Upload batch 0-50

Browse files

Files changed (2) hide show

hc_bulk//IPC_10130715.html +828 -0
hc_bulk//IPC_105683180.html +1837 -0

hc_bulk//IPC_10130715.html ADDED Viewed

	@@ -0,0 +1,828 @@

+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
+"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
+<html lang="en">
+<head>
+    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
+        <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
+    <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
+    <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
+    <script>
+        window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
+        function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
+            gtag('js', new Date());
+            gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
+    </script>
+    <TITLE>State vs Abhayjeet @ Anuj on 26 March, 2013</TITLE>
+</head>
+<body class="docpage">
+    <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
+    <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
+    <header class="main-header" role="banner">
+        <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
+        <div class="header-container">
+            <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
+            <div class="header-logo">
+                <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
+    <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
+                </a>
+            </div>
+              <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
+            <div class="header-search" role="search">
+                <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
+                <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
+                    <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
+                    <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
+                           placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
+                           value="" autocomplete="off">
+                    <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
+                </form>
+            </div>
+            <!-- Right: Navigation -->
+            <div class="header-nav">
+                <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
+                <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
+                    <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
+                    <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
+                    <div class="premium-dropdown">
+                        <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
+                            Premium
+                            <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
+                                <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
+                            </svg>
+                        </button>
+                        <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
+                            <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
+                        </div>
+                    </div>
+                    <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
+                    <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
+                        <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
+                </nav>
+                <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
+                <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
+                    <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
+                        <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
+                        <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
+                        <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
+                    </svg>
+                </button>
+            </div>
+        </div>
+        <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
+        <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
+            <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
+            <div class="mobile-menu-content">
+                <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
+                <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
+                    <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
+                    <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
+                </div>
+                <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
+                <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
+                    <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
+            </div>
+        </nav>
+    </header>
+    <main id="main-content" role="main">
+<h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
+<div class="maindoc">
+<aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
+    <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
+    <div id="structuralanal"></div>
+    <div id="citetextdash"></div>
+</aside>
+<article class="middle_column" role="article">
+    <div class="ad_doc">
+      <a href="/members/signup/">
+    <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
+         alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
+</a>
+    </div>
+<nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
+  <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
+  <form method="POST" action="/doc/10130715/" class="button-form">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="9wah7uw3pNSg5LqIbPkwpeffmVHX5wIvJ98Rm83axOaZtrWxPFM63DHu6NZP87eW">
+      <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
+      <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
+  </form>
+  <form method="POST" action="/doc/10130715/" class="button-form">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="9wah7uw3pNSg5LqIbPkwpeffmVHX5wIvJ98Rm83axOaZtrWxPFM63DHu6NZP87eW">
+      <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
+      <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
+  </form>
+  <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/10130715/" class="button-form">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="9wah7uw3pNSg5LqIbPkwpeffmVHX5wIvJ98Rm83axOaZtrWxPFM63DHu6NZP87eW">
+      <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
+      <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
+  </form>
+</nav>
+<div class="judgments">
+    <div class="covers">
+        <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:10130715">11</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:10130715">0</a>]</span>
+    </div>
+  <h3 class="docsource_main">Delhi District Court</h3>
+  <h2 class="doc_title">State vs Abhayjeet @ Anuj on 26 March, 2013</h2>
+<pre id="pre_1">                      IN THE COURT OF SH. A.K.AGRAWAL,
+                  MM-(East) KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI
+FIR No. 272/2003
+PS: Shakarpur
+Offence Complained of                 : 279/337/304-A <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_1">IPC</a>
+Date of commission of Offence         : 24.06.2003
+Unique Case I.D. No.                  : 02402R085832003
+Serial No.                            : 1550/09
+                        STATE Vs ABHAYJEET @ ANUJ
+Abhayjeet @ Anuj
+S/o Late Kamal Singh,
+R/o 4/185, Gali No. 4, Lalita Park,
+Laxmi Nagar, Delhi                                               ....................Accused
+Mohd. Amar
+Sh. Abdul Rahman
+R/o Jhuggi No. B-70, J.J. Camp, Thokar No. 8,
+Hathishala, Vikas Marg, Delhi.
+                                                               ...............Complainant
+Date of Institution                            :    25.11.2003
+Plea of the accused                            :    Pleaded not guilty
+Date of reserving judgment/order               :    21.03.2013
+Date of pronouncement                          :    26.03.2013
+Final order                                    :    ACQUITTED
+                  Brief reasons for the decision of the case: -
+1.</pre><p data-structure="Facts" id="p_1">     In brief the story of prosecution is that on 24.06.2003 at about 02.00 AM in
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur        State v. Abhayjeet                     Page no.1 of  8
+        night at Vikas Marg, in front of Hathishaala, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, accused
+       Abhayjeet @ Anuj was driving his vehicle i.e. RTV bearing No. DL1VA
+       3418 (in short &quot;vehicle&quot;) in a rash and negligent manner and in the process
+       he struck his vehicle against two persons namely Mohd. Umar and
+       Khursheed, who were sitting on the footpath, causing simple injury to
+       Mohd. Umar and the death of Khursheed. Accordingly, an FIR was
+       registered against the accused for offences punishable<a href="/doc/1270101/" id="a_2"> u/s 279</a>/<a href="/doc/1402213/" id="a_3">337</a>/<a href="/doc/1371604/" id="a_4">304-A</a>
+       IPC. After completion of investigation, present charge sheet was filed
+       against accused Abhayjeet for aforesaid offences on 25.11.2003 and
+       cognizance was also taken on the same date.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Facts" id="p_2">2.     Notice of accusation was served on the accused for offences punishable
+       u/s 279/337/304-A <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_5">IPC</a> on 06.06.2006 to which he pleaded not guilty and
+       claimed trial.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Issue" id="p_3">3.     During PE, only three witnesses were produced for evidence.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_4">4.     PW1 is Retd. SI Kedar Nath, the mechanical inspector. He proved the
+       mechanical inspection report of RTV bearing no.DL1VA 3418 which is
+       Ex.PW1/A.
+</p><p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_5">5.     PW2 is Ct. Rajiv, who joined investigation alongwith ASI Narender on
+       receiving D.D.No.6-A dt.24.06.2003. He got the FIR registered on the
+       direction of IO. The accused was arrested in his presence. Further the
+       Driving Licence and the offending vehicle of accused as well as the
+       documents of vehicle were also seized in the presence of this witness. He
+       correctly identified the accused.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_6">6.     PW3 is IO/SI Narender Singh who stated that on receiving D.D.No.6/A, he
+       along with Ct.Narender went to the place of accident and found the
+       accidental vehicle bearing no.DL1VA 3418 at the spot. He recorded the
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur      State v. Abhayjeet               Page no.2 of  8
+        statement of injured Mohd. Umar vide Ex.PW3/A. Then, he went to LBS
+       hospital and collected MLC of deceased Khursheed. Thereafter, he
+       prepared rukka vide Ex.PW3/B and the site plan vide Ex.PW3/C. He
+       seized the vehicle and other documents and also arrested the accused.
+       He also got the mechanical inspection of the vehicle conducted. The body
+       of the deceased was handed over to the relatives after post mortem. After
+       completion of investigation, he filled the charge sheet. This witness
+       correctly identified the accused.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_7">7.     The prosecution had also cited three public witnesses namely Mohd.
+</p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_8">       Umar, Shahi-ud-din and Choudhary Mahboob, in support of its case.
+       Mohd. Umar was the eye witness of the accident whereas Shahi-ud-din
+       and Choudhary Mahboob were the relatives of the deceased Khursheed.
+       However all the above public witnesses could not be examined as
+       repeated processes issued to them were returned unserved with the report
+       that the witnesses were untraceable. Even summons issued to them
+       through the IO as well as DCP proved futile to secure their presence in
+       court. Thereafter, PE was closed.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_9">8.     Statement of accused was recorded<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_6"> u/s 313</a> Cr.P.C. r/w 281 <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_7">Cr.P.C</a>., on
+       03.12.2011, wherein, the accused admitted that the accident took place
+       from his vehicle but he also stated that he was not driving the vehicle in a
+       rash and negligent manner. He further stated that accident took place
+       because the brakes of his vehicle were not working and the deceased and
+       the injured came in front of his vehicle all of a sudden. No Defence
+       evidence was lead by the accused.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_10">9.     During final arguments, the Ld. APP prayed for conviction of the accused
+       arguing that the accused had himself admitted in his statement<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_8"> u/s 313</a>
+       Cr.P.C., that the accident took place from his vehicle and the prosecution
+       witnesses examined in court have also corroborated this fact. On the other
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur      State v. Abhayjeet                Page no.3 of  8
+        hand, Ld. Defence counsel argued that the prosecution case was not
+       proved in view of non-examination of the sole eye witness Mohd. Umar.
+       He also argued that the statement of accused cannot be read in evidence
+       against him and the prosecution case must stand on its own legs. Even
+       otherwise he argued that the accused had merely admitted the accident
+       and he also stated that he was not driving the vehicle in a rash and
+       negligent manner. Accordingly, he prayed for acquittal of the accused.
+       Thereafter final arguments were closed.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Section" id="p_11">10.    In the present case, the accused is alleged to have committed an offence
+       punishable<a href="/doc/1270101/" id="a_9"> u/s 279</a>/<a href="/doc/1402213/" id="a_10">337</a>/<a href="/doc/1371604/" id="a_11">304-A</a> IPC which reads as under:-
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_1">       Sec 279 <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_12">IPC</a>: &quot;Whoever drives any vehicle, or rides, on any public way in
+       a manner so rash or negligent as to endanger human life, or to be likely to
+       cause hurt or injury to any other person, shall be punished with
+       imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six
+       months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with
+       both.&quot;
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_2">       Sec 337 <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_13">IPC</a>: &quot;Whoever causes hurt to any person by doing any act so
+       rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or the personal safety of
+       others, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a
+       term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to
+       five hundred rupees, or with both.&quot;
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_3">       Sec 304-A <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_14">IPC</a>: &quot;Whoever causes the death of any person by doing any
+       rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide shall be
+       punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
+       extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.&quot;
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_4">       So the prosecution is required to prove two things for offence<a href="/doc/1270101/" id="a_15"> u/s 279</a>
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur       State v. Abhayjeet              Page no.4 of  8
+        <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_16">IPC</a>:-
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_5">       (a) Firstly, the accused was the driver of the vehicle in question, and
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_6">       (b) Secondly, driving of vehicle by accused was in a manner so rash or
+       negligent, so as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or
+       injury to any other person.
