international networks international networks generated revenues of $ 1637 million during 2012 , which represented 37% ( 37 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .

our international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks .

this segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami .

discovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks .

international networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with as many as fourteen networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world .

at december 31 , 2012 , international networks operated over 180 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities .

international networks also has free-to-air networks in the u.k. , germany , italy and spain and continues to pursue international expansion .

our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2012 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .

on december 21 , 2012 , our international networks segment acquired 20% ( 20 % ) equity ownership interests in eurosport , a european sports satellite and cable network , and a portfolio of pay television networks from tf1 , a french media company , for $ 264 million , including transaction costs .

we have a call right that enables us to purchase a controlling interest in eurosport starting december 2014 and for one year thereafter .

if we exercise our call right , tf1 will have the right to put its remaining interest to us for one year thereafter .

the arrangement is intended to increase the growth of eurosport , which focuses on niche but regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and skating , and enhance our pay television offerings in france .

on december 28 , 2012 , we acquired switchover media , a group of five italian television channels with children's and entertainment programming .

( see note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) education education generated revenues of $ 105 million during 2012 , which represented 2% ( 2 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .

education is comprised of curriculum-based product and service offerings .

this segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , digital textbooks and , to a lesser extent , student assessments and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content .

our education business also participates in global brand and content licensing and engages in partnerships with leading non-profits , corporations , foundations and trade associations .

content development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers .

our content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which include some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies as well as independent producers .

our production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed .

substantially all produced content includes content that we engage third parties to develop and produce , while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights , in exchange for paying all development and production costs .

coproduced content refers to program rights that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop because at times world-wide rights are not available for acquisition or we save costs by collaborating with third parties .

licensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties. .

1	global networks discovery channel	internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 246	regional networks dmax	internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 90

2	animal planet	183	discovery kids	61

3	tlc real time and travel & living	174	quest	26

4	discovery science	75	discovery history	13

5	investigation discovery	63	shed	12

6	discovery home & health	57	discovery en espanol ( u.s. )	5

7	turbo	42	discovery familia ( u.s )	4

8	discovery world	27

Question: what was the percentage of equity ownership interests acquired in eurosport?

Answer: 20.0


what was the percentage of equity ownership interests acquired in eurosport?

Question: and how much is that percentage as a portion of one?

Answer: 0.2


and how much is that percentage as a portion of one?

Question: considering the value equivalent to that percentage, what would be the full value of the european sports satellite and cable network?

Answer: 1320.0


directors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .

the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year .

for the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 .

executive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .

security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .

the following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 .

certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .

principal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

1	plan category	number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )	weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights	number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )

2	equity compensation plans approved by security holders	1442912	$ 86.98	4446967

Question: what is the total value of the options , warrants and rights that remain available for future issuance?

Answer: 386797189.66


what is the total value of the options , warrants and rights that remain available for future issuance?

Question: what about in millions?

Answer: 386.79719


the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what was the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?

Answer: 8.2


rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

what was the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?

Question: what was the value in 2008?

Answer: 49.0


rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what is the net change divided by the 2008 value?

Answer: 0.16735


market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .

all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .

we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .

based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .

we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .

we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .

tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .

the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .

the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .

generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .

we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .

also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .

in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .

the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .

general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .

we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .

the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .

the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .

we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .

the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .

neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .

the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .

we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .

these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .

the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .

our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .

we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .

in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .

these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .

credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .

in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .

the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .

in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .

the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .

we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .

accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Question: what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?

Answer: 14.0


( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .

all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .

we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .

based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .

we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .

we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .

tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .

the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .

the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .

generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .

we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .

also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .

in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .

the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .

general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .

we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .

the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .

the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .

we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .

the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .

neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .

the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .

we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .

these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .

the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .

our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .

we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .

in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .

these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .

credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .

in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .

the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .

in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .

the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .

we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .

accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Question: what is it in 2008?

Answer: 19.0


( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .

all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .

we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .

based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .

we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .

we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .

tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .

the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .

the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .

generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .

we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .

also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .

in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .

the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .

general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .

we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .

the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .

the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .

we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .

the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .

neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .

the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .

we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .

these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .

the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .

our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .

we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .

in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .

these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .

credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .

in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .

the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .

in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .

the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .

we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .

accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?
what is it in 2008?

Question: what is the sum?

