+ under:</span>
827
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_11"> &#x27;24. With deep concern, we may point out
828
+ that the organised activities of the
829
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_32"> 15</span>
830
+ 2025:HHC:6580
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+ underworld and the clandestine smuggling
836
+ of narcotic drugs and psychotropic
837
+ substances into this country and illegal
838
+ trafficking in such drugs and substances
839
+ have led to drug addiction among a sizeable
840
+ section of the public, particularly the
841
+ adolescents and students of both sexes and
842
+ the menace has assumed serious and
843
+ alarming proportions in the recent years.
844
+ Therefore, in order to effectively control and
845
+ eradicate this proliferating and booming
846
+ devastating menace, causing deleterious
847
+ effects and deadly impact on the society as
848
+ a whole, Parliament in its wisdom, has
849
+ made effective provisions by introducing
850
+ this Act 81 of 1985 specifying mandatory
851
+ minimum imprisonment and fine.
852
+ </blockquote>
853
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_12">8. To check the menace of dangerous drugs
854
+ flooding the market, Parliament has
855
+ provided that the person accused of
856
+ offences under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_35">NDPS Act</a> should not be
857
+ released on bail during trial unless the
858
+ mandatory conditions provided in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_36">Section
859
+ 37</a>, namely,
860
+
861
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_13">(i) there are reasonable grounds for
862
+ believing that the accused is not guilty of
863
+ such offence; and
864
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_14">(ii) that he is not likely to commit any
865
+ offence while on bail are satisfied. The High
866
+ Court has not given any justifiable reason
867
+ for not abiding by the aforesaid mandate
868
+ while ordering the release of the
869
+ respondent-accused on bail. Instead of
870
+ attempting to take a holistic view of the
871
+ harmful socio-economic consequences and
872
+ health hazards which would accompany
873
+ trafficking illegally in dangerous drugs, the
874
+ court should implement the law in the spirit
875
+ with which Parliament, after due
876
+ deliberation, has amended.&quot;
877
+ </blockquote><span class="hidden_text" id="span_33"> 16</span>
878
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_40"> 2025:HHC:6580
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_41">19. The scheme of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_37">Section 37</a> reveals that the
884
+ exercise of power to grant bail is not only
885
+ subject to the limitations contained under
886
+ <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_38">Section 439</a> of the CrPC, but is also subject to
887
+ the limitation placed by <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_39">Section 37</a> which
888
+ commences with non-obstante clause. The
889
+ operative part of the said section is in the
890
+ negative form prescribing the enlargement of
891
+ bail to any person accused of commission of
892
+ an offence under the Act, unless twin
893
+ conditions are satisfied. The first condition is
894
+ that the prosecution must be given an
895
+ opportunity to oppose the application; and the
896
+ second, is that the Court must be satisfied
897
+ that there are reasonable grounds for
898
+ believing that he is not guilty of such offence.
899
+ If either of these two conditions is not
900
+ satisfied, the ban for granting bail operates.
901
+
902
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_42">20. The expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot;
903
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_15">means something more than prima facie
904
+ grounds. It contemplates substantial probable
905
+ causes for believing that the accused is not
906
+ guilty of the alleged offence. The reasonable
907
+ belief contemplated in the provision requires
908
+ existence of such facts and circumstances as
909
+ are sufficient in themselves to justify
910
+ satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of
911
+ the alleged offence. In the case on hand, the
912
+ High Court seems to have completely
913
+ overlooked the underlying object of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_40">Section 37</a>
914
+ that in addition to the limitations provided
915
+ under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_41">CrPC</a>, or any other law for the time
916
+ being in force, regulating the grant of bail, its
917
+ liberal approach in the matter of bail under the
918
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_42">NDPS Act</a> is indeed uncalled for.
919
+ </blockquote>
920
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_43">21. We may further like to observe that the
921
+ learned Single Judge has failed to record a
922
+ finding mandated under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_43">Section 37</a> of the
923
+ NDPS Act which is a sine qua non for granting
924
+ bail to the accused under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_44">NDPS Act</a>.&quot;
925
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_34"> 17</span>
926
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_44"> 2025:HHC:6580
927
+
928
+
929
+
930
+
931
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_45">28. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="68361150" id="span_35">In a recent decision, in case, titled as <a href="/doc/68361150/" id="a_45">Narcotics
932
+
933
+ Control Bureau versus Mohit Aggarwal</a>, reported in AIR
934
+
935
+ 2022 SC 3444, the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court has reiterated
936
+
937
+ the earlier view regarding compliance of the conditions, as
938
+
939
+ enumerated in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_46">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act. The relevant
940
+
941
+ paras 10 to 15 of the judgment are reproduced, as under:</span>
942
+
943
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_16"> &quot;10. The provisions of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_47">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act
944
+ read as follows:
945
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_17"> &quot;[37. Offences to be cognizable and non-
946
+ bailable.-(1) Notwithstanding anything
947
+ contained in the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_48">Code of Criminal Procedure</a>,
948
+ 1973 (2 of 1974)-
949
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_18"> (a) every offence punishable under this Act
950
+ shall be cognizable;
951
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_19"> (b) no person accused of an offence
952
+ punishable for [offences under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_49">section 19</a> or
953
+ <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_50">section 24</a> or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_51">section 27A</a> and also for
954
+ offences involving commercial quantity] shall
955
+ be released on bail or on his own bond
956
+ unless-
957
+ </blockquote>
958
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_20"> (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given
959
+ an opportunity to oppose the application
960
+ for such release, and
961
+
962
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_21"> (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes
963
+ the application, the court is satisfied that
964
+ there are reasonable grounds for
965
+ believing that he is not guilty of such
966
+ offence and that he is not likely to
967
+ commit any offence while on bail.
968
+ </blockquote>
969
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_22"> (2) The limitations on granting of bail specified
970
+ in clause (b) of sub section (1) are in addition to
971
+ the limitations under the Code of Criminal
972
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_36"> 18</span>
973
+ 2025:HHC:6580
974
+
975
+
976
+
977
+
978
+ Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law
979
+ for the time being in force, on granting of bail.
980
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_46">11. It is evident from a plain reading of the non
981
+ obstante clause inserted in sub-section (1) and
982
+ the conditions imposed in subsection (2) of
983
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_52">Section 37</a> that there are certain restrictions
984
+ placed on the power of the Court when granting
985
+ bail to a person accused of having committed an
986
+ offence under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_53">NDPS Act</a>. Not only are the
987
+ limitations imposed under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_54">Section 439</a> of the
988
+ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to be kept in
989
+ mind, the restrictions placed under clause (b) of
990
+ sub-section (1) of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_55">Section 37</a> are also to be
991
+ factored in. The conditions imposed in sub-
992
+ section (1) of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_56">Section 37</a> is that (i) the Public
993
+ Prosecutor ought to be given an opportunity to
994
+ oppose the application moved by an accused
995
+ person for release and (ii) if such an application
996
+ is opposed, then the Court must be satisfied that
997
+ there are reasonable grounds for believing that
998
+ the person accused is not guilty of such an
999
+ offence. Additionally, the Court must be
1000
+ satisfied that the accused person is unlikely to
1001
+ commit any offence while on bail.
1002
+ </p>
1003
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_47">12. The expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; has
1004
+ come up for discussion in several rulings of this
1005
+ Court. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1026836" id="span_37">In &quot;<a href="/doc/1026836/" id="a_57">Collector of Customs, New Delhi v.
1006
+ Ahmadalieva Nodira</a>&quot;, (2004) 3 SCC 549, a
1007
+ decision rendered by a Three Judges Bench of
1008
+ this Court, it has been held thus:</span>
1009
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_23"> &quot;7. The limitations on granting of bail come
1010
+ in only when the question of granting bail
1011
+ arises on merits. Apart from the grant of
1012
+ opportunity to the Public Prosecutor, the
1013
+ other twin conditions which really have
1014
+ relevance so far as the present accused
1015
+ respondent is concerned, are: the
1016
+ satisfaction of the court that there are
1017
+ reasonable grounds for believing that the
1018
+ accused is not guilty of the alleged offence
1019
+ and that he is not likely to commit any
1020
+ offence while on bail. The conditions are
1021
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_38"> 19</span>
1022
+ 2025:HHC:6580
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+
1027
+ cumulative and not alternative. The
1028
+ satisfaction contemplated regarding the
1029
+ accused being not guilty has to be based on
1030
+ reasonable grounds. The expression
1031
+ &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; means something
1032
+ more than prima facie grounds. It
1033
+ contemplates substantial probable
1034
+ causes for believing that the accused is
1035
+ not guilty of the alleged offence. The
1036
+ reasonable belief contemplated in the
1037
+ provision requires existence of such
1038
+ facts and circumstances as are
1039
+ sufficient in themselves to justify
1040
+ satisfaction that the accused is not
1041
+ guilty of the alleged offence.&quot;
1042
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_48"> [emphasis added]
1043
+
1044
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_49"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="35047711" id="span_39">13. The expression &quot;reasonable ground&quot; came
1045
+ up for discussion in &quot;<a href="/doc/35047711/" id="a_58">State of Kerala and others
1046
+ Vs. Rajesh and others</a>&quot; (2020) 12 SCC 122 and
1047
+ this Court has observed as below:</span>
1048
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_24"> &quot;20. The expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot;
1049
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_50"> means something more than prima facie
1050
+ grounds. It contemplates substantial
1051
+ probable causes for believing that the
1052
+ accused is not guilty of the alleged offence.
1053
+ The reasonable belief contemplated in
1054
+ the provision requires existence of such
1055
+ facts and circumstances as are
1056
+ sufficient in themselves to justify
1057
+ satisfaction that the accused is not
1058
+ guilty of the alleged offence. In the case
1059
+ on hand, the High Court seems to have
1060
+ completely overlooked the underlying object
1061
+ of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_59">Section 37</a> that in addition to the
1062
+ limitations provided under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_60">CrPC</a>, or any
1063
+ other law for the time being in force,
1064
+ regulating the grant of bail, its liberal
1065
+ approach in the matter of bail under the
1066
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_61">NDPS Act</a> is indeed uncalled for.&quot;
1067
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_51"> [emphasis added]
1068
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_40"> 20</span>
1069
+ 2025:HHC:6580
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_52"> 14. To sum up, the expression &quot;reasonable
1075
+ grounds&quot; used in clause (b) of Sub-Section
1076
+ (1) of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_62">Section 37</a> would mean credible,
1077
+ plausible and grounds for the Court to
1078
+ believe that the accused person is not guilty
1079
+ of the alleged offence. For arriving at any
1080
+ such conclusion, such facts and
1081
+ circumstances must exist in a case that can
1082
+ persuade the Court to believe that the
1083
+ accused person would not have committed
1084
+ such an offence. Dove-tailed with the
1085
+ aforesaid satisfaction is an additional
1086
+ consideration that the accused person is
1087
+ unlikely to commit any offence while on bail.
1088
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_53"> 15. We may clarify that at the stage of
1089
+ examining an application for bail in the
1090
+ context of the <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_63">Section 37</a> of the Act, the
1091
+ Court is not required to record a finding that
1092
+ the accused person is not guilty. The Court
1093
+ is also not expected to weigh the evidence
1094
+ for arriving at a finding as to whether the
1095
+ accused has committed an offence under the
1096
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_64">NDPS Act</a> or not. The entire exercise that the
1097
+ Court is expected to undertake at this stage
1098
+ is for the limited purpose of releasing him on
1099
+ bail. Thus, the focus is on the availability of
1100
+ reasonable grounds for believing that the
1101
+ accused is not guilty of the offences that he
1102
+ has been charged with and he is unlikely to
1103
+ commit an offence under the Act while on
1104
+ bail.&quot;
1105
+ </p>
1106
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_54">29. Moreover, the view of this Court is being guided
1107
+
1108
+ by the decision of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in Criminal
1109
+
1110
+ Appeal No.5544 of 2024, titled as &#x27;Narcotics Control
1111
+
1112
+ Bureau versus Kashif&#x27;, Neutral Citation No.2024 INSC
1113
+
1114
+ 1045, wherein, it has been held that in case of commercial
1115
+
1116
+ quantity of the contraband, the accused shall generally be
1117
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_41"> 21</span>
1118
+ 2025:HHC:6580
1119
+
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+ not released on bail, until or unless, the conditions, as per
1124
+
1125
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_65">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, are held to be existed in favour
1126
+
1127
+ of the applicant. Relevant paragraphs 8 and 39 of the said
1128
+
1129
+ judgment are reproduced, as under:-
1130
+ </p>
1131
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_25"> &quot;8. There has been consistent and persistent
1132
+ view of this Court that in the NDPS cases, where
1133
+ the offence is punishable with minimum
1134
+ sentence of ten years, the accused shall
1135
+ generally be not released on bail. Negation of
1136
+ bail is the rule and its grant is an exception.
1137
+ While considering the application for bail, the
1138
+ court has to bear in mind the provisions of
1139
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_66">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, which are
1140
+ mandatory in nature. The recording of finding as
1141
+ mandated in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_67">Section 37</a> is a sine qua non for
1142
+ granting bail to the accused involved in the
1143
+ offences under the said Act. Apart from the
1144
+ granting opportunity of hearing to the Public
1145
+ Prosecutor, the other two conditions i.e., (i) the
1146
+ satisfaction of the court that there are
1147
+ reasonable grounds for believing that the
1148
+ accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and
1149
+ that (ii) he is not likely to commit any offence
1150
+ while on bail, are the cumulative and not
1151
+ alternative conditions.
1152
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_26"> Xxx xxx xxx xxx
1153
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_27"> 39. The upshot of the above discussion may be
1154
+ summarized as under:
1155
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_28"> (i) The provisions of <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_68">NDPS Act</a> are required to be
1156
+ interpreted keeping in mind the scheme, object
1157
+ and purpose of the Act; as also the impact on the
1158
+ society as a whole. It has to be interpreted
1159
+ literally and not liberally, which may ultimately
1160
+ frustrate the object, purpose and Preamble of the
1161
+ Act.
1162
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_29"> (ii) While considering the application for bail, the
1163
+ Court must bear in mind the provisions of
1164
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_69">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act which are mandatory
1165
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_42"> 22</span>
1166
+ 2025:HHC:6580
1167
+
1168
+
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+ in nature. Recording of findings as mandated in
1172
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_70">Section 37</a> is sine qua non is known for granting
1173
+ bail to the accused involved in the offences
1174
+ under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_71">NDPS Act</a>.
1175
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_30"> (iv) Sub-section (2) of <a href="/doc/1304888/" id="a_72">Section 52A</a> lays down the
1176
+ procedure as contemplated in sub-section (1)
1177
+ thereof, and any lapse or delayed compliance
1178
+ thereof would be merely a procedural irregularity
1179
+ which would neither entitle the accused to be
1180
+ released on bail nor would vitiate the trial on
1181
+ that ground alone.
1182
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_31"> (v) Any procedural irregularity or illegality found
1183
+ to have been committed in conducting the search
1184
+ and seizure during the course of investigation or
1185
+ thereafter, would by itself not make the entire
1186
+ evidence collected during the course of
1187
+ investigation, inadmissible. The Court would
1188
+ have to consider all the circumstances and find
1189
+ out whether any serious prejudice has been
1190
+ caused to the accused.&quot;
1191
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_55"> (self-emphasis supplied)
1192
+
1193
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_56"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="59082837" id="span_43"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="168160496" id="span_44"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="640713" id="span_45"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="127830481" id="span_46">30. So far as the case laws, which have been relied
1194
+
1195
+ upon by the learned counsel for the applicant i.e. <a href="/doc/127830481/" id="a_73">Abdul
1196
+
1197
+ Majeed Lone</a>&#x27;s case (<a href="/doc/640713/" id="a_74">supra), Kulwant Singh</a>&#x27;s case (<a href="/doc/168160496/" id="a_75">supra),
1198
+
1199
+ Mohammad Salman Hanif Shaikh</a>&#x27;s case (<a href="/doc/59082837/" id="a_76">supra) and
1200
+
1201
+ Ankur Chaudhary</a>&#x27;s case (supra), are concerned, with due
1202
+
1203
+ respect to the law<a href="/doc/59082837/" id="a_77">, <a href="/doc/59082837/" id="a_78">laid down by</a></a> the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme
1204
+
1205
+ Court in the said cases, the same, in no way, helps the
1206
+
1207
+ case of the applicant, as, in the said cases, the
1208
+
1209
+ applicant(s), before the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court, were in
1210
+
1211
+ custody for more than 2 years, whereas, in the present
1212
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_47"> 23</span>
1213
+ 2025:HHC:6580
1214
+
1215
+
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ case, the custody of the applicant was only 1 year and 2
1219
+
1220
+ months.</span></span></span></span>
1221
+ </p>
1222
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_57"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="139736498" id="span_48">31. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied
1223
+
1224
+ upon the cases of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in <a href="/doc/139736498/" id="a_79">Nitish
1225
+
1226
+ Adhikary @Bapan</a>&#x27;s case (supra) and Sohrab Khan&#x27;s case
1227
+
1228
+ (supra). In the said cases, the petitioner(s) were not having
1229
+
1230
+ any criminal antecedents, whereas, in the present case,
1231
+
1232
+ vide FIR No.21 of 2019, dated 17.04.2019, the case, under
1233
+
1234
+ <a href="/doc/1566465/" id="a_80">Section 21</a> of the NDPS Act, has already been registered
1235
+
1236
+ against the applicant with Police Station Damtal, District
1237
+
1238
+ Kangra, H.P. As such, no benefit could be derived by the
1239
+
1240
+ applicant from the said case laws.</span>
1241
+ </p>
1242
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_58"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="115934651" id="span_49"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="19483715" id="span_50">32. So far as other case laws, which have been
1243
+
1244
+ relied upon by the learned counsel for the applicant, i.e.
1245
+
1246
+ <a href="/doc/19483715/" id="a_81">Chitta Biswas @Subhas</a>&#x27;s case (<a href="/doc/115934651/" id="a_82">supra) and Gopal Krishna
1247
+
1248
+ Patra @Gopalrusma</a>&#x27;s case (supra<a href="/doc/115934651/" id="a_83">)<a href="/doc/115934651/" id="a_84">, <a href="/doc/115934651/" id="a_85">laid down by</a></a></a> the
1249
+
1250
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court, the appellant(s), in the said cases,
1251
+
1252
+ were released on bail, keeping in view the facts and
1253
+
1254
+ circumstances of those cases. As such, no benefit could be
1255
+
1256
+ derived by the applicant.</span></span>
1257
+ </p><span class="hidden_text" id="span_51"> 24</span><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_59">
1258
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_60"> 2025:HHC:6580
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_61"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="47714331" id="span_52">33. The other case law, which has been relied upon
1264
+
1265
+ the learned counsel for the applicant i.e. <a href="/doc/47714331/" id="a_86">Mahmood
1266
+
1267
+ Kurdeya</a>&#x27;s case (supra), the said case, in no way, helps the
1268
+
1269
+ case of the applicant, as, charges were not framed, till
1270
+
1271
+ 07.12.2021. In the case, before the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme
1272
+
1273
+ Court, charge-sheet was filed on 23.09.2018, whereas, in
1274
+
1275
+ the present case, the case is now listed for prosecution
1276
+
1277
+ evidence.</span>
1278
+ </p>
1279
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_62">34. So far as other case laws, which have been
1280
+
1281
+ relied upon by the learned counsel for the applicant, i.e.
1282
+
1283
+ Mohan Kumar&#x27;s case (supra), Raj Kumari&#x27;s case (supra)
1284
+
1285
+ and Tilak Raj&#x27;s case (supra), are concerned, the factual
1286
+
1287
+ position, involved in the said cases, is totally different from
1288
+
1289
+ the facts of this case. Moreover, in the said cases, the relief
1290
+
1291
+ of bail was granted, without considering the twin
1292
+
1293
+ conditions, as enumerated, under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_87">Section 37</a> of the NDPS
1294
+
1295
+ Act, whereas, compliance of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_88">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act is
1296
+
1297
+ held to be mandatory, as per Narcotics Control Bureau
1298
+
1299
+ versus Kashif&#x27;s case (supra). As such, no benefit could be
1300
+
1301
+ derived from the said case laws by the applicant.
1302
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_53"> 25</span>
1303
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_63"> 2025:HHC:6580
1304
+
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_64">35. In view of the above discussion, at this stage, it
1309
+
1310
+ cannot be said that the applicant has not committed the
1311
+
1312
+ offence, nor it can be said that in case, he is ordered to be
1313
+
1314
+ released on bail, he will not commit any offence.
1315
+
1316
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_65">36. In the absence of the twin conditions, as
1317
+
1318
+ enumerated, under <a href="/doc/1241164/" id="a_89">Section 37(1)(b)</a> of the NDPS Act, this
1319
+
1320
+ Court cannot accept the arguments of learned counsel,
1321
+
1322
+ appearing for the applicant, who has sought the release of
1323
+
1324
+ the applicant, on bail, during the pendency of the trial.
1325
+
1326
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_66">37. In view of the discussions, made hereinabove,
1327
+
1328
+ this Court is of the view that the applicant is not able to
1329
+
1330
+ make out a case for his release on bail.
1331
+
1332
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_67">38. Consequently, the present bail application is
1333
+
1334
+ dismissed.
1335
+ </p>
1336
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_68">39. Any of the observations, made hereinabove,
1337
+
1338
+ shall not be taken, as an expression of opinion, on the
1339
+
1340
+ merits of the case, as, these observations are confined only
1341
+
1342
+ to the disposal of the present bail application.
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_69"> ( Virender Singh )
1347
+ Judge
1348
+ March 19, 2025(Gaurav Thakur)
1349
+ </p>
1350
+ </div>
1351
+ </article>
1352
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
1353
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
1354
+ <div class="translate_container">
1355
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
1356
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
1357
+ <button id="translatewarn"
1358
+ type="button"
1359
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
1360
+ </div>
1361
+
1362
+
1363
+
1364
+
1365
+
1366
+ </aside>
1367
+ </div>
1368
+
1369
+ </main>
1370
+
1371
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
1372
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
1373
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
1374
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
1375
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
1376
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
1377
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
1378
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
1379
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
1380
+
1381
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/122402051/" class="device-toggle">
1382
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="VoEJVSivgqVA6CWOmwQfZeIeI25KZDmuqAbT31M37U9x5KIDUsLqeZ74Ml9S80yM">
1383
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
1384
+ </form>
1385
+ </div>
1386
+ </footer>
1387
+
1388
+ <script>
1389
+ (function() {
1390
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
1391
+
1392
+ if (navigator.share) {
1393
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
1394
+
1395
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
1396
+ try {
1397
+ await navigator.share({
1398
+ title: document.title,
1399
+ url: window.location.href
1400
+ });
1401
+ } catch (err) {
1402
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
1403
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
1404
+ }
1405
+ }
1406
+ });
1407
+ }
1408
+ })();
1409
+ </script>
1410
+
1411
+
1412
+
1413
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1414
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1415
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
1416
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
1417
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
1418
+
1419
+
1420
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1421
+ (function($) {
1422
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
1423
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
1424
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
1425
+ }
1426
+ }
1427
+
1428
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
1429
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
1430
+ return $("<li></li>")
1431
+ .append(
1432
+ $("<div></div>")
1433
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
1434
+ .html(item.label)
1435
+ )
1436
+ .appendTo(ul);
1437
+ };
1438
+ }
1439
+
1440
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
1441
+ if (!$input.length) {
1442
+ return;
1443
+ }
1444
+
1445
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
1446
+
1447
+ $input.autocomplete({
1448
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
1449
+ delay: 180,
1450
+ minLength: 2,
1451
+ appendTo: 'body',
1452
+ position: {
1453
+ my: "left top",
1454
+ at: "left bottom+6",
1455
+ collision: "flipfit"
1456
+ },
1457
+ classes: {
1458
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
1459
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
1460
+ },
1461
+ open: function() {
1462
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
1463
+ var offset = $input.offset();
1464
+ $menu
1465
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
1466
+ .css({
1467
+ left: offset.left,
1468
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
1469
+ });
1470
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
1471
+ },
1472
+ close: function() {
1473
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
1474
+ },
1475
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
1476
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
1477
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1478
+ event.preventDefault();
1479
+ }
1480
+ },
1481
+ select: function(event, ui) {
1482
+ event.preventDefault();
1483
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1484
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
1485
+ }
1486
+
1487
+ if ($form.length) {
1488
+ $form.trigger('submit');
1489
+ } else {
1490
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
1491
+ }
1492
+ }
1493
+ });
1494
+
1495
+ }
1496
+
1497
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1498
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
1499
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
1500
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
1501
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
1502
+ });
1503
+ })(jQuery);
1504
+ </script>
1505
+
1506
+
1507
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
1508
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1509
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1510
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
1511
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
1512
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
1513
+
1514
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
1515
+ signupForDownload();
1516
+ e.preventDefault();
1517
+ return false;
1518
+ });
1519
+
1520
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
1521
+ e.preventDefault();
1522
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
1523
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
1524
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
1525
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
1526
+ });
1527
+ });
1528
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
1529
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
1530
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1531
+ if (!translateContainer) {
1532
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
1533
+ return;
1534
+ }
1535
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
1536
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
1537
+ return;
1538
+ }
1539
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
1540
+
1541
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
1542
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1543
+ if (!translateEl) {
1544
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
1545
+ return;
1546
+ }
1547
+
1548
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
1549
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
1550
+
1551
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
1552
+ var node;
1553
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
1554
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
1555
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
1556
+ }
1557
+ }
1558
+
1559
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
1560
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
1561
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
1562
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
1563
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
1564
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
1565
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
1566
+ }
1567
+ }
1568
+ });
1569
+ }
1570
+
1571
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
1572
+ }
1573
+ </script>
1574
+
1575
+
1576
+
1577
+
1578
+
1579
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
1580
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1581
+ $(document).ready(function () {
1582
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
1583
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
1584
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
1585
+ valid_ag: '',
1586
+ is_valid: '',
1587
+ is_auth: 'False',
1588
+ is_agreement: '',
1589
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
1590
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
1591
+ });
1592
+ </script>
1593
+
1594
+
1595
+
1596
+
1597
+
1598
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
1599
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1600
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
1601
+ window.is_auth = false;
1602
+
1603
+ // Document context for chatbot
1604
+ window.documentContext = {
1605
+ tid: 122402051,
1606
+ title: "Reserved On : 13.03.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 19 March, 2025",
1607
+ url: window.location.href,
1608
+ isFragment: false
1609
+ };
1610
+
1611
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
1612
+ </script>
1613
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
1614
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
1615
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
1616
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
1617
+
1618
+
1619
+
1620
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c5704b59e61b7d1',t:'MTc2OTY3MTc2NS4wMDAwMDA='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.nonce='';a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
1621
+
1622
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_126547378.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,2567 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Sanjay Kumar @ Chapan vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 9 January, 2026</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/126547378/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="JJB1erBgRsMe3U57IcakJBmxSwTPoTz44Cc5RpYj7aigSZcxKQNu5ura96dQr9T8">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/126547378/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="JJB1erBgRsMe3U57IcakJBmxSwTPoTz44Cc5RpYj7aigSZcxKQNu5ura96dQr9T8">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/126547378/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="JJB1erBgRsMe3U57IcakJBmxSwTPoTz44Cc5RpYj7aigSZcxKQNu5ura96dQr9T8">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:126547378">48</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:126547378">0</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Himachal Pradesh High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Sanjay Kumar @ Chapan vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 9 January, 2026</h2>
187
+
188
+ <pre id="pre_1"> 2026:HHC:2995
189
+
190
+
191
+
192
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
193
+
194
+ Cr. MP(M) No. 2734 &amp; 2735 of 2025
195
+
196
+
197
+
198
+
199
+ .
