Penal Code, 1860 – ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 – Appellant alongwith other accused persons convicted and sentenced u/ss.363, 366, 376-D, 506 and s.4, POCSO Act – Held: Evidence of the prosecutrix and the medical evidence establish the charge of rape – However, charge of gang evidence – Thus, conviction by the trial court, confirmed by High Court u/s.376-D is modified – Appellant is convicted u/s.376 and sentenced for the period undergone – Fine and default sentence imposed by the trial court, unaltered – Conviction u/s.506 is set aside


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – ss. 42 & 43 – Governing provisions, if s.42 or s.43 – Non-compliance of s.42 – Secret information received by PW-4 (S.I.) that accused- appellants were selling poppy straw in a vehicle – with fellow officials – Accused-appellants found sitting in a Jeep – Notice served u/s.50 – Search led to recovery of poppy straw – Trial court convicted appellants u/s.15 rejecting their plea of acquittal on ground of non-compliance of s.42 – The trial court held


Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.439 – Appeal against grant of bail – Accused-respondent was accused of a heinous and shocking murder of a lady doctor aged about 30 years – Incident alleged to have taken place in the presence of victim’s father – His bail Bail application moved before High Court was, however, allowed within 10/12 days of dismissal of bail application by Sessions Court – State filed appeal against the grant of bail – Held: In the impugned order, High Court did not advert to any error in the reasoning of Sessions


Sentence/Sentencing: Conviction of appellant-accused under s.21 of NDPS Act – He was found to be in possession of 1 kg heroin which is four times more than the minimum of commercial quantity – As per NDPS Act, 250 gm and above of Narcotic substance/drug is a commercial quantity – under s.21 of the NDPS Act is 10 years R.I. – So far as the commercial quantity is concerned, it may be upto 20 years R.I. – Appellant was sentenced to 15 years R.I. with fine of Rs.2 lakhs – Plea of appellant that while imposing punishment of 15 years R.I. which is higher than


THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU


Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 389(1) r/w. s. 37 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Suspension of sentence – Of the person convicted u/ss. 23(c) and 25A of NDPS Act – Granted by High Court during pendency of Appeal to Supreme Court – Held: Where trial has ended in conviction, High court should exercise its power to suspend the sentence for sufficient reasons, which must have bearing on the public policy underlying s. 37 NDPS Act – No case of suspension of sentence u/s. 389(1) is made out


UNION OF INDIA THROUGH NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, LUCKNOW


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – ss.8, 21, 27A and 29 – On receiving information, a vehicle was intercepted by the NCB officers in which respondent and other two accused persons were travelling – Nothing objectionable was found in the search – However, search of car revealed two packets together weighing 3.300 kg hidden under the place where wiper is connected to the front bonnet of the car – The application for bail of the respondent was rejected by the Additional District and Sessions Judge – The High


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act – ss.8, 21, 43, 50 – Appellant convicted u/ss.8, 21 – Affirmed by High Court – On appeal, held: As recovery of the contraband from appellant’s motorcycle was a chance recovery on a public road, apply – Seizure of the motor cycle from appellant is proved beyond reasonable doubt, therefore, the question of ownership of vehicle is not relevant – Compliance of s.50 not attracted in the present case – Concurrent findings by courts holding the appellant guilty and


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: ss. 8(c), 22(c), 25, 28, 29, 67 – Seizure of psychotropic substances – Prosecution case that large number of tablets seized by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence from different locations believing – A-1 to A-3 arrested under various provisions of NDPS Act for alleged export of psychotropic substances – Arrest of A-4 on the basis of statements of A-1 and A- 3 for contravening provisions of NDPS Act – Grant of bail to A-4 by NDPS Court – However, the High Court


Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.427 – Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – ss. 23, 29 and s.21 – Appellant-accused was held guilty by the PS Customs, Amritsar u/s.23 and s.21 of the NDPS Act for recovery of 4 kg of heroin and sentenced rigorous imprisonment (RI) – Thereafter, he was again held guilty for the offence u/s.29 r/w. s.21(c) of the NDPS Act after recovery of 750 grams of heroin from Delhi and was sentenced for 10 years RI by the Trial Court at Delhi, however, in view of the provisions of s.31 (ii) of the NDPS


Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.439 – Bail application rejected by Session Judge applying the provisions of s.37 of the NDPS Act 1985and stating that as a total seizure ‘from all accused’ was 12 gms cocaine, 55 gm Ganja, 11.5 gms ecstasy MDMA, no bail could be given to the appellant in present case – High Court also rejected bail – On appeal, held: The residence of the appellant was searched pursuant to statement made by one ‘BKR’ – Pursuant to search made of the appellant’s premises, no drugs


Penal Code, 1860: s.376(2)(f) or s.354 – Prosecution case was that about fortnight prior to the date of registration of FIR, the two victim-prosecutrix (PW-1 and PW-2) aged about 9 years and 8 years respectively were playing in the street near the respondent’s house – Respondent them to his house and took off his clothes and undressed PW- 1 and started rubbing his genital against her genital and repeated same act with PW-2 – Both the girls got scared and started crying and he threatened them with physcial harm – After few days, victims revealed the incident


Sentence / Sentencing – Suspension of execution of sentence – Trial Court had convicted and sentenced appellant u/ss.363 and 354 IPC and s.8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 – Prayer of appellant for declined by High Court –Appellant pleaded before Supreme Court that the High Court had taken too strict and stern view of the matter and failed to appreciate that the maximum sentence of imprisonment awarded in the matter was of three years – Held: The High Court, while referring


Penal Code, 1860 – s.376 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) – ss. 5 and 6 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss. 397, 482 – Discharge of Accused – ‘X’, delivered a baby and thereafter committed suicide by registered for the offence punishable u/s 376 of IPC and the provision of the POCSO Act against the respondent – The special Judge framed charges for the abovementioned offences against the respondent – The accused questioned the legality and validity of the order of framing charge by


Penal Code, 1860 – ss. 376A, 376 (2)(i), 302 – POCSO Act – s. 6 – Rape and murder of a minor girl – Prosecution case that appellant-accused had raped and throttled to cause death of victim, who was daughter of appellant’s cousin sister – While in custody statement and thereafter, at his instance, the victim’s corpse concealed underneath gunny bags, was recovered – The post-mortem and the forensic science laboratory (FSL) reports revealed commission of rape in a diabolically and gruesome manner and causing of death by throttling


Anticipatory bail: Case filed against respondent no.1 under ss.354(1)(i), (ii) and (iv), 354A(2) and 354A(3) IPC /w ss.7, 8, 9 and 11 of POCSO Act – Allegation against respondent no.1 was that he sexually assaulted his 12 years old niece – He asked the victim to sit on his lap her and kissed her on the cheeks and tried to kiss her on her lips – He further attempted to disrobe her and made lewd comments – The incident traumatized the victim to an extent that she slumped down in her course and performance although she was an excellent student giving good