Answer: 33.0


( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .

all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .

we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .

based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .

we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .

we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .

tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .

the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .

the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .

generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .

we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .

also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .

in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .

the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .

general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .

we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .

the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .

the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .

we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .

the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .

neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .

the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .

we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .

these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .

the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .

our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .

we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .

in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .

these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .

credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .

in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .

the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .

in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .

the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .

we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .

accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?
what is it in 2008?
what is the sum?

Question: what is the average per year?

Answer: 16.5


stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .

the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .

the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .

comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Question: what is the value of the s&p 500 index on january 3, 2009 less it at the end of 2006?

Answer: -34.3


what is the value of the s&p 500 index on january 3, 2009 less it at the end of 2006?

Question: what is that divided by 100?

Answer: -0.343


masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .

goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .

( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .

subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .

( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .

in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .

the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .

the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .

the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .

in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .

the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .

the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .

the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .

other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .

in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .

the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .

in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

1		gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011

2	cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181

3	plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201

4	installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044

5	decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219

6	other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246

7	total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Question: what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?

Answer: -492.0


what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?

Question: and what is this change as a percent of that net goodwill in 2010?

Answer: -0.20646


and what is this change as a percent of that net goodwill in 2010?

Question: and in that last year of 2011, what percentage of that goodwill was due to cabinets and related products?

Answer: 0.09572


company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .

as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .

there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .

leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .

several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .

future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .

rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .

data processing and maintenance services agreements .

the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .

the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .

however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .

( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .

subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .

under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .

pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .

shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .

the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .

the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .

fidelity national information services , inc .

and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what was the rent expense in 2007?

Answer: 106.4


Question: and what was it in 2006?

Answer: 81.5


what was the rent expense in 2007?
and what was it in 2006?

Question: what was, then, the change over the year?

Answer: 24.9


what was, then, the change over the year?

Question: what was the rent expense in 2006?

Answer: 81.5


Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 rent expense, in percentage?

Answer: 0.30552


2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .

in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .

these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .

in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .

thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .

we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .

we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .

we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .

we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .

the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .

pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .

treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .

performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .

in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .

aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .

a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .

the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .

$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .

7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .

$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .

( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .

( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .

( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

1	( in millions )	cme clearingavailable assets

2	designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )	$ 100.0

3	guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )	2899.5

4	assessment powers ( 3 )	7973.6

5	minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )	$ 10973.1

Question: what would be the change in the multi-currency line of credit if the potential increase was fulfilled?

Answer: 2.0


2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .

in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .

these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .

in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .

thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .

we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .

we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .

we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .

we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .

the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .

pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .

treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .

performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .

in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .

aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .

a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .

the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .

$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .

7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .

$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .

( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .

( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .

( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

what would be the change in the multi-currency line of credit if the potential increase was fulfilled?

Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the original multi-currency line of credit, in percentage?

Answer: 0.4


the table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 .

in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .

these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .

we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .

we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .

for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .

the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .

the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .

earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .

fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .

see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .

financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) .

the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .

neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .

commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .

these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .

the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .

at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .

the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .

in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .

neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .

we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .

dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .

we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .

1	millions of dollars	2006	2005	2004

2	track	$ 1487	$ 1472	$ 1328

3	capacity and commercial facilities	510	509	347

4	locomotives and freight cars	135	98	125

5	other	110	90	76

6	total	$ 2242	$ 2169	$ 1876

Question: what was the cash capital investments in track in 2006?

Answer: 1487.0


in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .

these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .

we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .

we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .

for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .

the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .

the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .

earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .

fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .

see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .

financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) .

the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .

neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .

commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .

these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .

the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .

at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .

the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .

in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .

neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .

we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .

dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .

we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .

what was the cash capital investments in track in 2006?

Question: and for 2005?

Answer: 1472.0


in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .

these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .

we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .

we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .

for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .

the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .

the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .

earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .

fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .

see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .

financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) .

the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .

neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .

commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .

these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .

the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .

at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .

the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .

in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .

neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .

we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .

dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .

we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .

Question: so what was the difference between these two years?

Answer: 15.0


in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .

these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .

we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .

we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .

for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .

the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .

the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .

earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .

fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .

see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .

financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) .

the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .

neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .

commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .

these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .

the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .

at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .

the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .

in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .

neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .

we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .

dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .

we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .

so what was the difference between these two years?

Question: and the specific value for 2005 again?

Answer: 1472.0


in 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .

these investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .

we designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .

we expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

we expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .

for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .

the increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .

the ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .

earnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .

fixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .

see exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .

financing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the "facilities" ) .

the facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .

neither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .

commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .

these facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .

the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .

at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .

the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .

in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .

neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .

we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .

dividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .

we expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .

dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .

Question: so what was the percentage change over this time?

Answer: 0.01019


conditions and changes to regulatory capital requirements under basel iii capital standards .

beginning in 2014 , other comprehensive income related to available for sale securities ( as well as pension and other post-retirement plans ) are included in pnc 2019s regulatory capital ( subject to a phase-in schedule ) and , therefore will affect pnc 2019s regulatory capital ratios .

for additional information , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 2013 business and the capital portion of the balance sheet review section in this item 7 of this report .

the duration of investment securities was 2.9 years at december 31 , 2013 .

we estimate that , at december 31 , 2013 , the effective duration of investment securities was 3.0 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel increase in interest rates and 2.8 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates .

comparable amounts at december 31 , 2012 were 2.3 years and 2.2 years , respectively .

we conduct a quarterly comprehensive security-level impairment assessment on all securities .

for securities in an unrealized loss position , we determine whether the loss represents otti .

for debt securities that we neither intend to sell nor believe we will be required to sell prior to expected recovery , we recognize the credit portion of otti charges in current earnings and include the noncredit portion of otti in net unrealized gains ( losses ) on otti securities on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income and net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) on our consolidated balance sheet .

during 2013 and 2012 we recognized otti credit losses of $ 16 million and $ 111 million , respectively .

substantially all of the credit losses related to residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities collateralized by non-agency residential loans .

if current housing and economic conditions were to deteriorate from current levels , and if market volatility and illiquidity were to deteriorate from current levels , or if market interest rates were to increase or credit spreads were to widen appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .

additional information regarding our investment securities is included in note 8 investment securities and note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .

loans held for sale table 15 : loans held for sale in millions december 31 december 31 .

for commercial mortgages held for sale designated at fair value , we stopped originating these and continue to pursue opportunities to reduce these positions .

at december 31 , 2013 , the balance relating to these loans was $ 586 million compared to $ 772 million at december 31 , 2012 .

for commercial mortgages held for sale carried at lower of cost or fair value , we sold $ 2.8 billion in 2013 compared to $ 2.2 billion in 2012 .

all of these loan sales were to government agencies .

total gains of $ 79 million were recognized on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , in 2013 , and $ 41 million in 2012 .

residential mortgage loan origination volume was $ 15.1 billion in 2013 compared to $ 15.2 billion in 2012 .

substantially all such loans were originated under agency or federal housing administration ( fha ) standards .

we sold $ 14.7 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 568 million in 2013 .

the comparable amounts for 2012 were $ 13.8 billion and $ 747 million , respectively .

interest income on loans held for sale was $ 157 million in 2013 and $ 168 million in 2012 .

these amounts are included in other interest income on our consolidated income statement .

additional information regarding our loan sale and servicing activities is included in note 3 loan sales and servicing activities and variable interest entities and note 9 fair value in our notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .

goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $ 11.3 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 10.9 billion at december 31 , 2012 .

the increase of $ .4 billion was primarily due to additions to and changes in value of mortgage and other loan servicing rights .

see additional information regarding our goodwill and intangible assets in note 10 goodwill and other intangible assets included in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .

44 the pnc financial services group , inc .

1	in millions	december 312013	december 312012

2	commercial mortgages at fair value	$ 586	$ 772

3	commercial mortgages at lower of cost or fair value	281	620

4	total commercial mortgages	867	1392

5	residential mortgages at fair value	1315	2096

6	residential mortgages at lower of cost or fair value	41	124

7	total residential mortgages	1356	2220

8	other	32	81

9	total	$ 2255	$ 3693

Question: between the years of 2012 and 2013, what was the change in the total of residential mortgages, in millions?

Answer: -864.0


between the years of 2012 and 2013, what was the change in the total of residential mortgages, in millions?

Question: and what was the combined total of those mortgages in the two years, also in millions?

