Datasets:
Add eval-200 README
Browse files
FormulaCascade_Benchmark_eval_200/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# FormulaCascade Benchmark — Evaluation Subset (eval-200, v2)
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
This is a 200-task stratified evaluation subset of the full FormulaCascade Benchmark (11,171 tasks).
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
## Sampling Design (v2)
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
- **200 tasks total**: 50 per tier × 4 tiers
|
| 8 |
+
- **Balanced**: 25 single-sheet + 25 cross-sheet per tier
|
| 9 |
+
- **Quality-filtered**: all tasks are verdict=RELEASE, total QC score ≥ 26, D3 ≥ 3, D4 ≥ 3
|
| 10 |
+
- **Diverse**: maximizes domain and formula-family coverage within each tier
|
| 11 |
+
- **Reproducible**: sampled with seed=42 using `resample_eval200_v2.py`
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
### v2 Improvements over v1
|
| 14 |
+
- All 200 tasks are `verdict=RELEASE` (v1 had 31 HOLD tasks in T4_STANDARD)
|
| 15 |
+
- Minimum QC score raised to 26/30 (v1 allowed 25)
|
| 16 |
+
- T2_HARD: removed extreme outliers with total_masked > 2000
|
| 17 |
+
- T4_STANDARD: depth-stratified (depth=2: 70%, depth=3–4: 20%, depth=5+: 10%) for better differentiation from T3_MEDIUM
|
| 18 |
+
- T1_FRONTIER depth=2 tasks require total_masked ≥ 50 to ensure genuine difficulty
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
## Tier Distribution
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
| Tier | Count | Single | Cross | Depth Range | Avg Depth | QC Score (avg) |
|
| 23 |
+
|------|-------|--------|-------|-------------|-----------|----------------|
|
| 24 |
+
| T1_FRONTIER | 50 | 25 | 25 | 2–45 | 10.5 | 27.6 |
|
| 25 |
+
| T2_HARD | 50 | 25 | 25 | 3–4 | 3.4 | 27.8 |
|
| 26 |
+
| T3_MEDIUM | 50 | 25 | 25 | 2 | 2.0 | 27.8 |
|
| 27 |
+
| T4_STANDARD | 50 | 25 | 25 | 2–8 | 2.7 | 26.0 |
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
## Domain & Formula Coverage
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
| Domain | Count | Formula Family | Count |
|
| 32 |
+
|--------|-------|----------------|-------|
|
| 33 |
+
| general | 35 | arithmetic | 68 |
|
| 34 |
+
| finance | 34 | conditional | 42 |
|
| 35 |
+
| sales | 31 | aggregation | 39 |
|
| 36 |
+
| data_analysis | 28 | lookup | 33 |
|
| 37 |
+
| education | 19 | ranking | 6 |
|
| 38 |
+
| operations | 19 | | |
|
| 39 |
+
| hr | 17 | | |
|
| 40 |
+
| engineering | 17 | | |
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
## Directory Structure
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
```
|
| 45 |
+
FormulaCascade_Benchmark_eval_200/
|
| 46 |
+
├── README.md
|
| 47 |
+
├── manifest_eval200.jsonl # 200-task metadata (v2)
|
| 48 |
+
├── fcb_id_mapping.json # FCB-ID ↔ task_id mapping (200 tasks)
|
| 49 |
+
├── eval200_summary_v2.json # sampling statistics summary
|
| 50 |
+
├── T1_FRONTIER/
|
| 51 |
+
│ ├── release/FCB-NNNNN/ # task_description.json + task-NNNNN.xlsx
|
| 52 |
+
│ └── internal/FCB-NNNNN/ # full provenance + ground truth
|
| 53 |
+
├── T2_HARD/
|
| 54 |
+
├── T3_MEDIUM/
|
| 55 |
+
└── T4_STANDARD/
|
| 56 |
+
```
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
## Usage
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
For evaluation, use `release/FCB-NNNNN/task_description.json` (prompt) and
|
| 61 |
+
`release/FCB-NNNNN/task-NNNNN.xlsx` (masked workbook) as solver input.
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
Ground truth is in `internal/FCB-NNNNN/ground_truth_target.json` (layer-1 target cells).
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
See the full benchmark README for evaluation protocol details.
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
## Tier Counts
|
| 68 |
+
- **T1_FRONTIER**: 50 tasks (all RELEASE, depth 2–45, avg depth 10.5)
|
| 69 |
+
- **T2_HARD**: 50 tasks (all RELEASE, depth 3–4)
|
| 70 |
+
- **T3_MEDIUM**: 50 tasks (all RELEASE, depth 2)
|
| 71 |
+
- **T4_STANDARD**: 50 tasks (all RELEASE, depth 2–8)
|