operating activities for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2019 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2969.9 .

income from continuing operations of $ 1760.0 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , a charge for the facility closure of one of our customers , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , gain on sale of assets and investments , share-based compensation , noncurrent capital lease receivables , and certain other adjustments .

the caption "gain on sale of assets and investments" includes a gain of $ 14.1 recognized on the disposition of our interest in high-tech gases ( beijing ) co. , ltd. , a previously held equity investment in our industrial gases 2013 asia segment .

refer to note 7 , acquisitions , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .

the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 25.3 , primarily driven by $ 69.0 from trade receivables and $ 41.8 from payables and accrued liabilities , partially offset by $ 79.8 from other receivables .

the use of cash within "payables and accrued liabilities" was primarily driven by a $ 48.9 decrease in accrued utilities and a $ 30.3 decrease in accrued interest , partially offset by a $ 51.6 increase in customer advances primarily related to sale of equipment activity .

the decrease in accrued utilities was primarily driven by a contract modification to a tolling arrangement in india and lower utility costs in the industrial gases 2013 americas segment .

the source of cash from other receivables of $ 79.8 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures and the collection of value added taxes .

for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2547.2 , including income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 .

other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions .

the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities .

in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 .

the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables .

the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures .

the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules .

in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s .

the source of cash from other receivables of $ 128.3 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures. .

what was cash spent from investing activities?

Question: what is cash provided from operating activities less cash spent from investing activities?

Answer: 905.6


liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout fiscal year 2019 .

as of 30 september 2019 , our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .

we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future .

as of 30 september 2019 , we had $ 971.5 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .

as a result of the tax act , we do not expect that a significant portion of our foreign subsidiaries' and affiliates' earnings will be subject to u.s .

income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states .

the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside .

however , because we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s .

refer to note 23 , income taxes , for additional information .

the table below summarizes our cash flows from operating activities , investing activities , and financing activities from continuing operations as reflected on the consolidated statements of cash flows: .

operating activities for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2019 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2969.9 .

income from continuing operations of $ 1760.0 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , a charge for the facility closure of one of our customers , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , gain on sale of assets and investments , share-based compensation , noncurrent capital lease receivables , and certain other adjustments .

the caption "gain on sale of assets and investments" includes a gain of $ 14.1 recognized on the disposition of our interest in high-tech gases ( beijing ) co. , ltd. , a previously held equity investment in our industrial gases 2013 asia segment .

refer to note 7 , acquisitions , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .

the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 25.3 , primarily driven by $ 69.0 from trade receivables and $ 41.8 from payables and accrued liabilities , partially offset by $ 79.8 from other receivables .

the use of cash within "payables and accrued liabilities" was primarily driven by a $ 48.9 decrease in accrued utilities and a $ 30.3 decrease in accrued interest , partially offset by a $ 51.6 increase in customer advances primarily related to sale of equipment activity .

the decrease in accrued utilities was primarily driven by a contract modification to a tolling arrangement in india and lower utility costs in the industrial gases 2013 americas segment .

the source of cash from other receivables of $ 79.8 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures and the collection of value added taxes .

for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2547.2 , including income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 .

other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions .

the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities .

in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 .

the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables .

the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures .

the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules .

in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s .

the source of cash from other receivables of $ 128.3 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures. .

what was the amount of cash provided by operating activities?

what is cash provided from operating activities less cash spent from investing activities?

Question: what is that less cash spent in financing activities?

Answer: -454.2


segment results 2013 operating basis ( a ) ( b ) ( table continued from previous page ) year ended december 31 , operating earnings return on common equity 2013 goodwill ( c ) .