200
+ Reserved on: 08.01.2026
201
+
202
+
203
+
204
+
205
+
206
+ Date of Decision: 09.01.2026.
207
+ ______________________________________
208
+
209
+
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+ 1. Cr. MP(M) No. 2734 of 2025
214
+ Sanjay Kumar @ Chapan ...Petitioner
215
+
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+ of
220
+ Versus
221
+
222
+ State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent
223
+ _____________________________________
224
+ rt
225
+ 2. Cr. MP(M) No. 2735 of 2025
226
+ Suman Kumari ...Petitioner
227
+
228
+ Versus
229
+
230
+ State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondent
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+ Coram
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+ Hon&#x27;ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
240
+ Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+ For the Petitioners : M/s Rahul and Rajat, Advocates, in
247
+ both the petitions.
248
+
249
+
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+ For the Respondent : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional
254
+ Advocate General, in both the
255
+ petitions.
256
+
257
+
258
+ Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
259
+ </pre>
260
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1"> The petitioners have filed the present petition seeking
261
+
262
+ regular bail in FIR No. 62 of 2025, dated 06.04.2025, registered at
263
+
264
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1">1</span>
265
+ Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
266
+ </p>
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_2"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
271
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_3"> 2</span>
272
+
273
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_2"> 2026:HHC:2995
274
+
275
+ Police Station Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P., for the
276
+
277
+ commission of an offence punishable under Section 20 of the
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ .
283
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_3"> <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_1">Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985</a> <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_2">(NDPS
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+
289
+ Act</a>). Since both petitions have arisen out of the same FIR, they
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+ are being taken up together for convenience.
296
+ </p>
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_4"> of
301
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_5"> 2. It has been asserted that the petitioners were arrested
302
+
303
+ on 06.04.2024 and have been in custody since then. As per the
304
+ rt
305
+ prosecution, 1.246 kg of cannabis was recovered from the house
306
+
307
+ of the petitioner, Sanjay Kumar @ Chapan. The investigation is
308
+
309
+ complete, and no fruitful purpose would be served by detaining
310
+
311
+ the petitioners in custody. The petitioners were not informed of
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+ the grounds of arrest, which is a violation of their constitutional
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+
320
+ right provided under <a href="/doc/581566/" id="a_3">Article 22</a> of the Constitution of India. Bail is
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+
326
+ the rule and jail is the exception. There is no legally admissible
327
+
328
+ evidence against the petitioners. The petitioners would abide by
329
+
330
+
331
+
332
+
333
+
334
+ the terms and conditions that the Court may impose. Hence, it
335
+
336
+ was prayed that the present petitions be allowed and the
337
+
338
+ petitioners be released on bail.
339
+ </p>
340
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_6"> 3. The petitions are opposed by filing separate status
341
+
342
+ reports asserting that the police had set up a nakka at Sheela
343
+
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_4"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
348
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_5"> 3</span>
349
+
350
+ 2026:HHC:2995
351
+
352
+ Chowk on 06.04.2025. They received secret information at 1:40
353
+
354
+ AM that Sanjay Kumar @ Chappan was selling charas from his
355
+
356
+
357
+
358
+
359
+ .
360
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_7"> home, and a huge quantity of charas could be recovered by
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+ searching the house. The police reduced the information into
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+ writing and sent it to the Supervisory Officer. The police
373
+
374
+ associated Abhishek Anand and Vimoksh Upmanyu, and went to
375
+
376
+
377
+
378
+
379
+ of
380
+ the house of Sanjay Kumar @ Chapan. Petitioners, Suman Kumari
381
+
382
+ @ Varsha and Sanjay Kumar @ Chapan, were found in the house.
383
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_8"> rt
384
+ The police told them about the information and searched the
385
+
386
+ house. The police recovered a packet kept beneath the mattress,
387
+
388
+ which was checked, and 1 kg 246 grams of cannabis was found in
389
+
390
+
391
+
392
+ it. The police seized the cannabis and arrested the petitioners.
393
+ </p>
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_9"> The cannabis was sent to SFSL, and as per the result of analysis, it
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ was confirmed to be an abstract of cannabis and a sample of
404
+
405
+ charas. FIR No. 39 of 2018 was registered against the petitioner,
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+
410
+
411
+ Sanjay Kumar, on 18.03.2018. An order for freezing his property
412
+
413
+ has been passed by the competent authority. No FIR was
414
+
415
+ registered against the petitioner, Suman Kumari. Hence, the
416
+
417
+ status report.
418
+ </p>
419
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_10"> 4. I have heard M/s Rahul Kumar and Rajat, learned
420
+
421
+ counsel for the petitioners, in both the petitions and Mr Jitender
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_6"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
427
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_7"> 4</span>
428
+
429
+ 2026:HHC:2995
430
+
431
+ Sharma, Learned Additional Advocate General for the
432
+
433
+ respondent/State.
434
+ </p>
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_11"> .
439
+ </p>
440
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_12"> 5. Mr Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners,
441
+
442
+ submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+
448
+ implicated. The grounds of arrest were not communicated to
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ of
454
+ them, and their arrest is illegal. There is no evidence that the
455
+
456
+ house from where the recovery was effected belonged to the
457
+ rt
458
+ petitioners, and mere presence in the house without any further
459
+
460
+ material is not sufficient to connect the petitioners to the
461
+
462
+ commission of the crime. He relied upon the judgment of the
463
+
464
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in Ismail khan Aiyub khan Pathan vs. State
465
+
466
+
467
+
468
+ of Gujarat (SC) 2000 (10) SCC 257 in support of his submission.
469
+ </p>
470
+
471
+
472
+
473
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_13"> 6. Mr Jitender Kumar Sharma, learned Additional
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+ Advocate General, for the respondent/State, submitted that the
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+ petitioners were found present in the house from where the
486
+
487
+ recovery was made. Prima facie, their presence in the house would
488
+
489
+ connect them to the commission of a crime. Burden would shift
490
+
491
+ upon them to rebut the presumption, and there is no material to
492
+
493
+ rebut the presumption at this stage. Hence, he prayed that the
494
+
495
+ present petition be dismissed.
496
+ </p>
497
+
498
+
499
+
500
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_8"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
501
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_9"> 5</span>
502
+
503
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_14"> 2026:HHC:2995
504
+
505
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_15"> 7. I have given considerable thought to the submissions
506
+
507
+ made at the bar and have gone through the record carefully.
508
+ </p>
509
+
510
+
511
+
512
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_16"> .
513
+ </p>
514
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_17"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="58450110" id="span_10">8. The parameters for granting bail were considered by
515
+
516
+ the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in <a href="/doc/58450110/" id="a_4">Pinki v. State of U.P.</a>, (2025) 7 SCC
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+ 314: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 781, wherein it was observed at page 380:</span>
523
+ </p>
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1"> of
528
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_2"> (i) Broad principles for the grant of bail
529
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_3"> 56. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="656741" id="span_11">In <a href="/doc/656741/" id="a_5">Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. High</a> Court of A.P., (1978) 1
530
+ SCC 240: 1978 SCC (Cri) 115, Krishna Iyer, J., while
531
+ elaborating on the content of <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_6">Article 21</a> of the Constitution
532
+ rt
533
+ of India in the context of personal liberty of a person under
534
+ trial, has laid down the key factors that should be
535
+
536
+ considered while granting bail, which are extracted as
537
+ under: (SCC p. 244, paras 7-9)
538
+ &quot;7. It is thus obvious that the nature of the charge is the
539
+ vital factor, and the nature of the evidence is also
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+ pertinent. The punishment to which the party may be
544
+ liable, if convicted or a conviction is confirmed, also
545
+ bears upon the issue.</span>
546
+ </blockquote>
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_4"> 8. Another relevant factor is whether the course of justice
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+ would be thwarted by him who seeks the benignant
557
+ jurisdiction of the Court to be freed for the time being.
558
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_18"> [Patrick Devlin, &quot;The Criminal Prosecution in England&quot;
559
+ </p>
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+
564
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_5"> (Oxford University Press, London 1960) p. 75 -- Modern
565
+ Law Review, Vol. 81, Jan. 1968, p. 54.]
566
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_19"> 9. Thus, the legal principles and practice validate the Court
567
+ considering the likelihood of the applicant interfering with
568
+ witnesses for the prosecution or otherwise polluting the
569
+ process of justice. It is not only traditional but rational, in
570
+ this context, to enquire into the antecedents of a man who
571
+ is applying for bail to find whether he has a bad record,
572
+ particularly a record which suggests that he is likely to
573
+ commit serious offences while on bail. In regard to
574
+ habituals, it is part of criminological history that a
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_12"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
580
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_13"> 6</span>
581
+
582
+ 2026:HHC:2995
583
+
584
+ thoughtless bail order has enabled the bailee to exploit the
585
+ opportunity to inflict further crimes on the members of
586
+ society. Bail discretion, on the basis of evidence about the
587
+
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+ .
592
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_20"> criminal record of a defendant, is therefore not an exercise
593
+
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+ in irrelevance.&quot; (emphasis supplied)
599
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_21"> 57. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1067439" id="span_14">In <a href="/doc/1067439/" id="a_7">Prahlad Singh Bhati v. State (NCT of Delhi</a>), (2001) 4
600
+ SCC 280: 2001 SCC (Cri) 674, this Court highlighted various
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+
606
+ aspects that the courts should keep in mind while dealing
607
+ with an application seeking bail. The same may be
608
+ extracted as follows: (SCC pp. 284-85, para 8)
609
+
610
+
611
+
612
+
613
+ of
614
+ &quot;8. The jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the
615
+ basis of well-settled principles, having regard to the
616
+ circumstances of each case and not in an arbitrary manner.
617
+ While granting the bail, the court has to keep in mind the
618
+ rt
619
+ nature of accusations, the nature of evidence in support
620
+ thereof, the severity of the punishment which conviction
621
+
622
+ will entail, the character, behaviour, means and standing of
623
+ the accused, circumstances which are peculiar to the
624
+ accused, reasonable possibility of securing the presence of
625
+ the accused at the trial, reasonable apprehension of the
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+ witnesses being tampered with, the larger interests of the
630
+ public or State and similar other considerations. It has also
631
+ to be kept in mind that for the purposes of granting the bail
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+ the legislature has used the words &quot;reasonable grounds for
637
+ believing&quot; instead of &quot;the evidence&quot; which means the court
638
+
639
+
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+ dealing with the grant of bail can only satisfy it (sic itself)
644
+ as to whether there is a genuine case against the accused
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+
649
+
650
+ and that the prosecution will be able to produce prima facie
651
+ evidence in support of the charge.&quot; (emphasis supplied)</span>
652
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_22"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="836557" id="span_15">58. This Court in <a href="/doc/836557/" id="a_8">Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh</a>,
653
+ (2002) 3 SCC 598: 2002 SCC (Cri) 688, speaking through
654
+ Banerjee, J., emphasised that a court exercising discretion
655
+ in matters of bail has to undertake the same judiciously. In
656
+ highlighting that bail should not be granted as a matter of
657
+ course, bereft of cogent reasoning, this Court observed as
658
+ follows: (SCC p. 602, para 3)
659
+ &quot;3. Grant of bail, though being a discretionary order, but,
660
+ however, calls for the exercise of such a discretion in a
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_16"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
666
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_17"> 7</span>
667
+
668
+ 2026:HHC:2995
669
+
670
+ judicious manner and not as a matter of course. An order
671
+ for bail bereft of any cogent reason cannot be sustained.
672
+ Needless to record, however, that the grant of bail is
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+ .</span>
678
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_23"> dependent upon the contextual facts of the matter being
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ dealt with by the court and facts do always vary from case
685
+ to case. While the placement of the accused in society,
686
+ though it may be considered by itself, cannot be a guiding
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+
691
+
692
+ factor in the matter of grant of bail, the same should always
693
+ be coupled with other circumstances warranting the grant
694
+ of bail. The nature of the offence is one of the basic
695
+
696
+
697
+
698
+
699
+ of
700
+ considerations for the grant of bail -- the more heinous is
701
+ the crime, the greater is the chance of rejection of the bail,
702
+ though, however, dependent on the factual matrix of the
703
+ matter.&quot; (emphasis supplied)
704
+ rt
705
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_24"> 59. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1342616" id="span_18">In <a href="/doc/1342616/" id="a_9">Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan</a>, (2004) 7 SCC
706
+ 528: 2004 SCC (Cri) 1977, this Court held that although it is
707
+
708
+ established that a court considering a bail application
709
+ cannot undertake a detailed examination of evidence and
710
+ an elaborate discussion on the merits of the case, yet the
711
+ court is required to indicate the prima facie reasons
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ justifying the grant of bail.</span>
716
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_25"> 60. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1129584" id="span_19">In <a href="/doc/1129584/" id="a_10">Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee</a>, (2010) 14
717
+ SCC 496: (2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 765, this Court observed that
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+ where a High Court has granted bail mechanically, the said
723
+ order would suffer from the vice of non-application of
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+ mind, rendering it illegal. This Court held as under with
730
+ regard to the circumstances under which an order granting
731
+
732
+
733
+
734
+
735
+
736
+ bail may be set aside. In doing so, the factors which ought
737
+ to have guided the Court&#x27;s decision to grant bail have also
738
+ been detailed as under: (SCC p. 499, para 9)
739
+ &quot;9. ... It is trite that this Court does not, normally, interfere
740
+ with an order passed by the High Court granting or
741
+ rejecting bail to the accused. However, it is equally
742
+ incumbent upon the High Court to exercise its discretion
743
+ judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the
744
+ basic principles <a href="/doc/1129584/" id="a_11">laid down in</a> a plethora of decisions of this
745
+ Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_20"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
751
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_21"> 8</span>
752
+
753
+ 2026:HHC:2995
754
+
755
+ circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while
756
+ considering an application for bail are:</span>
757
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_6"> (i) whether there is any prima facie or reasonable
758
+
759
+
760
+
761
+
762
+ .
763
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_26"> ground to believe that the accused had committed the
764
+
765
+
766
+
767
+
768
+
769
+ offence;
770
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_27"> (ii) nature and gravity of the accusation;
771
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_28"> (iii) severity of the punishment in the event of
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+ conviction;
778
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_29"> (iv) danger of the accused absconding or fleeing, if
779
+ released on bail;
780
+ </p>
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_30"> of
785
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_31"> (v) character, behaviour, means, position and standing
786
+ of the accused;
787
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_32"> (vi) likelihood of the offence being repeated;
788
+ rt
789
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_33"> (vii) reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being
790
+ influenced; and
791
+
792
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_34"> (viii) danger, of course, of justice being thwarted by
793
+ grant of bail.&quot; (emphasis supplied)
794
+ xxxxxxx
795
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_35"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="61980621" id="span_22">62. One of the judgments of this Court on the aspect of
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+ application of mind and requirement of judicious exercise
800
+ of discretion in arriving at an order granting bail to the
801
+ accused is <a href="/doc/61980621/" id="a_12">Brijmani Devi v. Pappu Kumar</a>, (2022) 4 SCC 497 :</span>
802
+ </p>
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_7"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="61980621" id="span_23"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="137780833" id="span_24">(2022) 2 SCC (Cri) 170, wherein a three-Judge Bench of this
807
+ Court, while setting aside an unreasoned and casual order
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+ (<a href="/doc/137780833/" id="a_13">Pappu Kumar v. State of Bihar</a>, 2021 SCC OnLine Pat 2856
814
+ and Pappu Singh v. State of Bihar, 2021 SCC OnLine Pat 2857)
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+ of the High Court granting bail to the accused, observed as
821
+ follows: (<a href="/doc/61980621/" id="a_14">Brijmani Devi v. Pappu Kumar</a>, (2022) 4 SCC 497 :</span></span>
822
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_8"> (2022) 2 SCC (Cri) 170]), SCC p. 511, para 35)
823
+ &quot;35. While we are conscious of the fact that liberty of an
824
+ individual is an invaluable right, at the same time while
825
+ considering an application for bail courts cannot lose sight
826
+ of the serious nature of the accusations against an accused
827
+ and the facts that have a bearing in the case, particularly,
828
+ when the accusations may not be false, frivolous or
829
+ vexatious in nature but are supported by adequate material
830
+ brought on record to enable a court to arrive at a prima
831
+ facie conclusion. While considering an application for the
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_25"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
837
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_26"> 9</span>
838
+
839
+ 2026:HHC:2995
840
+
841
+ grant of bail, a prima facie conclusion must be supported by
842
+ reasons and must be arrived at after having regard to the
843
+ vital facts of the case brought on record. Due consideration
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ .
849
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_36"> must be given to facts suggestive of the nature of crime, the
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+
854
+
855
+ criminal antecedents of the accused, if any, and the nature
856
+ of punishment that would follow a conviction vis-à-vis the
857
+ offence(s) alleged against an accused.&quot; (emphasis
858
+
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ supplied)
864
+
865
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_37"> 9. The present petition has to be decided as per the
866
+
867
+
868
+
869
+
870
+ of
871
+ parameters <a href="/doc/61980621/" id="a_15">laid down by</a> the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court.
872
+ </p>
873
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_38"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="165351878" id="span_27">10. The status report shows that the petitioners were
874
+ rt
875
+ present in the house at the time of the arrival of the police. The
876
+
877
+ police knocked at the door, and the petitioners came out of the
878
+
879
+ house. Therefore, prima facie, the petitioners were able to exercise
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ control over the articles lying inside the house. It was <a href="/doc/61980621/" id="a_16">laid down
884
+
885
+ by</a> the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in <a href="/doc/165351878/" id="a_17">Union of India v. Mohd. Nawaz
886
+
887
+
888
+
889
+
890
+ Khan</a>, (2021) 10 SCC 100: (2021) 3 SCC (Cri) 721: 2021 SCC OnLine SC
891
+
892
+
893
+
894
+
895
+
896
+ 1237, that a person is in possession if he is in a position to exercise
897
+
898
+
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+ control over the article. It was observed at page 111:</span>
903
+ </p>
904
+
905
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_9"> 25. We shall deal with each of these circumstances in turn.
906
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_39"> The respondent has been accused of an offence under
907
+ <a href="/doc/704277/" id="a_18">Section 8</a> of the NDPS Act, which is punishable under
908
+ <a href="/doc/1566465/" id="a_19">Sections 21</a>, <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_20">27-A</a>, <a href="/doc/1252855/" id="a_21">29</a>, <a href="/doc/1701170/" id="a_22">60(3)</a> of the said Act. <a href="/doc/704277/" id="a_23">Section 8</a> of the
909
+ Act prohibits a person from possessing any narcotic drug
910
+ or psychotropic substance. The concept of possession
911
+ recurs in <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_24">Sections 20</a> to <a href="/doc/263398/" id="a_25">22</a>, which provide for punishment
912
+ for offences under the Act. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="111774620" id="span_28">In <a href="/doc/111774620/" id="a_26">Madan Lal v. State of
913
+ H.P. [Madan Lal</a> v. State of H.P., (2003) 7 SCC 465: 2003 SCC
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_29"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
919
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_30"> 10</span>
920
+
921
+ 2026:HHC:2995
922
+
923
+
924
+ (Cri) 1664] this Court held that : (SCC p. 472, paras 19-23 &amp;</span>
925
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_40"> 26)
926
+
927
+ &quot;19. Whether there was conscious possession has to be
928
+
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+ .
933
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_41"> determined with reference to the factual backdrop. The
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+ facts which can be culled out from the evidence on
940
+ record are that all the accused persons were travelling
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+ in a vehicle, and as noted by the trial court, they were
947
+ known to each other, and it has not been explained or
948
+ shown as to how they travelled together from the same
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+ of
954
+ destination in a vehicle which was not a public vehicle.
955
+ </p>
956
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_42"> 20. <a href="/doc/1557102/" id="a_27">Section 20(b)</a> makes possession of contraband
957
+ articles an offence. <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_28">Section 20</a> appears in <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_29">Chapter IV of
958
+ the Act</a>, which relates to offences for possession of such
959
+ rt
960
+ articles. It is submitted that in order to make the
961
+ possession illicit, there must be a conscious possession.
962
+ </p>
963
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_43"> 21. It is highlighted that unless the possession was
964
+ coupled with the requisite mental element, i.e.
965
+ conscious possession and not mere custody without
966
+
967
+
968
+ awareness of the nature of such possession, <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_30">Section 20</a>
969
+ is not attracted.
970
+ </p>
971
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_44"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1985622" id="span_31">22. The expression &quot;possession&quot; is a polymorphous
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ term which assumes different colours in different
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+
982
+ contexts. It may carry different meanings in
983
+ contextually different backgrounds. It is impossible, as
984
+ was observed in Supt. &amp; <a href="/doc/1985622/" id="a_31">Remembrancer of Legal Affairs,
985
+
986
+
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+ W.B. v. Anil Kumar Bhunja [Supt</a>.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1985622" id="span_32">&amp; <a href="/doc/1985622/" id="a_32">Remembrancer of
991
+ Legal Affairs, W.B. v. Anil Kumar Bhunja</a>, (1979) 4 SCC 274:</span>
992
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_10"> 1979 SCC (Cri) 1038] to work out a completely logical and
993
+ precise definition of &quot;possession&quot; uniformly applicable
994
+ to all situations in the context of all statutes.
995
+ </blockquote>
996
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_45"> 23. The word &quot;conscious&quot; means awareness about a
997
+ particular fact. It is a state of mind which is deliberate
998
+ or intended.
999
+ </p>
1000
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_46"> ***
1001
+
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_33"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1006
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_34"> 11</span>
1007
+
1008
+ 2026:HHC:2995
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_47"> 26. Once possession is established, the person who
1012
+ claims that it was not a conscious possession has to
1013
+ establish it because how he came to be in possession is
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+
1017
+
1018
+ .
1019
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_48"> within his special knowledge. <a href="/doc/852142/" id="a_33">Section 35</a> of the Act gives
1020
+
1021
+
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+ a statutory recognition of this position because of the
1026
+ presumption available in law. Similar is the position in
1027
+ terms of <a href="/doc/1297682/" id="a_34">Section 54</a>, where also presumption is also
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+
1032
+
1033
+ available to be drawn from possession of illicit articles.&quot;
1034
+ </p>
1035
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_49"> 26. What amounts to &quot;conscious possession&quot; was also
1036
+
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+ of
1041
+ considered in Dharampal Singh v. State of Punjab
1042
+ [Dharampal Singh v. State of Punjab, (2010) 9 SCC 608:
1043
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_11"> (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 1431], where it was held that the
1044
+ knowledge of possession of contraband has to be gleaned
1045
+ rt
1046
+ from the facts and circumstances of a case. The standard of
1047
+ conscious possession would be different in the case of a
1048
+
1049
+ public transport vehicle with several persons as opposed to
1050
+ a private vehicle with a few persons known to one another.
1051
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_50"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="143167371" id="span_35">In <a href="/doc/143167371/" id="a_35">Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan [Mohan Lal</a> v. State of
1052
+ Rajasthan, (2015) 6 SCC 222: (2015) 3 SCC (Cri) 881], this
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+ Court also observed that the term &quot;possession&quot; could
1057
+ mean physical possession with animus; custody over the
1058
+ prohibited substances with animus; exercise of dominion
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+ and control as a result of concealment; or personal
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+ knowledge as to the existence of the contraband and the
1070
+ intention based on this knowledge.</span>
1071
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_51"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Neg" data-docid="165351878" id="span_36">11. Therefore, the petitioners cannot claim that they were
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+ not in possession when they were able to exercise control over the
1078
+
1079
+ substance recovered by the police and the judgment in <a href="/doc/165351878/" id="a_36">Ismail
1080
+
1081
+ Khan</a> (supra) will not apply to the present case.</span>
1082
+ </p>
1083
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_52"> 12. It was submitted that there is a discrepancy in the
1084
+
1085
+ weight of the charas. The police weighed the charas on the spot
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+
1089
+
1090
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_37"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1091
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_38"> 12</span>
1092
+
1093
+ 2026:HHC:2995
1094
+
1095
+ and found its weight to be 1.246 kilograms. When the substance
1096
+
1097
+ was weighed in the presence of a learned Magistrate, its weight
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+
1101
+
1102
+ .
1103
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_53"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="118219406" id="span_39">was found to be 1289 grams. The discrepancy in the weight will
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+ make the prosecution&#x27;s case doubtful. This submission cannot be
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+ accepted. It was <a href="/doc/165351878/" id="a_37">laid down by</a> this Court in Sohan Lal alias <a href="/doc/118219406/" id="a_38">Bhau
1116
+
1117
+ and others Vs. State of H.P. and others</a>, 2019 STPL 3203 HP, that if
1118
+
1119
+
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+ of
1123
+ there is a variation in the report of analysis and the certificate
1124
+
1125
+ issued under <a href="/doc/1304888/" id="a_39">Section 52-A</a> of the ND&amp;<a href="/doc/198083419/" id="a_40">PS Act</a>, the certificate will
1126
+ rt
1127
+ prevail. It was observed: -</span>
1128
+ </p>
1129
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_12"> &quot;10. It would be evidently clear from the aforesaid
1130
+ exposition of law that the samples drawn and certified by
1131
+ the learned Magistrate in compliance with sub-sections (2)
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+ and (3) of <a href="/doc/1304888/" id="a_41">Section 52-A</a> are primary evidence and,
1136
+ therefore, had to be taken as true and any contradiction in
1137
+ such certification with the final report prepared by the
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+ prosecution, the quantity mentioned in the final report
1143
+ obviously had to give way to the certification so made by
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ the Court under <a href="/doc/1304888/" id="a_42">Section 52-A</a> of the Act ibid.&quot;
1150
+ </blockquote>
1151
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_54"> 13. Therefore, as per the judgment, the certificate issued
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+ by the learned Judicial Magistrate is the primary evidence, and
1158
+
1159
+ any discrepancy in the weight on the spot and before the learned
1160
+
1161
+ Magistrate during the proceedings under <a href="/doc/1304888/" id="a_43">Section 52-A</a> of the
1162
+
1163
+ NDPS Act will not be fatal.
