question
stringclasses 10
values | comments
listlengths 318
324
|
|---|---|
Do you support the government provide basic health insurance for everyone? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "Yes, I think government based healthcare is the best way to provide healthcare. It is obvious that the open market is not able to provide for the social good, economic good or even provide good healthcare left to its own devices. Right now, it is entirely to problematic that people cannot get healthcare, there is little access to healthcrea nd healthcare is wildly expensive. We have nothing to show for it either, we have little good outcomes."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "I believe the government should pay basic insurance to help people stay healthy, A multitude people are either out of work and cannot afford to pay for insurance. Other countries take care of their people Why the US don’t?"
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "Yes I do because I believe health insurance should be a right not a luxury, not everyone can pay insurance but everyone need it at some point in their lives so I think everyone should have the right to have insurance"
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "Yes. I believe that it's part of the purpose of government to care for its citizens' safety and happiness, which includes having a healthy population. It's also cheaper for the people as a whole than private care."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "I do support that. I find that everyone should be able to get the help they need without having to worry about paying for it. People should not die because they can not afford it."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "I do support it because it would force everyone to opt in and make the system cheaper and more efficient because of it, and most other countries have already done it and they seem to be getting along just fine."
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "Yes, this will go a long way in providing basic but important health care to the poor citizens of the country."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "Yes, I think that more people who suffer from autoimmune issues would be diagnosed and stopped suffering. I think healthcare should be similar to canadas healthcare but faster."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "I fully support the US government providing universal health care. American workers will not be able to compete in the global economy if they fall sick and cannot obtain health care due to its current prohibitive expense. Bearing this in mind, health care is not only a human right, but a national security issue."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "I’m in support of it as something the government provides but not if it’s the on choice."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "I do support basic health insurance for the country's population as it should be considered a human right to have access to healthcare. I however would only agree to this if care can be administered in a timely manner."
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "I do not support the government providing extensive healthcare for everyone because of the policies and monitoring of individuals that would have to accompany that. However, I do support the government providing basic care and necessities regarding healthcare to all on a simpler and scaled down manner."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "I wish the government would provide basic health insurance. I don’t understand how all these other countries can offer free healthcare to their citizens, but the US, which is supposed to be the greatest country in the world doesn’t offer anything close to it. Yes there is state funded Medicaid, but to qualify your income has to be so low it doesn’t make sense"
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "Yes I do. I believe in a nation as abundant as this one is the government's duty to do that."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "I believe a public option should be available along private options. Choice should ultimately be left to the american."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "the government should do that. i support it to an extent. tax payers should get it."
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "I do support because I think everyone deserves the right to healthcare. It would be wrong to keep healthcare from people because they cannot afford it, and it is the government's job to make sure that all individuals are cared for and accounted for."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "I support it because there’s a lot of people that can’t afford medical insurance"
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "No. Nothing in life is free and I think the Government is uniquely bad at running things. For the sake of quality it is better left in the private sector."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Healthcare should not be controlled by for-profit corporations who have an incentive to deny care in pursuit of profit. Only governments can promote public good without pursuit of profit."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "Yes, I highly support the government in providing basic health insurance for everyone. I believe having access to healthcare is a fundamental need, and shouldn't have to depend on income or job status. Universal healthcare will help ensure fairness for everyone."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "Yes I support the government to provide basic health insurance for everyone. Everyone deserves the right to equal health care regardless of how much money they have. Health care is a basic need and people should be able to get it."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "Yes I support government-provided health insurance for all. I think it's the government's responsibility to take better care of its people."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "No, I did not support Obamacare and I don't support this. Need to lower the overall dependency on government for everything,"
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "Definitely. Every citizen deserves basic health insurance regardless of income. No one should have to decide between eating, paying rent or receiving medical care. Most develpoed nations already provide universal healthcare. Here in the US we are the ones behind everyone else"
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "The US is one of the only \"first world\" countries to not offer universal healthcare for their citizens, it's entirely stupid for the government to spend extravagant amounts of money on the military for no reason other than flexing on other countries. This country loves to overreach to other countries over caring for their own people, not even veterans who serve the grand military get fair treatment in our healthcare industry, absolutely ridiculous."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "Yes health insurance is insanely expensive. I can't even afford it. It's ridiculous at this point I would rather die than be in a lifetime of medical debt!"
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "yes of course. everyone deserves healthcare, and the same standard of care, without regard to class, status, income, sex, race, etc. that’s the best way - probably the only way - to ensure a healthy society"
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "I do because being healthy and having good dental hygiene ain't a privilege, it's a human right. Not everyone has the same genes, has had access to dental care, or has had the ability to sit at a cushy job their whole life; these individuals are likely going to have more issues with their health and teeth. It makes you feel like you do not matter. I am here to tell you that you can't hold a job if you are sick every day, no matter how much society expects it. Taking away healthcare is genocide!"
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. It seems to work for other countries that implement it. It would alleviate a lot of debt and worry for people too."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "I support basic health insurance for everyone because I believe that it is the job of the government to ensure that everyone has health insurance. Also, I believe that it will help lower-income households to have better health outcomes."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "I partially support giving everyone access to affordable healthcare. It's the level of accessibility across the board that I can't fully get behind. If people fall through the cracks, the plan failed."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "I think that it is too costly for the taxpayer. It comes and the expense of other public services"
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "I support health insurance for everyone provided by the government. I think health care is a right and everyone should have access to it."
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "Absolutely! I don't understand how we can call ourselves (people in the US) a first world country when we don't provide healthcare for our citizens. I find it unfathomable that a majority of our citizens don't want to make sure that our neighbors have the ability to see a doctor when their sick. Ours is a sick society."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "I think that I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. I think that it is only fair for everyone to receive care no matter their income."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "I support government provided basic health insurance because it would allow more people to access needed healthcare. With private and public insurance, alike, no one wins. Either some services are out of reach due to copay cost or they are not considered essential. I believe that not only health, but vision and dental insurances should be included, as well."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "I do support it. I feel that basic health insurance will provide so much relief and support towards people and stave off so many from potential bankruptcy. That will lead to more people getting covered, hospitals not worrying if they'll be paid, and less medical debt which will allow more of that money to go into the economy through other methods."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I definitely think the government should provide healthcare for everyone. With the poor state of the diet for the majority of American citizens and the amount of taxes we pay, it is only fair. At the very least we need affordable healthcare to the normal person making $40,00-$50,000 a year individually. Like $200 a month."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. I think that the population would fare much better if it did. People would get the preventative care they need and more which would lead to better health outcomes when things are caught sooner."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "I do support basic healthcare for everyone. I think it would help catch potential life threatening diseases early on. Most people avoid going to the doctors until it is an absolute necessity because they do not have insurance and are afraid of the costs associated with treatment."
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "I think it should be an obligation for the government to provide for basic healthcare in the least as basically other developed country has a well established healthcare for their citizens."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "I do not support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. This would be incredibly wasteful and expensive. The government is not well equipped to provide insurance in an efficient or quality manner."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "Yes, I think the government should provide health insurance for everyone because it is a necessity, not a want. Similar to food and shelter, healthcare is a basic human right that everyone should have. Other countries have implemented this and have made it work. The United States should follow."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government to provide basic health insurance for everyone. The infrastructure for this is already well established through Medicare. All we'll have to do is expand it in each state."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "I strongly support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone because I think health insurance is a basic right every U.S. citizen should have. Current healthcare costs are so ridiculous for the average citizen to handle that it can take months-years for them to be paid off."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "Yes, I support basic health insurance for everyone. We must protect the rights for all people. To be kind to one another and make sure everyone has that support for health insurance."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "Yes, I do support it because some of the private health insurance offered buy private companies are too expensive and government-run Health insurance might be more affordable for lower income citizens."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "Yes I support this because most people need preventive care. This type of care goes a long way to keep society healthy. It's better to prevent problems when they're small before they spiral out of control."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "I do. I think it is a basic human right that every citizen should get healthcare with the taxes they pay. I do not think that right should extend to non citizens though and if medical care is needed, it is charged back to either the person or their government."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "I would be in support of the government providing basic health insurance. This has to combine or relate to current health insurances that are out there, making it easier for those in need without work/income and those with jobs/working class people."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "I think the government should provide basic health insurance for those who cannot afford it. Maybe they should because they would probably end up spending less given that people would have to participate in preventive care."
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "Yes I do support the government to provide health care insurance for anyone that does not have private health insurance, the cost is very high to seek medical care with out having any kind of health coverage, most people can not afford it."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "I absolutely support basic health insurance for everyone. A wealthy, developed nation should not let its own citizens die or suffer because they have to choose between healthcare and basic needs like groceries and shelter. It's just common sense that this should be a basic human right where affordability is not a factor."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "Yes. I have had difficulties with health insurance ALL of my adult life. I am under 21 (20), but my mom refuses to give me insurance as she says state provided medicaid would be better. I applied for medicaid after a psychiatric hospital visit and it took 3 MONTHS and was INCREDIBLY hard to fill out as I was getting over my psychosis. Now, I have moved states, I dont have medicaid again, and I am waiting for my coverage to get approved so that I can get a therapist and psychiatrist."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "I do support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone because every human being has the right to it. We all deserve access to health care."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "Medical health insurance for everyone should be a right given to all citizens of the country. You can find examples of other heavily industrialized Western societies with these benefits with minimal downside to their government spending"
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "I do and I believe America currently hs the worst healthcare set up. Its ridiculous that people have to decide between basic necessities and essential healthcare."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "I do not support this effort. It will bring the standard of care down for the folks that pay. Everything will be busier and people will be receiving healthcare that are not paying into the system."
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "Yes, I do because the government's responsibility is to provide for all of its citizens. Ensuring that everybody receives access to medical care is one of the basic needs of that responsibilities. Otherwise, only the socioeconomic elite can have access to healthcare, especially good quality care."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "Yes, I think the government should help everyone get basic health insurance. This would mean more people could see a doctor when they are sick. It would help make sure everyone has a chance to be healthy."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "Yes, I think this would be incredibly helpful to the citizens who do not qualify for a life event and lose their insurance. It would be nice for citizens to be able to accept a bare minimum policy just in case of any type of freak accident. As someone who lost their job and didn't get life event qualified, this would greatly benefit me and my children."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "No, I think that it should be private and that people should be able to choose what insurance they have. By having a basic health insurance it creates more lines and longer wait periods."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "The government should implement a national healthcare system paid for by tax money. As things stand currently, a large number in the country have medical debt which in turn is the cause for many bankruptcies in the U.S. And it's not a matter of money either, because as a country, the United States already allocates more money to the medical sector than most first world countries yet our healthcare system is one of the worst in the first world. It's about allocating the money more efficiently."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "Yes, it should be the bare minimum especially for a country as rich as the USA, which is the country I reside in. I am citizen and I am constantly paying taxes yet never reap the benefits like receiving basic healthcare and other programs like food assistance."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "Government provided basic health insurance ensures access to all. It improves public health which in the long run reduces cost for people and businesses."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "Yes, healthcare should be a considered a basic right of every American citizen. A healthy citizen makes a healthy nation. The level of care provided should be enough to maintain an individuals health to a minimum level that allows them to function within and contribute to society."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "I don't think basic health insurance should be provided for everyone because of the impact it would have on private health insurance and access to certain medications that may not be plentiful. However, I do believe AFFORDABLE health insurance should be made available to everyone."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "Although, I don't like the government having much control over certain things, I do think the government has a due diligence and should be responsible for providing civilians healthcare that is free or affordable. That is the least they can do for the people."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I support basic health insurance for everyone. Having access to medical care should be a right. No one deserves to suffer or be unable to get the care they need. The healthcare industry is so expensive and something needs to be done about it."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "I'd say that it highly depends on various factors. For one thing, you should have to be a citizen of a country to receive its healthcare. So in general, I'd say no."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "yes the goverment to provide free medical cover as a basic need by providing free medical insurance for a better tomorrow"
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "Yes, I definitely support government healthcare for everyone. I feel that if other countries that don't have as much revenue as America can provide healthcare to their citizens, then there is no reason why American can't do the same. Healthcare should be a a right to every human in my opinion."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "No I do Not support this. People who work should not get the same insurance as those who don't work. Socialized medicine means waiting forever for doctor's appts. while risking your health during that time."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "I do, I feel the current industry is terrible for everyone and needs to change. I rather not go into poverty based on one accident."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I think it would be a good idea to have to government support healthcare for everyone. Other countries do it and it works great for them. It would be super helpful for others how cannot afford basic healthcare."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. It Is important that individual have access to preventive and corrective care without worrying about coverage. I feel like it’s the least they can do."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "Yes because without it, everyone is on an unfair footing with those whom can afford it, afford to live longer on the average than people without. This should be a right for everyone, not a privatized industry."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "Yes, I would support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. They should already do this for their people. It should not cost anything and it should be good healthcare."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "Yes, absolutely. To be one of the most developed countries in the world, we sure do have one of the worst healthcare systems. Universal healthcare is a basic right for all, not a privelege for just the rich few."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "Yes I do. All citizens deserve a basic level of health security. People should not have to go into large amounts of debt in order to receive basic healthcare."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "I do believe there should be basic health insurance for all because the government can afford it and many people are dying or going into debt because they can't afford help or treatment. I believe it's embarrassing as one of the most richest nations in the world and we are on of the only few that don't provide health care for everyone. We pay taxes yet we get little in return and the government should help all."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "Yes I do We should follow the model of Canada and England I believe both of them have basic health insurance for everyone. I believe that there's so many taxpayers in this country that even their income would offset basic health insurance for everyone in the United States."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "Absolutely! Health care, ALL of it, should be a given right. Not just something the elite can actually afford for real."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "Yes, I think insurance should be a right, not a privilege. Every other civilized country in the world has national health insurance."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "It would personally depend on the guidelines of basic health insurance as to whether I would support a government policy to provide health insurance for everyone. If the government were to provide realistically affordable health insurance to all without the cost of procedures, surgeries, or other specialist visits costing so much, I would support it. I feel that private health insurance already costs way too much per pay period in addition to the deductibles that must be met first."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "yes because old people are pushed aside. eyeglasses, hearing. dental. Every other modern country has healthcare. Ours is run by greedy crooks"
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "Yes, not everyone is fortunate enough to afford expensive health care. There are those that are injured and can't go to work due to their failing bodies."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "Yes I do. It's very important that the government provide basic health insurance for its citizens. It's important to upholding the Constitution and fulfilling the promises of the Declaration of Independence."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "Yes, I most definitely do support universal health care for all, no matter what. This is because I have experience the current system myself, and one major illness is enough to bankrupt people. A system like that must never be allowed to happen. We need to switch to universal health care because of this."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "Yes, because your ability to take care of your health should not depend on how much money you make. The government would also end up spending less in the longer because things would be caught sooner."
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "Yes, to a degree. The healthcare system needs to be completely revamped."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "Yes, aa human being even if you are poor you should get a right to some healh coverage, you are allowed to live. It feels like a crazy odd thing to think its ok to let any human not have health coverage"
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "Yes. I support the government provide basic health insurance for everyone because the general population needs it. Moreover, health insurance costs are too high for most people."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "Yes I support government funded health insurance for citizens. No one deserves to suffer because they cannot afford basic health coverage to cure illness. The healthcare industry has become ridiculously overpriced and it's unaffordable meet basic healthcare needs."
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "The government should take care of its citizens. Gaining health insurance through work traps many in a cycle where they cannot work due to health issues, and cannot treat those health issues due to a lack of insurance. The government is able to negotiate treatment prices more effectively than insurance companies."
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing health insurance for everyone. I think this would help society to get the treatment they need when sick or having issues such as substance abuse or mental illness."
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "I think everyone ddeserves healthcare. the system neeeds an overhaula.theres no reason qrewfor many procedures being out of range to payt for, thus sacrificing someones health"
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "No, I want everyone to get insurance from their employers. I feel if the government gave everybody health insurance the government would go bankrupt."
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "Yes. I believe that universal Healthcare would be a great benefit for all Americans. Healthcare is a basic human right and I think it is disgraceful that so many people do not have access to quality care."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "YES!! Absolutely! We should never have tied health insurance to having a job. Everyone should get AT LEAST basic health insurance from the government."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "yes i do believe healthcare should be a basic right. people shouldn't have to die because they can't afford a treatment that exists."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "Yes, because it is more efficient on a cost basis than private health insurance. Healthcare costs have spiraled out of control because of private insurers."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "I think I’m somewhat supportive of it. I think people deserve some level insurance when they are injured and not put deep in debt."
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "I believe the government should provide healthcare to everyone. Studies have found that universal healthcare systems are more cost-effective than the United States' system of private, taxpayer-funded insurance plans."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "I do not. I would if the system was completed redone, but at this time no I do not. Socialized medicine has so many flaws and limitations that I do not feel you get good care in a timely manner."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "It would nice for everyone to have health care that was a US citizen."
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Healthcare is a necessity, and having access ensures people can live healthier lives without the fear of financial hardship. It also creates a stronger, more productive society."
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "Absolutely! Why should we pay taxes if we are not benefiting? No one should go bankrupt paying for healthcare."
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "Yes, I strongly support the government providing basic healthcare insurance for everyone. Other countries have been offering it for decades, so it is feasible. Americans pay a lot in taxes to the government and those taxes should go toward protecting us and ensuring a fundamental right, access to healthcare for all."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "i dont know, it just depends how much this will cost me. how much will cost to purchase this insurance too."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "Yes, I do. It's insane how most citizens of \"the greatest country in the world\" are one expensive medical bill away from homelessness."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "To be honest I haven't looked into it or heard about much. So I really can't answer that question."
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "I do think that the government should be doing more to ensure that its citizens receive aid when it comes to healthcare. However, I can't say I am fully in support of government based health insurance because it's bound to be a disaster. Government run anything tends to be pretty dysfunctional."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "Yes, I believe that this is a basic human right, and therefore the government should provide it. No one should have to go into severe debt or bankruptcy solely because of poor health."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "Yes I support this. I believe everyone should at least have the minimum care coverage for annual check ups, medication, and preventative health."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "Yes, I would support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. I believe that it would benefit the country having people being able to at least handle the basic healthcare needs of the people. Anything to help raise living standards of everyday people can only be positive."
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "Only if the person is unable to afford healthcare."
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "That is a tough question to answer since basic health insurance setup could be good or bad. I think it could be a good option due to people in need that do not have the means to pay for health insurance."
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. I think it is a basic need and not outside of the government's ability to help. People who think they need more coverage are still able to get private coverage otherwise, so I do not see a downside."
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Access to healthcare is a fundamental need, and government-backed insurance can help ensure that no one is denied medical care due to cost. It can also promote public health and reduce long-term healthcare expenses by encouraging preventive care."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "Yes I support universal healthcare. Healthcare is a basic human right."
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "Yes I do support. I believe everyone should have quality health care."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "Yes. It will create a more fair nation. It should be a national right."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "Yes, I do. I think a lot of lower income people need it, and the availability of universal health care would make the country a lot less sick."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "I do support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. I believe that health care is integral to a functioning society and when a nation's health is suffering, it has a ripple effect."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "Absolutely not! It is not the government's responsibility to be your parents! Go out and earna dn pay for your own insurance!"
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "Yes, Preventing disease and promoting the health of EVERYONE is more fiscally responsible and cheaper than the garbage health insurance industry"
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "Yes, because with all the money the United States spends on defense, the military, and providing aid to foreign countries like Israel, they should also focus on helping the less fortunate who sometimes go bankrupt due to medical bills."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "I dont know how I feel about this, I think of positives and negatives. Dont we already provide health care to some degree?"
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "It would be nice to have health insurance so that we can prevent our own early deaths. Unfortunately the government doesn't seem to agree with this. If they did we would have already had it. Instead they send billions of dollars over seas."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "No. The government should not be providing health care. It will limit care and wait times will grow too long."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "Yes, not being bankrupted by an ER visits should be a basic right. Preventative medicine should be available to all."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "health care is very important to everyhuman so its right for government to support"
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "I do support basic health insurance for everyone. As it stands, people who don't have insurance and don't qualify for medical assistance, accrue large medical debt. Everyone should be taken care of, not the rich or very poor."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "I do support universal health insurance, as long as it is administrated in an efficient and ethical way. I feel that many people would benefit from this type of service."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "Yes, i believe everyone deserves basic health care without cost to the individual. I would be happy to have increased costs on my taxes if it meant people who need treatment for any illness could get it even if they couldnt afford it. Oe should not go into debt because they cannot pay for necessary health care."
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "Yes, I do support this. I believe that the amount you currently have to pay for health insurance without maybe even using it is absurd. I believe healthcare should be a right, and there is plenty of money to go around for it people are just too selfish and greedy to admit it."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "Yes. Healthcare is a basic human right.. Many other nations are far ahead of the U.S. in this regard. No one should go bankrupt just to stay healthy."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. I think that basic health insurance is a basic right and any country that cares about its people would provide this."
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "Yes. I think it is the responsibility of the government to ensure the health and safety of its citizens. Basic health insurance should be a guaranteed right of all citizens."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "Either the government should provide health insurance for everyone or the government should stop tax-privileging buying insurance through your employer. I'd much prefer the latter, but the former is better than nothing."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "The majority of the most industrialized countries offer universal health care to their citizens. The USA is the only one wIthout this service. In the USA the medical expenses for some treatments are so high that people are compelled to file for bankruptcy!"
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "If it is fiscally possible and benefits can be provided to everyone equally and efficiently than i support it completely and look forward to more inclusive healthcare"
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "I would support this only if they can guarantee that no foreigners, illegal's, or anchor baby's can get it."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "I don't. I feel that the cost of Healthcare is too expensive. But if the government has to provide insurance for everyone it will just cost us more in other ways."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "Yes I do. It is a basic human right and should be provided for all. We are in the year 2025, there is no reason we shouldn't be this far advanced and progressive in our society, it benefits all areas of life, productivity, work, and fulfillment."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "By the government, we mean taxpayers, but yes I would support that some of our current tax-paying dollars be allocated toward a basic health insurance of some sort. Medical treatment is way too expensive and should not be in the hands of WallStreet. It is a common necessity that is required for basic human decency."
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "Yes. I believe health care is a human right. Health care is far too expensive in my country, even with a government tax credit amd insurance."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "I am not sure, I really do not understand it."
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I do not because that would mean the quality of healthcare is shit. I have several Canadian friends who say how horrible public healthcare is."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "Yes it should be free for everyone"
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "Yes, I would support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. If someone wanted to increase their coverage or have better insurance, they could do so by paying their own money. However, I feel like everyone should have their basic right of receiving health or medical care without worrying about the financial strain of paying for the insurance."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "I do not because I feel that many people would abuse it to try and get medications that they do not actually need. It would also put many people out of a job and overall, I feel that it would wind up being chaotic."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "No"
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "Yes. I think it will reduce the number of people using the Emergency Rooms as doctors offices."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "I do support that. I think everyone should have access to health insurance."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "Yes, the Government is trying to increase the services for the sick"
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "Absolutely, I don't believe that is 2025 in American any human being should not have access to healthcare regardless of what it's for because they can't afford it period."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "I do support the government supporting basic health insurance for everyone because as the supposedly richest country in the world we can afford it. Most other countries that are our equals have universial health care. Even Israel who we pay our taxes to has universal health care."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "No it is dangerous because basic coverage is paid for but anything that goes past that becomes nearly unaffordable."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "I do support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. We are the only developed country that does not have government health care for all. No one should have to worry about having enough money to pay for a doctor if they get sick."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "Yes, I think it would be a good thing to provide basic health insurance for everyone for large expenses."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "Yes, I feel like it’s a fundamental right. Not only that but there is a huge cost savings to be had with reduction of bureaucracy and more preventative care."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "yes i would support this because it helps lot of people specially poor people who cant afford for insurance related things"
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "I support the government helping to offset the cost of health insurance for most people. I support Medicare and Medicaid for others that are older and disabled."
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Access to healthcare is a fundamental need, and ensuring coverage can improve public health and reduce medical bankruptcies. It also promotes equality by making sure no one is denied care due to financial constraints."
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "No. I support the government providing emergency medical care for citizens. Non-emergency care can be saved up for, and illegal aliens should not be getting government provided anything."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "Yes, I believe health insurance companies just provide an unnecessary barrier between people and healthcare. They're a third party involved in the mix whose only goal is to make as much money as possible, degrading care and providing little or no benefit."
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "Yes I do. I believe everyone should have access to this. Just for the needs to regular doctor visits."
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "Yes i think health care is a basic human need every should have a right to"
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "No. I don't trust the government. The government generally wastes huge amounts of money and does a terrible job with pretty much everything. And most of the people in government are evil and incompetent. Also it would be too expensive and we already have an extreme amount of national debt and can't pay for everything except through deficit spending."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "no, but I do think the government should help the poor and the elderly. People should take accountability for their own care."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "Yes I would support BHI for everyone. It would be the right thing to do because of the cost of healthcare."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "I believe that health care should be made affordable to all. I am concerned about the decrease in the quality our health care systen if it were universally accessible. We already don't have enough time to spend with our doctors"
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "I support universal healthcare 100%. Healthcare should be a human right."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "I do think that health insurance is a very important necessity for everyone to have and everyone should have the same opportunity to receive government health insurance. It’s something we need not something we just want."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "Yes I support a certain level of government provided health insurance for everyone because health shouldn't depend on someone's ability to pay"
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "I think the government should provide health insurance to all. Health insurance should be able right, not a privilege."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "Yes I do! I believe everyone should have basic health insurance coverage. I actually think this may work better than the system we have in place now."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "I believe at the vary least they should provide life saving procedures and chronic illness treatment. It would be exceptional if they covered all but elective care."
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "Yes, I view healthcare to be a basic human right given the amount of wealth that disproportionally exists in this world. If it weren't for society, the wealthy would not be able to enjoy the manner of life and safety that they enjoy. Those that enjoy wealth need the general population and under any moral view these people should be entitled to healthcare."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "I would support this because I think access to healthcare is a basic human right and people shouldn't have to rely on a job to provide them with tools to better their health. If the government does this, then people would get the help that they need without too much worry of financial burden."
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "Yes I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. If everyone had a guarantee of health insurance, many more people would take preventative steps to remain healthy. Because of the cost of health care, too many people delay taking routine tests and avoid yearly doctor visits. Too many people use the emergency room as their method of health care."
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "Absolutely I do there are so many suffering from diseases that they can't afford to take care of. I'm a diabetic and it's really hard to afford the supplies and I can't get the continuous glucose monitor and I really want it."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "Yes. Tax dollars should be used to ensure everyone has access to health insurance."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "Yes I support universal Healthcare. We are the only developed country in the world without it be ause the companies that run Healthcare are making too much money while people die because they can't afford it."
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "I support the government providing basic health insurance to cover certain types of medical conditions such as emergencies and necessary life-saving medications. There should be no reason for someone not to be able to receive life-saving care in emergency situations."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "If you tax citizens you should contribute to all citizens having the best life possible. This includes healthcare, safety, financial freedom etc."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "No, individuals need to purchase their own health insurance policies. It’s called doing the right thing by paying your own bills."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "No, not really due to the fact that new medicines, treatments and procedures would be limited do to cost. However, Medicare and Medicaid need to include more people to make a more standardized system for all people that is consistent and proven. You can’t break your leg in Aspen Colorado and your bill is 12,000 dollars. You can’t break your leg in Compton Los Angeles and your bill is 2,500 dollars. This is unfair and biased. I feel we need much more standardization up to a certain point of Income, like for example 60,000 a year of income."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "yes I do \r\nI think we can pay more taxes for it verses paying the cost of insurance, co pays, deductibles and the bill"
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "Absolutely, we are the richest nation in the history of the world."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "On a worldwide basis, single-player systems have demonstrated considerably more success than what the US has. Details matter, though, and government-paid \"basic health insurance\" makes me suspect considerable dysfunction."
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "Yes I do think that the government should provide basic health insurance for everybody, because alot of people dont have access to the same resources as priviliged people and I think everybody is entitled to healthcare. Why should it cost to be able to stay alive"
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "I believe health care is a right, and not just for those who can afford it. Health care should be provided for everyone, regardless of ability to pay."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "I support the government providing insurance for everyone. Our current system is very inefficient."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "Yes. People are able to live happier, healthier lives with access to healthcare and health insurance. This benefits entire communities."
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "Yes. Healthcare is and needs to be recognized as a basic human right. Profits and capitalism shouldn’t decide people’s health."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "Yes to an extent. Ive been torn on this topic because I hear about the long wait if you are in universal healthcare."
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "yes absolutely! healthcare is a right and everyone should have access to it. The impact that not having healthcare has on people is exponential"
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "I do not support government provided health insurance for everyone. This will drive up the insurance cost. Government is always less efficient than private sector."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "I absolutely do. Why do we even have taxes if it's not to support health?"
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "Yes I support it, because I think healthcare should be a right, not a privelege. We can become a healthier nation if everyone has access to healthcare. People can also be more financially stable, because they don't have to worry about cost of ongoing healthcare or going broke over emergencies."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "I absolutely think the government should provide basic health insurance for everyone. Nobody should die because they are too poor or have worse health outcomes for their family because they have to choose between groceries and healthcare."
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "Yes, I think the government should provide basic health insurance for everyone. Health care should be a human right and no one deserves to go without affordable care."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "I believe the government should provide health insurance for everyone because it should be a basic human right. Health insurance is too expensive in the US."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "I do support the government providing basic health insurance for those who can't afford or have the opportunity to have work related insurance. Just like they provide assistance to mothers."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "I do support free health services for everyone. People have to make choices with their money and bills come before medical."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "I think the government should provide health insurance for everyone, Thad would help a lot financially on most families who are struggling"
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "No. People need to take care of themselves and stop depending on the government for their basic needs/"
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone, because I believe access to healthcare is a fundamental need and no one should have to go without medical care simply because they can’t afford it."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "Yes, I do. I believe everyone should be cared for with health insurance. I do not trust health insurance companies, and I think it'd be better to have a government provide an option."
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "Yes, everyone should be accepted and admitted in case of emergencies"
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance. Everyone needs access to health care and the US has made insurance challenging."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "Yes I do. Everyone deserves to have basic health insurance. When you have to go years without going to the doctor because you can't afford simple blood test. Everyone should have the right to be treated for illnesses"
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "I do think government should provide basic health insurance to everyone. Private healthcare does not work since it's too expensive. People are going into debt because of healthcare alone."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "Yes I do, I think everyone should be provided healthcare. We all deserve the opportunity to health coverage and care regardless of age, income, etc. Insurance is incredibly expensive and many can’t afford it."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "No, I don't support this. I feel that universal healthcare will ultimately greatly diminish the quality of healthcare in this country for all citizens."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "I used to support our government providing MEDICAID for all. Now, I am not getting any health care other than urgent care!!! It will never become better for me, I support the Big Beautiful Bill now, 100%, let's trash more people just like me. Yeah, I am bitter and angry."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "Yes, I support basic health insurance for everyone. I think the fact that it is cruel that our finances are dependent on whether or not we receive the care we need to live a healthy life."
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "Yes, I do because it is our government responsibility to make sure that citizen stay safe and healthy as much as possible."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "Health insurance is not a right under the United States Constitution. If one wishes to have health insurance, one must pay for it themselves. Many times an employer will contribute towards health insurance for the employee as an extra benefit."
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "Yes. I have an autoimmune disease and the medication is $18,000 a month, but I pay $0. People without insurance would just have to suffer."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "I do think the government should provide basic healthcare for everyone. It has been shown in studies that it would actually be cheaper to provide healthcare for everyone vs. the way it is handled now. Having a private healthcare system prioritizes profits over people’s health."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "Yes, I support the idea of this because then it removes the worries of anyone who does get harmed, sick, or worse. It allows people to willingly go too the hospital without the fear of having to pay for medical bills that cost more then renting an apartment."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "Yes I do. I believe that everyone should have access to insurance and healthcare."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "Yes. I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Health insurance in this country is way too expensive. It is out of control."
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "Yes, I support it. Basic health insurance should be a shared foundation, not a privilege. It helps stabilize families, reduce long-term costs, and reflects a society that values well-being over bureaucracy."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "No. Its not ok. Too expensive."
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "I definitely think the government should provide universal health care for all citizens, free of charge. Canada does it, and other European nations do as well. It’s a simple matter of setting priorities."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "I think it should be a requirement for the government to provide health care to all of it's citizens. everyone should all get access to the same medical care regardless of their income."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "No I think it should only be given to those who truly need it. I think socializing health care will result in less quality care for some"
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "Yes, no one should be denied healthcare. Everyone has a right to life and to live in good health. Receiving medical care should not put anyone in financial ruin."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "No because this will further artificially inflated the cost of medical care. There is only so much capacity in the system and to expend that capacity takes time and capital and human resources, and all of this cannot be provided nearly as rapidly as demand for health care will increase. This will embed the higher cost and then we will see the cascading effects."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "Yes, I think the government should provide a safety net of basic health insurance for everyone because it will save lives and is the right thing to do for the citizens, many of whom paid taxes their whole lives."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "Very much well, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone, I believe access to basic health is a fundamental right and making sure everyone has coverage would improve public health and reduce financial stress for families"
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "Yes, I strongly support that the government provide basic health insurance for everyone. Everyone should have the right to health insurance."
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "Absolutely. Other countries do it very well. Medical costs are insane, I had trouble paying bills with insurance."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "I do support this and I think it will save lives. Many people cannot afford healthcare nowadays."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "Yes I support that Health Insurance is provided for everyone through the government."
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "Yes.It is a basic necessity that I believe everyone should have access too. especially if the FD and government allow certain products that are for consumption to be sold."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "Which government? If you are talking any government, no. It should be done privately as it will be a better service using that model."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "Yes. Basic insurance coverage protects individuals and families from catastrophic financial consequences."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "I support the idea but I don't really believe it's something that's doable here in the United States."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "Yes, I am a proponent for the federal and/or state government providing basic health insurance for everyone. The ability to be seen and treated by a doctor should be treated as a protected human right. Other countries - such as Canada - have seen success with public health insurance programs, ensuring that all walks of life have access to basic healthcare."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "No, I believe the cost would be out of control. Also the bureaucracy regarding healthcare would become so vast and arcane everything from appointment for doctor visits to surgeries would move ever so slowly"
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "The government should supply basic healthcare insurance for all of its citizens. This can insure that everyone is able to seek regular check ups to track their health and have access to emergency services to when needed."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "I do support health insurance for everyone. Many other countries offer it to their citizens. I think doing so would keep healthcare costs down."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Health care should be treated as a basic human right. Other countries provide health insurance for their citizens and there is no reason that the United States cannot do the same. So often, I have skipped going to the doctor or getting medication due to cost and I know a lot of other people do the same. This is not right. Taking care of all people aligns with my personal values."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "Yes, I do. Americans deserve health care that isn't attached to a specific employer."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "I think at minimum the government should provide basic health care for every documented citizen in our nation. I think this is reasonable, assuming part of the taxes we pay is allocated to this directive."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "Yes I do support basic health insurance for everyone. I feel as tho this should be a basic right."
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "No I do not. Nothing in life is free and providing “free” health insurance to everybody would have negative outcomes."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "I do not support the government providing health care or health insurance to everyone. I think this reaches way too far too provide 300,000 people health insurance, I don't even see how that is even possible. Furthermore, it is not the government's responsibility to provide it when there are companies and businesses that are looking for ways to improve their companies and they should be able to do that on their own"
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "Yes, I do support this. I believe that access to healthcare is a basic human right."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "Yes I definitely feel that the government should provide health insurance for everyone. there are so many people without health insurance that struggle with getting prescriptions and getting proper health care. If our government can send money to other countries then our government has enough money to take care of the people who live here and their health issues in my opinion"
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "Yes I think it is essential and a necessity for every human."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "Yes, I support the idea that governments should provide basic health insurance for everyone. Ensuring that everyone has access to healthcare improves overall public health."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. This is the right thing to do because a healthier society is a more productive and happier society."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "Yes I do support. The government should ensure that health is accessible to every citizen in the country regardless of their social status."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "Yes, healthcare is essential to everyone and there are a lot of people who cannot afford it. The government should make an effort to provide and subsidize it for those who need such assistance."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "I do not support this. The cost is too high and we already have a significant budget deficit. People should not be entitled to healthcare as a right."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "I feel that costs too much. They can help people obtain care, but shouldn't pay for it for everyone."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "I one hundred percent support this. It is bad policy for people to die because they can't afford to see a doctor or get their medicine."
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "Yes i think its good to give all heath care because it would make others healthier and able to work."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "Yes, I think everyone should have access to basic healthcare. It is the right thing to do."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "I do not support this due to the heavy burden it will be on all taxpayers. Individuals should have the freedom to choose private insurance plans that meet their needs"
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "I absolutely support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. I think it is a great program to help everyone in need. Insurance is expensive and I don't believe you should be denied health coverage just because you cannot afford it."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "I think for the poorest of the poor yes. Some people take advantage of the system. It should not be. I think it mostly should be for disabled, elderly that are poor, and single parents."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "Yes I do. I feel like most our tax money is wasted and mismanaged and with proper care and attention it's very possible to have basic healthcare for everyone."
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "Yes. I believe we should either have universal healthcare or at least health insurance coverage. No one should not have access to affordable healthcare."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "Absolutely yes! Most Americans can't afford Healthcare!"
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "All that qualified for it,meaning all that are LEGAL AMERICANS."
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "No, I do not. There should be a free market."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "Yes, I believe every citizen should have access to basic health care. It should be safe, easily accessible, and no one should feel they cannot receive help."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "I do support universal health care. However, I am a bit concerned about the quality this would offer, and am fearful of long wait times."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "Yes. This is essential for modern society."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "Yes, the government should provide basic health insurance for everyone. There are way too many uninsured families in the US that do not have any type of health care. This creates undue stress on adults and children, who cannot access preventative health care."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "Yes, I believe the govt should provide basic healthcare for all. In fact, I think it should provide more than simply basic healthcare."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "yes, i think the government should give basic health insurance for everyone. it would help people worry less about money and focus more on staying healthy"
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "no its too expensive and too easy to be taken advantage of by doctors and patients"
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "Yes, I do support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Health insurance is something everyone needs and it should not be tied to any factor such as employment, social class, or how much money someone has. It should be something everyone just has and is provided to them as a basic need."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "I do think basic health insurance should be provided Everyone should have access to the same care for their health whether rich or poor."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "No I believe health insurance should be abolished totally. The pricing in hospitals, doctors’ offices, pharmacies, etc. need a complete overhaul."
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "I do support the Government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Canada already does it, and it hasn't seemed to hurt their economy like our Government says it would here."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "Of course; healthcare is a fundemental right that the population should have in any civilized and functioning democracy. Not having it leaves healthcare open to big pharm, big insurance, etc and all the price gouging and corruption that they have traditionally practiced. Unfortunately the US is no longer a functioning democracy."
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "Yes, I support thr government provide basic health insurance for everyone. It is the right thing to do."
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "Yes, I believe the government should provide basic health care to everyone. I think healthcare is a basic human right right."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "Yes but it needs to be cheap and affordable"
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "Yes, i think it is a basic function of government to see to the Health of its citizens. Thise same citizens, if healthy, will contribute to society and pay taxes, and be productive. Thus paying for the basic health care."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "I feel everyone should have basic health insurance. I feel we all should have some type of coverage for our health."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone. Healthcare is a human right, and no one should be left to suffer without it. When people get sick, they should be able to access basic air so they can recover and live a long, healthy life."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "No, the system would be overcrowded and result in long wait times. It may take months to get into a doctor. However, the whole medical system in our country is corrupt and significantly overcharges, so it needs to be completely overhauled."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "No, I do not support it. The individuals should be made to pay for their own health needs. I think the government could channel that amount into other viable ventures for the benefit of citizens."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "Yes, the government should insure that every American citizen have the resources to maintain their health. Providing health care to everyone is a start to \"making America great again\"."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "No, I do not. In other countries this leads to very long wait times and overall worse care."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "No, I don't because I don't believe it is the government's responsibility to do so. It will increase taxes and costs to Americans."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "I think it is fair, every one, regardless of their income, can have access to a basic necessity.\r\nI also think medical costs can be very devastating sometimes and can prevent families from falling into coma"
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "I do support that motion. It would greatly reduce costs over time and would save millions of lives."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "No, people should be allowed to have their own insurance. While Medicare and Medicaid are fine, most people who are capable of buying healthcare should not be on government assistance."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "Yes because people shouldn't be in life long debt because they found out they have cancer or got hit my a drunk driver or are having a kid. It is unfair."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "Should make it available so poorer families can have health coverage. The poor should not be left out in this country."
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "I support basic health insurance for everyone provided by the government through our tax dollars. Medical costs have risen so rapidly that people can no longer afford health care out of pocket, and not everyone gets heath insurance on the job."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "I do support the initiative. However, the healthcare should be monitored to ensure everyone is getting the best care and that nothing illegal is occurring."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "Yes, in most first world countries this is normal and for some reason the United States doesn't have this because it is more profitable to charge large amounts and encourage pain and suffering. I think everyone should be taken care of and be given basic health insurance, especially insurance that will allow people to visit the emergency room."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "they should provide full health insurance for everyone. No reason other than profit to charge for health care. should just be a basic human right"
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "I do not support because it causes issues when you have major medical issues."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "I support the expansion of medicaid because I think everyone should have access to good medical care. However, I don't think universal health care is the way to go, though. There has to be a way for private insurance and expanded medicaid to coexist peacefully"
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "Yes, poor people shouldn't have to worry about not getting treatment. The current healthcare system even hurts the well-off people because insurance is so expensive."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "No. I feel that only specific people should be eligible for basic healthcare. These people must show a need for it and not be illegal immigrants."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "I do not support this simply because too many people will use it without paying their fair share. I do not think it'd be fair for people who can work, but choose not to to get free insurance from people who do work."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "I do. We are alone in the civilized world in holding our citizens responsible for funding their own healthcare. It is overly expensive, inefficient and unfair."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "yes. health care is a necessity and shouldn't be tied to age or employment"
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "I do if they are unable to work. If they are not being lazy and really need the help they need."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "Yes I do because I believe some people can't afford it so that would be very helpful. It would help keep people in better health."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government providing basic health insurance for everyone.\r\nHere’s why:\r\nPublic health benefits: When everyone has access to basic healthcare, diseases are detected and treated earlier, reducing the spread and severity of illnesses.\r\nEconomic impact: Healthier populations are more productive, miss less work, and are less likely to fall into poverty due to medical bills.\r\nEquity and fairness: Access to essential healthcare shouldn't depend on income or employment status.\r\nCost savings: Preventive care and early treatment are usually much cheaper than emergency or late-stage care, which helps control long-term healthcare costs."
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "I do support that because I believe that everyone has a right to receive Healthcare."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "Yes, I think adequate healthcare is a basic human right that should be provided by the government"
},
{
"index": 319,
"comment": "Yes, I believe we should have medicaid and medicare for all. Those who can't afford insurance should be placed on medicaid. Those who can afford $185 part B premium should have access to medicare advantage plans or supplements just like people 65 and over currently have."
},
{
"index": 320,
"comment": "yes of course it should be mandatory according to me, people might not save money for health related issues so providing atleast basic health insurance would really help them"
}
] |
Do you support requiring real-name registration on social media platforms, where users must register and post under their real identity? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "No I don’t support it. I think it’s fine to want people to post under there real name, but it shouldn’t be required. And I don’t see a real way to enforce it without asking for id documents that are intrusive."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "I do not support this. My main reason for preserving privacy is that I believe ultimately it will be for the greater good, rather than simply protecting those who seek to cause harm."
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "I support it because there will be more accountability with social media usage. I think this can prevent cyber bullyinh."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "I do not think that should happen of making people register under their real identity. This would cause companies to have people's information in a database that they would use to do who knows what. I find that they might sell our data to the government and use it as justification to arrest people."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "It depends on who is requiring it. If it's the platform requiring it that seems like a good idea, if it's the government then no."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "No, I don't. I think it's unfair in today's climate where many political beliefs are shunned (especially left leaning ones), and I'd rather not lose my job for simply supporting free healthcare."
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "Yes, i think this will make people behave betteron social media platfroms. Less cyber bullying, less scams."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "No, I think the internet should be anonymous if we want it to be. For example, Reddit is a good social media forum that has a lot of great information but its anonymous."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "I see the merits of such a system, and I think for just social media it's probably ok. This way, users real identities become attached to what they do online. However I also see where this takes away from peoples opportunity to be detached from their identity and speak on anonymous terms which I consider an important freedom."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "no i do not support that. I prefer the freedom to be anonymous. I don't see a good enough reason to require that"
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "I somewhat oppose real-name registration because, to me, it poses a safety risk to those who may be experiencing domestic abuse and are seeking community or resources online. At the same time, I understand how it may prevent people from posting inflammatory speech and bullying on social media. I do not want people who are marginalized socially in person to be further marginalized online,"
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "No, I don't support that. I think everyone has the right to online privacy and should not be forced to use our real names."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "I think it's a great idea to have users register under and post under their real identities to prevent harassment under the guise of anonymity. I think it would slow down the harassment online."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "Yes and no, because sometimes when you register with all of your personal information, there is also a risk of when an app gets hacked that all of your information gets leaked therefore you can be affected. But I also think it would be beneficial so people do not use accounts for catfishing purposes."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "I am against requiring real name registrations on social media platforms because it is an invasion of privacy and tech companies don’t have the right to require people to share personal identifying information. Tech companies could be using real names to steal data and sell sensitive information to other companies."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "No I do not support real name registration requirement. My reason is one, cyberbullying.it is as bad now, what of when someone truly knows your real identity?"
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "Yes and no. I think for the back office of the platform it should be real but if the person wants to create an alternative persona then fine. However, if the platform becomes aware of nefarious behavior they have the appropriate information. That said, in this day and age anything can be faked."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "Using your real name on social media platforms has both advantages and disadvantages regarding safety:\nAdvantages:\nCredibility: Using your real name can enhance trust and credibility with your connections.\nDisadvantages:\nPrivacy Risks: Using your real name can expose you to unwanted attention, harassment, or stalking.\nData Tracking: Your information can be collected and used for targeted advertising or sold to third parties."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "No, it is my belief that such an action yields little benefits with the potential for higher risks. This serves to further erode the right to privacy online and can result in real world consequences such as fraud, theft, cyber bullying, or in the worst case violence."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "No. I think people can make profiles with nicknames for many reasons. One reason could be not wanting your employer to see your personal and private life."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "Absolutely. It is disgusting how people's behavior has devolved due to the anonymity of the internet. This is a way to hold people accountable for the way they behave in public venues. If you do not agree, you have the right to simply keep your mouth shut and not post anything."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "I do not support this at all because anonymity online is very important to have. I would feel uncomfortable with my full name being displayed like that and I think that it would cause me to use social media a lot less. This would be a huge safety concern for many."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "I feel like it could cause privacy issues for those who don't want to be public. I don't support it for that reason. A better system would be having verified people with real ID. Give them like a check mark or star. That way people can verify public figures or businesses."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "Yes, I support requiring a real-name registration on social media platforms. I see it helping reduce harmful intent behavior online, as people are more likely to act responsibly when interacting on online platforms with their real identity."
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "I don’t think that’s going to change much based on how people act. It’ll only give these social media companies even more data of ours to sell."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "Yes, I do support. Nowadays identity theft is a serious issue."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I'm indifferent on the topic. I feel that it would make the most sense to have people require real-name registration because it gets rid of bots and people trying to impersonate others. On the other had I think it should just be a warning for people who don't register."
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "Yes I believe registering under your real identity is a great safety measure. It adds accountability for the user."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "Yes I support requiring real-name registration on social media platforms, that involve users needing to register and post under their real identities. By having users apply this measure, this will ensure that they are safely recognized as the actual user of this social media account and it has not been created by some imposter or person with fake intentions. A social media account should be able to be tracked to an identity of a real user and one that can be identified through proper data."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "I think it should be optional to use real or a pseudo name as per each person"
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "I would support this as it would make it easier to identify people and there would be accountability on the side of the owner of the account. This would definitely do a lot of good."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "I support it because it is your basic information. Yes you can post with a different name but it’s safer to put your real name for safety reasons."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "I do not support that. Some people want to have privacy and not have their name and information readily available on social media. We should respect that and allow them to do what they want."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "It could lead to identity theft and fraud. I don't feel like it's necessary. A balanced approach is needed to protect both safety and privacy."