Review – Clarification sought on quantum of sentence – In judgment dated 19.04.2022 for which review is sought, the petitioner-accused was held guilty and punished for the offences was under ss.376(2)(i), 376(2)(m) and as also under s.5 (i) and s.5 (m) read with s.6 of the POCSO Act – In judgment dated 19.04.2022, the Court, while commuting the sentence of death for the sentence of life imprisonment for the offence punishable under s.302 of IPC, and while imposing sentence to undergo imprisonment for 20


Bail – Cancellation of – Allegations of drug trafficking – Held: A confessional statement recorded u/s.67 of the NDPS Act will remain inadmissible in trial of an offence under the NDPS Act petitioner-NCB, on basis of confession/ voluntary statements of respondents-accused or the co-accused u/s.67, cannot form the basis for overturning the impugned orders releasing them on bail – Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.67. Bail – Cancellation of


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – ss.20(b)(ii)(C), 54 Presumption u/s.54 – Appellant concurrently convicted u/s.20(b)(ii)(C) and sentenced, relying on the testimony of PW-7-DSP (who acted both as the informant and the IO) examined as PW-7 claims to have done everything only in the presence of independent witnesses – But those independent witnesses not merely denied their presence and participation but also came up with an explanation as to how their signatures found a place in the documents – Thus,


Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.391 – Additional evidence in criminal appeal – When impermissible – Respondent no.1-accused was convicted u/s 302, IPC and sentenced to life – Conviction and sentence challenged by respondent before High for recording of evidence in respect of his plea of unsoundness of mind – Application allowed, Trial Court was directed to take on record the additional evidence and documents and to send the file back along with additional evidence – On appeal by complainant, held: Evidence


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – ss. 8, 22, 29, 37 and 67 – Post-arrest bail – Not granted – Respondent made statement u/s. 67 NDPS Act and disclosed that he was illegally selling and purchasing the illegal drugs from ‘PJ’ – was conducted by NCB at the premise of co-accused-‘PJ’ and drugs covered under NDPS were recovered in huge quantities – Respondent was taken into custody – Respondent made application for bail before Special Judge, NDPS which was rejected – High Court granted


Bail: Regular bail – Denial of – Matter pertaining to seizure of huge quantity of Narcotics drug, Heroin near Port in Gujarat in a joint operation by the Indian Coast Guard and – Prosecution case that on receiving intelligence input, the DRI intercepted a Pakistani boat in the Indian territorial waters which was trying to escape – Seizure of bags containing narcotic substance, and the Captain of the boat admitted dumping some bags into the sea along


Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003 – ss.12, 13(6) – Adaptation of sentence, when permissible – Dangerous Drugs Act – ss.30(1)(f)(II), 47(2), 5(2) – Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1994 – s.21(b) – International Convention/Treaties – Mauritius – Article 8 – Continued enforcement of sentence – Respondent convicted by Supreme Court of Mauritius under Dangerous Drugs Act, sentenced to imprisonment for 26 years – Transferred to India under the 2003 Act – His representation u/ s.13(6), 2003 Act to


Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: s.23 – Applicability of s.155(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure Code to the investigation of an offence u/s.23 of POCSO Act – Per Indira Baneerjee, J. – Procedure under Cr.P.C is not required to u/s.23 of POCSO Act which has been committed, by disclosure of the identity of victim, necessitates expeditious investigation for compliance of sub-sections (5) and (6) of s.19 of POCSO – Per J.K Maheshwari, J. – Procedure of s.155(2) Cr.P.C is required to be followed in an


Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 – s.50 – Effect of – Search conducted by Sub-Inspector and not by a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, recovery of ganja from a polythene bag on a Kanwad carried by appellant – Appellant – Relying on State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand & Anr. [2014] 3 SCR 522 and seeking to expand the scope of the observations made, the appellant contended that the option given to him to get himself searched from the Officer concerned not being part of the statute, the same could not have


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – ss.27A, 37, and 21(b)/29 – Rigours of provisions of s.37 relating to grant of bail – Inapplicability – Cocaine, a contraband drug, recovered from a motorcar with three occupants – Respondent accused – Accusation against respondent pertaining to offence u/s. 27A that he along with other co-accused hatched criminal conspiracy to implicate two occupants of the motorcar under the NDPS Act out of personal grudge – Prosecution alleged that respondent got the contraband


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.2(xvii)(a) and (b) and s.15 – Conviction in relation to ‘poppy straw’ – ‘Poppy straw’ defined to mean all parts of ‘opium poppy’ except the seeds – ‘Opium poppy’ defined As per sub-clause (a) of Clause (xvii) of s.2 of the 1985 Act, ‘opium poppy’ means the plant of the species ‘papaver somniferum L’ – As per sub-clause (b) thereof, ‘opium poppy’ would also mean the plant of any other species of ‘papaver’


Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988: s. 3(1) – Power to make orders detaining certain persons – FIRs against the appellant for the offences punishable u/ss. 22(b)/22(C)/29 and 21(B) of illegal trafficking of the narcotic drugs and that he is a habitual offender – Detention order by the Government – Writ petition challenging the legality and validity of the detention order – Dismissed by the High Court – On appeal, held: There was delay in passing the


Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 – Quashing of F.I.R. and charge sheet – Non Reporting of Sexual Assault – FIR registered against unidentified person(s) on the accusation of commission of sexual offences against minor tribal girls who were residing – Respondent is the medical practitioner who was appointed for treatment of the girls in the said girl’s hostel – He was arraigned as the sixth accused thereunder, essentially for the failure to report the commission of the offence under the POCSO Act, punishable u/s.21 (1) the


Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 302, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(m), 363, 366, 376A – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) – ss. 5 (i), 5 (m), 6 – Evidence Act, 1872 – s. 106 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss. 304, sexual assault on the young child-victim – Appellant-accused along with one another accused person was convicted for death sentence and life imprisonment, respectively, by the trial court for the offences u/ ss. 302, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(m), 363, 366 IPC r/w. s. 5(i) r/w. s. 6 and s.5(m) r/w.


HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the Single Judge of the High Court was justifi ed in granting bail to the respondent-accused in connection with the FIR registered against them by the appellant-uncle of the minor girl alleging gang rape, threat of making video of rape recorded viral and u/ss. 376D, 384, 506 IPC, s. 3 to 6 of POCSO Act, s. 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and s. 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 439 – Special powers of High Court or Court of


Bail – Denial of – When not proper – Appellant charged for commission of offences u/s. 20(b)(ii)(C), NDPS Act had been in custody for two years and 11 months – Bail denied – On appeal, held: The fact that the co-accused who was released on bail did not surrender Impugned order set aside – Matter to be reconsidered by the High Court – Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.20(b)(ii)(C). CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No.1578 of 2023. From the Judgment and Order dated 20.01.2023 of the High Court


HEADNOTES Issues for consideration: (i) When an arrestee is forwarded to the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 19(3) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, whether writ of Habeus Corpus would lie; (ii) Whether s.41 CrPC has got any made under PMLA, 2002; (iii) The actual import of Section 167(2) of the CrPC, 1973 as to whether the 15 days period of custody in favour of the police should be only within the fi rst 15 days of remand or spanning over the entire period of investigation - 60 or 90 days, as the case may be, as a


Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: ss. 6, 5 clause (m) – Aggravated penetrative sexual assault – Punishment for – Prosecution case that accused had put his penis into mouth of the victim aged about 10 years and discharged semen – Conviction u/s. 377 and the POCSO Act, and sentenced accordingly – However, the High Court held that the act committed by the accused was of penetrative sexual assault punishable u/s. 4 and reduced the sentence – Correctness of – Held: Accused committed an offence of aggravated penetrative sexual


HEADNOTES Issues for consideration : The contention raised was that the High Court erred in holding the appellant guilty of off ence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) as Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not contended that the High Court committed error in recording the fi nding that Section 50 of the NDPS Act was not applicable in the present case as the recovery of the contraband substance was not made as a result of the personal search of the accused but on account of the search of his bag. The


Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 – Claim of Juvenility – Appellant convicted for various offences under IPC and POCSO Act was awarded death sentence – Death sentence affirmed by High Court – During the pendency of the present appeals, appellant Trial Court was directed to submit report after due inquiry – Report submitted, appellant’s date of birth was found to be conclusively proved as 25.07.2002 – Date of incident being 15.12.2017, the appellant was aged 15 years 04 months and 20 days on the date of the incident


Criminal Law – Investigation by CBI – When cannot be directed – Appellant no.1 accused of indulging in sale of psychotropic NDPS substance – It is the case of the appellant no.1 that while he was travelling with regard to illegally abducted, detained and a case under NDPS was foisted on him – Appellant no.1 and his father-appellant no.2 filed writ petition before High Court inter alia seeking direction to transfer the investigation to the CBI, which was declined – Revision petition filed by the


Border Security Force Act, 1968 – Appellant-Commandant in Border Security Force was sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment; imposed fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and dismissed from service for allegedly permitting smuggling of contraband goods from India to Pakistan from his control – Held: Though in the armed forces, including the paramilitary forces, utmost discipline, unity of command are the sine qua non, the doctrine of proportionality still holds the field – In the present case, there is no direct evidence against the appellant – Except


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.37 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.436A – Appellant accused of committing offences punishable under NDPS Act has been in custody since 2015, if entitled to bail – Held: Recovery of ganja was made from the behest, and on the statement of one of the co-accused – Prosecution relied on that statement, as well as the confessional statement of the appellant – In addition, it also relied on the bank statements of one of the co-accused who allegedly disclosed that money used to be transferred


HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Whether the High Court erred in confi rming the conviction and death sentence passed by trial court against appellant- accused for off ences punishable u/ss.302, 376, IPC and s.4, POCSO Act, 2012, despite serious lapses in the entire investigation. Penal Code, of Children from Sexual Off ences Act, 2012 – s.4 – Serious lapses in investigation, confi rmation of conviction and death sentence – Propriety: Held: s.162, CrPC does not prevent a Judge from looking into the record of the police investigation – Being a case of rape


Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302, 201 and s.84 – Murder – Disappearance of evidence – Circumstantial evidence – Appreciation of – Plea of mental incapacity – Tenability – Allegations against appellant that, he took his two sons, aged about 9 years and canal, strangulated them to death, and threw their dead bodies into the canal – Trial court held appellant guilty u/ss.302 and 201 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment – High Court upheld the conviction and sentence – Held: There is no infirmity in the findings concurrently


Penal Code, 1860 – ss.302, 364, 201 – The prosecution case was that the victim ‘H’, aged about 7 years, went missing on 8.10.1999 – On 10.10.1999, his dead body was found in the sugarcane field of ‘Y’ in Village – The victim’s father (PW-1) recorded on 21.11.1999 – In the FIR, the informant alleged that he was told by PW-3 and PW-2 that they had seen A-3 taking deceased boy ‘H’ into her house on 08.10.1999 – PW-4 told him that on 09.10.1999 at about 6 AM, he had seen ‘H’ standing along with A-1


HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: Matter pertains to admissibility in evidence of the confessional statement recorded by the Narcotics Control Bureau officers u/s. 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; and proving of possession prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s. 67 – Confession statement made by an accused u/s. 67 before an offi cer of Narcotics Control Bureau – Admissibility in evidence: Held: Statement made by an accused and recorded u/s. 67


Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 389 – The three respondents were convicted for the murder of the appellant’s brother by the Trial Court and sentenced to life imprisonment – The order of conviction and sentence passed by Trial Court was challenged in appeal by the prayed before the High Court that they be released on bail pending the final disposal of their appeals by suspending the substantive order of sentence of life imprisonment – High Court suspended sentence and ordered their release on bail – On appeal, held: The endeavour on the


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 – s.52A – Non-compliance of – Held: – In the present case, search warrant under Exhibit P-4 acknowledged the fact that procedure contemplated under the NDPS Act was not followed – Also, one of the witnesses to the while the other turned hostile – Both the witnesses to the arrest memo were not examined – The record also indicates that an order was passed by the trial Judge permitting the prosecution to keep the seized materials within the police station, to be produced at a later point of


HEADNOTES Issue for consideration: When the sentence of accused is suspended on appeal and he is released on bail, whether the High Court can cancel the bail without giving a reasonable opportunity, to the accused of being heard. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 389 – Suspension the appeal; release of appellant on bail - Appeal against conviction by the accused admitted by the High Court – Substantive sentence of the accused suspended and he was enlarged on bail – When appeal called for hearing, the High Court cancelled the bail of the accused, without giving


Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: ss. 25, 35 – Applicability of s. 25 – When – Presumption of culpable mental state u/s. 35 – When, available –On facts, truck found lying turtle and bags of powder scattered which on investigation found to be and the cleaner coming out of the truck and disclosed the name of the owner- appellant, and fled away – Conviction of the appellant u/s. 25 and imposition of imprisonment for 10 years by the courts below – On appeal, held: s. 25 provides that if an owner of a vehicle knowingly