Answer: 3576.0


mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) on june 24 , 2008 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201camerican express settlement 201d ) with american express company ( 201camerican express 201d ) relating to the u.s .

federal antitrust litigation between mastercard and american express .

the american express settlement ended all existing litigation between mastercard and american express .

under the terms of the american express settlement , mastercard is obligated to make 12 quarterly payments of up to $ 150000 per quarter beginning in the third quarter of 2008 .

mastercard 2019s maximum nominal payments will total $ 1800000 .

the amount of each quarterly payment is contingent on the performance of american express 2019s u.s .

the quarterly payments will be in an amount equal to 15% ( 15 % ) of american express 2019s u.s .

global network services billings during the quarter , up to a maximum of $ 150000 per quarter .

if , however , the payment for any quarter is less than $ 150000 , the maximum payment for subsequent quarters will be increased by the difference between $ 150000 and the lesser amount that was paid in any quarter in which there was a shortfall .

mastercard assumes american express will achieve these financial hurdles .

mastercard recorded the present value of $ 1800000 , at a 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) discount rate , or $ 1649345 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .

in 2003 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201cu.s .

merchant lawsuit settlement 201d ) related to the u.s .

merchant lawsuit described under the caption 201cu.s .

merchant and consumer litigations 201d in note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) and contract disputes with certain customers .

merchant lawsuit settlement , the company was required to pay $ 125000 in 2003 and $ 100000 annually each december from 2004 through 2012 .

in addition , in 2003 , several other lawsuits were initiated by merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff class in the u.s .

the 201copt-out 201d merchant lawsuits were not covered by the terms of the u.s .

merchant lawsuit settlement and all have been individually settled .

we recorded liabilities for certain litigation settlements in prior periods .

total liabilities for litigation settlements changed from december 31 , 2006 , as follows: .

see note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) for additional discussion regarding the company 2019s legal proceedings. .

1	balance as of december 31 2006	$ 476915

2	provision for litigation settlements ( note 20 )	3400

3	interest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit	38046

4	payments	-113925 ( 113925 )

5	balance as of december 31 2007	404436

6	provision for discover settlement	862500

7	provision for american express settlement	1649345

8	provision for other litigation settlements	6000

9	interest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement	32879

10	interest accretion on american express settlement	44300

11	payments on american express settlement	-300000 ( 300000 )

12	payments on discover settlement	-862500 ( 862500 )

13	payment on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement	-100000 ( 100000 )

14	other payments and accretion	-662 ( 662 )

15	balance as of december 31 2008	$ 1736298

Question: what was the change in total liabilities for litigation settlements from 2006 to 2007?

Answer: -72479.0


mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) on june 24 , 2008 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201camerican express settlement 201d ) with american express company ( 201camerican express 201d ) relating to the u.s .

federal antitrust litigation between mastercard and american express .

the american express settlement ended all existing litigation between mastercard and american express .

under the terms of the american express settlement , mastercard is obligated to make 12 quarterly payments of up to $ 150000 per quarter beginning in the third quarter of 2008 .

mastercard 2019s maximum nominal payments will total $ 1800000 .

the amount of each quarterly payment is contingent on the performance of american express 2019s u.s .

the quarterly payments will be in an amount equal to 15% ( 15 % ) of american express 2019s u.s .

global network services billings during the quarter , up to a maximum of $ 150000 per quarter .

if , however , the payment for any quarter is less than $ 150000 , the maximum payment for subsequent quarters will be increased by the difference between $ 150000 and the lesser amount that was paid in any quarter in which there was a shortfall .

mastercard assumes american express will achieve these financial hurdles .

mastercard recorded the present value of $ 1800000 , at a 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) discount rate , or $ 1649345 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .

in 2003 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201cu.s .

merchant lawsuit settlement 201d ) related to the u.s .

merchant lawsuit described under the caption 201cu.s .

merchant and consumer litigations 201d in note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) and contract disputes with certain customers .

merchant lawsuit settlement , the company was required to pay $ 125000 in 2003 and $ 100000 annually each december from 2004 through 2012 .

in addition , in 2003 , several other lawsuits were initiated by merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff class in the u.s .

the 201copt-out 201d merchant lawsuits were not covered by the terms of the u.s .

merchant lawsuit settlement and all have been individually settled .

we recorded liabilities for certain litigation settlements in prior periods .

total liabilities for litigation settlements changed from december 31 , 2006 , as follows: .

what was the change in total liabilities for litigation settlements from 2006 to 2007?

Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those liabilities in 2006, in percentage?

Answer: -0.15197


2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .

the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .

partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .

mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .

the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .

partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .

backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .

backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .

trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .

operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .

space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .

space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .

space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .

operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .

government , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .

space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .

the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs .

partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .

Question: what was the increase in the operating profit for space systems from 2011 to 2012?

Answer: 20.0


2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .

the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .

partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .

mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .

the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .

partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .

adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .

backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .

backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .

trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .

operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .

space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .

space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .

space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .

operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .

government , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .

space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

what was the increase in the operating profit for space systems from 2011 to 2012?

Question: and what was that operating profit in 2011?

Answer: 1063.0