{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMASSIMILANO LATORRE AND OTHERS\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 527\n2021 INSC 306\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 307, 427 and 34 \u2013 United Nationals Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 (UNCLOS) \u2013 Annex VII \u2013 On 15.02.2012, two fishermen who were onboard the boat registered in India, were fired at from a passing ship (an Italian vessel) due to died \u2013 FIR was registered \u2013 Two Italian Marines- Petitioner no.1 & 2 were apprehended by the police \u2013 A writ petition was filed by the Marines before the High Court challenging the jurisdiction of the State and the Circle Inspector of Police \u2013 Meanwhile, the\n Decision Date :\n 15-06-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 20370/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Proceedings disposed of with directions\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARI SHANKAR AGGARWAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 1005\n2021 INSC 176\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN, S. ABDUL NAZEER, HEMANT GUPTA\n Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 \u2013 ss.7/16 \u2013 Offence under \u2013 Cognizance taken against appellant by Courts below \u2013 If justified \u2013 Case of appellant that he was not a nominee of the firm / company in question and there being no allegation against him, no against him \u2013 Held: As per s.17 of the Act, notice u/s.17(2) is contemplated by company to Local Health Authority in such form and in such manner as prescribed that it has nominated such Director or Manager as a person who is responsible along with written consent of such Director\n Decision Date :\n 10-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 297/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSWAATI NIRKHI & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 905\n2021 INSC 171\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, INDU MALHOTRA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.406, 177 \u2013 Trial pending in Delhi \u2013 Transfer petition seeking transfer to Prayagraj, U.P. \u2013 Allowed ex-parte \u2013 Complainant filed application for recall thereof \u2013 Dismissed \u2013 Review Petition \u2013 Allowed, ex-parte the transfer petition \u2013 De-novo hearing \u2013 Held: In a criminal case, the place of inquiry and trial has to be by the Court within whose local jurisdiction, the crime was allegedly committed as provided by s.177 \u2013 In the present case, cause of action as per the averments in the\n Decision Date :\n 09-03-2021\n | Case No :\n TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 262/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTRIYAMBAK S. HEGDE\n versus \nSRIPAD \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 189\n2021 INSC 529\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, A.S. BOPANNA\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss. 118 and 139 \u2013 The case of the appellant was that the respondent approached him to sell his house \u2013 Pursuant to which an agreement dated 06.06.1996 was executed by the respondent while receiving the advance amount of Rs.3,50,000/- out of the Subsequently, appellant found that the house was in respondent\u2019s father\u2019s name and the respondent had no authority to sell the same \u2013 Appellant demanded return of Rs.3,50,000/- \u2013 The respondent instead of paying the entire amount, issued a cheque for sum of Rs.1,50,000/-\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 849/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVINOD DUA\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 12 S.C.R. 1071\n2021 INSC 304\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, VINEET SARAN\n Constitution of India: Art. 32 \u2013 Quashing of FIR under \u2013 On facts, FIR against petitioner-renowned journalist u/ss. 124-A, 505, 501, 268 for some statements made by him in his talk show on social media about handling of the Covid Pandemic; and that the Prime Minister has used deaths violence against the government and the Prime Minister, and creating panic amongst the public and disturbing the public peace by trying to spread false information \u2013 Petition u/Art. 32 by the petitioner for quashing of FIR and seeking directions for protection of journalists\n Decision Date :\n 03-06-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 154/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATBIR SINGH & ANOTHER\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 269\n2021 INSC 301\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 304B \u2013 Dowry death \u2013 Conviction under \u2013 Prosecution case that the victim committed suicide by setting herself ablaze just after one year of her marriage and that soon before her death, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment for bringing less dowry by the offences u/s. 304B and 306 with 7 years and 5 years rigorous imprisonment respectively \u2013 High Court upheld the order of the trial court \u2013 On appeal, held: Prosecution was able to successfully prove that the death of the victim due to burn injuries took place within one year of her\n Decision Date :\n 28-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1735/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUMETI VIJ\n versus \nM/S PARAMOUNT TECH FAB INDUSTRIES \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 266\n2021 INSC 172\nCoram : INDU MALHOTRA\n*\n, AJAY RASTOGI\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 \u2013 Order placed by the accused-appellant \u2013 Delivered \u2013 Cheque issued by the appellant in the name of complainant-respondent \u2013 Returned on presentation with a note of \u201cinsufficient funds\u201d in the \u2013 Notices sent by respondent \u2013 Neither responded to nor any payment made within the statutory period \u2013 Complaints filed by the respondent u/s.138 \u2013 Finding of acquittal returned by Trial Court \u2013 Reversed by High Court \u2013 Held: Appellant has only recorded her\n Decision Date :\n 09-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 292/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMIC\n versus \n. \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 268\n2021 INSC 302\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, L. NAGESWARA RAO, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n COVID-19 pandemic: Suo Motu writ petition \u2013 Cognizance of the Management of the Covid -19 pandemic during the second wave \u2013Gradual recession of the second wave \u2013 In view thereof, Central Government\u2019s Liberalised Vaccination Policy, vaccine distribution, vaccine procurement process, and the augmentation of vaccine availability, taken up \u2013 With respect to the vaccine distribution between different age-groups, the policy of the Central Government conducting free\n Decision Date :\n 31-05-2021\n | Case No :\n SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNATHU SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 599\n2021 INSC 300\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.438 \u2013 Anticipatory bail \u2013 Propriety of protective order after dismissal of anticipatory bail application \u2013 High Court while dismissing anticipatory bail application of the respondents-accused granted them 90 days to surrender before trial court them protection from coercive action for the said period \u2013 Aggrieved by such relief, instant appeal filed by the complainant \u2013 Held: A Court, be it a Sessions Court or a High Court, in certain special facts and circumstances may decide to grant anticipatory bail for a limited period\n Decision Date :\n 28-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 522/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRITI SARAF & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 577\n2021 INSC 177\nCoram : INDU MALHOTRA\n*\n, AJAY RASTOGI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Scope and ambit of \u2013 Commercial transaction \u2013 FIR against respondent no.2 and one more person u/ss.420, 406 and 34 IPC \u2013 High Court quashed all the criminal proceedings \u2013 On appeal, held: To exercise powers u/s.482, the basis of the allegation made in the complaint/FIR/charge-sheet \u2013 At that stage, High Court not under an obligation to go into the matter or examine its correctness \u2013 Whatever appears on the face of the complaint/FIR/charge-sheet shall be taken into consideration without any critical\n Decision Date :\n 10-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 296/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION\n versus \nM/S TEXMO INDUSTRIES \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 1010\n2021 INSC 167\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Employee State Insurance Act, 1948 \u2013 s.2(22) and s.2(24) \u2013 Whether \u2018wages\u2019, as defined in s.2(22) of the ESI Act would include Conveyance Allowance paid by a Company to its employees \u2013 Held: From the definition of wages in s.2(22), it is includes remunerative payments, but does not include compensatory payments \u2013 Travelling allowance including the value of travelling concession has expressly been excluded from the definition of wages, as also any payment made to an employee to reimburse or compensate for special expenses\n Decision Date :\n 08-03-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 811/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAGABHUSHAN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 595\n2021 INSC 159\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Indian Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.300(fourthly); ss.498A, 302 r/w 34 \u2013 Dowry death \u2013 Dying declaration \u2013 Accused persons acquitted by trial Court \u2013 Acquittal of appellant-accused reversed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: There are two dying declarations, Exhibit P5 has been proved that the deceased was set ablaze by pouring kerosene on her \u2013 Prosecution is successful in proving that the appellant poured kerosene on the deceased \u2013 Act of the accused falls in clause fourthly of s.300 \u2013 Merely because thereafter he might have tried to\n Decision Date :\n 08-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 443/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nALKA KHANDU AVHAD\n versus \nAMAR SYAMPRASAD MISHRA & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 633\n2021 INSC 164\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 r/w S.141 \u2013 Complaint filed against appellant \u2013 High Court refused to quash the same \u2013 On appeal, held: Dishonoured cheque was issued by original accused no.1-husband of the appellant \u2013 It was drawn on his bank account and was neither the signatory to the cheque nor the dishonoured cheque was drawn from her bank account \u2013 Account in question was not a joint account \u2013 s.138 does not speak about the joint liability \u2013 Even in case of a joint liability, in case of individual persons, a person other than\n Decision Date :\n 08-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 258/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKRISHNA LAL CHAWLA & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 550\n2021 INSC 160\nCoram : MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n COURT REPORTS [2021] 2 S.C.R. KRISHNA LAL CHAWLA & ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 283 of 2021) MARCH 08, 2021 [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND R. SUBHASH REDDY JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Complaint u/s. 200 Cr.P.C \u2013 Alleging offences u/ss. that occurred in the year 2012 \u2013 Magistrate issued process against the appellants \u2013 Confirmed by Sessions Judge \u2013 Appellants\u2019 petition for quashing the orders of Magistrate and the Sessions Judge dismissed \u2013 Appeal to Supreme Court \u2013 Held: In the complaint\n Decision Date :\n 08-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 283/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA\n versus \nPRATEEK SHUKLA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 570\n2021 INSC 165\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: s. 37 \u2013 Complaint u/s.8,9A,25A,23 and 29 of the Act \u2013 Alleging that the respondent was part of an international drug syndicate involved in diversion of a controlled substance \u2013 Bail granted by High Court \u2013 Appeal to Held: The bail was granted without applying legal norms provided u/s. 37 \u2013 The reasons for granting bail do not reflect application of mind to the seriousness of the offence involved \u2013 Bail liable to be cancelled. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Ex facie, there has been no\n Decision Date :\n 08-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 284/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGIRRAJ\n versus \nKIRANPAL AND ANR ETC \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 229\n2021 INSC 161\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Bail: Grant of bail \u2013 By High Court \u2013 To the five respondent-accused charged under provisions of IPC and Arms Act \u2013 On the ground of parity with the co-accused who was already granted bail by the High Court \u2013 Appeal to Supreme Court seeking cancellation of bail \u2013 by Supreme Court \u2013 Since the bail granted to the present respondent-accused was on the ground of parity, their bail also liable to be cancelled \u2013 However, the respondents are granted one more opportunity to apply for bail before High Court, subject to their surrendering pursuant\n Decision Date :\n 08-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 286/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVURI KRISHNA MURTHY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 986\n2021 INSC 153\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Blanket order of protection from arrest \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 The High Court stayed all the proceedings in a suit OS No. 274 of 2014 and directed the District Collector, to submit report in respect fabrication of the judgment and decree dated 11.11.2014 in the said suit \u2013 The District Collector conducted an enquiry and submitted a report to the High Court, stating that the decree as well as the judgment were fabricated and no such decree was passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate\n Decision Date :\n 05-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 274/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.\n versus \nK. SHOBANA ETC. ETC. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 1164\n2021 INSC 154\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, DINESH MAHESHWARI, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act, 2016 \u2013 s.27(f) \u2013 Reservation for appointment \u2013 Manner of filling up the seats \u2013 Direct recruitment \u2013 Post Graduate Assistants in Chemistry \u2013 356 posts notified wherein and 43 current vacancies) were available for Most Backward Class (MBC) and Denotified Community (DNC) candidates \u2013 Provisional selection list published \u2013 Meritorious candidates under the MBC quota were appointed in the MBC/DNC quota against the backlog vacancies \u2013 Challenged\n Decision Date :\n 05-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3745/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRASHANT SINGH RAJPUT\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 161\n2021 INSC 645\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439 \u2013 Anticipatory bail in murder case \u2013 FIR and the statements under ss. 161 and 164 indicated a specific role in the crime to the two respondents \u2013 High Court granted anticipatory bail to the two respondents \u2013 Challenge against \u2013 anticipatory bail ignored material aspects including nature and gravity of the offence and specific allegations against the respondents \u2013 Hence sufficient case made out for cancelling anticipatory bail granted by High Court. Bail: Challenge to an order granting bail and application\n Decision Date :\n 08-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1202/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nACHHAR SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 243\n2021 INSC 289\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 378 \u2013 Appeal in case of acquittal \u2013 Exercise of power by the High Court under \u2013 On facts, the High Court convicted two accused-appellants for offences u/s. 452, 326 and 323 and u/ss. 302 and 452 IPC, respectively, setting aside trial court \u2013 Interference with \u2013 Held: High Court rightly interfered with the perverse findings of the trial court and prevented miscarriage of justice by convicting the appellants \u2013 High Court went through the consistent evidence against some of the accused which were\n Decision Date :\n 07-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1140/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLOCHAN SHRIVAS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2021] 14 S.C.R. 809\n2021 INSC 882\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code 1860: ss.363, 366, 376(2)(i), 377, 201, 302 and 376A \u2013 Prosecution case was that on the fateful day, the minor daughter of complainant was found missing \u2013 They went in search for her but she was not found anywhere \u2013 When they came back home, PW-3 told who was neighbour had said that if they would allow him to conduct worship, he could find the child in an hour \u2013 They agreed and after the worship, appellant informed them that the child was tied and kept inside the sack in the bushes \u2013 PW-1 informed police and on suspicion,\n Decision Date :\n 14-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 499/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S GIMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED\n versus \nMANOJ GOEL \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 432\n2021 INSC 637\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss. 138, 139 \u2013 Parallel prosecutions arising from a single transaction u/s.138 \u2013 Impermissibility of \u2013 Dishonour of cheques \u2013 First set of complaints filed \u2013 Compromise \u2013 cheques issued pursuant to the compromise deed also dishonoured \u2013 Second complaint filed \u2013 Both the complaints if can be pursued simultaneously \u2013 Held: No \u2013 A settlement agreement effaces the original complaint \u2013 Non-compliance of the terms of the settlement\n Decision Date :\n 08-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1068/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGURMEET SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 153\n2021 INSC 299\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.304-B \u2013 Death of married woman after she consumed poison in her matrimonial home \u2013 Conviction of appellant-husband by Courts below \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 Held: On facts, not acceptable \u2013 Death was caused within seven years of marriage in inspiring testimony of deceased\u2019s father (PW4) about continuing harassment meted out to deceased on account of dowry \u2013 Prosecution having satisfied the necessary ingredients u/s.304B IPC, the presumption u/s.113-B, Evidence Act took full effect, which was not rebutted by the\n Decision Date :\n 28-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1731/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVELLADURAI\n versus \nSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 187\n2021 INSC 477\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.306 r/w s.4(b) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act \u2013 Abetment to suicide \u2013 Mere harassment without any positive action on part of the accused proximate to the time of occurrence which led to the suicide would not amount to offence u/s.306 IPC and died \u2013 Appellant had quarrel with his wife on the incident date \u2013 But no material on record that appellant played an active role by an act of instigating or by doing a certain act to facilitate the commission of suicide \u2013 On the contrary, even appellant also had tried to\n Decision Date :\n 14-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 953/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR\n versus \nAKASHDEEP MORYA & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 723\n2021 INSC 485\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Service Law \u2013 Judicial Service \u2013 Involvement in criminal case \u2013 Appointment to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) \u2013 Respondent was found not deserving to be appointed for the said post in view of his antecedents \u2013 Held: Post of a judicial officer at hierarchy involves applying the most exacting standards \u2013 In the absence of an honourable acquittal, the alleged involvement of an officer in criminal cases may undermine public faith in the system \u2013 In the present case, in two cases, the respondent was charge-sheeted for offences\n Decision Date :\n 16-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5733/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJAY KUMAR RAI\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 143\n2021 INSC 292\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.397 \u2013 Criminal revision \u2013 Judicial Magistrate declined to discharge appellant in a case u/ ss.504 and 506 IPC \u2013 Criminal revision against the order turned down by High Court on ground of lack of jurisdiction u/s.397 CrPC while citing a case \u2013 On appeal, held: The High Court apparently under-appreciated the decision in Asian Resurfacing case \u2013 One may say so at least for two reasons \u2013 Firstly, the said case dealt with a challenge to charges framed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (POCA)\n Decision Date :\n 07-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 472/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Matter remanded to High Court\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIN RE: EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT 1881\n versus \n. \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 257\n2021 INSC 257\nCoram : S.A. BOBDE, L. NAGESWARA RAO, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, A.S. BOPANNA, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: s. 138 \u2013 Expeditious trial/ disposal of cases u/s. 138 \u2013 Pendency of matters u/s. 138 at various levels, having adverse effect in disposal of other criminal cases \u2013 the situation \u2013 Suo Motu Writ Petition \u2013 Issuance of notice to Union of India, Registrar Generals of the High Courts, Director Generals of Police of the States and Union Territories, Member Secretary of the National Legal Services Authority, Reserve Bank of India and Indian\n Decision Date :\n 16-04-2021\n | Case No :\n SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 2/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 5 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNASIB SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 13 S.C.R. 566\n2021 INSC 642\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss. 386, 223 \u2013 Power of appellate court to direct retrial \u2013 Scope of \u2013 Held: Appellate Court may direct a retrial only in \u2018exceptional\u2019 circumstances to avert a miscarriage Mere lapses in the investigation are not sufficient to warrant a direction for re-trial \u2013 Only if the lapses are so grave so as to prejudice the rights of the parties, a retrial can be directed \u2013 On facts, two FIR\u2019s relating to the offences in the same transaction, one arising\n Decision Date :\n 08-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1051/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNIL KUMAR @ SUDHIR KUMAR & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 630\n2021 INSC 298\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Sentence/Sentencing: Sentences to run concurrently or consecutively \u2013 Duty of Court of first instance to specify \u2013 Held: It is legally obligatory upon the court of first instance while awarding multiple punishments of imprisonment terms as to whether the sentences would run concurrently or consecutively \u2013 If the Court of first instance does not specify the concurrent running of sentences, the inference, primarily, is that the Court intended such sentences to run consecutively, though, the Court of first instance\n Decision Date :\n 25-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 526/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUTTAR PRADESH POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.\n versus \nCG POWER AND INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED AND ANR. \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 37\n2021 INSC 294\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, INDIRA BANERJEE\n Building and Other Construction Workers\u2019 Welfare Cess Act, 1996: s. 3(1), (2) \u2013 Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Rules, 1998 \u2013 rr. 3 and 4 (1)-(4) \u2013 Building and Other Construction and Condition of Service) Act, 1996 \u2013 s. 2 (1)(d), (g) and (i) \u2013 Levy of cess on cost of construction incurred by builders \u2013 Respondent no. 1-contractor entered into an agreement with UPPTCL for construction of 765/ 400 KV Substations, split into four contracts \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 12-05-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 8630/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANOJ MISHRA @ CHHOTKAU\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 707\n2021 INSC 640\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 \u2013 Appellant alongwith other accused persons convicted and sentenced u/ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 and s.4, POCSO Act \u2013 Held: Evidence of the prosecutrix and the medical evidence establish the charge of rape \u2013 However, charge of gang evidence \u2013 Thus, conviction by the trial court, confirmed by High Court u/s.376-D is modified \u2013 Appellant is convicted u/s.376 and sentenced for the period undergone \u2013 Fine and default sentence imposed by the trial court, unaltered \u2013 Conviction u/s.506 is set aside\n Decision Date :\n 08-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1167/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNEEHARIKA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 1044\n2021 INSC 253\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH, SANJIV KHANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Article 226 \u2013 Quashing of FIR \u2013 Blanket interim orders of stay of investigation and/or \u201cno coercive steps to be adopted\u201d during pendency of u/Art.226 \u2013 Impermissibility of \u2013 Held: Police has the statutory right and duty to investigate into a cognizable offence \u2013 Save in exceptional cases, the Court should not interfere at the stage of investigation of offences \u2013 When the investigation is in progress and the\n Decision Date :\n 13-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 330/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) AND ANR.\n versus \nTHOMMANDRU HANNAH VIJAYALAKSHMI @ T. H. VIJAYALAKSHMI AND ANR. \n- \n[2021] 13 S.C.R. 364\n2021 INSC 643\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 \u2013 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(e) \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.109 \u2013 Central Bureau of Investigation (Crime) Manual 2005 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Corruption cases \u2013 Preliminary enquiry if mandatory before registering an FIR \u2013 FIR registered against first respondent, Commissioner of Income Tax on the basis of \u201csource information\u201d for allegedly possessing assets\n Decision Date :\n 08-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1045/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGAUTAM NAVLAKHA\n versus \nNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 87\n2021 INSC 295\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, K.M. JOSEPH\n Constitution of India: Art.21 \u2013 House arrest \u2013 When a citizen is placed on house arrest, which has the effect of depriving him of any freedom, it will not only be custody but it would involve depriving him of the fundamental freedoms unless such freedoms are specifically protected undergoing a house arrest and in the teeth of an absolute prohibition, in the facts of the case forbidding him from moving outside his home, the hallmark of custody described in the case of incarceration is equally present \u2013 The right under Art.21 is undoubtedly available to citizens\n Decision Date :\n 12-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 510/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nALI AHMAD\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 565\n2021 INSC 723\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.389 \u2013 Suspension of sentence pending the appeal; release of accused on bail \u2013 Second respondent-accused was convicted by trial court under s.302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 Pending appeal, High Court allowed application filed under Held: With the introduction of the first proviso to s.389, the law giver has stipulated a particular procedure to be followed in a matter of releasing a person who stands convicted of serious offences as are indicated thereunde \u2013 Every law is intended to be followed \u2013 In the impugned\n Decision Date :\n 12-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1374/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMALLAPPA\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 1\n2021 INSC 290\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Deceased was allegedly assaulted with a club \u2013 Prosecution case primarily based on evidence of PW5 (deceased\u2019s wife) \u2013 Trial court acquitted accused-appellant as well as the co-accused \u2013 Acquittal of appellant reversed \u2013 Held: On facts, evidence of PW5 cannot be accepted in full \u2013 There were contradictions in PW5\u2019s deposition as regards her having seen appellant at the spot of occurrence \u2013 PW5 was not a witness to actual act of assault \u2013 As a witness, she did not inspire\n Decision Date :\n 07-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1993/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBOOTA SINGH & OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 180\n2021 INSC 256\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, K.M. JOSEPH\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 ss. 42 & 43 \u2013 Governing provisions, if s.42 or s.43 \u2013 Non-compliance of s.42 \u2013 Secret information received by PW-4 (S.I.) that accused- appellants were selling poppy straw in a vehicle \u2013 with fellow officials \u2013 Accused-appellants found sitting in a Jeep \u2013 Notice served u/s.50 \u2013 Search led to recovery of poppy straw \u2013 Trial court convicted appellants u/s.15 rejecting their plea of acquittal on ground of non-compliance of s.42 \u2013 The trial court held\n Decision Date :\n 16-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 421/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHEMRAJ RATNAKAR SALIAN\n versus \nHDFC BANK LTD. & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 529\n2021 INSC 408\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002: ss. 14, 13(2) and 13(13) \u2013 Taking of possession of secured asset by the secured creditor \u2013 Tenant restraining from taking possession of the secured asset \u2013 Protection of tenant and the landlord \u2013 On facts, grant of financial facility to borrowers by the respondent Bank \u2013 Credit facility secured by way of mortgage of property-secured asset in favour of the Bank \u2013 Accounts of borrower declared as non-performing assets \u2013 Issuance of notice u/s.\n Decision Date :\n 17-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 843/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAIKAM KHAN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 14 S.C.R. 767\n2021 INSC 896\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Criminal Law \u2013 Murder \u2013 Interested and related witnesses \u2013 Deceased had four sonsincluding the appellant--accused No.1 and P.W.1-\u2013Six persons were murdered at different places in thehouse, witnessed by P.W.1- and P.W.2- (P.W.1-\u2019s brother-in-law) \u2013 One was killed verandah, two inroom and one was killed in a room upstairs \u2013Appellants--accused Nos. 1, 3 and 4 convicted for offence punishable u/ss.302/34 IPC and sentenced to death \u2013 Accused No.2 was acquitted\u2013 On appeal, held: Both P.W.1- and P.W.2- are witnesses, who are closely related to\n Decision Date :\n 15-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 434/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Allowing the appeals filed by accused persons while dismissing that of the P.W-1, the Court\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nK. P. NATARAJAN & ANR.\n versus \nMUTHALAMMAL & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 350\n2021 INSC 337\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Or.XXXII, r.3 \u2013 Suit for specific performance filed by the petitioner \u2013 Respondents-defendants after having entered appearance through counsel, remained ex parte \u2013 In the plaint, the third defendant represented by the next friend (minor\u2019s father) \u2013 Petitioners had filed along with the plaint, an application under Or. XXXII, r.3 for appointing second respondent (minor\u2019s father) as guardian \u2013 Petitioner had also sought alternate relief, a decree for refund of the money\n Decision Date :\n 16-07-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 2492/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n THE STATE OF KERALA\n versus \nMAHESH \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 964\n2021 INSC 195\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.439 \u2013 Appeal against grant of bail \u2013 Accused-respondent was accused of a heinous and shocking murder of a lady doctor aged about 30 years \u2013 Incident alleged to have taken place in the presence of victim\u2019s father \u2013 His bail Bail application moved before High Court was, however, allowed within 10/12 days of dismissal of bail application by Sessions Court \u2013 State filed appeal against the grant of bail \u2013 Held: In the impugned order, High Court did not advert to any error in the reasoning of Sessions\n Decision Date :\n 19-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 343/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nFAKHREY ALAM\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 1000\n2021 INSC 183\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.167 \u2013 Default bail \u2013 FIR against appellant under provisions of IPC, Arms Act and the UAPA Act \u2013Appellant, if entitled to default bail under s.167(2) CrPC in the facts of the case \u2013 Held: Entitled \u2013 s.167 CrPC provides for which the investigation should be completed, depending upon the nature of offences \u2013 Since, liberty is a Constitutional right, time periods are specified in default of which the accused will have a right to default bail, a valuable right \u2013 On facts, FIR was filed against\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 319/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAYAMMA & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 11\n2021 INSC 287\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 r/w 34 \u2013 Allegation that on account of previous dispute between the parties, accused with the intention to kill the victim went to her house, doused her with kerosene and set her ablaze \u2013 Acquittal by the trial court \u2013 However, the High Court on basis of of the police officer who recorded the dying declaration and the doctor who endorsed the mental fitness of the victim to make such statement, convicted the accused u/s. 302 r/w 34 and imposed life imprisonment \u2013 On appeal, held: Conviction of the accused cannot be upheld only on the basis\n Decision Date :\n 07-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 758/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD. RAFIQ @ KALLU\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 163\n2021 INSC 481\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 and s.304 \u2013 Prosecution case that Sub-Inspector (SI) motioned a truck, driven by the accused/ appellant, to stop \u2013 Instead of applying brakes, the accused tried to speed away, upon which SI boarded the truck from its left side \u2013 It was alleged that that he would get killed \u2013 Nevertheless, SI boarded the truck \u2013 Appellant pushed him, as a result of which SI fell off the truck and he was run over by the rear wheels of the truck \u2013 SI died \u2013 Appellant fled with the truck \u2013 However, later he was arrested and charged\n Decision Date :\n 15-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 856/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAPARNA BHAT & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 479\n2021 INSC 192\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Bail condition \u2013 Accused guilty of sexual offence \u2013 Rakhi tying as a condition for bail, propriety \u2013 Imposing conditions that implicitly tend to condone or diminish the harm caused by the accused and have the effect of potentially exposing the survivor to secondary trauma The law does not permit or countenance such conduct, where the survivor can potentially be traumatized many times over or be led into some kind of non- voluntary acceptance, or be compelled by the circumstances to accept and condone behavior what is a serious offence \u2013 Using rakhi tying as\n Decision Date :\n 18-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 329/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLAKHVIR SINGH ETC\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 269\n2021 INSC 30\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Probation of Offenders Act, 1958: Object of legislation \u2013 Held: To give the benefit of release of offenders on probation of good conduct instead of sentencing them to imprisonment \u2013 Thus, increasing emphasis on the reformation and rehabilitation of offenders as useful and self-reliant deleterious effects of jail life is what is sought to be subserved. Probation of Offenders Act, 1958: s.6 \u2013 Appellants were convicted by trial court for offence under s.397 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of seven years each \u2013 High Court dismissed the appeal against\n Decision Date :\n 19-01-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 47/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSADAKAT KOTWAR AND ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 332\n2021 INSC 719\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Penal Code, 1860: s.307 r/w s.34 \u2013 Grievous injuries on vital parts of the body \u2013 Prosecution case was that appellant no.1 stabbed PW-7 with a dagger in her ribs and appellant no.2 stabbed PW-8 with a dagger on right side of his stomach and on left ribs \u2013 Trial for offence under s.307 r/w s.34 \u2013 High Court upheld the order of conviction \u2013 On appeal, held: There was no reason to doubt the testimony of the witnesses particularly PW7 and PW8 who were injured eye-witnesses \u2013 It was not the case of appellants-accused that the\n Decision Date :\n 12-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1316/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA\n versus \nM.R VIJAYABHASKAR & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 5 S.C.R. 196\n2021 INSC 286\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Constitution of India: Arts. 32, 226, 19(1)(a), 19(2) \u2013 Freedom of the media to report court proceedings \u2013 High Court made certain oral remarks attributing responsibility to the Election Commission-EC for the present surge of cases of COVID-19, due to their failure to implement COVID-19 related protocol during the elections \u2013 Oral remarks were \u2018EC is singularly responsible for the second wave of Covid-19 and that the EC should be put up for murder charges\u201d \u2013 Said remarks though not part of\n Decision Date :\n 06-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1767/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARVATI DEVI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR NOW STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 711\n2021 INSC 911\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 304B and 201 r/w s. 34 \u2013 Dowry death \u2013 Prosecution case was that the victim-deceased daughter of informant (PW-3) was married to A-1 \u2013 Within few months of marriage, A-1, his father (A-2) and his mother (A-3) started harassing motor cycle \u2013 They threatened the victim that if the demand was not fulfilled then they would throw her out of matrimonial home and get A-1 married to someone else \u2013 Similar message was conveyed to PW-3 by his son-in-law (PW-2) with whom A-1 had raised the issue of insufficient dowry\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 574/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGOVINDAN\n versus \nSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 515\n2021 INSC 915\nCoram : R. SUBHASH REDDY\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Sentence / Sentencing \u2013 Quantum of punishment \u2013 Appellant convicted by trial court u/s.304(II) IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years \u2013 Conviction and sentence confirmed by High Court \u2013 Issue before Supreme Court limited to quantum of punishment to quantum of sentence, it all depends on background facts of the case, antecedents of the accused, whether the assault was pre-meditated and pre-planned or not, etc. \u2013 In the present case, there was a dispute with regard to pathway, which the complainant\u2019s family members were claiming\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1665/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM VIJAY SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 175 OF 2021 FEBRUARY 25, 2021 \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 566\n2021 INSC 120\nCoram : R.F. NARIMAN\n*\n, HEMANT GUPTA, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015: Importance/reliability of ossification test \u2013 When a person is around 18 years of age, the ossification test can be said to be relevant for determining the approximate age of with law \u2013 However, when a person is around 40-55 years of age, the structure of bones cannot be helpful in determining the age \u2013 When the ossification test cannot yield trustworthy and reliable results, such test cannot be made a basis to determine the age of the person concerned\n Decision Date :\n 25-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 175/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. KALAMANI TEX & ANR\n versus \nP. BALASUBRAMANIAN M.A. NO. 364 OF 2021 IN \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 679\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Addition/deletion of words \u2013 By judgment dated 10.02.2021, direction by this Court to the Registry to transfer the amount of Rs.11,20,000/- along with interest accrued thereupon to the complainant-respondent \u2013 However, said amount of Rs.11,20,000/- was lying in a non-interest earning account with the designated Bank \u2013 In view thereof, the words \u201calong with interest accrued thereupon\u201d are deleted \u2013 Issuance of direction to the Registry to transfer the said amount to the\n Decision Date :\n 24-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 364/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM RATAN\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 866\n2021 INSC 912\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.392, 397 \u2013 Appellant along with other two accused was convicted u/ss.392, 397 r/w s.11/13, MPDVPK Act, 1981 \u2013 On appeal, held: Complainant narrated in detail the manner in which he was woken up by the accused while hut and the demand for money that was made by brandishing the firearm \u2013 Motorcycle and mobile which was stolen were recovered \u2013 Appellant participated in the offence of committing robbery as the motorcycle was recovered at his instance \u2013 His conviction u/s.392 by trial court\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1333/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSIVASANKARAN\n versus \nSANTHIMEENAL \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 169\n2021 INSC 467\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Hindu Law \u2013 Divorce \u2013 Cruelty \u2013 Subsequent conduct \u2013 Continued allegations and litigative proceedings \u2013 Irretrievable breakdown of marriage \u2013 Parties living separately from the date of marriage for almost 20 years \u2013 Appellant-husband had remarried after court \u2013 Held: The marriage never took off from the first day and was never consummated \u2013 Continuing acts of respondent-wife amounted to cruelty even if the same had not arisen as a cause prior to institution of the divorce petition \u2013 Her conduct showed disintegration of\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 4984/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U. P. & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 219\n2021 INSC 470\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.319 \u2013 Summons purporting to invoke power u/s.319 CrPC \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 Murder \u2013 Deposition of second respondent that her husband (deceased) was murdered by his employer (the appellant) with the help of his friends \u2013 Deceased Application on behalf of prosecution invoking s.319 CrPC \u2013 Sessions Judge held that power u/s.319 CrPC has to be invoked and ordered to summon the appellant \u2013 Order upheld by High Court \u2013 Held: The statement of law as regards the standards fixed for invoking power u/s.319 CrPC\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 990/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGURU DUTT PATHAK\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 573\n2021 INSC 285\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302/34 \u2013 Four accused \u2013 Acquittal by Trial Court \u2013 During pendency of State\u2019s appeal before High Court, accused no. 1 to 3 died \u2013 Reversal of acquittal of fourth accused by High Court \u2013 Appeal against conviction \u2013 Held: Prosecution established and proved by prosecution by leading evidence that the incident had taken place on the road near Primary Pathshala \u2013 The dead body was recovered from the road near the Pathshala and blood stained clothes were also recovered from that place \u2013 Thus prosecution proved the\n Decision Date :\n 06-05-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 502/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEVILAL AND OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 592\n2021 INSC 118\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, K.M. JOSEPH, INDIRA BANERJEE\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302 r/w 34 \u2013 Appellants convicted u/ss.302 r/w 34, sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 Affirmed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: FIR was rightly relied upon by the courts below as dying declaration of FIR itself referred to the presence of PW1 (wife of deceased) and PW2 (sister- in-law of the deceased) \u2013 Testimony of both these witnesses disclosed that the appellants opened an assault on victim which led to his death \u2013 Recoveries of the weapons in question viz., lathi, sword and\n Decision Date :\n 25-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 989/2007\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMURALI\n versus \nSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 201\n2021 INSC 2\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.320 \u2013 Compounding of offence under ss.307, 324 \u2013 Prosecution case was that fifteen years ago, over a volleyball match, verbal altercation took place between victim-injured and original accused no.3 and 5 who after sometime cornered the victim along him \u2013 Appellant-M struck the victim on his head with a hockey stick and appellant-R tied to kill him by giving a neck blow with sharp edged object and in the process, left hand of the victim and the thumb and finger of his right hand got severed \u2013 Trial court held appellant-M guilty\n Decision Date :\n 05-01-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 24/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0986\u00b7\u099a\u09bf\u0995 - Garo\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0996\u09b8\u09bf - Khasi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u1c65\u1c5f\u1c71\u1c5b\u1c5f\u1c72\u1c64 - Santali\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPATRICIA MUKHIM\n versus \nSTATE OF MEGHALAYA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 65\n2021 INSC 213\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.153A and 505(1)(c) \u2013 Brutal attack on non-tribals in State of Meghalaya with iron rods and sticks \u2013 Attackers allegedly belonged to tribal community of Meghalaya \u2013 Facebook post uploaded by Appellant, alleged to be intentionally made for promoting State \u2013 Prima facie case made out u/ss.153A and 505(1)(c) or not \u2013 Held: Close scrutiny of the Facebook post uploaded by appellant indicate that her agony was directed against the apathy shown by the CM, Meghalaya, DGP and the DorbarShnong of the area in not taking any action against\n Decision Date :\n 25-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 141/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. KALAMANI TEX & ANR\n versus \nP. BALASUBRAMANIAN \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 668\n2021 INSC 72\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: ss. 118 and 139 \u2013 Presumption as to negotiable instruments \u2013 Presumption in favour of holder \u2013 Held: Once the signature of an accused on the cheque/ negotiable instrument are established, then clauses become operative \u2013 In such a situation, the obligation shifts upon the accused to discharge the presumption imposed upon him \u2013 Presumptions raised u/ss. 118, 139 are rebuttable in nature \u2013 A probable defence needs to be raised, which must meet the standard of\n Decision Date :\n 10-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 123/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGULAB\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 678\n2021 INSC 852\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 34 \u2013 Exhortation to co-accused who fired fatal shot \u2013 Common intention \u2013 Appellant convicted u/ s.302 r/w s.34 while the co-accused (since deceased) was convicted u/s.302; sentenced to imprisonment for held: Prosecution not required to prove that there was an elaborate plan between the accused to kill the deceased or a plan was in existence for a long time \u2013 A common intention to commit the crime is proved if the accused by their words or action indicate their assent to join in the\n Decision Date :\n 09-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 81/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX AND OTHERS\n versus \nM/S. COMMERCIAL STEEL LIMITED \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 660\n2021 INSC 441\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLI\n Constitution of India \u2013 Ar.226 \u2013 Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 \u2013 s.107 \u2013 The case of Revenue that in the guise of an inter-State sale, the respondent was attempting to sell the goods in the local SGST and CGST \u2013 An order of detention was issued and a notice was served on the person in charge of the conveyance \u2013The respondent paid tax and penalty, following which the goods and the conveyance were released \u2013Writ petition was filed by the respondent \u2013 The High Court\n Decision Date :\n 03-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5121/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n THE STATE OF ODISHA\n versus \nBANABIHARI MOHAPATRA AND ANR. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 612\n2021 INSC 85\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, HEMANT GUPTA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.302/201 r/w s.34 \u2013 Prosecution case was that the victim-deceased was found dead in shop of accused with a swollen belly and deep burn injury on right foot and blood was oozing out of his mouth and nostrils \u2013 In by complainant-wife of the deceased, she had stated that on the fateful day, the first accused-respondenthad come to her house and told her that the deceased was lying motionless and not responding to calls and thereafter younger son of first accused also came and gave similar information \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 12-02-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 1156/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMAWATAR\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 499\n2021 INSC 664\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Constitution of India: Art.142 \u2013 Prosecution case was that there was property dispute between the two neighbours appellant and complainant \u2013 Complaint was filed under SC/ST Act against the appellant that he abused complainant with repeated reference to her caste \u2013 Courts under SC/ST Act \u2013 In the instant appeal, complainant filed an application for compromise \u2013 Held: The record manifests that there was an undeniable pre-existing civil dispute between the parties \u2013 Thus, the genesis of the deprecated incident was civil/property dispute\n Decision Date :\n 25-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1393/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBRIJESH KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 995\n2021 INSC 197\nCoram : MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR\n*\n, AJAY RASTOGI\n Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 \u2013 Counsel for the Petitioner in this matter was appointed as amicus curiae for the Petitioner \u2013 He brought attention to the Court that in this, as well as other matters he was appointed as amicus curiae, he was only provided with the judgment and the trial Court judgment preceding it, severely hampering effective representation \u2013 Held: This, from the frequent grievances raised by advocates appearing, seems to be reflective of a general practice, particularly in criminal matters \u2013 This practice only serves to\n Decision Date :\n 22-03-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 773/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARUBAI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 135\n2021 INSC 393\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 and 436 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Fire incident at mid-night wherein house of appellant and her family engulfed in flames \u2013 Appellant-second wife came out of the house unscathed, whereas the first wife and her two children caught by flames and two of them died later by the courts below, though her husband and her mother-in-law acquitted by the trial court \u2013 On appeal, held: Links in the chain of circumstances is necessary to be established for conviction on the basis of circumstantial evidence \u2013 Mere suspicion would not be sufficient, unless the\n Decision Date :\n 10-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1154/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIN RE: TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 100\n2021 INSC 260\nCoram : S.A. BOBDE, L. NAGESWARA RAO, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Criminal trials: Draft Rules for expeditious and fair criminal trials \u2013 Implementation of \u2013 Suo motu proceeding under Art. 32 \u2013 This of deficiencies occurring in the course of criminal trials and certain practices adopted by trial courts in criminal proceedings as well as in the disposal of criminal cases, leading to prolonged proceedings \u2013 Also that there were inadequacies in the practices and rules of High Courts, and\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2021\n | Case No :\n SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 01/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSONU @ SUBHASH KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 137\n2021 INSC 134\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Second respondent lodged FIR against the appellant alleging that appellant developed friendship with her and assured that he would marry her \u2013 Appellant and second respondent developed physical relationship for about one and a half appellant expressed disinclination to marry her \u2013 Charge sheet filed against appellant under s.376 IPC \u2013 s.482 application filed by appellant for quashing the charge-sheet \u2013 High Court dismissed the application with direction that appellant may move trial court to seek\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 233/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANDEEP KHAITAN, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR NATIONAL PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. \n versus \nJSVM PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 122\n2021 INSC 268\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, K.M. JOSEPH\n COURT REPORTS [2021] 4 S.C.R. [2021] 4 S.C.R. 122 122 SANDEEP KHAITAN, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR NATIONAL PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. VERSUS JSVM PLYWOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. & Anr. (Criminal Appeal No.447 of 2021) APRIL 22, 2021 [UDAY UMESH LALIT AND K. M. JOSEPH, JJ] Insolvency and Bankruptcy NCLT admitted application u/s. 7 IBC against one NPIL and subsequently appellant was appointed as Resolution Professional \u2013 Appellant alleging that the respondent-operational creditor, transferred Rs 32.50 lakhs from the Corporate Debtor\u2019s bank account without the appellant\u2019s\n Decision Date :\n 22-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 447/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.\n versus \nLOVE KUSH MEENA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 1192\n2021 INSC 208\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Service Law: Appointment for post of constable \u2013 Disqualification for appointment \u2013 Advertisement provided for disqualification clause that only those candidates would be qualified to appear who have not been convicted for offence of moral turpitude, violent activities acquitted by court \u2013 Respondent-candidate was found ineligible since in a criminal case under ss.302, 323, 341, 34 IPC, he was not acquitted honourably but was acquitted on benefit of doubt \u2013 High Court held in favour of respondent \u2013 Appeal by employer-State \u2013 Held: The\n Decision Date :\n 24-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3894/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSALIMBHAI HAMIDBHAI MEMON\n versus \nNITESHKUMAR MAGANBHAI PATEL & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 281\n2021 INSC 430\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.405, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 \u2013 Appellant and the first respondent entered into a deed of partnership under which a firm was constituted \u2013 Dispute arose between the parties \u2013 The gravamen of the allegations in the FIR is that: a) The deed of relinquishment which was prepared in relation to certain lands situated was interpolated and forged by the first respondent; b) The deed of dissolution of partnership was fabricated; and c) Despite the settlement dated 24.12.2018,\n Decision Date :\n 31-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 884/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHUPESH RATHOD \n versus \nDAYASHANKAR PRASAD CHAURASIA & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 319\n2021 INSC 710\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: ss.138, 142 \u2013 Complaint filed u/s.138 by the Managing Director of the appellant-company \u2013 Board Resolution authorising the Managing Director to file complaint for dishonour of cheque annexed with the complaint \u2013 Defence of respondent that the the complaint and the Board Resolution annexed did not lead to conclusion that it was filed on behalf of the Company \u2013 Held: It is quite apparent from the format of the complaint that the Managing Director had filed the complaint on behalf of the Company \u2013 There could be a format\n Decision Date :\n 10-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1105/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRADEEP S. WODEYAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 985\n2021 INSC 798\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 193, 209 and 465 \u2013 Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 \u2013 Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 \u2013 Special Court\u2019s power to take cognizance \u2013 Allegations of purchasing and selling extracted iron mining dispatch permits and the payments of charges to the Mining and Geological Departments and the Forest Department \u2013 FIR registered and a final report u/s. 173 of Cr.P.C. submitted \u2013 Additional City and Civil Sessions Judge and Special Judge took cognizance after perusing the\n Decision Date :\n 29-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1288/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE\n versus \nRAJ KUMAR \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 4\n2021 INSC 423\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Service Law \u2013 Recruitment \u2013 Public employment \u2013 Delhi Police \u2013 Post of constable \u2013 Standing Order No.398/2010 Policy for deciding cases of candidates provisionally selected in Delhi Police involved in criminal cases (facing trial or acquitted) \u2013 Selection candidature of respondents candidates as they had faced criminal proceedings \u2013 CAT allowed the applications of respondents \u2013 Writ petitions \u2013 Direction of High Court that the respondents be considered for appointment \u2013 Held: Not justified \u2013 Reading of the applicable\n Decision Date :\n 25-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 4960/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDR. U. N. BORA, EX. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS. \n versus \nASSAM ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 484\n2021 INSC 671\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 \u2013 Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972 \u2013 s.21 \u2013 Levy of cess on the agricultural produce bought or sold in the notified market area \u2013 Deeming fiction respondent no.1-Association \u2013 Rules struck down \u2013 s.21A inserted by 2006 amending Act \u2013 Challenged \u2013 Division Bench of High Court upheld s.21 and held that the deeming fiction would apply only where a trader fails to establish direct evidence of sale or purchase having\n Decision Date :\n 26-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1967/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUDHA SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 95\n2021 INSC 271\nCoram : S.A. BOBDE, A.S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Bail: Bail granted to accused arrested with respect to the offence punishable under s.3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 \u2013 Accused alleged to be a contract killer and sharp shooter and allegedly murdered husband of the appellant \u2013 Previously he was prosecuted in 15 cases for serious offences including murder, attempt to murder and criminal conspiracy \u2013 High Court granted bail to the accused on liberal terms \u2013 Appeal by complainant \u2013 Held: High Court overlooked several aspects, such as the\n Decision Date :\n 23-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 448/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGURDEV SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 439\n2021 INSC 232\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Sentence/Sentencing: Conviction of appellant-accused under s.21 of NDPS Act \u2013 He was found to be in possession of 1 kg heroin which is four times more than the minimum of commercial quantity \u2013 As per NDPS Act, 250 gm and above of Narcotic substance/drug is a commercial quantity \u2013 under s.21 of the NDPS Act is 10 years R.I. \u2013 So far as the commercial quantity is concerned, it may be upto 20 years R.I. \u2013 Appellant was sentenced to 15 years R.I. with fine of Rs.2 lakhs \u2013 Plea of appellant that while imposing punishment of 15 years R.I. which is higher than\n Decision Date :\n 06-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 375/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S SUVARNA COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 389\n2021 INSC 854\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.482 and 319 \u2013 Quashing of criminal proceedings \u2013 Held: Merely because some other persons who might have committed the offences, but were not arrayed as accused and were not charge-sheeted cannot be a ground to quash the the accused who is charge- sheeted after a thorough investigation \u2013 During the trial if it is found that other accused persons who committed the offence are not charge-sheeted, the Court may array those persons as accused in exercise of powers u/s.319 CrPC. Allowing the appeal, the Court\n Decision Date :\n 09-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1535/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHIVAJI CHINTAPPA PATIL\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 617\n2021 INSC 136\nCoram : R.F. NARIMAN\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Penal Code, 1860: s.302 \u2013 Conviction based on circumstantial evidence \u2013 Prosecution case was that the appellant was addicted to liquor and used to abuse and beat his wife forcing her to get money from her mother \u2013 On the fateful night, the appellant and his wife went to sleep in of the appellant went to call the appellant for going to field for harvesting crop, appellant informed him that his wife committed suicide by hanging \u2013 Trial court convicted appellant under s.302 and sentenced him to imprisonment for life \u2013 High Court upheld the said order \u2013 On\n Decision Date :\n 02-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1348/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLOK PRAHARI THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY S.N. SHUKLA IAS (RETD.)\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 3 S.C.R. 317\n2021 INSC 261\nCoram : S.A. BOBDE, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, SURYA KANT\n Constitution of India: Art. 224A \u2013 Appointment of retired judges at sittings of High Courts \u2013 Pendency of 57 lakhs cases in the High Courts along with consistent ratio of vacancies of almost 40 per cent \u2013 Held: Recourse to Art. 224A by judges needed \u2013 It would provide a ready-made pool of known judicial talent to deal with the disposal of pending old cases \u2013 Certain checks and balances to be provided for resorting to Art. 224A \u2013 Guidelines on aspects such as, the trigger point to activate the provision,\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 20/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLALA @ANURAG PRAKASH AASRE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 501\n2021 INSC 415\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302, 120B, 147, 148 and 324 \u2013 Unlawful assembly with common object of causing death \u2013 Prosecution case that dispute between the parties \u2013 Deadly assault on victim by 10-12 persons carrying sharp edged weapons \u2013 Victim later succumbed to his injuries the injured informant wherein six accused named, however appellant not named but his physical description given \u2013 In the supplementary statement u/s. 161 CrPC appellant identified by name \u2013 Conviction and sentence of accused including appellant u/ss. 302, 120B, 147, 148 and 324 \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 540/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGANESAN\n versus \nSTATE REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 514\n2021 INSC 698\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Penal Code, 1860: s.397 \u2013 Applicability of \u2013 Held: To bring the case within s.397, the offender who uses any deadly weapon, or causes grievous hurt to any person shall be liable for minimum punishment under s.397 \u2013 The term confined to the \u2018offender\u2019 who uses any deadly weapon and use of deadly weapon by one offender at the time of committing robbery cannot attract s.397 for the imposition of minimum punishment on another offender who has not used any deadly weapon. Penal Code, 1860: ss.391, 395, 397\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 903/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeals partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAVAT CHANDRA MOHANTY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ODISHA & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 407\n2021 INSC 80\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, AJAY RASTOGI\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 324 \u2013 Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means \u2013 Two police officers mercilessly beat victim in the premises of the police station, who died the same night \u2013 Conviction of the accused u/s. 304 (Part II), s. 471/466, s. 342, s. 323 and High Court set aside the conviction u/s. 304 (Part II) r/w s. 34 and s. 342/34, and upheld their conviction u/s. 324/34, s. 323/34 and s. 471/34 \u2013 Appeal before this Court \u2013 Submissions of the accused that conviction u/s. 324 be compounded by this Court u/s. 320(2) Cr.P.C.; and that\n Decision Date :\n 11-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 125/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS\n versus \nRAJ KUMAR @ BITTU \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 320\n2021 INSC 377\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Constitution of India: Art. 161 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 432, 433, 433-A \u2013 Power of Governor to grant pardon/remission \u2013 Order by the High Court whereby the policies of the State Government to grant remission were decided, inter alia, directing the State of drafting a fresh policy particularly in respect of exercise of powers conferred u/Art 161; that such policy may have retrospective operation, provided the same does not lead to discrimination amongst identically situated prisoners; and till such decision is taken, the appropriate\n Decision Date :\n 03-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 721/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD.\n versus \nRAMJAN ALI & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 36\n2021 INSC 3\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, M.R. SHAH, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989: r.61 \u2013 Termination of hire purchase agreement \u2013 Hire purchase agreement entered into by appellant financier with the original owner/purchaser of vehicle \u2013 While registering the vehicle, an entry regarding hypothecation was certificate \u2013 Failure on part of original owner to pay instalment of loan \u2013 Appellant referred dispute to arbitrator who passed award in favour of appellant for an amount of Rs.25,97,053/- \u2013 Subsequently, original owner filed application before the Regional Transport\n Decision Date :\n 05-01-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 6/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH (RETD.)\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 3 S.C.R. 364\n2021 INSC 248\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Public Interest Litigation: The instant special leave petition is filed by a non-party to the writ petition PIL questioning order passed in the writ petition \u2013 Before the High Court, the Registrar General of the High Court had filed preliminary of the PIL and pleaded that the petition was filed by political person to political gain and to malign the High Court \u2013 It was further stated therein that former High Court Judge \u2018VE\u2019 (the petitioner in the instant special leave petition) had also submitted a complaint\n Decision Date :\n 12-04-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 6100/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nA.T. MYDEEN AND ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS DEPARTMENT \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 91\n2021 INSC 697\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Allegation of clandestine export \u2013 Two separate trials \u2013 Acquittal by two separate judgments \u2013 Appellate court considering evidence of only one case and convicting the accused \u2013 Propriety of \u2013 Held: Evidence trial against any accused is confined to the culpability of that accused only and it does not have any bearing upon a co- accused, who has been tried on the basis of evidence recorded in a separate trial, though for the commission of the same offence \u2013 In the instant case, High Court\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1306/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU\n versus \nLOKESH CHADHA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 538\n2021 INSC 142\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 389(1) r/w. s. 37 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 Suspension of sentence \u2013 Of the person convicted u/ss. 23(c) and 25A of NDPS Act \u2013 Granted by High Court during pendency of Appeal to Supreme Court \u2013 Held: Where trial has ended in conviction, High court should exercise its power to suspend the sentence for sufficient reasons, which must have bearing on the public policy underlying s. 37 NDPS Act \u2013 No case of suspension of sentence u/s. 389(1) is made out\n Decision Date :\n 02-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 257/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS\n versus \nMETHU MEDA \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 657\n2021 INSC 623\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Service Law \u2013 Appointment \u2013 Acquittal from criminal case \u2013 Nature of \u2013 Effect of \u2013 Respondent applied for the post of Constable in Central Industrial Security Force \u2013 Provisionally selected \u2013 Found not eligible for appointment on account of a criminal case acquitted \u2013 Held: If a person is acquitted giving him the benefit of doubt, from the charge of an offence involving moral turpitude or because the witnesses turned hostile, like in the present case, it would not automatically entitle him for the employment, that too in disciplined force\n Decision Date :\n 06-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 6238/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHANTABEN BHURABHAI BHURIYA\n versus \nANAND ATHABHAI CHAUDHARI & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 460\n2021 INSC 674\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 \u2013 Proviso to s.14 inserted by amendment \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.207, 209, 193, 482 \u2013 Offences under Atrocities Act \u2013 Second proviso to Special Court constituted u/s.14 also to directly take cognizance of such offences \u2013 Cognizance taken by Magistrate and thereafter case committed to the Special Court \u2013 Criminal proceedings, if vitiated \u2013 High Court quashed and set aside the FIR as well as order passed by the\n Decision Date :\n 26-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 967/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURINDER SINGH\n versus \nSTATE (UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH) \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 1061\n2021 INSC 790\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, A.S. BOPANNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.307 \u2013 Attempt to murder \u2013 Appellant- Head Constable convicted u/s.307 and s.27 of Arms Act, sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 3 years for both the offences \u2013 On appeal, held: Appellant was in an inebriated condition office of the complainant \u2013 After consuming water, he pulled out his pistol and aimed it at the complainant, whereafter he directed PW-3 and PW-4 to get out of the room \u2013 CFSL Report proves that the cartridge recovered from the office of the complainant was fired from the service\n Decision Date :\n 26-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2373/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI\n versus \nUTTAMCHAND BOHRA \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 821\n2021 INSC 855\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss.13(1)(e), 13(2) \u2013 A-1, a public servant was accused of accumulating assets disproportionate to his known sources of income in collusion with other accused \u2013 Respondent accused of abetting and/or conspiring with A-1 \u2013 According A-1 acquired a flat, through a company \u2013 Respondent was alleged to be close associate and financer of A-1 and his family \u2013 Chargesheet against the respondent quashed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Role attributed to the respondent is that he helped in the execution of the\n Decision Date :\n 09-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1590/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP. MOHANRAJ & ORS.\n versus \nM/S. SHAH BROTHERS ISPAT PVT. LTD. \n- \n[2021] 14 S.C.R. 204\n2021 INSC 133\nCoram : R.F. NARIMAN\n*\n, NAVIN SINHA, K.M. JOSEPH\n Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 \u2013 s.14 \u2013 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 \u2013 Chapter XVII \u2013 ss.138, 141 \u2013 Institution/ continuation of proceeding u/s.138/141, NI Act, if covered by the moratorium provision i.e. Natural persons if covered by s.14 \u2013 Held: A s.138/141 proceeding against a corporate debtor is covered by s.14(1)(a), IBC \u2013 A quasi-criminal proceeding contained in Chapter XVII of the NI Act would amount to a \u201cproceeding\u201d within the meaning of s.14(1)(a), the moratorium\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 10355/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLAXMAN PRASAD PANDEY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 629\n2021 INSC 874\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 188 and s.120B \u2013 Arms Act \u2013 s.27/30 \u2013 Two FIRs were filed, both pertained to the same incident \u2013 There was a clash of two groups by using firearms which resulted in indiscriminate firing from both of 2020 (u/ss.147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 188, 120B IPC and s.27/30 of the Arms Act) was filed by the appellant alleging that he along with his brother and some other persons had gone to seek return of the money which he had given to a person of the another group \u2013 It is alleged that they\n Decision Date :\n 11-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1551/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSOMESH CHAURASIA\n versus \nSTATE OF M.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 692\n2021 INSC 349\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.389 (1) \u2013 Prosecution case was that the second respondent was convicted under s.302 IPC and awarded life imprisonment \u2013 By order dated 3.2.2016, High Court directed that the sentence shall during the pendency of appeal 389(1) \u2013 Two applications were filed before High Court for cancellation of bail and revocation of order dated 3.2.2016 suspending the sentence of second respondent inter- alia on ground that after the sentence was suspended, an FIR was registered against the second respondent at the behest\n Decision Date :\n 22-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 590/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAPTAN SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 408\n2021 INSC 402\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Inherent powers of High Court \u2013 Exercise of \u2013 On facts, criminal proceedings u/ss. 147, 148, 149, 406, 329 and 386 IPC pending against the private respondents \u2013 High Court in exercise of powers u/s. 482 proceedings \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 Held: Not sustainable \u2013 High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers u/s. 482 \u2013 High Court failed to consider the material collected during the investigation/inquiry and even the\n Decision Date :\n 13-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 787/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNOORULLA KHAN\n versus \nKARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 243\n2021 INSC 330\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, AJAY RASTOGI\n Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 \u2013 ss. 43, 44, 47 and 48 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 197 \u2013 Gram Panchayat and the appellant, who at the relevant time was chief officer of said Gram Panchayat, were accused of having committed offences \u2013 Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate First Class found appellant guilty of the offences \u2013 However, the Additional Session Judge held that the appellant was entitled to protection u/ s.197 of Cr.P.C. and in the absence of requisite sanction, his prosecution was\n Decision Date :\n 13-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 599/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN\n versus \nBABLU @ OM PRAKASH \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 450\n2021 INSC 782\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT, AJAY RASTOGI\n Appeal against acquittal: Interference with \u2013 Prosecution case that 13 accused along with 10-12 persons armed with weapons, forcibly entered the house of the informant and hurled abuses, inflicted informant\u2019s brother with injuries who later succumbed to his injuries \u2013 injuries when he tried to intervene \u2013 Conviction of 13 accused in respect of offences punishable u/ss. 147, 148, 149, 450 or 450/149, 452 or 452/149, 302 or 302 rw ss. 149, 307 or 307 rw 149 IPC on basis of the eye witness account \u2013 High Court upheld the conviction and sentence\n Decision Date :\n 24-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1475/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKALABHAI HAMIRBHAI KACHHOT\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 239\n2021 INSC 274\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n 4 S.C.R. 239 239 KALABHAI HAMIRBHAI KACHHOT v. STATE OF GUJARAT (Criminal Appeal No. 216 of 2015) APRIL 28, 2021 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND R. SUBHASH REDDY,JJ.] Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 rw s. 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Previous animosity between the parties \u2013 On the fateful day, accused persons Police Act \u2013 High Court while upholding the conviction, extended benefit of s. 428 CrPC \u2013 Interference with \u2013 Held: Not called for \u2013 On examination of entire evidence of all the witnesses with reference to medical and other evidence on record, it is clear that the\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 216/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNETAJI ACHYUT SHINDE (PATIL) & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2021] 3 S.C.R. 255\n2021 INSC 200\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, HEMANT GUPTA, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 Prosecution case was that on the fateful day, at 17:30, accused persons in furtherance of their common intention assaulted the victim-deceased and inflicted serious injuries with a sword as well as by fists blows and kicks \u2013 At 17:45, information regarding the incident \u2013 Around 19:15, deceased succumbed to injuries in hospital \u2013 Based on the complaint of PW-1, FIR was registered at 23:45 pm at police station alleging involvement of appellants-accused and one absconding person \u2013 Trial court convicted A-2\n Decision Date :\n 23-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 121/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKUMER SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 539\n2021 INSC 343\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.439 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Prosecution case was that the accused brutally killed brother of the complainant in a pre-planned manner \u2013 26 injuries were found on the body of the victim-deceased and 11 injuries on brother of the deceased caused by blunt and the bail granted by High Court on the ground that no reasons whatsoever were assigned by High Court while releasing the accused on bail \u2013 Held: Except narrating the submissions made on behalf of the accused and the public prosecutor and the complainant, there was no independent\n Decision Date :\n 20-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 571/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nN. VIJAYAKUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 63\n2021 INSC 60\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, M.R. SHAH, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss.7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) \u2013 Appellant-accused was Sanitary Inspector in 8th Ward of Madurai Municipal Corporation \u2013 Case of prosecution that he demanded Rs.500/- and a cell phone as illegal gratification from PW-2, to send his report working as Supervisor in an Organisation which was given sanitation work on contract basis in the aforesaid ward \u2013 Trial court acquitted the appellant \u2013 Acquittal reversed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: There are material contradictions in the deposition of key witnesses\n Decision Date :\n 03-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 100/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF\n versus \nKAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 721\n2021 INSC 113\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.167(2)(a)(ii) \u2013 Default bail \u2013 Issue as to whether while computing the period of 90 days or 60 days as contemplated in s.167(2)(a)(ii) CrPC, the day of remand is to be included or excluded, for considering a bail \u2013 Because of the conflicting view on the proposition of law for grant of default bail, a judicial conundrum has arisen which is required to be resolved for guidance of the Court \u2013 Issue referred to larger Bench \u2013 Bail. State of M.P. v. Rustom & Ors. 1995 (Supp) 3 SCC\n Decision Date :\n 23-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 701/2020\n \n | Direction Issue :\n  Matter referred to larger bench.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSARABJEET SINGH MOKHA\n versus \nTHE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JABALPUR & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 468\n2021 INSC 702\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Constitution of India: Art.22(5) \u2013 Preventive detention \u2013 Protection to undertrials and detainees \u2013 Held: Art.22(5) mandates that (i) the authority making the order shall \u201cas soon as on which the order has been made to the person detained; and (ii) the detaining authority shall afford to the person detained \u201cthe earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order\u201d \u2013 Both these procedural requirements are mutually reinforcing \u2013 The\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1301/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNIL TODI & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 1086\n2021 INSC 823\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.138, 141 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 202, 203 and 482 \u2013 Dishonour of cheque issued by way of security \u2013 A Power Supply Agreement (PSA) was entered into between the company \u2013 The PSA between the parties envisaged that the second respondent would supply power to the company of which the appellants are directors etc. \u2013 The agreement postulated that payment for the power supplied would be made by means of Letter of Credit (LCs) \u2013 A cheque\n Decision Date :\n 03-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1446/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDAYLE DE\u2019SOUZA\n versus \nGOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH DEPUTY CHIEF LABOUR COMMISSIONER (C) AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 511\n2021 INSC 699\nCoram : R. SUBHASH REDDY\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Minimum Wages Act, 1948: s.22A, s.22C(1) and (2) \u2013 Appellant is director of WS Company which had entered into an agreement for servicing of ATMs with another company \u2013 The latter company had entered into agreement with State Bank of all their ATMs \u2013 A notice was issued to the appellant and the head of WS company (accused no.2) by Labour Enforcement Officer alleging non-compliance of provisions of 1948 Act \u2013 WS company responded that they neither manage the ATMs nor work at the ATMs \u2013 Criminal\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1319/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nOPTO CIRCUIT INDIA LTD.\n versus \nAXIS BANK & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 81\n2021 INSC 56\nCoram : S.A. BOBDE\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.17, 2(v) and s.2(w) \u2013 The Directorate of Enforcement initiated the proceedings against the appellant under PMLA \u2013 In the said process the Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement through the communication dated Anti Money-Laundering (AML) Officer of Respondents No.1 to 3 Banks instructed them that the accounts maintained by the appellant company be \u2018debit freezed/ stop operations\u2019 \u2013 Aggrieved, the appellant filed writ petition and sought to quash the communication dated 15.05.2020\n Decision Date :\n 03-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 102/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBRIJESH SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 522\n2021 INSC 341\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 378 \u2013 Appeal against acquittal \u2013 Grant of leave to appeal against order of acquittal by trial court \u2013 Principles to be considered by the High Court \u2013 On facts, trial court acquitted second to sixth respondents under the Penal Code and Dowry Prohibition Act \u2013 Application for leave to appeal by the informant \u2013 Rejected by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Judgment of the High Court did not meet the requirements to be observed, consistent with the provisions of s. 378 \u2013 High Court\n Decision Date :\n 20-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 646/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nXXX\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 1115\n2021 INSC 770\nCoram : VINEET SARAN, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Practice and Procedure \u2013 Recall of earlier order \u2013 By order dated 20.04.2021, FIR quashed by High Court by a detailed reasoned order \u2013 Thereafter, on 28.04.2021, High Court took up the matter suo moto and recalled the order dated 20.04.2021 \u2013 Propriety of \u2013 Held: Not to alter the judgment and order once passed, except to correct the clerical or arithmetical error \u2013 There is no power, except u/s.362 CrPC, which only provides for correction of any clerical or arithmetical error \u2013 The same does not empower the court to recall the earlier order\n Decision Date :\n 22-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1444/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHAGWAN NARAYAN GAIKWAD\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 81\n2021 INSC 503\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.326 \u2013 Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons \u2013 Conviction under \u2013 Prosecution case that the appellant and other accused persons attacked the victim with a lethal weapon which chopped off his right arm and leg during the course of the with the immediate medical treatment \u2013 Trial Court convicted 12 accused persons including appellant \u2013 accused for the offence punishable u/s.326 r/w. s.149 IPC and each of them was sentenced to suffer 7 years rigorous imprisonment \u2013 Appeal before the High Court was collectively\n Decision Date :\n 20-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1039/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMESH BHAVAN RATHOD\n versus \nVISHANBHAI HIRABHAI MAKWANA MAKWANA (KOLI) & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 17\n2021 INSC 265\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439 \u2013 Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail \u2013 On facts, six persons implicated in five homicidal deaths \u2013 Grant of bail by High Court \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Held: Nature of the offence, its gravity is a important bearing on the grant of bail \u2013 On facts, while granting bail to the six accused, the High Court committed serious mistake by failing to recognize material aspects of the case, rendering the orders of the High Court vulnerable to assail on the ground of perversity \u2013 High Court\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 422/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJITUL JENTILAL KOTECHA\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 9\n2021 INSC 718\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Inherent powers of High Court \u2013 Exercise of \u2013 On facts, dispute over title of land \u2013 FIR registered against respondents u/ss 465, 467, 468 and 120B IPC by the appellant \u2013 Respondents nos. 2 to 7 filed petitions u/s 482 before of FIR \u2013 Interim order by the High Court that investigation to be continued but charge-sheet to be filed only with its permission \u2013 Draft charge-sheet placed before the High Court for offences punishable u/ss. 385, 389, 418, 477, 506(2), 120B and 34 IPC \u2013 Draft charge-sheet\n Decision Date :\n 12-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1328/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS.\n versus \nDALBIR SINGH \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 800\n2021 INSC 520\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Service Law \u2013 Dismissal from service \u2013 The writ petitioner was a General Duty Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) \u2013 A FIR was lodged against the writ petitioner u/ss. 302, 307 of IPC and s.27 of the Arms Act \u2013 He was accused of firing from his service and Deputy Commandant, resulting in death of the Head Constable and injuring Deputy Commandant \u2013 Trial Court convicted the writ petitioner \u2013 However, the High Court acquitted him \u2013 Criminal Appeal filed by the State against the acquittal of the High Court was dismissed by the\n Decision Date :\n 21-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5848/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA\n versus \nPANKAJ JAGSHI GANGAR \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 307\n2021 INSC 824\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.384,386,387 r/w. s.34 \u2013 Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 \u2013 s.23(1)(a) and s.21(4) \u2013 Prosecution case that there was a organized crime by one international gangster and it was also found that from time to time, the respondent was paying crime syndicate and other gangs which they used to use the said amount for taking help of other members by paying amount to them and it was also found that the respondent was running the Matka business \u2013 After investigation a charge sheet was submitted under the provisions of the IPC\n Decision Date :\n 03-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1493/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSARTAJ SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2021] 3 S.C.R. 87\n2021 INSC 185\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.319 \u2013 Summoning of additional accused \u2013 Appellant-original informant was attacked by private respondents and other accused persons \u2013 On basis of the statement of the appellant, FIR was lodged for offences u/ss.148, 149, 341, 323, 324, \u2013 Thereafter, charge-sheet was filed by the Investigating Officer against the other accused, but not against the private respondents \u2013 During the trial the appellant was examined as P.W-1, he named the private respondents in his evidence specifically and stood the test of\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 298/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBANKA SNEHA SHEELA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 978\n2021 INSC 371\nCoram : R.F. NARIMAN\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Preventive detention: Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-leggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders Land-Grabbers, Spurious Seed Offenders, Insecticide Offenders, Fertiliser Offenders, Food Adulteration Offenders, Fake Commodities Offenders, Forest Offenders, Gaming Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Explosive Substances Offenders, Arms Offenders, Cyber Crime Offenders and White Collar or Financial Offenders Act, 1986 \u2013 s. 3(2) \u2013 Preventive detention under \u2013 On facts, detenu accused of cheating\n Decision Date :\n 02-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 733/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRIPATI SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS SON GAURAV SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 116\n2021 INSC 687\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882: s.138 \u2013 Respondent no.2 obtained financial assistance of Rs.2 crore from the appellant due to previous acquaintance and assured that the amount would be returned in June/July 2015 \u2013 Towards were handed over to appellant \u2013 Based on assurance of payment, appellant presented the cheques for realisation in October 2015, however same were dishonoured on account of insufficiency of funds \u2013 Appellant filed complaint under s.420 IPC and also under s.138 NI Act \u2013 Respondent\n Decision Date :\n 28-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1269/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTAXES OFFICER, CIRCLE-B, BHARATPUR\n versus \nM/S BHAGAT SINGH \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 488\n2021 INSC 36\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicle into Local Areas Act, 1988 \u2013 Respondent purchased a truck/trailer on 26.12.2009 \u2013 On 11.07.2012, the respondent received a summon under 1988 Act \u2013 The respondent failed to the Assistant Commissioner Commercial Taxes Department levied a total demand of Rs.3,00,376/-, which included tax, penalty and interest \u2013 Aggrieved, the respondent filed an appeal before the Appellate Authority and contended that the Assessment order was barred by limitation, the\n Decision Date :\n 21-01-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 15870/2020\n \n | Direction Issue :\n SLP dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n LAXMIBAI CHANDARAGI& ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATKA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 518\n2021 INSC 67\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Constitution of India \u2013 Article 21 \u2013 Right to choose life partner \u2013 Missing complaint of petitioner no.1 lodged by her father \u2013 FIR \u2013 On investigation it was found that without informing her parents, she had travelled from Hubli to Delhi no.2 \u2013 Resided with him in U.P \u2013 Sent marriage certificate to parents on whatsapp \u2013 Informed IO \u2013 IO insisted on her to visit Murgod police station, objected by her in view of threat from parents \u2013 Petitioners approached Allahabad High Court for protection, matter\n Decision Date :\n 08-02-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 359/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURAJDEO MAHTO AND ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 911\n2021 INSC 379\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Evidence: Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Conviction on basis of \u2013 Permissibility of \u2013 On facts, prosecution case that appellant no. 1 lured the victim out of his house, remained with him all along, on the fourth day joined by appellant no. 2 thereafter, both conspired and murdered the no. 1 and 2, u/s. 302 r/w 34 and 120B and sentenced accordingly \u2013 Appellant no. 1 also convicted u/s. 364 \u2013 Upheld by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Upon considering the prosecution evidence in entirety, no reason to disbelieve the prosecution version of last seen theory\n Decision Date :\n 04-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1677/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nC. SIVASANKARAN\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 589\n2021 INSC 833\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Diplomats/Ambassadors \u2013 Diplomatic immunity \u2013 Ambassador- at-large \u2013 Relief(s) claimed in writ petition before High Court on the assertion that the petitioner being an Ambassador-at-large of Seychelles, enjoys diplomatic immunity and, therefore, cannot be proceeded with before by way of criminal action \u2013 Argument rejected by High Court \u2013 Propriety \u2013 Held: Proper \u2013 For, the petitioner does not come within the sweep of definition of \u201cdiplomatic agent\u201d or for that matter any other category of officials referred to in Article 1 of the\n Decision Date :\n 07-12-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 302/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA\n versus \nPERRY KANSAGRA \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 742\n2021 INSC 632\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, AJAY RASTOGI, HEMANT GUPTA\n Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 \u2013 Custody of minor child \u2013 Obtained by fraud \u2013 Contempt of Court \u2013 Guardianship petition filed by father (of Indian origin) settled in Kenya for custody of the Family Court, New Delhi \u2013 Allowed \u2013 Affirmed by High Court \u2013 Undertaking given by him to submit to the jurisdiction of Indian Courts \u2013 High Court\u2019s order challenged by mother \u2013 Appeal dismissed by majority judgment of Supreme Court dtd. 28.10.20 \u2013 Custody\n Decision Date :\n 07-10-2021\n | Case No :\n MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 1167/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Application disposed of\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA THROUGH NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, LUCKNOW\n versus \nMD. NAWAZ KHAN \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 819\n2021 INSC 526\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 ss.8, 21, 27A and 29 \u2013 On receiving information, a vehicle was intercepted by the NCB officers in which respondent and other two accused persons were travelling \u2013 Nothing objectionable was found in the search \u2013 However, search of car revealed two packets together weighing 3.300 kg hidden under the place where wiper is connected to the front bonnet of the car \u2013 The application for bail of the respondent was rejected by the Additional District and Sessions Judge \u2013 The High\n Decision Date :\n 22-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1043/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHWAHA FASAL\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 797\n2021 INSC 688\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967: Factors for consideration while granting bail \u2013 While deciding a bail petition filed by an accused against whom offences under Chapters IV and VI of the 1967 Act have been alleged, the Court has to consider whether there are reasonable grounds for the accused is prima facie true \u2013 If the Court is satisfied after examining the material on record that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against the accused is prima facie true, then the accused is entitled to bail \u2013 Thus, the scope of inquiry is to\n Decision Date :\n 28-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1302/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIRAPPA SIDDAPPA MURGANNAVAR\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 51\n2021 INSC 707\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302, 376, 364, 366A and 201 \u2013 Rape and murder \u2013 Prosecution case that accused raped and murdered a five year old girl, and then disposed of her body, tied in a gunny bag, into the stream \u2013 Conviction and sentence for commission of offence u/s. 302, 376, 364, Upheld by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: On overall view of the evidence and witness statements adduced by the prosecution, the chain of circumstances affirmatively establishes the guilt of the appellant \u2013 Contradictions and inconsistencies highlighted in the prosecution\u2019s\n Decision Date :\n 08-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1473/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF ODISHA\n versus \nPRATIMA MOHANTY ETC. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 335\n2021 INSC 872\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 An FIR was lodged u/s. 420 r/w.120B IPC and ss.13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against the public servants occupying crucial positions in Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) and in Housing and Development entered into a criminal conspiracy, abusing their official position distributed prime plots among themselves and their relatives at minimal rates \u2013 Five Accused persons approached High Court u/s.482 Cr.P.C. to quash the criminal proceedings \u2013 The High Court partly allowed the\n Decision Date :\n 11-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1455/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANVERSINH @ KIRANSINH FATESINH ZALA\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 249\n2021 INSC 16\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, S. ABDUL NAZEER, SURYA KANT\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.361 and 366 \u2013 Kidnapping \u2013 Victim- minor girl aged 16 years recovered from custody of appellant \u2013 Appellant admited to having established sexual intercourse and of having an intention to marry the victim \u2013 Conviction under ss.361 and 366 \u2013 Held: there should be an act of enticing or taking, in addition to establishing the child\u2019s minority (being sixteen for boys and eighteen for girls) and care/keep of a lawful guardian \u2013 Such \u2018enticement\u2019 need not be direct or immediate in time and can also be through\n Decision Date :\n 12-01-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1919/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURENDRAN\n versus \nSUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 171\n2021 INSC 317\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN, VINEET SARAN, M.R. SHAH\n Sentence / Sentencing \u2013 Trial Court (Magistrate) convicted appellant u/ss.279, 338 IPC and sentenced him to imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs.500/- u/s.337 IPC \u2013 Conviction upheld by Sessions Judge and High Court \u2013 Appellant, however, was on bail all throughout \u2013 \u2013 Plea of appellant that he was sole earning member of a poor family consisting of four children and his wife; and if he was sent to jail after so many years, he will suffer irreparable injury \u2013 Held: Conviction of appellant affirmed \u2013 However, on facts, specially the fact that\n Decision Date :\n 30-06-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 536/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIPAN KUMAR DHIR\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 1137\n2021 INSC 598\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Bail \u2013 Dowry death alleged \u2013 Respondent no.2-accused, the mother-in- law of the deceased charged u/ss.304B, 302 r/w 120B \u2013 Anticipatory bail granted \u2013 Held: Offence alleged in the instant case is heinous \u2013 High Court swayed by the fact that the accused \u2013 However, this is contrary to the record as she remained absconding for more than two years after being declared a proclaimed offender \u2013 She chose to join investigation only after securing interim bail from the High Court \u2013 Further, ground of parity with co-accused,\n Decision Date :\n 04-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1161/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLAKSHMAN SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND) \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 723\n2021 INSC 352\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 327 and 147 \u2013 Prosecution case was that on the day of general election PW-8 was issuing slips to the voters 200 yards away from pooling booth \u2013 Accused persons who belonged to another village came there armed with lathis, sticks and country made pistols and asked over voter list and on refusal by PW-8 started beating him with hands, fists, lathis and sticks \u2013 When PW-10, the brother of PW-8 came to rescue him, accused-\u2018D\u2019 fired gun shot at PW-10 due to which he received pellet injuries \u2013 Accused-\u2018A\u2019 fired at PW- 12\n Decision Date :\n 23-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 606/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nINDRA DEVI\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 23\n2021 INSC 356\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, HEMANT GUPTA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.197 \u2013 Sanction for prosecution \u2013 Case of complainant was that in a sale transaction, the purchaser fabricated the agreement with the intention to defraud her \u2013 This was allegedly done in collusion with the then executive officer of the the dimensions of the plot whch was sold to him with the intention to grab the land and house occupied by the complainant and her husband \u2013 Respondent no.2 was the concerned clerk during the relevant period though he was neither named in the FIR nor in the charge sheet \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 23-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 593/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nASHIM @ ASIM KUMAR HARANATH BHATTACHARYA @ ASIM HARINATH BHATTACHARYA @ ASEEM KUMAR BHATTACHARYA\n versus \nNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 607\n2021 INSC 813\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Bail: Post-arrest bail \u2013 Trial for offence under National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 \u2013 Charge sheet filed against the accused in 2012 while charges framed after seven years in 2019 \u2013 Statement of still not completed \u2013 Large number of prosecution witnesses yet to be examined \u2013 Appellant-accused in custody since 2012 and completed nine and a half years of incarceration as undertrial prisoner \u2013 Appellant seeking bail \u2013 Held: Deprivation of personal liberty without\n Decision Date :\n 01-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1525/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAHMAT KHAN @ RAMMU BISMILLAH\n versus \nDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 571\n2021 INSC 424\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 \u2013 s.56(1)(a)(b) \u2013 Externment order \u2013 The State Government introduced a scheme for the upliftment of the Muslim community by providing quality education to Muslim children \u2013 The State announced the disbursement of grants to 33 Madrasas of \u2013 Appellant came to know of irregularities in the running of Madrasas, including misappropriation of public money distributed to Madrasas in the said District \u2013 Pursuant thereto, various complaints were made \u2013 The appellant requested the Collector as also the police to\n Decision Date :\n 25-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 884/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0627\u064f\u0631\u062f\u064f\u0648 - Urdu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS\n versus \nDR. SALEEM UR REHMAN \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 864\n2021 INSC 703\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n J&K Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006: s.3, second proviso, s.5(1)(d) r/w 5(2) \u2013 Authorisation by Senior Superintendent of Police to the inspector to enquire into the FIR for the offences under ss.5(1)(d) r/w 5(2) of the J&K PC Act, 2006 Ranbir Penal Code, legality of \u2013 Requirement to give reasons in the authorisation \u2013 Held: It cannot be said that there was non- application of mind on the part of the Senior Superintendent of Police authorising the inspector to enquire into the FIR for the stated offences \u2013 The\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1170/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION\n versus \nGAJADHAR NATH \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 394\n2021 INSC 846\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 \u2013 Misconduct \u2013 Respondent- workman removed from service as conductor \u2013 Order of removal set aside by Tribunal \u2013 Confirmed by High Court \u2013 Held: Tribunal or High Court could not reject the appellant- employer in respect of misconduct of the workman before the adjudicator \u2013 Non lodging of FIR cannot be the circumstance against the witness examined by the employer \u2013 Initiation/non- initiation of criminal proceedings against an employee has no bearing to prove misconduct in\n Decision Date :\n 08-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 7536/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA\n versus \nSATISH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 955\n2021 INSC 762\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: s. 7 \u2013\u201dsexual assault\u201d \u2013Words touch and physical contact \u2013 Interpretation of \u2013 Held: Both the said words \u201ctouch\u201d and \u201cphysical contact\u201dhave been interchangeably used in s. 7 by the with regard to the sexual parts of the body, whereas the word \u201cphysical contact\u201d has been used for any other act \u2013 Thus, the act of touching the sexual part of body or any other act involving physical contact, if done with \u201csexual intent\u201d would amount to\n Decision Date :\n 18-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1410/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeals disposed of\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF GUJARAT\n versus \nBHALCHANDRA LAXMISHANKAR DAVE \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 453\n2021 INSC 53\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, M.R. SHAH, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Appeal: Appeal against acquittal \u2013 Scope of interference \u2013 Conviction of respondent-accused by trial court u/s.7 r/w ss.13(1) and (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act \u2013 Acquittal by High Court \u2013 On State\u2019s appeal, held: High Court made general observations on witnesses examined \u2013 However, there was no re-appreciation of the entire evidence on record in detail, which ought to have been done by High Court while dealing with order of conviction passed by trial court \u2013 High Court ought to have appreciated that it was dealing with first appeal\n Decision Date :\n 02-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 99/2021\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal allowed and matter remitted to High Court.