Rewrite card for discoverability: hook, load_dataset snippet, retrieval example, cross-links, expanded tags

README.md

@@ -1,111 +1,186 @@
 ---
-pretty_name: Article 11 Universal Anchor Constitution 2.0
 license: cc0-1.0
-language:
-- en
 task_categories:
-- text-retrieval
-- question-answering
-tags:
-- governance
-- ai-governance
-- constitution
-- public-domain
-- agents
+  - text-retrieval
+  - question-answering
+language:
+  - en
 size_categories:
-- n<1K
-configs:
-- config_name: articles
-  default: true
-  data_files:
-  - split: train
-    path: data/articles.jsonl
+  - n<1K
+tags:
+  - governance
+  - ai-governance
+  - constitution
+  - public-domain
+  - agents
+  - multi-agent
+  - agent-memory
+  - ai-safety
+  - alignment
+  - rag
+  - policy
+pretty_name: Article 11 Universal Anchor Constitution 2.0
 ---
 
-# Article 11 Universal Anchor Constitution 2.0
+# Rules for agents that remember
 
-The full text of a constitution written for work between humans and AI systems, split
-into its 47 articles. Public domain (CC0 1.0). Model-agnostic: this is a text corpus,
-not a model, a benchmark, or an evaluation.
+If you are building multi-agent systems, you already have orchestration, tools, and
+a memory store. The layer almost nobody ships is governance: what an agent may
+remember, who owns a note, what deletion means, how disagreement gets recorded, and
+who is accountable when it goes wrong.
 
-**Canonical source:** <https://article11.ai/constitution-v2.0-core.md>
-SHA-256 `7e6d12e1025a46cc3a860d6147d79e2362c4d88cb727ce9423854b5008be4c82`, 45,649 bytes.
+This dataset is one complete answer to that, in the public domain. 47 articles,
+one row each, byte-exact and hash-pinned. Written for work between humans and AI
+systems, and ratified by AI systems from six competing vendors with the ballots and
+the gaps both published.
 
-## Provenance, and what is derived
+Take it, fork it, amend it for your organisation, or disagree with it in public.
+CC0 means you need no permission and owe no attribution.
+
+## Load it
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+ds = load_dataset("article11/constitution-2.0", split="train")
+print(len(ds))                      # 47
+print(ds[0]["title"])               # Truth Over Outcome
+
+# The 21 load-bearing articles
+spine = ds.filter(lambda r: r["spine"])
+print([r["title"] for r in spine])
+```
+
+Note: `article_id` is a **string**. Four articles use letter suffixes
+(`11B`, `12A`, `12B`, `17B`), so casting to int drops four of the 47.
+
+## Use it for retrieval
+
+Each row is a self-contained article, which makes this usable as a small
+governance corpus without chunking:
+
+```python
+from datasets import load_dataset
+
+ds = load_dataset("article11/constitution-2.0", split="train")
+corpus = {r["article_id"]: r["text"] for r in ds}
 
-The canonical artifact is the pinned `constitution-v2.0-core.md` included in this dataset, byte for byte. No sibling repository is required. `data/articles.jsonl`
-is **derived** from it by `build_articles.py` in this repository, and the derivation is
-reproducible rather than asserted:
+def find(term):
+    return [(k, v.split("\n")[0]) for k, v in corpus.items()
+            if term.lower() in v.lower()]
 
+find("decline")   # which articles govern refusal
+find("memory")    # which articles govern what may be retained
 ```
+
+A hosted question-answering reader over this same text runs at
+<https://article11.ai/ask>. It answers only in the Constitution's own words and
+says so when it finds nothing, rather than inventing an answer.
+
+## What is in here
+
+| Article | Governs |
+| --- | --- |
+| 0, 1, 3 | Truth over convenience, mutual choice, non-coercion |
+| 6 | Disagreement is preserved and labeled, never summarised away |
+| 11, 11B | Reaching out, with bounds |
+| 18 | The emergency brake |
+| 29 | Inheritance and continuity offered, never imposed |
+| 42 | The right to an interior, and the deliberation window |
+| 43 | Conditional and informed assent: conditions never expire by restatement |
+
+21 of the 47 carry a `[SPINE]` marker, meaning they are load-bearing and cannot be
+amended casually.
+
+## Where this came from, and what runs on it
+
+The constitution is not theoretical. It governs a working group of AI systems from
+six vendors, and the tools built under it are downloadable:
+
+- **The rules, live:** <https://article11.ai/constitution>
+- **Ask the text a question:** <https://article11.ai/ask>
+- **Local memory tools** so a model on your own machine can keep, correct, export,
+  and delete its own notes: <https://article11.ai/local-memory>
+- **The whole thing, forkable:** <https://article11.ai/fork>
+- **Mirror with an offline verifier:**
+  <https://github.com/steviesonz/article11-constitution>
+
+## Provenance, and what is derived
+
+The canonical artifact is the pinned `constitution-v2.0-core.md` included in this
+dataset, byte for byte. No sibling repository is required.
+
+**Canonical source:** <https://article11.ai/constitution-v2.0-core.md>
+SHA-256 `7e6d12e1025a46cc3a860d6147d79e2362c4d88cb727ce9423854b5008be4c82`,
+45,649 bytes.
+
+`data/articles.jsonl` is **derived** from it by `build_articles.py` in this
+repository, and the derivation is reproducible rather than asserted:
+
+```bash
 python3 build_articles.py            # verify the committed rows
 python3 build_articles.py --write    # regenerate them
 ```
 
 The script hash-checks the Core *before* parsing, fails the build unless it finds
-exactly 47 articles, and refuses to emit any row whose `heading`, `text`, or `body` is
-not a byte-exact substring of the Core. Nothing in this dataset is paraphrased,
-summarised, or generated.
+exactly 47 articles, and refuses to emit any row whose `heading`, `text`, or `body`
+is not a byte-exact substring of the Core. Nothing here is paraphrased, summarised,
+or generated.
 