1164
+ </p>
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_40"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1169
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_41"> 13</span>
1170
+
1171
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_55"> 2026:HHC:2995
1172
+
1173
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_56"> 14. The status report shows that the petitioners were
1174
+
1175
+ found in possession of 1246 grams of charas, and the order of the
1176
+
1177
+
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ .
1181
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_57"> learned Magistrate shows that the weight of charas was 1289
1182
+
1183
+
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+
1187
+ grams, which is a commercial quantity. Therefore, the rigours of
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_44">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act apply to the present case.
1194
+ </p>
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_58"> of
1199
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_59"> 15. <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_45">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act provides that in an offence
1200
+
1201
+ involving a commercial quantity, the Court should be satisfied
1202
+ rt
1203
+ that the accused is not guilty of the commission of an offence and
1204
+
1205
+ is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. It reads as
1206
+
1207
+ follows:
1208
+ </p>
1209
+
1210
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_13"> &quot;37. Offences to be cognisable and non-bailable. -
1211
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_14"> (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_46">Code of
1212
+ Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974)--
1213
+ </blockquote>
1214
+
1215
+
1216
+
1217
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_15"> (a) every offence punishable under this Act shall be
1218
+ cognisable.
1219
+ </blockquote>
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_16"> (b) no person accused of an offence punishable for
1225
+ offences under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_47">section 19</a>, <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_48">section 24</a>, or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_49">section 27A</a>
1226
+
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+ and also for offences involving commercial
1232
+ quantity, shall be released on bail or his own bond
1233
+ unless-
1234
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_17"> (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an
1235
+ opportunity to oppose the application for such
1236
+ release, and
1237
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_18"> (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the
1238
+ application, the court is satisfied that there
1239
+ are reasonable grounds for believing that he is
1240
+ not guilty of such an offence and that he is not
1241
+ likely to commit any offence while on bail.
1242
+ </blockquote>
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_42"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1247
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_43"> 14</span>
1248
+
1249
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_60"> 2026:HHC:2995
1250
+
1251
+ (2) The limitations on granting of bail specified in clause
1252
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_61"> (b) of sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations
1253
+ under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_50">Code of Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974) or
1254
+
1255
+
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ .
1259
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_62"> any other law for the time being in force, on granting of
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+ bail.&quot;
1266
+ </p>
1267
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_63"> 16. This Section was interpreted by the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+ Court in Union of India Versus Niyazuddin&amp; Another (2018) 13 SCC
1274
+
1275
+ 738, and it was held that in the absence of the satisfaction that the
1276
+
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+ of
1281
+ accused is not guilty of an offence and he is not likely to commit
1282
+
1283
+ an offence while on bail, he cannot be released. It was observed:
1284
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_19"> rt
1285
+ &quot;7. <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_51">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act contains special
1286
+
1287
+ provisions with regard to the grant of bail in respect
1288
+ of certain offences enumerated under the said
1289
+ Section. They are:
1290
+ </blockquote>
1291
+
1292
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_20"> (1) In the case of a person accused of an offence
1293
+ punishable under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_52">Section 19</a>,
1294
+ (2) Under <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_53">Section 24</a>,
1295
+
1296
+
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+ (3) Under <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_54">Section 27A</a> and
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+
1305
+ (4) offences involving a commercial quantity.
1306
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_64"> 8. The accusation in the present case is with regard to
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ the fourth factor, namely, commercial quantity. Be
1313
+ that as it may, once the Public Prosecutor opposes the
1314
+ application for bail to a person accused of the
1315
+ enumerated offences under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_55">Section 37</a> of the NDPS
1316
+ Act, in case the court proposes to grant bail to such a
1317
+ person, two conditions are to be mandatorily satisfied
1318
+ in addition to the normal requirements under the
1319
+ provisions of the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_56">Cr.P.C</a>. or any other enactment.
1320
+ </p>
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_44"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1325
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_45"> 15</span>
1326
+
1327
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_65"> 2026:HHC:2995
1328
+
1329
+ (1) The court must be satisfied that there are
1330
+ reasonable grounds for believing that the
1331
+ person is not guilty of such an offence;
1332
+ </p>
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_66"> .
1337
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_67"> (2) that person is not likely to commit any
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+ offence while on bail.&quot;
1344
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_68"> 17. This position was reiterated in State of Kerala Versus
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+ Rajesh, AIR 2020 SC 721, wherein it was held:
1351
+ </p>
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_21"> of
1356
+ &quot;19. This Court has laid down broad parameters to be
1357
+ followed while considering the application for bail moved
1358
+ by the accused involved in offences under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_57">NDPS Act</a>. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1378939" id="span_46">In
1359
+ <a href="/doc/1378939/" id="a_58">Union of India vs Ram Samujh and Ors.</a>, (1999) 9 SCC 429, it
1360
+ rt
1361
+ has been elaborated as under: -</span>
1362
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_22"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1054146" id="span_47">&quot;7. It is to be borne in mind that the aforesaid
1363
+
1364
+ legislative mandate is required to be adhered to and
1365
+ followed. It should be borne in mind that in a murder
1366
+ case, the accused commits the murder of one or two
1367
+
1368
+
1369
+ persons, while those persons who are dealing in
1370
+ narcotic drugs are instrumental in causing death or
1371
+ in inflicting death-blow to a number of innocent
1372
+
1373
+
1374
+
1375
+
1376
+ young victims, who are vulnerable; it causes
1377
+ deleterious effects and a deadly impact on the
1378
+
1379
+
1380
+
1381
+
1382
+
1383
+ society; they are a hazard to the society; even if they
1384
+ are released temporarily, in all probability, they
1385
+ would continue their nefarious activities of
1386
+
1387
+
1388
+
1389
+
1390
+
1391
+ trafficking and/or dealing in intoxicants
1392
+ clandestinely. The reason may be the large stake and
1393
+ illegal profit involved. This Court, dealing with the
1394
+ contention with regard to punishment under the
1395
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_59">NDPS Act</a>, has succinctly observed about the adverse
1396
+ effect of such activities in <a href="/doc/1054146/" id="a_60">Durand Didier vs Chief Secy.
1397
+ Union Territory of Goa</a>, (1990) 1 SCC 95) as under:</span>
1398
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_23"> 24. With deep concern, we may point out that
1399
+ the organised activities of the underworld and
1400
+ the clandestine smuggling of narcotic drugs
1401
+ and psychotropic substances into this country
1402
+
1403
+
1404
+
1405
+
1406
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_48"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1407
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_49"> 16</span>
1408
+
1409
+ 2026:HHC:2995
1410
+
1411
+ and illegal trafficking in such drugs and
1412
+ substances have led to drug addiction among a
1413
+ sizeable section of the public, particularly the
1414
+
1415
+
1416
+
1417
+
1418
+ .
1419
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_24"> adolescents and students of both sexes and the
1420
+
1421
+
1422
+
1423
+
1424
+
1425
+ menace has assumed serious and alarming
1426
+ proportions in the recent years. Therefore, in
1427
+ order to effectively control and eradicate this
1428
+
1429
+
1430
+
1431
+
1432
+
1433
+ proliferating and booming devastating
1434
+ menace, causing deleterious effects and a
1435
+ deadly impact on society as a whole,
1436
+
1437
+
1438
+
1439
+
1440
+ of
1441
+ Parliament, in its wisdom, has made effective
1442
+ provisions by introducing Act 81 of 1985
1443
+ specifying mandatory minimum
1444
+ rt imprisonment and fine.
1445
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_25"> 8. To check the menace of dangerous drugs flooding
1446
+ the market, Parliament has provided that the person
1447
+
1448
+ accused of offences under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_61">NDPS Act</a> should not
1449
+ be released on bail during trial unless the
1450
+ mandatory conditions provided in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_62">Section 37</a>,
1451
+ namely,
1452
+
1453
+
1454
+
1455
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_26"> (i) there are reasonable grounds for believing
1456
+ that the accused is not guilty of such offence;
1457
+ </blockquote>
1458
+
1459
+
1460
+
1461
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_27"> and
1462
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_28"> (ii) that he is not likely to commit any offence
1463
+
1464
+
1465
+
1466
+
1467
+
1468
+ while on bail are satisfied. The High Court has
1469
+ not given any justifiable reason for not abiding
1470
+ by the aforesaid mandate while ordering the
1471
+
1472
+
1473
+
1474
+
1475
+
1476
+ release of the respondent accused on bail.
1477
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_69"> Instead of attempting to take a holistic view of
1478
+ the harmful socio-economic consequences
1479
+ and health hazards which would accompany
1480
+ trafficking illegally in dangerous drugs, the
1481
+ court should implement the law in the spirit
1482
+ with which Parliament, after due deliberation,
1483
+ has amended.&quot;
1484
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_70"> 20. The scheme of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_63">Section 37</a> reveals that the exercise of
1485
+ power to grant bail is not only subject to the limitations
1486
+
1487
+
1488
+
1489
+
1490
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_50"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1491
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_51"> 17</span>
1492
+
1493
+ 2026:HHC:2995
1494
+
1495
+ contained under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_64">Section 439</a> of the CrPC but is also subject
1496
+ to the limitation placed by <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_65">Section 37</a>, which commences
1497
+ with the non-obstante clause. The operative part of the
1498
+
1499
+
1500
+
1501
+
1502
+ .
1503
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_71"> said section is in the negative form prescribing the
1504
+
1505
+
1506
+
1507
+
1508
+
1509
+ enlargement of bail to any person accused of the
1510
+ commission of an offence under the Act unless the two
1511
+ conditions are satisfied. The first condition is that the
1512
+
1513
+
1514
+
1515
+
1516
+
1517
+ prosecution must be given an opportunity to oppose the
1518
+ application, and the second is that the Court must be
1519
+ satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing
1520
+
1521
+
1522
+
1523
+
1524
+ of
1525
+ that he is not guilty of such an offence. If either of these
1526
+ two conditions is not satisfied, the ban on granting bail
1527
+ operates.
1528
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_72"> 21. The expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; means something
1529
+ rt
1530
+ more than prima facie grounds. It contemplates substantial
1531
+ probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty
1532
+
1533
+ of the alleged offence. The reasonable belief contemplated
1534
+ in the provision requires the existence of such facts and
1535
+ circumstances as are sufficient in themselves to justify
1536
+ satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the alleged
1537
+
1538
+
1539
+
1540
+ offence. In the case at hand, the High Court seems to have
1541
+ completely overlooked the underlying object of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_66">Section 37</a>
1542
+ that, in addition to the limitations provided under the
1543
+
1544
+
1545
+
1546
+
1547
+ <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_67">CrPC</a>, or any other law for the time being in force,
1548
+ regulating the grant of bail, its liberal approach in the
1549
+
1550
+
1551
+
1552
+
1553
+
1554
+ matter of bail under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_68">NDPS Act</a> is indeed uncalled for.&quot;
1555
+ </p>
1556
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_73"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1598973" id="span_52">18. A similar view was taken in <a href="/doc/1598973/" id="a_69">Union of India v. Mohd</a>.</span>
1557
+ </p>
1558
+
1559
+
1560
+
1561
+
1562
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_74"> Nawaz Khan, (2021) 10 SCC 100: (2021) 3 SCC (Cri) 721: 2021 SCC
1563
+
1564
+ OnLine SC 1237, wherein it was observed at page 110:
1565
+ </p>
1566
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_29"> &quot;21. Under <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_70">Section 37(1)(b)(ii)</a>, the limitations on the
1567
+ grant of bail for offences punishable under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_71">Sections
1568
+ 19</a>, <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_72">24</a> or 27-A and also for offences involving a
1569
+ commercial quantity are:
1570
+ </blockquote>
1571
+
1572
+
1573
+
1574
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_53"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1575
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_54"> 18</span>
1576
+
1577
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_30"> 2026:HHC:2995
1578
+
1579
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_31"> (i) The Prosecutor must be given an opportunity
1580
+ to oppose the application for bail; and
1581
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_32"> (ii) There must exist &quot;reasonable grounds to
1582
+
1583
+
1584
+
1585
+
1586
+ .
1587
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_75"> believe&quot; that (a) the person is not guilty of such
1588
+
1589
+
1590
+
1591
+
1592
+
1593
+ an offence, and (b) he is not likely to commit any
1594
+ offence while on bail.
1595
+ </p>
1596
+
1597
+
1598
+
1599
+
1600
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_76"> 22. The standard prescribed for the grant of bail is
1601
+ &quot;reasonable ground to believe&quot; that the person is not
1602
+ guilty of the offence. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1648816" id="span_55">Interpreting the standard of
1603
+
1604
+
1605
+
1606
+
1607
+ of
1608
+ &quot;reasonable grounds to believe&quot;, a two-judge Bench
1609
+ of this Court in <a href="/doc/1648816/" id="a_73">Shiv Shanker Kesari [Union of India v.
1610
+ Shiv Shanker Kesari</a>, (2007) 7 SCC 798: (2007) 3 SCC (Cri)
1611
+ rt
1612
+ 505], held that: (SCC pp. 801-02, paras 7-8 &amp; 10-11)
1613
+ &quot;7. The expression used in <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_74">Section 37(1)(b)(ii)</a> is
1614
+
1615
+ &quot;reasonable grounds&quot;. The expression means
1616
+ something more than prima facie grounds. It
1617
+ connotes substantial probable causes for believing
1618
+
1619
+
1620
+ that the accused is not guilty of the offence charged,
1621
+ and this reasonable belief contemplated, in turn,
1622
+ points to the existence of such facts and
1623
+
1624
+
1625
+
1626
+
1627
+ circumstances as are sufficient in themselves to
1628
+ justify the recording of satisfaction that the accused
1629
+
1630
+
1631
+
1632
+
1633
+
1634
+ is not guilty of the offence charged.</span>
1635
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_77"> 8. The word &quot;reasonable&quot; has in law the prima
1636
+
1637
+
1638
+
1639
+
1640
+
1641
+ facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those
1642
+ circumstances of which the actor, called on to act
1643
+ reasonably, knows or ought to know. It is
1644
+ difficult to give an exact definition of the word
1645
+ &quot;reasonable&quot;.
1646
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_78"> &#x27;7. ... Stroud&#x27;s Judicial Dictionary, 4th Edn., p. 2258
1647
+ states that it would be unreasonable to expect an
1648
+ exact definition of the word &quot;reasonable&quot;.
1649
+ Reason varies in its conclusions according to the
1650
+ idiosyncrasies of the individual and the times
1651
+
1652
+
1653
+
1654
+
1655
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_56"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1656
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_57"> 19</span>
1657
+
1658
+ 2026:HHC:2995
1659
+
1660
+ and circumstances in which he thinks. The
1661
+ reasoning which built up the old scholastic logic
1662
+ sounds now like the jingling of a child&#x27;s toy.&#x27;
1663
+
1664
+
1665
+
1666
+
1667
+ .
1668
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_79"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="799168" id="span_58">[See <a href="/doc/799168/" id="a_75">MCD v. Jagan Nath Ashok Kumar [MCD</a> v.</span>
1669
+ </p>
1670
+
1671
+
1672
+
1673
+
1674
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_80"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1069282" id="span_59">Jagan Nath Ashok Kumar, (1987) 4 SCC 497], SCC p.
1675
+ 504, para 7 and <a href="/doc/1069282/" id="a_76">Gujarat Water Supply &amp; Sewerage
1676
+
1677
+
1678
+
1679
+
1680
+
1681
+ Board v. Unique Erectors (Gujarat) (P) Ltd. [Gujarat
1682
+ Water Supply &amp; Sewerage Board</a> v. Unique Erectors
1683
+ (Gujarat) (P) Ltd., (1989) 1 SCC 532] ]
1684
+
1685
+
1686
+
1687
+
1688
+ of
1689
+ ***</span>
1690
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_81"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="136345" id="span_60">10. The word &quot;reasonable&quot; signifies &quot;in
1691
+ accordance with reason&quot;. In the ultimate
1692
+ rt
1693
+ analysis, it is a question of fact whether a
1694
+ particular act is reasonable or not, which
1695
+
1696
+ depends on the circumstances in a given
1697
+ situation. (See <a href="/doc/136345/" id="a_77">Municipal Corpn. of Greater
1698
+ Mumbai v. Kamla Mills Ltd. [Municipal Corpn. of
1699
+
1700
+
1701
+ Greater Mumbai</a> v. Kamla Mills Ltd. (2003) 6 SCC
1702
+ 315]</span>
1703
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_82"> 11. The court, while considering the application
1704
+
1705
+
1706
+
1707
+
1708
+ for bail with reference to <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_78">Section 37</a> of the Act, is
1709
+ not called upon to record a finding of not guilty.
1710
+ </p>
1711
+
1712
+
1713
+
1714
+
1715
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_83"> It is for the limited purpose essentially confined
1716
+ to the question of releasing the accused on bail
1717
+
1718
+
1719
+
1720
+
1721
+
1722
+ that the court is called upon to see if there are
1723
+ reasonable grounds for believing that the
1724
+ accused is not guilty and records its satisfaction
1725
+ about the existence of such grounds. But the
1726
+ court has not to consider the matter as if it is
1727
+ pronouncing a judgment of acquittal and
1728
+ recording a finding of not guilty.&quot; (emphasis
1729
+ supplied)
1730
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_84"> 23. Based on the above precedent, the test which the
1731
+ High Court and this Court are required to apply while
1732
+
1733
+
1734
+
1735
+
1736
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_61"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1737
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_62"> 20</span>
1738
+
1739
+ 2026:HHC:2995
1740
+
1741
+ granting bail is whether there are reasonable grounds
1742
+ to believe that the accused has not committed an
1743
+ offence and whether he is likely to commit any offence
1744
+
1745
+
1746
+
1747
+
1748
+ .
1749
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_85"> while on bail. Given the seriousness of offences
1750
+
1751
+
1752
+
1753
+
1754
+
1755
+ punishable under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_79">NDPS Act</a> and in order to curb
1756
+ the menace of drug trafficking in the country,
1757
+ stringent parameters for the grant of bail under the
1758
+
1759
+
1760
+
1761
+
1762
+
1763
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_80">NDPS Act</a> have been prescribed.&quot;
1764
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_86"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="193050765" id="span_63">19. It was held in <a href="/doc/193050765/" id="a_81">Union of India v. Ajay Kumar Singh</a>, 2023
1765
+
1766
+
1767
+
1768
+
1769
+ of
1770
+ SCC OnLine SC 346, that bail cannot be granted without complying
1771
+
1772
+ with the requirement of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_82">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act. It was
1773
+ rt
1774
+ observed:</span>
1775
+ </p>
1776
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_33"> 4. This apart, it is noticed that the High Court, in
1777
+ passing the impugned order of bail, had lost sight of
1778
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_83">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, which, inter alia, provides
1779
+
1780
+
1781
+
1782
+ that no person accused of an offence involving
1783
+ commercial quantity shall be released on bail unless
1784
+ the twin conditions laid down therein are satisfied,
1785
+
1786
+
1787
+
1788
+
1789
+ namely, (i) the public prosecutor has been given an
1790
+
1791
+
1792
+
1793
+
1794
+
1795
+ opportunity to oppose the bail application; and (ii) the
1796
+ court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for
1797
+ believing that he is not guilty of such an offence and
1798
+
1799
+
1800
+
1801
+
1802
+
1803
+ that he is not likely to commit any such offence while
1804
+ on bail.
1805
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_34"> 15. For the sake of convenience <a href="/doc/192465/" id="a_84">Section 37(1)</a> is
1806
+ reproduced hereinbelow:--
1807
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_35"> &quot;37. Offences to be cognisable and non-bailable.-
1808
+ (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the
1809
+ <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_85">Criminal Procedure Code</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974)-
1810
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_36"> (a) every offence punishable under this Act
1811
+ shall be cognisable.
1812
+ </blockquote>
1813
+
1814
+
1815
+
1816
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_64"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1817
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_65"> 21</span>
1818
+
1819
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_87"> 2026:HHC:2995
1820
+
1821
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_88"> (b) no person accused of an offence
1822
+ punishable for offences under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_86">section 19</a> or
1823
+ <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_87">section 24</a> or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_88">section 27A</a>, and also for
1824
+
1825
+
1826
+
1827
+
1828
+ .
1829
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_89"> offences involving commercial quantity, shall
1830
+
1831
+
1832
+
1833
+
1834
+
1835
+ be released on bail or on his own bond unless-
1836
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_90"> (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an
1837
+
1838
+
1839
+
1840
+
1841
+
1842
+ opportunity to oppose the application for
1843
+ such release, and
1844
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_91"> (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes
1845
+
1846
+
1847
+
1848
+
1849
+ of
1850
+ the application, the court is satisfied that
1851
+ there are reasonable grounds for believing
1852
+ rt that he is not guilty of such offence and
1853
+ that he is not likely to commit any offence
1854
+ while on bail.&quot;
1855
+ </p>
1856
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_92"> 16. In view of the above provisions, it is implicit that
1857
+ no person accused of an offence involving trade in a
1858
+ commercial quantity of narcotics is liable to be
1859
+
1860
+
1861
+ released on bail unless the court is satisfied that there
1862
+ are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not
1863
+ guilty of such an offence and that he is not likely to
1864
+
1865
+
1866
+
1867
+
1868
+ commit any offence while on bail.
1869
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_93"> 20. It was held in State of Meghalaya v. Lalrintluanga Sailo,
1870
+
1871
+
1872
+
1873
+
1874
+
1875
+ 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1751, that the grant of bail without
1876
+
1877
+
1878
+
1879
+
1880
+
1881
+ considering <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_89">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act is impermissible. It was
1882
+
1883
+ observed:
1884
+ </p>
1885
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_37"> &quot;5. There cannot be any doubt with respect to the position
1886
+ that, in cases involving the commercial quantity of
1887
+ narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, while
1888
+ considering the application of bail, the Court is bound to
1889
+ ensure the satisfaction of conditions under <a href="/doc/1241164/" id="a_90">Section 37(1)(b)</a>
1890
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_38"> (ii) of the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_91">NDPS Act</a>. The said provision reads thus:--
1891
+ </blockquote>
1892
+
1893
+
1894
+
1895
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_66"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1896
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_67"> 22</span>
1897
+
1898
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_39"> 2026:HHC:2995
1899
+
1900
+ &quot;37(1)(b)(ii)- where the Public Prosecutor opposes the
1901
+ application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable
1902
+ grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence
1903
+
1904
+
1905
+
1906
+
1907
+ .
1908
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_40"> and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on
1909
+
1910
+
1911
+
1912
+
1913
+
1914
+ bail.&quot;
1915
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_94"> 6. While considering the cases under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_92">NDPS Act</a>, one
1916
+ cannot be oblivious of the objects and reasons for bringing
1917
+
1918
+
1919
+
1920
+
1921
+
1922
+ the said enactment after repealing the then-existing laws
1923
+ relating to Narcotic drugs. The object and reasons given in
1924
+ the acts themselves read thus:--
1925
+ </p>
1926
+
1927
+
1928
+
1929
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_41"> of
1930
+ &quot;An act to consolidate and amend the law relating to
1931
+ narcotic drugs, to make stringent provisions for the control
1932
+ and regulation of operations relating to narcotic drugs and
1933
+ rt
1934
+ psychotropic substances, to provide for the forfeiture of
1935
+ property derived from, or used in, illicit traffic in narcotic
1936
+ drugs and psychotropic substances, to implement the
1937
+
1938
+ provisions of the International Convention on Narcotic
1939
+ Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and for matters
1940
+ connected therewith.&quot;
1941
+ </blockquote>
1942
+
1943
+
1944
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_42"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1026836" id="span_68">In the decision in <a href="/doc/1026836/" id="a_93">Collector of Customs, New Delhi v.
1945
+ Ahmadalieva Nodira</a> (2004) 3 SCC 549, the three-judge
1946
+ bench of this Court considered the provisions under
1947
+
1948
+
1949
+
1950
+
1951
+ <a href="/doc/1241164/" id="a_94">Section 37(1)(b)</a> as also 37(1)(b)(ii) of the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_95">NDPS Act</a>, with
1952
+ regard to the expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; used
1953
+
1954
+
1955
+
1956
+
1957
+
1958
+ therein. This Court held that it means something more
1959
+ than the prima facie grounds and that it contemplates
1960
+ substantial and probable causes for believing that the
1961
+
1962
+
1963
+
1964
+
1965
+
1966
+ accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. Furthermore, it
1967
+ was held that the reasonable belief contemplated in the
1968
+ provision would require the existence of such facts and
1969
+ circumstances as are sufficient in themselves to justify
1970
+ satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the alleged
1971
+ offence.</span>
1972
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_43"> As relates to the twin conditions under <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_96">Section 37(1)(b)(ii)</a>
1973
+ of the NDPS Act, viz., that, firstly, there are reasonable
1974
+ grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of such
1975
+ offence and, secondly, he is not likely to commit any
1976
+
1977
+
1978
+
1979
+
1980
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_69"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
1981
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_70"> 23</span>
1982
+
1983
+ 2026:HHC:2995
1984
+
1985
+ offence while on bail it was held therein that they are
1986
+ cumulative and not alternative. Satisfaction of the
1987
+ existence of those twin conditions had to be based on the
1988
+
1989
+
1990
+
1991
+
1992
+ .
