tissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia .

average sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp .

operating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 .

the benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight .

entering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly .

however , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages .

industrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products .

in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix .

industrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 .

operating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings .

bene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) .

in addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard .

the segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related .

industrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 .

north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 .

operating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 .

containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 .

average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 .

margins improved reflecting stronger export demand .

manu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages .

raw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly .

operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine .

converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand .

earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 .

favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs .

looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 .

however , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy .

manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter .

european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .

sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year .

operating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 .

sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes .

conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs .

entering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues .

profit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .

Question: what is the value of european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 times 1000?

Answer: 1100.0


north american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 .

operating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 .

containerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 .

average sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 .

margins improved reflecting stronger export demand .

manu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages .

raw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly .

operating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine .

converting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand .

earnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 .

favorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs .

looking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 .

however , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy .

manufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter .

european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .

sales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year .

operating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 .

sales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes .

conversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs .

entering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues .

profit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .

what is the value of european industrial packaging net sales for 2007 times 1000?

Question: what is that divided by total 2007 sales?

Answer: 0.20972


results of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .

we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .

freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .

changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .

we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .

we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .

we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .

other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .

we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .

freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .

volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .

freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .

revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .

arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .

volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .

fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .

fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .

in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .

in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

Question: what was the fuel surcharge program freight revenue in 2014?

Answer: 2.8


we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .

freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .

changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .

we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .

we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .

we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .

other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .

we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .

freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .

volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .

freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .

revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .

arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .

volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .

fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .

fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .

in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .

in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

what was the fuel surcharge program freight revenue in 2014?

Question: and in 2013?

Answer: 2.6


we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .

freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .

changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .

we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .

we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .

we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .

other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .

we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .

freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .

volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .

freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .

revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .

arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .

volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .

fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .

fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .

in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .

in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

Question: so what was the difference between these two values?

Answer: 0.2


we generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .

freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .

changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .

we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .

we recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .

we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .

other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .

we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .

freight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .

volume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .

freight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .

revenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .

arc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .

volume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .

our fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .

fuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .

fuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .

in 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .

in 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .

so what was the difference between these two values?

Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?

Answer: 0.07692


notes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .

income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .

subsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .

the tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .

the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .

the tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .

employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .

the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .

for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .

for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .

the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .

the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .

effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .

this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .

on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .

compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .

a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .

as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

other earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

stock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return .

all current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc .

amended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 .

shares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 9.7 million as of december 31 , 2011 .

total stock-based compensation cost was $ 36 million , $ 52 million and $ 34 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

the total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 13 million , $ 18 million and $ 12 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

stock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc .

stock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan .

under the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted .

the options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years .

upon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock .

the ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that 68 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .

1	( millions )	2011	2010	2009

2	royalty income	55	58	45

3	share of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )	37	45	-5 ( 5 )

4	gain on sale of assets	12	8	36

5	other	73	69	74

6	total	$ 177	$ 180	$ 150

Question: what was the value of stock-based compensation in 2011?

Answer: 36.0


notes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .

income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .

subsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .

the tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .

the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .

the tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .

employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .

the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .

for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .

for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .

the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .

the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .

effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .

this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .

on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .

compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .

a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .

as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

other earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

what was the value of stock-based compensation in 2011?

Question: what was it in 2010?

Answer: 52.0


notes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .

income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .

subsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .

the tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .

the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .

the tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .

employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .

the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .

for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .

for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .

the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .

the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .

effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .

this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .

on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .

compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .

a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .

as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

other earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

Question: what is the ratio of 2011 to 2010?

Answer: 0.69231


notes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .

income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .

subsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .

the tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .

the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .

the tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .

employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .

the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .

for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .

for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .

the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .

the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .

effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .

this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .

on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .

compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .

a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .

as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

other earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

Question: what was the 2011 value?

Answer: 36.0


notes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .

income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .

subsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .

the tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .

the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .

the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .

the tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .

employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .

the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .

for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .

for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .

the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .

the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .

effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .

this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .

on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .

compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .

a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .

as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .

other earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

Question: what is the ratio times the 2011 value?

Answer: 24.92308


to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .

the 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term .

the company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years .

at december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .

commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 .

future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .

at december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .

this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .

generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .

these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .

these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .

the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .

the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .

see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .

contingent payments related to business acquisitions .

in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .

in addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .

the fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .

from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .

federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .

it is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .

the company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .

additionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .

management , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .

however , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .

due to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .

in the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .

the terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .

consequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .

in connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .

at december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .

the company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .

the fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .

Question: what was the difference in rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements between 2012 and 2013?

Answer: 4.0


rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .

at december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .

this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .

generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .

these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .

these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .

the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .

the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .

see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .

contingent payments related to business acquisitions .

in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .

in addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .

the fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .

from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .

federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .

it is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .

the company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .

additionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .

management , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .

however , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .

due to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .

in the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .

the terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .

consequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .

in connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .

at december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .

the company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .

the fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .

what was the difference in rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements between 2012 and 2013?