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_12">       Further in order to prove offence punishable<a href="/doc/1402213/" id="a_17"> u/s 337</a> IPC, the prosecution
+       in addition to above facts, is also required to prove :-
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_7">       (c) That by doing the aforesaid act in the aforesaid manner, the accused
+       caused simple hurt to any person.
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_13">       And in order to prove offence punishable<a href="/doc/1371604/" id="a_18"> u/s 304-A</a> IPC, the prosecution in
+       addition to facts (a) and (b), is also required to prove :-
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_8">       (d) That by doing the aforesaid act in the aforesaid manner, the accused
+       also caused the death of a person;
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_14">11.    Having heard the submissions of both sides, it is apparent that the
+       accused is not disputing the fact that the accident took place from his
+       vehicle and resultantly a death of a person was caused in the accident, so
+       the only question remaining before the court is whether the evidence on
+       record is sufficient to prove that the alleged accident was caused due to
+       the rash and negligent driving of the accused or not.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_15">12.    Submissions of both sides has been duly considered and the evidence on
+       record carefully perused. As far as witnesses are concerned, PW1 is
+       mechanical inspector, who is a formal witness. PW2 is the police
+       constable who joined investigation with IO/ASI Narender after the
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur       State v. Abhayjeet                Page no.5 of  8
+        information regarding accident was received in the PS and lastly PW3 is
+       the IO himself. The testimony of PW2 and PW3 is corroborative in nature.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_16">13.    In the instant case, the sole eye witness of this case namely, Mohd. Umar
+       remained untraceable. None of other witnesses produced by prosecution
+       is an eye witness. The testimony of PW2 and PW3 does not even form
+       circumstantial evidence against the accused. It is apparent that the
+       prosecution seeks conviction of the accused on the sole basis of his
+       statement<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_19"> u/s 313</a> Cr.P.C., wherein he admitted that he committed the
+       accident. The question before the court at this stage is whether the
+       statement of accused can be treated as an evidence against him or not?
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_17">14.    <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="13149785" id="span_1">In <a href="/doc/13149785/" id="a_20">Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra</a>, AIR 1984 SC
+       1622, the Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court observed that it is well settled that the
+       prosecution&#x27;s case must stand or fall on its own legs and cannot derive
+       any strength from the weakness of the defence put up by the accused.</span>
+       <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="469763" id="span_2">Further in <a href="/doc/469763/" id="a_21">Mohan Singh v. Prem Singh and Anr.</a> 2003 SCC (Crl.) 1514,
+       the Apex Court has held : &quot;The statement of accused under <a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_22">Section 313</a>
+       of Cr.P.C. is not a substantive piece of evidence. It can be used for
+       appreciating evidence led by the prosecution to accept or reject it. It is,
+       however, not a substitute for the evidence of the prosecution.&quot;</span> <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="1589218" id="span_3">This
+       proposition of law was reiterated by Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in <a href="/doc/1589218/" id="a_23">Bishnu
+       Prasad Sinha v. State of Assam</a> reported as 2007 SCW 569 wherein it
+       was held that &quot;It is well settled that statements under <a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_24">Section 313</a> of the
+       Code of Criminal Procedure, cannot form the sole basis of conviction; but
+       the effect thereof may be considered in the light of other evidences
+       brought on record.&quot;</span>
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_18">15.    So, the above discussion leads to the settled proposition of law that the
+       statement of accused cannot be the sole basis of his conviction and it can
+       be used only for the limited purpose of lending credibility to the
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur     State v. Abhayjeet                Page no.6 of  8
+        prosecution case in the light of the evidence put forth by the prosecution.
+       So the statement of accused Abhayjeet<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_25"> u/s 313</a> Cr.P.C. evenif inculpatory
+       to an extent, is not sufficient enough for the prosecution to secure
+       conviction of the accused.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_19"><span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="155591" id="span_4">16.    Even otherwise, one important point which has been ignored by the
+       prosecution is that the accused has also categorically stated that he was
+       not rash and negligent in driving the vehicle. Further he states that the
+       accident took place as the brakes of the vehicle were not working and the
+       deceased and injured came in front of his vehicle all of a sudden. So the
+       prosecution still has to prove one of the essential ingredient of the
+       offences<a href="/doc/1270101/" id="a_26"> u/s 279</a>/<a href="/doc/1402213/" id="a_27">337</a>/<a href="/doc/1371604/" id="a_28">304-A</a> IPC i.e. rash and negligent driving of accused.
+       Reference can be made to observations of Hon&#x27;ble Supreme Court in
+       <a href="/doc/155591/" id="a_29">Naresh Giri v. State of M.P.</a> 2008 1 SCC791 where it was held that
+       &quot;Negligence and rashness are essential elements under <a href="/doc/1371604/" id="a_30">Section 304-A</a>.&quot;</span>
+       <span class="citetext" data-sentiment="Pos" data-docid="506063" id="span_5">Furthermore, it has also been held in <a href="/doc/506063/" id="a_31">Lachhman v. State of Haryana</a>
+       2000(2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 727 that simply because an accident has taken
+       place there cannot be any presumption that accident took place due to
+       rash and negligent driving of the accused.</span>
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_20">17.    In the facts and circumstances of this case, there is no eye witness who
+       can prove under what circumstances the accident took place or whether
+       the accused was at fault or not. The sole eye witness is untraceable.
+       There is no evidence, direct or circumstantial, which can prove that the
+       accident had taken place due to rash and negligent driving of the accused.
+       So evenif it were to be presumed that the accident and death was caused
+       by the accused, he can still be held not liable for offences punishable<a href="/doc/1270101/" id="a_32"> u/s
+       279</a>/<a href="/doc/1402213/" id="a_33">337</a>/<a href="/doc/1371604/" id="a_34">304-A</a> IPC as rash and negligent driving by him, is not proved.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_21">18.    Infact, prosecution has completely failed to produce incriminating evidence
+       against accused. With these observations, as there is insufficient evidence
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur      State v. Abhayjeet               Page no.7 of  8
+        against accused Abhayjeet @ Anuj, he is hereby acquitted from offences
+       punishable<a href="/doc/1270101/" id="a_35"> u/s 279</a>/<a href="/doc/1402213/" id="a_36">337</a>/<a href="/doc/1371604/" id="a_37">304-A</a> IPC. Bail bond and surety bond of accused
+       shall be cancelled after six months in view of Section 437 (A) Cr.P.C.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_22">       Ordered accordingly. File be consigned to Record Room.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_23">Announced in open court
+on Dated: 26.03.2013
+                                                              (A. K. AGRAWAL)
+                                                         MM(East)/KKD/26.03.2013
+FIR No.272/2003   PS Shakarpur      State v. Abhayjeet                Page no.8 of  8
+ </p>
+</div>
+</article>
+<aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
+  <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
+  <div class="translate_container">
+      <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
+      <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
+      <button id="translatewarn"
+              type="button"
+              aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
+  </div>
+    <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
+      <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
+      <ul class="sr-only-list">
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:death-by-negligence">death-by-negligence</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:examine-accused">examine-accused</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:indian-penal-code">indian-penal-code</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:hurt-by-endangering-life">hurt-by-endangering-life</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:rash-and-negligent-driving">rash-and-negligent-driving</a></div></li>
+      </ul>
+    </nav>
+    <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
+      <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
+      <ul class="sr-only-list">
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20279%20ipc">section 279 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=sole%20eye%20witness%20%20">sole eye witness  </a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=rash%20and%20negligent%20driving">rash and negligent driving</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=sec%20337%20ipc">sec 337 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=337%20ipc">337 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=304%20ipc">304 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=negligent%20driving">negligent driving</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=indian%20penal%20code%20304">indian penal code 304</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=304%20a%20ipc">304 a ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=279%20ipc">279 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=what%20is%20hurt">what is hurt</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=279%20and%20337%2C">279 and 337,</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=sec.279%20of%20the%20indian%20penal%20code">sec.279 of the indian penal code</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=rash%20and%20negligent">rash and negligent</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=279%20%20337%20%20304%20A">279  337  304 A</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20304">section 304</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=279%20indian%20penal%20code">279 indian penal code</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=279%2C304%20a%20ipc">279,304 a ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20337%20indian%20penal%20code%20">section 337 indian penal code </a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20304%20a%20ipc">section 304 a ipc</a></div></li>
+      </ul>
+    </nav>
+</aside>
+</div>
+    </main>
+    <footer class="homepage-footer">
+  <div class="homepage-footer-links">
+    <a href="/about.html">About</a>
+    <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
+    <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
+    <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
+    <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
+    <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
+    <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
+    <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/10130715/" class="device-toggle">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="9wah7uw3pNSg5LqIbPkwpeffmVHX5wIvJ98Rm83axOaZtrWxPFM63DHu6NZP87eW">
+      <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
+    </form>
+  </div>
+</footer>
+<script>
+(function() {
+  const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
+  if (navigator.share) {
+    shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
+    shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
+      try {
+        await navigator.share({
+          title: document.title,
+          url: window.location.href
+        });
+      } catch (err) {
+        if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
+          console.error('Error sharing:', err);
+        }
+      }
+    });
+  }
+})();
+</script>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
+<script type="text/javascript">
+(function($) {
+    function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
+        if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
+            throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
+        }
+    }
+    function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
+        $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
+            return $("<li></li>")
+                .append(
+                    $("<div></div>")
+                        .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
+                        .html(item.label)
+                )
+                .appendTo(ul);
+        };
+    }
+    function attachAutocomplete($input) {
+        if (!$input.length) {
+            return;
+        }
+        var $form = $input.closest('form');
+        $input.autocomplete({
+            source: "/qsuggest/",
+            delay: 180,
+            minLength: 2,
+            appendTo: 'body',