/ 2005 annual report 35 and are retained in corporate .

these retained expenses include parent company costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses ; adjustments to align certain corporate staff , technology and operations allocations with market prices ; and other one-time items not aligned with the business segments .

during 2005 , the firm refined cost allocation methodologies related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations expenses in order to improve transparency , consistency and accountability with regard to costs allocated across business segments .

prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new cost allocation methodologies .

capital allocation each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand- alone peer comparisons , economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements .

the amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity .

at the time of the merger , goodwill , as well as the associated capital , was allocated solely to corporate .

effective january 2006 , the firm expects to refine its methodology for allocating capital to the business segments to include any goodwill associated with line of business-directed acquisitions since the merger .

gaap requires the allocation of goodwill to the business segments for impairment testing ( see critical accounting estimates used by the firm and note 15 on pages 81 2013 83 and 114 2013116 , respectively , of this annual report ) .

see the capital management section on page 56 of this annual report for a discussion of the equity framework .

credit reimbursement tss reimburses the ib for credit portfolio exposures the ib manages on behalf of clients the segments share .

at the time of the merger , the reimbursement methodology was revised to be based upon pre-tax earnings , net of the cost of capital related to those exposures .

prior to the merger , the credit reimbursement was based upon pre-tax earnings , plus the allocated capital associated with the shared clients .

tax-equivalent adjustments segment and firm results reflect revenues on a tax-equivalent basis for segment reporting purposes .

refer to explanation and reconciliation of the firm 2019s non-gaap financial measures on page 31 of this annual report for additional details .

description of business segment reporting methodology results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business .

the management reporting process that derives these results allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies .

effective with the merger on july 1 , 2004 , several of the allocation methodologies were revised , as noted below .

as prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new methodologies , they are not comparable to the presentation of periods beginning with the third quarter of 2004 .

further , the firm continues to assess the assumptions , methodologies and reporting reclassifications used for segment reporting , and further refinements may be implemented in future periods .

revenue sharing when business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the firm 2019s clients , the participating business segments agree to share revenues from those transactions .

these revenue-sharing agreements were revised on the merger date to provide consistency across the lines of business .

funds transfer pricing funds transfer pricing ( 201cftp 201d ) is used to allocate interest income and expense to each business and transfer the primary interest rate risk exposures to corporate .

the allocation process is unique to each business and considers the interest rate risk , liquidity risk and regulatory requirements of its stand- alone peers .

business segments may retain certain interest rate exposures , subject to management approval , that would be expected in the normal operation of a similar peer business .

in the third quarter of 2004 , ftp was revised to conform the policies of the combined firms .

expense allocation where business segments use services provided by support units within the firm , the costs of those support units are allocated to the business segments .

those expenses are allocated based upon their actual cost , or the lower of actual cost or market cost , as well as upon usage of the services provided .

effective with the third quarter of 2004 , the cost allocation methodologies of the heritage firms were aligned to provide consistency across the business segments .

in addition , expenses related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations ceased to be allocated to the business segments .

1	year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )	year ended december 31 , 2005	year ended december 31 , 2004	year ended december 31 , change	2005	2004

2	investment bank	$ 3658	$ 2948	24% ( 24 % )	18% ( 18 % )	17% ( 17 % )

3	retail financial services	3427	2199	56	26	24

4	card services	1907	1274	50	16	17

5	commercial banking	1007	608	66	30	29

6	treasury & securities services	1037	440	136	55	17

7	asset & wealth management	1216	681	79	51	17

8	corporate	-1731 ( 1731 )	61	nm	nm	nm

9	total	$ 10521	$ 8211	28% ( 28 % )	17% ( 17 % )	16% ( 16 % )

Question: what was the percentage of total segment operations that was made of investment banking in 2005?

Answer: 0.34769


/ 2005 annual report 35 and are retained in corporate .

these retained expenses include parent company costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses ; adjustments to align certain corporate staff , technology and operations allocations with market prices ; and other one-time items not aligned with the business segments .

during 2005 , the firm refined cost allocation methodologies related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations expenses in order to improve transparency , consistency and accountability with regard to costs allocated across business segments .

prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new cost allocation methodologies .

capital allocation each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand- alone peer comparisons , economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements .

the amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity .

at the time of the merger , goodwill , as well as the associated capital , was allocated solely to corporate .

effective january 2006 , the firm expects to refine its methodology for allocating capital to the business segments to include any goodwill associated with line of business-directed acquisitions since the merger .

gaap requires the allocation of goodwill to the business segments for impairment testing ( see critical accounting estimates used by the firm and note 15 on pages 81 2013 83 and 114 2013116 , respectively , of this annual report ) .

