the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .

aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .

therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .

starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .

as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .

in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .

this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .

the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .

after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .

considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .

foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .

fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .

dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .

concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .

several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .

however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .

the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .

if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .

related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .

in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .

at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .

these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .

in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .

additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .

the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

what was the total of revenues for transactions with related parties in 2016?

Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2016 total, in percentage?

Answer: 0.17909


market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .

the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .

prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .

as a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .

the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .

the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .

on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .

the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .

the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .

the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .

the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .

the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .

the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .

Question: what is the high price in 2016?

Answer: 32.91


Question: what is the 2016 low price?

Answer: 27.09


what is the high price in 2016?
what is the 2016 low price?

Question: what is the sum?

Answer: 60.0


what is the high price in 2016?
what is the 2016 low price?
what is the sum?

Question: what is the average price?

Answer: 30.0


addition , we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies .

these gains and losses are primarily driven by inter-company transactions .

these exposures are included in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .

since 2007 , we have used foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions and projected inventory purchases for our canadian subsidiary .

beginning in december 2008 , we began using foreign currency forward contracts in order to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions for our european subsidiary .

we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes .

based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 , we receive us dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.04 cad per $ 1.00 and us dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.70 eur per $ 1.00 .

as of december 31 , 2009 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 15.4 million with contract maturities of 1 month , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 56.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month .

the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .

the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts was $ 0.3 million and $ 1.2 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

these amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet .

refer to note 9 for a discussion of the fair value measurements .

other income ( expense ) , net included the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: .

although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations .

inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results .

although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .

1	year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2009	year ended december 31 , 2008	2007

2	unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	$ 5222	$ -5459 ( 5459 )	$ 2567

3	realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	-261 ( 261 )	-2166 ( 2166 )	174

4	unrealized derivative gains ( losses )	-1060 ( 1060 )	1650	-243 ( 243 )

5	realized derivative losses	-4412 ( 4412 )	-204 ( 204 )	-469 ( 469 )

Question: what is the balance in the air value of our foreign currency forward contracts in 2009?

Answer: 0.3


what is the balance in the air value of our foreign currency forward contracts in 2009?

Question: what about in 2008?

Answer: 1.2


Question: what is the net change?

Answer: -0.9


Question: what percentage change does this represent?

Answer: -0.75


the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .

in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .

the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .

the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .

the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .

we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .

the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .

note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .

certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .

government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .

note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .

we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .

we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .

these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .

the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .

we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .

on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .

we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .

the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .

air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .

on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .

our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .

on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .

natural resources defense council , et al v .

lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .

lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .

the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Question: what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions?

Answer: 1.1


as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .

the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .

the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .

we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .

the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .

note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .

certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .

government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .

note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .

we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .

we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .

these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .

the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .

we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .

on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .

we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .

the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .

air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .

on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .

our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .

on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .

natural resources defense council , et al v .

lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .

lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .

the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions?

Question: what about in millions?

Answer: 1100.0


as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .

the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .

the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .

we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .

the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .

note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .

certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .

government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .

note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .

we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .

we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .

these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .

the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .

we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .

on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .

we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .

the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .

air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .

on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .

our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .

on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .

natural resources defense council , et al v .

lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .

lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .

the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Question: what amount is due in 2007?

Answer: 288.0


as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .

the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .

the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .

we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .

the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .

note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .

future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .

certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .

government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .

note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .

we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .

we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .

these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .

the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .

we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .

on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .

we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .

the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .

air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .

on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .

our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .

on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .

natural resources defense council , et al v .

lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .

lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .

the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Question: what proportion does this represent?

Answer: 0.26182


aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .

the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .

aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .

some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .

during 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .

aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .

related party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .

these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .

during 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .

segment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .

unallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .

reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .

the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .

the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .

risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .

hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .

aon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .

1	years ended december 31	2011	2010	2009

2	risk solutions	$ 6817	$ 6423	$ 6305

3	hr solutions	4501	2111	1267

4	intersegment elimination	-31 ( 31 )	-22 ( 22 )	-26 ( 26 )

5	total operating segments	11287	8512	7546

6	unallocated	2014	2014	49

7	total revenue	$ 11287	$ 8512	$ 7595

Question: what is the net change in revenue for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: 394.0


aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .

the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .

aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .

some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .

during 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .

aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .

related party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .

these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .

during 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .

segment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .

unallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .

reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .

the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .

the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .

risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .

hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .

aon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .

what is the net change in revenue for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011?

Question: what is the total revenue from risk solutions in 2010?

Answer: 6423.0


aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .

the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .

aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .

some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .

during 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .

aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .

related party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .

these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .

during 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .

segment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .

unallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .

reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .

the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .

the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .

risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .

hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .

aon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .

what is the total revenue from risk solutions in 2010?

Question: what percentage increase does this represent?