+            position: {
+                my: "left top",
+                at: "left bottom+6",
+                collision: "flipfit"
+            },
+            classes: {
+                "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
+                "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
+            },
+            open: function() {
+                var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
+                var offset = $input.offset();
+                $menu
+                    .width($input.outerWidth())
+                    .css({
+                        left: offset.left,
+                        top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
+                    });
+                $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
+            },
+            close: function() {
+                $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
+            },
+            focus: function(event, ui) {
+                // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
+                if (ui && ui.item) {
+                    event.preventDefault();
+                }
+            },
+            select: function(event, ui) {
+                event.preventDefault();
+                if (ui && ui.item) {
+                    $input.val(ui.item.value);
+                }
+                if ($form.length) {
+                    $form.trigger('submit');
+                } else {
+                    $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
+                }
+            }
+        });
+    }
+    $(document).ready(function() {
+        ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
+        overrideGlobalRenderer();
+        attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
+        attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
+    });
+})(jQuery);
+</script>
+<script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
+<script type="text/javascript">
+$(document).ready(function() {
+    $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
+    $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
+    $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
+    $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
+        signupForDownload();
+        e.preventDefault();
+        return false;
+    });
+    $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
+        e.preventDefault();
+        var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
+        var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
+        modify_dialog_params(params);
+        $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
+    });
+});
+function googleTranslateElementInit() {
+    var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
+    var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
+    if (!translateContainer) {
+        console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
+        return;
+    }
+    if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
+        console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
+        return;
+    }
+    new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
+    function removeUnwantedText() {
+        var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
+        if (!translateEl) {
+            console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
+            return;
+        }
+        var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
+        var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
+        var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
+        var node;
+        while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
+            if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
+                node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
+            }
+        }
+        translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
+            if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
+            var text = el.textContent || '';
+            if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
+                el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
+                if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
+                    el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
+                }
+            }
+        });
+    }
+    setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
+}
+</script>
+<SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
+<script type="text/javascript">
+    $(document).ready(function () {
+        $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
+        $('.searchbox_top a').button();
+        $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
+            valid_ag: '',
+            is_valid: '',
+            is_auth: 'False',
+            is_agreement: '',
+            headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
+        }, registerEmailAlert);
+});
+</script>
+<link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
+<script type="text/javascript">
+    // Authentication context for chatbot
+    window.is_auth = false;
+    // Document context for chatbot
+    window.documentContext = {
+        tid: 10130715,
+        title: "State vs Abhayjeet @ Anuj on 26 March, 2013",
+        url: window.location.href,
+        isFragment: false
+    };
+    // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
+</script>
+<script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
+<script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
+<script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
+<script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
+<script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c56fcfb49e05a0b',t:'MTc2OTY3MTQ0OA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
+</html>

hc_bulk//IPC_105683180.html ADDED Viewed

	@@ -0,0 +1,1837 @@

+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
+"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
+<html lang="en">
+<head>
+    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.theme.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/footer.css" rel="stylesheet">
+    <link type="text/css" href="/static/print.css" rel="stylesheet">
+        <LINK REL="stylesheet" TYPE="text/css" HREF="/static/search_desktop_v20.css?v=20241118-1">
+    <!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->
+    <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HML2J37TKY"></script>
+    <script>
+        window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
+        function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}
+            gtag('js', new Date());
+            gtag('config', 'G-HML2J37TKY');
+    </script>
+    <TITLE>Is Examined As Pw.1 And His Father I.E vs Have Not Stabbed Him With Knife on 4 August, 2022</TITLE>
+</head>
+<body class="docpage">
+    <!-- Skip link for keyboard and screen reader users -->
+    <a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
+    <header class="main-header" role="banner">
+        <h1 class="sr-only">Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law</h1>
+        <div class="header-container">
+            <!-- Left: Logo (hidden on homepage) -->
+            <div class="header-logo">
+                <a href="/" aria-label="Indian Kanoon Home">
+    <img src="/static/pics/ikanoon7_large.png" alt="Indian Kanoon" class="header-logo-img">
+                </a>
+            </div>
+              <!-- Center: Search Bar (hidden on homepage and search page) -->
+            <div class="header-search" role="search">
+                <h2 class="sr-only">Search</h2>
+                <form method="GET" action="/search/" class="search-form">
+                    <label for="header-search-box" class="sr-only">Search Indian laws and judgments</label>
+                    <input type="text" name="formInput" class="searchbox" id="header-search-box"
+                           placeholder="Search laws, court judgments and everything else ..."
+                           value="" autocomplete="off">
+                    <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submitbutton header-submitbutton" id="header-submit-button">
+                </form>
+            </div>
+            <!-- Right: Navigation -->
+            <div class="header-nav">
+                <!-- Desktop Navigation -->
+                <nav class="nav-desktop" aria-label="Main navigation">
+                    <h2 class="sr-only">Main Navigation</h2>
+                    <a href="/free_features/" class="nav-link">Free features</a>
+                    <div class="premium-dropdown">
+                        <button class="nav-link premium-dropdown-btn" id="premium-dropdown-btn" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="premium-dropdown-menu" aria-haspopup="true">
+                            Premium
+                            <svg width="12" height="12" viewBox="0 0 12 12" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
+                                <polyline points="3 4.5 6 7.5 9 4.5"></polyline>
+                            </svg>
+                        </button>
+                        <div class="premium-dropdown-menu" id="premium-dropdown-menu" role="menu" aria-hidden="true">
+                            <a href="/premium/" class="premium-dropdown-item" role="menuitem">Premium features</a>
+                        </div>
+                    </div>
+                    <a href="/prism/" class="nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
+                    <a href="/prism/pricing" class="nav-link">Pricing</a>
+                        <a href="/members/login/" class="nav-link">Login</a>
+                </nav>
+                <!-- Mobile Menu Button -->
+                <button class="mobile-menu-btn" id="mobile-menu-btn" aria-label="Open mobile menu" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="mobile-menu">
+                    <svg width="24" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" aria-hidden="true">
+                        <line x1="3" y1="6" x2="21" y2="6"></line>
+                        <line x1="3" y1="12" x2="21" y2="12"></line>
+                        <line x1="3" y1="18" x2="21" y2="18"></line>
+                    </svg>
+                </button>
+            </div>
+        </div>
+        <!-- Mobile Menu (hidden by default) -->
+        <nav class="mobile-menu" id="mobile-menu" aria-label="Mobile navigation" aria-hidden="true">
+            <h2 class="sr-only">Mobile Navigation</h2>
+            <div class="mobile-menu-content">
+                <a href="/free_features/" class="mobile-nav-link">Free features</a>
+                <div class="premium-dropdown mobile">
+                    <div class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-header">Premium</div>
+                    <a href="/premium/" class="mobile-nav-link premium-dropdown-item">Premium features</a>
+                </div>
+                <a href="/prism/" class="mobile-nav-link brand-prism">Prism AI</a>
+                <a href="/prism/pricing" class="mobile-nav-link">Pricing</a>
+                    <a href="/members/login/" class="mobile-nav-link">Login</a>
+            </div>
+        </nav>
+    </header>
+    <main id="main-content" role="main">
+<h2 class="sr-only">Legal Document View</h2>
+<div class="maindoc">
+<aside class="left_column sticky_column" aria-label="Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments">
+    <h3 class="sr-only">Tools for analyzing structure and cite text of judgments</h3>
+    <div id="structuralanal"></div>
+    <div id="citetextdash"></div>
+</aside>
+<article class="middle_column" role="article">
+    <div class="ad_doc">
+      <a href="/members/signup/">
+    <img src="/static/posters/Introducing Prism, A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon.gif"
+         alt="Introducing PRISM - A suite of AI tools developed on the vast and comprehensive database of Indian Kanoon">
+</a>
+    </div>
+<nav class="docoptions" aria-label="Document actions">
+  <h4 class="sr-only">Document Options</h4>
+  <form method="POST" action="/doc/105683180/" class="button-form">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="l9Kx5juSkxByc55OdckqtQIqrgW0nBDn8R4ApwgaDv8FKahW68SPywTc6Kprv4qd">
+      <input type="hidden" name="type" value="pdf">
+      <button id="pdfdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download document as PDF">Get in PDF</button>
+  </form>
+  <form method="POST" action="/doc/105683180/" class="button-form">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="l9Kx5juSkxByc55OdckqtQIqrgW0nBDn8R4ApwgaDv8FKahW68SPywTc6Kprv4qd">
+      <input type="hidden" name="type" value="print">
+      <button id="printdoc" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Print this document">Print it!</button>
+  </form>
+  <form id="courtcopyform" method="POST" action="/doc/105683180/" class="button-form">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="l9Kx5juSkxByc55OdckqtQIqrgW0nBDn8R4ApwgaDv8FKahW68SPywTc6Kprv4qd">
+      <input type="hidden" name="type" value="courtcopy">
+      <button id="courtcopysubmit" type="submit" class="action-button" aria-label="Download official court copy">Download Court Copy</button>
+  </form>
+</nav>
+<div class="judgments">
+    <div class="covers">
+        <span class="citetop">[Cites <a href="/search/?formInput=cites:105683180">13</a>, Cited by <a href="/search/?formInput=citedby:105683180">0</a>]</span>
+    </div>
+  <h3 class="docsource_main">Bangalore District Court</h3>
+  <h2 class="doc_title">Is Examined As Pw.1 And His Father I.E vs Have Not Stabbed Him With Knife on 4 August, 2022</h2>
+<pre id="pre_1">1
+KABC030191262020
+                         Presented on    : 13-03-2020
+                         Registered on   : 13-03-2020
+                         Decided on      : 04-08-2022
+                         Duration        : 2 years, 4 months, 22 days
+     IN THE COURT OF THE XXXI ADDL. C.M.M., BENGALURU.
+               Dated this the 4th day of August 2022
+           Present:   SRI.SHANKARAPPA B.MALASHETTI
+                                     B.com., LL.B.(Spl)
+                        XXXI ADDL. C.M.M., BENGALURU.