see the capital management section on page 56 of this annual report for a discussion of the equity framework .

credit reimbursement tss reimburses the ib for credit portfolio exposures the ib manages on behalf of clients the segments share .

at the time of the merger , the reimbursement methodology was revised to be based upon pre-tax earnings , net of the cost of capital related to those exposures .

prior to the merger , the credit reimbursement was based upon pre-tax earnings , plus the allocated capital associated with the shared clients .

tax-equivalent adjustments segment and firm results reflect revenues on a tax-equivalent basis for segment reporting purposes .

refer to explanation and reconciliation of the firm 2019s non-gaap financial measures on page 31 of this annual report for additional details .

description of business segment reporting methodology results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business .

the management reporting process that derives these results allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies .

effective with the merger on july 1 , 2004 , several of the allocation methodologies were revised , as noted below .

as prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new methodologies , they are not comparable to the presentation of periods beginning with the third quarter of 2004 .

further , the firm continues to assess the assumptions , methodologies and reporting reclassifications used for segment reporting , and further refinements may be implemented in future periods .

revenue sharing when business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the firm 2019s clients , the participating business segments agree to share revenues from those transactions .

these revenue-sharing agreements were revised on the merger date to provide consistency across the lines of business .

funds transfer pricing funds transfer pricing ( 201cftp 201d ) is used to allocate interest income and expense to each business and transfer the primary interest rate risk exposures to corporate .

the allocation process is unique to each business and considers the interest rate risk , liquidity risk and regulatory requirements of its stand- alone peers .

business segments may retain certain interest rate exposures , subject to management approval , that would be expected in the normal operation of a similar peer business .

in the third quarter of 2004 , ftp was revised to conform the policies of the combined firms .

expense allocation where business segments use services provided by support units within the firm , the costs of those support units are allocated to the business segments .

those expenses are allocated based upon their actual cost , or the lower of actual cost or market cost , as well as upon usage of the services provided .

effective with the third quarter of 2004 , the cost allocation methodologies of the heritage firms were aligned to provide consistency across the business segments .

in addition , expenses related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations ceased to be allocated to the business segments .

what was the percentage of total segment operations that was made of investment banking in 2005?

Question: what would 2005 operating income be without the commercial banking segment?

Answer: 9514.0


and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in the tables above : 2030 the gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting , and therefore are not representative of the firm 2019s exposure .

2030 counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels .

where the counterparty netting is across levels , the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting .

significant unobservable inputs the table below presents the amount of level 3 assets ( liabilities ) , and ranges , averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .

level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december $ in millions 2017 2016 .

in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .

2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .

2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .

an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .

for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .

2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .

for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .

accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .

2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .

2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .

for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .

therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .

2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .

2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .

2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .

range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .

ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .

generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .

ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .

for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .

2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .

the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .

the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .

Question: what was the value of credit net in 2017?

Answer: 1505.0


in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .

2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .

2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .

an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .

for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .

2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .

for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .

accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .

2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .

2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .

for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .

therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .

2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .

2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .

2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .

range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .

ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .

generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .

ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .

for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .

2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .

the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .

the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .

what was the value of credit net in 2017?

Question: what was it in 2016?

Answer: 2504.0


in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .

2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .

2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .

an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .

for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .

2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .

for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .

accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .

2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .

2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .

for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .

therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .

2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .

2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .

2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .

range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .

ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .

generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .

ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .

for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .

2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .

the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .

the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .

Question: what is the net change?

Answer: -999.0


in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .

2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .

2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .

an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .

for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .

2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .

for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .

accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .

2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .

2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .

for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .

therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .

2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .

2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .

2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .

range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .

ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .

generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .

ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .

for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .

2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .

the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .

the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .

Question: what was the 2016 value?

Answer: 2504.0


in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .

2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .

2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .

an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .

for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .

2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .

for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .

accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .

2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .

2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .

for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .

therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .

2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .

2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .

2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .

range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .

ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .

generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .

ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .

for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .

2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .

the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .

the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .

Question: what was the change over the 2016 value?

Answer: -0.39896


impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .

the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .

these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income .

the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities .

we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .

to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .

the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) .

the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 .

such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .

to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income .

national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current .

management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) .

as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .

excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities .

additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .

Question: what was the change in amortized cost in 2009?

Answer: 14057.0


what was the change in amortized cost in 2009?

Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?

Answer: 0.23125


so what was the percentage change during this time?

Question: what is the amortized cost as a percentage of the fair value of securities in 2009?

Answer: 1.02949


table of contents the estimated amortization expense at september 26 , 2015 for each of the five succeeding fiscal years was as follows: .

goodwill in accordance with asc 350 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( asc 350 ) , the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value .

events that could indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include , but are not limited to , current economic and market conditions , including a decline in market capitalization , a significant adverse change in legal factors , business climate , operational performance of the business or key personnel , and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator .

in performing the impairment test , the company utilizes the two-step approach prescribed under asc 350 .

the first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value .

to estimate the fair value of its reporting units for step 1 , the company primarily utilizes the income approach .

the income approach is based on a dcf analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate .

assumptions used in the dcf require significant judgment , including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal values , growth rates , and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows .

the forecasted cash flows are based on the company 2019s most recent budget and strategic plan and for years beyond this period , the company 2019s estimates are based on assumed growth rates expected as of the measurement date .

the company believes its assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the underlying businesses .

the discount rates used are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections and are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital ( 201cwacc 201d ) of market participants relative to each respective reporting unit .

the market approach considers comparable market data based on multiples of revenue or earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization ( 201cebitda 201d ) and is primarily used as a corroborative analysis to the results of the dcf analysis .

the company believes its assumptions used to determine the fair value of its reporting units are reasonable .

if different assumptions were used , particularly with respect to forecasted cash flows , terminal values , waccs , or market multiples , different estimates of fair value may result and there could be the potential that an impairment charge could result .

actual operating results and the related cash flows of the reporting units could differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows .

if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , the company is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss , if any .

the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit 2019s goodwill to its carrying value .

the implied fair value of goodwill is derived by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation for each reporting unit as of the measurement date and allocating the reporting unit 2019s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities .

the residual amount from performing this allocation represents the implied fair value of goodwill .

to the extent this amount is below the carrying value of goodwill , an impairment charge is recorded .

the company conducted its fiscal 2015 impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 28 , 2015 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .

the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as of the measurement date .

as a result of completing step 1 , all of the company's reporting units had fair values exceeding their carrying values , and as such , step 2 of the impairment test was not required .

for illustrative purposes , had the fair value of each of the reporting units that passed step 1 been lower than 10% ( 10 % ) , all of the reporting units would still have passed step 1 of the goodwill impairment test .

at september 26 , 2015 , the company believes that each reporting unit , with goodwill aggregating 2.81 billion , was not at risk of failing step 1 of the goodwill impairment test based on the current forecasts .

the company conducted its fiscal 2014 annual impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 29 , 2014 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .

the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 19 , 2015 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .

the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .

past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .

Question: what was the net change in value of the amortization expense from 2016 to 2017?

Answer: -11.4


goodwill in accordance with asc 350 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( asc 350 ) , the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value .

events that could indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include , but are not limited to , current economic and market conditions , including a decline in market capitalization , a significant adverse change in legal factors , business climate , operational performance of the business or key personnel , and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator .

in performing the impairment test , the company utilizes the two-step approach prescribed under asc 350 .

the first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value .

to estimate the fair value of its reporting units for step 1 , the company primarily utilizes the income approach .

the income approach is based on a dcf analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate .

assumptions used in the dcf require significant judgment , including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal values , growth rates , and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows .

the forecasted cash flows are based on the company 2019s most recent budget and strategic plan and for years beyond this period , the company 2019s estimates are based on assumed growth rates expected as of the measurement date .

the company believes its assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the underlying businesses .

the discount rates used are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections and are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital ( 201cwacc 201d ) of market participants relative to each respective reporting unit .

the market approach considers comparable market data based on multiples of revenue or earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization ( 201cebitda 201d ) and is primarily used as a corroborative analysis to the results of the dcf analysis .

the company believes its assumptions used to determine the fair value of its reporting units are reasonable .