Customs Act, 1962 – ss.123, 127B – Seized goods specified u/s.123, remedy of settlement u/s.127B if available – Held: Per Krishna Murari, J. In cases of seizure within the customs area, s.123 cannot apply and the accused is entitled to the remedy of by the Bombay High Court in Suresh Raheja case states the correct position of law – Per Sanjay Karol, J. Proviso to s.127B(1) specifies certain categories of goods that are barred from the jurisdiction of the settlement commission including goods mentioned u/s.123 and goods relating to NDPS


Constitution of India – Articles 226, 227 – Power of High Court to issue additional directions/orders in bail pleas – FIR was filed against accused u/ss.376, 506, IPC; POCSO Act, SCST Act and IT Act –FSL Report was forwarded to the appellant- Inspectorwith a note that guidelines be undertaken however, the DNA examination was not carried out – In the meantime, the accused filed his bail plea – High Courtcalled for the case-diary, but the FSL Report was not included therewith – Appellant was found guilty of dereliction of dutyand direction


Issue for Consideration Whether the Special Judge could have conducted the proceedings against the present appellant for the offence punishable u/s.58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; whether the Special Judge was justified in recording the findings against as the other police officers without even issuing notice to them. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – ss.36-A, 58 – In a trial regarding recovery of the opium from the accused persons, the Special Judge vide final judgment dated 22.02.2007


Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order of conviction and death sentence to the appellant for offences punishable u/ss.302, 364 and 377 IPC and ss. 4 and 6 of the POCSO, for committing murder and brutal sexual assault of the 4 year old ss.302, 364, 377 – Protection of Children from Sexual offences Act, 2012 – ss.4, 5, 6, 29 – Murder, kidnapping and sexual assault – Case of brutal sexual assault and murder of four year old boy – Trial court convicted and sentenced the appellant to death for


Issue for Consideration Appellant alleged to be an active member of the Popular Front of India (PFI) involved in planning to cause disturbance during the proposed visit of Prime Minister of India to Patna in 2022. Chargesheet filed against the appellant under Sections 121, 121A, 122, 153A & 18, 18A, 18B & 20, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Charges not framed yet. Appellant has undergone long incarceration, no likelihood of trial being completed in near future. High Court whether justified in denying bail. Headnotes† Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967


154 : 2024 INSC 716 Just Rights for Children Alliance & Anr. v. S. Harish & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No(s). 2161-2162 of 2024) 23 September 2024 [Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala,* J.] Issue for Consideration What is the scope of Section 15 of the Protection of Children child pornographic material is punishable under the POCSO; what is the true scope of Section 67B of the IT Act; what is the scope of Section 30 of the POCSO; what are the foundational facts necessary for invoking the statutory presumption of culpable mental state in respect of Section 15 of the


Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court was justified in affirming the judgment of the trial court convicting and sentencing the accused appellants for the charge u/s. 8(c) r/w. s.20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes Narcotic Drugs Act, 1985 – s.8(c) r/w. s.20(b)(ii)(c) – Prosecution case that PW-1-Inspector and team members intercepted a vehicle and A-1 and A-2 were present in the vehicle – It was alleged that three bundles of ganja weighing around 80 kgs found lying in the vehicle were seized in the


Issue for Consideration As per the prosecution, secret information was received by PW-2 (Intelligence Officer/Inspector) as to Accused No. 4 (husband of Accused No.1) carrying contraband from a particular route in an auto rickshaw. Said secret information was recorded by her and reported (Zonal Officer, a Gazetted Officer). The raiding party chased the said auto rickshaw however, Accused No.4 allegedly abandoned it fleeing away from the scene. On conducting the search of the said auto rickshaw, the raiding party inter alia found 1.450 Kgs charas. It eventually searched the


Issue for Consideration In a case involving recovery of huge quantity of narcotic substance (232.5 kg of ganja), wherein the Respondent-accused was indicted as being the conspirator for procurement/supply of the ganja so recovered, High Court whether justified in granting anticipatory bail in registered for the offences punishable u/ss.8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.37 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.438 – Quantity of narcotic substance


Issue for Consideration Issue arose as regards whether a third party to a criminal proceeding got locus standi to challenge the order quashing the FIR lodged against the teacher by the father of the minor victim under the Penal Code, POCSO Act and SC/ST Act, for sexually assaulting the minor based on a compromise arrived at by the parties, in a Special Leave Petition u/Art.136; and whether the power to quash criminal proceedings or FIR in regard to heinous and serious offences having serious impact on society, is exercisable merely because the offender and victim or parents of the


Issue for Consideration Respondent no.1 was released on bail by the High Court for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Procedure, 1973 – s.439 – Bail – The case of the prosecution is that one accused viz. K (President of a Society), in connivance with the co-accused, misappropriated an amount of ₹79,54,26,963/- – Further case of the prosecution that respondent no.1 is a


Issue for Consideration The appellant was convicted for offences punishable u/ss. 450, 376(2)(i), 376D, 376A and 302 r/w. s.34 of IPC and s.5(g)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) awarding death penalty u/ss. 376A and 302 IPC and of the IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years u/s. 450 of the IPC. Headnotes† Penal Code, 1860 – ss.450, 376(2)(i), 376D, 376A and 302 r/w. s. 34 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – s.5(g)/6 – Appellant contended that the instant case


Issue for Consideration Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the accused solely on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to the mandate under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), NDPS Act, and without taking in view the quantity of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.37 – Recording a finding mandated u/s.37 is sine qua non for granting bail to accused under the Act – High Court erred in granting bail to accused solely on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to


Issue for Consideration The appellant who was convicted for offence u/ss. 3(a) r/w s. 4 of the POCSO Act, and was awarded the sentence of ten years RI alongwith a fine, the quantum of sentence awarded, if justified. Headnotes Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – ss. 3(a) Quantum of sentence – Conviction of the appellant for offences u/ss. 3(a)/4 and sentenced to ten years RI alongwith a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with a default clause to undergo SI for three months alongwith the compensation of Rs One Lakh to the victim by the courts below – In appeal before


Issue for Consideration High Court, if justified in disturbing the custody of the child, aged one year and five months at the time of passing the order, by handing over the custody of the child to her father and paternal side relatives from the custody of her maternal – Art. 226 – Writ of Habeas Corpus under, seeking custody of minor – Minor child aged 11 months, in custody of maternal side relatives after the unatural death of her mother – Arrest of father in connection with mother’s death, however later released on bail –


Issue for Consideration Appellant-accused, a Child in Conflict with Law on the date of the incident was convicted and sentenced u/ss.363, 342, 302, 201 r/w 302, IPC and s.6, POCSO Act. Trial, conviction and sentence of the appellant, if was vitiated on account of non-adherence to of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Headnotes Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – ss.3, 9, 15, 18, 19 – Despite the appellant-accused having been found to be a juvenile and thus, a Child in Conflict with Law (CICL) on


Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Interpretation of: Held: The provisions of NDPS Act are required to be interpreted keeping in mind the Act; as also the impact on the society as a whole – It has to be interpreted literally and not liberally, which may ultimately frustrate the object, purpose and Preamble of the Act. [Para 39(i)] Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.37 – Nature of: Held: While


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_687' aria-label="/57296/2021 of MANOJ RAI .Array[93]. The Narcotics Control Bureau, Patna throug The Union of India. pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('687','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010642962021_1_2022-11-15.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >/57296/2021 of MANOJ RAI Vs The Narcotics Control Bureau, Patna throug The Union of India.</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56946 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna ====================================================== Vipin Kumar S/O Sri Navdeep Rai R/O Village- Kutubpur, P.S.- Bidupur, Distt.-
 CNR : BRHC010642962021 | Date of registration : 27-09-2021 | Decision Date : 15-11-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_728' aria-label="CR. MISC./2236/2022 of GANGA RAI @ GANGA PRASAD @ GANJA PRASAD .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('728','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010008282022_1_2022-07-25.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./2236/2022 of GANGA RAI @ GANGA PRASAD @ GANJA PRASAD Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2236 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2020 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== GANGA RAI @ GANGA PRASAD @ GANJA PRASAD Son of Late Ram Sawaroop Singh @ Ram Sawrup Rai Resident of
 CNR : BRHC010008282022 | Date of registration : 17-01-2022 | Decision Date : 25-07-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_322' aria-label="CWJC/9237/2021 of Rakesh Kumar Sharma .Array[93]. The Chairman, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('322','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010225022021_1_2022-07-12.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CWJC/9237/2021 of Rakesh Kumar Sharma Vs The Chairman, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA,MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9237 of 2021 ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Male, aged about 56 years, S/o Late Ramanand Sharma, R/o Dr. Zakir Hussain Institute Campus, Hartali More, Bailey Road, P.S. - Kotwali, District-
 CNR : BRHC010225022021 | Date of registration : 08-04-2021 | Decision Date : 12-07-2022 | Disposal Nature : WITHDRAWN
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1317' aria-label="CR. MISC./29764/2021 of SANJAY YADAV .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1317','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010266062021_1_2022-01-12.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./29764/2021 of SANJAY YADAV Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 29764 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-483 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Sanjay Yadav, aged about 40 years, Male Son of Rano Yadav. 2. Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Yadav,
 CNR : BRHC010266062021 | Date of registration : 03-06-2021 | Decision Date : 12-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_410' aria-label="CWJC/3176/2022 of Gayatri Narayan Construction Pvt. Ltd. .Array[93]. The Chairman and Managing Director, Food Corporation of India pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('410','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010130432022_1_2022-09-30.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CWJC/3176/2022 of Gayatri Narayan Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Chairman and Managing Director, Food Corporation of India</button>
Judge : THE CHIEF JUSTICE -,MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3176 of 2022 ====================================================== Gayatri Narayan Construction Pvt. Ltd. through its Director, Gayatri Narayan, female, aged about 51 years, D/O- Bansh Narayan, R/O- B-2 Vinita Villa, Bailey Road,
 CNR : BRHC010130432022 | Date of registration : 23-02-2022 | Decision Date : 30-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : DISPOSED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_110' aria-label="CR. MISC./14446/2021 of RAJ KUMAR YADAV .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('110','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010032522021_1_2022-01-11.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./14446/2021 of RAJ KUMAR YADAV Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14446 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2020 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Raj Kumar Yadav, Male aged about 36 years, Son of Baguli Yadav. Resident of Village- Charkapathar, P.S
 CNR : BRHC010032522021 | Date of registration : 22-02-2021 | Decision Date : 11-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2108' aria-label="CR. APP (SJ)/1130/2022 of MOHAN YADAV @ MOHAN KUMAR YADAV .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2108','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010251762022_1_2022-06-22.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. APP (SJ)/1130/2022 of MOHAN YADAV @ MOHAN KUMAR YADAV Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1130 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2020 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Mohan Yadav @ Mohan Kumar Yadav, male, aged about 30 years, Son of Neti Yadav Resident of village -
 CNR : BRHC010251762022 | Date of registration : 11-04-2022 | Decision Date : 22-06-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_296' aria-label="CR. MISC./16315/2021 of AKASH SINGH @ AKASH KUMAR .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('296','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010054572021_1_2022-02-08.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./16315/2021 of AKASH SINGH @ AKASH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16315 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2020 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Akash Singh @ Akash Kumar, aged about 21 years, male, S/o Akhilesh Singh @ Mahaldar, R/o
 CNR : BRHC010054572021 | Date of registration : 02-03-2021 | Decision Date : 08-02-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1748' aria-label="CR. MISC./36246/2022 of RAJA KUMAR @ RAJABABU .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1748','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010501332022_1_2022-09-23.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./36246/2022 of RAJA KUMAR @ RAJABABU Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36246 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2022 Thana- SHYAMPUR BHATHA District- Sheohar ====================================================== RAJA KUMAR @ RAJABABU aged about 23 years son of Anoj Singh @ Anoj Kumar Singh, resident
 CNR : BRHC010501332022 | Date of registration : 12-07-2022 | Decision Date : 23-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1' aria-label="CWJC/5060/2021 of M/s Kumar Distributors Pvt Ltd., .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010067242021_1_2022-02-22.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CWJC/5060/2021 of M/s Kumar Distributors Pvt Ltd., Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH,MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5060 of 2021 ====================================================== M/s Kumar Distributors Pvt Ltd., Bailey Road, Near Shaguna More, Patna- 801503 (Opp DAV School), through its Director, Vikash Singh Male, aged about 42 Years, Son of
 CNR : BRHC010067242021 | Date of registration : 12-02-2021 | Decision Date : 22-02-2022 | Disposal Nature : DISMISSED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2245' aria-label="CR. MISC./32490/2022 of RAM PRASAD MANDAL .Array[93]. The Union of India through the Secretary, Mnistry of Home, Narcotic Drugs Control Bureau, New Delhi pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2245','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010450292022_1_2022-09-01.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./32490/2022 of RAM PRASAD MANDAL Vs The Union of India through the Secretary, Mnistry of Home, Narcotic Drugs Control Bureau, New Delhi</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29444 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2022 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Arzu Rain Son Of Subhan Rain Resident Of Hanuman Nagar , Ward No 11, P.S- Sursand , Dist-
 CNR : BRHC010450292022 | Date of registration : 23-06-2022 | Decision Date : 01-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_914' aria-label="CR. MISC./2642/2022 of PAPPU SAHNI .Array[93]. The Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs Narcotics Control Deptt. , Patna. pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('914','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010003242022_1_2022-05-25.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./2642/2022 of PAPPU SAHNI Vs The Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs Narcotics Control Deptt. , Patna.</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2642 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== PAPPU SAHNI Son of Suresh Sahani Resident of Village - Sumerpati, P.O.-