+                          C.C. NO.5045-2020
+              JUDGMENT U/S 355           OF THE <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_1">Cr.P.C</a>. 1973.
+         Sl. No. of the Case           5045-2020
+         The date of commission of the 25/09/2019
+         offence
+         Name of the complainant       Bagalagunte Police Station
+         Name of the accused               1: Subbaraju @ Gidda ,
+                                           S/o.Raju, 27 years, R/at
+                                           No.407, 17th Cross,
+                                           Ravindranagar, T.Dasarahalli,
+                                           Bengaluru.
+                                           2: Umesh.K.,
+                                           S/o.Kadrinarasimhaiah, 32
+                                           years, R/at No. 285, 5th Cross,
+                                           II Main,
+                                           Ravindranagar, T.Dasarahalli,
+                                           Bengaluru.
+         The offence complained of or      U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_2">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/770961/" id="a_3">323</a>, <a href="/doc/267625/" id="a_4">324</a>, 504,
+         proved                            506 r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_5">IPC</a>.
+          Plea of the accused and his       Pleaded not guilty
+          examination
+          State represented by:              Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+ 2
+                               Bengaluru.
+    Accused represented by:    Sri.SRK Advocate,
+                               Bengaluru.
+    Final Order               Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_6">Cr.PC</a>
+                              Accused-1 &amp; 2 are acquitted.
+    Date of such order        04/08/2022
+    For the following:-
+ 3
+                                JUDGMENT
+</pre>
+<p data-structure="Issue" id="p_1">     The PSI,     Bagalagunte Police Station has filed the charge sheet
+against the accused persons      for the offences punishable    U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_7">sec.341</a>,
+<a href="/doc/770961/" id="a_8">323</a>, <a href="/doc/267625/" id="a_9">324</a>, 504, 506 r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_10">IPC</a>.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Facts" id="p_2">       2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_1">      On    25.09.2019     at about 9 p.m. infront of Church, situated at
+T.Dasarahalli, Mallasandra, Ravindra Nagar,      within the jurisdiction of
+Bagalagunte Police Station.,     accused - 1 and 2 in furtherance        of
+common intention to commit an offence        picked up quarrel with CW.1
+and in the above said transaction wrongfully restrained him, accused -
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_2">1   assaulted him with     hands, stabbed with knife on the left stomach
+and hand, abused and threatened him, thereby accused has committed
+the alleged offences.
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="Issue" id="p_3">     3. Accused-1 &amp; 2 are on bail.     As required u/sec. 207 of <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_11">Cr.PC</a>, the
+copies of the charge sheet papers were furnished to the accused. Charge
+was framed for the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_12">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/770961/" id="a_13">323</a>, <a href="/doc/267625/" id="a_14">324</a>, 504, 506
+r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_15">IPC</a>.    Accused have pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Facts" id="p_4">     4. In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution has
+examined    PW.1 and 2 and got marked Ex.P.1 to 3.       On closure of the
+prosecution evidence, as there was no incriminating evidence against the
+ 4
+accused, the statement of the accused u/<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_16">sec.313</a> Cr.PC is                    dispensed
+with.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_5">        5. I have heard the arguments from both the sides.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Issue" id="p_6">        6. The following points that arise for my consideration are:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_3">                     1. Whether the prosecution                 proves
+                        beyond all reasonable doubt                  that
+                        on    25.09.2019          at about 9 p.m.
+                        infront     of    Church,       situated      at
+                        T.Dasarahalli, Mallasandra, Ravindra
+                        Nagar,       within the        jurisdiction of
+                        Bagalagunte Police Station., accused
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_4">                        - 1 and 2 in furtherance of common
+                        intention    to    commit        an    offence
+                        picked up quarrel with CW.1 and in
+                        the       above         said      transaction
+                        wrongfully restrained            CW.1        and
+                        thereby          committed an          offence
+                        punishable U/<a href="/doc/661069/" id="a_17">sec.341</a> r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_18">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_5">                     2. Whether      the    prosecution         further
+                        proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+                        that on the above said date, time
+                        and   place       accused-1      and     2     in
+                        furtherance of common intention to
+                        commit an offence                 picked up
+                        quarrel with CW.1         and in the above
+                        said transaction               accused - 1
+                        assaulted        with     hands to CW.1
+ 5
+      thus voluntarily caused hurt and
+      thereby          committed      the offence
+      punishable U/s.323 r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_19">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_6">    3. Whether     the       prosecution    further
+      proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+      that on the above said date, time
+      and place accused             -1 &amp; 2       in
+      furtherance of common intention to
+      commit an offence picked up quarrel
+      with CW.1 and in the above said
+      transaction accused - 1 stabbed with
+      knife on the left stomach and on the
+      hands of CW.1              thereby caused
+      simple      bleeding       injuries      and
+      thereby committed an                  offence
+      punishable U/<a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_20">sec.324</a> r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_21">IPC</a>.?.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_7">    4. Whether     the       prosecution    further
+      proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+      that on the above said date, time
+      and place picked up quarrel with
+      CW.1       and    in    the    above     said
+      transaction        accused -1         abused
+      CW.1 in filthy language knowingly
+      such insult will provoke breach of
+      peace      and thereby committed an
+      offence punishable U/<a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_22">sec.504</a> r/w 34
+      of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_23">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_8">    5. Whether     the       prosecution    further
+      proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+      that on the above said date, time
+      and place           accused -1 &amp; 2 in
+ 6
+                      furtherance of common intention to
+                      commit an offence            picked up
+                      quarrel with CW.1 and in the above
+                      said transaction      threatened CW.1
+                      with      dire    consequences     thus
+                      committed criminal intimidation and
+                      thereby          committed an offence
+                      punishable U/<a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_24">sec.506</a> r/w 34           of
+                      <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_25">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_9">                   6. What order?
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_10">    7.My finding on the above points are held as under:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_11">                      Point No.1 to 5: In the negative
+                      Point No.6:        As per final order
+                                             for the following:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_12">                                    REASONS
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_13">     8.Point Nos.1 to 5 :-
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_14">     The above     points are inter linked to each other hence, I took all
+the points together for consideration in order to avoid repeatation.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_15">     9.In order to substantiate the        contents of complaint,      very
+complainant is examined as PW.1 and his father i.e., CW.4 is examined
+as PW.2, but they fully turned hostile to the case of prosecution.     PW.1
+in his evidence deposed that, accused have          neither restrained him
+wrongfully nor   assaulted him with hands. He further deposed that,
+accused have     not stabbed him with knife, not abused him in filthy
+language   and not     put any kind of life threat to him. He        further
+ 7
+deposed that, he    had been to Police Station for some other reason,
+wherein police took his signatures on documents as per Ex.P1 and P2,
+but he does not know        the contents of the complaint - Ex.P.1 and
+Mahazar Ex.P2.     PW.2    in his evidence   deposed that,   he know the
+accused persons and Cw.1 is his son, but he does not know about the
+present case. He    denied for having given statement as per Ex.P3.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_16">     10. Even in the cross-examination by learned Sr.APP, PW.1 and 2
+have not supported the case of the prosecution. PW.1 has specifically
+denied about filing of complaint before the police as per Ex.P.1.      It is
+fatal to the case of the prosecution.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_17">     11. As I discussed above, after evidence of PW.1 &amp; 2, learned Sr.APP
+has prayed for issuance of summons to other witnesses. In this case,
+PW.1 being the complainant and victim has not supported the case of
+the prosecution. Moreover, in the cross-examination PW.1 has clearly
+admitted that matter is ended in compromise. Admittedly investigating
+officer has filed charge sheet against accused for the offence punishable
+U/<a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_26">sec.324</a>    of    IPC., which is non-compoundable in nature. In my
+considered view, due to compromise, PW.1 might have said goodbye to
+the case of prosecution.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_18">     12.Apart from this, when PW.1      being the complainant    and victim
+has not supported the case of the prosecution,        mere      issuance of
+ 8
+summons to other witnesses and examination of those witnesses would
+not serve the purpose of the prosecution. Moreover, in order to maintain
+cordial relationship between accused and complainant in future days
+and to save the precious time of court, other witnesses were dropped
+by rejecting the prayer of learned Sr.APP.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_19">     13.In the absence of cogent, corroborative and material evidence
+of the victim as well as other independent witnesses, it is not safe to
+come to conclusion that     prosecution has    successfully proved   guilt
+against the accused. Accordingly, my answer to the above point Nos. 1
+to 5 are in the negative.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_20">     14. Point No.6:- For the reasons discussed herein above, I proceed
+to pass the following:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_21">                                       ORDER
+             Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_27">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,   accused -1 and 2
+     are    hereby acquitted of the offences punishable   U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_28">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1011035/" id="a_29">323</a>,
+     <a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_30">324</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_31">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_32">506</a> r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_33">IPC</a>.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_22">           Bail bonds of accused and their surety bonds stand cancelled
+     after six months from today.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_23">           The property seized in PF.No.187/2019 dated 03.10.2019 is
+     worthless is ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_24">       (Dictated to the stenographer, transcript thereof, corrected and
+then pronounced by me in the open court this the 4 th day of August
+2022.)
+                                    (Shankarappa B.Malashetti)
+                                    XXXI Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.
+ 9
+                           Annexure:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_25">1.List of Witnesses examined on behalf of the prosecution:
+P. Ws:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_26">1. Shivakumar
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_27">2. Thangavelu.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_28">2.List of Documents marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+Ex.Ps:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_29">1. Complaint.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_30">2. Mahazar
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_31">3. Statement of PW.2.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_32">3.List of Material objects marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_33">                             -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_34">4.List of witnesses and documents marked on behalf of the
+accused:                    -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="Issue" id="p_7">                            XXXI Addl. C. M. M. Bengaluru.
+</p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_8"> 10
+           Judgment pronounced in the open court.