\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKALLU KHAN\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 700\n2021 INSC 873\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act \u2013 ss.8, 21, 43, 50 \u2013 Appellant convicted u/ss.8, 21 \u2013 Affirmed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: As recovery of the contraband from appellant\u2019s motorcycle was a chance recovery on a public road, apply \u2013 Seizure of the motor cycle from appellant is proved beyond reasonable doubt, therefore, the question of ownership of vehicle is not relevant \u2013 Compliance of s.50 not attracted in the present case \u2013 Concurrent findings by courts holding the appellant guilty and\n Decision Date :\n 11-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1605/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJOSE ANTONIO ZALBA DIEZ DEL CORRAL ALIAS JOSE ANTONIO ZALBA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 767\n2021 INSC 367\nCoram : VINEET SARAN, DINESH MAHESHWARI\n Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 32 \u2013 Habeas Corpus Petition \u2013 For custody of minor children \u2013 Maintainability \u2013 Petitioner had married respondent no.6 and they have two minor children \u2013 Disputes between petitioner and Habeas Corpus Petition filed u/Art.32 by petitioner, a citizen of Spain, for custody of the two minor children who were living with respondent no.6 in India \u2013 Preliminary objection raised by respondent no.6 with regard to maintainability of the Habeas Corpus petition, particularly when a\n Decision Date :\n 28-07-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 318/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBRAJESH SINGH\n versus \nSUNIL ARORA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 890\n2021 INSC 388\nCoram : R.F. NARIMAN, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Contempt of Court: Contempt petition \u2013 Issue as regards publication of criminal antecedents of the contesting candidates \u2013 Contempt petition alleging violation of order dated 13.02.2020 passed in **Rambabu Singh Thakur\u2019s case \u2013 Allegation that there has been order by various political parties during the Bihar Assembly Elections-2020, as regards publication and declaration of criminal antecedents by various political parties of their candidates \u2013 Prior thereto, directions have been issued by the Constitution Bench of this Court in\n Decision Date :\n 10-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 656/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARI & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 1022\n2021 INSC 792\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n COURT REPORTS [2021] 10 S.C.R. [2021] 10 S.C.R. 1022 HARI & ANR. v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2018) NOVEMBER 26, 2021 [L. NAGESWARA RAO, SANJIV KHANNA AND B. R. GAVAI, JJ] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 147, 302/149, 323/149, 324/149 and 201/149 \u2013 Scheduled Castes the Jat community \u2013 Jat girl and Jatav boy along with another Jatav boy who accompanied them, physically assaulted for 12 hours and killed by accused for violating caste-ridden societal norms \u2013 54 persons charged \u2013 Trial court convicted 35 persons for the commission of\n Decision Date :\n 26-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 186/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAVEEN SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 52\n2021 INSC 182\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Bail \u2013 Forgery / manipulation of court records \u2013 Respondent no.2 was beneficiary of the same \u2013 FIR u/ss. 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC \u2013 Sessions Judge dismissed bail application of respondent no.2 \u2013 High Court, however, released him on bail \u2013 If justified released respondent no.2 on bail in a routine and casual manner without adverting to the seriousness of the offence and the gravity of the matter relating to forgery and /or manipulation of the court order \u2013 It did not at all consider that respondent no.2 was charged for offences u/ss.\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 320/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. CHEMINOVA INDIA LTD. & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 352\n2021 INSC 381\nCoram : NAVIN SINHA\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.469 \u2013 Commencement of period of limitation \u2013 Complaint of misbranding \u2013 Samples drawn from dealer on 10.02.2011 and sent to the Insecticide Testing Laboratory on 17.02.2011; and the report of analysis was received on 14.03.2011 with show cause notice \u2013 Request made on 15.04.2011 for reanalysis of second sample \u2013 Second sample sent on 02.05.2011 and re-analysis report was received on 09.12.2011 \u2013 Complaint filed on 25.03.2014 \u2013 Whether complaint was time-barred \u2013 Held: The report of\n Decision Date :\n 04-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 749/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTAIJUDDIN\n versus \nSTATE OF ASSAM & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 444\n2021 INSC 809\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.147/148/324/302/201 r/w 149 \u2013 Unlawful assembly \u2013 When not part of \u2013 Land dispute \u2013 Victim died in a mob attack \u2013 32 accused persons convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 High Court convicted some while others \u2013 SLPs by unsuccessful appellants dismissed \u2013 However, notice issued in appellant\u2019s case \u2013 Held: Only role assigned to the appellant was that of pointing out the place where the victim was hiding \u2013 Family members of the deceased never even pointed a finger at\n Decision Date :\n 01-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1526/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAKESH AND ANOTHER\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 874\n2021 INSC 321\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 Previous enmity between the complainant party and accused \u2013 Gun shot and knife blows on the victim deceased resulting in his death \u2013 Conviction under s.302 r/w s.34 by courts below \u2013 On appeal, held: recovery of the weapon used in commission of offence is not a sine qua non \u2013 PW1 & PW2 were reliable and trustworthy eye- witnesses to the incident and they specifically stated that A1 fired from the gun and the deceased sustained injury \u2013 The injury by the gun was established\n Decision Date :\n 06-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 556/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARI OM @ HERO\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. \n- \n[2021] 13 S.C.R. 49\n2021 INSC 1\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, INDU MALHOTRA, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.396, 412 \u2013 Six accused persons tried for committing offences u/ss.396 and 412 IPC, s.3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and s.25 of Arms Act \u2013 Trial court convicted all the accused persons for offence u/s accused persons while awarding death sentence to Appellant- Hari Om \u2013 High Court affirmed death sentence of appellant-Hari Om, life imprisonment of Appellant-Sanjay and Saurabh and acquitted other three accused persons \u2013 On appeal, held: Corroboration of the testimony of a child\n Decision Date :\n 05-01-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1256/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR\n versus \nAKHILESH JHA & ANR \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 146\n2021 INSC 450\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLI\n Service Law \u2013 Departmental enquiry \u2013 First respondent- Superintendent of Police allegedly violated administrative orders of the Inspector General of Police for disbanding \u201cGunda Squad\u201d constituted, operated and supervised by the interrogated by the Squad died in custody \u2013 Magisterial enquiry was conducted and the report submitted contained observations against the first respondent \u2013 Departmental enquiry subsequently convened against the first respondent and charge sheet was issued \u2013 Tribunal\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5153/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nN. RAGHAVENDER\n versus \nSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, CBI \n- \n[2021] 12 S.C.R. 57\n2021 INSC 876\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d) \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.409, 420, 477A \u2013 Criminal breach of trust by public servant or Banker \u2013 Strong suspicion short of conclusive proof \u2013 Case of prosecution that accused no.3-brother-in-law of an account of the Academy of which he was Treasurer \u2013 Allegedly, appellant and the other co- accused also working in the Bank conspired with accused no.3 by allowing withdrawal of amounts from the said account, despite insufficient funds \u2013 Appellant was further accused of pre-maturely\n Decision Date :\n 13-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHARAT CHAUDHARY\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 551\n2021 INSC 877\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: ss. 8(c), 22(c), 25, 28, 29, 67 \u2013 Seizure of psychotropic substances \u2013 Prosecution case that large number of tablets seized by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence from different locations believing \u2013 A-1 to A-3 arrested under various provisions of NDPS Act for alleged export of psychotropic substances \u2013 Arrest of A-4 on the basis of statements of A-1 and A- 3 for contravening provisions of NDPS Act \u2013 Grant of bail to A-4 by NDPS Court \u2013 However, the High Court\n Decision Date :\n 13-12-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 5703/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAVITHA LANKESH\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 309\n2021 INSC 654\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000: s.24 \u2013 Purport of \u2013 The purport of s.24 is that information regarding commission of an offence of organized crime under the 2000 Act can be recorded by a police officer only upon obtaining prior approval of the police officer not below Inspector General of Police \u2013 What is crucial in this provision is the factum of recording of offence of organized crime and not of recording of a crime against an offender as such \u2013 Thus, only after registration of FIR, investigation for the concerned offence would proceed in which\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1236/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNASER BIN ABU BAKR YAFAI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 353\n2021 INSC 649\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n National Investigation Agency Act, 2008: s.6 \u2013 Investigation by NIA \u2013 If the Central government is of the opinion that the offence is a scheduled offence and it is a fit case to be investigated by the NIA, it shall direct the NIA to investigate Upon the issuance of a direction by the Central government, two consequences emanate under sub-Section (6) of s.6: (a) the State government and any police officer of the State government investigating the offence shall not proceed with the investigation; and (b) the relevant documents and records\n Decision Date :\n 20-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1165/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHOOPENDRA SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 188\n2021 INSC 691\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Bail: Grant of \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 On facts, 60 year old women accused of murder of village sarpanch \u2013 Case of previous enimity between accused and the victim \u2013 Four previous bail application rejected \u2013 Fifth bail application granted by the High Held: Not sustainable \u2013 High Court failed to notice relevant circumstances bearing on the seriousness and gravity of the crime and the specific role attributed to the accused \u2013 High Court proceeded on the erroneous basis that no specific or overt act attributed to the accused\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1279/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVISHWAS BHANDARI\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 59\n2021 INSC 57\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Complaint filed under ss.363 and 366-A IPC against one \u2018V\u2019 and the appellant that the two accused had kidnapped her daughter by alluring her for the purpose of marriage \u2013 In the proceedings before the court, the complainant appeared of \u2018V\u2019 only while prosecutrix deposed that accused \u2018V\u2019 had married her and she has two children with him \u2013 Trial court acquitted \u2018V\u2019 \u2013 Appellant invoked the jurisdiction of High Court for quashing of the FIR and subsequent proceedings, inter\n Decision Date :\n 03-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 105/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKALA SINGH @ GURNAM SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 225\n2021 INSC 519\nCoram : R. SUBHASH REDDY\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.304 Part II r/w s.34 and s.201 \u2013 Appellant-accused and deceased had a sudden fight \u2013 In the heat of passion, the co-accused, who had rod with him, gave a blow with the rod on the head of deceased resulting in his death \u2013 Thereafter appellant and canal \u2013 Appellant and co-accused were convicted by the Sessions Court u/ss.302/34 and s.201 IPC \u2013 High Court modified the conviction u/s.302 IPC to that u/s.304 Part-I IPC \u2013 On appeal, held: Sudden fight took place in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel \u2013 There was no\n Decision Date :\n 21-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1040/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJASWANT SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 1100\n2021 INSC 650\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 High Court declined to exercise its powers u/s.482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings arising out of FIR u/ss.406 and 420 of IPC \u2013 Propriety \u2013 Held: The power u/s.482 CrPC is to be exercised to prevent the abuse of process of any secure the ends of justice \u2013 Inherent powers should be exercised in a given and deserving case where the Court is satisfied that exercise of such power would either prevent abuse of such power or such exercise would result in securing the ends of justice \u2013 It is clear from the facts\n Decision Date :\n 20-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1233/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMESH ALIAS DAPINDER SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 896\n2021 INSC 198\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, K.M. JOSEPH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 323 and 324 r/w 34 \u2013 Murder consequent to armed assault \u2013 Common intention \u2013 Vicarious liability \u2013 Three accused \u2013 \u2018S\u2019 and \u2018N\u2019, maternal uncles of PW1 (informant), were the principal accused \u2013 nursed ill-will against PW1 \u2013 PW1 had visited residence of his maternal grandmother alongwith his friends \u2013 \u2018S\u2019 and \u2018N\u2019, who were present there, abused PW1 and his friends leading to a quarrel and scuffle \u2013 PW1 and his friends hurriedly left the spot\n Decision Date :\n 22-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 347/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKERALEEYA SAMAJAM & ANR.\n versus \nPRATIBHA DATTATRAY KULKARNI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 737\n2021 INSC 594\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Condition of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 \u2013 Second petitioner-School directed by High Court to pay arrears of salary as per 5th and 6 th Pay Commission to its teaching and non-teaching staff \u2013 Petitioners though ready sought to restrict the same to three years preceding the filing of the writ petitions alleging limitation in view of respondents having approached the Deputy Director (Education) \u2013 Held: Only when the petitioners though required to pay wages as per the applicable rules and\n Decision Date :\n 01-10-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 21660/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJENDRA KHARE\n versus \nSWAATI NIRKHI AND ORS. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 460\n2021 INSC 45\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, INDU MALHOTRA\n Constitution of India: Arts. 137 and 145 r/w Order XLVII rule 1 and Order XXXIX Rule 2 of Supreme Court Rules, 2013 \u2013 Review jurisdiction \u2013 Scope and ambit of \u2013 By order dated 18.05.2018, a from the court of Delhi to the Court at Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh \u2013 The informant of the criminal case, who was not impleaded as party in the transfer petition, filed Miscellaneous Application for recalling the order dated 18.05.2018 \u2013 The Application was dismissed \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 28-01-2021\n | Case No :\n TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No. 262/2018\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Review Petition allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSONU\n versus \nSONU YADAV AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 78\n2021 INSC 225\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 439 \u2013 Unnatural death of married woman within a year of marriage \u2013 Charge-sheet against her husband (first respondent) for offences u/ss.498-A and 304-B IPC and ss.3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act \u2013 Bail application of first respondent Judge \u2013 Bail application u/ s.439 CrPC before High Court \u2013 High Court allowed the application \u2013 Justification of \u2013 Held: In view of the provisions of s.304-B IPC, as well as the presumption arising u/s.113-B of Evidence Act, the High Court, on facts, was clearly not\n Decision Date :\n 05-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 377/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGEO VARGHESE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 393\n2021 INSC 618\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Allegation against appellant was that the son of the complainant committed suicide due to mental harassment meted out by the appellant \u2013 Appellant was physical Training Teacher in the school where complainant\u2019s son was student \u2013 overall discipline by the students of the school \u2013 The allegations in the FIR was that the appellant had harassed and insulted her son in the presence of everyone due to which he was under deep mental pressure and committed suicide \u2013 High Court dismissed s. 482 application for\n Decision Date :\n 05-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1164/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHARATH BOOSHAN AGGARWAL\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 671\n2021 INSC 621\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Kerala Forest Act \u2013 ss.2(f), 27, 69 \u2013 Appellant convicted and sentenced by Trial Court u/s.27 (1) (d), u/r.3(iii) r/w r.23 of the Transit Rules \u2013 Acquitted by Sessions Court \u2013 Acquittal reversed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Sandalwood oil in question is a forest seizure ipso facto meant that the appellant had conscious knowledge about its illicit nature or origin; or the inability to account for a transit pass implied that it was procured illegally, thus attracting s.27 \u2013 Appellant furnished documents explaining how they had sourced the sandalwood\n Decision Date :\n 06-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 834/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANMOHAN NANDA\n versus \nUNITED INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 1138\n2021 INSC 826\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Consumer Protection Act, 1986 \u2013 s.21 \u2013 Insurance \u2013 Repudiation of claim on ground of suppression or non-disclosure of material facts \u2013 Appellant intended to travel to the USA \u2013 Appellant was issued a overseas policy \u2013 The appellant was medically examined at the instance of respondent No. 1 insurance company prior to the consideration of his request for issuance of a mediclaim policy \u2013 The medical report categorically noted that the appellant had diabetes-type II (mellitus- II) \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 06-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 8386/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAHUL\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 499\n2021 INSC 145\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Indian Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w. s.34 \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 s.25(1B)(a) \u2013 Prosecution case was that the appellant-accused suspected that his wife was in illicit relation with the victim-deceased \u2013 The appellant informed his father-in-law and his brother-in-law about All three of them had taken victim-deceased to a hill and fired on him and thereafter thrown him in a pit \u2013 A telephonic message regarding the body was received in Police station \u2013 After receiving the said information, the police officials reached the spot \u2013 The inspecting\n Decision Date :\n 03-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 262/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAHENDRA K C\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 582\n2021 INSC 700\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Exercise of power under, scope \u2013 Prosecution case was that the victim-deceased, the driver of accused-second respondent committed suicide \u2013 In the suicide note, he had made serious and the accused second respondent of amassing wealth disproportionate to the known sources of income and a detailed account of the role of the accused in the events which led to the deceased committing suicide \u2013 Second respondent successfully filed s.482 application for quashing the criminal\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1238/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARVEEN @ SONU\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 643\n2021 INSC 835\nCoram : R. SUBHASH REDDY\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.224, 225, 332, 353, 302 r/w s.120-B \u2013 Case of prosecution that police party was escorting four accused to be produced before the Court \u2013 Appellant, a party to another accused group, conspired together to rescue them \u2013 One of the accused was alleged to who later succumbed to fire arm injuries \u2013 Accused persons convicted and sentenced \u2013 On appeal only by appellant, held: To prove the charge of conspiracy, within the ambit of s.120-B, it is necessary to establish that there was an agreement between the parties for doing an unlawful\n Decision Date :\n 07-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1571/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBIJENDER @ MANDAR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 1138\n2021 INSC 706\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 392 and 397 \u2013 Robbery using deadly weapons \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant and co-accused armed with pistols robbed the complainant and his nephew \u2013 Conviction u/ss. 392 and 397 and sentenced accordingly, on basis of the disclosure statement \u2013 High Court upheld the conviction, however, reduced the sentence u/s. 397 \u2013 On appeal, held: Court can convict an accused exclusively on the basis of his disclosure statement and the resultant recovery of inculpatory material \u2013 However, in order to sustain the guilt of\n Decision Date :\n 08-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2438/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAPIL AGARWAL AND OTHERS\n versus \nSANJAY SHARMA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 145\n2021 INSC 132\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Constitution of India: Art. 226 \u2013 Writ petition \u2013 For quashing FIR u/ss. 420/406 IPC \u2013 Pursuant to termination of contract of distributorship of the complainant, the manufacturing company demanded outstanding amount due on the complainant \u2013 Cheque issued by amount was dishonoured and case u/s. 138 of NI Act pending \u2013 Complaint alleging misappropriation of funds against one of the officers of the manufacturing company resulted in negative final police report \u2013 Another complaint of complainant u/s. 156(3) Cr.P.C against officers of\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 142/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRISHIPAL SINGH SOLANKI\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 12 S.C.R. 502\n2021 INSC 752\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 \u2013 Claim of juvenility \u2013 Determination of age \u2013 Matriculation Certificate \u2013 Respondent no.2-accused along with others was alleged to have attacked family causing death of his father and uncle \u2013 Application filed by respondent no.2, through his mother/natural guardian before the Juvenile Justice Board for declaring the respondent no.2 as a juvenile delinquent \u2013 Appellant sought medical test of respondent no.2 to ascertain his\n Decision Date :\n 18-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1240/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. SUPREME BHIWANDI WADA MANOR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 226\n2021 INSC 360\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.438 \u2013 Anticipatory bail \u2013 Appellant-complainant was awarded contract for constructing road \u2013 Four accused were engaged by appellant company as its employees and were farmers on the basis of list provided by the governmental authorities and to disburse compensation to them after verifying authenticity of the claim \u2013 Appellant filed complaint against the four accused alleging that the accused were involved in fraud of around Rs.5.08 crores by\n Decision Date :\n 26-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 680/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJENDRA @ RAJAPPA AND ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 293\n2021 INSC 219\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 r/w 149 \u2013 Murder pursuant to armed assault \u2013 Deceased was assaulted with axe, stick, pickaxe and stone when he was coming back from work alongwith his wife (PW1) and elder brother (PW2) \u2013 Six accused \u2013 A-1 died \u2013 Trial court acquitted reversed acquittal of A-2 to A-5 and convicted them u/s.302 r/w s.149, however, confirmed acquittal of A-6 \u2013 On appeal by A-2 to A-5 (appellants), held: Trial court erred in disbelieving the evidence of PWs-1 to 3 only on the ground that they were relatives of the deceased, forgetting\n Decision Date :\n 26-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1438/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD ZAHID\n versus \nSTATE THROUGH NCB \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 372\n2021 INSC 834\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.427 \u2013 Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 ss. 23, 29 and s.21 \u2013 Appellant-accused was held guilty by the PS Customs, Amritsar u/s.23 and s.21 of the NDPS Act for recovery of 4 kg of heroin and sentenced rigorous imprisonment (RI) \u2013 Thereafter, he was again held guilty for the offence u/s.29 r/w. s.21(c) of the NDPS Act after recovery of 750 grams of heroin from Delhi and was sentenced for 10 years RI by the Trial Court at Delhi, however, in view of the provisions of s.31 (ii) of the NDPS\n Decision Date :\n 07-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1457/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S CHEMINOVA INDIA LIMITED & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 360\n2021 INSC 381\nCoram : NAVIN SINHA\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Insecticides Act, 1968: s.33 \u2013 Allegation of misbranding \u2013 Complaint against the appellant-manufacturing company and appellant-Managing Director of the company and other accused under ss.3(k)(i),17,18 and 33 \u2013 High Court dismissed the petition for quashing In the instant appeal, plea of appellants was that they had nominated the manager to be incharge and responsible officer of the company to maintain quality of the pesticides manufactured by company and had filed the undertaking to that effect before the respondents along with the resolution of\n Decision Date :\n 04-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 750/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBRIJMANI DEVI\n versus \nPAPPU KUMAR & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 533\n2021 INSC 919\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n PAPPU KUMAR & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No.1663 of 2021) DECEMBER 17, 2021 [L. NAGESWARA RAO, B. R. GAVAI AND B. V. NAGARATHNA] Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302 r/w 34; 341, 307 r/w 34 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Respondent accused of murder of appellant\u2019s son \u2013 Bail rejected by Sessions alleging attempt to murder him and in 2020 alleging his murder \u2013 Respondent has criminal antecedents \u2013 There is a likelihood of him absconding or threatening the witnesses if on bail which would have a vital bearing on the trial \u2013 Present cases not fit for grant of bail to the\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1663/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARJIT SINGH\n versus \nINDERPREET SINGH @ INDER AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 258\n2021 INSC 418\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Bail: Grant of bail \u2013 Exercise of power while granting bail, scope of \u2013 Duty of appellate court particularly when bail was refused by lower courts and principles and considerations for granting or refusing the bail \u2013 Discussed \u2013 In the instant FIR alleging that his father was murdered by the accused in connivance with respondent no.1 who was undergoing sentence on account of a case registered at the instance of the complainant party \u2013 Respondent no.1 filed bail application before High Court \u2013 High Court released respondent\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 883/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHAGCHANDRA\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 765\n2021 INSC 851\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w. s.201 and 506-B \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant committed murder of his two brothers and a nephew \u2013 There was a property dispute of appellant with his both brothers \u2013 On the day of incident, PW-1-complainant had gone to attend the \u2013 While returning, she saw the appellant armed with an axe getting out of her house \u2013 When she went inside her house she saw her brother-in-law lying dead in outer room \u2013 His neck was cut \u2013 When she came in the courtyard, she saw her son dead, having injuries on his neck\n Decision Date :\n 09-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 255/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMITESH KUMAR J. SHA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 875\n2021 INSC 675\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER, KRISHNA MURARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Complaint by respondent no.2 against appellant alleging that the appellant-builder company had sold four excess flats beyond its share, in terms of the agreements entered into between them \u2013 Appellant filed s.482 application before High \u2013 Hence instant appeal \u2013 Held: The facts did not show that appellants deceptively or intentionally tried to sell excess flats as contended by respondent No. 2 \u2013 Although, there is no doubt that a singular factual premise can give rise to a dispute which is both, of a civil\n Decision Date :\n 26-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1285/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA\n versus \nK. A. NAJEEB \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 443\n2021 INSC 50\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Bail: Grant of bail \u2013 By High Court \u2013 To the accused charged for offences u/ss. 143, 147, 148, 120-B, 341, 427, 323, 324, 326, 506(H), 201, 202, 153A, 212, 307 and 149 IPC; u/s. 3 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and ss. 16, 18, 18-B, 19 and 20 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, that the undertrial- accused could not be kept in custody for too long when the trial was not likely to commence in near future \u2013 By setting aside the order of Special Court who had declined to grant bail to the accused primarily in view of the bar against grant of bail u/s. 43-D(5) of\n Decision Date :\n 01-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 98/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN\n versus \nASHOK KUMAR KASHYAP \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 158\n2021 INSC 252\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: s. 7 \u2013 Offence relating to public servant being bribed \u2013 On facts, filing of chargesheet against the accused for the offence u/s. 7 \u2013 Special Judge on basis of the transcript of conversation recorded between the complainant and there is a prima facie case of the alleged offence u/s. 7, and framed the charges against the accused for the said offence \u2013 Revision Application thereagainst \u2013 High Court discharged the accused of the alleged offence u/s. 7 \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 Held: Not sustainable\n Decision Date :\n 13-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 407/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMGOPAL & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 249\n2021 INSC 568\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT\n v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (Criminal Appeal No. 1489 of 2012) SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 [N. V. RAMANA, CJI AND SURYA KANT, J.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.482 and 320 \u2013 Quashing of criminal prosecution \u2013 On basis of compromise/ settlement between the parties \u2013 an offence within the framework of s.320 CrPC is not an embargo against invoking inherent powers by the High Court vested in it u/s.482 CrPC \u2013 As opposed to s.320 CrPC where the Court is squarely guided by the compromise between the parties in respect of offences\n Decision Date :\n 29-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1489/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDENA BANK (NOW BANK OF BARODA)\n versus \nC. SHIVAKUMAR REDDY AND ANR. \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 1061\n2021 INSC 380\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: s. 7 \u2013 Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by financial creditor \u2013 Petition u/s. 7, if barred by limitation \u2013 On facts, appellant Bank sanctioned term loan and letter of credit cum buyer\u2019s credit in favour of corporate corporate debtor defaulted in repayment of its dues to the bank and loan amount declared as non-performing asset-NPA \u2013Issuance of notice to corporate debtor in 2014, to clear its dues \u2013 Pursuant thereto, in 2015 Bank filed application for recovery of the outstanding dues \u2013 In\n Decision Date :\n 04-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1650/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVINDRANATHA BAJPE\n versus \nMANGALORE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE LTD. & OTHERS ETC. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 268\n2021 INSC 555\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Criminal Law \u2013 Vicarious liability \u2013 Allegation that the accused-respondents with the common intention of laying pipeline beneath the properties belonging to the complainant, committed criminal trespass into the properties and also cut and destroyed about 100 trees \u2013 Magistrate issued process against respondents-accused nos.1 to 8 for offences punishable u/ss.427, 447, 506 and 120B r/w s.34 IPC \u2013 Sessions Court set aside the order of Magistrate \u2013 High Court confirmed the order of Sessions Court\n Decision Date :\n 27-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1047/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 237\n2021 INSC 764\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860: s 302 rw s. 149 \u2013 Dispute between the parties over the pathway, an order of stay obtained by the prime accused and consequential panchayat also held on the date of occurrence \u2013 Prime accused along with his son and 25 others got into the land of the victim and other weapons \u2013 Death of two and injuries to others \u2013 Complaint filed by eye-witness \u2013 Acquittal of two while conviction of five of them \u2013 Acquittal of one more accused by the High Court while upholding the conviction of the other four, and ordered for further investigation\n Decision Date :\n 22-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 753/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Allowing the appeals by the accused and dismissing the appeals by the complainant, the Court\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDHARMESH @ DHARMENDRA @ DHAMO JAGDISHBHAI @ JAGABHAI BHAGUBHAI RATADIA & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 1\n2021 INSC 323\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, HEMANT GUPTA\n Bail: Imposition of condition for bail \u2013 Free fight between two groups in Amreli resulting in death of two persons \u2013 Case against 13 persons \u2013 Appellants, arrayed as accused no.12 and 13, were arrested \u2013 By impugned order, they were However, they were aggrieved by the condition imposed on them for bail requiring them to deposit Rs.2 lakhs before the trial court as compensation to victims \u2013 Held: In cases of offences against body, compensation to the victim should be a methodology for redemption \u2013 Similarly, to\n Decision Date :\n 07-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 432/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMIRZA IQBAL @ GOLU & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 469\n2021 INSC 890\nCoram : R. SUBHASH REDDY\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Death of married woman \u2013 Matrimonial disputes \u2013 Bald allegations against family members of husband \u2013 Complaint filed by 2nd respondent, father of the deceased married woman, alleging that husband and in-laws of the intention beat her, killed her by putting a noose around her neck and hanged her \u2013 Case registered against all the named accused including first appellant (brother-in-law of the deceased) and second appellant (mother-in-law of the deceased) for alleged offences u/ss.498-A, 323, 504, 506,\n Decision Date :\n 14-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1628/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n MS. X\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 156\n2021 INSC 31\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, M.R. SHAH, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Crime Against Women: Rape victim \u2013 Rehabilitation of \u2013 Writ petition u/Art. 32 \u2013 By the victim \u2013 Seeking rehabilitation \u2013 Alleging that many people raped her for which criminal proceedings were initiated \u2013 She, with her three children has no means not able to give education to her children \u2013 Her identity has been disclosed by media as a rape victim \u2013 The administration, media and society has been alleged to compel her to lead a life with no security, no job and no shelter \u2013 Held: The petitioner is a rape victim and hence\n Decision Date :\n 20-01-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1352/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF KERALA\n versus \nK. AJITH & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 774\n2021 INSC 366\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 321 \u2013 Withdrawal of prosecution \u2013 Respondents-MLAs allegedly disrupted the presentation of the budget by climbing on to the dais of the Speaker and damaging furniture and articles causing huge loss \u2013 Registration the behest of the Legislative Secretary u/ss. 447 and 427 r/w s. 34 IPC and s. 3(1) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 \u2013 Cognizance taken by Chief Judicial Magistrate-CJM upon submission of the final report u/s 173 CrPC \u2013 Application u/s 321 by the public\n Decision Date :\n 28-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 697/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANJEET SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 855\n2021 INSC 419\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.319 \u2013 Summoning of additional accused \u2013 An FIR was registered on the basis of the statement of the original complainant regarding death of his son and injuries suffered by his nephew-appellant \u2013 As per his statement his son and his \u2018S\u2019 and four accused persons/private respondents armed with weapons while they were on their way back home after purchasing the pesticides meant for paddy in their car \u2013 There was indiscriminate firing from \u2018S\u2019 which led to death of his son and his nephew was injured\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 875/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAJAY KUMAR @ BITTU & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 191\n2021 INSC 48\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, M.R. SHAH, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 319 \u2013 Application under \u2013 Appellants summoned by order dated 17.8.2019 \u2013 As the appellants did not appear before the Court, bailable warrant issued on 5.9.2019 and non-bailable warrant issued on 18.9.2019 issuing notice u/s. 446 Cr. P.C. against order dated 17.8.2019 \u2013 High Court dismissed the Revision on the ground that there was concealment of fact as order dated 18.9.2019 was not placed on record \u2013 Appeal to Supreme Court \u2013 Held: Power u/s. 319 is extra-ordinary and discretionary and has to be exercised\n Decision Date :\n 29-01-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 88/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHIMA RAZU PRASAD\n versus \nSTATE, REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBI/SPE/ACU-II \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 1020\n2021 INSC 180\nCoram : MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR\n*\n, VINEET SARAN\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.195(1)(b) \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.420, 467, 468 and 471 \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 s.13(2) r/w. s.13(1)(d) \u2013 A case was registered against the appellant/accused no.1 471 of IPC and s.13(2) r/w. s.13(1)(d) of the PC Act \u2013 Thereafter, the respondent- investigative agency conducted search at the appellant\u2019s residence and found an amount of Rs.79,65,900/-, in addition to jewellery and property papers \u2013 Assets were found disproportionate to the\n Decision Date :\n 12-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 305/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARIRAM BHAMBHI\n versus \nSC/ST \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 855\n2021 INSC 701\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: ss.15A(3) and 15A(5) \u2013 Rights of victims \u2013 Notice under s.15A not issued to victim/ dependents while hearing bail application of accused \u2013 Effect of \u2013 Held: Sub-sections (3) and (5) of s.15A specifically make the victim or stakeholder in the criminal proceedings \u2013 These provisions enable a member of the marginalized caste to effectively pursue a case and counteract the effects of defective investigations \u2013 Sub-section (3) confers a right to a prior notice, this being evident from the use of the\n Decision Date :\n 29-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1278/1989\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nN.S. NANDIESHA REDDY\n versus \nKAVITHA MAHESH \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 297\n2021 INSC 374\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Election Laws: Representation of People\u2019s Act, 1951 \u2013 s. 100(1)(c) \u2013 Improper rejection of nomination paper \u2013 Returning officer giving false evidence before the Court \u2013 Effect of \u2013 On facts, the High Court held the election of the appellant from the Legislative and in the course of the said order issued direction to the Registrar General of the High Court to register a complaint u/s. 193 IPC against the Returning Officer for the said election, for giving false evidence before the Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Mere reference to inconsistent\n Decision Date :\n 03-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 4821/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP MAHESH COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK SHAREHOLDERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION\n versus \nRAMESH KUMAR BUNG AND ORS. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 850\n2021 INSC 346\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Grant of interim protection, challenged \u2013 Petitioner filed pre-election writ petition against the proposed elections and when failed to get writ petition and also criminal complaints \u2013 Respondent no.1 to 3 filed petitions for quashing the criminal complaints \u2013 Pending disposal of criminal complaints, respondent no.1 to 3 were granted interim stay of all further proceedings including their arrest before the High\n Decision Date :\n 20-07-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 3869/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAKASH GUPTA\n versus \nSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 862\n2021 INSC 353\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992: ss. 24 and 24A \u2013 Compounding of offence under \u2013 On facts, allegations against appellant-director of a company of price rigging and insider trading in the scrip of the Company appellant u/s. 24(1) \u2013 Appellant sought the compounding of the offence u/s. 24A \u2013 Rejection of, by the trial judge upholding the objection of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) that the offence could not be compounded without its consent \u2013 Upheld by the High Court\n Decision Date :\n 23-07-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 569/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMLA FROM MAU DISTRICT, UP\n versus \nJAIL SUPERINTENDENT (ROPAR) & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 863\n2021 INSC 223\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Constitution of India/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Art. 32/s.406 \u2013 Petition u/Art. 32 read with s. 406 \u2013 Maintainability of \u2013 On facts, various criminal cases filed against sitting MLA from Mau District, UP \u2013 Ten criminal cases pending trial against him, transferred lodged in District Jail, Banda, UP, pursuant to order of Special Judge \u2013 Meanwhile case registered against accused in District Mohali, Punjab u/ss. 386 and 506 IPC \u2013 Pursuant to the issuance of production warrant, Superintendent of District Jail, Banda, UP, without permission from the\n Decision Date :\n 26-03-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 409/2020\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Writ Petition partly allowed and Transfer Petitions dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAGINI DWIVEDI @ GINI @ RAGS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 264\n2021 INSC 38\nCoram : R.F. NARIMAN\n*\n, NAVIN SINHA, K.M. JOSEPH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.439 \u2013 Bail application rejected by Session Judge applying the provisions of s.37 of the NDPS Act 1985and stating that as a total seizure \u2018from all accused\u2019 was 12 gms cocaine, 55 gm Ganja, 11.5 gms ecstasy MDMA, no bail could be given to the appellant in present case \u2013 High Court also rejected bail \u2013 On appeal, held: The residence of the appellant was searched pursuant to statement made by one \u2018BKR\u2019 \u2013 Pursuant to search made of the appellant\u2019s premises, no drugs\n Decision Date :\n 21-01-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 62/2021\n \n | Direction Issue :\n  Matters and appeals disposed of.\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPHOOL SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 317\n2021 INSC 812\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.376 \u2013 Rape \u2013 Prosecution case that when the husband of the victim/prosecutrix was in another village and she was alone and sleeping in her room, the accused jumped the wall, entered into the room of the prosecutrix and raped her \u2013 As per the case of the but they did not believe her \u2013 On the contrary, she was beaten \u2013 Thereafter, she was compelled to go to her parental house \u2013 FIR was registered \u2013 The trial Court convicted the accused for the offence u/s. 376 IPC and sentenced the appellant to undergo 7 years\n Decision Date :\n 01-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1520/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHAN @SRINIVAS @SEENA @TAILOR SEENA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 451\n2021 INSC 879\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.378, 384 \u2013 Appeal against acquittal \u2013 Murder of police officer \u2013 Appellants acquitted giving benefit of doubt \u2013 Acquittal reversed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Most of the witnesses turned hostile the sterling witness of the prosecution had an axe to grind against the accused who had given a complaint against him \u2013 It is too strange that he could be a chance witness \u2013 Many contradictions in statements made by PW-1 and PW-2-Duty constable \u2013 Alleged occurrence was said\n Decision Date :\n 13-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1420/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATPAL\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 493\n2021 INSC 143\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Indian Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 \u2013 Prosecution under \u2013 Death caused by husband of wife by setting her ablaze \u2013 Dying declaration recorded by Magistrate \u2013 Conviction by courts below \u2013 Appeal to Supreme Court \u2013 Held: The dying declaration is natural and the same is of the accused beyond reasonable doubt \u2013 Conviction affirmed. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1 On coming to know that the deceased was admitted to hospital with the burn injuries, as informed by the police, the ASI went to the hospital along with other police officials. When it\n Decision Date :\n 03-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 261/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAKUNTALA SHUKLA\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 87\n2021 INSC 458\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Bail \u2013 Murder case \u2013 Conviction of accused-private respondents a/w life sentence \u2013 Appeals \u2013 Grant of bail by High Court during pendency of the appeals \u2013 Challenged by widow of the deceased \u2013 Held: Impugned judgment/order passed by the High Court releasing the clarity on which part of the judgment/order can be said to be submissions and which part can be said to be the findings/ reasonings \u2013 It does not even reflect the submissions on behalf of the Public Prosecutor \u2013 Detailed counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State opposing the\n Decision Date :\n 07-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 876/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (IPC) MP POWER TRADING CO LTD & ANR.\n versus \nNARMADA EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD \n- \n[2021] 4 S.C.R. 430\n2021 INSC 204\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH, SANJIV KHANNA\n Arbitration: Appointment of arbitrator \u2013 Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) in 1999 with the respondent \u2013 PPA was terminated in 2001 the writ petition filed by respondent in view of arbitration clause contained in the PPA \u2013 In 2011, respondent issued notice to the Board invoking arbitration as contained in the PPA \u2013 As no reply was received, respondent filed application under s.11(6) of AC Act seeking appointment\n Decision Date :\n 23-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1051/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nG H KHOKAN @ KHOKHAN VISHWAS\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2021] 1 S.C.R. 534\n2021 INSC 79\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Penal Code, 1860: s.302 \u2013 Conviction of appellant u/s.302 \u2013 Prosecution case was that on the fateful evening when the victim- deceased was in the house of his neighbour, appellant had conversation with him regarding money \u2013 with him and pushed him down and stood up on his abdomen and crushed \u2013 Next day, in the evening when deceased had severe pain in abdomen, he was admitted in hospital for treatment and on the same night he was referred to another hospital \u2013 After two days, he died due to septicemia\n Decision Date :\n 11-02-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 121/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHARANSINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2021] 3 S.C.R. 704\n2021 INSC 207\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Preliminary enquiry \u2013 Corruption case \u2013 A complaint was received against the appellant in the office of the Director General, Anti-corruption Bureau, Maharashtra State, Mumbai on 7.2.2018, against the appellant and his brothers with regard to accumulating the assets disproportionate to his known sources of income \u2013 At that time the appellant was a Member and President of Municipal Council \u2013 In connection with the said complaint, Police Inspector, Anti-corruption\n Decision Date :\n 24-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 363/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRI SAI RR INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY\n versus \nDR. A.P.J. ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 535\n2021 INSC 319\nCoram : R.F. NARIMAN\n*\n, K.M. JOSEPH, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Education/Educational Institutions: Pharmacy college \u2013 Writ petitions seeking directions to respondent no.1-University to comply with Notification dated 19.03.2021 issued by the State Government and grant conditional affiliation to the direction to University to organize special examinations for B.Pharma students for academic year 2020-2021 and to permit students of the petitioner-colleges to participate in the special examinations \u2013 Held: The facts of both the writ petitions are almost similar to facts in\n Decision Date :\n 06-07-2021\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 446/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGUMANSINH @ LALO @ RAJU BHIKHABHAI CHAUHAN & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 24\n2021 INSC 443\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.498A and 306 \u2013 Married woman committed suicide in her matrimonial home within 8 months of marriage, purportedly, by consuming pesticide \u2013 Conviction of appellants (husband and mother-in-law) by Courts \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 Held: Prosecution proved that deceased was harassed with a view to coerce her to meet unlawful demand of Rs.25,000/- and such harassment was on account of her failure to bring said amount from her father (PW-1) who was financially incapable to meet such demand \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 03-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 940/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAIK AHMED\n versus \nSTATE OF TELANGANA \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 462\n2021 INSC 308\nCoram : ASHOK BHUSHAN\n*\n, R. SUBHASH REDDY\n Penal Code, 1860: s.364A \u2013 Essential ingredients \u2013 For covering an offence under s.364A, apart from fulfillment of first condition i.e. \u201cwhoever kidnaps or abducts any person or keeps a person in detention after such kidnapping or abduction\u201d, the second condition, i.e., or hurt to such person\u201d also needs to be proved in situation the case is not covered by subsequent clauses joined by \u201cor\u201d. Penal Code, 1860: s.364A \u2013 Prosecution case was that accused kidnapped 13 years old school boy (PW-2) and telephoned to his father (PW-1)\n Decision Date :\n 28-06-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 533/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPATAN JAMAL VALI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 3 S.C.R. 470\n2021 INSC 272\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 376 \u2013 Offence of rape \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant committed rape of a blind Scheduled Caste woman in her own house \u2013 Appellant known to the victim and her family \u2013 Mother and her sons found the victim in nude condition, bleeding from apprehended when trying to escape \u2013 Conviction of the appellant for offence punishable u/s. 3(2)(v) of the SC and ST Act and s. 376(1) by courts below \u2013 Imposition of life imprisonment for each of the offences, which were to run concurrently \u2013 On appeal, held: Nature and\n Decision Date :\n 27-04-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 452/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSARANYA\n versus \nBHARATHI AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 513\n2021 INSC 416\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Exercise of power under \u2013 Stage of framing of charge \u2013 High Court quashed and set aside the criminal proceedings qua co-accused-respondent no. 1 for the offences u/ss. 420, 302 rw 109 IPC \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Held: High Court on the basis of the evidence, the accused is likely to be convicted or not \u2013 At this stage, while considering the application u/s.482 Cr.P.C., this is not at all permissible \u2013 High Court was not conducting the trial and/or was not exercising the jurisdiction as an appellate court\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 873/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nK.S. RANGANATHA\n versus \nVITTAL SHETTY \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 652\n2021 INSC 837\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, HIMA KOHLI\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 \u2013 Dishonour of cheque \u2013 Appellant acquitted by trial court \u2013 Acquittal reversed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Respondent successfully discharged the initial burden cast on him \u2013 He established signed by the appellant was issued in his favour towards discharge of a legally recoverable amount \u2013 Parties were known to each other \u2013 Appellant admitted about an earlier transaction where he had borrowed the amount and repaid \u2013 This indicates that the parties had entered into\n Decision Date :\n 08-12-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1860/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVINOD KUMAR\n versus \nAMRITPAL @ CHHOTU & ORS. \n- \n[2021] 11 S.C.R. 954\n2021 INSC 802\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Penal Code, 1860: s.300 thirdly \u2013 Prosecution case was that respondent 1 to 5-accused were guilty of killing victim-deceased \u2013 Trial court convicted respondents-accused inter alia for offence punishable u/ss.302/149 \u2013 High Court altered conviction u/s.302 to one u/s.304 Part injuries caused to deceased were on non-vital parts of the body and, therefore, there was no intention on part of accused to kill the deceased \u2013 High Court further observed that the accused took deceased to a doctor which showed that there was no intention on their part to kill the\n Decision Date :\n 30-11-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1519/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKANCHAN SHARMA\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 194\n2021 INSC 496\nCoram : R. SUBHASH REDDY\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.306 \u2013 Deceased (brother of complainant) went to the house of appellant and consumed poison by taking out from a small bottle which he carried in his pocket \u2013 Proceedings against appellant u/s.306, IPC and 3(2)(v) of the SC and ST Act \u2013 High of appellant u/s.482, CrPC \u2013 On appeal, held: Merely because deceased consumed poison in front of the house of the appellant, that itself will not indicate any relation of the appellant with the deceased \u2013 Absolutely no material to allege that appellant abetted for suicide of the\n Decision Date :\n 17-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1022/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMINUDDIN\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 7 S.C.R. 264\n2021 INSC 181\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Constitution of India: Arts. 136, 21 \u2013 Invocation of jurisdiction under \u2013 In a matter involving serious offence of murder, grant of bail by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Undoubtedly, the protection of personal liberty u/Art. 21 is a constitutional value which by the High Court, as indeed by all courts \u2013 Equally, in a matter involving serious offence of murder, the liberty of the accused has to be necessarily balanced with the public interest in the administration of criminal justice system which requires that a person who is accused of a crime\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 317/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHRI MAHADEV MEENA\n versus \nPRAVEEN RATHORE AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 214\n2021 INSC 548\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860\u2013 ss.302, 120B \u2013 Bail \u2013 Murder of appellant\u2019s son \u2013 FIR inter alia alleged involvement of first respondent and his proximity with deceased\u2019s wife (co-accused) \u2013 Eventually, first respondent granted bail \u2013 On appeal, held: High in allowing the application for bail \u2013 It ought to have had due regard to the seriousness and gravity of the crime \u2013 Deceased was employed with the Intelligence Bureau in New Delhi \u2013 First respondent being an employee of the Anti-Corruption Bureau at Jhalawar, the likelihood of\n Decision Date :\n 27-09-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1089/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nREKHA SENGAR\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 314\n2021 INSC 37\nCoram : MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR\n*\n, VINEET SARAN, AJAY RASTOGI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.439 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Non- bailable cases \u2013 FIR against petitioner and another person alleging involvement in pre-natal sex determination and sex selective abortion \u2013 Bail denied cases, the primary factors the court must consider while exercising the discretion to grant bail are nature and gravity of the offence, its impact on society, and whether there is a prima facie case against the accused \u2013 In the present case, there is prima facie evidence against the\n Decision Date :\n 21-01-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 380/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE\n versus \nTR N SEENIVASAGAN \n- \n[2021] 2 S.C.R. 529\n2021 INSC 125\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, M.R. SHAH\n Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2013 s.311 \u2013 Ambit of \u2013 FIR under PC Act registered in 2010 against respondent-Chief Engineer in the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Company Limited (TANGEDCO) and other co-accused (since deceased) accorded \u2013 Final report filed in July 2011 \u2013 Prosecution evidence closed in October 2017 \u2013 Applications filed u/s.311 in 2019 for recalling PW-1(Chairman of TANGEDCO) and PW-11 (Deputy Superintendent of Police) \u2013 Dismissed \u2013 On appeal, held: Having due regard to\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 231/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMADHAV\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 451\n2021 INSC 413\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 rw s. 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that three accused, A1, A2 and A3 in furtherance of common intention, attacked, brother of A1 with weapons, resulting in his death \u2013 A2 took victim to the hospital and sent information to the police that the assault of A1, A2 and A3 u/s. 302 rw s. 34 by the courts below \u2013 Appeal by A2 and A3 before this Court \u2013 Held: Right from the beginning there was an attempt on the part of the prosecution to shield the culprits named in the first FIR, on account of political pressure, as admitted by the IO\n Decision Date :\n 18-08-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 852/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Leave Granted & Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPREM SHANKAR PRASAD\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 6 S.C.R. 1176\n2021 INSC 658\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.438 \u2013 Anticipatory bail \u2013 FIR lodged by appellant against respondent no.2 for offences punishable under ss.406, 407, 468 and 506 IPC \u2013 A warrant of arrest issued by Magistrate \u2013 Thereafter, respondent himself to avoid service of warrant of arrest \u2013 Magistrate issued a proclamation against respondent no.2 under s.82 CrPC \u2013 Thereafter respondent no.2 filed anticipatory bail application before trial court which was dismissed \u2013 However, High Court allowed the anticipatory\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1209/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH\n versus \nMAHENDRA ALIAS GOLU \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 133\n2021 INSC 665\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860: s.376(2)(f) or s.354 \u2013 Prosecution case was that about fortnight prior to the date of registration of FIR, the two victim-prosecutrix (PW-1 and PW-2) aged about 9 years and 8 years respectively were playing in the street near the respondent\u2019s house \u2013 Respondent them to his house and took off his clothes and undressed PW- 1 and started rubbing his genital against her genital and repeated same act with PW-2 \u2013 Both the girls got scared and started crying and he threatened them with physcial harm \u2013 After few days, victims revealed the incident\n Decision Date :\n 25-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1827/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPOOJA CERATECH PRIVATE LIMITED\n versus \nOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. \n- \n[2021] 9 S.C.R. 441\n2021 INSC 925\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n 9 S.C.R. 441 441 POOJA CERATECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. (Special Leave Petition (C) No. 19006 Of 2021) DECEMBER 03, 2021 [ M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ] Tender: Tender process \u2013 Security interest deposit \u2013 Forfeiture of \u2013 Bidder Corporation then decided to invoke the bank guarantees furnished by the bidder towards the security interest deposit invoking clause 14.5(b) of the tender document \u2013 Writ petition by the bidder challenging the decision of the Corporation to forfeit the security interest deposit by invoking\n Decision Date :\n 03-12-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 19006/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.\n versus \nNARAYAN @ NARAYAN SAI @ MOTA BHAGWAN ASARAM @ ASUMAL HARPALANI \n- \n[2021] 10 S.C.R. 330\n2021 INSC 653\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules: Release on furlough \u2013 Respondent was convicted under ss.376(2)(c), 377, 354, 504, 506(2), 508 of the IPC \u2013 By order dated 8 May 2021, application by the Sanctioning Authority on the ground that the respondent had engaged in illegal activities inside the jail, including keeping a mobile phone and making contacts outside the jail; has engaged in criminal misconduct to hinder the judicial proceedings during trial by threatening,\n Decision Date :\n 20-10-2021\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1159/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2021, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUMAN CHADHA & ANR.\n versus \nCENTRAL BANK OF INDIA \n- \n[2021] 8 S.C.R. 370\n2021 INSC 386\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: ss. 2(b), 19 \u2013 Contempt of court \u2013 Wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court \u2013 On facts, bank filed a petition u/ss. 10 and 12 for punishing the petitioners for wilful and deliberate breach of their breach of an undertaking made with a view to secure a conditional order of stay may not tantamount to contempt, especially when the consequences of breach of such undertaking are spelt out in the Court order itself \u2013 Single judge of the High Court held the petitioners guilty of contempt\n Decision Date :\n 09-08-2021\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 28592/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION\n versus \nDILIP UTTAM JAYABHAY \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 148\n2022 INSC 5\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Maharashtra Recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices Act 1971: Departmental proceedings \u2013 Misconduct proved against respondent-driver of driving the vehicle rashly and negligently due to which the four persons died \u2013 Disciplinary authority passed order of dismissal from service \u2013 Labour Court did not interfere with the order of dismissal by giving cogent reasons and after re-appreciating entire evidence on record including the order of acquittal passed by the criminal court\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 7403/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAROON PURIE\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 18 S.C.R. 311\n2022 INSC 1142\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1853-1856 of 2022) OCTOBER 31, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973: s.482 \u2013 Quashing of complaint \u2013 In the instant case, a news item titled \u2018Mission Misconduct\u2019 was to be recalled in quick succession following serious allegations of sexual misconduct, corruption in issuance of visas and sale of Indian passports to illegal immigrants \u2013 Allegations were levelled against an officer of the Indian Foreign Service posted in UK for soliciting sexual favours\n Decision Date :\n 31-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1853/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJENDRA BHAGAT\n versus \nSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 473\n2022 INSC 6\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 498A \u2013 Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty \u2013 Conviction of the appellant- husband u/s 498A and imposition of simple imprisonment for three years \u2013 Few years later, appellant and his wife entered into a settlement, resolved all a happy conjugal life \u2013 High Court took note of the settlement, and reduced the sentence to the period of imprisonment already undergone, however, upheld the conviction u/s 498A \u2013 On appeal, held: Taking note of the terms of settlement which include the undertaking of the\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT\n versus \nPADMANABHAN KISHORE \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 1064\n2022 INSC 1143\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n COURT REPORTS [2022] 13 S.C.R.[2022] 13 S.C.R. 1064 1064 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT v. PADMANABHAN KISHORE (Criminal Appeal No. 1864 of 2022) October 31, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.] Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 ss. 2(1)(u), 3, and 4 \u2013 Prosecution Rs.50,00,000/- in cash \u2013 It is alleged that A1 and A3 were in that car at that time \u2013 During investigation, it came to light that the sum of Rs.50,00,000/- was handed over to A-1 by A-2 whose income tax file was pending with A1 for clearance \u2013 Since A-2 wanted certain benefits,\n Decision Date :\n 31-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1864/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND\n versus \n SHAILENDRA KUMAR RAI @ PANDAV RAI \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 1033\n2022 INSC 1139\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.32(1) \u2013 Dying declaration \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302,376,341 and 448 \u2013 Victim was raped and set on fire \u2013 Respondent was convicted u/ss. 302, 341, 376,448 by the Sessions Court onthebasis of dying declaration of the Judgment set aside by High Court inter alia holding that the statement made by the deceased is not admissible as a dying declaration, respondent was acquitted \u2013 On appeal, held: Post- mortem report concludes that the cause of death is septicemia caused by the burn injuries sustained by the\n Decision Date :\n 31-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1441/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nINDRESH KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 323\n2022 INSC 426\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Service law: Appointment to the Post of Postgraduate trained Teachers \u2013 Eligibility Criteria \u2013 Jharkhand Selection Service Selection issued an advertisement by which application were invited from the eligible candidate for the appointment to the Post of \u2013 Eligibility Criteria for the appointment in History was Postgraduate degree in History with 50% marks \u2013 At the time of verification of testimonials of the selected candidates, it was found that they had a Postgraduate degree in one of the branches of History in place of History as\n Decision Date :\n 13-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2217/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAMATCHI\n versus \nLAKSHMI NARAYANAN \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 629\n2022 INSC 422\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 \u2013 ss.12 and 31 \u2013 Proceedings arising out of application of appellant-wife u/s.12 of the Act in the year 2018 seeking protection in terms of ss.17 and 18 of the Act \u2013 Petition of respondent-husband u/s.482 CrPC \u2013 High of limitation holding that ss.28 and 32 of the Domestic Violence Act r/w r.15(6) of the Domestic Violence Rules, made the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code applicable and therefore, appellant ought to have filed application u/s.12 of the Act within period of one year from date of the\n Decision Date :\n 13-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 627/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJAY GUPTA & ORS\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 137\n2022 INSC 421\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Constitution of India: Arts. 21 and 32 \u2013Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 - ss.2(a), 3 - U.P. Fire Service Act, 1944 - s. 16 \u2013 Uttar Pradesh Fire Prevention and Fire Safety Act, 2005 - ss. 2(g) ,3 - Code of Criminal Procedure - ss.133,144 Tragedy in a Consumer Show, organized by the respondents 10 to 12( Organizers)\u2013 Incident claimed lives of 65 persons and 161 suffered burn injuries \u2013 Organizers appointed a contractor to look after the proposed construction of exhibition infrastructure \u2013 Organizers claiming that\n Decision Date :\n 12-04-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 338/2006\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAHIR HAK\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 101\n2022 INSC 412\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH, HRISHIKESH ROY\n 3 S.C.R. 101 101 JAHIR HAK v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN (Criminal Appeal No. 605 of 2022) April 11, 2022 [K. M. JOSEPH AND HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ. ] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.439 \u2013 Application for anticipatory bail by undertrial prisoner who has undergone 8 years of incarceration \u2013 him on 29.01.2018 \u2013 Appellant has been in custody for a period of 8 years \u2013 By impugned order, his application for bail was rejected by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Appellant is charged with offences, some of which are punishable with a minimum punishment of 10 years and the\n Decision Date :\n 11-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 605/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN\n versus \nBANWARI LAL AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 613\n2022 INSC 410\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Appeal by State: Conviction of accused-B by the trial Court for the offence u/s.307 IPC for having caused serious injuries on the vital part of the body of the victim/injured \u2013 Trial Court sentenced accused-B to undergo three years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment \u2013 In an appeal before the did not challenge the conviction, but only prayed the Court to reduce the sentence to the period already undergone by him by submitting that occurrence took place about 26 years ago; that they were facing trial since then; and when the occurrence took place, they were young and now they are aged\n Decision Date :\n 08-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 579/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJEETU KHATIK\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 128\n2022 INSC 414\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Sentence / Sentencing \u2013 Suspension of execution of sentence \u2013 Trial Court had convicted and sentenced appellant u/ss.363 and 354 IPC and s.8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 \u2013 Prayer of appellant for declined by High Court \u2013Appellant pleaded before Supreme Court that the High Court had taken too strict and stern view of the matter and failed to appreciate that the maximum sentence of imprisonment awarded in the matter was of three years \u2013 Held: The High Court, while referring\n Decision Date :\n 11-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 603/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nEASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED & ORS.\n versus \nRABINDRA KUMAR BHARTI \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 1084\n2022 INSC 405\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Service Law \u2013 Departmental proceedings \u2013 Respondent, employed as a clerk with the appellant(s), was suspended by the appellant on the complaint of demanding bribe to clear retirement formalities and also served with a notice of Respondent moved a writ petition \u2013 Single Judge of High Court allowed the appellant to continue with the proceedings but ordered the appellant to not to pass final order without the leave of the Court \u2013 At the end of the enquiry, the appellant(s) filed an application seeking leave to\n Decision Date :\n 07-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2794/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANENDRA PRASAD TIWARI\n versus \nAMIT KUMAR TIWARI & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 174\n2022 INSC 1317\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.376 \u2013 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) \u2013 ss. 5 and 6 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 397, 482 \u2013 Discharge of Accused \u2013 \u2018X\u2019, delivered a baby and thereafter committed suicide by registered for the offence punishable u/s 376 of IPC and the provision of the POCSO Act against the respondent \u2013 The special Judge framed charges for the abovementioned offences against the respondent \u2013 The accused questioned the legality and validity of the order of framing charge by\n Decision Date :\n 12-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1210/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH\n versus \nJOGENDRA & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 295\n2022 INSC 30\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860: s.304-B, 498-A \u2013 Dowry death \u2013 Prosecution case was that fed up with the constant dowry demands made on her by the respondents (husband and father-in-law), which her family could not satisfy, the victim-deceased committed suicide by immolating herself at her \u2013 Conviction of respondents for offence under ss.304B, 498A and 306 \u2013 On appeal, held: All the four pre-requisites for invoking s.304-B were satisfied, namely, that the death of the victim-deceased took place at her matrimonial home within seven years of her marriage; that the\n Decision Date :\n 11-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 190/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJOSEPH JOHNSON N. MAITHKURI\n versus \nSUBRAHMANYA & ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 505\n2022 INSC 944\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Bail \u2013 Cancellation of \u2013 High Court granted bail to accused persons \u2013 Original complainant has preferred appeal before the Supreme Court for cancellation of bail and submitted that in a case of co- accused, Supreme Court in Crl.A.No.39/2022 by judgment and order dated 06.01.2022 a similar order passed by the High Court \u2013 Held: In view of the reasons stated in the judgment and order dated 06.01.2022 passed in Crl.A.No.39/2022, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court in the instant case releasing accused on bail deserve to be quashed and set aside\n Decision Date :\n 09-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1439/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHAITU GOWALA AND ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ASSAM \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 190\n2022 INSC 937\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and 149 \u2013 Appellants alongwith 70 other accused persons were accused of murdering the Managing Director of a company in which they were working \u2013 Prosecution examined three eye witnesses who identified the appellants \u2013 Trial Court them to life imprisonment \u2013 High Court confirmed the conviction \u2013 On appeal, held : On considering the disposition of the eye witnesses nothing is forthcoming that appellants caused any injury to the deceased and participated in any manner in commission of the offence \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 07-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 325/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSMRUTI TUKARAM BADADE\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 443\n2022 INSC 39\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT\n Guidelines/Norms/Directions: Guidelines \u2013 Issuance of \u2013 As regards recording evidence of vulnerable witnesses in criminal matters \u2013 Directions issued to facilitate the implementation of directions issued in State of Maharashtra v Bandu @ Daulat\u2019s case centres for examination of vulnerable witnesses in criminal cases \u2013 Definition of \u201cvulnerable witness\u201d contained in Clause 3(a) of the \u2018Guidelines for recording evidence of vulnerable witnesses in criminal matters\u2019 of the High Court of Delhi widened \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 11-01-2022\n | Case No :\n MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 1852/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP. DHARAMARAJ\n versus \nSHANMUGAM & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 972\n2022 INSC 940\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss.320, 482 \u2013 Compounding of Offence \u2013 Inherent powers of High Court \u2013 Exercise of, permissibility \u2013 As per s.320(9), no offence can be compounded except as provided in the said section \u2013 Compounding of offences is not permissible \u2013 Non-Compoundable offences are well within the jurisdiction of the High Court u/s.482 of the Code and Art. 226 of the Constitution and can be quashed on the basis of settlement but the court has to go slow while exercising such jurisdiction when the offence has impact\n Decision Date :\n 08-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1514/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS.\n versus \nDILIP KUMAR MALLICK \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 1056\n2022 INSC 1301\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Service law: Central Reserve Police Force \u2013 Punishment of Removal \u2013 In the instant case, respondent was removed from the service on the ground that a criminal case was pending against him for offence 337, 506 r/w s.34 IPC before the competent court but, while filling up the verification roll, he concealed the said fact and such an act was prejudicial to the discipline of CRPF \u2013 Appellate Authority declined to interfere with the decision of the Disciplinary Authority \u2013 Respondent\n Decision Date :\n 05-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2754/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLALANKUMAR SINGH & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 573\n2022 INSC 1061\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940: ss.34, 16, 18 \u2013 Vicarious liability \u2013 Appellants are the directors of M/s Cachet Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd. (CPPL) \u2013 Test report of the sample of the drug manufactured by CPPL stated that it was not of standard quality \u2013 Complaint filed 16 and 34 of the Act \u2013 CJM issued summons to all the accused including the appellants \u2013 Appellants filed revision petition against the summoning order before the Sessions Judge which was rejected on the ground that there was a specific averment in the complaint that the appellants\n Decision Date :\n 11-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1757/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPAPPU\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 13\n2022 INSC 164\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n 13 13 PAPPU v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1097-1098 of 2018) FEBRUARY 09, 2022 [A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ] Penal Code, 1860: ss. 376, 302, 201 \u2013 Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act 2012 \u2013 ss. 5, 6 \u2013 her and killed her and dumped the dead body in bushes near the riverbank \u2013Trial court and High Court concurrently recorded the findings that the prosecution was able to successfully establish the chain of circumstances leading to unmistakable conclusion that the appellant was guilty of the\n Decision Date :\n 09-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1097/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDASHRATHBHAI TRIKAMBHAI PATEL\n versus \nHITESH MAHENDRABHAI PATEL & ANR \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 522\n2022 INSC 1067\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 and s.56 r/w s.15 \u2013 Legally enforceable debt on the date of maturity \u2013 Whether offence u/s.138 would deem to be committed if the cheque that is dishonoured does not represent the enforceable debt at \u2013 Whether s.138 would still be attracted when the drawer of the cheque makes a part payment towards the debt or liability after the cheque is drawn but before the cheque is encashed, for the dishonour of the cheque which represents the full sum \u2013 Held: For commission of an\n Decision Date :\n 11-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1497/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMEERA\n versus \nSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVOTRIYUR POLICE STATION CHENNAI \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 223\n2022 INSC 35\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860: s.498A \u2013 Death of married woman due to self-immolation \u2013 Allegation of dowry demand against in-laws \u2013 Conviction of mother-in-law and one year RI \u2013 Challenged \u2013 Held: Deceased was staying with her in-laws, while husband of deceased \u2013 It was established and proved that deceased was subjected to torture/cruelty by her mother-in-law (appellant) regarding jewellery \u2013 Conviction of appellant u/s.498-A was, therefore, justified \u2013 As regards the plea of lenient view in sentencing, incident having occurred in 2006\n Decision Date :\n 11-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 31/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM NIWAS\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 138\n2022 INSC 818\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Evidence \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Completion of chain of evidence \u2013 Held: There has to be a chain of evidence so complete so as not to leave any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act by the accused \u2013 Circumstances should be of a conclusive nature and tendency \u2013 The circumstances should exclude every possible hypothesis except the one to be proved \u2013 The accused \u2018must be\u2019 and not merely \u2018may be\u2019 guilty before a Court can convict\n Decision Date :\n 11-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 25/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMALLADA K SRI RAM\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 5\n2022 INSC 386\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT\n Preventive Detention \u2013 Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders,Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Land Grabbers, Spurious Seed Offenders, Insecticide Offenders, Fertiliser Offenders, Food Adulteration Offenders, Fake Document Forest Offenders, Gaming Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Explosive Substances Offenders, Arms Offenders, Cyber Crime Offenders and White Collar or Financial Offenders Act,1986 \u2013 s.3(2) and 2(x) \u2013 Order of detention u/s.3(2) \u2013 It was alleged that detenu was a \u2018white-collar\n Decision Date :\n 04-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 561/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA\n versus \nANAND KINDO & ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 337\n2022 INSC 939\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA, VIKRAM NATH\n Sentence/Sentencing \u2013 Murder committed for greed of money by trusted employees of an aged couple while they were sleeping \u2013 Trial Court awarded the death sentence u/s.302 IPC to accused persons \u2013 High Court interfered with sentencing and imposed life sentence \u2013 On appeal, murder for gain and greed by somebody who was in a position of trust with the family \u2013 The two victims were aged people who engaged one of the convicts to look after them and paid appropriate emoluments \u2013 Battering two sleeping people beyond recognition who imposed trust in their\n Decision Date :\n 08-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1797/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAMBHU KHARWAR\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 156\n2022 INSC 827\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Penal Code 1860: ss. 376, 375 \u2013 Punishment for rape \u2013 Necessary ingredients of s. 375 \u2013 On facts, accusation of rape by the second respondent-women against the appellant-man on the pretext of marriage \u2013 Application by appellant seeking quashing of criminal offence punishable u/s. 376 \u2013 Dismissed by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Relationship between the parties-appellant and the second respondent purely consensual in nature \u2013 They are both educated adults \u2013 Relationship of the second respondent with the appellant was in\n Decision Date :\n 12-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1231/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIJAY RAJMOHAN\n versus \nSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2022] 19 S.C.R. 563\n2022 INSC 1066\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1981 \u2013 s.19 \u2013 Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 \u2013 Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 \u2013 Whether an order of the Appointing of a public servant u/s.19 of the PC Act, would be rendered illegal on the ground of acting as per dictation if it consults the Central Vigilance Commission for its decision \u2013 Held: The position of law and the legal regime obtained by virtue of the five legislations, the Cr.P.C,\n Decision Date :\n 11-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1746/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJARNAIL SINGH & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 196\n2022 INSC 708\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 409/109, 420/109, 467/109, 471/109, 474/109, 477-A/109 and 120-B \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss. 13(i)(d) and 7 \u2013 Allegations against the General Manager of the State Roadways Depot, that in connivance with conductor and others was selling and on his own and sold through his own persons, who used to collect money for him, causing huge loss to the Depot \u2013 Registration of FIR \u2013 Conviction and sentence of the three conductors-appellants u/ss. 409/109, 420/ 109, 467/109, 471/109, 474/109, 477-A/109 and 120-B IPC and ss.\n Decision Date :\n 12-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 634/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT & ORS. ETC.\n versus \nK. CHANDRAN ETC. \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 287\n2022 INSC 310\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Service Law \u2013 Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity (DCRG) \u2013 Kerala Service Rule \u2013 Rules 3 & 3A \u2013 Interpretation of \u2013 On conviction in a criminal case for violation of integrity norms in performance of official duties and an appeal pending before the High Court, whether entitled to the release of his DCRG \u2013 Held: Rule 3A cannot be read in isolation nor the latter part of it struck down \u2013 Rule 3, Note 2, Ruling 3, and Rule 3A have to be read in conjunction as they provide for the treatment of the DCRG in case of disciplinary or judicial proceedings\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 7437/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBARUN CHANDRA THAKUR\n versus \nMASTER BHOLU & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 595\n2022 INSC 716\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 \u2013 s.15 \u2013 Proviso to s. 15(1) \u2013 Directory or Mandatory \u2013 Held: Well settled principle of interpretation that the word \u2018may\u2019 when used in a legislation by itself does not connote a directory meaning to the court that the intent of the legislature is to convey a statutory duty, then the use of the word \u201cmay\u201d will not prevent the Court from giving it a mandatory colour \u2013 Looking to the purpose of the Act, 2015 and its legislative intent, particularly to ensure the\n Decision Date :\n 13-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 950/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVEERENDRA\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 225\n2022 INSC 565\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 376A, 376 (2)(i), 302 \u2013 POCSO Act \u2013 s. 6 \u2013 Rape and murder of a minor girl \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant-accused had raped and throttled to cause death of victim, who was daughter of appellant\u2019s cousin sister \u2013 While in custody statement and thereafter, at his instance, the victim\u2019s corpse concealed underneath gunny bags, was recovered \u2013 The post-mortem and the forensic science laboratory (FSL) reports revealed commission of rape in a diabolically and gruesome manner and causing of death by throttling\n Decision Date :\n 13-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABHAY JAIN\n versus \nTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AND ANR \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 693\n2022 INSC 309\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, VINEET SARAN\n Judicial Service \u2013 Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010 \u2013 rr.45 and 46 \u2013 Entitlement to protection u/Art.311 of the Constitution \u2013 Bail order dated 27.04.2015 passed by Appellant-judicial officer in favour an accused in a case under Prevention of Corruption Act taken against him \u2013 Departmental enquiry instituted against him u/r.16 of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 for acts amounting to misconduct and violation of rr.3 and 4 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Conduct Rules), 1971 \u2013 Allegation leveled\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2029/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAHENDRA SINGH AND ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF M.P. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 737\n2022 INSC 637\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 r/w s.149, and s.148 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Conviction of accused-appellants on basis of sole testimony of PW6 \u2013 High Court found PW6 to be in the category of a witness who was \u201cneither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable\u201d, and upheld conviction \u2013 Challenged, on ground that PW6 fell in the category of a \u201cwholly unreliable\u201d witness \u2013 Held: From evidence of PW3 and PW4 which was fully corroborated by evidence of DW3 and DW4, it was clear that PW6 could not have witnessed the incident \u2013 Evidence of PW6 would\n Decision Date :\n 03-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 764/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURENDRAN\n versus \nSTATE OF KERELA \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 675\n2022 INSC 566\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, HIMA KOHLI\n (Criminal Appeal No. 1080 of 2019) MAY 13, 2022 [N. V. RAMANA CJI, A. S. BOPANNA AND HIMA KOHLI. JJ.] Evidence Act, 1872: s. 32 \u2013 Dying declaration \u2013 Admissibility of \u2013 On facts, suicide attempt by the wife soon after marriage due to harassment and dowry demands of husband and of husband, his mother and two brothers u/ss. 304B and 498A \u2013 Appellate court acquitted the brothers but maintained the conviction of the husband and the mother \u2013 However, the High Court acquitted the husband and his mother u/s.304B while upheld their conviction u/s.498A and\n Decision Date :\n 13-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1080/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHARAFAT ALI\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 696\n2022 INSC 173\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT, VIKRAM NATH\n Premature release \u2013 Relevant considerations \u2013 Held: Application for premature release has to be considered on the basis of the policy as it stood on the date when the petitioner was convicted of the offence history, his conduct and behavior in jail, and possible danger to the society on his release are to be adverted to \u2013 There has to be a considered application of mind to the facts of each case \u2013 On facts, petitioner convicted u/s. 302/34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment,\n Decision Date :\n 10-02-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 439/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nN. S. MADHANAGOPAL & ANR.\n versus \nK. LALITHA \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 649\n2022 INSC 1323\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.294(b), 341 \u2013 When not attracted \u2013 Verbal altercation between parties on excessive flow of waste water in the society \u2013 Complaint filed by respondent for offences u/ss.294(b), 341 \u2013 Application filed by appellants for quashing of criminal been averred in the complaint is that the appellant hurled unparliamentary words towards the complainant \u2013 s.294(b) talks about the obscene acts and songs \u2013 The test of obscenity u/s.294(b) is whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity is to deprave and corrupt those\n Decision Date :\n 10-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1759/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMEENA DEVI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 23\n2022 INSC 568\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s 439 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Grant/ cancellation of \u2013 When \u2013 Held: Power of the High Court u/s. 439 is wide \u2013 Exercise of the said discretionary powers vested in the Court when considering grant of bail ought to be in a judicious manner and not as application of mind or in contravention of directions of this court, it would be susceptible to interference \u2013 When it comes to assessing an application seeking cancellation of bail, the appellate court looks out for, amongst others, supervening circumstances or any violation of the\n Decision Date :\n 13-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 808/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSWAMINATHAN KUNCHU ACHARYA\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 727\n2022 INSC 639\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Custody \u2013 Of minor child \u2013 5 year old child lost his parents in the Covid-19 pandemic \u2013 Appellant is paternal grandfather of the child, and he and his wife\u2013 paternal grandparents sought custody of the child \u2013 Writ petition seeking writ of habeas corpus filed by the child \u2013 High Court handed over custody to respondent No.4 \u2013 Held: On facts and circumstances, High Court erred in not handing over and/or continuing the custody of the corpus\u2013grandson to appellant / paternal grandparents \u2013 Income and/or the age and/or the bigger family\n Decision Date :\n 09-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 898/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRI BISWANATH BANIK & ANR.\n versus \nSMT. SULANGA BOSE & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 302\n2022 INSC 300\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Or.VII r.11 \u2013 Rejection of plaint \u2013 Suit of declaration and permanent injunction \u2013 Defendants seeking rejection of plaint on the ground that the suit is barred by limitation and that the suit for a of TPA would not be maintainable \u2013 Trial court refused to reject plaint under Or.VII r.11 \u2013 However, on revision, High Court allowed Or.VII r.11 application \u2013 On appeal, held: Rejection of a plaint under Or.VII r.11(d) by reading only few lines and passages and ignoring the\n Decision Date :\n 14-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1848/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRI NARENDRA KUMAR A. BALDOTA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 969\n2022 INSC 301\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of proceedings \u2013 M Company of which appellant is the Chairman and Managing Director, imported a car for which customs duty and road tax was paid \u2013 Thereafter, differential motor vehicle tax was demanded in respect of the same was paid, and no Dues Certificate was also issued \u2013 FIR filed against appellant that he conspired with Regional Transport Officer to evade payment of road tax\u2013 Petition seeking quashing of proceedings\u2013 Dismissed by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Criminal law cannot\n Decision Date :\n 14-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 429/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAJMAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 503\n2022 INSC 709\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.34, 149, 302, 304 Part II\u2013 Culpable homicide not amounting to murder \u2013 Deceased along with other friends were stopped by ten accused persons \u2013 Verbal altercation took place \u2013 Deceased was beaten by accused no. 1 and 2 and as a result, deceased fell on and caused them simple and grievous hurt \u2013 Charges framed u/ss.143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 427 and 302 r/w s.149 \u2013 Trial Court acquitted accused nos.4, 5, 7 and 10 \u2013 High Court acquitted three other accused namely accused nos.6, 8 and 9 of all the charges \u2013 Conviction\n Decision Date :\n 12-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1838/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSADHNA CHAUDHARY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 239\n2022 INSC 712\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 438 \u2013 Anticipatory Bail \u2013 Cancellation of \u2013 Accused-Station House officer on the fateful day, exploited the victim \u2013 Exploitation continued for two years on account of threats of making public, the videos and photographs of her in if she did not continue to accede to his demands and commands \u2013 Thereafter, registration of FIR against SHO for the offences punishable u/ss. 376, 323, 341, 354 and 379 IPC by the victim \u2013 Application for anticipatory bail by the SHO \u2013 Allowed by the High Court \u2013 On\n Decision Date :\n 12-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 936/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUMITHA PRADEEP\n versus \nARUN KUMAR C.K & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 1012\n2022 INSC 1133\nCoram : SURYA KANT, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Anticipatory bail: Case filed against respondent no.1 under ss.354(1)(i), (ii) and (iv), 354A(2) and 354A(3) IPC /w ss.7, 8, 9 and 11 of POCSO Act \u2013 Allegation against respondent no.1 was that he sexually assaulted his 12 years old niece \u2013 He asked the victim to sit on his lap her and kissed her on the cheeks and tried to kiss her on her lips \u2013 He further attempted to disrobe her and made lewd comments \u2013 The incident traumatized the victim to an extent that she slumped down in her course and performance although she was an excellent student giving good\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1834/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.\n versus \nAKHIL SHARDA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 772\n2022 INSC 705\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of criminal proceedings \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 On facts, FIRs u/ss. 406 and 420 IPC \u2013 Allegations relating to disappearance of trucks loaded with beer from highways \u2013 High Court quashed the criminal proceedings FIR including the charge-sheet filed by the Investigating Agency as well as the summoning order passed by the trial court \u2013 On appeal, held: High Court virtually conducted a mini trial, which was not permissible at this stage \u2013 At the stage of deciding the application u/s. 482, the\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 840/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS.\n versus \nMAJOR R. METRI NO. 08585N \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 581\n2022 INSC 384\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Service Law: Armed Force service \u2013 Interference by Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) \u2013 Scope of \u2013 Respondent-officer was posted as the Recruitment Medical Officer\u2013 Case against him was that he helped certain candidates in clearing Army Recruitment Rallies by declaring them (GCM) found him guilty u/s.7 of the PC Act, 1988 r/w s.69 of the Army Act, 1950 and sentenced him to be cashiered from service and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year \u2013 In appeal, AFT set aside the order of GCM and convicted him u/s.63 of the Army Act and sentenced him to\n Decision Date :\n 04-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2196/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSOM DUTT & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 1\n2022 INSC 385\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Probation \u2013 Release on probation \u2013 Appellants convicted by three courts below u/s.379 r/w s.34 IPC and sentenced to 3 months SI \u2013 Revision filed before High Court \u2013 Dismissed \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 Held: No interference warranted with concurrent findings of facts appellants granted benefit of release on probation of good conduct u/s.361 CrPC r/w ss.3 and 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act having regard to the sentence imposed by courts below, and as the appellants had no criminal antecedents, and the Respondent (State) filed no objection to this \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 04-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 549/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD. FIROZ\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 1027\n2022 INSC 1129\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Review \u2013 Clarification sought on quantum of sentence \u2013 In judgment dated 19.04.2022 for which review is sought, the petitioner-accused was held guilty and punished for the offences was under ss.376(2)(i), 376(2)(m) and as also under s.5 (i) and s.5 (m) read with s.6 of the POCSO Act \u2013 In judgment dated 19.04.2022, the Court, while commuting the sentence of death for the sentence of life imprisonment for the offence punishable under s.302 of IPC, and while imposing sentence to undergo imprisonment for 20\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2022\n | Case No :\n REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 282/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHONNAIAH T.H.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1108\n2022 INSC 794\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n COURT REPORTS [2022] 6 S.C.R. HONNAIAH T.H. v STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS (Criminal Appeal No. 1147 of 2022) AUGUST 04, 2022 [DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AND J B PARDIWALA, JJ] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.161. 397(2) \u2013 Prosecution csae was that FIR was registered on 26 the village of the appellant armed with knives and rods, and abused and assaulted some of the villagers \u2013 A few of the accused allegedly assaulted and stabbed the appellant, his elder brother and another villager with knives \u2013 The grievously injured persons were first taken to the\n Decision Date :\n 04-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1147/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKRISHNAMURTHY @ GUNODU AND OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 433\n2022 INSC 190\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 and 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Common intention \u2013 Three accused \u2013 Conviction of appellants-accused (K, T, G) for murder of victim-deceased u/s. 302 r/w s.34 and for offences u/ss.447, 504, 506, 341 \u2013 Division Bench of High Court affirmed their conviction appeal \u2013 Held: The assault on victim-deceased by appellant-K was fearsome, brutal and cruel \u2013 He had pinned down and tromped the deceased using his legs and hands fracturing four ribs, contusing and injuring the spinal cord, the chest and neck of the deceased \u2013 The injuries were\n Decision Date :\n 16-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 288/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGIREESAN NAIR & ORS. ETC.\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 599\n2022 INSC 1199\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Evidence Act, 1872 : s. 9 \u2013 Test Identification Parade(TIP) \u2013 Legality and validity of \u2013 Prosecution case that accused persons to avenge the police atrocity hatched a conspiracy, abetted acts of rioting and destruction of public property \u2013 A-17 and A-19 alleged the death of a bus conductor \u2013 Accused convicted and sentenced for hatching conspiracy, murder of the bus conductor and destruction of roadways buses and other public properties \u2013 Findings of trial court and High Court on issue of conspiracy and murder attained finality \u2013 As\n Decision Date :\n 11-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1864/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAKHAN SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 357\n2022 INSC 831\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Evidence \u2013 Two dying declarations \u2013 In first dying declaration recorded by DW-1, deceased exonerated appellant and his family \u2013 However, in the second dying declaration recorded by PW-6, deceased implicated appellant and his parents \u2013 Trial Court convicted appellant u/s. imprisonment \u2013 High Court reduced the sentence from 10 years to 7 years \u2013 On appeal, held: In the first dying declaration, PW1-doctor had examined deceased whether she was in fit state of mind and conscious to make statement \u2013 After certification, DW-1 also satisfied herself as\n Decision Date :\n 16-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1290/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUBHASH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 258\n2022 INSC 127\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w s.149 and s.148 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Informant was sitting with his brother, the deceased, on a cot when the six accused persons allegedly arrived at the scene \u2013 Allegation that A-3 and three other accused, who fired at the deceased, while one other accused \u2018SD\u2019, who was armed with an axe, and A-6, who was armed with knife, assaulted deceased on his neck \u2013 Sessions Judge convicted all six accused u/s.302 r/w 149 and 148 IPC \u2013 High Court confirmed the conviction \u2013 On\n Decision Date :\n 01-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 158/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD. ARIF @ ASHFAQ\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 792\n2022 INSC 1156\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Review Petition \u2013 Death Penalty \u2013 In firing incident inside Lal Quila, three army jawans received fatal injuries and lost their lives \u2013 Review Petitioner was tried and was awarded death sentence was confirmed by High Court \u2013 Petitioner preferred appeal before Supreme Court \u2013 The challenge was negated and award of death to the petitioner was affirmed \u2013 Review petitions before Division Bench were dismissed \u2013 Curative petition filed by review petitioner also\n Decision Date :\n 03-11-2022\n | Case No :\n REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 286/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 150\n2022 INSC 855\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT\n Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act,1999 \u2013 ss.2(1)(f), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4), 3(5), 18, 23 and 427 \u2013 Penal Code 1860 \u2013 ss. 143, 147, 149, 395, 307, 353, 332, 155, 109, 324, 323 and 427 \u2013 Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act 1887 \u2013 s. 4 and Act 1949 \u2013 s.65(e) \u2013 Bombay Police Act 1951 \u2013 s. 37 \u2013 Interpretation of the provisions of s.18 MCOCA \u2013 Case of the prosecution was that the appellants are members of an organized crime syndicate which has engaged in systematic course of activities for cheating\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1125/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE BY (NCB) BENGALURU\n versus \nPALLULABID AHMAD ARIMUTTA & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 422\n2022 INSC 26\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Bail \u2013 Cancellation of \u2013 Allegations of drug trafficking \u2013 Held: A confessional statement recorded u/s.67 of the NDPS Act will remain inadmissible in trial of an offence under the NDPS Act petitioner-NCB, on basis of confession/ voluntary statements of respondents-accused or the co-accused u/s.67, cannot form the basis for overturning the impugned orders releasing them on bail \u2013 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s.67. Bail \u2013 Cancellation of\n Decision Date :\n 10-01-2022\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE TO PETITION (CRIMINAL)... No. 242/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAHAJA @ SHAHAJAN ISMAIL MOHD. SHAIKH\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2022] 12 S.C.R. 196\n2022 INSC 725\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Evidence \u2013 Ocular evidence \u2013 Discovery of fact in consequence of an information received from accused \u2013 Victim-deceased and appellant were working as labourers \u2013 Prosecution case that quarrel ensued between the victim on the night of 10.12.2006, which was witnessed by PW-1 and PW-8 \u2013 Appellant assaulted victim with a hammer on his head \u2013 Victim died \u2013 Trial Court relied upon the oral testimony of the PW-1,PW-8 and the evidence of discovery of weapon i.e. hammer and convicted appellant\n Decision Date :\n 14-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 739/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNEETHA NARREDDY & ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 745\n2022 INSC 1238\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Transfer of Criminal Trial \u2013 Fair and Independent Trial \u2013 Petition pertaining to the mysterious death of uncle of the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh \u2013 Writ petition filed by the daughter and the wife of the deceased seeking transfer of trial for duly completing the investigation in time bound manner \u2013 Apprehension of petitioners that star witnesses/witnesses were having life threat perceptions and that some of the witnesses were already influenced and that justice will not be done and/or there shall not be a fair trial \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 29-11-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 169/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPAWAN KUMAR\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 928\n2022 INSC 499\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Service Law: Railway Protection Forces Rules, 1987: rr. 52 and 67.2 \u2013 Discharge order \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 On facts, appellant- recruit selected for the post of constable in Railway Protection Forces \u2013 However, while undergoing training, discharged from of submission of false declaration/suppression of relevant information in the verification form as regard his criminal antecedents \u2013 Said discharge order upheld by the High Court \u2013 On appeal: Held: Mere suppression of material/false information regardless of the fact whether there\n Decision Date :\n 02-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3574/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMS.Y\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 27\n2022 INSC 431\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n 3 S.C.R. 27 27 MS.Y v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 649 of 2022) APRIL 19, 2022 [N. V. RAMANA, CJI AND KRISHNA MURARI, J.] Bail \u2013 Necessity of reasoned bail orders, especially in matters involving serious offences \u2013 In the present case, respondent no.2 was accused factors for grant of bail and did not advert to the actual facts of the case \u2013 In fact, no reasoning is apparent from the order of High Court \u2013 Fact that respondent no.2 was a habitual offender and nearly twenty cases were registered against him was not even mentioned in the\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 649/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHURI BAI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 190\n2022 INSC 1325\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439(2) \u2013 Cancellation of bail \u2013 Power of \u2013 Held: Power of cancellation of bail should be exercised with extreme care and circumspection \u2013 Such cancellation cannot be ordered merely for any perceived indiscipline on the part of granting bail \u2013 Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances or grounds are required to cancel the bail already granted \u2013 Unless a strong case based on any supervening event is made out, an order granting bail is not to be lightly interfered with \u2013 Cancellation is envisaged only in\n Decision Date :\n 11-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1972/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMANAND @ NANDLAL BHARTI\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 162\n2022 INSC 1075\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Penal Code, 1860: s.302 \u2013 Prosecution case was that on fateful day, appellant-accused murdered his wife and four children with a sharp cutting weapon while they were sleeping \u2013 Motive behind the murder was attributed to extra marital affair lady which was highly opposed by the deceased- wife \u2013 Discovery statement made by appellant and consequently recovery made \u2013 Appellant said to have made extra judicial confession to prosecution witness \u2013 Trial court convicted the appellant and passed death sentence \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 13-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 64/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nINDRAJEET YADAV\n versus \nSANTOSH SINGH AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 73\n2022 INSC 440\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Practice and Procedure \u2013 Pronouncement of final orders without a reasoned judgment, deprecated \u2013 High Court while allowing appeals of the accused pronounced the operative portion of the order and set aside the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial court and directed the be released, but a reasoned judgment and order was pronounced after approximately five months \u2013 On appeal, held: Despite strong observations made by Supreme Court as far as back in the year 1984 and thereafter repeatedly reiterated, still the practice of pronouncing only the operative\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 577/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nXYZ\n versus \nABHISHEIK & ANR \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 420\n2022 INSC 905\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000: s.7A \u2013 Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 \u2013 R.12(3)(b) \u2013 Plea of Juvenility \u2013 Appellant alleged that she was subjected to gang rape by the first \u2013 FIR was registered on 24 July 2015, three to four months after the commission of offences \u2013 Plea of Juvenility \u2013 JMFC found that the matriculation certificate produced by the first respondent was fabricated and therefore directed FIR to be filed against first respondent\n Decision Date :\n 02-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1408/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF M.P.\n versus \nRAMJI LAL SHARMA & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 754\n2022 INSC 285\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Common Intention \u2013 Trial Court held that all the four accused shared the common intention to kill the deceased, and convicted them u/s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 High Court allowed appeal of accused no.1 and 3 by giving them benefit of doubt and by observing that there was a contradiction in the ocular and medical evidence and therefore their presence itself was doubtful \u2013 According to High Court, three eye witnesses stated that respondent No.1 and 2 were having axe in their hands, and they\n Decision Date :\n 09-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 293/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.\n versus \nCHETAN JEFF \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 692\n2022 INSC 556\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Service Law \u2013 Appointment \u2013 Post of Constable \u2013 Suppression of material fact by the candidate in respect of his criminal antecedents and making false statement in the job application form \u2013 Rejection of his candidature \u2013 Writ petition by the candidate \u2013 Single offences for which the candidate was charged with of trivial in nature and their suppression should have been ignored thus, the State directed to consider him for the post \u2013 Upheld by the Division Bench \u2013 On appeal, held: It is the duty of the constable is to maintain law and order\n Decision Date :\n 11-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3116/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDAUVARAM NIRMALKAR\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 5\n2022 INSC 786\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.304 Part I and 302 and Exception 1 to s.300 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Conviction of appellant by Courts below u/s.302 IPC for murder of his brother \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 Held: The fact that the appellant and the deceased were together the night when the deceased Therefore, s.106 of the Evidence Act gets attracted and in the absence of any breakin or third-party involvement, the chain of facts and circumstances established beyond doubt, bares that the appellant and no other person was the perpetrator who had inflicted the injuries on his brother \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 02-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1124/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNITA PALITA & OTHERS\n versus \nM/S PANCHAMI STONE QUARRY \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 458\n2022 INSC 775\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Quashing of proceedings \u2013 Dishonour of cheque \u2013 Account Payee Cheque signed by accused no. 2, who was M.D. of the Company in favour of respondent in discharge of liability \u2013 On dishonour u/s.138 r/w s.141 of NI Act \u2013 In the complaint, appellants who were independent/non-executive director were impleaded as accused no. 3 to 5 \u2013 Appellants unsuccessfully filed application in High Court u/s.482 praying that the proceeding be quashed \u2013 Hence instant appeal\n Decision Date :\n 01-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1105/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJESH GUPTA\n versus \nSTATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 864\n2022 INSC 359\nCoram : VINEET SARAN, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: s.7 \u2013 For an offence under s.7, the demand of illegal gratification is a sine qua non to prove the guilt \u2013 Mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute an offence under s.7 unless it is proved accused voluntarily accepted the money, knowing it to be a bribe \u2013 The proof of acceptance of illegal gratification can follow only if there is proof of demand \u2013 In the instant case there are no sufficient evidence available which points towards such demand except of the evidence\n Decision Date :\n 29-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1769/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHAMMED ZUBAIR\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS \n- \n[2022] 18 S.C.R. 494\n2022 INSC 736\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT, A.S. BOPANNA\n Criminal Law \u2013 Multiplicity of proceedings \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.153-A, 295-A, 201, 120-B \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.437, 438, 482 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 32, 226 \u2013 Foreign Contribution (Regulation) s.35 \u2013 FIR No.172 of 2022 was registered against Petitioner, co-founder of ALT News, a fact checking portal, at Special Cell of Delhi Police for alleged offences punishable u/ss.153-A, 295-A, 2 201 and 120-B, IPC \u2013 Offence u/s.35, FCRA added during course of investigation \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 20-07-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 279/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAHUL\n versus \nSTATE OF DELHI MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 1129\n2022 INSC 1176\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 365, 367, 376(2)(g), 302, 201 & 34 \u2013 A girl was kidnapped when she was returning from her job along with her friends \u2013 She was raped and killed later on and her body was thrown in open field \u2013 FIR was registered against the accused- appellant 302, 201 read with 34 of IPC \u2013 Trial Court after appreciating the evidence on record and material recovered during investigation, convicted and sentenced them with death penalty \u2013 The same was confirmed by the High Court in Death Sentence Reference referred by the Session\n Decision Date :\n 07-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 611/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRASHIDUL JAFAR @ CHOTA\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 475\n2022 INSC 932\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Remission: Pre-mature release \u2013 Remission plea of five hundred and twelve convicts undergoing a sentence of imprisonment for life in the State of UP \u2013 In 2021, amendment brought to the Standing Policy Regarding Premature Release of Life Convicts of 2018 \u2013 Earlier policy of the so as to provide that a convict undergoing imprisonment for life would not be released until the age of sixty years is attained \u2013 Challenge to, on the ground that the plea for premature release must be considered on the basis of the law as it stood on the date of conviction and that a\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 336/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJEET KUMAR SINGH @ MUNNA KUMAR SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 166\n2022 INSC 883\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 ss.20(b)(ii)(C), 54 Presumption u/s.54 \u2013 Appellant concurrently convicted u/s.20(b)(ii)(C) and sentenced, relying on the testimony of PW-7-DSP (who acted both as the informant and the IO) examined as PW-7 claims to have done everything only in the presence of independent witnesses \u2013 But those independent witnesses not merely denied their presence and participation but also came up with an explanation as to how their signatures found a place in the documents \u2013 Thus,\n Decision Date :\n 30-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 871/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNIL KUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 229\n2022 INSC 99\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Bail \u2013 Murder \u2013 Unlawful assembly \u2013 Respondent No.2 and other accused persons allegedly formed an unlawful assembly and killed the elder brother of informant- appellant \u2013 Deceased was fired at, and also assaulted with danda and lathi \u2013 Respondent no.2 was a He was also allegedly involved in murder of informant\u2019s father and younger brother \u2013 Trial of these cases were at the crucial stage of recording of evidence, and there were allegations of the informant and the witnesses being pressurised by respondent no.2 \u2013 Judgment of High\n Decision Date :\n 25-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 95/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAKEEL AHMED\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 705\n2022 INSC 1162\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA, VIKRAM NATH\n Directions \u2013 Direction issued to the State Government to implement the recommendations \u2013 Government of Maharashtra in the aftermath of communal riots and bomb blasts that occurred in Mumbai between December 1992 and March 1993 constituted a Commission \u2013 The in February 1998, which contained recommendations on various issues, including the causes of the riots, inadequate measures taken by the police, failure to register crimes, delay in the disposal of criminal cases, political interference in the functioning of the police machinery, and lack of\n Decision Date :\n 04-11-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 182/2001\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAWABUDDIN\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1083\n2022 INSC 162\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: ss.5/ 6 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.376(2)(i) \u2013 Prosecution case was that the appellant-accused was neighbour of PW-1-informant \u2013 On the fateful day, when PW-1 went out of the house, appellant took four year old daughter of clothes as well as clothes of the victim girl and fondled her private parts and penetrated his finger into the vagina of the victim girl \u2013 Some persons spotted the accused and caught him red handed \u2013 Trial Court as well as the High Court convicted the accused for the offences under\n Decision Date :\n 08-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 144/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nS. P. MANI AND MOHAN DAIRY\n versus \nDR.SNEHALATHA ELANGOVAN \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 634\n2022 INSC 970\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.138 and 141 \u2013 Partnership firm \u2013 Cheque dishonour case \u2013 Vicarious liability of the partners \u2013 Held: Burden is on Board of Directors or officers in charge of the affairs of the company /partners of a firm to show that they to be convicted \u2013 Existence of any special circumstance that makes them not liable is something that is peculiarly within their knowledge and it is for them to establish at the trial to show that at the relevant time they were not in charge of the affairs of the company or the firm \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 16-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1586/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHOLA KUMHAR\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 1176\n2022 INSC 535\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 19(1)(d), 21 \u2013 Illegal detention \u2013 Accused kept in prison beyond the Period of Imprisonment \u2013 The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable u/s. 376 of IPC and Sections 3(ii)(v) and 3(1)(xii) of the Scheduled (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 \u2013 He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 12 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, to undergo imprisonment for one more year \u2013 High Court in appeal, confirmed the conviction but reduced his sentence of 12\n Decision Date :\n 09-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 937/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S TRL KROSAKI REFRACTORIES LTD\n versus \nM/S SMS ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 268\n2022 INSC 214\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Dishonour of cheque \u2013 Respondent issued certain cheques in favour of the appellant company which on presentation were dishonoured by the bank \u2013 On respondent\u2019s with the demand notices, appellant filed the complaint before the Magistrate u/ss.138 and 142 of N.I. Act \u2013 Respondent filed petition u/s.482 before the High Court for quashing of complaint, which was allowed \u2013 On appeal, held: s.142(1)(a) of N.I. Act states that the complaint ought to\n Decision Date :\n 22-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 270/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKHEMA @ KHEM CHANDRA ETC.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 21\n2022 INSC 810\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Criminal Trial: Evidence \u2013 Appreciation of \u2013 Discrepancies and inconsistencies in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses \u2013 Effect of \u2013 On facts, the appellant-accused persons armed with various weapons assaulted the victim, and also fired gun shots, resulting in his brother, his sister, his wife and PW-2 \u2013 When they all came forward to save victim\u2019s life, they were also assaulted and in the assault PW-2 sufferred gunshot injury \u2013 Conviction and sentence of the appellants for offences punishable u/s. 302/149, s. 307/149 and s.148 IPC by the\n Decision Date :\n 10-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1200/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTEDHI SINGH\n versus \nNARAYAN DASS MAHANT \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 442\n2022 INSC 272\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881: s.139 \u2013 Presumption in favour of holder \u2013 Respondent filed complaint stating that appellant was his friend and as he was in urgent need of money, he gave a sum of Rs.7 lakhs \u2013 However, cheque given by the appellant was dishonored u/s.138 \u2013 Held: s.139 of the N.I. Act provides that Court shall presume that the holder of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in s.138 for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability \u2013 However, it is open to the accused to establish that\n Decision Date :\n 07-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 362/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP R ADIKESAVAN\n versus \nTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 779\n2022 INSC 625\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 \u2013 ss. 2(c)(iii), 12(1) \u2013 Conviction under \u2013 Insolvency proceedings were initiated against the appellant \u2013 The Single Judge of the High Court issued a non-bailable warrant and sought the presence of the appellant \u2013 When a team of the the warrant, the appellant and other advocates gheraoed the police and prevented them from executing the order \u2013 High Court initiated contempt proceedings against the appellant \u2013 Division Bench of the High Court found that the appellant is guilty of contempt and sentenced him to\n Decision Date :\n 23-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 847/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKANCHAN KUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 188\n2022 INSC 955\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.227, 228 \u2013 Discharge application \u2013 Requirement of prime facie case for framing of charges \u2013 FIR filed against appellant under ss.13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleging that he possessed known source of income \u2013 Charge-sheet filed against him indicated that he earned a total income of Rs. 3,01,561 and incurred an expenditure of Rs. 5,24,386 during the check period \u2013 Thus, charge was of having amassed Rs. 2,22,825, disproportionate to his known sources of income \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 14-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1562/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAMOD SINGH KIRAR\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 841\n2022 INSC 1241\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Service Law: Appointment for the post of Police Constable \u2013 Disclosure in the verification form \u2013 Appellant while applying for the post of police constable disclosed in verification form the fact of his being tried for offence under s.498A IPC, for which he was later acquitted \u2013 Appellant filed writ petition before the High Court \u2013 Single Judge of the High Court set aside the cancellation of candidature with all consequential benefits \u2013 Division Bench of the High Court allowed the appeal and set aside order of Single Judge \u2013 Hence instant appeal \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 02-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 8934/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABU SALEM ABDUL KAYYUM ANSARI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2022] 12 S.C.R. 169\n2022 INSC 671\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Extradition Act, 1962: Sovereign assurance \u2013 In the instant case, appellant was extradited from the Republic of Portugal and custody of the appellant was handed over to Indian authorities \u2013 Government of India submitted a solemn sovereign assurance under the Portuguese law that penalty or imprisonment for a term beyond 25 years \u2013 Trial Court convicted the appellant and sentenced him under the different provisions of law \u2013 Held: Separation of Judicial and Executive powers and the scheme of the Indian Constitution cannot bind the Indian courts in proceedings\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 679/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHOTKAU\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 601\n2022 INSC 1032\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.376, 302 \u2013 Rape and murder \u2013 Conviction for, and death sentence by courts below \u2013 Challenged \u2013 Held: There were very serious contradictions in the evidence tendered by prosecution witnesses on crucial aspects which made them completely untrustworthy Court trivialized the major contradictions to hold that the chain of circumstances was established unbroken \u2013 Delay of five days in transmitting the FIR to the jurisdictional court was fatal \u2013 Failure of the prosecution to subject the accused to medical examination when ocular\n Decision Date :\n 28-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 361/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIN RE: EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL OF CASES UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT 1881\n versus \n. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 276\n2021 INSC 257\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 \u2013 Supreme Court had issued various directions with respect to conduct of trials of complaints u/s.138 \u2013 Expert Committee was constituted to consider suggestions the procedure of arresting the judicial docket, in regard to complaints and trials for offences under the NI Act \u2013 The Expert Committee suggested creation of de novo Special NI Courts by the Central Government to tackle the problem of docket explosion \u2013 The amici curiae\n Decision Date :\n 19-05-2022\n | Case No :\n SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 2/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATISH CHANDRA YADAV\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 537\n2022 INSC 1024\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Service Law \u2013 Appointment \u2013 Suppression of information/ submitting false information in the verification form \u2013 Dismissal of the appellants from service \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Held: In case of appellant in Civil Appeal arising out of the SLP (C) No. 20860 of 2019, what services was not his involvement in the criminal case which was then pending, and in which he was acquitted subsequently but the fact that he had withheld relevant information while filling in the verification Form \u2013 Appellant was given appointment on probation subject to the verification of\n Decision Date :\n 26-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 6955/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nV. P. SINGH ETC\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 847\n2022 INSC 1326\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 306 \u2013 Abetment of suicide \u2013 Commission of suicide by the student after he was reprimanded for the misconduct in the College \u2013 He was suspended and asked to call for his parents as an exercise of legitimate disciplinary action; and was also issued notice and security amount of Rs. 10,000/- \u2013 However, instead of complying with the disciplinary action, student took his own life by jumping into the canal \u2013 Before doing so, he sent an SMS to his brother stating that he love his parents and does not want to trouble them \u2013 Registration\n Decision Date :\n 24-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2103/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM SHARAN CHATURVEDI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 1\n2022 INSC 866\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 201, 380, 435, 457 and 477 rw s. 120B \u2013 Theft of cash from the Bank \u2013 Criminal conspiracy \u2013 Prosecution of three employees of the Bank, for offences of theft of Rs. Six Lakhs from the safe and strong room of the Bank, house-trespass, destruction and other offences \u2013 Main accused persons A1 and A2 convicted and sentenced concurrently on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence, as per which the money is proved to have been recovered from their possession \u2013 Appellant, head cashier in the custody of one of the keys of\n Decision Date :\n 25-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1066/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMINUDDIN\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 19 S.C.R. 271\n2022 INSC 1020\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Bail \u2013 Grant of, on parity \u2013 When not justified \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.147, 148, 149, 302, 352 and 34 \u2013 Held: When the bail granted to co-accused person has been disapproved by Supreme Court and such grant of bail to co-accused had been the only reason for which the order is liable to be set aside\u2013 In the said case, the High Court had proceeded in a rather cursory manner and without regard to the salient feature of the case at hand, being that of gruesome day- light murder of the son of the appellant with 8 grievous injuries, including those of incise\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1669/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEEPAK YADAV\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ANR \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 1\n2022 INSC 610\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 439 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Cancellation of \u2013 Accused with the common intention to kill the victim, inflicted gun shot injuries to victim who later succumbed to his injuries \u2013 Before death, the victim gave statement naming the accused and the DSP and SI \u2013 Criminal case against accused and co-accused u/ss. 302 and 34 IPC \u2013 Rejection of bail to the accused by the Sessions Court, however, granted by the High Court on the ground of parity as the co-accused was granted bail \u2013 Sustainbility of \u2013 Held: Not sustainable\n Decision Date :\n 20-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 861/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHASMUKHLAL D. VORA & ANR. \n versus \nTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 113\n2022 INSC 1294\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Quashing of Criminal complaint \u2013 Before High Court, appellant sought for quashing of complaint filed against him for contravening provision of Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and Drugs and Cosmetics Rules 1945, which was dismissed \u2013 On under s.482 only has to consider whether or not the allegations in the complaint disclose the commission of a cognizable offence \u2013 Quashing of a criminal complaint must be done only in the rarest of rare cases but still it is the duty of the High Court to look into each and every case\n Decision Date :\n 16-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2310/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANUJ SINGH @ RAMANUJ SINGH @ SETH SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 1023\n2022 INSC 463\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 324, 307 r/w s. 34 \u2013 Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means \u2013 Altercation between the one of the appellant and the informant, over a land dispute \u2013 Appellants armed with guns fired upon the informant which hit his right arm \u2013 Other two accused assaulted the informant with spear and lathis \u2013 Trial court convicted the appellants u/s. 307 rw s. 34 and s. 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced accordingly \u2013 High Court modified the conviction u/s. 307/34 to s. 324 and awarded two years rigorous\n Decision Date :\n 22-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 150/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDESH RAJ & ORS.\n versus \nROHTASH SINGH \n- \n[2022] 18 S.C.R. 65\n2022 INSC 1279\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Contract Act, 1872: s. 55, 74 \u2013 Specific Relief Act - s. 22 \u2013 Specific performance of agreement - Effect of failure to perform at fixed time, in contract in which time is essential \u2013 Refund of earnest money \u2013 Appellants, joint owners of their respective share in the the agreements, the earnest money could be confiscated by the appellants if the sale deed was not executed on prescribed date \u2013 Respondent made a part payment towards the sale as earnest money \u2013 Respondent was liable to secure necessary No Objection Certificates and intimate the\n Decision Date :\n 14-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 9217/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM CHANDER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 1103\n2022 INSC 468\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 432- Power to suspend or remit sentences \u2013 Application of a convict for premature release \u2013 On completion of 16 years of imprisonment without remission \u2013 Value of the Opinion of the Presiding Judge \u2013 There is nothing to judge took into account the factors for grant of remission \u2013 In his opinion dated 21 July 2021 the Special Judge, Durg referred to the crime for which the petitioner was convicted and simply stated that in view of the facts and circumstances of the case it would not be appropriate to\n Decision Date :\n 22-04-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 49/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANOJ @ MONU @ VISHAL CHAUDHARY\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 279\n2022 INSC 186\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 \u2013 s.94(2)(ii) \u2013 Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 \u2013 r.12(3) \u2013 U.P Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 \u2013 U.P. Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of Family Register) Rules, 1970 \u2013 in conflict with law by Additional Sessions Judge \u2013 Order set aside by High Court, appellant ordered to stand trial as an adult \u2013 On appeal, held: Plea of juvenility has to be raised in a bonafide and truthful manner \u2013 To seek juvenility, if the reliance is on a document\n Decision Date :\n 15-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 207/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAJWAR\n versus \nNIYAJ AHMAD & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 356\n2022 INSC 1054\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 161, 482, 173 \u2013 Bail \u2013 When not granted \u2013 FIR was registered against the ten accused for offence punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 352 and 504 r/w. s.34 of the IPC \u2013 The first respondent was not named in the FIR, his role during the course of the investigation \u2013 After the investigation was completed, charge-sheet was filed against the accused, including the first respondent \u2013 During the course of the deposition, PW 1 has adverted to the role of the first respondent \u2013 Bail application filed\n Decision Date :\n 30-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1722/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJU @ RAJENDRA PRASAD\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 241\n2022 INSC 983\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code \u2013 ss.302, 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 As per FIR, the appellants-accused (wife of the deceased and co- accused) had illicit relations \u2013 It was further stated that on account of disputes, the accused started residing in her paternal house \u2013 and the children back, however, on the next day his body was found hanging from tree \u2013 Appellants convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 On appeal, held: Case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence \u2013 There is no direct evidence that the appellants killed or committed the\n Decision Date :\n 19-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1559/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM. NAGESWARA REDDY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 501\n2022 INSC 266\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Appeal: Appeal against acquittal \u2013 In the instant case, eleven accused were tried together for the offences under ss.147,148, 324, 326, 307, 427 and 302 r/ws.149 IPC\u2013 Trial Court convicted accused no.1 to 3 u/ss. 148 and 302 of IPC and acquitted accused no.4 to 11 \u2013 High of accused no.1 to 3 and confirmed the acquittal of accused no.4 to 11 \u2013 State and complainant filed appeal against acquittal \u2013 Held: With respect to accused no.1 to 3, they were identified by PW1, PW3 & PW6 \u2013 They were main assailants \u2013 The depositions of the\n Decision Date :\n 07-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 72/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nU.P. AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD THROUGH HOUSING COMMISSIONER\n versus \nRAM SINGH (D) TH. LRS. & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 19 S.C.R. 853\n2022 INSC 448\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Land Acquisition Act, 1894:s. 48 \u2013 Scope of \u2013 \u2018Actual\u2019 Possession \u2013 Completion of acquisition not compulsory, but compensation to be awarded when not completed \u2013 Acquisition of land u/s. 28 of the U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Urgency Clause invoked \u2013 Actual Possession of acquired land not taken \u2013 Notification purporting to exempt the acquired land in question \u2013 Representation by the beneficiary of the acquisition \u2013 By notification dated 25.04.2008 exemption notification cancelled and\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3023/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMEKALA SIVAIAH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 989\n2022 INSC 727\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 On account of previous grudge, accused armed with knife, sprinkled chilli powder into the eyes of the agriculturalist and stabbed him on the chest and abdomen, resulting in grievous injuries which led to his death \u2013 Conviction u/s. 302 and Interference with \u2013 Held: Not called for \u2013 On facts and upon appreciation of evidence of the eyewitnesses and other material adduced by the prosecution, the courts below rightly convicted the accused for offence u/s. 302. Constitution of India: Art. 136 \u2013 Scope of\n Decision Date :\n 15-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2016/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINHA\n versus \nSTATE OF JHARKHAND \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 25\n2022 INSC 860\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.109, 409, 420, 467, 471, 477A and 120B \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 s.13(1)(c) and s. 13(1)(d) \u2013 Charges under \u2013 While giving effect to an award in favour of RPCL, JSEB faced shortage of funds \u2013 JSEB decided to make internal RPCL \u2013 On basis of the said enquiry, allegations of malpractice and financial irregularity were levelled against the appellant and some others \u2013 FIR was registered \u2013 Charge sheet was filed \u2013 Appellant moved a discharge petition u/s.239 of Cr.PC, which was dismissed by the\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1333/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMABORA @ RAMABORAIAH & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 827\n2022 INSC 809\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Penal Code,1860 \u2013 ss.143,144,148,147,448,302 and 149 \u2013 22 accused formed unlawful assembly, armed with deadly weapon and trespassed into the house of victim-deceased and committed the murder of victim in furtherance of a common object \u2013 Sessions Court acquitted all the accused of appellants (A-1 and A-2) and held them guilty of the offence punishable u/s 302 IPC and sentenced them to imprisonment for life but the acquittal of all the other accused was confirmed by High Court \u2013 Held: High Court has not given more stronger and cogent reasons to set aside the\n Decision Date :\n 10-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1697/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEVENDRA NATH SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 692\n2022 INSC 1071\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Allegations of defalcation of goods and misappropriation of stocks from the godown of the Corporation \u2013 FIR was registered \u2013 Magistrate took cognizance of offences u/ss. 409, 467, 468 and 420 of IPC against respondent no.3 petition u/s. 482 Cr.PC \u2013 High Court observed that an accused in the case \u2018as scapegoat to save the skin\u2019 of the present appellant \u2013 Having said so, the High Court proceeded to direct the Magistrate to give directions to the police to further investigate the case in\n Decision Date :\n 12-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1768/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nB.L.A. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 184\n2022 INSC 838\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 \u2013 Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 \u2013 Mines (Special Provisions) Ordinance, 2014 \u2013 Supreme Court in Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary and Others [2014] 8 SCR 446 (the that the entire allocation of coal blocks, as per the recommendations made by the Screening Committee constituted by respondent no.1- Union of India (UOI) from 14th July, 1993 onwards and the allocations made through the Government Dispensation Route after 1993 were arbitrary and illegal \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 17-08-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 63/2015\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Writ petition allowed and contempt petition dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUBRATA ROY SAHARA\n versus \nPRAMOD KUMAR SAINI & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 122\n2022 INSC 1308\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 438 \u2013 Anticipatory bail \u2013 Application under \u2013 Scope of \u2013 Held: Is limited to the cause of the concerned applicant, applying for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with offence already registered against him and in connection with such a case \u2013 Inquiry must be limited to the facts relevant and applicable to the concerned applicant who has come before the Court \u2013 No attempt should be made to inquire into matters pertaining to some third party much less beyond the scope of the complaint/FIR\n Decision Date :\n 14-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 955/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMS. P\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 823\n2022 INSC 514\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439 \u2013 Special powers of High Courts and Courts of Sessions regarding bail \u2013 Exercise of \u2013 Held: High Court or the Sessions Court have wide discretion u/s. 439(1) however, it must be exercised after due application of the judicial mind and not individual has been placed on the high pedestal however, the reasons for granting bail should be furnished \u2013 Absence of cogent reasons and failure to refer the relevant factors to grant bail can persuade the appellate court to interfere with the order passed \u2013 Bail once granted, can be\n Decision Date :\n 05-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 740/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIRENDRA\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 464\n2022 INSC 678\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 r/w s. 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that victim was allegedly shot dead and killed by the three persons over a pending property dispute \u2013 One of them died during the trial \u2013 Conviction of other two-appellant and other u/s. 302/34 and the Arms Act imprisonment by courts below \u2013 Appeal by the appellant before this Court \u2013 Held: Evidence of eye-witness cannot be relied upon as against the other prosecution witnesses \u2013 Recovery of weapon not proved \u2013 Evidence to implicate the accused not adequate \u2013 Failure of\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 466/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLAKHAN SINGH\n versus \nAMARJEET SINGH & ANR \n- \n[2022] 17 S.C.R. 820\n2022 INSC 1327\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.391 \u2013 Additional evidence in criminal appeal \u2013 When impermissible \u2013 Respondent no.1-accused was convicted u/s 302, IPC and sentenced to life \u2013 Conviction and sentence challenged by respondent before High for recording of evidence in respect of his plea of unsoundness of mind \u2013 Application allowed, Trial Court was directed to take on record the additional evidence and documents and to send the file back along with additional evidence \u2013 On appeal by complainant, held: Evidence\n Decision Date :\n 06-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2191/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAI PRAKASH TIWARI\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 198\n2022 INSC 791\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 313 \u2013 Power to examine the accused \u2013 Object and scope of \u2013 Held: s. 313 confers a valuable right upon an accused to establish his innocence \u2013 Purpose of s. 313 is to provide the accused a reasonable opportunity circumstances which have emerged against him during the course of trial \u2013 Non-fulfilment of the true spirit of s. 313 may ultimately cause grave prejudice to the accused and the court may not have the benefit of all the necessary facts and circumstances to arrive at a fair conclusion\n Decision Date :\n 04-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 704/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEEPAK S/O LAXMAN DONGRE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 35\n2022 INSC 110\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 \u2013 s.56(1)(a)(b) \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.151 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Arts.19(1)(d), 19(5) \u2013 Respondent no.2 exercising powers u/ s.56(1)(a)(b) passed the impugned order of externment dtd.15.12.20 against appellant, 5 the appellant were relied upon \u2013 Statutory appeal and writ petition against the impugned order were also dismissed \u2013 Held: As the order impugned takes away fundamental right u/Art. 19(1)(d), it must stand the test of reasonableness contemplated by clause (5) of Article 19 \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 28-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 139/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0c95\u0ca8\u0ccd\u0ca8\u0ca1 - Kannada\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nREKHA JAIN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 558\n2022 INSC 549\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 420 \u2013 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property \u2013 Necessary ingredient of s. 420 \u2013 Held: To make out a case against a person for the offence u/s. 420, there must be a dishonest inducement to deceive a person to deliver any property to any On facts, no allegation at all against accused-appellant of any inducement by her to deceive and to deliver the gold jewellery \u2013 Allegations of dishonest inducement and cheating against her husband \u2013 Thus, it cannot be said that she has committed any offence u/s. 420 for which she is\n Decision Date :\n 10-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 749/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED\n versus \nSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 730\n2022 INSC 796\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Companies Act, 1956 \u2013 s.77 \u2013 Non-disclosure of information by SEBI \u2013 SEBI directed to act fairly \u2013 Complaint was filed with SEBI against RIL & its associate companies and its directors alleging that they fraudulently shares of RIL to entities purportedly connected with RIL \u2013 Investigation Report was submitted by the Investigating Authority on 04.02.2005 \u2013 SEBI in its counter affidavit admitted that the aforesaid report was inconclusive and recommended further enquiry in this regard \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 05-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1167/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIQRAM\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 51\n2022 INSC 1295\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n UTTAR PRADESH & ORS (Criminal Appeal No. 2319 of 2022) DECEMBER 16, 2022 [DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.] Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2013 s. 427 \u2013 Sentences in multiple trials \u2013 Appellant sought concurrent running of sentences \u2013 and consequently the accused was convicted by nine separate judgments \u2013 No specific direction was issued by the trial Court as to allow the subsequent sentences to run concurrently \u2013 Net consequence of the position emerged that appellant had to undergo a total term of\n Decision Date :\n 16-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2319/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHIV KUMAR SHARMA\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 403\n2022 INSC 765\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss.13(1)(d)(ii), 15 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.477A \u2013 Complaint made regarding malpractices in the construction of rooms and varandha in Primary Schools \u2013 As per the prosecution, the appellant manipulated the record and after the in the Measurement Book and also with regard to the construction work \u2013 Appellant convicted u/s.13(1)(d)(ii) r/w s.15 and u/s.477A, IPC \u2013 On appeal, held: For an offence punishable u/ss.13(1)(d)(ii) r/w s.15, it is necessary to establish that a public servant has attempted to\n Decision Date :\n 28-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1050/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVASUDEV\n versus \nSTATE OF M.P. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 514\n2022 INSC 135\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.307/34 \u2013 Arms Act \u2013 s. 3/25(1B)(a) and s. 27/34 \u2013 The case of prosecution that Sub-Inspector (PW-6) along with SDOP (PW-10) reached a village on having information that an absconding accused \u2018R\u2019 was hiding with his associate members \u2013 were hiding in a house \u2013 PW-10 challenged the accused to surrender \u2013 However, the accused persons opened fire on the police from inside the house \u2013 After retaliation from the police parties, the accused \u2018R\u2019 expressed his wish to surrender \u2013 Accordingly, the\n Decision Date :\n 01-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 388/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nS. KALEESWARAN\n versus \nSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE POLLACHI TOWN EAST POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 38\n2022 INSC 1157\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n COURT REPORTS [2022] 10 S.C.R. S. KALEESWARAN v. STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE POLLACHI TOWN EAST POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU (Criminal Appeal No. 160 of 2017) NOVEMBER 03, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.] Evidence: Circumstantial Evidence \u2013 body in a pit, and also sold the car and shared the sale proceeds \u2013 Conviction of all of them for offences u/ss. 120(B), 147, 364, 302 r/w s.120(B)/149, 201 and 396 IPC and sentenced accordingly by the courts below \u2013 Held: Entire prosecution case rested on the circumstantial evidence\n Decision Date :\n 03-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 160/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nISTKAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 854\n2022 INSC 1324\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Chapter VIII \u2013 s.107, 117 \u2013 Bond in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- was furnished by the appellant in terms of s.107 for keeping the peace in the wake of upcoming panchayat elections \u2013 Forfeited \u2013 appellant was dismissed \u2013 Writ petition filed by appellant, High Court held that there was no illegality in the orders passed \u2013 On appeal, held: The scope and nature of s.107 is preventive and not punitive as it aims at ensuring that there be no breach of peace and that the public\n Decision Date :\n 11-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2034/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRS ADVERTISING & MARKETING PVT. LTD. ORS\n versus \nMR. KAMAL GARG & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 254\n2022 INSC 192\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Constitution of India \u2013 Writ petition \u2013 Exceeding of jurisdiction by High Court \u2013 Respondent no.1-writ petitioner bought properties auctioned in pursuance of Recovery Certificate which was in favour of bank \u2013 25% of the as earnest money \u2013 Respondent no.1 filed application seeking some clarity in the matter, replied by Bank \u2013 However, thereafter the Recovery Officer dismissed the application and forfeited 10% of the amount deposited\u2013 Appeal filed by respondent no.1, dismissed by DRT \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 16-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1302/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHAMMAD LATIEF MAGREY\n versus \nTHE UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 236\n2022 INSC 947\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 14, 21, 25, 26 and 136 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.176(3) \u2013 Exhumation of the dead body \u2013 There was an encounter between militants and Police \u2013 Four militants were shot including the son of appellant \u2013 During the investigation four bullet ridden unidentified dead bodies were recovered from the site of the encounter \u2013 Bodies of two out of four persons were later exhumed and handed over to their relatives for performing their last rites \u2013 The bodies of the other two\n Decision Date :\n 12-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 6544/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDILIP HARIRAMANI\n versus \nBANK OF BARODA \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 615\n2022 INSC 539\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: s. 138 r/w s.141 \u2013 Dishonour of cheque \u2013 Vicarious liability of partner \u2013 On facts, cheque issued by authorised signatory of the partnership firm to the Bankfor part payment of loan - Dishonour of cheque due to insufficient funds \u2013 \u2013 Firm not made an accused \u2013 Conviction by trail court and High Court \u2013 On appeal, held : s. 141 impose vicarious liability by deeming fiction which presupposes and requires the commission of the offence by the company or firm as a principal accused, to make them liable and\n Decision Date :\n 09-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 767/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSARDAR MEENA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 114\n2022 INSC 220\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 \u2013 s.38(1) \u2013 Removal and Suspension of a member of Panchayati Raj Institution \u2013 FIR was registered against the appellant-Sarpanch \u2013 Allegations that appellant along with others committed the offence of indiscriminate firing that has resulted in the injuries on several parts of the body of the complainant \u2013 High Court granted bail to appellant \u2013 Preliminary enquiry initiated u/s.38(1) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act read with r.22(2) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules\n Decision Date :\n 22-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1558/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAMTA & ANR\n versus \nTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 548\n2022 INSC 626\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Grant of \u2013 Factors to be considered \u2013 Allegation of murder of young child for ransom against the second respondent \u2013 Grant of bail by the High Court \u2013 Propriety of \u2013 Held: Exercise of discretion by the High \u2013 While granting bail, the High Court failed to take into consideration that crucial witnesses were yet to be examined, that release of the second respondent on bail, at this stage, would impede a fair trial, and that there was an apprehension that the witnesses may be tampered \u2013 Thus,\n Decision Date :\n 24-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 878/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nROHITH THAMMANA GOWDA\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 784\n2022 INSC 770\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Child and Family welfare \u2013 Custody of minor child \u2013 Appellant (Husband) and respondent no.3 (Wife) shifted to US from India and presently are holders of Permanent US Resident Cards \u2013 Their child was born in USA in the year 2011 and till 2020 he was living there occurred in connubial relationship \u2013 The appellant came to India on 27.02.2020 in India to attend his ailing mother \u2013 On 03.03.2020, respondent no.3 came to India and brought the child with herself, without the consent of the appellant \u2013 Upon reaching back to USA,\n Decision Date :\n 29-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 4987/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n IN RE: FRAMING GUIDELINES REGARDING POTENTIAL MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED WHILE IMPOSING DEATH SENTENCES\n versus \n IN RE: FRAMING GUIDELINES REGARDING POTENTIAL MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED WHILE IMPOSING DEATH SENTENCES \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 543\n2022 INSC 987\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 235, 309 \u2013 Whether, after recording conviction for a capital offence, under law, the court is obligated to conduct a separate hearing on the issue of sentence to have clarity in the matter to ensure a uniform approach on the question of granting real and meaningful opportunity, as opposed to a formal hearing, to the accused/convict, on the issue of sentence \u2013 Matter referred to a larger bench of five Hon\u2019ble Judges. Referring the\n Decision Date :\n 19-09-2022\n | Case No :\n SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 1/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJ. VEDHASINGH\n versus \nR.M. GOVINDAN & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 888\n2022 INSC 825\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 and s.300 (1) \u2013 High Court allowed criminal petition filed by respondents no.1 to 4 u/s.482 CrPC and quashed proceedings u/ss.120B, 406, 420 and 34 IPC taking into consideration that proceedings u/s.138 of the NI same cause of action and on the same facts and grounds were pending, prior to registration of the present proceedings \u2013 It held that, looking to the allegations made in the FIR, only offence u/s.138 of NI Act can be made out and continuance of the proceedings for offences u/ss.406, 420, 120B\n Decision Date :\n 11-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2864/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURYAVIR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 1\n2022 INSC 139\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302, 34 and 120-B \u2013 Indian Arms Act, 1959 \u2013s.25 \u2013 The present appellant-original accused no.1 along with two persons (\u2018D\u2019 and \u2018P\u2019) were tried for having committed murder of PW-12\u2019s son \u2013 FIR was registered against was prepared \u2013 Trial Court convicted accused no.1 and \u2018D\u2019 of offence punishable u/s. 302/34IPC and acquitted \u2018P\u2019 of all charges \u2013 On appeal against conviction High Court affirmed the view taken by trial Court \u2013 Accused \u2018D\u2019 preferred SLP\n Decision Date :\n 03-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 177/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR (NOW U.T. OF JAMMU & KASHMIR) & ORS.\n versus \nSHUBAM SANGRA \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 349\n2022 INSC 1205\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Juvenile Justice: Jammu and Kashmir Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2014: r.74 \u2013 Plea of Juvenility \u2013 Kathua Rape Case \u2013 The Kathua rape case involved abduction, gang rape and murder of an eight year-old girl by six men and the respondent \u2013 Special Medical Board opined the age of respondent as above 19 years \u2013 However, the CJM, Kathua relied on the deposition of the Executive Officer, Municipal Committee and the deposition of father of respondent held that respondent was juvenile on date of the commission of the\n Decision Date :\n 16-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1928/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUNUWA @ SATISH ETC.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 12 S.C.R. 86\n2022 INSC 874\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 34, 302, 307 \u2013 Murder \u2013 On the fateful day, while the victim-principal of the College was sitting with his family physician and private practitioner-PW-6 outside his office of the college campus, three persons, A-1, A-2, and and fired gunshots at the principal as well as at PW-6, and fled \u2013 First aid given to the principal and thereafter taken to Police Station on bullock cart \u2013 FIR lodged by the victim, thereafter sent to hospital where he died of shock and hemorrhage due to injuries caused by\n Decision Date :\n 26-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2224/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU\n versus \nMOHIT AGGARWAL \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 600\n2022 INSC 730\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 ss. 8, 22, 29, 37 and 67 \u2013 Post-arrest bail \u2013 Not granted \u2013 Respondent made statement u/s. 67 NDPS Act and disclosed that he was illegally selling and purchasing the illegal drugs from \u2018PJ\u2019 \u2013 was conducted by NCB at the premise of co-accused-\u2018PJ\u2019 and drugs covered under NDPS were recovered in huge quantities \u2013 Respondent was taken into custody \u2013 Respondent made application for bail before Special Judge, NDPS which was rejected \u2013 High Court granted\n Decision Date :\n 19-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1001/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMJHAN GANI PALANI\n versus \nNATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY AND ANR \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 1050\n2022 INSC 482\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Bail: Regular bail \u2013 Denial of \u2013 Matter pertaining to seizure of huge quantity of Narcotics drug, Heroin near Port in Gujarat in a joint operation by the Indian Coast Guard and \u2013 Prosecution case that on receiving intelligence input, the DRI intercepted a Pakistani boat in the Indian territorial waters which was trying to escape \u2013 Seizure of bags containing narcotic substance, and the Captain of the boat admitted dumping some bags into the sea along\n Decision Date :\n 27-04-2022\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE TO PETITION (CRIMINAL)... No. 8942/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAJOR SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 800\n2022 INSC 1306\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.304 Part II \u2013 Distinction between culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder \u2013 Held: There is a subtle distinction of degree of intention and knowledge involved in both the crimes \u2013 Intention is pivotal to decide has committed culpable homicide amounting to murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder \u2013 Along with intention, knowledge and the degree of crime, i.e. how the deceased was killed, plays an important role in deciding \u2013 In the present case, the accused-appellant had no\n Decision Date :\n 16-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2405/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJASWINDER SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE\n versus \nNAVJOT SINGH SIDHU & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 725\n2022 INSC 603\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n Sentence/Sentencing: Enhancement of sentence \u2013 Incident pertaining to a dispute of right of way \u2013 Respondent No. 1-accused inflicted fist blows to a 65 years old man, resulting in his death \u2013 High Court convicted the accused u/s. 304 Part II IPC \u2013 However, in Court held that out of all the fist blows of the respondent, only one of them landed on the head of the deceased, that there was uncertainty regarding the cause of death, that no weapon used nor there was past enmity, thus, respondent not held guilty of death but of causing voluntary hurt to the\n Decision Date :\n 19-05-2022\n | Case No :\n REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 477/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDESH DEEPAK KUMAR VIHANGAM@ DEEPAK KUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 886\n2022 INSC 278\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 364A and 120B \u2013 Kidnapping for ranson and abduction \u2013 On facts, a doctor kidnapped for ransom and abducted along with his driver \u2013 Six persons convicted u/ss. 364A and 120 B, and sentenced to life imprisonment, and ordered to pay fine held: Four of the accused were found present at the house and were involved in the kidnapping \u2013 They along with DK, on whose disclosure the amount was recovered from his tenanted premises, were identified by the victims \u2013 In view thereof, and the appreciation of evidence, findings and\n Decision Date :\n 08-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 673/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGALI JANARDHAN REDDY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 656\n2022 INSC 1059\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Bail \u2013 Applicant sought modification of condition of bail \u2013 Directions issued \u2013 Applicant is accused for the offences u/s 120(B), 420, 379, 409, 468, 411, 427 and 447 of IPC, s.2 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, r.21 r/w. Rules of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 \u2013 Appellant was arrested by the CBI on 05.09.2011 \u2013 Bail was granted by Supreme Court on 20.01.2015, subject to some conditions \u2013 One of them was a condition (c) which read as \u201che shall not visit the Districts\n Decision Date :\n 10-10-2022\n | Case No :\n MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 528/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATENDER KUMAR ANTIL\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 351\n2022 INSC 690\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Bail \u2013 Grant of \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 41, 41A, 88, 170, 204 and 209 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 21 & 22 \u2013 Applications have been filed seeking certain directions/ clarifications, to deal with the aspects governing the grant of of India may consider the introduction of a separate enactment in the nature of a Bail Act so as to streamline the grant of bail \u2013 While considering the application for enlargement on bail, Courts will have to satisfy themselves on the due compliance of sec. 41 of CrPC \u2013 Any\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 1849/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRABHA TYAGI\n versus \nKAMLESH DEVI \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 970\n2022 INSC 563\nCoram : M.R. SHAH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: ss.12, 17, 19, 22 \u2013 Domestic violence \u2013 Allegations of, by the aggrieved person-wife \u2013 Death of the husband within one month of the marriage in a car accident \u2013 Birth of daughter within a year of marriage \u2013 After tortured and harassed by her mother-in-law and her matrimonial family, and was forced to leave her matrimonial home \u2013 She started working to support herself and her child \u2013 Issuance of notice to the respondents to return her stridhana but there was no response \u2013 Aggrieved person\n Decision Date :\n 12-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 511/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE\n versus \nPRABODH KUMAR TEWARI \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 72\n2022 INSC 832\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 \u2013 ss. 138, 139 \u2013 Engagement of hand-writing expert to determine the details filled in the cheque \u2013 The respondent admits that he signed a blank cheque and handed over to the appellant \u2013 The High Court permitted the expert to determine whether the details that were filled in the cheque were in the handwriting of the respondent \u2013 Held: A drawer who signs a cheque and hands it over to the payee, is presumed to be liable unless the drawer adduces evidence to rebut the presumption that the cheque\n Decision Date :\n 16-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1260/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABHISHEK\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 1128\n2022 INSC 618\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 363, 364A, 384, 386, 387, 397 and 504 \u2013 Sanction order \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 FIR was registered against the appellant for offences u/s 363, 364A, 384, 386, 387, 397 and 504 IPC \u2013 The appellant having remained out of reach, a proclamation was issued r/w. s.20(3) of MCOCA, declaring him as an \u2018absconder\u2019 \u2013 ADGP and Commissioner of Police after examining the proposal of Assistant Commissioner of Police for according sanction in terms of s.23(2) of MCOCA, granted the sanction for prosecution of appellant under IPC, Arms Act\n Decision Date :\n 20-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 869/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n RAJBIR SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 80\n2022 INSC 858\nCoram : HEMANT GUPTA\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Death by poisoning alleged \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 As per the prosecution, PW-1-informant\u2019s wife died after consuming the milk brought from the appellant, residing in the neighbourhood and carrying on the business of dairy farm and u/s.302 \u2013 On appeal, held: In the present case, chain of evidence has many missing and weak links \u2013 None of the essential ingredients to record conviction in a case of circumstantial evidence and that of poisoning case are made out \u2013 Prosecution has not established the charge\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2152/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S KNIT PRO INTERNATIONAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 290\n2022 INSC 621\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Copyright Act, 1957 \u2013 s.63 \u2013 Whether, the offence under s.63 of the Copyright Act is a cognizable offence or a non-cognizable offence \u2013 Held: For offence u/s.63 of the Copyright Act, the maximum punishment which can be imposed would In that view of the matter considering Part II of the First Schedule of the CrPC, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for three years and onwards but not more than seven years the offence is a cognizable offence \u2013 High Court committed grave error in holding that the offence\n Decision Date :\n 20-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 807/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVENKATESH @ CHANDRA & ANR. ETC\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 556\n2022 INSC 1302\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Evidence Act, 1872: s.27 \u2013 Settled Legal Position \u2013 Going by the parameters of s.27 of the Evidence Act, only so much of information which relates distinctly to the facts thereby discovered can be stated to have been proved of the statement which leads to the discovery of certain facts alone could be marked in evidence and not the entire of the statement \u2013 All the earlier facts narrated in the statement about past history which are in the nature of self-implication, would be inadmissible as amounting to a\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1476/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJESH YADAV & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 967\n2022 INSC 148\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code 1860: ss. 302, 307 \u2013 Two persons were done to death by bullet firing by the accused \u2013 Previous dispute between the groups \u2013 Two eye-witness present on the spot \u2013 Recoveries made from all the accused \u2013 Trial court convicted and sentenced all the accused them for the offence charged u/s.307, with the confirmation of conviction and sentence u/s. 25 of the Arms Act \u2013 On appeal, held: PWs-1 & 2 have not contradicted between themselves being the eye-witnesses \u2013 Merely because they are related witnesses, in the absence of any\n Decision Date :\n 04-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 339/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJAY PURAN BAGDE & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 178\n2022 INSC 766\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Common intention \u2013 On the fateful night at about 3 a.m., the victim and his wife (eye witness) woke up and while the wife was doing preparations for cooking, the husband went to attend to the nature\u2019s call \u2013 Wife when she ran to the site she saw two accused assaulting her husband with an axe whereas the appellants had caught hold of him \u2013 She found him bleeding, he also told her that four of them had caught hold of him and assaulted him by an axe \u2013 He was taken to hospital, was declared\n Decision Date :\n 28-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 143/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nS.P. VELUMANI\n versus \nARAPPOR IYAKKAM AND ORS. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 1067\n2022 INSC 623\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Investigation: Preliminary enquiry report of Superintendent of Police \u2013 Non-disclosure of \u2013 On facts, in a corruption case against the appellant-Cabinet Minister, the High Court ordered a preliminary enquiry by a Superintendent of Police, Directorate of Vigilance in turn submitted a final report \u2013 High Court obtained the report, however, without furnishing a copy thereof to the appellant, unceremoniously closed the writ petition \u2013 Held: When the State has not pleaded any specific privilege which bars disclosure of material utilized in the\n Decision Date :\n 20-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 867/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA & ANR.\n versus \nSHAIKH ISTIYAQ AHMED & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 679\n2022 INSC 38\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003 \u2013 ss.12, 13(6) \u2013 Adaptation of sentence, when permissible \u2013 Dangerous Drugs Act \u2013 ss.30(1)(f)(II), 47(2), 5(2) \u2013 Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1994 \u2013 s.21(b) \u2013 International Convention/Treaties \u2013 Mauritius \u2013 Article 8 \u2013 Continued enforcement of sentence \u2013 Respondent convicted by Supreme Court of Mauritius under Dangerous Drugs Act, sentenced to imprisonment for 26 years \u2013 Transferred to India under the 2003 Act \u2013 His representation u/ s.13(6), 2003 Act to\n Decision Date :\n 11-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 71/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMRIK SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 451\n2022 INSC 667\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Criminal Trial: Test Identification Parade-TIP \u2013 Non-conduct of \u2013 Effect of, on prosecution case \u2013 Appellant and two others allegedly committed robbery and murdered the victim during the course of the robbery \u2013 FIR by complainant-eye-witness \u2013 Conviction u/ss. 302 r/w On appeal, held: Prosecution failed to prove that the complainant and the deceased were carrying cash and it was looted by the accused persons \u2013 Conviction solely on the basis of the identification of the accused by the complainant-eye-witness for the first time in the court room \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 993/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nISHWARJI NAGAJI MALI\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 694\n2022 INSC 57\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure \u2013 s.439 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302, 120B, 114 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Grant of, when not proper \u2013 FIR was lodged against unknown persons initially for offences punishable u/s.304A, IPC and ss.177, 184 & 134, Motor Vehicles Act considering the no.2 that his wife was accidentally hit by a speeding car when they were walking together \u2013 However, later it was revealed that he hatched a criminal conspiracy along with co-accused persons to kill his wife and treat the offence as an accident \u2013 Charged u/ss.302, 120(B), 114,\n Decision Date :\n 18-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 70/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0627\u064f\u0631\u062f\u064f\u0648 - Urdu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nWAHEED-UR-REHMAN PARRA\n versus \nUNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU & KASHMIR \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 102\n2022 INSC 240\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.173(6), 207 and 161 \u2013 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 s.44 \u2013 Whether in the case of certain witnesses being declared as protected witnesses in the exercise of powers s.44 of UAPA by the trial court, can the defence seek recourse to the remedy u/ s.207 and s.161 CrPC for obtaining copies of redacted statements of these protected witnesses \u2013 Trial Court noted that the prosecution was duty bound to provide the copies of the statements of protected\n Decision Date :\n 25-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 237/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHAJABHAI RAJASHIBHAI ODEDARA\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 971\n2022 INSC 704\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302, 307, 328 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that the accused and co-accused with the object of getting married, hatched a conspiracy and killed the mother and the uncle of co-accused by strangulation \u2013 Parties also tried to kill the brother of the co-accused On investigation recovery of pesticide bottle from the place of occurrence \u2013 Co-accused being minor, tried by Juvenile Court \u2013 Conviction of accused u/ss. 302, 307 and 328 by the courts below \u2013 Justification of \u2013 Held: Justified \u2013 Though there are some contradictions\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 644/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE\n versus \nLALY @ MANIKANDAN & ANOTHER ETC \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 633\n2022 INSC 1093\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code \u2013 ss. 302 & 34 \u2013 Conviction on the basis of the deposition of the sole eye witness \u2013 The respondents-three accused were tried for having committed the murder of victim-deceased \u2013 The respondents were held guilty of the offences u/s 302 r/w. 34 of IPC by the the High Court did not find the testimony of PW1 credible and acquitted the accused \u2013 On appeal, held: PW1 was the eye witness to the occurrence at both places i.e. the first part was at the time when the victim, PW1 and one another were travelling in the car, where A1 caused injury on the\n Decision Date :\n 14-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1750/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMARIANO ANTO BRUNO & ANR.\n versus \nTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 889\n2022 INSC 1073\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 498A, 306 and 107 \u2013 Marriage of Appellant No.1 (husband) & deceased was solemnized in 2005 \u2013 A male child was born out of wedlock in 2007 \u2013 Prosecution case that Appellant No.1 caused immense mental torture to deceased by compelling her to have with second pregnancy and that deceased was subjected to continuous cruelty which drove her to commit suicide \u2013 Trial court convicted appellant No.1 & mother-in-law of deceased u/s 498A & 306 IPC \u2013 High Court upheld the conviction of appellants \u2013 Held: To convict\n Decision Date :\n 12-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1628/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0627\u064f\u0631\u062f\u064f\u0648 - Urdu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGHULAM HASSAN BEIGH\n versus \nMOHAMMAD MAQBOOL MAGREY & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 34\n2022 INSC 750\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 226, 227 and 228 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860: 147, 302, 323, 354 & 451 \u2013 Accused persons formed an unlawful assembly and laid an assault on the appellant and his family members and during the assault wife of injuries inflicted on her by the accused persons \u2013 Cause of death of the deceased in the post mortem report was \u201ccardio respiratory failure\u201d \u2013 Charge sheet against the accused persons for the offence of murder along with other offences \u2013 Trial court discharged the\n Decision Date :\n 26-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1041/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.\n versus \nPHOOL SINGH \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 140\n2022 INSC 902\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Service Law \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.392 \u2013 Arms Act \u2013 ss.3/25 \u2013 Respondent-delinquent employee\u2019s dismissal from service was quashed by High Court on the ground that he was acquitted by criminal court on the same set of facts and charges on which he faced reinstatement in service \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Held: A departmental proceeding is different from a criminal proceeding \u2013 A delinquent employee after his dismissal from service, nevertheless, seeks reinstatement when he is acquitted by a criminal court on the same set of charges\n Decision Date :\n 02-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5930/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPAPPU TIWARY\n versus \nSTATE OF JHARKHAND \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 121\n2022 INSC 118\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302/34 \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 s.27 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Five people collectively inflicted knife injuries on the deceased after he was shot \u2013 Accused P fired at deceased and others inficted knife blows\u2013 Conviction and sentence u/s. 302/34, and P Upheld by the High Court, except for one who was a minor \u2013In appeal before this Court by the two accused, held: As regards, accused L, on all the aspects, the accused failed to discharge the burden to establish the plea of alibi \u2013 It was not a case where opportunity was not\n Decision Date :\n 31-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1492/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHIV KUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 493\n2022 INSC 933\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Penal Code, 1860: s.411 \u2013 Dishonestly receiving stolen property \u2013 Prosecution case was that the appellant-accused and co-accused received the articles looted from the truck knowing fully well that those are stolen property \u2013 Trial court convicted both the accused u/s.411 \u2013 that a person is dealing with stolen property, the \u2018believe\u2019 factor of the person is of stellar import \u2013 It is not enough for prosecution to prove that the accused was either negligent or that he had a cause to think that the property was stolen, or that he failed to make\n Decision Date :\n 07-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1503/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nASHOK KUMAR SINGH CHANDEL\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. \n- \n[2022] 12 S.C.R. 1035\n2022 INSC 1164\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 r/w s.149, s.307 r/w s.149 and s.148 \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 ss.25 and 30 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.293 \u2013 Murder of five persons \u2013 Seven accused \u2013 The deceased belonged to or were associated with two of them were brothers, the third was their minor son and the other two were their close family friends \u2013 Trial Court acquitted all the accused \u2013 Appeal against acquittal \u2013 High Court reversed the findings of the trial court and convicted all the accused under ss.148, 302\n Decision Date :\n 04-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 946/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nATBIR\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 1166\n2022 INSC 492\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Delhi Prison Act, 2000 \u2013 s.2(h) \u2013 Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 \u2013 rr.1220-1225 \u2013 By order dtd.15.11.12 issued by the Hon\u2019ble President of India on a mercy petition, the sentence of death awarded to the appellant was modified to imprisonment for life with the requirements for the whole of remainder of his natural life without parole and any remission in the term of imprisonment\u2013Impugned order passed by the Director General of Prisons declined furlough to the appellant referring to the saidconditions of the order dtd. 15.11.12 \u2013 Challenged before High\n Decision Date :\n 29-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 714/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHIMANSHU KUMAR AND OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 724\n2022 INSC 720\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Criminal Law \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Article 32 \u2013 Petition seeking mandamus for re-investigation / further investigation \u2013 Two incidents of alleged brutal massacre of tribals in three villages in the State of Chhattisgarh \u2013 Case of the Chhattisgarh Police, Special Police Officers (SPOs), the activists of Salwa Judum (group of vigilantes sponsored by the Chhattisgarh Government) and the Paramilitary Forces consisting of the CRPF and the CoBRA Battalions were responsible for the alleged massacre \u2013 Whether any case was made\n Decision Date :\n 14-07-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 103/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Writ petition dismissed and Interlocutory application disposed of\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nB. A. UMESH\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 628\n2022 INSC 1173\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Sentence/Sentencing : Death Sentence \u2013 Commutation of \u2013 Award of death sentence in a rape and murder case \u2013 Commutation sought on the grounds of delay in disposal of mercy petition and solitary confinement from the order till the disposal of mercy petition \u2013 Held: Undue long delay in execution of death sentence would entitle the condemned prisoner to pray for commuting the death sentence to that of life imprisonment \u2013 On facts, the alleged period is of two years and three months, starting\n Decision Date :\n 04-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1892/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANJU GARG & ANR\n versus \nDEEPAK KUMAR GARG \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 909\n2022 INSC 1033\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 125 \u2013 Order for maintenance of wives, children and parents \u2013 Basis purpose u/s. 125 \u2013 Held: Is to ameliorate the agony, anguish and financial suffering of a woman who is required to leave the matrimonial home, so that some suitable and the children \u2013 Husband is required to earn money even by physical labour, if he is an able-bodied, and could not avoid his obligation, except on the legally permissible grounds \u2013 On facts, the wife on account of harassment and cruelty by husband, was forced to leave her\n Decision Date :\n 28-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1693/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGANGADHAR NARAYAN NAYAK @ GANGADHAR HIREGUTTI\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 925\n2022 INSC 318\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n*\n Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: s.23 \u2013 Applicability of s.155(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure Code to the investigation of an offence u/s.23 of POCSO Act \u2013 Per Indira Baneerjee, J. \u2013 Procedure under Cr.P.C is not required to u/s.23 of POCSO Act which has been committed, by disclosure of the identity of victim, necessitates expeditious investigation for compliance of sub-sections (5) and (6) of s.19 of POCSO \u2013 Per J.K Maheshwari, J. \u2013 Procedure of s.155(2) Cr.P.C is required to be followed in an\n Decision Date :\n 21-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 451/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMVEER UPADHYAY & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 336\n2022 INSC 455\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Saving of inherent powers of High Court \u2013 Political animosity between petitioner No.1 and Ex. MLA \u2013 Complaint u/s. 365/511 IPC and s. 3(1)(Dha) of the 1989 Act by respondent no. 2 against Judge took cognizance of the charges against the petitioners and issued summons \u2013 Application u/s. 482 by the petitioner seeking quashing of the proceedings as well as the cognizance order \u2013 High Court dismissed the application \u2013 Petitioners case that this is a case of\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2022\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 2953/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSMT. REKHA JAIN AND ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 509\n2022 INSC 141\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Criminal proceedings u/ss.406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC \u2013 Six accused including appellants-accused \u2013Allegation in FIR that one co-accused had misappropriated complainant\u2019s and other persons\u2019 monies whereafter was attached in the year 1998-199 against the amounts due; and in the year 2019, the property was purchased by the appellants \u2013 High Court declined to quash criminal proceedings against the appellants \u2013 Justification of \u2013 Held: Not justified \u2013 Main allegations were\n Decision Date :\n 03-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 136/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDAYALU KASHYAP\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1020\n2022 INSC 95\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 \u2013 s.50 \u2013 Effect of \u2013 Search conducted by Sub-Inspector and not by a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, recovery of ganja from a polythene bag on a Kanwad carried by appellant \u2013 Appellant \u2013 Relying on State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand & Anr. [2014] 3 SCR 522 and seeking to expand the scope of the observations made, the appellant contended that the option given to him to get himself searched from the Officer concerned not being part of the statute, the same could not have\n Decision Date :\n 25-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 130/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHAGWANI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 1\n2022 INSC 52\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.363, 366A, 364, 346, 376D, 376A, 302 and 201 \u2013 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 \u2013 s.5(g)(m) r/w s.6 \u2013 Kidnapping, rape and murder of 11 year old girl \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 PW-2 (father of victim) along with his one \u2018AM\u2019 in the evening \u2013 His 11 years old daughter went missing and was found dead next morning \u2013 Appellant alongwith co-accused- \u2019S\u2019 (since deceased) was convicted and sentenced to death \u2013 On appeal, held: Medical evidence shows that the deceased was\n Decision Date :\n 18-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 101/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSIDDHARTH MUKESH BHANDARI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 853\n2022 INSC 788\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Stay of investigation and/or interim relief while exercising powers u/s.482 CrPC \u2013 Private respondents-accused filed Special Criminal Applications u/Art.226 of the Constitution r/w s.482 CrPC for quashing criminal proceedings instituted further investigation, the High Court passed ad-interim order dated 10-10-2019 directing that coercive steps be not taken against private respondents-accused \u2013 SLPs against the interim order dated 10-10-2019 \u2013 Interim order 10-10-2019 stayed by Supreme Court \u2013 SLPs converted into\n Decision Date :\n 02-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1044/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIJAYA\n versus \nSTATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 367\n2022 INSC 964\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 ss. 32, 157 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure \u2013 s. 164 \u2013 Dying declaration \u2013 Victim survived \u2013 Statement u/s.164 Cr.P.C. \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant consumed a poisonous substance, which she also administered to her 10 months old was recorded \u2013 Appellant survived but her baby died \u2013 Appellant\u2019s husband reported matter to the police, which led to regsitration of FIR u/ss. 302 and 309 IPC \u2013 Appellant\u2019s husband (PW1) and her father-in-law (PW5), both turned hostile during the trial\n Decision Date :\n 15-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1573/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n MS. P  XXX\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 324\n2022 INSC 648\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.177-180, 184, 218, 220 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.376, 504, 506 \u2013 Allegations against respondent No.2-accused consisting of offences of distinct nature, one set of allegations is of the offence of rape at Delhi set of allegations is of hurling abuses and extending threat on phone calls received by the appellant at her village in District Chamoli (ss.504, 506 IPC), if could be said to be \u2018one series of acts so connected together as to form the same transaction\u2019 for the purpose of trial\n Decision Date :\n 16-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 903/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHANDI PULIYA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 566\n2022 INSC 1276\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss.227, 300, 228 \u2013 Discharge application \u2013 Appellant was acquitted by the Sessions Court for the offences under ss. 148, 149, 448, 364 and 506 IPC \u2013 Second FIR filed against appellant alleging inter alia that he and other co-accused of the father of the first informant, the same person that they had alleged to have kidnapped and were granted acquittal \u2013 Appellant approached the High Court for quashing the criminal proceedings arising out of the second FIR \u2013 Dismissing the petition, High Court granted appellant\n Decision Date :\n 12-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2249/2022\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Matter remitted to trial court\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANNO LAL JAISWAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 990\n2022 INSC 97\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 439 and 161 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Grant of \u2013 Appellant lodged FIR against the respondents-accused for murder of his son \u2013 Respondents-accused applied for bail \u2013 Sessions Courts rejected the said bail applications bail to respondents \u2013 Appellant approached this court and submitted that \u2013 (i) High Court erroneously noted that the accused persons were not named in the FIR and that the statement of witnesses u/s. 161 Cr.PC were recoded after inordinate delay; (ii) High Court have not\n Decision Date :\n 25-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 97/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF U.P.\n versus \nJAI DUTT AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 215\n2022 INSC 71\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302 and 326 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Conviction by trial court u/s.302 accepting the prosecution case that the accused persons armed with deadly weapons went to the agricultural field were the victim (complainant\u2019s father) was working and beat him, resulting in his to that u/s.326, primarily on grounds that the victim died six days after the incident and no fracture was found on his head \u2013 Justification \u2013 Held: Not justified \u2013 Merely because the victim died six days after the incident not a ground to set aside the conviction u/s.302\n Decision Date :\n 19-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 37/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNEERAJ DUTTA\n versus \nSTATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 104\n2022 INSC 1280\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, A.S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Prevention of Corruption Act 1988: ss.7 and 13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) \u2013 In the absence of evidence of the complainant (direct/ primary, oral/documentary evidence) it is permissible to draw an inferential deduction servant u/ss.7 and 13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) of the Act based on other evidence adduced by the prosecution. Reference Matter \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 \u2013 Whether B. Jayaraj v State of A.P & P. Satyanarayana Murthy v D. Insp. Of Police, State of A.P. in conflict with M.\n Decision Date :\n 15-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1669/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Reference answered\n \n |  Bench :\n 5 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAVIKA KUMAR\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 182\n2022 INSC 1017\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Constitution of India: Art 32 \u2013 Writ of Certiorari \u2013 Petitioner was the anchor of Newshour Debate (debate) telecasted on Times Now \u2013 Various FIRs/criminal complaints filed against the petitioner in relation to the debate telecasted on 26.05.2022 \u2013 Petitioner prayed described in the instant writ petition or any other FIR/criminal complaint that may be instituted in future arising out of the same incident \u2013 Petitioner also prayed that the various FIR/Complaints be clubbed together \u2013 Held: Taking into consideration the order passed by\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 286/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nXYZ\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS \n- \n[2022] 18 S.C.R. 163\n2022 INSC 799\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2013 s.156(3) \u2013 \u201cmay\u201d \u2013 Commission of cognizable offence alleged, need for police investigation \u2013 Exercise of jurisdiction u/s.156(3) \u2013 Sexual harassment alleged by appellant against second respondent (Vice- Chancellor of the Police on her complaint, the appellant eventually, moved the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) u/s.156(3) \u2013 JMFC though concluded that, prima facie, \u201coccurrence of the offence by the accused persons\u201d was \u201cshown\u201d, however, held that the case could be decided\n Decision Date :\n 05-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1184/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nYERUVA SAYIREDDY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 882\n2022 INSC 1297\nCoram : VINEET SARAN, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 394 \u2013 Abatement of appeals \u2013 Appeal against conviction and sentence of death or of imprisonment \u2013 Death of appellant/convict during the pendency of the appeal \u2013 Amicus curiae, if a near relative of deceased of appeal \u2013 Held: Counsel appearing as an Amicus Curiae, cannot be treated as a near relative of the deceased appellant/convict \u2013 On facts, application for continuance of the appeal having not been made within 30 days or even thereafter by any near relative, as per the provision\n Decision Date :\n 07-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 233/2016\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTARLOCHAN SINGH @ RANA\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 961\n2022 INSC 356\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n 961 961 TARLOCHAN SINGH @ RANA v. STATE OF PUNJAB (Criminal Appeal No. 293 of 2018) March 29, 2022 [N. V. RAMANA, CJI, KRISHNA MURARI AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ] Arms Act, 1959: ss. 29 and 30 \u2013Punishment for knowingly purchasing arms, etc., from unlicensed person or for delivering arms, etc., to double barrel 12 bore rifle, used in the murder of the deceased and was part in the conspiracy hatched by the other co-accused \u2013 Conviction of the appellant u/ss. 29 and 30, and u/s. 120-B IPC and sentenced accordingly \u2013High Court acquitted the appellant u/s. 120-B IPC, however, upheld\n Decision Date :\n 29-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 293/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHAMMAD IRFAN\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 827\n2022 INSC 664\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, HEMANT GUPTA, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.121 and 121 A \u2013 Conspiracy to commit offences punishable by s.121 \u2013 Prosecution case that the Investigating Officer, while investigating incident of shoot-out occurred at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, came to know about a larger (LeT), banned militant organization in India \u2013 Registration of FIR that accused persons A-1 to A-6, active members of LeT entered into a criminal conspiracy to cause large scale destruction of public property, multi- national companies, places of worships, by causing bomb explosions,\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 201/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH\n versus \nNANDU @ NANDUA \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 487\n2022 INSC 901\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n MADHYA PRADESH v. NANDU @ NANDUA (Criminal Appeal No. 1356 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 02, 2022 [M. R. SHAH, JJ. AND KRISHNA MURARI] Sentence/Sentencing \u2013 ss.147,148,323 and 302/34 of IPC \u2013 Reduction of sentence by the High Court \u2013 Proper or not \u2013 The respondent-accused along with under aforesaid sections but reduced the sentence to approximately seven years and ten months, the period of sentence undergone by the respondent \u2013 State approached the Supreme Court and submitted that the reduction in sentence is contrary to s.302 IPC \u2013 On appeal, held: Though\n Decision Date :\n 02-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1356/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n versus \nTHE STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, CHENNAI & ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 715\n2022 INSC 228\nCoram : M.R. SHAH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Land Grabbing: Transfer of 864 cases pending in civil courts to the jurisdictional courts \u2013 Original complainant in case pending on the file of the Special Court for Land Grabbing the High Court, seeking transfer of the said case from the Special Court to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate \u2013 Allowed/disposed of, by the High Court \u2013 Thereafter, on \u2018mentioning\u2019 made by the Additional Public Prosecutor in the said disposed of petition, the Single\n Decision Date :\n 23-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 272/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP. PONNUSAMY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 265\n2022 INSC 1177\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 120B, 109, 341, 302 & 34 \u2013 Draft Rules of Criminal Practice, 2020 \u2013 Right of accused to demand documents \u2013 Appellant along with other eight accused were convicted and sentenced by Sessions Court for the offences punishable u/s 120B, with 34 of IPC \u2013 Some of them were sentenced to death penalty and some with life imprisonment \u2013 The Sessions Court had referred its judgment to the High Court for confirmation of the death penalty \u2013 Adjournments were sought several times by the parties \u2013 During the course\n Decision Date :\n 07-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1926/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVI SHARMA\n versus \nSTATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 12 S.C.R. 257\n2022 INSC 699\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.378 \u2013 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.27 \u2013 FIR was recorded on finding a dead body \u2013 PW-2 (brother of deceased) identified the dead body \u2013 Statements of both PW-1, father of deceased and PW-2 were recorded \u2013 Both pointed extending the benefit of doubt in favour of appellant passed the order of acquittal \u2013 High Court ordered conviction of the appellant \u2013 On appeal, held: High Court have not acted within the legal parameters set down for s.378 Cr.PC. by the various judgments of Supreme Court \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 410/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJASDEEP SINGH @ JASSU\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 647\n2022 INSC 23\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 304 part I and s.34 \u2013 Allegation that victim-deceased was shot dead by the accused persons (A1 to A4) during the night time \u2013 A3 and A4 (appellants) were present at the scene of occurrence and made a statement saying \u201cwhat are you seeing now\u201d, his pocket and shot the deceased \u2013 In complaint, father of the deceased (Complainant/ PW6) did not make any statement that A3 and A4 exhorted A1 to shoot \u2013 However, in his additional statement u/s. 161 Cr.P.C. he improved his statement stating that A3 and A4 instigated A1 to fire\n Decision Date :\n 07-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1584/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSERIOUS FRAUD INVESTIGATION OFFICE\n versus \nRAHUL MODI & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 597\n2022 INSC 158\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.167(2) \u2013 Filing of a charge-sheet is sufficient compliance with the provisions of s.167and that an accused cannot demand release on default bail under s.167(2) on the ground that cognizance has not been taken before the expiry of 60 days right of an accused to seek statutory bail under Section 167(2) arises only if the charge- sheet has not been filed before the expiry of the statutory period. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1 It is clear from the judgment of this Court in Bhikamchand Jain that filing of a charge-sheet\n Decision Date :\n 07-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 185/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABDUL VAHAB\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 311\n2022 INSC 263\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Jurisdiction of High Court under s.482 for quashing of confiscation proceedings under s.11(5) of the M.P Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004 and Rule 5 of the M.P Govansh Vadh Pratishedh Rules, 2012 \u2013 In the instant case, appellant\u2019s was intercepted and the driver along with other accused was arrested \u2013 Case was registered under M.P Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004 and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 \u2013 Vehicle was seized \u2013 Trial court held that no offence was made out under these Acts\n Decision Date :\n 04-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 340/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJOSEPH STEPHEN AND OTHERS\n versus \nSANTHANASAMY AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 182\n2022 INSC 96\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.401 \u2013 Whether in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under s.401, High Court can convert a finding of acquittal into one of conviction and what is the procedure to be followed by the High Court \u2013 Held: the High Court to convert a finding of acquittal into one of conviction \u2013 Though the High Court has revisional power to examine whether there is manifest error of law or procedure etc., however, after giving its own findings, on the findings recorded by the court acquitting the\n Decision Date :\n 25-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 90/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHHERTURAM @ CHAINU\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 210\n2022 INSC 951\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Exception 4 of s.300, s.82 \u2013 Exception 4 of s.300, when not applicable \u2013 Father and appellant- son were drinking alocohol together, got into a fight \u2013 Appellant convicted for murder of his father \u2013 On appeal, held : being father and son \u2013 There was no prior dispute and liquor got the better of the appellant, however that is no defence in view of s.86 \u2013 There were eleven injuries \u2013 It is not only the number of injuries but where and in what manner they were inflicted, even if it is by a\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1317/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUSSTT REHANA BEGUM\n versus \nSTATE OF ASSAM & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 962\n2022 INSC 80\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.494, 495 \u2013 Appellant-wife filed application u/s.482 for quashing the complaint filed by second respondent-husband u/ ss.494 and 495, IPC \u2013 Dismissed by Single Judge \u2013 the appellant and the second respondent the issue as to whether she had a subsisting marriage on the date on which she entered into a marriage with him is the subject matter of a conclusive finding of the Principal Judge of the Family Court which has attained finality \u2013 Appellant and the\n Decision Date :\n 21-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 118/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEVADASSAN\n versus \nTHE SECOND CLASS EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 868\n2022 INSC 286\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss. 122(1)(b), 111, 117 and 110 \u2013 Security for keeping the peace and for good behaviour \u2013 Imprisonment in default of security \u2013Correctness of \u2013On facts, bond executed by the appellant by him on account of his involvement in a criminal case, registered subsequently \u2013 Executive Magistrate and the High Court found the appellant guilty for breach of the conditions of bond and punished him in exercise of power u/s 122(1)(b) and sent him to custody \u2013Interference\n Decision Date :\n 09-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 388/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS\n versus \nLT. GEN. (RETD.) S.K. SAHNI \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 946\n2022 INSC 332\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Army Rules, 1954 \u2013 rr.180, 22 and 40(2) \u2013 Army Act, 1950 \u2013 s.123 \u2013Respondent, commissioned in the Indian Army in 1967, was thereafter appointed as Director General, Supplies and Transport (DGST) in 2005 \u2013 A Court of Inquiry (CoI) was ordered to investigate against him \u2013 CoI only recommended for award of recordable censure against the respondent, but the Army Commander and GOC-in-C directed disciplinary action under the Army Act, 1950 and Army Rules, 1954 \u2013 After his retirement in 2006, respondent filed a writ petition before High\n Decision Date :\n 23-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2169/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal dismissed and  Transferred Case allowed.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHANDRAPAL\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH (EARLIER M.P.) \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 366\n2022 INSC 629\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 and 201/34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that a girl and a boy having a love affair went missing and ten days later their dead bodies found hanging on the tree in decomposed state \u2013 Allegations of accused and other co-accused \u2013 Conviction u/ss. 302/34 and 201/ 34 and sentenced accordingly \u2013 In appeal, the High Court upheld the order of conviction and sentence as regards the appellant, however, set aside the conviction of co-accused u/s. 302/34, but upheld for the offence\n Decision Date :\n 27-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 378/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1\n2022 INSC 653\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Gujarat Riots \u2013 Godhra incident of 27.2.2002, in which large number of Kar-sevaks, returning from Ayodhya, were burnt alive in train bogies \u2013 As aftermath of that incident, there was unrest and violence all across the State of Gujarat \u2013 A violent mob attacked the inhabitants of 69 persons including the husband of appellant \u2013 Complaint dated 8.6.2006 of appellant to Director General of Police, Gujarat and other high officials inter alia containing allegations of \u201clarger conspiracy at the highest level\u201d which resulted into causing mass violence across\n Decision Date :\n 24-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 912/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAFARUDHEEN & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 721\n2022 INSC 464\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.378: Appeal against acquittal \u2013 Scope of \u2013 Appellate Court has to consider whether trial court\u2019s view can be termed as a possible one, particularly when evidence on record has been analyzed \u2013 An order of acquittal adds up to the of the accused \u2013 Double presumption that enures in favour of the accused has to be disturbed only by thorough scrutiny on the accepted legal parameters \u2013 Thus, appellate court has to be relatively slow in reversing the order of trial court rendering acquittal. Criminal Law: FIR: Delay\n Decision Date :\n 22-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 430/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nOMKAR SINGH\n versus \nJAIPRAKASH NARAIN SINGH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 550\n2022 INSC 166\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Common intention \u2013Two accused, A-2 (respondent no.1) and his son (A-1) \u2013 Three PWs \u2013 Sessions Court convicted A-1 u/s.302 and A-2 u/s. 302 r/w 34 \u2013 High Court affirmed conviction of A-1, but, by first informant/ son of deceased, held: High Court erred in acquitting A-2 \u2013 All three PWs were consistent and fully supported the case of prosecution \u2013 Even as per the High Court the motive was established and proved \u2013 High Court also observed that due to land dispute\n Decision Date :\n 09-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 84/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATISH KUMAR JATAV\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U.P. & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 270\n2022 INSC 577\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Quashing of criminal proceedings \u2013 Legality of \u2013 Magistrate summoned the private respondents-accused for offences punishable u/ss.307, 504, 506 of IPC and s.3(10)(15) of the Scheduled Castes of Atrocities) Act \u2013 High Court allowed application u/s.482 CrPC preferred by the private respondents\u2013accused and quashed the criminal proceedings as well as summoning order of the Magistrate \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 Held: The order passed by the High Court was a cryptic,\n Decision Date :\n 17-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 770/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGEETA DEVI\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 428\n2022 INSC 54\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.378 \u2013 Appellate Power of High Court in case of acquittal \u2013 In the instant case, trial court convicted respondents for the offences punishable under ss.452, 323/34 and 325/34 of the IPC, however, acquitted them for the 504, 506 of the IPC, ss.3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 \u2013 High Court dismissed victim\u2019s appeal without elaborate reappreciation of the entire evidence on record \u2013 On appeal, held: High Court only\n Decision Date :\n 18-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 78/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Allowing the appeal and remitting the matter to High court, the Court\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS.\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 382\n2022 INSC 757\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.2(1), Clause (na) \u2013 Expression \u201cproceedings\u201d therein \u2013 Held: The expression \u201cproceedings\u201d occurring in Clause (na) of s.2(1) is contextual and is required to be to include inquiry procedure followed by the Authorities of ED, the Adjudicating Authority, and the Special Court. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.2(1), Clause (na) \u2013Expression \u201cinvestigation\u201d therein \u2013 Held: The expression \u201cinvestigation\u201d in\n Decision Date :\n 27-07-2022\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 4634/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Reference answered\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Issues Answered\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHOTEL PRIYA, A PROPRIETORSHIP\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 322\n2022 INSC 206\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Licensing and Performance for Public Amusement including Cabaret Performance, Melas and Tamashas Rules, 1960 \u2013 rr.108, 109, 120, 122 and 123 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Article 15(1), 19(1)(g) \u2013 Impugned conditions inter alia imposed a gender cap as to or men, who can perform in orchestras and bands in licensed bars \u2013 Challenge to \u2013 Conditions upheld by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Impugned gender cap is the product of stereotypical view that women who perform in bars and establishments, like the appellants, belong to a\n Decision Date :\n 18-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1459/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF SIKKIM\n versus \nJASBIR SINGH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 242\n2022 INSC 128\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT\n Army Act \u2013 ss. 69, 70, 125, 126 \u2013 Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 \u2013 ss. 3, 4 and 5 \u2013 Concurrent jurisdiction between the court-martial and the ordinary criminal court \u2013 FIR u/s. 302 of IPC the respondent-accused \u2013 Sessions Judge directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to furnish a written notice to the Commanding Officer of the unit of the respondent-accused and deliver him for trial by a Court-martial \u2013 High Court upheld the decision of the Session Judge \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 01-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 85/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVINOD KATARA\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 836\n2022 INSC 949\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000: ss. 3, 7A, 16, 20 \u2013 Applicability of the 2000 Act \u2013 Plea of juvenility at belated stage \u2013 Determination of juvenility \u2013 On facts, writ applicant while undergoing sentence of life imprisonment subjected to medical examination by the State in pursuant of the judgment by the High Court wherein the High Court directed the Juvenile Justice Boards to hold an enquiry for determination of the age of prisoners languishing in jails who claimed to have been juveniles in conflict with the law\n Decision Date :\n 12-09-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 121/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR\n versus \nUMESH \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 574\n2022 INSC 322\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT\n Service Law: Disciplinary Enquiry \u2013 Respondent working as a village accountant was charged for demanding bribery \u2013 Criminal complaint registered against him under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 \u2013 Special Judge granted benefit of doubt to all charges \u2013 However, disciplinary authority held that the misconduct was proved and imposed penalty of compulsory retirement \u2013 Tribunal upheld the order of compulsory retirement \u2013 High Court, however, u/Art.226 set aside compulsory retirement \u2013 On appeal, held: While\n Decision Date :\n 22-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1763/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF WEST BENGAL\n versus \nRAKESH SINGH @ RAKESH KUMAR SINGH \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 538\n2022 INSC 691\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 ss.27A, 37, and 21(b)/29 \u2013 Rigours of provisions of s.37 relating to grant of bail \u2013 Inapplicability \u2013 Cocaine, a contraband drug, recovered from a motorcar with three occupants \u2013 Respondent accused \u2013 Accusation against respondent pertaining to offence u/s. 27A that he along with other co-accused hatched criminal conspiracy to implicate two occupants of the motorcar under the NDPS Act out of personal grudge \u2013 Prosecution alleged that respondent got the contraband\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 923/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUBRAMANYA\n versus \n STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 828\n2022 INSC 1083\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n COURT REPORTS [2022] 14 S.C.R. [2022] 14 S.C.R. 828 828 SUBRAMANYA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA (Criminal Appeal No. 242 of 2022) OCTOBER 13, 2022 [UDAY UMESH LALIT, CJI AND J.B. PARDIWALA, J.] Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Evidence Act \u2013 ss. 8, 27 & 30 \u2013 Motive \u2013 cattle shed, the deceased was hit on her head and neck with a hard object like a club \u2013 Later, they alleged to have removed the gold chain, a pair of ear studs and one gold ring from the body of the deceased \u2013 Later, A-3 is alleged to have helped the appellant and A-2 in wrapping the\n Decision Date :\n 13-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 242/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANOJ PRATAP SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 743\n2022 INSC 652\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, DINESH MAHESHWARI, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Sentence / Sentencing \u2013 Death Sentence \u2013 Rarest of Rare case \u2013 Kidnapping, rape and murder of a seven-and-a-half-year old mentally and physically challenged girl \u2013 Case of circumstantial evidence \u2013 Trial Court found appellant-accused guilty and imposed IPC \u2013 High Court found it to be a \u2018rarest of rare case\u2019 and upheld the conviction and death sentence \u2013 Appeal before the Supreme Court on two issues \u2013 First, whether concurrent findings of fact required interference \u2013 Second, whether death sentence be\n Decision Date :\n 24-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 910/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLUCKOSE ZACHARIAH @ ZAK NEDUMCHIRA LUKE AND OTHERS\n versus \nJOSEPH JOSEPH AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 917\n2022 INSC 205\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, SURYA KANT\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss.173(2), 173(8), 173(3), 173(6) \u2013 Initial Report and Supplementary Report \u2013 Duty of Magistrate \u2013 As per the law laid down in Vinay Tyagi v Irshad Ali whenever a supplementary police report is filed after the original police has to consider both the reports conjointly and should not place reliance only upon the supplementary police report \u2013 Both the reports have to be assessed conjointly so as to find out whether there existed grounds to presume that the accused has committed the offence. Disposing of the\n Decision Date :\n 18-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 256/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJ. SEKAR @SEKAR REDDY\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 698\n2022 INSC 519\nCoram : VINEET SARAN, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: ss. 3 and 4 \u2013 On facts, seizure of large amount of currency notes and gold from the appellant \u2013 Registration of FIR against the appellant under the provisions of PMLA in addition to schedule offences under the Penal Code and Act \u2013 Petition seeking quashing of proceedings \u2013 Dismissed by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Chances to prove the allegations in the court are very bleak \u2013 CBI filed closure report in respect of the FIR registered with respect scheduled offence \u2013 Schedule\n Decision Date :\n 05-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 738/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAHAR SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 795\n2022 INSC 314\nCoram : VINEET SARAN\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss.164, 190(1)(b), 209, 319 \u2013 Power of Magistrate taking cognizance of an offence on the basis of a police report in terms of s.190 (1)(b) CrPC to issue summons to any person not arraigned as an accused in the police report and whose name also not featuring such report \u2013 Held: If there are materials before the Magistrate showing complicity of persons other than those arraigned as accused or named in column 2 of the police report in commission of an offence, the Magistrate at that stage can summon such persons as well, upon taking cognizance of\n Decision Date :\n 16-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 443/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHRI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI GAUSHALA\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 1129\n2022 INSC 1045\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HIMA KOHLI\n Cattle: Custody of property pending trial \u2013 A truck transporting 18 heads of cattle was intercepted \u2013 Driver of the truck was unable to provide satisfactory explanation about the relevant permits \u2013 Cattle were seized and FIR was registered 6 of the Maharashtra Act, 11(1)(d) of PCA Act and other allied provisions \u2013 Respondents filed an application u/ ss. 451 and 457 Cr.PC seeking interim custody of the cattle on ground that they were the owners of the cattle \u2013 Magistrate rejected the application \u2013 At the same\n Decision Date :\n 30-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1719/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMALTI SAHU\n versus \nRAHUL & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 440\n2022 INSC 702\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. MALTI SAHU v. RAHUL & ANR. (Criminal Appeal No. 471 of 2022) JULY 11, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ] Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that respondent committed murder of brother and sister \u2013 Complaint by the On appeal, held: Prosecution witness had seen the accused alongwith the deceased going to their house \u2013 Though he turned hostile but his evidence can be considered to that extent \u2013 Prosecution established and proved the motive as regards the accused \u2013 Recovery of the knife in\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 471/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMATA PRASAD\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1052\n2022 INSC 123\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Sentence / Sentencing \u2013 Remission of Sentence \u2013 Petitioner convicted by Sessions Judge u/ss. 302, 307, 323, 34 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 Appeal of petitioner pending in High Court \u2013 Governor of Uttar Pradesh issued G.O / 161 of the Constitution for pre-mature release of prisoners on occasion of Republic Day every year \u2013 Petitioner filed writ petition u/Art.32 of the Constitution \u2013 His case, that despite having satisfied all terms and conditions for pre-mature release under the said policy, and his\n Decision Date :\n 31-01-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 256/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nWYETH LIMITED & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1132\n2022 INSC 1316\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of FIR/complaint \u2013 When \u2013 Held: Complaint is to be quashed when no offence is made out by a careful reading of the complaint \u2013 On facts, respondent no. 2 filed private complaint u/s. 200 Cr.P.C, which was referred 156(3) to the police for registration of FIR against the appellants u/ss. 406, 420, 408, 460, 471, 384, 311, 193, 196/120-B IPC \u2013 Reading of the complaint, shows that none of the ingredients of any of the offences complained against the appellants made out, thus, it cannot be said that\n Decision Date :\n 11-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1224/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANOJ KUMAR TIWARI\n versus \nMANISH SISODIA & ORS \n- \n[2022] 19 S.C.R. 820\n2022 INSC 1104\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : ss. 199(2), 199(4) & 199(6) \u2013 Prosecution for defamation \u2013 Complaint u/s. 200 CrP.C. filed by respondent-Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi against six individuals alleging commission of the offences u/s. 499 and 500 r/w. ss. 34 and 35 IPC accused no.1-appellant held a press conference making false and defamatory statements as though the respondent was involved in corruption to the tune of Rs. 2000 crores, in the matter of award of contracts for building classrooms in Delhi Government Schools; that accused no. 2 to 4 shared\n Decision Date :\n 17-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1791/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAHKASHAN KAUSAR @ SONAM & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 558\n2022 INSC 163\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code, 1860: s.498-A \u2013 Purpose of enactment of s.498- A and misuse of the said section \u2013 Discussed. Penal Code, 1860: s.498-A \u2013 Complaint against in-laws \u2013 Complainant alleged that \u2018all accused harassed her mentally and her pregnancy\u2019 \u2013 No specific and distinct allegations made against either of the accused i.e., none of the appellants were attributed any specific role in furtherance of the general allegations made against them \u2013 Allegations were, therefore, general and omnibus and can\n Decision Date :\n 08-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 195/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT\n versus \nSANDIP OMPRAKASH GUPTA \n- \n[2022] 17 S.C.R. 765\n2022 INSC 1288\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015: s.2(1)(c) \u2013 Whether an FIR under the 2015 Act is maintainable in law or can be registered if there is no FIR registered against the accused after the promulgation of the 2015 Act for any offence under the IPC or any other term, \u2018organised crime\u2019 indicates that there has to be an activity prohibited by law for the time being in force which is a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment of three years or more, undertaken as singly or jointly as a member of organised crime syndicate or on behalf\n Decision Date :\n 15-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2291/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPURAN MAL\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 859\n2022 INSC 297\nCoram : VINEET SARAN, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.439 \u2013 Bail \u2013 Respondent no.2 was accused of offence u/s.302, IPC \u2013 Bail denied by Trial Court \u2013 Granted by High Court \u2013 On appeal by complainant, held: When the Trial Court has dismissed the bail application (in the present taking a view different from the Trial Court ought to give some cogent and valid reasons for grant of bail \u2013 Nature of offence in the present case is very grave \u2013 Fact that the son (accused no.1) of the respondent no.2 had stabbed the deceased in his presence is prima facie clear\n Decision Date :\n 10-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 398/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNOOR MOHAMMED\n versus \nKHURRAM PASHA  \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 860\n2022 INSC 779\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.143A \u2013 Mandate of \u2013 Failure to deposit interim compensation in terms of s.143A and its effect, if any, on the right of accused to cross-examine witnesses examined on behalf of the complainant \u2013 Cheque of Rs.7,00,000/- drawn of Respondent, dishonoured \u2013 Complaint case by Respondent u/s.138 \u2013 Trial court directed appellant to deposit 20% of the cheque amount as interim compensation in terms of s.143(A) \u2013 No such deposit made by appellant \u2013 Application on behalf of appellant u/s.145(2) seeking\n Decision Date :\n 02-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1123/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH\n versus \nNIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 11 S.C.R. 369\n2022 INSC 1121\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s.2(xvii)(a) and (b) and s.15 \u2013 Conviction in relation to \u2018poppy straw\u2019 \u2013 \u2018Poppy straw\u2019 defined to mean all parts of \u2018opium poppy\u2019 except the seeds \u2013 \u2018Opium poppy\u2019 defined As per sub-clause (a) of Clause (xvii) of s.2 of the 1985 Act, \u2018opium poppy\u2019 means the plant of the species \u2018papaver somniferum L\u2019 \u2013 As per sub-clause (b) thereof, \u2018opium poppy\u2019 would also mean the plant of any other species of \u2018papaver\u2019\n Decision Date :\n 20-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 956/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MANIPUR & ORS\n versus \nBUYAMAYUM ABDUL HANAN @ ANAND & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 760\n2022 INSC 1117\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 22(5) \u2013 Right to make representation \u2013 Preventive Detention \u2013 Non-supply of legible copies of documents relied upon by detaining authority \u2013 Denial of effective representation \u2013 Respondent no.1 was under 1988 Act \u2013 High Court set aside the order of detention passed on the premise that the appellants failed to supply the legible copies of documents relied upon while passing the order of detention \u2013 On appeal, held: Right to make representation is a fundamental right of the\n Decision Date :\n 19-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1819/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUKHPAL SINGH KHAIRA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 156\n2022 INSC 1252\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, A.S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 319 \u2013 Power to summon additional accused under \u2013 When the trial with respect to other co- accused has ended and the judgment of conviction rendered on the same date before pronouncing Held: Power u/s. 319 has to be exercised before the pronouncement of the order of sentence where there is a judgment of conviction of the accused \u2013 In the case of acquittal, the power should be exercised before the order of acquittal is pronounced \u2013 In case of conviction,\n Decision Date :\n 05-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 885/2019\n \n |  Bench :\n 5 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEVENDER SINGH & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 1037\n2022 INSC 457\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 304B, 498A & 120B \u2013Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s. 113B \u2013 Dowry death \u2013 Presumption of dowry death \u2013 On facts, complaint against appellants-husband, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the victim-wife that the victim was repeatedly harassed for unnatural death within six months of the marriage \u2013 Victim went missing from her matrimonial home and her body was subsequently found in the river after 10 days \u2013 Conviction and sentence of the appellants u/s. 498A, 304B and 120B by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: s. 304B r/w\n Decision Date :\n 21-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 383/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJIGAR @ JIMMY PRAVINCHANDRA ADATIYA\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 367\n2022 INSC 1013\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.167(2) \u2013 The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015 \u2013 s.20(2) \u2013 Proviso added by the 2015 Act to sub-section (2) of s.167, CrPC \u2013 Interpretation of. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.167(2) \u2013 Crime Act, 2015 \u2013 s.20(2) \u2013 Order of extension passed in exercise of power under the proviso to sub-section (2) of s.20 of the 2015 Act \u2013 Legality of \u2013 Appellants are accused in FIR registered for offences under various provisions of the 2015 Act \u2013 Reports were\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1656/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPAWAN KUMAR GOEL\n versus \nSTATE OF U. P. & ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 102\n2022 INSC 1212\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 \u2013 ss. 138, 141, 142 \u2013 Whether a director of a company would be liable for prosecution u/s. 138 of NI Act without the company being arraigned as an accused \u2013 Held: If the complainant fails to make specific averments against the company in commission of an offence u/s. 138 of NI Act, the same cannot be rectified by taking recourse to general principles of criminal jurisprudence \u2013 The provisions of s.141 impose vicarious liability by deeming fiction which pre-supposes and requires the commission of the offence by the company\n Decision Date :\n 17-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1999/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDIBAKER NUNIA & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ASSAM \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1151\n2022 INSC 886\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 34 \u2013 Eye-witnesses, when not reliable \u2013 Person brutally assaulted, received multiple injuries on vital parts, died \u2013 Appellants convicted u/s.302/34 \u2013 On appeal, held: Findings in question are based essentially on the testimony of parents of they saw their son being assaulted by two persons with weapon \u2013 PW-2 allegedly fell unconscious after seeing the blood oozing from the body of his son \u2013 Thus, it is difficult to appreciate that they would go home, take meal and go to bed without bothering about the welfare of their\n Decision Date :\n 30-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 962/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSABITRI SAMANTARAY\n versus \nSTATE OF ODISHA \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 276\n2022 INSC 608\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and 304(II) \u2013 Prosecution case that victim-deceased was strangulated to death by the appellants (husband and wife) along with their daughter in their house and an attempt was made to conceal identity of deceased by pouring acid over the dead convicted appellants and their daughter for the offence u/s.302 r/w. s.34 IPC and sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment for life \u2013 However, the High Court acquitted daughter of all the charges and upheld the conviction of the appellants \u2013 The conviction of the appellants was\n Decision Date :\n 20-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 988/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE THROUGH DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE\n versus \nR. SOUNDIRARASU ETC. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 630\n2022 INSC 915\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. STATE THROUGH DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Of POLICE v. R. SOUNDIRARASU ETC. (Criminal Appeal Nos. 1452-1453 of 2022) SEPTEMBER 05, 2022 [DINESH MAHESHWARI AND J. B. PARDIWALA. JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss.239, 397, 401 \u2013 Discharge of accused \u2013 of income and paying the income tax from 1990 onwards \u2013 FIR registered against Respondent No.1 for offences u/ s 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) PC Act r/w s.109 IPC \u2013 During investigation, role of his wife i.e. Respondent No.2 surfaced as an abettor \u2013 Charge sheet filed in the Court of the\n Decision Date :\n 05-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1452/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUNIKRISHNA @ KRISHNA ETC.\n versus \nSTATE BY ULSOOR PS \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 415\n2022 INSC 1322\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 34 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Article 20(3) \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.161 \u2013 Evidence Act \u2013 ss.25, 27 \u2013 Murder of old aged person \u2013 Circumstantial Evidence \u2013 Appellants were convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34 Order of conviction and sentence upheld by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: In a case of circumstantial evidence, the entire chain of evidence must be complete and the conclusions arrived after examining the chain of evidence must point towards the culpability of the accused and to no other\n Decision Date :\n 30-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1597/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVINDER SINGH @ KAKU\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 589\n2022 INSC 505\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, VINEET SARAN\n Penal Code,1860: ss. 302 r/w 120B and 364 \u2013 Murder and kidnapping \u2013 Kidnapping and murder of two minor children \u2013 Conviction of the main accused and other co-accused including the mother of the children and imposed death sentence for offence punishable u/s. 302 r/w 120B and ten punishable u/s. 364 \u2013 However, the High Court acquitted the co-accused and sentenced the main accused to rigorous imprisonment for 20 years \u2013 On appeal, held \u2013 When conviction is based solely on circumstantial evidence, it is imperative that the chain of circumstances is\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1307/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKARAN SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 473\n2022 INSC 253\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r/w s.149; s.307 r/w s.149 and s.148 \u2013 Conviction of appellant along with other accused by trial court as well as by High Court under the aforesaid sections \u2013 Prosecution case was that there was dispute between the prime accused and the victim-deceased over for which the deceased stopped the prime accused from harvesting his crops \u2013 On the fateful day, six accused persons armed with rifles and guns came to the site of occurrence where the deceased had come to collect the price of buffalo \u2013 When the deceased asked for money, the prime\n Decision Date :\n 02-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 327/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAHLAD\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 82\n2022 INSC 753\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302,120B and 34 \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 ss.25,27 \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 Prosecution case was that victim- deceased had political enmity with three accused (A-1, A-2 and A- 3) \u2013 All three accused hatched a conspiracy to away with the victim \u2013 no.2 had used motorcycle of accused no.3 to arrive near a bus stand where a gun shot was fired at victim from a short distance \u2013 Victim died \u2013 Charge-sheet filed \u2013 Trial Court acquitted all the three accused \u2013 On appeal by the State, the High Court relying upon\n Decision Date :\n 27-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2043/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAYABEN\n versus \nTEJAS KANUBHAI ZALA & ANR \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 18\n2022 INSC 28\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Appeal: Murder case \u2013 Complainant\u2019s appeal against release of accused by High Court \u2013 Appellant-original complainant and her aunt and one another are the eye witnesses who have identified the accused in Test Identification Parade(TIP) \u2013 The entire incident CCTV footages and the mobile phone \u2013 During the course of the investigation, the punchnama of the place of the incident was prepared, statements of the witnesses were recorded; test identification of the accused was carried out; CCTV footages and DVR from the place of incident were recovered\n Decision Date :\n 10-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1655/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRATHISH BABU UNNIKRISHNAN\n versus \nTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 989\n2022 INSC 480\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Scope of \u2013 Summoning order passed against appellant u/s.138 of NI Act \u2013 Petition u/s.438 for quashing summoning order \u2013 High Court opined that the grounds agitated by the appellant are \u201cfactual defences\u201d which within the parameters of limited enquiry permissible in petition u/s.482 \u2013 According to the appellant, the concerned post-dated cheques drawn by him in favour of the complainant were contingent/security cheques for buyback of shares of appellant\u2019s company held by the\n Decision Date :\n 26-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 694/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBOHATTI DEVI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 283\n2022 INSC 1052\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 120B \u2013 Bail \u2013 Respondent no.2- accused granted bail by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held : No cogent reasons have been given by the High Court while releasing the respondent no.2 on bail, germane to the grant of bail and that too in a very serious have been ignored by the High Court while releasing the respondent no.2 on bail \u2013 Further, while considering the parity with co-accused, it did not consider the role attributed to the said co-accused and the allegations against respondent no.2 \u2013 Impugned judgment set aside \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 30-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1695/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF U.P.\n versus \nVEERPAL & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1163\n2022 INSC 133\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.32 \u2013 Dying declaration \u2013 Appreciation of \u2013 Dying declaration recorded by the Magistrate in which deceased specifically stated that due to feud over demand of money, respondents-accused burnt her after pouring kerosene over her \u2013 On facts, no by the magistrate \u2013 Statements in the dying declaration consistent with medical evidence inasmuch as there were no injuries on the chest and injuries were found only on the head and backside \u2013 Such injuries on the head and backside could have been possible only if somebody have\n Decision Date :\n 01-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 34/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUSHANTA KUMAR BANIK\n versus \nSTATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 484\n2022 INSC 1053\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988: s. 3(1) \u2013 Power to make orders detaining certain persons \u2013 FIRs against the appellant for the offences punishable u/ss. 22(b)/22(C)/29 and 21(B) of illegal trafficking of the narcotic drugs and that he is a habitual offender \u2013 Detention order by the Government \u2013 Writ petition challenging the legality and validity of the detention order \u2013 Dismissed by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: There was delay in passing the\n Decision Date :\n 30-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1708/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nP.S. JAYAPRAKASH ETC. ETC. \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 635\n2022 INSC 1243\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Anticipatory bail: High Court granted anticipatory bail to private respondents \u2013 Accusation against private respondents was that during relevant time, they were officials either with the Kerala Police or with the Intelligence Bureau and were involved in filing false against scientists of ISRO \u2013 Writ petition filed by one of the scientist seeking appropriate action against the police officers \u2013 Matter travelled upto Supreme Court \u2013 The Supreme Court constituted a committee headed by former judge of Supreme Court to take appropriate steps\n Decision Date :\n 02-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2147/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeals allowed and matters remitted to High Court.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMD. ANOWAR HUSSAIN\n versus \nSTATE OF ASSAM \n- \n[2022] 18 S.C.R. 721\n2022 INSC 1079\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Circumstantial Evidence \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.106 \u2013 Appellant was held guilty of the offence u/s.302 for murder of his wife and was awarded the punishment of imprisonment for life \u2013 On appeal, held: Victim was none other than the to when did he part with the company of his wife was within the knowledge of the appellant alone however, he explained nothing in that regard \u2013 When the appellant\u2019s wife was found killed with the dead body carrying several injuries and the cause of death having been asphyxia due to\n Decision Date :\n 13-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 414/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIJAY KUMAR GHAI & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 884\n2022 INSC 326\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of complaint \u2013 Appellant No. 1 is the Managing Director of the Public Limited Company and Appellant Nos.2 and 3 are the Directors of the said Company \u2013The company itself has been arrayed In January 2008, Respondent No. 2, an authorized representative of SMC Global Securities Ltd, Delhi desired to make an investment on its behalf with the appellants \u2013It was mutually decided between the parties that Respondent No. 2 will invest an amount of Rs. 2.5 crore with the company\n Decision Date :\n 22-03-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 463/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMR. VINAY PRAKASH SINGH\n versus \nSAMEER GEHLAUT & ORS. IN THE MATTER OF:- SHIVINDER MOHAN SINGH \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 660\n2022 INSC 1202\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.428 \u2013 Period of off against the sentence or imprisonment \u2013 When \u2013 Applicant was found guilty of contempt by order dtd.15.11.19, was sentenced for 6 months imprisonment by order dtd.22.09.22 \u2013 Present application seeks clarification w.r.t the date of commencement of the term of imprisonment,\n Decision Date :\n 14-11-2022\n | Case No :\n MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 1902/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nT.P. GOPALAKRISHNAN\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2022] 14 S.C.R. 478\n2022 INSC 1262\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Constitution of India: Art.20(2) \u2013 Protection against double jeopardy \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure \u2013 s.300 \u2013 \u2018Same offence\u2019 meaning of \u2013 Appellant-accused worked as Agricultural officer for the period 31.05.1991 to 31.05.1994 \u2013 that he committed criminal breach of trust and misappropriated certain amount in his official position as a public servant, by not remitting the same to the sub-treasury \u2013 Accusations related to time period from 27.04.1992 to 25.08.1992 and 01.03.1993 to 12.04.1994 \u2013 Trial Court\n Decision Date :\n 08-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 187/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.\n versus \nDR. MAROTI S/O KASHINATH PIMPALKAR \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 821\n2022 INSC 1152\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 \u2013 Quashing of F.I.R. and charge sheet \u2013 Non Reporting of Sexual Assault \u2013 FIR registered against unidentified person(s) on the accusation of commission of sexual offences against minor tribal girls who were residing \u2013 Respondent is the medical practitioner who was appointed for treatment of the girls in the said girl\u2019s hostel \u2013 He was arraigned as the sixth accused thereunder, essentially for the failure to report the commission of the offence under the POCSO Act, punishable u/s.21 (1) the\n Decision Date :\n 02-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1874/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJESH PRASAD\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 1046\n2022 INSC 19\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302/34, 120B \u2013 Explosive Substances Act, 1908 \u2013 ss. 3, 4 \u2013 In the instant case, the accused-respondent committed offence u/s 302 r/w 34 and 120B IPC by causing death of father of appellant-informant, and other deceased victim substance (bomb) and thereby was also charged u/s 3/ 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 \u2013 On trial, the accused was convicted and along with the term of imprisonment was also awarded death sentence \u2013 High Court acquitted him of all charges on the ground that there were flaws in\n Decision Date :\n 07-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 111/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRUM FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 8 S.C.R. 19\n2022 INSC 115\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Bail \u2013Non-consideration of relevant factors\u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B \u2013Commercial transaction \u2013 Respondent no.2-accused granted bail by High Court\u2013 Correctness of \u2013 On appeal, held:While releasing Respondent no.2 on bail, the all considered the relevant factors including the nature and gravity of accusation;serious allegations of siphoning off the huge amount, the modus operandi and the manner in which the offences were committed through shell companies and creating false/forged documents and/or misusing documents of\n Decision Date :\n 28-01-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 94/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANOJ & ORS\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 9 S.C.R. 452\n2022 INSC 606\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Sentence / Sentencing \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 397 \u2013 Triple murder, in course of robbery \u2013 Three accused \u2013 Trial Court convicted the accused-appellants u/s. 302 IPC and imposed death penalty on them \u2013 High Court confirmed the conviction \u2013 trial Court and High Court failed to provide an effective sentencing hearing to the accused at the relevant stage which is a right u/s 235(2) CrPC \u2013 The crime that the appellants were held guilty of, was heinous, and its execution was vicious and cruel \u2013 The repeated stabbings of two\n Decision Date :\n 20-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 248/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDHANANJAY RAI @ GUDDU RAI\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 763\n2022 INSC 723\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.374(2) \u2013 Appellant convicted u/ss.302 and 120B of IPC and s.27(1) of the Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 He preferred appeal \u2013 High Court of Patna admitted the appeal for hearing \u2013 Meanwhile, appellant went absconding \u2013 High Court dismissed \u2013 Whether an appeal against conviction filed by an accused u/sub-section (2) of s.374 CrPC can be dismissed on ground that the accused was absconding \u2013 Held: The law does not envisage dismissal of appeal for default or non- prosecution but only contemplates disposal on merits\n Decision Date :\n 14-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 803/2017\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Matter remanded to High Court.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM N G BHARATEESH REDDY\n versus \nRAMESH RANGANATHAN AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1097\n2022 INSC 847\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 120A, 405, 415, 420, 499, 500 \u2013 In the instant case the first respondent was employed as a Consultant Neurosurgeon by BGS Apollo Hospital \u2013 Consultancy Agreement was entered into between the first respondent and the hospital containing his terms of engagement the engagement was that either party may terminate the agreement, with or without cause, by giving a prior notice of thirty days \u2013 Differences arose between the first respondent and the management of the hospital \u2013 First respondent wrote a letter to the General Manager of the\n Decision Date :\n 18-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1273/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN\n versus \nGURBACHAN SINGH & OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 73\n2022 INSC 1260\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Common intention \u2013 Dispute w.r.t partition of land\u2013 Victim was beaten resulting in his death, PW1 (his brother) also suffered injuries \u2013 Respondent convicted along with 5 others \u2013 Respondent\u2019s appeal partly allowed by High death of deceased as he only inflicted wounds on his feet with a \u2018lathi\u2019, was directed to be released having suffered the maximum punishment provided for the offence \u2013 Conviction of other 3 co- convicts (\u2018DS\u2019, \u2018BS\u2019, \u2018MS\u2019), not challenged\n Decision Date :\n 07-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2201/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKALICHARAN & ORS\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 56\n2022 INSC 1277\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.213, 313 \u2013 Failure to comply with the requirements of s.213 and s.313 \u2013 The Fast track Court convicted accused nos.1, 2, 3 and 4 for offences punishable u/s. 302, 307 of the IPC along with other sections \u2013 Allegation that accused with sharp edged weapons and accused no.2 with pistol \u2013 It was also alleged that accused no. 2 murdered deceased (\u2018H\u2019) by firing bullets from his pistol \u2013 Held: In cross-examination PW-1 stated that he was not aware whether bullets hit victim (\u2018H\u2019) or not\n Decision Date :\n 14-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 122/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMD. JABBAR ALI & ORS. \n versus \nTHE STATE OF ASSAM \n- \n[2022] 15 S.C.R. 773\n2022 INSC 1096\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 r/w 149, 148,123 and 447 \u2013 Trial court convicted accused persons under different provisions of IPC including ss. 302 r/w 149, 148,123 and 447 \u2013 Prosecution had examined ten witnesses before trial court \u2013 High Court upheld the judgment and sentence passed challenged on the ground that inter alia, witnesses PW- 1 to PW-6 were related to each other \u2013 Prosecution failed to examine any independent and impartial witness and there were material contradictions in the depositions made by the witnesses \u2013 Held: Court in appeal may reassess the\n Decision Date :\n 17-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1105/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVEENA SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LR\n versus \nTHE DISTRICT REGISTRAR/ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (F/R) AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2022] 3 S.C.R. 736\n2022 INSC 544\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Registration Act, 1908: ss. 35, 72, 73, 74 \u2013 Execution and registration of sale deed \u2013 Agreement to sell certain land between the appellant and the second respondent \u2013 Execution of sale deed by of second respondent, however, during registration of said sale deed, the appellant denied its execution \u2013 However, no denial on the part of the appellant in signing the sale deed and having placed her thumb impressions/fingerprints on the documents \u2013 Appellant also asserted\n Decision Date :\n 10-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2929/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nEX. CT. MAHADEV\n versus \nTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL, BOARDER SECURITY FORCE & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 1136\n2022 INSC 644\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Border Security Force Act, 1968 \u2013 s.46 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.96-100 & s.302, Exception 2 to s.300 and s.304 \u2013 Plea of self defence \u2013 When available \u2013 Appellant, serving in BSF was convicted for an offence committed for murder u/s.302, IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 Statutory appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed \u2013 Order upheld by High Court \u2013 Held: Whether a person has legitimately acted in exercise of the right of defence would depend on the nuance of each case\n Decision Date :\n 14-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2606/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHRADDHA GUPTA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS \n- \n[2022] 17 S.C.R. 622\n2022 INSC 481\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 \u2013 ss. 2 & 3 \u2013 A case u/s 147, 304, 504, 323, 506, 120-B IPC was registered against the six accused persons \u2013 On further investigation and on the basis of the the co-accused, the names of the appellant was added as accused in the case \u2013 Thereafter, a gang chart was prepared against the appellant and sections 2/3 of the Gangsters Act has been lodged/ registered against the appellant \u2013 The appellant approached the High Court u/s 482 of CrPC\n Decision Date :\n 26-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 569/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMEHMOOD PRACHA\n versus \nCENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 20\n2022 INSC 813\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 \u2013 ss. 14, 17 \u2013 The Contempt of Courts (C.A.T) Rules, 1992 \u2013 rr. 13, 15 \u2013 Contempt Proceedings \u2013 Denial of right to trial by Tribunal \u2013 Appellant made certain submissions in his capacity as the counsel for the party before the to be contemptuous by the Tribunal \u2013 Charges were framed \u2013 Appellant denied charges \u2013 However, appellant was convicted by the CAT u/s. 14 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 \u2013 Appellant urged that the Tribunal had erred in denying the appellant the right to be tried\n Decision Date :\n 10-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 892/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJARAM\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS \n- \n[2022] 16 S.C.R. 99\n2022 INSC 1296\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s. 32 \u2013 Inconsistencies between Multiple dying declaration \u2013 Prosecution case that victim-deceased was brought to hospital by her husband (appellant) in burnt condition \u2013 Her first dying declaration (Ex. P-11) was recorded in which appellant was not by the police before she succumbed to the injuries in which she named her husband \u2013 The trial Court convicted one accused u/s.302 IPC and the appellant & other accused for the offences u/s 498A of IPC \u2013 Appellant and other accused challenged their conviction and sentence,\n Decision Date :\n 16-12-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2311/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nA.G. PERARIVALAN\n versus \nSTATE, THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CBI/SIT/ MMDA, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU AND ANR. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 1048\n2022 INSC 588\nCoram : L. NAGESWARA RAO\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, A.S. BOPANNA\n Constitution of India: Art. 161 \u2013 Power of Governor to grant pardons, etc, and to suspend, remit or commute sentences in certain cases \u2013 Appellant, one of the accused former Prime Minister of India-Shri Rajeev Gandhi \u2013 Convicted and sentenced to death \u2013 Death sentence commuted to life imprisonment \u2013 As regards, remission of the sentence of the appellant, reference made by the Governor to the President of India on 25.01.2021, without taking a\n Decision Date :\n 18-05-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 833/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIN RE: PERRY KANSAGRA\n versus \nIN RE: PERRY KANSAGRA \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 207\n2022 INSC 706\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Contempt of Court \u2013 Tendering of affidavits and undertaking containing false statement, if amounts to criminal contempt \u2013 On facts, custody of child given to the father, Kenyan citizen with Indian origin, with visitations rights given to the mother \u2013 courts in his affidavits and undertook to honour and comply with the orders of the Court \u2013 However, did not comply and inspite of several summons and orders, did not appear before Court nor brought the son to India; and also obtained orders of this Court by practising fraud upon the Court\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n SUO MOTO CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 3/2021\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Matter further listed.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJESWARI CHANDRASEKAR GANESH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 232\n2022 INSC 721\nCoram : A.M. KHANWILKAR\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Constitution of India \u2013 Art.32 \u2013 Writ of Habeas Corpus \u2013 Object and scope of \u2013 Custody of minor children \u2013 Parties having two minor children have been residing in the USA \u2013 As per the petitioner-mother, the respondent no.2-father picked up for Michigan, USA, from Cleveland, Ohio, without informing her \u2013 A shared parenting plan was arrived at between the parties by the order passed by the Court at Ohio \u2013 Case of the petitioner is that the respondent no.2 clandestinely and with a view to remove the children from the USA\n Decision Date :\n 14-07-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 402/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIMRAN\n versus \nMR. MOHAMMED BHAVA & ANR \n- \n[2022] 2 S.C.R. 1093\n2022 INSC 467\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI\n 1093 1093 IMRAN v. MR. MOHAMMED BHAVA & ANR (Criminal Appeal No. 658 of 2022) APRIL 22, 2022 [N. V. RAMANA, CJI, KRISHNA MURARI AND HIMA KOHLI, JJ] Bail: Cancellation of Bail \u2013 In the instant case, accused persons 1 to 10 were accused of having committed the offence u/ ss.114, 109, session which were rejected but both the bail applications were allowed by the High Court \u2013 Subsequently on appeal the High Court cancelled the bails granted to Accused 2, 3, 4, 7, 9 and 10 which was upheld by Supreme Court and the regular bail of accused no 1 was also cancelled \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 22-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 658/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDAXABEN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 295\n2022 INSC 771\nCoram : INDIRA BANERJEE\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of FIR \u2013 FIR u/s.306 for abetment to commit suicide, entailing punishment of imprisonment of ten years \u2013 Quashed by the High Court on the basis of a settlement between the complainant and the accused named in the FIR \u2013 On is lodged and a criminal case is started by the State, it becomes a matter between the State and the accused \u2013 State has a duty to ensure that law and order is maintained in society and the offender is prosecuted \u2013 An informant has no right in law to withdraw the complaint of a non-\n Decision Date :\n 29-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1061/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRATNAMBAR KAUSHIK\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2022] 18 S.C.R. 326\n2022 INSC 1254\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n*\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 439 \u2013 Grant of bail \u2013 Application under, by petitioner against alleged offence u/s. 132(1)(a),(h),(k) and (l) rw s. 132(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 \u2013 Petitioner had clandestinely transported by 7 trucks weighing 90,520 kgs for manufacture and supply of zarda without payment of leviable duties and taxes \u2013 Held: Petitioner was arrested on 21.07.2022 and while in custody, the investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has been filed \u2013 For the alleged evasion of\n Decision Date :\n 05-12-2022\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE TO PETITION (CRIMINAL)... No. 10319/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD. FIROZ\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2022] 19 S.C.R. 168\n2022 INSC 429\nCoram : UDAY UMESH LALIT\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Ss. 302, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(m), 363, 366, 376A \u2013 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) \u2013 ss. 5 (i), 5 (m), 6 \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s. 106 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 304, sexual assault on the young child-victim \u2013 Appellant-accused along with one another accused person was convicted for death sentence and life imprisonment, respectively, by the trial court for the offences u/ ss. 302, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(m), 363, 366 IPC r/w. s. 5(i) r/w. s. 6 and s.5(m) r/w.\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 612/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUTTAM\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 863\n2022 INSC 634\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI\n Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 Multiple dying declarations \u2013 Admissibility, evidentiary value of \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Appellant convicted u/s.302 for having murdered his wife by pouring kerosene on her and setting her on fire, by relying on two dying declarations of the and PW-14 (IO) and the other two being oral and communicated by the deceased to PW-2 (her father) and PW- 12 (mediator who had arranged the marriage of the parties) \u2013 Appeal filed by appellant, dismissed by High Court discarding the written dying declarations but giving credence to the\n Decision Date :\n 02-06-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 485/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVARSHA GARG\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 150\n2022 INSC 807\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 91, 311 \u2013 Challenge to the dismissal of applications filed by the prosecution for the production of the decoding registers and for summoning of the witnesses of the cellular companies \u2013 Held: The decoding registers are evidence to establish the co-relationship between the location of the accused and the cell phone tower \u2013 Summons to produce a document or other thing u/s.91 can be issued where Court finds that production of the document or thing \u201cis necessary or desirable for the purpose of any\n Decision Date :\n 08-08-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1021/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.\n versus \nMS. MADHURI MARUTI VIDHATE (SINCE AFTER MARRIAGE SMT. MADHURI SANTOSH KOLI) \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 251\n2022 INSC 1057\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Service Law \u2013 Compassionate appointment \u2013 Married daughter, if entitled to \u2013 Father died in harness \u2013 Mother appointed on compassionate ground, also died while in service \u2013 Elder married daughter made application for seeking rejected \u2013 Thereafter, respondent-younger married daughter\u2019s application for appointment on compassionate ground was also rejected \u2013 Tribunal directed appellants to appoint respondent on compassionate ground \u2013 Order confirmed by High Court \u2013 On appeal, held :\n Decision Date :\n 30-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 6938/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGURMAIL SINGH & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 13 S.C.R. 1011\n2022 INSC 1097\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Penal Code, 1860: s.149 \u2013 Unlawful Assembly \u2013 In the instant case, Accused Nos. 1 and 2 are real brothers of the victim-deceased \u2013 Land dispute arose between accused persons and deceased \u2013 On the fateful day, deceased got to know that accused nos. 1 and 2 were getting by deceased \u2013 When deceased asked them to stop, appellant along with eight others assaulted him in which he lost his life \u2013 Trial Court convicted all the accused persons including appellant u/ss.302/149, IPC \u2013 High Court confirmed conviction and sentence though seven of\n Decision Date :\n 17-10-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 965/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATYE SINGH & ANOTHER\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 1137\n2022 INSC 185\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 34 and 201 \u2013 Homicidal death \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Dead body of married woman found in burnt condition in the Chhan (hut) of her husband \u2013 Father of the deceased gave written complaint implicating the husband, mother- in-law and Accused-appellants i.e. husband and mother-in-law of the deceased were convicted by the Sessions Court u/s 302 r/w ss.34 and 201 IPC \u2013 High Court upheld the conviction \u2013 Propriety \u2013 Held: Conviction can be based solely on circumstantial evidence but it should be tested on the\n Decision Date :\n 15-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2374/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH\n versus \nSUBHASH @ PAPPU \n- \n[2022] 5 S.C.R. 832\n2022 INSC 382\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.146, 148, 149,302, 304 \u2013 Prosecution case was that six (out of which three persons were unknown) persons came to a shop and attacked the servant (deceased) of the shop with knife and hockey for refusing to provide articles asked by them respondent-accused for offences u/ s.302 and 148, however, acquitted the other two known accused \u2013 High Court acquitted the respondent for offences u/s.302 as well as s.148 \u2013 Instant appeal filed by State \u2013 Held: From the medical evidence on record, it was established\n Decision Date :\n 01-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 436/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANDEEP ALIAS KALA\n versus \nSUPREME COURT OF INDIA \n- \n[2022] 18 S.C.R. 468\n2022 INSC 835\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA\n Supreme Court Rules, 1966 \u2013 Or. XXI, r.15\u2013Supreme Court (2nd Amendment) Rules,1981 \u2013 Supreme Court (Amendment) Rules,1978 \u2013 Supreme Court Rules, 2013 \u2013 Or.XX, rr.5(1),21\u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Article 134(1)(a), (b) \u2013 Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 \u2013 s.2(a)\u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.379 \u2013 Appeals u/Article 134(1)(a) or (b) or s.2 of the Enlargement of Jurisdiction Act, modalities to be followed \u2013Acquittal of the petitioner of the charge of committing offences\n Decision Date :\n 16-08-2022\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 143/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHISHPAL @ SHISHU\n versus \nTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2022] 12 S.C.R. 275\n2022 INSC 670\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Victim-deceased and PW4 were standing in the queue before the liquor store \u2013 A2 (not before the Supreme Court) attacked the victim by knife while appellants-accused caught hold of victim \u2013 All accused dragged the victim from of IPC \u2013 Trial Court held them guilty of the offence charged and the same was confirmed by the High Court \u2013 Out of three accused two (A1 and A3) have presented the appeal \u2013 Held: Both Courts below have made reliance upon the non-cooporation on the part of the accused to undergo\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1053/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND\n versus \nSACHENDRA SINGH RAWAT \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 529\n2022 INSC 153\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860: Culpable homicide not amounting to murder \u2013 Prosecution case was that an altercation took place between the victim-deceased and the respondent-accused at the place of marriage ceremony \u2013 Due to intervention of villagers, matter did not proceed further \u2013 After night, when victim-deceased was near his house, accused attacked him by giving blows on his head with the \u201cDanda/Phakadiyat\u201d, a rough piece of wood \u2013 Deceased ran towards his house for safety \u2013 Accused ran after him with \u201cPhakadiyat\u201d in his hand and gave\n Decision Date :\n 04-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 143/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nB.R.K. AATHITHAN\n versus \nSUN GROUP & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 10 S.C.R. 87\n2022 INSC 1236\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Quashing of criminal proceedings \u2013 Second complaint on identical set of facts \u2013 Factum of FIR against appellant and his arrest was telecasted and publicised by the respondents \u2013 Complaint u/ss.499 and 500, IPC filed by Revision petition filed by the appellant before High Court was dismissed as withdrawn \u2013 Appellant filed second complaint under the same provisions on same facts only adding the factum of Revision Petition and claiming that the second complaint is being filed as per the order of the High\n Decision Date :\n 29-11-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2080/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nYASHPAL SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 835\n2022 INSC 966\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, KRISHNA MURARI\n Bail \u2013 Cancellation of \u2013 Allegedly a land dispute was going on between respondent no.2-original accused and original informant-Complainant \u2013 It was also alleged that accused persons had attacked informant and other persons \u2013 In the said incident brother of informant died on FIR was registered \u2013 Respondent no.2 was arrested \u2013 Bail of respondent no.2 was rejected by the trial Court \u2013 High Court released respondent no. 2 on bail \u2013 Complainant approached Supreme Court and challenged the validity of grant of bail \u2013 Held: That on the day of\n Decision Date :\n 15-09-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1509/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMRITLAL\n versus \nSHANTILAL SONI & ORS. \n- \n[2022] 1 S.C.R. 721\n2022 INSC 243\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 468 \u2013 Bar to cognizance after lapse of period of limitation \u2013 Relevant date for computation of limitation period u/s. 468 \u2013 Held: Is the date of filing of the complaint or the date of institution of prosecution and not the date on which the offence \u2013 On facts, the High Court erred in assuming that the date of taking cognizance is decisive of the matter, while ignoring the fact that the written complaint was indeed filed by the complainant well within the period of limitation of 3 years with reference to the date of commission\n Decision Date :\n 28-02-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 301/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKANCHAN KUMARI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 7 S.C.R. 138\n2022 INSC 746\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.438 \u2013 Anticipatory Bail granted to second respondent by High Court, however adverse directions passed against third party \u2013 In the instant case, second respondent filed an application u/s.438 before High Court seeking anticipatory bail for and 468 IPC \u2013 High Court while allowing the said application, directed the authority to cancel the licence of agent granted to appellant and not to allow to work as agent in Bihar or anywhere else \u2013 Justification of such peremptory direction \u2013 Held: High Court went beyond what\n Decision Date :\n 25-07-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1031/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2022, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAGJEET SINGH & ORS\n versus \nASHISH MISHRA @ MONU & ANR. \n- \n[2022] 4 S.C.R. 536\n2022 INSC 427\nCoram : N.V. RAMANA\n*\n, SURYA KANT, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss.2(wa),372, 439 \u2013 Victim\u2019s right to be heard \u2013 Consideration for granting bail \u2013 Lakhimpur Kheri Incident \u2013 On 03.10.2021, an annual Dangal (wrestling) competition was organised Some supporters of respondent No.1, who were travelling by a car to the Dangal venue were allegedly attacked by certain farmers \u2013 Due to the large protest, the route of the Chief Guest had to be changed \u2013 Respondent Accused became agitated \u2013Respondent No.1 and his aides, armed\n Decision Date :\n 18-04-2022\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 632/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM LAL\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 808\n2023 INSC 1047\nCoram : J.K. MAHESHWARI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the dismissal of the appellant- constable from service pursuant to the departmental enquiry was justifi ed; and what is the eff ect of the acquittal, ordered by the appellate judge in the criminal trial, on the order of dismissal passed in Service law \u2013 Dismissal from service pursuant to the departmental enquiry on allegation of commission of fraud \u2013 Justifi cation \u2013 Eff ect of acquittal ordered by the appellate judge in the criminal trial, on the order of dismissal \u2013 Allegation against the\n Decision Date :\n 04-12-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 7935/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nNAROTTAM DHAKAD & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 306\n2023 INSC 770\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In cases relating to off ences arising out of the Vyapam Scam, respondents-accused fi led applications seeking direction to supply a Hindi translation of the charge sheet fi led by the appellant in English language. Rejected by Magistrate High Court whether justifi ed in interfering and inter alia holding that Hindi was the only language of the Criminal Courts in the State of MP and therefore, the respondents were entitled to seek translation of the charge sheet into the language of the Court. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973\n Decision Date :\n 25-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2592/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJO @ RAJWA @ RAJENDRA MANDAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 484\n2023 INSC 771\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Petitioner serving a sentence of life imprisonment for commission of off ences punishable u/ss.302/34 of the IPC, 1860 and s.27 of the Arms Act, 1959 sought direction for his premature release on the ground that he has been in custody for 24 years without or parole. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Remission \u2013 Grant of: Held: Remission Board rejected the petitioner\u2019s application for premature release twice \u2013 The reason for rejection of the petitioner\u2019s application was the adverse report submitted by the presiding\n Decision Date :\n 25-08-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 252/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED\n versus \nM/S. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS CORP. LTD. & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 326\n2023 INSC 103\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 226, 12, 14 \u2013 Commercial Contract \u2013 Unequal bargaining power \u2013 Maintainability of writ petition \u2013 Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas issued a letter for allocation of natural a PSU) \u2013 IPCL entered into a contract with GAIL for supply of natural gas \u2013 As per the allocation terms, IPCL had to lay down its own pipelines and those pipelines alone were utilised for carrying gas \u2013 IPCL laid down pipelines \u2013 However, GAIL levied charge for\n Decision Date :\n 08-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3504/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAKASH NISHAD @ KEWAT ZINAK NISHAD\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2023] 8 S.C.R. 152\n2023 INSC 561\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Evidence \u2013 Case of circumstantial evidence \u2013 Six year old child was sexually assaulted, killed and thrown her into a \u2018nala\u2019 \u2013 Appellant was arrested on the basis of suspicion \u2013 Charged for having committed 377, 302 and 201, IPC \u2013Concurrently convicted, death sentence imposed for the charge u/s.302 and sentenced for other offences \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Held: There were yawning gaps in the chain of circumstances rendering it far from being established, pointing to the guilt of the\n Decision Date :\n 19-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1636/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJKUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 412\n2023 INSC 718\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Uttar Pradesh Prisoners (Release on Probation) Act 1938 \u2013 Uttar Pradesh Prisoners (Release on Probation) Rules 1938 \u2013 Standing Policy formulated on 01.08.2018, amended release of persons sentenced to suffer life imprisonment on conviction under IPC, directions issued by Supreme Court in Rashidul Jafar case \u2013 Despite the said judgment and the convicts having fulfilled the conditions of eligibility for the grant of premature release, cases were not being\n Decision Date :\n 06-02-2023\n | Case No :\n MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 2169/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUKESH SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 886\n2023 INSC 765\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) Whether the High Court committed any error in dismissing the appeal fi led by the appellant convict and thereby affi rming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court for the alleged off ences?; (ii) Whether an accused in the TIP on the ground that he was already shown to the eye witnesses prior to the conduct of the TIP and in such circumstances, the TIP would be nothing short of creating evidence against him?; (iii) Can an accused decline to participate in the TIP that the investigating offi cer may\n Decision Date :\n 24-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1554/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHAGWAN SINGH\n versus \nDILIP KUMAR @ DEEPU @ DEPAK AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 469\n2023 INSC 761\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Single Judge of the High Court was justifi ed in granting bail to the respondent-accused in connection with the FIR registered against them by the appellant-uncle of the minor girl alleging gang rape, threat of making video of rape recorded viral and u/ss. 376D, 384, 506 IPC, s. 3 to 6 of POCSO Act, s. 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and s. 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 439 \u2013 Special powers of High Court or Court of\n Decision Date :\n 23-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2560/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHASHIKANT SHARMA & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 1067\n2023 INSC 1036\nCoram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the prima facie ingredients of the off ence punishable u/s. 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act were made out against the appellants. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 504 \u2013 Scheduled Castes and of Atrocities) Act, 1989 \u2013 s.3(2)(v) \u2013 Appellants, at the outset, conceded that so far as the off ences punishable under IPC are concerned, the prayer for discharge would require extensive evaluation of evidence and hence, challenge to the order framing charges was given up\n Decision Date :\n 01-12-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3663/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRANA AYYUB\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 892\n2023 INSC 101\nCoram : V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s. 3, 4, 44 and 45 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 4.3, 406, 418, 420 \u2013 Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 \u2013 s. 66D \u2013 Black Money Act \u2013 s. 4 \u2013 Act, 1999 \u2013 s. 37 \u2013 Income Tax Act, 1961 \u2013 ss. 133(6) \u2013 Petitioner during the pandemic did the crowdfunding campaign using an online crowdfunding platform \u201cKetto\u201d \u2013 Mumbai Zonal Office of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) initiated inquiry under FEMA\n Decision Date :\n 07-02-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 12/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSEBIL ELANJIMPALLY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ODISHA \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 563\n2023 INSC 557\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Bail \u2013 Denial of \u2013 When not proper \u2013 Appellant charged for commission of offences u/s. 20(b)(ii)(C), NDPS Act had been in custody for two years and 11 months \u2013 Bail denied \u2013 On appeal, held: The fact that the co-accused who was released on bail did not surrender Impugned order set aside \u2013 Matter to be reconsidered by the High Court \u2013 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s.20(b)(ii)(C). CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No.1578 of 2023. From the Judgment and Order dated 20.01.2023 of the High Court\n Decision Date :\n 18-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1578/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHANCHALPATI DAS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 655\n2023 INSC 554\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 FIR and charge-sheet \u2013 Quashing of \u2013 FIR was registered against appellant-accused u/ss. 468, 471, 406 and 120-B of IPC \u2013 Appellant-accused claim themselves to be spiritual leaders and are related to a religious/ spiritual society \u2013 had committed theft as well as criminal breach of trust in respect of a bus \u2013 Appellant-accused sought quashing of the criminal proceedings \u2013 High Court dismissed the criminal revisions \u2013 On appeal, held: As per the case of the complainant, the alleged incident of bus\n Decision Date :\n 18-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1592/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMESH CHANDRA VAISHYA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 643\n2023 INSC 569\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 \u2013 ss. 3(1)(x), 18 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 323, 325, 392, 452, 504, 506 \u2013 Prosecution case that the appellant was engaged in an altercation with the second respondent-complainant over the issue \u2013 It was alleged that during this altercation, the appellant verbally hurled caste related abuses towards the complainant and his family members, and subsequently physically assaulted the complainant causing him multiple injuries \u2013 Two FIRs were filed \u2013 First FIR by the\n Decision Date :\n 19-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1617/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCAPTAIN MANJIT SINGH VIRDI (RETD.)\n versus \nHUSSAIN MOHAMMED SHATTAF & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 469\n2023 INSC 555\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Application for discharge \u2013 Victim\u2019s body was found in a pool of blood in his bedroom \u2013 After investigation, charge-sheet was filed against respondent nos.1 & 2 \u2013 Trial Court had not yet framed charges \u2013 Immediately after was filed \u2013 The same was dismissed by the Trial Court \u2013 However, the High Court set aside the order passed by the Trial Court and discharged respondent nos. 1 & 2 \u2013 On appeal, held: The settled proposition of law is that at the stage of hearing on charges entire\n Decision Date :\n 18-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1399/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVI MANDAL\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2023] 7 S.C.R. 1\n2023 INSC 552\nCoram : HRISHIKESH ROY\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302, 34 and 201 \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 ss. 4 and 25 \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 FIR lodged by PW-1 (father of deceased) after founding dead body of his son at 0730 hours on 01.11.2001 in a forest, alleging that deceased was with \u2018R\u2019 and with \u2018S\u2019 in written information \u2013 Both accused (R and S) were convicted by the Trial Court u/s.302 r/w. s.34, s.201 of IPC and ss. 4/25 of the Arms Act \u2013 Trial Court relied on testimonies of PW-2 and PW-5 to conclude that deceased was last seen alive in the company\n Decision Date :\n 18-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 511/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nV. SENTHIL BALAJI\n versus \nTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND ORS.  \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 853\n2023 INSC 677\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) When an arrestee is forwarded to the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 19(3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, whether writ of Habeus Corpus would lie; (ii) Whether s.41 CrPC has got any made under PMLA, 2002; (iii) The actual import of Section 167(2) of the CrPC, 1973 as to whether the 15 days period of custody in favour of the police should be only within the fi rst 15 days of remand or spanning over the entire period of investigation - 60 or 90 days, as the case may be, as a\n Decision Date :\n 07-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2284/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT & ORS.\n versus \nDR. MANU & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 7 S.C.R. 366\n2023 INSC 539\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Service Law \u2013 Respondent No.1 joined the service of the Appellant-University in July 1999 as a Lecturer \u2013 He was placed in the senior scale and granted four advance increments by virtue of Cl 6.16 of the UGC Scheme dtd.21.12.1999 which provided that degree at the time of recruitment as lecturers would be eligible for four advance increments \u2013 Later, Respondent No.1 was placed as a Selection Grade Lecturer however, while fixing the pay, two advance increments payable on placement of a Lecturer holding a Ph.D. degree as a Selection\n Decision Date :\n 16-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3752/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF U.P\n versus \nSONU KUSHWAHA \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 993\n2023 INSC 603\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: ss. 6, 5 clause (m) \u2013 Aggravated penetrative sexual assault \u2013 Punishment for \u2013 Prosecution case that accused had put his penis into mouth of the victim aged about 10 years and discharged semen \u2013 Conviction u/s. 377 and the POCSO Act, and sentenced accordingly \u2013 However, the High Court held that the act committed by the accused was of penetrative sexual assault punishable u/s. 4 and reduced the sentence \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Held: Accused committed an offence of aggravated penetrative sexual\n Decision Date :\n 05-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1633/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRANJAN KUMAR CHADHA\n versus \nSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 289\n2023 INSC 878\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration : The contention raised was that the High Court erred in holding the appellant guilty of off ence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) as Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not contended that the High Court committed error in recording the fi nding that Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not applicable in the present case as the recovery of the contraband substance was not made as a result of the personal search of the accused but on account of the search of his bag. The\n Decision Date :\n 06-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2239/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S IVECO MAGIRUS BRANDSCHUTZTECHNIK GMBH\n versus \nNIRMAL KISHORE BHARTIYA & ANR \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 220\n2023 INSC 880\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: (i) Whether, while considering a private complaint alleging defamation, the Magistrate before summoning the accused ought to confi ne himself to the allegations forming part of the petition only or he may, applying the exceptions to s.499, IPC, dismiss the complaint holding that the facts alleged do not make out a case of defamation? (ii) Whether and, if at all, to what extent, is it open to the High Courts to exercise inherent power saved by s.482, Cr. PC to quash proceedings for defamation by setting\n Decision Date :\n 05-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1959/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE\n versus \nS. SUBBEGOWDA \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 19\n2023 INSC 669\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) Whether the High Court in exercise of its powers u/s. 482 of CrPC could have discharged the respondent-accused from the charges levelled against him for the off ences u/s. 13(1)(e) punishable u/s. 13(2) of the said Act, despite the fact that pressed for his second application for discharge by submitting the Memo dated 02.12.2014 and despite the fact that after framing of the charge by the Special Court on 23.12.2014, the trial had proceeded further and the prosecution had examined 17 witnesses in support of its case? (ii) Whether the\n Decision Date :\n 03-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1598/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. JERMYN CAPITAL LLC DUBAI\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 565\n2023 INSC 509\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.102 \u2013 Freeze orders and bank guarantee in furtherance there of were imposed against the appellant company on grounds of necessity of investigation of an alleged crime initiated against one \u2018D\u2019 allegedly connected to the appellant company an employee/ share holder/director or a key managerial person in the appellant company \u2013 Since \u2018D\u2019 was in no way connected to the appellant company, the trial faced by him, was in his individual capacity, and not vicariously on behalf of the appellant company \u2013 No\n Decision Date :\n 09-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1434/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVISHNU KUMAR SHUKLA & ANR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 1071\n2023 INSC 1026\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the order passed by the High Court refusing to discharge the accused in a criminal case and quashing an FIR calls for interference. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 239-240 \u2013 Trial of warrant- cases Application for discharge \u2013 Permissible extent of scrutiny \u2013 On facts, refusal of the High Court to discharge the accused- appellant in a criminal case and quash an FIR \u2013 Interference with: Held: Case for interference made out \u2013 There is no suspicion, much less strong or\n Decision Date :\n 28-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3618/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nN. RAMKUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 845\n2023 INSC 812\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellant in fi t of rage, dashed head of the victim against the wall, resulting in death of victim. Appellant convicted u/s. 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. Whether judgment, order and sentence passed by the Sessions Court and affi rmed by rmed or the sentence is to be converted and punishment to be awarded u/s. 304 of IPC and if so, which part of s.304 IPC? Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 and 304 Part II \u2013 Limited question before the Supreme Court regarding the affi rmation of sentence u/s. 302 IPC or conversion of sentence\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2006/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPREMCHAND\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 119\n2023 INSC 207\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Penal Code,1860 \u2013 ss. 300,302 307 and 304 \u2013 The trial Court convicted the appellant for the offence of murder of the victim- deceased and attempt to murder three others \u2013 The judgment of the trial Court was challenged by the appellant by preferring appeal before the High Court On appeal, held: The trial court and the High Court did not consider written Statement (Ext. 96) of the appellant u/s 313(5) Cr.P.C. in its entirety, non-consideration of the same has made the conviction vulnerable to interference \u2013 Trial Court failed to appreciate the defence version\n Decision Date :\n 03-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 211/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPAVANA DIBBUR\n versus \nTHE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 1049\n2023 INSC 1029\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the off ence u/s.120B, IPC included in Paragraph 1 of the Schedule to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, can be treated as a scheduled off ence even if the criminal conspiracy alleged is to commit an off ence which is not a part Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 Paragraph 1 of the Schedule \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.120B \u2013 Appellant purchased the fi rst property from Alliance Business School and the second property from accused no.1 against whom an FIR was registered alleging that he\n Decision Date :\n 29-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2779/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nK. HYMAVATHI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 412\n2023 INSC 811\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court if justifi ed in quashing the criminal proceedings fi led by appellant against respondent No.2-accused u/ss.138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 holding that it was a fi t case for quashing since the complaint fi led seeking prosecution recoverable debt. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 Debt if legally enforceable \u2013 Exercise of power u/s. 482, CrPC \u2013 Scope: Held: Whether the debt in question is a legally enforceable debt or other liability would arise on the facts and circumstance of each case and in that\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2743/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKISHORE BALKRISHNA NAND\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 34\n2023 INSC 675\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : Whether the allegations made in the complaint in the good faith addressed to the lawful authority-Sub Divisional Magistrate, make out an off ence of defamation under Section 500 IPC or not. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.499, eighth exception, s. 500 in good faith \u2013 When not defamation: Held : Accusation in the complaint preferred in good faith against any person, to a person in lawful authority with regard to the subject-matter of accusation, is not a defamation \u2013 By perusing the allegations made in the complaint, no case for\n Decision Date :\n 02-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2291/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nY. BALAJI\n versus \nKARTHIK DESARI & ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 8 S.C.R. 1026\n2023 INSC 542\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 ss.3, 2(1)(u) \u2013 Offence of Money Laundering \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 Jobs-for-cash scam in the State of Tamil Nadu \u2013 Whether without identifying the proceeds of crime/a of crime and any process or activity connected to proceeds of crime as required by s.3, which constitute the foundational/ jurisdictional fact, can ED initiate an investigation and issue summons \u2013 Held: All the three FIRs alleged that the accused had committed offences included in the\n Decision Date :\n 16-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1671/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAMAL\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 49\n2023 INSC 678\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : In a prosecution case where father was found dead by the complainant-brother of the deceased, and suspicion arose on the son of the deceased on account of the property dispute between the father and the son, and the son fl ed from the scene of incident and later, whether the courts below were justifi ed in convicting the son u/s. 302/34 IPC and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for life. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 r/w 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Circumstantial evidence and last seen theory \u2013 Conviction on basis of, by the courts\n Decision Date :\n 07-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 465/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSIVAMANI AND ANR. \n versus \nSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 849\n2023 INSC 1027\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Victims sustained simple injuries. Whether Courts below were justifi ed in convicting appellants u/s. 307 IPC. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 323, 324 and 307 \u2013 Trial Court Nos.3 and 4) u/s. 307, IPC and sentenced to 10 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment \u2013 High Court reduced the imprisonment from 10 years to 5 years \u2013 Propriety: Held: PW1 and accused no.1 had a dispute concerning a lane between their houses \u2013 A civil case regarding the same was\n Decision Date :\n 28-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3619/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARSHURAM\n versus \nSTATE OF M.P. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 186\n2023 INSC 973\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the courts below were justifi ed in convicting and sentencing the appellants for the off ences punishable u/s. 302/149, s.326/149, s.324/149, s.323/149, s.147 and s.148 IPC. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 302/149, 326/149, 324/149, 323/149, 147 and 148 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Unlawful assembly \u2013 Accused persons formed an unlawful assembly when the buff alo of the complainant party spoiled the taparia built by the accused, and thereafter grieviously assaulted the complainant and his members\n Decision Date :\n 03-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 524/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJITENDRA NATH MISHRA\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ANR \n- \n[2023] 7 S.C.R. 642\n2023 INSC 576\nCoram : DIPANKAR DATTA, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.319 \u2013 Exercise of power under \u2013 Held: What is essential for exercise of the power u/ s.319 is that the evidence on record must show the involvement of a person in the commission of a crime and that the said arraigned as an accused, should face trial together with the accused already arraigned \u2013 However, the court holding a trial, if it intends to exercise power conferred by s.319 must not act mechanically merely on the ground that some evidence has come on record implicating the person sought\n Decision Date :\n 02-06-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 978/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBALVIR SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 815\n2023 INSC 879\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The High Court affi rmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Trial Court holding appellant-husband guilty of the off ence of murder punishable u/s.302 of the IPC alongwith the off ence punishable u/s. 498A of the IPC and appellant-mother-in-law the IPC r/w. 34 of the IPC, whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302, s.498A \u2013 Prosecution case was that victim died due to poisoning \u2013 At the time of death only her appellant-husband was present \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 06-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 301/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. SHEKHAR RESORTS LIMITED (UNIT OF ORIENT TAJ)\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 1111\n2023 INSC 15\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 : Deposit of settlement amount under the 2019 Scheme, during moratorium \u2013 When impossible in view of the bar under the IBC \u2013 Appellant-corporate debtor, if can be made to suffer for no fault of its own and rendered rememediless \u2013 On facts, of the appellant u/s. 7 \u2013 Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the appellant \u2013 Appellant subjected to moratorium \u2013 Thereafter, Resolution plan approved and the appellant applied for \u201cSabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme 2019 \u2013 Appellant could\n Decision Date :\n 05-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 8957/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSMT. ROOPA SONI\n versus \nKAMALNARAYAN SONI \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 871\n2023 INSC 814\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the trial Court and High Court were justifi ed in adopting a hyper-technical and pedantic approach in declining the decree of divorce, when both the parties had made serious allegations against each other and were living separately for decade Act, 1955 \u2013 The appellant-wife registered a complaint u/s. 498A of IPC and ss.3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 \u2013 The respondent-Husband had questioned the character of the appellant-wife \u2013 Petition for divorce \u2013 Trial Court and the High Court declined decree of\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5700/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMARKASH JAJARA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 834\n2023 INSC 1015\nCoram : SURYA KANT, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The appellant was held guilty of having committed the murder of his son-in-law. Whether the off ence attributed to the appellant falls within the ambit of Exception I of Section 300 IPC which defi nes \u201cmurder\u201d. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 and \u2013 The occurrence took place inside the house of the appellant \u2013 The informant had gone to the house of the appellant and found his brother, who had been staying with his in-laws, lying dead \u2013 Trial Court on consideration of the evidence held the appellant guilty of committing\n Decision Date :\n 03-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3405/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRIYANKA MISHRA & ORS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 1152\n2023 INSC 729\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Quashing of FIR \u2013 Complaint filed by Respondent no.2-wife against appellants (sister-in-law, mother-in-law and father-in-law) and her husband for offences punishable u/s.498-A s.4, Dowry Prohibition Act \u2013 Petition filed by appellants u/s.482 for quashing, dismissed \u2013 On appeal, held: FIR in question as far as appellants are concerned, is an abuse of the process of the Court \u2013 Respondent No.2 resided for less than three weeks in the matrimonial home\n Decision Date :\n 08-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1545/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nWAZIR KHAN\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 39\n2023 INSC 674\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : In a case hinging on circumstantial evidence, where the appellant was put to trial u/ss. 302 and 201 IPC for murdering his wife, and he did not dispute his presence at the place of incident and, further, the explanation off ered by him as regards wife was found to be false, whether the High Court was justifi ed in reversing the acquittal order passed by the trial court. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and 201 \u2013 Reversal of acquittal by High Court \u2013 Propriety: Held : When attention of the appellant was drawn to the\n Decision Date :\n 02-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1922/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. D. N. SINGH\n versus \nCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL, PATNA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 7 S.C.R. 530\n2023 INSC 543\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Income Tax Act, 1961 \u2013 s.69A \u2013 Scope and applicability of \u2013 s.69A deals with unexplained money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable articles \u2013 Deeming effect of the provision \u2013 When applicable \u2013 Ambit of the word \u2018owner\u2019 in s.69A Joseph, J.) : To apply s.69A of the Act, it is indispensable that the Officer must find that the other valuable article is owned by the assessee \u2013 A bailee who is a common carrier is not the owner of the goods \u2013 A bailee who is a common carrier would necessarily be entrusted with\n Decision Date :\n 16-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3738/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSARVESH MATHUR\n versus \nTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 1117\n2023 INSC 891\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Denial of access to video conferencing facilities or hearing through the hybrid mode. Directions by Supreme Court \u2013 Conduction of hearings through video conferencing/hybrid mode \u2013 Considerable variation between High Courts in of technology \u2013 Position of the tribunals under various ministries of the Union Government: Held: No High Court shall deny access to video conferencing facilities or hearing through the hybrid mode to any member of the Bar or litigant desirous of availing of such a facility \u2013 All\n Decision Date :\n 06-10-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 351/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVARDAN ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.\n versus \nASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX CENTRAL SECTION & ORS \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 1118\n2023 INSC 1087\nCoram : HIMA KOHLI, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Consignment was intercepted in the course of inter-state movement, as there was no valid E-way bill. High Court directed that the goods be released subject to payment of the entire amount of the Goods cash and 50% of the penalty imposed also in cash while the remaining 50% by way of bank guarantee. Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 \u2013 West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 \u2013 Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 \u2013 Appellant executed work contracts for GAIL in the\n Decision Date :\n 31-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 8302/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKARAN @ FATIYA\n versus \n THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 587\n2023 INSC 197\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 \u2013 Claim of Juvenility \u2013 Appellant convicted for various offences under IPC and POCSO Act was awarded death sentence \u2013 Death sentence affirmed by High Court \u2013 During the pendency of the present appeals, appellant Trial Court was directed to submit report after due inquiry \u2013 Report submitted, appellant\u2019s date of birth was found to be conclusively proved as 25.07.2002 \u2013 Date of incident being 15.12.2017, the appellant was aged 15 years 04 months and 20 days on the date of the incident\n Decision Date :\n 03-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 572/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD. NAUSHAD\n versus \nSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 160\n2023 INSC 605\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Decision Date :\n 06-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1269/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMANDEEP SINGH SARAN\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 435\n2023 INSC 1028\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Conduct of the trial for off ence under Section 409, Penal Code, 1860; exercise of powers under Cr.PC, for committal of cases to the Court of competent jurisdiction. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.26, 29, 12, 323; First Schedule to CrPC \u2013 s.409 \u2013 Courts by which off ences are triable \u2013 Procedure when, after commencement of inquiry or trial, Magistrate fi nds case should be committed\u2013 Appellant charged for commission of various off ences including u/s.409, IPC punishable with imprisonment for life or\n Decision Date :\n 29-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2625/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRATIBHA MANCHANDA & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 411\n2023 INSC 612\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 438 \u2013 Anticipatory bail \u2013 Rejection of \u2013 Appellants\u2019 case that they had possession over the subject land and they never sold the subject land to anyone nor have they ever executed any power of attorney (GPA) in favor of any third persons had approached the halqa patwari to sanction mutation of the aforesaid land \u2013 It was alleged that the application for mutation was based on a forged and fabricated sale deed dated 24.02.2022 \u2013 Appellant also learnt that the said sale deed was based on yet another,\n Decision Date :\n 07-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1793/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANIL KUMAR \n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA  \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 173\n2023 INSC 965\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA, PANKAJ MITHAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether in the circumstances of the instant case, the appellant had any premeditated mind to kill the deceased or was it due to grave and sudden provocation which would not amount to murder or would at best be a case of culpable homicide not amounting to for a term which may extend up to 10 years or with fi ne or with both u/s. 304 Part-II of IPC. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 and s. 304 Part-II \u2013 Prosecution case that the appellant, with the intention to kill his wife, lighted a matchstick and threw it upon her when she had\n Decision Date :\n 01-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2697/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRIYA INDORIA\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 525\n2023 INSC 1008\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the power of the High Court or the Court of Session to grant anticipatory bail u/s 438 CrPC could be exercised with respect to an FIR registered outside the territorial jurisdiction of the said Court; and whether the transit anticipatory bail or interim protection to enable an applicant seeking anticipatory bail to make an application u/s 438 CrPC before a Court of competent jurisdiction is consistent with the administration of criminal justice. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 438 \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 20-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 003549/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAILASH VIJAYVARGIYA\n versus \nRAJLAKSHMI CHAUDHURI AND OTHERS \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 135\n2023 INSC 494\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 156(3) \u2013 Police officer\u2019s power to investigate cognizable case \u2013 Application u/s. 156(3) by the victim-complainant alleging rape by the appellants; and sought direction to police to investigate the matter treating the complaint as an FIR filed several complaints before the police authorities, who conducted an enquiry and found that there was delay of two years in filing the complaint and refused to register the same \u2013 Dismissal of the application u/s. 156(3) by the Magistrate \u2013 Revision application thereagainst,\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1581/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDINESH KUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 220\n2023 INSC 493\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Penal Code,1860 \u2013 ss.302,364,392,394,201 and 34 \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 ss.27,101,106 and 165 \u2013 The case of prosecution was based on circumstantial evidence i.e. the evidence of \u2018last seen\u2019 and the \u2018discoveries\u2019 made from the information given by the co-accused convicted by Trial Court for the murder of the deceased \u2013 Two separate appeals were filed before the High Court \u2013 During the pendency of the appeal, the co-accused passed away, thus, his appeal stood abated \u2013 The appeal of the present appellant was dismissed, thus\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 530/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMARIAPPAN\n versus \nSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 1074\n2023 INSC 1034\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: On the day of incident, heated arguments took place between the two parties. During the quarrel, accused nos.1 and 2 stabbed victim multiple times with sooriknives, while accused no.3, though armed with a spade handle, did not infl ict injuries attack. The appellant-accused was convicted u/s. 302 IPC. Whether the acts of the accused would come under Exception 4 to s.300 IPC or would be an act of culpable homicide amounting to murder punishable u/s. 302. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 and s.304 Part-I \u2013 Trial Court after examining\n Decision Date :\n 24-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3598/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPAWAN KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 261\n2023 INSC 1012\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n 261 : 2023 INSC 1012 261 CASE DETAILS PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. (Criminal Appeal No. 3548 of 2023) NOVEMBER 21, 2023 [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND SUDHANSHU DHULIA,JJ] HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The question which arise for determination is whether the appellant was a of age \u2013 When exact assessment of the age cannot be done: Held: Age of a juvenile has to be determined on the basis of the date of the alleged commission of the crime \u2013 In a case of juvenility where two views are possible, a liberal approach should be undertaken \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 21-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3548/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRASAD PRADHAN & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 241\n2023 INSC 79\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant/accused and the victim were cousins \u2013 On the afternoon of 28.02.2012, when the victim was getting his land levelled through a JCB machine, the appellants (A-1 and A-2) reached the place and armed with an axe and he attacked the victim on the head \u2013 Against A-2, the allegation was that he was armed with an axe and had assaulted the victim on the legs \u2013 Regarding A-3, the grandson of A-1 and son of A-2, the allegation was that he went to the spot and caught hold of the\n Decision Date :\n 24-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2025/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUNNA LAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 224\n2023 INSC 78\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 374(2) \u2013Appeal from convictions \u2013 Murder of the complainant\u2019s father \u2013 Previous enmity between the parties \u2013 On the fateful day, the appellants armed with weapons inflicted gun shot injuries and blows to the \u2013 FIR against the appellants \u2013 Surviving appellants convicted u/s. 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 Upheld by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held : PW-2 being inimical to the appellants, his testimony to be taken carefully \u2013 PW-3 was at the best, a chance\n Decision Date :\n 24-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 490/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTARUN KUMAR\n versus \nASSISTANT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 813\n2023 INSC 1006\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellant was arrested on the fourth supplementary complaint fi led u/ss.44, 45, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in continuation of three complaints in the Complaint Case, for the commission of the off ence of whether justifi ed in dismissing the bail application of the appellant seeking bail in connection with the said Complaint Case bearing ECIR No. arising out of the FIR registered for off ence u/s.13(2) r/w 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and u/s.120B r/w ss.420, 465, 467, 468, 471,\n Decision Date :\n 20-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3593/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nATULBHAI VITHALBHAI BHANDERI\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 239\n2023 INSC 496\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Bail : Grant of \u2013 Appellant involved in intimidating and threatening the victim in connivance with the main accused no.1 running an organised crime syndicate for extorting money and land- grabbing by threatening people \u2013 59 cases registered against the accused no.1 \u2013 FIR for offence punishable under the 2015 Act and the Penal Code \u2013 Bail application by the appellant during pendency of the trial \u2013 Dismissed by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: Discretion must be exercised judiciously \u2013 Keeping in view the appellant\u2019s alleged role,\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1390/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTALAT SANVI\n versus \nSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 289\n2023 INSC 80\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n Victim compensation: Interim victim compensation in proceedings for anticipatory bail cannot be imposed as a condition for the same \u2013 Question of interim victim compensation cannot form part of the bail jurisprudence \u2013 Bail \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 357. 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for order to pay compensation when a court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (includinga sentence of death) of which fine forms a part in the circumstances enumerated therein. Sub-section (2) imposes a limitation that when fine is imposed in a\n Decision Date :\n 24-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 205/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0c95\u0ca8\u0ccd\u0ca8\u0ca1 - Kannada\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVASAHEB @ RAVASAHEBGOUDA ETC.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 965\n2023 INSC 238\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Victim was murdered \u2013 The trial court and the High Court, despite most of the prosecution witnesses turning hostile, found the prosecution case to be established beyond reasonable doubt through the unrefuted testimony of PW-1 and convicted the accused consideration on appeal was, whether eight men can be convicted based on the testimony of a solitary witness, who was the only eyewitness to the crime \u2013 Held: Presence of the accused on the spot is not disputed by anyone \u2013 Witness, despite being cross-examined extensively, is\n Decision Date :\n 16-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1109/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nSHYAM BIHARI & OTHERS \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 464\n2023 INSC 623\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n COURT REPORTS [2023] 10 S.C.R. 464 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SHYAM BIHARI & OTHERS (Criminal Appeal No. 413 of 2013) JULY 17, 2023 [B. V. NAGARATHNA AND MANOJ MISRA, JJ. ] Penal Code,1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and 34 \u2013 Murder case \u2013 Acquittal of three policeman \u2013 with weapons \u2013 Policemen fired at them, hitting the victim who succumbed to the injuries and the prosecution witnesses managed to escape \u2013 Policemen charged of murder while patrolling u/s. 302/34 \u2013 However, acquittal by the trial court \u2013 Appeal thereagainst, u/s. 378(3)\n Decision Date :\n 17-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 413/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nH. D. SUNDARA & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 47\n2023 INSC 858\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The question which arose for consideration was whether the High Court was justifi ed in setting aside the order of acquittal passed by the trial court. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 378 \u2013 Appeal against acquittal \u2013 Matter pertaining to accused and the family of complainant \u2013 Accused assaulted the complainant and his family \u2013 Acquittal of all the accused by the trial court, however conviction for the off ences punishable u/s. 304 Part I and s. 324/149 IPC by the High Court \u2013 Correctness: Held: No fi ndings\n Decision Date :\n 26-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 247/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTEESTA ATUL SETALVAD\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1147\n2023 INSC 637\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Bail\u2013 Appellant was on interim bail on account of order dtd. 02.09.2022 passed by Supreme Court \u2013 By the impugned order, High Court rejected the bail application filed by the appellant and directed the appellant to surrender immediately \u2013 Legality of \u2013 Held: There was no immediately when she was enjoying the interim protection under the orders of Supreme Court \u2013 The considerations which were available when the order dtd.02.09.2022 was passed are still available even at this stage \u2013 Most of the evidence in the present case are documentary evidence\n Decision Date :\n 19-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2022/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nROYDEN HAROLD BUTHELLO & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 150\n2023 INSC 180\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Criminal Law \u2013 Investigation by CBI \u2013 When cannot be directed \u2013 Appellant no.1 accused of indulging in sale of psychotropic NDPS substance \u2013 It is the case of the appellant no.1 that while he was travelling with regard to illegally abducted, detained and a case under NDPS was foisted on him \u2013 Appellant no.1 and his father-appellant no.2 filed writ petition before High Court inter alia seeking direction to transfer the investigation to the CBI, which was declined \u2013 Revision petition filed by the\n Decision Date :\n 28-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 634/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMS. X\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 1112\n2023 INSC 252\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA, HIMA KOHLI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 437,438 and 439 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 354,354-B, 376 and 506 \u2013 Anticipatory bail \u2013 Cancellation of \u2013 A complaint filed by the appellant- prosecutrix, against the respondent No.2-accused, who lured her under the garb of assignments, raped her in a hotel room where she was staying \u2013 Initially, the FIR was registered u/ss. 354, 354-B and 506 of the IPC, and later, on the supplementary statement of the appellant being recorded, the offence u/s.376 was added to the FIR \u2013 The High Court granted\n Decision Date :\n 17-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 822/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT\n versus \nADITYA TRIPATHI \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 410\n2023 INSC 531\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: s. 45 \u2013 Enlargement on bail \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 Allegations of tempering of bids \u2013 Accused chargesheeted u/ss. 120-B, 420, 468, 471 IPC and s. 7 rw s. 13(2) of the PC Act, the scheduled offences \u2013 Offences 2002 added later \u2013 Enforcement Directorate initiated money laundering investigation \u2013 Respondent no. 1 arrested \u2013 Thereafter, the High Court enlarged the respondent No.1 on bail \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 Held: Not sustainable \u2013 High Court did not consider the\n Decision Date :\n 12-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1401/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARAYAN CHETANRAM CHAUDHARY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 1055\n2023 INSC 298\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 \u2013 ss. 9, 94 \u2013 Juvenility \u2013 Determination of \u2013 The applicant, along with two other accomplices had committed and two children \u2013 They were tried for commission of offences u/ss. 302, 342, 397, 449 r/w 120B and 34 of IPC \u2013 Trial Court sentenced the appellant to death \u2013 Both the judgment of conviction and order of sentence were confirmed by the High Court \u2013 The Supreme Court\n Decision Date :\n 27-03-2023\n | Case No :\n Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 157334/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSAJEEV\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 241\n2023 INSC 998\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the conviction and sentence of the accused-A10 and A11 u/ss. 302, 307, and 326/120B IPC and s.55(a), (h), (i) and s. 57 (A)(1)(ii) of the Abkari Act by the courts below is sustainable in law. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302, 307 and 326/120B \u2013 \u2013 Conspiracy of alcohol poisoning \u2013 A1, kingpin of the illicit liquor business alongwith A3, A10, and A11 hatched a conspiracy to mix methyl alcohol with spirit to sell the same for an unlawful gain through the outlet operated by A1, and the consumption of the same resulted in the\n Decision Date :\n 09-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1134/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nR. SREENIVASA\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 55\n2023 INSC 803\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court if justifi ed in reversing the acquittal order passed by the Trial Court qua the appellant-accused acquitting him of off ences u/ss.302 and 201, IPC by which it held that the prosecution had failed to prove that the deceased was last seen in the Evidence \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Last seen theory \u2013 When cannot be invoked: Held: The \u2018last seen\u2019 theory can be invoked only when the same stands proved beyond reasonable doubt \u2013 In the present case, there is no defi nitive evidence of last seen and\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 859/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNIL SAINI & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 1105\n2023 INSC 715\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n 1 S.C.R. 1105 SUNIL SAINI & ORS. v. THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. (Transfer Petition (Criminal) No.125 of 2019) JANUARY 30, 2023 [K. M. JOSEPH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA] Transfer Petition: Transfer of the case sought from the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar to the Competent Court in to the petitioners by setting their houses, godowns and their every belonging on fire \u2013 Complete breakdown of the law and order resulting in gross damage \u2013 Prosecuting team not acting in a fair and fearless manner \u2013 Petitioners who are witnesses have been under threats by the\n Decision Date :\n 30-01-2023\n | Case No :\n TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 125/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nB. S. HARI COMMANDANT\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 431\n2023 INSC 369\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Border Security Force Act, 1968 \u2013 Appellant-Commandant in Border Security Force was sentenced to 10 years\u2019 rigorous imprisonment; imposed fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and dismissed from service for allegedly permitting smuggling of contraband goods from India to Pakistan from his control \u2013 Held: Though in the armed forces, including the paramilitary forces, utmost discipline, unity of command are the sine qua non, the doctrine of proportionality still holds the field \u2013 In the present case, there is no direct evidence against the appellant \u2013 Except\n Decision Date :\n 13-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1890/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHATRUGHAN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 758\n2023 INSC 630\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 \u2013 Culpable homicide amounting to murder \u2013 Conviction u/s. 302 \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 FIR against the appellant by the informant-uncle of deceased \u2013 Allegation that the deceased had shouted that the appellant had assaulted him with a tabbal \u2013 place of incident and saw his nephew lying there with deep cut on the neck \u2013 Nephew later succumbed to his injuries \u2013 Conviction of the appellant u/s. 302 and sentenced to life imprisonment by the courts below \u2013 On appeal, held: Prosecution failed to establish the charge \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 20-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 437/2016\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBUDDHADEB SAHA & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 332\n2023 INSC 1084\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment holding the husband and in-laws guilty for the off ence punishable u/ss. 498A, 304B read with 34 IPC. Evidence \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Dowry demand \u2013 Commission of suicide by victim-wife on account of consumption of poison \u2013 However, post mortem report silent as to the exact cause of death and the viscera report silent as to traces of poison being found therein \u2013 Eff ect of, on prosecution case: Held: Considering the\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1692/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRITU CHHABARIA\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 826\n2023 INSC 436\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.167(2) \u2013 Right of default bail \u2013 A chargesheet, if can be filed in piecemeal without first completing the investigation and whether the filing of such chargesheet extinguishes the right of an accused for grant of default bail \u2013 Held: completing the investigation of a case, a chargesheet or prosecution complaint cannot be filed by an investigating agency only to deprive an arrested accused of his right to default bail u/s.167(2) \u2013 Such a chargesheet, if filed, would not extinguish the right to default bail u/s.167(2)\n Decision Date :\n 26-04-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 60/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJUDGEBIR SINGH @ JASBIR SINGH SAMRA @ JASBIR & ORS.\n versus \nNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 1\n2023 INSC 472\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n 1 1 JUDGEBIR SINGH @ JASBIR SINGH SAMRA @ JASBIR & ORS. v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY (Criminal Appeal No. 1011 of 2023) MAY 01, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND J. B. PARDIWALA, J.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss. 167(2), 173 \u2013 Default Bail \u2013 Entitlement to, passed by a competent authority \u2013 Held : It cannot be said that a chargesheet filed without sanction is an incomplete chargesheet which could be termed as not in consonance with s. 173 \u2013 According sanction is the duty of the sanctioning authority who is not connected with the\n Decision Date :\n 01-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1011/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nFIRST GLOBAL STOCKBROKING PVT. LTD. & ORS.\n versus \nANIL RISHIRAJ & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 421\n2023 INSC 845\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Enforcement Offi cer appointed under FERA, 1973 continued to have the authority or competence to fi le a complaint for the off ences punishable under FERA before the expiry of the sunset period provided in sub-section FEMA, 1999. Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 \u2013 Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 \u2013 On 11.02.2002, the fi rst respondent, who was an Enforcement Offi cer appointed under clause (e) of s.3 of FERA, fi led a complaint against the appellants for various off ences punishable under\n Decision Date :\n 21-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2151/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUNILAKSHMI\n versus \nNARENDRA BABU & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 1058\n2023 INSC 943\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Bail granted to Respondent No.1 accused of off ences u/ss.109, 120B, 201, 302, 450, 454 r/w s.34, IPC, if to be cancelled, in view of events subsequent to the grant of bail. Bail \u2013 Scope of interference \u2013 Respondent No.1 was specifi cally named as the murder of his wife \u2013 However, change of stance by most vital witnesses, the family members of the deceased within 20 days of their examination-in-chief \u2013 Allegations made against Respondent No.1 in the past, of infl uencing the police, hiring goons, repeatedly assaulting the deceased\n Decision Date :\n 20-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3297/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD MUSLIM @ HUSSAIN\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 697\n2023 INSC 311\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s.37 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.436A \u2013 Appellant accused of committing offences punishable under NDPS Act has been in custody since 2015, if entitled to bail \u2013 Held: Recovery of ganja was made from the behest, and on the statement of one of the co-accused \u2013 Prosecution relied on that statement, as well as the confessional statement of the appellant \u2013 In addition, it also relied on the bank statements of one of the co-accused who allegedly disclosed that money used to be transferred\n Decision Date :\n 28-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 943/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nARYAN SINGH ETC. \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 819\n2023 INSC 338\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Saving of inherent powers of the High Court \u2013 Accused chargesheeted, on conclusion of the investigations by the CBI \u2013 Discharge applications by the two accused \u2013 Dismissed by the trial court, and thereafter, the High Court quashed proceedings in exercise of the powers u/s. 482 \u2013 On appeal, held: High Court exceeded in its jurisdiction in quashing the entire criminal proceedings in exercise of the limited powers u/s. 482 \u2013 At the stage of discharge and/or quashing of the criminal proceedings, while exercising\n Decision Date :\n 10-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1025/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNEETHA NARREDDY\n versus \nY S AVINASH REDDY & ANR \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 568\n2023 INSC 422\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Investigation \u2013 Victim-deceased was found murdered \u2013 CBI submitted a chargesheet and supplementary chargesheet naming five persons \u2013 CBI issued summons to the first respondent \u2013 First respondent appeared before the CBI on several occasions petition \u2013 On 18.04.2023, the High Court (i) granted an ad interim stay of arrest; and (ii) directed that the examination before the CBI in the course of the investigation shall be \u201cin printed/written form\u201d during the course of which a questionnaire may also be handed over to\n Decision Date :\n 24-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1251/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANIK HIRU JHANGIANI \n versus \nSTATE OF M.P \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 551\n2023 INSC 1078\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The question arose when the penal action can be taken under both the statutes-Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, which statute would prevail. Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) \u2013 ss. 52, 89 \u2013 this Act over all other food related laws: Held: Eff ect of s. 89 is that if there is an inconsistency between the provisions of the PFA and the FSSA, s. 89 would operate, and provisions of the FSSA would prevail over the provisions of the PFA to the extent to which the same are inconsistent\n Decision Date :\n 14-12-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3864/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S UNIBROS\n versus \nALL INDIA RADIO \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 683\n2023 INSC 931\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Arbitral award in question if in confl ict with the public policy of India and; whether a claim on account of loss of profi t is liable to succeed merely on the ground that there has been delay in the execution of the construction contract, attributable to Act, 1996 \u2013 s.34(2)(b) \u2013 \u201cPublic policy of India\u201d \u2013 Appellant awarded work contract by the respondent \u2013 Disputes between the parties owing to the delay in work, referred to Arbitrator \u2013 Vide First Award, appellant was awarded sum towards loss of\n Decision Date :\n 19-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 6895/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0985\u09b8\u09ae\u09c0\u09af\u09bc\u09be - Assamese\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPULEN PHUKAN & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ASSAM \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 616\n2023 INSC 305\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 302, 326, 147, 148, 149, 447 and 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Unlawful Assembly \u2013 Complainant-PW 1\u2019s case that 13 persons entered her house and caused grievous injury to her brother-in-law PW 2 and three of them assaulted the weapons resulting in his death \u2013 Trial conducted against 11 of them \u2013 Courts below convicted them u/s. 147/148/ 447/323/302/149 and sentenced them to imprisonment for life u/ss. 302/149 along with other punishment for the charged offences \u2013 On appeal, held: Prosecution is not to\n Decision Date :\n 28-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 906/2016\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABHISHEK SHARMA\n versus \nSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 890\n2023 INSC 924\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The victim-deceased gave four dying declarations. High Court confi rmed the appellant\u2019s conviction and sentence of life imprisonment u/s. 302 IPC as awarded by the trial Court. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 Multiple Prosecution case that appellant and victim had a quarrel, as the victim had aff ection for their boss and not for appellant \u2013 Appellant took victim to an open site near a school and in the midst of an argument, set her on fi re \u2013 Victim died \u2013 Victim had given four dying\n Decision Date :\n 18-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1473/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nYASHODHAN SINGH & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1196\n2023 INSC 652\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.319 \u2013 Principle of hearing a person who is summoned u/s. 319 Cr.P.C. \u2013 Applicability of \u2013 Respondent no.2-complainant got an FIR registered u/ss. 147, 148, 149, 302, 452, 307, 504 of IPC \u2013 A charge-sheet was filed persons but the names of appellants were not mentioned in it as their role was under investigation \u2013 Respondent no.2 filed application u/s. 319 Cr.P.C. to summon appellants \u2013 Trial Court summoned appellants to join trial \u2013 High Court affirmed the order passed by the trial Court\n Decision Date :\n 18-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2186/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nS. ATHILAKSHMI\n versus \nTHE STATE REP. BY THE DRUGS INSPECTOR \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 914\n2023 INSC 237\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 \u2013 ss.18(c), 27(b)(ii) \u2013 Prosecution of appellant u/s.18(c) punishable u/s.27(b)(ii) \u2013 Held: Prohibition u/s.18(c) is on the manufacturing, distribution, stocking or exhibition of medicines for the purposes of sale \u2013 In against the appellant was unwarranted \u2013 Appellant is a registered medical practitioner along with the fact that the quantity of medicines seized was extremely small, a quantity which can be easily found in the house or a consultation room of a doctor \u2013 Considering the small\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 804/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPEOPLE\u2019S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES AND ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.  \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 370\n2023 INSC 833\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to the modalities to be followed by the police in conducting media briefi ngs during criminal investigation. Media \u2013 Media briefi ngs/reporting by Propriety and procedure: Held: Media reporting in criminal matters involves degree of public interest associated with the fundamental right u/Art. 19(1)(a) \u2013 Guidelines for conducting media briefi ngs were prepared by the Union Ministry of Home Aff airs over a decade ago \u2013 Since then\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1255/1999\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nA. SREENIVASA REDDY\n versus \nRAKESH SHARMA AND ANR. \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 932\n2023 INSC 682\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the appellant, an Assistant General Manager of a Nationalised Bank is removable from his offi ce save by or with the sanction of the Government so as to make s.197, CrPC applicable; and if he can be proceeded against for off ences punishable the sanction u/s.19, PC Act, 1988 to prosecute him for the off ences thereunder was declined. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.197 \u2013 When not attracted: Held: Although a person working in a Nationalised Bank is a public servant, yet the provisions of s.197 would not be\n Decision Date :\n 08-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2339/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.\n versus \nSUVENDU ADHIKARI & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 842\n2023 INSC 647\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n National Investigating Agency Act, 2008 \u2013 s.6(5) \u2013 Exercise of Jurisdiction u/s. 6(5) \u2013 Six FIRs were registered between 30.03.2023 to 03.04.2023 in relation to different incidents \u2013 Acting on a High Court by its order held that the allegations implicate offences punishable under the Explosive Substances Act, and held that the entire investigation should be transferred to the National Investigation Agency with a direction to the Central Government to exercise their power u/s 6(5) Act\n Decision Date :\n 24-07-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 6283/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nYOGESH UPADHYAY AND ANR.\n versus \nATLANTA LIMITED \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 511\n2023 INSC 150\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.138, 142(1) \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.406 \u2013 Transfer of criminal cases \u2013 Power of Supreme Court \u2013 Held: Notwithstanding the non-obstante clause in s.142(1), the power of Supreme Court to transfer criminal remains intact in relation to offences u/s.138, if it is found expedient for the ends of justice \u2013 In the present case, as the six complaint cases filed by the respondent (four before the Dwarka Courts at New Delhi and two before the Courts at Nagpur, Maharashtra) pertain to the same\n Decision Date :\n 21-02-2023\n | Case No :\n TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 526/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBIMLA TIWARI\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 501\n2023 INSC 45\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI, HRISHIKESH ROY\n Bail \u2013 Pre-arrest bail and regular bail \u2013 Grant of \u2013 Considerations \u2013 Held: The process of criminal law cannot be utilised for armtwisting and money recovery, particularly while opposing the prayer for bail \u2013 The question as to whether pre- arrest bail, or for that or not is required to be examined and the discretion is required to be exercised by the Court with reference to the material on record and the parameters governing bail considerations \u2013 In a given case, the concession of pre-arrest bail or regular bail could be declined even if the\n Decision Date :\n 16-01-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 834/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT\n versus \nM. GOPAL REDDY & ANR \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 79\n2023 INSC 163\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.45 \u2013 Applicability of, to applications u/s.438, CrPC \u2013 Held: Once the prayer for anticipatory bail is made in connection with offence under the 2002 Act, the underlying principles and rigours of s.45 must get triggered, although CrPC \u2013 In the present case, once the enquiry/investigation against respondent No. 1 was going on for the offence under the 2002 Act, the rigour of s.45 of the 2002 Act would be attracted \u2013 Impugned order passed by the High Court holding that the provisions of s.45 shall not be\n Decision Date :\n 24-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 534/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ETC.\n versus \nDR. P. A. BHATT & ORS. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 301\n2023 INSC 434\nCoram : V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Service Law : Equal Pay \u2013 Allopathy doctors and doctors of indigenous medicine-, if can be said to be performing \u201cequal work\u201d so as to be entitled to \u201cequal pay Non-MBBS medical officers seeked extension of the benefit of higher scales of pay on parity on the basis of the recommendations of Tikku Pay Commission \u2013 \u2013 Held: Classification based upon educational qualification for the grant of higher pay scale, is a valid classification \u2013 Both categories of doctors are certainly not performing equal work to be entitled to equal\n Decision Date :\n 26-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 8553/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANIL KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 666\n2023 INSC 296\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 \u2013 s.3(3) \u2013 Petitioner was released on emergency parole/ temporary parole pursuant to the decision of the High-Powered Committee constituted as per the orders issued by Supreme Court, due to the Covid-19 pandemic \u2013 Such be counted towards the total period of sentence of the petitioner \u2013 Held: No \u2013 In the State of Haryana, the temporary release on parole is governed by the statutory provisions of the 1988 Act \u2013 s.3(3) of the 1988 Act specifically provides that the period of temporary release\n Decision Date :\n 24-03-2023\n | Case No :\n TRANSFERRED CASE (CRIMINAL) No. 46/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHANKAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 661\n2023 INSC 234\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Penal Code 1860: s. 302 r/w 34 \u2013 Conviction under, on basis of circumstantial evidence \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 Prosecution case that the victim assaulted with sharp weapons, sustained 22 ante- mortem injuries leading to instantaneous death \u2013 On the fateful day, the victim also came there and the appellant in the latter appeal hurled abuses on the victim and asked him why he along with his friend had assaulted his brother, though the victim denied the assault \u2013 Later, the accused invited the victim for drinks and all of them left the house of PW 8 on\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 954/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVERNON\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 867\n2023 INSC 655\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 Chapters IV and VI- ss.16, 17, 18, 18B, 20, 38, 39, 40 and ss.13, 43D(5) \u2013 Denial of bail \u2013 When not justified \u2013 Bhima-Koregaon violence \u2013 FIR \u2013 Scope of the investigation was expanded \u2013 Searches were conducted \u2013 Case of the NIA is that various letters and other materials recovered from the arrested co-accused persons showed appellants\u2019 involvement with the CPI (Maoist), an organization placed in the First Schedule to the 1967 Act as a terrorist organization \u2013 It is alleged that the\n Decision Date :\n 28-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 639/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nASHOK GULABRAO BONDRE\n versus \nVILAS MADHUKARRAO DESHMUKH AND OTHERS \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 820\n2023 INSC 724\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.195 \u2013 Documents allegedly fabricated and forged prior to filing in evidence, embargo u/s.195 if applicable \u2013 On appeal, held: s.195(1)(b)(ii) would be attracted only when the offence enumerated in the said provision was of a document after it has been produced or filed in evidence during proceedings before any Court, i.e. during the time when the document is custodia legis \u2013 In such a case, the Court will be entitled to take cognizance of the offence only on the basis of the complaint made by the\n Decision Date :\n 12-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1931/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJESH JAIN\n versus \nAJAY SINGH \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 788\n2023 INSC 888\nCoram : ARAVIND KUMAR\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Since the execution of the cheque is, admittedly, not under dispute, the limited question to be considered, is (i) whether the accused can be said to have discharged his \u2018evidential burden\u2019, for the courts below to have concluded that the presumption Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 had been rebutted. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.139 \u2013 Respondent-accused tried for off ence u/s. 138 of NI Act \u2013 Trial Court acquitted respondent \u2013 Order of acquittal upheld by the High Court \u2013 Propriety: Held: There is a\n Decision Date :\n 09-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3126/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSH. RAKESH RAMAN\n versus \nSMT. KAVITA \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 552\n2023 INSC 433\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: s. 13(1)(ia) and (ib) \u2013 Divorce \u2013 Grounds of cruelty and desertion \u2013 Marital discord between the parties \u2013 Petition for dissolution of marriage by the husband on the ground that the wife treated him with cruelty and deserted him,that between the parties, and that the wife had filed multiple false and frivolous criminal cases against him \u2013 Trial court passed a decree of divorce holding that the wife had deserted the husband and had meted out cruel behaviour against him \u2013 However, the High Court set aside\n Decision Date :\n 26-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2012/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n\u0627\u064f\u0631\u062f\u064f\u0648 - Urdu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHINDER PAL AND OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF J & K \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 375\n2023 INSC 26\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Ranbir Penal Code \u2013 s.300 Exception I, s.302 and Part I of s.304 \u2013 Grave and sudden provocation \u2013 Death of two persons, \u2018J\u2019 and \u2018M\u2019 \u2013 Seven accused \u2013 Allegation that accused No.1 and his sons forcibly detained \u2018J\u2019 and injuries \u2013 Sessions Judge acquitted accused nos.5 and 6 but convicted accused nos.1 to 4 and 7 u/s 302, 148 and 149 of RPC \u2013 High Court upheld the conviction \u2013 Accused no.1 died during pendency of appeal while accused no.2 went absconding \u2013 On appeal by accused nos.3, 4 and\n Decision Date :\n 12-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1863/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAGARATHINAM\n versus \nSTATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 1124\n2023 INSC 495\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Premature Release \u2013 Appellant had an affair with \u2018S\u2019, who threatened her often \u2013 Appellant took decision to commit suicide along with her children \u2013 Appellant survived \u2013 Children died \u2013 Trial Court convicted appellant u/ss. 302 High Court partly allowed appeal, acquitted appellant u/s. 309 and upheld the conviction u/s. 302 IPC \u2013 After undergoing imprisonment for 20 years, appellant applied for premature release \u2013 However, same was rejected by the State \u2013 Held: Appellant was in tremendous mental\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1389/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nT. GANGI REDDY @ YERRA GANGI REDDY \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 741\n2023 INSC 44\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 167(2) \u2013 Default bail \u2013 Cancellation of, on merits \u2013 On facts, accused-respondent arrested in connection with the murder of a former MLA, released on default bail u/s 167(2) \u2013 CBI concluded the investigation, filed chargesheet cancellation of bail of the respondent \u2013 However, the High Court rejected the said petition on the ground that default bail granted u/s. 167(2) cannot be cancelled on merits \u2013 On appeal, held: Order of release on bail under proviso to s. 167(2) cannot be called as an order on merits\n Decision Date :\n 16-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 37/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARILAL ETC.\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (NOW CHHATTISGARH) \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 138\n2023 INSC 801\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in upholding the order of the Sessions Judge convicting and sentencing the appellants to imprisonment for life u/s 302 IPC. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Conviction of the accused u/s. 302 and courts below \u2013 Ocular account of two prosecution witness that the assault on the deceased took place at night, however, neither of them lodged the FIR, rather, a named FIR lodged next day by the village chowkidar of neighbouring village, even though she was not an eye witness \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 05-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2216/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARENDRA RAI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 583\n2023 INSC 806\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA, VIKRAM NATH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In a murder case, the acquittal of respondent no.2 recorded by Trial Court and the High Court having been reversed and respondent no.2 having being convicted u/ss.302 and 307 IPC by the Supreme Court by an earlier judgment, now the issue for consideration was the no.2. Sentence / Sentencing \u2013 Murder \u2013 Conviction vide earlier judgment ([2023] 11 S.C.R. 403) \u2013 Death sentence not appropriate on facts, and as such imprisonment for life awarded alongwith fi ne \u2013 However, fi ne awarded to be paid as damages \u2013 Also,\n Decision Date :\n 01-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1726/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDIGAMBAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 96\n2023 INSC 445\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Criminal Law \u2013 \u2018Rarest of rare\u2019 case \u2013 When not \u2013 One \u2018P\u2019 was married but had a love affair with \u2018G\u2019 \u2013 This was opposed by her brother-\u2018D\u2019, who along with co-accused-\u2018M\u2019 committed the murder of \u2018P\u2019 and the case to be \u2018rarest of rare\u2019, awarded death penalty and life imprisonment to \u2018D\u2019 and \u2018M\u2019, respectively \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Held: No interference warranted with the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and the High Court that the accused\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 221/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUNNA PANDEY\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 1005\n2023 INSC 793\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court erred in confi rming the conviction and death sentence passed by trial court against appellant- accused for off ences punishable u/ss.302, 376, IPC and s.4, POCSO Act, 2012, despite serious lapses in the entire investigation. Penal Code, of Children from Sexual Off ences Act, 2012 \u2013 s.4 \u2013 Serious lapses in investigation, confi rmation of conviction and death sentence \u2013 Propriety: Held: s.162, CrPC does not prevent a Judge from looking into the record of the police investigation \u2013 Being a case of rape\n Decision Date :\n 04-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1271/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH\n versus \nPHOOLCHAND RATHORE \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 601\n2023 INSC 444\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and 201 \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 Prosecution rested its case on the circumstances, inter-alia, (a) the accused bore a grudge against his wife for keeping jewellery with her sister (PW8); (b) on the fateful day, during day time, accused on with PW8 and threatened to kill the deceased and set the house on fire; (c) in the evening of that fateful day, the accused quarrelled with the deceased and took her with him on a bicycle, while extending threats that he would kill her; (d) later, that evening, the deceased was found in a\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1315/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM KISHOR ARORA\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 743\n2023 INSC 1082\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the action of the respondent ED in handing over the document containing the grounds of the arrest to arrestee and taking it back after obtaining the endorsement and his signature thereon, as a token of he having read the same, and in not furnishing a copy time of arrest would render the arrest illegal u/s. 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 High Court dismissed the petition seeking declaration that the arrest of the appellant on 27.06.2023 by the respondent Directorate of Enforcement\n Decision Date :\n 15-12-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3865/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPREM SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 800\n2023 INSC 3\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 201 and s.84 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Disappearance of evidence \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Appreciation of \u2013 Plea of mental incapacity \u2013 Tenability \u2013 Allegations against appellant that, he took his two sons, aged about 9 years and canal, strangulated them to death, and threw their dead bodies into the canal \u2013 Trial court held appellant guilty u/ss.302 and 201 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment \u2013 High Court upheld the conviction and sentence \u2013 Held: There is no infirmity in the findings concurrently\n Decision Date :\n 02-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 01/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJPAL\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 1136\n2023 INSC 1089\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to the concern expressed by the Court on the lethargy in following its earlier orders in the matter of dealing with bail applications arising out of the same FIR. Judicial notice \u2013 Bail applications arising out of the same FIR diff erent Judges leading to anomalous situation \u2013 Some of the Judges granting bail and some other Judges refusing to grant bail, even when the role attributed to the applicants is almost similar \u2013 Earlier orders by this Court that it would be appropriate that all the matters\n Decision Date :\n 12-12-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 15585/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed as withdrawn\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJABIR & ORS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 969\n2023 INSC 48\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 364, 201 \u2013 The prosecution case was that the victim \u2018H\u2019, aged about 7 years, went missing on 8.10.1999 \u2013 On 10.10.1999, his dead body was found in the sugarcane field of \u2018Y\u2019 in Village \u2013 The victim\u2019s father (PW-1) recorded on 21.11.1999 \u2013 In the FIR, the informant alleged that he was told by PW-3 and PW-2 that they had seen A-3 taking deceased boy \u2018H\u2019 into her house on 08.10.1999 \u2013 PW-4 told him that on 09.10.1999 at about 6 AM, he had seen \u2018H\u2019 standing along with A-1\n Decision Date :\n 17-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 972/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBALWANT SINGH\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 265\n2023 INSC 482\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 32, 72, 161 \u2013 Mercy Petition \u2013 Petitioner was convicted for having committed an offence u/s. 120- B, 302, 307 of IPC and u/s. 3(b), 4(b) and 5(b) r/w s. 6 of Explosives Substances Act, 1908 and was awarded death sentence \u2013 Death reference of by the High Court \u2013 Petitioner neither preferred appeal against the decision of the High Court nor preferred the mercy petition \u2013 The mercy petition for the petitioner was preferred by the Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee \u2013 The case of the petitioner is that the Union has not\n Decision Date :\n 03-05-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 261/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPHULEL SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF HARAYANA \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 793\n2023 INSC 863\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether in the totality of the circumstances, it can be said that the dying declaration (Ex. P.L.) is free from doubt; whether evidence prove beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased was harassed on account of non-fulfi llment of demand of dowry. Evidence Act, \u2013 Dying declartion free from doubt or not \u2013 Doubt whether the dying declaration recorded was voluntary or it was tutored \u2013 Doubt regarding fi tness of victim \u2013 Variation in statement made by victim: Held: The present case mainly rests on the dying declaration of the\n Decision Date :\n 27-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 396/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJIT SAHA & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 83\n2023 INSC 1085\nCoram : K.V. VISWANATHAN\n 83 : 2023 INSC 1085 83 CASE DETAILS SANJIT SAHA & ANR. v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL (Special Leave Petition (Crl.) D. No. 46699 of 2018) OCTOBER 09, 2023 [K. V. VISWANATHAN, J.] HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to the steps/guidelines to be taken in cases where despite the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition. Supreme Court Rules, 2013 \u2013 Ord. XXII r. 5 \u2013 Special Leave Petitions in Criminal Proceedings \u2013 Surrendering by the accused \u2013 Lapse in the communication \u2013 Eff ect: Held: Convict has to surrender to the sentence before fi\n Decision Date :\n 09-10-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 46699/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Papers alongwith this order be placed before Hon\u2019ble CJI\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBOBY\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 335\n2023 INSC 23\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.27 \u2013 Discovery of Fact \u2013 Criminal trial \u2013 Three accused \u2013 Disclosure statement allegedly made by accused no.3-appellant \u2013 Recovery of dead body of complainant\u2019s husband \u2013 Appreciation of evidence \u2013 Held: s.27 requires and the knowledge of the accused as to this, and the information given must relate distinctly to the said fact \u2013 The information as to past user, or the past history, of the object produced is not related to its discovery \u2013 If a fact is actually discovered in consequence of\n Decision Date :\n 12-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1439/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPANKAJ BANSAL\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 714\n2023 INSC 866\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the arrest of the appellants u/s. 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was valid; whether there was proper compliance with s.19(1) of the Act of 2002 and as to whether the Vacation Judge/Additional Sessions Judge correctly passing the remand orders; what is the importance of informing the arrested person of the grounds for his/her arrest. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 Compliance of s.19 of the Act \u2013 Proper or not: Held: The remand order dated 15.06.2023 passed by the Vacation\n Decision Date :\n 03-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3051/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPEETHAMBARAN\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 1144\n2023 INSC 481\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of proceedings \u2013 Non-exercise of power u/s. 482 \u2013 Justification of \u2013 Appellant charged u/s. 420 along with the other accused persons for cheating the de-facto complainant and other persons for certain sum jobs \u2013 Registration of FIR \u2013 Final report that as no proper evidence, case should be considered as a false case \u2013 Another final report filed which stated that Inspector of Police conducted further investigation as per order passed by District Police Chief \u2013 Petition\n Decision Date :\n 03-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1381/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNIL\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 381\n2023 INSC 840\nCoram : HRISHIKESH ROY\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) Whether based on the evidence led, the appellants could be convicted for the off ence of murder of the two deceased with the aid of s.34 IPC or only for the off ence punishable u/s. 307 IPC r/w. s. 34 IPC; (ii) Whether, on account of not putting the to the appellants while recording their statements u/s. 313 Cr.PC, appellants\u2019 conviction with the aid of s.34 of the IPC stood vitiated. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Prosecution case that there was an altercation between two families \u2013 The main accused went to his house on Street\n Decision Date :\n 21-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 688/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHANDRA PRATAP SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF M.P \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 761\n2023 INSC 887\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in altering the charge u/s. 302 read with ss. 148 and/or 149 to a charge u/s. 302/34 IPC, and convicting and sentencing the appellant for the off ence punishable u/s 302/34 and u/s. 201 IPC. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 Murder \u2013 Common intention \u2013 Causing disappearance of evidence of off ence, or giving false information to screen off ender \u2013 Conviction of accused persons for the off ence punishable u/s. 302 rw ss. 148 and 149 and s. 201 and sentenced accordingly, for committing triple\n Decision Date :\n 09-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1209/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S SRI MAHAVIR AGENCY & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 126\n2023 INSC 375\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 : ss.7, 14, 16(1)(a)(i), 19(2) \u2013 Food Adulteration \u2013 Protection u/s. 19(2), to the vendor \u2013 Availability of \u2013 Appellant purchased \u2018Pan Parag\u2019 from the manufacturer through invoices and Sample of \u2018Pan masala\u2019 collected from the business premises of the buyer of pan masala, from the appellant \u2013 Samples seized tested and found to be below standard \u2013 Appellant\u2019s case that he is merely a vendor who purchased pan masala from the manufacturer in\n Decision Date :\n 17-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 982/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJAN\n versus \nSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 1016\n2023 INSC 264\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Constitution of India : Arts. 137 \u2013 Review jurisdiction in matters pertaining to capital punishment \u2013 Scope of \u2013 Petitioner accused a 7-year old child \u2013 Conviction u/ss. 364A, 302 and 201 IPC and imposition of death sentence by the courts below \u2013 Upheld by this Court \u2013 Review thereagainst \u2013 Dismissed through circulation \u2013 However, in view of the judgment in Mohd. Arif\u2019s case, order\n Decision Date :\n 21-03-2023\n | Case No :\n REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 159/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVINDER SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 480\n2023 INSC 426\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 432 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 45, 53 \u2013 Power to impose a modified punishment \u2013 Special category sentencing to life imprisonment in excess of 14 years \u2013 Appellant was convicted for having committed offence u/s. 376, 377, 506 imprisonment \u2013 Trial Court directed that the appellant should not be given any clemency by the State before he spent at least 20 years in jail \u2013 Same was confirmed by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: It is settled that the power to impose a modified punishment within the\n Decision Date :\n 25-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1031/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSAUMYA CHAURASIA\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 848\n2023 INSC 1073\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellant aggrieved by the order of the High Court dismissing the bail application fi led u/s.439 of Cr.P.C. has preferred this appeal. (i) Whether the appellant was prima facie found involved in the commission of the off ence of money laundering s.3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; (ii) Whether the appellant being a woman should be granted the benefi t of the fi rst proviso to s.45 of the PMLA; (iii) Whether an impudent attempt was sought to be made by alleging all the throughout in the synopsis, list of dates, questions\n Decision Date :\n 14-12-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3840/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKRISHAN KUMAR AND ANR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 861\n2023 INSC 679\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Conviction of the appellants-accused u/ ss.201, 300, 302, IPC r/w s.34 based on circumstantial evidence, consisting of evidence of last seen, extra judicial confession, recovery of weapon of off ence and motive, if justifi ed. Evidence \u2013 Conviction based upon \u2013 When not justifi ed: Held: Categoric fi nding of the courts below on appreciation of the oral testimonies of the prosecution witnesses is that none of the witnesses had spoken of having lastly seen the deceased in the company of the accused alive and\n Decision Date :\n 08-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1076/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHER\n versus \nCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 317\n2023 INSC 5\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Interest Tax Act,1974 \u2013 s.2(5-A) and s.2(5-B) \u2013 Hire-purchase agreements \u2013 Appellants-assessees are credit institutions within meaning of s.2(5-A) \u2013 Whether appellants-assessees liable to pay tax on interest component included in hire-purchase instalments paid \u2013 ITAT referred to CBDT Circular No. 760 dated 13th January 1998 and observed that hire-purchase agreement is a composite transaction, and has elements of bailment and sale and appellants-assessees are not liable to pay interest tax as hire instalments are not interest on loans and\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 10201/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHARAN SINGH @ CHARANJIT SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 511\n2023 INSC 404\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 304 B, 498 A and 201 \u2013 Dowry Death \u2013 Presumption as to dowry death \u2013 Prosecution case that woman married two years ago, killed by her husband-appellant and in- laws for dowry \u2013 Death was unnatural and the victim was cremated without even informing her the appellant, brother-in-law and mother-in-law u/ss. 304 B, 498 A and 201 and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years u/s 304B, rigorous imprisonment for two years respectively u/ ss. 498A and 201 \u2013 In appeal, the conviction and sentence of the brother-in-law\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 447/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBALWINDER SINGH (BINDA)\n versus \nTHE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 100\n2023 INSC 852\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, HIMA KOHLI, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to admissibility in evidence of the confessional statement recorded by the Narcotics Control Bureau officers u/s. 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; and proving of possession prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s. 67 \u2013 Confession statement made by an accused u/s. 67 before an offi cer of Narcotics Control Bureau \u2013 Admissibility in evidence: Held: Statement made by an accused and recorded u/s. 67\n Decision Date :\n 22-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1136/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER\n versus \nDELOITTE HASKINS AND SELLS LLP & ANR \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 949\n2023 INSC 484\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Companies Act, 2013 \u2013 s.140(5) \u2013 Analysis and Interpretation of \u2013 Maintainability of proceedings u/s.140(5) after resignation of the auditors \u2013 s.140(5) empowers the Tribunal (NCLT), either suo motu or on an application made to it by the Central Government or by to take action against the auditor who has acted in a fraudulent manner or is abetting or colluding in fraud with the management of a company \u2013 If on completion of an enquiry it is found by the Tribunal that an auditor of a company has, whether directly or indirectly, acted in a\n Decision Date :\n 03-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2305/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNO.15138812Y L/NK GURSEWAK SINGH\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1139\n2023 INSC 648\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 304 Part I, s 300 exception 4 \u2013 Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder \u2013 Appellant and the victim, both Lance Naik in the Indian Army \u2013 Altercation between them on the issue of seniority, after consuming liquor \u2013 Appellant snatched the bullet at him, resulting in the death of the victim \u2013 Appellant convicted by the court martial for the offence punishable u/s. 302 rw s. 69 of the Army Act and sentenced to imprisonment for life \u2013 Order of conviction and sentence upheld by the courts below \u2013 On appeal, held:\n Decision Date :\n 27-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1791/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE BANK OF INDIA\n versus \nP. ZADENGA \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 740\n2023 INSC 868\nCoram : HRISHIKESH ROY\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether clause 4 of the Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) dated 10th April 2002 create a bar on departmental proceedings continuing when the person subjected thereto is being tried before a criminal court for off ences of the same origin; and whether acquittal in proceedings entail a benefi t in the surviving proceedings, inuring a right upon the delinquent employee of automatic discharge in disciplinary proceedings. Service Law \u2013 Departmental proceedings pending criminal trial arising from the same transactions, if to be stayed \u2013 Acquittal\n Decision Date :\n 03-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2518/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAVTAR SINGH & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 639\n2023 INSC 280\n Essential Commodities Act, 1955: s. 7 \u2013 Penalties \u2013 Appellants in unauthorized possession of gas cylinders \u2013 Conviction and sentenced u/s. 7, by the courts below \u2013 Appellants\u2019 case that gas cylinder were seized by sub-inspector of the police, who was not authorised to thing in a certain way, the thing must be done in that way or not at all \u2013 Other methods are necessarily forbidden \u2013 In the absence of the authority and power with the Sub-Inspector to take action as per the Order, the proceedings initiated by him totally unauthorised and have to be\n Decision Date :\n 23-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1711/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUDAYAKUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 943\n2023 INSC 239\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 302, 120B \u2013 Murder \u2013 Due to rivalry A-1 alongwith A-3 hatched a conspiracy to murder the victim and engaged services of A-2 for the same \u2013 A-2 killed the victim with a sickle thereafter, fled with A-1 and A-2 \u2013 Incident witnessed by PW-1 \u2013 life imprisonment \u2013 High Court acquitted A-1 and A3 for both the offences and A-2 for the offence u/s 120B, however, conviction of A-2 for the offence punishable u/s 302 upheld on the basis of identification by PW1 \u2013 On appeal, held: Other than the identification of A-2 being the\n Decision Date :\n 16-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1741/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n RAJESH & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH  \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 1\n2023 INSC 839\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In a case based on circumstantial evidence as there was no eyewitness to the kidnapping and murder, and where the prosecution\u2019s case essentially turned upon the \u2018recoveries\u2019 made at the behest of the Evidence Act, whether their conviction on diff erent counts and death sentence imposed on two out of the three appellants was justifi ed, when the confessions were made before their arrest and prior to being \u2018accused of any off ence\u2019. Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 ss.26, 27 \u2013 Being\n Decision Date :\n 21-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 793/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nARUP BHUYAN\n versus \nSTATE OF ASSAM & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 8 S.C.R. 496\n2023 INSC 292\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 ss.10(a)(i), 3 and 4 \u2013 s.10(a)(i) provides that where an association is declared unlawful by a notification issued u/s.3 which has become effective under sub-section 3 of that Section, a person who is and continues to be a member shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years and shall also be liable to fine \u2013 Whether \u201cactive membership\u201d is required to be proven over and above the membership of a banned organization under the UAPA, 1967 \u2013 Held: The object and\n Decision Date :\n 24-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 889/2007\n | Disposal Nature :\n Reference answered\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMADAN\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 765\n2023 INSC 990\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Six deaths were caused on account of brutal fi ring by the appellants and other accused persons. The trial court imposed sentence of capital punishment to the appellants (\u2018M\u2019 and \u2018S\u2019) herein for the off ence punishable u/s. IPC, while it sentenced accused \u2018I\u2019 to imprisonment for life for the same. (i) Whether the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt the case for conviction u/s. 302 of IPC; (ii) Whether the present case falls in the category of rarest of rare cases; (ii) Whether on the facts of\n Decision Date :\n 09-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1381/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAFJAL ANSARI\n versus \nSTATE OF UP \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 969\n2023 INSC 1071\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA, UJJAL BHUYAN\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: What are the parameters to be considered for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; whether the appellant has made out a prima facie case for the suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC; and whether conviction of an off ence involving a valid ground to deny suspension of conviction u/s. 389(1) CrPC. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 389 (1) \u2013 Suspension of conviction \u2013Appellant-member of Parliament, convicted u/s. 3(1) of the Gangsters Act and sentenced to four years imprisonment with a fi ne of Rupees One\n Decision Date :\n 14-12-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3838/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP. SARANGAPANI (DEAD) THR. LR PAKA SAROJA\n versus \nSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 433\n2023 INSC 844\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in confi rming the conviction of appellant-accused no.1 u/s. 7 and s.13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 Allegation demanded and accepted a sum of Rs.1500/- as gratification other then legal remuneration from the defacto- complainant \u2013 Trial Court convicted the appellant-accused no.1 for the off ences u/s. 7 and s.13(1)(d)r/w 13(2) of the 1988 Act \u2013 High Court confi rmed the conviction \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 21-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2173/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNIKHIL CHANDRA MONDAL\n versus \nSTATE OF WEST BENGAL \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 20\n2023 INSC 198\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Evidence \u2013 Extra-judicial Confession \u2013 Evidentiary value \u2013 Lady found murdered by a sharp cutting weapon \u2013 During investigation, revealed that the appellant-husband of the deceased had confessed before the prosecution witness that he had murdered the deceased with the spot where the body of the deceased was found \u2013 However, the trial court found the evidence of the witnesses contradictory to each other and not trustworthy, and acquitted the appellant \u2013 In appeal, the High Court convicted and sentenced the appellant u/s. 302 \u2013 Interference\n Decision Date :\n 03-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2269/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n\u0627\u064f\u0631\u062f\u064f\u0648 - Urdu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIMTIYAZ AHMAD MALLA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 165\n2023 INSC 179\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Service Law: Reinstatement \u2013 Petitioner issued appointment letter for the post of constable in the Jammu and Kashmir Executive Police \u2013 He suppressed the information with regard to his involvement in the criminal case \u2013 In view thereof, his Later, the petitioner acquitted in the criminal case pending against him \u2013 High Court set aside the cancellation order \u2013 Respondent directed to take further action \u2013 On reconsideration, the Director General of Police in view of the criminal background of the petitioner, found\n Decision Date :\n 28-02-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 678/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBOHATIE DEVI (DEAD) THROUGH LR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 644\n2023 INSC 465\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.158, 173(3) \u2013 Reinvestigation by another agency \u2013 Order passed by Secretary (Home), State of U.P., Lucknow for reinvestigation by CBCID \u2013 Legality of \u2013 Held: s.173(3) r/w s.158 does not permit the Secretary further investigation/reinvestigation by another agency, other than the officer in charge of the concerned Police Station and/or his superior officer \u2013 For reinvestigation, the prior permission/approval of the Magistrate is required \u2013 In the present case, the Secretary (Home) passed\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1294/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMBALAL PARIHAR\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 213\n2023 INSC 946\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Impugned order passed in Civil Writ Petition, fi led by the second to fourth respondents for clubbing of eight FIRs fi led against them, directing that no coercive action be taken against the aforesaid respondents in connection with the said FIRs, if \u2013 Abuse of process of law \u2013 Forum hunting \u2013 Six FIRs were registered against the second to fourth respondents, at the instance of the appellant \u2013 Two other FIRs were also registered against them by some other fi rst informants, respondents sought quashing thereof,\n Decision Date :\n 16-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3233/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANAK CHAND @ MANI \n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 74\n2023 INSC 959\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the courts below were justifi ed in convicting and sentencing the appellant for off ence of rape u/s. 376 IPC. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 376 \u2013 Rape - Allegation of the prosecutrix aged less than 16 years, against her was raped two three times when she had gone to her sister\u2019s matrimonial home \u2013 Considering the family relations, initially the matter was sought to be settled by the marriage of the two \u2013 However, the off er was turned down, and the prosecutrix\u2019s father lodged an FIR\n Decision Date :\n 30-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2276/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMATHEW ALEXANDER\n versus \nMOHAMMED SHAFI AND ANR. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1083\n2023 INSC 621\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of final report \u2013 Motor accident matter \u2013 Rash and negligent driving \u2013 Appellant\u2019s son was driving a car which collided with the gas tanker lorry \u2013 Death of appellant\u2019s son and five others travelling in legal representative of the deceased passengers \u2013 Claim petition also filed by the appellant against the driver and the insurer of the tanker lorry, and against the owner \u2013 FIR against the appellant\u2019s son u/s. 279 and 304 A, however, abatement of charges against him on his\n Decision Date :\n 13-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1931/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM GOPAL S/O MANSHARAM\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 402\n2023 INSC 133\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Conviction under \u2013 Evidence Act 1872 \u2013 s. 106 \u2013 Prosecution case is that petitioner-accused had taken victim-deceased \u2013 Thereafter the very next day, victim was found lying dead on road u/s. 302 IPC \u2013 High Court confirmed the conviction \u2013 On appeal, held: The time gap between the period when the deceased was last seen with the accused and the recovery of the corpse of the deceased being quite proximate, the non-explanation of the petitioner with regard to the\n Decision Date :\n 17-02-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 9221/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAGHAVENDRA PRATAP SINGH @ PANKAJ SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 829\n2023 INSC 415\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 , 201, 120-B \u2013 Circumstantial Evidence \u2013 Criminal Conspiracy \u2013 Businessman-victim threatened for money and shot dead by two motorcyclists \u2013 Appellant and several others chargesheeted \u2013 Trial court convicted and sentenced all the accused However, the High Court acquitted all the accused except the appellant \u2013 On appeal, held: Prosecution case rests solely on circumstantial evidence, as none was found present at the scene of the incident \u2013 Neither of the independent witness supported the prosecution case \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 24-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 915/2016\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIRFAN @ NAKA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 789\n2023 INSC 758\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the prosecution could be said to have proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant who was convicted for off ence punishable u/ss.302, 436 and 326-A, IPC and sentenced to death, for allegedly setting his son and his real brothers on fi dying declarations. Evidence \u2013 Dying declarations \u2013 Sole basis of conviction \u2013 When not justifi ed \u2013 Appellant had strained relationship with his son (victim- deceased) from his first marriage and his two brothers (victims- deceased), all of whom, as per the prosecution,\n Decision Date :\n 23-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 825/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAUSHAL KISHOR\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 8 S.C.R. 581\n2023 INSC 4\nCoram : S. ABDUL NAZEER\n*\n, BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 19(1)(a) and 19(2) \u2013 Are the grounds specified in Article 19(2) in relation to which reasonable restrictions on the right to free speech can be imposed by law, exhaustive, or can restrictions on the right to free speech not found in Article 19(2) by invoking other fundamental rights \u2013 Held: The grounds lined up in Art.19(2) for restricting the right to free speech are exhaustive \u2013 Under the guise of invoking other fundamental rights or under the guise of two fundamental rights staking a competing\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 113/2016\n | Disposal Nature :\n Reference answered\n \n |  Bench :\n 5 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURESH THIPMPPA SHETTY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 1135\n2023 INSC 749\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellants-accused (A4 and A2) were convicted u/s.302, s.120B, IPC and sentenced accordingly. Whether High Court was justifi ed in dismissing the appeals fi led by them and upholding their conviction. Administration of Criminal Justice to the involvement of the appellants in the crime \u2013 Conviction unsustainable: Held: There is suffi cient material on record giving rise to reasonable doubt as to the involvement of the appellants in the crime \u2013 Appellants were able to poke holes in the testimonies of PW1, PW2 and PW7\n Decision Date :\n 26-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1541/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANOJ KUMAR SONI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 246\n2023 INSC 705\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : Conviction of both the appellants-accused respectively u/s.411 and s.120-B, IPC was based largely upon disclosure statements made by them and the co-accused, unaccompanied by supporting evidence, if justifi ed Evidence \u2013 Disclosure any supporting evidence, to convict u/s.411 and s.120-B, IPC \u2013 If adequate: Held : No \u2013 Although disclosure statements hold signifi cance as a contributing factor in unriddling a case, they are not so strong a piece of evidence suffi cient on its own and without anything more to\n Decision Date :\n 11-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1030/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 197\n2023 INSC 819\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether a transferee entity-a successor bank (DBS Bank) can be fastened with corporate criminal liability for the off ences which the amalgamating entity-the erstwhile Laxmi Vilas Bank (LVB) is accused of. Criminal Law \u2013 Corporate criminal liability \u2013 entity: Held: Criminal liability of a company cannot be transferred ipso facto, except when it is in the nature of penalty proceeding \u2013 Only defi ned legal proceedings are succeeded to by the transferee company, which is the DBS Bank in the instant case \u2013 Further, every scheme\n Decision Date :\n 11-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2242/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVAHITHA\n versus \nSTATE OF TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 942\n2023 INSC 151\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Conviction under \u2013 Strangulation of child \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant strangulated her five year old child to death while PW-1 (mother-in-law of appellant) had gone out of the house \u2013 As per the FIR, when PW-1 came back she saw the appellant tie the outer end of her saree tightly around the neck of the child \u2013 During her testimony PW-1 stated that she found the appellant sitting silently next to the deceased child when she came back to the house \u2013 Upon hearing PW-1 shout; daughters of PW-1 i.e. PW-2\n Decision Date :\n 22-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 762/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U.P. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 386\n2023 INSC 791\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Appellant convicted u/s. 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment, whether the sentence imposed by the Trial Court and as upheld by the High Court is just and proper. Sentence/sentencing \u2013 Trial Court convicted A-2 (appellant) u/s. him to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment \u2013 Conviction and order of sentence of appellant confi rmed by the High Court \u2013 Limited question before the Supreme Court regarding the quantum of sentence: Held: It is a well-established principle that while imposing sentence,\n Decision Date :\n 04-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2710/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSITA SOREN\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 753\n2023 INSC 856\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, A.S. BOPANNA, M.M. SUNDRESH, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Issue pertains to whether an MP or MLA can claim immunity from criminal prosecution for taking bribery for making a speech or voting in a particular manner in the House; and as to correctness of case. Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 194(2) \u2013 Powers, privileges, etc, of the House of Legislatures and of the members and committees thereof \u2013 Issue as regards immunity to an MP or MLA from criminal prosecution for taking bribery for making a speech or voting in a particular\n Decision Date :\n 20-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 451/2019\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Papers to be placed before Hon\u2019ble CJI for constituting larger Bench of seven judges\n \n |  Bench :\n 5 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSIBY THOMAS\n versus \nM/S. SOMANY CERAMICS LTD \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 821\n2023 INSC 890\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In the impugned order, the High Court declined to quash the complaint u/s.138 r/w. s.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 qua the appellant-accused no.4 in exercise of the power u/s. 482 of the Cr.P.C. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s. 138 Respondent fi led complaint u/s. 138 r/w. s.141 of the NI Act \u2013 Appellant set up twin grounds to seek quashment of the complaint against him; fi rstly, that he had resigned from the partnership fi rm on 28.05.2013 whereas the cheque in question was issued on 21.08.2015 and secondly, that\n Decision Date :\n 10-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3139/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAND LAL AND OTHERS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 276\n2023 INSC 224\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860: s. 302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that previous enmity between the accused persons and the complainant \u2013 Accused no. 11 assaulted the complainant and thereafter, the complainant lodged an FIR \u2013 Said accused then alongwith the other accused weapons formed an unlawful assembly, and assualted the victim-complainant\u2019s father along with the prosecution witnesses, resulting in the death of the victim \u2013 Conviction of the accused persons for the offences punishable u/s. 302 along with the other offences and sentenced to life\n Decision Date :\n 14-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1421/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.\n versus \nSUSHILA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 573\n2023 INSC 36\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: s. 24(2) \u2013 Land acquisition, when deemed to have lapsed \u2013 Writ petition by the respondent no.1-original writ petitioners, being subsequent purchasers seeking declaration that land is deemed to have lapsed in view of s.24(2) since neither physical possession of the land was taken nor they were paid compensation \u2013 Allowed by the High Court \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 Held: Not sustainable \u2013 Possession was taken over by the acquiring body and handed\n Decision Date :\n 13-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 9205/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAKASH AGGARWAL\n versus \nGANESH BENZOPLAST LIMITED AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 844\n2023 INSC 464\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Administration of Justice \u2013 Abuse of process of law \u2013 Held: Respondent No.1-complainant has attempted to turn a purely contractual dispute between the parties into a criminal case \u2013 Not only that, there is an inordinate delay in lodging the complaint \u2013 Further, at its face value, does not disclose that any of the ingredients of the offence complained of have been made out \u2013 Thus, the present complaint is nothing else but an abuse of process of law \u2013 Complaint filed before the trial court u/ss.403, 406, 420, 120B, IPC is dismissed \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1308/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIKAS CHAUDHARY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF DELHI \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 748\n2023 INSC 412\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n Sentence/Sentencing: Imposition of a fixed term sentence of 30 years, without remission \u2013 Correctness of \u2013 Victim aged 18 years, kidnapped for ransom and on the same day was killed by strangulation, and the body was burnt, to eliminate evidence \u2013 of murder, the accused regularly made ransom calls to the family \u2013 Trial court convicted all the accused persons u/ss. 302, 364A, 201, r/w s. 120B \u2013 Appellants-A-1 and A-2 also convicted u/s. 411 with A-1 additionally u/ss. 420, 468 and 471 and sentenced to life imprisonment\n Decision Date :\n 21-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2276/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ETC.\n versus \nCHOODAMANI PARMESHWARAN IYER & ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 8 S.C.R. 1139\n2023 INSC 972\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 \u2013 s.69 \u2013 Summons issued under \u2013 Invocation of s.438, CrPC by the person summoned \u2013 Impermissibility of \u2013 Held: If any person is summoned u/s.69, 2017 Act for the purpose of recording of his statement, the provision of s.438, \u2013 The only way a person summoned can seek protection against the pre-trial arrest is to invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court u/Art.226 \u2013 This is exactly what the respondents did in the present case \u2013 By filing criminal applications u/Art. 226 before the High Court, the\n Decision Date :\n 17-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1963/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA\n versus \nKAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR. ETC \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 918\n2023 INSC 723\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH\n*\n, HRISHIKESH ROY, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 167(2) proviso (a) (ii) \u2013 Default Bail \u2013 Claim for \u2013 60/90 day period of remand under proviso (a) to s. 167(2) \u2013 Computation of \u2013 Day on which the Magistrate orders remand to be \u2013 Held: s. 167(2) pertains to the power of the Magistrate to remand an accused and there is no reason why the date of the Magesterial Court\u2019s gaze on the accused, should be excluded \u2013 Ignoring the date of remand u/s. 167 in the 60/90 day period would militate against the\n Decision Date :\n 27-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 701/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Reference answered\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nSANTOSH KARNANI & ANR \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 476\n2023 INSC 380\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss. 7, 13(1), 13(2) \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 41A, 438 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 21 \u2013 Tax Department initiated search and seizure action against the complainant\u2019s company Commissioner of Income Tax was handling the case of the complainant \u2013 Allegation against the respondent that he made a demand of illegal gratification to help the complainant with his case \u2013 The said conversation of demand between the complainant and the respondent was recorded in\n Decision Date :\n 17-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1148/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nOMPRAKASH SAHNI\n versus \nJAI SHANKAR CHAUDHARY & ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 141\n2023 INSC 478\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 389 \u2013 The three respondents were convicted for the murder of the appellant\u2019s brother by the Trial Court and sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 The order of conviction and sentence passed by Trial Court was challenged in appeal by the prayed before the High Court that they be released on bail pending the final disposal of their appeals by suspending the substantive order of sentence of life imprisonment \u2013 High Court suspended sentence and ordered their release on bail \u2013 On appeal, held: The endeavour on the\n Decision Date :\n 02-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1331/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJOSEPH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 505\n2023 INSC 843\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the writ petition fi led by the petitioner seeking appropriate direction to the State Government, to prematurely release him, having been in custody-actual imprisonment for over 26 years, and served a sentence of over 35 years of remission earned, for off ence punishable u/ss. 302 and 392 IPC, should be allowed. Premature release \u2013 Convict served over 26 years in actual imprisonment and served 35 years of sentence including 8 years of remission earned for off ences punishable u/ss. 302 and 392 \u2013 Case\n Decision Date :\n 21-09-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 520/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nROHIT BISHNOI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 502\n2023 INSC 642\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s 439 \u2013 Special powers of High Court or Court of Sessions regarding bail \u2013 On facts, an honour killing matter, wherein victim in extra-marital-live in relationship with the sister-in-law Allegation that the respondents conspired to kill the victim and later shot him dead \u2013 FIR lodged by the brother of the victim against the respondents \u2013 Respondents charged u/s. 302 and 120B IPC and ss. 3 r/w ss. 25 and 27 of the Arms Act \u2013 Bail application \u2013 Grant of bail\n Decision Date :\n 24-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2078/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRI GULAM MUSTAFA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 354\n2023 INSC 511\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Administration of Justice \u2013Abuse of Process of Law \u2013 Civil dispute relating to land given the colour of criminality \u2013 Held: There is a huge unexplained delay of over 60 years in initiating dispute with regard to the ownership of the land Criminal case was lodged only after failure to obtain relief in the civil suits coupled with denial of interim relief to the respondent no.2/her family members \u2013 Thus, criminal proceedings were resorted to with ulterior motives, for oblique reasons and vengeance \u2013 Further, even if the\n Decision Date :\n 10-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1452/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP. YUVAPRAKASH\n versus \nSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 478\n2023 INSC 676\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 \u2013 ss.3,4,5,6,7, 34 \u2013 Juvenile Justice (Care and protection of Children) Act, 2015 \u2013 s.94 \u2013 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 \u2013 s.10 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.366 \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 appellant-accused and others kidnapped the victim \u2018M\u2019 (allegedly 17-year-old girl) \u2013 Complaint lodged u/s. 366A of IPC \u2013 Appellant solemnized marriage with her and engaged in sexual intercourse \u2013 M was traced by police \u2013 In her statement recorded,\n Decision Date :\n 18-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1898/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN\n versus \nASHARAM @ ASHUMAL \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 1\n2023 INSC 383\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.391 \u2013 High Court allowed the application filed by the respondent u/s.391 of Cr.P.C., directing summoning and recording of evidence of one DCP, who wrote a book \u201cGunning for the Godman:The True story behind Asaram Bapu\u2019s conviction\u201d had recorded a video of the scene of the crime (i.e. Kutiya) on his mobile phone on 21.08.2013, which is the day prior to the drawing of the site maps on 22.08.2013 \u2013 It was alleged that the victim was tutored based on the videography of the scene of the crime a day prior to the preparation\n Decision Date :\n 17-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1156/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPESALA NOOKARAJU\n versus \nTHE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 520\n2023 INSC 734\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Division Bench of the High Court rightly declined to interfere with the order of preventive detention passed against the appellant detenu by the District Collector in exercise of his powers u/s. Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-leggers, Dacoits, Drug Off enders, Goondas, Immoral Traffi c Off enders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986. Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot- leggers, Dacoits, Drug Off enders, Goondas, Immoral Traffi c Off enders and Land\n Decision Date :\n 16-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2304/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANANT THANUR KARMUSE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 56\n2023 INSC 168\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.173(8) \u2013Further Investigation \u2013 Transfer of Investigation to CBI \u2013Appellant shared a viral picture of then Cabinet Minister on facebook\u2013As per him, appellant was forcibly took from his residence by up and threatened by the police \u2013 FIR lodged by appellant, however, name of the Cabinet Minister not named in FIR \u2013 Writ Petition was filed in the High Court seeking transfer of investigation to CBI or to any other agency\u2013During the pendency of the writ petition, the trial Court\n Decision Date :\n 24-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 13/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBALU SUDAM KHALDE & ANR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 851\n2023 INSC 314\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302 r/w 34 \u2013 Prosecution case that verbal altercation between the parties resulting in a fight wherein first informant assaulted on the head and the deceased suffered severe assault and succumbed to his injuries \u2013 Appellants convicted u/s 302 r/w 34, imprisonment, however, acquittal of A-2 and A-4 \u2013 High Court upheld the order \u2013 Interference with \u2013 Held: Not called for \u2013 Oral evidence of all the three eyewitnesses is consistent and no good reason for the court to disbelieve the ocular version as narrated by the three\n Decision Date :\n 29-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1910/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABHISHEK\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 507\n2023 INSC 779\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The question pertains to quashing of the FIR and the Criminal Case pending before the magistrate against the appellants, mother-in-law and two brother-in-laws u/s. 498A IPC and ss. 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Penal Code 1860 \u2013 s. 498A \u2013 Harassment for dowry \u2013 In the midst of matrimonial dispute between husband and wife, complaint by wife-daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law and brother-in-laws alleging that they subjected her to mental and physical harassment for dowry \u2013 Quashing of criminal proceedings:\n Decision Date :\n 31-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1457/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF GUJARAT\n versus \nDILIPSINH KISHORSINH RAO \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 847\n2023 INSC 894\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in allowing the application for discharge fi led by the accused; and as such whether the order of the sanctioning authority is liable to be set aside and consequently, the charge-sheet fi led by to be quashed. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 397, 227, 401 \u2013 Application for discharge \u2013 Principles to be considered: Held: The court must proceed on an assumption that the material brought on record by the prosecution is true and evaluate the said material to\n Decision Date :\n 09-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2504/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAGARAJ REDDY\n versus \nSTATE OF TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 457\n2023 INSC 269\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Concurrent conviction of the appellant- accused No.1 for off ences punishable u/ss.302, 341 IPC primarily on the basis of evidence of PW-1, an interested witness, if justifi ed. Evidence \u2013 Interested witness \u2013 Previous enmity \u2013 Conviction based witness, without corroboration of such testimony \u2013 Legality: Held: PW-1 is an interested witness, being the brother of the deceased \u2013 He admitted that there existed previous enmity between the parties wherein the deceased and his wife-PW-3 were injured after a scuffl e between\n Decision Date :\n 21-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 886/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANGILAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 517\n2023 INSC 634\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 \u2013 s.52A \u2013 Non-compliance of \u2013 Held: \u2013 In the present case, search warrant under Exhibit P-4 acknowledged the fact that procedure contemplated under the NDPS Act was not followed \u2013 Also, one of the witnesses to the while the other turned hostile \u2013 Both the witnesses to the arrest memo were not examined \u2013 The record also indicates that an order was passed by the trial Judge permitting the prosecution to keep the seized materials within the police station, to be produced at a later point of\n Decision Date :\n 12-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1651/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJOHN ANTHONISAMY @ JOHN\n versus \nSTATE, REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 279\n2023 INSC 54\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 r/w s.201 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Purported extra-judicial confession \u2013 Effect \u2013 Five accused including appellant (A-1) \u2013 Prosecution case that in pursuance of a conspiracy, the accused persons killed the deceased car \u2013 PW11 (Sub inspector) closed the case as undetected \u2013 However, case was subsequently re-opened and investigation initiated by police witness (PW30) on basis of confessional statement made in letter allegedly written by appellant to PW22 \u2013 Trial Court convicted appellant\n Decision Date :\n 19-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 466/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPAWAN KUMAR CHOURASIA\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 875\n2023 INSC 227\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Criminal Law \u2013 Evidence \u2013 Extra-Judicial Confession \u2013 Conviction based on, when not justified \u2013 Appellant was convicted for offences punishable u/s.302 r/w 34 and s.201, IPC based on extra-judicial confession \u2013 Held: Case of the prosecution was that the appellant had PW6 including the complainant himself whose son was killed did not support prosecution \u2013 PW7 to PW9, the only material prosecution witnesses were not consistent about the place at which the alleged confession was made \u2013 Even after the alleged extra-judicial confession of committing\n Decision Date :\n 14-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2230/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPURUSHOTHAMAN \n versus \nSTATE OF TAMIL NADU  \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 181\n2023 INSC 970\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: When the sentence of accused is suspended on appeal and he is released on bail, whether the High Court can cancel the bail without giving a reasonable opportunity, to the accused of being heard. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 389 \u2013 Suspension the appeal; release of appellant on bail - Appeal against conviction by the accused admitted by the High Court \u2013 Substantive sentence of the accused suspended and he was enlarged on bail \u2013 When appeal called for hearing, the High Court cancelled the bail of the accused, without giving\n Decision Date :\n 30-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3341/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMESH KUMAR\n versus \n STATE OF NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2023] 9 S.C.R. 1165\n2023 INSC 596\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.438 \u2013 Anticipatory Bail \u2013 Payment of amount as a condition precedent for grant of bail \u2013 Legality of \u2013 An FIR was registered u/ss. 420, 406 r/w s. 34 \u2013 As per the FIR, an agreement to sell was executed by and between the of Rs. 17,00,000/- by issuing cheques favouring the appellant-owner allegedly on the instructions of the builder \u2013 Complainants were not handed over the floor which they intended to purchase \u2013 Apprehending arrest, the appellant moved an application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. before the\n Decision Date :\n 04-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1741/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS\n versus \nBHUPENDRA YADAV \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 438\n2023 INSC 837\nCoram : HIMA KOHLI\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the appellants have erred in rejecting the candidature of the respondent to the post of Constable, despite the latter having truthfully disclosed in his affi davit the fact that he had faced trial in a criminal case which had resulted Service Law \u2013 Rejection of candidature by the departmental authorities on basis of moral turpitude \u2013 Propriety: Held: An employer has the discretion to terminate or condone an omission in the disclosure made by a candidate \u2013 While doing so, the employer must act with\n Decision Date :\n 20-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5984/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRUPESH MANGER (THAPA)\n versus \nSTATE OF SIKKIM \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 578\n2023 INSC 826\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court reversed the order of acquittal of the trial Court and convicted appellant-accused u/s.302 IPC, whether the case of the appellant-accused falls within the exception u/s. 84 of IPC or not. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Appellant-accused deceased with sharp-edged weapon causing his death \u2013 Appellant pleaded insanity: Held: During preliminary examination, CW-1-doctor categorically deposed that going by the case history of the accused prepared by the Hospital, appellant had earlier been treated for acute and transient\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2069/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF PUNJAB\n versus \nKEWAL KRISHAN \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1\n2023 INSC 583\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA, MANOJ MISRA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 \u2013 Acquittal confirmed \u2013 Prosecution case that the deceased was last seen alive in his own house in the company of the accused at about 7.00 p.m. on 10.12.1998 \u2013 PW-6, nephew of the deceased discovered body of deceased on 12.12.1998 \u2013 FIR was \u2013 PW-2, the sole witness of the last seen circumstance, in his deposition in court, stated that he had expressed his suspicion in respect of accused\u2019s involvement to the police on 13.12.1998 \u2013 It was also alleged that accused made an extra-judicial confession before PW-3\n Decision Date :\n 21-06-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2128/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARBHAJAN SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 545\n2023 INSC 424\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: ss. 25, 35 \u2013 Applicability of s. 25 \u2013 When \u2013 Presumption of culpable mental state u/s. 35 \u2013 When, available \u2013On facts, truck found lying turtle and bags of powder scattered which on investigation found to be and the cleaner coming out of the truck and disclosed the name of the owner- appellant, and fled away \u2013 Conviction of the appellant u/s. 25 and imposition of imprisonment for 10 years by the courts below \u2013 On appeal, held: s. 25 provides that if an owner of a vehicle knowingly\n Decision Date :\n 25-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1480/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAMOD SINGLA\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 793\n2023 INSC 344\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 \u2013 Preventive Detention \u2013 Representation by detenue to the Central Government, the detaining authority and the Advisory Board \u2013 Central Govt. if bound to wait for the decision of the Advisory Board Whether there exists an incongruity between the Pankaj Kumar case and the Abdullah Kunhi case \u2013 Held: No \u2013 Since these two judgments exist symbiotically and apply to two separate authorities within the COFEPOSA Act, there exists no friction between the judgments \u2013 The mandate to\n Decision Date :\n 10-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1051/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVI DHINGRA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 164\n2023 INSC 182\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.364A, 363 and 364 \u2013 Modification of conviction u/s.364A to s.363 \u2013 Appellants convicted u/ss.148, 364A r/w s.149, IPC \u2013 Sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years u/s.148, rigorous imprisonment for life and fine u/s.364A r/w s.149 \u2013 has three components- kidnapping or abduction of a person and keeping them in detention; threat to cause death or hurt, and the use of kidnapping, abduction, or detention with a demand to pay the ransom; and when the demand is not met, then causing death \u2013 In the present case, there are two\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 987/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMOD KUMAR KANTH\n versus \nASSOCIATION OF VICTIM OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY AND ANR. \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 669\n2023 INSC 397\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH, B.V. NAGARATHNA, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.197 \u2013Ambit of \u2013 Uphaar Tragedy case \u2013 Closure report filed by the CBI against the appellant was rejected by the Magistrate,who instead took cognizance on the protest petition filed by the first against the appellant \u2013 Cognizance was taken for offences u/ss.304A, 337, 338, IPC and u/s.14, Cinematograph Act r/w the Rules \u2013 Appellant filed petition u/s.482, CrPC challenging the order issuing summons \u2013 Dismissed \u2013 On appeal, held: When considering the question of\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1359/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF PUNJAB\n versus \nDIL BAHADUR \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 766\n2023 INSC 307\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Sentence/Sentencing \u2013 Principle of \u2013 High Court though confirmed the conviction of the respondent-accused for offences u/ ss.279 and 304A, IPC, however, reduced the sentence from two years to eight months \u2013 Justification of \u2013 Held: While reducing the sentence, the High of the offence and the manner in which the accused committed the offence \u2013 Because of the rash and negligent driving on the part of the accused one innocent person died and two persons sustained injuries \u2013 High Court did not consider the fact that IPC is punitive and deterrent in\n Decision Date :\n 28-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 844/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRUCHIR RASTOGI\n versus \nPANKAJ RASTOGI AND OTHERS ETC. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 914\n2023 INSC 941\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: High Court if justifi ed in quashing the FIR lodged by the appellant against respondents u/ss.457, 380 and 506, IPC. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.457, 380, 506 \u2013 FIR fi led stating that the appellant and respondent No.1 as Kartas of in equal share and there was an interim order of preserving the assets and belongings of the shop in question \u2013 However, Respondent No.1, along with other co-accused, removed the assets and belongings of the shop in violation thereof \u2013 When the appellant inquired from respondent\n Decision Date :\n 19-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3283/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJASWANT SINGH & ORS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 595\n2023 INSC 31\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Code of Criminal Procedure 1973: s. 432(2) \u2013 Grant of Remission \u2013 Requirement of s. 432(2) \u2013 Held: Presiding Judge must give adequate reasons while giving an opinion u/s. 432(2) \u2013 On facts, three convicts, out of a total of eight, submitted their respective applications for same was refused\u2013 Held:The said orders should have contained adequate reasons after taking into consideration the relevant factors that govern the grant of remission as laid down in Laxman Naskar\u2019s case applications for remission \u2013 Issuance of direction to the Special Judge to\n Decision Date :\n 13-01-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 323/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUGGARSAIN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 74\n2023 INSC 587\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Sentence/Sentencing \u2013 Appropriateness of sentences \u2013 Eight accused persons were charged with and tried for offences punishable u/ss. 148, 149, 302, 304 Part-II and 323 of IPC for having causing death of deceased and causing injury Trial Court convicted all the accused persons and sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment for life u/s. 302 r/w s.149 and one year rigorous imprisonment u/s. 148 and six months rigorous imprisonment u/s.323 r/w. s.149 \u2013 The High Court partially allowing the appeal by the accused persons\n Decision Date :\n 03-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1378/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJ KUMAR @ SUMAN\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 754\n2023 INSC 520\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.313 \u2013 Power to examine the accused \u2013 Law summarized. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.313 \u2013 Non-compliance of \u2013 Omission made while questioning the accused u/s.313, effect of \u2013 Appellant was convicted IPC and sentenced accordingly \u2013Held: The only alleged incriminating circumstance against the appellant is in the evidence of PW5, who stated that the appellant was standing with a katta in his hand outside the premises where the offence took place\u2013However, this was not put to him\n Decision Date :\n 11-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1471/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHISHAM LAL VERMA\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 55\n2023 INSC 955\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : Is a second petition maintainable u/s. 482 Cr.P.C. on grounds that were available for challenge even at the time of fi ling of the fi rst petition thereunder. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 A complaint case 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC r/w. ss. 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 Petitioner was amongst the accused named therein \u2013 The State Government accorded sanction to prosecute the petitioner \u2013 Upon completion of investigation, charge- sheet was\n Decision Date :\n 30-10-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 7976/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARIPRASAD @ KISHAN SAHU\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 214\n2023 INSC 986\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: Whether the delay of about more than one year in registering the FIR could be said to be fatal to the case of prosecution; whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased had died due to administration of poison and the poison in the liquor and made the deceased to drink it on the previous date of his death. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Allegation of murder by poisoning \u2013 Delay in registering FIR \u2013 When not fatal: Held: FIR being only a corroborative piece of evidence and not a\n Decision Date :\n 07-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1182/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nILAVARASAN\n versus \nTHE SUPERITENDENT OF POLICE & ORS.  \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 325\n2023 INSC 813\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Issue arose as regards the conduct of advocates as to whether they are capable of certifying self respect marriages u/s. 7A of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; and whether the Suyammariyathai marriage-self-respect marriage can Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 \u2013 s. 7A (as amended and applicable in Tamil Nadu) \u2013 Special provision regarding suyamariyathai and seerthiruththa marriages-self respect marriages \u2013 Advocates, if cabable of certifying marriages u/s. 7A \u2013 Appellant married a girl in accordance\n Decision Date :\n 28-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 002752/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURENDRA SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 354\n2023 INSC 354\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.149 \u2013 Applicability of \u2013 High Court set aside the respondent-accused\u2019s conviction for the offence punishable u/s.302/149, IPC on the ground that the initial charge- sheet was filed only against two accused persons (one of and the remaining three persons were subsequently arrayed as the accused and are being tried separately thus, s.149, IPC shall not be attracted \u2013 Held: When five persons were specifically named in the FIR and are facing the trial though separately, s.149 IPC would be attracted \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 11-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1059/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.\n versus \nMITUL KUMAR JANA \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 613\n2023 INSC 754\nCoram : J.K. MAHESHWARI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court erred in allowing the writ petition fi led by the respondent, setting aside the order passed by the Administrative Tribunal and directing the appointment of the respondent as constable in the West Bengal police force. Suppression of material information \u2013 When not: Held: Information sought in the verifi cation roll was regarding arrest, detention and conviction by a Court in any off ence \u2013 In reply to the information asked the respondent gave the answer as \u201cno\u201d \u2013 As per the\n Decision Date :\n 22-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 8510/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIKAS RATHI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 6\n2023 INSC 186\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 : s. 319 \u2013 Summoning of additional accused \u2013 Murder of a person working in the appellant\u2019s firm \u2013 Complaint by the brother of the deceased \u2013 FIR registered against unknown persons \u2013 However, after two months, complaint by the \u2013 Appellant listed as a prosecution witness \u2013 Application u/s. 319 by the complainant to summon the appellant as accused \u2013 Dismissed by the trial court \u2013 High Court quashed the order passed by trial court and remanded the matter \u2013 On appeal, held: On\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 644/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF HARYANA\n versus \nDHARAMRAJ \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 705\n2023 INSC 784\nCoram : AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In instant appeal, the State seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the sole respondent by the Single Judge of the High Court. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Section 438 \u2013 Pre arrest bail \u2013 FIR u/ss. 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, charges u/ss. 186, 353 and 364 against the respondent \u2013 Grant of anticipatory bail to the respondent by the High Court \u2013 Cancellation of: Held: Much like bail, grant of anticipatory bail is to be exercised with judicial discretion \u2013 Each case turns on its own facts and\n Decision Date :\n 29-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2635/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNEERAJ DUTTA\n versus \nSTATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 997\n2023 INSC 245\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 : ss. 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) \u2013 Proof of demand of illegal gratification \u2013 Prosecution case that a trap was laid and the appellant-Electricity Inspector came with the co-accused and demanded the documents and bribe of which was paid by the complainant circumstantial evidence on record to prove the guilt of the appellant, convicted her for the offence punishable u/ ss. 7 and 13(i)(d)(i) and (ii) rw 13(2) \u2013 High Court upheld the same \u2013 On appeal, held : Apart from the evidence of PW-5-shadow witness, there is no other evidence\n Decision Date :\n 17-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1669/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUKESHBHAI VALLABHBHAI ABHANGI\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 1137\n2023 INSC 496\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Bail : Grant of \u2013 Appellant, along with accused no.1 who was operating an organised crime syndicate involving, inter alia, extortion, land grabbing, contract killing, money-laundering, pressurized Secret Witness 11 to enter into a deal \u2013 SW11 was threatened to execute around with either creditors of the leader of the organized crime syndicate-accused no. 1 or creditors of the appellant \u2013 Allegedly the appellant had extorted 50,000 square feet of land from the said persons \u2013 FIR against the appellant for offences punishable under the 2015 Act and Penal\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1391/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDHANRAJ N ASAWANI\n versus \nAMARJEET SINGH MOHINDER SINGH BASI AND OTHERS \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 297\n2023 INSC 710\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the provisions of s.81(5B) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 can be construed as preventing a share holder of the society such as the appellant, who was also an erstwhile director, from independently setting the criminal Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 \u2013 s.81(5B) \u2013 The High Court was of the view that since the provisions of the 1960 Act are special, the provisions of s.81(5B) would preclude the registration of an FIR at the behest of a person, such as the appellant, who is a shareholder\n Decision Date :\n 25-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2093/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal allowed and SLP disposed of.\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA\n versus \nT. NASEER @ NASIR @ THANDIANTAVIDA NASEER @ UMARHAZI @ HAZI & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 230\n2023 INSC 988\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The High Court rejected the applications fi led by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certifi cate u/s. 65B of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 311 \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.65B \u2013 A serial bomb blasts took place \u2013 Certain electronic devices were seized \u2013 Trial Court held electronic devices inadmissible in evidence \u2013 Thereafter, an application was fi led in\n Decision Date :\n 06-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3456/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSIJU KURIAN\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 397\n2023 INSC 378\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Penal Code, 1860: ss. 302, 201, 404 and 419 \u2013 Circumstantial Evidence \u2013 Reliance upon \u2013 Prosecution case that the accused- labourer in the farmhouse of the victim, murdered the victim by hitting him with iron rod and then hid the dead body in a pit located in the garden \u2013 house and sold them as also sold the land to make undue monetary gain \u2013 Acquittal by the trial court on the ground that prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt \u2013 However, the High Court convicted and sentenced the accused for the offence punishable u/ss. 302,\n Decision Date :\n 17-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 64/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nA. SRINIVASULU\n versus \nTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 11\n2023 INSC 971\nCoram : V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Penal Code, 1860: ss.120B, 193, 420, 468 and 471 \u2013 Criminal conspiracy and cheating \u2013 Prosecution case that the appellant, officials of PSU and other private persons entered into a criminal conspiracy to cheat the PSU in the matter of award of contract \u2013 Contract granted to one tenders causing wrongful loss to the PSU \u2013 Illegalities alleged in the procedure followed for inviting the tender \u2013 FIR lodged u/s. 120B r/w ss. 193, 420, 468, 471 r/w ss. 13 (2) and 13(1)(d) of PC Act \u2013 Final report against accused persons including the public\n Decision Date :\n 15-06-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2417/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAVEEN @ AJAY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 977\n2023 INSC 936\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether appellant was aff orded a fair trial; whether he was deprived of his valuable legal rights. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 \u2013 Appellant was convicted and sentenced for committing rape and murder of 3 \u2013 His death sentence was confi rmed by the High Court \u2013 Appellant contended that the entire trial was completed within a span of 15 days and appellant was not aff orded a fair trial \u2013 Propriety: Held: The Order-sheet would clearly indicate that the trial was conducted in a\n Decision Date :\n 19-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 489/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S. BLS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED\n versus \nM/S. RAJWANT SINGH & OTHERS \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 183\n2023 INSC 187\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 256(1) Proviso \u2013 Non- appearance of complainant \u2013 Dismissal of complaints for non- prosecution \u2013 Sustainability of \u2013 On facts, the appellant-complainant filed eight complaints u/s 138, N.I. Act \u2013 Complainant\u2019s statement and Accordingly, complainant\u2019s evidence closed with date set for recording of defence evidence \u2013 Application u/s 311 CrPC also filed by complainant \u2013 However, complainant failed to register appearance on subsequent dates \u2013 Magistrate dismissed the complaints for\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 657/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHRI SUKHBIR SINGH BADAL\n versus \nBALWANT SINGH KHERA AND ORS. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 917\n2023 INSC 466\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Representation of People Act, 1951 \u2013 s. 29-A(5) \u2013 Sikh Gurudwaras Act, 1925 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 420, 463, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 r/w s. 120B, 191, 192 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 202, 204, 315, 482 \u2013 A private complaint was filed by the 468, 471, 191, 192 of IPC against the appellants \u2013 It was alleged in the complaint that while complying with the requirements of s.29-A(5) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 an affidavit was filed before the Election Commission of India (ECI), which conflicted with the\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1116/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF PUNJAB\n versus \nPRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 6 S.C.R. 532\n2023 INSC 181\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n COURT REPORTS [2023] 6 S.C.R. STATE OF PUNJAB v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 302 of 2023) FEBRUARY 28, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI AND PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.] Constitution of India \u2013 Art.174 \u2013 Governor (not furnished the relevant information sought) \u2013 The Governor noted that the CM in his correspondence underscored the mandate of Art. 167 of the Constitution as per which the CM is bound to furnish full details and information sought by the Governor \u2013 On 22.02.2023, the\n Decision Date :\n 28-02-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 302/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDAKKATA BALARAM REDDY & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 887\n2023 INSC 411\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 397, 450 \u2013 Case based on circumstantial evidence \u2013 Case of the prosecution that appellants- accused (A1 and A2) trespassed into house of PW-1, wherein he also did his gold and silver business, concealing iron rods and robbed gold ornaments and brutally Accused held guilty of offences punishable u/ss.302, 397 and 450 and sentenced accordingly \u2013 Legality of \u2013 Held: Though there were no eye-witnesses to the actual killings, there were three separate witnesses PWs 4, 6, and 10, who were independent of each other and had no animosity\n Decision Date :\n 21-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1295/2019\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANJUNATH & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 727\n2023 INSC 978\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In a case primarily involving a dying declaration in addition to the ocular and circumstantial evidence, the Trial Court acquitted the appellants-accused along with other accused persons, whether the High Court was justifi ed in overturning the same in respect Evidence \u2013 Dying declaration \u2013 Reliance upon in addition to the ocular and circumstantial evidence \u2013 Legality: Held: The dying declaration, although undoubtedly a substantive piece of evidence upon which reliance can be placed, in the present facts is rendered nugatory as\n Decision Date :\n 06-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 866/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDAVINDER SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 986\n2023 INSC 585\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 376, 452 and 506 \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 Allegation that appellant committed offence against the prosecutrix (PW-6) u/s. 376 at her residence \u2013 The appellant-accused was charged and convicted u/ss. 376, 452 and 506 by the Trial Court and the same was On appeal, held: There was delay in filing complaint \u2013 There was no attempt to recover the knife from the appellant as it is a specific case of the prosecution that he committed the offence by threatening to harm the prosecutrix \u2013 There was no reason as to non-examination of the sole\n Decision Date :\n 22-06-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 12/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRADEEP\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1021\n2023 INSC 599\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Evidence \u2013 Testimony of child witness \u2013 Sole basis of conviction \u2013 When not proper \u2013 Appellant along with co-accused was convicted for the offences punishable u/s. 302 r/w s.34, IPC and ss. 449, 324 r/w s.34, IPC based on the testimony of PW-1, minor son of the deceased was under a duty to record his opinion that the child is able to understand the questions put to him and that he is able to give rational answers \u2013 Trial Judge must also record his opinion that the child witness understands the duty of speaking the truth and state why he is of the\n Decision Date :\n 05-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 553/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATHYAN\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 95\n2023 INSC 703\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration : (i) Whether the conviction, solely on the basis of offi cial witnesses is sustainable in the instant facts? (ii) Whether the delay of nearly 3 years in fi ling the challan can be said to be materially aff ecting the correctness of the judgement of the lower judgement? Abkari Act \u2013 s. 8 \u2013 Conviction under: Held : No reason is forthcoming on behalf of the appellant to challenge the veracity of the testimonies of PW-1 and PW-2 (offi cial witnesses) \u2013 In the instant case, conviction on the basis of testimony of the police witnesses\n Decision Date :\n 11-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2363/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAJAY KUMAR RADHEYSHYAM GOENKA\n versus \nTOURISM FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 986\n2023 INSC 232\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 \u2013 ss. 1(3), 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 29, 30, 31, 32A, 53, 61, 238 \u2013 Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 \u2013 Rule 6 \u2013 \u2013 ss. 138, 139, 141, 142, 147 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 190, 200, 256, 257, 305, 482 \u2013 A demand-cum-legal notice u/s. 138 of the NI Act was issued on behalf of the respondent calling upon the company as accused no.1 and appellant herein as accused no.2 to\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 172/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARESH @ NEHRU\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 771\n2023 INSC 889\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Conviction of the appellants for off ences punishable u/s.302 r/w s.149, IPC based on the statement of PW-9, as an eyewitness to the crime, if justifi ed. Evidence \u2013 Of eyewitness \u2013 When not to be relied upon: Held: Evidence of the eye-witness should quality and calibre and it should not only instil confi dence in the court to accept the same but it should also be a version of such nature that can be accepted at its face value \u2013 In the present case, testimony of PW-9 (cousin of the deceased) was shrouded with inconsistencies and he had\n Decision Date :\n 09-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1786/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSALIB @ SHALU @ SALIM\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 58\n2023 INSC 687\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration : In a case where in the further statement of the fi rst informant\u2019s name of the appellant surfaced for the fi rst time, the appellant not named in the FIR as one of the accused persons and no allegation worth the name in the entire FIR against Court was justifi ed in declining to quash the FIR. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of FIR, when in the further statement of the fi rst informant\u2019s name of the appellant surfaced for the fi rst time \u2013 High Court declining to quash the FIR \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 08-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2344/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAFJAL ALI SHA @ ABJAL SHAUKAT SHA\n versus \nSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 1090\n2023 INSC 257\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 321, 406 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 139A \u2013 Supreme Court Rules, 2013 \u2013 Or. 39 \u2013 Petitioner-brother of deceased sought transfer of the criminal trial pending in West Bengal to Assam by unknown persons \u2013 Respondents-accused were charged u/s. 302 r/w s.120B of the IPC and u/ss. 25 and 27 of the Arms Act 1959 \u2013 Charge-sheet was filed \u2013 Trial commenced \u2013 Respondent no.2 (main accused) was in the custody \u2013 During pendency of trial, a notification\n Decision Date :\n 17-03-2023\n | Case No :\n TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 409/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0c95\u0ca8\u0ccd\u0ca8\u0ca1 - Kannada\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHIVA KUMAR @ SHIVA @ SHIVAMURTHY\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 669\n2023 INSC 306\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.366, 376 and 302 \u2013 Power to impose modified punishment \u2013 Appellant convicted u/ss. 366, 376 and 302 IPC \u2013 Trial Court sentenced the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for the rest of his life \u2013 High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by \u2013 In appeal before the Supreme Court, appellant contended that in view of the law laid down by the Constitutional Bench in the case of Union of India v. V. Sriharan alias Murugan & Ors., a modified sentence can be imposed only by the Constitutional Courts and not by the Sessions\n Decision Date :\n 28-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 942/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP. V. NIDHISH & ORS.\n versus \nKERALA STATE WAKF BOARD & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 547\n2023 INSC 452\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Wakf Act, 1995 \u2013 s.52A added by 2013 amendment \u2013 Penal provision \u2013 Operation of, if retrospective \u2013 Held: No \u2013 Giving effect to a penal statute so as to cover past acts is a proscribed action in law \u2013 Therefore, s.52A cannot cover cases where leases of wakf or lessee was in physical possession and facing civil proceedings for eviction at the time the amendment of 2013 came into force \u2013 Interpretation of Statutes. Wakf Act, 1995 \u2013 s.3(ee) added by 2013 amendment \u2013 \u201cEncroacher\u201d \u2013 Interpretation \u2013 Appellants\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 309/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nROHAN DHUNGAT ETC.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GOA & ORS. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 1029\n2023 INSC 16\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Goa Prisons Rules, 2006 \u2013 r. 335 \u2013 Whether the period of parole is to be excluded from the period of sentence under Rules of 2006 while considering 14 years of actual imprisonment for the purpose of premature release \u2013 Held: r. 335 of the Rules, 2006 provides that the period and Parole shall be counted as remission of sentence \u2013 Once the period of parole is to be counted as remission of sentence, the period of parole is also required to be excluded from the period of sentence while considering 14 years of actual imprisonment. Parole \u2013 Object and\n Decision Date :\n 05-01-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 12574/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCBI\n versus \nR.R. KISHORE \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 1\n2023 INSC 817\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, SANJIV KHANNA, ABHAY S. OKA, VIKRAM NATH, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: Section 6A(1) of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (DSPE Act) required approval of the Central Government to conduct inquiry or investigation into any off ence alleged to have been committed by senior the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and provided a kind of immunity to such offi cers. Whether there could be a deprivation of such immunity by a retrospective operation of a judgment of the Court, in the context of Article 20 of the Constitution of India, was the moot question that arose\n Decision Date :\n 11-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 377/2007\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Matters be placed before appropriate Bench\n \n |  Bench :\n 5 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJARAM S/O SRIRAMULU NAIDU (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS.\n versus \nMARUTHACHALAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 809\n2023 INSC 51\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Money Lending \u2013 The appellant\u2019s wife subscribed to chit funds (1992 and 1995) with the respondent for which two signed blank cheques were submitted as security \u2013 After maturity of the chit funds, appellant and his wife sought amount \u2013 However, respondent presented those cheques for encashment without any intimation to appellant \u2013 Said cheques were dishonoured as the appellant had closed the account \u2013 Respondent filed two complaint cases u/s 138 of NI Act \u2013 Both cases were dismissed by\n Decision Date :\n 18-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1978/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRITINDER SINGH @ LOVELY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1033\n2023 INSC 614\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Evidence \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 As per the prosecution, two days prior to the date of the incident, a dispute allegedly arose between the deceased-complainant\u2019s brother and their step mother wherein she allegedly threatened the deceased that he would not survive \u2013 Two co-accused) came in a car and took the deceased on the pretext of purchasing shoes, when the complainant was also present in the house and allegedly noticed that the step mother was carrying her 12 bore double barrel licensed gun in the car \u2013 Later, dead body of the deceased was found\n Decision Date :\n 05-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1635/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANTOSH @ BHURE\n versus \nSTATE (G.N.C.T.) OF DELHI \n- \n[2023] 7 S.C.R. 719\n2023 INSC 443\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 r/w. s.34 \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 Prosecution case that \u2018S\u2019 was tenant of an apartment on the second floor of a building owned by PW-3 \u2013 On 12.09.2000, at about 10.40 a.m., an information was given to the police that a dead body is lying in As per prosecution, two disclosure/ confessional statements were made by each of the two accused (\u2018S\u2019 and \u2018N\u2019) during police custody \u2013 Trial Court held that the proven circumstances constituted a chain which conclusively indicated that the accused \u2018S\u2019 in\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 575/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRADEEP KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 682\n2023 INSC 242\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code,1860 \u2013 ss. 302,34,201 \u2013 Two accused persons (including appellant) were convicted for offence of murder by trial Court \u2013The prosecution case, rested upon three circumstances (a) the alleged confessional statement of appellant;(b) prior animosity deceased; and (c) the recovery of material from the appellant \u2013 The High Court upheld the conviction of appellant and acquitted co-accused \u2013 On appeal, held: The testimonies of PW-12(son of the deceased) and PW-13(co-villager) negated circumstances that there was tension between the\n Decision Date :\n 16-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1304/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF CHATTISGARH & ANR\n versus \nAMAN KUMAR SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 134\n2023 INSC 189\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Constitution of India \u2013 Art.226 \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss.13(1)(b), (2) \u2013 FIR registered against one \u2018AS\u2019 and his wife \u2018YS\u2019 \u2013 FIR quashed by High Court \u2013 Justification of \u2013 Held: In the present case, FIR does make cognizable offence having been committed by \u2018AS\u2019 and \u2018YS\u2019 \u2013 Power of quashing a criminal proceeding should be exercised very sparingly and with circumspection and that too in the rarest of rare cases \u2013 Whenever its powers are invoked either u/Art.226 or s.482,\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 646/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nARVIND KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT, DELHI \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 713\n2023 INSC 622\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Penal Code, 1860 : s. 304A \u2013 Causing death by negligence \u2013 Scuffle between the victim-constable and the appellant-police guard \u2013 Semi Automatic Fire (SAF)-carbine of the appellant got entangled in the chain of the appellant\u2019s belt resulting in accidental firing of five victim in his neck leading to his death \u2013 Case of the appellant that he was requested by the sub-inspector to ask the victim to desist from continuing with his conversation on the telephone \u2013 Conviction of the appellant u/s. 302 and sentenced to life by the courts below \u2013 On\n Decision Date :\n 17-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2390/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMD. ASFAK ALAM\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1184\n2023 INSC 660\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 438 \u2013 Grant of anticipatory bail \u2013 Disentitlement to \u2013 Husband accused of s. 498A and various other provisions under the Penal Code, and under the Dowry Prohibition Act \u2013 Anticipatory bail application pending and no husband \u2013 Grant of an interim order by the High Court directing the police not to arrest the husband during the pendency of his application u/s. 438 \u2013 Thereafter, the investigation was completed, charge sheet was filed and cognizance was taken by the Sessions Judge \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 31-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2207/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABHISHEK SAXENA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 1126\n2023 INSC 1088\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the chargesheet submitted showed prima facie case u/ss. 323, 384 and 406, IPC for voluntarily causing hurt, for extortion and for criminal breach of trust; Whether the High Court has fallen in error in not invoking the powers u/s. the proceedings qua the appellant. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.323, 384 and 406 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 An FIR was registered against the appellant, his parents and relatives on 04.09.2016 alleging commission of offences u/ss. 323, 363, 384 and 406 of the\n Decision Date :\n 28-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3628/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nINDRAKUNWAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 959\n2023 INSC 934\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether, in explaining the purported incriminating circumstance against her, the convict-appellant ought to have disclosed, over and above denial of any relationship with the deceased child, the specifi cs of her miscarriage and its aftermath; particularly has failed to discharge its burden of establishing such relationship between the deceased and the convict -appellant. Constitution of India \u2013 Right to Privacy \u2013 Personal life of a woman accused of committing a crime \u2013 Failure of Prosecution to discharge its duty: Held: The\n Decision Date :\n 19-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CONTEMPT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 1730/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBIRBAL NATH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 85\n2023 INSC 957\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in acquitting the accused for the major off ences u/ss. 302 and 307 IPC, and convicting them only for the off ences u/ss. 147, 148, 323, 324, 325/149 and reducing their sentences to the period already undergone contractions in the two statements of the injured eye witness, one given to police u/s.161 Cr.PC., and the other given before the court, would be suffi cient to discredit a witness. Penal Code, 1870 \u2013 ss. 304 Part I, 308, 147, 148, 323, 324, 325/149 \u2013 Culpable homicide not\n Decision Date :\n 30-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1587/2008\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nINDRAJIT DAS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TRIPURA \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 142\n2023 INSC 175\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 302/34, 201 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Information received from one of the prosecution witness that his nephew was missing since the previous evening \u2013 Victim had gone on his bike but did not return \u2013 On informed that the victim had gone out with two friends \u2013 Both the friends alleged to have confessed their crime before the investigating officer \u2013 One of them being juvenile, tried under Juvenile Act \u2013 As regards the other the trial court held that the prosecution had fully\n Decision Date :\n 28-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 609/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCARDINAL MAR GEORGE ALENCHERRY\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 1014\n2023 INSC 250\nCoram : DINESH MAHESHWARI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Issuance of summons \u2013 Legality of \u2013 A complaint was made against the appellant-archbishop and other accused persons for having committed an offense u/s 120B, 406, 409, 418, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468 r/w 34 of IPC alleging along with other accused persons had fraudulently disposed of certain immovable property belonging to the church \u2013 The first complaint filed by the complainant was dismissed by the court at Maradu on 30.09.2021 without taking cognizance of the complaint as the counsel for complainant did\n Decision Date :\n 17-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 836/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAMAL PRASAD & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (NOW STATE OF CHHATTISGARH) \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 810\n2023 INSC 895\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Case of the prosecution rested primarily on the testimonies of three witnesses, conviction of the appellants for off ence punishable u/ss.148, 302 r/w 149, 307 r/w 149, IPC and ss.4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act, sentence imposed, if justifi ed. Evidence \u2013 Testimonies of eyewitnesses \u2013 Reliance upon: Held: Death of the deceased \u2018C\u2019 and his son \u2018K\u2019 is undisputed \u2013 Deceased \u2018C\u2019 having sustained multiple injuries upon vital parts of the body as a\n Decision Date :\n 10-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1578/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANOOP BARTARIA & ETC\n versus \nDY. DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 531\n2023 INSC 413\n Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.3 \u2013 Offence of money laundering \u2013 Knowledge of dealing with the proceeds of crime, if sine qua non for\u2013 Held: No \u2013 Knowledge of the accused that he was dealing with proceeds of crime is not a condition precedent or to be shown by the prosecution for lodging the complaint under the Act \u2013 Apart from having knowledge, if a person who directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or is actually involved in the process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime, is also guilty of the offence of\n Decision Date :\n 21-04-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 2397/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nZUNAID\n versus \nSTATE OF UP. & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 715\n2023 INSC 778\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: CJM rejected the fi nal report submitted by the investigating offi cer and accepted the Protest Petition as the Complaint Case, whether the course opted by the CJM was just, legal and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. Code of Criminal The Investigating Offi cer, after completing the investigation, submitted the Final Report \u2013 Appellant- complainant fi led a Protest Petition \u2013 The concerned CJM vide order dated 15.11.2018 rejected the Final Report of the Investigating Offi cer and directed that the Protest Petition\n Decision Date :\n 29-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2628/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0c95\u0ca8\u0ccd\u0ca8\u0ca1 - Kannada\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSEEMANT KUMAR SINGH\n versus \nMAHESH PS & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 587\n2023 INSC 272\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Bail \u2013 Adverse remarks \u2013 Expunction of \u2013 During the pendency of bail proceedings of respondent no.1, the High Court made adverse remarks against the appellants, who had no lis in the proceedings \u2013 Further, the High Court issued direction for seeking reports against Remarks made by High Court against appellant no.2 are unreasonable and without justification as appellant no.2 has no personal involvement in the case \u2013 No evidence against appellant no.2 has been analysed and no opportunity has been given to him to explain himself \u2013 Also,\n Decision Date :\n 21-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 872/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVISHALAKSHI AMMA\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA & ORS \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 1081\n2023 INSC 255\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Wildlife (Protection Act), 1972: ss. 40, 40A \u2013 Time for declaration of custody or possession of any captive animal or animal article \u2013 Relaxation of \u2013 On facts, the appellant filed the application/ declaration on 25.05.2011 much beyond the prescribed period \u2013 Refusal of the of the deer horn found from the house of the appellant which was in custody and possession of the appellant on the ground of delay in the application/declaration \u2013 Writ petition by the appellant \u2013 Single Judge directed the Chief Wild Life Warden to consider whether time has been\n Decision Date :\n 17-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1720/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAMALAKAR\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 787\n2023 INSC 989\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the prosecution has proved the charges against the appellant-accused u/ss. 498A and 306 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 498A and s.306 \u2013 The prosecution alleges that after two years of marriage, all the three accused, i.e., started ill-treating and assaulting victim-deceased \u2013 Appellant brought victim back to her parents\u2019 house \u2013 The appellant refused to take her back to his house and told the informant that he will be remarried \u2013 After two months, victim poured kerosene oil on her body\n Decision Date :\n 12-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1485/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nEX-CONST/DVR MUKESH KUMAR RAIGAR\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 797\n2023 INSC 42\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Service Law : Removal from service \u2013 Constable found guilty of gross misconduct and indiscipline \u2013 Suppression of pending criminal litigation in the verification form submitted at the time of appointment \u2013 Departmental inquiry \u2013 Order of removal Single Judge of the High Court set aside the dismissal order and directed the reinstatement of the constable \u2013 However, the Division Bench set aside the order \u2013 On appeal, held: Constable has committed gross misconduct \u2013 There was deliberate suppression of fact which was an\n Decision Date :\n 16-01-2023\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 10499/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & OTHERS\n versus \nR. THAMARAISELVAM ETC. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 851\n2023 INSC 490\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Land Grabbing: Land grabbing matters \u2013 By a Government Order, the State of Tamil Nadu, constituted Anti Land Grabbing Special Cells in Tamil Nadu for investigating the cases pertaining to land grabbing, however, without defining land grabbing cases \u2013 By the other grabbing cases were ordered to be transferred to the Special Courts constituted to exclusively deal with the land grabbing cases \u2013 Writ Petitions against the said G.Os \u2013 High Court set aside the G.Os on the ground that the same does not lay down any yardstick or guideline to pick and\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1580/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRAKASH NAYI @ SEN\n versus \nSTATE OF GOA \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 823\n2023 INSC 24\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and s.84 \u2013 Plea of Insanity \u2013 \u201cSchizophrenia\u201d \u2013 Accused-appellant was convicted and sentenced u/s. 302 IPC for having caused the death of the victim-deceased by attacking him at a store in which the deceased was working, with an iron of trial, the defence pleaded insanity \u2013 At one of the hospitals where the accused was undergoing the treatment before the date of incident, it was recorded that the accused was suffering from anxiety neurosis with reactive depression and has symptoms of acid peptic disease and mild\n Decision Date :\n 12-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2010/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHAMMAD WAJID AND ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.  \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 313\n2023 INSC 683\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: In the instant case wherein FIR was registered u/ss. 395, 504, 506 and 323 IPC against the appellants, the questions which arose for consideration are whether the said case falls within the parameters laid down for quashing the FIR; whether the plain reading of of dacoity punishable u/s. 395 IPC; whether any case of criminal intimidation punishable u/ss. 504 and 506(2) IPC is made out; and whether the allegations levelled in the FIR inspire any confi dence considering the delay of one year in lodging the FIR. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.\n Decision Date :\n 08-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2340/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nROOPWANTI\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 30\n2023 INSC 157\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n Decision Date :\n 24-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1904/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKEKHRIESATUO TEP ETC.\n versus \nNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 523\n2023 INSC 362\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 ss. 39, 40, 43D(5) \u2013 Bail under \u2013Special Judge found that appellants had not voluntary succumbed to the demands of the organization and investigating agency admitted that accused persons were cooperating in investigation \u2013Bail Special Judge \u2013 However, High Court reversed the order of the Special Judge \u2013 Before the Supreme Court, appellants contended that they were forced to make payments \u2013 Held: There are twin requirement under sub-section (5) of s. 43D \u2013 First one being that the public\n Decision Date :\n 12-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 415/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJAY RAGHUNATH AGARWAL\n versus \nTHE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 461\n2023 INSC 408\nCoram : V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Bail \u2013 A criminal complaint u/ss. 406, 407, 415 to 420, 120B r/w s.34 IPC was filed against six persons, including the appellant \u2013 Complaint was, that Farmax India Ltd. availed the services of the accused in raising Global Depository Receipts (GDRs), to the tune of INR the accused raised the said amount, they transferred to Farmax only a sum of INR 2.20 crores \u2013 According to the Enforcement Directorate, the appellant and the others had committed the offence of money-laundering \u2013 Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) was lodged \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 20-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1198/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nHEMENDHRA REDDY & ANOTHER. ETC. \n- \n[2023] 7 S.C.R. 134\n2023 INSC 460\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 169, 173(2), 173(8) \u2013 Further Investigation \u2013 Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the entire prosecution instituted by the CBI against the accused persons for on the ground that the CBI could not have undertaken further investigation under sub- section (8) of s.173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and filed a charge-sheet having once already submitted a final report under sub-section (2) of the s.173 of the CrPC (closure report) \u2013 Held:\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1300/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARENDRA RAI \n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.  \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 403\n2023 INSC 738\nCoram : SANJAY KISHAN KAUL\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA, VIKRAM NATH\n HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: In a double murder case, wherein it was alleged that accused no.1-respondent no.2 had opened fi re from his rifl e resulting in injury to three persons, out of which two died, and the trial court had acquitted accused-respondent nos. 2 to 8 of all the charges, High Court in criminal revision, the issues before this Court were: (i) Whether the Supreme Court, in appeal against acquittal, could consider the High Court\u2019s judgment dated 13.03.2007 passed in a Habeas Corpus Writ Petition (fi led pursuant to abduction of CW1, mother of one of the\n Decision Date :\n 18-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1726/2015\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Acquittal of main accused reversed and matter listed for hearing on sentence. \n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRANVIR SINGH ETC. ETC.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 841\n2023 INSC 25\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, M.M. SUNDRESH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 148, 302/149, 324/149, 304 Part-II \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 Appellants-accused persons were charged of having committed an offence u/ss. 148, 302/149, 324/149 \u2013 Dehati Nalishi (Ex. P-28) was recorded as an FIR, in pursuance of the information given by person \u2018H\u2019, in which he stated that he along with the other two persons (K and PW-12) was attacked by the appellants \u2013 The Statement of the H was recorded at the place of occurrence by PW-20 (Investigating officer) and later H died at the hospital \u2013 Trial Court\n Decision Date :\n 12-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1384/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKASHIBAI & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 175\n2023 INSC 722\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.498A, 306 r/w 34 \u2013 Appellants-accused were convicted u/ss.498A, 306 r/w 34 and sentenced \u2013 Held: Deceased was subjected to harassment at the instance of appellants \u2013 Prosecution has successfully brought home the charges levelled against them for the However, it failed to adduce any clinching evidence to conclude that the appellants abetted the deceased to commit suicide \u2013 Mere fact of commission of suicide by itself would not be sufficient for the court to raise the presumption u/s.113A, Evidence Act, and to hold the accused\n Decision Date :\n 28-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 627/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSOUNDARAJAN\n versus \nSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIGILANCE ANTICORRUPTION DINDIGUL \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 133\n2023 INSC 377\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 : ss. 7, 13(1)(d), r/w 13(2) \u2013 Illegal gratification \u2013 Appellant-Sub-Registrar demanded gratification of Rs.500/- from the complainant-PW 2, for handing over the registered sale deed \u2013 Complaint filed \u2013 Trap laid witness PW-3, the appellant caught red-handed while accepting the bribe \u2013 However, complainant did not support the prosecution and was declared hostile \u2013 Trial court convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offences punishable u/s 7 and s. 13(2) r/w s. 13(1)(d) \u2013 Upheld\n Decision Date :\n 17-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1592/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAJAI ALIAS AJJU ETC. ETC\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 930\n2023 INSC 127\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302/149, 307 \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 161, 164 \u2013 The case of prosecution was that the accused persons, entered into the house of the PW-1 and her sister and had caused the death their family members \u2013 In the course of committing the offence, the accused persons also inflicted the injuries upon the PW-1 and her sister \u2013 Presuming them to be dead, the accused persons left the house \u2013 Thereafter, the PW-1 and her sister came out of the house shouting and\n Decision Date :\n 15-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 598/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u09ac\u09be\u0982\u09b2\u09be - Bengali\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0915\u094b\u0902\u0915\u0923\u0940 - Konkani\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nVIKAS MISHRA @ VIKASH MISHRA \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 321\n2023 INSC 345\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 167(2) \u2013 Application for default bail \u2013 Frustration of judicial process by conduct \u2013 Respondent was accused of having committed offence u/s 409/120B of IPC \u2013 On 16.04.2021, the respondent-accused was arrested by the CBI and was custody for a period of seven days i.e., till 22.04.2021 \u2013 However, during the said period the respondent-accused was admitted in the hospital and thus could not be interrogated by the CBI \u2013 Thereafter, he obtained interim bail on 21.04.2021 which came to be extended till 08.12.2021\n Decision Date :\n 10-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 957/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARVINDER SINGH @ BACHHU\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 1157\n2023 INSC 907\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court was justifi ed in setting aside the order of acquittal and convicting the appellant for murder and attempt to rape relying on the testimony of the prosecution witness despite contradictions, only because he was educated and a god fearing ss. 302, 376, 511, 454, 380 r/w s.34 \u2013 Murder and attempt to rape \u2013 High Court convicted the appellant for murder and attempt to rape, setting aside the order of acquittal by the trial court \u2013 Correctness: Held: Trial court gave substantial reasons for arriving at its\n Decision Date :\n 13-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 266/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAVED SHAUKAT ALI QURESHI\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 220\n2023 INSC 829\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Assault by mob, Seven accused were convicted, including the present appellant-accused no.6, for the off ences punishable u/s. 396 r/w. s.149, s.395 r/w. s.149, s.307 r/w. s.149, s.435 r/w. s.149 and s.201 r/w. s.149 of the IPC. Accused nos. 1, 5 and 13 were conviction of appellant-accused no.6 justifi ed; (b) Whether conviction of accused no. 2, 3, 4 was justifi ed, when role ascribed to them was that they were part of mob. Evidence \u2013 Conviction of appellant-accused no.6 based on sole testimony of PW-2 \u2013 Propriety: Held: Considering\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1012/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nQAMAR GHANI USMANI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 824\n2023 INSC 337\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 167(2) \u2013 Default bail \u2013 Appellant-accused was arrested on 29.01.2022 \u2013 90 days period u/s. 167 was to expire on 29.04.2022 \u2013 On 22.04.2022, IO prayed for extension of time to complete the investigation, to investigate by 30 days in absence of accused \u2013 The accused came to be informed about the extension on 23.04.2022 itself \u2013 On 22.05.2022, the IO again prayed for further extension, the same was allowed by 30 days \u2013 Second Extension was granted in the presence of the accused\n Decision Date :\n 10-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1045/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR\n versus \nVIJAYANAGARAM CHINNA REDDAPPA \n- \n[2023] 5 S.C.R. 485\n2023 INSC 726\nCoram : V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss.426(2)(b), 427(2) \u2013 Interplay between \u2013 Held: While s.426 covers the case of an escaped convict, clause (b) of sub-section (2) thereof creates a conundrum in respect of life convicts \u2013 But s.427, though does not deal convict, provides enough room for finding out how a sentence imposed on a subsequent conviction, in respect of a life convict, should be handled \u2013 Application of s.427(2) by the High Court to the case on hand is perfectly in order \u2013 Detenu to be set at liberty \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 28-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1313/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARANAGOUDA AND ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 923\n2023 INSC 933\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the courts below were justifi ed in convicting and sentencing the accused for the off ences punishable u/ss. 498A, 304B read with s. 34 IPC and ss. 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act; whether the conviction of the accused u/s. be sustainable; and whether accused can be convicted for the off ence punishable u/s. 306 IPC though not charged for said off ence. Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 498A, 304B rw s. 34, 306 \u2013 Cruelty against married women \u2013 Abetment of suicide - Accused-husband and in-laws subjected the\n Decision Date :\n 19-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3274/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY \n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 266\n2023 INSC 991\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Writ petition in the nature of public interest sought expeditious disposal of criminal cases against elected members of the Parliament and Legislative Assemblies. Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 32 of criminal cases against elected members of the Parliament and Legislative Assemblies \u2013 Directions issued: Held: (i) Learned Chief Justices of the High Courts shall register a suo-motu case with the title, \u201cIn Re: designated courts for MPs/MLAs\u201d to monitor early disposal of\n Decision Date :\n 09-11-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 699/2016\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA\n versus \nKAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR. ETC \n- \n[2023] 16 S.C.R. 1133\n2023 INSC 1090\nCoram : K.M. JOSEPH, HRISHIKESH ROY, B.V. NAGARATHNA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to application fi led by the appellant seeking clarifi cation of the judgment dated 27.03.2023 passed by this Court in Crl App Enforcement Directorate, Government of India v. Kapil Wadhawan & Anr. Etc. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 167(2) \u2013 Judgment/order as regards grant of default bail \u2013 Clarifi cation of \u2013 Application by the appellant seeking clarifi cation of the judgment dated\n Decision Date :\n 24-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 701/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nADITI ALIAS MITHI\n versus \nJITESH SHARMA \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 247\n2023 INSC 981\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The appellant-minor daughter of the respondent-father is aggrieved of the order passed by the High Court by which the maintenance for the appellant \u20b9 20,000/- per month, was reduced to \u20b97,500/- per month by the High Court. Maintenance \u2013 The High Court of maintenance from \u20b920,000/- to \u20b97,500/- \u2013 Propriety: Held: The manner in which maintenance payable u/s. 24 of the Hindu Mariage Act, 1955 or s.125 Cr.P.C. is to be assessed, was considered by the Supreme Court in its celebrated judgment in Rajnesh v. Neha and Another, [2020] 13 SCR\n Decision Date :\n 06-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3446/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSAURAV DAS\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 731\n2023 INSC 76\nCoram : M.R. SHAH\n*\n, C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973:ss. 173, 207 \u2013 Report of police officer on completion of investigation \u2013 Writ Petition u/Art. 32 seeking direction to all the States to upload all chargesheets on public domain/websites \u2013 Held: Relief sought is contrary to scheme of CrPC \u2013 as victim and/or even the investigating agency \u2013 Putting the FIR on the website cannot be equated with putting the chargesheets along with the relevant documents on the public domain and on the websites of the State Governments \u2013 Chargesheet are not public documents u/s. 73 of the\n Decision Date :\n 20-01-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1126/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLOK PRAHARI\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS \n- \n[2023] 7 S.C.R. 357\n2023 INSC 302\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 \u2013 Rule 39-AA \u2013 Representation of the People Act, 1951 \u2013 ss. 59, 94 and 128(1), amended by Act of 2003 \u2013 Challenge to r. 39-AA \u2013 Petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of rule 39-AA on the ground that the said Art.14 of the Constitution and is also contrary to s.123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 \u2013 Held: The Constitution Bench in Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India held that after the amendment, voting to the Council of States has undergone a material change and that the norm of\n Decision Date :\n 27-03-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1141/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGUNA MAHTO\n versus \nSTATE OF JHARKHAND \n- \n[2023] 3 S.C.R. 782\n2023 INSC 240\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860 : ss. 302, 201 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that husband murdered his wife and dumped her dead body in well to cause disappearance of evidence and later lodged missing report with the police \u2013 Conviction u/ss. 302 and 201 by the courts below \u2013 On appeal, Officer has, in the attending circumstances rendered the prosecution case to be doubtful if not false \u2013 Offence u/s. 201 could not have been proven without his examination \u2013 Courts below presumptively, proceeded with the acquired assumption of the guilt of the accused for the\n Decision Date :\n 16-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 108/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANBAZHAGAN\n versus \nTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2023] 10 S.C.R. 1091\n2023 INSC 632\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Alteration of conviction from s. 304-I to s.304-II of IPC \u2013 Single injury \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant and deceased picked up verbal altercation in regard to the pathway and the appellant had inflicted one blow with a \u201cHoe\u201d-a of which the victim fell unconscious and later died \u2013 Trial Court held appellant guilty for the offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder u/s. 304-I of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years \u2013 High Court dismissed the appeal\n Decision Date :\n 20-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2043/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHANESAR SINGH SODHI (D) THR. LRS.\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. \n- \n[2023] 14 S.C.R. 777\n2023 INSC 997\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Detention order passed under Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 subsequently revoked/withdrawn, proceedings under Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) become non est and untenable, as claimed. Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 \u2013 s.2(2)(b) and its proviso \u2013 Application \u2013 Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 \u2013 ss.3, 9, 12 \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 09-11-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5500/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nYAMAL MANOJBHAI\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 916\n2023 INSC 498\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Customs Act, 1962 \u2013 ss.123, 127B \u2013 Seized goods specified u/s.123, remedy of settlement u/s.127B if available \u2013 Held: Per Krishna Murari, J. In cases of seizure within the customs area, s.123 cannot apply and the accused is entitled to the remedy of by the Bombay High Court in Suresh Raheja case states the correct position of law \u2013 Per Sanjay Karol, J. Proviso to s.127B(1) specifies certain categories of goods that are barred from the jurisdiction of the settlement commission including goods mentioned u/s.123 and goods relating to NDPS\n Decision Date :\n 04-05-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 55/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Matter to be placed before Hon\u2019ble CJI.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANDEEP KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR \n- \n[2023] 9 S.C.R. 1210\n2023 INSC 654\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.319 \u2013 The appellant- informant (PW-9) moved an application u/s. 319 before the Trial Court to summon three additional accused persons, R, K and P, who were named in FIR but not in the charge-sheet by the appellant as assailants in his examination-in-chief during trial \u2013 The trial Court allowed the application and summoned the three accused persons \u2013 However, the High Court set aside the said order in revision \u2013 The revision was allowed for the reasons that R was\n Decision Date :\n 28-07-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2195/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0ba4\u0bae\u0bbf\u0bb4\u0bcd - Tamil\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAIM AHAMED\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2023] 1 S.C.R. 1061\n2023 INSC 85\nCoram : AJAY RASTOGI\n*\n, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.375, 376 \u2013 Conviction u/s.376, when not justified \u2013 Plea of the respondents was that the prosecutrix gave her consent for sexual relationship under the misconception of fact, as the accused had given a false promise to marry her but subsequently he did not was no consent in the eye of law and the case fell under the Clause- Secondly of s.375 \u2013 Held: In the present case, the prosecutrix who herself was a married woman having three children, could not be said to have acted under the alleged false promise given by the appellant- accused or under\n Decision Date :\n 30-01-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 257/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nB V SESHAIAH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 293\n2023 INSC 93\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN\n Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 \u2013 Conviction of the Appellants \u2013 Revision filed before High Court \u2013 Meanwhile, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to settle the dispute, in terms thereof Respondent No.2 was bound to file a compromise Court, however he failed to do so \u2013 Revision dismissed by High Court, conviction of the Appellants confirmed \u2013 On appeal, held: This is a very clear case of the parties entering into an agreement and compounding the offence to save themselves from the process of litigation \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 01-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 284/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANISH SISODIA\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION \n- \n[2023] 15 S.C.R. 480\n2023 INSC 956\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The two appeals are fi led by the appellant- former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi seeking bail in the prosecutions arising from a case registered by the CBI under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Penal Code, 1860; and enforcement the Directorate of Enforcement, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.45 \u2013 Requirement for grant of bail under: Held: Referring to s.45 of the PML Act, in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary it was held that provision does not require\n Decision Date :\n 30-10-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3352/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJAY DUBEY\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 939\n2023 INSC 519\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Constitution of India \u2013 Articles 226, 227 \u2013 Power of High Court to issue additional directions/orders in bail pleas \u2013 FIR was filed against accused u/ss.376, 506, IPC; POCSO Act, SCST Act and IT Act \u2013FSL Report was forwarded to the appellant- Inspectorwith a note that guidelines be undertaken however, the DNA examination was not carried out \u2013 In the meantime, the accused filed his bail plea \u2013 High Courtcalled for the case-diary, but the FSL Report was not included therewith \u2013 Appellant was found guilty of dereliction of dutyand direction\n Decision Date :\n 11-05-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1466/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMEENA BEGUM\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 958\n2023 INSC 788\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: An order of detention dated 24.03.2023 was passed by the Commissioner of Police against appellant\u2019s husband. Whether the alleged acts of commission for which the Detenu has been kept under detention are prejudicial to \u2018public order\u2019 and whether factors weighed in the mind of the detaining authority leading to the conclusion that the Detenu is a habitual off ender and for prevention of further crimes by him, he ought to be detained. Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Off enders, Goondas, Immoral\n Decision Date :\n 04-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2706/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANSAR AHMAD\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 577\n2023 INSC 725\nCoram : SURYA KANT, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Bail \u2013 Bail applications filed by two respondents herein in a case crime u/ss.147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 120-B and 34 IPC and ss. 3 & 4 of Explosive Substances Act before the High Court was granted \u2013 It was alleged that appellant\u2019s son was killed in a contract killing \u2013 one of the respondents was allegedly present at the spot at the time of occurrence, the other respondent was a part of the conspiracy hatched to eliminate victim-deceased \u2013 On appeal, held: The offences were serious in nature and the respondents were allegedly involved in a contract\n Decision Date :\n 18-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1168/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARENDRASINH KESHUBHAI ZALA\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 746\n2023 INSC 241\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL\n Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302/34 \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 ss. 25(1) A, 27(2) \u2013 Acquittal of accused \u2013 Appellant was accused of having committed the murder of the victim-deceased by shooting at him while he was sitting on a Nala with PW-3 \u2013 FIR charge-sheet was filed and the appellant was put on trial \u2013 Trial Court convicted the appellant on the testimony of the sole eye-witness (PW-3) and such conviction was upheld by the High Court \u2013 On appeal, held: In the case of a sole eye witness, the witness has to be reliable,\n Decision Date :\n 16-03-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1179/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMALIK MAZHAR SULTAN & ANR\n versus \nU P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS IN THE MATTER OF: STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 682\n2023 INSC 860\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The State of Haryana sought a direction that it should be permitted to conduct the entire selection process of recruiting judicial offi Service Commission and the order dated 12.02.2009 should be modifi ed to facilitate this exercise. Judicial Service \u2013 Selection process \u2013 State Government sought selection process of recruiting judicial offi cers to be done through the Public Service Commission \u2013 State\n Decision Date :\n 26-09-2023\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 1867/2006\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n IA No. 53466 of 2022. IA dismissed. \n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAKKELLA NAGAIAH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH \n- \n[2023] 12 S.C.R. 250\n2023 INSC 800\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, SANJAY KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Claim of petitioner for juvenility after conviction u/s. 302 r/w. s.34 IPC. Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 \u2013 Petitioner and other co-accused convicted u/s. 302 r/w. s.34 IPC imprisonment for life \u2013 High Court upheld the conviction and sentence \u2013 SLP also dismissed \u2013 Petitioner claimed juvenility \u2013 The Sessions Judge was directed to conduct an enquiry and to submit the report: Held: The Additional Sessions Judge submitted the report after\n Decision Date :\n 05-09-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 429/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJITENDRA KUMAR RODE\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2023] 4 S.C.R. 512\n2023 INSC 419\nCoram : KRISHNA MURARI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974: s. 385 \u2013 Procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily \u2013 Conviction and sentence of the appellant-Assistant Commercial Manager, Northern Railway u/s. 7 of PC Act by the trial court \u2013 In appeal before the High Court though the record record of the matter before trial court has been lost and is not traceable and the documents sent as reconstructed documents do not constitute the relevant trial court record, the High Court upheld the conviction despite going into the merits \u2013 Legality of \u2013 Held : Accused, in appeal,\n Decision Date :\n 24-04-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1269/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLAN\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 13 S.C.R. 658\n2023 INSC 745\nCoram : S. RAVINDRA BHAT\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: The role of a \u2018support person\u2019 as envisaged in the Protection of Children from Sexual Off ences Rules, 2020. Protection of Children from Sexual Off ences Act, 2012 \u2013 Protection of Children from Sexual Off ences Rules, 2020 \u2013 Role of HELD: A support person is to provide information, emotional and psychological support, and practical assistance which are often crucial to the recovery of the child \u2013 This can go a long way in helping them cope with the aftermath of the crime and with the strain of any criminal proceedings\n Decision Date :\n 18-08-2023\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 427/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJUHRU & ORS\n versus \nKARIM & ANR. \n- \n[2023] 2 S.C.R. 519\n2023 INSC 148\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, J.K. MAHESHWARI\n Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 319 \u2013 Additional accused \u2013 Summoning of \u2013Appeal filed by the father-in- law(appellant no.1), sister-in-law(appellant no.2), and brother-in- law(appellant no.3) of the deceased against the High Court judgment wherein the High Court accused \u2013 Earlier, respondent no. 1 (brother of the deceased woman) had filed an FIR u/s 304B, 498A, 406, 323 and 34 IPC against the husband of the deceased, the mother-in-law of the deceased, and the abovementioned appellants \u2013 The investigating agency did not find any\n Decision Date :\n 21-02-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 549/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2023, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATBIR SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. \n- \n[2023] 11 S.C.R. 723\n2023 INSC 786\nCoram : AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Courts below, if justifi ed in rejecting the application of the appellant u/s.311, CrPC for his recall as a witness in the trial for further examination. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.311 \u2013 Power under \u2013 Exercise of \u2013 Appellant fi accused-ex-employees of his company had stolen company data and used it to manufacture equipment, which was manufactured by his company \u2013 Evidence of the appellant was recorded before the CFSL Report came \u2013 Though, the CFSL expert in his examination described the data found on the\n Decision Date :\n 29-08-2023\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2634/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIJAY SINGH @ VIJAY KR. SHARMA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 108\n2024 INSC 735\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards sustainablility of the findings of the High Court holding the appellants guilty of commission of offences u/ss. 302/34 and 364/34 IPC; as also the approach of the High Court, if in line with the settled law for reversing an acquittal \u2013 ss. 302/34 and 364/34 \u2013 Kidnapping or abducting in order to murder \u2013 Abduction and murder of woman over a property dispute \u2013 Factum of her death discovered in furtherance of written report lodged by informant and brother- in-law of the victim \u2013 Conviction and\n Decision Date :\n 25-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1031/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARESH KUMAR & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 740\n2024 INSC 196\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Refusal by High Court to quash criminal proceedings against Appellants/Accused arising out of a civil transaction between Appellants and Respondent No.2, if justified. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Powers of the High Court under filed by Respondent No.2 against Appellants \u2013 Appellants, employees of a bicycle manufacturing company engaged Respondent No.2 for assembling, transporting and delivering bicycles \u2013 Respondent No.2 aggrieved by the fact of payment not being commensurate with the service rendered - FIR\n Decision Date :\n 12-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1510/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRIKANT UPADHYAY & ORS\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 421\n2024 INSC 202\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Whether there could be any bar on the Trial Court for proceeding u/s. 82 Cr.P.C., merely because an anticipatory application for bail has been filed or because such an application was adjourned without passing any interim order. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Application for anticipatory bail was filed in November 2022 and brought up for hearing on 04.04.2023, on which it was dismissed \u2013 Meanwhile, proclamation was issued u/s. 82 Cr.P.C. on 04.01.2023 and thereafter process u/s.83 Cr.P.C. was initiated on 15.03.2023 \u2013 The core\n Decision Date :\n 14-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1552/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDABLU KUJUR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 614\n2024 INSC 197\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n 614 : 2024 INSC 197 Dablu Kujur v. The State of Jharkhand (Criminal Appeal No. 1511 of 2024) 12 March 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Pankaj Mithal, JJ] Issue for Consideration The issue for consideration was the compliance of the requirements of a Police Report under Section 173(2) of the Code of 1973: Held: The Police Report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. being a very important piece of document from the view point of the prosecution, the defence and the court, it is incumbent upon the Investigating Officer to strictly comply with the requirements of the said provisions, as\n Decision Date :\n 12-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1511/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBIJAY KUMAR MANISH KUMAR HUF\n versus \nASHWIN BHANULAL DESAI \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 859\n2024 INSC 445\nCoram : J.K. MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration The interlocutory applications have been filed seeking direction for payment of rent and other associated benefits in connection with the property which is the subject matter of the dispute. Headnotes\u2020 Rent Control and Eviction \u2013 The lis governs four different tenancies \u2013 Petitioner-applicant landlord alleges non-payment of rent and has filed applications in the pending SLPs seeking direction for payment of \u2018monthly occupational charges\u2019 following the prevalent market rate: Held: On account of\n Decision Date :\n 17-05-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 4049/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n IA disposed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY NEW DELHI\n versus \nOWAIS AMIN @ CHERRY & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 1056\n2024 INSC 447\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration Applicability of Section 196-A of Code of Criminal Procedure SVT., 1989 vis-\u00e0-vis the provisions and mandate contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Headnotes\u2020 Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 \u2013 s.103 \u2013 Code of Criminal ss.4(1)(e), 196-A \u2013 Jammu and Kashmir State Ranbir Penal Code SVT., 1989 \u2013 s.120-B \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 \u2013 Para 2(13) \u2013 Proceedings initiated under CrPC, 1989,\n Decision Date :\n 17-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2668/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNITA DEVI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 629\n2024 INSC 448\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration Need for a comprehensive sentencing policy. Trial against the accused under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was conducted by the judicial officer in utmost haste and the accused was denied due opportunity to defend himself. Conviction and death by the High Court and a de novo trial was ordered, making certain observations against the Special Judge. Criminal Appeal Nos.3925-3927 of 2023 filed by the judicial officer. Criminal Appeal No.3924 of 2023 filed by the informant against the order of remittal for de novo trial. On facts, in\n Decision Date :\n 17-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3924/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY CHENNAI BRANCH \n versus \nBARAKATHULLAH ETC. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 1011\n2024 INSC 452\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Issue for Consideration The respondents-accused were arrested for the alleged offences under section 120(b), 153(A), 153(AA) of IPC and Section 13, 17, 18, 18(B), 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, released the respondents on bail subject to the conditions. Whether from the perusal of the chargesheet and other material/documents produced against the respondents, there are reasonable grounds for believing that accusations against the respondents are prima facie true, as contemplated in\n Decision Date :\n 22-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2715/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKAILASHBEN MAHENDRABHAI PATEL & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 62\n2024 INSC 737\nCoram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Issue for Consideration FIR was filed against the appellants under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC. Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition under Section 482, CrPC for quashing of the said FIR and the chargesheet against that a prima facie case of cruelty was made out against them under Section 498A, Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.498A, 323, 504, 506 r/w s.34 \u2013 Ingredients of \u2013 When not made out \u2013 Complaint filed by respondent no.2-wife making vague\n Decision Date :\n 25-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4003/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nK. VADIVEL\n versus \nK. SHANTHI & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1\n2024 INSC 746\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Under what circumstances could the power be invoked for further investigation and whether on the facts, further investigation was warranted. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 178(3) \u2013 Further investigation \u2013 Applications filed by the investigation or re-investigation by examining the related occurrence and eyewitnesses of the crime mentioned in the application and submit additional/supplementary charge-sheet \u2013 Dismissed by the trial court holding that further investigation cannot be ordered at the post cognizance stage\n Decision Date :\n 30-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4058/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nV. SENTHIL BALAJI\n versus \nTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 393\n2024 INSC 739\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to grant of bail to former Tamil Nadu transport minister against whom complaint was filed for offence u/s.3 PMLA, which is punishable u/s.4 PMLA for his alleged involvement in the job racket scam. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of \u2013 ss.3, 4, 45(1) (iii) \u2013 Offence of money-laundering \u2013 Appellant-former Tamil Nadu transport minister\u2019s alleged involvement in the job racket scam \u2013 Arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with the Enforcement Case Information Report \u2013 Bail\n Decision Date :\n 26-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4011/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAJWAR\n versus \nWASEEM AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 575\n2024 INSC 438\nCoram : HIMA KOHLI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in exercising jurisdiction u/s. 439(1) Cr.P.C for granting regular bail in favour of the accused persons. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 439(1) \u2013 Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail enmity, the accused persons indiscriminately fired at the complainant and his two sons, resulting in death of his sons and serious injuries to his nephew \u2013 Grant of regular bail to the accused by the High Court \u2013 Justification: Held: Orders granting bail not justified and suffers\n Decision Date :\n 17-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2639/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTARSEM LAL\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT JALANDHAR ZONAL OFFICE \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 864\n2024 INSC 434\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration (a) Whether the complaint filed u/s.44(1)(b) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 will be governed by sections 200 to 205 of the CrPC; (b) If the accused was not arrested by the ED till the filing of the complaint, while taking cognizance on the Court should issue a summons to the accused or warrant; (c) After a summons are issued u/s. 204 of the CrPC on taking cognizance of the offence punishable u/s. 4 of the PMLA on a complaint, if accused appears before the Special Court, would he be treated as in custody and is it necessary for\n Decision Date :\n 16-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2608/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRABIR PURKAYASTHA\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 666\n2024 INSC 414\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the arrest and subsequent remand of the accused- appellant was vitiated as the copy of the remand application was not provided to him or his counsel before passing of the order of remand thus, not informing him of the grounds of arrest in writing. Headnotes \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Articles 22(1) and 22(5) \u2013 FIR registered u/ss.13, 16, 17, 18, 22C, UAPA r/w ss.153A, 120B, IPC \u2013 Appellant was arrested in connection therewith however, the arrest memo did not contain the \u2018grounds of arrest\u2019 \u2013 Appellant\n Decision Date :\n 15-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2577/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJENDRA S/O RAMDAS KOLHE\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 740\n2024 INSC 422\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration By the judgment and order dated 15.11.2010, the High Court relied upon the written dying declaration of the deceased Ex. 59 recorded by PW-6 and also the oral dying declarations of the deceased made before PW-2, PW-3, PW-4, PW-7 and PW-8 and thereafter upheld the judgment trial court. The appellant was convicted for committing an offence punishable u/s. 302 r/w. s.34 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment. Whether the dying declaration (Ex.59), in the instant case, was the valid piece of evidence. Headnotes Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.32(1) \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 15-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2281/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANIK & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 724\n2024 INSC 734\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n*\n Issue for Consideration Appellants-convicts are members of the police force and the allegation against them is misuse and abuse of their powers, in resorting to custodial torture of victim-S and tampering with evidence. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 330, 331, 342, 343, 348, 218, all r/w. s.34 \u2013 Victim-S was taken into police custody for interrogation \u2013 Allegation that he was subjected to third degree torture \u2013 Thereafter, a burnt and buried body was found in the forest \u2013 Body was unidentified \u2013 Prosecution case that appellants-convicts\n Decision Date :\n 25-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1614/2012\n \n | Direction Issue :\n In view of the divergent of opinion, the appeal papers directed to be placed before the Hon\u2019ble Chief Justice of India for assigning the same to the appropriate Bench.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nK. RAVI\n versus \nSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 700\n2024 INSC 642\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the right of the accused to file a fresh application u/s.216 Cr.P.C. seeking his discharge after the charge is framed by the court, more particularly when his application seeking discharge u/s.227 Cr.P.C. has already been dismissed; and as regards the application u/s.397 Cr.P.C. against the order dismissing application seeking modification of charge framed which would be an interlocutory order. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.216 \u2013 Alteration of charge \u2013 s.227 \u2013 Discharge \u2013 On facts, in\n Decision Date :\n 29-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3598/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARVEEN KUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 54\n2024 INSC 717\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose, if the High Court was justified in convicting and sentencing the husband u/ss. 498A and 306 IPC for subjecting the victim-wife to cruelty and forcing her to commit suicide. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.498-A and 306 \u2013 Husband or relative subjecting her to cruelty \u2013 Abetment of suicide \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.113A \u2013 Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman \u2013 Victim- wife committed suicide by consuming tablets of aluminum phosphide-insecticide within two years of marriage \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1014/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SANGRAM SADASHIV SURYAVANSHI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1321\n2024 INSC 899\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Whether appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail; whether it is appropriate for High Court to fix a time bound schedule for conclusion of trials. Headnotes\u2020 Bail \u2013 Allegation against appellant for commission of offences punishable u/ss.489A, 489B and Appellant incarcerated for two and a half years \u2013 Whether appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail: Held: Six counterfeit currency notes of Rs.500/- each are subject matter of the offence \u2013 The appellant has been incarcerated for two and a half years \u2013 The counter\n Decision Date :\n 25-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4758/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "KAMARUDDIN DASTAGIR SANADI \n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SHO KAKATI POLICE \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1269\n2024 INSC 908\nCoram : PANKAJ MITHAL\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the acquittal of the appellant-accused and convicting him under Sections 417, 306 IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.306, 107, 417 \u2013 When asked by the deceased, the appellant refused to marry committed suicide \u2013 On facts, whether the appellant, instigated or provoked the deceased to commit suicide: Held: No \u2013 Dying declaration of the deceased indicates that it was the deceased who was in love with the appellant and wanted to marry him \u2013 There was no evidence to\n Decision Date :\n 29-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 551/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "RAJEEV KUMAR UPADHYAY\n versus \nSRIKANT UPADHYAY & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1122\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration The victim was subjected to grave accusations and was also disrobed and assaulted in public. The Court take this as an opportunity to refer and reaffirm the commitment to the ideals of equality and justice for all. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.341, 323, \u2013 Witch (Daain) Act \u2013 ss.3 and 4 \u2013 Victim was accused of witchcraft \u2013 She abused physically & verbally and thereafter disrobed \u2013 FIR was registered against 13 accused persons \u2013 Trial Court took cognizance \u2013 Accused persons sought quashing of FIR\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4831/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAZIA AMAN KHAN AND ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 10\n2024 INSC 163\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Custody of a minor child in parens patriae jurisdiction. Headnotes Child and Family Welfare \u2013 Custody of minor child \u2013 Custody of one of the twin daughters born to respondent No.2 and his wife is in question, who had undisputedly been living with of respondent No. 2) ever since she was 3-4 month old and thereafter with the family: Held: Stability and security of the child is an essential ingredient for full development of child\u2019s talent and personality \u2013 Welfare of the children is of paramount consideration and not\n Decision Date :\n 04-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1345/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHANKAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 10\n2024 INSC 366\nCoram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Whether there is sufficient material against the appellant prompting the trial court to pass a summoning order u/s. 319 Cr.P.C. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 319 \u2013 Summoning order u/s. 319 \u2013 Legality of \u2013 Appellants facing trial for u/s. 319 by the trial court \u2013 High Court refused to quash the summoning order \u2013 Correctness: Held: Degree of satisfaction required to exercise power u/s. 319 is much stricter, considering that it is a discretionary and an extra- ordinary power \u2013 Only when the evidence is\n Decision Date :\n 02-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2367/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUNIL @ SONU ETC.\n versus \nSTATE NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 616\n2024 INSC 727\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose for consideration that as to whether the accused can be convicted for the offence punishable u/s.302 IPC or in the facts and circumstance of the case, the conviction needs to be altered to a lesser offence. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.304 not amounting to murder \u2013 Pre-existing disputes between the parties leading to verbal altercation whereafter accused persons attacked the victims with knives and dandas, resulting in death of one \u2013 FIR lodged by one of the victim as also the appellant \u2013 Conviction of the\n Decision Date :\n 24-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3978/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "HDFC BANK LTD.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1902\n2024 INSC 807\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration What is the nature of enquiry while determining quashing of a First Information Report u/s.482 Cr.P.C., against a Bank and its Officials. Headnotes\u2020 Criminal law \u2013 Essential ingredients for offence under Section 420 of IPC \u2013 Question of mens rea does not must disclose the following ingredients to make out an offence u/s.420 : (i) That the Accused has induced anyone since inception; (ii) That the inducement was fraudulent or dishonest; (iii) That mens rea existed at the time of such inducement. The Accused/Bank is a jurisdiction person, and as\n Decision Date :\n 22-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4324/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPREM RAJ\n versus \nPOONAMMA MENON & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 29\n2024 INSC 260\nCoram : SANJAY KAROL\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Whether, a criminal proceeding can be initiated and the accused therein held guilty with natural consequences thereof to follow, in connection with a transaction, in respect of which a decree by a competent Court of civil jurisdiction, already stands passed. Headnotes s.138 \u2013 Appellant borrowed Rs.2,00,000/- from the complainant \u2013 On receipt of demand, appellant issued a cheque for the said amount \u2013 It was dishonoured due to insufficient funds and \u2018payments stopped by drawer\u2019 \u2013 The complainant issued a notice of demand\n Decision Date :\n 02-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1858/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "V.D. RAVEESHA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 2265\n2024 INSC 1060\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the petitioner is guilty of committing offences u/ss.406, 420, 468, 465 and 471 IPC, and if so, whether the sentences imposed on him by the Trial Court and confirmed by the Appellate Court and High Court call for interference. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 420, 468, 465, 471 \u2013 Petitioner failed to repay the loan obtained to purchase a vehicle \u2013 Allegation that petitioner forged documents and sold the vehicle to one S \u2013 FIR registered \u2013 Trial Court found petitioner guilty of offences u/ss.406, 468, 465, 420, and 471 of IPC\n Decision Date :\n 22-10-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 980/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANIL MISHRA\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 385\n2024 INSC 189\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether High Court was justified in setting aside the entire proceedings of the case against the accused on the basis of a Settlement Agreement where the complainant in the FIR was not made a party. Headnotes During the pendency of the trial, a Settlement Agreement was i.e. Respondent Nos. 2 to 4; and one of the victims i.e. Respondent No.5 \u2013 Trial Court on considering the said agreement rejected the same by observing that (i) chargesheet has been filed under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 364 of the IPC of which Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 364 of the IPC\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1335/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nACHIN GUPTA\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 129\n2024 INSC 369\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration The appellant herein was chargesheeted u/ss.323, 406, 498A and 506 of IPC. The appellant filed a quashing petition for the purpose of getting the criminal proceedings quashed. The High Court by its impugned order, declined to quash the criminal proceedings in exercise of of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Whether the High Court should have exercised its inherent power u/s. 482 of the Cr.P.C. for the purpose of quashing the criminal proceedings. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 323, 406, 498A and 506 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 03-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2379/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMULAKALA MALLESHWARA RAO & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF TELANGANA & ANR.  \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 739\n2024 INSC 639\nCoram : J.K. MAHESHWARI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration The complaint, which set in motion the Criminal Law, was at the instance of Respondent No.2-complainant, who filed the same against the former in-laws of his elder daughter, for not returning the ornaments (gold) which he had given at the time of her marriage with and substance of the present dispute lie in the father\u2019s right over the gifts, i.e.,\u2018stridhan\u2019 given by him to his daughter at the time of marriage. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.406 \u2013 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 \u2013 s.6 \u2013 Hindu Succession Act,\n Decision Date :\n 29-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3599/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPREM PRAKASH\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 955\n2024 INSC 637\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration When a person is in judicial custody/custody in another case investigated by the same Investigating Agency, whether the statements recorded (in the present case, the statements dated 03.08.2023, 04.08.2023, 11.08.2023) for a new case in which his arrest is not are claimed to contain incriminating material against the maker, would be admissible under Section 50, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.50 \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.25 \u2013 Appellant was in judicial\n Decision Date :\n 28-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3572/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANEES\n versus \nTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 164\n2024 INSC 368\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Murder of appellant-accused\u2019s wife in their house in which the appellant, deceased and their 5 year old daughter lived. s.106, Evidence Act, 1872 was invoked and the appellant was convicted u/s.302, IPC for the murder. Whether the High Court committed the impugned judgment affirming the conviction of the appellant. Headnotes Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.106 \u2013 Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge \u2013 \u201cprima facie case\u201d (foundational facts) in the context of s.106 \u2013 Murder of appellant-accused\u2019s\n Decision Date :\n 03-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 437/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nASHOK SIRPAL \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 930\n2024 INSC 819\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the challenge to the order passed by the High Court suspending the sentence of imprisonment and the fine imposed on the accused who was convicted for embezzlement of Rs. 46 lakhs. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.389 \u2013 2023 \u2013 ss.430 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.64 \u2013 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 \u2013 ss.4 and 8(2) \u2013 Suspension of sentence pending appeal; release of appellant on bail \u2013 Respondent-accused convicted for the offences punishable under the Penal Code and Prevention\n Decision Date :\n 24-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4277/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHENTO VARGHESE\n versus \nJULFIKAR HUSEN & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 409\n2024 INSC 407\nCoram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration What is the implication of non-reporting of the seizure forthwith to the jurisdictional Magistrate as provided under Section 102(3) Cr.P.C.; does delayed reporting of the seizure to the Magistrate vitiate the seizure order altogether. Headnotes\u2020 Code of s.102(3) \u2013 Implication of non-reporting of the seizure forthwith to the jurisdictional Magistrate: Held: The meaning of the word \u2018forthwith\u2019 as used in section 102(3) has not received judicial construction \u2013 The said expression must receive a reasonable construction\n Decision Date :\n 13-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2531/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSARFARAZ ALAM\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 267\n2024 INSC 18\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Validity of the detention order passed by the respondents; Detenue\u2019s right to make a representation, the communication regarding the same if to be made both orally and in writing. Headnotes Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, \u2013 Article 22(5) \u2013 Detention order \u2013 Validity \u2013 Detenue\u2019s right of making a representation \u2013 Communication thereof if to be made both orally and in writing \u2013 Appellant inter alia pleaded that the detenue was not informed/communicated regarding his right\n Decision Date :\n 04-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 45/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDHARNIDHAR MISHRA (D) AND ANOTHER\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 714\n2024 INSC 415\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration A land owned by the appellant was acquired and he did not receive any compensation for the same. Before the Division Bench of the High Court, the appellant was informed that value of land was Rs. 4,68,099/-. The Division Bench of the High Court disposed of the Letters the appellant to file an appropriate application before the concerned authority for disbursement of the value of the land. Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned order. Headnotes Land Acquisition Act, 1894 \u2013 Payment of compensation \u2013 In the year 1977, a land\n Decision Date :\n 13-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 6351/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURAJ SINGH GUJAR & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 782\n2024 INSC 661\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.323, 324 and 325 r/w. s.34 of IPC. It is stated by the appellants that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide compromise deed dated 29.01.2024. In the instant appeal, they are Court for compounding the offence. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.323, 324 and 325 r/w. s.34 \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Art.142 \u2013 Incident between relatives \u2013 Conviction under non-compoundable offences set aside: Held: On perusal of affidavits filed, this\n Decision Date :\n 30-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3731/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "BHARTI ARORA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1044\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the Special Judge could have conducted the proceedings against the present appellant for the offence punishable u/s.58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; whether the Special Judge was justified in recording the findings against as the other police officers without even issuing notice to them. Headnotes\u2020 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 ss.36-A, 58 \u2013 In a trial regarding recovery of the opium from the accused persons, the Special Judge vide final judgment dated 22.02.2007\n Decision Date :\n 13-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1699/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHABI KARMAKAR & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 796\n2024 INSC 665\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.B. PARDIWALA\n Issue for Consideration The appellants have been convicted u/ss.498A, 304B and 306 r/w.s.34 of the IPC. The Trial Court had convicted sister-in-law (appellant no.1), husband (appellant no.2) and mother-in-law of the deceased and sentenced them to suffer life imprisonment, 3 years R.I and 10 years 498A and 306 of IPC respectively, along with fine and other default stipulations. Both the conviction and the sentence of the present appellants have been upheld in appeal and the High Court. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.498A, 304B and s.306 r/w. s.34 \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872\n Decision Date :\n 29-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1556/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDATTATRAYA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 989\n2024 INSC 167\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Whether the courts below were justified in convicting the appellant u/ss. 302 and 316 IPC and sentencing to undergo life imprisonment and 10 years of R.I. respectively along with fine, for causing death of his wife as also the child she was bearing by pouring kerosene on fire. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 304 Part II and 316 \u2013 Culpable homicide not amounting to murder \u2013 Causing death of quick unborn child by act amounting to culpable homicide \u2013 Prosecution case that on the fateful night the husband in an inebriated state, picked a fight\n Decision Date :\n 01-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 666/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJU AND ANOTHER\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1147\n2024 INSC 633\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the material on record unmistakably justifies the conviction of the appellant u/s. 307 IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 307 \u2013 Attempt to murder \u2013 Prosecution case that appellants armed with knives and lathis inflicted injuries to the to whom the incident was narrated later \u2013 Trial court acquitted the appellant and his co-accused, however, the High Court sentenced the appellant and one of his co-accused to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and upheld acquittal of other two accused \u2013 Correctness: Held:\n Decision Date :\n 31-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1151/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSACHIN GARG\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1134\n2024 INSC 72\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE, SANJAY KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration In a case wherein the dispute was commercial in nature having no element of criminality, whether the Magistrate was justified in issuing summons for trial u/ss.406, 504 and 506, Penal Code, 1860 and the High Court in dismissing the application filed by the appellant for complaint case. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Issuance of summons, duty of Magistrate \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.406, 504 and 506 \u2013 Commercial dispute given criminal colour \u2013 Dispute between the parties related to the rate at which the assigned work was\n Decision Date :\n 30-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 497/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBALLU @ BALRAM @ BALMUKUND AND ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 48\n2024 INSC 258\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration High Court whether justified in reversing the acquittal of the appellant Nos.1 and 2 and convicting them u/ss.302 and 201/34 and ss.302/34 and 201, Penal Code, 1860 respectively and sentencing accordingly; whether the prosecution proved its case whether the appellants were guilty of committing the crime. Headnotes Appeal against acquittal \u2013 Interference \u2013 When not sustainable: Held: Prosecution case rests on circumstantial evidence \u2013 Trial Judge gave sound and cogent reasons for discarding the testimony of the IO and\n Decision Date :\n 02-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1167/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "PRAKASH AND OTHERS\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1160\n2024 INSC 1020\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the courts below were justified in accepting the prosecution case that the act of suicide by the victim was a direct result of the words uttered by the appellants at the mahalokadalat when there was a clear gap of over a month between the incident and the commission of suicide. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code \u2013 ss.306, 107 \u2013 Abetment of suicide \u2013 Disputes between the victim, and her husband-appellant no.1 and in-laws \u2013 Victim tortured mentally and physically over demand of money at her matrimonial house \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5543/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \n STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS\n versus \nASSOCIATION OF RETIRED SUPREME COURT AND HIGH COURT JUDGES AT ALLAHABAD & ORS \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 211\n2024 INSC 4\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court had the power to direct the State Government to notify Rules proposed by the Chief Justice pertaining to post-retiral benefits for High Court; whether the power of criminal contempt could be invoked by the High Court against officials of the State Government on the ground that the application for recall was \u2018contemptuous\u2019; and as regards the broad guidelines to guide courts when they direct the presence of\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 23/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "VIJAYA SINGH & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 906\n2024 INSC 905\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the Criminal Appeal filed by the Appellants challenging the conviction under Section 302/201 IPC can be entertained in the facts and circumstances of the case. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Section 302 \u2013 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2013 evidence reiterated \u2013 On facts and circumstances, held that the Trial Court and the High Court have correctly appreciated the evidence, and the conviction of the Appellant upheld: Held: It is a well settled principle of law that when a case is based on circumstantial evidence, the\n Decision Date :\n 25-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 122/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDARSHAN SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 248\n2024 INSC 19\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt, the entire chain of circumstances, not leaving any link missing for the appellant to escape from the clutches of law. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 rw s. 34 \u2013 Murder \u2013 appellant along with the lady with whom he had illicit relations, administered poison to the appellant\u2019s wife, with the motive to eliminate her and caused her death \u2013 Conviction u/s.302/34 and sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 High Court upheld the order of conviction and\n Decision Date :\n 04-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 163/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nALAUDDIN & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 20\n2024 INSC 376\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to correctness of the order convicting the appellants for the offences punishable u/ss. 302/149 IPC when the statements in evidence full of omissions and contradictions and the evidence of last seen theory and motive not established. Headnotes Penal Code, Murder and unlawful assembly \u2013 Conviction of the appellants for the offences punishable u/ ss. 302/149 for committing murder of the victim by the courts below \u2013 Correctness \u2013 Plea that statements in evidence of prosecution witness full of omissions and contradictions, and\n Decision Date :\n 03-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1637/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "BIJAY AGARWAL\n versus \nM/S MEDILINES  \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1890\n2024 INSC 918\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the signatory of a cheque authorized by the Company is a drawer and whether such a signatory could be directed to deposit any sum out of the fine or compensation awarded by the trial Court u/s.148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as a condition for his conviction u/s.138 of the NI Act. Headnotes\u2020 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.138 and 148 \u2013 Appellant is the authorized signatory of the company \u2013 The signed cheques were presented in the bank \u2013 The cheques were dishonoured and returned with the\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4301/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHARAT SHER SINGH KALSIA\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1165\n2024 INSC 77\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the prayer for quashing of the FIR registered u/ss. 409, 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC against the vendee for the criminal acts, misuse of power of attorney-PoA, misappropriation of property, and executing fraudulent had no role either in the execution of the PoA nor in any misdeed by the PoA holder vis-\u00e0-vis the land-owners/principals. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of FIR \u2013 Power of Attorney-PoA executed by the landowners/ principals, including the\n Decision Date :\n 31-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 523/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "ASHOK VERMA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 743\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether concurrent conviction of the appellant u/ss.302, 201 and 498A of the IPC for the murder of his wife is justified. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 201 and 498A \u2013 Concurrent conviction \u2013 Death of the wife of the appellant-convict, Plea of the appellant-convict that her death was suicidal and not homicidal: Held: Trial Court and High Court concurrently weighed the circumstances and gave sturdy reasons to conclude that death of the deceased was homicidal in nature and not suicidal \u2013 Even after seeing his wife hanged\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 815/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH\n versus \nRAMJAN KHAN & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1876\n2024 INSC 823\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was right in setting aside the conviction of the respondents-accused under Section 302, IPC read with Section 34, IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Evidence \u2013 Dying declaration, allegedly made to a close relative \u2013 Reliance upon \u2013 When not inter alia relying on the dying declaration allegedly made to the mother of the deceased (PW-8) \u2013 Conviction set aside by High Court \u2013 Correctness: Held: Oral dying declaration should be of such a nature as to inspire full confidence of the Court in its correctness \u2013 Dying\n Decision Date :\n 25-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2129/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SAMBHUBHAI RAISANGBHAI PADHIYAR\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1072\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order of conviction and death sentence to the appellant for offences punishable u/ss.302, 364 and 377 IPC and ss. 4 and 6 of the POCSO, for committing murder and brutal sexual assault of the 4 year old ss.302, 364, 377 \u2013 Protection of Children from Sexual offences Act, 2012 \u2013 ss.4, 5, 6, 29 \u2013 Murder, kidnapping and sexual assault \u2013 Case of brutal sexual assault and murder of four year old boy \u2013 Trial court convicted and sentenced the appellant to death for\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5412/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Special Leave Petition dismissed.\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHARIF AHMED AND ANOTHER\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 86\n2024 INSC 363\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration Nature of chargesheets filed in some jurisdictions by the State/ Police, without stating sufficient details of the facts constituting the offense or putting the relevant evidence on record; significance of chargesheets for taking cognizance, summoning of the Magistrate; chargesheets and criminal proceedings against the appellants, if to be quashed. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.173 \u2013 Report of police officer on completion of investigation \u2013 Nature and standard of evidence in chargesheet \u2013 Chargesheet when\n Decision Date :\n 01-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2357/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SURESH CHANDRA TIWARI & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1233\n2024 INSC 907\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration (a) Whether the circumstances relied by the prosecution have been proved beyond reasonable doubt; (b) whether those circumstances are of a definite tendency unerringly pointing towards the guilt of the accused; (c) whether those circumstances taken cumulatively form a that there is no escape from the conclusion that within all human probability the crime was committed by the accused; (d) whether they are consistent only with the hypothesis of the accused being guilty; and (e) whether they exclude every possible hypothesis except the one to be proved.\n Decision Date :\n 24-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1902/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "GURMEET KAUR\n versus \nDEVENDER GUPTA & ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1602\n2024 INSC 967\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n 1602 : 2024 INSC 967 Gurmeet Kaur v. Devender Gupta & Another (Criminal Appeal No(s). 4825-4826 of 2024) 26 November 2024 [B.V. Nagarathna* and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh JJ.] Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the appellant while discharging her duty as a public servant on the Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.197 \u2013 Prosecution of Judges and public servants \u2013 Appellant-District Town Planner (Enforcement) and 12 others forcibly entered the college of the respondent-chairman, created chaos and took away the college telephone forcibly \u2013 Complaint filed but\n Decision Date :\n 26-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4825/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nC. SUBBIAH @ KADAMBUR JAYARAJ AND OTHERS\n versus \nTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 813\n2024 INSC 416\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the permissibility of suing the accused for a civil wrong, in relation to the benami transactions, as a corollary, allowing criminal prosecution of the accused in relation to the same cause of action. Headnotes\u2020 Act 1988 \u2013 s. 4 \u2013 Benami transaction \u2013 Initiation of civil suit/criminal proceedings by the real owner of the benami property \u2013 Permissibility \u2013 Complainant-government teacher, previously doing real estate business, fraudulently allured and induced by the\n Decision Date :\n 15-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2582/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nX\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 941\n2024 INSC 909\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, R MAHADEVAN\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards accused being enlarged on bail in rape case by the High Court, when the victim and the mother who was the eye-witness to the incident were yet to be examined. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.438 - Grant of bail to person enlarged on bail in rape case by the High Court, when only one witness was examined and the victim and the mother who was the eye-witness to the incident were yet to be examined \u2013 Propriety: Held: In the instant case, the victim is yet to be examined and her mother who, is an eye-witness\n Decision Date :\n 27-11-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 13378/2024\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Special Leave Petition disposed of.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "PARTHA CHATTERJEE\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT  \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 627\nCoram : SURYA KANT, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to grant of bail to the appellant-former State Education Minister and MLA, in the ED case for his involvement in various investigations, owing to the racket of illegal appointment of teachers. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 Teachers Recruitment Scam \u2013 FIR registered by CBI under the PC Act, as well as IPC, against certain functionaries of the West Bengal Board of Primary Education, and one who was allegedly engaged in an unholy nexus with varied authorities, so as to facilitate appointments of primary\n Decision Date :\n 13-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5266/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "ATHAR PARWEZ\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1093\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Appellant alleged to be an active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI) involved in planning to cause disturbance during the proposed visit of Prime Minister of India to Patna in 2022. Chargesheet filed against the appellant under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 153A & 18, 18A, 18B & 20, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Charges not framed yet. Appellant has undergone long incarceration, no likelihood of trial being completed in near future. High Court whether justified in denying bail. Headnotes\u2020 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5387/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SONU AGNIHOTRI\n versus \nCHANDRA SHEKHAR & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 861\n2024 INSC 888\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration The appellant-Judicial Officer has preferred these appeals for expunging adverse findings/remarks recorded against him in the impugned order dated 02.03.2023 by the Delhi High Court. Headnotes\u2020 Judicial Service \u2013 Expunging of adverse Officer passed some strict orders against police officials \u2013 He pointed out flaws in the investigation and failure of the police officials \u2013 Writ petition \u2013 The High Court directed all the remarks made against the IO & SHO expunged and recorded findings/remarks\n Decision Date :\n 22-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 388/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "UMA & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1757\n2024 INSC 809\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n 1757 : 2024 INSC 809 Uma & Anr. v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Criminal Appeal No. 757 of 2015) 22 October 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma,* JJ] Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was able to demonstrate perversity and non-appreciation s.4A \u2013 Appellants acquitted by Trial Court \u2013 High Court in impugned judgment reversed the finding of acquittal and convicted the Appellants \u2013 Held, High Court has demonstrated perversity and non-appreciation of the materials on record by Trial Court \u2013 Appeals dismissed:\n Decision Date :\n 22-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 757/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "OM PRAKASH YADAV\n versus \nNIRANJAN KUMAR UPADHYAY & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 777\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards whether in the absence of the grant of sanction for prosecution u/s.197 CrPC, the CJM, Firozabad could have taken cognizance of the charge sheets against the respondents; and whether the offence or the act alleged to have been committed by said to have been done while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of official duty. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.197 \u2013 Prosecution of Judges and public servants \u2013 Incident of indiscriminate firing by eight persons including main accused at\n Decision Date :\n 13-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5267/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nFULESHWAR GOPE\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 315\n2024 INSC 718\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the validity of the Sanction Order can be challenged at any stage; whether violation of s.45(2) of the UAPA r/w rr.3 and 4 of the 2008 Rules, if any, vitiates the proceedings, whether violation of statutory timelines and the requirement of of mind, are necessary aspects of procedure; whether the appellant\u2019s involvement were actually independent of the ones in which A-6 and other members were arrayed as accused; and whether the statutory exemption u/s.22 A of the UAPA applies to the appellant who claims to be unaware of\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3923/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR.\n versus \nS. HARISH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 154\n2024 INSC 716\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA\n 154 : 2024 INSC 716 Just Rights for Children Alliance & Anr. v. S. Harish & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No(s). 2161-2162 of 2024) 23 September 2024 [Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala,* J.] Issue for Consideration What is the scope of Section 15 of the Protection of Children child pornographic material is punishable under the POCSO; what is the true scope of Section 67B of the IT Act; what is the scope of Section 30 of the POCSO; what are the foundational facts necessary for invoking the statutory presumption of culpable mental state in respect of Section 15 of the\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2161/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SIDDHANT @ SIDHARTH BALU TAKTODE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 837\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration In six years, out of 102 dates, on most of the dates the appellant- accused was not produced before the Court either physically or virtually. Prolonged incarceration. Bail rejected by High Court. Headnotes\u2020 Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, on account of non-production of the appellant- accused \u2013 Appellant incarcerated for approximately five years \u2013 If entitled to bail: Held: Yes \u2013 Prolonged incarceration without the accused being made to face the trial would result in forcing him to face the sentence\n Decision Date :\n 18-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5438/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSITA SOREN\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 462\n2024 INSC 161\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, A.S. BOPANNA, M.M. SUNDRESH, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.B. PARDIWALA, SANJAY KUMAR, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Instant Reference pertains to reconsideration of the correctness of the view of the majority judgment in *PV Narasimha Rao\u2019s case granting immunity from prosecution to a member of allegedly engaged in bribery for speaking or casting a vote. Headnotes Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 105 and 196 \u2013 Powers, privileges and immunities of the Houses of Parliament or Legislature, as the case may be, and of members and committees \u2013 Member of Parliament or the\n Decision Date :\n 04-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 451/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Reference answered\n \n |  Bench :\n 7 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "AMUTHA\n versus \nA.R. SUBRAMANIAN \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 755\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration The appellant-wife herein is challenging the grant of divorce. Headnotes\u2020 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 \u2013 s.13(1)(ia) and (ib) \u2013 Cruelty and desertion \u2013 The High Court found that the respondent- husband had sufficiently established the grounds of cruelty the appellant\u2019s false criminal complaint and her indifference to reconciliation efforts caused significant mental agony to the respondent, amounting to cruelty \u2013 Additionally, her prolonged separation without reasonable cause constituted desertion \u2013 Thus, the High Court\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 2643/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "MAFABHAI MOTIBHAI SAGAR\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.  \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1448\n2024 INSC 806\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration The appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Section 302 read with sections 147 and 148 Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to life imprisonment. His application for remission was considered expeditiously by the State Government after interference of the Government while granting remission imposed four conditions on the appellant. The appellant contended that two out of these four conditions are vague, subjective and arbitrary. The issue before the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court is the legality of these two conditions imposed by the appropriate\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4307/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nARVIND KEJRIWAL\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 346\n2024 INSC 400\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the Appellant is entitled to grant of interim bail/release during the pendency of the Appeal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement, on account of an intervening factor i.e. 18th Lok Sabha General Elections. Headnotes\u2020 Bail \u2013 Interim Court to consider peculiarities associated with person in question and surrounding circumstances \u2013 Appellant has not been convicted, no criminal antecedents \u2013 Question of legality and validity of arrest sub judice \u2013 Interim bail granted. Held: Appellant arrested on 21.03.2024 by\n Decision Date :\n 10-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2493/2024\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Interim Bail granted\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "MAHESH DAMU KHARE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.  \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 886\n2024 INSC 897\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n Issue for Consideration The High Court dismissed the petition filed u/s.482 of CrPC for quashing FIR registered u/ss.376, 420, 504 and 506 IPC holding, inter alia, that the offence under Section 376 of IPC is an offence against the society which would require further investigation and does not warrant interference. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.376, 420, 504 and 506 \u2013 Complainant filed a complaint alleging that the appellant had cheated on her by forcibly engaging in sexual intercourse without her consent in his house and in the rented rooms from 2008\n Decision Date :\n 26-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4882/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "AYUB KHAN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 680\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Adverse observations were made against the appellant, a District and Sessions Judge of Rajasthan Judicial Service by the Rajasthan High Court. High Court observed that while rejecting the bail application, the appellant did not incorporate the details of the antecedents of form in terms of the directions issued to the Trial Courts by the High Court in the case of Jugal Kishore vs. State of Rajasthan. Granting bail to the accused by the impugned order, High Court observed that non- compliance of the directions by the appellant, not only amounted to indiscipline\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5388/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "RANDEEP SINGH @ RANA & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1425\n2024 INSC 887\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards conviction and sentence of the appellants u/ss.364, 302, 120-B and 201 IPC for abduction and brutal murder of the victim, if justified. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.364, 302, 120-B and 201 \u2013 Abduction and Criminal conspiracy \u2013 Prosecution case that accused persons abducted the victim, thereafter murdered him and the next day the torso with other body parts of the deceased were recovered from the canal \u2013 Conviction of the appellants-accused along with others u/ss.364, 302, 120-B and 201\n Decision Date :\n 22-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 297/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nYOGARANI\n versus \nSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 625\n2024 INSC 721\nCoram : SANJAY KUMAR\n*\n, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose, if the court can convict one accused and acquit the other when there is similar or identical evidence pitted against two accused persons. Headnotes\u2020 Passports Act, 1967 \u2013 ss.12(1)(b) and 12(2) \u2013 Offences and penalties \u2013 Prosecution of second passport in favour of accused no.1 \u2013 Other accused persons connived with the appellant in procuring second passport to accused no.1 \u2013 Appellant and accused no.1 convicted for offences punishable u/s.420 IPC and s.12(1)(b) and s.12(2) of the 1967 Act, accused no.5\n Decision Date :\n 23-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 477/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "THE STATE OF KARNATAKA \n versus \nCHANDRASHA  \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1472\n2024 INSC 928\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR, R MAHADEVAN\n Issue for Consideration Issue as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court setting aside the conviction of the respondent-government servant u/ss.7 and 13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding of illegal gratification and its Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss.7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) and 20 \u2013 Illegal gratification \u2013 Presumption u/s. 20, if attracted \u2013 Prosecution case of demand and acceptance of bribe amount by the respondent-government servant from the complainant for encashment of\n Decision Date :\n 26-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2646/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNATIONAL HOUSING BANK\n versus \nBHERUDAN DUGAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD. & ORS. ETC. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 1\n2024 INSC 566\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration On a complaint filed u/s. 200 CrPC, wherein the Magistrate took cognizance of the complaint for the offence u/s. 29A (i) read with s. 50 and punishable u/s. 49 (2A) of the 1987 Act against the first respondent-company, second accused-Managing accused as directors, whether the High Court was justified in quashing the complaint in its entirety, holding that the requirements of sub-Section (1) of s. 50 of the 1987 Act are similar to the requirements incorporated in s. 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which were not\n Decision Date :\n 01-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3176/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHOOR SINGH & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 818\n2024 INSC 713\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in acquitting the parents-in-laws and the husband of the victim-daughter-in-law of the offences punishable u/ss.304-B and 498-A IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.304-B and 498-A \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.113-B \u2013 \u2013 Victim-daughter-in-law died of burn injuries at her matrimonial home within one year of marriage \u2013 FIR by the father that his daughter was harassed by the appellants-parent- in-laws and husband soon before her death in connection with dowry demand \u2013 Order of conviction and\n Decision Date :\n 20-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 249/2013\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMANATULLAH KHAN\n versus \nTHE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 927\n2024 INSC 383\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the names of the Appellant\u2019s minor children and his wife against whom there is no adverse material should be included in the History Sheet of the Appellant. Headnotes\u2020 Punjab Police Rules 1934 (As applicable rule 23.8 and rule 23.9 \u2013 Format of history sheet \u2013 Need to revisit archaic rules \u2013 Amended Standing Order issued on 21.03.2024 \u2013 In column on \u2018relations and connections\u2019 only those persons who can provide shelter to history sheeter to be reflected \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 07-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2349/2024\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal partly allowed with directions. \n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAILESH KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. (NOW STATE OF UTTARAKHAND) \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 776\n2024 INSC 143\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration What is the goal of investigation and what is the role of investigating officer; Are s.172 CrPC and ss. 145 & 161 of the Evidence Act to be read in consonance with each other; Can a General Diary entry precede the registration of FIR. Headnotes Code of Goal of investigation and the role of investigating officer: Held: An investigation of a crime is a lawful search of men and materials relevant in reconstructing and recreating the circumstances of an offence said to have been committed \u2013 With the evidence in possession, an\n Decision Date :\n 26-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 684/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCOL. RAMNEESH PAL SINGH\n versus \nSUGANDHI AGGARWAL \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 259\n2024 INSC 397\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the guardianship of two minor children till they attain the age of majority. Headnotes Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 \u2013 ss. 7, 9 and 25 \u2013 Custody of two minor children \u2013 Family Court granted permanent custody of minor children to the visitation rights to the mother \u2013 However, the High Court set aside the order and granted the parties shared custody of the minor children \u2013 Challenge to: Held: Principal consideration whilst deciding an application for guardianship under the Act in exercise of its parens patriae\n Decision Date :\n 08-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 6137/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "ARJUN S/O RATAN GAIKWAD\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 637\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Appellant was detained under s.3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black-Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 to prevent in the activities of bootlegging thereby preventing the maintenance of peace. High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant. Headnotes\u2020 Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand\n Decision Date :\n 11-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5204/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, ALLAHABAD\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 946\n2024 INSC 150\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, PANKAJ MITHAL, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration What is the object behind passing interim orders; Whether the High Courts are empowered to vacate or modify interim relief; Whether an interim order can come to an end automatically only due to What is the scope of exercise of powers u/Art. 142 of the Constitution; Position of the High Courts and its power of superintendence; Whether the Court should deal with an issue not arising for consideration; Effect of directions issued by the Constitutional Courts to decide pending cases in a\n Decision Date :\n 29-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3589/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Reference answered\n \n |  Bench :\n 5 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHAKORE UMEDSING NATHUSING\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1178\n2024 INSC 198\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Scope of interference by High Court in an appeal challenging acquittal of the accused by the trial Court; standard of proof required to bring home charges in a case based purely on circumstantial evidence. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.378(1)(b) acquittal \u2013 Interference by High Court \u2013 Scope \u2013 Prosecution\u2019s case that the accused persons took the jeep of the victim-deceased on hire and thereafter they murdered the victim and looted the jeep \u2013 Appellants-accused were convicted and sentenced for offence\n Decision Date :\n 22-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 250/2016\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHARTI CELLULAR LIMITED (NOW BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED)\n versus \nASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 57, KOLKATA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1001\n2024 INSC 148\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration The liability to deduct tax at source u/s.194-H, Income Tax Act, 1961 on the amount which, as per the Revenue, is a commission payable to an agent by the assessees-cellular mobile telephone franchise/distributorship agreement between the assessees and the franchisees/distributors. Headnotes Income Tax Act, 1961 \u2013 s.194-H \u2013 When not attracted \u2013 Assessees entered into franchise or distribution agreements and sold start-up kits, recharge vouchers at a discounted\n Decision Date :\n 28-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 7257/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nARVIND KEJRIWAL \n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 683\n2024 INSC 687\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n*\n Issue for Consideration The instant appeals are directed against the judgments and orders dated 05.08.2024 passed by the High Court, dismissing the appellant\u2019s challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of regular bail. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.477A \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 s.7 \u2013 The High Court upheld the arrest of the appellant by the CBI and congruously denied him regular bail \u2013 Propriety: Held: [Per Surya Kant, J.]: CBI complied with Section 41A CrPC, in its true letter\n Decision Date :\n 13-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3816/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSELVAMANI\n versus \nTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 653\n2024 INSC 393\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Appellant was one of the five accused persons who were found guilty of committing the offence of gang rape and was convicted under Section 376(g) and 506(1) of Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act by the trial court. Whether in dismissing the appeal filed by the Appellant against the conviction when prosecutrix and witnesses turned hostile at the cross examination stage. Headnotes Conviction upheld even when prosecutrix and other witnesses turned hostile \u2013 Correctness of: Held: In the present case, the\n Decision Date :\n 08-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 906/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKUMAR @ SHIVA KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 329\n2024 INSC 156\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Appellant was convicted for the offence u/s. 306 IPC by the trial Court and the conviction was upheld by the High Court. Whether the prosecution proved the charge of abetment to commit suicide u/s. 306 IPC against the appellant. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 306 that appellant was earlier residing in the house of the victim-deceased X as a tenant \u2013 It was alleged that appellant threatened victim to marry him when she was returning home after dropping children of her sister at school \u2013 Thereafter, she consumed poison in the house \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1427/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "GEORGE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 769\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the Division Bench of the High Court erred in convicting the appellant-original accused no.1, when on the basis of the very same evidence of PW-1, a benefit of doubt was granted to accused Nos.2 and 3. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.294(b), 341, the informant\u2019s son was caught by the two accused persons when he was trying to escape their attack, the appellant hacked the knife forcibly on the left side of his neck \u2013 The informant\u2019s son was taken to the hospital, where he was declared dead \u2013 Hence, the FIR by PW-1\n Decision Date :\n 13-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5279/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANTOSH @ RAJESH @ GOPAL\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 609\n2024 INSC 723\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR, R MAHADEVAN\n Issue for Consideration Evidence provided by the prosecution, if sufficient to secure a conviction of the appellant for the murder of the victim. Headnotes\u2020 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 ss.8 and 27 \u2013 Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct \u2013 How much of information may be proved \u2013 Chain of circumstances to establish hypothesis of guilt \u2013 Absence of corroborative evidence \u2013 On facts, conviction of the appellant u/ss.302, 34 and 120B IPC and s.25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act, for committing murder of the victim, by the courts below \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 19-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2030/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAYEDEEPSINH PRAVINSINH CHAVDA & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 439\n2024 INSC 960\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the High Court refusing to discharge the appellants-accused from offences punishable u/s.306, 498A and 114 of IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.227 \u2013 Discharge of accused \u2013 girl\u2019s father against the appellants-husband and in-laws for offences u/ss.306, 498A, 114 IPC alleging that the girl committed suicide after 12 years of marriage due to the physical and mental harassment meted out by the husband which included the husband selling her ornaments, given to her\n Decision Date :\n 10-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5175/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJENDRA BHAGWANJI UMRANIYA\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 698\n2024 INSC 413\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Respondents herein were convicted by the Sessions Court for offence punishable u/s. 325 IPC and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of five years. However, the High Court reduced the sentence of five years to four years and further held that if an amount of of the two respondents, then the respondents need not undergo even the four years of sentence. The question falls for consideration is whether the procedure adopted by the High Court could be said to be in accordance with law. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 357 \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 09-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2481/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHAGWAN SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 774\n2024 INSC 708\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Respondent Nos.3 and 4, son-in-law and daughter of the petitioner respectively, made attempts to falsely implicate the Respondent No.2-a star witness in the Nitish Katara case on whose evidence the accused son and nephew of Ex-Minister and M.P. Mr. D.P. Yadav were various false proceedings in the name of the petitioner without his knowledge, consent or authority in the High Court and Supreme Court with the assistance of a battery of advocates and many other unknown persons. Present SLP was filed against Respondent No.2 in the name of the petitioner against\n Decision Date :\n 20-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3883/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n | Direction Issue :\n In view of the divergent of opinion, the appeal papers directed to be placed before the Hon\u2019ble Chief Justice of India for assigning the same to the appropriate Bench.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHAMMED KHALID AND ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 23\n2024 INSC 158\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in affirming the judgment of the trial court convicting and sentencing the accused appellants for the charge u/s. 8(c) r/w. s.20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes Narcotic Drugs Act, 1985 \u2013 s.8(c) r/w. s.20(b)(ii)(c) \u2013 Prosecution case that PW-1-Inspector and team members intercepted a vehicle and A-1 and A-2 were present in the vehicle \u2013 It was alleged that three bundles of ganja weighing around 80 kgs found lying in the vehicle were seized in the\n Decision Date :\n 01-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1610/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAVED GULAM NABI SHAIKH\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 992\n2024 INSC 645\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes\u2020 Bail \u2013 Denial \u2013 When not justified \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Applicability of, irrespective of the seriousness of crime \u2013 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.489B, 489C, 120B, 34 \u2013 National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 \u2013 s.19 \u2013 Fake counterfeit Indian currency notes seized from the\n Decision Date :\n 03-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2787/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSURENDER SINGH\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 163\n2024 INSC 462\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Correctness of the order of the High Court upholding the conviction and sentence of the appellant for offences under ss. 302 and 307 IPC . Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and 307, s. 300 exception 1 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Culpable homicide not amounting Prosecution case that the appellant- police guard committed murder of the deceased inside the police station while he was on duty \u2013 Deceased was having illicit relationship with the appellant\u2019s wife \u2013 Deceased and the appellant last seen together in conversation with each other\n Decision Date :\n 03-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 597/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAMAYAN SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 686\n2024 INSC 323\nCoram : SANJAY KAROL\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court appropriately exercised its discretion under Section 439 of the CrPC while granting bail to the accused persons. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 439 \u2013 Discretion to grant bail ought not to be used arbitrarily, Appeal allowed \u2013 High Court ought not to have been granted bail on account of (i) seriousness of the crime; (ii) conduct of accused persons; and (iii) overall impact of crime on the society. Held: Accused persons charged under s. 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 427, 394, 411, 302 and 120-B,\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2168/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nROHINI SUDARSHAN GANGURDE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1031\n2024 INSC 519\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the alleged conduct of the appellant-accused in the nature of marital disputes attracts s.306 IPC read with s.107 IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Ss. 306, 107 \u2013 Appellant is wife of deceased who committed suicide \u2013 Appellant and deceased purchased by them \u2013 Cause of death \u2018due to hanging\u2019 \u2013 FIR lodged by mother of deceased under s. 306 IPC \u2013 Alleging deceased committed suicide because of harassment and beating by appellant on account of demand of money and for transfer of dwelling house in her name\n Decision Date :\n 10-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2877/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 676\n2024 INSC 502\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Instant suit has been filed by the State of West Bengal against Union of India seeking declaration that registration of cases by the defendant-UOI after withdrawal of Notification u/s. 6 of the DSPE Act by the plaintiff-State is unconstitutional and non-est; seeking any case and/or investigating a case in connection with offences committed within the territory of State of West Bengal after withdrawal of the consent u/s. 6 of the DSPE Act by the State, as also sought quashing of such cases; and as regards the jurisdiction of the CBI to investigate cases\n Decision Date :\n 10-07-2024\n | Case No :\n ORIGINAL SUIT No. 4/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n | Direction Issue :\n List the suit for framing of issues.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLAL MOHAMMAD MANJUR ANSARI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJRAT \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 41\n2024 INSC 475\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Conviction and sentence of the appellant for offence punishable u/s. 302 IPC, if justified. Headnotes\u2020 Evidence \u2013 Extra-judicial confession \u2013 Dying declaration \u2013 Reliance upon, when \u2013 Murder case wherein prosecution case based on the evidence the appellant-accused to his employer, and the dying declaration made by the victim to one of the prosecution witness \u2013 Though few prosecution witnesses who were eyewitnesses turned hostile, courts below relied upon certain parts of their testimony \u2013 High Court disbelieved the\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3524/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS\n versus \nSHISHU PAL @ SHIV PAL \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 910\n2024 INSC 550\nCoram : HIMA KOHLI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Appellants, if justified in terminating the services of the respondent on the post of Constable (GD) in the CRPF after conducting a departmental inquiry against him on receiving information that he had deliberately failed to reveal in his Verification Roll that two criminal him. Headnotes\u2020 Service law \u2013 Appointment \u2013 Verification of disclosures made by a candidate to the employer \u2013 On facts, suppression of material information, submission of false information in the Verification Roll by the respondent at the time of his appointment to the\n Decision Date :\n 23-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 7933/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM SINGH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U.P. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 668\n2024 INSC 128\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration As per PW-1-informant (son of the deceased), on the fateful evening when he and his brother were sitting in the open space in front of the entrance door of his house, his mother was sitting close by on a cot and some neighbours were also sitting on another cot, the instigation he fired on PW-1 but he slipped below the cot and the bullet hit his mother who died immediately. While the co-accused was acquitted on the same set of evidence, whether the conviction of the appellant u/s.301 r/w 302, u/s.307 IPC and his sentence were justified when there was no\n Decision Date :\n 21-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 206/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARA CHANDRABABU NAIDU\n versus \nSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 549\n2024 INSC 41\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE, BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Issue for Consideration Interpretation of s.17A, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 incorporated by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 26 of 2018 and its applicability to the facts of the present case. Headnotes Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 s.17A inserted by (Amendment) Act, 26 of 2018 \u2013 Operation \u2013 Allegations against the appellant for commission of offences u/ss.166, 167, 418, 420, 465, 468, 471, 409, 209 and 109 r/w ss.120-B, 34, 37, IPC and ss.12, 13(2) r/w ss.13(1) (c) and (d), 1988 Act allegedly committed between 2015 and 2019\n Decision Date :\n 16-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 279/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nA.M. MOHAN\n versus \nTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY SHO AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 722\n2024 INSC 233\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration FIR registered against accused Nos.1, 2 and 3 (appellant) for offences punishable u/s.420 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860. High Court whether justified in rejecting the petition filed by the appellant u/s.482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Section 420, IPC, appellant. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.420 \u2013 Ingredients \u2013 s.420 when not attracted: Held: For attracting the provision of s.420, IPC, the FIR/complaint must show that the ingredients of s.415, IPC are made out \u2013 It must be shown that the FIR/complaint discloses the\n Decision Date :\n 20-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1716/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "RAMA DEVI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1313\n2024 INSC 755\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR, R MAHADEVAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of the trial court and acquitting the respondents of the charges punishable under Sections 302, 307, 333, 355 and 379, all read with Section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860, and Section 27 of the Arms \u2013 ss.302, 307, read with s.34 \u2013 Murder of an MLA and his bodyguard \u2013 Respondents convicted by Trial Court \u2013 Conviction reversed by High Court \u2013 Challenge to: Held: In view of the evidence and materials on record, charges against A-4 and A-8 under Section 302 read\n Decision Date :\n 03-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2623/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAPOORVA ARORA & ANR. ETC.\n versus \nSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 1147\n2024 INSC 223\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the use of expletives and profane language in the titles and content of the episodes of the web-series \u2018College Romance\u2019 constitutes an offence of publication and transmission of obscene and sexually explicit content u/ss.67 Information Technology Act, 2000. Headnotes Information Technology Act, 2000 \u2013 ss.67, 67A \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.292 \u2013 \u201cobscenity\u201d \u2013 Test for \u2013 Complaint filed that Season 1, Episode 5 of the web-series \u2018College Romance\u2019, titled\n Decision Date :\n 19-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1694/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMUKHTAR ZAIDI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 655\n2024 INSC 316\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether CJM as also the High Court fell in error in taking cognizance u/s. 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. inasmuch as the CJM had relied upon not only the Protest Petition which was supported by affidavit of the complainant but also on the affidavits of witnesses which were Protest Petition to support the contents of the complaint. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.190(1)(b), s.200 \u2013 FIR lodged \u2013 Police report filed u/s. 173(2) Cr.P.C. \u2013 I.O. found that no evidence could be collected which could substantiate the allegations made\n Decision Date :\n 18-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2134/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUSELA PADMAVATHY AMMA\n versus \nM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 647\n2024 INSC 206\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration The High Court rejected the prayer for quashing of criminal complaints qua the appellant in connection with the offence punishable u/s. 138 r/w. s.142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 r/w. s.142 \u2013 complainant-respondent is that in-spite of regular follow-ups and reminders, the company-accused no.1 failed and neglected to clear the respondent\u2019s dues \u2013 On repeated demands, the company furnished respondent five cheques \u2013 When complainant deposited the cheques, they were\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1577/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKUSHA DURUKA\n versus \n STATE OF ODISHA \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 604\n2024 INSC 46\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the prerequisites to be mandatorily mentioned in the application filed for grant of bail; and effect of non-mentioning of details of previous bail applications and order in all bail applications. Headnotes Bail \u2013 Bail applications \u2013 application filed for grant of bail: Held: Details and copies of orders passed in the earlier bail applications filed by the petitioner which have been already decided \u2013 Details of any bail application filed by the petitioner, pending in any court, higher or lower court, and if none is\n Decision Date :\n 19-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 303/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nINSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA\n versus \nSATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 1\n2024 INSC 319\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Special Court under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would be as provided u/s. 435 of the Companies Act as it existed at the time when the Code came into effect, or it would be as provided u/s.435 after the 2018 Amendment; and the reference under Chapter XXVIII of the Companies Act, 2013\u2019 in s. 236(1) is \u2018legislation by incorporation\u2019 or \u2018legislation by reference\u2019. Headnotes Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 \u2013 ss.236, 73(a) and 235A \u2013 Trial of offences by Special Court \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3851/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.\n versus \nPRADEEP YASHWANT KOKADE & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 574\n2024 INSC 947\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Effect of delay in executing the death sentence. Headnotes\u2020 Sentence \u2013 Death sentence \u2013 Inordinate, unexplained delay in execution of \u2013 Delay in processing, disposal of mercy petitions and issue of warrant of execution of the High Court commuted the death sentence of the convicts to thirty-five years of imprisonment holding that there was an undue and avoidable delay in executing the death sentence \u2013 Challenge to: Held: Impugned judgment upheld \u2013 An inordinate and unexplained delay caused by circumstances\n Decision Date :\n 09-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2831/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.\n versus \nMAYA DEVI & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 999\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the insured vehicle was involved in the accident; whether the insurance policy granted by the insurance company covers the incident; whether the insurance policy was fraudulently obtained. Headnotes\u2020 Accident resulting in the death of R1 and R2 involved in the accident \u2013 Witnesses\u2019 accounts confirmed involvement \u2013 Confirmed by Final Report under S. 173, CrPC \u2013 Insurance Company could not disprove: Held: Per the MACT award, various witnesses had stated that it was the vehicle described in the complaint that was\n Decision Date :\n 02-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 15016/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM. VIJAYAKUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF TAMIL NADU \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1054\n2024 INSC 177\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Prosecution, if succeeded in establishing that there was mens rea on the part of the appellant to commit the offence rather to push the victim to commit suicide and to attract the offence u/s. 306, IPC. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 306 \u2013 Abetment of suicide sustainable \u2013 Prosecution case that the appellant and others abducted and wrongful confined the victim for repayment of the balance amount and the inability to withstand the torment, he committed suicide \u2013 Conviction of the appellant u/ss. 306, 342 and 365 by the trial court,\n Decision Date :\n 21-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1078/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATISH P. BHATT\n versus \n STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 241\n2024 INSC 16\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration The High Court took a firm stance against the appellant\u2019s continued failure to fulfil his financial obligations, culminating in the cancellation of his bail and the order of suspension of sentence. Whether the High Court was justified. Headnotes Disregard for \u2013 The High Court cancelled the order of suspension of sentence and bail granted to the appellant and intervenor (petitioner before the High Court) as they violated the undertaking given before the High Court and further violated the condition in an order granting extension of\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 42/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF HARYANA\n versus \nMOHD. YUNUS & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 404\n2024 INSC 34\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in convicting A1 only u/s. 323 while acquitting u/s. 302/34, and convicting and sentencing A2 u/s. 302 and 323 read with s. 34; and whether in trial u/s. 302 IPC, it is safe to convict on the basis of the statement of an Evidentiary value, when witness not trustworthy: Held: For trial u/s. 302 IPC, if a witness is branded as untrustworthy having allegedly twisted the facts and made contrary statement, it is not safe to impose conviction on the basis of statement made by such witness \u2013 When there is an\n Decision Date :\n 12-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1307/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVISHANKAR TANDON\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 558\n2024 INSC 299\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration In a case based on circumstantial evidence wherein the appellants- accused persons were convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34, ss.120B and 201, s.302 r/w ss.34 and 120B, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life, whether the prosecution was able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that dead body of the deceased from the pond was on the basis of the information given by the appellants in the statement recorded u/s.27, Evidence Act, 1872. Headnotes Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.27 \u2013 Prosecution relied on the memorandum of the appellants-accused u/s.27 and the subsequent\n Decision Date :\n 10-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3869/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSMT. NAJMUNISHA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 442\n2024 INSC 290\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration As per the prosecution, secret information was received by PW-2 (Intelligence Officer/Inspector) as to Accused No. 4 (husband of Accused No.1) carrying contraband from a particular route in an auto rickshaw. Said secret information was recorded by her and reported (Zonal Officer, a Gazetted Officer). The raiding party chased the said auto rickshaw however, Accused No.4 allegedly abandoned it fleeing away from the scene. On conducting the search of the said auto rickshaw, the raiding party inter alia found 1.450 Kgs charas. It eventually searched the\n Decision Date :\n 09-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2319/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJASEELA SHAJI\n versus \nTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 313\n2024 INSC 683\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the non-supply of the statement of the person stating about the detenu\u2019s dealing in foreign exchange to the detenu, has affected the right of the detenu to make an effective representation u/Art. 22(5); and whether non-receipt of delay in deciding the representation by the Detaining Authority and the Central Government would affect the right of detenu u/Art.22(5) of the Constitution. Headnotes\u2020 Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 22(5) \u2013 Protection against arrest and detention \u2013 Right of the detenu to\n Decision Date :\n 12-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3083/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMS. X \n versus \nMR. A AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 947\n2024 INSC 216\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in quashing the criminal proceedings by exercising the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 354D, 376(2)(n), 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1) (s), of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Headnotes Crime Against Women \u2013 Sexual intercourse based on promise of marriage \u2013 The Appellant-prosecutrix believed that the accused would marry her leading her to consent to establishing a sexual\n Decision Date :\n 18-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1661/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF HARYANA\n versus \nDR. RITU SINGH AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 1004\n2024 INSC 263\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration FIR against the accused-employee by the complainant, for defrauding the State-employer, if can be quashed on basis of a \u201ccompromise\u201d between the complainant and the accused. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of FIR complainant for defrauding the State-employer \u2013 Allegations with reference to withdrawal of salary for the period the accused-employee was on unauthorized foreign trips and also withdrawal of salary by producing false medical certificates \u2013 FIR quashed by the High Court on basis of a\n Decision Date :\n 22-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1791/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "NIPUN ANEJA AND OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1483\n2024 INSC 767\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration The High Court rejected the application filed by the appellants herein seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings under section 306 of IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.306 \u2013 Abetment of suicide \u2013 Victim-deceased was an employee of a company that company wanted some of its employees to opt for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) \u2013 As all those employees were not ready to opt for the VRS scheme, they were being harassed in some manner or the other \u2013 It is further alleged that in a course of a office meeting the\n Decision Date :\n 03-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 654/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGIRISH GANDHI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 561\n2024 INSC 617\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Multiple cases were filed against the petitioner. Though he was granted bail in all of them, he was not able to furnish multiple sureties. Is the petitioner entitled to the relief of treating the personal bond and one set of sureties already furnished as holding good for also. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.441 \u2013 Bond of accused and sureties \u2013 Constitution of India \u2013 Article 21 \u2013 13 FIRs against the petitioner in 6 States \u2013 Enlarged on bail with conditions in all of them \u2013 Unable to find\n Decision Date :\n 22-08-2024\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 149/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANIKANDAN\n versus \nSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 234\n2024 INSC 272\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the tutoring of the material witnesses by the police and its effect on the prosecution case. Headnotes Evidence \u2013 Witnesses \u2013 Tutoring of the material witnesses by the police \u2013 Effect: Held: This is a blatant act by the police to tutor witnesses \u2013 It amounts to gross misuse of power by the police machinery \u2013 Police cannot be allowed to tutor the prosecution witness \u2013 On facts, the appellants convicted and sentenced u/ss. 302/34 IPC \u2013 Day before the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was\n Decision Date :\n 05-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1609/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMARIAM FASIHUDDIN & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE BY ADUGODI POLICE STATION & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 623\n2024 INSC 49\nCoram : SURYA KANT, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Issue for Consideration The crux of respondent No. 2\u2019s allegations is that the appellants purportedly forged his signature on the passport application submitted to obtain the minor child\u2019s passport. Whether the actions of the appellants prima facie constitute the offence IPC; Whether there has been a prima facie case made out for forgery u/ss. 468 and 471 IPC; Whether there has been a violation of s.12(b) of the Passports Act, 1967; Whether in the absence of any new evidence found to substantiate the conclusions drawn by the investigating officer in the\n Decision Date :\n 22-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 335/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGURWINDER SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 134\n2024 INSC 92\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH, ARAVIND KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in upholding the order passed by the Special Judge, rejecting the application filed u/s. 439 CrPC by the appellant seeking regular bail in a case registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 alongwith other charges and the Arms Act. Headnotes Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 ss. 43D (5), 17, 18, 19 \u2013 Rejection of bail \u2013 On facts, charges u/ss. 17, 18, 19 of the UAP Act, u/ss. 124A, 153A, 153B, 120-B IPC and u/ss. 25 and 54 of Arms Act against the appellant along with other\n Decision Date :\n 07-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 704/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNITYA NAND \n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 37\n2024 INSC 655\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the prosecution could prove the charges against the appellant under Sections 148 and 302/149 IPC beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the appellant was a part of the unlawful assembly and if he actually took part in the crime or not. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 was convicted for the murder of his Uncle \u2013 Whether the appellant was a part of the unlawful assembly \u2013 Plea of the appellant that both the courts below erred in convicting him as the allegation against him was that he was carrying a country- made pistol, however, neither were there\n Decision Date :\n 04-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1348/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAHUL KUMAR YADAV\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 501\n2024 INSC 359\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n 501 : 2024 INSC 359 Rahul Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar (Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 2018) 25 April 2024 [B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta,* JJ. ] Issue for Consideration The issue for consideration was challenge to the conviction of the Petitioner under Section 302 and 394 IPC on the ground that may be raised before any Court and it shall be recognised at any stage, even after final disposal of the case \u2013 Courts should be guided by object and purpose of the Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act and the matter should be considered prima facie on the touchstone of preponderance of\n Decision Date :\n 25-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 177/2018\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Interim direction issued.  Matter to be relisted.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVINDRA KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 722\n2024 INSC 131\nCoram : J.K. MAHESHWARI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration There was a non-disclosure of a criminal case (in which the candidate was acquitted) in the verification form of the employment. The State cancelled the selection of the appellant. Was the State justified in cancelling the selection of the appellant. Headnotes Service Law Selection \u2013 Non-disclosure of a criminal case in verification \u2013 Appellant applied for the post of constable \u2013 After submitting application, he was embroiled in a criminal case \u2013 He cleared exam \u2013 In the criminal case, appellant was acquitted \u2013 After being\n Decision Date :\n 22-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5902/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRI SUJIES BENEFIT FUNDS LIMITED\n versus \nM. JAGANATHUAN \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 322\n2024 INSC 602\nCoram : HIMA KOHLI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration In order to partly discharge the loan amount, a cheque was issued by the respondent-accused for a sum of Rs.19,00,000/-. However, the cheque was returned with the endorsement \u2018Account Closed\u2019. Whether a discrepancy apropos the rate of interest, whether it be sufficient to disbelieve the claim of the appellant-chitfund company. Headnotes\u2020 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s. 138 \u2013 The respondent- accused, being a subscriber of the appellant-chitfund company, borrowed loan amounts on several dates from appellant totaling Rs.\n Decision Date :\n 13-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3369/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUBRATA CHOUDHURY @ SANTOSH CHOUDHURY & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF ASSAM & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1\n2024 INSC 834\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Whether after the acceptance of a negative Final Report in the first complaint, upon considering the written objections/protest petition and hearing the complainant, a fresh/second complaint on the same set of facts is maintainable or not. Headnotes\u2020 Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Second respondent- complainant filed second complaint dtd. 20.07.2011, after the dismissal of the protest petition and the acceptance of the negative Final Report in the first complaint dtd. 11.11.2010, on the same set of facts/allegations against the appellants and the\n Decision Date :\n 05-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4451/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH\n versus \nKAMAL AGARWAL & ORS. ETC \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 624\n2024 INSC 317\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to correctness of the order passed by the Rajasthan High Court quashing the FIR registered in Arunachal Pradesh. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Quashing of FIR \u2013 Territorial jurisdiction for registration of FIR Pradesh for offences u/ss. 420/120B/34 IPC by the complainant against accused persons \u2013 Complainant\u2019s case that accused refused to hand over the property despite full payment for the sale of the land/building made by complainant \u2013 Said property situated in Rajasthan as also\n Decision Date :\n 18-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2136/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nALLARAKHA HABIB MEMON ETC.\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 345\n2024 INSC 590\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration As per the FIR (Exhibit-79) there were two eyewitnesses to the incident, PW-12-Police Constable and PW-11-the first informant who was deceased\u2019s cousin brother. PW-12 claiming to be an eyewitness to the incident had reported at the police station with the crime any complaint of the incident. FIR was registered on the basis of the oral statement of PW-11. Testimony of the aforesaid witnesses, if was trustworthy and reliable. In view of inconsistencies and contradictions in the evidences, whether the conviction of the accused-appellants under Section\n Decision Date :\n 08-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2828/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVINDER KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 397\n2024 INSC 684\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration FIR under Section 23 of the Pre Conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and a complaint under Section 28(1) was filed against the appellant and co-accused persons. The allegation was of indulging in the illegal activity of sex In the facts of the case, when there was no legal decision by the Appropriate Authority in terms of sub-section (1) of Section 30 to search for the appellant\u2019s clinic and the decision to carry out the search was an individual decision of the Civil Surgeon-Chairman of the concerned\n Decision Date :\n 12-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3747/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVINOD JASWANTRAY VYAS (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 365\n2024 INSC 490\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.02.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, whereby, the Division Bench partly accepted the appeal preferred by the appellant accused-A1 and altered his conviction as recorded by the trial Court for under Section 302 of the Penal Code, 1860 to one under Section 304 Part I IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 Custodial torture \u2013 Death of victim \u2013 Acquittal of accused \u2013 Prosecution case that the two police officers i.e. A1 and A2, assaulted J in the confines of\n Decision Date :\n 09-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2038/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD ABAAD ALI & ANR.\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF REVENUE PROSECUTION INTELLIGENCE \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 638\n2024 INSC 125\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Whether benefit of s.5 r/w. ss. 2 and 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963 can be availed in an appeal against acquittal. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 378 \u2013 Limitation Act, 1963 \u2013 s. 5 r/w. ss.2 and 3 faced trial u/s. 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act \u2013 Acquitted \u2013 Appeal against the acquittal u/s. 378 of Cr.P.C. was filed before the High Court along with an application for condonation of delay \u2013 The said application was allowed \u2013 Against the said order, the appellant moved\n Decision Date :\n 20-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1056/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGAURAV MAINI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 333\n2024 INSC 488\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Courts below, if justified in convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offences punishable u/ss. 364A, 392 and 120B IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 364A, 392 and 120B \u2013 Kidnapping for ransom \u2013 Robbery \u2013 Prosecution case that on payment of ransom of Rs. One crore, the boy was released \u2013 FIR was registered by police on the basis of the secret information received by them while patrolling about such offences \u2013 Pursuant thereto, first disclosure of the incident made by the grandfather to the Investigating\n Decision Date :\n 09-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 696/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPUNEET SABHARWAL\n versus \nCBI \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 679\n2024 INSC 221\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration The charges were framed against the appellants. While the charge against the appellant-P was u/s. 109 IPC r/w. s.13(1) (e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the charge against appellant-R was u/s. 13(1)(e) r/w. s.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption appellant-R owned assets disproportionate to known sources of income and the appellant-P son of R has abetted him in the commission of the said offence. The High Court, by the impugned order, dismissed the petitions for quashing criminal proceedings. The question that arises for consideration is\n Decision Date :\n 19-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1682/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRANJEET MITTAL\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ETC. ETC. \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 811\n2024 INSC 766\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration High Court whether justified in quashing the charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 (husband and in-laws of the victim-deceased) holding that prima facie the respondents did not abet the deceased to commit suicide. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.498-A, 306, 34, 302, 201 \u2013 Victim died after allegedly falling off from terrace \u2013 Trial court framed charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 for abetment to commit suicide \u2013 Charges if rightly quashed by High Court: Held: No \u2013 High Court erred\n Decision Date :\n 03-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3680/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n | Direction Issue :\n In view of the divergent of opinion, the appeal papers directed to be placed before the Hon\u2019ble Chief Justice of India for assigning the same to the appropriate Bench.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATENDER KUMAR ANTIL\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1072\n2024 INSC 134\nCoram : M.M. SUNDRESH, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration The Amicus submitted report dated 10.02.2024 indicating the directions that have been complied with by the parties in terms of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil**. On basis of the said are issued for due compliance by the States/Union Territories/CBI and High Courts. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 41, 41A, 438, 440, 88, 170, 204, 209, 436A \u2013 Supreme Court Directions \u2013 Compliance of directions by the States, Union Territories and CBI\n Decision Date :\n 13-02-2024\n | Case No :\n MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 2034/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKIRPAL SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 707\n2024 INSC 312\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration The appellant was convicted u/s. 302, s.307 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and rigorous imprisonment for 5 years respectively. Both sentences were to run concurrently. An appeal preferred by the appellant before the High Court was dismissed. Headnotes Penal \u2013 Prosecution case was that victim went to sleep in chaubara of the house which was not having any shutter, whereas PW-5 (first informant) along with the other family members slept in a room on the ground floor \u2013 PW-5 heard a knock on the door in which she was sleeping \u2013 She\n Decision Date :\n 18-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1052/2009\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHADAKSHARI\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 429\n2024 INSC 42\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether sanction u/s. 197 Cr.P.C. is required to prosecute respondent No. 2 who faces accusation amongst others of creating fake documents by misusing his official position as a Village Accountant, thus a public servant. The competent authority has declined to grant held that in the absence of such sanction, respondent No. 2 cannot be prosecuted and consequently has quashed the complaint as well as the chargesheet, giving liberty to the appellant to assail denial of sanction to prosecute respondent No. 2 in an appropriate proceeding, if so advised.\n Decision Date :\n 17-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 256/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "BASAMSETTI RAMA DEVI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF A.P. & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 1687\n2024 INSC 1055\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration In cases relating to quashing of criminal complaint against the accused police officers-respondents in matters of custodial death, whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the committal order and discharging the accused-respondents in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 201, 149, 120B r/w s.34 \u2013 Matters of custodial death \u2013 High Court solely relying on the reports of the investigating agencies (CID and CBI) held that the occurrence took place in the exercise\n Decision Date :\n 07-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1358/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHIV PRATAP SINGH RANA\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 8\n2024 INSC 481\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration The prosecutrix had lodged an FIR u/s. 376(2)(n) and s.506 of IPC on 06.09.2018 against the appellant. The charges u/s. 376(2) (n) and s.506 of IPC were framed against the appellant and the application for discharge filed by the appellant was rejected. Headnotes\u2020 and s.506 \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant had committed rape on the prosecutrix on the false promise of marriage and threatening to make public her photographs \u2013 Trial Court framed charges u/s.376(2)(n) and s.506 of IPC \u2013 A criminal revision filed against the said order\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1552/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAJAN SKARIA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 1086\n2024 INSC 625\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 imposes an absolute bar on the grant of anticipatory bail in cases registered under the said Act; when can it be said that a prima facie case is made out in a given FIR/complaint in question disclose commission of any offence under Section 3(1)(r) or under Section 3(1)(u) of the 1989 Act; whether mere knowledge of the caste identity of the complainant is sufficient to attract the offence under Section 3(1)(r) of the 1989 Act. Headnotes\u2020 Scheduled\n Decision Date :\n 23-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2622/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARTEEK BANSAL\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 74\n2024 INSC 324\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in not quashing FIR under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 498A, 406, 384, 420, and 120(B), Indian Penal Code, 1860, on the ground that the second FIR was on the same set Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Abuse of process of law \u2013 Subsequent FIR in Udaipur, Rajasthan on the same set of allegations by the complainant after two weeks of lodging the first FIR under Section 498A read with Section 34 IPC in Hisar, Haryana was an abuse of process of law.\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2167/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "M.R. AJAYAN \n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1448\n2024 INSC 881\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the appellant has the locus standi to prefer this SLP against the impugned order; whether the High Court rightly held the proceedings in question to be hit by the bar u/s. 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C.; and whether the High Court could have ordered de novo steps to Headnotes\u2020 Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 136 \u2013 Locus standi of private individual \u2013 De novo trial \u2013 Permissibility \u2013 High Court, if could order de novo steps to be taken against the accused on the allegations made out in the quashed proceedings \u2013 Locus\n Decision Date :\n 20-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4675/2024\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.4887 of 2024 allowed. Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.7896 of 2023 dismissed.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLALU YADAV\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 639\n2024 INSC 782\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court ought to have exercised its inherent power under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing the FIR against the appellant under Section 376, Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Respondent No.4-complainant alleged rape by the appellant on false promise of marriage \u2013 Whether the complainant gave her consent for the sexual relationship with the appellant under misconception of fact, as alleged: Held: No \u2013 As per the FIR, the offence was allegedly committed\n Decision Date :\n 16-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4222/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABDUL JABBAR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 162\n2024 INSC 99\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to conviction of the appellant for offences punishable u/s. 323/34 IPC and imposition of three months imprisonment, as also conviction u/s. 325/34 IPC and imposition of one year imprisonment with Rs 500/- fine which was modified to three months imprisonment the High Court. Headnotes Sentence/Sentencing \u2013 Reduction of sentence \u2013 Conviction of the appellant for offences punishable u/s. 323/34 and u/s. 325/34 \u2013 Imposition of three months imprisonment and one year imprisonment with Rs 500/- fine respectively \u2013 High Court modified\n Decision Date :\n 05-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 748/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE\n versus \nB. RAMU \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 357\n2024 INSC 114\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Issue for Consideration In a case involving recovery of huge quantity of narcotic substance (232.5 kg of ganja), wherein the Respondent-accused was indicted as being the conspirator for procurement/supply of the ganja so recovered, High Court whether justified in granting anticipatory bail in registered for the offences punishable u/ss.8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s.37 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.438 \u2013 Quantity of narcotic substance\n Decision Date :\n 12-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 801/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI\n versus \nRAJ KUMAR @ LOVEPREET @LOVELY \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 73\n2024 INSC 11\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration The High Court granted default bail to the respondent u/s. 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Whether the High Court committed an error in allowing the petition and granting default bail to the respondent. Headnotes Unlawful Activities Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.201/120-B \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 ss. 13/18/20 \u2013 The High Court had relied upon the judgment in the case of Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others wherein the Supreme Court was dealing with the provisions of s.20(4)\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 43/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRABHAT KUMAR MISHRA @ PRABHAT MISHRA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF U.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 157\n2024 INSC 172\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in rejecting the application filed by the accused appellant u/s. 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceeding of the criminal case registered against him u/s. 306 IPC and s. 3(2)(v) of the Schedule Castes and the Schedule Act, 1989. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 306, 107 \u2013 Abetment of suicide \u2013 Allegations set out in the suicide note, if constitutes necessary ingredients of abetment to commit suicide \u2013 Suicide note by the victim-posted as Senior Clerk, that he was frustrated and\n Decision Date :\n 05-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1397/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM PRAKASH CHADHA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1155\n2024 INSC 522\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Issue for Consideration In the chargesheet, appellant was accused for commission of offences u/ss. 302, 343, 217, 218, 330, 120B and 34, IPC. An application for discharge u/s. 227 of Cr.PC was rejected by the Trial Court. Whether the findings of the trial Court on the ground to proceed against on suppositions and suspicions, having no foundational support from the materials produced by the prosecution. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.227 \u2013 Discharge \u2013 In the chargesheet, appellant was accused for commission of offences u/ss. 302, 343, 217, 218,\n Decision Date :\n 15-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2395/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF ODISHA\n versus \nNIRJHARINI PATNAIK @ MOHANTY & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 56\n2024 INSC 346\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Chargesheet was filed against the Respondents in an FIR filed alleging a widespread conspiracy involving forgery of documents to facilitate the illegal transfer of valuable government land to private entities. SDJM, Bhubaneshwar passed an order of cognizance and 34 IPC and issue of process against the Respondents. Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the order taking cognizance against the Respondents. Headnotes Quashing- Decision of High Court to quash the proceedings at preliminary stage, when the case is linked\n Decision Date :\n 26-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2270/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANDAKINI DIWAN AND ANR.\n versus \nTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 86\n2024 INSC 666\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to investigation as regards the suspicious death of the wife of senior judicial officer. Headnotes\u2020 Constitution of India \u2013 Arts. 226, 136 \u2013 Investigation by independent agency \u2013 Death of the wife of senior judicial officer appellants-mother and the brother of the deceased that the death was suspicious and was not a case of simple suicide, and apprehended that the husband being a senior judicial officer had managed the post mortem in which the cause of death was shown to be suicide by hanging \u2013 Several\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3738/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nLEONARD XAVIER VALDARIS\n versus \nJITENDRA RAMNAYARAN RATHOD & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 400\n2024 INSC 344\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA, DIPANKAR DATTA\n 400 : 2024 INSC 344 Leonard Xavier Valdaris v. Jitendra Ramnayaran Rathod & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No. 2198 of 2024) 22 April 2024 [Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta JJ.] Issue for Consideration Whether a Single Judge of the High Court can disagree with an earlier order of a Single Judge based out of same set of facts and one trial \u2013 Subsequent order to be treated as order referring the matter to larger Bench of two judges for consideration Held: Single Judge of High Court upheld order passed by the Special Judge framing charge under Section 302 of the Penal Code, 1860 \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 22-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2198/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJALALUDDIN KHAN\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 633\n2024 INSC 604\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act. Headnotes\u2020 Bail is the Rule and jail is an exception \u2013 \u2013 Applicability of: Held: The Court while deciding an application of bail falling under the provisions of Section 43D (5) is not required to conduct a mini- trial \u2013 Only a prima facie case has to be established \u2013 The Court has to examine the material forming a part of the\n Decision Date :\n 13-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3173/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDINESH GUPTA\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.  \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 390\n2024 INSC 32\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Despite the commercial nature of the dispute involved, criminal complaint was filed and an FIR was registered against the appellants. Whether, the High Court was justified in refusing to quash the FIR and the summoning order. Headnotes Administration of Justice \u2013 of law \u2013 Forum shopping \u2013 Financial transactions between parties based in New Delhi \u2013 On the basis of complaint filed by respondent- complainant, FIR was registered in Gautam Budh Nagar against three companies, appellants-promoters of the companies and other accused persons\n Decision Date :\n 11-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 214/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBACCAROSE PERFUMES AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS PVT. LTD\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 54\n2024 INSC 662\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision Application against the rejection of the discharge application moved by the appellant-Company. Headnotes\u2020 Companies Act, 1956 \u2013 Central Excise Act, 1944 \u2013 Code 1973 \u2013 Immunity from the prosecution \u2013 Grant of \u2013 Allegations against the appellant-Company that it cleared its goods into the Indian Market on payment of Countervailing Duty-CVD on the invoice value of the concerned goods, rather than the payment of the CVD on the Maximum\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3216/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHALASANI UDAYA SHANKAR AND OTHERS \n versus \nM/S. LEXUS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 235\n2024 INSC 671\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration NCLT and NCLAT, if justified in dismissing the company petition by the appellant seeking rectification of the Register of Members of respondent No.1-Company by entering their names therein u/ss. 59 and 88 of the Companies Act, 2013, and against respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4, for oppression and mismanagement, and criminal proceedings u/ss. 447 and 448 of the 2013 Act, for committing fraud. Headnotes\u2020 Companies Act, 2013 \u2013 ss. 59 and 88 \u2013 Rectification of registrar of members \u2013 Allegations of fraudulent\n Decision Date :\n 09-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 5735/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEVENDRA KUMAR & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 523\n2024 INSC 841\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the conviction would fall for the offence punishable u/s.302 IPC or under a lesser offence. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 304 Part I, 302, 307 read with s.34 \u2013 Punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder \u2013 Previous of the appellants and the victim \u2013 Appellants assaulted the victim with weapons after making a threat that they would kill him and later the victim succumbed to his injuries \u2013 Courts below convicted the appellants u/s.302 and s.307 rw s.34 and sentenced accordingly \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 06-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 328/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "RAMJI LAL BAIRWA & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.  \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 641\n2024 INSC 846\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards whether a third party to a criminal proceeding got locus standi to challenge the order quashing the FIR lodged against the teacher by the father of the minor victim under the Penal Code, POCSO Act and SC/ST Act, for sexually assaulting the minor based on a compromise arrived at by the parties, in a Special Leave Petition u/Art.136; and whether the power to quash criminal proceedings or FIR in regard to heinous and serious offences having serious impact on society, is exercisable merely because the offender and victim or parents of the\n Decision Date :\n 07-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3403/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUKHPAL SINGH\n versus \nNCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2024] 6 S.C.R. 315\n2024 INSC 385\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Appellant was convicted u/s.302, Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife. Courts below whether justified in holding that the statement of Complainant-PW-1 recorded in proceedings u/s.299, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 could be read as a piece of substantive the links in the chain of incriminating circumstantial evidence. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.299 \u2013 Record of evidence in absence of accused \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.33 \u2013 Appellant murdered his wife owing to her suspected infidelity however, fled\n Decision Date :\n 07-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 55/2015\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT\n versus \nBIBHU PRASAD ACHARYA, ETC. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 510\n2024 INSC 843\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration The appellant filed complaints against the respondents and others u/s.44(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Special Court took cognizance of the complaints and issued summons to the respondents and other accused persons. However, that it was necessary to obtain prior sanction under sub-section (1) of s.197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and quashed the orders of taking cognizance passed by the Special Court on the complaints only as against the said respondents. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Money Laundering\n Decision Date :\n 06-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4314/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHATRUGHNA ATMARAM PATIL & ORS.