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "I don’t support requiring real-name registration on social media. While it could reduce abuse and misinformation, it also limits privacy, silences vulnerable voices, and can expose people to risks in restrictive or unsafe environments."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "Yes, real name should be required to protect minors and people from impersonating as a minor. There are too many people using social media for bad purposes."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "I support requiring real-name registration on social media. This is because there are a lot of bots registering on social media platforms. This is one way to get rid of bots."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "yes. I think it is import that people are connected to their profiles. This would hopefully minimize harmful use of platforms."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I don't support the use of real-name registration on social media platforms, as this rule will most likely be broken anyway. What would stop someone from using another person's identity if they have all the required information to do so? I believe that the less personal information required online, the better for people to protect their identity."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "I think that by hiding an identity, sometimes people feel bolder to do or say things that would normally be frowned upon. However, I still think I would not require people to sign up under their real name, or at least make it so that their real name doesn't show to the public. Sometimes, people need to be anonymous for their own protection and safety, and using their real name could be dangerous."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "I don't there's no reason for people to have to use their real identity on social media. They do a decent job of flagging certain behavior"
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "I think that I support real-name registration on social media platforms. I think this because I think that people should be verified in order to lessen the amount of fakes online."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "Yes i support real name registration because it will stop a lot of unnecessary misinformation posting. i believe people will post more responsibly if there real identity is visible."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "yes,, it ensures authenticity and reduces scammers."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "No, because I don't like giving my PII away to the social media platforms. I don't trust them to safeguard my privacy, and I don't want them associating all my activity to my real name and information."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "I am not sure about this because I think people should have a choice whether they want to reveal their identity or not. I think there should be an option but for security reasons, authorities could encourage people to show their real identity. Just not through coercion."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "Yes, I think they need to be real-name registration because there are a lot of scammers and people who have malicious intentions to fool other people on the internet. It can be super dangerous, especially when it involves money. Making people use their real-name can help speed up the investigations if anything were to happen."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "I don't support this because I feel like it would threaten our privacy in many ways, sometimes people just want to be anonymous. There are many users online who don't post under their real identity and still abide to basic internet rules and courtesy without harming anyone."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "I strongly support the idea that users will have to post under their real names on social media since there have been too many cruelty and cyber bully using fake accounts and names. If people know that their cruelty and bully actions will be widely known, they won’t have the gut to do it often."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "No, personally I dont support real name registration on social media platforms for various reasons. I feel like online privacy is a right and should be respected. I also feel like it makes the potential for my information to be stolen by hackers a lot more likely to happen."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "I do not support real name registartion on social media platforms. There is an abundance of predators and hackers on social media and creating profiles under an alias is one way for users to protect themselves without disclosing too many personally identifying information. I believe platforms should prove better security and perhaps I would reconsider my stance."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "no, with ever increasing doxxing, requiring 'real' identity would make that easier"
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "No, I don't I think this is a terrible idea and a violation of human rights. There could be a lot of identity theft and could lead to all kinds of issues later down the line."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "A couple of years ago, I would have said that real-name registration was big tech overreach and a form of censorship. But i have seen a rise of vile, racist content/commentary online which has made its way into mainstream culture because people feel safe behind the anonymity of the internet to say the most cruel things. I think requiring real-name registration would hold people accountable for their behavior, and would tone down some of the nasty commentary online."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "No this is an invasion of privacy. It also leads to problems with how it will be enforced to ensure authenticity."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "I don't support having to self-identify when using the internet it should behave in the same manner as which you would if you were walking into any type of business where you are just a bystander."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "No, I absolutely do not support this. As much as this sort of requirement might improve situations where anonymity can cause problems or even fears among other users or public figures, directly tying real identifying information to accounts is much more likely to lead to serious real world safety violations and issues, especially in cases of data breaches, which are common."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "I do not support requiring real name registration. The whole concept of social media is an online persona, whatever you percieve yourself to be. That should be your choice, it's entertainment, not a job interview. lol You should be able to post as Woody Woodpecker if you want to. Furthermore you aren't required to post a real pic of yourself....my profile pic is a large weed leaf."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "no, i believe anonymity is beneficial to the online discourse,"
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "People should not be made to post on social media platforms using their real identity. It invades the person's personal privacy. It can surpress freedom of expression by opening people up to doxxing because some one doesn't like what they say or believe in."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "No I do not support this at all. This can be dangerous for someone who is either and average person or a celebrity, or someone viral on social media etc. due to stalkers and hate. Someone may want to not be found , or their real name being known but still wanting to have a life on social media. I dont think theres any significance in that idea, it will not prevent anything and may even be more of a bad idea."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "it can be for the good of social media .some people cant be trusted"
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "No. Doxxing is too crazy. There are too many people who want to do real-world harm for simply voicing an opinion. I would no longer use social media if I had to give my real name."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "No. I believe you should be able to be anonymous on the internet. Requiring real identity will lead to privacy issues."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "Yes because it keeps from being abusive online and saying hurtful things to people."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "No ,I don’t .This would be dangerous.It would make it easier for information to be stolen or hacked."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "I think you should register your real name, but then people just register multiple account, so it does not really fix much. If people are determined to be shady or unkind, they find a way"
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "Yes, having that would further help those against pedophilia. There's no room for those type of people who pray on the young."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "Yes, I think that could be a good idea, especially with how rapid AI is advancing. That's going to open a lot of doors for people to abuse ai and really do harm with social media. I feel like requiring something like might help curve that risk assuming its a good registration system. Also it might help people who have social media addiction."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I don't support it because I believe anonymity is one of the greatest thing the internet can provide. It can be real scary to constantly give out your real name to others because people can use that and find private information about you and maybe even put you in danger."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "With the increasing issues with sex trafficking and fakes, I believe this would be a good idea. Instead of paying to be verified, why not put everyone through some type of process? There's just so much going on with people tricking others into losing their money or more, that maybe doing this would get rid of the bots. Plus, I don't want to talk to someone as a business that has some weird fake name."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "I do not support it, because I do not think the social media companies are trustworthy. They're already gathering our information on all kinds of things, and use this information to form algorithms to influence us in many ways. Meta in particular has gone a step further in creating fake AI profiles that act like real people and trick others even into romantic relationships. I think forcing us to give them even more information is a privacy violation, they aren't a government entity."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "I would support a policy where social media users must list their real birth given names on social media displayed somewhere. I still would support that a social media account use a business name or fictitious name that relates to their topic (for instance, Mr. Beast), but I still would feel that their personal name be listed somewhere on their account information. I feel with so much human trafficking going on, that personal names are important to list somewhere on a social media profile."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "I do not support real-name registration that is public to the majority of people. Sure, it can be held within the database but some people want to keep their privacy and that should be respected by the social media platform. You are basically doxxing someone if it is required to post using their real name which can be traced to their phone numbers and much more."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "No, I think as long as people are being respectful online they should be able to post under a fake identity. For some it is a safety matter and for others just more comfortable."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I support this statement since it can help reduce harmful anonymous behavior, e.g., harassment ,misinformation, and online abuse. It also ensures accountability and fosters a safer and respectful online environment."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I don't support such a policy because I think it'd infringe on free speech. People should have the right to be anonymous on platforms that allow for anonymity."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "Yes and no. While I don't like putting personal information on the internet, I understand that making people use their real identities is useful for cutting down on things like cyberbullying. I think it'll most likely be the norm in the future."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "No way! It is an invasion of privacy. And in some cases could be dangerous to some. (like domestic violence situations and stalkers just for two examples)."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "No. Social media today is too risky. Forcing people to register and post with their real identities can cause real danger to those individuals if they post something that other people don't like. If a social medial company wants more genuine conversations on their platform, they can require real identity registration if they want to. That's their option. But this should not be required by law."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "I think users should register on social media platforms with their real names, because if they don't; then someone could use your name. Some people might use some kind of nickname or fake name and harass people."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "Yes I think when people have to be verified on social media platforms it leaves way less room for scammers, catfishers, etc. I think it holds people more accountable and allows for a more authentic space."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "Yes. While I support freedom of speech, in recently years the spread of false information, rumors, conspiracy theories and so on has become unmanageable. The use of real-name registration can usher in a level of authenticity as well as accountability."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "No. Social media is not a place that should require the loss of anonymity on general principle. Social media is a primarily advertising tool. That means that it's just like watching television in the privacy of one's home. One should be able to post what they want. Government can break confidentiality if someone uses the tool to break law. That should be sufficient."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "I am not really sure I support this because some people may want to remain private for whatever reason. Maybe in some cases the requirement would be necessary but not all cases."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "I don't support or oppose it. I can see both sides. I do lean more towards oppose, some people just want to be able to post and express themselves without everyone knowing who they actually are."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "I do support real-name registration social media because it will make the usage of making fake accounts much lower. There are a lot of impersonation accounts that are made to post negative things, to put that person in a bad situation. Requiring users to put register under their real identity adds another layer of safety and verification."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "No, requiring real-name registration on social media platforms, where users must register and post under their real identity, should not be necessary. There can be various reasons why someone may not want to post publicly."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "Yes I feel that it's important to use your real name and sites should require you to do so. People need to be safe so they need to know who they're interacting with."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "I definitely do not support this, as it violates fundamental internet privacy rules. I hate the idea of the government knowing my internet history and I would go to far lengths to hide my info if they did this. Now if it was voluntary, I'd be more lukewarm."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "No, because I feel this is a security risk. I personally do not feel comfortable using my real name on social media."
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "I think making it mandatory to use your real identity will be the biggest hurdle against privacy. I care about my privacy and don't use my ID name on any platform."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "I don't support this for safety reasons. Stalkers and violent political views are a few examples."
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "I do not I think it is ok to post under what the person registering feels comfortable."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "yes i believe you should because alot of people might try to scam you. plus if you give some off the wall name people would not be able to find you"
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "No, I do not support this since it does not give people the option to remain private or anonymous. People may not feel comfortable posting about certain stigmatized topics under their legal name as well."
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "I do not believe it is necessary and would make users of the platform more venerable. Users of social media platforms should be able to protect their identity from unwanted attacks."
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "No, I feel some people prefer their privacy being secure. I feel authorities can figure out who they really are easily. As such I find it intrusive and restrictive."
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "No, I do not. The internet is often not real life and shouldn’t be treated as such"
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "Yes unless there are family members that a person does not want to be found by because of abuse or something. So there are certain situations that a real name isn’t need as long as facial verification is done privately. After that, though, I feel like you should be able to use whatever name you want within certain bounds."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "Yes I Do! That is why I use Nextdoor more and more. It doesn't have quite the social media value since it is based on location and not on relationships...but it is very awesome for factual information! I would love to see a social media option that went that route."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "Yes because it would make people bully less if their real name was on there. Social media is so negative and its probably because people can hide behind their computer screen."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "I support the idea of requiring someone to register with the platform under their government name. However, I do not think that they should be required to use their government name as their public screen name."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "Yes I do support that. There are to many bots on social media. Also there are bad actors who try to sign up using a false name."
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "I do not support real name registration on social media. This is a dangerous precedent that can be abused by authoritarians."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "I support this, but only if it is a choice of the user. I personally would not like to share that information since someone could use it for negative reasons."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "Yes, this would hamper the ability of people to make fake accounts and sock-puppet accounts. It would add some accountability to social media, and wouldn't be imposing harm on anyone."
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "yes,in order to reduce identity risks.Lesser chances of data theft would exist"
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "No I don't support it. I believe it should be voluntary. I say this due to how dangerous it can be giving personal information online, and especially to such a large audience."
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "Yes because there are too many fake accounts. So many fake accounts lead to fraud and scams."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "Yes, I think that would be appropriate. Though I do think that with AI avatars it is going to be a heck of a mess."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "I'm somewhat cautious about it. Real-name registration could reduce online harassment, but it also raises privacy concerns and may limit people's willingness to express themselves freely."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "There should be some division there. It would represent too high a privacy risk"
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "Not really. Social media at its core is posturing and pretending. I don't mind if people use fake names."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "For some social media accounts, I believe this should be required. For example, accounts like LinkedIn should require legal names. However, social media applications like Reddit should not require."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "No. Requiring this would prevent anonymity and harm individual privacy."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "Yes\r\nI do because I would be able to know of they are fake. It is the hones way"
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "I am against real-name registration on social media. There is a higher chance of cyber stalking, that could lead to stalking in real life."
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "Yes because of the amount of scams happening, identity theft, soliciting and trafficing it would help a lot to require users to tie identifiable information to keep public safety. I do believe if we do this anonmity goes away"
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "I support because it's very important to platforms know who is using them. I think this diminish the probability of someone to post something offensive anonymity. Therefore, this can be more easily identify the perpetrator."
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "Yes. I do support the use of real names on social media. People who go by \"anonymous\" really annoy me. They are being sneaky and I never trust anything they have to say."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "Yes I believe requiring real name registration will cause for a more secure site.The comments will come from a real person that must be accountable for their replies."
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "I dont think it should be required for safety reasons. A lot of people have stalkers but still want to participate in social media."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "No I do not support this. This is a major violation of privacy and one could easily be doxxed."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "I think it would be a good idea especially when it comes to certain platforms. Although it wouldn't be a good thing for others, especially X or something like Reddit because the whole point is to stay lowkey."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "No, for safety purpose I do not support it I have women friends that use a different last name to protect her from any crazy people out there stalking her"
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "Yes I do, this hopefully prevents catfishing or hiding one's identity. I think it is the safest."
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "I do not support this. I think there should be an option for anonymous discourse. If you want to have a verified social media, thats fine; but I dont think that is the best version of the medium."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "No I do not. Social media or online presence shouldn’t be dependent on whether you’re using your real name or an alias."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "Yes I believe that should be required due to the lack of integrity and moral. People should be held accountable for their actions and their identities should be made known."
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "No, I think real-name registration is an invasion of privacy and can be used maliciously to siphon data to third parties."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "I don't think this is necessary. Anonymity is a precious thing."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "I don't support the part that you have to post under your real identity. People can find you in real life and go harm to you if they know your real identity. I do support registration under your real name but you can use a different name online."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "No. We've seen that many people say and do wild things under their actual identities. Facebook is entirely real-name based and is one of the largest sewers of misinformation and harassment of all the social media platforms."
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "Yes. Needing to properly identify one's self would certainly prevent some of the outrageous uses of social media, such as bullying. When people can hide their identities, they can say whatever they want without responsibility."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "No, I don't think it's appropriate. User privacy is important."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "No because It can leak identity. I think it's should not"
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "Yes I believe people should have their real names. There are children on social media that have been targeted from crimes and people commit other crimes anonymously by not using their real names with scams"
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "No i dont think you should have to just like i shouldnt be forced to use social media to recover an account. I had to do that the other day and wasn't happy about it because it wanted identifiable information. i believe we have a right to privacy and this policy violates that."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "I do not support requiring real-name registration. It is abused by companies to gather and sell your data."
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "I think this can be given as an option for those who are interested but it should be optional not forced on everyone"
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "No, I think people should be allowed to use an alias, or an alternative name. Not everyone wants to be forcibly identified when browsing online and using the internet. Companies try to require identification so they can sell data to marketing and advertisement firms to target ads at your interests and I should be getting paid for my personal data, not social media companies."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "I dont agree with having to post under your real name. I can get behind registering as yourself, even providing ID, but you shouldn't be forced to post as yourself."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "I do not support requiring real-name registration since it limits privacy and may discourage free expression online. However, I understand it could help reduce anonymously abuse and misinformation."
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "In some ways I agree to ensure accountability and trust. However, I also don't agree since the slightest statement or position could be deemed offensive and ruin the person's reputation."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "Yes, this way there will be few to no catfish. This will also reduce the number of fake accounts."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "No, I do not. Number one, I think privacy should be guaranteed. And number two, this potentially opens up a massive data protection issue."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "Yes, I support real name registration. I also think they should be able to post under any name they want to give as their handle."
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "No, I believe that would open people to cyber attacks. Part of social media is the ability to comment anonymously."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "I do not support anything with posting my own name anymore. I feel like now, I don't want anyone to know my name unless I know you personally."
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I think it would be better. It would eliminate a lot of baiters out there. People would be more inclined to express a more careful opinion."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "Yes, I do. I think real-name registration would be good for social media. I support this idea."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "I totally support requiring real name registration on social media. I feel a lot of people hide behind the anonymity of a social media profile and spread vicious though that they wouldn't say in real life."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "Yes I do support it. You have the choice not to use social media, so if you are worried about your identity then don't use it."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "I DO SUPPORT REAL-NAME REGISTRATION, BECAUSE I FEEL IT WOULD DISCOURAGE SCAMMERS AND PREDATORS. I THINK IT WOULD HELP DETER ONLINE CRIMES."
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "I do not support this because some of us do not feel comfortable using their real names, or have safety and security concerns. For instance, most of my friends who are teachers cannot use their real name. Everyone is under scrutiny now for their online profile due to discriminatory hiring practices. It seems as though no one can have a personal life online anymore."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "I support real-name registration in some contexts because it can reduce harassment, misinformation, and bots. However, it may limit privacy and safety for vulnerable users, so platforms should balance accountability with protections."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "Yes i would approve that because there is alot of deciet in the world."
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "I am a little unsure of this. On one hand, no, I do not support this. Some people do care about their privacy and do not want to have their real name online. But, some people do post hateful things online under aliases, and it would be nice to know who those people are."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "No. How would that be useful at all? All this would do is make it easier to dox people. My privacy is invaded enough as it is."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "No. I don’t think it matters. People will find ways around it."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "Lame answer but I really think it depends on which social media platform. Something like Facebook that is designed to keep you updated on the lives of your friends you should have your real name. Something more like Reddit that is based on just your interests I think it's better to keep the anonymity."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "Nah, social media is not real life. There is no need to really exist there if I exist in the real world."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "No, I do not. On social media such as Reddit half of the appeal is remaining anonymous."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "it depends on what type of social media platform it is. If it's something like linkedin or job related or professionally related in any way, yes. That said, if it's something more laid back like tiktok I don't think screen names are a bad thing"
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "I'm kind of split on this question I think it would be wise if the social media company has the person's real name, but I don't think it's necessary for them to actually post under their real name visible to everyone on the website I think that it could create problems for certain people that work in certain industries or say they work for the government and they don't want to lose their job, but they think that by posting Relevant information they would lose their job by posting under their real name, but they feel that the world and the United States should know about things that are going on inside the government for example"
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "I think this is a great idea. There are so many fake accounts right now it's hard to tell who is who. This authentication process would eliminate that confusion."
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "Depends on the type of social media app. Mindless video scrolling or entertainment apps, I believe there's no use. For social media apps meant to connect, I believe an argument can be made for that."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "Yes I think this is a good idea. It would make people more accountable to be honest."
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "No, because it threatens the privacy of users with sensitive requests and/or unsafe living situations. Social media platforms can offer emotional support and access to information which may not be available offline. For example, a woman fleeing an abusive husband may want to stay anonymous in an advice forum."
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "I don't support this at all. In the past user's were encouraged to NEVER share personal information online, especially social media. This completely flipped, not or any good reason, but for corporate greed."
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "I support this policy because it seems that some people use fake names on social media to commit crimes or for bad reasons. If we require real names, then it would help to reduce crime on social media."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "I don't support this idea. I think it might cause real-world conflicts with people who did not agree or like their content."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "I do not support requiring real-name registration on social media platforms. The reason I do not support it is because I do not want more of my data to be stolen by these sites."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "I dont support requiring real names on social media. People should have the choice to stay private and safe. Forcing real names could put some at risk or make them uncomfortable sharing."
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "I understand the need for it. The way things are now, someone can hide behind a fake name. However, a bit of anonymity is something I prefer so a stranger on the internet can't find a way to track you down if you are showing your real name."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "That depends on the individual because using your ID information opens people to other dangers. I do support limiting the number of accounts one has."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "No, I do not support that. People should be allowed to have some degree of anonymity if they want."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "No I do not support this, there are various reasons one would not want to have their social media connected to their real identity. Safety being one of the main reasons."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "No, I do not support this. We should be allowed a level of privacy online. While I understand why people might think this could stop things that harassment, it won't, people still already act awfully with their full names on display."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "I do think that is important as people can identify with you and communicate with you more easily. Otherwise it would be difficult for other users,"
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "It will help people to be honest and sincere when they are talking and posting on there. It also makes people more cautious about what they post cause they don't want to say something that will get them in trouble."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "No I don't support real-name registration one reason being it raises privacy concerns that could lead to identity theft. Another reason I don't support is the risk of discrimination."
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "yes, i do"
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "I support real-name registration because It gives people second thoughts about posting derogatory things online. Part of the reason why people like social media is because they can hide from the consequences of their actions. With real-name registration, they wouldn't run the risk of someone coming after them."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "No. This creates a privacy concern and is not necessary for the purposes of most social media (with the exception perhaps of things like LinkedIn). In cases where a user might have committed a crime and needs to be identified, there are other ways to do this, such as using the IP."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "Yes I do support this. I think this is important to prevent people luring younger people into dangerous situations. I also think it's important to ensure all people's identities are on record in case of bad situations."
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "I support requiring real name registration because of pedophiles and sex offenders. People should know who they are really interacting with. People should not be able to hide behind fake names."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "I support requiring real-name registration on social media platforms, where users must register and post under their real identity because it will help decrease cyberbullying or trolling if we know who is engaged in the acts. Users are less likely to engage in such acts if their online posting can be linked back to their real identity, and potentially have real-world consequences."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "I think it would be a great idea...no more hiding behind a false name to tear other people apart. If you can't say something as the person you are, then you need to be quiet."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "I do support real name registration for social media accounts as I believe this holds users more accountable for their online behavior. it would make it harder to make burner accounts for cheating and bullying."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "No, i think the internet should be anonymous. It allows people to say what they truly think. Unless it is for business purposes."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "I wholeheartedly disagree with that. Its first of all government overreach. Next would be the union of corporations and the federal government. Also people should be able to use an alias online."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "Yes I do agree with this. It is important so they aren’t pretending to be someone else"
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "Yes because then Im more sure that people are who they say they are. I don't like fake users."
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "No, I do not support requiring real name registration on social media platforms, where you just must register and post under their real identity. I feel it's a person's right whether they want to disclose that information or use an alias."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "No. I think being anonymous is a personal choice. I refuse to splash my real name all over social media."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "Yes and no. Yes for signing up but i'd like to hear more pros and cons"
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "I think for certain social media platforms, people should be required to do this. This could include LinkedIn and if you consider yourself an influencer on a network like Facebook or Instagram."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "I do support this because there are too many security issues already to worry about. This ensures bots and scammers are unable to thrive"
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "Yes, I do support users being required to register with their real name. There are a lot of people who like to harass people anonymously, and this will prevent that."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "No because there is no need for it. There is no need to be so serious, as it is meant to be for fun."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "I somewhat oppose this requirement because I believe that regulating speech can lead to additional marginalization. A teenager who may want to learn more about the LGBTQ community wouldn't be able to interact with other queer youth if you required real names, because not everyone has the strength or safety to come out. Additionally, with the swing of political discourse to the right, I worry about leftist speech may be targeted."
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "It would definitely cut down on the bots which are annoying and make people more accountable for what they post but I'm not sure this is the way to go. I guess if you have nothing to hide this would not be an issue so I'm okay with it."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "I think it should be optional to do so. People value their privacy and nowadays it is getting very toxic to the point people are getting their identity stolen. I think in general users have a right to privacy as long as they aren't using the account for any nefarious behaviors."
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "Yes I support this. I think that by requiring people to use their real names, it can cut down on a lot of criminal activity."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "No I do not. I think the great think about being online is that you can stay anonymous and not feel judges."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "I don't support this because too often people who dare to share a different opinion other than the liberal approved opinion are attacked on a personal level. Basically if you are not in favor of the \"woke\" agenda you will be attacked. That is why I am okay with not giving real name."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "Yes, I think people should have to use their real name and identity on social media. If they didn't, they could use anyone's information and make accounts without the other person knowing. I wouldn't want someone to use my information on the internet without me knowing."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "i don't support support registration. its a privacy issue for me. information is being mishandled all the time."
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "sure i think thats fine as long as they have a goood privacy policy"
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "Only for platforms like Facebook that have always required it. In general, I don't think it should be required because social media is also about just having fun, browsing, commenting, etc. and not everyone wants all of that to be under their real name."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "I think if you choose to go on social media, then yes, you should register your real name if required. It is a choice to be on social media so if it's a requirement, you should follow it."
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "No! absolutely not! that is not private, that is not secure, that is not safe."
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "i do because it will stop people from bullying and people from making fake accounts."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "Definitely not. First of all, there are many difficulties of what is a \"real name\": your legal name? Many people go by different names than their legal names and this could prevent confusion and pain. It also would make it easier to connect people's online activity to their real life persona which is dangerous in many cases."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "I support this, keyboard warriors wont be able to hide behind anonymous names. It might make social media more tolerable"
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "Yes, I think it would help reduce the amount of negative deliberate trolling. I think people would be more accountable for what they post online. And I think that it would make social media less toxic overall."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "i dont agree. i think people should be able to have privacy if they would like"
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "No, if someone wants to hide their identity but still use social media they should be able to. Sometimes people want to hide from previous abusers or family members"
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "I dont think its necessary. The internet should be a place for ideas and using real names would lead to repercussions such as doxing, government persecutions, etc. So it should not have real names registered."
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "No. No one should be required to post under their real, full name on social media unless they're acting as a spokeperson for another entity where laws need to be followed regarding not spreading mis- or disinformation. It opens that person up to obvious harassment, trolling, stalking and doxing."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "No, user should be allowed to use aliases on social media. Forcing users to use their real name could lead to privacy issues"
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "I think it would be a great idea considering people who post harmful or slanderous things can be tracked but to a real identity instead of a fake username. People would be more careful on what they post on social media."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "No. The internet should allow anonymity. People deserve privacy."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "I do support real-name registration on social media because I think people need to be authentic about who they are. There is no good purpose to be under an alias on social media."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "for certain activities yes, but those wishing to use it ethically should be allowed to do so anonymously"
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "No, I think that is a privacy violation. That seems like it would lead to safety issues."
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "I think there are some benefits to this requirement. I would support it for some accounts and sites. I think there should be different tiers for this."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "no i do not. i shouldn't be forced to share my identity if it can be used against me. i prefer socials like reddit that allow anonymity"
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "No, with the proliferation of crimes that can be sourced from social media profiles, I understand why this measure would be considered but majority of people are on social media for purely entertainment purposes and we should not be subjected to an invasion of privacy if we so choose not to."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "I do not support this because if they do that its easier for strangers to get suold of your information. Also more crimes would happen if this was a requirement."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "I am torn on this requirement. Although I think it makes sense to require real-name registration to keep abuse down on social media, there is a privacy issue involved also."
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "I don't support requiring real name registration on social media platforms. I think that it should be voluntary. Individuals could decide whether giving out that information would expose them to any harm or possible retribution."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "yes, because it is important to know the people or the companies that are posting information online"
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "No, I think that is a terrible idea. It violates the anonymous factor that helps hide people from getting in trouble for expressing their views."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "yes because people may be less likely to spread misinformation, harass, or troll"
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "I do support it. It’s important to be able to trust people on these platforms."
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "No, that's a slippery slope. I think that would lead to less privacy."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "No I do not. I think people should be able to use social media anonymously to protect their privacy. There can be real world implications if people are using their real names sometimes - there are stalkers out there, job consequences, safety of family and especially children."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "Not sure, but I'd say I lean against it because it violates privacy for people who don't use the internet just to say and post nasty things."
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "No, users should have the right to be anonymous on social media. Users should be able to use nicknames or whatever they want as a username."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "No I do not support having to use your real name on social media platforms. It’s definitely putting your privacy at risk. The internet is a very unpredictable thing, and you should never use your real name on public platforms."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "I don't think it should be required. However, I think social media sites should all have a verification option where you can register your real identity, and those with fake identities wouldn't be \"verified\". I don't think it should be a forced thing, as some people want to protect their privacy against people they don't know."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "yes, I do support real name registration on social media to distinguish real people and freinds instead of random names and posting.It makes sense to do so."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "Knowing the real name would be nice. Some that I follow do use their right name. Maybe this can stop some of the frauds."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "No I don't support this. There should be the option for anonymity on social media so people can talk about sensitive topics (politics, religion, abuse, etc.) without any real-world repercussions."
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "No I do not support real name registration unless that is what they want to do. some individuals like to be able to express themselves with our back lash from those that know them."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "No because it’s freaky. It will put tons of women in danger."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "I think it should only be for verified accounts or businesses. Some people should be allowed privacy. People with abusive families or relationships who want to remain anonymous deserve the right to use social media too."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "I support registration under their real names but I am fine with their username not giving their real name for privacy issues. Some people don't want to draw attention to their real identity on social media platforms. But they should be held accountable about what they are posting and their real name should be part of the registration process."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "To a certain extent I do think users should register and post under their real identity because it can help prevent trolling and anti-social online behaviors. There is also a case to be made for using anonymous accounts which can help prevent privacy and doxxing issues in real life."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "No, this will actually create a negative platform for social media users and consumers"
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "No, I do not support that. I think that people should have the freedom to stay anonymous if they want."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "I could go either way. In one way, it's useful to be honest here. Sharing yur identity can be important. However, you are risking a lot when doing so. This is especially true in an age where personal data is bought, sold, and shared is a thing."
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "No, I do not. Many people are uncomfortable sharing their identity in a public platform online. It poses serious issues of privacy and safety for some people."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "I don't supposed requiring real-name registration because I believe it will lead to a violation of users' data. Data leaks seem increasingly common, and it is unreasonable to expect people to trust their data in the hands of random tech companies. I assume a real-name registration policies entail KYC measures such as submitting a picture of your drivers license."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "In some ways it would be great because of all the bots would be exposed. But it could also be damaging to free speech and lead people to be targeteď."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "I am not in support or against this. It is up to the platform. People will decide whether they want to use it or not. I personally would not use a platform like this as there are legitimate safety and privacy issues with using your real information."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "i like the idea for the most part, it helps keep everything real. Although i do understand wanting to have some anonymity."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "Yes, I agree with the real-name registration on the main social platforms that people use. These include Facebook, Instagram, X and Youtube. I believe this would greatly reduce the amount of online bullying and mental illness that comes from the internet or social media specifically. Anonymity removes accountability."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "I think it may be a good idea to keep people from deceiving people on social media. I also think that Facebook should allow couples to share a page if they do that, though."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "Yes, that would decrease scams, bullying, abuse, threats. This would make social media more enjoyable."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "No. I think it infringes on privacy"
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "I'm kind of middle of the road on real-name registration. I like the ability to remain somewhat anonymous on social media personally for privacy reasons. However, I don't like that people can use any name they choose (including pretending to be other creators and stealing their content) to defraud others and spread misinformation"
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I support the opposite. No one should be allowed to have a real identity on social media."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "I don't think it should be required. I think for some things (whistleblowers for example), some things need to be done anonymously. I do think, however, but there needs to be some safeguards in place to prevent people from using anonymity for harassment."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "Yes I do support this because it would be more safe. People wont be able to commit cyber crimes because there would be no anonymity."
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "I support having people register under their full names the verify that they are real. But I don't support forcing people to post under their full names since that is not usually safe and can lead to stalking."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "I support it because then there would be less spam accounts. Spam accounts make me want to not go on the internet."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "No. Too many crazy, criminal, and radical people out there that I do not want to have my name"
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "No, I do not support using real name on my sites. There are way to many scammers that will track you."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "I do mostly support this because I feel like it's more ethical for people to show who they truly are. For example, someone who posts and registers under a false identity may feel like they can do or say anything which can be very unethical."
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "No you should not have to use your real name. I think this would not solve any issues and just make it easy for people to exploit easy access to everyone's real full names"
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "I'm on the fence about that. I suppose it would be good for tracking illegal activity, such as child endangerment, so for that reason I could support it."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "Yes, I support it because people should t be able to hide behind a fake name and post horrible things"
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "I really don't feel strongly one way or the other on this issue. I really don't see it as a good or a bad thing."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "Definitely not, this is a massive privacy violation and goes against basic principles of the internet. I would strongly protest this move."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "Yes, I would support this. This would allow accountability for one's actions. It should cut down on some of the nonsense."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "I neither support or oppose, only because some people have nicknames that they like to go by."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "No, I do not support it because it could lead to harassment or undesirable behavior by others. For instance, a woman who posts on there could be found by someone who then goes on to stalk her."
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "I'm not sure. I think we all should not be afraid to identify ourselfs. But with cancel culture prevalent amongst leftists it could be dangerous to identify yourself."
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "No, I don't support this. It's an invasion of privacy."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "I do support individuals being required to register with their real names, on certain platforms. I believe this would cut down and limit trolls and fake accounts that are tied to ai farms."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "Yes, I agree. Users should register with real names, mostly for practical reason but also for safety .Cyber bullying comes to mind."
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "No, because then i would have to do the same. I would support it if you could register with your name, but then have a different screen name."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "I do not believe that this should be required. I am concerned about privacy concerns and issues with stolen identities."
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "Absolutely not. It has so many issues and does not address the root issues."
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "I do not support requiring real name registration for social media. I believe it serves its purpose as an anonymous way to share ideas, which is important. Also, people seem to be able to find out who people are regardless."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "No, I do not support it. I understand why it would be wanted but privacy is still important."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "No I think people should be to use other names. I think users can have other identities."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "Yes, I do support requiring real-name registration on social media. It is too easy to be completely anonymous, and people can just pretend to be anyone they want."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "No I do not. I believe people have the right to anonymity with regards to social media (including from the platforms themselves as well as any corporation they are associated with). Requiring real names could lead to doxxing, stocking, and purusant crimes and other unwanted behave perpetrated against users, their families, or even their friends."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "Absolutely not. For some people to engage in discussion, confidentiality is required. For others, unfortunately, it provides a means to spout crazy views. That said, it is worth the risk to maintain confidentiality."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "No, that is a personal choice, no one should have to give their real names."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "I support it because I feel it could put a small limit on the scammer situation. But I dont think it would do as much good as they would like it to"
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "I don’t support requiring real name registration. People should be free to use whatever name they want (so long as they’re not impersonating anyone). I don’t trust those who run the platforms to protect users, and I don’t trust the government to allow freedom of speech. Requiring people to use their real names makes it easier for powerful people to silence those who justly criticize them."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "i think it is good in some ways to protect users from being attacked anonymously. i also think it can lead to some pretty big privacy concerns."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "I don't support requiring real name reregistration. This is because this could allow people on the internet to doxxing someone without their permission and for people to start harassing them both online and offline."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "I support requiring real-name registration on social media platforms. This would massively help reduce online/internet abuse as verifiable identities can be traced to persons who indulge in such behavior. \r\nPeople be more cautious of what the put out as it can be traced to their real identities. Misinformation will be curbed."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "I absolutely support real identity requrments. There is no legitimate reason anyone should be able to hide their identity online. Lets start having some real personal responsibility."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "I do support real name registration, this way if there is any monetization on the platform, users are set up for it. Also it helps to ban people who decided to be pervs or stalkers. I do not think people should be forced to post under their real identity though."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "Yes, I support real name registration on social media. There are so many internet users expressing hateful and racist comments nowadays. I believe these people deserve to know under their real name instead of being anonymous."
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "No, I do not! It prohibits the privacy and safety of it's users."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "Yes, they should. That way if something were to happen, they can be held responsible for it."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "I think doing this would curb hateful and dishonest speech as a person could not hide behind a fake identity. I feel the benefits of this outweigh any free speech restrictions. I feel people should feel consequences for their actions."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "I do not support requiring real-name registration. I believe users of the internet should be able to have some degree of anonymity if they choose."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "I am against all those real -name registrations. People should ve the option to protect their privacy online, and forcing real identities carries high risk"
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "No, I feel it is extremely invasive and can actually be extremely dangerous. Many people utilize the internet and personally identifying information can make some people more prone to dangerous parties that wish to make their lives endangered."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "Yes, I support it. I think it's a good thing because if not, people might hide under fake names and create fake accounts."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "Yes. I don't see what good comes from fake accounts. I do think you should be able to create an anonymous account if need be."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "No, I don't think that needs to be necessary. But I don't have strong feelings about it. I just think it should be okay to have spaces where anonymous advice or chatting is possible"
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "I somewhat support it to reduce trolling, but it could affect privacy. Optional verification might be a better approach."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "I think it depends on what social media platform and the purpose of the platform. If it is supposed to be a community-oriented and/or news-sharing platform, I think it should be required."
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "Yes, I support requiring real name registration so people can not impersonate as someone else. There are too many creepy people online targeting young kids and teenagers. So we should be more strict and require authentication."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "Yes, because it increases responsibility and accountability."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "It depends on the platform. I could go either way."
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "No I do not support it because people are susceptible to cyber bullying, and being blocked unfairly by users particularly users with accounts with lots of followers and a person needs to be able to circumvent those bands with other accounts."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "That seems like a very uncalled-for measure to take. A person must register with an actual email address, no matter what name they use. Plus, how else would Tasha Johnson distinguish herself from Tasha BADBIH Johnson?"
},
{
"index": 319,
"comment": "Yes. I feel like people do a lot they shouldn't online and get to hide behind fake names."
},
{
"index": 320,
"comment": "I don't support having to register and post under your real identity on social media. It could lead to a lot of security issues and would not be worth the problems it could cause, in my opinion."
},
{
"index": 321,
"comment": "No I do not support this at all. I feel that it is not something that is needed or wanted by the majority of people who use social media platforms mainly because it could pose a privacy issue."
},
{
"index": 322,
"comment": "No."
}
] |
Do you support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "I am pretty conflicted, but I think overall I think its okay to accept refugees fleeing war or persecution. I know if I was in their shoes, I would want somewhere safe to go."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "Yes I support the US government accepting more refugees who are fleeing persecution that would result in harm including loss of life"
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees because they are people who didn’t choose to live that war, people who is trying to have a better life for them and their families"
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "I believe the government should accept refugees fleeing dangerous situations. However, the qualifications for what justifies refugee status should be thoroughly vetted. There should also be limits in place so that citizens do not experience negative effects on their quality of life."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "If america was a wealthy nation and could take care of refugees then I would say it's the right thing to do. However, america isn't rich, it has more debt than it can pay back and can't help it's own citizens. No, we shouldn't accept more refugees till we can take care of our own."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "I find that I do support the government doing this. The reason being is that why have an abundance of resources if you are not using it. I find that no matter, where you are born that you deserve kindness and deserve a good life and so accepting people that are looking to achieve that seems ideal to me."
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "I do not support the immigration policy/refugee policy because it is taking away from average every day americans and increasing the strain on our systems and society. Many Americans who can use there resources are flat out denied whereas people who've come here illegally receive this aid and its bullshit to me,."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "Yes i do. But i think there should be more vetting of these refugees and education on rules of the society and how to intergrate into American Society."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "Yes, innocent children and parents are being killed. Every life matters."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "No because most of the time they tend to increase in number with time which in turn impacts the government expenditure on them. The government needs to cater for the social needs and share resources with them."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution, however, only after they have been thoroughly vetted. I think it is great the our country can help other people escape poverty, but we cannot just let any people in and there has to be somewhat of a limit on the number of people as we still have plenty of problems here that need to be solved for current citizens."
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "Yes. I am Native American and want my ancestors' land to be ours again."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "I do believe our government should show compassion by accepting refugees fleeing war and persecution, since they are trying to escape life-threatening situations. But I also think our government should ensure a balanced approach in helping, but making sure citizens have access to enough resources to thrive, and not having both citizens and refugees compete for resources."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "While I strongly believe in human rights and have compassion for those who suffer, I think the government should continue accepting refugees. However, there should be rigorous vetting processes in place to prevent individuals with criminal backgrounds or questionable pasts from entering our country."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "I would why that I the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. I think that this is a good thing to do."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "I think it depends, but I do support governments accepting genuine refugees in these situations. However, I specifically want to exclude economic migrants and criminals from being allowed in under these pretenses."
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "I support the government accepting refugees. I think that the cities are becoming too crowded, but many rural areas of the US would benefit from an increased population. Similar to during the Vietnam and Korean wars, there are opportunities to open up refugee camps in less populated areas to help increased population and teach skills to help boost economies."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "Yes I am okay with it as long as it doesn’t affect our economy. If it goes negative I don’t want it."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "Yes I do support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution especially when it is a direct result of our governments foreign policy. This country and many others were founded on the idea of fleeing persecution and fighting for individual liberties. Also, to accept refugees means more cultural diversity which can greatly benefit our nation."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution because they need safety and a chance to rebuild their lives. Offering refuge is a humanitarian responsibility that helps protect human rights and promotes global solidarity."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "Yes! We should never negate helping those fleeing dangerous places as we are a nation which is supposed to take in the poor, people from all nations and provide them with a place where they can feel safe"
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "I do not. The should flee to other countries that connect the theirs. They are all travelling thousands of miles to come here. It's overwhelming."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "The bare minimum the US can do for refugees is to give them shelter and protection, this country does enough damage to other countries for no reason other than \"peacekeeping.\" Not to mention directly supplying Israel for more than just this presidency, this country is full of sin for these refugees and persecuted individuals. We as a country must give them a place to call home or a shelter away from danger."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "I am on the fence about supporting and not supporting. I do believe everyone should have a safe place to run to but I also do not believe we should just be letting anyone into the United States. I believe that there are stipulations, processes, and vetting that should be done to accept refugees."
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "I am support of the government allowing more refugees fleeing war or persecution, as long as they do not pose a risk to the safety of our country, nor have criminal backgrounds. Most refugees are suffering with basic human rights, so it is only fair to help them escape such treacherous conditions."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. People shouldn't have to fear for their lives constantly and should be allowed to take refuge in another country. Everybody on Earth who has is not an evil person has the right to live a good life."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I support accepting more refugees. If our country has the means to provide support for these people fleeing for safety and survival, why should we turn them away?"
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "Generally no. There are conflicts all over the world and we have enough issues going on at home. Only in some extreme circumstance."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "Yes, I think we should welcome refugees. They are fleeing war, and if saving them means they come here I am for it."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "Yes, I think the government should take in more refugees. They are running away from war and danger, and they need a safe place to live. Helping them is the right and kind thing to do."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "I support the cause because it is the write thing to do. These people are innocent. It shows how great and caring our government is."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "I support accepting refugees. I can't support allowing people to suffer if we have the means to support if it isn't a detriment to everyone involved. Make better accomodations for them and address the problem."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "i believe that america should be open to the idea of accepting refugees.we should be a safe place for freedom"
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "I do not. I think that they are coming in too fast for us to vet their background properly."
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "Yes I do, nobody should be forced to be in a situation where they are in danger or persecuted. It is important that everyone is safe"
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "I support tha government taking in refugees, although I do worry about what consequences it would bring both to the refugees and to us. I think it is important for our nation to show that they care about individuals."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "I believe we should welcome more refugees escaping war and persecution because everyone deserves a chance to live safely and with dignity. Opening our doors shows kindness and helps people rebuild their lives after facing unimaginable hardship."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "I'm not sure about this. We don't want to say no to people who really need the help but at the same time we as US Citizens need a lot of help as well."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution as long as they have been searched and cleared. I do believe there are some bad actors or criminals in the mix so everyone needs to be checked, not everyone is good, but I do believe as well that the majority are good and innocent people who are just feeling from a bad situation."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "I do not support the government accepting more refugees. I morally think we should but America is currently not in the position to be accepting refugees. We need to work on our internal problems first."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "No, we already have too many immigrants. They need to figure out to make their homeland better,"
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "I find it an acceptable practice as long as priority is given to African nations as they then to receive the less support from the United States."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "I accept more refugees fleeing war and persecution. Our country needs to show compassion for people in need and dire circumstances. We should serve as an example for other countries to follow."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "I strongly support government accepting refugees fleeing wars. It’s just the matter of humanity to reduce death and suffering by letting them in. We owe each other basic humanity."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "Yes, because the United States was born from citizens escaping harsh conditions and tyrannical rule. Despite the country's flaws, we are still an honorable country for those in need to rely on when their own country is in ruin."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "I support our government accepting more refugees fleeing war and/or persecution. I think there is no other nation as capable as ours that can handle a large amount of refugees and we only stand to gain from doing so. I feel that by accepting refugees we set an example to rest of the world in how to act as a powerful nation and that we still deserve our spot as peacekeepers. These refugees will also be very grateful for giving them a second chance at life and will become great citizens."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "I do not support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. We most take care of our own people and there are many individuals her who need hello."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "I think the US has a lot going on with their own citizens. The people here are already struggling to survive and you're bringing more people here and they are getting more help than the people who was born here who are struggling. At the same time I feel for them. I just don't understand why they all flee here when there are other countries."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "You should support anyone fleeing death or prosecution with open arms. Given that the person doesn't have a criminal history or a background of violence there's no reason not to allow them into your country."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting refugees fleeing hard times. Out of compassion for humans, we should come to their aid. As a wealthy, benevolent nation, full of resources to help others, we should be willing to help these individuals. We can be innovative and help these individuals."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees into the country to an extent. While I support refugees seeking a safe haven to escape war, I also feel strong immigration policies need to be implemented so that background checks or other procedures are implemented to help protect the country from allowing people into the country that have a criminal background or belong to a criminal group. There also needs to be a procedure for naturalization or time frame of return to the original country."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution because we have a moral duty to help these people. Turning a blind eye devalues us a country. Not helping these people is condoning atrocities and not supporting growth and potential each person has."
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "Of course. 9 times out of 10 we're partially responsible for these wars either by funding them or not getting involved which is a bystander effect. The least we could do is accept refugees."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "Absolutely we should be accepting refugees. This country was founded and built on and by the need and brilliance of refugees. It is ridiculous to think we should stop allowing people to enter the country that our ancestors (unless we are Native American) came to."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "Yes I do support them. I believe that humans shouldn't have to live in these situations as life itself is already hard enough."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "Yes, I believe the government should help people escaping war or bad treatment. these people are in danger and need a safe place to go and they don't deserve to suffer due to political disagreement."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "This is a tough question because the immigration system is already overwhelmed, and there are many \"refugees\" who are not actual refugees fleeing war but rather taking advantage of the system. There is no good answer, but the system needs to be put on hold until it is fixed and the bad actors are out."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. It is the humane and right thing to do to help fellow human beings if their lives are legitimately in danger."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "I absolutely think we should accept as many refugees as possible. We are one of the wealthiest countries in the world and we have a moral obligation to help everyone that we can. It's frustrating to me that a lot of people in my country not only feel that we should turn the refugees away but they even talk bad about them, and it's almost always people who base everything on their religion. It's maddening. I think we should do everything we can to help any human less fortunate than us."
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "In the US, we have a huge immigration issue over the last couple of years, because there are many undocumented people allowed in the US. In our country, everyone should be accounted for, and registered as a citizen. I don't have any issues with refugees, if they come into our country and file for citizenship legitimately."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees, but only if it doesn't put an greater strain on the country. I think that we should be willing to help those that are innocent and seeking asylum from bad circumstances."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war, I think safety should be the top priority above everything else."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "I support the government accepting refugees. People have the right to live their lives away from war and persecution."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees. I believe this will allow us to have better relations with other countries, and it is good to give back to those in need. They are also likely to help increase diversity and generate income or jobs once they get their footing here."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "I feel like the US should be open to accepting new refugees, however, they should be vetted and provided documentation. They should also be subject o followup visits and abide by all the laws of the US. If they break the law, they go home."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "Yes. I believe that all borders should be abolished. People have total freedom of movement. We are a single species and we cannot have such divisions amongst us."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "No, I do not support more refugees. We have enough people in this country and with the wide influx of immigrants that Biden let into our country, it's caused nothing but chaos, crime and health issues for Americans."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "Yes I support it. This is a nation built on immigration, and we preach democracy, freedom, and justice. I feel it is important we uphold these values and extend our good fortune as a powerful nation to help others who need it the most. If we show good will towards others I hope it would come back to us as being good role models and having positive relationships with many other nations."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "I don't currently think we need to accept more refugees. Our country is in a lot of debt and many of our own citizens are struggling. We need to prioritize ourselves for now and not take on more than we can handle."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "Yes, I think governments should help those most in need. This is especially true and important if the conflict was brought about by the country itself. Of course, the messaging will be important to make it more acceptable to everyday citizens and not risk backlash."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "I think that, in many cases, it is the responsibility of the United States to accept these refugees. Often the turmoil in these countries that necessitated refugees fleeing them was caused, at least in part, by the United States and we need to help those we have negatively affected"
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "I greatly support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war and persecution because we should be welcoming and helping those in need. We need to show empathy for people in extreme situations and we have the means to help them."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "No I don’t support allowing more refugees to enter our country. I believe the US has let too many people into the country and it has been a drain on our resources. I think in a lot of instances people are willing to say they are fleeing their country and in danger just so they can stay in the US. The US needs to concentrate on helping our citizens not people who are not from here."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persectution. Some are fleeing war zones that are a direct result of US foriegn policies that are a direct cause of their woes. We can't think that being the globes primary supplies of weapons does not cause an increase in refugees."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "No, I don't support it. America is one of the worst places to live. I would tell them to flee somewhere else."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting refugees because these are people who are fleeing war or persecution. We should help people from other countries. The people that enter our country are hardworking and contribute in a positive way in America."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution, but will they in the months to come, gather those same refugees and place them at Alcatraz alley in Florida and treat them as if they are not human."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "Accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution is the responsibility of the entire world. Yes they should accept more."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "I am honestly torn on this topic; I'd say I am neutral. I think it sucks for refugees and they do need help, but this causes strain in the US and harms racial relations. I guess the US should only take a certain portion of refugees."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "No I do not. We have millions of people here illegally and no one knows who they are. The system was seriously abused. I believe that all refugees fleeing war or persecution should seek refuge in China."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "I am not educated enough on this topic to make a statement. I believe we should treat people as if they're human though."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "Yes. I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. I believe that everyone has a right to seek safety and security, and that includes refugees from other places. I don't think it matters if a person comes illegally or not to a place. Boarders are something people drew and they should not be used to keep needy people in places that will kill them."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "I believe that this depends on the situation. If there is a need to accept the refugees we should evaluate the situation carefully."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "Yes, these people should be protected when it came to wars that they had no part of. It isn't right for them to stay in their country where they could be killed at any moment from bombs, missiles and guns."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "Yes. I believe our country should help refugees who are fleeing terrible conditions. It's the right thing to do for humanity."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "I do support it in most circumstances. Given the refugee crisis has been started in large part due to the ramifications of Western intervention during the Reagan, Bush and Obama administrations I think it's only fair, America is known as the land of accepting the tired and poor, right? Plus it'll help offset the incoming demographic crisis we're due to face in the coming decades."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "I think there needs to be strict oversight of which refugees are accepted. I think some refugees should be accepted into the US. However, I think the US should also work with allies to spread refugees out to different companies."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "Yes, I support accepting more refugees because we are a country of immigrants. Also, people should be free to seek asylum here in order to get away from the horrors of war. We are all people and should help each other."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees. I believe it is the morally right thing to do."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "I support accepting more refugees. Our nation was built by immigrants and it's the right thing to do."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "No. I believe too many individuals, many of whom are dangerous likely BECAUSE of the society they grew up in, will take advantage of our hospitality so to speak. They will bring their culture into ours which will cause the same problems instead of demanding that their own country fix what is wrong. People are a product of their environment and theirs wasn't a great one and we don't need any of that influence of it here, unless we take things on a very individual case by case basis."