1993
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_44"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1026836" id="span_71">&#x27;reasonable grounds&#x27;, as <a href="/doc/1026836/" id="a_97">referred to above</a>.</span>
1994
+ </blockquote>
1995
+
1996
+
1997
+
1998
+
1999
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_95"> 7. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="35047711" id="span_72">In the decision in <a href="/doc/35047711/" id="a_98">State of Kerala v. Rajesh</a> (2020) 12 SCC
2000
+ 122, after reiterating the broad parameters <a href="/doc/35047711/" id="a_99">laid down by</a>
2001
+ this Court to be followed while considering an application
2002
+
2003
+
2004
+
2005
+
2006
+
2007
+ for bail moved by an accused involved in offences under the
2008
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_100">NDPS Act</a>, in paragraph 18 thereof this Court held that the
2009
+ scheme of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_101">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act would reveal that the
2010
+
2011
+
2012
+
2013
+
2014
+ of
2015
+ exercise of power to grant bail in such cases is not only
2016
+ subject to the limitations contained under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_102">Section 439</a> of
2017
+ the Code of Criminal Procedure, but also subject to the
2018
+ limitation placed by <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_103">Section 37(1)(b)(ii)</a>, NDPS Act. Further,
2019
+ rt
2020
+ it was held that in case one of the two conditions
2021
+ thereunder is not satisfied, the ban on granting bail would
2022
+
2023
+ operate.</span>
2024
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_96"> 8. Thus, the provisions under <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_104">Section 37(1)(b)(ii)</a> of the
2025
+ NDPS Act and the decisions referred supra reveal the
2026
+
2027
+
2028
+ consistent view of this Court that while considering the
2029
+ application for bail made by an accused involved in an
2030
+ offence under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_105">NDPS Act</a>, a liberal approach ignoring the
2031
+
2032
+
2033
+
2034
+
2035
+ mandate under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_106">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act is impermissible.
2036
+ Recording a finding mandated under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_107">Section 37</a> of the NDPS
2037
+
2038
+
2039
+
2040
+
2041
+
2042
+ Act, which is a sine qua non for granting bail to an accused
2043
+ under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_108">NDPS Act</a>, cannot be avoided while passing
2044
+ orders on such applications.&quot;
2045
+ </p>
2046
+
2047
+
2048
+
2049
+
2050
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_97"> 21. In the present case, the prosecution has collected
2051
+
2052
+ sufficient material to prima facie connect the petitioners with the
2053
+
2054
+ commission of the crime. There is nothing on record to show that
2055
+
2056
+ the petitioners would not indulge in the commission of an offence
2057
+
2058
+ if released on bail. Hence, they have not satisfied the twin
2059
+
2060
+ conditions <a href="/doc/35047711/" id="a_109">laid down in</a> <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_110">Section 37</a> of the ND&amp;<a href="/doc/198083419/" id="a_111">PS Act</a>.
2061
+ </p>
2062
+
2063
+
2064
+
2065
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_73"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
2066
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_74"> 24</span>
2067
+
2068
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_98"> 2026:HHC:2995
2069
+
2070
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_99"> 22. It was submitted that the grounds of arrest were not
2071
+
2072
+ communicated to the petitioner, and his arrest is illegal. This
2073
+
2074
+
2075
+
2076
+
2077
+ .
2078
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_100"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="47595581" id="span_75">submission is not acceptable. Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court held in
2079
+
2080
+
2081
+
2082
+
2083
+
2084
+ <a href="/doc/47595581/" id="a_112">Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra</a>, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2356
2085
+
2086
+
2087
+
2088
+
2089
+
2090
+ that the communication of the grounds of the arrests in all the
2091
+
2092
+ offences would apply prospectively from the date of the
2093
+
2094
+
2095
+
2096
+
2097
+ of
2098
+ pronouncement of the judgment. It was observed:</span>
2099
+ </p>
2100
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_45"> rt
2101
+ &quot;58. We are cognizant that there existed no consistent or
2102
+ binding requirement mandating the written
2103
+ communication of the grounds of arrest for all the
2104
+
2105
+ offences. Holding as above, in our view, would ensure
2106
+ implementation of the constitutional rights provided to an
2107
+ arrestee as engrafted under Article22of theConstitution of
2108
+
2109
+
2110
+ India in an effective manner. Such clarity on obligation
2111
+ would avoid uncertainty in the administration of criminal
2112
+ justice. The ends of fairness and legal discipline, therefore,
2113
+
2114
+
2115
+
2116
+
2117
+ demand that this procedure, as affirmed above, shall govern
2118
+ arrests henceforth.&quot; (Emphasis supplied)
2119
+
2120
+
2121
+
2122
+
2123
+
2124
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_101"> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="137270560" id="span_76">23. This judgment was followed by a co-ordinate bench of
2125
+
2126
+ this Court in <a href="/doc/137270560/" id="a_113">Kabir Khan vs State</a> 2025:HHC:39246, wherein it was
2127
+
2128
+
2129
+
2130
+
2131
+
2132
+ observed:</span>
2133
+ </p>
2134
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_46"> &quot;7. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="137270560" id="span_77">In light of the fact that in <a href="/doc/137270560/" id="a_114">the said judgment</a>, Hon&#x27;ble
2135
+ Supreme Court has been pleased to clearly hold that as
2136
+ previously there existed no consistent or binding
2137
+ requirements mandating written communication of the
2138
+ grounds of arrest for all the offences, the ends of fairness
2139
+ and legal discipline, therefore, demand that this procedure
2140
+ as affirmed shall govern arrests henceforth, this means
2141
+
2142
+
2143
+
2144
+
2145
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_78"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
2146
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_79"> 25</span>
2147
+
2148
+ 2026:HHC:2995
2149
+
2150
+ that the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court has been pleased to make
2151
+ directions issued therein prospective.&quot;</span>
2152
+ </blockquote>
2153
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_102"> 24. It was submitted that the bail is a Rule and Jail is an
2154
+
2155
+
2156
+
2157
+
2158
+ .
2159
+ </p>
2160
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_103"> exception, and the petitioners are entitled to bail on this
2161
+
2162
+ consideration. This submission will not help the petitioners, as
2163
+
2164
+
2165
+
2166
+
2167
+
2168
+ they are prima facie involved in the commission of an offence
2169
+
2170
+
2171
+
2172
+
2173
+ of
2174
+ punishable under <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_115">Section 20</a> of the NDPS Act involving the
2175
+
2176
+ commercial quantity. It was <a href="/doc/137270560/" id="a_116">laid down by</a> the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme
2177
+ rt
2178
+ Court in Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kashif, (2024) 11 SCC 372: 2024
2179
+
2180
+ SCC OnLine SC 3848 that in cases under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_117">NDPS Act</a> involving
2181
+
2182
+ the commercial quantity, the negation of bail is the rule and its
2183
+
2184
+ grant an exception. It was observed at page 381:
2185
+ </p>
2186
+
2187
+
2188
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_47"> &quot;Compliance with the mandate under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_118">Section 37</a>
2189
+
2190
+
2191
+
2192
+
2193
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_48"> 9. There has been a consistent and persistent view of
2194
+ this Court that in the NDPS cases, where the offence is
2195
+
2196
+
2197
+
2198
+
2199
+
2200
+ punishable with a minimum sentence of ten years, the ac-
2201
+ cused shall generally not be released on bail. Negation of
2202
+ bail is the rule, and its grant is an exception. While consider-
2203
+ </blockquote>
2204
+
2205
+
2206
+
2207
+
2208
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_49"> ing the application for bail, the court has to bear in mind
2209
+ the provisions of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_119">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, which are
2210
+ mandatory in nature. The recording of findings as man-
2211
+ dated in <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_120">Section 37</a> is a sine qua non for granting bail to the
2212
+ accused involved in the offences under the said Act.&quot;
2213
+ </blockquote>
2214
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_104"> 25. It was submitted that the learned Magistrate had
2215
+
2216
+ opened the parcel without breaking the seals, which shows that
2217
+
2218
+ the parcel can be tampered with. This submission is not
2219
+
2220
+
2221
+
2222
+
2223
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_80"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
2224
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_81"> 26</span>
2225
+
2226
+ 2026:HHC:2995
2227
+
2228
+ acceptable. Usually, the parcel is cut to remove its contents to
2229
+
2230
+ keep the original seals intact, and nothing can be made out from
2231
+
2232
+
2233
+
2234
+
2235
+ .
2236
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_105"> the order of the learned Magistrate at this stage. Further, a
2237
+
2238
+
2239
+
2240
+
2241
+
2242
+ presumption regarding the regularity of the official act exists in
2243
+
2244
+
2245
+
2246
+
2247
+
2248
+ Section 119 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, which will apply
2249
+
2250
+ to the present case as well, and it cannot be said at this stage that
2251
+
2252
+
2253
+
2254
+
2255
+ of
2256
+ there was any tampering with the case property.
2257
+ </p>
2258
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_106"> 26.
2259
+ rt
2260
+ No other point was urged.
2261
+ </p>
2262
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_107"> 27. In view of the above, the present petitions fail, and the
2263
+
2264
+ same are dismissed.
2265
+ </p>
2266
+
2267
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_108"> 28. The observation made herein before shall remain
2268
+
2269
+ confined to the disposal of the instant petitions and will have no
2270
+
2271
+
2272
+
2273
+
2274
+ bearing whatsoever on the merits of the case.
2275
+ </p>
2276
+
2277
+
2278
+
2279
+
2280
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_109"> (Rakesh Kainthla)
2281
+ Judge
2282
+
2283
+
2284
+
2285
+
2286
+
2287
+ 9th January, 2026.
2288
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_110"> (Nikita)
2289
+
2290
+
2291
+
2292
+
2293
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_82"> ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2026 20:35:36 :::CIS</span>
2294
+ </p>
2295
+ </div>
2296
+ </article>
2297
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
2298
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
2299
+ <div class="translate_container">
2300
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
2301
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
2302
+ <button id="translatewarn"
2303
+ type="button"
2304
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
2305
+ </div>
2306
+
2307
+
2308
+
2309
+
2310
+
2311
+ </aside>
2312
+ </div>
2313
+
2314
+ </main>
2315
+
2316
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
2317
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
2318
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
2319
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
2320
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
2321
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
2322
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
2323
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
2324
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
2325
+
2326
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/126547378/" class="device-toggle">
2327
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="JJB1erBgRsMe3U57IcakJBmxSwTPoTz44Cc5RpYj7aigSZcxKQNu5ura96dQr9T8">
2328
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
2329
+ </form>
2330
+ </div>
2331
+ </footer>
2332
+
2333
+ <script>
2334
+ (function() {
2335
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
2336
+
2337
+ if (navigator.share) {
2338
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
2339
+
2340
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
2341
+ try {
2342
+ await navigator.share({
2343
+ title: document.title,
2344
+ url: window.location.href
2345
+ });
2346
+ } catch (err) {
2347
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
2348
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
2349
+ }
2350
+ }
2351
+ });
2352
+ }
2353
+ })();
2354
+ </script>
2355
+
2356
+
2357
+
2358
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
2359
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
2360
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
2361
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
2362
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
2363
+
2364
+
2365
+ <script type="text/javascript">
2366
+ (function($) {
2367
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
2368
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
2369
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
2370
+ }
2371
+ }
2372
+
2373
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
2374
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
2375
+ return $("<li></li>")
2376
+ .append(
2377
+ $("<div></div>")
2378
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
2379
+ .html(item.label)
2380
+ )
2381
+ .appendTo(ul);
2382
+ };
2383
+ }
2384
+
2385
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
2386
+ if (!$input.length) {
2387
+ return;
2388
+ }
2389
+
2390
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
2391
+
2392
+ $input.autocomplete({
2393
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
2394
+ delay: 180,
2395
+ minLength: 2,
2396
+ appendTo: 'body',
2397
+ position: {
2398
+ my: "left top",
2399
+ at: "left bottom+6",
2400
+ collision: "flipfit"
2401
+ },
2402
+ classes: {
2403
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
2404
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
2405
+ },
2406
+ open: function() {
2407
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
2408
+ var offset = $input.offset();
2409
+ $menu
2410
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
2411
+ .css({
2412
+ left: offset.left,
2413
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
2414
+ });
2415
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
2416
+ },
2417
+ close: function() {
2418
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
2419
+ },
2420
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
2421
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
2422
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
2423
+ event.preventDefault();
2424
+ }
2425
+ },
2426
+ select: function(event, ui) {
2427
+ event.preventDefault();
2428
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
2429
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
2430
+ }
2431
+
2432
+ if ($form.length) {
2433
+ $form.trigger('submit');
2434
+ } else {
2435
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
2436
+ }
2437
+ }
2438
+ });
2439
+
2440
+ }
2441
+
2442
+ $(document).ready(function() {
2443
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
2444
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
2445
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
2446
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
2447
+ });
2448
+ })(jQuery);
2449
+ </script>
2450
+
2451
+
2452
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
2453
+ <script type="text/javascript">
2454
+ $(document).ready(function() {
2455
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
2456
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
2457
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
2458
+
2459
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
2460
+ signupForDownload();
2461
+ e.preventDefault();
2462
+ return false;
2463
+ });
2464
+
2465
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
2466
+ e.preventDefault();
2467
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
2468
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
2469
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
2470
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
2471
+ });
2472
+ });
2473
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
2474
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
2475
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
2476
+ if (!translateContainer) {
2477
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
2478
+ return;
2479
+ }
2480
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
2481
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
2482
+ return;
2483
+ }
2484
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
2485
+
2486
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
2487
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
2488
+ if (!translateEl) {
2489
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
2490
+ return;
2491
+ }
2492
+
2493
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
2494
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
2495
+
2496
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
2497
+ var node;
2498
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
2499
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
2500
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
2501
+ }
2502
+ }
2503
+
2504
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
2505
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
2506
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
2507
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
2508
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
2509
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
2510
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
2511
+ }
2512
+ }
2513
+ });
2514
+ }
2515
+
2516
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
2517
+ }
2518
+ </script>
2519
+
2520
+
2521
+
2522
+
2523
+
2524
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
2525
+ <script type="text/javascript">
2526
+ $(document).ready(function () {
2527
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
2528
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
2529
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
2530
+ valid_ag: '',
2531
+ is_valid: '',
2532
+ is_auth: 'False',
2533
+ is_agreement: '',
2534
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
2535
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
2536
+ });
2537
+ </script>
2538
+
2539
+
2540
+
2541
+
2542
+
2543
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
2544
+ <script type="text/javascript">
2545
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
2546
+ window.is_auth = false;
2547
+
2548
+ // Document context for chatbot
2549
+ window.documentContext = {
2550
+ tid: 126547378,
2551
+ title: "Sanjay Kumar @ Chapan vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 9 January, 2026",
2552
+ url: window.location.href,
2553
+ isFragment: false
2554
+ };
2555
+
2556
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
2557
+ </script>
2558
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
2559
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
2560
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
2561
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
2562
+
2563
+
2564
+
2565
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c5703aada7fd97b',t:'MTc2OTY3MTcyMg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
2566
+
2567
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_129144287.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1477 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Sujith Kumar Das vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 3 September, 2020</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/129144287/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="D2ElpkqkHPfv8OxySyekDXL6bEcZN7JwO3bYaLPaX4R6kE8IhVx3gNoM4jmHdmgC">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/129144287/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="D2ElpkqkHPfv8OxySyekDXL6bEcZN7JwO3bYaLPaX4R6kE8IhVx3gNoM4jmHdmgC">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/129144287/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="D2ElpkqkHPfv8OxySyekDXL6bEcZN7JwO3bYaLPaX4R6kE8IhVx3gNoM4jmHdmgC">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:129144287">49</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:129144287">0</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Sujith Kumar Das vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 3 September, 2020</h2>
187
+
188
+ <pre id="pre_1">IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
189
+
190
+ THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER fa SORES
191
+
192
+ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
193
+ :PRESENT:
194
+
195
+ THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
196
+
197
+
198
+
199
+ CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2873 OF 2020
200
+ Between:
201
+
202
+ Sujith Kumar Das, S/o Sri Krishna Chand Das, Age 29 year, Plot No 220/4,
203
+ Khandagiri Bari, Near Heaven Villa, Knandagiri, Bhubaneswar, Orissa 751003.
204
+
205
+ ...Petitioner/A-4
206
+ AND
207
+ The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate
208
+ of Revenue Intelligence, Visakhapatnam Rep. Through the Public Prosecutor,
209
+ State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
210
+
211
+ ...Respondent
212
+
213
+ Petition under <a href="/doc/848468/" id="a_1">Section 437</a> and <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_2">439</a> of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances
214
+ stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be
215
+ pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in F.NO.DRI/HZU/VRU/48/ENQ-01(INT-
216
+ 01/2020 dated 26.02.2020 registered/ lodged on the file of Directorate Of Revenue
217
+ Intelligence, Regional Unit, Visakhapatnam.
218
+
219
+ The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit
220
+ filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Ashwani Kumar
221
+ Advocate for the Petitioner, Special Public Prosecutor for the Respondent and the Court
222
+ made the following.
223
+
224
+ ORDER:</pre>
225
+
226
+
227
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1">THE HON&#x27;BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
228
+ CRIMINAL PETITION No.2873 of 2020
229
+ ORDER:
230
+ </p>
231
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1">The criminal petition is filed under <a href="/doc/848468/" id="a_3">Sections 437</a> &amp; <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_4">439</a> of
232
+ Cr.P.C seeking regular bail to the petitioner / A-4 in connection
233
+ with F.No.DRI/HZU/VRU/48/ENQ-O1(INT-01)/2020 dated
234
+ 26.02.2020 on the file of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence,
235
+ Regional Unit, Visakhapatnam for the offence punishable under
236
+ <a href="/doc/1330288/" id="a_5">Sections 8 (c)</a>, <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_6">20</a> and <a href="/doc/646188/" id="a_7">28</a> of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
237
+
238
+ Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity &quot;<a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_8">NDPS Act</a>&quot;).
239
+ </blockquote>
240
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_2">2. The case of the prosecution is that on 26.02.2020 basing on
241
+ a specific intelligence input that Ganja is being illicitly transported
242
+ in TATA goods carriage bearing No.OD O02 BD 4155 by the
243
+ petitioner and other persons, which is coming from Narsipatnam
244
+ sidé and going towards Orissa and some persons are also piloting
245
+ the said vehicle in TATA Indigo Car bearing No.OD 02 U 7123, the
246
+ officers of DRI mounted surveillance at NAD Junction, stopped the
247
+ Indigo Car and detained the inmates. They also stopped TATA
248
+ goods carriage bearing No.OD 02 BD 4155 and found the petitioner
249
+ and 2 others and on enquiry, they admitted that Ganja was loaded
250
+ in the said vehicle. On verification, they found total 1638.68 KGs
251
+
252
+ of Ganja.
253
+ </p>
254
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_3">3. Heafd Sri N.Ashwani Kumar, learned counsel for the
255
+
256
+ petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
257
+ </p>
258
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_4">4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
259
+ petitioner is the driver of Rata Indigo Car, which was owned by his
260
+
261
+ father and the petitioner has no knowledge about the illegal
262
+
263
+ een
264
+
265
+
266
+ activity committed by the accused. The petitioner does not belong
267
+ either to the area or the persons alleged offence and there is no
268
+ remote scope that the petitioner in any way interfere either with
269
+ the investigation or with the witnesses. He further submits that
270
+ the petitioner is in judicial custody from 27.02.2020 and more
271
+ than 150 days elapsed, as such he is entitled for default bail. In
272
+ this connection, he relied upon the order of this Court in
273
+ Crl.P.No.3124 of 2020 dated 20.06.2020. Learned counsel submits
274
+ that in. the said order this Court taking into consideration several
275
+ judgments of the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court held that if the charge sheet
276
+ is not filed within the period contemplated under <a href="/doc/1687975/" id="a_9">Section 167</a> of
277
+
278
+ Cr.P.C., the accused is entitled for default bail.
279
+ </p>
280
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_5"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="194334432" id="span_1">5. Learned counsel for petitioner relied on the judgment of the
281
+ Apex Court in <a href="/doc/194334432/" id="a_10">Rakesh Kumar Paul Vs. State of Assam</a>! held that
282
+ keeping the application for default bail pending for some time to
283
+ enable filing of charge sheet was strongly discouraged and no
284
+ subterfuge should be resorted to defeat the indefeasible right of the
285
+ accused.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="117859307" id="span_2">He also relied on the judgment of the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court
286
+ in <a href="/doc/117859307/" id="a_11">Nikesh Tarachand Shah Vs. Union of India and another</a>?, and
287
+ submitted that the provision of the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_12">NDPS Act</a> laying twin condition
288
+ is in para materia with the provisions of <a href="/doc/1697463/" id="a_13">Prevention of Money
289
+ Laundering Act, 2002</a> and the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court has held that
290
+
291
+ the twin conditions are unconstitutional.</span>
292
+ </p>
293
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_6"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="68944118" id="span_3">6. Learned counsel for petitioner also relied on the judgment of
294
+
295
+ Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court in <a href="/doc/68944118/" id="a_14">Sujit Tiwari Vs. State of Gujarat</a>?</span> and
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+ &#x27; (2017) 15 SCC 67 ~
300
+ 2 AIR 2017 SC 550
301
+ 42020 SCC OnLine SC 84
302
+
303
+
304
+ State of Kerala Vs. Rajesh (Criminal Appeal Nos.154-157 of 2020)
305
+ dated 24.01.2020). Learned counsel submits that there is no
306
+ strait-jacket formula that in each and every case if the contraband
307
+
308
+ seized is of commercial quantity, bail cannot be granted.
309
+ </p>
310
+ <p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_7">7. Learned counsel for petitioner mainly contends that even if
311
+ the contraband seized is of commercial quantity, still the bail
312
+ application has to be considered in the light of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_15">Section 37</a> of NDPS
313
+ Act, according to which, the burden lies on the Public Prosecutor
314
+ to place on record the material to show that the accused is a
315
+ habitual offender, if he is enlarged on bail, he is likely to commit
316
+ the offence and other reasonable evidence connected the accused
317
+ to the commission of the crime. Unless and until such material is
318
+ placed before the Court, the Public Prosecutor cannot oppose the
319
+ bail application on the sole ground that the contraband seized is of.
320
+ </p>
321
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_8">comimercial quantity.
322
+ </p>
323
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_9">8. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor would submit
324
+ that the petitioner earlier filed Cril.M.P.No.735 of 2020 on the file of
325
+ Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-I Additional District &amp; Sessions
326
+ Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial of offence under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_16">NDPS Act</a>,
327
+ Visakhapatnam, which was dismissed by order dated 20.06.2020
328
+ holding that the quantity of Ganja seized is commercial quantity
329
+
330
+ and the investigation is still in progress.
331
+ </p>
332
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_10">9. Before adverting to the various arguments advanced on
333
+ behalf of either parties. It is appropriate to have a look at the
334
+
335
+ objects of the Act.
336
+ </p>
337
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_11">Bearesscne®
338
+
339
+
340
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_12">10. The objects of the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_17">NDPS Act</a> are -
341
+ </p>
342
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_2">&quot;The statutory control over narcotic drugs is exercised in India
343
+ through a number of Central and State enactments. The Principal
344
+ Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, <a href="/doc/72261612/" id="a_18">The Opium Act, 1878</a>
345
+ and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago.
346
+ With the passage of time and the developments in the field of illicit
347
+ drug traffic and drug abuse at national and international level
348
+
349
+ many deficiencies in the existing laws have come to notice.&quot;
350
+ </blockquote>
351
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_3">&quot;<a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_19">An Act</a> to consolidate and amend the law relating to narcotic
352
+ drugs, to make stringent provisions for the control and regulation
353
+ of operations relating to narcotic drugs and_ psychotropic
354
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_4">-substances, to provide for the forfeiture of property derived from,
355
+ or used in, illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic
356
+ substances, to implement the provisions of the International
357
+ Conventions on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and
358
+
359
+ for matters connected therewith&quot;.
360
+ </blockquote>
361
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_13">11. <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_20">The NDPS Act</a> is amended to implement United Nations&#x27;
362
+ 1988 Covenant mandating its Member-Nations to recognize &quot;the
363
+ importance of strengthening and enhancing effective legal means
364
+ for international cooperation in criminal matters for suppressing
365
+ the international criminal activities of illicit traffic&quot; in narcotic
366
+ drugs. The Covenant&#x27;s Preamble expresses United Nations&#x27; serious
367
+ concern that &quot;children are used in many parts of the world as an
368
+ illicit drug consumers&#x27; market&quot; and that the traffic in drug &quot;pose a
369
+ serious threat to the health and welfare of human beings and
370
+ adversely affect the economic, cultural and political foundations of
371
+ the society&quot;. <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_21">The NDPS Act</a> being a purposive enactment to curb
372
+ the menace of narcotic and psychotropic substances, a special
373
+ provision is incorporated to deal with grant of bail. While dealing
374
+ with the bail petitions under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_22">NDPS Act</a>, the courts have to face
375
+
376
+ the task of balancing individual freedom with social interest.
377
+ </p>
378
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_14">~
379
+
380
+
381
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_15">12. Now, it is appropriate to look at the language employed in
382
+
383
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_23">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act, which reads thus:
384
+ </p>
385
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_5">37. Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable --.--
386
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_6">(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_24">Code of Criminal
387
+ Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974)
388
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_7">(a) every offence punishable under this Act shall be cognizable;
389
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_8">(b) no person accused of an offence punishable for 2[offences
390
+ under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_25">section 19</a> or <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_26">section 24</a> or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_27">section 27A</a> and also for offences
391
+ involving commercial quantity] shall be released on bail or on his own
392
+ bond unless -
393
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_9">(i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to
394
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_10">-oppose the application for such release, and
395
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_11">(ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the
396
+ court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for
397
+ believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is
398
+ not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
399
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_12">(2) The limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of
400
+ sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_28">Code of
401
+ Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being
402
+
403
+ in force, on granting of bail.
404
+ </blockquote>
405
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_16"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="117859307" id="span_4">13. The first and foremost contention of learned counsel for the
406
+ petitioners is that <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_29">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act is in pari materia with
407
+ <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_30">Section 45</a> of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for
408
+ brevity &quot;<a href="/doc/1697463/" id="a_31">PML Act</a>&quot;). <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_32">Section 45</a> of PML Act has been declared
409
+ unconstitutional by the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court and to buttress his
410
+ contention, he relied upon the judgment of Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court in
411
+ <a href="/doc/117859307/" id="a_33">Nikesh Tarachand Shah Vs. Union of India and another</a>&#x27;,
412
+ wherein the issue that fell for consideration before the Apex Court
413
+ is constitutionality of <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_34">Section 45</a> of PML Act. <a href="/doc/1001502/" id="a_35">Section 45 (1)</a> of PML
414
+ Act that imposes two conditions for grant of bail, where a person
415
+ accused of an offence punishable for a term of imprisonment of
416
+ more than three years under Part A of the Schedule shall be
417
+ released on bail and the conditions are that the Public Prosecutor
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+ &quot; AIR 2017 SC 550
422
+
423
+
424
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_5">6</span>
425
+
426
+ must be given an opportunity to oppose the application for release
427
+
428
+ on bail and the Court must be satisfied, where the Public
429
+
430
+ Prosecutor opposes the application, that there are reasonable
431
+
432
+ grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and he is
433
+
434
+ not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The Hon&#x27;ble Apex
435
+
436
+ Court taking into consideration various contentions advanced has
437
+
438
+ upheld <a href="/doc/1001502/" id="a_36">Section 45 (1)</a> of PML Act insofar as it imposes two further
439
+
440
+ conditions for release on bail were declared to be unconstitutional
441
+
442
+ as it violates <a href="/doc/367586/" id="a_37">Articles 14</a> and <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_38">21</a> of the Constitution of India.</span>
443
+ </p>
444
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_17">14.
