( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd , 77 mbpd and 71 mbpd in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .

on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard .

this change resulted in lower refined product sales volumes for the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under the previous accounting practices .

see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements .

the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 71 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .

we sold 52 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis .

half of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers .

propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry .

base lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide .

we market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .

our customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .

we blended 35 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2006 .

in 2005 and 2004 , we blended 35 mbpd and 30 mbpd of ethanol .

the expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations .

we sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .

as of december 31 , 2006 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4200 marathon branded retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois .

branded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , minnesota , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , virginia , north carolina , pennsylvania , alabama and south carolina .

sales to marathon brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 14 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .

ssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .

sales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .

as of december 31 , 2006 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.7 billion in 2006 , compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2005 .

what is the buy/sell volume in 2006?
what is the value in 2005?

Question: what is the sum of those two years?

Answer: 101.0


in 2006 , our board of directors approved a projected $ 3.2 billion expansion of our garyville , louisiana refinery by 180 mbpd to 425 mbpd , which will increase our total refining capacity to 1.154 million barrels per day ( 2018 2018mmbpd 2019 2019 ) .

we recently received air permit approval from the louisiana department of environmental quality for this project and construction is expected to begin in mid-2007 , with startup planned for the fourth quarter of 2009 .

we have also commenced front-end engineering and design ( 2018 2018feed 2019 2019 ) for a potential heavy oil upgrading project at our detroit refinery , which would allow us to process increased volumes of canadian oil sands production , and are undertaking a feasibility study for a similar upgrading project at our catlettsburg refinery .

marketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .

in 2006 , our refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 21.5 billion gallons , or 1.401 mmbpd .

the average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 77.76 per barrel for 2006 .

the following table sets forth our refined product sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years .

refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2006 2005 2004 .

( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd , 77 mbpd and 71 mbpd in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .

on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard .

this change resulted in lower refined product sales volumes for the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under the previous accounting practices .

see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements .

the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 71 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .

we sold 52 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis .

half of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers .

propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry .

base lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide .

we market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .

our customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .

we blended 35 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2006 .

in 2005 and 2004 , we blended 35 mbpd and 30 mbpd of ethanol .

the expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations .

we sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .

as of december 31 , 2006 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4200 marathon branded retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois .

branded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , minnesota , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , virginia , north carolina , pennsylvania , alabama and south carolina .

sales to marathon brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 14 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .

ssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .

sales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .

as of december 31 , 2006 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.7 billion in 2006 , compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2005 .

1	( thousands of barrels per day )	2006	2005	2004

2	gasoline	804	836	807

3	distillates	375	385	373

4	propane	23	22	22

5	feedstocks and special products	106	96	92

6	heavy fuel oil	26	29	27

7	asphalt	91	87	79

8	total ( a )	1425	1455	1400

9	average sales price ( $ per barrel )	$ 77.76	$ 66.42	$ 49.53

what is the buy/sell volume in 2006?
what is the value in 2005?
what is the sum of those two years?

Question: what is the total sum including the 2004 value?

Answer: 172.0


notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively .

a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k .

additionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k .

pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 .

as a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years .

during 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible .

the following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below .

domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans .

the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .

federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .

savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .

the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .

we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .

amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .

expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .

the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .

we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .

the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .

we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .

in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

Question: how much was contributed to defined contribution plans for foreign countries in 2008?

Answer: 28.7


the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .

federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .

savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .

the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .

we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .

amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .

expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .

the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .

we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .

the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .

we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .

in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

how much was contributed to defined contribution plans for foreign countries in 2008?

Question: how much was contributed in 2007?

Answer: 26.7


the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .

federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .

savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .

the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .

we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .

amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .

expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .

the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .

we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .

the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .

we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .

in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

Question: what is the difference?

Answer: 2.0


the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .

federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .

savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .

the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .

we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .

amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .

expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .

the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .

we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .

the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .

we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .

in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

Question: what was the 2007 value?

Answer: 26.7


the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .

federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .

savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .

the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .

we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .

amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .

expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .

deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .

the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .

we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .

the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .

we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .

in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .

these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

Question: what is the difference over the 2007 value?