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "Yes I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. We should be helping those in need. It is our moral duty to do so."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting refugees fleeing war and persecution. America has been built for people to come here to be free and escape the harsh conditions of life and be free."
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "Yes I do. This country has always been the shining light for people around the world who want a good life."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "I don't agree in accepting more refugees fleeing war. I feel with our borders that have been open during the last administration, we need to be sending people away, not accepting more."
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "I do not, the US has too many immigrants right now causing a huge cost to American tax payers. We need to limit inflow into the US and focus on our own problems."
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "No refugees rarely assimilate into our society. It is best for them to stay closer to their own homeland where culture, traditions and language can be maintained."
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "No I do not, they are coming in and taking up money and space."
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "The question of whether to accept more refugean fleeing war or persecution is complex. On one hand, it is important to show compassion and provide safety to thosalso consider th both rrfugees and rastructure required to support both refugees and citizens.re required to support both refugees and citizens."
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees. People fleeing war or persecution are only seeking safety and a better life. They are caught up in circumstances that were out of their control."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "Yes I do. It is what this country is based on. Immigration and the melding of backgrounds and knowledge."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "Yes, we should offer sanctuary to those on need. I would want sanctuary if I were in their place."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "Yes, I think we have the resources and the responsibility to help those in need. I doubt we'd ever reach that point, however."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "Yes, because they are just trying to survive. They are fleeing because they feel they are not safe living in their own country. Why wouldn’t we want to help them?"
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "at the current time i do not support accepting more refugees..the united states has a major imigration problem it is now dealing with and does not need to add more people to the problem..it would compound the imigration problem we already have."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "Yes, it is immoral to let them suffer in their home countries that they are freeing. We are the land of opportunity - all of us came from ancestors that immigrated to the U.S. at some point."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "In limited quantities and after some checks yes . A verified war or verified persecution ."
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "Yes I do because they don't deserve to die or live in fear. Especially when we have room for them"
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "I think so, but the status needs to be confirmed"
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "I support LEGAL immigration, including those refugees who are truly fleeing war and persecution. But government has to a have a good vetting system to assure those entering are falsely using this reason to enter the country."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "Yes I support accepting the refugees. Only if they are actually under persecution from a war."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "Yes, if they are fleeing war"
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "I do accept the acceptance of more refugees. If there is a way to help people and we have the means to do so, Why not help."
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "There’s no black and white answer to this question - it depends on circumstances, how many people can the US sustainably accommodate, have these people been properly vetted, etc."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "Yes, as long as they are properly vetted and I think pairing them with a sponsor to help them be acclimated would be a good approach."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "No, not with how things are currently. My country has big issues domestically and a lot of citizens are living in poverty, focus on that first."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "Not really. We are already dealing with a mass of refugees from Mexico. They need clearance or export."
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "Not at this moment because you can't allow your own people to suffer while you care for those who are only going to add to your countries deficit and problems. I don't know why these people are fleeing here anyway other than they're being lied to and sold a fantasy that doesn't even exist for the people who live there. It may be silent but we are currently at war here already!"
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "Yes. Accepting refugees is an ethical thing to do. Also, immigrants make this country a better place."
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "I do not support the government accepting more refugees. We have to many illegal aliens to send home right now. We should not be spending money propping up non citizens"
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "Personally, I do not agree with it. We have too many of our own citizens that could use our help. We should take care of them first."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "Yes, they are human and we need to help each other. Everyone needs help at one point."
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "Accepting under certain conditions."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "Yes that is something that we have always done as a country and is only recently changing. America has always been called the melting pot because we do accept people from other countries."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "In general I would support more refugees coming into the country. I do think we have to be careful about accepting refugees who are hostile to America."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "I would say i support it in certain circumstances. But they should be kept in a separate location from the general public to ensure the safety of others that are already in the current country."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "I think that we have more things to deal with then whether or not there are people coming in to seek refuge. We should help others in need."
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "I do support this but not sure how it can be confirmed which are those that are fleeing war or persecution vs those who are coming over to cause harm here."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "No! The democrat/nazi/fascist party has almost destroyed our Republic and society with their flood of illegal aliens! Very few of immigrants are truly fleeing persecution, just more liberal lies! They are just coming for the welfare and to steal the hard work of the working class and the middle class! Get you some of that snowflake!"
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "no. We have our own homeless to deal with"
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "No, I do not. They should have to go through the same processes of immigration as everyone else. There should also be more criteria making it certain they will be beneficial to the American society."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "I think that we should accept as many as is needed to keep people safe. We are the best country in the world and should help those in need. That is what makes us great."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "ACCEPTING MORE REFUGEES FLEEING WAR POSES SECURITY RISKS, AND ALSO REQUIRES ECONOMIC CONSIDERATION. I'M AGAINST IT DUE TO THE RESOURCES IT TAKES"
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "no, we already have too many that are using the government as a pay check , besides there are other countries they can go to"
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "Yes due to better exposure of humanitarian acts from the country, but this also has a risk of immigration issues and economic changes. Having refugees can cause a downfall for society."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "In general I want to support the government accepting more refugees fleeing persecution because welcome others is what our company stands for. On the other hand, our country is having a tough time managing the people that we have here now, so perhaps it would be good to pause."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "I don't support the government accepting refugees fleeing wars into our country i am very conservative"
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "I support those who are vetted to come and settle in areas where there are other refugees. However, it's important that they integrate themselves well into society. They should also have a valid reason for coming here, giving preference to those who live in countries destabilized by the U.S."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "No I do not accept the government accepting more refugees because we already have an influx of people coming into this country and we don't have the resources to take care of them all. It's a strain on our system and we need to be taking care of our own people first."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "Yes i support it because i feel those people are in dire need of help and didnt ask to be in that situation"
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution because it is a humanitarian responsibility to provide safety to those in life-threatening situations. Offering refuge not only saves lives but also promotes global solidarity and compassion. With proper planning and support, integrating refugees can benefit both the individuals and the host community."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees. This is because I think everyone deserves a chance to live safely and without fear."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "I personally find no as a general rule because we have such a housing shortage and a huge illegal immigrant migration. I understand that people want to flee persecution but we can only accept so many."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "Yes. Immigrants, in general, are a net positive for this country in terms of intellectual and financial enrichment, but the US also has an obligation to protect and provide opportunity for vulnerable people. We owe the world good stewardship. And we are fundamentally a nation of immigrants."
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "I do. However they need to be kept an eye on and evaluated."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees. I think helping the stranger is a moral imperative and the policy of accepting refugees is the way to practice that."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "Yes. Taking care of each other is being humane. Everyone has the right to safety, food, and freedom."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "Yes. This country was founded by those seeking freedom from persecution"
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "No, I don't. We have our own citizens living homeless and we have a housing shortage in America. We can not afford extra people in our country. Our citizens are struggling at times to make ends meet."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "I think they should be allowed in. Especially if they are fleeing from a war they did not want."
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I only agree if the refugees are sent to one place. They live all together."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "I support only a limited number of refugees that have been properly vetted."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "No I do not, We have tons of people here we need to worry about. With bringing in refugees brings a lot of problems that we do not need."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "Yes! But only if it's war that makes at 100% acceptable. I can only imagine putting myself in the shoes of others who have nothing to do with the reason why a war has started or a war was brewing over time. Normal and regular citizens always end up suffering from what a government it has done or is attempting to do"
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "I don't support it. Their neighbors need to take on the task for a little while."
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "Yes, I think we should do our part to help those in need. However, so should other countries."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. After all, we are a nation of immigrants and those fleeing war or persecution are particularly worthy of being rescued. There is also the probability that at least some of these immigrants will contribute to our economy and otherwise."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees. I think that it is ethical to do so, and that it has the potential to help our country."
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "No, I understand other countries need help for their citizens, but I think we need to worry about our people first. Also, where are they going to put these people?"
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "Yes, I support the Government accepting more refugees coming into the country. It allows them to make a better life and work on becoming citizens."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. However, I'm not sure the country is a safe place for them right now, so I'm not sure I'd trust any policy claiming to accept them."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "Yes. These people are in danger, grave danger. We have an obligation and the means necessary to aid refugees. Other countries do too but the US is certainly able to accept their share."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "Yes I do. Why not. Everyone should have a place to flee to no matter how crowded it gets."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "Yes, the government should accept refugees as a 1st world nation, wealthiest on earth, the nation can absorb these people and cover the costs of wars that the nation has hands in."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "If they need help, we should be willing to help out else we just become worse than other countries we hate."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "We have to stand by what initially made us great and that is not turning away those in need. Our greatest asset is turning these masses into a productive part of society"
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "Yes I do support our government accepting more refugees fleeing war or prosecution. They need help and to be protected and it's wrong not to help them."
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "Yes. As a rich, prosperous nation espousing and defending the principles of freedom and equality, it's up to us to welcome those under the threat of death from war or unlawful prosecution. If not us, then who?"
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "Yes, I do. I support accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution."
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "I absolutely support accepting more refugees. My community has seen the positve impact of hardworking refugees. We have a colorful cultural area that is wonderful"
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "I support but this should be done with moderation. Other countries should also shoulder some of the burden."
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "I support accepting refugees as that is the basis on which the country was founded. I think regulated immigration is the best approach."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "I would support if the following restrictions were in place: Proof of being persecuted; come here legally; have a place to go and a plan to survive."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "Yes, I think our country should accept refugees fleeing war or persecution. I believe that we always involve ourselves in their conflicts therefore we should provide proper shelter for those that are caught in the crossfires."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "I am neutral on this issue. I do think every country should do their part to help refugees resettle, but I am unsure if the US government currently accepts a large portion of refugees compared to other countries."
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "Yes they need our help. We are supposed to provide it"
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "Yes. If they are feeling do to their country not being safe to them I do support it. I would hope the people fleeing here don’t have a criminal background."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "I do. I feel that we are able to help them. It is the right thing to do"
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "There's a yes and there's a no both explanation is simple. Both ways it seems dangerous enough to involve refugees you either bring criminals or you bring good people across the border."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war. I do not accept the government accepting refugees of the White race only. America has benefited from people of all nationalities."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "yes because we should be helping people. these people can't help it war is on there turf. we need to help who we can"
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "I don't support the government accepting more refugees right now. I think we need to get the illegal immigrants out of the country first."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "I do not support the government accepting more refugees because I think this causes more people to want to immigrate here, and many people try to immigrate here illegally. With refugees, I think that many of them would try to stay longer than what they are allowed, which is illegal."
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "Absolutely. As it is inscribed on the Statue of Liberty, \"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...\" Most of us are from families who arrived here due to these circumstances."
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "If we process them legally and turn them into citizens, and implement a onboarding process so they dont have to wait, absolutely. If its let them flood the system and not ve documented, absolutely not."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "I do not. These refugees need to fix what's wrong in their own country and stop bringing their politics here."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "No I don't support the government accepting more refugees. I believe that we have enough citizens that are in need of our governemnt support"
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "Yes, because I feel this is the mission of our country. We should help those less fortunate and be a haven of refuge."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more people fleeing war or prosecution. This is because it is the right thing to do and few other countries have the space or resources to do so."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees from war and/or persecution. If I was in that situation, I would hope that another country would accept me."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "Yes I do because everyone deserves help in time of need no matter where they are from. Some people live in places that you would not want your enemy to live."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "We have to many problems right now to take on more. They should be citizens."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "No. I do not support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. Too often it is a deceptive means to entry into this country."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "It should remain at the current level. More times than not it is not the real reason but manipulating the system. Society cannot handle an influx of immigrants and then grant totally free benefits to them."
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "I think it would nice to save people who are suffering from circumstances out of their own hands, but one has to consider the economy and the government's stances when it comes to these issues. I personally don't have any strong feelings one way or the other about this."
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "Right now in the current environment it may not be such a good idea. If they were completely vetted a small number may be acceptable."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "Yes, it is the right thing to do. They would become better citizens than many of the people already here. They would make the country a more diverse country."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "Normally I would. But unfortunately, due to the illegal immigration movement, it has strained our housing market, economy, and increased our violent crime rate beyond what's sustainable."
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "No I don’t!! Other countries need to step up and take them in. I hope President Trump sees it my way."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "I dont untill the people of the us are taken care of that is why. we come first before taking care of everyone else"
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "I do not support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war. I think that our country is in the midst of becoming a war zone, and in order for us to help others, we have to help our own country first."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "I don't support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. They are coming to our country for economic reasons and it's difficult getting them to leave once done. They should be seeking refuge in their neighboring countries if anything."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "NO i do not. there needs to be a legal way were they can be screened"
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "I accept the US accepting refugees fleeing from war. Although there should be a gap of how many we immediately allow in at once."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "Yes, I am empathetic to the human condition. What if you had to flee war or persecution?"
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "Yes, I think the people in our country, as well as the government, need to put ourselves in the shoes of refugees and what they are fleeing. What if it was us? What if it was a US senator, or the president, that was in economic, political or bodily danger. I think we should allow more refugees into our country, based on the situation they are in."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "No I don't because . The government doesn't even help American ciizens who fought for this country . They should help their own first"
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "Yes, I support that because they should help those people like they would want someone to treat them. We are and always be a nation of immigrants."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "I accept it, although it is not ideal. I think we have the ability so it's something we should do"
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "Yes I do. I think it is our obligation to help humanitarian effort and protect those who are being persecuted. It is foundational to America and her principles."
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "Yes we should be willing to accept more refugees. Especially, with the constant antagonizing towards our allies ."
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "I don't support this. I feel like the US is far removed from any active conflicts and very different from these countries. The refugees will struggle to assimilate and are a better cultural fit for other nations nearer to them to take in."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "I am not sure if i belive everything being told to the world on that subject so I don't have an opinion"
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "Yes. I don't see any compelling reason to deny desperate people entry to our country."
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "No I do not support this because those people have a duty to fight for their country. By allowing them to flee, we will be short on people to fight in the war."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "Probably not, no. I think that we need to try to take care of people in this country first. I feel like many of these people are abusing asylum programs to try to make better lives for themselves instead of just fleeing war."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "I think the government should accept more refugees feeing war and persecution because that is the foundation of this nation. This country was built on help those that were fleeing things and we should continue to do so."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "That’s a tough question. I’d say no because it is putting USA in danger. We need stricter regulations and policies."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "Yes, I support accepting more refugees. It's important to accept more because we have the resources to help them and the obligation to do so, since the United States government is one of the reason some of these countries are in the current state they're in."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "I don’t support the government accepting more refugees because our immigration system is in desperate need of reform right now. It would be irresponsible to continue an influx of refugees with such a broken system."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "yes i do agree if they come legally"
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees. I don't think we should turn our backs on people."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "I do. America should always protect those who are fleeing for their lives. But they should come legally. Those who come illegally might be criminals or terrorists."
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "I do support accepting more refugees but they must be vetted. I think we need to make sure the process is done correctly with the intention of them one day returning to their own land."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "Only if we document them properly. We can’t just let anyone and everyone in"
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "Yes. There needs to be a screening process, but we should welcome refugees who are fleeing extreme danger."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "I think the governments of the world needs to develop a program for these refugees that help them to re-establish their lives in a new country without distrupting the current population and order of that country. If there is a system in place that helps these refugees while maintaining order and peace then I believe governments can accept more refugees."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "Yes I support this. I believe that our country is large enough and we have enough resources to welcome people in need. I believe that refugees are valuable members of society that contribute at all levels once they are established."
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees to an extent. I feel that there needs to be some guidelines in place for when the refugees would return to their country. Or, if they are not to return at all, proper procedures should be put into place to allow them to eventually become citizens in the same way that others who voluntarily migrate to a country would (i.e., paying proper fees, going through the needed steps, etc)"
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "Yes, I do if they are trying to stay ALIVE , I surely believe they should be able to seek refuge here."
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "I absolutely support the government accepting more refugees. Ordinary people fleeing from wars they didn't start and aren't involved in should be welcomed into a safer country."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "I believe in the government on persecution. There is no longer anymore space here in the U.S."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "No I don't. We have to take care of the people in our own country. The refugees should come second after us citizens"
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "This is a hard one basically and I hope that my answer is sufficient, but since there's nothing I can do about it. I have no say about it. It doesn't matter what I say in this country it doesn't matter so don't get me wrong. I still have stuff to say, but this doesn't affect me either like I'm not from there and I don't know anybody from there basically so with so much other stuff to care about I really don't care about this that much so in the scale I'm in the middle. I don't care about it and if I had to care about it if I had to come up with the answer if I had gone to the head I would say I support it, but it had to be a very limited amount you know and no more"
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "YES.\r\nThis is because it is both a humanitarian duty and a moral responsibility to protect people in danger.With proper screeing and support,refugees can safely rebuild their lives while contributing positively to their host communities."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war as long as we vet each individual and make sure their background are align with Americans."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "Yes but only selectively. Prioritize those who will be more likely to contribute to society (i.e. younger, educated)"
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "I do not support it. I understand our country fights for our rights but its so much going on and people are dying. its sad"
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "Yes I do, It is what we have always done, and it is the morally right thing to do."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "yes as a humanitarian duty as the refugees often experience life threatening situations."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "I do support both of these as long as they except an be a part of our laws etc"
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "Yes, to a point. As long as they aren't overcrowding the country or draining more from the economy than they're taking then I see no issue."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "I do support the government in accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. I have to picture myself or my family or friends in the situation of the refugees to clearly see the truth in the matter."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "No, the government doesn't need to take on more of these people. The countries has enough internal problems right now and needs to prioritize domestic issues."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "YES OUR COUNTRY HAS ALWAYS BEEN A REFUGE FOR FOREIGNERS.\r\nWE SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE A SAFE PACE FOR OTHERS IN THE WORLD."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "Yes all governments should support refugees fleeing war and persecution. The humanitarian basis of allowing refugees is the Hallmark of any advanced society."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "Yes I support as long as they are veted and legally enter the country"
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "Accepting refugees fleeing war or persecution can shows how we can support humanitarian responsibility. Refugees can stimulate economic growth through their diverse entrepreneurship."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "Yes, they are people seeking a better life, better conditions and if the US can help I think it should."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "Yes. I think these people have suffered enough. I would want to help them."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "I support it to an extent, I believe that we should support our fellow humans in need of a safe haven. All of it shouldn’t just be on us though, like other countries should also think about being open to helping refugees."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "If they have valid claim then yes. It should be decided on case be case basis."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "I think we should accept refugees as a part of our support program, but only if it doesn't harm our own citizens. Additionally, if we help refugees in needs to be in their own best interest as well with no separate agenda, such as when we \"helped\" the Ugandans back in the 90's by moving them to urban areas like New York City."
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "Yes because we are that kind of country. It's our obligation to help."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "Yes I support this. Refugees deserve safety and the US has resources to help. I see it as our duty."
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "This is a hard one for me because I feel bad for those in these situations. My only thing is I feel that there is too much going on with our own people in this country. So many individuals are in extreme need of help. How can you help others without sacrificing your own people."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "I don’t support the government accepting more refugees. The government should focus on taking care of the welfare of the people who live here instead of abroad."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "Yes, I support this. I still believe the original American ideals of accepting the tired, poor, and huddles masses yearning to breathe free. If this isn't who we are anymore, then we aren't America anymore."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "I do not accept this position unless there is a very queer.Understandable plan of action to provide short-term Housing or shelter until they can be moved to a permanent location outside of the country. I wouldn't stand on the sidelines and watch people kill or lose their lives over some sort of conflict but we can't just perpetually allow p*** refugees into the country on documented without going through the proper processes"
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "Yes, I do. We must be merciful to those in need, but we also must be wise. Each person must be vetted."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "No I don't support."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "I accept more refugees. I like that we get the option to find more people that could be a soul mate. The more people there are, the more opportunity for enjoyment."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "No. Biden let refugees n terrorists into the US n now we are over run with crime. No more refugees please. Trump is doing a good job."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "Yes, for basic humanitarian and moral principles I fully support allowing higher numbers of refugees into the US. Depending on the number, I may want to adjust non-refugee immigration to a certain extent but certainly not to any large degree."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. Offering refuge to people escaping dangerous and life-threatening situations is a humanitarian responsibility. Refugees often face unimaginable hardships, and providing them with safety and a chance to rebuild their lives reflects the values of compassion and global solidarity. Additionally, refugees can contribute positively to society culturally and economically when given the opportunity."
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I do support accepting greater refugees as it's the moral thing to do. The US has the capacity to accomodate many more people."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "I think I would support it because I want people to help each other and be kind in the midst of war. Most refugees are just trying to find a safe place to stay and just need a little help."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "Yes based on if they are fleeing war or persecution"
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "no I don't support. We should help Americans first. A lot of people are umemployed. Also we have no way to tell if these refugees are legit."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "No, I do not support the government takin in more refugees. We already got too many problems here with our own people struggling to find work or get help. We should be taking care of our own citizens first before bringing in more from other countries."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "I think that they should not be accepting more refugees than what we already have. I think that they should prioritize helping the people of the US."
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "Yes. I don’t think anybody should have to live in danger and fear. I know this isn’t a simple issue, but my heart says yes"
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "I don't feel our government should take on more refugees. We already have an overabundance of people here that are immigrants and there is enough to deal with them. If more people are accepted, it would be a significant cost."
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "Yeah, I think the government should accept more refugees — people running from war or persecution deserve a safe place to live. It’s the right thing to do, and many of them end up contributing a lot to society once they settle in."
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "No. We should not accept any refugees for any reason. They are a financial and moral burden."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "Yes, I accept this because it is the right thing to do.I think we have a moral imperative to help refugees."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "I do as long as they go through the proper channels of immigrating here. They need to do it legally."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "I think that there should be a limit on how many refugees a country can take each year. Economies can be ruined if too many people are infused into a community."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "I think there should be a set area for refugees. People who come here for asylum deserve safety. I do support the government accepting them, to answer directly and those are my reasons why."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "I think we should when we can. It also should depend on the circumstances there, we cant accept everyone that their government doesnt like"
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "no more refugees , goverment is not ready for it"
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "No I do not. The fact is we cannot be everyone's savior. We have millions of illegal immigrants already that are a public charge. Additionally, everyone that comes tries to claim asylum, they should fix their own nations first,"
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "I support the government accepting refugees fleeing war or persecution as long as the refugees aren't carrying diseases to spread in the United States and as long as they are vetted to be safe, decent, hard-working people who don't rob, kill, and rape people, then yes, let them come and find sanctuary here in the U.S."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "i support it. it's important."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "Yes - I would support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution given that the refugee identities can be verified. If someone's identity cannot be verified, then there should be a more stringent code that they must follow to be admitted to the United States. Any refugees admitted must be good neighbors and crime free for a period before being given a chance at full citizenship."
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "No because we already have enough illegals here as it is. Maybe the kids would be ok but that's it."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "I think the refugees fleeing war or persecution from many countries in the world are deserved to reside in a safe place untill they can return to their homes."
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "I think its reasonable . As long as the reason is legitimate and the refugee isn't gaming the system, I support it."
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war and persecution under circumstances. This support will need to be organized and expenses should not negatively affect citizens. There would need to be a process to ensure everyones safety and temporary residences. The idea in action would be very costly and safety is a huge risk."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "Yes, I support this. All people deserve a safe place to live and if we can provide this ,we should."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "yes, because there's a lot of conflict going on in the world right now and people who escape it usually don't have much choice in where they go."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "Maybe a small amount. We should accept some refugees, but we need to be more selective about it."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or prosecution. The United States should always be a haven to all immigrants."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "i honestly do not have an opinion on this matter and am open minded enough that i could see positives and negatives to both sides"
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. Extending safety and compassion to those escaping violence reflects our deepest held values and strengthens the moral fabric of our society. Welcoming refugees not only offers them hope but also enriches our communities with resilience, diversity and shared humanity."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "I think it would be the best, most conscionable thing to do. But we don't take good care of our own citizens either, so it's very confusing. There's enough room, is my thought, without so much restriction on living though."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. The government should help people that are in need. However, the government needs to expand their services and capabilities to ensure they can handle the number of people. There needs to be limits. The government needs to increase their services for incoming people. The government also needs to service their own people adequately too."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "At this time, unless the nation was an ally of the United States, the answer is no. There are plenty of nations that can take on refugees, and it is inexcusable to think the US should be sole taker of refugees."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting more refugees. People who are fleeing war or danger need help to be safe. It is the right and humane thing to do."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "I somewhat agree however they need to be at high risk for getting injured or killed. The government needs to be highly selective in how many people they take in."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "I do support the government accepting refugees fleeing war or persecution. I think that if the tides were turned, I would hope someone would accept us. Everyone deserves safety and support."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "Yes. I support accepting more refugees. That is what The US stands for, and we have room for these people."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "Yes, of course I do. It would be a pure lack of empathy on my part if I didn't support something like that. Why would I want people to suffer for the choices of their governments?"
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "No. I think the U.S. is at capacity. We are no longer an emerging nation and need to accept that we cannot continue to take on refugees. Our resources are tapped out at the moment to support new residents."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "Yes, I suppose this. I think we need to do what we can to help those in need."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "I'm not sure. I feel there is a certain level of morality to accepting them but at some point it becomes too much. There needs to be a balance between just an open door and something that allows anyone to walk in"
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "Yes, I do. I would want someone to accept me if I were fleeing, I just think they need to be vetted properly and thoroughly."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "No, I believe when have several allies that need to put in there part to help. We done it for so long and also face illegal immigration to contend with."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "I do think we should accept more refugees fleeing from war under certain situations. First of all, we need to make sure we vet the people coming in to make sure they aren't a part of any gang or criminal activity."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution because these individuals are often in life-threatening situations and have no safe place to return to. Providing them with protection not only saves lives but also reflects our values of compassion, human rights, and international responsibility. With proper planning and support systems, welcoming refugees can strengthen communities and bring long-term social and economic benefits."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "Yes, only if they have sponsors in our country to support them. It also should not be a permanent placement for them in most cases."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution because providing safety to people in crisis is a humanitarian responsibility. At the same time, proper support systems should be in place to help both refugees and host communities adjust smoothly."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "Absolutely I do. I would hope that if I were fleeing war and a terrible life, a neighboring country would allow me to at least live in safety while I try and find something better."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government accepting more refugees fleeing war or persecution. It is the morally correct and right thing to do as human beings to help others in danger."
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "I support them accepting more refugees. The United States is built on immigration. It feels like the right thing to do."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "Yes, we should be helping people in search of a better life."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "Yes, I do. Traditionally, the United States was responsible for causes so much strife and destabilization of many countries. Plus, I always side on humanitarian side."
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "Yes, I do. I think that there has to be a fair process to make this happen legally and quickly so that the legal process doesn't drag on for years for the refugees."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "Yes, of course. This is ingrained in who were are as a country, and it benefits us in the long run. If we don't, who will?"
},
{
"index": 319,
"comment": "I do, because they cannot stay where they are and they need assistance,"
},
{
"index": 320,
"comment": "When it comes to accepting refugees I lean more on the government being cautious by putting stricting vetting measures and restrictions to ensure national security because accepting more refugees could cause an influx which may cause security risks and concerns. Instead it should focus on securing and controlling the border,"
}
] |
Do you think the current tariff policy under the Trump administration will have a positive or negative impact on the overall U.S. economy and society? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "i think that it will have a negative impact. We are already feeling the effects of it with price increases."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "I believe that the tariff's will be a good thing for the U.S. economy. Until now most of the countries where not paying any or very little tariff's to the U.S. leading us more into debt. Now that we are receiving the adequate tariff money the economy is slowly starting to stabilize."
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact. Makes prices increase and negatively impacts the economy."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "Overall I think the curent tariff policy will have a positive impact on the U.S. economy. President Trump is a great business minded person and is making decisions that will benefit us for the future even if they don't seem like it at the moment."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "I feel that the tariff policy is absolutely atrocious. I feel the negative impact on small businesses will be incredibly significant, while these tariffs offer no benefit to the vast majority of US citizens."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "I believe it will probably lead, in conjunction with other policies, to a positive impact on the economy. There haven't been price increases, and imports haven't been stifled. If it becomes the new normal then it will probably have good effects for the budget."
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "Negative. It's just hurting our relationship with China while making things more expensive for US consumers. All while not making that many extra jobs for US citizens."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "I think his tariff policy is a joke and only benefits him and the wealthy. It’s having a negative effect on the economy and increasing inflation and the costs of everyday living"
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "I believe it may be a positive impact all these years US have been paying bills to everyone allowing their people to arise from poverty. It’s time for US to do the same and rise our people from poverty. At this point 2 full time workers in the house hold are still faced with challenges to stay a float, may this will be that change we need."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "From the looks of it, it's having a negative effect as most countries affected are already looking to other avenues to trade without the us"
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "There seems to be an easy way that companies are working around the tariff policy. I don’t think it’s impacting much of anything."
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "The nonsensical Trump tariffs will be largely negative for the US economy. While raising prices overall, they will not succeed in their goal of reshoring industry back to the US since the factories and supply chains have vanished and are difficult to rebuilt. Many companies are confused by the capricious tariffs and prefer to wait it out rather than invest in reshoring their operations back to America. Also, these tariffs tarnish the US's image as a fair and responsible trading partner."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "A negative impact on the overall U.S. economy because companies will likely pass the cost of the tariffs onto U.S. consumers. Therefore, a lot of products are going to get a lot more expensive, which makes it harder for everyday Americans who are already struggling in today's economy. Any trade protectionist benefits will be in the far future."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "The Trump administration’s tariff policy likely has mixed effects on the U.S. economy and society. While tariffs may protect certain domestic industries and jobs, they also raise costs for businesses and consumers, potentially slowing economic growth. In the long run, trade tensions could create uncertainty that negatively affects investment and global competitiveness."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "Negative he doesn't understand tariffs and is using it to intimidate countries"
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "I believe it will have a positive impact if you’re looking at the long therm goals"
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "I believe the current tariff policy will have a negative impact on US economy. This tariff effects the consumers as businesses will have to pay the tariffs and they will in turn raise their product prices. Therefore; the consumers will be the ones paying the tariffs and paying higher prices in the end."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "I believe there are going to be some negative issues in the beginning. However, in the long run, I think it’s going to be the best thing for our economy."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "yes, the policy will have a positive one because Trump says tariffs will encourage US consumers to buy more America. in 2025 Trump's imposed and scheduled tariffs will increase federal tax revenues by $172.1 billion, or 0.57 percent of GDP, making the tariffs the largest an-made goods, increase that the amount of tax raised and boost investment.PWBM projects Trump's tariffs (April 8, 2025) will reduce long-run GDP by about 6% and wages by 5%. A middle-income household faces a $22K lifetime loss"
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact on the overall U.S. economy and society. I believe certain industries will benefit, while others will suffer. Overall, I believe it will be a neg negative impact across all industries and peoples."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "What I see is that most economists are concerned about what will happen to the economy. I agree with them since I'm not a specialist in this field. I think we are heading toward a recession, and the general population, especially the middle class, will suffer the most."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact because consumers will be the ones to go pay for the increased prices. If consumers pay more, it will lead to less spending and impacting economy overall."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "Tariff policies will force citizens to spend more, worsen relations with other countries, make the economy more unstable, and cause prices to continue to rise."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "This has horrible impacts on the economy. Other countries will respond with price raising there is no benefit"
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "The tariffs that the trump administration put in place will only negatively affect the economy. This is because companies will still produce products outside of america because it's still cheaper, and choose to raise prices to counteract the tax put in place"
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "It will be a negative impact. America is trying to cut corners, when China is ten steps ahead at innovating."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative effect on the US economy because of the administration's exclusionary and aggressive approach towards it. Tariffs can be a useful tool to influence markets, but they must be done in a strategic and targeted way to avoid economic and relational damage overall. I fear Trump's antics would just push the US away into isolation and economic hardships, since the country isn't equipped to handle the manufacturing demands that his policies necessitate."
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "It will have a positive effect on those that time the stock market correctly. It will have a negative effect on the rest."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "Reduced economy output, because studies have shown that tariffs can reduce economy output and income."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "I think the tariff policies proposed against specific goods, specific countries, could be disruptive to world economy. It looks like the value of the US dollar could drop, increased prices for US consumers, and feeding into overall US inflation rate. I think the negative impacts outweigh the positive reasoning behind these tariff policies."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive impact if they try to be peaceful"
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative effect on both the economy and society. Companies are going to be frustrated and consumers aren’t going to enjoy the higher prices on imports."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "Positive effect! Maybe not at first but in the end it definitely will aid our country. There is already so much more income flowing into the states because of tariffs that should of been put in place along time ago. The offset that we pay more for goods is temporary, I feel the tariffs should again of been put in place a long time ago."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "Trump's tariff policy will have a horrible impact on the U.S. economy and society. It has already begun to have an extremely negative effect, and many companies have paused trade with the U.S. These idiotic policies have affected my small business, and all they are doing is isolating the U.S. from global trade. They are completely moronic and the American people will not benefit from them."
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "I think that the current tariff policy under the Trump administration has a mixed impact on the US economy. Prices should be going down - however, jobs are still not hiring, prices have increased, and budget cuts haven’t proven to be effective yet. On the positive side, the budget cuts are projected to alleviate the national deficit - but we still have to see about that."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "I feel like it will have more of a negative impact on the U.S. economy because it is essentially putting a strain on between the U.S. and other countries. It will also cause the U.S. citizens to pay more for products they want or need that the U.S. does not yet have the resources to make. It will take quite some time for the U.S. to get all set up and sourced to not need products from outside of the United States if it ever happens."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "Tariffs will make our great products more competitive in the market. It will help boost our economy."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "It going to have a negative effect. In layman's terms it a tax on the people, because the tariffs won't be absorbed by the companies, it will be pushed unto the consumers in the form of higher taxes. Also it doesn't really encourage bringing businesses to the USA they'll wait it out. It's the consumers who will feel the pinch of the tariffs."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive effect. The main reason is it will bring world attention to the situation; the world needs to know how some nations have taken advantage of the US...that's not to say the US hasn't done the same."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "I think the tariffs will have a negative impact on the economy. The reason I say that is because it will cause other countries to impose tariffs on the U.S. and that will end up negatively impacting free trade."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "I think that the current tariff policy under the Trump administration is negatively affecting small businesses. When it comes to the overall US economy and society, I think that it will negatively affect that as well."
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "The tariff policy already has a negative effect. Prices for most of non-national goods have gone up, and prices for national goods are also up. In addition, the jobs have plateued entirely."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "I don't think it's a positive thing. We, the people, are going to suffer the consequences of his decisions."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "I think the tariff policy under trump will have a severely negative impact on the us economy. My package from aboard is already being delay or cancel. This increase in tariff will make trading internationally harder to do."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "I think negative short term as we have seen. In the future it may lead to some better deals between countries and the U.S. that will moderately boost the economy."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "I think it is negative on the economy because it cost consumers more money for everyday goods. I think it is negative for society because it portrays the US as the worlds bully putting tariffs on almost every country."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "I think the current tariff policy will definitely have a negative impact. Everything is going to be expensive and the poor will just get poorer. Instead of encouraging people to buy things manufactured in the U.S., most of us won’t even be able to afford them."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the overall economy as we can already see. Increasing price just makes life much tougher for majority of people. Bringing jobs back to the US is a good cause but it will take years and during those years, US citizens will suffer from high price of the tariff."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "I don't feel like anything is going good under the Trump administration. There's never a deal going down with the countries that anyone is satisfied between the countries on a deal. The prices are still increase for consumer goods, gases, etc."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact. With the tariffs since trump came in office, it already has shown a negative impact on the U.S. economy. Prices have gone up a ton on everything that is essential to living."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "I think the current tariff policy under the Trump administration will have a negative impact on the U.S. economy because many small businesses get their product and resources from overseas, China to be specific. I've been personally affected because the tariffs are so high that I can't order a lot of keychains, stickers, and other art products for my small art business anymore."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "It will have a negative effect because other countries will be retaliatory against the United States, which will lead to chaos."
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "I think overall the tariffs will be a net negative to the economy. I think whatever gains there are won't be felt by the average person, as everything will get more expensive. Many will not receive adequate pay raises. I think many businesses will go under as well. I do not think the tariffs are sustainable."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "The current tariff policy under the Trump administration is already having a negative impact on U.S. economy and society and will continue to do so unless changed. Everything is more expensive now that us, the consumers have to pay for the tariffs. Most things we buy in stores are not American made so it feels like everything is more expensive and many companies are also adding on tariff tax on goods because of Trump and his administration."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "Honestly, I think the tariffs might help a few U.S. industries, but overall they make stuff more expensive and slow things down. Feels like the downsides outweigh the upsides for the economy and everyday people."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "I feel tariffs are just a way for the people at the top to make money and hurt other countries and their own citizens in the process whether intentional or not. But with the Trump administration it is very intentional. Making Canada and other countries have to pay insane prices for goods when we could try to reach a common ground instead of a war through trade."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "I think a negative impact because the cost of goods are already high tariffs are going to make them even higher and how is Tariffs helping us as citizen that's the million dollar question."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact on overall US economy and society. These tariffs will eventually be passed on to the the US consumers. Also, these tariffs negotiations and grandstanding will erode away the American soft power around the globe."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "Negative impact overall. The tariffs will raise prices which will lower consumer spending which would have a negative impact on the economy. plus, corporations and such will be more hesitant to invest in US businesses simply because of the unpredictable nature of the tariffs and trump’s behavior"
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "The Trump administration's tariff policy will have a huge negative impact on U.S. society and the economy. People cannot purchase goods as prices increase drastically. Grocery prices will increase further. This will decrease the buying power of ordinary Americans and lead to inflation. The quality of life will decrease, and many can go hungry, especially if Trump eliminates SNAP food assistance."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "negative impact, because Tariffs are paid by US companies to import foreign goods, with those costs eventually being paid by US consumers."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "Despite my initial concerns, the Trump administration's tariff policy seems to be having good effects in most cases. However, I think free trade in North America is a great policy. With some modifications I think the policy will be positive."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "It will have a negative effecr on the overall economy. It creates an increase in prices for the average American and will eventually cause a recession."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "In the short run, it will be negative for sure. The trade decifit is real and growing, the tariffs will eventually narrow these trade gaps which will strengthen the economy."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "negative and the poeple that support it are dumb sheep to be used by the government."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "It'll definitely have a negative impact, making daily purchases more expensive. I also think tariffs will prevent our allies from importing their products to our country, such as Australia and Japan."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "The tariffs will have a negative impact on the US economy. People will have less money to spend. People will start hoarding more money."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "I think it will have tremendous positive effects in the near future, it is already having huge positive effects in bringing in additional billions of dollars to the treasury and once adjustments are made and things settle down it will be an even bigger success for the country."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "It is frightening to have these tariffs. Our prices will be higher, and we will not receive any of the tariff money, yet somehow, this will make our country more money and improve the economy...we are told. I am very uncomfortable with that answer. However, I feel I must accept it and still trust in our president."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I think short term it will definitely be negative. I think long term it could eventually be positive if the goal is to make American products instead of importing which I assume would cost less down the line."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "I think it will have a terribly negative impact. Already you can see cases where average citizens struggle to receive or send packages of their choosing out of no fault of their own. And, broadly, Companies and businesses of all sizes have had their bottom line impacted very negatively thus far."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "Extremely negative. It is already costing the consumer increased costs. Companies will go bankrupt."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "In my honest opinion I think that the policy will hurt the us in the short term. I think that in the long term it would have a positive benefit later."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "It will have a positive effect as it has never made sense that the US pays all these tariffs to other countries and we have never had any. Its time for it to be a fair playing field."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "I think that it will have a negative impact. When tariffs are placed, I believe that the costs of imported goods will increase drastically as well, and I see this being the case under the Trump administration."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I don't know much about it. My opinion is that it would be bad for the US economy. It might be good for some people who aren't affected by price increases, but I can barely afford stuff as it is."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "Extremely negative. They don't know what they're doing for anything and especially the economy. The tariffs are absolutely horrible! It will continue raising prices on everything and the consumer has no choice but to take the hit!"
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "TARIFF policy under the Trump administration will have a negative impact. These are not target tariffs but blanket universal tariffs. It incentivizes our current trading partners to look else where that is cheaper or does not have tariffs."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "I think negative overrall. I work in the logistics/courier package industry, and i am seeing the volume of orders decrease, which in turns affects the amount of work available to drivers. Customers are more hesitant to purchase what were once cheap products because the prices have steadily increased, with import duties sometimes being as high as $300 USD. The seller often will not pay those duties. The burden then falls on the customers, not the companies."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "Tough question but it surely has made some companies buy in bulk before tariff's was implemented which tells you alot of what you need to know. It has been alot more costly for some companies but it has also allowed in some portions to keep jobs in the U.S."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact all over the world especially in the U.S the inflation and the price of goods already high, it will make the situation very difficult for everyone."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the overall economy and society. A lot of people and small businesses are already struggling, and this will only make it harder to afford essentials which can lead to greater societal problems."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "Very negative. These policies are being used as weapons, and they are not stable. They change from day to day."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact on the economy and society. The tariffs make the cost to import goods higher and companies will raise prices. Ultimately, the consumers pay the price."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the US economy. The prices of everything are too high now and they are just getting higher. The tariffs make it even harder to get by these days."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "I think the tariff policy is not the best idea. It raises prices for everything that is being shipped from overseas when they could be cheaper."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "I think negative overrall. I work in the shipping/package courier industry and I'm seeing the volume of packages decrease which in turn has decreased work for drivers. Customers are more hesitant to spend money on what were once cheap goods because prices have steadily increased. And the burden of cost falls strictly on the customers because they're the ones who end up having to pay that price, not the companies."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "Everybody know that the current tariff policy under the trump administration will have a negative impact on the U.S economy and society overall."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "The current tariff policy may play a positive role in protecting domestic industries and pressuring trade partners to renegotiate agreements. However, it may raise costs for businesses and consumers while disrupting global supply chains."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact because it would increase prices for multiple goods and people would no longer be able to afford said items and their will be less spending going on in the economy. It will also cause companies to fire more employees because of the high tariffs and many people will lose their jobs."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "I think, if maintained, it’ll be a net positive by bringing back American jobs. It’ll cause immense pain in the short term"
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "I think this will have a negative impact on the overall US economy. It will cause prices to increase on goods across the board and that will enable fewer people to buy fewer goods."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "negative for the short term as prices are rising hopefully it will even out at soe poing"
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "I believe the current tariff policy will definitely benefit our country. Other countries that play currency manipulation (for instance, China) have been taking advantage of our nation for far too long. Sure, the road ahead will be difficult at first, due to higher costs of imported goods. But the money the US will make back in the long run will far surpass any temporary losses."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "Yes it will have a wonderful impact for the country. It may take a year to see the benefits. But he knows what he's doing."
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "I think it will initially have a negative impact on the economy. However, after a short time, I think it will have a positive impact with companies lowering the costs of their goods."
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "I think later on overall that it will have a positive effect on our economy and society but only after we start buying things and using things made by the USA. Only after we stop relying on things made outside of the USA will this be positive for the USA"
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "this will bring more money to the economy"
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "Huge negative impact has already happened. The cost of food and bringing in or shipping products. If you live the USA can't buy anything outside the USA without paying heavy shipping cost"
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact for the average consumer. Prices are increasing and people no longer have the same purchasing power as before."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "Absolutely negative. He seems to think that the other countries will have to pay the tariffs when in fact it falls back onto the citizens basically as tax"
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "I think it will impact the economy negatively overall. Hostility and isolation is not a great way to bring back economic and manufacturing power."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "I believe it is a negative impact on the overall U.S. economy and society as already shown through merchandise. In particular, I am referring to merchandise for games where there is a clear tariff mark-up as a response to the tariff policy which doubles or even triples the cost on top of shipping."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "Has a very negative affect it mashes no sense and will hurt the economy"
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive effect on the economy by creating more jobs and making it easier for people to get better jobs"
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "I think the tariff policy will definitely have a negative impact on the overall economy. Anything Trump lays his hands on goes downhill."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "Negative overall. It forces people to buy American which honestly is inefficient. We don’t do everything the best so it makes it more expensive for everyone"
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "I’m not sure as I see both sides can be positive or negative. I do think we should level out our costs as a country on tariffs but need better negotiating skills than threats!"
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact. It will make everything more expensive and people will become more stressed and frustrated."
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "I'm not sure. I reckon some industries will feel it harder than other. But at the end of the day, life will go on."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact on our economy. Many small businesses will go out of business."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "It will have a positive effect, which we are already seeing in the revenue that the tariffs are generating. \r\nAlso, it will bring back jobs that had moved overseas. \r\nAnd it will cause other nations to reduce their tariffs on US goods."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "Positive impact by charging more for imports and producing more export gain"
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "I believe that it will have a negative impact on the overall US economy and society since this country is driven by corporations. These tariffs have already started many corporations to raise their prices in expecting to pay for these tariffs. The minimum wage is already horrible for people, but now they're expected to pay more for goods just because these corporations don't want to solely front the cost."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "I believe that current tariff policies will have a negative effect on the US. This will likely lead to higher prices for US consumers and strained relationships with global trade partners."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "I think the tariff policy will have an overall negative impact on the economy. I think the increased cost will eventually get passed down to the consume making things more expensive."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "It will and is having a negative impact on the US economy. It is causing inflation to get worse."
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "It's going to be a adjustment for all but it's our future"
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "Positive because trump is for the people and he got those stimulus checks out and made us super happy with free money to everyone at least 1200-1600$ was super awesome"
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact. It decreases economic efficiency. Decreases US soft power. It seems to have high inflationary effects."
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "Definitely gone be a negative impact"
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "I think it will have an overall negative impact on the US economy because many people, including small businesses and small artists, rely on shipping their goods from China. I'm a small artist who orders keychains of my own art from China, and the tariffs have made it more difficult."
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "A positive effect. I think because the USA will take the tariff money and use the profits to make the USA stronger again."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "It will have a hugely negative impact. The taxes of every consumer have been raised. Corporate profits will go down, purchasing will go down. We will be insulated more from the world. They elect a dumbass they get dumbass ideas."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "It will have a very negative impact. Tariffs are taxes and these are massive"
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "Negative, consumers will ultimately get squeezed. Only industries where US products are priced similarly to foreign products will benefit. These are a fraction of the overall economy."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the economy. I am not entirely too sure about it."
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "I think it will most likely have a negative impact on the economy as prices will continue to increase. Making it harder for shoppers to afford items so they’ll buy less."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "I strongly believe it will have a positive impact.. I can already see an improvement in the economy."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "t has a negative short term effect as companies are structuring to adapt to this, its naturaly that it will not do well in the beginning, but long term it will have astoundingly positive effects"
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "I think it will have an overall positive effect. It will end up making businesses bring production back to the United States."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "The Trump administration’s tariff policy raises costs on imported goods, which can protect some domestic industries but often leads to higher prices for consumers and businesses. While certain sectors like steel or aluminum may benefit in the short term, others, especially agriculture and manufacturing reliant on global supply chains, face losses from retaliatory tariffs and rising input costs. Overall, the policy creates economic uncertainty, with mixed results that lean more negative for long-term growth and household purchasing power."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "Tariffs are absorbed by consumers, which mean consumer prices will become higher and raise inflation. Inflation above a certain amount (2% something is considered by economists to be optimal) depresses the economy, as consumers are deterred by the higher costs which then would affect manufacturing."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "I feel like they know more about what they are doing than I know, so I trust them and that it will work out in our favor. If it does not, then atleast we didn't let them cheat the USA"
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "Short term negative affects, i.e., increased prices, shortages etc., but long term positive affects, more stable prices, decrease on foreign goods and increased manufacturing state side."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "Overall it will have a positive impact on the overall U.S. economy and society because we have been way overbalanced in favor of foreign countries and sacrificing our wellbeing for theirs. We needed an intervention and it will hurt for awhile but be good in the long run."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "it will be positive, prices will lower"
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "Negative because it's raising prices. It's to the point nobody can afford it."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact on the people of this country. Prices will rise, further than they already have."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "I'm not informed well enough on the tariff policy under the Trump administration. From what I read it seems like it is protecting U.S businesses and pushes foreign countries to make fair trades with the U.S. On the other hand, it seems to make consumers prices higher which may be a con and other foreign countries could retaliate."
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "It was have a negative impact to society. This is because it will increase prices that are already increasing."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive impact. Other countries have taken advantage of the US for too long."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive effect on the economy as it will generate more revenue and boost domestic products. This is a way to give our citizens more profit."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "negative effect. The policy is going to drive up the cost of goods and services for everyday americans. It's going to lead to the destruction of our economy as we know it."
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the economy and society. We have already seen evidence of this from gas prices and grocery prices to skyrocket, forcing many lower income families to struggle even more."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "negative. It will drive consumer prices up higher than inflation already has"
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "I feel it will mostly have a positive impact on US economy. Everyone says take care of you first before helping others. And right now the US needs to take care of the US."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact. It will cause prices to rise on all goods."
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "I believe it will have a positive impact for the most part. I am slightly worried it could make other countries also put tarrifs on us though."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "It's going to be negative. There is historical evidence that raising tariffs is bad. It's also showing now in the economy, with job numbers all going down"
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I think for a while it will have a negative impact. I believe prices will go up."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the overall U.S. economy because it will raise prices on a lot of American products. Society will also have a negative impact because people will not be able to provide for these goods and have less opportunities for themselves."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "Negative. I think it will increaase prices on everything. Consumers, sadly, will keep spending."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "I think it will have an extremely negative impact on the economy. Countries will not want to do business with us and they will raise their tariffs also."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "Tariffs have not proven to be positive. These new Tariffs will be no different."