 CNR : BRHC010003242022 | Date of registration : 20-01-2022 | Decision Date : 25-05-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_602' aria-label="CR. MISC./17187/2021 of MD MANSUR  @ BAILUN .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('602','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010071592021_1_2022-03-07.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./17187/2021 of MD MANSUR  @ BAILUN Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17187 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2020 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Md Mansur @ Bailun, aged about 55 years, Male, Son of Md. Isharail Resident of Village -
 CNR : BRHC010071592021 | Date of registration : 04-03-2021 | Decision Date : 07-03-2022 | Disposal Nature : WITHDRAWN
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2939' aria-label="CR. MISC./69395/2021 of PREM KUMAR SINGH @ TIGER @ PREM SINGH TIGER .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2939','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010832412021_1_2022-11-16.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./69395/2021 of PREM KUMAR SINGH @ TIGER @ PREM SINGH TIGER Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69395 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2018 Thana- AURAI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Prem Kumar Singh @ Tiger @ Prem Singh Tiger, aged about 44 years, S/o Late Yugal Kishor Singh
 CNR : BRHC010832412021 | Date of registration : 14-12-2021 | Decision Date : 16-11-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1376' aria-label="CR. MISC./16731/2021 of UPENDRA YADAV @ UPENDRA KUMAR @ UPENDRA KUMAR YADAV .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1376','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010073782021_1_2022-01-12.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./16731/2021 of UPENDRA YADAV @ UPENDRA KUMAR @ UPENDRA KUMAR YADAV Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 16731 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2019 Thana- DUMRAO District- Buxar ====================================================== Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Kumar Yadav, Male, aged about 22 years, Son of Mahesh Singh
 CNR : BRHC010073782021 | Date of registration : 03-03-2021 | Decision Date : 12-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1548' aria-label="CR. MISC./41084/2021 of CHANDANI DEVI .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1548','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010437822021_1_2022-01-12.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./41084/2021 of CHANDANI DEVI Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 41084 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2020 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1. Chandani Devi, Female, aged about 32 years, Wife of Bablu Singh. 2. Bablu Singh, Male, aged
 CNR : BRHC010437822021 | Date of registration : 24-07-2021 | Decision Date : 12-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2194' aria-label="CR. MISC./30610/2021 of PRAVEEN SONI @ PARBINDA .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2194','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010254882021_1_2022-03-02.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./30610/2021 of PRAVEEN SONI @ PARBINDA Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30610 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-544 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Praveen Soni @ Parbinda, aged about 35 years, male, S/o Late Asharfi Sah R/o
 CNR : BRHC010254882021 | Date of registration : 05-06-2021 | Decision Date : 02-03-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_997' aria-label="CR. MISC./11216/2021 of SUBODH KUMAR .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('997','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010745862020_1_2022-01-13.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./11216/2021 of SUBODH KUMAR Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11216 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2018 Thana- NAYA RAM NAGAR District- Munger ====================================================== 1. Subodh Kumar, aged about 28 years, Male Son of Jagdish Mahto, Resident of Bhattha, Dhira
 CNR : BRHC010745862020 | Date of registration : 08-02-2021 | Decision Date : 13-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2394' aria-label="CR. MISC./25412/2022 of RAKESH MAHTO @ RAKESH CHOUHAN @ RAKESH KUMAR MAHTO @ CHOUHAN .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2394','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010257342022_1_2022-07-06.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./25412/2022 of RAKESH MAHTO @ RAKESH CHOUHAN @ RAKESH KUMAR MAHTO @ CHOUHAN Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25412 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2020 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== Rakesh Mahto @ Rakesh Chouhan @ Rakesh Kumar Mahto @ Chouhan, aged about 36 years
 CNR : BRHC010257342022 | Date of registration : 17-05-2022 | Decision Date : 06-07-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2714' aria-label="CR. MISC./18117/2021 of BACHCHU MANJHI .Array[93]. Union of India Through Department of Narcotics. pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2714','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010079142021_1_2022-03-30.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./18117/2021 of BACHCHU MANJHI Vs Union of India Through Department of Narcotics.</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18117 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== BACHCHU MANJHI S/o Late Mangal Manjhi R/o Vill- Bibipura Mushahari, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt-
 CNR : BRHC010079142021 | Date of registration : 08-03-2021 | Decision Date : 30-03-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_156' aria-label="CR. MISC./14386/2022 of CHHABILAL MANDAL @ CHABILAL MANDAL .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('156','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010173572022_1_2022-09-06.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./14386/2022 of CHHABILAL MANDAL @ CHABILAL MANDAL Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14386 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2021 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Chhabilal Mandal @ Chabilal Mandal, aged about 25 years, Male, Son of Bijay Mandal, Resident of
 CNR : BRHC010173572022 | Date of registration : 23-03-2022 | Decision Date : 06-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_48' aria-label="CR. MISC./13690/2021 of RAHUL SINGH .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('48','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010027942021_1_2022-01-11.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./13690/2021 of RAHUL SINGH Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13690 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2019 Thana- NATWAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Rahul Singh, aged about 27 years, Male Son of Late Abhimanyu Singh, Resident of Village- Dewal,
 CNR : BRHC010027942021 | Date of registration : 20-02-2021 | Decision Date : 11-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1373' aria-label="CR. MISC./52367/2021 of DHARAMRAJ SINGH @ JUNNA .Array[93]. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, PATNA ZONAL UNIT pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1373','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010584212021_1_2022-03-24.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./52367/2021 of DHARAMRAJ SINGH @ JUNNA Vs THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, PATNA ZONAL UNIT</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52367 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== DHARAMRAJ SINGH @ JUNNA Son of Haradev Yadav @ Hardev Sadhu Resident of
 CNR : BRHC010584212021 | Date of registration : 13-09-2021 | Decision Date : 24-03-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_3308' aria-label="CR. MISC./19391/2022 of SUNNY SHAH .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('3308','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010243242022_1_2022-08-24.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./19391/2022 of SUNNY SHAH Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19391 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2021 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sunny Shah (Male) aged about 25 years, S/o RAjendra Shah R/o Village and Post- Simruan, P.S.-
 CNR : BRHC010243242022 | Date of registration : 13-04-2022 | Decision Date : 24-08-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2591' aria-label="/29323/2022 of BHUTELI SAHNI .Array[93]. The Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs Narcotic Control Bureau Karpuri Thakur pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2591','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010395282022_1_2022-09-14.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >/29323/2022 of BHUTELI SAHNI Vs The Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs Narcotic Control Bureau Karpuri Thakur</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29323 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Bhuteli Sahni Son of Late Sanjivan Sahni Resident of Village - Sumerpatti,