Answer: 0.07491


notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .

the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .

income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .

to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .

tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .

as of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .

income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .

the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .

as of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .

we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .

the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .

the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .

the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .

as of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .

for fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .

accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .

these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .

we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .

we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .

our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .

for ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .

we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .

we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .

the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .

these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .

we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .

given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .

1		2018	2017

2	beginning balance	$ 172945	$ 178413

3	gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	16191	3680

4	gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	-4000 ( 4000 )	-30166 ( 30166 )

5	gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions	60721	24927

6	settlements with taxing authorities	2014	-3876 ( 3876 )

7	lapse of statute of limitations	-45922 ( 45922 )	-8819 ( 8819 )

8	foreign exchange gains and losses	-3783 ( 3783 )	8786

9	ending balance	$ 196152	$ 172945

Question: between the years of 2017 and 2018, what was the variation observed in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits?

Answer: 23207.0


between the years of 2017 and 2018, what was the variation observed in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits?

Question: and what was that total gross amount in 2017?

Answer: 172945.0


and what was that total gross amount in 2017?

Question: what percentage, then, of this amount did that variation represent?

Answer: 0.13419


what percentage, then, of this amount did that variation represent?

Question: and concerning the valuation allowance in that last year, what was its change in the fiscal period?

Answer: 80.9


the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what was the lease payments to the employee who became an officer of the company following his business acquisition in 2008?

Answer: 0.9


rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

what was the lease payments to the employee who became an officer of the company following his business acquisition in 2008?

Question: and in 2009?

Answer: 0.9


rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: so what was the total payment for these two years?

Answer: 1.8


rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

so what was the total payment for these two years?

Question: and including the value for 2010?

Answer: 2.8


devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .

impairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .

as a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .

this conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .

consequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .

other intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .

the weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .

amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .

other intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .

the following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .

year amortization amount ( in millions ) .

Question: how much does the total of intangibles represent in relation to the total amortization in 2014?

Answer: 0.8


how much does the total of intangibles represent in relation to the total amortization in 2014?

Question: and how much is that in percentage?

Answer: 80.0


impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

1	( in millions )	2011	2010

2	fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881

3	amortized cost	100013	82329

4	net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )

5	net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Question: what was the fair value in 2011?

Answer: 99832.0


the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Question: what was it in 2010?

Answer: 81881.0


the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

what was the fair value in 2011?
what was it in 2010?

Question: what is the net change?

Answer: 17951.0


the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .

refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .

the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .

our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .

such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .

housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .

as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .

generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .

as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .

overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .

the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .

in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .

the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .

our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .

ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .

in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .

we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .

this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .

to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

what was the fair value in 2011?
what was it in 2010?
what is the net change?

Question: what is the net change over the 2010 value?

Answer: 0.21923


used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .

interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .

the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .

in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .

net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .

interest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year .

the 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes .

in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .

net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .

interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .

the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes .

in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) .

net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes .

interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .

these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes .

commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043 .

future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

in may 2017 , the company entered into an agreement with 50 hymc owner llc , for the lease of approximately 847000 square feet of office space located at 50 hudson yards , new york , new york .

the term of the lease is twenty years from the date that rental payments begin , expected to occur in may 2023 , with the option to renew for a specified term .

the lease requires annual base rental payments of approximately $ 51 million per year during the first five years of the lease term , increasing every five years to $ 58 million , $ 66 million and $ 74 million per year ( or approximately $ 1.2 billion in base rent over its twenty-year term ) .

this lease is classified as an operating lease and , as such , is not recorded as a liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition .

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 134 million and $ 136 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .

at december 31 , 2017 , the company had $ 298 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .

these funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds .

this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .

generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .

these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .

these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding .

the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .

contingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions .

in connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products .

the fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 236 million , including $ 128 million related to the first reserve transaction , and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. .

Question: what was the difference in rent payment after 10 years compared to after five years?

Answer: 8.0


used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .

interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .

the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .

in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .

net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .

interest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year .

the 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes .

in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .

net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .

interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .

the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes .

in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) .

net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes .

interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .

these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes .

commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043 .

future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

what was the difference in rent payment after 10 years compared to after five years?

Question: and the specific rent value after five years?