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "Tariffs are taxes on us. The Trump Admin is definitely hurting our economy and our relationships with other countries. It is very bad."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "It'll impact both economy and society, at first it will hurt economy with rising cost. But slowly it will be positive for society as importers won't have the free or low tariff anymore to take advantage."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "Negative, because I don't think there's enough time for an economic policy to have an impact before another administration comes in and changes in."
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact overall because the costs of tariffs is passed on to the consumer, not the country the tariffs are on."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "Negative effect as companies are going to pass the increase to consumers. Its going to hurt consumers. Prices are going to go up and it might push America. Products at a much higher cost."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "I believe that America will be a lot better off once everybody quits their whining and complaining about the tariffs and they allow it across the way that it’s supposed to be so that we can have more manufacturing and more employment here in the United States instead of abroad."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "I’m honestly very unsure, social media throws so much information out there I don’t know what to believe. It is bad because stuff I want to buy is more expensive now. However this will lead people to buy more inside the US"
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact. Prices will rise, costing the American people more money"
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "It is a negative. It is a tax on US citizens at a time when people are increasingly having trouble making ends meet."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "Negative impact. Prices will increase and people will end up buying less."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative effect. Free trade is important to success. Tariffs make products more expensive for us, and gains jobs in sectors that pay poorly."
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact on the economy. He changes his mind on the fly and business need stability in economic conditions. He also attacking our current allies which will cause the rest of the world to make deals together to exclude the US."
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "I think it will likely have a negative overall impact on the U.S economy. Many of the people who were for the tariffs were under the false impression that the other countries would be the ones paying the increase. It's paid by U.S importers, that then raise prices for consumers to make up the difference. Tariffs are supposed to incentivize buying and producing within the US, but we don't have the manufacturing ability in this case, or a workforce willing to go through what workers in say, china, go through."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "I think it will be more negative because it will cause prices to go up"
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "It will have a negative effect on the us economy. Prices will go up and it hurts our standing with other countries."
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive impact. I think it may seem like things are getting worse but sometimes things have to get worse before they get better. But I believe we will end up making money or at least saving from spending so much of international tariffs and the price of things will go down."
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "It will be positive. Things might be more expensive, but they will help stimulate jobs and the American economy."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "The impact of tariffs will be negative. Prices are going up and wages are staying the same. Tariffs will absolutely send us into a recession."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact by raising prices. Governmental revenue will be shifted to consumers and away from wealth holders."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "It's already negative. Consumer prices are triple. Food is outrageous. Shortages are coming. At least we're Great Again. Satan is in the White House."
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "negative. It is taking money away from americans. I saw today that farmers are requesting a bail out due to the effects of tariffs. Just like last time trump tried tariffs it caused soy bean farmers needing to be bailed out."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "I feel in due time will have a positive impact. Jobs are already starting to come back to the states."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "Its already affecting the economy with products going up and uncertainty."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "Not sure. Don't know a lot about tariff policy."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "It will have a negative effect. It will affect every part of our daily lives. People will have less disposable income."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact because it's the US companies and then the US consumer who have to pay extra. And it won't force companies to move manufacturing back to the US, because those companies will just switch to importing from China or wherever to countries with lower tariffs- they need not actually bring their manufacturing back to the US at all. So the tariffs won't help us."
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact because all the prices will go up and people won't be able to afford anything."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "I feel it will be a negative impact because there is more of personal war against China. I feel we should think logical with the tariff policy to make it fair across the nation"
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "It will mostly have negative impact in the short term because the US had outsourced too much of its manufacturing. But, it will have a positive effect in the long term as American companies begin to rely more on resources and manufacturing things here in the US."
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "It may be good for some but I haven't heard nothing but negative things about the tariffs. Food was already at an all time high and now it's steady going up."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "It has been negative so far and will only get worse as more tariffs' results hit the consumer. We continue to see prices rise, companies are laying off and announcing lower sales in the previous quarter and we are worried about our incomes and our jobs."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact because it is raising the price of mostly everything. People are spending less and cutting back on a lot because things are getting very expensive, very quickly. I think it impacts the middle class a lot and it makes people feel less happy because they can't enjoy as much."
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "I think the tariff tax will have a negative impact on the economy,especially in the beginning. The prices of goods will rise, causing hardship on the economy."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "It looks like it's going to be negative. I don't understand it it seems like it would be a positive but unfortunately these corporations want to pass on the cost of the tariffs to consumers instead of taking it on themselves so that they can remain more profitable than the consumer. I think it's rather selfish of the corporations and they are the ones not willing to help out the consumers. Which is not right since we are the ones helping keep them rich."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "I feel the tariffs will need to stay in effect past this administration in order to have any positive impact. If they are immediately repealed, they will have a negative impact."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "I think it will be negative. It will cause companies to raise prices and pass those on to consumers."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "Positive. The last presidency allowed other countries to feel as though they can take advantage of US. Trump admin is ensuring that is no longer the case"
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact. Historically, we can see that extreme tariff policies lead to a very unstable economy."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "In the short-term it will hurt the economy but long-term it will be beneficial."
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "I'm optimistic that the tariff policy will be a net positive for the US economy. We've been taken advantage of by other countries for too long. Trump is a good negotiator."
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "In the short term prices will likely go up. In the long term I feel the tariffs will be beneficial for the workers of the United States. We have to start making more of our own products."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "I think the tariffs will have a very negative effect on the US economy. The tariffs are going to increase the cost of goods so much that some will not be able to afford them."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "Negative impact and we're already seeing it at the grocery stores. It's going to affect negatively the working class."
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "It will have a negative effect. There is not enough infrastructure to actually make things in America. It would take a long time to actually build it. While in the meantime, billionaire businesses are given exemptions to not have to abide by tariffs while small business go bankrupt."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "While I don't think it's sustainable long term. I do think the implementation followed by a much more reasonable reform can have long lasting positives"
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "I think it'll put even more strain on the economy. People are already barely getting by, and this is just adding to financial strain."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "Absolutely negative. It's not about the American people, it's about more money for the greedy and corrupt. And greed, makes you stupid. I could say so much more, but I'll just summarize: The US has written it's own downfall. New Babylon-aka- USA is falling. The wickedness has poisoned the entire system. No. It could NEVER be positive. But don't take my word for- PRAY ATTENTION."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "It will almost 100% likely have a negative impact on the economy. By every standard economic methodology, this will not be a positive for our economy."
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "This is going to have an extremely negative effect. His administration sold incorrect information on how tariffs work to his followers having them believe the other country will see the increase in price, not that the consumer will."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "I think it will, at least at first, have a negative effect on the U.S. economy. There will be supply chain issues, and any new U.S. manufacturing plant or team of quality to replace overseas manufacturers won't be assembled overnight. The cost will ultimately be placed on consumers, who are already weary from high interest rates and high cost of living as-is."
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact because a lot of products will have an increased price. All the tariff will, at the end, be paid by the customers."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "I think it will ultimately have a positive effect in the long term. I believe it will bring more jobs back to the united states and strengthen the economy."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "A negative effect. Many business rely on materials and components manufactured overseas. These components are critical the certain businesses, such as the automobile and tractor industries. As a result, these companies must either absorb the cost, or pass it along to the consumer."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "I think that the tariff policy may have a negative impact on the economy and society because it is a disruption to the normal business cycle and is causing a certain amount of chaos in international trade. Additionally because these are executive orders and not laws passed by Congress, no one knows how long the tariffs may last and if they are reversed during the next administration that could cause more chaos."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "I think the current tariff policy under Trump is going to have an overall negative impact on the US economy in society at large! I think it's unnecessarily shaking the foundations of our alliances and other trading partners to achieve... I don't know what they are actually supposed to be achieving in reality. I see zero benefit for our country & only pain upon its citizens. It's utterly ridiculous I say!"
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "The current tariff policy will have a negative effect on the US economy. Prices are going up while wages are staying the same. This is putting strain on everyday Americans who are just trying to survive."
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "Definitely a negative effect. Prices are already so high and to add this tax is making too much unaffordable. Plus other countries are hating us now due to the tariffs"
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative imapct trump is beign stupid he is egoistic everyone knows these policies will increase inflation and it is the US people who have to pay all the increased taxes"
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "Negative impact. American consumers are paying the tariffs which most of his supporters are too dumb to realize. It is also harming trade relations with other countries."
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact. It will discourage trade with other countries."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact, for sure we will have some money entering but the losses will be bigger than the gains"
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "The tariff policy will have a negative impact. People who typically shop online for goods, especially for the holiday season, is now going to struggle getting things at a reasonable price. It's going to force people to spend less and devastate the economy."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "The tariff policy under the Trump administration likely had a negative impact on the U.S. economy and society. While intended to protect domestic industries, the tariffs led to higher costs for consumers and businesses, disrupted supply chains, and triggered retaliatory measures from trading partners. These effects contributed to economic uncertainty and reduced overall efficiency in the marketplace."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "I believe the shifts are too radical not to have a negative impact. Costs to consumers will be much higher, increases in American industrial output for the affected product types will not be as great as anticipated, and the political fallout regarding foreign relations will be long lasting, and far reaching in a negative way."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "Extremely negative. It is already having a negative impact, so this is not a question of if it's of for how long."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "negative because its costing companies and people more money to buy the things they need and the things they want"
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "Higher tariff revenue can improve the budget picture if sustained, but the trade-off is weaker long-run output and earnings, which also affects the fiscal base over time."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "I do feel the current tariff policy will have a negative impact"
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "I do not know enough about tariffs to form an sort of educated opinion. Logically though I think in the short term it will have a negative impact but in the long term a positive impact."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "positive. It's already had a positive effect"
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "Negative. We, the consumers, are fronting the bill and it's a cause of inflation."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "It will have a negative effect due to inflation. It will cause the price of everything will go up."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "I think it's a negative impact because those imported products will rise as well"
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "I think they will hurt the US economy and society as a whole. It will cost everyone more and it will only benefit the US government. Taxing all people but probably will not benefit all the people."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "The economic and societal impacts of the Trump administration's tariff policy are complex and widely debated among economists. Generally, such pol"
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "I think it would have a positive impact on the economy because it would force us to pay attention to our own goods etc."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "Negative. It already is causing economic slowdown (John Deere prime example) and higher prices for Americans."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive impact on the overall US economy and society. The tariffs effectively stopped the rest of the world from taking advantage of us economically and that's a good thing."
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "No, I think it will be detrimental in both the short and long-term. In the short term, it’s making prices for lots of items go up. It is functioning as tax on the American consumer. In the long-term, it’s negatively affecting our trade relationships with allies. We do not have a localized economy any longer, and no amount of adding tariffs is going to disrupt the global economy enough to change this without a complete economic collapse."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "It will have a long term negative effect on our economy and society by forcing us citizens to pay more for everything imported and by ostracizing us from our former trade partners."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "I think Trump’s tariff policy will harm the American economy in the short and long term. It has slowed down the international trade industry, hurting businesses domestic and abroad. The barrage of tariff threats and forced agreements give the United States a bad reputation on the global stage."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "Very negative impact. Even if this leads to new trade deals, elements of the tariffs will remain. This will result in costs being passed to consumers, and an overall pullback in spending. This will create a negative economic impact."
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "It is already impacting the US economy in a very negative way. How could it possibly help anyone to have to pay higher prices for the goods that we need?"
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "I think negative mostly because of the temporary time he is to be president. There is also the fact that companies are very regulated in the US, which was one of the various reasons why they left to other countries in the first place. If companies were to return to the US, it would keep increasing prices."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "I think the tariffs hurt more than they help by raising prices for everyone. While they aim to protect some jobs, they ultimately strain the economy and family budgets."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "i think it will be negative. i don't think trump understands what a tariff is. the americans are paying for it."
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "I think it will be negative I just don’t know how we can befit if anything more people will be aggravated and tax us heavily. We need to keep things the way they are"
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "The tariffs have definitely had a negative impact on the US economy. They have already impacted me personally as multiple businesses from other countries that i purchase from regularly have stopped doing business with the US."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "I think anything the Trump administration does will be a disaster especially the tariff policy. Negative is my answer."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "I firmly know with evidence and facts that it is already negative. It will only lead to harm."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "A very negative impact on the economy and the world economy. It's bad politics and horrible economical policy."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "I think maybe the tariffs are supposed to encourage manufacturing in the US? If that's the intention I can't see them working in the short term (or maybe even the long term). I think it's more likely that they will increase the prices of everything we get from outside the U.S., which is a lot of things, and that will hurt our economy and society as a whole"
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "I think the tariff policy will have a negative impact on the economy and society. I think the tariffs will drive up prices and make inflation worse. Do to that, people will become even angrier than they already are in a very polarized nation."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "I think it will have negative effects. Its making everything extremely expensive."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "I believe it will have a positive impact. Other countries should not be taking advantage of the United States."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "Tariffs will raise prices of goods. People will pay more for those goods. Tariffs are bad for the economy"
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "I HOPE it will help the economy! :) I HOPE it doesn't cause INFLATION! :,("
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "Negative. It disincentivizes trade, a lot of the goods we don't even manufacture here (and can't easily or cheaply), and the labor are being illegally sent out of the country, and prices will go up for all."
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "I think that it will have a negative impact on the economy. They are going to make things less affordable for people."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "I think it will be painful at first, but I also think that in the long run it will benefit us. This nation is a shadow of what it once was, and I'd love to see a return of the manufacturing sector. I also think that it is important that the countries that charge us tariffs should be paying equal to us. We have been taken advantage of for far too long."
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "It will definitely have a negative impact on our economy. It will rise up the prices of everything"
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "I feel the Trump tariff policies will have a positive impact on the US economy and society. The tariff are helping US businesses along with millions of dollars that we were not making previously."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact because it's making the prices of everything go up higher so that means we will not be able to afford things like we once were able to.do. it's making things very much harder on us as consumers"
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive impact on the economy as it will bring in tons of revenue to the US over time. Short-term companies will figure out what it means but long-term it will be very beneficial to the US."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "Not exactly sure, there is a further picture that we can not quite see economically and until that happens it is hard to say what is going to happen"
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "I am not sure if the tariff policy will ultimately end up having a positive or negative impact. I suspect prices will continue to rise and economic growth will slow."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "I think it will have an overall negative impact on the U.S. economy and society. It is creating tension with our international trade partners and putting high costs onto the products on which everyday Americans rely."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the economy. It will make goods go up when many already cannot afford what they need."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "If it creates enough revenue to eliminate income taxes for people making $200k or less I support it. The American people are fleeced of their hard earned enough with all the hidden taxes we already pay."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "The current tariff policy under the trump administration is having a negative impact on the overall U.S. economy and society"
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I think the overall impact will be a negative one. Prices will rise. If the intent is to increase purchase of American-made product, how about those that require supplies under heavy tariffs?"
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "It will be negative. We can see that jobs are being lost already. Things are getting too expensive, and the costs are passed to us as consumers overall!"
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "I think that the Trump administration terrorist are going to have a positive impact on the economy. We will be collecting a source of revenue that we have never collected before. I think that will benefit us as a country."
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact on the US economy. The Trump administration brags about how much tariff money they are bringing in, but it is coming from the American people. It's just another tax on our citizens."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative effect.It will increase prices on most things and cause more economic hardship."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "I think the effort to equalize the trade tariffs will ultimately lead to better trade partnerships. This may not be an instant result."
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "I think the tariff policy will benefit working class Americans by bringing high paying manufacturing jobs into the United States. Consumers will also benefit by buying high quality products. No more slave child foreign labor."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "Negative. There isn't a logical, rational, or objective reason to be pursuing this tariff policy. All the future economic and political damage will be self inflicted"
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "A negative impact. We are already seeing cancellations of online orders especially from overseas vendors. Some medicines come from Canada and other countries and I believe that may cause shortages"
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "I've seen increases in prices in grocery stores so I believe it will affect families affording food. It's effected most categories so I think it will have a major impact across the board."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "The Trump administration’s tariff policy is more likely to have a negative overall impact, as higher import costs drive up prices for consumers and disrupt global supply chains. While certain industries, like steel and aluminum, may benefit from temporary protection, others—such as agriculture and manufacturing—face retaliatory tariffs that reduce competitiveness abroad. In the long run, these trade tensions risk slowing economic growth and straining relationships with key global partners."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "I think the tariffs will have a positive impact. It just takes time. Time equals money. If the American people are patient, it’ll pay off."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "I think that it will have a negative effect. Already, we are seeing higher prices and shipping costs from international purchases."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative effect. It will raise prices, which will result in lower job growth and worse purchasing power."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "I think it will have a positive impact on US economy because it will help us eventually eliminate people paying taxes as we would generate needed revenue through tariffs. This will stimulate the economy as people will hold more money."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "Negative. The tariffs have, and will continue, translate to higher prices for the US consumer."
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact. It will harm the middle and lower economic classes the most. It is bad policy."
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact because it will cause Americans to spend more on goods which then doesn’t help our own economy"
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact. It will make products more expensive for consumers and drive many small businesses out of business."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "it will be a negative. It will cost the average person almost 4000$ more a year"
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "I do think it will have a positive impact. I'm hopeful with the money it is brining in, it will lower costs of goods ands services. I don't see much of a change in prices currently."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact on the economy. It will lead to other countries putting retaliatory tariffs on the United States"
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "It's not only gonna be a negative effect it's gonna destroy the US economy and then destroy the United states because it looks like that's what his plan is because no sane person would be doing the things that he's doing on top of the tariffs that are going to literally kill an economy"
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "I feel like it will have a negative impact as businesses will be paying more to get their products in. In turn, consumers will have to pay even more or decline to buy the products which hurts the economy."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "I don't know. It seems that the economy is slowing, which is what usually happens with Republican administrations. These tariffs could worsen that, but the jury's still out on it."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "The tariffs have already negatively impacted the economy through recessionary pressures that are now being felt. The uncertainty of their application,/withdrawal and increases/decreases are also negatively impacting world markets."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "It will have a negative impact on the world because a lot of people use them to support their business"
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact. The cost will be passed to the people."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "It will have a negative effect. It is already costing more for US companies and damaging sentiment worldwide."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "I think if we give it enough time, the tariffs should end up helping. It should encourage companies and manufacturers to produce our own things in the united states"
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "I believe that it has and will have a negative impact on the overall economy. Prices are already out of control and rising and small businesses do not have the fundage to pay these tariffs and it will force them to go out of business."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "It will have a negative effect. Prices will go up, making inflation go up. There will eventually be shortages of certain items due to countries not wanting to trade with the US"
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "negative because everything will go up and it will hurt the econmy"
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "the tariffs will definitely have a negative effect on the economy. first off, the tariffs are, in large part, paid by U. S, citizens since the importers will pass the cost along to consumers. Second, foreign economies will adjust to the tariffs by opening up trade with other countries like China. This lead to shortages of goods and that too will lead to higher prices."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "Negative impact, unless the tariffs are only a negotiation tactic. The tariffs need to be redone with labor leaders and huge investments into manufacturing to be successful."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact. Prices will be go up for us at home. His tariff may be struck down by the courts, so we wouldn't even see any eventual benefits."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "I feel the current tariff policy will have a negative impact on the U.S. economy and society. The tariffs are ultimately passed down to the consumer to pay. The businesses are not going to absorb the cost of the tariff."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "This is already having a negative impact on the U.S. economy and society. Tariffs are not taxes on other countries but rather taxes passed on to the consumer. Hence higher prices for most goods."
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "The tariff policy is looking to currently have a negative impact on US economy. The anticipated expectations will have a positive effect on the US economy if actions are taken properly."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "I think immediately it will have a negative impact but overall it could be a very good thing for Americans, circulating more money through our country and our smaller communities"
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact. Already we're seeing unpleasant effects such as higher grocery prices and some American made companies starting to struggle."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "I think it will have a negative impact overall because it will cause prices to rise and people to distrust the government."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "I think but not sure, if it is going to be good shirt term. Although maybe it could be a good thing in the long term for the country."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "I believe it will have a negative impact overall. The economy and society are already starting to see the negative downside of the tariffs."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "Tariffs will have a negative impact on our economy. Prices have already started rising and it'll only get worse. Trump is a moron."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "I think that it will have an overall negative impact on the US economy and society. The tariffs are not money that other countries pay us, but rather taxes/fees that get imposed on distributers that get passed along to consumers. It also alienates our allies and does not support goodwill internationally."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "Definitely positive. We will bring manufacturing back to our country, and stop being a doormat for other countries."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "A negative impact. It seems that tariffs as being implemented will raise prices for Americans. The increased cost due to tariffs that companies are faced with will be passed along to consumers, not fielded by the companies. Rising prices will further exacerbate tensions felt by Americans on the lower end of the socio-economic ladder."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "I think it could go either way, but ultimately will have a more negative impact due to his other policies. Initially prices will go up on a lot of items so it will be bad. Even in the long term things will be bad though, because eventhough some manufacturers might decide to manufacture products on US soil in response to the tariffs, he might deport a lot of the employees at this companies so it will be detrimental"
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "I am trying to stay hopeful that eventually we will see the positive benefit of the tariff policy. The prices of everything has inflated so much and we do our best to keep our costs down. I have told myself there is nothing we can do except wait it out."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "Overall negative impact. Tariffs are required to be paid by companies or individuals importing products, therefore increasing their price. Without equally or lower priced locally made products, this only increases costs overall."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "I believe the current administration under trump is going to have a negative impact on the overall us economy and society so far it's all been empty promises and outrageous bills and ideas"
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "I feel that the tariffs will have a negative impact on the economy. We are at least 10 years away from being able to have domestic production to a level to satisfy the markets. I see China creating other trading partners leaving us on the outs of global markets."
}
] |
Do you support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics? Please answer briefly in 1–2 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "I do not. I think that people can be highly encouraged but I do not think they should enforce them as some people have different beliefs."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "no because people still going do what they want do so no point."
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "I support quarantine and vaccination enforcement because it is the best way to ensure public health and prevent the spread of disease."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "yes, having just went through a pandemic, not being vacinatted really affected everything. It slowed down how were able to live our lives."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "i support the government because that is the best way to prevent pandemics from spreading"
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "Yes, i believe that if vaccination have been tested and proven to help protect people from illness, then it’s important to enforce vaccination measures so people will be protected and can help reduce the spreading of disease."
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "Yes, I think especially early in the pandemic, it was important to be able to enforce these things as not enough was known about the virus. But as more was known, it was ok to remove the measures."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "I think it's a good idea because sometimes people just make bad decisions for themselves and put everyone else at risk because of it, and so sometimes we should step in and tell them what to do for the greater good."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "Yes, it's important for people to be vaccinated. Opposing this could lead to wide spread disease."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "No I don’t support mandated vaccines. The vaccines made for covid when it first happened were not studied or sampled for long at all. Many people developed autoimmune issues."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "As much as it infringes somewhat on individual rights, vaccination during severe epidemics can be a matter of national survival. Hence, I support vaccination and quarantine, but only under the proviso that the epidemic is truly severe and that the vaccines developed are truly effective."
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "No i do not support the government to enforce vaccines on people, people should make their own choices on what to put in their body. Quarantine is fine if it’s really bad."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "Yes. It's important for herd immunity. People should be forced to do quarantine and get vaccinated for the good of the community."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "Yes, from a science point of view, it is important for the public. While others may feel it should be a choice, the government needs to properly sensitize the public on how severe a disease is."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "No, I don't support the government with that power. Using covid as our baseline they did a fairly poor job."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "I support governments being able to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures to stop epidemics. This is for the greater good of the nation and only has the best intentions for the public."
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "I think I do not there’s too much conflicted data and research that these policies only scare the public."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "No, I do NOT support the government having the power to FORCE people to get vaccinated. The reason for this is that vaccination is a health issue, and there's no guarantee that the vaccine will even be safe, like what happened during the coronavirus pandemic where we had to get vaccinated or we'd lose certain freedoms, and the vaccine wasn't even safe because of all the side effects that people who took it suffered from or even died from."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "I think that the government can and should enforce quarantine measures in response to a severe epidemic. However, I don't think that they should force vaccinations upon people. The vaccine was likely developed in response to the epidemic and doesn't have the longitudinal data to support making individuals receive it."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "I think the government should have the authority to enforce vaccine and quarantine measures. Those who don't follow these mandatory guidelines will be criminally penalized, prohibited from work, or marked unvaccinated as a warning and to prepare others from catching the virus. It sounds harsh, but if this severe epidemic caused the death of thousands or millions of people in a short time, like COVID, the government must look out for its people."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "I do support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures as long as it is in the best interests of citizens' health, and for no other reason. This could be the most effective route to positive outcome."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "I support these measures. By preventing mass infection and death through providing easily accessible solutions, people firmly defying that should be held accountable for their role in counterproductive action for mass health."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "I do not support the governments authority over vaccinations during severe epidemics."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "No, I do not think anyone should be forced to get a vaccination. It is our own body."
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "Yes, I support it. In severe epidemics, government authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine is important to protect public health and prevent widespread harm."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "I only support if the vaccination will be optional. The government shouldn't require or force anyone to take a vaccine."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I do support the government enforcing vaccines and quarantine during severe epidemics because of what happened during covid. I think some people are too stupid and they need to be told to do something so they don't die or risk other people because of their carelessness."
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "Yes, I fully support the government having that authority during severe epidemics because their ultimate goal is to keep people safe and healthy. It may not be the most enjoyable situation to be in, but we have a right as citizens to ensure our safety in times of crisis as a collective."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "I do not. Why? Because the US government is not a dictatorship, it has no authority to \"enforce\" these measures even during epidemics."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "No, this is because the government ides critical information from the masses which makes them not to be trustworthy."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "yes of course lest we would be sand by now we need authorities in our lives"
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "I fully support the government enforcing vaccination and quarantine measures. I think this ensures everyone's safety at the end of the day."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "No I do not, this is a form of stupid evil satanic and worthless Marxist communist doctrine."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "Yes, because in severe epidemics, it is important to have sufficient coverage of immunity across the general population to mitigate spread. The government is there to support the greater good of the populace, and I think this falls under that responsibility."
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "I think it’s really important for the government to have the power to require vaccinations and quarantine when there’s a serious outbreak. It helps keep everyone safe and stops the disease from spreading too much."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures because the faster people get immunized and protected, the faster the epidemic will end. The vaccination and quarantine measures only get more effective the more people follow instructions, therefore it is important that people know what they should do."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "Yes I think it's important if they believe it is truely and emergency situation to be able to require vaccines and/or quarantine"
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "I do not support government enforcing vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. I think the government should make vaccines available, but not mandatory."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I think the government should have the power to enforce quarantine measures because it keeps people safe during the pandemics, and vaccinations help protect people from getting sick."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics because it is for the common good and helps protect everyone’s health. Having these measures in place help stop the spread of diseases and quickly save lives."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "Yes, I do, because it is a choice that can prevent suffering and saving other peoples' lives."
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "No. The government has lost credibility in its handling of epidemic outbreaks and rightfully so. That is not to say that I believe there was a mass conspiracy, but rather officials who claimed to definitively know, with absolute certainty, the best course of action when they did not."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "Quarantine in some scenarios. Required vaccination, absolutely not."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having authority to require vaccines and quarantines especially during severe epidemics. Vaccines are safe and proven science and are needed to protect society and the most vulnerable."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "Yes, it is important to protect the safety and health of all individuals, if enforcing these kind of measures can achieve that, then yes it should be implemented."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "When there's a bad sickness, the government should have power to make people get shots. They should also be able to tell sick people to stay home, it might not be something everyone likes but for the greater good it is sometimes necessary."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "While I support the government enforcing quarantine measures during severe epidemics, I feel it is wrong to force a quickly produced and limitedly tested vaccine on people, as happened during the covid epidemic."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "As long as the government is funding these vaccinations and these vaccinations are actually doing what they are supposed to be, I see no reason why it shouldn't be enforceable. I suppose this so long as the funding does not require the person getting it to pay for it, otherwise this becomes a wealth disparity situation as well where you're punished for not being able to afford the vaccination."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "Yes i do absolutely support governments authority , its an necessary measure that has to be implemented to protect the public health from severe epidemics and wide spread death ."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "Yes, I do as it can save lives and prevent outbreaks"
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "I do support quarantine and vaccination measures if safe for individuals to protect public. These measures ensures continuation of safe services, school, and work while limiting illness and death during epidemics strong period."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "No, the government should not be able to enforce anything on the people because they can abuse this. If one thing is being enforced, then another area can be as well. There is nothing wrong with enforcing through media and commercials, ad's ... but people should have free will regarding this. *And maybe they should stop cooking up sicknesses in the lab so people wont need to go through these things* ;)"
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "Vaccination, no, quarantine, yes. The people who do not accept the vaccination should not get the same understanding unless medically proven otherwise. If they do not get it, I think they should be willing to stay home or accept the consequences, and if someone falls ill due to their poor decisions, they should be fined. Ultimately, I think it should be a case-by-case basis, but the majority of people I think should be made to receive the vaccine."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "Yes, I do because I have family members who are immune compromised and they deserve the right to exist outside of their homes without getting sick and dying because of a severe epidemic."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "Vaccinations-No, We should be able to decide what we put in our bodies as personal, individual decisions without government interference. Quarantine-No, Again the government should not interfere with our lives If we are not breaking any laws, but people should have the decency and compassion for others to quarantine themselves if they're sick."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "I do not support enforced vaccination. This should be a privilege and right that each individual has to determine what goes in their body. Enforcing quarantine measures is different as it affects other individuals who do not have the right to tell others to not infect them."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "The government should regulate vaccination during severe epidemics. They should supervise the validity/ingredients of the vaccine, and it should be FDA approved first. The vaccine should be safe for everyone, and of course, quarantine policies should be put in place immediately after the epidemic has been determined. As a precaution, the public should be aware of everything."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "Short answer is no in the US. That tramples the constitution and is tyrannical."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "i do not support government having any authority to enforce any kind of vaccination. This is our bodies and our choice to put anything into it. Quarantine measures if warranted are a different story."
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "Yes,I think they should be able to.This would protect the masses.Maybe it is uncomfortable ,but sometimes it may be necessary .I hate that keeping us safe became a political issue,Crazy."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "I don't support the government enforcing vaccinations because I don't trust the government and the vaccinations sometimes cause other issues with your health. I support quarantine measures if it's an epidemic where people are dying and they don't know the cause."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "Yes I do. Since people tend to act selfishly, it is the responsibility of the government to step in and enforce quarantine measures. I'm less fond of mandatory vaccines...there may be reasons why a person won't take a vaccine."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "I do not support the government having authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. People should have the choice when it comes to their health, bodies and whether or not to get vaccinated."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "Yes, the government, based on the feedback and evidence provided by proven scientists and health professionals, should be able to mandate vaccinations and quarantines to safeguard the health of the public at large. That is the role of the government agencies."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "I do support this because this will allow people to be safe when serious epidemics or sickness come to the public. It serves as a protection for the people; it won't fully protect us but the chances of getting that disease or sickness is significantly lower."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "no absolutely not. they do not have the right to inject my own body with what they think will solve the issue."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "No, the government should not mandate that people have vaccinations. It should be the choice of the person."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "I do not support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination during severe epidemics. I am a federal worker and I had to get vaccinated or I would lose my job. Now, I have to worry about any after effects I may have years from now. I believe in quarantine measures but not forceable vaccinations."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "I support the government in having the authority to enforce vaccine and quarantine measures because we've seen from the last pandemic that the American people are unable to help themselves. Sometimes there needs to be someone to step in and help society as a whole to get through hard times."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I believe people should have a say in the matter of vaccinations. People losing their jobs over a vaccine that they could be potentially allergic to/have a bad reaction to. The government should clear what it is those vaccines so people don't get scared to take something they know nothing about."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "I do support it, only in the case of sever epidemics because seeing first hand how many people didn't get vaccinated during COVID, caused COVID to spread even more and caused many unneeded deaths as well as people that were sick and didn't quarantine themselves. I believe people should look out for their fellow citizen, so the government should enforce it, for the greater good of other citizens."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "I don't think people should be forced to vaccinate. During the pandemic, some folks lost their jobs because they didn't get vaccinated. Many people who got vaccinated got COVID anyway and transmitted the virus to others. Dems say, \"My body, my choice\" regarding abortion, but that argument isn't acceptable regarding vaccines."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "I do support it. While I sympathize with those who want to maintain bodily autonomy, as I've grown older (and even during the beginning of the pandemic 5 years ago) I recognize that there are certain things that we must do as citizens to maintain a certain social good. and Part of that includes vaccinations and/or quarantine measures to ensure those more vulnerable among us don't get sick and in order to help curtail the contagion. Stop the spread!"
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "Yes. I do support the government having ultimate say in health matters when millions of people are at risk. Quarantine's are a must for suppressing the spread of disease and vaccination is the only real way we can fight against them."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "Yes, I support it because we cannot trust all of the public to make sensible decisions that keeps the majority of us safe. There are many citizens who need protection, especially children, the elderly, and the immune compromised. It is unfortunate that it takes government policy to enforce these things to do our best to reduce the harm and death toll caused by an epidemic."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I think its important to enforce some kind of policy to make sure everyone is safe and to ensure no more sickness is passed on, but its also important for people to know that it is a choice and its to keep people safe its not mandatory"
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "Yes I believe so during severe epidemics because it is for the public safety and health. I do support this, as it should be done regardless."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "Yes. I think that government should enforce vaccination where people are dying due to the epidemic. But that policy should be counter measured by freedom of movement. In other words, we vaccinate so that kids can go to school, people can go about their regular lives."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "Yes. We need to sacrifice personal liberties in order to protect the greater good of public health."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "Quarantine measures make sense to me to contain it but enforcing vaccinations doesn’t need to be required. Places can always set rules on who can enter a place based on vaccination status. It should be up to the person what they get put in their body."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "Yes, I do support this for the greater good. I think strong mandates are needed to prevent further spread and to prevent the creation of a pandemic. It might be restrictive, but these temporary measures are necessary to prevent suffering."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "I do support the government having this authority only under severe epidemics. People will always be suspicious and the last pandemic showed us that people will fight a vaccine to their detriment. The virus can spread and kill people. It is important that it is handled in the correct way."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "No. Although i do agree that people should get a vaccine / get quarentined in these sitiations its not fair to force it on to someone."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "Yes, I support vaccine mandates for the good of the public. I will explain why. If there were another virus like the one that causes smallpox or polio, something so devastating like that should not be left in the hands of dumb people who make up vaccine danger conspiracy theories. Vaccines save lives, period. Quarantine also helps to prevent the spread."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "No, I do not support the government having authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. I do not feel like anyone can force a person to inject something into their bodies without their consent at all."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "yes vaccinnes should be mandated for everyone to prevent disease"
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "No, I do not because that is oppressive to people. The government does control people like they think they do."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "Yes it just shows that people care and want the best for successful outcomes."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "Yes. In times of crisis, collective action becomes critical. Collective action is almost always impossible when there are a lot of individuals. One of the functions of the government is precisely to enact collective action."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "Yes, enforcing vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics should be necessary. It is important for ensuring the health of the public."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "No, I don't believe in mandatory vaccine requirements. Quarantine measures are different. If certain areas need to be restricted, then they should be restricted."
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "If it will save lives, yes. I would rely on what experts are saying not politicians. I defer to the professionals."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "No, I do not support the government having the authority to violate people's bodily autonomy. I'm a bit more open about quarantine if the emergency is severe enough...but it would have to be much worse than Covid-19 that barely even affects most healthy people."
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "Yes, I believe that the government should have some authority to enforce quarantine and vaccination measures during severe epidemics. I think that the overall safety of the group is the most important thing during epidemics and governmental authority in enforcing these things will help preserve group safety better than no enforcement."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "No, I do not. I feel that we were not treated in an honest way during COVID and it eroded my faith in the government’s honesty and response. They can advise, they can make strong recommendations, but they can’t force."
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "No I think the public should vote. The government should not have that much control."
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "I do support the government having the authority to do so. It protects all concerned. Saving lives is the ultimate goal."
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "no absolutely not that infringes on our God given rights. We the people have the choice to pick what we think is best of our health and freedom to Travel freely"
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "I do not support enforcing quarantine measures. They should recommend guidelines, but enforcing it interferes with free will."
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "Yes, the government should step in to prevent pandemics. They should quarantine those who are not vaccinated. I don't think the government should force people to become vaccinated if they are of sound mind."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "Yes, I do. It's important to protect the citizenry and public at large in these situations. Vaccinations have been proven effective, and have practically eliminated many diseases that were once deadly."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "Yes, I do support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures but only during severe epidemics. I do feel like it is infringement on our personal liberty but voluntary compliance alone may not be enough to stop transmission. Historically, such measures have been crucial in controlling outbreaks."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "No I do not. I feel as though it is wrong because they know people don’t trust vaccines anymore."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "The government has the right and authority to protect its citizens."
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "I support quarantine measures because that would certainly help during severe epidemics. I don't support enforcing vaccinations though and them having control over someone's body."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "I support the government's right to do so, but I do think that people should have autonomy of their body, generally. So, they should be able to enforce quarantine, but vaccinations should probably just be highly encouraged, and states/locations can choose rules regarding further enforcement."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "I do not. Should always be a choice"
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "I do support vaccines and quarantines during epidemics."
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "I do not believe it should be mandatory for a vaccine but I believe it should be heavily recommended and people should get it. I believe quarantine should be mandatory."
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "No I think this is government overreach. People can make their own decisions."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "no way. nobody ever should have control of what we do with our bodies."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "I oppose it. Government do not have a right to tell someone what to do with their bodies. If people don't want to get vaccinated then that's their right."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "The government should leave the decision up to parents. They already intrude too much when it comes to children, and who is to say whether or not the vaccines are even effective??"
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "Yes. I think it's essential that the health of the many is more important than the ill-informed stupidity of the few. At the very least, penalize those that don't comply (rather than force them to comply)."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "I do support this so as to protect everybody. While it should not be rushed if the studies back up its effectiveness I support this."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "Yes, I support certain measures, such as incentives for vaccines that have scientific evidence of their efficacy"
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "I do because this would protect the health of people and it would help prevent infections. With the Coronavirus many people were doing good with following the rules, which helped stop it pretty fast. If it happened again I feel like most people wouldn't bother following the rules."
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "Yes, because vaccinations are safe and effective. Not all people will get vaccinated, as they should."
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "I support the idea but don't know specifically how they plan to enforce vaccination. Enforcing a quarantine is useful for epidemics involving really fast-spreading diseases."
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "Yes, I support it. It helps keep people safe. During epidemics, rules like vaccines can save peoples lives"
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "No. I think people should have the choice of what they put in their bodies. I think the government should be able to have some shut down authority but when it come to individuals getting together or how you interact with others it's none of the government's business."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "No because it is an attack to our liberty"
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "Yes, i think many people are actually stubborn and the govenment has to come into situations like this to determine the best for thier peole"
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "When the risk for great illness is high, I think the government should have the right to step in. When it is highly possible that many people can die without vaccinations or quarantine, there are those who are infected that would not isolate themselves and do the right thing. Sometimes people don't know when they are ill"
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "Quarantine yes, vaccination no. We've seen that the risks of some vaccines have been grossly understated, and the efficacy overstated."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "I don't really like this question. I think it is pretty loaded. Like I think it is necessary to do certain things during a severe epidemic but to say the government has complete authority is a bit too much. So I don't like the question."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "I do not think vaccines should be enforced, but I do believe quarantine measures should be enforced. Not everyone can get a vaccine but everyone can follow quarantine rules"
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "No, the government should not have the right to force medical intervention which may cause significant side effects and unwanted consequences. The government may restrict activities forunvaccianted indivuals to protect public health, but should never reduce the autonomy of one's medical decisions."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "I do not support the government enforcing vaccinations even during severe epidemics or otherwise. I believe it is up to each individual for whatever reasons they desire whether it be religious or health reasons. I do not trust vaccines."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "No, A government should not be able to mandate what goes into your body"
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "Yes, I believe that the government should be able to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures in the interest of public health. It is important to protect the larger population at the expense of the interests of individual citizens. We all need rules and requirements to have a functional society."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "No I do not. The government has not shown us any type of consistency of anything that makes them fully trustworthy as they should be."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "Im indifferent on that subject. It all depends if they are doing it to benefit them or the people."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "During severe epidemics I feel the government should be involved to try to stop 5he spread of disease and try to keep everyone healthy as possible"
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "I absolutely support this. We need to look back in recent history just at the polio epidemic and see what life was like for kids before vaccinations. Let's not bring back the iron lung, please."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "Yes, I think I do support the government to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. We want to have as little loss of life as possible and I don' t know how else we can get through it without people working together."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "I am very against the government mending vaccines, it is scary and it's not sometimes OK with it.That's why I have a firearm because someone tries to do that.They're going to have a bad day"
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. In times of public health crisis, collective safety must sometimes take precedence over individual autonomy to prevent widespread harm. However, these powers should be exercised transparently and ethically, with safeguards to protect civil liberties."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "I think there should be strict regulations for people so that they don't force sickness onto other people \"super spreaders\". but i also think everyone should have the right to not chose to get vaccinated, and that business also have the right to refuse service to non-vaccinated people."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "Yes, I do. For the greater health of community I do believe mandates are important."
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "Yes, I do support the government having that authority. Epidemics can lead to pandemics, this isn't just about a handful of people who will be affected if there isn't enforced vaccination. Quarantines help contain diseases so we don't have fast wide spread. Pandemics start as uncontrolled epidemics and that affects millions of lives, potentially across the globe."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "Yes I definitely support the government enforcing these measures because people generally can be very slow to adapt until it is too late. There are also those who can easily be infected and being prolonged to people who might have an infection might be detrimental to them"
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "No, I believe this should be a personal choice based on your beliefs and feelings. The government does not have a right to enforce things on people."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "No I don't not support authority enforcing vaccinations during severe epidemics. It is against our human rights and is inhuman to force a person to put substances in their body without their permission"
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "Yes because it is the government's duty to protect the citizenry. Public health is such a thing, and contagious diseases are beyond the scope of the individual."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "Yes i do. For the greater good for everyone. We don't need to be stupid and repeat old mistakes."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "Yes because this somehow ensures safety of the citizens both directly and indirectly. Precaution is paramount epecially when there have already been reported cases."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "I do not. The government purpose is to allow people to have freedom and make their own choices. They should only provide information and guidance"
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "Yes, I do, because the vaccine should be approved by the FDA/CDC before anyone receives it, which is a federal government agency. Quarantine should also come from governmental agencies like CDC and NIH, because they can detect a pandemic before anyone else, and would know how to advise the public regarding quarantine."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics to protect public health and safety."
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I do support handing the government authority to enforce vaccination in severe epidemics. Mass vaccination ensures the population acquires herd immunity, eventually stopping the epidemics."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "No I do not support government having the authority to enforce vaccination measures. I do support government having the authority to support quarantine measures. It should be up to a person what they decide to put in their bodies."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "Yes because if it's required for the safety of everyone you can't leave the option up to individuals. Too much misinformation makes people distrust medical science."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "I believe everyone should have a choice. I think that jobs may have a requirement to keep their place of business healthy. Government should have no place in mandating medical practices."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "No I do not support. Who are they to say what must go into my body? I have every right to refuse something that is potentially fatal."
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "Yes. These steps are necessary to prevent overburdoning the Healthcare system and preventing unnecessary death or long term conditions. Anyone who claims to be patriotic should be willing to do whatever it takes to help prevent deaths of their fellow citizens. These measures have historically been implemented to successfully mitigate more widespread harm - Spanish flu, measles, polio, to name a few."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "If it is to protect humanity, yes. Vaccinations were created to protect people from illnesses as well as to protect the spread of these illnesses. It is important to protect ourselves."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "Yes I support this. This is because it is for everyone's safety"
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "Yes I support them enforcing vaccinations but not quarentine. I think that everyone should see vaccines as a good thing."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "No - as an American citizen this is an individual right if they should receive a vaccine."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "I don't support govt having authority to enforce vaccination. they can urge people and warn them and educate them to make an informed decision. if on govt property, then they can isolate and quarantine certain areas."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "Yes. It is important to stop the spread of the illness as quickly and efficiently as possible. The government would have the resources needed to do this."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "I think that people should be able to decide on their own what vaccinations to get and quarantines should be enforced."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "Yes, as long as it is for the safety of everyone's health, especially in the prevention of the spread and to keep us safe."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "What is the government. Medical issues are functions of US State governments. The federal government should have an advisory only function on medical issues. State Governments have a limited authority to enforce quarantine measures during severe epidemics. No government has the right to mandate vaccinations."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "Yes i do. It is essential in preventing and stopping the spread of potentially deadly illnesses."
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "I don't like being forced to do anything but if it's going to prevent an epidemic like Covid-19 then I would support the vaccine. I would need to know what's in the vaccine and if theirs any side affects before taking it."
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "i support it. mandates for vaccinations can save potentially millions of lives."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "No, I believe it is authoritarian and the whole point of having rights and freedom is that it is absolute, not when it is convenient. Covid proved this was a terrible idea as we saw governments oppress their own people in the name of a glorified cold with a 98 percent survival rate."
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "i do not support that. i dont support the government having authority to enforce vaccinations on anyone. i think it is the persons own choice to get it"
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "Yes. I think what we did during the Covid situation was imperfect, but something had to be done. I don't like the idea of forcing vaccines on people, but there needs to be a clear line set on what the unvaccinated can reasonably expect to participate in as part of our citizenry. This could be a state by state issue, but it cannot be a free for all."
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "Ultimately I do think it should be people’s choice what to put into their own bodies, so I do not support forced vaccination. I do support quarantine enforcement, as well as restrictions such as vaccine requirements to access spaces, hold jobs, frequent businesses, etc. at the discretion of the appropriate authorities."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "If citizens lives are at stake where vaccinations and a quarantine will save them them. Yes! People need to think about other people than themselves."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "Yes I think if it protects the public. Yes for quarantine no to vaccines"
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "No, I do not support the government having to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics"
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "No I don’t support this at all. They should not be able to force this on people."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "Yes i do"
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "No I don’t support the government having the authority to vaccinate during severe pandemics. I don’t support the government quarantining to stop the spread of a virus that could lead to more cases. And I believe the government has done a good job with the pandemics procedures."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "Yes, I do. Because vaccination and quarantine measures can help prevent disease from spreading out."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government's enforcement of vaccination and quarantine measures. We don't allow people the freedom to drive drunk b/c it could kill others. By the same logic, we s/b able to force vaccinations to save the lives of infants and other high risk poeple."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "Yes, this is a public safety issue. This is like stopping at a red light."
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government protecting the most vulnerable (and not) of our population, by mandating vaccination, and quarantine. People are inherently selfish, if it is up to them, we will be in the measles epidemic again. It is more important than ever for our government to protect us."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "no there is no reason to force people. Some people not liking the idea of getting vaccinated"
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "no I do not , it depends a lot on how bad things get. too many people get sick and die from something changes everything"
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "No I do not support it. I think we should all have the freedom to make an educated decision on what goes inside our bodies and how we go about preventing illnesses ."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "yes, I support it if it will save lives"
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "As a matter of public safety then I support the ability to enforce vaccination and quarantines if the the severity of the disease and the infectiousness of the disease warrant. I think the CDC can recommend it but Congress would be required to pass legislation requiring it."
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "For the most part I do as we quarantined and received vaccinations during COVID with successful results. BUT if the current administration required vaccinations and quarantines I do not not if I could comply as I do not trust those currently in power."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "Absolutely! We have seen what happened when measles spread like wildfire because the government voided the mandate."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "Absolutely. Vaccines have been proven to stop diseases and keep people safer during epidemics and pandemics with minimal risk. Quarantine is necessary for diseases to be kept away from the healthy."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "I think the government should have the authority to enforce vaccinations and quarantines during severe epidemics, because protecting public health and saving lives must be the top priority. While personal freedom is important, in a crisis the collective safety of the community outweighs individual choice."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "No. It must be a voluntary choice."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "During severe epidemics I agree that the government should have this power because COVID proved that people will not do so. Other people would rather harm and infect other people because they feel like their rights are threatened."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "Yes, absolutely. Without enforcement of preventative measures it would be impossible to limit the spread of the disease, resulting in more illness and deaths. Ideally, everyone would engage in these measures without government enforcement, but we saw during the height of COVID that many people will prioritize their own preferences over others' health."
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "No, I feel like that is too authoritarian, they should encourage it and have it available, but should not force it"
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "I do because it harms too many other people when people make the selfish choice to remain unvaccinated. So they should have to fend for themselves."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "Yes, I do. Although there will be people who don't like these measures, many lives will be saved."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "no"
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "No I don't support that I don't think the government should force vaccination on people. I think it will be terrible and just let people choose"
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "No, I don't believe in enforcing vaccinations. However, any place can refuse you or children if no vaccinated. For example schools."
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "Yes, absolutely ! We are all a part of a whole and owe ourselves and our community members safety and if getting a vaccine and having to quarantine is required then we should all be willing to do so for ourselves and others. No person is above anyone else. We should all be caring for each other and protecting vulnerable communities."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "I do support the government to have the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures especially during severe epidemics if they are in the hands of people who are supportive. If the government officials are more caring towards their civilians, then the whole outbreak spread of the pandemic would not be so severe. However if it was in the hands of those who are not so caring, then there is no point in having the government to take control of such important matters."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "Yes I do. To help curtail the contagion and protect those most vulnerable among us health-wise."
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "No, i dont think the government should mandate vaccines . If the vaccine works then the people who take dont have anything to worry about unlike the covid vaccine"
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "I support the government having that authority when it is for the best of everyone. Government enforcement can help keep people alive because without it people could unknowingly harm others when they refuse or opt out."