+     (vide separate order):
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_35">                          ORDER
+            Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_34">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,
+     accused -1 and 2 are      hereby acquitted of
+     the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_35">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1011035/" id="a_36">323</a>, <a href="/doc/724142/" id="a_37">324</a>,
+     <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_38">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_39">506</a> r/w 34 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_40">IPC</a>.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_36">          Bail bonds of accused and their surety
+     bonds stand cancelled after six months from
+     today.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_37">          The property seized in PF.No.187/2019
+     dated 03.10.2019 is worthless is ordered to be
+     destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_38">                     31st Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.</blockquote><pre id="pre_2">
+ 11
+ 12
+ 13
+           Sl. No. of the Case                  6497/2020
+</pre><blockquote id="blockquote_39">           The date of commission 10/02/2020
+           of the offence
+           Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+           complainant
+           Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                  S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                  No.45/1,    7th   Cross,      I   Main,
+                                  Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                  Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_40">                                  Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_41">                                  Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                  Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_42">           The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_41">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_42">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_43">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_44">506</a> of IPC.
+           of or proved
+            Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+            and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_43"> 9. 7.      State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                   Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_44">     8.     Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_45">            by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_46">     9.    Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_45">Cr.PC</a>
+                                  Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_47">     10.   Date of such order      22/09/2021
+           For the following:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_48"> 14
+            Sl. No. of the Case                     6497/2020
+            The date of commission 10/02/2020
+            of the offence
+            Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+            complainant
+            Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                      S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                      No.45/1,    7th    Cross,     I   Main,
+                                      Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                      Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_49">                                      Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_50">                                      Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                      Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_51">            The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_46">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_47">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_48">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_49">506</a> of IPC.
+            of or proved
+             Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+             and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_52"> 9. 7.       State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                    Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_53">     8.      Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_54">             by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_55">     9.     Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_50">Cr.PC</a>
+                                   Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_56">     10.     Date of such order        22/09/2021
+             For the following:-
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_57">                                JUDGMENT
+      The PSI,      Bagalagunte Police Station has filed the charge sheet
+against the accused         for the offences punishable          U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_51">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_52">326</a>,
+<a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_53">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_54">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_58">          2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_59">       On 10.02.2020 at about 5 p.m. at Chaitra Bar &amp; Restaurant
+bearing No.40, situated at T.Dasarahalli, within the jurisdiction of
+ 15
+Bagalagunte Police Station     accused     picked up quarrel with CW.1
+and CW.2 with regard to marriage and in the above said transaction
+wrongfully restraned CW.1, assaulted with beer bottle on the mouth
+of CW.1 and on account of the same CW.1 lost six front teeth and
+bleeding injury to lips thus voluntarily caused grievous hurt. Further,
+accused      abused CW.1 in filthy language knowingly such insult will
+provoke breach of peace           and      threatened him    with dire
+consequences thus committed criminal intimidation         and thereby
+accused has committed the alleged offences.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_60">     3. Accused is on bail. As required u/sec. 207 of <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_55">Cr.PC</a>, the copies
+of the charge sheet papers were furnished to the accused. Charge was
+framed for the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_56">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_57">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_58">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_59">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote><p data-structure="PetArg" id="p_9">Accused has pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_10">        4. In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution
+has examined       PW.1 and got marked Ex.P.1 and 2.        On closure of the
+prosecution evidence, as there was no incriminating evidence against
+the accused, the statement of the accused u/<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_60">sec.313</a> Cr.PC is dispensed
+with.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_11">        5. I have heard the arguments from both the sides.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Issue" id="p_12">        6. The following points that arise for my consideration are:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_61">                     1) Whether the prosecution        proves
+                        beyond all reasonable doubt         that
+                        on 10.02.2020 at about 5 p.m.        at
+                        Chaitra Bar &amp; Restaurant bearing
+                        No.40, situated at      T.Dasarahalli,
+                        within    the        jurisdiction     of
+                        Bagalagunte Police Station accused
+                        picked up quarrel with CW.1         and
+                        CW.2 with regard to marriage and
+ 16
+       in   the    above    said    transaction
+       wrongfully restrained CW.1           and
+       thereby       committed     the   offence
+       punishable U/sec. 341 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_61">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_62">     2) Whether    the    prosecution    further
+       proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+       that on the above said date, time
+       and place accused             picked up
+       quarrel with CW.1 and CW.2 with
+       regard to marriage and in the above
+       said transaction       assaulted     with
+       beer bottle on the mouth of CW.1
+       and on account of the same          CW.1
+       lost six front teeth        and bleeding
+       injury to      lips thus      voluntarily
+       caused grievous hurt        and thereby
+       committed the       offence punishable
+       U/sec. 326 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_62">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_63">     3) Whether    the    prosecution    further
+       proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+       that on the above said date, time
+       and place accused             picked up
+       quarrel with CW.1 &amp; 2 with regard to
+       marriage       and in the above said
+       transaction       abused CW.1 in filthy
+       language knowingly such insult will
+       provoke breach of peace              and
+       thereby       committed the       offence
+       punishable U/sec. 504 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_63">IPC</a>?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_64">     4) Whether    the    prosecution    further
+       proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+ 17
+                       that accused picked up quarrel with
+                       CW.1 and 2 quarrel with CW.1 &amp; 2
+                       with regard to marriage and in the
+                       above said transaction    threatened
+                       CW.1   with dire consequences thus
+                       committed     criminal   intimidation
+                       and thereby committed the offence
+                       punishable U/sec. 506 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_64">IPC</a> ?
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_65">                    5) What order?
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_13">     7.My finding on the above points are held as under:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_66">                       Point No.1 to 4: In the negative
+                       Point No.5:      As per final order
+                                            for the following:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_67">                                   REASONS
+</blockquote><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_14">      8.Point Nos.1 to 4 :-
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_68">      The above     points are inter linked to each other hence, I took all
+the points together for consideration in order to avoid repeatation.
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_15">      9.In order to substantiate the        contents of complaint, very
+complainant is examined as PW.1, but he fully turned hostile to the case
+of prosecution.     In his evidence he has deposed that          accused has
+neither wrongfully restrained him nor abused him in filthy language .
+</p>
+<p data-structure="RespArg" id="p_16">He further deposed that, the accused has not assaulted him          with beer
+bottle or caused any injury to his teeth. PW.1 further deposed that the
+accused has not      threatened him. PW.1 has      simply identified      his
+ 18
+signatures in complaint and Mahazar, which are marked as Ex.P1 and
+</p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_17">2. In-fact PW.1 does not know the contents of Ex.P1.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_18">      10. Even in the cross-examination by learned Sr.APP, PW.1 has not
+supported the case of the prosecution. PW.1 has specifically denied
+about filing of complaint before the police as per Ex.P.1.          This being
+the evidence of PW.1. It is fatal to the case of the prosecution.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_19">      11. As I discussed above, after evidence of PW.1, learned Sr.APP
+has prayed for issuance of summons to other witnesses. In this case,
+PW.1 being the material witness and victim has not supported the case
+of the prosecution. Moreover, in the cross-examination PW.1 has clearly
+admitted that matter is ended in compromise. Admittedly investigating
+officer has filed charge sheet against accused for the offence punishable
+U/<a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_65">sec.326</a>      of  IPC., which is non-compoundable in nature. In my
+considered view, due to compromise, PW.1 might have said goodbye to
+the case of prosecution.
+</p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_20">      12.Apart from this, when CW.1 being the material witness and
+victim has not supported the case of the prosecution, mere issuance of
+summons to other witnesses and examination of those witnesses would
+not serve the purpose of the prosecution.          Moreover, in order to
+maintain cordial relationship between accused and complainant in
+future days and to save the precious time of court, other witnesses
+were dropped by rejecting the prayer of learned Sr.APP.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_21">      13.In the absence of cogent, corroborative and material evidence
+of the victim as well as other independent witnesses, it is not safe to
+come to conclusion that prosecution has successfully proved guilt
+against the accused. Accordingly, my answer to the above points are in
+the negative.
+</p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_22">      14. Point No.5:- For the reasons discussed herein above, I proceed
+to pass the following:
+</p><blockquote id="blockquote_69">                                       ORDER
+                  Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_66">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,     accused is
+     hereby acquitted of the offences punishable      U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_67">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_68">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_69">504</a>,
+     <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_70">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_23">           Bail bond of accused     and his surety bond stands cancelled
+     after six months from today.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_24"> 19
+          The property seized in PF.No.17/2020 dated 17.02.2020 is
+     worthless is ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+      (Dictated to the stenographer, transcript thereof, corrected and
+then pronounced by me in the open court this the 22 nd          day of
+September 2021.)
+                                   (Shankarappa B.Malashetti)
+                                   XXXI Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_25">                              Annexure:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_70">1.List of Witnesses examined on behalf of the prosecution:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_71">P. Ws:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_72">7. Manjanna.C.R.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_73">2.List of Documents marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+Ex.Ps:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_74">1. Complaint.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_75">2. Mahazar
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_76">3.List of Material objects marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_77">                             -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_78">4.List of witnesses and documents marked on behalf of the
+accused:                    -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_26">                       XXXI Addl. C. M. M. Bengaluru.
+</p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_27"> 20
+           Judgment pronounced in the open court.
+     (vide separate order):
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_79">                         ORDER
+           Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_71">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,
+     accused is   hereby acquitted of the offences
+     punishable   U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_72">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_73">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_74">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_75">506</a>       of
+     IPC.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_80">          Bail bond of accused    and his surety
+     bond stands cancelled after six months from
+     today.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_81">          The property seized in PF.No.17/2020
+     dated 17.02.2020 is worthless is ordered to
+     be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_82">                     31st Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.</blockquote><pre id="pre_3">
+ 21
+ 22
+           Sl. No. of the Case                  6497/2020
+</pre><blockquote id="blockquote_83">           The date of commission 10/02/2020
+           of the offence
+           Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+           complainant
+           Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                  S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                  No.45/1,    7th   Cross,      I   Main,
+                                  Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                  Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_84">                                  Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_85">                                  Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                  Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_86">           The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_76">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_77">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_78">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_79">506</a> of IPC.