if different assumptions were used , particularly with respect to forecasted cash flows , terminal values , waccs , or market multiples , different estimates of fair value may result and there could be the potential that an impairment charge could result .

actual operating results and the related cash flows of the reporting units could differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows .

if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , the company is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss , if any .

the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit 2019s goodwill to its carrying value .

the implied fair value of goodwill is derived by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation for each reporting unit as of the measurement date and allocating the reporting unit 2019s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities .

the residual amount from performing this allocation represents the implied fair value of goodwill .

to the extent this amount is below the carrying value of goodwill , an impairment charge is recorded .

the company conducted its fiscal 2015 impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 28 , 2015 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .

the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as of the measurement date .

as a result of completing step 1 , all of the company's reporting units had fair values exceeding their carrying values , and as such , step 2 of the impairment test was not required .

for illustrative purposes , had the fair value of each of the reporting units that passed step 1 been lower than 10% ( 10 % ) , all of the reporting units would still have passed step 1 of the goodwill impairment test .

at september 26 , 2015 , the company believes that each reporting unit , with goodwill aggregating 2.81 billion , was not at risk of failing step 1 of the goodwill impairment test based on the current forecasts .

the company conducted its fiscal 2014 annual impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 29 , 2014 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .

the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 19 , 2015 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .

the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .

past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .

what was the net change in value of the amortization expense from 2016 to 2017?

Question: what was the value in 2016?

Answer: 377.0


goodwill in accordance with asc 350 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( asc 350 ) , the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value .

events that could indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include , but are not limited to , current economic and market conditions , including a decline in market capitalization , a significant adverse change in legal factors , business climate , operational performance of the business or key personnel , and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator .

in performing the impairment test , the company utilizes the two-step approach prescribed under asc 350 .

the first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value .

to estimate the fair value of its reporting units for step 1 , the company primarily utilizes the income approach .

the income approach is based on a dcf analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate .

assumptions used in the dcf require significant judgment , including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal values , growth rates , and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows .

the forecasted cash flows are based on the company 2019s most recent budget and strategic plan and for years beyond this period , the company 2019s estimates are based on assumed growth rates expected as of the measurement date .

the company believes its assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the underlying businesses .

the discount rates used are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections and are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital ( 201cwacc 201d ) of market participants relative to each respective reporting unit .

the market approach considers comparable market data based on multiples of revenue or earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization ( 201cebitda 201d ) and is primarily used as a corroborative analysis to the results of the dcf analysis .

the company believes its assumptions used to determine the fair value of its reporting units are reasonable .

if different assumptions were used , particularly with respect to forecasted cash flows , terminal values , waccs , or market multiples , different estimates of fair value may result and there could be the potential that an impairment charge could result .

actual operating results and the related cash flows of the reporting units could differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows .

if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , the company is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss , if any .

the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit 2019s goodwill to its carrying value .

the implied fair value of goodwill is derived by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation for each reporting unit as of the measurement date and allocating the reporting unit 2019s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities .

the residual amount from performing this allocation represents the implied fair value of goodwill .

to the extent this amount is below the carrying value of goodwill , an impairment charge is recorded .

the company conducted its fiscal 2015 impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 28 , 2015 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .

the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as of the measurement date .

as a result of completing step 1 , all of the company's reporting units had fair values exceeding their carrying values , and as such , step 2 of the impairment test was not required .

for illustrative purposes , had the fair value of each of the reporting units that passed step 1 been lower than 10% ( 10 % ) , all of the reporting units would still have passed step 1 of the goodwill impairment test .

at september 26 , 2015 , the company believes that each reporting unit , with goodwill aggregating 2.81 billion , was not at risk of failing step 1 of the goodwill impairment test based on the current forecasts .

the company conducted its fiscal 2014 annual impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 29 , 2014 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .

the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 19 , 2015 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .

the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .

past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .

Question: what is the percent change?

Answer: -0.03024


results of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .

we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .

freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .

changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .

we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .

we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .

we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .

other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .

we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .

freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .

volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .

freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .

revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .

arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .

volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .

fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .

fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .

in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .

in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

Question: how much does the fuel surcharge revenue in 2014 represent in relation to the one in 2013?