 CNR : BRHC010395282022 | Date of registration : 02-06-2022 | Decision Date : 14-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_389' aria-label="CR. MISC./60281/2021 of SAISTANAND RAY @ SAISTANAND RAI .Array[93]. The Union of India through Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna Zonal Unti, Patna. pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('389','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010676852021_1_2022-11-15.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./60281/2021 of SAISTANAND RAY @ SAISTANAND RAI Vs The Union of India through Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna Zonal Unti, Patna.</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56946 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna ====================================================== Vipin Kumar S/O Sri Navdeep Rai R/O Village- Kutubpur, P.S.- Bidupur, Distt.-
 CNR : BRHC010676852021 | Date of registration : 08-10-2021 | Decision Date : 15-11-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1138' aria-label="/2585/2022 of RUDAL SHARMA .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1138','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010011132022_1_2022-09-03.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >/2585/2022 of RUDAL SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2585 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2020 Thana- KADWA District- Katihar ====================================================== Rudal Sharma, Male, aged about 26 years Son of Indra Nand Sharma Resident of Village - Dhangama,
 CNR : BRHC010011132022 | Date of registration : 19-01-2022 | Decision Date : 03-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1114' aria-label="CR. MISC./11227/2021 of BINOD MANDAL .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1114','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010750232020_1_2022-01-13.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./11227/2021 of BINOD MANDAL Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11227 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2020 Thana- AMDABAD District- Katihar ====================================================== 1. Binod Mandal, aged about 35 years, Gender-Male, Son of Kishan Mandal. 2. Bablu Mandal, aged
 CNR : BRHC010750232020 | Date of registration : 09-02-2021 | Decision Date : 13-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2174' aria-label="CR. MISC./9070/2021 of GAUTAM KUMAR .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2174','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010745202020_1_2022-03-02.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./9070/2021 of GAUTAM KUMAR Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9070 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2020 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1. Gautam Kumar, aged about 27 years, Male Son of Rambhavan Ram @ Rajbhavan Ram. 2. Vishnu Kumar @
 CNR : BRHC010745202020 | Date of registration : 30-01-2021 | Decision Date : 02-03-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1584' aria-label="CR. MISC./46511/2021 of AMIT RANJAN @ AMIT KUMAR .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1584','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010518092021_1_2022-03-03.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./46511/2021 of AMIT RANJAN @ AMIT KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46511 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2012 Thana- BATH District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== AMIT RANJAN @ AMIT KUMAR , aged about 31 years, Gendr-Male, son of Vinay Mandal, resident of
 CNR : BRHC010518092021 | Date of registration : 17-08-2021 | Decision Date : 03-03-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1208' aria-label="CR. MISC./23104/2022 of RAJEEV MAHTO @ RAJEEV RANJAN KUMAR .Array[93]. The Union of Inda through the Secretary, Narcotic Drug, New Delhi. pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1208','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010313882022_1_2022-09-19.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./23104/2022 of RAJEEV MAHTO @ RAJEEV RANJAN KUMAR Vs The Union of Inda through the Secretary, Narcotic Drug, New Delhi.</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23104 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Rajeev Mahto @ Rajeev Ranjan Kumar, Son Of Raj Nandan Mahto Resident Of Village
 CNR : BRHC010313882022 | Date of registration : 30-04-2022 | Decision Date : 19-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_85' aria-label="CR. MISC./59626/2021 of RAJENDRA RAM @ RAJENDRA PRASAD .Array[93]. the Union of India through Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('85','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010686792021_1_2022-03-29.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./59626/2021 of RAJENDRA RAM @ RAJENDRA PRASAD Vs the Union of India through Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59626 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== RAJENDRA RAM @ RAJENDRA PRASAD S/o Lalit Ram R/o village- Chiksil, P.S.-
 CNR : BRHC010686792021 | Date of registration : 06-10-2021 | Decision Date : 29-03-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_283' aria-label="CR. MISC./22592/2022 of NAVIN MANDAL @ NAVIN KUMAR .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('283','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010306262022_1_2022-09-06.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./22592/2022 of NAVIN MANDAL @ NAVIN KUMAR Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14386 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2021 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Chhabilal Mandal @ Chabilal Mandal, aged about 25 years, Male, Son of Bijay Mandal, Resident of
 CNR : BRHC010306262022 | Date of registration : 28-04-2022 | Decision Date : 06-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2191' aria-label="CR. MISC./62697/2021 of RANJEET GOPE @ RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET ROY .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2191','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010739132021_1_2022-05-12.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./62697/2021 of RANJEET GOPE @ RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJEET ROY Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62697 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-389 Year-2021 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjeet Gope @ Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Roy, aged about 48 years, Male Son of Shayam Babu Gope,
 CNR : BRHC010739132021 | Date of registration : 27-10-2021 | Decision Date : 12-05-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_518' aria-label="CWJC/5341/2020 of Abhay Kumar Mishra .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('518','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010222742020_1_2022-10-10.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CWJC/5341/2020 of Abhay Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : THE CHIEF JUSTICE -,MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5341 of 2020 ====================================================== Abhay Kumar Mishra, aged about 54 years, Male, Son of Late Chandrama Mishra Resident of G1, Girjanandan Enclave, I A S Colony, Ramjaipal Path, Rupaspur, Bailey Road,
 CNR : BRHC010222742020 | Date of registration : 06-03-2020 | Decision Date : 10-10-2022 | Disposal Nature : DISPOSED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_398' aria-label="/14418/2021 of SATRUGHAN SINGH .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('398','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010035592021_1_2022-01-11.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >/14418/2021 of SATRUGHAN SINGH Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14418 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2020 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar ====================================================== Satrughan Singh, aged about 51 years, Male Son of Late Parmeshwar Singh, Resident of Village -
 CNR : BRHC010035592021 | Date of registration : 22-02-2021 | Decision Date : 11-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1485' aria-label="CR. MISC./10780/2021 of MANISH KUMAR .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1485','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010732712020_1_2022-02-10.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./10780/2021 of MANISH KUMAR Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10780 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-538 Year-2020 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Manish Kumar, aged about 20 years, male, S/o Ramnath Chaudhary @ Bhulan Chaudhary, R/o village-
 CNR : BRHC010732712020 | Date of registration : 05-02-2021 | Decision Date : 10-02-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2543' aria-label="CR. MISC./23848/2022 of SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA @ SUNIL SAH @ BABLU SAH .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2543','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010305552022_1_2022-11-09.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./23848/2022 of SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA @ SUNIL SAH @ BABLU SAH Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23848 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2020 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Gupta @ Sunil Sah @ Bablu Sah, aged about 31 years, Male, son of Ramayan