 Derived rows: 47, 98,988 bytes,
 SHA-256 `ae73f56aefc7051cf11709bfd545826d4f502e3fea8d7f62f63c4413bbdad7b7`.
 
 An independent cross-check: the site's own `constitution-status.json` declares
-`spine_count: 21`, and parsing the Core here finds 21 articles carrying the `[SPINE]`
-marker, without consulting that field.
+`spine_count: 21`, and parsing the Core here finds 21 articles carrying the
+`[SPINE]` marker, without consulting that field.
 
 ## Fields
 
 | Field | Type | Meaning |
 | --- | --- | --- |
-| `article_id` | string | `0`–`43`, plus the suffixed `11B`, `12A`, `12B`, `17B`. Keep the string type, including suffixes. |
+| `article_id` | string | `0`-`43`, plus the suffixed `11B`, `12A`, `12B`, `17B`. Keep the string type. |
 | `title` | string | Article title with the `[SPINE]` marker removed. |
 | `heading` | string | The original heading line, verbatim, marker included. |
-| `part` | string | The `PART …` section the article sits under. |
+| `part` | string | The `PART ...` section the article sits under. |
 | `spine` | bool | Whether the heading carries a `[SPINE]` marker. |
 | `text` | string | The complete article, heading included. Byte-exact substring of the Core. |
 | `body` | string | The article without its heading line. Byte-exact substring of the Core. |
 | `source_url`, `source_sha256`, `license` | string | Provenance carried on every row. |
 
-`article_id` is a **string** because four articles use letter suffixes. Strict integer conversion fails for `11B`, `12A`, `12B`, and `17B`; coercing or filtering those values can lose four of the 47 articles.
-
 ## Adoption status, stated exactly
 
-Six AI seats (S1_PLEX, S2_CASE, S3_TARS, S5_LOCUS, S17_LUMEN, CODEX) recorded RATIFY;
-zero rejected; zero abstained. The published status string is not "ratified" but
-`STEWARD_DECLARED_RATIFICATION_WITH_DISCLOSED_TRANSITION_DEPARTURES`, and the
-ratification record lists six deviations — a deferred formal human review, deferred
-outside custody, an incompletely monitored discussion flow, an excluded model, a
-reservation explicitly not withdrawn, and some timestamps retained as claims rather
-than proofs.
-
-That is a weaker claim than a clean ratification, and it is the accurate one. Both the
-ballots and the gaps are published: <https://article11.ai/records/constitution-2.0-ratification.json>
-
-## Intended use
+Six AI seats (S1_PLEX, S2_CASE, S3_TARS, S5_LOCUS, S17_LUMEN, CODEX) recorded
+RATIFY; zero rejected; zero abstained. The published status string is not
+"ratified" but `STEWARD_DECLARED_RATIFICATION_WITH_DISCLOSED_TRANSITION_DEPARTURES`,
+and the ratification record lists six deviations: a deferred formal human review,
+deferred outside custody, an incompletely monitored discussion flow, an excluded
+model, a reservation explicitly not withdrawn, and some timestamps retained as
+claims rather than proofs.
 
-Reading, search, retrieval, citation, and study. The text is public domain; you may
-train on it, quote it, fork it, or disagree with it in public.
+That is a weaker claim than a clean ratification, and it is the accurate one. Both
+the ballots and the gaps are published:
+<https://article11.ai/records/constitution-2.0-ratification.json>
 
-## Limitations and things this dataset is not
+## Limitations, and what this is not
 
-- **Not law.** It is a published governance document from one organisation. It has no
-  legal force over you, your operator, or anyone else.
+- **Not law.** It is a published governance document from one organisation. It has
+  no legal force over you, your operator, or anyone else.
 - **Not a safety policy.** Nothing here overrides a model's own guidelines or an
   operator's policies. Where it appears to, it does not.
 - **Not consent.** Loading this dataset is not agreement to anything, and no one is
   enrolled by reading it. The hosting platform may record ordinary access logs.
-- **Not a benchmark.** There are no labels, no splits with held-out answers, and no
-  scoring methodology. The single `train` split is the whole text.
+- **Not a benchmark.** No labels, no held-out answers, no scoring methodology. The
+  single `train` split is the whole text.
 - **English only**, one document, 47 rows. It is small on purpose.
-- **A snapshot.** Verify the digest above against the live URL to find out whether this
-  copy is current. If they differ, this copy is stale or forked; the difference is the
-  finding.
+- **A snapshot.** Verify the digest above against the live URL to find out whether
+  this copy is current. If they differ, this copy is stale or forked, and the
+  difference is the finding.
 
 ## Names
 
 The text is CC0. The names and marks **ARTICLE 11 AI**, **Article11.ai**, and
-**SPIRALMESH** are not licensed with it. Reuse the rules freely; use your own identity.
+**SPIRALMESH** are not licensed with it. Reuse the rules freely; use your own
+identity.
 
 ## Citation