Answer: 1.07692


we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .

freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .

changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .

we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .

we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .

we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .

other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .

we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .

freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .

volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .

freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .

revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .

arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .

volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .

fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .

fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .

in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .

in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

how much does the fuel surcharge revenue in 2014 represent in relation to the one in 2013?

Question: and what was, in billions, that fuel surcharge revenue in 2014?

Answer: 2.8


we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .

freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .

changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .

we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .

we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .

we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .

other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .

we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .

freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .

volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .

freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .

revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .

arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .

volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .

fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .

fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .

in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .

in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

and what was, in billions, that fuel surcharge revenue in 2014?

Question: assuming that the fuel surcharge revenue in 2015 will represent in relation to the 2014 the same as this 2014 one represents in relation to the 2013 one, what will be that fuel surcharge revenue in 2015, in billions?

Answer: 3.01538


the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .

as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .

this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .

during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .

pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .

earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .

basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

1	( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015

2	net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873

3	less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24

4	net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849

5	weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549

6	plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014

7	weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

Question: what was the total of net earnings attributable to pmi in 2017?

Answer: 6035.0


what was the total of net earnings attributable to pmi in 2017?

Question: what was that in 2016?

Answer: 6967.0


Question: what was, then, the increase over the year?

Answer: -932.0


what was, then, the increase over the year?

Question: and how much did this increase represent in relation to the 2016 total?

Answer: -0.13377


and how much did this increase represent in relation to the 2016 total?

Question: and concerning the net earnings for basic and diluted eps, what was their change over that period?

Answer: -927.0


and concerning the net earnings for basic and diluted eps, what was their change over that period?

Question: what was the total of those earnings in 2016?

Answer: 6948.0


what was the total of those earnings in 2016?

Question: what was, then, that change as a portion of this 2016 total?

Answer: -0.13342


management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

1	cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013

2	net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4

3	net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )

4	changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1

5	net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9

6	net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )

7	net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Question: what is the combined total of the net cash provided by operating activities and the one used in investing activities?

Answer: 471.2


1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

what is the combined total of the net cash provided by operating activities and the one used in investing activities?

Question: what was the net cash used in financing activities?

Answer: -472.8


1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .

2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .

due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .

our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .

net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .

our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .

the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .

in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .

to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .

the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .

our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .

our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .

for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .

investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .

net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .

capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .

we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

what was the net cash used in financing activities?

Question: including this net cash, what then becomes that total?

Answer: -1.6


the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .

aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .

therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .

starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .

as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .

in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .

this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .

the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .

after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .

considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .

foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .

fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .

dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .

concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .

several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .

however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .

the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .

if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .

related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .

in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .

at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .

these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .

in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .

additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .

the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

1	years ended december 31,	2017	2016	2015

2	revenue 2014non-regulated	$ 1297	$ 1100	$ 1099

3	cost of sales 2014non-regulated	220	210	330

4	interest income	8	4	25

5	interest expense	36	39	33

Question: what was the total of revenues for transactions with related parties in 2017?

Answer: 1297.0


the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .

aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .

therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .

starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .

as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .

in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .

this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .

the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .

after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .

considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .

foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .

fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .

dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .

concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .

several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .

however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .

the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .

if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .

related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .

in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .

at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .

these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .

in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .

additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .

the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

what was the total of revenues for transactions with related parties in 2017?

Question: and what was that in 2016?

Answer: 1100.0


the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .

aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .

therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .

starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .

as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .

in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .

this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .

the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .

after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .

considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .

foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .

fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .

dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .

concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .

several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .

however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .

the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .

if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .

related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .

in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .

at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .

these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .

in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .

additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .

the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Question: what was, then, the change over the year?

Answer: 197.0


the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .

aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .

therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .

starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .

as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .

in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .

this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .

the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .

after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .

considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .

foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .

fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .

dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .

concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .

several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .

however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .

the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .

if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .

related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .

in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .

at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .

these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .

in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .

additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .

the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

what was, then, the change over the year?

Question: what was the total of revenues for transactions with related parties in 2016?

Answer: 1100.0