impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

1	( in millions )	2011	2010

2	fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881

3	amortized cost	100013	82329

4	net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )

5	net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Question: what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?

Answer: 303.0


the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?

Question: and what was it after tax?

Answer: 189.0


the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Question: what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?

Answer: 114.0


the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?

Question: and between that year and the previous, 2010, what was the change in the fair value of the full unrealized losses?

Answer: 17951.0


the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

and between that year and the previous, 2010, what was the change in the fair value of the full unrealized losses?

Question: what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2010?

Answer: 0.21923


market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .

the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .

berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .

( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .

dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .

regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Question: what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?

Answer: -2.63


what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?

Question: what is that divided by 100?

Answer: -0.0263


instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .

sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .

we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .

as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .

we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .

tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .

tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .

we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .

this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .

sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .

we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .

due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .

in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .

107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .

this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .

the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .

we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .

107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .

information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

1	tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590

2	consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266

3	less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )

4	plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360

5	adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822

6	non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Question: in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?

Answer: -30584.0


instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .

sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .

we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .

as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .

we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .

tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .

tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .

we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .

this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .

sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .

we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .

due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .

in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .

107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .

this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .

the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .

we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .

107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .

information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?

Question: and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?

Answer: 531822.0


instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .

sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .

we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .

as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .

we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .

tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .

tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .

we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .

this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .

sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .

we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .

due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .

in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .

107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .

this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .

the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .

we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .

107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .

information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?

Question: what, then, was that amount as a portion of this adjusted cash flow?

Answer: -0.05751


instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .

sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .

we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .

as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .

we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .

tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .

tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .

we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .

this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .

sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .

we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .

due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .

in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .

107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .

this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .

the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .

we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .

107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .

information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .

the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

what, then, was that amount as a portion of this adjusted cash flow?

Question: and what was the tower cash flow also as a portion of it?

Answer: 1.0499


american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar .

the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit .

the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal .

network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies .

the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 .

the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units .

such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded .

as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively .

rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired .

the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years .

amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) .

the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively .

notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a .

( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million .

the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) .

the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) .

as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .

the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .

1		2004	2003

2	acquired customer base and network location intangibles	$ 1369607	$ 1299521

3	deferred financing costs	89736	111484

4	acquired licenses and other intangibles	43404	43125

5	total	1502747	1454130

6	less accumulated amortization	-517444 ( 517444 )	-434381 ( 434381 )

7	other intangible assets net	$ 985303	$ 1019749

Question: what was the change in the amortization expense from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 3.9


what was the change in the amortization expense from 2007 to 2008?

Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that amortization expense in 2007, in percentage?

Answer: 0.04239


approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .

our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .

this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .

therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .

this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .

our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .

this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .

approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .

in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .

brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .

annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .

for additional financial information for each of our business segments , refer to note 18 , 201cinformation on business segments , 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials .

the table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments .

these materials are available from a number of sources .

volatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products. .

Question: in the year of 2017, what percentage of the net sales were for international markets?

Answer: 0.25


approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .

our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .

this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .

therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .

this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .

our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .

this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .

approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .

in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .

brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .

annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .

in the year of 2017, what percentage of the net sales were for international markets?

Question: and what were those net sales?

Answer: 5283.3


approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .

our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .

this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .

therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .

this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .

our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .

this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .

approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .

in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .

brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .

annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .

Question: what, then, was the amount correspondent to that percentage?

Answer: 1320.825


approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .

our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .

this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .

therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .

this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .

our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .

this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .

approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .

in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .

brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .

annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .

what, then, was the amount correspondent to that percentage?

Question: and from 2016 to that year, what was the increase in the sales of cabinets?

Answer: 69.3


approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .

our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .

this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .

therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .

this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .

this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .

our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .

this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .

approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .

this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .

in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .

in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .

brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .

annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .

and from 2016 to that year, what was the increase in the sales of cabinets?

Question: what percentage did this increase represent in relation to those sales in 2016?

Answer: 0.0289


market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .

on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse .

as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders .

dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock .

payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status .

in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .

for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

1	2010	high	low

2	quarter ended march 31	$ 44.61	$ 40.10

3	quarter ended june 30	45.33	38.86

4	quarter ended september 30	52.11	43.70

5	quarter ended december 31	53.14	49.61

6	2009	high	low

7	quarter ended march 31	$ 32.53	$ 25.45

8	quarter ended june 30	34.52	27.93

9	quarter ended september 30	37.71	29.89

10	quarter ended december 31	43.84	35.03

Question: what was the closing price of the common stock in february of 2011?

Answer: 56.73


what was the closing price of the common stock in february of 2011?

Question: and what was its highest value during the last quarter of the year before, in 2010?

Answer: 53.14


and what was its highest value during the last quarter of the year before, in 2010?

Question: by how much, then, did it change over this period?

Answer: 3.59


by how much, then, did it change over this period?

Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that highest value, in percentage?

Answer: 0.06756


and how much did this change represent in relation to that highest value, in percentage?

Question: and by the end of that period, at the date of the closing price, what was the number of outstanding shares of common stock?

Answer: 397612895.0


and by the end of that period, at the date of the closing price, what was the number of outstanding shares of common stock?

Question: considering the closing price, what was, then, their total value?

Answer: 22556579533.35


the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .

colon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .

ipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .

the total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .

certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .

holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .

dpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .

the dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .

in addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .

in september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .

as such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .

in october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .

upon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .

ipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .

in april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .

as a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

no gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .

in march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

in june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .

1	december 31,	2016	2015

2	ipalco common stock	$ 618	$ 460

3	colon quotas ( 1 )	100	2014

4	ipl preferred stock	60	60

5	other common stock	4	2014

6	dpl preferred stock	2014	18

7	total redeemable stock of subsidiaries	$ 782	$ 538

Question: what were the total annual dividend requirements in the end of the 2015 and 2016?