+           of or proved
+            Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+            and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_87"> 9. 7.      State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                   Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_88">     8.     Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_89">            by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_90">     9.    Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_80">Cr.PC</a>
+                                  Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_91">     10.   Date of such order      22/09/2021
+           For the following:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_92"> 23
+           Sl. No. of the Case                  6497/2020
+           The date of commission 10/02/2020
+           of the offence
+           Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+           complainant
+           Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                  S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                  No.45/1,    7th   Cross,      I   Main,
+                                  Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                  Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_93">                                  Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_94">                                  Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                  Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_95">           The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_81">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_82">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_83">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_84">506</a> of IPC.
+           of or proved
+            Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+            and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_96"> 9. 7.      State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                   Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_97">     8.     Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_98">            by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_99">     9.    Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_85">Cr.PC</a>
+                                  Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_100">     10.   Date of such order      22/09/2021
+           For the following:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_101"> 24
+            Sl. No. of the Case                     6497/2020
+            The date of commission 10/02/2020
+            of the offence
+            Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+            complainant
+            Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                      S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                      No.45/1,    7th    Cross,     I   Main,
+                                      Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                      Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_102">                                      Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_103">                                      Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                      Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_104">            The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_86">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_87">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_88">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_89">506</a> of IPC.
+            of or proved
+             Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+             and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_105"> 9. 7.       State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                    Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_106">     8.      Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_107">             by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_108">     9.     Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_90">Cr.PC</a>
+                                   Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_109">     10.     Date of such order        22/09/2021
+             For the following:-
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_110">                                JUDGMENT
+      The PSI,      Bagalagunte Police Station has filed the charge sheet
+against the accused         for the offences punishable          U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_91">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_92">326</a>,
+<a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_93">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_94">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_111">          2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_112">       On 10.02.2020 at about 5 p.m. at Chaitra Bar &amp; Restaurant
+bearing No.40, situated at T.Dasarahalli, within the jurisdiction of
+ 25
+Bagalagunte Police Station     accused     picked up quarrel with CW.1
+and CW.2 with regard to marriage and in the above said transaction
+wrongfully restraned CW.1, assaulted with beer bottle on the mouth
+of CW.1 and on account of the same CW.1 lost six front teeth and
+bleeding injury to lips thus voluntarily caused grievous hurt. Further,
+accused      abused CW.1 in filthy language knowingly such insult will
+provoke breach of peace           and      threatened him    with dire
+consequences thus committed criminal intimidation         and thereby
+accused has committed the alleged offences.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_113">     3. Accused is on bail. As required u/sec. 207 of <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_95">Cr.PC</a>, the copies
+of the charge sheet papers were furnished to the accused. Charge was
+framed for the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_96">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_97">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_98">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_99">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_28">Accused has pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_29">        4. In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution
+has examined       PW.1 and got marked Ex.P.1 and 2.        On closure of the
+prosecution evidence, as there was no incriminating evidence against
+the accused, the statement of the accused u/<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_100">sec.313</a> Cr.PC is dispensed
+with.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_30">        5. I have heard the arguments from both the sides.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Issue" id="p_31">        6. The following points that arise for my consideration are:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_114">                     6) Whether the prosecution        proves
+                        beyond all reasonable doubt         that
+                        on 10.02.2020 at about 5 p.m.        at
+                        Chaitra Bar &amp; Restaurant bearing
+                        No.40, situated at      T.Dasarahalli,
+                        within    the        jurisdiction     of
+                        Bagalagunte Police Station accused
+                        picked up quarrel with CW.1         and
+                        CW.2 with regard to marriage and
+ 26
+       in   the    above    said    transaction
+       wrongfully restrained CW.1           and
+       thereby       committed     the   offence
+       punishable U/sec. 341 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_101">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_115">     7) Whether    the    prosecution    further
+       proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+       that on the above said date, time
+       and place accused             picked up
+       quarrel with CW.1 and CW.2 with
+       regard to marriage and in the above
+       said transaction       assaulted     with
+       beer bottle on the mouth of CW.1
+       and on account of the same          CW.1
+       lost six front teeth        and bleeding
+       injury to      lips thus      voluntarily
+       caused grievous hurt        and thereby
+       committed the       offence punishable
+       U/sec. 326 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_102">IPC</a>.?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_116">     8) Whether    the    prosecution    further
+       proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+       that on the above said date, time
+       and place accused             picked up
+       quarrel with CW.1 &amp; 2 with regard to
+       marriage       and in the above said
+       transaction       abused CW.1 in filthy
+       language knowingly such insult will
+       provoke breach of peace              and
+       thereby       committed the       offence
+       punishable U/sec. 504 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_103">IPC</a>?
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_117">     9) Whether    the    prosecution    further
+       proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+ 27
+                       that accused picked up quarrel with
+                       CW.1 and 2 quarrel with CW.1 &amp; 2
+                       with regard to marriage and in the
+                       above said transaction    threatened
+                       CW.1    with dire consequences thus
+                       committed     criminal   intimidation
+                       and thereby committed the offence
+                       punishable U/sec. 506 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_104">IPC</a> ?
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_118">                    10)       What order?
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_119">     7.My finding on the above points are held as under:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_120">                       Point No.1 to 4: In the negative
+                       Point No.5:      As per final order
+                                            for the following:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_121">                                   REASONS
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_122">      8.Point Nos.1 to 4 :-
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_123">      The above     points are inter linked to each other hence, I took all
+the points together for consideration in order to avoid repeatation.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_124">      9.In order to substantiate the        contents of complaint, very
+complainant is examined as PW.1, but he fully turned hostile to the case
+of prosecution.     In his evidence he has deposed that          accused has
+neither wrongfully restrained him nor abused him in filthy language .
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_32">He further deposed that, the accused has not assaulted him          with beer
+bottle or caused any injury to his teeth. PW.1 further deposed that the
+accused has not      threatened him. PW.1 has      simply identified      his
+ 28
+signatures in complaint and Mahazar, which are marked as Ex.P1 and
+</p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_33">2. In-fact PW.1 does not know the contents of Ex.P1.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_34">      10. Even in the cross-examination by learned Sr.APP, PW.1 has not
+supported the case of the prosecution. PW.1 has specifically denied
+about filing of complaint before the police as per Ex.P.1.          This being
+the evidence of PW.1. It is fatal to the case of the prosecution.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_35">      11. As I discussed above, after evidence of PW.1, learned Sr.APP
+has prayed for issuance of summons to other witnesses. In this case,
+PW.1 being the material witness and victim has not supported the case
+of the prosecution. Moreover, in the cross-examination PW.1 has clearly
+admitted that matter is ended in compromise. Admittedly investigating
+officer has filed charge sheet against accused for the offence punishable
+U/<a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_105">sec.326</a>      of  IPC., which is non-compoundable in nature. In my
+considered view, due to compromise, PW.1 might have said goodbye to
+the case of prosecution.
+</p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_36">      12.Apart from this, when CW.1 being the material witness and
+victim has not supported the case of the prosecution, mere issuance of
+summons to other witnesses and examination of those witnesses would
+not serve the purpose of the prosecution.          Moreover, in order to
+maintain cordial relationship between accused and complainant in
+future days and to save the precious time of court, other witnesses
+were dropped by rejecting the prayer of learned Sr.APP.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_37">      13.In the absence of cogent, corroborative and material evidence
+of the victim as well as other independent witnesses, it is not safe to
+come to conclusion that prosecution has successfully proved guilt
+against the accused. Accordingly, my answer to the above points are in
+the negative.
+</p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_38">      14. Point No.5:- For the reasons discussed herein above, I proceed
+to pass the following:
+</p><blockquote id="blockquote_125">                                       ORDER
+                  Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_106">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,     accused is
+     hereby acquitted of the offences punishable      U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_107">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_108">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_109">504</a>,
+     <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_110">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_39">           Bail bond of accused     and his surety bond stands cancelled
+     after six months from today.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_40"> 29
+          The property seized in PF.No.17/2020 dated 17.02.2020 is
+     worthless is ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+      (Dictated to the stenographer, transcript thereof, corrected and
+then pronounced by me in the open court this the 22 nd          day of
+September 2021.)
+                                   (Shankarappa B.Malashetti)
+                                   XXXI Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_41">                              Annexure:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_126">1.List of Witnesses examined on behalf of the prosecution:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_127">P. Ws:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_128">8. Manjanna.C.R.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_129">2.List of Documents marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+Ex.Ps:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_130">1. Complaint.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_131">2. Mahazar
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_132">3.List of Material objects marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_133">                             -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_134">4.List of witnesses and documents marked on behalf of the
+accused:                    -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_42">                       XXXI Addl. C. M. M. Bengaluru.
+</p><p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_43"> 30
+           Judgment pronounced in the open court.
+     (vide separate order):
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_135">                         ORDER
+           Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_111">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,
+     accused is   hereby acquitted of the offences
+     punishable   U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_112">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_113">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_114">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_115">506</a>       of
+     IPC.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_136">          Bail bond of accused    and his surety
+     bond stands cancelled after six months from
+     today.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_137">          The property seized in PF.No.17/2020
+     dated 17.02.2020 is worthless is ordered to
+     be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_138">                     31st Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.</blockquote><pre id="pre_4">
+ 31
+ 32
+           Sl. No. of the Case                  6497/2020
+</pre><blockquote id="blockquote_139">           The date of commission 10/02/2020
+           of the offence
+           Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+           complainant
+           Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                  S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                  No.45/1,    7th   Cross,      I   Main,
+                                  Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                  Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_140">                                  Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_141">                                  Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                  Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_142">           The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_116">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_117">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_118">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_119">506</a> of IPC.
+           of or proved
+            Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+            and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_143"> 9. 7.      State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                   Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_144">     8.     Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_145">            by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_146">     9.    Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_120">Cr.PC</a>
+                                  Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_147">     10.   Date of such order      22/09/2021
+           For the following:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_148"> 33
+           Sl. No. of the Case                  6497/2020
+           The date of commission 10/02/2020
+           of the offence
+           Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+           complainant
+           Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                  S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                  No.45/1,    7th   Cross,      I   Main,
+                                  Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                  Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_149">                                  Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_150">                                  Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                  Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_151">           The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_121">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_122">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_123">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_124">506</a> of IPC.