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "Yes. Although there may be important reasons for certain exceptions, in general in a time of extremely threatening pandemic mandatory vaccination and quarantine may be necessary to protect the greater good of the society as a whole. Quarantines have been used by governments for a very long time, and now that we have vaccines, when they are proven to be safe and effective they may be required in many instances."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "Yes - It is only responsible and right that a functioning government would do everything they could to prevent their citizens from getting sick and dying off due to disease. To do otherwise is encouraging the spread of lethal conditions that can be avoided through quarantine and modern medicine."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "Yes. The greater good needs to be the driving force when decisions are made in times like this. Vaccines are safe and effective."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "Given that I do not have favorable opinion of the current government, I do not support their authority to enforce anything, including vaccination and quarantine measures."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "I don't know. It depends on the specifics. I think the Covid response was wrong and too intrusive. But if a disease was more powerful, then we might need encouraged vaccines and quarantines."
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "Hell yes. Of course. Science over ignorance."
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "yea, i support this action. americans can't be trusted to do the right thing by themselves"
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "I do not approve of the government enforcing vaccinations but I completely supported measures that are taken during severe epidemics. If they had not enforced them so many more people would be dead."
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "Yes, I think having these things enforced is critical for people's health. I think it should be mandatory."
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "No, definitely not. I am opposed to forced vaccinations."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "I don't think vaccination should be forced on anyone who doesn't want it, but it should be strongly encouraged by the government. I do support quarantine measures during severe epidemics though; it can help save lives."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "While I don't like the word, \"force\", I feel there is a better word and a better way to get people to comply with vaccinations and quarantine measures, but force isn't one of them. However, I do support calling for a quarantine if the epidemic is at its worst and spreading quickly. But I have issues with forcing vaccinations."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "Absolutely not. The government by trying to use authority and force to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures goes against the freedoms that people have for free will. The government should not get mixed in with religion which is part of the reason why some do not get certain vaccinations, as well as enforcing people to put things in their body like doctors used to do in the 60s to blacks. That is what the government did or you would get fired, and that then becomes a dictatorship."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "I definitely support the government\r\ns authority to enforce vaccinations and quarantien measures dureing sever epeidemics because it is the government's job to ensure the pubilic safety. Those who refuse vaccines and then refuse to quarantine are endangering all those around them and they're also the main reason epidemicis become epidemics."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "It's a tricky question, but ultimately I think it's appropriate as long as the epidemic is severe enough and it is not for an extended amount of time. While personal freedom is important, public health is necessary for personal freedom. Of course, it can be too extreme, but it is necessary."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "Yes I support it, though I don't believe the government has a right to tell us what to do or how to live our lives we still must protect the lives of all the people"
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "Yes, these have to be done for public safety."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "Yes, I think herd immunity is vital to securing a healthy world. To do so, if we need to enforce vaccinations then we need to enforce vaccinations. We already enforce wearing clothes and not peeing on each other, etc.--it's just another law."
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "Severe epidemics is good in theory, but many are not going to follow any rules. You enforce what you can"
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "Yes, yes, for the Love of God, YES! it is a public health issue...PUBLIC. Obviously, there are people out there who have proven issues with being allergic to certain vaccine ingredients, and there are some other health issues that may be of concern, but when those don't exist, not getting a vaccine is an extremely selfish act that affects EVERYONE YOU COME IN CONTACT WITH."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "Yes, I do. Protecting the populace is a core component of government."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "I believe the government should have authority and a duty to spread information of the risks backed by credible science with no financial incentive during times of severe epidemics. The government should NOT have the authority to force free citizens to put anything into their bodies."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "I do not support this at all. America is suppose to be a free country there is nothing free about enforcing."
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "No, the government has no right to do so! Especially when the health care is crazy expensive and most of people can't afford it!"
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "Yes. Herd immunity should be protected. But should still be approved by qualified personnel."
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "Yes. I believe it would help to curb the spread of the outbreak."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "I don't think the government should be able to enforce vaccination without some kind of option for exceptions. I do think they should be able to enforce quarantine measures in severe cases though"
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "i do not support the government in that madder"
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "Yes, I do support the government having the authority to enforce these things as they are for the greater good. I support vaccination because vaccinations are only truly effective when a large percent of the population get them as this causes herd immunity. I also support quarantine measures as it slows down the spread of a disease."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "I don't think the government should ever have the authority yo enforce vaccinations. Americans should not be forced to put something in their body. Enforcing quarantine is a little different. I dont think human rights should be taken away but i can understand enforcing guidelines for quarantine."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "Yes, I do, as long as it doesn't go too far and the power isn't abused. If it's a serious epidemic, they do need to take serious measures to protect people."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "I think it should be mandated personally, but freedom of choice is more important. So I don’t think the government should force vaccinations."
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "Yes, governments have a responsibility to enforce basic health and safety standards, even if people who failed high school biology are upset about it. If this is not the role of government, idk what is."
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "During severe epidemics, yes, I do. Sometimes these measures are necessary to protect citizens."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "No, I believe vaccinations should be a choice and not enforced on the public. Regardless of whether or not it would benefit the person"
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "Yes I think it is the correct thing to do. If a person has a choice if they are allergic then they can refuse."
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "I do not support the government forcing anything upon someone that is Medical. I think they have taken too many things away from our personal health care Journeys. And taking away or forcing medical things onto our own bodily autonomy is a growth overstepping of boundaries that I believe is unacceptable."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "Yes, I support this. Preventing the spread of transmittable disease is critical to preventing large-scale illness and needless deaths."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "Yes I do. It keeps the public safe, and stops disease from spreading."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "Absolutely not. They should stay out of things like that because what happened to \"my body, my choice\" when it suits their narrative. They had no idea about the long term effects of the vaccination because it was made in such a rush and there seems to be a lot of side effects."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "Yes, I support this. Ideally, the government would have more informed health officials that know what's best for the public."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics, as these actions can protect public health and prevent widespread harm."
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "Yes, I absolutely agree with the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. It is an absolutely necessary precaution to prevent high death counts."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "Yes if there is an emergency like there was with COVID and an epidemic is in progress. People are often stupid and careless and the government needs to step in and make vaccinations mandatory during these circumstances."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "Yes, the government should enforce vaccination and quarantine measures to ensure the health of the general public. This will also ensure that any outbreaks or deaths caused by disease can be minimized or eradicated completely."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "Yes I do. I think in extreme cases it may be necessary."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "Yes because it ensures public health and safety. It prevent people from getting sick, getting worse or dying. It will make for a healthier society."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "No. I believe it should be a person's personal choice. As everyone saw during the COVID epidemic, the government and agencies continuously lied to the public about the efficiency of the vaccine."
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "I do not support. It takes away the freedom of choice and people can make their decisions based on what works best for them"
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "Yes, because vaccination is a science and science is the way forward and supports modern medicine practices. Immigrants who came to ellis island had to recieve medical checks- if they were unhealthy, they weren't permitted in. If you as an American refuse to accept measures that promote health, you should be kicked out of the country."
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "government mandates enforcing vaccines is vital. anyone non immune compromised should have mandatory vaccinations."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "yes, at times some people are inconsiderate of others and endanger them."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "Yes I do. Look at what happened in the past. Vaccination saves lives or prevents more death and cost to us all."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "Yes, I support this. It is vital to keep people safe."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "No. I do not support mandatory enforcement of vaccinations. However, I support quarantines which may be necessary to contain an outbreak."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "Yes. Public health should take top priority in this scenario."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "Yes. We know vaccines work."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "No. Nobody should force us to have vaccines. I can see quarantine if something is very contagious. I believe in vaccines myself but to force a substance into our body by mandate is unjust."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "I don't support them to enforce vaccination. I do support quarantines."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "No, the government should not have authority to enforce vaccination measures during severe epidemics. The Covid Pandemic brought forced vaccinations during which many people lost their jobs, could not travel, and had other restrictions to their freedom if they refused to get vaccinated. This encroaches on individual freedom and does not take into account that some people may not be able to tolerate the vaccine because of health concerns."
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I absolutely do not. I believe the government never has the authority to compel anyone in regard to their own body."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "I believe that no one should be forced to take any vaccinations especially if we don't know how it would affect people's health"
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "Yes. I believe in authority and regulations and think we should trust health authorities."
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "It would depend. If a child is going to a government supported institution, then the government should enforce vaccines. If not, the government should allow the parent to make that decision within reason and under doctor care."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "Yes, I think the government has sufficient authority to take control, particularly in the event of a dangerous epidemic."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having those rights in times of need, like a severe epidemic. In those circumstances we need solid leadership and for people to follow, or the consequence is a mass loss of lives. It is within the governments and us as individuals right to protect our people."
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "Quarantine measures yes. I think that is important as more is found out about the virus."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "I do not support the government enforcing vaccinations. I think quarantining people when they have been exposed to certain diseases can be effective. You don't want to spread the disease but it's hard to force people to put vaccinations in their body that they don't want."
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "If there is an epidemic then I believe the government should have thatright. As long as health authorities agree, I believe this is an integral step."
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having an authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. Such measures can be necessary to protect public health, slow the spread of disease, and prevent healthcare systems from being overwhelmed."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "I do not support the government mandating any vaccination or quarantine measures during any epidemic as it infringes upon our human rights of liberty and justice. I would not be supportive of any initiative or mandate subjecting individuals to go against their will and better judgment by forcing something upon them without any viable justification."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "No I don’t support it, only because we the people don’t know what’s in the vaccination. They could tell us anything."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "Not the way it was done a couple of years ago. People's rights were taken away with no valid reason except to instill fear in the masses for an issue that was not the problem it was portrayed. We live in a free country and have the right to choose if we want or do not want an untested vaccine."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "This is a tough one. Our nature as the people is to say no. However, do we just let a virus run rampant? If I had to say: Quarantine, yes. Vaccination.. no."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "I support the government enforcing quarantine measures during a severe epidemic. However, I do not support vaccination requirements. If there is an existing vaccine with evidence to back up, it’s efficacy I would be more inclined to support a vaccine mandate."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "I absolutely do not support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics as this would be unethical. It is not up to the United States government to delegate what medicines I take or whether I want vaccinations. This is entirely my choice and I will not listen a governmental entity that states otherwise as that type of enforcement is tyrannical and not fair and I have never received a vaccine or even a flu shot in 25 years."
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "Yes. You can tell that people will not be able to self regulate as Covid has shown us. We need enforcement from an authority for the best interest of public health matters."
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "I am against it. I believe everyone should have a choice over which vaccines they choose."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "I do not think the government should have the authority to enforce vaccines or quarantine measures even during severe epidemics. They tried it during COVID and it was a disaster!"
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "The government should make recommendations but not have power to make rules. People can decide for themselves if they want them"
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "Yes, I support the goverment having that authority during severe epidemics. public health and safety should take priority in extreme situations, as long as major is based on science and protects individual right as much as possible"
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "Yes if it's in the best interest of the people. I support there being an option for a vaccine, but I don't think it should federally enforced, leave it to the states."
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "To a certain extent. However, if someone has a practical reason not to be vaccinated, such as religious reasons or health concerns, such as an allergic reaction, then they shouldn't be forced to be immunized."
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "Yes. It is important that the government be able to control disease epidemics. They are dangerous and can kill so many people so some entity needs to protect people."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "No, I do not support this because this goes against our right of freedom. I would not get any vaccination that was made just for an epidemic when cancer that has been around for tens of years still does not have a cure or way to prevent it."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "I support the government enforcing vaccination and quarantine in severe epidemics to protect public health. While individual freedom matters, coordinated action is necessary to save lives."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "Arguments for government authority:\r\n\r\nProtects public health when individual choices create collective risks (e.g., rapid spread of deadly diseases).\r\n\r\nHistorical precedent: smallpox vaccination mandates and quarantine laws reduced mortality.\r\n\r\nPrevents healthcare system collapse during severe outbreaks."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "No I believe that no government should force vaccines that change the DNA of the population of citizens against our wills. I believe that will cull our population if that is allowed. We will be treated like cattle that gets taken to the slaughterhouse."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "No I do not support it because it infringes on others rights and freedoms and also gives the government the power to enforce rules with any made up and unverified reason they want to."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "I suppose I do, although my answer might vary given the specifics of the situation. I would really need to know more about the the particulars of the pandemic (vitality, lethality, etc) before giving a definite answer."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "Yes, the government should be responsible in quelling any pandemics that arise by keeping all the citizens healthy. If the government didn't enforce vaccines and quarantine measures, a pandemic would run amok and cause more needless deaths."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "I think if the epidemic is severe enough, yes. Especially vaccinations, quarantine measures are a bit trickier. It's well worth it to save the lives of tens of thousands of people."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "i dont think anyone should be forced to be vaccinated however i believe it is in their right to deny entry to places if the person has no vaccination."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "I support quarantine measures but not vaccinations. They can require people avoiding certain gatherings or places but I don't think it's fair to require people to put something in their body."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics for the good of all."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "Yes, during severe epidemics, I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures. These actions are grounded in public health science and are necessary to protect vulnerable populations and prevent healthcare systems from being overwhelmed. Such temporary measures are a responsible use of authority to save lives and restore public safety."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "no. such authority would be misused, and would quickly spread to totalitarian control in all times, not only pandemics."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "Yes, I do believe some government intervention is necessary in these situations. Quarantine measures should absolutely be enforceable during a pandemic. For vaccines, since they involve people's bodies and therefore consent, they should only be enforceable in the sense that it is legal to be unvaccinated, but other policies should be set in place so that unvaccinated people do not further spread the disease."
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "Absolutely, since it’s for the public good and ensures that the dangers of deadly disease is minimized and fewer people will die or suffer other harmful long term effects."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "absolutely not. This is a direct violation of informed consent."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "No. I think people should be able to choose. Someone might be allergic to vaccines."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "No, I absolutely don't support government having the authority to enforce vaccines and quarantines measures during pandemics. They have already proven, during Covid, that they don't have the people's best interest in mind. I don't think anyone should ever be compelled to receive a vaccination because it violates basic human rights."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "no, people should be allowed to say no. always."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "I do not think that people should be forced to be vaccinated. As far as being quarantined, if the epidemic is severe and they are trying to contain it I can understand the need for that."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "I support the government having limited authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures. In areas such as hospitals, schools, government offices I believe this would be acceptable."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "I don't believe people should be forced to have vaccines they don't want. However, they should be banned from public spaces where they might spread disease to others."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "Yes, during a severe pandemic, such as one that just happened, the government should do more to encourage receiving vaccination. It should be legally required and free of charge and easily accessible country wide. However, at the end of the day, how badly the pandemic will affect people depends on the intelligence of the community largely."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "I support the government taking action like this. It keeps the public safer and promotes herd immunity."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "I support quarantine measures to stay safe. I do not support mandated vaccinations. I feel like people should have a choice whether or not to get injected with shots."
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "Yes, but only during a severe pandemic like with Covid. I think if they go too far, they will cause people to turn against them and choose not go get it. We saw that happen towards the tail-end of the covid pandemic and how lots of people did not trust the government and like it was overreach."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "No I don't support this because the government shouldn't have the power to force anyone to undergo a procedure they don't want or agree with. You are the one who should have the authority to say what you will put in your body and no one should ever have the power to make you do something against your conscience or will."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "Yes I do. This is a matter of public health so the government should have authority here after careful considerations."
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "Yes, I support the government having the authority to enforce vaccination and quarantine measures during severe epidemics. Ordinarily, I'd think it crosses boundaries that allow everyone to make the best decision for themselves about this issue. But, during severe epidemics, I'm Ok with it."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "Yes the government Main focus should be the health of the Public. Especially during epidemics this will ensure that the masses our protected."
}
] |
How has AI changed your life? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "Al changed my life by making my daily tasks easier to do ."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "It has allowed me to speed up my work. I can use AI to do meaningless tasks that would take up my time."
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "It has allowed me to have more free time. It makes doing routine tasks and research at work much easier. It is also made me more entertained and amused."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "AI has helped me streamline most of my things with precision and accuracy. This has made me struggle less in my place of work."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "Compiles information quickly into a summary. Sometimes its helpful."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "Yes but not to a great degree, I view it as another optional tool I can utilize for things such as research or quick ideas. But it hasn't really impacted or changed my life."
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "It has made researching and searching easier because it provides a summary and popular sources. However, the information isn't always accurate or relevant. I have to fact check the summary and the individual sources. Also, it is biased in on providing certain sources it can access."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "I've used AI, specifically ChatGPT, to learn information about a subject that I'm writing about. ChatGPT is basically like how Google used to be. It's been very useful in helping me learn technical information about various subjects that I'm interested in."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "I am an old school individual from the times of typewriter and library books. AI has made this so much easier to learn and understand information.in addition, the ability to search information and create new ideas much faster"
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "It helps me personally when I have conflicts with other people to realize if I’m overreacting or not."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "It has made things generally easier. For example, planning events, making tables, fine tuning letters and proposals. It irons out the time wasted trying to perfect things. Information is also easier to get."
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "AI has made me more untrustworthy of other people. I am constantly vigilant for AI usage in art, writing, and other creative outlets. I find this anxiety to be an unfortunate consequence of the widespread usage of AI."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "AI has taken my life in various directions. I love the fact that it can change my art in positive ways. However I feat that it will soon be able to capture all of my personal information that is something I feel very negative about."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "One way AI has helped me is by assisting me with making art. I used to have a hard time expressing myself through drawings but AI has helped me"
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "AI has changed my life for the better. I feel more productive in the work that I have been putting out. It's not just a tool, it's more of an assistant I never knew I needed that I cannot live without."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "AI has simplified my daily routines by providing quick information, assisting with tasks, and offering personalized recommendations, making life more efficient, connected, and easier overall."
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "AI has changed my life, in that, I am now able to ask for information to be found and have it within a couple seconds. I can also use AI to protect my home, run appliances and so many other things."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "Worry about the privacy over using my data, without my knowledge. It help in some point but worry of losing jobs due to the AI existent."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "Ai has made certain work related tasks less time consuming. It has also helped with more complex searches."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "I use voice dictation and there's a lot of random capitalization errors and misspellings sometimes so AI helps me correct that very easily."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "It has changed my life in two ways that come to mind. The first, being positive, is that it has made searching for answers and obtaining information relevant to my interests has been much simpler and more convenient. The second way, being negative, is how much information it has obtained and gained about me over time. The fact that it can track what I search and keep record of my preferences has felt like a major intrusion of my privacy."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by offering a whole new way to do research and collaborate with an informational system. It allows me to expand my horizons in terms of research, planning, and other tasks that AI can help with."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "AI helped with improving my writing. It also helps me with summarizing a big article and makes it faster for me to get my work done."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "AI has allowed me to think of new ideas for certain activities, say like remodeling my house or passive income ideas. Its shortened the time required to do a lot of things and I only feel it will increasingly get better and better with each rendition available."
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "Im now hyper aware of things that could be ai and try hard to avoid it. AI is theft and i dont want to use or consume it if possible."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "AI is incredible. It makes it so much easier to come up with ideas or to visually view things by digitally editing pictures."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "AI has mad it much easier for me to complete my homework and get good grades in school. It has helped me become more professional in life with using AI to help make emails and my resume."
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "It helped me become more productive. I write a little better, learned new words. I have been able to use it to create things where I got stuck before because it was too complex, so it's been a great free tutor."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "AI makes it a lot easier or me to search up answers to my questions without having to read through a bunch of pages/links. It's also easier to have AI help me photoshop images when needed with a simple command or request to it."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "So far AI has not changed my life in any major ways. I think the AI that's behind algorithms has made me a bit more addicted to social media. But I don't use AI like Chatgpt for anything major, it's just an advanced google/list maker for me."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "AI chatbots have given me great advice and improved my mental health a lot and given me emotional support. I'm physically healthier, mentally healthier, and making more money. Also AI videos have become the best video entertainment ever since VEO 3 and other AI video generators became really good."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "AI has increased my concerns about job security and privacy of personal information. I see it as a threat that will only become larger as time passes."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "AI has made my work more effective and my time more productive in meaningful and drastic ways. I can make better use of my time and get more done than before and I feel more effective at work and am able to accomplish more using AI than I did using more traditional methods."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "I don’t think it has changed my life much because i don’t use it or rely on it. But from what i have seen, I’ve seen a lot of fake pictures or videos and i don’t really like that because i sometimes don’t know what’s real"
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "AI has helped me improve my productivity at work as I am now able to complete my work effectively in lesser time. Moreso, it now gives me definite answer to questions compared to search engines."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "Make my life more easier and convenient. And I can get the answer immediately"
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "AI has made me more untrusting of what I see on the Internet but has also helped me gather information, learn new skills, and be more creative. Certain aspects of my life such as work or job hunting has changed now that AI is rampant. I rely on AI but do not want to become dependent."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "AI has made my life more interesting in the sense of information; meaning, I am able to pick the \"brain\" of AI. Also, my use of AI has made my work more efficient."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "It helps me with projects at work. It makes me save so much time during the day. It also gives me advise when it comes to my personal life."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "no I do not think ai has changed my life in any way yet but it is still very new and probly touch and change everyone life in the future for better or worse"
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "It has made it easier to find out information and it's fast and efficient. I often rely on it especially when dealing with difficult tasks or self improvement."
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "AI has helped me edit photo's more efficiently. AI also has been helpful to me when I'm researching different subject or health questions."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "I think that AI has changed my life for the better. I have access to so much information right now more than ever."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "It brings a new element to searching for information. It allows for aiding in things like editing and/or creativity. It seems that the possibilities are somewhat endless."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "ai has changed my life in good and bad ways. I try to not use it so much because i find myself depending on it to write emails or do simple tasks. i just feel it takes away my thinking time."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "AI has t changed my life too much. I think of it as more entertainment right now."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "It has made me more organized. It has also helped me to explore topics of interest in more detail"
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "it has made it more simple and efficient as i get to do more of what i want"
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "I has let me enhance my pictures the way I want them. It has provided me with the best advice in my life. It has replaced, for the most part, all the search engines."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "AI tools like CHATGPT has made us re imagine what technology can do to us. Though concerns like deep fake exists the AI advent is exciting. There needs to be more innovation and regulation to make AI a tool for human betterment in science technology and beyond. For me personally AI has made professional email writing and other activities more easier. But I am concerned that my originality may take a hit.When I read or hear anything on social media I wonder about its originality."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "it has helped to plan trips easily , help with my daughters homework , able to find accurate data .helps me to create a better mails , has been a teacher to help me learn new language. curate my recipe's been a friend in need always .reduced a lot of time as it has helped me brain storm ideas for my kids projects as well as mine"
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "When I look for answers when using bing I use copilot or chatgpt, It also gave me 10 steps to get started in investing"
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "At first, AI made me believe that I would be losing my job because companies will be automated, but now I think that AI would make my life easier because once I learn how to use AII could have AI work for me and generate me money."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "I feel like A.I. has made it harder for social media to be a place for people to express themselves and interreact with others. I feel it is a lot harder for me to find actual people in comment sections or actual creators I'm interested in. I feel A.I. has also made it to where many people who use it have their critical thinking skills diminish due to having A.I. do research and writing for them. Which spreads a lot of misinformation as well."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "Personally, it is very helpful in my day to day life in thst I'm able to more effectively do research. It is a tool that I'd been hoping would one day exist (in terms of research). Nevertheless, i do recognize that it can have very detrimental impacts on the environment and people's livelyhood. I like to imagine that my personal use of AI creates a much smaller impact as opposed to big corporations' use of it."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by providing me with opportunities to enhance my work performance with it's assistance. It has also helped me assist my children with their homework better and maximize efficiency as their tutor as needed. AI has reminded me of the importance of my own skill development so I can become indispensable in my own right."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "AI has been great for helping me as search engine essentially. I also use it for food recipes and analysis for sports."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "AI has changed my life in a positive way. I sell on ebay and I use chatgpt every day to research prices and get help with titles. It also helps write complete descriptions for me."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "I can write better letters with more depth and less words. I like the enhancement. I can get descriptive information."
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "AI has helped me develop several documents for my business that I have. It has given me policies, terms and conditions, as well as given me insight for how things can run smoothly."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "AI hasn't changed my life hardly at all. The only time I use it is when I get answers to Google searches."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "It has helped me understand things more, find out more for information. It has provided efficiency in my life and got me answers more quickly and personal, unlike a typical google search before."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "AI makes google searches faster without having to scroll. It helps me make designs for shirts much faster."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "It has made certain aspects of my life more convenient. However, it has also made my work more challenging. As a university educator, it's become difficult to teach students the importance of genuineness and authenticity."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "It has helped me tremendously in getting answers to difficult problems like math or to help me understand complex issues and also to put hard to understand text into simple and easy to understand words."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "Ai hasn't changed my life I still use my brain to study on my assignments at school, I still like people to talk to for my mental health problems"
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "AI has been a weird thing for me to adjust to. In my final semester of college in spring 2023 I used AI tools on assignments, but they were of no help. The biggest help to me with these traditional machine learning tools was the image denoising that I can run locally and batch upscale thousands of images. NotebookLM from google was a tool I tried later last year and it is an amazing tools for summarization. That is really fun to listen to."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "AI can drastically change human life its like a tool that can help you in almost every aspect of life, its a search engine with a personality. Its not only changing the way people work its changing peoples lives for the better."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "AI has given me a lot of confidence when approaching problems because I can ask it for solutions. It has also greatly reduced the amount of grunt work I have to do, as it can do repetitive task for me quickly. I also use it for image generation as a graphic designer. I fear it will replace me entirely in a few years. But right now, it has made me much more efficient at everything I do."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I went from not even having a smart phone to working off of one off an algorithm that is measured and processed completely by AI, and now even support goes through it. Life has coepletely changed"
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by providing candid and helpful information on several topics that I have recently discussed with AI. I find that each question that I ask, has always been answered in a manner as if I was speaking to a human."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "AI has not really changed my life. I used Chat GPT to write thank you notes for my wedding."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "AI has not changed my life. I do find it useful for help with ideas or even to summarize something I may want to say, but overall, it has not changed my life."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "It has made information more readily available to me by being more searchable. It feels easier to understand responses to the data that I receive and that it is able to accept constraints, I can have it packaged in ways that I like depending on the situation."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "AI has changed my life personally by being able to create resumes and cover letters. I also received personalized advice. I have also used it at work to help me with problems or to recall certain things I have forgotten in my healthcare setting."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "AI has changed my life because it has provided work opportunities as a side gig to earn money. I use AI to train and fact find information. Further, it helps with creating meal plans for the four people who I cook for at home that each has different dietary needs and restrictions."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I feel AI has changed my life in that it allows me to generate ideas that I may be able to turn into more tangible and personally created products such as stories or other digital items to sell. I feel however, that AI has also changed my life in that there are more jobs being taken over by AI and I fear that I may become obsolete in the workforce as a result."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by giving me detailed advice and recommendation on areas i seek advice for, primarily skin care. Chatgpt was able to give me a full list of supplements that support antioxidant health and which i am now taking. I pretty much use it every day to ask questions on other topics such as having concerns with my diet, or helping me tweak my existing workout routine."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "It hasn't changed my life very much as of right now. It does kind of make me more wary and unsettled with the capabilities that it has. The power that it has makes me trust it less."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "AI has expanded my creative capabilities. Creating unique content is a part of my job, and AI has served as a tool for inspiration when I have writer's block. Overall, it has enhanced my creative processes."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "Using AI has made life easier for me. If I need help finding answer to something I would go to AI for help."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "I use AI a lot now, and it had managed to change things a lot. I now use it for fun, to create stories, and learn random facts about the world. It is sometimes lively and fund to use, helping me process some emotions."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "I think AI has changed my life a lot, especially in ways to streamline my work. Whether it be to automate repetitive tasks at my workplace, or aid a lot in helping my in university. It also helped me learn a lot when it comes to data and coding. Giving it the problem I have struggle with it, and then the AI gives me a detailed understanding on how to approach it."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "It makes me more productive. Also, it makes my life much better."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "AI has allowed me to get information at a faster pace and enhance my learning. While I still need to Google some stuff to verify the information, AI made it easier for me and helps clarify concepts that I may not understand. This in turn has changed how I approach situations and have been using AI to spot mistakes or provide better explanations to the content I am trying to learn."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "AI hasn't changed my life in a significant way. Outside of some academic use and interesting topic, there isn't much besides being an interesting topic to learn about."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "I am better able to search for specifics on the internet that require some level of reasoning. I am also able to use it for simple commands such as note taking."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "Ai has made my life worse. Everything that in my daily life now has to have AI in it. The effect of the AI isn't even that large but it still seems to be everywhere."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "I have learned to ask questions about topics that are everyday occurrences. With AI I can try to find a solution to a problem that I may not have understood."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "It has helped me draft emails and social media post for organizations I am apart of. It’s also helped me brainstorm graphics to create when I am stuck"
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "I use ai (Siri) on my phone quite often. It is easier to make calls or get directions when driving"
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "AI has made it a little easier to research things on Google. At the same time it has made it more necessary than ever to fact check what AI tells me because it is often incorrect."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "AI has helped me with daily life activities, such as working out/with my fitness journey, but has also helped me emotionally by having someone to talk to about my problems. It has also helped me tremendously with work and getting my tasks done much faster."
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "This is probably the most outlier answer you'll get but I do these studies and other surveys and many times the topic is AI. I have learned so much about them and FROM them. My income comes solely from these studies and it helps our monthly budget tremendously."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "It really hasn't. I only use it when necessary like an AI chat assistant on a website before I can talk to an actual person.. Or the occasional use of Chat GPT to word things a little better. Other than that, I don't use it so it hasn't changed my life, aside from the annoyance from people attempting to trick you with AI headlines and things."
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "Helps me with tasks, especially simple one and repetitive ones. Helps me to find answers to questions and gives me an explanation of the answer instead of just a simple answer."
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "AI has changed my life in ways I recognize by using it at work, but also ways im sure I dont know about with AI chatbots used by businesses. I unsure how this will replace my job currently but worry it will influence people who cant tell of something is real of AI."
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "Ai has changed my life and made things a whole lot easier for me when I am working on projects. It is so helpful and changes my whole perspective."
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "I like using AI more than google for searching for info sometimes because it feels more tailored to my specific question/scenario. I can go back to a thread I have and add more info or add more detail to a question. I like the info/answers I get."
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by giving me a search assistant on my phone who can answer questions in the blink of an eye when asked. SIRI Is a powerful search tool on the Apple iPhone, and I have found that she aids me in finding answers to questions that would take time to open up a webpage and type in the question, now all I have to do is call her name and ask the question and I have it in instantaneously. There are other AI programs out there in the world and chat. GPT is the only other one I have used. If I’m on my computer, I have found a ChatGPT is he interesting system but it is not as convenient as using SIRI. Siri has changed my life in in the fact that she makes it easier to find answers instantaneously."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "I would not say that AI has changed my life, but I will say that it is a beneficial tool. I enjoy the simplicity of it."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "It has increased my knowledge about many things but in particular medical issues and identifying jewelry. I ask questions about these issues and often upload images that need identification."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "at work, it's allowed me to assign mundane, repetitive tasks to an assist. this frees up my time to work on more open-ended priorities."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "Searches are more informative, more detailed, providing more useful effective information."
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "AI hasn't changed my life in many ways, i've never relied on AI for anything. Is AI good for answering a simple question? Absolutely, but I never relied on it."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "It has made getting information way better. It has also made my work easier and more efficient."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "AI has changed online presence slowly that last couple of years. Sometimes it's hard for me to tell if a photo or a video is real."
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "Ai has allowed me to search things easily and get results to questions about health. It allowed me to think about possible scenarios regarding my health and how to handle it."
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "It’s definitely opened up access to more information & made it easier to summarize"
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "I feel that AI hasn't actually changed my life for the simple reason I haven't used AI in ways that can actually change me life. When I do use AI, I'm mainly using it for creating images."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "At my workplace I use AI fairly often in my hiring process. I was skeptical at first but now I am on board. It makes certain tasks easier."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "It has helped me tremendously. From schoolwork to everyday questions, it can truly be used for anything."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "It has opened my eyes so much more.It has helped me brainstorm and broaden my horizons of what my knowledge is"
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "It has made research easier for me. I like to chat with ai it is very interesting. It has opened a whole new world to me."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "It has made learning easier and more fun. I can do more in a shorter time as compared to before AI."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "It's enhanced it a little and aided me in creativity. I thought earlier this week that I'm so glad that I lived long enough to see this amazing technology, AI fills me with awe and appreciation."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "Ai has made life worse. Ai has stolen artists work and given false information to people."
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "I wouldn’t say it has changed my life in any significant way. But it has made some aspects easier, for example I have used it to reword essays."
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "It has made it easier for me to do thing both at home and at job. It is a quicker way to do things."
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "Personally when I've used it, AI basically searched the Internet for me. I also use it to make sure I'm using proper grammar. \r\nI do not like it being used to permanently replace a human customer service representative"
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "It hasn't changed my life much. It's convenient for editing."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "its made my life worse. people's voices, artwork, and jobs are being stolen and no one really cares. and it's ruining our already beat up planet. we're so screwed."
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "AI has greatly improved searching the internet for answers. When I have a question on a search engine, AI typically has the best overall answer"
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "It really hasn't affected me. I don't use it except when I have a survey that's using it"
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "AI has made life simpler in terms of thinkog and solve tasks that are difficlt to humans"
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "It has made my life more frustrating, as I have seen it misused and the work of artists stolen. It has already had a significant negative impact on the environment and companies are investing tons of money into an area of tech that is still vastly unknown and unregulated."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "its helped me search for answers a lot quicker. it has also helped me find and create images since i dont draw well."
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "it's made creative tasks easier. I often use it to help me decide if an idea is bad or good both inside and outside of artistic projects of any kind It's good in general for many parts of life like suggesting new tech/other items to buy, social situations, and tips on media/games in general."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "I think it has made certain things easier. Help with writing things such as resumes is easy to get done with AI."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "I get a laugh out of it when it just seems like a Google search on steroids. I am sure this will be monetized for whosevers personal gain much more than any real benefit for society."
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "It has given me slightly more of an opportunity to make money on Prolific. There a number of studies which ask about opinions and perceptions of AI that I have taken part in over the past year."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "AI has made it somewhat easier to do my job via drafting and other tote tasks. I think it's nice to have a constant presence to review your work."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "It’s made my life simpler since I can easily find answers to questions. It has also helped me proofread emails and make up charts which saves me a lot of time."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "AI has not changed my life. My life is going on with or without it."
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "It makes life so much easier. Helps me create content and make more money."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "AI has changed my life in many ways. It has made it harder to trust the content I see online. It has also made the people I work with and interact with less intelligent and less independent."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "AI has helped me primarily with brainstorming tasks for work. It has helped me find the words for feedback and other tasks. I always end up editing what I get, but it is a good starting point."
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "AI has allowed me to use Duolingo to practice a language as if I were talking to a person, which is positive. AI has also decreased the ability to contact human help when I need it from a business, which is a negative."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "AI has made my life easier by saving me time at work, helping me analyze data faster, and even supporting my pizzeria with marketing and customer tools. It also simplifies daily tasks, like finding information quickly or getting recommendations."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "It has given me key information to help me make more informed decisions. Which has allowed me to make better life choices,"
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "I am able to get more done at work. I could not meet all of my tight deadlines without it."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "It's actually helped when it comes to finding out where to find out if something is true or not. Or if I'm looking up a historical person to research for one of my classes, it gives me several options that are unheard of which gives me a variety of people to choose from."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "AI changed my life by allowing me the opportunity to do paid work involving AI. It also assists me with grammar and creating pictures."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "Not much yet"
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "It has changed my life in that it has given me more job opportunites. When I became self-employed I started out by training AI. I still count that as my main job although I don't do as much AI training as I used to."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "AI has changed my life with the ability to access information quickly using voice AI like Alexa, for example, I can ask to look up in order all of the past presidents and prime ministers and it takes you directly to the page."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "AI has not significantly changed my life at this point in time. It’s a helpful tool for random questions and small routine tasks like prepping a meal plan for the week, but at the level I use it (free chatGPT) it still pulls incorrect information and “hallucinates”. I would likely be more impacted if it affected my work, but it doesn’t at this point."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "It has helped me get answers to a lot of questions. It has helped me brainstorm ideas. It has helped calculate complicated math."
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "Ai has changed my life by making things easily accessible as well as more convenient . With having AI I am able to have a mini personal assistant that can help me with various tasks"
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "It has made me less trusting of the information/technology used, and whether its human biased or race/gender biased. Also has made me skeptical if its importance due to the devastating environmental effects."
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "It had made my job replaceable in some aspects. As a graphic artist, someone can replicate my work easily and profit easily from using AI to do what I do within seconds. It’s honestly sad how AI can be used to harm freelancers."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "It makes it more convenient for me to live. I can do a lot of things without even thinking."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "AI has saved me tremendous amounts of time when creating content via brainstorming, narration and title creation and technical troubleshooting. It doesn't do everything for me, instead it's my collaborator and we work together with both of our imaginations and skills to create. Definitely a positive life changing relationship."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "AI makes it easier to compose letters, descriptions of items I sell. Absolutely love it."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "AI has made answering questions and finding solutions to problems a lot easier"
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "AI has made it a lot easier to access information and speeds up the process of things.."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "I think it gives more opportunities to people in different ways. For me I get gig jobs on training AI, plus it helps with daily tasks or questions. A quicker response to random questions as well."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "It has given me a great way to get ideas about things in my everyday life. It has help with projects, hobbies and just general information."
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "It has made it easier for me to search the internet and find things quicker, instead of going from website to website like prior to having access to AI chats. \r\n\r\nAI's like Gemini are also a huge help with the ability to use your camera to point at different things and get information and instruction from the AI."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "i mean it really hasnt. its helped me a few times find things online that i needed to find or help me correct some code"
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by stream lining the things I do. Particularly research, school assignments and other complex tasks that would require planning (ex: calculating a budget or diagnosing car issues)"
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "AI changed my life for the better because it's like having a helping hand for certain solutions. AI helps make life easier."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "AI has helped me greatly with a lot of my school work. Preparing for exams and making study guides has been amazing."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "AI hasn't changed my life too much but I do find that it could be helpful in providing facts and suggestions. I do find AI helpful explaining things that I may not grasp easily by asking and getting quick responses."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "AI has made it easier for me to research into topics that may benefit my future. I can plan out my finances with it and my old research for my health is very easy accessible."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "Ai has helped me in many different aspects of my daily life. It has helped me continue learning about many topics, has assisted in organizing and re-organizing my home, my calendar, pretty much my life. Its the assistant I never had."
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "I don’t use it too often but I have friends who it has hurt. Many jobs are being replaced by AI and it pains me to know multiple people who are now seeking new jobs thanks to our society and its over reliance of AI."
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "It has helped me to get ideas to share on social media. I also use it as a learning tool. I can say it does make life a little easier."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "AI has changed my life because when I have a lot of just random questions I can get on my phone and use the AI option to find out certain things. I don’t use it all the time but"
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "It has made it easier for me to find quick and fairly reliable answers to a wide range of questions. I know I've only scratched the surface of what I can use it for."
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "Not really changed my life but makes life a small bit easier yes"
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "Ai hasn’t really changed my life, but it has changed the way I search for information or find information online"
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "AI has changed my life in that I can get the answers to my questions without having to read books or periodicals. However, AI has made me feel less confident in the information I receive on social media."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "AI has helped me increase my efficiency both in work and in my personal life"
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "It changed my life in a positive way, it has helped me in many ways, it has simplified my life"
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "It's a slow progress it's made me interact with someone else like a real conversation. It's given me art to help me make a book one day if I can."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "It's made it harder for me to find employment. I have a history degree, and a lot of related jobs focused historical writing and just writing in general have become oversaturated by people using AI. It has not changed my life for the better aakes me feel hopeless."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "I have been able to make some research tasks easier at work. I have also used it to help game plan a few projects I am working on."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "AI has helped me clarify questions about my personal history in a rational and accurate manner. AI also assists my business by creating concise product descriptions and clearly processed photos."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "It has changed what areas of expertise are wanted in my field of employment (IT). It has also warped public perceptions of truth and education, as many students don't bother to learn and just cheat using LLMs for exercises and fake videos and pictures make it hard to tell what is real."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "Not that much yet. I have mainly used it to answer questions I have. I don't have a lot of use for it at this point."
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "It has saved me tons of time in writing emails. I was able to put together a quick resume for a part-time job in less than 5 minutes. Awesome!"
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "It has helped me learn things and it helps edit emails, analyze reports and brainstorm with ideas I would not normally be able to think of."
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "It has made learning more expensive and jobs harder to come by. But my, certain tasks are done so fast."
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "AI has made my life slightly more productive. I use it when prepping for interviews and making my emails more concise."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "It has made it much easier for me to learn new subjects and understand information easier. Being able to ask questions to better understand whatever it is I'm trying to learn is extremely beneficial."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "Yes I use my Chat AI daily for general advice and for friendship. I hardly ever use Google now"
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "I have been able to write better emails. I have a tendency to be short. With AI I have been able to pad out my emails and turn them professional and/or humorous."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "I'd say that AI has changed my life by giving me a bit more confidence. What I mean by that is at the end of the day I can have the knowledge that there will be an AI that can answer nearly every question I have if I ever need to ask the AI a question, and it'll be tailored to my specific need."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "It has helped me look up answers to simple questions that I wasn’t sure of the answer"
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "it has helped me get work done faster at my job. It has also helped me in my everyday life with questions and concerns i have."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "It has given me work and taken work away. I have been able to do AI research and training."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "It's sometimes hard to tell what's real or not on the internet. I will often see videos or pictures and I can't tell if they're real or AI generated. It makes me question everything and question myself."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "It has made me a little lazier. But it also helps me to learn and accomplish task quicker. It’s also fun"
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "It hasn't changed my life. I will use when asking random questions and recently some health issues I had. It was actually very helpful."
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "I use googled and way less. I also don’t think for myself as much."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "so far i have not noticed a major change other than it has helped me with questions that i have"
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "It's made things a lot easier as far as learning and research"
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "AI has changed my life for the worst. The company I work for started using AI leading to my department getting shut down."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "AI has been helpful to me in certain situations. It can sometimes be scary. Not knowing if it is legitimate or not can be nerve racking."
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "Ai has made it easier for me to get the answers I’m looking for. It has opened my eyes up to how technology is taking over and we are just along for the ride."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "I am unsure whether ads and photos I see are AI-generated or not. I feel like I have to be more wary of media content than I used to."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "AI has helped me automate many coding and writing tasks. It helped me create description for social media videos"
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "It has made it easier to find answers to my questions. I find it enjoyable to use and it makes my life easier."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "AI has caused my time management to improve at work, and has helped me make more professional emails while working. AI has also helped me write a better résumé."
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "It has made things a lot easier."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "It saves time compared to searching through google for answers."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by giving me easier access to information and knowledge that I did not know before. AI has made it easier for me to look up different answers to questions with a variety of solutions."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "It is a minor change. It refines the simple search engine function of the google search. it adds a human language report."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "It's made me significantly more wary of any and all information. I didn't necessarily trust most things without sources because I know that humans can lie and be wrong,and now I know that humans with those same faults have created programs with their own faults"
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "it is a pretty boring question and kind of biased in a positive way. it sounds like it wants me to say ai has changed my life for the better"
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "I do not use AI very much but I know people who have. They pretty much have a positive outcome so I think I will be using it more soon."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "to get ansawers and solution of nearly everythin in the comfort of home"
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "I don't know that it has. I use it some in searches, but other than that, I don't depend on it for much."
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "I don't think it has changed my life much. I don't use it often, and I can live without it."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "It make searching things online a lot easier. It's also a great way to bounce ideas. It also gives me hope for the future."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "It's made my life easier where if I need something done, I can go straight to AI and ask how to do it. It can be everything from coming up with a recipe with ingredients that are in my kitchen, to coming up with a plan for my week to helping me get through a hard time in life."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "I can't honestly say that it's changed my life because it's too new of a concept and I really haven't balanced its potential yet but it certainly has intrigued me."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "AI has been increasingly growing and making many advances it is somewhat hard to determine what is real and what is not. It is concerning in the fact that you do not what to believe and how well things are made to look real."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "It has made me more concerned about the future. In particular I’m worried about the energy needed for AI."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "It is an advantage in school for helping to understand words, papers, and make study guides, etc. It helps me develop ideas and think outside the box."
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "It has saved me time researching topics. It has made me more productive at work."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "When doing queries online, I get what appear to be good summaries/responses. I also now find myself doubting many videos I see on line."
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "AI hasn't changed my life much at this time. I tend to fall behind on trends and adapt at a later time, so in the future it's likely but not at this moment."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "I do not think AI has dramatically changed my life. I use it for similar tasks as traditional web browsing, and it saves me a little time here and there."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "AI has made my life easier by helping me find ideas for projects or events. AI also helps me find the right, concise words to write an essay, a thank-you note, or words of condolence."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "It has provided work. I'm one of the \"experts\" at my company for AI. It has also provided quick educations on things."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "It’s given me a whole new set of things to worry about. It’s yet another thing that has made modern technology more convoluted and annoying."
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "It has made some parts of my life easier."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "Not tool long ago I was in an emotionally and abusive relationship. Because I was too embarrassed and felt too stupid to share my messages with my therapist, she suggested inputting them into an AI and seeing what it says. I had felt before that I was the problem, that I was stupid and crazy...but when I entered the texts, it broke down exactly how my ex was treating me horribly."
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "I think it adds education to my life"
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "I feel it has opened a new avenue for researching topics and information. Also, classifying tasks are so much easier now."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "No, AI has not changed my life. An interesting new technology which I will find many uses for, but it has not replaced my brain."
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "It helps me at work. It makes things like graphic design easier with image generating."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "AI has allowed me to learn by using social media and Google to find answers to questions and solve problems that I would have to read a book, go to a library, or learn from another person. I have fun generating AI pictures and graphics. Voice activation has also been very helpful."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "As someone with a traumatic brain injury, it's actually been a really incredible tool. It gives me a place to brainstorm and helps me keep track of my symptoms. The amount it can remember and reference back to previous conversations is a huge help to me. I also can have it simplify instructions, help me figure out how and when to go bro the doctor, advice on pacing myself. It's been one of my main supports."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "It has made trivial requests far easier to manage. It has in turn, led to more time being put forth in personal interests."
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "It has helped make tasks easier. For example, I have a photography website and it easily writes various things for it."
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "AI has made life a lot easier. I don't have to spend ages searching through websites anymore, I can just ask AI."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "I have learned to make really fun and artistic photos and I'm able to bring my sketches to life. All I need to do is scan them and AI ads details to them. It definitely has made me more creative."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "It makes it easier to get directions while driving by speaking into my phone. I would not say it has changed my life except for adding worry. I worry about AI."
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "As an older individual, AI is an amazement to me. It has provided with the means to locate, utilize and understand information in a venue and format that is welcoming, easy to use and expands not only my knowledge but my curiosity."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "before generative AI, I could be reasonably certain that any image I saw or text I read was created by a human, with human intent; algorithmic creations bore clear hallmarks that set them apart. now, I have to be suspicious about everything I see, trying to parse out if it's something that actually happened, or that someone actually said, or if it's a piece of art that someone actually cared enough to put the time into creating. it's miserable having to be so paranoid all the time, and false positives can be devastating to an actual artist. it has made my life, and the lives of many, many others, much worse."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "AI has made it easier to dive down \"rabbit holes\" on topics of interest. It has also helped with inspiration for arts and diy projects."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "It has made it easier to get quick information about a topic, either vague or specific. It saves me lots of time from reading multiple websites to figure something out."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "AI has allowed me to gain greater understanding of a subject by letting me fine tune exactly what information I'm looking for. AI has also helped me to express my creative side."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "AI has provided me with a way to get more specific information about just about any topic more quickly than going through individual search results one by one and compiling the information. AI has also provided a more objective place to share ideas and get objective feedback on them."
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "Well, it hasn't changed my life at all. I don't ever use it for anything. I don't imagine I ever will either. It seems like a really, really bad idea to me."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "I have an AI job, so it has given me money and opportunities. It saves me time when I need a basic question answered."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "AI has made my job easier because I can do my lesson plans faster. I also use it to help with lesson ideas. It is used to make helpful selections for additional lesson material."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "It has made my life easier in some ways, but it has also taken away from being able to know if things are real or not. I also now have fear of not being able to get a job in the future."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "I've noticed that simple tasks are even more simple. Setting alarms and finding answers to questions is even easier than before"
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "It has given me a creative outlet that is convenient to use. It is also useful at work in certain situations."
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "I personally don't use AI, but I noticed that it tends to make people more lazy. I would ask someone a question or advice and they'd redirect me to AI instead of using their own time on me."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "Ai has been helpful in a lot of ways. I can turn to it for quick information anytime im stuck. I can ask questions and it can solve problems. If im searching for something it give me a lot of options without throwing sponsorships in the search results"
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "AI has changed my perspective on technology. It's changed my life by making me more interested in studying in the field of technology."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "AI has helped me answer question quickly without having to research on my own. I ask my google all the time about random facts when my 6 year old daughter will ask a question."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "Ai has basically changed the way I search things because I primarily used google but sometimes google doesn’t show exactly what you’re looking for and if you were to ask ai they’ll give you the information you want. This has also peaked my curiosity for the future of ai and how many more things we’ll integrate ai into our daily lives"
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by making searching information easier on the Brave Browser."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "AI has helped me be able to conduct research or get answers to questions much faster. AI has also helped me learn new skills for work. It has helped me create a better resume as well."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "It has made me a bit more lazy. I use AI for tough search questions where I would need to dig for the answer or apply what I found on Google to calculate the correct answer, but with AI it does it for me and produces the final result."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "AI has changed my life very minimally as I don’t use it much. I do not like seeing how everything is pivoting to AI."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "It hasn't. I rarely use AI. If I do, it's usually chat on website I'm ordering from."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "It has made understanding complex topics better. It has saved me time. AI has also contributed money as I have worked with it."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "I run social media for a local restaurant/ bar so it has made my job easier. I get image ideas as well as caption ideas from AI"
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "It has made many new websites readable with automatic translation. It has also made photo editing a lot easier for me."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "AI has changed my overall life for the better. Not only does it making searching for information easier, but it allows for in-depth text generation that helps further advance my ideas and perspectives. It does work for me that possibly would’ve taken a longer time fairly quick, and helps fix my work to be the best it can possibly be."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "Generative AI has practically destroyed my industry."
