--- license: cc-by-4.0 pretty_name: Detecture ICLR Benchmarking task_categories: - image-segmentation tags: - texture-segmentation - sub-semantic-segmentation - referring-segmentation - benchmark size_categories: - 1K_mask_.png ├── overlays/ image + mask visualisations (not ground truth) ├── metadata.json image paths, mask paths, descriptions └── summary.json per-dataset statistics CSTD/ ├── images/ 256 generated images ├── textures_mask/ 512 binary masks, two per image ├── metadata.json the 256-image evaluation subset ├── verified_256_ids.json the accepted ids ├── screen_scores.json per-image screening metrics for all 10,000 ├── screen_rank.json the ranking those scores induce └── screen_cstd.py the screening script, so the selection is reproducible ``` Paths inside every `metadata.json` are relative to the repository root, so the bundle can be placed anywhere. ## Read this before using CSTD CSTD is redistributed here as a **256-image hand-verified subset**, not as published. The original release is on Kaggle as `architexanonymous/cstd-controlnet-synthetic-texture`. The reason is a ground-truth problem. CSTD's released `regions/*.png` is the stitching mask fed *into* ControlNet, not an annotation of what came out. Where the generator invented a third material or drifted from the mask, the ground truth silently stops describing the image. Three failure modes were observed and confirmed by eye: a region containing two distinct textures, a third material appearing at an edge or corner, and a contour that does not sit on any real appearance change. All 10,000 images were therefore screened on texture features, ranked, and the top candidates reviewed by eye. **274 of 1,296 reviewed candidates were accepted, a 21% pass rate**, and the top 256 form this subset. `screen_cstd.py` and `screen_scores.json` are included so the screening is reproducible rather than asserted. Anyone evaluating on CSTD as published will get different numbers, and should. ## Download ```bash cd ~/datasets git lfs install git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/aviadcohz/Detecture_ICLR_Benchmarking . ``` Or from Python: ```python from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download snapshot_download( repo_id="aviadcohz/Detecture_ICLR_Benchmarking", repo_type="dataset", local_dir="~/datasets", ) ``` ## Provenance **RWTD-COCO** carries no predicted pixels. A whitelist of 28 surface-like COCO-Stuff classes proposes adjacent label pairs, crops are enumerated around the shared boundary and scored by a closed-form structural criterion, and every ground-truth pixel is a deterministic remap of existing human annotation. No SAM, CLIP, DINO or saliency model participates in its construction. **TextureADE** is mined from the natural ADE20K validation split by a geometry-first scoring procedure: acceptance rests on observable mask geometry, and a frozen vision-language annotator is queried only afterwards, against a region that has already been accepted. **RWTD** is redistributed unchanged as a cross-domain stress test. ## Evaluation protocol Every number in the paper comes from one protocol, applied identically to every method and route: no ground-truth region count in the prompt, no inverse-mask completion, no truncation of proposals to a known count, and no dropping of images where a method returns nothing. Region counts are inferred, never supplied. ## Licence CC-BY-4.0 for this bundle. Upstream corpora keep their own licences: ADE20K, COCO-Stuff and DTD are each governed by their original terms, and this release does not relicense them.