Answer: 3.0


_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .

colon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .

ipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .

the total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .

certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .

holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .

dpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .

the dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .

in addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .

in september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .

as such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .

in october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .

upon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .

ipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .

in april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .

as a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

no gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .

in march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

in june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .

what were the total annual dividend requirements in the end of the 2015 and 2016?

Question: and what was the amount of the ipl preferred stock?

Answer: 60.0


_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .

colon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .

ipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .

the total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .

certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .

holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .

dpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .

the dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .

in addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .

in september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .

as such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .

in october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .

upon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .

ipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .

in april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .

as a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

no gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .

in march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

in june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .

and what was the amount of the ipl preferred stock?

Question: how much, then, did those requirements represent in relation to this amount?

Answer: 0.05


_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .

colon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .

ipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .

the total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .

certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .

holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .

dpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .

the dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .

in addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .

based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .

in september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .

as such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .

in october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .

upon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .

ipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .

in april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .

as a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

no gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .

in march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .

the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .

in june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .

any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .

how much, then, did those requirements represent in relation to this amount?

Question: and between those two years, what was the variation of ipalco common stock, in millions?

Answer: 158.0


federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

1	balance december 31 2002	$ 450697000

2	additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	68125000

3	deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-4645000 ( 4645000 )

4	balance december 31 2003	514177000

5	additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	82551000

6	deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-1390000 ( 1390000 )

7	balance december 31 2004	595338000

8	additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	83656000

9	deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-15244000 ( 15244000 )

10	balance december 31 2005	$ 663750000

Question: what is the value of accumulated depreciation and amortization at the end of 2005?

Answer: 663750000.0


what is the value of accumulated depreciation and amortization at the end of 2005?

Question: what is the balance at the end of 2004?

Answer: 595338000.0


Question: what is the ratio of 2005 to 2004?

Answer: 1.11491


Question: what is that less 1?

Answer: 0.11491


increased investment in programming to support subscriber growth , higher offer costs and continued investment in presto , partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations .

net income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above , partially offset by lower income tax expense .

( b ) other equity affiliates , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies , which owns proptiger .

interest , net 2014interest , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 decreased $ 13 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , as compared to fiscal 2015 , primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility .

( see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements ) .

other , net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30 .

( a ) rea group recognized a gain of $ 29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 .

( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) .

( b ) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 and 2015 .

these write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery .

( see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. ) ( c ) in august 2014 , rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $ 104 million .

as a result of the sale , rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $ 29 million , which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other , net in the statement of operations .

income tax benefit ( expense ) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 were $ 54 million and ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) , respectively , as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $ 185 million and 34% ( 34 % ) , respectively , for fiscal 2015 .

for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 54 million on pre-tax income of $ 181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s .

the lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $ 106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s .

federal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets .

this benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s .

taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration .

in addition , the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $ 29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty .

for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2015 , the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s .

statutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates , partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions .

( see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements ) . .

1	( in millions )	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2015

2	gain on iproperty transaction ( a )	$ 29	$ 2014

3	impairment of marketable securities and cost method investments ( b )	-21 ( 21 )	-5 ( 5 )

4	gain on sale of marketable securities ( c )	2014	29

5	dividends received from cost method investments	2014	25

6	gain on sale of cost method investments	2014	15

7	other	10	11

8	total other net	$ 18	$ 75

Question: what was the decrease amount on the net interest from fiscal year 2015 to 2016?

Answer: 13.0


what was the decrease amount on the net interest from fiscal year 2015 to 2016?

Question: and what was the equivalent of that as a percentage of the 2015 net interest?

Answer: 0.23


and what was the equivalent of that as a percentage of the 2015 net interest?

Question: considering, then, that decrease amount and how much it represents in relation to this 2015 net interest, what was the full amount of this net interest?

Answer: 56.52174


considering, then, that decrease amount and how much it represents in relation to this 2015 net interest, what was the full amount of this net interest?

Question: and what was the full amount of the 2016 net interest, considering the 2015 one and how much it decreased?

Answer: 69.52174


entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .

( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .

( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .

the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .

entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .

( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .

fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .

entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .

in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .

this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .

in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .

under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .

entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .

entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .

entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .

capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

Question: what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities in 2017?

Answer: 766801.0


what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities in 2017?

Question: and what was it in 2016?

Answer: 270852.0


Question: what was, then, the change over the year?

Answer: 495949.0


what was, then, the change over the year?

Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2016 total, in percentage?

Answer: 1.83107


we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .

2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .

higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .

in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .

lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .

federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .

as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .

congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .

investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .

significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .

capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .

lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .

included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

1	cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012

2	cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161

3	cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )

4	cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )

5	net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

Question: what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?

Answer: 7385.0


what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?

Question: and in 2013?

Answer: 6823.0


Question: so what was the difference between these years?

Answer: 562.0


so what was the difference between these years?

Question: and the percentage change over this time?

Answer: 0.08237


management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .

entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .

billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .

the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .

refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .

the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .

the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .

the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .

the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .

gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .

fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

1		amount ( in millions )

2	2007 net revenue	$ 231.0

3	volume/weather	15.5

4	net gas revenue	6.6

5	rider revenue	3.9

6	base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )

7	other	7.0

8	2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

Question: what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Answer: 21.7


what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Question: what was that net revenue in 2007?

Answer: 231.0


Question: how much, then, did that increase represent in relation to this 2007 amount?

Answer: 0.09394


how much, then, did that increase represent in relation to this 2007 amount?

Question: and what percentage of that increase between the years was due to rider revenue?

Answer: 0.17972