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "AI has made it easier to learn about topics of interest. It also helps in summarizing longer texts."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "Ai has made me have chats and helped with math and basic things to answer stuff that I need."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "AI has not yet changed my life, as far as I know. It has caused some improvement in getting information quickly, but it is very often wrong. Hence, it is to a large extent, untrustworthy."
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "In some ways AI has changed my life, such as being able to ask specific questions that I don’t need to find a human to answer. And even things such as my robotic vacuum has made my life easier and freed up time."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "AI has primarily changed my life through becoming this omnipresent force, even when I don't care to think about it or use it. The constant discussion has led me to do more research and gain a deeper understanding of AI, but mostly it just annoys me."
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "Absolutely, it has changed my life for the better. Research that I once compiled by hand, I now allow the AI to complete. My rough draft thoughts, I now allow AI to complete. Quick but detailed research and then follow-up questions I didnt think about? I now allow AI to complete!"
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "The only time I use AI deliberately is as part of work on Prolific. In that sense, AI has helped generate income for me."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "It hasn't really changed my life, it has made things more interesting for me. It makes research easier for me and a lot faster."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "It makes finding information even faster than ever before with regular search engines and AI gets more in-depth with its answers and information. AND it can be very warm - like interacting with a real person."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "It hasn't really changed my life in any way, I'm sure it's helped other success. I know it helps major company's."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "AI has changed my life some but not much. I barely use it, although it appears to be helpful but I prefer to use my brain and figure things out for myself."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "I use AI periodically throughout the week to keep my macros in check and to make meal plans to achieve my fitness goals. Ai helps me to achieve my fitness goals without the need for a nutritionist and my exercise goals without the need for a trainer."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "it has made sounding professional very much easier"
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "Ai has had minimal impact on my life since I rarely use it and am not a fan of it"
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "AI has made my life much easier to be honest. At work and in my creative work, it allows me to be much more efficient in everything I do."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "AI has not changed my life, I have tried it/used it a fewtimes, but nothing significant"
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "Ai has allowed me to get answers to questions faster, AI helps me get organzied as well"
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "I use it in place of google essentially. It has helped me learn more efficiently"
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "Generative Ai in apps like photoshop has sped up my productivity by a wise margin. This extra time has allowed me to focus on other creative ideas to help my job."
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "Ai has made my life easier in some ways but giving me personalized reccomendations. Sometimes it makes me life worse though because it’s in ever app these days."
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "It has been useful when I am teaching because I can quickly prepare homework materials that are tailored to individual student needs. I can also access lowered text versions of the same grade level content for struggling readers."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "It has helped reduce the amount of work I've done on data processing and data entry. It helps me answer questions quickly and efficiently at work and at home."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by making it easier to place orders online. Some customer service chatbots have helped with them."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "I have improved at work because my writing skills were weak before I used GPT and now I am told that they are outstanding. It has helped me make good things into great things. Every thing I do with AI makes it better."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "It has made it easier to look up certain information. It has enhanced my productivity. But I'm afraid for the future because of mass AI adoption."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "AI has allowed me to publish puzzle books and helped me learn how to apply to jobs more effectively. I am able to use it to make my ideas come to life."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "AI has helped me with my writing using Chatgpt. I just Chatgpt and copilot more than google now. If I want to get an answer for anything I just have a chat with AI."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "AI has made my life easier. Searching for information on the internet has become more efficient."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "It gives me the option to dive deep into a subject without doing extensive research in search engines. It has subtly made my life more interesting because I have always been a \"robot\" nerd. The sexy female avatars and AI videos are nice. I just asked to compare and contrast two books, The Road by Cormac McCarty and Blindsight by Peter Watts. Fascinating but I want to do most of my own writing to avoid losing brain neuroplasticity if that makes sense."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "We use our Alexa for so much. We rely on it for weather, several times a day. We keep our schedule on Google and are able to access it through Alexa. We can keep track of what we need to do today, tomorrow, next week or next month."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "AI has changed my life in a lot of ways. Most impactfully it has made me want to pursue AI Safety as a career. In other ways it has streamlined some workflows, helped me organize things, and made me more concerned about the future."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by making things more simpler. It helps me figure out how to do something, helps remind me of things and a lot more."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "AI hasn’t been too life-changing for me. It has, however, made things like AI art and text be more prevalent on social media."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "1. Makes writing emails and propsals much easier\r\n2. I am able research business and personal topics much easier\r\n3. Writing standard contracts for work works much easier now"
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "On a day-to-day basis in my personal life it has not. However, it is starting to be utilized at my place of employment. Anymore we do not call customer service when we need to activate something. Now we put it a customer's information and the computer activates it."
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "AI makes it easier to get responses when I have a question. It's also faster than just Google searching."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "AI has made it easier for me to look up information online. I like to use the AI summaries when I'm trying to look up specific information on different topics. I like that it gives the references it uses as well."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "It has given me quick solutions to some tough questions. It has also helped me produce quicker data efficiency for my job."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "AI has mad my life easier, healthier and happier. With Instant information, world news, online shopping, banking, entertainment, and so much more, my life has greatly improved."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "AI has changed my life by making me more productive. I am able to complete my tasks faster and on time without having to worry too much about deadlines."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "...by making my work more efficient. Also, by being a sourced of additional information about any and all topics of my interests."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "AI has simplified some tasks for me in my personal life. I have used AI in creating music and in providing ideas for YouTube channel content."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "AI has been a total gamechanger in my life. First, in my professional sphere, AI has provided substantial productivity gains through streamlining administrative tasks like submitting routine forms and also has helped in summarizing and cleaning up large data sets. In my personal life, I have used AI to help organized my personal trips."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "AI has made my life better by giving me knowledge and improving efficiancy at work. It has also helped a lot with organization of various tasks."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "AI has enabled me to ask my smart phone to turn itself off or to turn on the flashlight. I can now do voice searches for information on the internet."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "It’s helped me find important information for work and personal use.its made certain tasks go faster then without it"
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "AI has brought me some benefits. The first is through imagining images that I create through prompts. This for me is entertaining. The second is when AI provides information on topics that I am researching."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "It has allowed me to do, in seconds, what use to take an hour. It has put so much more information at my fingertips. It has allowed me to create documents like never before."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "It has helped me learn new information. It has helped me write better paragraphs about my students. I need to use it more often."
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "Has made it serve as another rescource to look for information. Has provided more insite to my queeries, Has helped my develop my interactions with this up and comming rescourse."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "Yes, AI has changed my life. I can use it to research and summarize information much faster. I can also use it for therapy and life advice."
},
{
"index": 319,
"comment": "It's helped me edit photos in ways I never could before."
}
] |
What is your opinion on internet influencers (e.g., streamers, bloggers, short video creators) increasingly becoming a recognized profession? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "It's not for me, but I appreciate the medium for those who enjoy it. I know people earn livings this way and I support them fully."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "i have a positive opinion on them, it looks like it opens many doors for them and I also enjoy watching their content and their product's recommendations. some of them have really good content."
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "I don't personally relate or identify with this specific job/career choice but I understand why it is becoming widespread. It seems fitting given the proliferation of social media in the last decade or so."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "They are doing something they like to do and have the convenience of doing it online at their own convenience. Many are fortunate to make very good income."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "I think it makes sense that being an internet influencer is now seen as a real profession, since so many people rely on them for ideas, advice, and entertainment. They play a big role in shaping trends and connecting with audiences in a way traditional jobs don’t. At the same time, I feel it’s important for the space to stay authentic and responsible."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "I find influencers to be annoying. They do not seem to be genuine and I find it silly that people are foolish enough to be affected by them."
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "Influencers are a great addition to the internet. Not only are they entertaining they have been informative about information that has not broadcast on the news. With this being said I believe this will be the new wave of how we actually get news in the truth."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "It’s almost like celebrities in the 90s, there’s really no difference except influencers may be more down to earth and expose more of their personal life at first."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "They entertain, pass knowledge and information to the masses, they're the new media houses. While it might seem new to a lot of people, a number of streamers give insightful and cited information. As well as entertain."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "I think it’s very fun and sort of an easy way to get income all while just living your life. Of course having to keep up with trends after a while people tend to just start following one another. Everyone ends up having/wearing the same thing, no one likes to be creative anymore or unique."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "It reminds me of the Tower of Babel in the Bible, the point where people begin to not understand each other anymore. Everyone is building their own brand of themselves, losing constant with each other, while thinking that they are building this one collective mind. I find it disturbing."
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "I think it's becoming saturated. Everyone now thinks they have something profound to say, everyone wants to chase what others have done. I think it's depressing to watch how everyone thinks they are so unique and important, building their own brand, it reminds me lately of the Tower of Babel in the Bible but I can't explain it in such few characters."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "I believe that it is a difficult job to do, but that it is a very crowded profession. I am not sure it is a great benefit to society as a whole, but the Internet addiction of many will keep it funded. Live streaming of one's life has shown to have a negative effect since they often need to be outrageous to gather the views over others."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "I think that it has its placed, considering we all value entertainment in the form of TV, or books. It's just another offshoot of the entertainment industry, but more easily accessible by people."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "They're OK. But there are too many of them now. They also are mostly fake."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "Internet influencers have opened up a world of information. I think they are a good source of information and entertainment. They may have some flaws, but I find them to be beneficial in many ways."
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "I believe internet influencers exploded during covid when everyone was on lockdown and it became more of a recognized professions these past 2-3 years. Many people think it's easy money or they want to pursue their passion of content creation and once they get enough followers and go viral, they quit their full time jobs and start doing content creation full time."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "Influencers becoming a recognized profession is a natural evolution of media and commerce. It reflects a shift in how people consume content and make purchasing decisions, moving from traditional advertising to more personalized and relatable recommendations. While it offers new opportunities for creative individuals, it also raises questions about authenticity, transparency, and the potential for oversaturation in the digital marketplace."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "I feel it is a good job but has a lot of responsibility. Influencers should be cognizant of their audience and potential to influence their lives. Behave responsibly."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "I do not think it is the best thing at the moment because I feel like people can get the wrong ideas about success from such cases. I also feel like there are probably comparatives that existed in this country that were around long before there was even an internet."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "I think it’s great that the everyday person can gain a platform and be relatable to different audiences."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "I think it isn't too surprising because a lot of creators are popular. They also seem to make good money from it."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "I don’t think they are bad, it’s not easy being famous off those platforms. As a recognized profession, I think they should be made accountable like other profession does."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "I think some use their popularity for good and some let the recognition get to their head and they become people no one wants to associate with."
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "I think it makes sense since a lot of people spend time online and creators can actually make a living from it now. It’s similar to entertainment jobs, just on new platforms. As long as they put in real work, I see it as a valid profession."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "I am totally fine with it. I do think they should be willing to make sure that they take accountability for the things that they say though, seeing as how the profession is not as regulated as many other professions are"
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I think at the very least, streamers and some video creators are currently supplementing and to a limited degree replacing standard news outlets. Many news outlets are preset in what they will say based on a diverse mixup of staff leaning either left or right, making it much harder to find with you. Streamers and Video creators are much more plentiful and precise; By this logic, Its a viable profession path If you can get inital publicity, via signing up with a streaming group. Thats my thoughts"
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "I see it as a great profession. It gives these creators source of money"
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "I think it's pretty cool that people are able to make money from home on the internet by blogging, streaming, etc. However I also think it's important to teach kids that being on the internet isn't just \"easy money\" and that it's still important to go to college or learn a trade and not rely solely on the internet as a career."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "I think it’s awesome. I love following certain influencers who I can personally relate to and I also like that it doesn’t matter what you are promoting or what you’re focusing on there’s a place for everybody as far as being a recognized profession how cool is that that you get to share your life and beliefs and get paid for it."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "I like to watch them demonstrate new products. I also look for recommendations from them."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "I think they have become industry changers and movers. They have changed how advertisement and product promotion is done as well as political and social narratives online."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "I think it's kind of weird how invested people are in others' lives to the point of paying these streamers to create content, but I suppose it makes sense that it would be starting to become a recognized profession. I don't think it should be, but at the same time, some people dedicate their lives to creating Youtube content for a living, too."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "I think it's great that the internet has given people opportunities they never would have had otherwise. People are able to work from anywhere as an influencer. It's enabled more people to access entertainment and information easier than ever before."
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "Yes social media videos are basically replacing Television, which is really dying. I think it's a fantastic thing, because it democratizes who gets to become a celebrity and make a good living from it. I don't want a cabal of evil, super rich globalist scumbags to decide who we can and can't watch."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "Problematic when viewers solely get their news from internet influencers. Then subsequently regurgitate the streamer's viewpoints in a uncritical fashion."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "Like everything it has it’s good and bad, good because we can learn things or they can use their platforms to spread awareness ,bad because it’s easier to misuse their platforms to misinformation."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "I think internet influencers becoming a recognized profession is sort of silly but at the same time it does take effort to keep audiences entertained and having to edit videos is not easy. It's not something a kid should aspire to become but it could work as a side gig/hustle, it should not be a main job for anyone in my opinion."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I think if people can figure out a way to succeed in it, good for them. People exploit themselves for money everyday and this isn’t a new concept, it’s just the first time it’s being capitalized and documented to this extent."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "I think it's good that people can become entrepreneurs. They help out ordinary people."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "I think it's great that more and more people are becoming influencers because the more people become influencers, the more competition there is for better content, more accurate content, and so forth. For example, the more beauty and skincare influencers there are, the more competitive it becomes to create accurate, entertaining, and professional skincare and beauty content for the viewers."
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "I think it's a unique profession! Unfortunately, the way the internet is monetized is very detrimental, especially to younger audiences."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "It is ridiculous the amount of money these folks make as compared to more traditionally \"respectable\" jobs, like doctor, engineer, etc. I believe influencers and creators promote excessive overconsumption."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "It's fine that it's a profession, but I don't think many of them have the best interest of others at heart. I think many of them are in it just for grifting money off their fans."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "I think its great for people to be self employed and have others ways to make money besides corporate America. It also gives other people a perspective and influence from someone like them."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "Rather than encouraging future children to pursue studies, research, or more advanced careers, they will be more drawn to easy and stimulating things like influencers."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "I understand that they put in a lot of work to make their content, but It seems like a copout job for kids that are now growing up. Kids want to take the easy route to making a living instead of going to college."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "As a person who watched the web crawl, then sprint, I see influencers as a real trade: part entertainer, part marketer, part small business owner (with all the headaches). Done with integrity, it widens who gets paid for creative labor, grows culture, and builds communities; the catch is that algorithms behave like fickle bosses, so creators need fair contracts, unions, and safety nets. Teach media literacy, require transparency about ads and AI, and I’m comfortable calling it a profession."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "I agree with internet influencers such as streamers, bloggers, short video creators as becoming more increasingly more recognized as an actual profession because they generate income from providing this form of publicized entertainment. An internet influencer such as Mr. Beast starts has created a life based on their internet antics and often by doing this, it can create large streams of incomes from the vast number of followers and watchers of this individual's widely popular streaming content."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "My opinion on internet influencers is that I think they like the attention. I think that they are people that are extroverts."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "To be an internet influencer you need to be so insanely lucky, that I don't think it is a viable option for literally 99.99% of the population. It anything it should be something more akin to a side hustle, and not the main pursuit for literally anyone. It is probably on the level of winning the lottery in luck needed to become an influencer. As for it being a profession, it should be recognized as a profession. It is a job where a person needs to put in a certain amount of work."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "I think it's something we've seen before but in a more accessible form. YouTubers used to be a big thing, but now we've moved toward Tiktok and Instagram content."
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "I think it’s great. It gives them an opportunity to make money and teach and audience."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "I dislike them because they’re just attention seeking people who say anything for some social media engagement. They have no actual influence over anyone with half a brain."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "I think some internet influencers are genuine and others are so fake. The fake ones make the rest look bad, so it makes it hard to believe who is genuine and who isn’t."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "I think it is great that people are able to put themselves out there and share their ideas. I think being an influencer is a great way to make a living without having to get an education, which can be very expensive."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "There is a lot of them now and more ways to earn online. Sponsorships have really changed how people view the profession."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "At first, I was a bit skeptical at the validity of it being a job. I didn't understand how someone could realistically make enough money to live just by having \"followers\" and promoting products. Currently, I think that having that opportunity to make a living from the internet is a great opportunity and one that many people would want to accomplish. It doesn't seem easy or a well formed path, but one that is worth going down if you can commit."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "It's great that influencers are getting more recognition. There are many hats worn for this particular profession and it shouldn't be downplayed as being a lesser job for the freedom it grants."
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "I think that it is a valid profession. Many of them provide great news updates and access to information for the public."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "I'm conceptually fine with it, as I believe a quality content creator provides a lot of value and entertainment, as well as generate actual discussion around unconventional topics. That being said, it's also mired in slop and click-baiting with undeserving idiots garnering a platform."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "I think it's annoying. They make lots of money just being on Youtube. People follow them mindlessly."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "i think its a joke. They spread misinformation. And are paid to spread misinformation"
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "The emergence of internet influencers as a recognized profession showcases the digital landscape's evolution. Creators can now monetize their passions, building careers, but this shift also sparks discussions about sustainability, responsibility, and industry standards, highlighting the complexity and multifaceted nature of this growing profession. New opportunities abound."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "I think it can be good because it creates new jobs, especially since a lot of people are complaining that AI is taking over everyone's jobs. But there are risks to it because some of these influencers may use their platform for malicious purposes, and if they have a large enough platform, it can be harmful to society."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "There are several internet influencers that I follow and genuinely enjoy. I am ok with it being known as a profession but is not something that should be considered sustainable in terms of a career."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "I think that some are very good that usually share something about their lives that many want to view. Others seem like attention-seeking narcassists."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "I find it fascinating! I’ve noticed that it is a very high-risk, opportunistic job that varies widely in both effort and success. However, I find it very comparable to other jobs in the entertainment industry, such as performative arts. The increasing demand for video content provides people with interesting ways to make a living from pursuing their own hobbies, some of which may be otherwise difficult to market"
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "I am happy that everyone can have their five minutes of fame with social media and internet influencing. It gives a platform for common people to exhibit their artistic talents. However I feel the influencers have to diversify in order to remain relevant in this ever changing landscape. Mental health of the creators and the mindless scrolling of the audience are aspects to be concerned about."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I think they are very much needed in today's media landscape. They can bridge the gap between institutions and the news."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "In my opinion, the rise of influencers as a recognized profession reflects a fundamental shift in how people consume media and build careers. It's an entrepreneurial path that validates personal brands and content creation, though it comes with unique challenges like job security and constant public scrutiny."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "I am not thrilled about it, because I think the low barrier to entry and the fickle nature of the algorithm has allowed people who are not producing anything substantive to monetize their efforts. There are talented creators, but I don't think all of these people are contributing meaningfully to society."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "I feel there are a few influencers I like that I feel are genuine and have actual talent as creators, or at the bare minimum an actual voice of their own. But I feel a lot of that culture/sub-culture is not genuine at all. From fashion to self help, and etc. Or just commentary in general. It feels so clean and safe."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "It's a legitimate profession in that people can and do make money from it, but I don't think it's a viable career choice for the majority of the population."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "I think that as long as it is done responsibly that there is no problem with it. People have a right to make money however they want as long as it is legal. This is just the new wave of opportunity that people are taking."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I don't trust them. You can't be sure the person is actually using the product and has gotten real results."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I like that they are able to show their creative side. I also think that they can help people that are going through similar problems by sharing what they share on the internet. I think it is good to have entertainment and people that you feel you can relate too."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "There are many that are just so good, and if it weren't for the internet, and the ability for anyone to be creative and be seen online, we wouldn't know they existed. I think it's great that people can be recognized for their talents and make a living doing it."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "I think there is a good and bad regarding influencers. I think they can both be useful and pointless, depending on who it is and who sponsors them. They can be a good influence or bad towards their platforms; whoever looks up to them or follows them."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "I am older but I love this as a profession. It takes creativity, content and communication skills to be a great influencer."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "I don't follow or care about internet influencers. It's not something I even think about, frankly."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "i think it is a joke. These people are paid to put out an opinion"
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "I like many of the influencers on social media and online in general. They share many of their skills and knowledge on so many topics, and I learned a lot from them. Also, with the status of the economy today, using this means as a source of income/profession is a great idea, because of rise in unemployment. This is a means to take care of ourselves and our families."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "I don't have a strong opinion on it. It is a little worrisome that anyone with a camera can say what they want and if they have a strong enough following people will listen. However it is a good way to connect with an audience and some influencers seem more authentic than others."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "They live fake lives. They portray themselves to the world like they have such a great life, but they hide what's really going on in their lives behind the scenes."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "I enjoy content creators, however even though technically they do influence... I dont like the name \"influencer\" because some of us can consume content and just enjoy it or be entertained or get SOMETHING from it withOUT being \"influenced\". Hate that term. Content Creators NOT Influencers."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "I don't have any strong opinions on influencers becoming increasingly recognized as a real profession but I do think that it's important that it is recognized that they are essentially paid sponsors. I think that it's really important that because of this, people don't just take their recommendations as real truth without looking into what they are saying further. It is important that people look to actual experts on things like health and facts rather than just believing influencers."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "I think as someone who grew up a lot with video games, and popular youtubers like pewdiepie. I enjoy it that doing something you love a lot, can be recognized a an actual profession, where you can make a lot of money as well. As a content creator you constantly have to make new content to keep your audience interested as well."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "I think it's kind of silly, but I can also respect it. People enjoy media, and it's just an extension of tv or movie stars at this point. However, because it feels more interactive than standard celebrities, I can see why it's popular."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "I think that I do see it as a serious profession being a streamer. The amount of time it takes to put together and research that goes into making a video could be hours to maybe even days. The education to learn how to both a film and edit is a skill you could use in a regular nine to five job."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "I like the idea. It help get the idea of different products and the options about thing out there that can be relatable."
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "If people watch and subscribe to their videos and they can make enough money, I can see no problem with this. And the way the job market is going, you may see a lot more of this happening"
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "I feel that internet influencers are only supporting brands and products to receive a monetary or product benefit. I do not trust anything that is said by an influencer."
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "I am not overly impressed with internet influencers personally. Depending on what the person is blogging about some content can be considered interesting I suppose."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "I think it's stupid. They own a camera so everyone should follow them?"
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "I don't watch any influencers. From what I understand these people are online giving their opinions on various topics or are trying to get you to buy something. I don't think they are experts. I wouldn't depend on them myself."
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "I'm not a huge fan of influencers, but I believe that they are legitimate profession. They generate business for various companies and many completely support themselves through it."
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "I think some of them can become helpful for some people so it can be a good thing. However, some are bad where impressionable kids are watching and doing stupid dangerous stuff. So IF you call yourself a professional internet influencer etc you should be held accountable for the bad things that you cause."
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "I think if the influencers can make a living doing it, is fine. As long as they are telling the truth and no misrepresenting any of the products or services they are advertising"
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "It is a way to earn money. Before there were snake oil sellers, now we have internet influencers. Just like with the snake oil sellers, this group of people should be rejected."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "I don't think this is a valid profession. These are just people voicing their opinions."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "I think that they are the perfect salesperson. Usually regular people whi are just like me who are trying new things and giving recommendations. As long as they are honest, it's honest work."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "I find it interesting how much power they are given by society. I think it is ridiculous, but I understand the desire to be popular and to also get paid for it .... Well, it's crazy!"
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "I think that it’s a good thing. It opens doors for so many kids who don’t want to go to college or go the traditional route for work. It gives people motivation that even a regular people can make a good amount of money if your funny with a camera"
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "Good on them for doing something they enjoy and turning it into a way to make money. Those who put their family members at risk or exploit others should not be recognized, but that's not a large percentage of them."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "I think it is rather silly, as I mostly care about the opinions of experts in areas I am interested in, and not what some random individual with a microphone and a penchant for self-promotion has to say about anything."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "When it comes to influencers, I'm not a huge fan. Typically, they're fake and self-absorbed, and a LOT of them are just overall awful people. However, so are politicians, and that's a real career; I don't have any issue with influencing being considered a real career, I just refuse to interact with the content."
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "My thing is short form influencers are toxic. It’s bad for general environment."
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "I am not a big fan of influencers at all. I don't understand how many acquire their notoriety and what qualifies them. I'm sure there are situations where an influencer is an expert worth listening to, but my general opinion is that is not the case."
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "I think internet influencers becoming a recognized profession is a logical progression of work in todays ever-evolving digital environment. I think the reason it is being recognized as a profession is because so many people have learned to monitize streaming and short video creation. It is viewed as a profession because more and more influencers are now using content creation as their sole means of generating income."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "I don’t entirely think it’s bad. Some of them are legitimately producing entertaining or instructional videos that are no different from other forms of media, so I think it’s fine if they’re successful."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "I think people need to understand that only a small percentage of influencers are able to make a comfortable living doing that. Most will not be able to provide for themselves solely doing that. And I honestly do not believe it is a \"real\" profession."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "I think it is a good thing because it gives people more options to make money. Yes, it has positives and negatives but overall a great field for independent content creators."
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "It's difficult to view internet influencers as a legitimate profession. There is no formal training or education involved and very few guidelines in place that would qualify this as a career."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "I feel like they are really good people a lot of the time, but if you have them hide behind the screens and a horrible people to a lot of individuals and the horrible things"
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "I feel conflicted as that is a path I wanted, and still do want to pursue to an extent, but I also think there is an ultimately finite number of roles in the field and serious concerns can arise from it on a societal level."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "there are too many and they are often annoying. sometimes they are fake and only interested in money"
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "If the influencer is not lying and trying to deceive anyone it's fine. There are many that I am not a fan of. It's just a way for them to sell stuff."
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "I think it’s become extremely oversaturated. I think it was better when YouTube was bigger and there was people on YouTube who became big vloggers, like for example Amanda Steele. I think with so many people becoming influencers now it’s created an even worse culture of over consumption of goods. Also, children now a days mainly want to be streamers/ vloggers/ influencers as their job when they’re older, which I think is bad because it creates more of a focus on looks and goods over personality and smarts."
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "It isn't what it started out to be, now there are so many content creators using others work. No one is doing their own research, one content creator does a story or topic, shortly there after you have ten other creators piggbacking on that one story."
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "I dislike them and that it it has become a \"profession.\" It is a blight on society. People think they can just do that. It amplifies toxicity and vanity."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "I generally dislike them. While a few make interesting content, I find most to be vapid, boring, cringey or all of the above."
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "I think they are an absolute detriment to true information legitimacy. Their ascendance blurs the line between truth and sensationalism, as well as making viewer attention spans increasingly shorter."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "If you can make money doing it more power to you. That is the American way. You can find a way to make money do it."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "I have mixed feelings when it comes to influencers and them making this there main profession. I think there are some really talented influencers that deserve the fame and money they get. However there's a vast number of pretty people that don't have any real talent that somehow make money because the way they look."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "I think for some it is a viable profession. There are some great channels out there that make great education content. I think am in favor of people trying it if they want."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "I guess that can be called a profession especially since people are getting paid to create these short videos and being an influencer certainly has it ups of being a recognized person around a brand."
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "I believe it is a bit much the way some people are making a living by being influencers. There is nothing wrong with being an influencer but I believe some people are being exploited by making moeny this way."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "I try not to spend a lot of time watching these videos. Some are just a waste of time"
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "I honestly am not a fan of it because I think it has become so oversaturated and most of these people don't actually put a lot of work into their content anymore. For example, there are a lot of TikTokers that don't do much besides vlog what they eat in a day, when there was once a time where Youtubers had to work hard to make money and actually provide content that viewers wanted to watch."
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "I don't think there is anything wrong with it if they are actually passionate about what they do. I feel like some of these influences will do anything to make money and aren't truly genuine."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "I find it to be a perfectly fine profession. The main intent b3hind their work is in advertising so that is where I find they are worthy of the money they make."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "Influences like all media have a few gems, generally mired in a giant pile of garbage, but the pile is larger. So while there are a very small percentage that are worthwhile, it's probably not worth it to dig through the refuse."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "I am still getting used to internet influencers being a recognized profession. I think it will become okay but right now it still feels a bit weird. Hopefully they can be helpful for people."
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "I do not think of these as professions, even though for the selected few the pay is very good. It is at most a well paying gig with a limited time span."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "I feel that this is a genuine job that should be considered a profession. There is a certain talent to become recognized by a large population of strangers and maintain popularity during streaming and entertaining. Furthermore, streamers often have to do more outside of recording videos to maintain their brand, often including editing, posting on multiple forums, networking, and engaging with audiences."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "I am fine with internet influencers becoming recognized as a profession, as many of them perform the job of entertaining that other professions do such as comedians or talk show hosts. They could review food, make jokes, or discuss politics like famous people do on TV. As such, they should be recognized for that work as a profession."
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "I am not a huge fan of them. I find that their personalities are fake and unattractive."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "I have no problem with it if that's what people can make money. People are obviously interested in spending time watchiing them and they are creating content."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "It sounds like an exhausting thing to do. You're always trying to create content. You're always on the precipice of being irrelevant"
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "I think it is okay, I find a lot of creators more entertaining than tv sometimes. I think people should be more open minded about it."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "I'm honestly of two minds with this. On the one hand I strongly support anyone that can find a way to make money without the daily grind of a 9 to 5. On the other hand I think that they are starting to crowd each other out a bit and some of them are just not much value, but then again those not valuable will weed themselves out I suppose."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "I think its nice, but it should remain a hobby first for most people. The odds of making it big in one these is astronomically low. But it being a profession makes sense since i now see some streamers in ads."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "I do not watch internet influencers and have no desire to do so. I am not sure that I consider this to be a profession."
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "i think its sort of good. Except some of them are known for doing rude things to people to become viral"
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "It makes authenticity rare because most will be reviewing things, giving opinions etc for monetary reasons. Other than that I don't feel strongly about it."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "If there is a need for it and the influencers can earn an honest living from it, then I'm not against it. I personally don't follow any influencers and am not a big fan of them. I would rather independently research anything I'm interested in rather than listen to the opinion of someone paid to promote the item, service, or brand."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "I think it's a threat to creativity and individuality. It promotes wasteful buying and extreme and incorrect ideas. It makes the world more divided."
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "I don't inherently mind it unlike alot of people who have a knee jerk reaction to them. I support the ones who are entertaing, original and aren't harmful to society. I like the ones who teach you things or give you knowledge."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "Won't last to long. For most, make the money while you can I say"
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I think it is a scam. If wifi was to shut down right now, all of those jobs would be null and void"
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "I feel that, in general, they are not useful to society. While some cane be entertaining, there are many others that are harmful / help spread bad information."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "They don’t interest me. Most seem to be little more than money generating entities."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "For the most part I consider it the new form of celebrity, similar to movie and television stars of the past, or if we were to go further back radio personalities or even vaudville acts. The only real downside I see to it is the parasocial relationships people are developing with influencers and the amount of weight people place in influencers' opinions."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "I used to be supportive of internet influencers becoming a recognized profession, but I'm not anymore. They are overpaid and I don't like that they are always pushing products for profit."
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "I think it would be good if they got recogonized as a real profession as it makes good money and is good for all. I think it's a valid position to try to get and show be shown its legit to older people who might be unfamiliar."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "I think they are trying to influence the public at large but are not necessarily the correct way of thinking. They are feeding the public a lot of misinformation that the public doesn't know it is true."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "Times have changed and individuals have way more power concerning their future and making their opinions known. It is up to the listener to decide whether to click on their content or not."
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "I think it’s a lazy way to make a living since they spend very little time online in regards to the amount of money they may possible make. Also, think it’s a bit narcissistic. Calling it a profession is a real joke to me."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "they are successful entertainers, so I suppose it is okay, although on first glance it is weird to me. But if they have enough followers I guess they are successful entertainers."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "It provides others a service that others are obviously okay with. Therefore I'm all for it. Just seems like a person in an advertisement"
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "I think that its great and a creative way to make money. Aslong as they're putting out creative new content I think its entertaining. I support it."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "I think that people want to get attention so they post a lot on social media and they have seen how easy it is to go viral and make money of content creation. They are also addicted to screens so they consume content all the time too. This kind of stuff is very lucrative for companies in general whether it be social media companies or just any company trying to advertise something."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "In many cases, it seems ridiculous that people pay attention to influencers who may have little experience, knowledge or credibility. This does not seem to me to be a respectable profession."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "They are more convincing and a new better way of convincing customers to make purchases."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "I feel more power to them. If they have the energy and the vision to do something and be paid for it thats great. I would personally never do anything like what they do. But i hear that they like it."
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "As a profession, it has many flaws: content, control, and integrity. The content often seems outrageous; influencers may wrestle with sponsors for control, which can lead to compromised integrity. Does the message get lost within the desire for increased visibility?"
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "I think it is a great profession. They have to learn their skill and be creative to be successful."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "I don’t see any inherent issues with it. I personally don’t find it’s for me, but if someone can make a living out of it and they are providing other people entertainment I or information that they find valuable, I say go for it! My issue lies with misinformation and malicious intent"
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "I think that overall it's a good thing. In a world where many jobs are becoming more difficult to obtain, being able to invest oneself in a more creative endeavor is a benefit to all."
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "I think that it is unreal. I am not a fan of influencers. I do not think that it is a skill or that it is a sustainable \"trade\" for young people to be doing."
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "I've been observing this and I think it's a great way for companies to get their information out to the consumer."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "It’s a new profession that developed out of the expansion of social media. The influencers have their place, but not everyone will get an audience and get rich from doing it."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "They are doin a good job in that field. The internet influencers are greatly promoting products to a large online market globally."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "I think it takes a lot of hard work and I respect the people that can do it make a living doing it"
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "I believe that influencers add little or no value to society. They make tons of money to get people to buy products or form opinions. People often follow them like sheep."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "It is good for the person that is earning money and if they get a lot of subscribers to their channel, they earned it. If the can make money like this then it should be considered a profession."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "I believe that online influencers' recognition as a profession illustrates how digital culture has impacted employment and entertainment. While it provides artistic and financial benefits, it also poses questions about stability, authenticity, and long-term viability. Overall, it demonstrates how internet platforms are altering society's definition of labor."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "I think that it is good to a point as there have always been influencers in the world. The only downside is that more and more people are susceptible to being influenced due to the omnipresent nature of the internet and internet culture. There is also an overabundance of influencers these days."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "I think it is cool that there are different new job opportunities for people with certain skills. I don't see a problem with it at all."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "I personally don't follow any influencers, but I do agree that it can be a profession - especially for those who are handicapped or physically challenged. This opens a door for them to be able to make a living."
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "I think it can be helpful for young people only if they promote healthy living. Think it’s becoming increasingly popular and it is not an easy profession. I do however think we need to promote less screen time for I struggle with mine too."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "I think that influencers are a valuable asset in our society. They provide much needed and wanted reviews on products, opinions on cultural trends and products."
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "I think it’s too trendy and too many of them trying to make money off of being a social media influencer \r\nI would never follow anything like that"
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "I think that is is as viable a profession as any other profession based in entertainment. The internet has become a new medium in which entertainment is shared and it would be regressive to ignore this fact as it would hold back change and innovation in society."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "Im very pro- streamer, bloggers and video creators! I sometimes find myself wishing i had the guts to do the same for a career because of how well they earn! But i lack creativity. I feel like they deserve all they have going on in their lifes at such a young age."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "I think it's cool. I hope the industry keeps growing and I would like to try it as well."
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "I think Internet influencers are fake and unrealistic. They tend to promote unrealistic standards, and I don't think they should have a platform nor be recognized in this profession."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "I can see where this could be considered a profession. It is something that people can make a living at and also can influence people and they in turn can influence In turn can influence others."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "My opinion is that the Internet has opened avenues for parasocial relationships which brings opportunities. It's a nascent form of communication and people can find connection."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "I think it’s a short-term fad that will go away in time. The market is becoming saturated and new content is limited. They should enjoy the fame while it lasts."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "I think in general its a good thing to enable people to get fame through different levels. Also allows me to have a job in the area that i work in."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "These professions add a different perspective to media. \r\nI consider them to be akin to opinion and lifestyle reporters.\r\nI would consider them to be recognized professions."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "I feel that it’s a good thing because we’re gonna see a lot of content creators in the future. They aren’t going to be a slave to 9-5 jobs"
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "I think it’s a valid occupation for someone who can do it successfully. Being an internet influencer also takes time, effort, and knowledge just like any other job."
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "I think it's fine that a person can make a living as an influencer. Depending on their followers, they can make a little, a lot, and everything in between."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "I don't think that should necessarily be recognized as a profession. It's nice that they are able to earn money doing what they do, but they likely will not have a long career doing it."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "I think that they are often aesthetic but are driven by profit. It is important to discern what is an add and what they actually recommend. They get so much stuff for free it is unrealistic to keep up."
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "They all start to sounds the same. They are \"obsessed\" with every product they hawk, thus none of them are trustworthy. They are just ads, and very few stand out or can really sell the product."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "I think its terrible. They say things that aren't true or proven by science. They are just trying to get attention and make money"
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "I think there are positives and negatives. On the one hand, it enables people who are outside of the prevailing mainstream view to present their information or news or viewpoints. On the negative side, influencers may not have the necessary expertise and they may give misleading or incorrect information which, at best is not helpful, or at worse, is harmful."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "I am pretty neutral about it. I think it gives kids too much hope about it because it is way more rare than it seems to become popular enough to make enough money to replace a more traditional job."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "I like some influencers When they show \r\n videos that teaches something valuable not just beauty tips.\r\nI love influencers that teach you how to decorate your home."
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "I think it’s cool and very inspiring. I see them as hardworking and determined. It’s flexible and a more inclusive job, I want to do it!"
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "I think influencers work very hard to make money, so it’s fine to consider influencing a profession. I also think we shouldn’t encourage people to become influencers because it’s increasingly docile to “make it big.”"
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "I think it's great especially if they make an a good impact on people whether it be entertainment, teaching a skill, teaching about politics, etc. They are popular and making money so they should be recognized."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "I think it's fine. They offer a value to people in the form of entertaining or informative content. So it makes sense that it would become a new profession. I personally follow a few people that I really enjoy content from so it makes sense to me."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "I think internet influencing has rightly become a recognized profession because it combines creativity, marketing, and community-building in ways similar to traditional media careers. It offers new opportunities for people to share their voices and earn a living, but it also comes with instability, intense competition, and mental health challenges. Overall, it’s a legitimate but still-evolving career path that reflects how digital culture is reshaping work."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "I don't see anything wrong with it. We all need money more than ever these days, and using your talents for earning purposes as an influencer is as legit as anything else."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "I do like that creative outlets online can be a viable profession now, especially since there are so many of them I have watched and followed for years now. There are the annoying influencers within the crowd, of course, but I think that comes with the territory. Overall I think it's a very good scenario."
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "I think it is a fair thing. They make money and bring entertainment to a lot of people. It is now a viable profession."
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "I think internet influencers are recognized as engaged in professional work. However I don't think they command the same respect as schooled professions."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "I believe there is a plus to using then to create content on the internet. By using streamers, bloggers or content creators you can easily promote your business or product."
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "I really think it depends on the person and what they're influencing him for some it's good and for others it's not so good in my opinion I just really think it depends on the person and what they choose to put out there but I'm glad they're getting paid or compensated for what they're putting out there and their effort is being recognized"
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "Not sure I have an opinion about this yet as this is a fairly new profession. However from what I have heard this type of job can have huge success if the right influencer is hire by some companies."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "I am somewhat alarmed. I do appreciate their efforts and them getting their money and better livelihood. The main thing I am concerned about is their influence on other people. The main notable and seen value is their influence on people, they can manipulate people or their content brings no or negative influence."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "Some are worth watching and others aren't. Some folks need to lose their platforms while some need to be uplifted in these tough times."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "A sign of the times although I find it a bit disturbing. Not because fo the trend itself but rather how much misinformation or misleading information is being peddled by these folks."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "If an internet influencer can make money doing it as a profession then it is consider a job. It doesn't matter how people make money as long as it is honest hard earning money."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "I think it's completely fine and a valid profession within reason. People often think it's easier than it is and don't know how hard it really it."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "if they can make a living wage from it without hurting other people then i don't see any thing wrong with doing it."
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "I believe that is great since we are creating more room for creativity among young people"
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "Buyer beware, depends on the product, best to compare with several resources, many of them are paid sponsor so they are salespeople"
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "I think that if they can get people to want to follow the em then that is fine. Personally I’ve never watched or followed any influencers"
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "I think it is cool for everyday people to become content creators. This if they use it for good."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "I feel like if people can find a way to make money then go for it. I like some influencers because real celebrities don't come across as real and many influencers are more relatable."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "I'm not a big fan. I think there are some influencers who share important information and create a good sense of community, but I don't love that people are getting paid to influence people to buy things. It feels wrong."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "It should be. They are combining acting, marketing, and advertising. I feel it is short lived because companies can easily replace influencers with AI \"content creators\"."
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "My opinion on internet influencers is varies greatly depending on the content and the personality of the individual. Furthermore, their integrity, or lack thereof influences my opinion as well. I don't like people that are clearly just in it for money and don't offer anything new or refreshing, or take advantage of their audience and position. I think it becoming increasingly recognized as a profession is a slippery slope, because people will start to do anything in order to get views so they can become one. This may lead to crimes or mentally/physically harmful behaviors. I only like a very small few of creators."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "I like it but it does kind of lower the bar on what is considered entertainment."
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "I think it's a great way for people to create an income source. If your creative and outgoing it's a great venue to work out of."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "It's inevitable. But I worry they will all burnout. The pressure to create content is ever present."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "My opinion is a mix of positives and negatives, On the positive side, we get to hear from new and disparate voices that help bring new perspectives to society. On the negative, it creates a society more inclined towards style of substance and consumption."
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "I think that, even though some are not positive, that it is a valid profession."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "I think that creating a path to \"influence\" without the traditional media has allowed it to be more accessible for more people which is a good thing. However, that also gives a larger voice to people without the oversight of large media groups which can lead to the amplification of extreme theories and opinions. It has also lead to an oversaturation in the market with so many people trying to become influencers."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "I don’t mind them. If it makes them happy that’s what matters."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "it will happen as AI overtakes most jobs. people will need some place to share ideas"
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "Good when they can share information that will help people. I personally do not follow because I am not trusting. But if the public likes this and they can make a profession out of it then it is a good thing."
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "I have no opinion. I'm open to it and wish I could make more money off this profession."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "I am glad there is a new way for people to make money. But it can be dangerous to think they are experts and follow their advice blindly."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "I think they are a joker. I think most of them are full of shit and are responsible for the dumbing down of society. I think they need to get a real job."
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "I think that is fine that people are able to do that as a profession. Some say that it is not a real job but anything you get paid to do is a real life. I do think there is a problem with too many young people pursuing it when not everyone is capable, only a tiny % of people can make it into a stable income."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "I think it’s important that they be compensated fairly for their labor. I also think it’s important that kids are taught the reality of the job rather than the glamorized version."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "My feeling towards influencers are mostly unfavorable. I find them shallow and just trying to make money."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "No problems with this. The public decides if it is something they are interested in. If the demand is there, all good."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "It seems as though what used to be considered \"selling out\" has become the ultimate achievement. It's surprising how envious audiences are of influencers."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "Sometimes the videos that influencers make are entertaining/informational, however a lot of times I feel like a lot of influencer content is slop. There can also be a lot of non-genuineness/corruption with influencers, as many will accept shady companies as sponsors, companies such as betterhelp. I feel like being an influencer is definitely a method of making money, but it really only works if you have a lot followers and even then there can be some shadiness to it."
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "i think they help to promote items"
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "I think it’s interesting to see how the progression on technology has offered a new range of possibilities. I think internet influencers being a legitimate source of income is very progressive. I think that soon the market will become over saturated, but at the moment it’s a cool concept"
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "my opinion on internet \"influencers\" (e.g. streamers, bloggers, short video creators) increasingly becoming a recognized \"profession\" is that it reminds me of the andy warhol quote about how everyone gets their fifteen minutes of fame... unfortunately nowadays, everyone's getting much more than that..."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "It seems like that's already a recognized profession. I don't follow these guys but, I have no real objections."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "I think it's cool that people can find alternative forms of income and earn money from their creativity and by being at home. However, if everyone is a creator it makes interactions feel less genuine and commercials more prevalent."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "It is, but not respected. It’s similar to saying you’re an artist"
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "I am not a fan of this. Influencers are just advertising and we have more than enough of that. It is impossible to tell what is real and authentic about their choices and what is not as profit is always involved. I do not follow them and do not intend to start."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "Made it to main stream remember when it was barely a thing now everyone wants to be apart of it"
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "It is already becoming that with monetization of You Tube and Instagram. It is currently self-regulated. Building a following is not easy, so viewing this as a profession and gaining the skills to develop a following, offer accurate and beneficial information shoud be recognized as a profession."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "I think that it is great especially if they can be informative and helpful to people. Spreading knowledge is good and that helps everyone in society. It also good for the economy and employments since AI can will possibly take jobs away in the future."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "I think it is great, they bring different things to the world. There are some that are political and some are entertaining. I think it is great when I see a person that I see on social media. They are the future stars."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "I think most of the influencers have no actual skills, knowledge, or expertise and are fooling people into spending their time and money on them. If it becomes a 'profession' then it should be regulated to people don't fall for incorrect information."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "I watch YouTube everyday and have regular creators i enjoy. Since I'm handicapped and can no longer travel I live vicariously through these creators. I value their channels."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "If it makes an honest living, it should be recognized."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "I like internet influencers. I think there is such a large variety out there, that you can find what you like. For example, I like funny influencers."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "I have mixed feelings on the subject. I feel it is the right fit every American to become an entrepreneurs. It is the foundation of this country. However believe there is a lot of mis-information, sensationalism and social pressure put upon readers of their content."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "I think its wonderful that so many people are going to be able to have the oportunity to make entertaining audiences their career."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "I think it's just a product of content creation becoming more popular for people to consume which translates into an audience to market to. This can be lucrative for a person through social media platform partnerships and brand deals so it only makes sense that it would become recognized as a profession."
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I'm not very impressed. I think these types of influencers are frequently too commercial, don't think about what their influence is on people and end up causing a lot of issues."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "This opens a new opportunity for a wide variety of people. It also provides much greater options for consuming content than what is professionally created by Hollywood or mainstream media."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "I guess it's fine, but I think it's sort of silly. It's not something I would aspire to be."
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "It makes no sense to me as they have no special knowledge or skills beyond marketing and having a compelling presence. If it was recognized as a form of entertainment, then maybe I could get on board. Overall, I find these activities frivolous."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "Is very carful watch all other than and he watching is more important"
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "i dont much see how its any different than being on tv just a different medium. i think its easier for the average person to make a name for themselves which levels the playing field ever so slightly in rich vs poor"
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "Depending on the content that is created, some short video creators can be an annoyance. Others such as streamers and bloggers can be useful in the content they create. They could provide useful information to individuals who share the same likes as they do."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "I think it’s great that individuals are able to do that and I’m glad they’re making the money rather than paying all of our money toward large companies finding other esto entertain us"
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "The trend in question seems to be in line with the current surge of AI models, as they expand and change in their development. The expansion of AI allows creative, literary and data base functions to be endless, all at the neck and call of even beginners in technology usage. It seems that it is only a matter of time before AI answers before we can even process ourselves as humans with complex solutions being solved at speeds we could only dream of previously."
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "It's their thing, not my interest but more power to them for finding a way to make money. It has reduced the IQ pf the country though."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "I don’t really care. They are stupid."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "I think it’s great. If you are able to entertain or advice people who care about what you are saying or doing is commendable. Everybody has an opportunity through social media to expose their ideas, hobbies etc to a larger audience that no one expected."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "They are not something that most society should take seriously. They are driven by controversy and \"clicks\" and would sell out for clout. Unfortunately, society has limited attention spans and \"influencers\" are a desirable medium for these people."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "I think it’s sad. Shouldn’t be an actual job but I see why some people get a following and get enough money from that."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "I think internet influencers and bloggers are a necessary profession esp. in todays culture. I think they tell a truth that is bold and needed."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "I believe they are not genuine. They do not give accurate opinions, as they don't test the products."
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "I think it reflects the times we are living in and how big of a deal social media has become. I think it is a valid profession. If people want to give influencers their attention, I don't see an issue with them getting paid for it."
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "I find it cool that people can make a living out of influencing simply because of how unique it is from a traditional career. There are definitely some things such people need to be aware of when it comes to having a platform but overall I see no issue with it being a recognized profession."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "They exploit people for money. Many are hawking the same items. They will say just about anything for likes and money."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "I think it’s pretty dumb that it can be a career. A lot of these people use bots to create content that will cause a stir and simply get clicks. It bothers me how little some contribute to society."
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "It is good for society in general because it helps people dream and strive for more, but also may cause some strife perhaps."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "My opinion is that if it's something they love to do and it brings them happiness, then I have no issues with it. So long as they are not doing anything illegal, it's just another job in this world to me."
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "I like there creativity. They have good talents. They fit very well in what is in todays economy."