 CNR : BRHC010305552022 | Date of registration : 07-05-2022 | Decision Date : 09-11-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_233' aria-label="CR. MISC./40381/2021 of RAUSHAN KUMAR @ RAUSAN MAHTO .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('233','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010430612021_1_2022-08-08.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./40381/2021 of RAUSHAN KUMAR @ RAUSAN MAHTO Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40381 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2020 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Rausan Mahto (male) aged about 31 years S/O Kameshwar Mahto R/O Village-
 CNR : BRHC010430612021 | Date of registration : 20-07-2021 | Decision Date : 08-08-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_726' aria-label="CWJC/438/2022 of M/s Jai Maa Service .Array[93]. The State of Bank of India, SARB, Patna pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('726','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010907492021_1_2022-02-21.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CWJC/438/2022 of M/s Jai Maa Service Vs The State of Bank of India, SARB, Patna</button>
Judge : THE CHIEF JUSTICE -,MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.438 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s Jai Maa Service through its Prop. Smt. Reena Singh (F), aged about 48 years, W/o Sri Chunnu Singh, Resident of Lane No.8, Bailey Road, Rukanpura, Vijay Nagar, P.S.-
 CNR : BRHC010907492021 | Date of registration : 07-01-2022 | Decision Date : 21-02-2022 | Disposal Nature : DISPOSED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_967' aria-label="CR. MISC./20890/2022 of ANAND KUMAR SINGH .Array[93]. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, PATNA pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('967','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010280572022_1_2022-09-05.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./20890/2022 of ANAND KUMAR SINGH Vs THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, PATNA</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20890 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== ANAND KUMAR SINGH SON OF RAJAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- MASARH, P.S.- UDWANT NAGAR,
 CNR : BRHC010280572022 | Date of registration : 20-04-2022 | Decision Date : 05-09-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1226' aria-label="REQ. CASE/76/2021 of Poly Kittu Imagings Pvt. Ltd. .Array[93]. The United India Insurance Company Ltd., pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1226','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010780432021_1_2022-01-12.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >REQ. CASE/76/2021 of Poly Kittu Imagings Pvt. Ltd. Vs The United India Insurance Company Ltd.,</button>
Judge : THE CHIEF JUSTICE -
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA REQUEST CASE No.76 of 2021 ====================================================== Poly Kittu Imagings Pvt. Ltd. Rep. through the Director - Dr. Pramod Kumar, Male, Aged about 54 years, S/o Bindesh Kumar Singh, at - A - 301-302, Bailey Kunj Apartment, Mazar Gali, Near
 CNR : BRHC010780432021 | Date of registration : 13-12-2021 | Decision Date : 12-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : DISPOSED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1648' aria-label="CR. APP (SJ)/4156/2021 of JUGANU SINGH .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1648','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010686612021_1_2022-02-16.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. APP (SJ)/4156/2021 of JUGANU SINGH Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4156 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2020 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Juganu Singh, aged about 27 years, male, S/o- Late Ashok Singh Resident of Village- Ekbalganj,
 CNR : BRHC010686612021 | Date of registration : 04-10-2021 | Decision Date : 16-02-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_193' aria-label="CR. MISC./14439/2021 of ASHO RAI @ ASHO KUMAR  @ ASHA KUMAR RAI .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('193','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010037972021_1_2022-01-11.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./14439/2021 of ASHO RAI @ ASHO KUMAR  @ ASHA KUMAR RAI Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 14439 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-525 Year-2017 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Asho Rai @ Asho Kumar @ Asha Kumar Rai, aged about 45 years, Male, Son of Daun Rai @ Dauan
 CNR : BRHC010037972021 | Date of registration : 22-02-2021 | Decision Date : 11-01-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1760' aria-label="CR. MISC./66722/2021 of CHHAPPAN KUMAR @ SANJAY .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1760','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010798972021_1_2022-02-16.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./66722/2021 of CHHAPPAN KUMAR @ SANJAY Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66722 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2020 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Chhappan Kumar @ Sanjay, aged about 36 years, male, S/o Suresh Bind @ Maruti R/o village-
 CNR : BRHC010798972021 | Date of registration : 30-11-2021 | Decision Date : 16-02-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1486' aria-label="CR. MISC./30939/2021 of SANTOSH CHOUDHARY .Array[93]. THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1486','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010291312021_1_2022-04-22.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./30939/2021 of SANTOSH CHOUDHARY Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30939 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2011 Thana- SRINAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Santosh Chaudhary, male, aged about 38 years. 2. Oshier Chaudhary, male, aged about 35
 CNR : BRHC010291312021 | Date of registration : 07-06-2021 | Decision Date : 22-04-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2948' aria-label="CR. MISC./70544/2022 of PAPPU SAHNI .Array[93]. The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs Narcotics Control Deptt., Patna pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2948','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC011017692022_1_2022-12-14.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./70544/2022 of PAPPU SAHNI Vs The Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs Narcotics Control Deptt., Patna</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70544 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== PAPPU SAHNI S/o Late Suresh Sahani R/v- Sumerpati, Post- Sitalpur, P.S.-
 CNR : BRHC011017692022 | Date of registration : 09-12-2022 | Decision Date : 14-12-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1350' aria-label="CR. MISC./24751/2022 of ASGAR .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1350','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010339472022_1_2022-11-14.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./24751/2022 of ASGAR Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24751 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2022 Thana- AAJAM NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== ASGAR, aged about 35 years(M), Son of Shek Aainuddin, Resident of Village-Khoura, Dakol,
 CNR : BRHC010339472022 | Date of registration : 12-05-2022 | Decision Date : 14-11-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2788' aria-label="CR. MISC./13259/2022 of VEERESH .Array[93]. The Union of India through the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Patna pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2788','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010148962022_1_2022-12-14.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./13259/2022 of VEERESH Vs The Union of India through the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Patna</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13259 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== VEERESH S/o Raj Pal R/o village- Rampur, Bujurag Aonia, P.S.- Bhamora, District-
 CNR : BRHC010148962022 | Date of registration : 11-03-2022 | Decision Date : 14-12-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court


<button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_884' aria-label="CR. MISC./4367/2022 of JEEVAK SINGH .Array[93]. The State of Bihar pdf"  class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('884','','court/cnrorders/patnahcucisdb94/orders/BRHC010035302022_1_2022-06-08.pdf#page=&search=%20'); >CR. MISC./4367/2022 of JEEVAK SINGH Vs The State of Bihar</button>
Judge : MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
 COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4367 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2021 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Jeevak Singh, aged about 22 years, Male Son of Yogendra Singh, Resident of Village Rattichak,
 CNR : BRHC010035302022 | Date of registration : 31-01-2022 | Decision Date : 08-06-2022 | Disposal Nature : BAIL REJECTED
Court : Patna High Court