445
+
446
+ The Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court observed that:
447
+ </p>
448
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_13">35. Another conundrum that arises is that, unlike the <a href="/doc/17848451/" id="a_39">Terrorist and
449
+ Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987</a>, there is no provision in the
450
+ 2002 Act which excludes grant of anticipatory bail. Anticipatory bail can
451
+ be granted in circumstances set out in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v.
452
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_18">State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 (See paragraphs 109, 112 and
453
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_19">117). Thus, anticipatory bail may be granted to a person who is
454
+ prosecuted for the offence of money laundering together with an offence
455
+ under Part A of the Schedule, which may last throughout the trial.
456
+ Obviously for grant of such bail, <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_40">Section 45</a> does not need to be satisfied,
457
+ as only a person arrested under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_41">Section 19</a> of the Act can only be
458
+ released on bail after satisfying the conditions of <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_42">Section 45</a>. But insofar
459
+ as pre-arrest bail is concerned, <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_43">Section 45</a> does not apply on its own
460
+ terms. This, again, would lead to an extremely anomalous situation. If
461
+ pre- arrest bail is granted to Mr. X, which ensures throughout the trial,
462
+ for an offence under Part A of the Schedule and <a href="/doc/1693109/" id="a_44">Section 4</a> of the 2002
463
+ Act, such person will be out on bail without his having satisfied the twin
464
+ conditions of <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_45">Section 45</a>. However, if in an identical situation, Mr. Y is
465
+ prosecuted for the same offences, but happens to be arrested, and then
466
+ applies for bail, the twin conditions of <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_46">Section 45</a> will have first to be
467
+ met. This again leads to an extremely anomalous situation showing
468
+ that <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_47">Section 45</a> leads to manifestly arbitrary and unjust results and
469
+
470
+ would, therefore, violate <a href="/doc/367586/" id="a_48">Articles 14</a> and <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_49">21</a> of the Constitution.
471
+ </p>
472
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_20">36. However, the learned Attorney General has argued before us that we
473
+ must uphold <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_50">Section 45</a> as it is part of a complete code under the 2002
474
+ Act. According to him, <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_51">Section 45</a>, when read with <a href="/doc/1840572/" id="a_52">Sections 3</a> and <a href="/doc/1693109/" id="a_53">4</a>,
475
+ would necessarily lead to the conclusion that the source of the proceeds
476
+
477
+ of crime, being the scheduled offence, and the money laundering offence,
478
+
479
+
480
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_21">15.
481
+
482
+ &#x27; would have to be tried together, and the nexus that is provided is
483
+
484
+ because the source of money laundering being as important as money
485
+ laundering itself, conditions under <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_54">Section 45</a> would have to be applied.
486
+ We are afraid that, for all the reasons given by us earlier in this
487
+ judgment, we are unable to agree. The learned Attorney General asked
488
+ us to read down <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_55">Section 45</a> in that when the Court is satisfied that there
489
+ are reasonable grounds for believing that a person is not guilty of an
490
+ offence, it only meant that the Court must prima facie come to such
491
+ aconclusion. Secondly, the fact that he is not likely to commit &quot;any
492
+ offence&quot; while on bail would only be restricted to any offence of a like
493
+ nature. Again, we are afraid that merely reading down the two conditions
494
+ would not get rid of the vice of manifest arbitrariness and discrimination,
495
+ as has been pointed out by us hereinabove. Also, we cannot agree with
496
+ the learned Attorney General that <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_56">Section 45</a> imposes two conditions
497
+ which are akin to conditions that are specified for grant of ordinary bail.
498
+ For this purpose, he referred us to Amarmani Tripathi (supra) at para 18,
499
+ in which it was stated that, for grant of bail, the Court has to see
500
+ whether there is prima facie or reasonable ground to believe that the
501
+ accused has committed the offence, and the likelihood of that offence
502
+ being repeated has also be seen. It is obvious that the twin conditions set
503
+ down in <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_57">Section 45</a> are a much higher threshold bar than any of the
504
+ conditions laid down in paragraph 18 of the aforesaid judgment. In fact,
505
+ the presumption of innocence, which is attached to any person being
506
+ prosecuted of an offence, is inverted by the conditions specified
507
+ in <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_58">Section 45</a>, whereas for grant of ordinary bail the presumption of
508
+ innocence attaches, after which the various factors set out in paragraph
509
+
510
+ 18 of the judgment are to be looked at. Under <a href="/doc/1821448/" id="a_59">Section 45</a>, the Court must
511
+
512
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_22">-be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person
513
+
514
+ is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any
515
+
516
+ offence while on bail.
517
+ </p>
518
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_23">As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the
519
+
520
+ petitioner, the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court while dealing with <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_60">Section 45</a> of
521
+
522
+ PML Act 2002 has not ruled in favour of the twin conditions laid
523
+
524
+ down in <a href="/doc/873452/" id="a_61">Section 45</a> of PML Act. No doubt, if <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_62">Section 37</a> of NDPS
525
+
526
+ Act is interpreted as per the language employed in the section, it
527
+
528
+ gives unfettered discretion to the Public Prosecutor and complying
529
+
530
+ of twin conditions certainly becomes impossible task.
531
+ </p>
532
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_24">es
533
+
534
+ Beene
535
+
536
+
537
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_25">16. In Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsingh Sharma Vs. State of
538
+ Maharastra&#x27;, the Apex Court while considering <a href="/doc/135076042/" id="a_63">Section 21</a> of
539
+ Maharastra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 where there are
540
+ twin conditions pari materia with <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_64">NDPS Act</a> for grant of bail has
541
+
542
+ held thus:
543
+ </p>
544
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_14">&quot;38. We are furthermore of the opinion that the restrictions on the
545
+ power of the Court to grant bail should not be pushed too far. If the
546
+ Court, having regard to the materials brought on record, is satisfied that
547
+ in all probability he may not be ultimately convicted, an order granting
548
+ bail may be passed. The satisfaction of the Court as regards his
549
+ likelihood of not committing an offence while on bail must be construed
550
+ to mean an offence under the Act and not any offence whatsoever be it a
551
+ minor or major offence. If such an expansive meaning is given, even
552
+ likelihood of commission of an offence under <a href="/doc/1270101/" id="a_65">Section 279</a> of the Indian
553
+
554
+ Penal Code may debar the Court from releasing the accused on bail.
555
+ </blockquote>
556
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_15">44. The wording of <a href="/doc/1566465/" id="a_66">Section 21(4)</a>, in our opinion, does not lead to the
557
+ conclusion that the Court must arrive at a positive finding that the
558
+ applicant for bail has not committed an offence under the Act. If such a
559
+ construction is placed, the court intending to grant bail must arrive at a
560
+ finding that the applicant has not committed such an offence. In such an
561
+ event, it will be impossible for the prosecution to obtain a judgment of
562
+ conviction of the applicant. Such cannot be the intention of the
563
+ Legislature. <a href="/doc/1566465/" id="a_67">Section 21(4)</a> of MCOCA, therefore, must be construed
564
+ reasonably. It must be so construed that the Court is able to maintain a
565
+ delicate balance between a judgment of acquittal and conviction and an
566
+ order granting bail much before commencement of trial. Similarly, the
567
+ Court will be required to record a finding as to the possibility of his
568
+ committing a crime after grant of bail. However, such an offence in
569
+ futuro must be an offence under the Act and not any other offence. Since
570
+ it is difficult to predict the future conduct of an accused, the court must
571
+ necessarily consider this aspect of the matter having regard to the
572
+ antecedents of the accused, his propensities and the nature and manner
573
+
574
+ in which he is alleged to have committed the offence.&quot;
575
+ </blockquote>
576
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_26">The Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court observed that while considering the
577
+ bail petition despite the language employed in the section, court
578
+ must develop a delicate balance between judgment of acquittal,
579
+
580
+ conviction and bail and the provision should be construed
581
+ f
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+ ° (2004) 5 SCC 294
586
+
587
+
588
+ reasonable. With regard to the second condition that the accused
589
+ is not likely to commit the offence in future, it was observed that
590
+ the court has to look into the antecedents of the accused as the
591
+
592
+ court cannot predict his future conduct.
593
+ </p>
594
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_27">17. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1813801" id="span_6">In <a href="/doc/1813801/" id="a_68">Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab®</a>, the Hon&#x27;ble Apex
595
+ Court has upheld <a href="/doc/138932506/" id="a_69">Section 20 (8)</a> of TADA Act, 1987 which has the
596
+ same twin: conditions to be applied to offences under <a href="/doc/17848451/" id="a_70">TADA Act</a>.</span>
597
+ </p>
598
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_28">The Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court observed thus:
599
+ </p>
600
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_16">&quot;349. The conditions imposed under <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_71">Section 20(8)(b)</a>, as rightly pointed
601
+ out by the Additional Solicitor General, are in consonance with the
602
+ conditions prescribed under clauses (i) and (ii) of sub-section (1) of
603
+ Section 437 and clause (b) of sub-section (3) of that section. Similar to
604
+ the conditions in clause. (b) of sub-section (8), there are provisions in
605
+ various other enactments such as <a href="/doc/1109803/" id="a_72">Section 35(1)</a> of Foreign Exchange
606
+ Regulation Act and <a href="/doc/276692/" id="a_73">Section 104(1)</a> of the Customs Act to the effect that
607
+ any authorized or empowered officer under the respective Acts, if, has got
608
+ reason to believe that any person in India or within the Indian customs
609
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_17">- waters has been guilty of an offence punishable under the respective
610
+ Acts, may arrest such person. Therefore, the condition that &quot;there are
611
+ grounds for believing that he is not guilty of an offence&quot;, which condition
612
+ in different form is incorporated in other Acts such as clause (i) of
613
+ Section 437(1) of the Code and <a href="/doc/852142/" id="a_74">Section 35</a>{1) of FERA and 104(1) of the
614
+ <a href="/doc/1059693/" id="a_75">Customs Act</a>, cannot be said to be an unreasonable condition infringing
615
+
616
+ the principle of <a href="/doc/1199182/" id="a_76">Article 21</a> of the Constitution.
617
+ </blockquote>
618
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_18">It_ was upheld on the ground that offences under TADA are
619
+ most heinous and there is a compelling state interest in tackling
620
+ such crimes, by way of which the vice of terrorism is sought to be
621
+
622
+ tackled.
623
+ </blockquote>
624
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_29">18. Coming back to the case on hand, <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_77">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act
625
+ mandates that the Court while granting bail has to be satisfied
626
+ that there are reasonable grounds &quot;for believing that the person
627
+
628
+ seeking bail is not guilty of such offence and application of
629
+
630
+
631
+
632
+ ° (1994) 3 SCC 569
633
+
634
+
635
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_7">10</span>
636
+
637
+ conditions mentioned in <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_78">Section 37 (1)(b)(ii)</a> be applicable only if
638
+ the Public Prosecutor opposes the application. As per the language
639
+ employed in the section, if the Public Prosecutor does not oppose
640
+ the application, the Court need not apply its mind for arriving at
641
+ conclusion despite the fact that the quantity is a commercial
642
+ quantity. Secondly the provision gives unlimited discretion to the
643
+ Public Prosecutor besides restricting the power of the Court to
644
+ freely decide the question of bail to the accused. The Court is
645
+ expected to be prima facie satisfied that the accused is not guilty of
646
+ the offence, which is not possible to determine by the Court at the
647
+ stage of bail and any observation of such kind poses a threat of
648
+ prejudicing the case of accused before the trial Court. Further, as
649
+ per the plain reading of the language employed in the section, the
650
+ Court should be satisfied that there is no likelihood of accused
651
+ committing any offence while on bail. Satisfying this condition or
652
+ recording - this condition appears to be impossible and
653
+ impracticable as committing of an offence depends upon the
654
+ mindset of the accused, mensrea and the Court at the stage of bail
655
+ cannot assess and decide whether the accused is going to commit
656
+ any offence or not in future. It is highly impossible for the Court to
657
+ arrive at any of the conclusions that are supposed to be recorded
658
+ at the time of granting bail by virtue of the conditions laid down
659
+
660
+ under <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_79">Section 37 (1) (b) (ii)</a> of the NDPS Act.
661
+ </p>
662
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_30">19. The Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court in several cases has laid down the
663
+ parameters how bails under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_80">NDPS Act</a> has to be dealt with and
664
+
665
+ further interpreted the language employed in the provision.
666
+ </p>
667
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_31">nn
668
+
669
+
670
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_8">11</span>
671
+
672
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_32">20. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="26003907" id="span_9">In <a href="/doc/26003907/" id="a_81">Satpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab</a>&#x27; the Apex Court has
673
+ clearly observed that liberal approach in matters of bail under
674
+
675
+ <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_82">NDPS Act</a> is uncalled for and held thus:</span>
676
+ </p>
677
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_19">&quot;4, Under <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_83">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, when a person is accused of
678
+ an offence punishable under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_84">Section 19</a> or 24 or 27A and also for
679
+ offences involving commercial quantity, he shall not be released on bail
680
+ unless the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose
681
+ the application for such release, and in case a Public Prosecutor opposes
682
+ the application, the court must be satisfied that there are reasonable
683
+ grounds for believing that the person is not guilty of the alleged offence
684
+ and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. Materials on
685
+ record are to be seen and the antecedents of the accused is to be
686
+ examined to enter such a satisfaction. These limitations are in addition
687
+ to those prescribed under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_85">Cr.P.C</a> or any other law in force on the
688
+ grant of bail. In view of the seriousness of the offence, the law makers
689
+ have consciously put such stringent restrictions on the discretion
690
+ available to the court while considering application for release of a
691
+
692
+ person on bail.
693
+ </blockquote>
694
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_33"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1378939" id="span_10">21. Further in <a href="/doc/1378939/" id="a_86">Union of India Vs. Ram Samujh and Ors.®</a> the
695
+
696
+ Apex Court held thus:</span>
697
+ </p>
698
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_20"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1054146" id="span_11">&quot;7, It is to be borne in mind that the aforesaid legislative mandate is
699
+ required to be adhered and followed. It should be borne in mind that in
700
+ murder case, accused commits murder of one or two persons, while
701
+ those persons who are dealing in narcotic drugs are instruments in
702
+ causing death or in inflicting death blow to number of innocent young
703
+ victims, who are vulnerable: it causes deleterious effects and deadly
704
+ impact on the society; they are a hazard to the society; even if they are
705
+ released temporarily, in all probability, they would continue their
706
+ nefarious activities of trafficking and/or dealing in intoxicants
707
+ clandestinely. Reason may be large stake and illegal profit involved. This
708
+ Court, dealing with the contention with regard to punishment
709
+ under <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_87">NDPS Act</a>, has succinctly observed about the adverse effect of
710
+ such activities in <a href="/doc/1054146/" id="a_88">Durand Didien v. Chief Secretary</a>. Union Territory of Goa
711
+ [1990] 1 SCC 95 as under: :</span>
712
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_21">&quot;With deep concern, we may point out that the organised
713
+ activities of the underworld and the clandestine smuggling of
714
+ narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances into this country and
715
+ illegal trafficking in such drugs and substances have led to drug
716
+
717
+ addiction among &#x27;@ sizeable section of the public, particularly the
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+ 72018 (13) SCC 813 -
722
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_22">§ 1999 (9) SCC 429 .
723
+ </blockquote>
724
+
725
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_34">22.
726
+
727
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_12">12</span>
728
+
729
+ adolescents and students of both sexes and the menace has
730
+ assumed serious and alarming proportion in the recent years.
731
+ Therefore, in order to effectively control and eradicate this
732
+ proliferating and booming devastating menace, causing
733
+ deleterious effects and deadly impact on the society as a whole,
734
+ the Parliament in the wisdom has made effective provisions by
735
+ introducing this Act 81 of 1985 specifying mandatory minimum
736
+
737
+ imprisonment and fine,&quot;
738
+ </p>
739
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_23">8. To check the menace of dangerous drugs flooding the market, the
740
+
741
+ Parliament has provided that the person accused of offences under
742
+
743
+ the NDPS Act should not be released on bail during trial unless
744
+
745
+ mandatory conditions provided in Section 37, namely,
746
+
747
+ (i} there are reasonable grounds for believing that accused is not
748
+ guilty of such offence; and
749
+
750
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_24">(ii) that he is not likely to commit while on are satisfied. The High
751
+ Court has not given any justifiable reason for not abiding by the
752
+ aforesaid mandate while ordering the release of the respondent
753
+ accused on bail. Instead of attempting to take a holistic view of
754
+ the harmful socio-economic consequences and health hazards
755
+ which would accompany trafficking illegally in the dangerous
756
+ drugs, the Court should implement the law in the spirit with
757
+
758
+ which the Parliament, after due deliberation, has amended.
759
+ </blockquote>
760
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_35"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1648816" id="span_13">In another case in <a href="/doc/1648816/" id="a_89">Union of India Vs. Shiv Shanker Kesari</a>?®
761
+
762
+ the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court has interpreted the word reasonable
763
+
764
+ grounds as follows:</span>
765
+ </p>
766
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_36">23.
767
+
768
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_25">&quot;The expression used in <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_90">Section 37 (1)(b) (ii)</a> is &quot;reasonable grounds&quot;. The
769
+ expression means something more than prima facie grounds. It connotes
770
+ substantial probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of
771
+ the offence charged and this reasonable belief contemplated in turn
772
+
773
+ points to existence of such facts and circumstances as are sufficient in
774
+
775
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_26">- themselves to justify recording of satisfaction that the accused is not
776
+
777
+ guilty of the offence charged. The word &quot;reasonable&quot; has in law the prima
778
+ facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those circumstances of which
779
+ the actor, called on to act reasonably, knows or ought to know. It is
780
+
781
+ toe
782
+
783
+ difficult to give an exact definition of the word &#x27;reasonable&#x27;.
784
+ </blockquote>
785
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_27"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="35047711" id="span_14">In the latest judgment of <a href="/doc/35047711/" id="a_91">State of Kerala Vs. Rajesh</a> in
786
+
787
+ Criminal Appeal Nos.154-157 of 2020 dated 24.01.2020, the Apex
788
+
789
+ Court considered the application moved by the State of Kerala
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_15">9</span>
794
+ (2007) 7 SCC 798 ,
795
+ al
796
+
797
+ Pome
798
+
799
+
800
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_16">13</span>
801
+
802
+ against grant of regular bail to the accused without noticing the
803
+
804
+ mandate of <a href="/doc/1199025/" id="a_92">Section 37 (1)(b)(ii)</a> of NDPS Act. The Apex Court held
805
+
806
+ thus:</span>
807
+ </blockquote>
808
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_28">18. The jurisdiction of the Court to grant bail is circumscribed by the
809
+ provisions of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_93">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act. It can be granted in case there
810
+ are reasonable grounds for believing that accused is not guilty of such
811
+ offence, and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. It is
812
+
813
+ the mandate of the legislature which is required to be followed.
814
+ </blockquote>
815
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_29">20. ., The scheme of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_94">Section 37</a> reveals that the exercise of power to
816
+ grant bail is not only subject to the limitations contained under <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_95">Section
817
+ 439</a> of the CrPC, but is also subject to the limitation placed by <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_96">Section 37</a>
818
+ which commences with non-obstante clause. The operative part of the
819
+ said section is in the negative form prescribing the enlargement of bail to
820
+ any person accused of commission of an offence under the Act, unless
821
+ twin conditions are satisfied. The first condition is that the prosecution
822
+ must be given an opportunity to oppose the application; and the second,
823
+ is that the Court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for
824
+ believing that he is not guilty of such offence. If either of these two
825
+
826
+ conditions is not satisfied, the ban for granting bail operates.
827
+ </blockquote>
828
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_30">21. The expression &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; means something more
829
+
830
+ © than prima facie grounds. It contemplates substantial probable causes
831
+
832
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_37">24.
833
+
834
+ for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. The
835
+ reasonable belief contemplated in the provision requires existence of
836
+ such facts and circumstances as are sufficient in themselves to justify
837
+ satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence.&quot;
838
+ Accordingly, the Apex Court set aside the order passed by the
839
+
840
+ High Court releasing the accused on bail.
841
+ </p>
842
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_38">In light of the law <a href="/doc/35047711/" id="a_97">laid down by</a> the apex court in the above
843
+
844
+ judgments, the Court while considering the application for bail
845
+
846
+ with reference to <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_98">Section 37</a> of NDPS Act is not called upon to
847
+
848
+ record a finding of &#x27;not guilty&#x27;. It is for the limited purpose and is
849
+
850
+ confined to the question of releasing the accused on bail and the
851
+
852
+ Court is called upon to see if there are reasonable grounds for
853
+
854
+ believing that the accused is guilty and record its satisfaction
855
+
856
+ about existence of such ground. But the Court shall not consider
857
+
858
+ the matter as if it is prorteurcing the judgment of acquittal and
859
+
860
+ pees?
861
+ </p>
862
+
863
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_17">14</span>
864
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_39">recording finding of &#x27;not guilty&#x27;. Additionally, the Court has to
865
+ record a finding that while on bail the accused is not likely to
866
+ commit any offence basing on the antecedents of the accused.
867
+ Accordingly, the first and foremost contention of the petitioner is
868
+
869
+ answered.
870
+ </p>
871
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_40">25. The next contention of learned counsel for petitioners is the
872
+ prosecution failed to file the charge sheet within 180 days and they
873
+ are entitled for default bail. Before dealing with this it is
874
+ appropriate to look at <a href="/doc/839149/" id="a_99">Section 167 (2)</a> of Cr.P.C., and Sectin 36-<a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_100">A of
875
+
876
+ the NDPS Act</a>.
877
+ </p>
878
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_41">26. <a href="/doc/839149/" id="a_101">Section 167 (2)</a> Cr.P.C reads thus:
879
+ </p>
880
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_31">167. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty
881
+ four hours.
882
+ </blockquote>
883
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_42">(2) The Magistrate to whom an accused person is forwarded under
884
+ this section may, whether he has or has not jurisdiction to try the case,
885
+ from time to time, authorise the detention of the accused in such custody
886
+ as such Magistrate thinks fit, for a term not exceeding fifteen days in the
887
+ whole; and if he has no jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial,
888
+ and considers further detention unnecessary, he may order the accused
889
+
890
+ to be forwarded to a Magistrate having such jurisdiction: Provided that-
891
+ </p>
892
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_43">(a) the Magistrate may authorise the detention of the accused
893
+ person, otherwise than in the custody of the police, beyond the period of
894
+ fifteen days; if he is satisfied that adequate grounds exist for doing so,
895
+ but_no Magistrate shall authorise the detention of the accused person in
896
+ custody under this paragraph for a total period exceeding,-
897
+ </p>
898
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_44">(i) ninety days, where the investigation relates to an offence
899
+
900
+ punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for
901
+
902
+ a term of not less than ten years;
903
+ </p>
904
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_45">(iii) sixty days, where the investigation relates to any other
905
+ offence, and, on the expiry of the said period of ninety
906
+ days, or sixty days, as the case may be, the accused
907
+ person shall be released on bail if he is prepared to and
908
+ does furnish bail, and every person released on bail
909
+ under this sub- section shall be deemed to be so
910
+ released under the provisions of Chapter XXXII for the
911
+ purposes of that Chapter:]
912
+
913
+ Psa
914
+
915
+
916
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_18">15</span>
917
+
918
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_46">27. <a href="/doc/1182815/" id="a_102">Section 36 (A)(4)</a> of the NDPS Act reads thus:
919
+ </p>
920
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_32">360A. Offences triable by Special Courts.
921
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_33">(4) In respect of persons accused of an offence punishable under
922
+ <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_103">section 19</a> or <a href="/doc/1373137/" id="a_104">section 24</a> or <a href="/doc/935721/" id="a_105">section 27A</a> or for offences involving
923
+ commercial quantity the references in sub-section (2) of <a href="/doc/1687975/" id="a_106">section
924
+ 167</a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), thereof
925
+ to &quot;ninety days&quot;, where they occur, shall be construed as
926
+ reference to &quot;one hundred and eighty days&quot;: Provided that, if it is
927
+ not possible to complete the investigation within the said period
928
+ of one hundred and eighty days, the Special Court may extend
929
+ , the said period up to one year on the report of the Public
930
+ Prosecutor indicating the progress of the investigation and the
931
+ specific reasons for the detention of the accused beyond the said
932
+
933
+ period of one hundred and eighty days.
934
+ </blockquote>
935
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_47">28. <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_107">Under NDPS Act</a>, there is a special provision as per <a href="/doc/181936441/" id="a_108">Section
936
+ 36A (4)</a> in respect of persons accused of an offence punishable
937
+ under <a href="/doc/128102/" id="a_109">Section 19</a> or 24 or 27-A or for the offences invoking
938
+ commercial quantity, the reference in sub section (2) of <a href="/doc/1687975/" id="a_110">Section
939
+ 167</a> of Cr.P.C., thereof to &quot;ninety days&quot; where they occur shall be
940
+ construed as reference to one hundred and eighty days. If the
941
+ investigation is not completed within 180 days, the Special Court
942
+ may extend the said period up to one year on the report of the
943
+
944
+ Public Prosecutor.
945
+ </p>
946
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_48">29. The Hon&#x27;ble apex court has dealt with Section 167(2) vis-a-
947
+ vis <a href="/doc/181936441/" id="a_111">Section 36A (4)</a> of the NDPS Act. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="685208" id="span_19">In <a href="/doc/685208/" id="a_112">Rajnikant Jivanlal Vs.