\n versus \nVINOD DODHU CHAUDHARY & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1128\n2024 INSC 75\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n Issue for Consideration One R (owner) sold premises in dispute to five persons. Thereafter, R committed suicide and left behind a suicide note, naming the tenants, who were in possession of premises in question, as abettors. On the strength of the same, to the local police. The tenants were held in police station and the premises in question were demolished with the help of local police. Thereafter, two tenants filed complaint u/s. 156(3) Cr.P.C., which was forwarded to the concerned Police Station for registration and investigation. The High\n Decision Date :\n 30-01-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 14585/2023\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S A.K. SARKAR & CO. & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 356\n2024 INSC 186\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 was repealed by the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 wherein s. 52 provides a maximum penalty of Rs.3,00,000/- for misbranded food. The issue arose whether the appellant can be granted the benefit of Act and be awarded a lesser punishment as is presently prescribed under the new law, though it was not in force when the offence was committed. Headnotes Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 \u2013 ss. 16(1)(a)(i) read with s.7, s. 2(ix)(k) \u2013 Prevention of Food Adulteration\n Decision Date :\n 07-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1447/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMOHD. ABDUL SAMAD\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1236\n2024 INSC 506\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration (i) Whether section 125 CrPC applies to all married women including Muslim married women; (ii) Whether section 125 CrPC applies to all non-Muslim divorced women; (iii) Whether section 125 of the CrPC applies to all such Muslim women, married and divorced under the addition to remedies available under the Special Marriage Act; (iv) If Muslim women are married and divorced under Muslim law, whether Section 125 of the CrPC as well as the provisions of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 are applicable; (v) If Section 125 of the CrPC is\n Decision Date :\n 10-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2842/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMALLAPPA & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 288\n2024 INSC 104\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Issue for Consideration The trial Court acquitted appellants-accused nos.3, 4 and 5 for the commission of murder of one \u2018M\u2019. However, the High Court reversed the order of acquittal and held the appellants guilty of the commission of murder. Whether the High Court was correct in trial Court and thereby convicting the accused persons u/s. 302 IPC. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Acquittal under \u2013 As per prosecution eight accused persons armed with axes, knives and clubs attacked \u2018M\u2019 and assualted him \u2013 PW-4 tried to run away,\n Decision Date :\n 12-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1162/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJ REDDY KALLEM\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 203\n2024 INSC 347\nCoram : A.S. BOPANNA, SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n Issue for Consideration Appellant was convicted u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Additionally, an FIR was also filed against the appellant u/ ss.406, 420, 120B, IPC. Parties agreed to compound the offence at the appellate stage and a settlement was reached. But, the appellant could the time stipulated in the settlement agreement. However, eventually, entire amount was paid by him but, the complainant did not agree for compounding of the offence. Complainant, if can be compelled by the courts to give consent for compounding of the matter. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act,\n Decision Date :\n 08-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2210/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SUNNY @ SANTOSH DHARMU BHOSALE\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1440\n2024 INSC 878\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether it was the appellant-accused who assaulted the victim-deceased due to which the death of the deceased has occurred; whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC, deserves to be altered to one under Part I of Section 304 IPC. Headnotes\u2020 s.302 and s.304 Part-I \u2013 Prosecution case that PW-6 and her husband-victim went to the house of PW-5 \u2013 Appellant-accused came in front of the house of PW-5 and started abusing PW-5 and his wife on account of a loan they had taken \u2013 Victim intervened \u2013 Appellant abused\n Decision Date :\n 20-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4664/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAHID ALI\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH  \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 377\n2024 INSC 191\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration In a celebratory firing during a marriage ceremony, the Appellant shot the deceased resulting in his demise. Whether the Appellant could be held guilty of the offence under Section 304 Part I or Part II of the IPC as against Section 302 IPC. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 I, 304 Part II \u2013 Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 s.25, s.27 \u2013 Deceased shot with country-made pistol \u2013 Succumbed to death after bullet hit the deceased on his neck \u2013 FIR registered under s.302 along with s.25, 27 Arms Act - All Eyewitnesses turned hostile \u2013 Trial Court based\n Decision Date :\n 11-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1479/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKHENGARBHAI LAKHABHAI DAMBHALA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 606\n2024 INSC 285\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Issue for Consideration Appellant\u2019s vehicle was seized under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 as the driver of the vehicle was found carrying liquor beyond permissible limit. Appellant approached the High Court by filing Special Criminal Application under Articles 226/227 of release of the seized vehicle, without first approaching concerned court under Section 451 CrPC. Whether High Court was justified in dismissing the Special Criminal Application filed by the Appellant under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. Headnotes Directly invoking writ jurisdiction\n Decision Date :\n 08-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1547/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVISHWAJEET KERBA MASALKAR \n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 753\n2024 INSC 788\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the conviction of the appellant and the death sentence awarded for the alleged murders of his wife, daughter and mother were justified. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 307 and 201 \u2013 Case based on circumstantial evidence \u2013 Case of appellant informed about a robbery at his house and the murder of his wife, daughter and mother and the injuries caused to his neighbour-PW-12 \u2013 Later, he was arrested on the basis of suspicion of committing the said murders as it was revealed during investigation that he had an\n Decision Date :\n 17-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 213/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBALASAHEB KESHAWRAO BHAPKAR & ORS.\n versus \nSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 730\n2024 INSC 525\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the facts of the case necessitated constitution of a High Powered Sale Committee, under Article 142 of the Constitution, to auction the immovable assets of the companies to satisfy the investors\u2019 claims and liquidate all other Companies. Headnotes\u2020 Constitution of India \u2013 Art.142 \u2013 Invocation of Art.142 for constitution of a High-Powered Sale Committee chaired by a former judge of the Supreme Court of India \u2013 Committee tasked with the responsibility of liquidating the assets to generate funds to\n Decision Date :\n 15-07-2024\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 546/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPRADEEP KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 306\n2024 INSC 21\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Issue for Consideration In a case based only on circumstantial evidence, conviction of the appellant u/s.302 read with s.34, Penal Code, 1860 for murder and sentence to rigorous imprisonment for life, if justified. Headnotes Evidence \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Case of the prosecution \u2013 Conviction of the appellant u/s.302 read with s.34, IPC \u2013 Propriety: Held: Versions of the three witnesses (PW-10, PW-11 and 12) are improbable and contradictory \u2013 The weapons recovered by the IO and the ones seen by the witnesses are only sticks \u2013 However, the deceased\n Decision Date :\n 05-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1338/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSRI DATTATRAYA\n versus \nSHARANAPPA \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 121\n2024 INSC 586\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court had rightly affirmed the acquittal of the respondent in a complaint case moved for the offence punishable u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by its judgment dated 03.03.2023. Headnotes\u2020 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 that respondent had borrowed rupees two lakhs from him \u2013 Against the said loan the respondent issued a cheque, as a guarantee against repayment \u2013 Since the respondent failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests, the appellant presented the concerned cheque for encashment, as\n Decision Date :\n 07-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3257/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPERUMAL RAJA @ PERUMAL\n versus \nSTATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 87\n2024 INSC 13\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration Accused not formally arrested at the time of giving information if can be deemed to be in the \u2018custody\u2019 of the police, admissibility of evidence in terms of s.27, Evidence Act, 1872. Conviction and sentence of the Penal Code, 1860, if justified. Headnotes Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.27 \u2013 \u201cin the custody of a police officer\u201d \u2013 Interpretation \u2013 Case based on circumstantial evidence \u2013 Appellant was taken into custody during the course of investigation for the murder of\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 863/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAMIT RANA @ KOKA & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 756\n2024 INSC 543\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration The issue before the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court was whether while imposing a sentence for an offence punishable under Section 307 part 2, IPC (attempt to commit murder \u2013 causing hurt to any person), a term of imprisonment beyond a period of ten years is permissible not to be given by the Courts below. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 S.307 \u2013 Part II \u2013 When the Court decided not to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life \u2013 Can a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 14 years be imposed: Held: In case the victim suffered hurt\n Decision Date :\n 22-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 700/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAMIDI ANIL KUMAR REDDY\n versus \nSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 252\n2024 INSC 101\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration The High Court, if justified in refusing to quash the docket order which re-initiated criminal proceedings against the appellants for offences u/s. 420, 498A, 506 IPC and u/s. 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Quashing of the docket order \u2013 Matter pertaining to matrimonial disputes, wherein the High Court refused to quash the docket order which re-initiated criminal proceedings against the husband and in-laws for offences u/s. 420, 498A, 506 IPC and u/s. 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,\n Decision Date :\n 05-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 758/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANDEEP\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 769\n2024 INSC 771\nCoram : PANKAJ MITHAL\n*\n, R MAHADEVAN\n Issue for Consideration The Sessions Court found the appellant guilty of the offence u/s.302 r/w. s.34 IPC, convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. The judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Sessions Court was also affirmed by the High Court. Arms Act, 1959 \u2013 s.25/27 \u2013 Prosecution case that four persons including appellant shot victim-deceased dead, when he was sitting in his courtyard \u2013 Trial Court found the appellant guilty of the offence u/s.302 r/w. s.34 IPC, convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous\n Decision Date :\n 14-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2224/2014\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SATYENDRA SINGH\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1634\n2024 INSC 873\nCoram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory? Whether the inquiry proceedings conducted against the appellant were in gross violation of Rule 7(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Rules, 1999, and is non-est in law. Headnotes\u2020 Appeal against disciplinary penalty \u2013 Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 \u2013 Rule 7(3) \u2013 Appellant, an Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, was subject to disciplinary proceedings in 2012\n Decision Date :\n 18-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 12509/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAEEM\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 36\n2024 INSC 169\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Conviction of the appellants-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302 and 34, Penal Code, 1860 based solely on the dying declaration, if justified. Headnotes Evidence \u2013 Dying declaration, sole basis of conviction \u2013 Appellants convicted for offences punishable Correctness: Held: Dying declaration can be the sole basis of the conviction if it inspires the full confidence of the court \u2013 Court is required to satisfy itself that the deceased was in a fit state of mind at the time of making the statement and that it was not the result of tutoring,\n Decision Date :\n 05-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1978/2022\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeals qua accused no. 2 and accused no.3 allowed and appeal qua accused no.1 dismissed.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGOVIND KUMAR SHARMA & ANR\n versus \nBANK OF BARODA & ORS \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 633\n2024 INSC 326\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether an auction/ sale under the Securit isation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFESI Act) carried out without issuing the mandatory 30-day notice to the borrower under Rules 8(6) and 8 (7) of the Security 2002 is liable to be set aside. If so, can the bona fide purchaser, who was originally the tenant, be forced to hand over the physical possession of the premises in order get the refund. Whether the bona fide purchaser would be entitled to refund of the auction money and interest, and compensation\n Decision Date :\n 18-04-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 24155/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGURDEV SINGH BHALLA \n versus \nSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 319\n2024 INSC 22\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge allowing the application u/s. 319 CrPC summoning the appellant along with three other officials of the Police Department. Headnotes Code of s. 319 \u2013 Power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of offence \u2013 Case of misappropriation of paddy against father of the informant \u2013 Application u/s. 319 for summoning the appellant-Inspector investigating the crime and three other police officials\n Decision Date :\n 05-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 120/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHUPATBHAI BACHUBHAI CHAVDA & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 322\n2024 INSC 295\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in overturning the order of acquittal. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 378 \u2013 Appeal against acquittal \u2013 Interference by the appellate court, when: Held: Appellate Court can interfere with the order of acquittal only the evidence that the only possible conclusion was that the guilt of the accused had been established beyond a reasonable doubt \u2013 Appellate Court cannot overturn order of acquittal only on the ground that another view is possible \u2013 Judgment of acquittal must be found to\n Decision Date :\n 10-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 334/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKUNHIMUHAMMED@KUNHEETHU\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 392\n2024 INSC 937\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Whether appellant had the intention to commit murder; whether the appellant\u2019s act can be brought under section 304, IPC in light of the offence being committed in exercise of private defense and thereby exceeding the power given under the law, that is under exception appellant\u2019s sentence should be reduced on the grounds of parity with his co-accused. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.302, 324 and 326/34 \u2013 The sympathizers of two political groups fought against each other \u2013 Appellant along with other accused committed murder\n Decision Date :\n 06-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5097/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARESH KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF DELHI \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 178\n2024 INSC 464\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Non-questioning the appellant convicted u/s.302 r/w s.34, Penal Code, 1860 on the twin incriminating circumstances during his examination u/s.313, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if caused material prejudice to him vitiating the trial qua him. Headnotes\u2020 Code of \u2013 s.302 r/w s.34 \u2013 Non-compliance of s.313 \u2013 Non-questioning on the twin incriminating circumstances to the appellant convicted u/s.302 r/w s. 34, IPC during his examination u/s.313, when the finding of common intention was based on the aforesaid twin incriminating\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1751/2017\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED AND ANOTHER\n versus \nVIJAYKUMAR V. IYER AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 140\n2024 INSC 15\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI\n Issue for Consideration The present appeals raise a question on the right to claim set-off in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, when the Resolution Professional proceeds in terms of clause (a) to sub-section (2) of s.25 of the Insolvency and take custody and control of all the assets of the corporate debtor. Headnotes Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 \u2013 clause (a) to sub- section (2) of s.25, s.238, s.243 \u2013 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 \u2013 Regn. 29 \u2013 The\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 3088/2020\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAKESH RANJAN SHRIVASTAVA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 438\n2024 INSC 205\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the provision of sub-section (1) of s.143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for the grant of interim compensation, is directory or mandatory. If it is held to be a directory provision, what are factors to be considered while exercising (1) of Section 143A of the N.I. Act. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.143A(1) \u2013 Grant of interim compensation \u2013 Directory or mandatory: Held: Power under sub-section (1) of s.143A is discretionary and not mandatory \u2013 Sub-section (1) of s.143A provides for\n Decision Date :\n 15-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 741/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPERIYASAMY\n versus \nTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 747\n2024 INSC 212\nCoram : HRISHIKESH ROY\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court justified in affirming the judgment of trial court convicting and sentencing the accused appellant, (A-1), for the offence punishable under sections 302 & 307 of Penal Code, 1860 and accused appellant (A-2) for the offence punishable & 307/109 of Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 and s.307 \u2013 Trial Court convicted and sentenced appellants \u2013 Relying on ocular and medical evidence \u2013 High Court confirmed the sentence and conviction \u2013 Whether the sentence and conviction falls\n Decision Date :\n 18-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 270/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0b13\u0b21\u0b3c\u0b3f\u0b06 - Odia\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTARINA SEN\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 417\n2024 INSC 752\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the appellants would be justified, when the matter has been compromised between the borrower and Bank. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Exercise of power u/ss.120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d) of the 1988 Act \u2013 Application u/s.482 CrPC for quashing of the criminal proceedings pending before the Special Judge \u2013 Disposed of, by the High Court by permitting the appellants to urge all the pleas raised in the\n Decision Date :\n 03-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4114/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIKAS CHANDRA\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1223\n2024 INSC 261\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Respondent No.2 was summoned to face the trial for the offence under Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860. High Court whether justified in quashing the summons. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.306, 107 \u2013 Abetment of suicide \u2013 When not \u2013 Code of ss.482, 204 \u2013 Case of the appellant was that his father committed suicide by consuming poison in the office of Sub-Mandi, Alhaganj where he was working, leaving a suicide note attributing responsibility for the same on respondent No.2 \u2013 Deceased was earlier working in Mandi Samiti,\n Decision Date :\n 22-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1101/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSARDAR RAVI INDER SINGH & ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 127\n2024 INSC 472\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration High Court whether erred in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants for quashing the complaint filed by the second respondent stating that the contentions raised were rejected in an earlier criminal revision application, which cannot be re-agitated and under Section 362 of the Cr. PC. Headnotes\u2020 Quashing \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.362 \u2013 When not applicable \u2013 Suit for specific performance of the agreements for sale filed against the appellants by the second respondent and his brother was later\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2807/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "AKANKSHA ARORA\n versus \nTANAY MABEN \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 954\nCoram : PANKAJ MITHAL, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court can convert the petition u/s.482 CrPC into a revision u/s.397 CrPC and decide it as per law; Whether s.397 CrPC can affect the amplitude of the inherent powers of the High Court u/s. 482 CrPC. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 petition u/s.482 CrPC in the High Court seeking enhancement of interim maintenance \u2013 The said petition has been dismissed by the High Court by the order impugned on the ground that it is not maintainable as the appellant-wife has a remedy of a revision u/s.397 CrPC \u2013 Correctness:\n Decision Date :\n 04-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5004/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANIK MADHUKAR SARVE & ORS.\n versus \nVITTHAL DAMUJI MEHER & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 753\n2024 INSC 636\nCoram : HIMA KOHLI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Respondent no.1 was released on bail by the High Court for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.439 \u2013 Bail \u2013 The case of the prosecution is that one accused viz. K (President of a Society), in connivance with the co-accused, misappropriated an amount of \u20b979,54,26,963/- \u2013 Further case of the prosecution that respondent no.1 is a\n Decision Date :\n 28-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3573/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nARVIND KEJRIWAL\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 2363\n2024 INSC 512\nCoram : SANJIV KHANNA\n*\n, DIPANKAR DATTA\n Issue for Consideration Validity of arrest of the appellant under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002; scope and ambit of the Courts to examine the legality of the arrest under Section 19; whether the Court while examining the validity of arrest in terms of Section 19(1) of into and examine the necessity and need to arrest; whether interim bail ought to be granted to the appellant. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s.19(1) \u2013 \u201cneed and necessity to arrest\u201d, if a separate ground to be considered beyond the conditions\n Decision Date :\n 12-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2493/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Matter referred to larger bench\n \n | Direction Issue :\n nterim bail granted to the appellant. Questions of law referred to a larger Bench.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAVED AHMAD HAJAM\n versus \nSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 317\n2024 INSC 187\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing the FIR filed against him for the offence punishable u/s.153-A, Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.153-A \u2013 When not attracted \u2013 Appellant- group that consisted of college teachers, students, and parents \u2013 He had put up a Whatsapp status protesting against the decision to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution of India; and a picture containing \u201cChand\u201d and below that the words \u201c14th August-Happy\n Decision Date :\n 07-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 886/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBILKIS YAKUB RASOOL\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 743\n2024 INSC 24\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration Writ petition filed u/Art. 32 by one of the victims challenging the order of State of Gujarat granting remission and early release of 11 convicts held guilty in Bilkis Bano matter, if maintainable; writ petitions filed as Public Interest Litigation, assailing the dated 10.08.2022, if maintainable; Government of State of Gujarat, if competent to pass the impugned orders of remission in favour of convicts in Bilkis Bano case; Order of remission passed by the State of Gujarat in favour of convicts in Bilkis Bano case, if in accordance with law; and the\n Decision Date :\n 08-01-2024\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 491/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SONU CHOUDARY\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT DELHI \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 786\n2024 INSC 864\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the conviction of the appellant u/ss.324 and 452 IPC is sustainable; and whether a restaurant can be said to be a place used for dwelling or for worship or for the custody of property for convicting a person u/s.452 IPC for committing offence of \u2013 ss.324 and 452 \u2013 Voluntarily causing hurt \u2013 House trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint \u2013 Prosecution case that the appellant inflicted injuries with the blade on the thigh, shoulder and back of the owner of the restaurant, when the owner\n Decision Date :\n 06-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3111/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nJAGAT RAM \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 533\n2024 INSC 952\nCoram : PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Respondent was convicted u/ss.7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by the Trial Court. High Court acquitted the respondent holding that the findings of the Trial Court were based on evidence however, as regards the issue of sanction it found order was proved but the official who gave the sanction was not examined. Appeal by CBI. Whether the irregularity of the sanction order, if any, has occasioned or resulted in a failure of justice. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss.19, 19(3)(a), (4) \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 03-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4964/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRATNU YADAV\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 466\n2024 INSC 487\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the Courts below erred in convicting appellant u/s.302, IPC for committing the murder of his stepmother by relying upon the alleged extra-judicial confession of appellant before PW1 and \u2018last seen together\u2019 evidence of PW5; and the guilt of the appellant Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.302 \u2013 Prosecution case that Appellant assaulted his step-mother; dragged her by holding her hair from her house up to the village pond and suffocated her to death by putting her head inside the pond water \u2013 No direct evidence \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 09-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1635/2018\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEVU G NAIR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 1273\n2024 INSC 228\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court, in a habeas corpus petition, was correct in directing the \u2018corpus\u2019 to undergo a counselling session with a psychologist; what guidelines should be followed by courts corpus petitions or petitions for police protection. Headnotes Constitution of India \u2013 Art. 226 \u2013 Habeas Corpus petition filed in High Court on the ground that Corpus (also referred to as \u2018X\u2019) was being forcibly kept by her parents in their custody whereas she wished\n Decision Date :\n 11-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1730/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nXXXX\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 309\n2024 INSC 181\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellant u/s. 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR registered against him u/ss. 376 (2)(n) and 506 IPC. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 376 (2)(n) and 506 \u2013 Punishment for committing rape repeatedly for Criminal intimidation \u2013 Complainant\u2019s case against the appellant alleging rape on false pretext of marriage; and that the appellant assured that he would marry her and take care of her daughter if she divorced her husband \u2013 However, the appellant refused to marry \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 06-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3431/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nANIRUDDHA KHANWALKAR\n versus \nSHARMILA DAS & OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 537\n2024 INSC 342\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n 537 : 2024 INSC 342 Aniruddha Khanwalkar v. Sharmila Das & Others (Criminal Appeal No. 2272 of 2024) 26 April 2024 [C.T. Ravikumar and Rajesh Bindal,* JJ] Issue for Consideration Whether it is sufficient to make out prima facie case on the basis of allegations for summoning of the accused. case was made out \u2013 Sessions Court partly allowed the revision against the order of magistrate setting aside the order to the extent of taking cognizance of the offence punishable under section 420 of IPC against the respondent no.1 and for the offence punishable under section 420 read\n Decision Date :\n 26-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2272/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNENAVATH BUJJI ETC.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 1181\n2024 INSC 239\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if erred in affirming the order of preventive detention passed by the Detaining Authority against the detenu and his associates for committing offence of gold chain snatching creating lot of fear and panic in the minds Headnotes Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of BootLeggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders Land-Grabbers, Spurious Seed Offenders, Insecticide Offenders, Fertiliser Offenders, Food Adulteration Offenders, Fake Document Offenders, Scheduled Commodities\n Decision Date :\n 21-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1738/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDEEPAK KUMAR SHRIVAS & ANR\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 364\n2024 INSC 117\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Parties levelled counter-allegations against each other of having extracted money for securing job for their relatives. High Court whether justified in dismissing the writ petition of the appellant for quashing the criminal proceedings Parties made allegations against each other of taking money for providing a job \u2013 Respondent no.6 filed FIR against the appellant \u2013 High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant for quashing the criminal proceedings \u2013 Correctness: Held: In the complaint made by\n Decision Date :\n 19-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1007/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nIN RE: ALLEGED RAPE AND MURDER INCIDENT OF A TRAINEE DOCTOR IN R.G. KAR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, KOLKATA AND RELATED ISSUES VERSUS\n versus \n \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 1047\n2024 INSC 613\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration R.G. Kar Hospital trainee doctor alleged rape and murder case. Lack of institutional safety standards in health care establishments; systemic issues for healthcare across directions issued for formation of a National Task Force. Headnotes\u2020 R.G. Kar trainee doctor murder and alleged rape case \u2013 Lack of institutional safety norms for medical professionals (doctors, medical students undergoing compulsory rotating medical internship (CRMI) in the MBBS\n Decision Date :\n 20-08-2024\n | Case No :\n SUO MOTO WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 2/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED AND ANOTHER\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 1146\n2024 INSC 623\nCoram : HIMA KOHLI\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration The present appeals challenge the Order on Charge dated 24.12.2021 and Order framing Charges dated 03.03.2022 passed by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) Central Bureau of Investigation registered u/s.120-B r/w. ss.409/420 ss.13(1)(d)/ 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants before this Court are M/s Karnataka Emta Coal Mines Limited (KECML) arrayed as accused No. 12 in the chargesheet and Chairman and Managing Director of Emta Coal Limited and former Managing Director of accused No. 12,\n Decision Date :\n 23-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1659/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGULSHAN BAJWA\n versus \nREGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1151\n2024 INSC 74\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Issue for Consideration High Court exercising suo motu contempt jurisdiction against the appellant for repeatedly disobeying the orders of the court, and for casting aspersions and threatening the Judges hearing the matters, and thereafter, holding him guilty of criminal contempt calls for interference Headnotes Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 \u2013 Appellant-practising advocate and former army personnel threatened lady counsel appearing for the opposite side after seeking adjournment in the matter, repeatedly disobeyed orders, repeatedly failed to appear before the court\n Decision Date :\n 30-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 577/2007\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKHURSHEED & ANR. \n versus \nSHAQOOR \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 963\n2024 INSC 764\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Whether by virtue of s.5(2)(a) upon publication of Notification u/s.4 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954, any pending civil suit for cancellation of sale deed executed by fraud and impersonation, stands abated and the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to try such in terms of s.49 of Consolidation Act. Headnotes\u2020 U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 \u2013 s.5(2)(a) and s.49 \u2013 Respondent herein filed a civil suit for cancellation of the Sale Deed before the Civil Judge \u2013 Petitioner No.2 herein filed an application stating that suit\n Decision Date :\n 10-09-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. 26454/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHOMA KANTI SEN\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 270\n2024 INSC 269\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration The appellant was detained on 06.06.2018. The appellant assails the order of a Division Bench of the High Court passed on 17.01.2023, disposing her application for bail with liberty to approach the Trial Court for filing a fresh application for bail. The that whether the offences under Part IV & VI of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, alleged to have been committed by the appellant, are prima facie true or not. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 153A, 505 (1b), 117 r/w. s.34 \u2013 Unlawful Activities (Prevention)\n Decision Date :\n 05-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2595/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nP. SASIKUMAR\n versus \nTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 87\n2024 INSC 474\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in upholding the conviction of the appellant u/s. 302/34 as well as u/ss. 449, 404 and 201 r/w 302 IPC, in absence of test identification parade, where accused is a stranger to a witness and the trial court accepted the dock identification by Headnotes\u2020 Evidence \u2013 Test identification parade \u2013 Relevance \u2013 Non- conduct of Test Identification Parade-TIP, effect on prosecution case \u2013 On facts, in a brutal murder of a teenager girl allegedly by the main accused and co-accused, conviction and sentence u/s.\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1473/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNAVAS @ MULANAVAS\n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 913\n2024 INSC 215\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Appellant-accused was held guilty for the offences punishable u/ ss.302, 449, 309, IPC and sentenced accordingly. For the offence punishable u/s.302, IPC, he was sentenced to death. High Court confirmed the conviction, however the sentence of death was modified and for life with a direction that he shall not be released from prison for a period of 30 years including the period already undergone with set off u/s.428, Cr.P.C. alone. What should be the appropriate sentence and whether the High Court was justified in adopting the Swamy Shraddananda v.\n Decision Date :\n 18-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1215/2011\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nATAMJIT SINGH\n versus \nSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.  \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1179\n2024 INSC 84\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate summoning Respondent No. 2 in relation to commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the premise that as on the date of the issuance of the underlying debt and/or liability qua Respondent No. 2 was time barred. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 s.138 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Scope of interference by the High Court in proceedings u/s.138 of the NI Act qua allegedly time barred\n Decision Date :\n 22-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 516/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAVINDER KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI  \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 767\n2024 INSC 211\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration 1) Whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to convict the accused; 2) Whether burden of proof u/s. 106 Evidence Act can be on accused before the prosecution proves its case; 3) Whether recovery pursuant to statement made u/s. 27 Evidence Act can be admissible, when known to all and not exclusively within knowledge of maker. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 - Conviction based on circumstantial evidence \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 ss. 106, 27 \u2013 Appellant\u2019s wife found dead with throat slit \u2013 Appellant convicted by trial court\n Decision Date :\n 06-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 918/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRABBU @ SARVESH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 37\n2024 INSC 720\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration The appellant was convicted for offences punishable u/ss. 450, 376(2)(i), 376D, 376A and 302 r/w. s.34 of IPC and s.5(g)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) awarding death penalty u/ss. 376A and 302 IPC and of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years u/s. 450 of the IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.450, 376(2)(i), 376D, 376A and 302 r/w. s. 34 \u2013 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 \u2013 s.5(g)/6 \u2013 Appellant contended that the instant case\n Decision Date :\n 12-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 449/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MEGHALAYA \n versus \nLALRINTLUANGA SAILO & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1314\n2024 INSC 537\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the accused solely on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to the mandate under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), NDPS Act, and without taking in view the quantity of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s.37 \u2013 Recording a finding mandated u/s.37 is sine qua non for granting bail to accused under the Act \u2013 High Court erred in granting bail to accused solely on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to\n Decision Date :\n 16-07-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 16021/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nASHOK\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 335\n2024 INSC 919\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the correctness of the order of conviction and sentence against the appellant, for the offences punishable u/ss.376, 302, 201 IPC as also SC and ST Act 1989; and as regards the role of the Public Prosecutor and appointment of legal \u2013 ss.376, 302, 201 \u2013 Rape and murder \u2013 Prosecution case that appellant committed rape and murder of a ten year old girl \u2013 Victim\u2019s cousin-witness to the incident, and narrated the same to the victim\u2019s father \u2013 Dead body found hidden at the place of\n Decision Date :\n 02-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 771/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL\n versus \nJAYEETA DAS \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 640\n2024 INSC 313\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the order dated 07.04.2022, whereby the Chief Judge cum City Sessions Court permitted the addition of the offences under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 to the case suffer from any illegality or infirmity; whether the extension of remand by the Chief the period of 90 days was illegal. Headnotes Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 \u2013 FIR registered u/ss. 121A, 122, 123, 124A, 120B of IPC \u2013 I.O. filed an application for addition of charges u/ss. 16, 18, 18B, 20, 38 and 39 of UAPA\n Decision Date :\n 18-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2128/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nS. VIJIKUMARI\n versus \nMOWNESHWARACHARI C \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 45\n2024 INSC 732\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n Issue for Consideration Respondent sought refund of the entire maintenance amount which was paid to the appellant (wife of respondent). Headnotes\u2020 Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 \u2013 s.25 \u2013 Respondent filed an application u/s. 25 of the Act and sought setting by which his appellant-wife was granted Rs.12,000/- per month as maintenance and Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation \u2013 Respondent also sought return of the maintenance amount paid on the ground of fraud: Held: The Magistrate while exercising his discretion under Section 25(2) of the Act\n Decision Date :\n 10-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3989/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nN. MANOGAR & ANR.\n versus \nTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 685\n2024 INSC 130\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the order passed by the trial court whereunder, the trial court rejected the application filed by the complainant u/s. 216/319 CrPC seeking the summoning of, and the impleadment of the appellants as accused persons case u/ss. 452, 294(b), 323 and 506(1) IPC. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 ss. 216/319 \u2013 Discretionary powers under \u2013 Exercise of, by the High Court \u2013 Application by the complainant u/s. 216/319 seeking the summoning of, and the impleadment of the appellants\n Decision Date :\n 16-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1333/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nABHISHEK BANERJEE & ANR.\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 110\n2024 INSC 668\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to seeking quashing of the summons issued to the appellants by the Enforcement Directorate, seeking their personal appearance in New Delhi with the documents sought for, pertaining to the FIR registered in respect of alleged illegal excavation against the accused. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s. 50 \u2013 Power of authorities regarding summons, production of documents and to give evidence \u2013 Registration of FIR in respect of alleged illegal excavation and theft of Coal in leasehold areas of\n Decision Date :\n 09-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2221/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S NEW WIN EXPORT & ANR. \n versus \nA. SUBRAMANIAM \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1225\n2024 INSC 535\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Whether in the instant case, conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be quashed by the Supreme Court as the parties had settled the dispute among themselves by entering into a settlement agreement. Headnotes\u2020 Negotiable Instruments Offence under \u2013 Compounding of \u2013 Settlement treated to be compounding of the offence: Held: Appellants and respondent-complainant had entered into a settlement agreement dated 27.01.2024 \u2013 It is clear that the parties have settled the dispute among themselves \u2013 As\n Decision Date :\n 11-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2948/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVISHWANATHA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 50\n2024 INSC 482\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n 50 : 2024 INSC 482 Vishwanatha v. The State of Karnataka by the Secretary, Home Department (Criminal Appeal No. 129 of 2012) 08 July 2024 [Sudhanshu Dhulia* and Prasanna B. Varale,JJ.] Issue for Consideration High Court reversing the order of acquittal found the appellant along with co-accused it was the accused persons who were responsible for the death of PW-1 and PW-3\u2019s mother. Headnotes\u2020 Evidence \u2013 Test Identification Parade (TIP) \u2013 Absence of \u2013 When fatal \u2013 As per the prosecution, the appellant and the co-accused (now deceased) broke into the\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 129/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nA.S. PHARMA PVT. LTD.\n versus \nNAYATI MEDICAL PVT. LTD. & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1476\n2024 INSC 690\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration High Court whether justified in exercising its inherent power under Section 482, Cr.P.C and the power under Section 147, N.I. Act, 1881 to compound the offence u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, despite the non-consent of the Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.138, 147 \u2013 Scope \u2013 Trial Court dismissed the application for compounding the offence u/s.138, N.I. Act filed u/s.320 Cr.P.C. \u2013 High Court despite the absence of the consent of the\n Decision Date :\n 23-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3051/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDINESH SAHU ALIAS DINNU\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 929\n2024 INSC 740\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Concurrent conviction of the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860, if justified. Whether the prosecution was able to prove the guilt of the appellant beyond reasonable doubt. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, s.34 \u2013 Concurrent conviction under \u2013 If to be interferred with: Held: No \u2013 Evidence of witnesses cannot be totally discarded merely because they turned hostile to the case of prosecution during the course of trial \u2013 One of the panch witnesses duly supported the case of\n Decision Date :\n 22-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 960/2021\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nPARVINDER SINGH KHURANA\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 979\n2024 INSC 546\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration The issue involved in these appeals concerns the power of the High Court or Sessions Court to grant an interim order of stay of operation of an order granting bail till the disposal of the application for cancellation of bail under sub-Section (2) of Section 439 of Procedure, 1973. Sub-Section (3) of Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) is the corresponding provision of sub-section (2) of Section 439 of the CrPC. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.439 \u2013 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023\n Decision Date :\n 23-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3059/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "XYZ\n versus \nTHE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 792\n2024 INSC 869\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences can be quashed on the ground of settlement. Headnotes\u2020 Criminal law \u2013 Quashing of criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences by High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or Article 226 of the \u2013 Advisable to procure presence of victim either personally or through video conferencing: Held: When petitions are filed before the High Court by invoking either Article 226 of the Constitution of India or Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of criminal\n Decision Date :\n 05-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4463/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUDEEP CHATTERJEE\n versus \nSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 662\n2024 INSC 567\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred by putting onerous conditions on accused-appellant while granting provisional pre-arrest bail. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.438 \u2013 Whether the High Court erred by putting onerous conditions on accused- bail: Held: Courts have to be very cautious in imposing conditions while granting bail upon finding pre-arrest bail to be grantable \u2013 Conditions should be put warily, especially when the couple concerned who are litigating in divorce proceedings, jointly though lukewarmly, agreed to\n Decision Date :\n 02-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3210/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHEIKH JAVED IQBAL @ ASHFAQ ANSARI @ JAVED ANSARI\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1054\n2024 INSC 534\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration High Court whether justified in denying bail to the appellant, an under-trial prisoner prosecuted under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 and Penal Code, 1860 who had been in custody for more than nine years. Headnotes\u2020 Bail \u2013 Denial \u2013 When Constitution of India \u2013 Article 21 \u2013 Right to speedy trial \u2013 Serious charges no ground to deny bail \u2013 Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 \u2013 SS.16, 43D \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 SS. 489B, 489C \u2013 Fake counterfeit Indian currency notes seized from\n Decision Date :\n 18-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2790/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMANISH SISODIA\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 1061\n2024 INSC 595\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Appellant was incarcerated for around 17 months, trial yet to commence. Bail denied. Whether the trial court and the High Court correctly considered the observations made by this Court with regard to right to speedy trial and prolonged period of incarceration. The claim of applying the triple test contemplated under Section 45, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Whether the right to bail in cases of delay coupled with incarceration for a long period should be read into Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 45 of the PMLA. Whether the\n Decision Date :\n 09-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3295/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNARESH KUMAR\n versus \nSTATE OF HARYANA \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 830\n2024 INSC 149\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Conviction of the appellant for the offence punishable u/s.306, Penal Code, 1860, if justified. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.306 \u2013 Abetment of suicide \u2013 Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.113A \u2013 Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman appellant u/s.306, IPC \u2013 Correctness: Held: In order to convict a person u/s.306, IPC there has to be a clear mens rea to commit the offence \u2013 Mere harassment is not sufficient to hold an accused guilty of abetting the commission of suicide \u2013 It also requires an active act or\n Decision Date :\n 22-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1722/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nNEERAJ SHARMA\n versus \nSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 40\n2024 INSC 6\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Conviction and sentence of the appellants, inter alia, for offence u/s.364-A, Penal Code, 1860, if justified. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.364-A \u2013 Conditions to be met to make out offence u/s.364-A \u2013 Conviction of the appellants u/ ss.307/120B, 364-A Prosecution if proved its case u/s.364-A beyond reasonable doubt: Held: In the present case, the most important witness is the complainant himself-an injured witness, who was an 18 year old boy who trusted his friends (appellants), not aware that he was being taken by deceit by his friends\n Decision Date :\n 03-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1420/2019\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVIPIN SAHNI AND ANOTHER\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 308\n2024 INSC 284\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n 308 : 2024 INSC 284 Vipin Sahni and Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Criminal Appeal No. 1980 of 2024) 08 April 2024 [Aniruddha Bose and Sanjay Kumar*, JJ] Issue for Consideration Whether it is open for High Court to convert or treat a petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C., as one 239 Cr.P.C. discharged the appellants \u2013 CBI approached the High Court under section 482 Cr.P.C. \u2013 High Court set aside the discharge order and directed the learned Special Judicial Magistrate to proceed with the case \u2013 Appellants preferred appeal against the said impugned order\n Decision Date :\n 08-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1980/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDHARMENDRA KUMAR @ DHAMMA\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 218\n2024 INSC 480\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration High Court if justified in upholding conviction and sentence of the appellant under ss. 302/34 IPC; the contradictions or discrepancies and the absence of blood group classification or inconclusive FSL results on the recovered weapon, if detrimental to the failure to obtain a fitness certificate from the medical officer, if would invalidate the consideration of the statement of the deceased recorded u/s. 161 CrPC before his death, as a \u2018dying declaration; and disclosure statement made by the appellant leading to the discovery and\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2806/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBABU SAHEBAGOUDA RUDRAGOUDAR AND OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 174\n2024 INSC 320\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in deciding the appeal as a first Court on independent appreciation of evidence and recording its own findings to hold the accused appellants (A-1, A-2 and A-3) guilty of charge u/s. 302 r/w. s.34 IPC. Headnotes Code of s.378 \u2013 Appeal in case of acquittal \u2013 Scope of interference by an appellate Court for reversing the judgment of acquittal recorded by the trial Court: Held: It is beyond the pale of doubt that the scope of interference by an appellate Court for reversing the judgment of acquittal\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 985/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHABNA ABDULLA\n versus \nTHE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 460\n2024 INSC 612\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the detenue\u2019s sister-in-law challenging the detention order as well as the confirmation of detention on the ground of non-supply and thus, sought release of the detenue, when the coordinate Bench of the same High Court had allowed the writ petitions filed by the co-accused persons challenging the same detention order holding that documents relied upon in the detention orders ought to have been furnished to the detenus\n Decision Date :\n 20-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3082/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJAMES KUNJWAL\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 332\n2024 INSC 601\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration The Single Judge of the High Court observed that the appellant had intentionally filed a false affidavit and therefore a direction was issued to the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court to file a complaint against him. The question that falls for consideration is of the affidavit filed before the High Court, constitutes an offence under Section 193 IPC, as defined in Section 191 IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.191, 193 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.195(1)(b) \u2013 Allegation of filing a false affidavit \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 13-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3350/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nFRANK VITUS\n versus \nNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 97\n2024 INSC 479\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration The appellant was ordered to be enlarged on bail subject to various terms and conditions incorporated in the said order. The petitioner is aggrieved by the two conditions imposed while granting bail. The two conditions are as follows: (i) A certificate of assurance from the is to be placed on record that the applicants/accused shall not leave the country and shall appear before the Special Judge as and when required; (ii) Accuse shall drop a PIN on the google map to ensure that their location is available to the Investigation Officer of the case.\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2814/2024\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Listed for final orders\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDARA LAKSHMI NARAYANA & OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF TELANGANA & ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 559\n2024 INSC 953\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n Issue for Consideration In the facts and circumstances of the case and after examining the FIR, whether the High Court was correct in refusing to quash the ongoing criminal proceedings against the appellants under Section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.498A \u2013 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 \u2013 ss.3, 4 \u2013 Refusal to quash criminal proceedings, when not justified \u2013 FIR lodged by respondent No.2-wife against appellants under Section 498A, IPC and Sections 3 and\n Decision Date :\n 10-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5199/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAJASEKAR\n versus \n STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 152\n2024 INSC 96\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n Issue for Consideration The appellant who was convicted for offence u/ss. 3(a) r/w s. 4 of the POCSO Act, and was awarded the sentence of ten years RI alongwith a fine, the quantum of sentence awarded, if justified. Headnotes Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 \u2013 ss. 3(a) Quantum of sentence \u2013 Conviction of the appellant for offences u/ss. 3(a)/4 and sentenced to ten years RI alongwith a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with a default clause to undergo SI for three months alongwith the compensation of Rs One Lakh to the victim by the courts below \u2013 In appeal before\n Decision Date :\n 05-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 756/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHANDAN\n versus \nTHE STATE (DELHI ADMN.) \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 94\n2024 INSC 271\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to effect of lack or absence of motive, when there is testimony of a reliable eye-witness. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Prosecution case that accused stabbed the victim multiple times with the knife he was carrying, \u2013 Victim\u2019s sister-in-law witnessed the incident from a short distance \u2013 Conviction and sentence u/s. 302 by the courts below \u2013 Interference with: Held: Not called for \u2013 Blood of the deceased clearly matched with the blood found on the knife recovered from the accused,\n Decision Date :\n 05-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 788/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHRI GURUDATTA SUGARS MARKETING PVT. LTD.\n versus \nPRITHVIRAJ SAYAJIRAO DESHMUKH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1211\n2024 INSC 551\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the signatory of the cheque, authorized by the \u201cCompany\u201d, is the \u201cdrawer\u201d and whether such signatory could be directed to pay interim compensation in terms of section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 leaving The High Court answered the question in the negative. Headnotes\u2020 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.138, 141, 143-A \u2013 Appellant company entered into several agreements with C Ltd. and made advance payments for supply of sugar \u2013 C failed to supply \u2013 In order to\n Decision Date :\n 24-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3070/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SHYAM NARAYAN RAM\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. ETC. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1726\n2024 INSC 800\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court fell in error in remanding the matter to Trial Court and giving liberty to the accused to cross-examine a prosecution witness and allowing the prosecution to lead further evidence in the form of formal witnesses. Headnotes\u2020 Code of s.294 \u2013 The High Court while allowing the appeal filed by accused persons and remanding the matter back to Trial Court recorded \u2013 Accused did not get a fair trial as their counsel had admitted the genuineness of documents filed by the prosecution and had dispensed with its formal\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4287/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBABA NATARAJAN PRASAD\n versus \nM. REVATHI \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 781\n2024 INSC 523\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court had shown undeserving leniency and sympathy to accused Nos.1 and 2 by sentencing them to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- each, even after finding that they committed the serious offence of bigamy of sentence is called for. Headnotes\u2020 Sentence/Sentencing \u2013 Enhancement of \u2013 High Court after restoring conviction for the offence of bigamy punishable u/s. 494 IPC, sentenced accused Nos.1 and 2 to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of\n Decision Date :\n 15-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2912/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSATYENDAR KUMAR JAIN\n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 778\n2024 INSC 217\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the appellants have been able to satisfy the twin conditions laid down in s. 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the persons accused of the offence under the PMLA is not guilty of such is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. Headnotes Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 s. 45 \u2013 Offence of money laundering \u2013 Conditions to be satified for grant of bail \u2013 Appellant-Minister in the Govt. of NCT of Delhi was the conceptualizer, initiator,\n Decision Date :\n 18-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1638/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nJADUNATH SINGH\n versus \nARVIND KUMAR & ORS. ETC. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 561\n2024 INSC 325\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Criminal appeal filed by appellant Jadunath Singh against the Allahabad High Court\u2019s decision to grant bail to Arvind Kumar, Chandra Kumar @ Chandu, and Rishi Kumar, who were convicted for life imprisonment under the offenses including murder. The incident occurred on February 11, 2011, in Village Bhogaon, where Arvind Kumar and his associates, armed with firearms, opened fire on Jadunath Singh and others, resulting in the deaths of Rajvir and Pawan Kumar, and injuries to Ravita. The accused were convicted\n Decision Date :\n 19-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2170/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "M/S S.S. PRODUCTION AND ANR. P1: M/S S. S. PRODUCTION P2: TR. S. SUBBIAH\n versus \nTR. PAVITHRAN PRASANTH \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 2248\n2024 INSC 1059\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the courts below were justified in convicting the petitioners u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheques and sentencing them to imprisonment and to pay the cheque amounts as compensation, in each of the complaints. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.138, 139 \u2013 Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds \u2013 Petitioners borrowed certain sum in five instalments as a hand loan from the\n Decision Date :\n 01-10-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 13981/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "PRASHANT\n versus \nSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 825\n2024 INSC 879\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n Issue for Consideration Whether FIR u/ss.376(2)(n) and s.506 IPC lodged against the appellant should be quashed; whether allegations in the FIR are correct; whether relationship between the parties was consensual in nature. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.376(2)(n) and s.506 \u2013 contact with each other in the year 2017 and after some time they got to know each other \u2013 Complainant alleged that in the year 2019 appellant had a forceful sexual relationship her \u2013 Further, it was alleged that appellant used to threaten the complainant to have forceful sexual\n Decision Date :\n 20-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4721/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY\n versus \nABHISHEK GUPTA ETC. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 2278\n2024 INSC 796\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration (i) Whether the mandatory procedure under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was followed while considering objections against the acquisition; (ii) Whether the acquisition proceedings were vitiated on grounds of violation of Article 14 of differential treatment of similarly placed landowners; (iii) Whether appeals are liable to be dismissed as infructuous in view of subsequent developments like \u2018settlement\u2019 between the parties; (iv) Whether the doctrine of merger applies, given prior dismissal of other appeals by the\n Decision Date :\n 21-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 7420/2010\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB \n versus \nPARTAP SINGH VERKA \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 62\n2024 INSC 483\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Correctness of the order passed by the High Court setting aside the order of the trial court which had summoned respondent u/s 319 CrPC to face the trial for the offences u/s. 7/13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as sanction u/s. 19 of the P.C. Act was Act, 1988 \u2013 s. 19 \u2013 Previous sanction necessary for prosecution \u2013 On facts, the trial court summoned the respondent-public servant u/s 319 CrPC to face the trial for the offences u/s. 7/13(2) of the P C Act \u2013 High Court set aside the order of the trial court as\n Decision Date :\n 08-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1943/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0d2e\u0d32\u0d2f\u0d3e\u0d33\u0d02 - Malayalam\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKARAKKATTU MUHAMMED BASHEER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KERALA \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 498\n2024 INSC 838\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration Issue as regards sustainability of the order of conviction and sentence of the accused, when the case not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the accused. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302, 201 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Circumstantial evidence \u2013 Main 201 for murder of one lady during night, at the house of other accused \u2013 Other accused convicted and sentenced u/s. 201 \u2013 Prosecution case that motive for murder was illicit relation between the two accused \u2013 Order of conviction and sentence upheld by the High Court \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 05-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 291/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHAILENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA \n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 813\n2024 INSC 529\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Ten persons were arrayed as accused and after investigation, a charge sheet was filed under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 IPC alleging indiscriminate shooting and/or conspiracy leading to death of two persons and injury of one person. The case was committed Sessions against nine accused persons numbered as Sessions Trial No. 17/1995. Subsequently, the case against the proclaimed offender was committed and numbered as Sessions Trial No. 66/2004. During the pendency of trial in 2007, one of the Accused, the 2nd Respondent herein was elected as Member\n Decision Date :\n 15-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2914/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDR SONIA VERMA & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 673\n2024 INSC 227\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n 673 : 2024 INSC 227 Dr Sonia Verma & Anr. v. The State of Haryana & Anr. (Criminal Appeal No. 1433 of 2024) 07 March 2024 [Vikram Nath and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ] Issue for Consideration The issue for consideration was a challenge to a decision of the High Court of Punjab & civil in nature. Headnotes Criminal Law \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Inherent powers \u2013 Scope of exercise of power for quashing the criminal proceedings: Held: The High Court ought to have quashed the criminal proceedings when it was apprised of the\n Decision Date :\n 07-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1433/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTUSHARBHAI RAJNIKANTBHAI SHAH\n versus \nKAMAL DAYANI & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 235\n2024 INSC 588\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Accused-petitioner was granted absolute interim protection of anticipatory bail by Supreme Court, until modified or altered upon final disposal of the present SLP which was pending consideration before this Court. However, of the said order, the petitioner was remanded to police custody during the currency of the aforesaid interim order. Present contempt petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents-police officials and the ACJM. Respondents, if committed contempt of this Court\u2019s order.\n Decision Date :\n 07-08-2024\n | Case No :\n DIARYNO AND DIARYYR No. 1106/2024\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Contempt petition listed for next date, SLPs disposed of\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMIR MUSTAFA ALI HASMI \n versus \nTHE STATE OF A.P. \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 640\n2024 INSC 503\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration The question arose whether the prosecution was able to prove beyond all manner of doubt the fact that the appellant demanded and accepted bribe from the complainant; and whether the courts below were justified in convicting and sentencing the appellant for offence the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 ss. 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) \u2013 Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification \u2013 Prosecution case that the the appellant-Forest\n Decision Date :\n 10-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2845/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION\n versus \nKAPIL WADHAWAN & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 677\n2024 INSC 58\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI, PANKAJ MITHAL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the respondents were entitled to the benefit of the statutory right conferred under the proviso to s.167(2), Cr.P.C, on the ground that the investigation qua some of the accused named in the FIR was pending, though the report u/s.173(2) against other accused was filed within the prescribed time limit and the cognizance of the offence was taken by the special court before the consideration of the application of the respondents seeking default bail u/s.167(2). Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 Proviso to s.167(2), s.173\n Decision Date :\n 24-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 391/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSOMNATH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 1014\n2024 INSC 232\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH\n Issue for Consideration Whether criminal proceedings should be initiated against a police officer who has committed excesses on individual in police custody? Headnotes Constitution of India \u2013 Article 142, 226 \u2013 Appellant verbally and physically assaulted in police custody \u2013 for 4 hours despite being granted bail \u2013 Sub- divisional Police Officer\u2019s inquiry report found Respondent No. 2 responsible \u2013 Special Inspector General of Police imposed punishment of \u201cstrict warning\u201d in departmental proceedings \u2013 High Court partly allowed\n Decision Date :\n 18-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1717/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSOMPRABHA RANA & ORS.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.  \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 64\n2024 INSC 664\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in disturbing the custody of the child, aged one year and five months at the time of passing the order, by handing over the custody of the child to her father and paternal side relatives from the custody of her maternal \u2013 Art. 226 \u2013 Writ of Habeas Corpus under, seeking custody of minor \u2013 Minor child aged 11 months, in custody of maternal side relatives after the unatural death of her mother \u2013 Arrest of father in connection with mother\u2019s death, however later released on bail \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 06-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3821/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAGHUVEER SHARAN\n versus \nDISTRICT SAHAKARI KRISHI GRAMIN VIKAS BANK & ANR.  \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 361\n2024 INSC 681\nCoram : PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant is entitled for protection under Section 132 of the Evidence Act, 1872 as his statement was recorded earlier at the pre-summoning stage as a witness for Evidence Act, 1872 \u2013 s.132 \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 319 \u2013 A criminal complaint was filed, the appellant was also examined as one of the witnesses of the respondent bank, wherein he admitted having changed the tenure of the Fixed Deposit from\n Decision Date :\n 10-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2764/2024\n \n | Direction Issue :\n Appeal dismissed. Contempt petition disposed of.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT\n versus \nNIRAJ TYAGI & ORS \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 311\n2024 INSC 106\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Issue for Consideration Interim orders passed by the High Court staying the investigations of the FIRs and the Enforcement Directorate, if justified. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Powers of the High Court under \u2013 Banking financial institution sanctioned borrowers, however, the borrowers defaulted \u2013 Banking institution auctioned the property and sold the shares of the borrowers for the recovery of its dues \u2013 Registration of FIR by the borrowers against the Banking institution and its officers, and investigation by the Enforcement\n Decision Date :\n 13-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 843/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH\n versus \nSHILPA JAIN & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 372\n2024 INSC 278\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court is correct in exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR filed against Respondents. Headnotes Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 \u2013 s. 482 \u2013 Whether High Court proceeded on false premise that the Suit Property State of Madhya Pradesh \u2013 Consequently proceeded to quash the FIR against Respondents: Held: The Trial Court categorically found that the Suit Property belonged to the State of Madhya Pradesh while dismissing the Civil Suit \u2013 This finding was upheld by the High Court \u2013 The facts\n Decision Date :\n 05-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1565/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSANJAY KUNDU\n versus \nREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 442\n2024 INSC 43\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration The proceedings before the High Court were initiated on an email from complainant, addressed to the Chief Justice of the High Court. The High Court suo motu registered a Criminal Writ Petition pursuant The High Court directed that the petitioner herein, who is holding the post of DGP, and the SP, Kangra should be moved to any other post to ensure that a fair investigation takes place. The petitioner was neither impleaded in the proceedings nor was he heard before the above order was\n Decision Date :\n 12-01-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 550/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nGAUTAM KUMAR DAS\n versus \nNCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 451\n2024 INSC 610\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the grant of custody of the minor child to the father, the only natural guardian. Headnotes\u2020 Custody \u2013 Claim of \u2013 Appellant-father, only surviving biological parent seeking custody of the minor daughter from the alleged unlawful custody wife just ten days after the birth of their daughter and thereafter, his father due to Covid-19 \u2013 Due to the loss, the father handed over the custody of his minor daughter to his sister-in-law as an interim arrangement, however, his son who was relatively older was with him \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 20-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3447/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a97\u0ac1\u0a9c\u0ab0\u0abe\u0aa4\u0ac0 - Gujarati\n \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 - Nepali\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nAJITSINH CHEHUJI RATHOD\n versus \nSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 1 S.C.R. 1083\n2024 INSC 63\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n Issue for Consideration Appellant-accused convicted u/s.138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, had claimed mismatch of signatures on the cheque in question. His application for comparison of the signature as appearing on the cheque through the handwriting expert was rejected by trial court. justified in dismissing the application filed by the appellant u/s.391, CrPC for taking additional evidence at appellate stage and seeking a direction to obtain the opinion of the handwriting expert. Headnotes Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 \u2013 ss.118, 138 \u2013 Code of Criminal\n Decision Date :\n 29-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 478/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSUBHASH @ SUBANNA & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 328\n2024 INSC 294\nCoram : SUDHANSHU DHULIA\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court convicting and sentencing accused no. 1 u/s. 302, and accused no. 2 and 4 u/ss. 324 and 326 IPC. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302 and 324 \u2013 Murder \u2013 dangerous weapon or means \u2013 Right of private defence, if applicable \u2013 On facts, morning incident wherein quarrel between the complainant and accused on account of blocking the way and accused persons hurled abuses to her \u2013 In the evening, the complainant informed her father\n Decision Date :\n 10-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 328/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKALINGA @ KUSHAL\n versus \nSTATE OF KARNATAKA BY POLICE INSPECTOR HUBLI  \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 391\n2024 INSC 124\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n Issue for Consideration Whether the extra judicial confession of the appellant-accused was admissible, credible and sufficient for his conviction thereon for the murder of his brother-PW-1\u2019s son; whether the testimony of PW-1 could be termed as reliable and the chain of circumstantial evidence was complete and consistent for arriving at the conclusion of guilt. Headnotes Evidence \u2013 Extra judicial confession \u2013 Evidentiary value \u2013 Case based on circumstantial evidence \u2013 Trial Court acquitted all the accused persons \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 20-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 622/2013\n \n |  Bench :\n 1 Judge\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKIRAN JYOT MAINI\n versus \nANISH PRAMOD PATEL \n- \n[2024] 7 S.C.R. 942\n2024 INSC 530\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Long-standing separation between the parties, multiple prolonged litigations pending adjudication, several failed attempts at reconciliation. Issue was as regards interim maintenance however, in view of irretrievable break down of marriage, marriage between the in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Amount of permanent alimony to be paid by the respondent to the appellant. Headnotes\u2020 Constitution of India \u2013 Article 142 \u2013 Exercise of powers under \u2013 Dissolution of marriage in view of its\n Decision Date :\n 15-07-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2915/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDELHI RACE CLUB (1940) LTD. & ORS.\n versus \nSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 670\n2024 INSC 626\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in declining to quash and set aside the summoning order passed by the Magistrate, against the appellants- company and its office bearers, for offence punishable u/ss. 406 and 420 IPC. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.406, 420 and 120B of trust and cheating \u2013 Private complaint filed by the respondent No. 2 in the court of Magistrate against the appellants for the offence punishable u/ss.406, 420 and 120B, alleging that certain amount was due and payable to him by the appellants towards the sale of horse grains and oats\n Decision Date :\n 23-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3114/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "IN RE: DIRECTIONS IN THE MATTER OF DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES \n versus \n \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 722\n2024 INSC 866\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the executive should be permitted to take away the shelter of a family or families as a measure for infliction of penalty on a person who is accused in a crime. In other words, whether properties of persons, who are accused of committing certain crimes or for for commission of criminal offences, can be demolished without following the due process of law. Headnotes\u2020 Demolition of property \u2013 Demolition of property of a person by the State machinery merely because he is an accused or a convict, that too without following due process\n Decision Date :\n 13-11-2024\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 295/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Directions issued\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nM/S RAJCO STEEL ENTERPRISES\n versus \nKAVITA SARAFF AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 255\n2024 INSC 288\nCoram : ANIRUDDHA BOSE\n*\n, SANJAY KUMAR\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose as to whether the cheques were issued in discharge of a debt and if so, whether the respondent no.1 was able to rebut the presumption in terms of s. 118/139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Headnotes \u2013 ss. 118/139 \u2013 Dishonour of cheque \u2013 Sum involved therein, if advanced in discharge of a legally enforceable debt \u2013 Raising of presumption u/s. 139 \u2013 Complaint by partnership firm alleging dishonour of cheques issued by the respondent no. 1 on the ground of\n Decision Date :\n 09-04-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 5583/2022\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nASIM AKHTAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 911\n2024 INSC 794\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Whether there is a mandate to decide the application u/s. 319 CrPC before cross-examination of other witnesses. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.319 \u2013 During the trial, the examination-in-chief of the victim (respondent no.2)-PW-1, her was recorded \u2013 Respondent no.2 filed an application u/s.319 CrPC for summoning the father and mother of the accused-appellant \u2013 Thereafter, the above three prosecuting witnesses did not appear before the trial Court for cross-examination and insisted for deciding application u/s.319\n Decision Date :\n 18-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4247/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSTATE OF PUNJAB\n versus \nGURPREET SINGH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1039\n2024 INSC 154\nCoram : SURYA KANT\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in acquitting the main accused and the co- accused of the charges u/s. 302/34 IPC. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 302 \u2013 Murder \u2013 Acquittal by High Court, if sustainable \u2013 Prosecution case that main accused armed with pistol in her death \u2013 Other co-accused accompanied the main accused \u2013 Motive behind the murder was that the main accused believed that his ex-mother-in-law was responsible for the divorce from his ex-wife, sabotaging his plan to settle abroad \u2013 Conviction and sentence of the main\n Decision Date :\n 06-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 664/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nTHIRUMOORTHY\n versus \nSTATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE \n- \n[2024] 3 S.C.R. 1228\n2024 INSC 247\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, SANDEEP MEHTA\n Issue for Consideration Appellant-accused, a Child in Conflict with Law on the date of the incident was convicted and sentenced u/ss.363, 342, 302, 201 r/w 302, IPC and s.6, POCSO Act. Trial, conviction and sentence of the appellant, if was vitiated on account of non-adherence to of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Headnotes Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 \u2013 ss.3, 9, 15, 18, 19 \u2013 Despite the appellant-accused having been found to be a juvenile and thus, a Child in Conflict with Law (CICL) on\n Decision Date :\n 22-03-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1773/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0920\u0940 - Marathi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nDHANRAJ ASWANI\n versus \nAMAR S. MULCHANDANI & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 9 S.C.R. 257\n2024 INSC 669\nCoram : D.Y. CHANDRACHUD\n*\n, J.B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable at the instance of an accused while he is already in judicial custody in connection with his involvement in a Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.438 \u2013 Accused already in judicial custody in connection with one case, if can apply for anticipatory bail in a different case \u2013 Maintainability of such anticipatory bail applications \u2013 Divergent opinions expressed by different High Courts: Held: An\n Decision Date :\n 09-09-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2501/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nBHAGGI @ BHAGIRATH @ NARAN\n versus \nSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 111\n2024 INSC 82\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration The capital punishment awarded to the petitioner-convict for the conviction u/s. 376 AB, IPC was not confirmed and it was commuted to imprisonment for life, which, going by the provisions thereunder, means imprisonment for the remainder of the convict\u2019s question is whether the commutation of capital punishment to sentence of life imprisonment requires further interference. Headnotes Sentence/Sentencing \u2013 Modification of sentence \u2013 Allegation that petitioner-convict took 7 year old girl to a temple and raped her \u2013 Trial Court\n Decision Date :\n 05-02-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 2888/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Case Partly allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSOMJEET MALLICK\n versus \nSTATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 893\n2024 INSC 772\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, MANOJ MISRA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the FIR, the cognizance order and the proceedings in pursuance thereof without considering the materials collected during investigation. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Penal Code, that as per agreement between the parties, the Truck/Trailor was rented to the accused-respondents for plying for 21 months at monthly rent but after payment of first month\u2019s rent, the rent was not paid despite assurances \u2013 Chargesheet filed and cognizance was taken by CJM while the\n Decision Date :\n 14-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4190/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nHARSHAD GUPTA\n versus \nTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 701\n2024 INSC 776\nCoram : SURYA KANT, UJJAL BHUYAN\n Issue for Consideration The Judge who had convicted the appellant was transferred post conviction, before the appellant could be heard on the quantum of sentence and a new Judge was posted in his place. Appellant relying on Sections 353 and 354, Cr.P.C sought direction from the High Court to the the case, including on the question of conviction. High Court whether justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellant and directing the new Presiding Officer to hear the appellant on the question of sentence and pass an appropriate order in terms of Section 235(2) of the Cr.P.C.\n Decision Date :\n 01-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4080/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nKALVAKUNTLA KAVITHA \n versus \nDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 717\n2024 INSC 632\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to the grant of the benefit of the proviso to s.45(1) of the PMLA to the applicant being a well educated and accomplished woman, who has remained Member of Parliament and a Member of Legislative Council. Headnotes\u2020 Prevention of Money Laundering Act, treatment under s.45 proviso \u2013 Entitlement \u2013 Applicant-well educated and accomplished woman, has remained Member of Parliament, Member of Legislative Council, was one of the chief conspirators in the entire conspiracy relating to formulation and implementation of new Excise Policy\n Decision Date :\n 27-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 3522/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nRAM NATH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 743\n2024 INSC 138\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration Interplay between the provisions of Chapter IX of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) and ss.272 and 273 of the Penal Code, 1860; whether the view taken by the Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Pepsico India Holdings (Pvt) Ltd. & Anr v. State of Uttar that after coming into force of the FSSA w.e.f 29th July 2010, it would have an overriding effect on other food related laws, including the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and ss. 272, 273, IPC, challenged in Criminal Appeal No. 476-478 of 2012 is correct. Headnotes Food Safety and\n Decision Date :\n 21-02-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 472/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nSHIVANI TYAGI\n versus \nSTATE OF U.P. & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 36\n2024 INSC 343\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n*\n Issue for Consideration Matter pertains to suspension of sentence of life imprisonment of the convicted persons, and their consequential enlargement on bail, in an acid attack case. Headnotes Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s. 389 \u2013 Suspension of sentence pending appeal, and on victim at the hands of the accused persons \u2013 Victim suffered 30-40 percent burn injuries resulting in total disfigurement of her face \u2013 Conviction of the accused persons u/ss. 307/149 and 326A/149 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment \u2013 High Court suspended the sentence\n Decision Date :\n 05-04-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1957/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n\u0c24\u0c46\u0c32\u0c41\u0c17\u0c41 - Telugu\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nVELTHEPU SRINIVAS AND OTHERS\n versus \nSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (NOW STATE OF TELANGANA) AND ANR. \n- \n[2024] 2 S.C.R. 1\n2024 INSC 87\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA\n Issue for Consideration The courts below, if justified in convicting the four accused u/ss. 302/34 IPC and imposing sentence for life for committing murder of the victim. Headnotes Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss. 302/34, s. 304 Part II \u2013 Murder \u2013 Culpable homicide not amounting to murder, when \u2013 Political animosity between two groups led to the murder of the deceased \u2013 Prosecution witnesses corroborating incident of accused A 1 stopping an auto, dragging the deceased to the house of A-4, and the other accused-A2, A4\n Decision Date :\n 06-01-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2852/2023\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nYASH TUTEJA & ANR.\n versus \nUNION OF INDIA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 4 S.C.R. 591\n2024 INSC 301\nCoram : ABHAY S. OKA\n*\n, UJJAL BHUYAN\n 591 : 2024 INSC 301 Yash Tuteja & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 153 of 2023) 08 April 2024 [Abhay S. Oka* and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ] Issue for Consideration The issue for consideration was a challenge to the Complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement under the meaning of clause (y) of sub-section (1) of s. 2 of PMLA.` Headnotes Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 \u2013 Clause (y) of sub-Section (1) of s. 2 \u2013 Scheduled Offence \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s. 120B \u2013 Complaint filed by the Directorate of Enforcement on the basis\n Decision Date :\n 08-04-2024\n | Case No :\n WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 153/2023\n \n | Direction Issue :\n WP(Crl) Nos. 153/2023 and 217/2023 disposed of. WP(Crl) No. 208/2023 partly allowed WP(Crl) No. 216/2023 allowed.\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SIDDIQUE \n versus \nSTATE OF KERALA & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 11 S.C.R. 822\n2024 INSC 877\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Whether the appellant is entitled to anticipatory bail. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.438 \u2013 FIR against the appellant u/ss.376, 506, IPC \u2013 Application seeking anticipatory bail rejected by High Court \u2013 Challenge to: Held: years the alleged incident which had taken place in 2016 \u2013 Further, though she had also posted a post on facebook in 2018 making allegations against about 14 people, including the appellant with regard to the alleged sexual abuse, however, she did not go to the Justice Hema Committee\n Decision Date :\n 19-11-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4625/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nMAHENDRA KUMAR SONKER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH \n- \n[2024] 8 S.C.R. 935\n2024 INSC 600\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the conviction of the appellant under s.353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) can be sustained without proving assault and use of criminal force. Headnotes\u2020 Indian Penal Code \u2013 s.353 IPC \u2013 Complaint against appellant filed 500/- as illegal gratification \u2013 Trap proceedings organised \u2013 Appellant charged for offences under ss.7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 along with ss.201 and 353 IPC \u2013 Special Judge, Sagar convicted appellant for offence u/s.353 IPC and sentenced him\n Decision Date :\n 12-08-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 520/2012\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 3 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0940 - Hindi\n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nCHILD IN CONFLICT WITH LAW THROUGH HIS MOTHER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 5 S.C.R. 761\n2024 INSC 387\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, RAJESH BINDAL\n Issue for Consideration (i) Whether the period provided for completion of preliminary assessment u/s. 14(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is mandatory or directory; (ii) Whether the words \u2018Children\u2019s Court\u2019 and \u2018Court Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and the 2016 Rules shall be read interchangeably; (iii) What is the time period to file an appeal u/s. 101(2) of the Act against an order of the Board passed u/s. 15 of the Act; (iv) Whether all the orders passed by the Courts, Tribunals,\n Decision Date :\n 07-05-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2411/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Disposed off\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "English\n \n\u0a2a\u0a70\u0a1c\u0a3e\u0a2c\u0a40 - Punjabi\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Disclaimer \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDue care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tJudgments in  regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tReasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India. \n\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\tSupreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and  for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text. \n\t\t\t\t\t\tThe translation of Judgements is provided for general information  and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.\n\t\t\t\t\t\tIf any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment,  users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. \n\n\t\t\t\t\t\tVisitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n \nK. BHARTHI DEVI AND ANR.\n versus \nSTATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR. \n- \n[2024] 10 S.C.R. 650\n2024 INSC 750\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Despite the dispute involved having predominantly overtures of a civil dispute and the matter having been compromised between the parties, whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the quashing petition filed by the accused persons including the appellants chargesheet. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.482 \u2013 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 s.120-B r/w ss.420, 409, 467, 468, 471 \u2013 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 s.13(1)(d), 13(2) \u2013 Quashing \u2013 Of criminal cases having predominantly civil character\n Decision Date :\n 03-10-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4113/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "ANIL BHAVARLAL JAIN & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1436\n2024 INSC 1039\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n Issue for Consideration Whether criminal proceedings can be quashed on the basis of a settlement arrived at between the parties on the consent terms drawn and submitted before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Headnotes\u2020 CrPC \u2013 s.482 \u2013 FIR and chargesheet filed against punishable under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 along with Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 \u2013 High Court rejected petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash FIR and chargesheet \u2013 Appeals\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5581/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "SHAMBHU DEBNATH\n versus \nTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 2083\n2024 INSC 1032\nCoram : VIKRAM NATH\n*\n, PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE\n 2083 : 2024 INSC 1032 Shambhu Debnath v. The State of Bihar & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No. 5579 of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Vikram Nath* and Prasanna B. Varale, JJ. ] Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in granting anticipatory bail to accused persons despite specific ablaze and filed FIR \u2013 Complainant submitted a written application as he saw that the body of his 20 year old nephew, was ablaze the fire \u2013 On being asked, the injured nephew named the accused persons \u2013 FIR registered: Factors for consideration for anticipatory bail \u2013\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n  No. 5579/2024\n \n |  Bench :\n  Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "DIGAMBAR AND ANOTHER\n versus \nTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1533\n2024 INSC 1019\nCoram : BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI\n*\n, K.V. VISWANATHAN\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court should have exercised its inherent powers u/s.482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the criminal proceedings u/ss.498-A, 312, 313 and 34 of the Penal Code, 1860. Headnotes\u2020 Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 ss.498-A, 312, 313 and 34 \u2013 The complainant filed and her parents-in-law (appellants) u/ss.498-A, 312, 313 and 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 \u2013 The appellants along with their son filed a criminal application u/s.482 of the Cr.P.C. praying for quashing and setting aside of the FIR before the High Court \u2013 The said application was\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5542/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU\n versus \nKASHIF \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1406\n2025 INSC 1045\nCoram : BELA M. TRIVEDI\n*\n, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA\n Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes\u2020 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 Interpretation of: Held: The provisions of NDPS Act are required to be interpreted keeping in mind the Act; as also the impact on the society as a whole \u2013 It has to be interpreted literally and not liberally, which may ultimately frustrate the object, purpose and Preamble of the Act. [Para 39(i)] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 \u2013 s.37 \u2013 Nature of: Held: While\n Decision Date :\n 19-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5544/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "P. MANIKANDAN\n versus \nCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1553\n2024 INSC 1007\nCoram : C.T. RAVIKUMAR\n*\n, SANJAY KAROL\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in directing re-investigation and retrial of the same offence on the same set of facts, after acquitting the accused by giving him the benefit of doubt; Whether, in the attending fact and circumstances, the de novo of double jeopardy and the appellant\u2019s right u/Art.20(ii) of the Constitution of India. Headnotes\u2020 Constitution of India \u2013 Art.20(ii) \u2013 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.386 \u2013 The Trial Court held appellant guilty for the offence punishable u/ss.364A\n Decision Date :\n 18-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5478/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "MUSKAN ENTERPRISES & ANR.\n versus \nTHE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1273\n2024 INSC 1046\nCoram : DIPANKAR DATTA\n*\n, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA\n Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the subsequent petition u/s.482, Cr. PC on the ground that since the earlier petition had been withdrawn without liberty obtained to apply afresh, the subsequent petition was Procedure, 1973-s.482 \u2013 Subsequent petition under \u2013 Maintainability \u2013 Order of conviction and sentence for offence punishable u/s.138 against appellants \u2013 In appeal, the sentence of the the appellants suspended and was granted bail however, directed to deposit 20% of\n Decision Date :\n 18-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5491/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "AMAR SARDAR\n versus \nTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1267\n2024 INSC 1040\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in affirming the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Fast Track Court. Headnotes\u2020 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 \u2013 s.374 \u2013 Whether High Court considered the evidence on record independently thereby by the Fast Track Court: Held: While hearing the appeals under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the High Court is exercising its appellate jurisdiction \u2013 It is the duty of an appellate court to independently evaluate the evidence presented and determine whether such\n Decision Date :\n 12-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5234/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Appeal(s) allowed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "ANKUSH VIPAN KAPOOR\n versus \nNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1743\n2024 INSC 986\nCoram : B.V. NAGARATHNA\n*\n, N KOTISWAR SINGH\n Issue for Consideration Whether the NIA can investigate only the same accused who is present in the NIA investigation qua Scheduled Offences and for non-scheduled offence by virtue of Section 8 of the National Investigation Agency, 2008; In other words, can the accused person who, although not being investigated for any Scheduled Offences could be investigated by NIA because there exists a link between the two namely, Scheduled and non-scheduled offences, thereby connecting every co-accused; Whether, the expression \u201cthe accused\u201d in Section\n Decision Date :\n 16-12-2024\n | Case No :\n SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 2819/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}
{"court": "Supreme Court (AWS)", "year": 2024, "full_text": "RAJENDRA KUMAR BARJATYA AND ANOTHER\n versus \nU.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & ORS. \n- \n[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1320\n2024 INSC 990\nCoram : J.B. PARDIWALA\n*\n, R MAHADEVAN\n Issue for Consideration Respondent Nos.5 (original allottee of the plot) and 6 (Respondent No.5\u2019s power of attorney) without any approval from the competent authority, unauthorizedly constructed commercial shops on the subject property which was residential in nature and sold Impugned order passed by High Court ordering demolition and directing criminal as well as departmental action against the erring officials. Headnotes\u2020 Illegal/Unauthorized constructions \u2013 U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 \u2013 s.83 \u2013 High Court allowed\n Decision Date :\n 17-12-2024\n | Case No :\n CIVIL APPEAL No. 14604/2024\n | Disposal Nature :\n Dismissed\n \n |  Bench :\n 2 Judges\nSplit view\nHTML view\nFlip view\nPDF", "outcome": "UNCLEAR", "source": "AWS_SC_Vanga", "instruction": "Analyze this Supreme Court judgment.", "output": "Analysis provided."}