Question: and the specific value for 2013 again?

Answer: 133.0


rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .

at december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .

this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .

generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .

these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .

these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .

the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .

the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .

see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .

contingent payments related to business acquisitions .

in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .

in addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .

the fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .

from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .

federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .

it is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .

the company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .

additionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .

management , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .

however , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .

due to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .

in the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .

the terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .

consequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .

in connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .

at december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .

the company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .

the fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .

Question: so what was the growth rate over this time?

Answer: 0.03008


entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .

the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .

2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .

utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .

non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .

the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .

following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

1		2002	2001	2000

2	net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475

3	generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171

4	capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

Question: what is the value of earning for non-utility nuclear in 2002?

Answer: 201.0


what is the value of earning for non-utility nuclear in 2002?

Question: what is the 2001 value?

Answer: 128.0


Question: what is the net change?

Answer: 73.0


Question: what is the 2001 value?

Answer: 128.0


Question: what is the net change divided by the 2001 value?

Answer: 0.57031


stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .

the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .

comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .

nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .

copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what is the net change in the price of the nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?

Answer: 10.78


what is the net change in the price of the nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?

Question: what is that over 100?

Answer: 0.1078


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .

the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .

inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .

change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .

provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .

effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .

recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .

undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .

instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .

field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .

following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .

this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .

company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

1		2003	2002

2	finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7

3	raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9

4	inventory step-up	52.6	2013

5	inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Question: what were net inventories in 2003?

Answer: 527.7


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Question: what were they in 2002?

Answer: 257.6


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

what were net inventories in 2003?
what were they in 2002?

Question: what is the ratio of 2003 to 2002?

Answer: 2.04852


a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .

an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .

federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .

operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .

period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .

the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .

the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .

periods benefited , typically five years .

for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .

the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .

the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .

new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .

the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .

( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .

each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .

receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .

inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .

the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

what were net inventories in 2003?
what were they in 2002?
what is the ratio of 2003 to 2002?

Question: what is that less 1?

Answer: 1.04852


at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus .

this reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment .

in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .

operating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments .

federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .

as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .

congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 .

similarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 .

bonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 .

higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .

2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation .

investing activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 .

higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 .

significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .

capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

1	millions	2015	2014	2013

2	cash provided by operating activities	$ 7344	$ 7385	$ 6823

3	cash used in investing activities	-4476 ( 4476 )	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )

4	cash used in financing activities	-3063 ( 3063 )	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )

5	net change in cash and cash equivalents	$ -195 ( 195 )	$ 154	$ 369

Question: what was the cash provided by operating activities for 2015?

Answer: 7344.0


what was the cash provided by operating activities for 2015?

Question: and in 2014?

Answer: 7385.0


Question: so what was the difference between these two values?

Answer: -41.0


Question: and the value for 2014 again?

Answer: 7385.0


Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?

Answer: -0.00555


entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed .

( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .

charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .

( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed .

( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .

it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .

the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements .

in december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements .

in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .

entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .

these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .

in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .

this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .

covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .

if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur .

in january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project .

capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .

Question: what were the total payments made for the notes entergy issued to nypa that lasted 7 years?

Answer: 756.0


what were the total payments made for the notes entergy issued to nypa that lasted 7 years?

Question: and the amount of the installment that was paid for eight years?

Answer: 20.0


and the amount of the installment that was paid for eight years?

Question: and the total amount of these installments?

Answer: 160.0


and the total amount of these installments?

Question: combined, what was the sum of the notes entergy issued to nypa?

Answer: 916.0


the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what is the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2009 to 2010?

Answer: 9.7


rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .

typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .

we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .

lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .

we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .

the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .

in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .

similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .

had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .

we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .

litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .

the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .

pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .

of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .

we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .

the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .

we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .

we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

what is the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2009 to 2010?

Question: what percentage change does this represent?

Answer: 0.16958


in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .

these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .

borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .

commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .

at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .

effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .

as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .

and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .

we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .

sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .

these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .

the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .

we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .

pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .

the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .

the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .

for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .

sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .

debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .

our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .

for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .

the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .

fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .

the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .

on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .

securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .

our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .

dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .

the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .

the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .

2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

1	type		face value	interest rate	issuance	maturity

2	u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 500	1.250% ( 1.250 % )	august 2015	august 2017

3	u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 750	3.375% ( 3.375 % )	august 2015	august 2025

Question: what was the change in the total debt from 2014 to 2015?

Answer: -1.0


in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .

these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .

borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .

commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .

at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .

effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .

as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .

and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .

we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .

sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .

these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .

the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .

we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .

pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .

the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .

the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .

for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .

sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .

debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .

our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .

for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .

the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .

fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .

the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .

on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .

securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .

our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .

dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .

the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .

the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .

2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

what was the change in the total debt from 2014 to 2015?

Question: and what was that total debt in 2014?

Answer: 29.5