Answer: 58.0


used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .

interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .

the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .

in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .

net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .

interest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year .

the 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes .

in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .

net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .

interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .

the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes .

in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .

these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) .

net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes .

interest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .

these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes .

commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043 .

future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

and the specific rent value after five years?

Question: so what would be the growth rate over this time?

Answer: 0.13793


devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .

impairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .

as a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .

this conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .

consequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .

other intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .

the weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .

amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .

other intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .

the following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .

year amortization amount ( in millions ) .

Question: what was the total amortization amount in the years of 2015 to 2018?

Answer: 180.0


what was the total amortization amount in the years of 2015 to 2018?

Question: including 2019, what becomes this total?

Answer: 224.0


including 2019, what becomes this total?

Question: and what was the average amount between those five years?

Answer: 44.8


and what was the average amount between those five years?

Question: and in the first year of that period, how much was the amortization expense for intangibles of the previous year as a portion of that amortization amount?

Answer: 0.8


and in the first year of that period, how much was the amortization expense for intangibles of the previous year as a portion of that amortization amount?

Question: what is that in percentage?

Answer: 80.0


management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .

other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .

the recovery became effective july 2007 .

see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .

2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .

following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .

the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .

the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .

as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .

see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .

the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .

the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .

retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .

see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .

the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .

the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .

refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .

gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .

the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .

1		amount ( in millions )

2	2006 net revenue	$ 403.3

3	purchased power capacity	13.1

4	securitization transition charge	9.9

5	volume/weather	9.7

6	transmission revenue	6.1

7	base revenue	2.6

8	other	-2.4 ( 2.4 )

9	2007 net revenue	$ 442.3

Question: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc . in 2007?

Answer: 442.3


what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc . in 2007?

Question: and what was it in 2006?

Answer: 403.3


Question: what was, then, the change over the year?

Answer: 39.0


what was, then, the change over the year?

Question: what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc . in 2006?

Answer: 403.3


what was the net revenue for entergy texas , inc . in 2006?

Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 net revenue?

Answer: 0.0967


and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 .

income taxes ( continued ) on april 1 , 2007 , the company adopted financial interpretation fin no .

48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no .

48 201d ) , which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no .

48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return .

48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure , and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized .

48 , the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $ 0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1 , 2007 .

this adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31 , 2003 , 2004 , and 2005 .

the company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan , which it completed in fiscal year 2009 .

the company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations .

as of march 31 , 2009 , the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31 , 2008 .

on a quarterly basis , the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest .

it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months ; however , it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position .

a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits , excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) is as follows: .

the company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s .

federal income tax , as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions .

the company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981 .

all tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions , including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts .

however , since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income , those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized .

commitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows : 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device , a payment of $ 5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device , a payment of $ 5583333 , and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide , a payment of $ 5583334 .

the two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31 , 2009 .

in april 2009 , the company received fda 510 ( k ) clearance of its impella 5.0 product , triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device .

in may 2009 , the company paid $ 1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock. .

1	balance at march 31 2008	$ 168

2	reductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations	-168 ( 168 )

3	balance at march 31 2009	$ 2014

Question: what was the contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders if impella 2.5 and impella 5.0 are approved?

Answer: 11166666.0


what was the contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders if impella 2.5 and impella 5.0 are approved?

Question: and the payment amount if impella 2019s worldwide are approved?

Answer: 5583334.0


and the payment amount if impella 2019s worldwide are approved?

Question: combined, what would be paid to former shareholders if all targets are achieved?

Answer: 16750000.0


28 2014 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2014 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s & p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2009 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .

total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .

peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .

in fiscal 2014 , we changed our peer group of companies used for this analysis to maintain alignment with peer companies selected by our compensation committee for use in determining compensation for executive management .

companies in the new peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , micros systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. .

companies in the old peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , cerner corp. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , sei investments company , telecommunications systems , inc. , and tyler technologies corp. .

Question: what was the annual performance of the jkhy stock in 2010?

Answer: 116.85


what was the annual performance of the jkhy stock in 2010?

Question: and what was it in 2009?

Answer: 100.0


Question: what was, then, the change in that performance over the year?

Answer: 16.85


what was, then, the change in that performance over the year?

Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2009 performance?

Answer: 0.1685