+           of or proved
+            Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+            and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_152"> 9. 7.      State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                   Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_153">     8.     Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_154">            by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_155">     9.    Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_125">Cr.PC</a>
+                                  Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_156">     10.   Date of such order      22/09/2021
+           For the following:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_157"> 34
+            Sl. No. of the Case                     6497/2020
+            The date of commission 10/02/2020
+            of the offence
+            Name of the            State by Bagalagunte P.S.
+            complainant
+            Name of the accused    Karagaiah,
+                                      S/o. Late Solaiah, 30 years, R/at
+                                      No.45/1,    7th    Cross,     I   Main,
+                                      Manjunathnagar,        Near        Sani
+                                      Mahatma Temple, Bengaluru .
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_158">                                      Permanent Address:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_159">                                      Hosahalli   Village,   Goluru     Hobli,
+                                      Tumkur Taluk &amp;Dist.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_160">            The offence complained U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_126">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_127">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_128">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_129">506</a> of IPC.
+            of or proved
+             Plea of the accused    Pleaded not guilty
+             and his examination
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_161"> 9. 7.       State represented by:  Sr.Asst.Public Prosecutor,
+                                    Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_162">     8.      Accused represented    Sri.KKK Advocate, Bengaluru.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_163">             by:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_164">     9.     Final Order            Acting U/sec. 248(1) <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_130">Cr.PC</a>
+                                   Accused is acquitted.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_165">     10.     Date of such order        22/09/2021
+             For the following:-
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_166">                                JUDGMENT
+      The PSI,      Bagalagunte Police Station has filed the charge sheet
+against the accused         for the offences punishable          U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_131">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_132">326</a>,
+<a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_133">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_134">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_167">          2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_168">       On 10.02.2020 at about 5 p.m. at Chaitra Bar &amp; Restaurant
+bearing No.40, situated at T.Dasarahalli, within the jurisdiction of
+ 35
+Bagalagunte Police Station     accused     picked up quarrel with CW.1
+and CW.2 with regard to marriage and in the above said transaction
+wrongfully restraned CW.1, assaulted with beer bottle on the mouth
+of CW.1 and on account of the same CW.1 lost six front teeth and
+bleeding injury to lips thus voluntarily caused grievous hurt. Further,
+accused      abused CW.1 in filthy language knowingly such insult will
+provoke breach of peace           and      threatened him    with dire
+consequences thus committed criminal intimidation         and thereby
+accused has committed the alleged offences.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_169">     3. Accused is on bail. As required u/sec. 207 of <a href="/doc/445276/" id="a_135">Cr.PC</a>, the copies
+of the charge sheet papers were furnished to the accused. Charge was
+framed for the offences punishable U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_136">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_137">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_138">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_139">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_44">Accused has pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_45">        4. In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution
+has examined       PW.1 and got marked Ex.P.1 and 2.        On closure of the
+prosecution evidence, as there was no incriminating evidence against
+the accused, the statement of the accused u/<a href="/doc/767287/" id="a_140">sec.313</a> Cr.PC is dispensed
+with.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_46">        5. I have heard the arguments from both the sides.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_47">        6. The following points that arise for my consideration are:
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_48">                     11)     Whether      the     prosecution
+                        proves beyond all reasonable doubt
+                        that on 10.02.2020 at about 5 p.m.
+                        at Chaitra Bar &amp; Restaurant bearing
+                        No.40, situated at      T.Dasarahalli,
+                        within    the        jurisdiction    of
+                        Bagalagunte Police Station accused
+                        picked up quarrel with CW.1         and
+                        CW.2 with regard to marriage and
+ 36
+       in   the    above    said    transaction
+       wrongfully restrained CW.1           and
+       thereby       committed     the   offence
+       punishable U/sec. 341 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_141">IPC</a>.?
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_49">     12)    Whether        the      prosecution
+       further proves beyond all reasonable
+       doubt that on the above said date,
+       time and place accused        picked up
+       quarrel with CW.1 and CW.2 with
+       regard to marriage and in the above
+       said transaction       assaulted     with
+       beer bottle on the mouth of CW.1
+       and on account of the same          CW.1
+       lost six front teeth        and bleeding
+       injury to      lips thus      voluntarily
+       caused grievous hurt        and thereby
+       committed the       offence punishable
+       U/sec. 326 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_142">IPC</a>.?
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_50">     13)    Whether        the      prosecution
+       further proves beyond all reasonable
+       doubt that on the above said date,
+       time and place accused        picked up
+       quarrel with CW.1 &amp; 2 with regard to
+       marriage       and in the above said
+       transaction     abused CW.1 in filthy
+       language knowingly such insult will
+       provoke breach of peace              and
+       thereby       committed the       offence
+       punishable U/sec. 504 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_143">IPC</a>?
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_51">     14)    Whether        the      prosecution
+       further proves beyond all reasonable
+ 37
+                       doubt that     accused       picked up
+                       quarrel with CW.1 and 2 quarrel with
+                       CW.1 &amp; 2 with regard to marriage
+                       and in the above said transaction
+                       threatened     CW.1         with   dire
+                       consequences     thus        committed
+                       criminal intimidation      and thereby
+                       committed the        offence punishable
+                       U/sec. 506 of <a href="/doc/1569253/" id="a_144">IPC</a> ?
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_52">                    15)       What order?
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Precedent" id="p_53">     7.My finding on the above points are held as under:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_170">                       Point No.1 to 4: In the negative
+                       Point No.5:      As per final order
+                                            for the following:
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_171">                                  REASONS
+</blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_54">      8.Point Nos.1 to 4 :-
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_172">      The above     points are inter linked to each other hence, I took all
+the points together for consideration in order to avoid repeatation.
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_55">      9.In order to substantiate the           contents of complaint, very
+complainant is examined as PW.1, but he fully turned hostile to the case
+of prosecution.     In his evidence he has deposed that          accused has
+neither wrongfully restrained him nor abused him in filthy language .
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_56">He further deposed that, the accused has not assaulted him          with beer
+bottle or caused any injury to his teeth. PW.1 further deposed that the
+ 38
+accused has not     threatened him. PW.1 has        simply identified      his
+signatures in complaint and Mahazar, which are marked as Ex.P1 and
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_57">2. In-fact PW.1 does not know the contents of Ex.P1.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_58">      10. Even in the cross-examination by learned Sr.APP, PW.1 has not
+supported the case of the prosecution. PW.1 has specifically denied
+about filing of complaint before the police as per Ex.P.1.          This being
+the evidence of PW.1. It is fatal to the case of the prosecution.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_59">      11. As I discussed above, after evidence of PW.1, learned Sr.APP
+has prayed for issuance of summons to other witnesses. In this case,
+PW.1 being the material witness and victim has not supported the case
+of the prosecution. Moreover, in the cross-examination PW.1 has clearly
+admitted that matter is ended in compromise. Admittedly investigating
+officer has filed charge sheet against accused for the offence punishable
+U/<a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_145">sec.326</a>      of  IPC., which is non-compoundable in nature. In my
+considered view, due to compromise, PW.1 might have said goodbye to
+the case of prosecution.
+</p><p data-structure="CDiscource" id="p_60">      12.Apart from this, when CW.1 being the material witness and
+victim has not supported the case of the prosecution, mere issuance of
+summons to other witnesses and examination of those witnesses would
+not serve the purpose of the prosecution.          Moreover, in order to
+maintain cordial relationship between accused and complainant in
+future days and to save the precious time of court, other witnesses
+were dropped by rejecting the prayer of learned Sr.APP.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_61">      13.In the absence of cogent, corroborative and material evidence
+of the victim as well as other independent witnesses, it is not safe to
+come to conclusion that prosecution has successfully proved guilt
+against the accused. Accordingly, my answer to the above points are in
+the negative.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_62">      14. Point No.5:- For the reasons discussed herein above, I proceed
+to pass the following:
+</p><blockquote id="blockquote_173">                                       ORDER
+                  Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_146">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,     accused is
+     hereby acquitted of the offences punishable      U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_147">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_148">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_149">504</a>,
+     <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_150">506</a> of IPC.
+</blockquote><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_63">           Bail bond of accused     and his surety bond stands cancelled
+     after six months from today.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_64"> 39
+          The property seized in PF.No.17/2020 dated 17.02.2020 is
+     worthless is ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+      (Dictated to the stenographer, transcript thereof, corrected and
+then pronounced by me in the open court this the 22 nd          day of
+September 2021.)
+                                   (Shankarappa B.Malashetti)
+                                   XXXI Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.
+</p>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_65">                              Annexure:
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_174">1.List of Witnesses examined on behalf of the prosecution:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_175">P. Ws:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_176">9. Manjanna.C.R.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_177">2.List of Documents marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+Ex.Ps:
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_178">1. Complaint.
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_179">2. Mahazar
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_180">3.List of Material objects marked on behalf of the prosecution:-
+</blockquote><blockquote id="blockquote_181">                             -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_182">4.List of witnesses and documents marked on behalf of the
+accused:                    -NIL -
+</blockquote>
+<p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_66">                       XXXI Addl. C. M. M. Bengaluru.
+</p><p data-structure="Conclusion" id="p_67"> 40
+           Judgment pronounced in the open court.
+     (vide separate order):
+</p>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_183">                         ORDER
+           Acting under <a href="/doc/1569106/" id="a_151">Section 248 (1)</a> of Cr.P.C.,
+     accused is   hereby acquitted of the offences
+     punishable   U/<a href="/doc/1599401/" id="a_152">sec.341</a>, <a href="/doc/1540253/" id="a_153">326</a>, <a href="/doc/555306/" id="a_154">504</a>, <a href="/doc/180217/" id="a_155">506</a>       of
+     IPC.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_184">          Bail bond of accused    and his surety
+     bond stands cancelled after six months from
+     today.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_185">          The property seized in PF.No.17/2020
+     dated 17.02.2020 is worthless is ordered to
+     be destroyed after the appeal period is over.
+</blockquote>
+<blockquote id="blockquote_186">                     31st Addl.C.M.M. Bengaluru.