948
+ Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau</a>!°, the Hon&#x27;ble
949
+ Apex Court held that an order for release on bail under proviso (a)
950
+ to Section 167 (2) may appropriately be termed as an order-on-
951
+ default. The right to bail under Section 167 (2) proviso (a) thereto
952
+ is absolute. It is a legislative..command and Court&#x27;s discretion
953
+ cannot supersede.</span>
954
+ </p>
955
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_49">tt
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+ 0 AIR 1979 SC 1377
960
+
961
+
962
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_20">16</span>
963
+
964
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_50">30. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="372318" id="span_21">In <a href="/doc/372318/" id="a_113">Bipin Shantilal Panchal (Dr) Vs. State of Gujarat</a>!!, it
965
+ was clarified by the Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court that although a default in
966
+ filing the charge sheet would confer an indefeasible right of the
967
+ accused to be admitted to bail. However, if the accused failed to
968
+ exercise his right to be released on bail for the failure of the
969
+ prosecution to file the charge sheet within the maximum time
970
+ allowed by law, he cannot contend that he had an indefeasible
971
+ right to exercise it at any time notwithstanding the fact that in the
972
+ meantime the charge sheet has been filed. On the other hand, if he
973
+ exercises the right within the time allowed by law and is released
974
+ on bail under such circumstances, he cannot be re-arrested on the
975
+
976
+ mere filing of the charge sheet.</span>
977
+ </p>
978
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_51">31. In Hitendra Vishnu Thakur Vs. State of Maharastra!?,
979
+ while dealing with a case under <a href="/doc/16437130/" id="a_114">Section 20</a> of the TADA Act, the
980
+ Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court held that when a report is submitted by the
981
+ public prosecutor to the Designated Court for grant of extension
982
+ under clause (bb), its notice should be issued to the accused before
983
+ granting such an extension so that an accused may have an
984
+ opportunity to oppose the extension on all legitimate and legal
985
+ grounds available to him. It is true that neither clause (b) nor
986
+ clause (bb) of sub-section (4) of <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_115">Section 20</a> TADA specifically
987
+ provide for the issuance of such a notice but in our opinion the
988
+ issuance of such a notice must be read into these provisions both
989
+ in the interest of the accused and the prosecution as well as for
990
+ doing complete justice between the parties. This is a requirement
991
+
992
+ of the principles of natural justice and the issuance of notice to the
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ &#x27;! (1996) 1 SCC 718 --
997
+ </p>
998
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_52">&#x27;2 (1994) 4 SCC 602
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_22">17</span>
1002
+
1003
+ accused or the public prosecutor, as the case may be, would
1004
+ accord with fair play in action, which the courts have always
1005
+ encouraged and even insisted upon. It would also strike a just
1006
+ balance between the interest of the liberty of an accused on the
1007
+ one hand and the society at large through the prosecuting agency
1008
+ on the other hand. There is no prohibition for issuance of such a
1009
+ notice to the accused or the public prosecutor in the scheme of the
1010
+ Act and no prejudice whatsoever can be caused by the issuance of
1011
+
1012
+ such a notice to any party.
1013
+ </p>
1014
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_53">32. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="51738625" id="span_23">In <a href="/doc/51738625/" id="a_116">Sanjay Dutt Vs. State</a> through CBI, Bombay (II)!3, the
1015
+ Hon&#x27;ble Apex Court held that the requirement of such notice to the
1016
+ accused before granting the extension of time for completing the
1017
+ investigation is not merely a written notice to the accused, rather
1018
+ production of the accused at the relevant time in the court
1019
+ informing him that the question of extension of the period for
1020
+
1021
+ completing the investigation is alone sufficient for the purpose.</span>
1022
+ </p>
1023
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_54">33. <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="650706" id="span_24">In <a href="/doc/650706/" id="a_117">Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotic Control Bureau</a>!</span>&#x27;, the
1024
+ jurisprudence on the subject further evolved when the Hon&#x27;ble
1025
+ Apex Court relied upon the law laid in the case of Hitendra Vishnu
1026
+ case (supra) while holding that the proviso inserted as clause (bb)
1027
+ in sub-section (4) of <a href="/doc/919170/" id="a_118">Section 20</a> of TADA, was pari materia with the
1028
+
1029
+ proviso to sub-section (4) of <a href="/doc/1712009/" id="a_119">Section 36-A</a> of NDPS Act.
1030
+ </p>
1031
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_55">34. In view of the specific provision under the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_120">NDPS Act</a>, the
1032
+ judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for petitioner passed
1033
+
1034
+ in Crl.P.No.3124 of 2019 is not applicable to the present case for
1035
+
1036
+
1037
+
1038
+ (1994) 5 SCC 410 ie wens
1039
+ &#x27;* (2009) 17 SCC 631
1040
+
1041
+
1042
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_25">18</span>
1043
+
1044
+ the reason that <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_121">NDPS Act</a> being a special enactment, is governed
1045
+ by <a href="/doc/1712009/" id="a_122">Section 36-A</a> along with the provisions of <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_123">Cr.P.C</a> and as per the
1046
+ same the time for filing charge sheet can be extended upto one
1047
+ year subject to the procedure contemplated under the provision. If
1048
+ the petitioner is aggrieved with non-compliance of <a href="/doc/1182815/" id="a_124">Section 36</a> of
1049
+ NDPS Act, he can approach the trial Court and file an appropriate
1050
+ application. Further, nothing is placed before this Court whether
1051
+ the prosecution has filed any application seeking extension of time.
1052
+ Even according to the petitioner himself, only 150 days are elapsed
1053
+ and still 30 days time is there for the prosecution to file the charge
1054
+ sheet and can also seek further extension of 180 days. On the
1055
+ facts of it, this Court is of the view that petitioner is not entitled for
1056
+
1057
+ default bail.
1058
+ </p>
1059
+ <p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_56">35. Having discussed the provisions of <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_125">NDPS Act</a>, ultimately the
1060
+ judicial effort is to give effect and uphold the language of <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_126">Section
1061
+ 37</a> of NDPS Act, as larger interest of society has to be taken into
1062
+ consideration. There is reasonable material on record by way of
1063
+ mediator-nama, remand report to connect the accused to the
1064
+ crime. The contraband that is seized is the huge quantity of
1065
+ 1638.680 kgs and the accused A4/ Driver is also aware of the
1066
+ contraband that is carried in the car. This Court is prima facie
1067
+ satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to connect the accused
1068
+ to the crime. Hence this Court is not recording any finding on the
1069
+ second limb of the section with regard to antecedents of the
1070
+ accused. In any view of the matter this Court feels that this is not
1071
+ a fit case for grant of bail. However, this Court emphasizes that in
1072
+ the NDPS cases the prosecution shall file the relevant material
1073
+
1074
+ before the Court with regard to the antecedents of the accused and
1075
+
1076
+ 5 gain
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ To,
1080
+
1081
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_26">19</span>
1082
+
1083
+ the material connecting the accused with the crime instead of
1084
+ merely saying that the contraband seized is of commercial
1085
+ quantity. It is settled law that in spite of the fact that the
1086
+
1087
+ contraband seized is of commercial quantity the accused is entitled
1088
+
1089
+ for bail, if the twin conditions are satisfied.
1090
+ </p>
1091
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_57">36. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed. If the
1092
+ petitioner is aggrieved about non-compliance of <a href="/doc/1712009/" id="a_127">Section 36-A</a> of
1093
+ NDPS Act and entitled for default bail, he is at liberty to approach
1094
+ the trial Court by filing appropriate application.
1095
+ </p>
1096
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_58">As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are
1097
+
1098
+ closed.
1099
+ </p>
1100
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_59">Sd/- K. TATA RAO
1101
+ ASSISTANT RE STRAR
1102
+ IITRUE COPYI// Pap
1103
+ For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1104
+
1105
+ Fair copy to Hon&#x27;ble Smt. Justice Lalitha Kanneganti. ( for her Lordships kind
1106
+
1107
+ perusal).
1108
+ </p>
1109
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_60">4. The VII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
1110
+ </p>
1111
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_61">2. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge-Cum-| Additional district &amp; Sessions Judge-
1112
+ Special Judge for Trail of Offenences Under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam.
1113
+ </p>
1114
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_62">3. The Superintendent, Visakhapatnam Central Jail, Visakhapatnam District.
1115
+ </p>
1116
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_63">4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate
1117
+ of Revenue Intelligence, Visakhapatnam Rep. Through the Public Prosecutor,
1118
+ State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.(oy RPAD)
1119
+
1120
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_64">5. The Secretary, Law &amp; Justice, New Delhi.
1121
+ </p>
1122
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_65">6. The Secretary, Advocate Bar Counsel, High Court, at Library, AP.
1123
+ </p>
1124
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_66">7. 11.L.R. capies.
1125
+ </p>
1126
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_67">8. One CC to Sri. N Ashwani Kumar Advocate [OPUC]
1127
+
1128
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_68">9. Two CCs to Special Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
1129
+
1130
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_69">10.One spare copy. &quot; &quot;
1131
+ </p>
1132
+
1133
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_34">HIGH COURT
1134
+
1135
+ LK,J
1136
+
1137
+ DATED:03/09/2020
1138
+
1139
+ ORDER
1140
+
1141
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_27">CRLP.No.2873 of 2020</span>
1142
+
1143
+ DIRECTION
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+ </blockquote>
1147
+ </div>
1148
+ </article>
1149
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
1150
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
1151
+ <div class="translate_container">
1152
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
1153
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
1154
+ <button id="translatewarn"
1155
+ type="button"
1156
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
1157
+ </div>
1158
+
1159
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
1160
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
1161
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
1162
+
1163
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:law-governing-narcotics">law-governing-narcotics</a></div></li>
1164
+
1165
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:non-bailable-offences">non-bailable-offences</a></div></li>
1166
+
1167
+ </ul>
1168
+ </nav>
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
1173
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
1174
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
1175
+
1176
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20ndps%20act">bail ndps act</a></div></li>
1177
+
1178
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20under%20ndps">bail under ndps</a></div></li>
1179
+
1180
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=anticipatory%20bail">anticipatory bail</a></div></li>
1181
+
1182
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=default%20bail">default bail</a></div></li>
1183
+
1184
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=grant%20of%20bail">grant of bail</a></div></li>
1185
+
1186
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%2037%20ndps%20act">section 37 ndps act</a></div></li>
1187
+
1188
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20bail">ndps bail</a></div></li>
1189
+
1190
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
1191
+
1192
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
1193
+
1194
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=167%282%29%20%20%20%20%20filter%3A%20%20%20%20%20section%2029%20of%20ndps%20act">167(2) filter: section 29 of ndps act</a></div></li>
1195
+
1196
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=bail%20application">bail application</a></div></li>
1197
+
1198
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=167%282%29%20cr.p.c%20">167(2) cr.p.c </a></div></li>
1199
+
1200
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=167%282%29">167(2)</a></div></li>
1201
+
1202
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=conditions%20of%20bail">conditions of bail</a></div></li>
1203
+
1204
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%22%20anticipatory%20bail%22">" anticipatory bail"</a></div></li>
1205
+
1206
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ganja">ganja</a></div></li>
1207
+
1208
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=in%20pari%20materia">in pari materia</a></div></li>
1209
+
1210
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20all%20section%20of%20ndps%20act"> all section of ndps act</a></div></li>
1211
+
1212
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=money%20laundering">money laundering</a></div></li>
1213
+
1214
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tada%20sortby%3A%20suresh%20patel">tada sortby: suresh patel</a></div></li>
1215
+
1216
+ </ul>
1217
+ </nav>
1218
+
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+ </aside>
1222
+ </div>
1223
+
1224
+ </main>
1225
+
1226
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
1227
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
1228
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
1229
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
1230
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
1231
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
1232
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
1233
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
1234
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
1235
+
1236
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/129144287/" class="device-toggle">
1237
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="D2ElpkqkHPfv8OxySyekDXL6bEcZN7JwO3bYaLPaX4R6kE8IhVx3gNoM4jmHdmgC">
1238
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
1239
+ </form>
1240
+ </div>
1241
+ </footer>
1242
+
1243
+ <script>
1244
+ (function() {
1245
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
1246
+
1247
+ if (navigator.share) {
1248
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
1249
+
1250
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
1251
+ try {
1252
+ await navigator.share({
1253
+ title: document.title,
1254
+ url: window.location.href
1255
+ });
1256
+ } catch (err) {
1257
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
1258
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
1259
+ }
1260
+ }
1261
+ });
1262
+ }
1263
+ })();
1264
+ </script>
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1269
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1270
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
1271
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
1272
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1276
+ (function($) {
1277
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
1278
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
1279
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
1280
+ }
1281
+ }
1282
+
1283
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
1284
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
1285
+ return $("<li></li>")
1286
+ .append(
1287
+ $("<div></div>")
1288
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
1289
+ .html(item.label)
1290
+ )
1291
+ .appendTo(ul);
1292
+ };
1293
+ }
1294
+
1295
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
1296
+ if (!$input.length) {
1297
+ return;
1298
+ }
1299
+
1300
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
1301
+
1302
+ $input.autocomplete({
1303
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
1304
+ delay: 180,
1305
+ minLength: 2,
1306
+ appendTo: 'body',
1307
+ position: {
1308
+ my: "left top",
1309
+ at: "left bottom+6",
1310
+ collision: "flipfit"
1311
+ },
1312
+ classes: {
1313
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
1314
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
1315
+ },
1316
+ open: function() {
1317
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
1318
+ var offset = $input.offset();
1319
+ $menu
1320
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
1321
+ .css({
1322
+ left: offset.left,
1323
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
1324
+ });
1325
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
1326
+ },
1327
+ close: function() {
1328
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
1329
+ },
1330
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
1331
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
1332
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1333
+ event.preventDefault();
1334
+ }
1335
+ },
1336
+ select: function(event, ui) {
1337
+ event.preventDefault();
1338
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1339
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
1340
+ }
1341
+
1342
+ if ($form.length) {
1343
+ $form.trigger('submit');
1344
+ } else {
1345
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
1346
+ }
1347
+ }
1348
+ });
1349
+
1350
+ }
1351
+
1352
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1353
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
1354
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
1355
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
1356
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
1357
+ });
1358
+ })(jQuery);
1359
+ </script>
1360
+
1361
+
1362
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
1363
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1364
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1365
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
1366
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
1367
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
1368
+
1369
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
1370
+ signupForDownload();
1371
+ e.preventDefault();
1372
+ return false;
1373
+ });
1374
+
1375
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
1376
+ e.preventDefault();
1377
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
1378
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
1379
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
1380
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
1381
+ });
1382
+ });
1383
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
1384
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
1385
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1386
+ if (!translateContainer) {
1387
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
1388
+ return;
1389
+ }
1390
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
1391
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
1392
+ return;
1393
+ }
1394
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
1395
+
1396
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
1397
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1398
+ if (!translateEl) {
1399
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
1400
+ return;
1401
+ }
1402
+
1403
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
1404
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
1405
+
1406
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
1407
+ var node;
1408
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
1409
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
1410
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
1411
+ }
1412
+ }
1413
+
1414
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
1415
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
1416
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
1417
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
1418
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
1419
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
1420
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
1421
+ }
1422
+ }
1423
+ });
1424
+ }
1425
+
1426
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
1427
+ }
1428
+ </script>
1429
+
1430
+
1431
+
1432
+
1433
+
1434
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
1435
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1436
+ $(document).ready(function () {
1437
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
1438
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
1439
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
1440
+ valid_ag: '',
1441
+ is_valid: '',
1442
+ is_auth: 'False',
1443
+ is_agreement: '',
1444
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
1445
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
1446
+ });
1447
+ </script>
1448
+
1449
+
1450
+
1451
+
1452
+
1453
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
1454
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1455
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
1456
+ window.is_auth = false;
1457
+
1458
+ // Document context for chatbot
1459
+ window.documentContext = {
1460
+ tid: 129144287,
1461
+ title: "Sujith Kumar Das vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 3 September, 2020",
1462
+ url: window.location.href,
1463
+ isFragment: false
1464
+ };
1465
+
1466
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
1467
+ </script>
1468
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
1469
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
1470
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
1471
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
1472
+
1473
+
1474
+
1475
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c570486291bf465',t:'MTc2OTY3MTc1Nw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
1476
+
1477
+ </html>
hc_bulk//NDPS_133641213.html ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1364 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3
+ <html lang="en">
4
+
5
+ <head>
6
+ <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
7
+
8
+
9
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
10
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
11
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
12
+ <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
13
+
14
+ <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
15
+
16
+
17
+ <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
18
+ <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
19
+ <script>
20
+ window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
21
+ function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
22
+ gtag('js', new Date());
23
+ gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
24
+ </script>
25
+
26
+ <TITLE>Sachin Jain vs Serious Fraud Investigation Officer on 20 December, 2019</TITLE>
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ </head>
31
+ <body class="docpage">
32
+ <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
33
+ <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
34
+
35
+ <header class="main-header" role="banner">
36
+ <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
37
+ <div class="header-container">
38
+ <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
39
+
40
+ <div class="header-logo">
41
+ <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
42
+
43
+
44
+ <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+ </a>
49
+ </div>
50
+
51
+
52
+ <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
53
+
54
+
55
+ <div class="header-search" role="search">
56
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
57
+ <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
58
+ <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
59
+ <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
60
+ placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
61
+ value="" autocomplete="off">
62
+ <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
63
+ </form>
64
+ </div>
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+ <!-- Right: Navigation -->
69
+ <div class="header-nav">
70
+ <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
71
+ <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
72
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
73
+
74
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
75
+ <div class="premium-dropdown">
76
+ <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
77
+ Premium
78
+ <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
79
+ <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
80
+ </svg>
81
+ </button>
82
+ <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
83
+ <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
84
+
85
+ </div>
86
+ </div>
87
+ <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
88
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
89
+
90
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
91
+
92
+
93
+ </nav>
94
+
95
+ <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
96
+ <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
97
+ <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
98
+ <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
99
+ <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
100
+ <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
101
+ </svg>
102
+ </button>
103
+ </div>
104
+ </div>
105
+
106
+ <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
107
+ <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
108
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
109
+ <div class="mobile-menu-content">
110
+
111
+ <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
112
+ <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
113
+ <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
114
+ <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
115
+
116
+ </div>
117
+ <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
118
+ <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
119
+
120
+ <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
121
+
122
+
123
+ </div>
124
+ </nav>
125
+ </header>
126
+
127
+ <main id="main-content" role="main">
128
+
129
+
130
+ <h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+ <div class="maindoc">
135
+ <aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
136
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
137
+ <div id="structuralanal"></div>
138
+ <div id="citetextdash"></div>
139
+ </aside>
140
+ <article class="middle_column" role="article">
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ <div class="ad_doc">
145
+ <a href="/members/signup/">
146
+ <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
147
+ alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
148
+ </a>
149
+
150
+
151
+ </div>
152
+
153
+
154
+ <nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
155
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
156
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/133641213/" class="button-form">
157
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="DVAIt9Nbg6nztPJopqLkbDdDb7AgI84eE186NupSXTYBgxSIzau4bNborHVDee8r">
158
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
159
+ <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
160
+ </form>
161
+ <form method="POST" action="/doc/133641213/" class="button-form">
162
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="DVAIt9Nbg6nztPJopqLkbDdDb7AgI84eE186NupSXTYBgxSIzau4bNborHVDee8r">
163
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
164
+ <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
165
+ </form>
166
+
167
+ <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/133641213/" class="button-form">
168
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="DVAIt9Nbg6nztPJopqLkbDdDb7AgI84eE186NupSXTYBgxSIzau4bNborHVDee8r">
169
+ <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
170
+ <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
171
+ </form>
172
+
173
+ </nav>
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ <div class="judgments">
178
+
179
+
180
+ <div class="covers">
181
+ <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:133641213">55</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:133641213">1</a>]</span>
182
+
183
+ </div>
184
+
185
+ <h3 class="docsource_main">Delhi High Court</h3>
186
+ <h2 class="doc_title">Sachin Jain vs Serious Fraud Investigation Officer on 20 December, 2019</h2>
187
+
188
+ <h3 class="doc_citations">Equivalent citations: 2020 (2) ADR 170, AIRONLINE 2019 DEL 2023</h3>
189
+
190
+ <h3 class="doc_author">Author: <a href="/search/?formInput=authorid:a-malhotra">Anu Malhotra</a></h3>
191
+
192
+ <h3 class="doc_bench">Bench: <a href="/search/?formInput=benchid:a-malhotra">Anu Malhotra</a></h3>
193
+
194
+ <pre id="pre_1">* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
195
+ + BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019
196
+
197
+ Judgment reserved on :13.09.2019
198
+ Date of decision :20.12.2019
199
+
200
+ SACHIN JAIN ..... Appellant
201
+ Through: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate.
202
+ versus
203
+ SERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE ..... Respondent
204
+
205
+ Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with
206
+ Ms. Sakshi Sharma, Advocate.
207
+
208
+ CORAM:
209
+ HON&#x27;BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
210
+
211
+ JUDGMENT
212
+ </pre><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1">ANU MALHOTRA, J.
213
+ </p>
214
+
215
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_2">1. The applicant Sachin Jain who is in custody since 20.05.2019 is
216
+ arrayed as accused No.28 in the complaint filed by the Serious Fraud
217
+ Investigation Office (hereinafter referred to as SFIO) which complaint
218
+ was filed on 18.09.2017 by the SFIO against 177 accused persons,
219
+ submits that through the complaint filed by the SFIO through its
220
+ Assistant Director before the Special Judge (Companies Act) qua the
221
+ offences punishable under <a href="/doc/1359568/" id="a_1">Sections 418</a>/<a href="/doc/896188/" id="a_2">477A</a>/<a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_3">120B</a> of the IPC and
222
+ <a href="/doc/330130/" id="a_4">Sections 211</a>/<a href="/doc/1819732/" id="a_5">297</a>/<a href="/doc/887771/" id="a_6">301</a>/<a href="/doc/545057/" id="a_7">628</a>/<a href="/doc/956080/" id="a_8">629A</a> of the Companies Act, 1956 and
223
+ offences punishable under <a href="/doc/131394231/" id="a_9">Sections 129</a>/<a href="/doc/103729560/" id="a_10">184</a>/<a href="/doc/28328618/" id="a_11">188</a>/<a href="/doc/103757662/" id="a_12">189</a>/<a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_13">447</a>/<a href="/doc/53504469/" id="a_14">448</a> of the
224
+ Companies Act, 2013, the applicant/petitioner is cited as a Director of
225
+ following companies:-
226
+ </p>
227
+
228
+
229
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_1">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 1 of 26</span>
230
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_1"> &quot;a. M/s Sampat Financials Planners Private Limited
231
+ b. M/s Subhiksha Securities &amp; Consultants Private Limited
232
+ c. M/s Shadilal Marketing Private Limited
233
+ d. M/s Sanchit Infrabuild Private Limited.&quot;
234
+ </blockquote>
235
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_3">and it is submitted by the petitioner that as per the said complaint of
236
+ the SFIO, the aforesaid four companies had caused a loss to the State
237
+ by hatching a conspiracy with one co-accused Md. Iqbal. The
238
+ petitioner submits that he was summoned vide order dated 24.01.2019
239
+ on cognizance being taken by the Special Judge (Companies Act),
240
+ Dwarka and appeared before the Court on 20.05.2019 and was taken
241
+ into custody by the Court. The petitioner submits that his application
242
+ seeking grant of bail was rejected vide order dated 07.06.2019 of the
243
+ Special Judge (Companies Act) and further submits that he is not well
244
+ educated and has not passed Standard X and worked as a salesman in
245
+ a shoe shop company and is not connected with any of the four
246
+ companies aforementioned and that he had not even been served with
247
+ the summons by the SFIO for joining the investigation at any stage.
248
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_4">2. The petitioner further submits that the requirements of <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_15">Section
249
+ 212(6)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 for institution of a complaint
250
+ under <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_16">Section 447</a> of the said enactment has not been complied with,
251
+ in as much as, the complaint was not filed by the Director of the SFIO
252
+ nor by any other officer authorized in that behalf by the Central
253
+ Government and has rather been filed by the Senior Assistant Director
254
+ of the SFIO (Dheeraj Kumar) who was neither a Director of the SFIO
255
+ nor was he specifically authorized under <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_17">Section 212(6)</a>of the
256
+
257
+
258
+
259
+
260
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_2">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 2 of 26</span>
261
+ <a href="/doc/172276913/" id="a_18">Companies Act, 2013</a> to file the complaint in relation to a cognizable
262
+ offence.
263
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_5">3. The petitioner further submits that the stringent conditions of
264
+ <a href="/doc/797651/" id="a_19">Section 212(6)</a> of the Cr.P.C., 1973 do not apply where bail is sought
265
+ after the completion of investigation and filing of the final report in
266
+ criminal complaint and is applicable only during the course of
267
+ investigation. The petitioner further submits that <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_20">Section 447</a> of the
268
+ Companies Act, 2013 has come into force only on 01.03.2014 and
269
+ thus, does not apply to the petitioner who in any event is a stranger to
270
+ all those four companies i.e. M/s Sampat Financials Planners Private
271
+ Limited, M/s Subhiksha Securities &amp; Consultants Private Limited,
272
+ M/s Shadilal Marketing Private Limited and M/s Sanchit Infrabuild
273
+ Private Limited wherein he was shown as a Director. The petitioner
274
+ further submits that though the prosecution has relied on the
275
+ Memorandum of Association, Resolution, Resignation Letters and
276
+ share certificates of the four companies i.e. M/s Sampat Financials
277
+ Planners Private Limited, M/s Subhiksha Securities &amp; Consultants
278
+ Private Limited, M/s Shadilal Marketing Private Limited and M/s
279
+ Sanchit Infrabuild Private Limited as having been signed by the
280
+ petitioner, the petitioner has never signed nor executed any of the said
281
+ documents and submitted that the same are forged and fabricated
282
+ bearing his forged signatures. The petitioner submits that there is no
283
+ document that has been filed by the SFIO to show that the SFIO is a
284
+ beneficiary of the transactions done by the companies.
285
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_6">4. The petitioner further submits that the offences punishable
286
+ under Sections 447 of the Companies Act, 1872 and the offences
287
+
288
+
289
+
290
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_3">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 3 of 26</span>
291
+ punishable under <a href="/doc/1359568/" id="a_21">Sections 418</a>/<a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_22">120B</a> of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
292
+ are not made out against the petitioner and that the law in force at the
293
+ time of the commission of the alleged act, was the substantive law
294
+ under which the petitioner could have been prosecuted and that the
295
+ petitioner cannot be prosecuted under the <a href="/doc/172276913/" id="a_23">Companies Act, 2013</a> which
296
+ was not in force in the year 2011. Inter alia the applicant submits that
297
+ he has clean antecedents and that there has been no recovery effected
298
+ from him and that he has deep roots in society and he is the only bread
299
+ earner of his family and that he ought to be released on bail. Inter alia
300
+ the petitioner submits that there are no chances of his tampering with
301
+ the evidence.