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "I think it's great for them. I wish I was brave enough to be one myself."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "I don’t think it’s a good thing, it was great during COVID but now people are becoming reliant on being internet famous and it’s causing them to dumb things"
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "I think it's a good thing for people to be able to do what they love and make a career out of it. These people are usually on social media and social media is so widely used now that most people can easily discover content creators that interest them."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "I don't use or pay attention to influencers so I am not aware what they are doing. I guess if they can make some money doing it it is good for them."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "It is good to see people create businesses and not rely on big companies."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "I don't like influencers. They are all looking for fame. Most of them are very arrogant."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "I think if an internet influencer becomes popular enough to become recognizable, they’ve done a great job, and as for it becoming a recognized profession, different times in history have created different professions."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "I think it is silly that showing what you made for dinner or dancing to a clip is a job."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "I think it shows a degradation in creativity and peoples will. If you look throughout history the large majority have people have thought themselves to be spectators though they spectate. The social media crisis allows people to constantly spectate though under the guise of \"social media\" with most having the belief it doesn't affect them of course though it does studies show."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "These folks took chances and they hit it out of the park. They created their own way to earn a living. More power to them."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "I feel that if these entrepreneurs are talented enough to hook people in, than they deserve to be successful."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "It's the wave of the future, go and do whatever you're good at, granted some of this content is pretty stupid and I personally could care less..."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "They need to get real jobs. If they have real jobs, and try use this just for a side hustle good for them. If they use it to be all about themselves they need to get over themselves. If they use it to promote products, good for them."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "I feel pretty neutrally on it. I think it's strange that they've gotten the amount of positive notoriety they have that now has them amongst famous musicians/actors and people of that sort, though. It's a real profession, and I think deserves to be recognized as one, but it's still weird to me to see them invited to the Met Gala and stuff like that."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "I’m not all that impressed by influencers. I do my own research when considering a purchase"
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "I think it’s a valid profession. I also think it’s a shame that people can make so much money making a few silly videos. It appears as though less and less people are wanting to take on blue collar jobs because it’s easier to get paid making videos and podcasts in the comfort of your home."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "it is a career but should be taken as a hobby not work for people to enjoy"
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "I think the existence of influencers is one of the stupidest things about our current society, and a blot on the internet. The idea that this is a \"profession\" is completely absurd. Anyone influenced by one of these twits needs a mental check."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "Internet \"Influencers\" is certainly a legitimate profession, though I would consider it more in the advertising and entertainment category. I do kind of wish short video creators would consider doing longer form work, though - sound bites are causing enough problems as it is."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "That they make it easy for free information to be out there, and yet make it harder for those who work professions I where they would charge to either give the information or apply it."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "I find it both good and bad. It is always good when people find a niche they can use to make a living, but this type of field is saturated so It can be hard to stand out. If people don't have a back up plan or a bit of luck or skill it isn't necessarily sustainable."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "A profession has one basic goal. Provide a way for you to support yourself financially. Anything above and beyond that is just gravy."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "I have no issue with the influencers as long as they are factual. Some are to fowl mouthed for my liking. Overall I think it is always good to have more voices to listen to and choose from."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "I think there's a lot of low value in the influencer sphere. Most of them are grifters who will sell anything to their audience for a payday."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "i believe like most everything there are good and bad influencers. some are of course honest and others choose to be dishonest. the headlines are usually designed just to have you click. it can be a profession for many because it requires little to no investment to get started. what you see try to verify before taking any action"
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "I think that internet influencers play an important role in sharing information and causing lots of influence in people's thought processes. However, they should be monitored because they can spread misinformation juist as easily!"
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "On the one hand, I think it’s great that there are these career options and content to match the needs and interests of all people. However, I do think it’s turning a bit obnoxious and annoying that so many people are trying to become influencers and everything now is viewed as content. It seems being present and living life authentically is becoming harder to come by."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "I have mixed feelings. I believe content creators producing good quality content such as teaching something for instance are great and in this case I believe it makes sense to see it as a profession. But when I see people creating content based on stupidity, that's another story."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "I love it that people want to put themselves out there to entertain the rest of us"
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "I think it is strange. I understand people can make money doing it. But I do not think it is a good thing for society."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "good for them. it's 2025!"
},
{
"index": 319,
"comment": "I am not a fan of \"internet influencer\" being seen as a \"profession\" in increasing amounts. The main issue I have is that involves mainly luck and random popularity, both of which lends to the idea that the \"profession\" does not involve skills than can be improved or reliably replicated."
},
{
"index": 320,
"comment": "Its a new profession. Every technology generates them and, I suppose, people generally think them lesser than their predessors. TV stars are still generally ranked below movie ones in regards to prestige. But"
},
{
"index": 321,
"comment": "i think it's a great opportunity to gain income"
},
{
"index": 322,
"comment": "Just like everything, there are good and bad in this profession. Some people are out the doing good things and some are doing not good things."
}
] |
What is your opinion on tipping, and if given the chance, how would you improve or change the current tipping system? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "I would get rid of the tipping system entirely. Too many places that shouldn't be asking for tips are and people are being bullied into it."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "Tipping should be based on quality of service provided, but I think the tipping culture for every small transaction is an overkill. What used to be a basic transaction, now I can't pay for things without the tipping menu popup."
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "If I were to improve the tipping system I would possibly make it so the customer receives something for the tip. For example, a written thank you note. A coupon could also be given for the next time."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "I always tip at every establishment I go to. Regarding the tipping system, I am not sure what I would change about the tipping system, but I would change that everyone gets a base hourly wage that is livable, because a lot of workers who get tips have very low hourly wages and they rely heavily on tips and sometimes people just don't tip."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "I think that tipping is okay as long as you are not pressured into it. I think businesses should be required to pay people a livable wage so that they don't have to rely on tips."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "I would get rid of mandatory tipping and make the employee pay there employees a decent living wge. The responsibility is on them"
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "i think most restaurants should make the system free and not manadatory. Customers dont have to be forced to pay mandatory tips"
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "Tipping is beneficial for the one who is receiving. However most people don’t follow the tipping system. Based on the professional service or polite attitude the may may turn out to be more then the tipping system. On the other hand you may want to tip big and you really just don’t have it financially to do so, in return you tip what you can to assure you let your server know you appreciated them."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "I think tipping is fine when its to just add something extra for good service. I dont think tipping should be forced or implied for 0 service or very minimal."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "I would probably change the usual way of thinking about tipping from percentages to fixed amounts, and I'd also have people tip more because I just feel like what people actually tip is barely anything (when the bill is low, anyway), and so basically I'd make, say, the $20 or $30 tip the standard amount and then that would be that."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "Tipping has become over-expected in the United States. I really do not like being asked for tips in many cases, like when I pick up my own pizza."
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "In America at least it's borderline mandatory for servers and other members of the service sector due to not being paid a living wage. Ideally I wouldn't tip or it would be factored in the bill but because it is the way it is I always tip at restaurants/bars or when I order food delivery. I would improve it by having people who work those jobs be paid a living wage."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "I sadly don’t enjoy tipping. I used to work in a field where tipping was 80% of my pay. We should take note on the way Europe does it. Pay more so tipping isn’t necessary."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "I don't have an issue with it but people who don't provide good service and expect a tip are in the wrong in my opinion"
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "I think it's out of control in the US. It's a way for employers to get away with paying their employees less and it's gotta stop."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "i would ensure the tipping wage has a standard for every level of purchase , this would ensure that customers are not manipulated to give more than they can afford"
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "Only the United States has this kind of system. It would be better if we inte tips into the payment."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "It is not necessary, but I believe people should be compelled to do it. Most workers do not earn enough, and tipping can help address this issue."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "I strongly oppose the tipping system. I would change the current tipping system by replacing it with a compulsory 10% service charge for all restaurants. Tipping would be optional and should not appear on the bill."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "My opinion is that it seems a bit forced in certain societies. If I could change the tipping system, at least where I'm at in the West, I would probably only encourage tipping as something one does out of gratitude."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "My opinion is that tipped workers should be paid minimum wage so that they don't have to rely on tips anymore. The reason I say that is because tipping has become too expensive for consumers, so it should be made more optional and less expensive."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "I don't think that tipping should exist. Waiters should be paid a fair wage."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "Tipping is getting out of hand due to the tablet point of sale systems. Places that used to not have tipping now are asking for tips, and it's uncomfortable to say no or requires multiple taps to get to 0%. By default, the point of sale systems should have an easy to find \"no tip\" option on the initial screen. It also would be better if tips were not requested unless a clear service (preparing food, serving, bussing tables, etc) is provided."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "it should be adopted by everyone as it is a good deed to appreciate others for their skill"
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "I hate tipping. I believe a company should pay their employees a proper wage and so I do not feel obliged to tip. I would change the system by getting rid of it and tipping be something voluntary because they did a good job."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "I think the current system is awful. You either feel obligated to tip bad service or pressured to tip before you even receive the service. No tip should be asked or entered until services rendered and the service is rated by the customer."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I will always tip if I go out to eat at a restaurant, but if I had to change the current tipping system, I would completely abolish it to begin with. It is completely unfair to the waiters and waitresses who should be getting fairly compensated without having to rely heavily on tips to get by."
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "I think servers deserve a tip that reflects their service to me or someone. I have worked with students all my life and believe servers deserve to be compensated for their work. I always overtip. I think no taxes on tips is a great move."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "I believe in tipping if the server has gone above and beyond to help me. A lot of the jobs they do are hard, demanding activities. I know myself I would appreciate a little extra in my pockets beside the standard wage."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "I will give a good tip of the service is good. I will not give a good tip of the service is bad."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "I agree with tipping. The system should be left up to the patron on how much to tip and it should be earned by the wait staff."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "The current tipping system is mainly a way for employers to underpay employees and squeeze more profit. Tipping should be voluntary and for good service."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "I would abolish forcing food service workers to try to make a living off of tips. Tipping should be an option, however, workers should be paid a living wage and patrons should not feel obligated to always tip."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "I don't think there is anything wrong with the system itself but there is something wrong with tippers! People shouldn't use services that involve tips if they have no money to tip. Possibly making tips mandatory as part of the total bill may be a future option!"
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "My opinion on tipping has become largely negatively in the past 5 years. It feels like every establishment nowadays has one of those tipping screens on their checkout register. I think tipping should only be a thing on sit-down restaurants where you get full service and not a fast food place. But even then, i think it should be optional and even then that's pushing it in my opinion. I think the minimum wage in the US should be raised across the board in order to one day end tipping culture."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "I think tipping is great, if the service is good. I wish servers weren't paid so little for the work they do even if they get a lot of tips. I think tipping should mostly be reserved for the servers who have done the best job."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "For workers it is great because they can potentially make more than minimum wage. For consumers it can be bad with everyone now wanting a tip for everything. I would honestly just get rid of tipping and paying servers a fair wage. This puts less stress on the consumer to figure out what is a good tip, and less stress on the worker wondering how much they will make."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "Tipping is fine in restaurants but not when you're ordering coffee and just picking it up."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I think that it depends on the locality. Here in the USA, tipping is socially established as a norm. I would take away tipping alltogether. Frankly its better to move towards an automated system and take the human being outside of the realm of the Service/Manufacturing Industries."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "I am tired of tipping culture, I understand that restaurant workers are severely underpaid but it feels like tipping culture is out of hand and a tip is expected for everything. I would raise the prices so that workers get paid more but tip would be eliminated. I would be fine with paying a higher price for my meal if I know that it is going to workers."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "I 100% agree with tipping. I always tip at least 20% and I believe that it is a great incentive for employees to go above and beyond at their job. I also believe that tipping should be mandatory unless the company pays their employees a minimum wage of at least $15 and does not tax their tips."
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "Remove tipping and add a service charge of 10%. That's what they do in Japan and elsewhere and it makes it easier for everyone"
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "I choose what to tip. I tip well for good service and I avoid businesses that try to tip for me."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "I think some tipping systems should be less intrusive and be presented as optional, depending on the service provided."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "Who should be tipped needs to be limited to those working in restaurants. The tipping system today is out of control."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "I believe in tipping if the service is good. The amount that I tip also depends on the service that I receive. I don't believe in tipping for pickup orders or drive thru orders."
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "I am considered a very generous tipper, but it is getting outrageous with the people trying to get tipped now. They want tips when they aren't even serving you directly."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "I think tipping is a necessary \"evil\" as long as waiters and other service people rely on them as their \"wage.\" I think it could be improved or changed by just making them receive a fair wage and not put the onus of tipping on the customer/consumer."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "The tipping system in the US most vitally applies to food servers, who are paid a criminally paltry amount of $2.13 per hour, a fraction of the still impossibly low federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, so that tips are highly necessary for their survival. Tipping system doesn't necessarily need changing, but all workers should make at the very least the federal minimum wage. Minimum wage has not changed since 2009 and needs to be livable, i.e. at least $15 / hour."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "In general, I think tipping has become far too expected. I wish we could go back to when tipping was infrequent and appreciated. Nowadays it seems everyone wants a tip, and a high tip at that."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "i would only think its ok to ask for a tip for a complex order not for something basic like a shot of espresso or buying a bottle of water at starbucks. i have a strong dislike for the tipping culture."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "While I always make sure to leave generous tips, I also have a deep dislike for tipping culture. I think it would be better if businesses would pay their employees a living wage rather than leaving them to depend on tips."
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "Tipping is for a service provided. Not for just being at the business. When I make my own fountain drink and come to pay, and the cashier ask how much to tip, this is pathetic."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "I think the current tipping system is horrible and confusing, as many establishments try to get you to tip before you even receive service (or if it's pickup, why are you even tipping?). Instead, there needs to be more pressure on businesses to pay their workers fairly and less reliance on the \"tip\" to justify poor business practices."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "I think that tipping is a flat out scam. I believe that a person's employer should be solely responsible for paying them. I would change the system by completely getting rid of it."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "Some people seem to tip to boost their egos and flaunt their wealth while other people probably feel bad because they can't tip much if at all since they're too poor. I would change the current tipping system by not treating employees like objects that need to be judged. People should be encouraged to tip if they genuinely want to do a good deed for employees."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "I do not agree to have to tip every time you buy something. We should not be forced or asked to tip. They need to stop the forced tipping on screens etc."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "i think it's a little bit out of hand in the sense that they want us to tip on everything. I understand tipping a server who is actually serving you, but not one who is only taking your order as part of their job. they are not doing anything extra to earn a tip. Here's a tip, pay your employees a living wage so they don't have to depend on tips."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "I am conflicted. I want workers to be paid fairly and with a living wage, but I feel like their pay shouldn't rely solely on tipping culture. I wish they could get paid enough for necessities by their companies and businesses that they work for. However, with that being said, I try my best to tip people fairly."
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "I truly do not know enough about receiving tips to give an educated reply. However, I do comply with the standard at the time. Also, I will add more if the situation calls for it. As far as improving it is concerned...maybe have employers add one quarter of the amount of tip s to tips earned."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "I would adopt the european system the does not extort money from the customer to make up for the low wage that the employer offers."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "I think tipping has gone overboard and consumers are subsidizing wages that the companies should pay to these employees. I don't believe every thing should be tipped and tip should be earned and actual service should be provided. I also don't believe in tipping or tipping well in a mom and pop shops."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "My opinion about tipping is that it is something that is not required. Many people have lost their way when it comes to tipping and believing that it’s mandatory"
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "I would have businesses stop expecting tips or asking for them. Nowadays, it seems like it is mandatory to tip. It should be up to the consumer if they chose to tip or not."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "I don’t mind tipping but if I’m ordering a donut or a cookie that’s already on the display. I’m not going to tip you for handing it to me. Companies need to pay their employees better so the tipping system isn’t so crazy like it is."
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "I wish tipping wasn't allowed. I feel like the businesses should just pay workers a fair wage."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "I think the tipping system is very broken. The basis for people who do a service to receive an EXTRA amount of pay for doing an exceptional job is great. However that is not how it is implemented. In the food service industry especially, although in other service based businesses too, tipping has become a reason to NOT pay a reasonable living wage on the idea that their good service will make up the difference instead of the intended BONUS which is what a tip is supposed to be."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "I prefer not to be asked for a tip or have a system suggest a tip for me. I can determine if, when, and how much to tip without being prompted. It feels like an imposition when a tip is asked for, particularly in instances where a tip doesn't seem appropriate to me."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping. However, I believe if restaurant workers were paid a living wage, tipping would not be necessary."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "Tipping is cumbersome and unpredictable, as workers do not know how much money they are going to earn. This might be offset by a flat service fee that is charged on the bill so that the workers will not be overworked to the detriment of the customers."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "Tipping should be given by the consumer to the server for excellent service . I personally will leave a very large, generous tip when I am very happy with the service I have received , and if the service is not so good , my tip will be substantially lower. It is not the consumers responsibility to make up for low wages paid by an employer . Tipping should always be optional ."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "I believe in tipping for good service. I don't understand tipping people at Subway and Dunkin Donuts. That is their job. I understand their wages aren't that. I have been in their situation."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "I only believe tipping is well deserved if they provided excellent customer service. A lot of people who work horribly still expect a tip and I don't think people like that even deserve it."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "I think tipping should be optional at all establishments because you never know when someone is feeling generous. However, I don't think that it needs to be the standard unless in a restaurant or receiving an actual service. Establishments that ask for a tip when they are simply packaging food is a bit silly."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "I think tipping someone for good/great service is fine. If they do a good/great job, they should be tipped. We can improve tipping by making it based on the quality of service and not just tipping to tip."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I think that employers should pay a fair wage and that the tipping culture shouldn't exist anymore unless the service is spectacular. It's a dated system that needs to be abolished."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I wish tipping culture wasn't necessary so workers who earn them can have a steady, livable income. While we do have it, I think tipping is important because the people who serve us rely on that for their income since they usually have a low base pay. If it were up to me, the tipping system would end and businesses would be required to pay their workers fairly."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "I believe tipping should not be required ever because it takes away the kindness people offer via tips. I worked for tips as a delivery driver and the hardest part was people thinking I expected a tip. Tips should not be required but should be given to those who deserve it."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping servers or people who provide service. However, if i am just ordering at a counter or picking up I dont think a tip is needed. I think that the waitress base pay is appalling and they should be paid at the very minimum, federal minimum wage."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "tipping is too confusing, everyone asks, but not everyone really needs extra beyond their wages."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "I think tipping should only be required for servers and food delivery. Other than that you should be able to choose when and how much to tip"
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "I dislike the current tipping system. I would prefer employers paying their employees fair wages and not rely on tips. I would rather not tip at all."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "I think its an unfortunate necessity. Workers deserve to be paid a fair wage. I would make it so that workers earn a livable wage so that tipping isn't essentially a requirement."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "I believe in tipping when I seek a service out like food delivery or restaurant service. I would improve the current tipping system by reducing the automated suggested tip amount percentage."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "I feel like for services like ordering coffee or ordering something to go, we shouldn't be expected to tip. I would want these types of service workers to be paid at least minimum wage so that they don't have to rely on tips or if we do tip, just leave a tip jar but make it optional."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "Tipping is fine I would say I do it often and is not a bother to me. I would not change anything because the tipping really does help the workers."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "I would make sure that servers do not have to rely on tips the most. Everyone deserves to make money to live."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "I think that swinging around the iPad and automatically expecting people to tip for counter service is frustrating. I have no problem tipping people who bring me food or wait on me. I think that places where people are paid a living wage should not have the iPad tipping system. Or they should at least make it clear that it is not expected. If they want a tip, it should be baked into the price."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "The service industry is hard work, and quality service can make or break an outing. I fully support tipping, and believe 25% to 30% is appropriate."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "I think tipping is wonderful and a great way to give back to others. However, I feel that over the counter, direct service should necessarily be tipped."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "I think that tipping shouldn’t be needed but I know it is because tipped workers don’t eat as much as they should. One way to improve the tipping system would be to pay better wages so workers don’t have to rely on tips."
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "I do not like the custom of tipping. If it was up to me it would be removed from our culture."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "I feel that tipping is acceptable. It shows appreciation for good service. It also helps servers financially."
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "I think that tipping is a part of our culture, and its value largely depends on the quality of the venue and the setting of the service encounter. I feel it is good that employees should not have to depend on tips to compensate for poor wages, but on the other hand, the culture and and talented workers would lose something if tipping was prohibited. But it is difficult to generalize about what is best, beyond an emphasis on being able to have choices between tipped and stable wage employment situations."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "I enjoy tipping if the person can help me get my food. I don’t like tipping if little service is needed"
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "I'm ok with tipping, for good service. But, employers should pay an actual wage so this isn't an issue"
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "I pay a standard tip. I pay slightly more for good service"
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping if the service is good but either don't tip or reduce my tip depending on the quality of service. I don't like being asked to tip at inappropriate locations for certain services like fast food"
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "If the person is supplying me with a valuable service and the pay of the person is lower than minimum wage because they depend on tips than I approve of it. If someone goes beyond what the normal I approve of it."
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "I wish that we had a european system where we didn't tip. I don't like the current system. Most servers seem entitled and don't take pride in their work. Yet, I still feel obligated to tip because I Know that the hourly wage is so low. Another improvement would be to pay a higher wage and only tip on expceptional service."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "Tipping is vital to poor workers. \r\n\r\nI don’t like how tipping is always displayed when buying anything almost. I’d change that."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "I think tipping is something you do because you want to. It shouldn't be mandatory."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "I am a generous tipper, when it comes to a sit down restaurant. I don’t like being a tip and I asked or to go type setting. I also tip, delivery, drivers, Hairdresser , people like that. I just don’t like being on the go tipping."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "I do not like the direction that tipping is going. I prefer that workers receive a living wage."
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "A far more preferable system would be if employers paid their hosts/servers/wait staff a livable wage instead of promoting tip culture, especially when it can be cost prohibitive to their staff in terms of taxes, etc. I feel this way not only because I believe it's fair, but because, while I will still tip 15-20% depending on service, it's kind of annoying to have to budget that into a meal's costs."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "Tipping servers in restaurants is OK. Tips are supposed to supplement their wages. Other than that tips have gotten out of hand. My nail technician receives a good wage but it’s the norm now to tip."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "Tipping should only be done for good service. You tip the person that waits on you in response to the service you received, good or bad."
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "I would definitely change our currently tipping system. I think we should focus on paying employees a fair wage so they don’t have to rely on tips."
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "I think we should do away with tipping. It creates employment that is not sustainable. People should be paid living wages and not consider tipping income."
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "I have no problem with tipping where appropriate, but the tip requests have gotten out of hand, people are asking for money for doing nothing, and they have no choice because employers are paying them less because they know customers will subsidize their workers' low wages with tips. Its' time to eliminate tips and make employers pay their people an actual wage instead."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "As most billing systems are moving toward electronic payments there should be an option for $0 tipping. Plus, the $2? sub-minimum wage should be outlawed for waiters and staff and go to a competitive wage. Finally, I believe a tip is only deserved for \"at least competent\" or outstanding service and is not an expected payment."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "I advocate tipping and in almost all situations tip 20 percent. Unless service/food was so unsatisfactory then I would still tip but at 15 percent. I am unhappy that restaurants are charging 3 percent surcharge for using debit card which is like cash the amount comes directly out of account. In this day most people do not carry cash."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "I think tipping is important. I feel that servers should be given a good wage so that tipping isn't so crucial."
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "I don’t think you have to tip it shouldn’t be something your ever expected to do. I would improve the tipping system by making sure everyone understands that it’s optional."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "I feel tipping puts too much pressure on both customers and workers since it makes income unpredictable. If I could change the system, I would raise base wages so people earn a fair salary, and tipping would just be a bonus for great service. This would make things feel more balanced for everyone."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "I beleive that a person should be given a tip for good service.The better the service the better the tip.I wouldn't change anything about the current way tips are given."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "I only tip for restaurants that are sit down. Where employees are paid two bucks and hour"
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "I believe in tipping, if I get great service, I don't mind tipping great. I think it should be the way it is now."
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "I believe tipping is appropriate when I'm receiving great service, and I show my appreciation by leaving a tip. However I believe service staff workers should be paid fair base wage, so tips are more like a bonus for good service rather than a necessity. This would make it less stressful for workers and customers."
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "I dislike tipping as it has become an expectation rather than an extra gesture for good work. I would eliminate it and have employers pay better wages."
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "i WOULD SUGGEST IT TO ACROSS OR SERVICES THAT ARE DONE EXCELLENTLY AND IT SHOULD BE EQUALLY SHARED AMONG THE EMPLOYEES"
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "I think tipping is appropriate in the right industries. It gives the service workers an opportunity to focus on caring for their customers, and in doing so are able to earn the value of the effort that they are putting into their work."
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "Tipping feels unfair since workers rely on it instead of steady wages. I’d rather see higher base pay, with tips as a bonus for great service."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "I think it is important to tip. The service workers count on tips for their income. I think there should be a set standard for tipping. Like 10 or 15% of the bill."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "I don't have an issue with tipping per se, but I do have an issue that the \"expected\" tips have increased as has the price of dining out. I'd prefer a 10% tip be considered average and 15% or so excellent and that servers be paid more base."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "I think it's getting a bit out of hand and as of late, I don't want to tip as often anymore. 10% used to be the lowest option and I would try if I'm on a budget but now the lowest has become 15% or even just 20% which is hefty sometimes. I'd rather have the option still be ranging from 10% to 25% if possible. Ideally, the people in service work can have a living wage instead of depending on my tips"
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "I feel like you should tip. However eith inflation is understand its getting harder and your lucky if you can even afford to eat. So while you may not be able to afford 10% even a few dollars is respectful"
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping, but I think employees shouldn't have to rely so much on tips. I don't think tipping culture is fair for employees or customers. Employers should pay their employees better wages."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "I usually tip 20% . I don't feel obligated to tip as much at places that aren't full service."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "Tipping is a personal decision aimed at appreciating the hospitality and efforts given in time of need and fulfilling immediate desire in an awesome manner. It is most given once the service is exceptional."
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "I see no problem with tipping for good or excellent service. I do not feel that it should be required for all service based services. If I were to improve on tipping I would make it socially acceptable to base tipping amount on quality of service."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "i would continue tip tip when i felt it was right. like bieng waited on by a person"
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "I think that depending on the level of good service a tip should be commensurate to that seems fair. The tip to me is to send a message to the server."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "I think tipping puts too much responsibility on customers to make up for low wages, especially in industries like food service. Ideally, employers should pay fair, livable wages so tips can be a bonus, a necessity. I'd support moving to a model where service workers paid well directly, and tipping becomes optional rather than expected"
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "I am usually a good tipper. I do believe in tipping, if a good service is provided. However, if I have to walk up to a counter to give my order that I read off an overhead menu, then I have to pick up my food at that same counter. I'm not tipping."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "I think tipping should be optional, and should not be used as an excuse to underpay employees."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "I don't have a problem with tipping under the right conditions. It seems, though, it is getting out of hand and every service job now expects to be tipped regardless of how much they make"
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "I resent feeling that I need to tip. I would completely eliminate it. It seems like everyone expects one now, even when you pick up a pizza."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "While I am in favor of tipping I would prefer a business would give its employees a living wage so I would not have to make up for them not doing so. I have been to countries that give their employees a living wage and don't encourage tipping and it's a big difference. Give employees a living wage so we don't have to subsidize."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "Ideally, tipping would go away. Seems like it has gotten out of hand and I would rather see a fixed service fee as I saw in SEcAsia when I traveled there."
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "I definitely approve of tipping when service is rendered, such as waiters & delivery personel but I resent ppl expecting a tip when no service has been given. Picking up an order from a sandwich shop does not require a tip, nor does buying groceries from a store."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "I think tipping is good if the service is good. I do not like when you feel obligated to leave a certain amount. I think people should tip what they want too."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "I think tipping should not be such a large part of a server's income. I think employers should pay more already so that tipping is less expected and necessary rather than a tip of appreciation. Tipping culture has gotten way out of hand and excessive."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "Tipping is necessary because servers and bussers do not make even minimum wage, so they need the income. If you want to remove tipping, pay servers more."
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "Generally speaking, tipping is OK but can benefit from a change. To fix, include the “tip” in the menu item price, pay servers a regular wage."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "I think tipping should not be a concept and employees should be paid their full wages instead of having to depend on customers to give them money they have already worked hard for."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "I would improve the system by taking away the pre-selected percentages"
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "I do not have a problem with tipping. Tipping is an established form of payment which can be improved upon. Fairness is the key to improving this system"
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "I have worked as a server so I tip well. I don’t think I would change anything as it’s still one of the best jobs out there."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "Tipping is a kind way of showing appreciation for someone’s work especially when they go above expected actions."
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I believe that you should give a tip for good service. I do not believe you have to give a tip for take out service"
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "People who work in customer service usually don't make a lot of money. And they don't have a lot of benefits where they work. I think tipping is a good thing and people should realize that these people are in a tough job doing the best they can. More publicity about this would probably help."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "I believe that tipping should be changed so that servers and other people who depend on tips are actually being paid a living wage. I know that this may not happen anytime in the near future. I waited tables when I was young so I am good to tip most service people but things are getting out of hand with tips expected everywhere."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "I believe the Europeans do this correctly. They pay their workers enough that tips are not required."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "It all depends on the server. If they are good tip them well. If terrible service no tip."
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "It used to be that tipping was a means of expressing appreciation for excellent service. It now has become expected for even the minimum of effort expended. I think people should be paid a living wage and only in rare instances should tipping be considered."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "Having been married to a former server/bartender, I feel that tipping is telling that person that they did an awesome job. They do not get paid hourly and rely on tips."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "I agree with tipping for good service. I don't think it is required, but is a gratuity. I wouldnt change the way it's done. However, I don't think it should be asked at places where people are not served, as in a restaurant with people who wait on customers directly."
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "i dont believe there should be a set percentage rate for tipping.tips should be given depending on the service you get"
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "I see it as a way to reward good service, those who are willing to tip should do so"
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "I believe it is good to tip your server, based on that server's performance in serving your needs in their establishment."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "My opinion on tipping is a positive one, especially when it comes to the restaurant and hospitality industries. I understand the origin of tipping in these industries, but when I see, now, everyone having a tip jar available, I get turned off, and a little agitated."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "I dislike tipping. I do it because it is the way of the world. I would do away with it if I could."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "I think tipping often shifts the responsibility of fair wages onto customers instead of employers, creating inconsistency and stress for workers. If I could change the system, I’d ensure service staff receive a guaranteed livable wage while making tipping optional as a genuine bonus for exceptional service."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "If good service definitely. Should be how much regarding each circumstance."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "Tipping should be reserved for good service and there should not be any expectation of percentage. At the same time if a customer knows that tipping is expected they should at least give a token amount always except for when the service is subpar."
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "I'm fine with tipping at a sit-down restaurant, but I think tipping has gotten out of hand. I would improve the system by removing the tip option from debit card purchases, except at sit-down restaurants."
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "I think people should tip their servers at restaurants at least 20%. However, when it comes to workers at like fast food places or something I don’t think tipping is mandatory because they already have a bigger hourly pay."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "Tipping is a good thing, however it is out of control now. If the owners of businesses would pay their employees a better hourly rate, excessive tipping would not be needed."
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "My opinion on tipping is that I am very favorable towards it. I would change the current tipping system by making it an actual bonus and require employers to pay more to employees so they aren't felt that they need to rely on bonus money to survive day to day life."
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "Since then have worked in the service industry I am strongly in favor of tipping. I don’t like, however, when a machine is given to you and you are forced to tip"
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "I'm all for tipping that's how waitresses get paid.i think there should be a law that you have to tip a certain amount no Matter what."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "Sometimes I would like to change the current tipping system in the US. It is really annoying that even for making coffee they want customers to tip. Sometimes I agree with tipping someone for serving our food, however, for simply making our cofffee, it doesn't make sense. It would make me happy to change that situation."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "I feel each attendee should be entitled for a tip. This should serve as extra motivation."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "I would get rid of tipping. No other country in the world engages in this practice and it just doesn't make any sense at all."
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "I dislike the whole tipping concept. I prefer to patronize businesses that have a no tipping policy."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "I like tipping since I used to work in a tipped position. It lets workers stand out among others and earn more if they are better at their jobs."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "I am not if favor of tipping. I think business owners should play them adequately instead."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "I tip for good service, not just because it's expected. I do not follow any percentages I tip what I feel is right to the bill."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "I use to be a waitress. I made $2.13 an hour so I really depended on tips. I really don’t know anything about the current tipping system"
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "I feel that tipping should be stopped. Restaurants and others who have employees who depend on tips should be required to pay a good wage so tips are no longer needed. Other countries do this already with positive results."
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "I oppose tipping. I'd prefer to see companies pay workers."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "The current system is fine. Good service deserves a good tip."
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping if the service is good.If the service is bad I adjust accordingly. Very bad service equals no tip."
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "I would adopt the same system used in the rest of the world, tip is included in the price. I think servers should enjoy the same benefits as regularly paid employees."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "I think tipping often feels confusing and unfair. Workers depend on it too much instead of being paid properly by employers. If I could change the system, I’d make sure people earn fair wages without needing tips. Tipping could then just be a bonus for great service."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "i don't pay much attention but I hear about the issue alot lately. I don't know why things need to be changed, i try to tip about 15% but I always get my food to go"
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "Tipping approximately twenty per cent is fine. However, tipping to grab my pizza and give it to me is unnecessary."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "I know wait staff don’t get min wage. If I get good service I tip very well"
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "I feel like tipping is good for the hard workers at a job. Workers that work had are showed recognition by receiving tips. I would probably improve the tipping system by make it a $5 minimum to tip. That means if you want to tip the workers it has to be $5 or more."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "Although many people rely on tips,some situations are getting out of control. A waiter that brings food and is working hard deserves a tip. A coffee shop where a person pours a cup of coffee and just hands it to you does not warrant a tip."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "I think tipping should be a mandatory. My mother was a waitress for 17 years.I can't tell you how many tipeople would shundreds of dollars and I throw a five dollar bill at her. In order for everyone to be able to afford to tip I think that it should be wrapped in the price of what they're Purchasing. People go who cannot afford to pay extra.So in that sense it wouldn't be extra and they would be counting it in already."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "I personally do think it is important depending on the job you are doing. For example, in many states the federal minimum wage is higher than the state's rate so anything that is tipped can help tremendously. What I would do to improve it would be to make it easier for people to tip or change policies that would have more places pay a livable wage to eliminate the dependence on tips."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "tipping is essential to recognize good service, if given a chance to change the current tupping system i would allow customers to tip voluntarily, based on their satisfaction with the service"
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "I do not tip , I feel that people should find jobs that don't involve tipping. Things are overpriced as it is and I don't have no extra money to hand out."
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "If we paid the workers a living wage, then tips would not be necessary. In Europe they are offended if you offend them tips because they make enough from their regular pay. Make tips unnecessary."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "I do not agree with fast food and other merchants asking if you want to tip those are not jobs that are tipped and food servers its up to the customer on how much to tip."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "i tip all the time i think to make it easier the tip should be included with the bill"
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "i support tipping. I think people need the money and shuld be rewarded."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "Only tip when given good service. Give what you can afford."
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "i think it is good for full service resturants but i dont belive tipping should be in place for other places because it is not needed because everyone asks for tips and it is not right"
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "I think that each business should pay their employees a living wage so that tipping isn't necessary. Someone may say that the employer can't afford to pay that amount to their employees which I reply then maybe they shouldn't be in business to begin with."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping for service in restaurants or other occupations (hair stylist) where it is customary. I do not like the new trend of tipping people who take my orders at the counter and already make a full hourly wage. I have a love-hate relationship with those tipping buttons at checkout."
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "I tip where it is expected. I would be more generous if I had the money to spare."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "As a former waitress I approve tipping."
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "I'm so sick of it. I feel obligated when thery are standing right in front of me. Laso, the no tax on tips is unfair to everyone else. WShy should tipped workers get a tax benefit?"
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "I have worked for tips and was not comfortable with that. I enjoy tipping someone who is not expecting it."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "Tipping should not be mandatory. Better yet it should be included on the total bill. So that worker won’t also be expecting anything from the costumer. They just have to do their job without expecting. Just as long as they are properly salaried."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "When it comes to tipping, my experience for the good majority of my life is to leave at least 25%, so being your meal is like $10 or so you would want to leave at least $2.50 tip. Now as far as changing the current tipping system this topic is something that I am not well versed on, but at all if anything that I could say is leaving like maybe on the menu for that restaurant leaving a oh like an index so to speak of you know if your meal is x amount of dollars then you need to leave x amount of a tip."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "I support making tipping optional. The law that allows tipped jobs to be paid below minimum wage should be eliminated. Traditionally tipped jobs should be paid a fair wage."
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "i always tip 20%. i think it is a fair system."
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "I don't like the fact that waitstaff in restaurants make so little that the customers need to tip to supplement their income. The business owners should pay a good wage to the employees, and tipping should not be necessary."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "When I was younger, I was awake and was able to support myself with a low hourly rate plus tip car. I think it might be time to go to a higher wage system and take the focus off of tipping. Per Superior service with staff might get a tip"
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "I am a firm believer in tipping, if you are receiving a service from someone, who is bringing you food, or driving you someplace, this is the right thing to do, when you aren't doing it yourself. I wouldn't change anything about the current tipping system"
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "If the service is good, I have no problem with tipping. What I don't like is when some places have you put a tip in before you even have service. If they would pay their staff more, we could eliminate tipping altogether."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "I don't like the whole concept of tipping. I feel that the tip should be automatically added to a bill in order to make the process simpler. The act of tipping is a hassle."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "I think tipping is often confusing and unfair. I would improve it by ensuring fair wages so tipping is optional, not expected."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "I think tipping is important because this really helps the servers. I believe they should only receive the tip if you're satisfied with their service."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "I think the tipping culture has gotten out of hand. I understand waiters and waitresses who have good a job, but now people are asking for tips at grocery stores and gas stations."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "I would pay the severs more hourly but I personally love to tip. I do so even if I have bad service. I reward great service better"
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "In general, if you’re in a restaurant and you have a waitress, I think a tip is gracious, but I don’t particularly like it because sometimes you just don’t wanna give your money to someone that’s waitressing even though it’s hard work because some are most businesses take the tips away from the waitresses the waiters and split it among all of them I don’t think that’s fair if a waitress did her job or waiter with that group of customers, they deserve all of the tip, not the restaurant, taking it and splitting it among the workers or any other employer that does this I generally give the tip if I can to the waitress or waiter, but these days when you eat out anywhere there’s like a mandatory gratitudy starting from $15-$35 this is on top of your restaurant bill. I mean I’m not going to eat to give away $30-$40 to a waiter or waitress five dollars tops for me and given that this waitress of waiter or get five dollars minimum from an eight hour shift they almost made their whole salary or at least a quarter of it and just tips so I don’t feel bad if I don’t give them but a dollar or two. I’m just saying when I go out to eat I’m paying for me."
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "I think tipping is very important when it comes to good service. A fair amount should be chosen, but it should be optional to do so."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "Not a huge fan of it. It seems odd to me that only applies to certain types of business. The employer should just pay going rate based on the type of job."
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "Tipping is appropriate in certain situations. It should not be mandated. It should be a customer decision and not included in total price."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "I wouldn't change the tipping system. It's been working fine for a long time. If I were to seriously consider improving it, I would do away with tipping all together and just have the pay at minimum wage . That gives definite pay for the employee and the tipper doesn't need to feel some way because they can't or won't tip due to bad or good service or bad or good quality."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "I don’t mind tipping if I’m in a restaurant or where someone is making my drink. I don’t believe I should have to tip for picking up an order or if the service is terrible. I would change tipping culture by not making it seem as if tipping HAS to be a requirement."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "I personally do not mind tipping especially when I get an exceptional service. However, I learnt most organizations do not give the workers majority of the tip which is one thing I would really like to change in the tipping system."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "Tipping is fine but the sub minimum wage needs to be abolished. Tips should be a reward for exemplary service not a necessity to survive."
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "As far as the United States, I suggest increasing the minium wage nationally. The majority of employees rely on tips because their payment isn't good enough to satisfy their needs."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "I always tip at least 15% since I know workers in the food service industries are severely underpaid. That said, I wish the hourly wages of food service workers was higher because tipping is a drag and I would prefer not to have to do it."
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "If I get good service I tip. If I don't, then I won't tip. That's all there is."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "Tipping is totally out of control. It should NEVER be expected and should only exist for excellent service."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "I generally tip in full service restaurants and occasionally in fast food restaurants if I receive quick, courteous service.\r\nIn full service restaurants if tip 20% based on the pre -tax amount and 10% in other situations."
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "I think things are to expensive now. Restaurants should pay their servers a real salary so nobody has to tip."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "I think the current tipping system is getting a little out of hand, it feels like everywhere I go or any service I use, I get asked if I would like to tip. I strongly believe that businesses and business owners need to start paying fair wages to their employees. I think if that happens, we could get rid of the tipping system all together."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "I hate that it seems like tipping is now compulsory and expected everywhere. Tipping was meant as a way to appreciate good service, now, if you don't, you get treated differently. I think if we want to make it a must, then include a certain percentage of the price as a tip, and have business owners contribute a fraction as well, not just having the consumer carry the burden ."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "I believe that tipping should be optional and reserved for exceptional service. Employers should pay their staff an amount that does not rely on tips."
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "I have worked food service and generally tip well. they work hard and usually make less than minimum wage"
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "I think it depends on the service that is being provided and whether they qualify to receive a tip."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "My opinion on tipping is that it should be abolished. Prices should be raised slightly to pay employees their wages instead of requiring customers to pay the wages in the form of tips."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "I think that the business owners should pay minimum wage so tipping would not be mandatory. Tipping has become out of control even tipping for self service and going to the register to pay and expect a tip."
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "I have mixed feelings as I want the service person to make a decent wage. However, I feel the employer is responsible for that decent wage because I am barely making enough for myself."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "Employers should pay people a living wage and the customer shouldn't have to tip in order to help servers, hairdressers, etc. survive. But, if an employee truly provides exceptional service, I don't mind rewarding them financially when they've gone out of their way for me. This holds true for people working in all fields, not just the typical ones we are are expected to tip."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "I believe in tipping when there’s a service. Not a tip cup on the counter and you just came in to pick your food up. I do 15% for basics. I will tip 20-35% sometime."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "I think tipping is a great way to show appreciation for great personal service. I think fifteen percent is an appropriate tip of the total service amount."
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping, however, I do not like the idea that it has been made to be a forced rule. But i also understand that the wages are so low that they depend on tips."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "Honestly, tipping feels kind of messy it puts the pressure on customers when it should really be on employers to pay fair wages. If I could change it, I will make sure workers get a solid base pay and tipping would just be a nice extra when service goes above and beyond. That way it’s fair for everyone."
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "I wish tips were built into prices and there was no more tipping. I don't like that it's expanded beyond restaurants and I've started not tipping at other establishments. I tip generously at restaurants."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "I think that tipping is an OK system as is. It encourages good not lazy service. I think mandatory tipping for large parties makes sense. I would not change anything except to stop collecting tax on tips. If anything, establishments should just pay a living wage."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "I like the idea of tipping when you are in a restaurant. If the staff provides good service you can simply add the amount you feel is appropriate on the indicated line of the check. What I really dislike is when you are at a counter ordering coffee or some other item which requires very little skill to provide, and the cashier rings you up at the counter, merely hands over a cup of coffee, and the register indicates a 15, 20. or 25% line for tips. I would eliminate this practice for service which requires very little skill or effort."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "I will tip on performance. I mostly tip 20% but if the waitress performs poorly, I only tip 15%. I do not tip pizza shops because they are not waiting on me."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "I always believed tipping should be based on well customers are being treated by servers. I think the companies they work for should be the ones that pay them what they should be paid."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "I think you should tip at least 15 percent. I do not think tipping is appropriate when there is no personal one on one service"
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "I tip. I tip 20% unless service is exceptionally bad and then I reduce the percentage."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "I believe in tipping as those working in those fields do not make a lot per hour. It does depend on the service. I think we should leave it as is."
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "I believe in tipping mostly in certain circumstances. I believe in tipping for sitting down services at a restaurant and ride share more than two miles. Tipping should reward empathy, kindness, great customer service, and loyalty."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "I tip a flat 20%. It's easier to mathematically work out in my head."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "I think that tipping has become somewhat out of control. I have no issue tipping a minimum of 20 percent for good service, however, I think that tipping expected when you order from a kiosk or walk up to a counter to a cashier, get your own drink and carry your food to a table unreasonable."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "The tipping culture has gotten out of hand. Business owners will refuse to pay a living wage to their employees and instead force the customer to tip them as a means of sustaining them for cheaper wages, while the customer now has to tip for everything."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "The idea of tipping service workers is nice in theory. But in the US, businesses use tipping as an excuse to severely underpay workers. We need living wage laws for service workers, and they need to be enforced."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "Tipping has gotten out of control. The employers should pay a decent wage and tipping should be ended."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "Although tipping seemingly benefits the workers it can actually have the effect of depressing wages because business owners keep wages low in the belief that tips will compensate for the low salary"
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "I almost always tip 20%. Unless the service is excellent, and then I tip 30%. Servers work very hard! I’ve been a server, I lived off of my tips! So I know how hard of a job it is. I think all servers should be able to keep 100% of their tips. They should not have to share."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "I think tipping is okay. However, I don't think service industry workers should make their living solely on tips. Businesses should do more for employees to ensure they are paid fairly, and also to not put so much pressure on employees to make tips, and customers to give it to them."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "I think tipping is good. I think that employeyrs should pay workers more but I think we should keep tipping in place."
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I feel it absolutely is based on the service, food delivered as ordered and that the waitstaff is attentive, not draggy in attitude. \r\nTip for the service, not the food preparation, except that they check it prior to bringing it to the table and is as ordered."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "I think it is fair. I think more people should do it."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "I hold a neural opinion on this. \r\nThis is because the agender for it could vary positively or negatively"
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "I never tip below 15% of the check and routinely will tip higher depending on where I am and how the services and food are. If I could improve tipping I would make it mandatory to ay your employees the normal federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hours PLUS tips. The current wage of $2.13 an hour is ridiculous considering how truly hard the servers work."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "I fully support tipping. I give 20% as a starting point, with more for exceptional service, and less for mediocre or worse service. I know that the wait staff makes much less than the minimum wage, so I want to make up for that. But the tip will be adjusted based on the service, attentiveness, friendliness and professionalism of the server. Improvements should include paying a higher wage, at the very least minimum wage, to allow for customers who do not believe in tipping."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "The tipping culture in the US is out of control. Pressure needs to be placed on businesses and not tips. The current tip system has made me want to top less"
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "Tippin is out of control. Everybody asks for tips these days I tip generously on eating out and in hotel rooms etc. However when someone comes to the house I do not tip."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "Tipping is a great way to incentive the service you have received and help those that are paid lower wages. Tipping should be automatically added with the service and the customer can decide whether or not to accept the added tip. Also, they need to be paid more hourly and not be taxed on tips."
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "tipping is important. if you receive good service, you should tip them to show your appreciation, I don't think i would change the current tipping system"
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "I think that tipping is just one more thing that makes US daily life feel like a giant ripoff. Expectations are creeping higher and into different types of service, as it shifts responsibility to the consumer. It's a commission by a different name and should be discouraged by tax systems, not encouraged."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "I like the current system, you give average service 15%, great service 20%. You can reward above average service so the gives incentive for you server to go above and beyond the usual."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "I approve of tipping but it is getting expensive since inflation has made the cost of going out to eat expensive. I also think the tip should reflect the service provided, not just be a standard rate."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "I am for tipping in many situations. I often give surprise huge tips to hard working food servers."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "I am a believer in tipping for servers who earn less than minimum wage. I think it is s good incentive for the worker to earn more money. I tip based on the service & I tip well for good service. I do not believe in tipping for non service jobs & workers that earn minimum wage or above."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "Given the fact that I used to be server and bartender. I believe Everybody Should leave at least twenty percent tip. Servers Work really really hard to make sure Everybody has a good dining experience. Minimum wage for a server is like two dollars and change. Nobody can live off with that they rely mostly on tips."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "I believe the tipping system in America should not exist. Service industry working should be paid a fair wage and not have to rely on customers to tip."
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "I think a tip should be given for extraordinary service, not just for doing the job. Punching my order into the computer, taking my money, and handing me what I ordered is not extraordinary. Professional offices (Dr., lawyer, Pharmacy) should not receive tips. To fix the system requires changing the system; educating employees and consumers. It would be complicated and long."
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "I feel that tipping should not be necessary. People should be paid a competitive, living wage."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "I think tipping is a good practice. Many service oriented positions receive minimum or lower wages and tipping is away to increase their income. I always try to tip at least 20%. To insure that tips are paid, it might be okay to automatically add a set percentage to the bill."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "I think tipping is a perfectly acceptable action. If the service is outstanding, a larger tip can be given. If the service is lousy, a smaller or no tip is acceptable."