+ 41
+ 42
+ 43
+ </blockquote>
+</div>
+</article>
+<aside class="right_column" aria-label="Related AI tags, queries and research notes">
+  <h3 class="sr-only">Related AI tags, queries and research notes</h3>
+  <div class="translate_container">
+      <h4 class="sr-only">Translation</h4>
+      <div id="google_translate_element" aria-live="polite"></div>
+      <button id="translatewarn"
+              type="button"
+              aria-label="Translation accuracy warning"></button>
+  </div>
+    <nav class="category" aria-label="Top AI tags">
+      <h4 class="category_title">Top AI Tags</h4>
+      <ul class="sr-only-list">
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:cause-hurt">cause-hurt</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:breach-of-peace">breach-of-peace</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:criminal-intimidation">criminal-intimidation</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:indian-penal-code">indian-penal-code</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=tag:wrongful-restraint">wrongful-restraint</a></div></li>
+      </ul>
+    </nav>
+    <nav class="category" aria-label="Related user queries">
+      <h4 class="category_title">Related user Queries</h4>
+      <ul class="sr-only-list">
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20248%281%29%20code%20of%20criminal%20procedure">section 248(1) code of criminal procedure</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20506%20ipc">section 506 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20504%20ipc">section 504 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20326%20of%20ipc">section 326 of ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=injury%20by%20teeth">injury by teeth</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=marking%20of%20documents">marking of documents</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20506%20of%20indian%20penal%20code">section 506 of indian penal code</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ipc%20section%20341">ipc section 341</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20504%20of%20indian%20penal%20code%20">section 504 of indian penal code </a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20248%20crpc">section 248 crpc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ipc%20506">ipc 506</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=list%20of%20witnesses">list of witnesses</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=Shankarappa%20B%20Malashetti">Shankarappa B Malashetti</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20341%20of%20indian%20penal%20code">section 341 of indian penal code</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=criminal%20intimidation%20">criminal intimidation </a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=ipc%20sec%20504%20and%20506">ipc sec 504 and 506</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=section%20313%20of%20crpc">section 313 of crpc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=no%20common%20intention">no common intention</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=326%20ipc">326 ipc</a></div></li>
+          <li><div class="item_toselect"><a href="/search/?formInput=when%20victim%20not%20supported">when victim not supported</a></div></li>
+      </ul>
+    </nav>
+</aside>
+</div>
+    </main>
+    <footer class="homepage-footer">
+  <div class="homepage-footer-links">
+    <a href="/about.html">About</a>
+    <a href="/disclaimer.html">Disclaimer</a>
+    <a href="/privacy.html">Privacy Policy</a>
+    <a href="/members/terms/">Terms</a>
+    <a href="/court_case_online.html">Case Removal</a>
+    <a href="https://blog.indiankanoon.org">Blog</a>
+    <button id="share-url-btn" style="display: none;">Share URL</button>
+    <form method="post" action="/change_device/?device=mobile&amp;nextpage=/doc/105683180/" class="device-toggle">
+      <input type="hidden" name="csrfmiddlewaretoken" value="l9Kx5juSkxByc55OdckqtQIqrgW0nBDn8R4ApwgaDv8FKahW68SPywTc6Kprv4qd">
+      <button type="submit">Mobile View</button>
+    </form>
+  </div>
+</footer>
+<script>
+(function() {
+  const shareBtn = document.getElementById('share-url-btn');
+  if (navigator.share) {
+    shareBtn.style.display = 'inline-block';
+    shareBtn.addEventListener('click', async function() {
+      try {
+        await navigator.share({
+          title: document.title,
+          url: window.location.href
+        });
+      } catch (err) {
+        if (err.name !== 'AbortError') {
+          console.error('Error sharing:', err);
+        }
+      }
+    });
+  }
+})();
+</script>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-3.6.1.min.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/jquery-ui-1.13.2/jquery-ui.min.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/utils_v13.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/share_url.js"></SCRIPT>
+    <SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/dropdown.js"></SCRIPT>
+<script type="text/javascript">
+(function($) {
+    function ensureAutocompleteAvailable() {
+        if (!($.ui && $.ui.autocomplete)) {
+            throw new Error('jQuery UI Autocomplete plugin not loaded');
+        }
+    }
+    function overrideGlobalRenderer() {
+        $.ui.autocomplete.prototype._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
+            return $("<li></li>")
+                .append(
+                    $("<div></div>")
+                        .addClass("search-autocomplete-item-wrapper")
+                        .html(item.label)
+                )
+                .appendTo(ul);
+        };
+    }
+    function attachAutocomplete($input) {
+        if (!$input.length) {
+            return;
+        }
+        var $form = $input.closest('form');
+        $input.autocomplete({
+            source: "/qsuggest/",
+            delay: 180,
+            minLength: 2,
+            appendTo: 'body',
+            position: {
+                my: "left top",
+                at: "left bottom+6",
+                collision: "flipfit"
+            },
+            classes: {
+                "ui-autocomplete": "search-autocomplete-list",
+                "ui-menu-item-wrapper": "search-autocomplete-item"
+            },
+            open: function() {
+                var $menu = $input.autocomplete('widget');
+                var offset = $input.offset();
+                $menu
+                    .width($input.outerWidth())
+                    .css({
+                        left: offset.left,
+                        top: offset.top + $input.outerHeight() + 6
+                    });
+                $input.addClass('autocomplete-open');
+            },
+            close: function() {
+                $input.removeClass('autocomplete-open');
+            },
+            focus: function(event, ui) {
+                // Prevent the default text replacement while navigating suggestions
+                if (ui && ui.item) {
+                    event.preventDefault();
+                }
+            },
+            select: function(event, ui) {
+                event.preventDefault();
+                if (ui && ui.item) {
+                    $input.val(ui.item.value);
+                }
+                if ($form.length) {
+                    $form.trigger('submit');
+                } else {
+                    $('#search-form').trigger('submit');
+                }
+            }
+        });
+    }
+    $(document).ready(function() {
+        ensureAutocompleteAvailable();
+        overrideGlobalRenderer();
+        attachAutocomplete($("#search-box"));
+        attachAutocomplete($("#header-search-box"));
+    });
+})(jQuery);
+</script>
+<script type="text/javascript" src="https://translate.google.com/translate_a/element.js?cb=googleTranslateElementInit"></script>
+<script type="text/javascript">
+$(document).ready(function() {
+    $('#pdfdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-document'}});
+    $('#printdoc').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-print'}});
+    $('#courtcopysubmit').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-arrowthickstop-1-s'}});
+    $('#courtcopyform').submit(function(e) {
+        signupForDownload();
+        e.preventDefault();
+        return false;
+    });
+    $('#translatewarn').click(function(e) {
+        e.preventDefault();
+        var params = {title: 'Warning on translation', closeText: "", width: 450};
+        var content = '<p>The option to translate the legal documents is to overcome language barriers and for broader understanding but should not be considered as <b>authoritative text</b> for any official purpose.</p> <p>As pointed out, translation of legal texts <a href="https://twitter.com/Banbreach/status/1585206506743427073" target="_blank">may be inaccurate</a>. So beware of it when using the translate feature. Lastly, translations here are provided by Google Translate and we do not warrant its accuracy.</p>';
+        modify_dialog_params(params);
+        $('<div>').html(content).dialog(params);
+    });
+});
+function googleTranslateElementInit() {
+    var translateElementId = 'google_translate_element';
+    var translateContainer = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
+    if (!translateContainer) {
+        console.warn('Google Translate container not found; skipping widget init.');
+        return;
+    }
+    if (typeof google === 'undefined' || !google.translate || !google.translate.TranslateElement) {
+        console.error('Google Translate API failed to load');
+        return;
+    }
+    new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en'}, translateElementId);
+    function removeUnwantedText() {
+        var translateEl = document.getElementById(translateElementId);
+        if (!translateEl) {
+            console.warn('Google Translate element became unavailable; skipping cleanup.');
+            return;
+        }
+        var pattern = /(translate|powered\s+by)/gi;
+        var hideStyle = 'display:none;visibility:hidden;width:0;height:0;padding:0;margin:0';
+        var walker = document.createTreeWalker(translateEl, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, null, false);
+        var node;
+        while (node = walker.nextNode()) {
+            if (pattern.test(node.textContent)) {
+                node.textContent = node.textContent.replace(pattern, '').replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
+            }
+        }
+        translateEl.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(function(el) {
+            if (el.querySelector('select') || el.querySelector('img')) return;
+            var text = el.textContent || '';
+            if (pattern.test(text) && text.trim()) {
+                el.textContent = text.replace(pattern, '').trim();
+                if (!el.textContent.trim()) {
+                    el.style.cssText = hideStyle;
+                }
+            }
+        });
+    }
+    setTimeout(removeUnwantedText, 200);
+}
+</script>
+<SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript" SRC="/static/js/pylaw/structure_v3.js"></SCRIPT>
+<script type="text/javascript">
+    $(document).ready(function () {
+        $('#translatewarn').button({icons: {primary: 'ui-icon-info'}, text: false});
+        $('.searchbox_top a').button();
+        $('#casemonitor').button({icon: 'ui-icon-alert'}).click({
+            valid_ag: '',
+            is_valid: '',
+            is_auth: 'False',
+            is_agreement: '',
+            headline: 'judgments that cite this document. Query alert for'
+        }, registerEmailAlert);
+});
+</script>
+<link rel="stylesheet" href="/static/css/mini-chatbot.css">
+<script type="text/javascript">
+    // Authentication context for chatbot
+    window.is_auth = false;
+    // Document context for chatbot
+    window.documentContext = {
+        tid: 105683180,
+        title: "Is Examined As Pw.1 And His Father I.E vs Have Not Stabbed Him With Knife on 4 August, 2022",
+        url: window.location.href,
+        isFragment: false
+    };
+    // Point the widget to the existing API endpoints
+</script>
+<script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/purify.min.js"></script>
+<script src="/static/chat/vendor/js/markdown-it.min.js"></script>
+<script type="module" src="/static/chat/js/modules/shared/markdown.js"></script>
+<script src="/static/js/mini-chatbot-widget.js"></script>
+<script>(function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9c56f6f93ab9101a',t:'MTc2OTY3MTIwMg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();</script></body>
+</html>