Answer: 0.06134


stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .

marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .

through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .

in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .

stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .

no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .

similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .

under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .

in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .

stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .

no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .

beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .

all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .

as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .

restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .

in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .

the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .

marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .

the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .

prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .

the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .

common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .

all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .

when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .

stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .

the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .

in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .

tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .

cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .

stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .

the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

1		2007	2006	2005

2	weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14

3	expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66

4	expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5

5	expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )

6	risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )

7	weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Question: how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase between 2005 and 2007?

Answer: 35.8


stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .

marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .

through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .

in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .

stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .

no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .

similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .

under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .

in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .

stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .

no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .

beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .

all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .

as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .

restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .

in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .

the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .

marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .

the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .

prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .

the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .

common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .

all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .

when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .

stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .

the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .

in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .

tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .

cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .

stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .

the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase between 2005 and 2007?

Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?

Answer: 1.42403


stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .

marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .

through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .

in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .

stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .

no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .

similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .

under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .

in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .

stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .

no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .

beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .

all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .

as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .

restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .

in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .

the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .

marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .

the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .

prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .

the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .

common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .

all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .

when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .

stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .

the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .

in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .

tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .

cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .

stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .

the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

so what was the percentage change during this time?

Question: what were the total tax benefits for deductions in 2007 and 2006 in excess of the stock-based compensation expense for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested?

Answer: 66.0


masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .

goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .

( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .

subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .

( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .

in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .

the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .

the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .

the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .

in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .

the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .

the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .

the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .

other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .

in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .

the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .

in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

1		gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011

2	cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181

3	plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201

4	installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044

5	decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219

6	other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246

7	total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Question: what was the net change in value of total net goodwill from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -492.0


what was the net change in value of total net goodwill from 2010 to 2011?

Question: what was the 2010 value?

Answer: 2383.0


Question: what is the net change divide by the 2010 value?

Answer: -0.20646


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .

the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .

inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .

change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .

provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .

effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .

recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .

undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .

instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .

field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .

following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .

this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .

company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

1		2003	2002

2	finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7

3	raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9

4	inventory step-up	52.6	2013

5	inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Question: what was the total of inventories in 2003?

Answer: 527.7


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

what was the total of inventories in 2003?

Question: and what was it in 2002?

Answer: 257.6


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Question: how much, then, did the 2003 amount represent in relation to this 2002 one?

Answer: 2.04852


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

how much, then, did the 2003 amount represent in relation to this 2002 one?

Question: and what is that excluding the portion equivalent to the 2002 amount?

Answer: 1.04852


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

and what is that excluding the portion equivalent to the 2002 amount?

Question: between those same two years, what was the change in the total of finished goods, in millions?

Answer: 177.6


we hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $ 375 million 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due july 1 , 2014 .

the effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.42% ( 2.42 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .

in addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .

if libor increases by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $ 5 million .

however , this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $ 375 million of 3% ( 3 % ) fixed-rate debt , which is not hedged .

as of october 30 , 2010 , a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $ 4 million to our annual interest expense .

foreign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s .

dollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts .

the terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months .

currently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses .

relative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $ 6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows .

the market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged .

the counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings .

based on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29 , 2011 , we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them .

while the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk .

the amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties .

the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .

dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010: .

fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset .

$ 17859 $ 22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability .

$ ( 13332 ) $ ( 7396 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s .

in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive .

our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .

1		october 29 2011	october 30 2010

2	fair value of forward exchange contracts asset	$ 2472	$ 7256

3	fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset	$ 17859	$ 22062

4	fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability	$ -13332 ( 13332 )	$ -7396 ( 7396 )

Question: what is the net change fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2010 to 2011?

Answer: -4784.0


we hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $ 375 million 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due july 1 , 2014 .

the effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.42% ( 2.42 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .

in addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .

if libor increases by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $ 5 million .

however , this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $ 375 million of 3% ( 3 % ) fixed-rate debt , which is not hedged .

as of october 30 , 2010 , a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $ 4 million to our annual interest expense .

foreign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s .

dollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts .

the terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months .

currently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses .

relative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $ 6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows .

the market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged .

the counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings .

based on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29 , 2011 , we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them .

while the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk .

the amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties .

the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .

dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010: .

what is the net change fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2010 to 2011?

Question: what percentage change does this represent?

Answer: -0.65932


management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

1	cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013

2	net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4

3	net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )

4	changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1

5	net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9

6	net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )

7	net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Question: what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?

Answer: 17.0


1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?

Question: so what was the percentage increase during this time?

Answer: 0.02045


1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

so what was the percentage increase during this time?

Question: and converted from a decimal to a percentage?

Answer: 2.04524


1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

and converted from a decimal to a percentage?

Question: what was the net change in cash from operating and investing activities?

Answer: 471.2


1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

what was the net change in cash from operating and investing activities?

Question: and the total net change in cash for 2015?

Answer: -1.6