302
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_7">5. The applicant further submits that in as much as the
303
+ investigation in the matter is complete and the charge sheet has been
304
+ filed, no purpose would be served by keeping him in custody. A
305
+ catena of verdicts is relied upon on behalf of the petitioner to contend
306
+ to the effect that the applicant ought to be released on bail, in as much
307
+ as the investigation in the matter is complete and that he is not likely
308
+ to tamper with the evidence. The verdicts relied upon on behalf of the
309
+ petitioner are as under:-
310
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_2"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="702896" id="span_4">&quot;I. &quot;Court on its own <a href="/doc/702896/" id="a_24">Motion Vs. CBI</a>&quot; [(2006) 4 RCR (CRL.)</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="46581094" id="span_5">206]
311
+ <a href="/doc/46581094/" id="a_25">II. &quot;H.B Chaturvedi Vs. C.B.I</a>&quot; 171 (2010) DLT 223
312
+ III.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="897981" id="span_6">&quot;<a href="/doc/897981/" id="a_26">Ashok Kumar Vs. State</a>&quot; 231(2016) DLT 32(CN)
313
+ IV. &quot;Sanjay Chandra Vs. C.B.I&quot; VII (2011) SLT 428
314
+ V. &quot;Suresh Kalmadi Vs. C.B.I&quot; 187(2012) DLT 575
315
+ VI. &quot;Anup Prakash Garg VS. Enforcement Department&quot; BAIL APP.
316
+ NO. 1061/2018 passed by Delhi High Court on 06.08.2018
317
+
318
+
319
+
320
+
321
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_7">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 4 of 26</span>
322
+ VII.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="13854679" id="span_8">&quot;<a href="/doc/13854679/" id="a_27">Yogesh Gupta Vs. State of NCT of Delhi&quot; Bail Appl.No.</a>
323
+ 1613/2018 passed by Delhi High Court on 17.08.2018.
324
+ [
325
+
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+ VIII.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="373190" id="span_9">&quot;<a href="/doc/373190/" id="a_28">Data Ram Singh Vs. State of UP</a>&quot; [(2018) 3 SCC 22]&quot;</span>
330
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_8">6. The SFIO through its status report has put forth the genesis of
331
+ the investigation conducted stating to the effect that the investigation
332
+ commenced pursuant to order dated 14.12.2015 of the Hon&#x27;ble
333
+ Supreme Court in W.P.(C) No.818/2015 wherein it had been alleged
334
+ that Mohd. Iqbal, a resident of Saharanpur had:-
335
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_3"> • Amassed disproportionate assets;
336
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_4"> • Incorporated a number of sham companies under the
337
+ <a href="/doc/1353758/" id="a_29">Companies Act, 1956</a>, many of which have dummy
338
+ directors or fictitious shareholders.
339
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_5"> • Acquired lands &amp; buildings in the names of these
340
+ companies, using laundered money earned from illegal
341
+ mining through contracts taken in the names of
342
+ Companies/partnership firms owned by his family
343
+ members.&quot;,
344
+
345
+ and thus, the respondents to that petition through the learned ASG
346
+ were called upon to inquire into the matter to find out that whether it
347
+ was a fit case to initiate any inquiry with it having been observed to
348
+ the effect that the proceedings in W.P.(C) No.818/2015, would not act
349
+ as an impediment for any legal action being taken against such
350
+ persons.
351
+ </blockquote>
352
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_9">7. Vide order dated 08.01.2016, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
353
+ in compliance of order dated 14.12.2015 of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme
354
+ Court ordered the SFIO to investigate into the affairs of six companies
355
+ allegedly owned by Md. Iqbal. Vide order dated 07.06.2019 vide
356
+
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_10">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 5 of 26</span>
361
+ which the second bail application of the applicant was declined by the
362
+ Trial Court, it was observed vide paragraphs 5 &amp; 6 to the effect:-
363
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_6"> &quot;5. In Cluster-IV companies, there are around 47
364
+ companies which were acquired by the Group of A-1 to
365
+ purchase land and fraudulent use of money for acquiring
366
+ the land was shown to have been required by these
367
+ companies in the form of loans and advances and mostly
368
+ they are unidentified identities. Further it was found that
369
+ majority of transactions made by these companies were
370
+ outside the banking channels and most companies even
371
+ did not maintain any account. Investigation has further
372
+ revealed that these companies have no business since
373
+ incorporation and they have acquired 175.65 hectares of
374
+ land for worth Rs. 1896.94 lakhs and further these groups
375
+ acquired the land through these clusters of companies 10
376
+ circumvent the Land Ceiling Act and A-28 Sachin Jain is
377
+ the Director of four such companies.
378
+ </blockquote>
379
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_7"> 6. It is pertinent to mention that the case of SFIO is that a
380
+ criminal conspiracy was hatched by the prime accused A-1
381
+ Mohd. Iqbal who allegedly has been engaged in illegal
382
+ sand mining operation in the State of Uttar Pradesh and
383
+ in/ around District Saharanpur for the purpose of
384
+ laundering the ill-gotten money so as the same to be
385
+ projected as legitimate assets and therefore, a number of
386
+ companies were fraudulently taken over by their shares
387
+ being purchased at diluted prices and the companies were
388
+ the shell companies/dummy companies and few of such
389
+ companies are under directorship of A-28. Allegations
390
+ against accused persons also covered <a href="/doc/1305316/" id="a_30">Section 447</a> of
391
+ Companies Act read with <a href="/doc/181588/" id="a_31">Section 212 (6)(ii)</a> of Companies
392
+ Act.&quot;,
393
+ significantly, vide paragraph 7 of the said order, it was observed to the
394
+ effect:-
395
+ </blockquote>
396
+
397
+
398
+
399
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_11">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 6 of 26</span>
400
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_8"> &quot;7. Arguments Heard. Investigation file record perused.
401
+ IO of SFIO has shown me investigation file (which is
402
+ confidential in nature).&quot;
403
+ </blockquote>
404
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_10">8. The SFIO submits that in as much as the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme
405
+ Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 had observed regarding extending
406
+ the investigation to other companies, the MCA vide its order dated
407
+ 23/24.02.2016 under <a href="/doc/114107122/" id="a_32">Section 212(1)(c)</a> directed the SFIO to
408
+ investigate into the affairs of additional 104 companies and one LLP.
409
+ The said status report of the SFIO submits that on investigation being
410
+ carried out, the report was submitted to the Central Government under
411
+ <a href="/doc/129479307/" id="a_33">Section 212(12)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 concluding that Md.
412
+ Iqbal in conspiracy with 111 accused entities and his family members/
413
+ key associates had committed a fraud as defined under <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_34">Section 447</a> of
414
+ the Companies Act, 2013 with the ultimate objective of camouflaging
415
+ ill-gotten money and of amassing real estate properties whilst
416
+ violating various provisions of the <a href="/doc/172276913/" id="a_35">Companies Act, 2013</a> and the
417
+ <a href="/doc/1353758/" id="a_36">Companies Act, 1956</a> and had further committed offences punishable
418
+ under the <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_37">Indian Penal Code</a>, 1860 and had caused a loss of Rs.610
419
+ crores approximately to the exchequer. The SFIO further submits that
420
+ the investigation had revealed that the entire network of EUIs i.e. the
421
+ Entities Under Investigation had been created with a single objective
422
+ of creating/acquiring legal assets out of the wealth amassed through
423
+ illicit sand mining activities and that to achieve this goal, Md.Iqbal
424
+ group (accused no.1 to 9) created/used a complex grid of EUIs to
425
+ camouflage the source of funds and fictitious assets acquired through
426
+ accommodation entry operators were liquidated to create real assets.
427
+ </p>
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_12">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 7 of 26</span>
432
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_11"> The status report of the SFIO further states that a set of dummy/ ghost
433
+ shareholders and Directors were used as a front to facilitate the
434
+ liquidation and acquisition of assets and that the group had indulged in
435
+ large scale falsification of the books of accounts and that the pliable
436
+ auditors and accounting professionals, including the present applicant
437
+ had totally disregarded the fundamental principles of accounting to
438
+ please the kingpin of the group. The SFIO has further submitted that
439
+ the investigation had revealed that amongst many illegal acts
440
+ committed by the group, it included stockpiling of the unaccounted
441
+ money and large scale money laundering for legitimizing the proceeds
442
+ of crime. The SFIO has further submitted that on the investigation
443
+ report being submitted before the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court vide order
444
+ dated 31.07.2017, the MCA was directed to take into consideration the
445
+ investigation report of the SFIO to take a conscious decision whether
446
+ or not to sanction prosecution and the MCA whilst exercising power
447
+ under <a href="/doc/160625927/" id="a_38">Section 212(14)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 issued instructions
448
+ and sanction to initiate prosecution for the violations in the offences
449
+ committed under the various provisions of the <a href="/doc/1353758/" id="a_39">Companies Act, 1956</a>
450
+ and the <a href="/doc/172276913/" id="a_40">Companies Act, 2013</a> as well as under the <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_41">Indian Penal Code</a>,
451
+ 1860 against 176 accused persons including the present petitioner and
452
+ that the order directing the initiation of prosecution was placed before
453
+ the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court, whereafter it was observed by the
454
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court that there was nothing that survived in the
455
+ matter and the petition was disposed of and as a consequence, a
456
+ criminal complaint was filed before the Trial Court on 18.09.2017.
457
+ </p>
458
+
459
+
460
+
461
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_13">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 8 of 26</span>
462
+ <p data-structure="Issue" id="p_12"> 9. Inter alia the SFIO submits that the applicant has been
463
+ summoned by the learned Trial Court for the offences punishable
464
+ under <a href="/doc/1359568/" id="a_42">Sections 418</a>/<a href="/doc/1436241/" id="a_43">420</a>/<a href="/doc/556166/" id="a_44">468</a>/<a href="/doc/1466184/" id="a_45">471</a>/<a href="/doc/896188/" id="a_46">477A</a>/<a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_47">120B</a> of the Indian Penal Code,
465
+ 1860, under <a href="/doc/330130/" id="a_48">Sections 211</a>/<a href="/doc/686913/" id="a_49">279</a>/<a href="/doc/1830654/" id="a_50">299</a>/<a href="/doc/887771/" id="a_51">301</a>/<a href="/doc/545057/" id="a_52">628</a>/<a href="/doc/956080/" id="a_53">629A</a> of the Companies
466
+ Act, 1956 and under <a href="/doc/131394231/" id="a_54">Sections 129</a>/<a href="/doc/103729560/" id="a_55">184</a>/<a href="/doc/28328618/" id="a_56">188</a>/<a href="/doc/103757662/" id="a_57">189</a>/<a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_58">447</a>/<a href="/doc/53504469/" id="a_59">448</a> of the
467
+ Companies Act, 2013 and for the offences punishable under <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_60">Sections
468
+ 447</a>/<a href="/doc/53504469/" id="a_61">448</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 and offences punishable under
469
+ <a href="/doc/393714/" id="a_62">Sections 424</a>/<a href="/doc/556166/" id="a_63">468</a> of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 are non-bailable. The
470
+ SFIO further submits that the Trial Court vide its detailed orders dated
471
+ 20.05.2019 and 07.06.2019 has dismissed the regular bail application
472
+ filed by the applicant.
473
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_13">10. The SFIO has further submitted that the applicant was detailed
474
+ in Cluster-IV of the complaint and that the investigation revealed that
475
+ the group in furtherance of a larger conspiracy, used Cluster-I accused
476
+ companies i.e. Mastiff Industries Private Limited, Net Agrofoods
477
+ Private Limited, V.K. Health Solutions Private Limited to acquire
478
+ shareholding in 47 other accused companies, which were then used to
479
+ acquire huge parcels of land in the State of U.P. to circumvent the land
480
+ ceiling laws in the State and in this manner, they first used their
481
+ unaccounted money and high net worth of the accused companies to
482
+ acquire the said 47 companies and then purchased huge land in the
483
+ name of the said 47 companies and that the acquisition of 47
484
+ companies and purchasing of parcels of land took place from the
485
+ period 2009-2014 and that the investigation revealed that the group
486
+ acquired the said four companies as under:-
487
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_9"> • Sanchit Infrabuild Private Limited- 20.1.11
488
+
489
+
490
+
491
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_14">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 9 of 26</span>
492
+ • Sampat Financials Planners Private Limited- 25.9.10
493
+ • Shadilal Marketing Private Limited- 31.3.11
494
+ • Subhiksha Securities &amp; Consultants Private Limited- 20.9.11
495
+
496
+ and that the applicant was a Director in four of the aforesaid accused
497
+ companies i.e. from 2010 to 13.08.2013 i.e. Sanchit Infrabuild Private
498
+ Limited, Sampat Financials Planners Private Limited, Shadilal
499
+ Marketing Private Limited &amp; Subhiksha Securities &amp; Consultants
500
+ Private Limited.
501
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_14">11. The SFIO further submits that the applicant remained as a
502
+ Director in Sanchit Infrabuild Limited till 13.08.2013 i.e. even after its
503
+ acquisition by the Group and thus contended that this clearly showed
504
+ that he was a participatory to the conspiracy hatched by the Group and
505
+ he being the Director in the aforesaid companies, committed
506
+ fraudulent acts in furtherance to the said conspiracy, whereby the
507
+ Group was able to acquire Rs.36.91, 53.66 &amp; 178.90 lacs worth of
508
+ land parcels with the money infused in said companies by the Cluster-
509
+ I companies of the Group and that the investigation revealed that
510
+ before acquisition by the Group, these companies were having
511
+ negligible cash/net worth and did not have any business transaction in
512
+ the past and that they were with the help of the applicant and other
513
+ accused, used by the Group to commit fraudulent acts.
514
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_15">12. Inter alia the SFIO has submitted that the investigation of 111
515
+ EUIs and associated entities revealed a design by Mohd. Iqbal, his
516
+ family members, close associates of the family and professionals to
517
+ launder the illicit gains from the rampant illegal sand mining
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_15">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 10 of 26</span>
523
+ undertaken by the group through a series of contracts awarded to the
524
+ entities controlled by the conglomerate and that most of the entities
525
+ incorporated or acquired off the shelf through self-acknowledged entry
526
+ operators did not carry out any commercial or economic activity and
527
+ that the sole purpose of having multiple set of companies and
528
+ partnership firms was to use them as a front for converting the
529
+ unaccounted money into legal assets, mainly agriculture land and later
530
+ on in real estate and construction sector. It was further submitted by
531
+ the SFIO that the facts which had come forth during the investigation
532
+ showed that the entire network was created with a single objective of
533
+ creating/ acquiring legal assets out of the wealth amassed through
534
+ illicit sand mining activities and that to achieve this goal, the group
535
+ created a complex grid of business entities to camouflage the source of
536
+ funds and fictitious assets acquired through accommodation entry
537
+ operators were liquidated to create real assets. The SFIO has further
538
+ submitted that a set of dummy/ghost shareholders and directors were
539
+ used as a front to facilitate the liquidation and acquisition of assets and
540
+ that the group had indulged in large scale falsification of the books of
541
+ accounts.
542
+ </p><p data-structure="Section" id="p_16"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="134614480" id="span_16">13. Reliance was placed on behalf of the SFIO on the verdict of this
543
+ Court in &quot;<a href="/doc/134614480/" id="a_64">Amit Ranjan Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau</a>&quot; 2019 SCC
544
+ OnLine Del 9104 to contend to the effect that the provisions of
545
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_65">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, 1985 were in pari materia to the
546
+ provisions of <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_66">Section 212(6)</a> and <a href="/doc/96849921/" id="a_67">Section 212(7)</a> of the Companies
547
+ Act, 2013.</span>
548
+ </p>
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_17">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 11 of 26</span>
553
+ <p data-structure="Section" id="p_17"> 14. <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_68">Section 212(6)</a> and <a href="/doc/96849921/" id="a_69">Section 212(7)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013
554
+ read to the effect:-
555
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_10"> &quot;212. Investigation into affairs of Company by Serious
556
+ Fraud Investigation Office.
557
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_11"> (6) Notwithstanding anything contained in the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_70">Code of
558
+ Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974), 1 [offence covered
559
+ under <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_71">section 447</a>] of this Act shall be cognizable and no
560
+ person accused of any offence under those sections shall
561
+ be released on bail or on his own bond unless--
562
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_12"> (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to
563
+ oppose the application for such release; and
564
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_13"> (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application,
565
+ the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for
566
+ believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he
567
+ is not likely to commit any offence while on bail:
568
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_14"> Provided that a person, who, is under the age of sixteen
569
+ years or is a woman or is sick or infirm, may be released
570
+ on bail, if the Special Court so directs:
571
+ Provided further that the Special Court shall not take
572
+ cognizance of any offence referred to this subsection
573
+ except upon a complaint in writing made by--
574
+ </blockquote>
575
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_15"> (i)the Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office; or
576
+
577
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_16"> (ii) any officer of the Central Government authorised, by a
578
+ general or special order in writing in this behalf by that
579
+ Government.
580
+ </blockquote>
581
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_17"> (7) The limitation on granting of bail specified in sub-
582
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_18"> section (6) is in addition to the limitations under the <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_72">Code
583
+ of Criminal Procedure</a>, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law
584
+ for the time being in force on granting of bail.&quot;,
585
+
586
+ and that in as much as the case of the applicant falls under the
587
+ provisions of <a href="/doc/61954183/" id="a_73">Section 212(6)(ii)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 and as
588
+ <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_74">Section 212(6)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 starts with a non-obstante
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_18">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 12 of 26</span>
594
+ clause and the provisions stipulated under <a href="/doc/61954183/" id="a_75">Section 212(6)(ii)</a> of the
595
+ Companies Act, 2013 are mandatory in nature, in the facts and
596
+ circumstances of the instant case, the applicant is not entitled to be
597
+ released on bail.
598
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_19"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="26003907" id="span_19">15. The SFIO places reliance also on the verdict of the Hon&#x27;ble
599
+ Supreme Court in &quot;<a href="/doc/26003907/" id="a_76">Satpal Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab</a>&quot; AIR 2018
600
+ SC 2011 whereby on a prayer seeking grant of anticipatory bail under
601
+ the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_77">NDPS Act, 1985</a> it was held that the twin conditions of bail under
602
+ the <a href="/doc/1727139/" id="a_78">NDPS Act, 1985</a> are applicable in a case of anticipatory bail also
603
+ and it was submitted thus, on behalf of the SFIO that the provisions of
604
+ <a href="/doc/496325/" id="a_79">Section 37</a> of the NDPS Act, 1985 being akin to <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_80">Section 212(6)</a> of the
605
+ Companies Act, 2013, the limitations prescribed under <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_81">Section 212(6)</a>
606
+ r/w <a href="/doc/96849921/" id="a_82">Section 212(7)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 are applicable in the
607
+ instant case.</span>
608
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_20">16. It is thus, submitted on behalf of the SFIO that the orders under
609
+ <a href="/doc/1290514/" id="a_83">Section 439</a> of the Cr.P.C., 1973 as sought by the petitioner herein,
610
+ cannot be granted without reference to the provisions of <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_84">Section
611
+ 212(6)</a> and <a href="/doc/96849921/" id="a_85">212(7)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 without entering a
612
+ finding on the required level of satisfaction of the Court that there are
613
+ reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioner is not guilty of the
614
+ offences alleged to have been committed by him and that the
615
+ petitioner is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
616
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_21"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="183369852" id="span_20">17. The SFIO further submits that as <a href="/doc/26003907/" id="a_86">laid down by</a> the Hon&#x27;ble
617
+ Supreme Court in &quot;<a href="/doc/183369852/" id="a_87">Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs. Central Bureau of
618
+ Investigation</a>&quot; 2013 (7) SCC 439, economic offences constituted a
619
+ class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_21">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 13 of 26</span>
624
+ matter of bail and that the economic offences have deep rooted
625
+ conspiracies and involved huge loss of public funds and thus, needed
626
+ to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the
627
+ economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing serious threat
628
+ to the financial health of the country, in as much as, they tend to
629
+ seriously prejudice/ destroy the economy of a country and thus, caused
630
+ immense irreversible damage to the larger public interest.</span>
631
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_22"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="PARTY" data-docid="13208976" id="span_22">18. Reliance was also placed on behalf of the SFIO on the verdict
632
+ of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in &quot;<a href="/doc/13208976/" id="a_88">Rohit Tandon Vs. Directorate of
633
+ Enforcement</a>&quot; (2018) 11 SCC 46 to contend to similar effect.</span>
634
+ Reliance was also placed on behalf of the SFIO on the verdict of the
635
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in &quot;State of Gujarat V. Mohanlal Jitamalji
636
+ Porwal&quot; (1987) 2 SCC 364 wherein, it was observed vide para 5 to the
637
+ effect:-
638
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_18"> &quot;......5. ......The entire community is aggrieved if the
639
+ economic offenders who ruin the economy of the State are
640
+ not brought to book. A murder may be committed in the
641
+ heat of moment upon passions being aroused. An
642
+ economic offence is committed with cool calculation and
643
+ deliberate design with an eye on personal profit regardless
644
+ of the consequence to the community. A disregard for the
645
+ interest of the community can be manifested only at the
646
+ cost of forfeiting the trust and faith of the community in
647
+ the system to administer justice in an even-handed manner
648
+ without fear of criticism from the quarters which view
649
+ white collar crimes with a permissive eye unmindful of the
650
+ damage done to the national economy and national
651
+ interest. ......&quot;
652
+ </blockquote>
653
+ <p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_23">19. During the course of the submissions that were made on behalf
654
+ of the petitioner, reliance was sought to be placed on the investigation
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_23">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 14 of 26</span>
659
+ report dated 26.07.2017 that was submitted to be shared to the
660
+ Chairman, CBDT for an appropriate action to contend that the offence
661
+ punishable under <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_89">Section 447</a> of the Companies Act, 2013, was not
662
+ even adverted to therein qua the present petitioner arrayed as accused
663
+ No.28. The petitioner has further sought to submit that several other
664
+ accused in the complaint case No.720/2017 pending before the Special
665
+ Judge, Companies Act i.e. Ashish Aggarwal A-91, Vijay Kumar
666
+ Sharma A-86, Kumari Shiriti A-89, Bimla Gupta A-77, Vinod Kumar
667
+ Mittal A-34, Arvind Kaneri A-92, Sujata Khandelia A-38, Shashi
668
+ Sharma A-41 have been released on bail and Ravi Kumar Singhal A-
669
+ 65, Yogesh GuptaA-57, Sanjay Garg A-66, Pawan Kumar Aggarwal
670
+ A-81, Dharmender Gupta, Rakesh Sharma, Suman Sharma, Amitabh
671
+ Singh, Abhijit Kanth A-58, Suresh Kumar Gupta, Mohit Kumar and
672
+ Ritika Agnihotri have been granted interim protection by this Court on
673
+ the basis of the order dated 11.07.2019 in Bail Appl. No.1615/2019
674
+ and even Mohd. Iqbal the stated kingpin vide order dated 29.05.2019
675
+ of the Hon&#x27;ble High Court of Allahabad whilst declining the prayer
676
+ for quashing of the summoning order in the said complaint case i.e.
677
+ CC No.720/2017 dated 24.01.2019 of the Special Judge, Companies
678
+ Act, Dwarka, was released on bail in terms of the directions therein to
679
+ the effect:-
680
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_19"> &quot;Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
681
+ record.
682
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_20"> This application under <a href="/doc/1679850/" id="a_90">Section 482</a> Cr.P.C. has been filed
683
+ for quashing the entire proceeding in Complaint Case
684
+ No.720 of 2017, Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs.
685
+ Mohammad Iqbal and others, under <a href="/doc/107969581/" id="a_91">Sections 420</a>, <a href="/doc/165047969/" id="a_92">468</a>, 471,
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_24">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 15 of 26</span>
691
+ 120B <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_93">I.P.C</a>., and <a href="/doc/330130/" id="a_94">Sections 211</a>, <a href="/doc/1819732/" id="a_95">297</a>, <a href="/doc/1830654/" id="a_96">299</a>, <a href="/doc/887771/" id="a_97">301</a>, <a href="/doc/1353758/" id="a_98">678</a>, <a href="/doc/956080/" id="a_99">629-A</a> of
692
+ the Companies Act, 1956 and <a href="/doc/131394231/" id="a_100">Sections 129</a>, <a href="/doc/103729560/" id="a_101">184</a>, <a href="/doc/28328618/" id="a_102">188</a>, <a href="/doc/103757662/" id="a_103">189</a>,
693
+ <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_104">447</a> and <a href="/doc/53504469/" id="a_105">448</a> of the Companies Act, 2013, Police Station
694
+ Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow, pending in the court of the
695
+ Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3 and Special Judge,
696
+ (Companis Act), Dwarka, District Court/ Delhi and
697
+ quashing of the summoning order dated 24.01.2019 passed
698
+ by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3 and Special
699
+ Judge, (Companies Act), Dwarka, District Court/ Delhi.
700
+ At the very outset, objection has been raised by learned
701
+ counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 regarding
702
+ maintainability of this application under <a href="/doc/1679850/" id="a_106">Section 482</a>
703
+ Cr.P.C. before this Court, however, he conceded that in this
704
+ case, point of maintainability has been considered
705
+ exhaustively and decide by this Court in Application U/S
706
+ 482 No.-18806 of 2019 Mohammad Wajid and 3 others Vs.
707
+ State of U.P. and another, on 10.05.2019, copy whereof has
708
+ been brought vide annexure no.6 to the affidavit filed in
709
+ support of this application.
710
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_21"> Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the
711
+ identical matter, this Court vide order dated 10.05.2019 in
712
+ Application U/S 482 No.-18806 of 2019 has allowed the
713
+ applicants to move discharge application before the court
714
+ below. Therefore, the same relief may be given to the
715
+ applicant in this case for moving discharge application
716
+ before the court concerned.
717
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_22"> Considered the submission so raised.
718
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_23"> On meritorial aspects of the case, it cannot be said that
719
+ prima facie evidence is lacking for summoning the
720
+ applicant.
721
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_24"> Consequently, the summoning order dated 24.01.2019
722
+ passed by the court below is sustained. No good ground is
723
+ made out for quashment of the impugned summoning order
724
+ is refused.
725
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_25"> However, under facts and circumstances of the case, it is
726
+ provided that in case the applicant moves an appropriate
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_25">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 16 of 26</span>
731
+ application personally or through counsel before the trial
732
+ Court seeking discharge within five weeks from today, the
733
+ same shall be considered and decided on its merit by
734
+ speaking order after affording opportunity of hearing to
735
+ both the sides.
736
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_26"> In the first instance, no coercive action shall be taken
737
+ against the applicant till the period of five weeks from
738
+ today or till presentation of the application, whichever is
739
+ earlier and in case the discharge application is moved
740
+ within aforesaid stipulated period, then no coercive action
741
+ shall be taken against the applicant till disposal of
742
+ discharge application.
743
+ </blockquote>
744
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_27"> However, it is made clear that in the event no such
745
+ application is moved within the time prescribed above, this
746
+ order will be of no avail to the applicant.&quot;
747
+ </blockquote>
748
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_24">20. The applications of Mohd. Naseem and 18 others in the said
749
+ complaint case i.e. CC No.720/2017 were likewise disposed of vide
750
+ order dated 29.05.2019 of the Hon&#x27;ble High Court of Allahabad.
751
+ </p><p data-structure="Issue" id="p_25">21. On behalf of the applicant, has been submitted a copy of a
752
+ complaint sent through speed post made by the applicant herein on
753
+ 19.07.2019 to the SHO, PS Shakarpur seeking the registration of the
754
+ FIR under <a href="/doc/1436241/" id="a_107">Sections 420</a>/<a href="/doc/556166/" id="a_108">468</a>/<a href="/doc/1466184/" id="a_109">471</a>/<a href="/doc/1897847/" id="a_110">120B</a>/<a href="/doc/37788/" id="a_111">34</a> of the Indian Penal Code,
755
+ 1860 against the following persons:-
756
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_28"> (i) Sanat Kumar Jain R/o 62, Vijay Block, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-
757
+ </blockquote><span class="hidden_text" id="span_26"> 92.</span>
758
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_29"> (ii) Director/Managing Director of Sampat Financials Planners
759
+ Private Limited, Add:25, Chauhan Market, Samaspur Jagir,
760
+ Delhi-110091.
761
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_30"> (iii) Director/Managing Director of Subhiksha Securities &amp;
762
+ Consultants Private Limited, Add:25, Chauhan Market,
763
+ Samaspur Jagir, Delhi-110091.
764
+ </blockquote>
765
+
766
+
767
+
768
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_27">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 17 of 26</span>
769
+ <blockquote id="blockquote_31"> (iv) Director/Managing Director of Shadilal Marketing Private
770
+ Limited, Add: 59/5, Emco Complex, Vijay Block, Laxmi
771
+ Nagar, Delhi-110092.
772
+ </blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_32"> (v) Director/Managing Director of SanchitInfrabuild Private
773
+ Limited, Add: 59/5, Emco Complex, Vijay Block, Laxmi
774
+ Nagar, Delhi-110092.
775
+ </blockquote>
776
+ <p data-structure="Facts" id="p_26">22. Inter alia it was sought to be submitted through the said
777
+ complaint of the petitioner that he works as a salesman in a shoe shop
778
+ company and that unfortunately on 13.02.2019, a notice was issued by
779
+ the Court at Dwarka in his name and on his appearing before the
780
+ Court, he was taken into custody by the Court whilst apprising him
781
+ that he was a Director of M/s Sampat Financials Planners Private
782
+ Limited, M/s Subhiksha Securities &amp; Consultants Private Limited,
783
+ M/s Shadilal Marketing Private Limited &amp; M/s Sanchit Infrabuild
784
+ Private Limited and that the said companies had committed a serious
785
+ fraud and had caused loss to the State. The petitioner submits that he
786
+ was also supplied the complete set of the charge sheet along with a
787
+ pen drive and that after going through the same, he was shocked to see
788
+ the documents i.e. MOA &amp; AOA of the above mentioned companies
789
+ deposited with ROC with FORM-1, Resignation letter attached with
790
+ FORM-32/FORM DIR-12 filled with ROC by the above mentioned
791
+ companies and Board Resolution attached with the account opening
792
+ form of M/s Sanchit Infrabuild Private Limited, which were filed with
793
+ the charge sheet on which the petitioner submits that it bore his forged
794
+ and fabricated signatures.
795
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_27">23. The petitioner submits that in the month of March 2010, he met
796
+ one Sanat Kumar Jain A-87 for getting a job and Sanat Kumar Jain
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_28">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 18 of 26</span>
802
+ promised to provide him a job of a peon as he had not passed Standard
803
+ X and that Sh.Sanat Kumar Jain asked the petitioner to submit his
804
+ voter identity card. The petitioner further submits that the said Sanat
805
+ Kumar Jain gave him no job and did not contact him till the date of his
806
+ complaint and rather forged and fabricated his signatures on the
807
+ documents referred to herein above as submitted with the charge sheet
808
+ by stating that he was a Director of the companies i.e. M/s Sampat
809
+ Financials Planners Private Limited, M/s Subhiksha Securities &amp;
810
+ Consultants Private Limited, M/s Shadilal Marketing Private Limited
811
+ and M/s Sanchit Infrabuild Private Limited.
812
+ </p><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_28">24. The petitioner has further submitted that because of this act of
813
+ Sanat Kumar Jain and other accused persons, he has been falsely
814
+ implicated in CC No.720/2017 without any accusation and has been
815
+ languishing in jail since 20.05.2019. Inter alia the petitioner has
816
+ submitted the copy of his account opening form bearing his signatures
817
+ submitting that the same could be compared with the signatures on the
818
+ documents that had been filed with the charge sheet in order to unearth
819
+ the forgery done by the other accused persons. The petitioner submits
820
+ that he does not know any of the accused persons in the matter.
821
+ </p><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_29">25. On a consideration of the submissions made on behalf of either
822
+ side, it is essential to observe at the outset that the charges in the
823
+ matter are yet to be framed by the learned Trial Court in relation to CC
824
+ No.720/2017. Though, undoubtedly, the allegations levelled against
825
+ the petitioner are grave and relate to the alleged commission of an
826
+ economic offence, it is essential to observe that vide order dated
827
+ 15.07.2019, the respondent i.e. SFIO had been directed to submit the
828
+
829
+
830
+
831
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_29">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 19 of 26</span>
832
+ formal reply setting out the case against the petitioner and a brief
833
+ summary of the evidence on which it was based. The response of the
834
+ respondent is on the record which has been adverted to elsewhere
835
+ hereinabove, however, the specific evidence collected against the
836
+ petitioner is not spelt out. Undoubtedly, the respondent alleges that in
837
+ apparent reference to the group of Mohd. Iqbal, the stated king pin and
838
+ his key associates and family members in furtherance of a larger
839
+ conspiracy induced the accused companies i.e. Mastiff Industries
840
+ Private Limited, Net Agrofoods Private Limited, V.K.Health Solutions
841
+ Private Limited to acquire shareholding in 47 other accused
842
+ companies which were then used to acquire huge parcels of land in the
843
+ State of UP to circumvent the land ceiling laws in the State and that as
844
+ per the investigation conducted, the petitioner was a Director in four
845
+ of them from 2010 to 13.08.2013 as adverted to hereinabove and that
846
+ the petitioner continued to remain the Director in Sanchit Infrabuild
847
+ Pvt. Ltd. till 13.08.2013 even after its acquisition by the Group, as a
848
+ consequence of which the petitioner is stated to have been a
849
+ participatory to a conspiracy hatched by the Group as being a Director
850
+ in the said companies and thus committed fraudulent acts in
851
+ furtherance of the said conspiracy whereby the Group was able to
852
+ acquire Rupees 36.91, 53.66 and 178.90 lakhs worth of land parcels
853
+ with the money infused in the said companies by the Cluster-1
854
+ companies of the Group despite the factum that these companies had
855
+ negligible cash/net worth and were not having any business
856
+ transactions in the past and that these companies with the help of the
857
+
858
+
859
+
860
+
861
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_30">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 20 of 26</span>
862
+ petitioner and other accused were used by the Group to commit
863
+ fraudulent acts.
864
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_30">26. Though undoubtedly, the allegations which are levelled against
865
+ the applicant/petitioner of his being a Director of four shell
866
+ companies/ dummy companies which companies are stated to have
867
+ been created so that they could be taken over by the prime accusedA-1
868
+ Mohd. Iqbal for the purpose of laundering his ill-gotten money
869
+ through engaging in illegal sand mining operations in the State of UP
870
+ and in/around the District Saharanpur, so that he could project the said
871
+ ill-gotten money as legitimate assets and these companies were
872
+ utilized to purchase land and that majority of the transactions made by
873
+ these companies were outside the banking channels and the companies
874
+ did not even maintain any account,- are allegations, if established
875
+ prima facie undoubtedly fall within the domain of a fraud in terms of
876
+ <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_112">Sections 447</a> and <a href="/doc/53504469/" id="a_113">448</a> of the Companies Act, 2013.
877
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_31"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="78288892" id="span_31">27. This is without any observations in relation to the applicability
878
+ or non applicability of the <a href="/doc/172276913/" id="a_114">Companies Act, 2013</a> to acts committed by
879
+ the petitioner allegedly prior to the date 12.09.2013, in as much as the
880
+ said aspect is sub judice before the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court pursuant
881
+ to the observations made in W.P.(Crl.) No.2453/2018 vide verdict
882
+ dated 29.08.2018 by the Hon&#x27;ble Division Bench of this Court in
883
+ &quot;<a href="/doc/78288892/" id="a_115">Neeraj Singh Vs. Union of India &amp; Ors.</a>&quot; having been stayed by the
884
+ Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in CRL.A.No.1114/2018 arising out of SLP
885
+ Crl.</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="77592912" id="span_32">No. 7421/2018 vide order dated 04.09.2018 in &quot;<a href="/doc/77592912/" id="a_116">Serious Fraud
886
+ Investigation Office Vs. Neeraj Singh &amp;Anr</a>&quot;, in view of the
887
+ contention raised on behalf of the applicant that the accusations
888
+
889
+
890
+
891
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_33">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 21 of 26</span>
892
+ against the petitioner qua applicability of <a href="/doc/67180474/" id="a_117">Section 447</a> of the
893
+ Companies Act, 2013 relate only upto the period 2011.</span>
894
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_32">28. However, in as much as the basic premise of the prosecution
895
+ launched against the petitioner relates to the documents allegedly
896
+ retrieved to show that the petitioner was a Director of four companies
897
+ i.e. i.e. M/s Sampat Financials Planners Private Limited, M/s
898
+ Subhiksha Securities &amp; Consultants Private Limited, M/s Shadilal
899
+ Marketing Private Limited and M/s Sanchit Infrabuild Private
900
+ Limited, the contention of the petitioner is that his proof of identity
901
+ has been illegally and unauthorizedly used by Sanat Kumar Jain A-87
902
+ whom he met for getting a job.
903
+ </p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_33">29. It is essential to observe that the documents that the petitioner
904
+ has submitted during the course of the present proceedings are copies
905
+ of an account opening form submitted to the Punjab National Bank,
906
+ Laxmi Nagar Branch, Delhi by Sarika Jain, his wife and by himself
907
+ purportedly giving the same address 73, J-Extension, Murtiwali Gali,
908
+ Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, which is the address mentioned as J-Extension,
909
+ Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092 in the summons issued by the SFIO dated
910
+ 16.08.2016 to the petitioner apprising him to appear before the SFIO
911
+ on 15.09.2016 for examination in connection with the investigation
912
+ into the affairs of M/s AMB Buildgroup Private Limited and Others
913
+ and AarzooAgritech Private Limited &amp; others under <a href="/doc/776609/" id="a_118">Section 212(1)(c)</a>
914
+ of the Companies Act which is also shown to be the address on the
915
+ summons dated 16.03.2017 issued to the petitioner to similar effect.
916
+ </p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_34">30. Significantly, page 157 which has been submitted on the record
917
+ which appears to be the copy of the page 157of the charge sheet,
918
+
919
+
920
+
921
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_34">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 22 of 26</span>
922
+ shows that the person at this address was reported to have left as
923
+ per the report dated 23.08.2016 in relation to the summons bearing
924
+ No.SFIO/INV/334-339 &amp; 359-463/ AMBBPL &amp; Others and AAPL &amp;
925
+ Others/ 2016/I/8425/2016 dated 16.08.2016 issued by the SFIO and in
926
+ relation to the summons bearing No. SFIO/INV/334-339 &amp; 359-463/
927
+ AMBBPL &amp; Ors and AAPL &amp; Others/ 2016/I/10205/2017 dated
928
+ 16.03.2017, it was reported on 18.03.2017 by the postal authorities
929
+ that there was no such person. The copies of the pages of the
930
+ documents submitted showing the signatures purportedly of the
931
+ petitioner Sachin Jain at pages 280, 320, 279, 291, 264, do not prima
932
+ facie appear to be as those of the person who signed the account
933
+ opening form with the Punjab National Bank, Laxmi Nagar Branch in
934
+ relation to the account No.1603000/02055/117.
935
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_35"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="178580003" id="span_35"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="7496" id="span_36">31. Taking the said aspect into account as well as the factum that
936
+ the summons bearing no.SFIO/INV/334-339 &amp; 359-463/ AMBBPL &amp;
937
+ Others and AAPL &amp; Others/ 2016/I/8425/2016 dated 16.08.2016 and
938
+ SFIO/INV/334-339 &amp; 359-463/ AMBBPL &amp; Ors and AAPL &amp;Others/
939
+ 2016/I/10205/2017 dated 16.03.2017 issued to the petitioner by the
940
+ SFIO referred to hereinabove were apparently not delivered to him,
941
+ taking into account also the verdict of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in
942
+ &quot;Rukmini Narvekar Vs. Vijaya Satardekar and Ors.&quot; AIR 2008 SC
943
+ 1013 with observations in paragraph 17 of the said verdict, which
944
+ observes categorically to the effect that though defence material
945
+ cannot be looked into by the Court while considering the framing of
946
+ the charge in view of the verdict of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in
947
+ &quot;<a href="/doc/7496/" id="a_119">State of Orissa Vs. Devendra Nath Padhi</a>&quot; AIR 2005 SC 359, there
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_37">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 23 of 26</span>
952
+ may be some very rare and exceptional cases where some defence
953
+ material when shown to the Trial Court, can be looked into by the
954
+ Court at the time of the framing of the charges or taking cognizance as
955
+ well as the observations of the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in the verdict
956
+ in&quot;<a href="/doc/178580003/" id="a_120">Nitya Dharmananda and Ors. Vs. Gopal Sheelum Reddy and
957
+ Ors.</a>&quot; AIR 2017 SC 5846, wherein it has been observed vide para 9
958
+ thereof to the effect:-</span></span>
959
+ </p><blockquote id="blockquote_33"> &quot;9. Thus, it is clear that while ordinarily the Court has
960
+ to proceed on the basis of material produces with the
961
+ charge sheet for dealing with the issue of charge but if
962
+ the Court is satisfied that there is material of sterling
963
+ quality which has been withheld by the
964
+ investigator/prosecutor, the Court is not debarred from
965
+ summoning or relying upon the same even if such
966
+ document is not a part of the charge sheet. It does not
967
+ mean that the defence has a right to invoke <a href="/doc/788840/" id="a_121">Section 91</a>
968
+ Code of Criminal Procedure de hors the satisfaction of
969
+ the Court, at the stage of charge.&quot;,
970
+
971
+ coupled with the factum that there is no document placed on the
972
+ record by the SFIO to show any direct benefit having been received by
973
+ the petitioner herein by the alleged fraud in any mode, without any
974
+ observations on the merits or demerits of the aspect of framing of
975
+ charges or otherwise and the trial, if any, in the circumstances, in as
976
+ much as, it has been laid down by the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in &quot;P.
977
+ Chidambaram Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation&quot; 2019
978
+ (14)SCALE 157 that the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains
979
+ the same, in as much as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the
980
+ exception, so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity to
981
+ securing a fair trial and that even though, economic offences fall under
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_38">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 24 of 26</span>
986
+ the category of a grave offence and the said circumstance is to be
987
+ considered at the time of consideration of an application for bail, even
988
+ if the allegation is one of a grave economic offence, it is not a rule that
989
+ bail should be denied in every case since there is no bar created in the
990
+ relevant enactment passed by the legislature nor does the bail
991
+ jurisprudence provide so.
992
+ </blockquote><p data-structure="Section" id="p_36">32. Furthermore, it is in these circumstances that the provisions of
993
+ <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_122">Section 212(6)</a> of the Companies Act, 2013 in the facts and
994
+ circumstances of the instant case would have also to be considered and
995
+ thus, it cannot be contended that the embargo of <a href="/doc/126104697/" id="a_123">Section 212(6)</a> would
996
+ essentially operate in the instant case.
997
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_37">33. In the instant case, there are no contentions raised on behalf of
998
+ the SFIO that the applicant&#x27;s presence cannot be secured or that the
999
+ applicant would flee from justice or that the applicant can influence
1000
+ the witnesses or tamper with the evidence in any manner.
1001
+ </p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_38">34. It cannot also be overlooked that as already observed
1002
+ hereinabove, several of the accused persons namely i.e. Ashish
1003
+ Aggarwal A-91, Vijay Kumar Sharma A-86, Kumari Shiriti A-89,
1004
+ Bimla Gupta A-77, Vinod Kumar Mittal A-34, Arvind Kaneri A-92,
1005
+ Sujata Khandelia A-38, Shashi Sharma A-41 have been released on
1006
+ bail and Ravi Kumar Singhal A-65, Yogesh Gupta A-57, Sanjay Garg
1007
+ A-66, Pawan Kumar Aggarwal A-81,Dharmender Gupta, Rakesh
1008
+ Sharma, Suman Sharma, Amitabh Singh, Abhijit Kanth A-58, Suresh
1009
+ Kumar Gupta, Mohit Kumar and Ritika Agnihotri have been granted
1010
+ interim protection by this Court on the basis of the order dated
1011
+ 11.07.2019 in Bail Appl. No.1615/2019.
1012
+ </p>
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_39">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 25 of 26</span>
1016
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_39"> 35. The applicant in the circumstances is allowed to be released on
1017
+ bail on filing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties
1018
+ of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Companies
1019
+ Act seized of the proceedings in CC No.720/2017 titled as &quot;SFIO Vs.
1020
+ Mohd. Iqbal &amp; Ors.&quot; with conditions that he shall not leave the
1021
+ country, shall not tamper with the evidence, shall provide his contact
1022
+ details to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) and shall
1023
+ commit no offence whatsoever.
1024
+ </p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_40">36. The application is disposed of.
1025
+ </p>
1026
+
1027
+ <p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_41"> ANU MALHOTRA, J.
1028
+ </p>
1029
+ <p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_42">DECEMBER 20, 2019/NC
1030
+
1031
+
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+ <span class="hidden_text" id="span_40">BAIL APPL. No.1706/2019 Page 26 of 26</span>
1035
+ </p>
1036
+ </div>
1037
+ </article>
1038
+ <aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
1039
+ <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
1040
+ <div class="translate_container">
1041
+ <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
1042
+ <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
1043
+ <button id="translatewarn"
1044
+ type="button"
1045
+ aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
1046
+ </div>
1047
+
1048
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
1049
+ <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
1050
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
1051
+
1052
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:punishment-for-fraud">punishment-for-fraud</a></div></li>
1053
+
1054
+ </ul>
1055
+ </nav>
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+ <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
1060
+ <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
1061
+ <ul class="sr-only-list">
1062
+
1063
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20447%20of%20companies%20act%202013">section 447 of companies act 2013</a></div></li>
1064
+
1065
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=companies%20act%202013">companies act 2013</a></div></li>
1066
+
1067
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=sfio">sfio</a></div></li>
1068
+
1069
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=discharge%20application">discharge application</a></div></li>
1070
+
1071
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=serious%20fraud%20investigation%20office">serious fraud investigation office</a></div></li>
1072
+
1073
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=indian%20penal%20code%201860">indian penal code 1860</a></div></li>
1074
+
1075
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ndps%20act">ndps act</a></div></li>
1076
+
1077
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20212%20of%20companies%20act%2C%202013">section 212 of companies act, 2013</a></div></li>
1078
+
1079
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%22sand%20mining%22">"sand mining"</a></div></li>
1080
+
1081
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20447%20companies%20act">section 447 companies act</a></div></li>
1082
+
1083
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20212%286%29%20">section 212(6) </a></div></li>
1084
+
1085
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=NDPS">NDPS</a></div></li>
1086
+
1087
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=economic%20offences">economic offences</a></div></li>
1088
+
1089
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=complaint%20case">complaint case</a></div></li>
1090
+
1091
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=%20sec%20212%20of%20companies%20act%20%20"> sec 212 of companies act </a></div></li>
1092
+
1093
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20447">section 447</a></div></li>
1094
+
1095
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=vs.%20cbi">vs. cbi</a></div></li>
1096
+
1097
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=420%20%2C%20468%2C%20471">420 , 468, 471</a></div></li>
1098
+
1099
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=212%286%29%20companies%20act%20">212(6) companies act </a></div></li>
1100
+
1101
+ <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=212%286%29%20of%20companies%20act%202013">212(6) of companies act 2013</a></div></li>
1102
+
1103
+ </ul>
1104
+ </nav>
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+ </aside>
1109
+ </div>
1110
+
1111
+ </main>
1112
+
1113
+ <footer class="homepage-footer">
1114
+ <div class="homepage-footer-links">
1115
+ <a href="/about.html">About</a>
1116
+ <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
1117
+ <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
1118
+ <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
1119
+ <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
1120
+ <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
1121
+ <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
1122
+
1123
+ <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/133641213/" class="device-toggle">
1124
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="DVAIt9Nbg6nztPJopqLkbDdDb7AgI84eE186NupSXTYBgxSIzau4bNborHVDee8r">
1125
+ <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
1126
+ </form>
1127
+ </div>
1128
+ </footer>
1129
+
1130
+ <script>
1131
+ (function() {
1132
+ const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
1133
+
1134
+ if (navigator.share) {
1135
+ shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
1136
+
1137
+ shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
1138
+ try {
1139
+ await navigator.share({
1140
+ title: document.title,
1141
+ url: window.location.href
1142
+ });
1143
+ } catch (err) {
1144
+ if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
1145
+ console.error('Error sharing:', err);
1146
+ }
1147
+ }
1148
+ });
1149
+ }
1150
+ })();
1151
+ </script>
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+
1155
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1156
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
1157
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
1158
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
1159
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1163
+ (function($) {
1164
+ function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
1165
+ if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
1166
+ throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
1167
+ }
1168
+ }
1169
+
1170
+ function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
1171
+ $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
1172
+ return $("<li></li>")
1173
+ .append(
1174
+ $("<div></div>")
1175
+ .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
1176
+ .html(item.label)
1177
+ )
1178
+ .appendTo(ul);
1179
+ };
1180
+ }
1181
+
1182
+ function attachAutocomplete($input) {
1183
+ if (!$input.length) {
1184
+ return;
1185
+ }
1186
+
1187
+ var $form = $input.closest('form');
1188
+
1189
+ $input.autocomplete({
1190
+ source: "/qsuggest/",
1191
+ delay: 180,
1192
+ minLength: 2,
1193
+ appendTo: 'body',
1194
+ position: {
1195
+ my: "left top",
1196
+ at: "left bottom+6",
1197
+ collision: "flipfit"
1198
+ },
1199
+ classes: {
1200
+ "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
1201
+ "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
1202
+ },
1203
+ open: function() {
1204
+ var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
1205
+ var offset = $input.offset();
1206
+ $menu
1207
+ .width($input.outerWidth())
1208
+ .css({
1209
+ left: offset.left,
1210
+ top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
1211
+ });
1212
+ $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
1213
+ },
1214
+ close: function() {
1215
+ $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
1216
+ },
1217
+ focus: function(event, ui) {
1218
+ // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
1219
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1220
+ event.preventDefault();
1221
+ }
1222
+ },
1223
+ select: function(event, ui) {
1224
+ event.preventDefault();
1225
+ if (ui && ui.item) {
1226
+ $input.val(ui.item.value);
1227
+ }
1228
+
1229
+ if ($form.length) {
1230
+ $form.trigger('submit');
1231
+ } else {
1232
+ $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
1233
+ }
1234
+ }
1235
+ });
1236
+
1237
+ }
1238
+
1239
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1240
+ ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
1241
+ overrideGlobalRenderer();
1242
+ attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
1243
+ attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
1244
+ });
1245
+ })(jQuery);
1246
+ </script>
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+ <script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
1250
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1251
+ $(document).ready(function() {
1252
+ $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
1253
+ $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
1254
+ $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
1255
+
1256
+ $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
1257
+ signupForDownload();
1258
+ e.preventDefault();
1259
+ return false;
1260
+ });
1261
+
1262
+ $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
1263
+ e.preventDefault();
1264
+ var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
1265
+ var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
1266
+ modify_dialog_params(params);
1267
+ $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
1268
+ });
1269
+ });
1270
+ function googleTranslateElementInit() {
1271
+ var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
1272
+ var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1273
+ if (!translateContainer) {
1274
+ console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
1275
+ return;
1276
+ }
1277
+ if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
1278
+ console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
1279
+ return;
1280
+ }
1281
+ new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
1282
+
1283
+ function removeUnwantedText() {
1284
+ var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
1285
+ if (!translateEl) {
1286
+ console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
1287
+ return;
1288
+ }
1289
+
1290
+ var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
1291
+ var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
1292
+
1293
+ var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
1294
+ var node;
1295
+ while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
1296
+ if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
1297
+ node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
1298
+ }
1299
+ }
1300
+
1301
+ translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
1302
+ if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
1303
+ var text = el.textContent || '';
1304
+ if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
1305
+ el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
1306
+ if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
1307
+ el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
1308
+ }
1309
+ }
1310
+ });
1311
+ }
1312
+
1313
+ setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
1314
+ }
1315
+ </script>
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+
1321
+ <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
1322
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1323
+ $(document).ready(function () {
1324
+ $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
1325
+ $('.searchbox_top a').button();
1326
+ $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
1327
+ valid_ag: '',
1328
+ is_valid: '',
1329
+ is_auth: 'False',
1330
+ is_agreement: '',
1331
+ headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
1332
+ }, registerEmailAlert);
1333
+ });
1334
+ </script>
1335
+
1336
+
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
1341
+ <script type="text/javascript">
1342
+ // Authentication context for chatbot
1343
+ window.is_auth = false;
1344
+
1345
+ // Document context for chatbot
1346
+ window.documentContext = {
1347
+ tid: 133641213,
1348
+ title: "Sachin Jain vs Serious Fraud Investigation Officer on 20 December, 2019",
1349
+ url: window.location.href,
1350
+ isFragment: false
1351
+ };
1352
+
1353
+ // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
1354
+ </script>
1355
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
1356
+ <script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
1357
+ <script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
1358
+ <script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
1359
+
1360
+
1361
+
1362
+ <script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c5706ed095991b2',t:'MTc2OTY3MTg1Ng=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
1363
+
1364
+ </html>