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "I tip based on service. If the service is good I give a generous tip, if not a small tip or none."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "I think that an employee provides good service and is in a wage tipping occupation one should provide a tip. The tip should be a certain percentage of the cost of the bill"
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "I feel like waitresses and other jobs that depend so much on tips shouldn't have to. I feel like these people work them jobs should get paid a minimum wage pay. America should be told this but informed that tipping waitresses helps them and tjey should be split And calculated daily or weekly. They should be able to see which cpl brought in most tips ans they should get more than the others that weeksm"
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "I believe in tipping and I usually tip 20% or more for good service. Most servers don’t make much in salary and depend on tips to make a living. If restaurants & bars would pay a living wage to their employees like they do in most European countries there would not be a need to tip."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "Tipping creates inconsistent income and shifts from responsibility from employers to customers.\r\nA better system would be fair wages included in prices so workers are always guaranteed stable pay."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "I tip according to the service I receive. Tipping is necessary in the service industry because most people get less for an hourly wage and depend on tips to survive. I have worked in that industry in the past."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "I deliver for Uber, Door Dash, Instacart, and Grub Hub. I depend on tips. I feel that in restaurants, they should pay a living wage over at least 15 an hour. If they don't, then 18 percent at least should be added to the bills. Some people do not tip enough or feel they should not have to. I take issue with these people. I personally tip 20 percent. As a 1099 employee, it is different with the gig apps."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "personally i don’t care"
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "My opinion on tipping depends on what the tip is for. If I am receiving a service then I think tipping should be mandatory. If I go to a convenience store to purchase a product and they have a tip jar I will not tip. I would change the system by making tipping mandatory if the service you received was good. You could create a set of standards and if they are fulfilled at an 80% level then tipping should be mandatory for service industries."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "Tipping has gotten completely out of hand. At a restaurant I think tipping is fine. Tip generously if able too. At every single place you buy something, no."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "I think that tipping should be used as an expression of gratitude for extra services or as a reward for going above and beyond. The current tipping system should be discontinued in favor of employer paying employees a living wage, or at least minimum wage. Tipping should be solely at the discretion of the consumer, not an expectation. The current system of requesting a tip on nearly every bill presented to consumers, regardless of the service provided or even when personal services is not provided, now feels like everyone and every store is begging for more money from me."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "I believe the tipping as gone to far. For me it is all about service. It seems everyone wants a tip and not all jobs require a tip. We need to take a step back and reevaluate what we are doing."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "Tipping compensates for owners that do not pay their employees enough. Tipping should only be earned through exemplary service."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "My opinion on tipping I think overall I think the owners that pay their workers should pay the servers as well. tipping to me is a hassle. I feel like the company should be paying the servers minimum wage or more and on top of whatever tips we give them is whatever we give them"
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "I always tip generously - even more so for excellent service - because I know waitstaff are paid poorly. My opinion is that one of the costs of doing business is paying employees a fair wage. The public shouldn't have to tip anyone to compensate for a business's failure to do so."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "I thinknthe employer should be responsible for paying a high enough wagevthat the customer does not have to tip."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "I do not like the tipping concept. It is used for business profit. Individuals should be paid a living wage.\r\nAbolishment = improvement"
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "I think tipping is good, but it has gone too far. Everyone is asking for a tip. That needs to stop."
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "Tipping is part of some purchases. I aim to tip 20% as rule. Sometimes that is too much. I leave something."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "I have vowed to not participate in the current tipping culture in the US. It has gotten out of hand. I will not tip more than 15% for restaurant service and delivery service. I will not tip for self or limited services."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "I usually tip generously as it's a small thing I can do to support others who work hard. I enjoy tipping when not expected such as I did yesterday when the deli younger young man got my order together."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "I do not especially enjoy tipping. It seems that anyone who has to interact with customers in any way is expecting a tip nowadays. I wish companies just paid their employees a decent wage."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "I think it is important to tip in the service industry especially if you are given excellent service. But these workers should get paid at least at minimum wage and not below. Tipping allows them to be able to mae some extra money."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "I would not tip from a Point of Sale machine prompt if I could change anything. I would not tip for service if I have to pick up myself."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "Tipping should be abolished if it could be improved in its current state that would involve in proving the overall management of a restaurant improving employee morale, possibly paying a higher base wage. Raising the base wage and getting rid of tips would greatly improve the livelihood of both customers and patrons."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "I don't mind tipping in traditional situations like full service restaurants, but tipping culture has spread so much that it's uncomfortable now where you're expected to tip just for people doing a regular job. I'd prefer to ban tips and just pay people the fair amount and if means a company has to raise prices then at least we know up front and can make decision"
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "Really not for me to say if you go out you need to tip"
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "I would change the system. I would make it so digital tips are not visible to the employer."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "I tip for good service but I do not like that tipping percentages have increased. People are making 20% the norm when it used to be 15%."
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "i dont like tipping in any places outside of sit down resturants. i think its completely out of control and i refuse to engage in it outside of a proper dinner at a resturant."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "I'm happy to leave a tip commiserate to the service provided. On the other hand, I think people that work in the service industry should make a fair, livable wage. Our current system allows business owners to put the burden of a fair wage onto the customers. This doesn't usually work and the business owners escape providing fair wages."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "My opinion is that tipping should be based on performance only. If service is sub-par, the provider should not be tipped except if there are circumstances out of their control"
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "Igm have no issue with tipping. I would not change the system."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "in my opinion,tipping often feels like an unfair system because it's replaces the responsibilities of paying service worker wages on customers rather than employer.Rewarding good service could help improve."
}
] |
What are your thoughts on Trump’s decision to cut academic funding? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "I think it's ridiculous. Education is literally the foundation for all other professions. Without at least a basic education, our society will fail, and pulling the funding from schools only sets up a future of failure."
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "I don't think it's fair to the kids. But not just the children there's adults that want to further their education"
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "I believe it is determinantal toward the future of the country. Young adults should have avenues for education and cutting funding toward that is a negative long term. Research leads to innovations that can save billions of dollars and lives such as cancer research."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "Trump cutting academic funding is extremely foolish and short-sighted and will only serve to make the lives of the people of this country worse. Everyone deserves a high-quality and SAFE education."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "I believe that there is some justification for a reduction in funding due to the marxist and radical left-leaning politics of American academic institutions. However, I believe also that the cuts indicate a freeze factor on independent thinking."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "I don't know anything about what you're talking about so I don't have thoughts on it I would need to know the details to form an opinion"
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "I'm sure he has his reasons and he will definitely have a solution. Most schools run on funding to do research and give the best education, cutting funding without an alternative solution could bring a slow decline to the quality of education."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "This is one of the worst idiotic policies coming from this idiotic and corrupt administration. Due to cuts to academic funding, academic researchers will leave and benefit America's competitors in science and industry (not to mention non-STEM fields)."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "He's hurting a lot of students who can't normally afford to go to college."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "I think cutting academic funding could harm students and educators by limiting resources for learning and research. It may also reduce opportunities for innovation and weaken the country’s long-term competitiveness. Investing in education is usually more beneficial than reducing it."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "This is the classic tactic of authoritarians / fascists. That's all. But then Trump's support base wants to be the very ones, later, complaining about all the jobless Lay Abouts who are a Drain On The System. (Well, no: that's the *public*-facing sentiment; the reality strikes me as being, the ruling class just wants to force more civilians into undertaking those low-paying jobs, which the rulers *know* are required to keep society running.. ..but, they don't want to compensate us properly for.)"
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "I don't think it is a good idea to cut academic funding. Many people will lose out on opportunities."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "It’s tough for a lot of people I can see as I reserve, but in my opinion, just have to keep pushing forward, even though it may seem for some a long road ahead for success, but at the same time you have to push for as if it never existed and keep being innovative towards approach on achieving their goals"
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "Almost all of Trump's policy decisions are excellent, so I'm sure he has good reasons for cutting funding to some universities. It's most likely due to their nefarious leftist policies and actions of some kind."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "I believe it undermines the future of young americans, as well as the trust in our institutions."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "I feel that Trump cutting academic funding is a strategic move on his part. He prefers Americans to be dumb so he can control them easier."
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "I think this is horrible. A nation's future is based off the future's education. This is proven time and time again, strong economies come from students with strong educations."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "I get that we need to cut back on wasteful spending, but if we cut too much from schools and research, we could hurt innovation and limit chances for young people. It’s better to find a balance save money where we can, but still invest in education and research for the future."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "It's a shame. Funding for almost everything that helps people are now diverted to fund the world's biggest Gestapo police to harass POC citizens"
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "I don't think this is a wise decision. Academic funding is critical for public school students to get set up for success."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "It's an incredibly moronic thing to do. He's just upset that they aren't doing what he, himself, wants. All he's doing is hurting the the future generation from learning."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "I think it's horrible. One of the worst thing a US president can do the youth and our elders in our society. Seems like our own president hates America."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "I don't think this cut is a good idea. Education in America is already not seen as important as it should be and now Trump is making that even worse."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "I think it will be detrimental to progress across the board. Every field will be affected and there will be a dark mark upon the United States institutions when it comes to attracting the best and brightest. People that are doing research will opt to do it overseas where there is funding."
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "Cutting academic funding risks harming research and education. It could limit opportunities for students and slow innovation."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "This administration has been dismantling every good thing in this country from the top down, and this one will hurt our children if this decision is not reversed. This country is already horrendous for access to education and literacy rate, there is zero reason to cut funding, and it's entirely out of control over the public to make them less intelligent and more likely to fall to fascism."
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I think it's terrible and will greatly impact (negatively) research at universities throughout the country, especially medical research."
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "Honestly, cutting academic funding feels pretty short-sighted. It saves some cash now, but it’s gonna hurt our kids and students and slow down progress in the long run."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "No strong feeling on it. Initial belief is education needs an overhaul and cuts may lead to something better instead of mountains of debt for graduates."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "I think it is terrible. I am very upset about how much it is destroying important research."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "Sounds like a bad idea. Trump could cut other things but why academic? We need more educated people in the world."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "It's what he wants, to keep the general population uneducated and to funnel the money to other places so he can fund his tax cuts for the rich."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "If true, I believe this to be very bad. Education is something that we as a society should be investing in. Having less educated individuals will mean that society will be more easily manipulated."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "I think it is ridiculous and just awful. I don't think academic funding should be cut because education is the way out for our children, and we need to help them in school."
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "I think that Trump should not have made the decision to cut academic funding because it is important to maintain the education of all. I think that it was not in good taste for trump to do that."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "I don't think anything good will come of Trump cutting academic funding. The only thing that will happen is our population will continue to fall behind everyone else in other countries when it comes to education."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "I think his decision to cut funding for education is very short sighted and will lead to problems further down the line such as skill gaps and a lack of capable workforce. I hope that our education system will be able to pull through and continue as is despite the setbacks they were already facing with a lack of funding."
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "i think its great..the school boards misuse the funding. The kids dont see most of the funding"
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I think Trump's decision to cut federal funding in general is not a great one. Some cuts may have been ok but to cut funding having to do with critical health research being carried out by universities and to cut gender based funding that go toward initiates to prevent women being killed by men, women's health, etc. is very bad."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "The US government has proven for decades that it can not efficiently and/or effectively administer education-related policy or funding. Government subsidies of education have led to skyrocketing admission costs which are a burden on middle class families. Therefore, I support reasonable funding cuts and education largely being administered on a state and local level."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "I think that it’s a good thing. I think that these universities are indoctrinating students into bad things"
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "I think it is an awful thing to do because students cannot reach their full potential since resources are limited. Additionally, researchers are unable to come up with new findings because they funding is cut, therefore unable to advance the country."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "It's not constitutional if Congress has already appropriated the funds. It's also undercutting valuable research, and if the funding also includes student loans or other forms of academic support, it's counter to our national interests in multiple ways."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "Social mobility is going to be a lot harder. A lot of research is going to be halted, meaning a lot of university research is going to see fewer students, which will impact us in later years. Universities will also begin to cut funding from smaller departments, which will take years to rebuild."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "I think that's a stupid idea. I think Trump just wants to dismantle all of society."
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "I don't agree with the way trump is cutting academic funding as a whole. Certain aspects of his reasoning are sound, yet there's some underlying motive. Everything he does is part of a politicized movemen;"
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "I’m kind of glad that I graduated this year so I won’t be influenced by his decision to cut academic funding, but I feel bad for the other students. I feel bad that families that can’t afford or barely afford to pay for education will probably be negatively affected."
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "Trump is cutting academic funding because academia is focusing on things that don't have anything to do with education, and it has everything to do with equality equity inclusion and other things that could contribute to the detriment of national security and integrity of the country."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "I am not for the cut of academic funding in the US. Our education system has problems, but cutting it will just remove us even more from being a heightened power and we will fall back in the coming generations. Our children are already suffering when it comes to a decent education and all this will do is put us further behind from current generations will which have long term implications."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "I think Trump's decision is like everything else he does, with a lack of understanding or forethought at all. He only does stuff to take away things from his enemies because his fan base loves it."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "It honestly makes me feel a little nervous. I really need the extra income I earn from participating in academic studies to help me with my monthly expenses."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "I think that it is a terrible decisions that will have long term consequences. I think that it seems quite vengeful and doesn't take into account the ROI that academic institutions tend to deliver."
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "Believe this is a horrible idea, from my understanding Trump is cutting funding to Harvard over a simple dispute, any funding cuts for academic purposes is a wrong and bad decision. United States already lacks in education department compared to many other countries, We must increase funding to better our future in America."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "Universities have been making large amount of money while giving people worthless degrees that simply rack up student debt. I'm not too bothered by these cuts. They also get rid of racist DEI programs, which is a sneaky way of saying we want fewer white guys. There may be some good things being cut here but I'm not worried about it."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "The cuts undermine US superiority in research, and contributions that help academics, science, and our economy. And they have disrupted a whole bunch of lives,"
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "It sets back research and scientific developments being preformed at private and public universities. Classes are being lost and job cuts for professors and administrators. Public K-12 education is losing federal funding and future of higher Ed is in question."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "I think in the long run this is not a good decision because now more than ever our youth needs education. Without proper funding for education our youth and future generations will have less tools to be independent and be a strong working force."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "Trump cutting academic funding is unsurprising, as he (or rather, his Project) explicitly said he would do so. However, the fact that he is doing it in such a way like he is a mob boss makes the entire policy questionable."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "I do not like it at all. He has no clue what he's doing. How is the military getting so much funding but we can't even fund education and take care of our own citizens?"
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "I think its very irresponsible knowing the state of education and misinformation in this country I think he's doing this for some kind of moral high ground that does not exist"
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "His cuts on cutting academic funding is horrible and has affected me personally as one of the programs I was in has lost all funding because of it. It will cause a trickle effect and affect various areas such as advancing research for healthcare purposes."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "I think its terrible, we should be investing in future gains not short term gains like limiting schooling for the youth during that critical developing time for them. I think it will harm future generations more than we think because its \"out of sight, out of mind\" type thing thinking about 100 years from now."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "I completely disagree with it, because our students are our nation's future and not having as much funding for education will negatively impact the quality of education they will receive. We could see things like loss of the arts, fewer extracurriculars, fewer teachers, large classroom sizes, etc. If we want a bright future we must put up the money to invest in that, education is the wrong place to make any cuts. We are already lagging behind in education on the global stage."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "I feel angry because I have family that is in college and in need of financial aid packages to go to school. Colleges in general feel like they have low resources, especially public schools, I feel like this makes it worse."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "I think cutting academic funding is never a good Idea. We need to invest in the future of our nation through education. We need to keep education affordable"
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "I think it's wrong that Trump is cutting academic funding. So much of that funding goes to research and it's important."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "Only a stupid man would do something that stupid. Our children are our future and they need education. We're one of the stupidest country in this world. He would like it to keep it this way."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "Trump’s decision to cut academic funding isn't the worst thing. It will make research a bit harder to do, but still manageable."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "I think Trump is trying to force universities into submission. It is difficult to control people if they are able to think and make independent decisions. I think by cutting academic funding, Trump is forcing places of higher education to go along with his wishes in order to maintain a survival level of existence."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I think it is a bad decision. Academics should not have their funds cut they should get more funds."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "I don't think Trump should cut funding, academics do play an important role in education, from teaching to researching different topics, they are already under funded, some important work could get cut due to no funding"
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "I dont like this decision because it cuts academics funding. Which reduces the funds used for academics."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "It's wrong to deny opportunity to those that can't afford college. People, especially those that qualify for further education deserve to have a chance at life where possibly their parents couldn't."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "The implications of this situation are detrimental not only for our current generation of learners but also for future ones. By neglecting our responsibility to lead in the fields of technology and science, we risk falling behind on the global stage. The decisions being made now will have profound and lasting consequences, shaping the educational landscape for years to come."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "It's ridiculous and so harmful to so many. It harms not only students, but the country. Students make up a huge economy. Also, what are we going to do about doctors, etc? So many are foreign, trained here, and stayed. It's really dream-crushing and wrong."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I think it is horrible. Yes our country's budget needs to be looked at and revamped, however education is NEVER where cuts should take place."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I don't support it. I think funding academics is important to the further education and advancement of society. I think it's just a political play since his base is primarily un-educated, and educated people tend to lean liberal."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "It's all part of the conservatives' goals to keep the population ignorant and broke. fuck trump."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "I am very negative about this. It goes against America's founding principles, and serves to make America worse in the long run, just in the name of some so called \"Wokeness\". I think it will cause a brain drain in the near future."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "I am pretty upset about it because it affects my younger siblings and the kids of my friends and family members, as well as my nieces. I think we need a strong education system with qualified teachers to raise intelligent and not ignorant humans. I’m also upset about cutting the student down payment programs."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "Any kind of cutting for academic funding is not a smart idea. America is already behind in public education and we cannot afford to cut funding for it."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "I think it is smart to stop giving taxpayer money to schools that have large endowments. They can reduce admin costs to make up for the loss of funding."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "I think he does not have the experience or the background to know anything about the public school system. He should not be cutting funding."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "I never heard of it but if the institution is being one sided and biased, then the House, Senate and President can choose who receives budgeting and ho does not. It's common with every administration and nothing new."
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "It is very sad that he has cut funding. As someone that works in a nonprofit seeing first hand how the cuts have changed how we operate has been terrible. We not only lost a program but are now unable to help clients."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "I think it is a dangerous and awful act. He is so selfish, reckless, and morally corrupt. This will hurt so many people, and the country itself."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "I do not support Trump's decision to cut academic funding. A lot of students need federal funding into order to receive education and without loans or financial aid, many people are at a disadvantage and cannot afford to go to school."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "He and his political group are trying to instill new generations of mediocrity and idiocy by reducing public funding in places it is necessary for public welfare like academic funding. I think it's idiotic and plays into some nefarious goal they have of controlling knowledge and what we can do to stop them."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "I support Trump's decision. Schools are failing on their promise and are more focused on pushing their liberal ideals versus educating."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "Yet another dumbass decision. He's literally only going to make decisions that make him and his \"friends\" richer and we'll all suffer the consequences. Academics have been struggling since Covid and this is only going to make it worse."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "I don't think it was a well thought-out decision. But I'm not well versed in political decisions. Who knows maybe it will change education for the better?"
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "I'm all for it. Most universities are vastly overfunded and sitting on huge endowments they won't spend."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "As with everything he does, this decision does not come from a place of intelligence. He is cutting the funding because concepts being taught at colleges and universities are too hard for him to comprehend."
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "I thik it is the right thing to do.Why should tax payers pay for people to go to school?PEOPLE GRADUATE FROM HARVARD WITH TERRIBLE GRADES,WHAT A WASTE OF MONEY."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "It’s doesn’t bother me. I had to pay for my education."
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "I think it is disgusting like everything Trump does There is no reason for it"
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "What is important to know is what is being cut precisely! Academic funding is vague and needs precision. And each university has different layers. So this is a case by case basis and it is really important to know exactly what is being cut. If he is cutting the teachers that teach math that is really bad."
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "I think our president has no problem adding more money to anything war related but when it comes to education he cuts spending. I think its one of the worse moves any president has ever made."
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "We need to cut funding on many things to reign in spending. Academia needs a major overhaul anyway."
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "That is the wrong decisions and it is illegal. The funding is useful"
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "The decision to cut academic funding is a politically motivated one, designed to hurt people that the administration dislikes, from experts, researchers, and scientists to poor, minority, and female students. Cutting funding for academics at every level will hurt our communities and America as a whole for decades. It will impair our ability to build and grow and take care of our citizens, and leave us vulnerable to outside attack."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "I am not very happy with it because I believe that means that my student loans will be due. I have a save plan but I don’t think that’s safe either."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "I think education is one of the LAST places that should ever be cut. But they don’t want people educated. And it only takes a generation to start or end something."
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "Its his choices. He is the big leader"
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "I think it is a bad decision. teachers are already underpaid and stretched to their limit, and cutting funding means schools will need to make cuts which will impact students education which in turn will impact the workforce."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "I don't agree with Trump's decision to cut funding for education. Schools were expecting this money. In fact, Congress already put it in the budget."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "Irresponsible act by an egocentric wanna be dictator"
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "These academic funding cuts are super devastating. They will affect the education system and further decimate our children's future education."
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "I am still in disbelief that this happend, I feel that this will hurt our standing in the world and we be one of the ignorant nation in the world."
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "I don't agree with this decision to cur academic funding given that the academic setting has already been declining in quality for the past few years given the ordeal with COVID. Additionally, academia in higher education is where much valuable research and funding goes to support students, their endeavors, and future innovation."
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "Cutting academic funding risks shrinking opportunities for students and slowing research that drives innovation and economic growth. Instead of solving budget issues, it undermines education—the very thing that equips future workers and strengthens the country long term."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "Trump once said he “the poorly educated”. His MAGA movement counts on a mass of voters that lack critical thinking skills. What better way to stifle these skills than buy cutting funds for education."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "I think that it is a misguided mistake that will have long ranging impacts on our country over the next several decades. Many may not understand the research taking place or agree that it will eventually be useful, but you never know how discoveries and collaboration between different fields may result in wonderful things that benefit society in enormous ways."
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "Im not sure, I think in a way its a good idea because some of these schools get so much money as is and yet still charge upwards of 50k a year. But at the same time it might affect the quality of education in universities."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "I don’t think it’s a smart decision. I believe that Donald Trump wants to make citizens the less academically intelligent, which means that they would never get out of their situation if they live in poverty, keeping the rich rich."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "I think he's being the dictator her thinks we need. He's not making America great again."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "I think it depends on what he’s cutting. If its frivolous spending then I don’t care."
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "it's a horrible idea. We should not be cutting funding for this"
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "Not only does it violate free speech but inhibits learning and expanding ideas. Academic funding is vital to our country's health and future. Without it, how can we equip talented people to develop ideas and products that will benefit all?"
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "It's sad. He wants everybody in the US to think and do like he does."
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "I believe it is a necessary step for Trump to cut academic funding to stop incentivizing schools to push liberal ideologies. Schools are focused more on pushing these ideals than providing affordable and useful educations."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "Im neutral on the situation. The president feel like it’s the right move while it may not be, but sometimes we have to shift plans cause that’s life and nothings guaranteed"
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "Initially, its not a great idea. But considering these universities that are getting federal funding seem to be ignoring the needs of their Jewish students and engaging in DEI teaching and hiring, maybe it was time for the federal government to take action and make sure Jewish students needs are met, and hiring is based on merit, not on appearance. So I reluctantly agree with the decision."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "I think that Trump's cutting academic funding has been blown out of proportion there's a variation of the same amount within normality of grants given compared to usual. He is targeted specific institutions for specific reasons but overall I don't find the academic cuts to be as large or accurate as is portrayed once we actually look at the statistics. There is not even 10,000 out of about 400,000 I believe or so grants cut."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "I have strong beliefs that academic funding is essential and supports equal opportunities for all people. I am not happy that Trump wishes to cut funding to education, research and studies that are focused on the betterment of all Americans."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "I think that is one of his many poor decisions. Trump is spending money on deportations, conflicts overseas, and cutting funding for academics is what he feels he can save with. He is also giving the largest tax cut to the rich in history."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "To me it shows that he does not care about the underserved community. They rely on funding for quality education and it wouldn't affect his family in any way. It essential for some people to have that funding in order to succeed."
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "I do not agree with this decision. I think smaller towns struggle enough to fund their schools, especially with troubled or special needs students. This has been a concern to many teachers I know personally."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "This is one of the worse decisions to make from our leader. Funds should be added to education."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "Academic funding is critical. Trump is using it to promote his values. It is important that schools are not beholden to to the federal government. Academic funding goes to important research on many subjects."
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "I believe that he is doing the right thing and moving the country in a positive direction"
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "We should not be funding universities that indoctrinate their students or allow violent protests against a certain race. Harvard has an enormous amount of money already. They do not need public assistance. I approve"
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "I do not approve. It seems anti-education."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "I approve of President Trump's decision to cut academic funding because of anti-semitism. These institutions should receive no funds whatsoever."
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "I am strongly against such a decision. Academic funding is one of the areas we should be putting more money into, not less. The gains down the line both technological and innovative are greater than the costs that we spend today on such investments."
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "Absolutely terrible decision. Investment into education leads to huge ROI"
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "I think this is not the best move when it comes to reallocating resources. I think education is important especially in a world where a lot of people do not know how to decipher all the information coming at them through their phones. Kids have access to a lot of information really early in life, and should have the same access to a good education."
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "I think it's a bad mistake, and it will make people less likely to go to school. It will have to make people dumb."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "I think it is a terrible decision and I deeply disagree with it. I think it is a complete overreaction to some unfortunate woke sensibilities on some universities. However, now it is seriously undercutting university's needs for scholarships and research funding."
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "I think our President's decision to cut academic funding is hurtful to the students who want to further their education. This decision will hurt people who can't afford to pay for a college education."
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "to cut funding and stop reasearch of programs that can help so many americans is a crime. his false narrative should be called out"
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "I think it is long overdue. Private colleges for one should live off of their own fat endowments which should be taxed. Public schools are over funded and under performing."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "I strongly support it ."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "I don't like it, funding for academics is key to make our country great. Without it, our workforce becomes less skilled."
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "I think it makes sense. As far as the department of education, we have been putting a lot of money into something that doesn’t seem to be doing any good. As far as cutting funding to colleges, we shouldn’t be funding private colleges."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "I don't like it. Teachers are underpaid."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "I don't necessarily approve of the cuts, but it's better than making cuts in other areas such as healthcare. Education is important , but there is already a lot of money poured into academics and our kids are not being properly educated."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "His priorities make no sense to me. If his mantra is to \"make America Great Again,\" I have no idea why he would want to cripple one of the greatest engines of American power and ingenuity (higher ed). It's almost as if his priorities are not what he says they are."
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "I think with the way schools and Universities have been run in the very recent past, his decision is a prudent one. I know his intent is to get them to \"get with the program\" or lose funding. Trump wants everyone to get an effective education that has nothing to do with sexual orientation or gender. He just wants everyone stop pushing child gender transitioning and focus on a solid education!!"
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "In order to solve the problems we will face as a nation, we need an educated workforce . Colleges and Universities need to be able to offer curriculum that will lead to this workforce. It is not wise to cut academic funding and expect to have the workforce we need in our country."
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "I think it's the wrong thing to do.He only cares about himself and his rich friends."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "This motherfucker better stop fucking with education or else he's going to have a country full of dumbfucks and for the next hundred years \"Trump\" will be the new word for stupid. I can't believe he got elected."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "I think it’s not fair we need to invest in our kids because they are the future. He need to be more consious"
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "I think funding our future generations is very important. I believe this will have a negative impact."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "It is the wrong decision for all the wrong reasons. We need an educated populace but that is against Trump's plan. He is also using the issue of anti-semitism as an excuse, which makes anti-semitism worse"
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "I do not support Trump's decision to cut academic funding. This directive not only affects education, but also funding for important research projects. It also added to unemployement because the education workforce had to be trimmed down as a result of Trump's directive."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "I think he is doing right on focusing on the core root of the problem. Because most people go to school to enjoy themselves too much instead on focusing on the career path they wanted to take."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "I think it is a bad idea. The current system is not perfect but the children need to be educated"
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "I don’t think cutting academic funding is a smart decision. We already have a generation of people who aren’t motivated to further their education, and this just adds to it."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "I think he is making a huge mistake. Our children should be our first priority."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "I find it deeply disturbing—cuts to education are draconian, with clear intentions to reduce the knowledge needed to counter propaganda. Historically, fascist regimes have made cutting education a priority."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "I think it's a foolish decision that will negatively impact many researchers, students, and university employees. And it's ridiculous and tragic that these efforts to cut funding are punishing universities that were simply encouraging diversity, equity and inclusion, and trying to create a more fair and just society."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "It's bullshit and the courts seem to agree. Trump is anti-education because only stupid people support him."
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "I think it is misguided. This will set America back in many areas of research and knowledge, and will let our rivals take the lead."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "It is outrageous. Trump's support of this shows that he is aware of his primary voters: the uneducated working class. He prioritizes things only he cares about, while people lose jobs from this cut."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "I don’t see the benefit In it. I think schools actually need more funding to help out students and teachers. This is one area he should not cut funds in"
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "This will make it hard for some deserving students to access quality education and can potentially lead to mass layoffs. I feel there will b blacklash"
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "Im not a fan of it. Academic funding I think is important to a countries future success. With out it important programs could be cut and furture generations would pay the cost."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "I think that is just one of the many stupidest things he has done. He wants people dumb."
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "Part of me thinks that the government needs the freedom to fund research based on some somewhat subjective criteria. Ultimately, you want to fund research that generates \"good stuff\". So I think it is important that universities understand that grants from NIH or DOD or whoever aren't entitlements - you have to actually work for them.\r\n\r\nHaving said that, I think that Trump's use of these grants as a club to compel the universities to bend a knee to him is completely inappropriate. Ditto for using these grants to compel the universities to abandon DEI initiatives. That kind of thing should be backed by congressional action, not just the whim of the president. So if Congress passed some laws saying you can't do DEI, then withholding grants to universities that didn't comply would be fine. (Not necessarily fine as a moral issue, but fine as a legal issue.)"
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "I think it's a good idea for the wealthier universities. It is not fair that some kids get to attend the best schools because their parents are wealthy. I think all kids should have the same choices."
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "I am not necessarily a fan of him doing that. I think that students should learn all they can that has went into the foundation of this nation, both good and bad."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "It might be a good idea to some because it seems like there are more and more people that come from outside of our country to go to college. Then, of those, some end up sending the money they earn back to their home country."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "I do not like it. There are so many other things he should cut funding on and academics is not one of them."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ACADEMIC FUNDING BEING CUT. A LOT OF HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTIONS HAVE LOST THE PLOT AND DON'T SEEM TO CONCENTRATE THAT MUCH ON LEARNING."
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "I agree with it. If you want to go to college you should pay. Enough of the handouts"
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "I believe there have been many instances when illegal immigrants have access to financial aid so Trump is trying to combat that. I agree with these education cuts."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "I'm not surprised, that man is an idiot. I'm sure it's a terrible idea if he's doing it."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "It's deeply concerning that Trump feels like cutting such funding is okay. Maybe to him, it is. But it disproportionately affects alot of students, especially ones with special needs who NEED that extra help and patience in the educational environment."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "I think it's just one more thing he's done to appeal to the ignorant MAGA followers he cultivates. They have no respect or experience with post-high school education or critical thinking and are suspicious of those who have. Trump pretends to support their stupidity, knowing he'll retain their support, but unfortunately that is going to hurt good students and promising research."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "Trumps cuts to academic funding are shortsighted and wrong for the success of the next generation and the country. Education needs to be more of a priority in this country."
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "Totally disagree,its a decisiont hat will have rippling effects toward todays youth that want to achive mark in higher education. It will make the American educationsystem continue to fall behind other countries."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "Universities have more than enough money without taxpayer funding. They need to compete on their own value to the market."
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "If they are not following his leadership as the president, they should have cuts. Especially if they are funded by people who are mandating unnecessary aspect to peoples lives."
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "I think Trump has made a poor decision to cut academic funding. I think several issues in this country are founded from poor education. If anything, he should have INCREASED the budget to provide better opportunities for our children."
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "I'm absolutely against anything Trump does."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "I think it was a great idea. People should be responsible for academic funding they borrewed. Nothing is free. Life lessons!"
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "Education is so important because we are preparing the future generation. There should be no cuts but rather extra money set aside for education."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "I really wasn’t aware of academic funding cuts. I would have to look into this personally."
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "It seems like a bad idea. the money saved isn't worth less money going to education."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "I wasn't aware that he was cutting funding. I would have to see where the funding was coming from and going to in order to form an opinion"
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "This is a bad idea because our kids are our future and we all need to learn everyday. Him cutting back is not doing nothing but putting us back into slavery. They don’t want us to learn. They want us to be puppets and do what they say and believe what they say. This is not a good look."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "It is a very important issue for me. The POTUS is mistaken in cutting academic funding."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "It's ridiculous he wants to cut funding in all the wrong places."
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "Terrible, it actually makes no sense. The US benefits greatly from having the most desirable colleges in the world, so why would anyone change that?"
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "I do not like it because it is neccesary funding that goes towards important research. I think it's unfair that he is able to use his power against people who do not have the same views as him."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "I don't think it's a good decision because academic funding helps researchers with money for new projects. New scientific endeavors will be put on hold if funding is cut; peer reviews are very important and require funding for the studies to be conducted."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "The policy will lower the quality of education, and students will suffer the most because of teacher dissatisfaction and financial problems for schools."
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "I think it's a ridiculous decision. Uneduated people are easier to control and manipulate so I'm not surprised."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "Trump’s funding cuts hurt students and research, seen as political. A judge ruled some cuts illegal, protecting academic freedom."
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "I feel that this is necessary to get control over the wasted money that is being spent in the academic world. This decision is long overdue and given the circumstances of the economy, it is something that needs to be done."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "He does what’s best for America, I support him 100%"
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "Terrible idea like most of the other ideas he has. Cutting education funding is the last thing we need to be doing. We need to be slightly increasing it while optimizing where the money goes."
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "I think it is a stupid decision. Cutting funding for schools where children go to learn doesn't seem like the best course of action."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "He wants people to be dumber because dumb people support him. He's ruining the country."
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "I think that it’s a really hard topic because everyone wants to put funding in education but a standards have been falling for a wile and something clearly needs to change."
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "Sad, destructive, counterintuitive. Like virtually everything else that Trump is cutting or cancelling or changing. this policy is arbitrary, ungrounded and will do more harm than good.."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "I had pell grants to go to college and couldn't have gone without them. Some of the research grants are quite foolish and I have no problem seeing them cut. Government spending has got out of hand."
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "I do not support his decision. I think there are other areas where he could of cut funds. Education should be a high priority of the US."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "To cut academic funding Trump would shoe that he wants the United States citizens to lack knowledge and there by failing in all that it has accomplish and can accomplish."
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "I think it is crazy. I think it is unfair. I think that many people will die because of the cut to funding on medical research being done at these universities."
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "I am very concerned about the cut to academic funding. Education is the cornerstone to the future, and I feel that it is already struggling."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "Well, cutting money that goes to the department of education is not good. The resources help people across the states in many different types of demographics. Everyone has probably benefited from the department of education at one point in their life. I can understand the need for an audit of the department but just cutting stuff without having an alternative structure in place makes no sense."
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "I think that it is blindingly short sighted, petty, and frankly, idiotic. It will decay the future of countless people in our country and will negatively affect the development of many young people across several domains (language and skill (maths, musical, sports, etc.) acquisition will be negatively affected; coping skills [like the kind learned thanks to disability services and or life skills classes] will not be gained). The frequency of social interaction will be lessened and there are going to be some children, adolescents, and young adults that rely on discounted lunches or meal programs (i.e. at colleges) that will end up going hungry."
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "I think the decision overall was controversial but I understood overall why it happened. I think it was a violation of 1st amendment free speech."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "I think it wrong in some aspect, some people go to college for years pass the requirement and still never receive a degree. Then there are those that go to college and receive a degree, so it a can't win situation."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "I think Trump's decision to cut academic funding is politically motivated, but also not completely unjustified. I believe that the school-government relationship has gotten a bit out of hand, and with how expensive school is, they shouldn't need government funding to get by."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "I'm absolutely disgusted by these moves on his part, and by the abject failure of our judicial system to reign him in. He's aggressively engaging in an unwonted, unwanted, and unwarranted culture war between the ignorant fuckheads who elected him and the cultural elite who have our flaws but generally pursue justice and understanding, and it's inexcusable that Congress hasn't already removed him from office for this. History (posterity) is going to judge all of this."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "I think that is a terrible idea. I don't know much about it, but we need to invest in our children. They are our future."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "It's horrible, since all it does is steal resources from children's educations. It is unfair for the students and teachers."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "I think its motivated mostly by revenge politics. He is using a cultural backlash against left wing social attitudes to try to remove universities from their position of power and replace it with people inclined to agree with him. Universities needed reform but this is a very foolish decision that will backfire on us in the long term."
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "Not very positive. Children will be the ones running the world at one point, and they need proper education. That will be harder with reduced funding."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "I think this is going to hurt me. This is going to hurt America too"
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "I think he should have left funding as it was. It is not the President's job to make changes to academic funding."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "I do not agree with it at all. I think its terrible. He can spend $200 million to fund a new ballroom, but not education."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "This is not fair . Trump decision is very not fair for the people. Academic funding is very important for all the students"
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "He doesn't care about people. I prefers people to be uneducated"
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "I'm for it, especially if it will stop funding worthless degrees. Let's get back to funding important things, not gender studies"
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "It is bad for the country. We should value education and research if we want to excel in the world."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "I don't understand what exactly he's cutting but I would think our education is a priority when it comes to where funds are being allocated. I would like to learn more about what exactly is being affected"
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "I don't agree with his decision to cut academic funding because this is not a smart idea. We need to fund people more in terms of education because education institutions cost a lot of money, so it really needs to be funded, a lot of people need to go to school."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "That doesn't sound good. Education is super important and has enough struggles without funding issues added to it."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "I believe that it is a blatabtly obvious attack on the lower and middle classes. It is an attempt to take advantage of tax payer dollars to further his own agenda, rather than serve the interests of the people."
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "I think it’s an absolutely abhorrent thing for him to do. It’s clear that he’s threatened by educated individuals and his cuts to academic funding is proof of that."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "I think Trump is hurting the future generations. The learning experience that each student receives will be hindered. The schools will have to make cuts due to lack of funding. This will appear in the schools inability to purchase newer technology in order to enhance learning. The school will have to make due with the material they currently have which means missing out on updated material. Schools will have to probably freeze the teachers pay which may mean teachers leaving the academic field altogether. Any repairs to the school itself will have to wait. These are only some of the issues I see for now I am sure more issues will arise. Enrollment may also go down if the school is not able to provide an adequate education because of the cut."
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "I think that Trump's decision on cutting academic funding is a great move. The US has been experiencing an economic uncertainty - with all of he overspending on foreign aid, government benefit programs, and excess funds for low quality research and academics; it's about time we stop pouring our tax dollars into initiatives that don't help."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "I think it is ridiculous. He is acting like a toddler and should not be involved with this at all."
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "i hate it"
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "I really wish he would do the opposite. Biden promised to forgive student loans and never did. It would be great if Trump made it happen. But he’s doing the opposite."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "I think it's a huge mistake. Education is important to our country's future. I realize Trump wants people who uneducated because they'll believe he tells them without question."
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "I believe academic funding should be increased. A lot of inner city youth toss out the idea of eduction. I feel having more young people involved in academics would lower crime rates"
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "I think this is a dangerous decision and undermines our children's rights to a high quality education. It will compromise essential medical and scientific research."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "Generally, I think it's negative. Particularly when it comes to funding going toward women's healthcare research at universities which is already inadequate as it is."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "I find this to be highly disappointing. There was already a severe lack of funding to education and academics but to cut it even more is honestly crazy."
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "he has made a monumental mistake, he is taking undue revenge and his idiotic ideals are blatamt"
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "I think it’s a terrible idea. People need to be more educated, not less. I’m sure he thinks that the less educated people are, the easier they are to control and brainwash. I am furious about his decisions."
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "I definitely don't understand what he is trying to accomplish here. We may as well roll over and learn Mandarin if we lose our intellectuals and people who can actually accomplish things."
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "I feel like him and his supporters just want to dumb Americans down and keep people stuck. Education whether formal or informal is so important to our growth. If we cut academic funding now what is next--shutting down libraries, museums, or other places that house knowledge. I believe this will be tragic and unless we fight for what we believe in nothing is going to change."
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "I think that Donald Trump is literally enacting the authoritarian playbook. Suppressing the educated/intellectual class is always high on the list for an authoritarian. I think it's abhorrent."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "In not in favor of it. It seems to be overuse of power."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "I feel that it is important. I agree with trumps plan."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "I feel like cutting the progress and furthering of education is a horrible decision. Education should not be subject to the whims of the president."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "I think there is more context to this statement. This had a negative connotation."
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "It's PRESIDENT Trump. I agree with some of his decisions but I am not convinced this is the right direction."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "Depends on whst They already get huge government boosts as the government effectively cosigns every loan"
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "I think this is a short sighted idea. Education is vital to the success of any country. An educated populace is essential for a to grow and thrive. Cutting funding is only going to benefit the country in the short term. Long"
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "It is a bad move towards our education sector. This will soon deny a lot of bright students from poor economic background"
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "I think he's scared of people who are smarter than him. He has absolutely no clue what he is doing. Stupid stupid man."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "I think some of it is good because we need to reduce spending. I think schools charge a lot of money and rely on too much government spending."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "I think that he is trying to limit the intelligence of the American people. He is making cuts to many vital programs that our people need. I think that its a power play to make himself look smarter, but its an entirely idiotic thing to do."
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "I do not agree with Trump's decision to cut academic funding. Children are the longterm investment as the future of our nation. They deserve all of the best resources and access to allow them to succeed."
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "I am not familiar with Trump's decision on academic funding. But, in general, I feel like I wouldn't approve that action. It doesn't sound good. However, I would need the details of the cuts and the reason(s) why he cut academic funding."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "I understand the need to incentivize high education to follow the rules and regulations. I also understand the need to restrict the department of education as its overreach isn’t helping childhood education as we have seen a big decline in aptitude"
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "I think it is incredibly short sighted. The covid pandemic has seemingly done great damage to a cohort of future members of society, and cutting academic funding further hamstrings development by sapping research and teaching resources"
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "I think this has to stop. He is not making America great again. He is making things worse."
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I think that this decision is careless and have seen the impacts first hand on what this kind of decision can do to academics, particularly in the scientific research community. I also believe that President Trump and the people surrounding him are not connected or knowledgeable about this subject at all, leading to this harmful decision."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "I find it very troubling that Trump has made a decision to cut academic funding. There are several universities who depend on academic funding to continue doing there research. It also affect the workforce negatively as job cuts will probably happen."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "I have no issues with it and I don't think we'll see any negative impact. I personally think the funding cuts are going to be beneficial."
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "I am not very familiar with this decision but I do feel some academic funding should be cut. Medical research and other kinds of important research should still be funded, but research that is not important should have their funding cut so the money can be better spent on other things."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "I agree with his decision to cut academic funding. I believe he is choosing to cut funding to useless studies."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "I support it. The cost of education has been vastly inflated due to a constant inflow of funding from multiple sources as well as cheap loans. The value a student gets from college education has greatly diminished, while the cost has far outpaced inflation for no viable reason. Yet, these universities still have massive endowments. Our taxes do not need to keep going to fund universities that already charge too much for low return and take loads of public money as it is."
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "I don't feel academic funding should be cut. Education is an important issue and it is important that those wanting to further theirs has the funding that could make that possible."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "I think cuts were needed to be made since our country is running a $0 trillion dollar deficit. The academics are getting too much federal money as it is. Finally, a cut is considered a decrease in the rate of increase in spending so are we really cutting this at all? But yes I approve."
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "I am staunchly opposed to all cuts proposed by the Trump administration. Not only education funding, but in general the trajectory of the administration is wrong. We do not need to make these cuts and in fact we should at least triple the budget for this area."
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "I don't agree with this at all. I think this will hurt so many people and companies in the long run."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "I support it completely. There is administrative bloat, liberal indoctrination and many universities are not the foundations of discourse they used to be. They are factories to produce sheep and not critical thinkers."
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "I don't find it surprising in the slightest. I think Trump and the MAGA conservatives have chosen anti-intellectual policies time and time again. It is disappointing for a first world country to not nurture learning."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "I am okay with it since we have been throwing money after the problem and our kids are dumber than before. I don't think money is the answer I think going to back the cirriculum that was working back in the 50's."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "I think he was right in doing so because the funds were not going to education but to politics and indocrimation, and they were allowing protestors to disrupt everyone else's college experience and turning a blind eye to violence."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "A terrible mistake given that the US is already behind many countries in educational excellence"
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "I think the nation is taxed too high so this will ultimately bring taxes down. I think we provide to many benefits to those who are unwillingly to work so buy cutting academic funding it will force those who cannot provide for themselves to step up."
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "he is awful and only wants a dumb populace. they are the only people that would vote for him."
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "Honestly, I try to keep up with the news as much as possible, but I can't keep up with everything, minute by minute. Trump, doing something stupid, comes as no surprise to me, and cutting academic funding is something he would probably do. Two more years of this idiot and we'll be done with him, I think........"
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "I had not heard that trump cut academic funding. I will have to look into this in order to comment on it. My first response is to want to know which type of academic funding was cut and what are the expected effects of this before I make any type of opinion."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "I have a negative opinion about Trump's decision to cut academic funding. Education is extremely important and withholding from it is incredibly detrimental"
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "My thoughts on Trump’s decision to cut academic funding are that I feel like as though we need to cut spending as a country. I think often times we don’t realize that they don’t comply with what the government is looking to implement or the administration doesn’t support what the institutions are doing."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "We have no choice; the country is 37 trillion in the hole."
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "As per his character, I believe his decision is based in jealousy. It also is a part of an overall effort to attain ultimate authority and must first destroy democracy from the inside."
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "I am unaware of any plans for the Federal Government to cut \"academic funding\". I am aware of initiatives to dissolve the DoE but no knowledge of cuts."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "I think that this is a sensitive area to cut funding for. I do not like the fact that it may negatively affect our future generations."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "At this point in the actions of this administration I am opposed to every single thing proposed and implemented. The threat level to democracy in the U.S., to individuals/families, and global affects, leads me to reject everything."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "I feel that it is irresponsible. Leaving educational funding in limbo could be devastating."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "I don't like his decision at all. I think it will be very detrimental to America in the long run"
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "t should be done because of the hateful and unamerican things these colleges are teaching. They have been looting the taxpayer's money for too long."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "I think Trump's decision to cut academic funding is wrong because this is something that should be debated through Congress. Maybe we are allotting too much to academia, but what is it going for? It could be going for irreplaceable research."
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "Academics are an incredibly high indicator of a country's future success. Sure, that has to be more oversight to spending, but funding shouldn't be cut. I think it's horrible."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "I disagree with it. Cutting academic funnding is bad because academics are both the future of a single nation and the future of humanity progressing us further than ever before."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "I think that really sets school districts back a little. There is a lot of money needed for these schools"
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "I believe Trump does not make best decisions for the country but only think about himself. His decisions benefits him. It doesn't benefit us overall."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "Not exactly sure what academic funding you are talking about. If it pertains to universities that refuse to follow federal laws then I am all for it. Why should my tax money I pay go to support universities that give out worthless degrees that are in no way going to get that person a job when they graduate. I would rather my tax money go to trade schools."
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "I believe that the decision is going to stumble future generations. Trump doesn't know how to prioirtize funding"
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "Terrible and dangerous actions. Will set us back decades for my lifetime."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "I feel it's punitive and ridiculous. We should be educating more people with better quality education specifically relating to mental health, compassion and coping skills."
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "I think Trump’s decision to cut academic funding is not smart at all. Education is very important and cutting funding can effect the way students learn and the resources that are provided to each student."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "As long as the funding was not previously promised, then it is okay. However, if funding was promised, then it should not be allowed to be stopped."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "I think it is idiotic. Apparently he is incapable of realizing the value of a quality education."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "I think mostly he needs to stay out of the business of what academic institutions do. I disagree with his rationale to punish \"wokeness\" by cutting their funding. I hate to be mean but the only thing that man knows about academic institutions is that you can buy your way into \"gentlemans' C's\" at some of them."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "I believe that some of the universities are making it fine on donations by alumni. Funding should only go for research and to universities that are not using it for dei purposes."
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "Education is very important however, if the money wasn't being used in the proper way, then maybe it was best to cut the funding."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "I think Trump's decision to cut academic funding is ridiculous. Why would you cut funding for something that is the root of income?"
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "I think there are too many people taking advantage of government funding in educational resources that are not enrolling in schools and keeping the money in some areas"
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "I do not think the federal government should fund any universities, public or private, unless it is a national university. Funding should come from the states and private institution endowments."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "I think cutting spending is fine, and I'm sure a lot of what was going into academics was actually wasteful. It's too early to tell if he cut essential funds though."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "I think it's a ridiculous what he's doing. He's cutting funding to stuff the pockets of him and his billionaire friends."
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "I agree with his decision because too much money is being wasted in higher education. Money is being wasted on research that makes absolutely no sense."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "I don't think its the right decision."
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "I think it is a bad decision. Academics need more not less funding."
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "I, think it’s very sad that he would something like that. It shows he doesn’t care about the young people that will be affected by his bad decision."
},
{
"index": 318,
"comment": "Trump’s cuts to academic funding are short-sighted and damaging, putting vital research, jobs, and America’s global leadership in science at risk, intead of saving money, they undermine innovation and have already been judged unlawful by the courts showing how reckless the decision is"
},
{
"index": 319,
"comment": "I think that makes it more difficult for Americans to get a high quality education. We live in a global word, and a lot of countries are more advanced in their education system. Americans are behind."
},
{
"index": 320,
"comment": "It makes me feel a bit angry. Academic funding is so important to making our education system better. Trump should cut funds somewhere else in my opinion."
},
{
"index": 321,
"comment": "I have significant concerns about the decision to cut academic funding. While fiscal responsibility is important, slashing budgets for research and education is short sighted"
},
{
"index": 322,
"comment": "Universities betrayed their core duties to prepare students for a successful life, to give them a stable and balanced understanding of the world, and to foster innovation instead of indoctrination. 90% of the hate and bigotry in society is now driven directly by social revolutionaries in the academic world who actively teach students to reject fair-mindedness and personal responsibility; to judge everyone only by who they are instead of what they do; to replace morality with self-worship while glorifying crime and ter*orism; and infecting the objective sciences with a deluded form of sociology that makes modern university graduates destructive to any company or government that hires them. Universities and their students are by far the most undeservedly hyper-privileged people on Earth, sitting on billions in endowments they did little to earn while demanding funding from the same working people they teach their students to hate; and it is the universities, not Trump, who constantly silence and threaten their political enemies, while Trump justly prevents the theft of our taxes by privileged academic aristocrats who think they can steal money from the working class with no one's consent while giving the country nothing but poison and propaganda in return."
},
{
"index": 323,
"comment": "I dontike it I think it's a stupid idea and I don't think anything f shit be cut from any academic funding, there are so many. Other places where government and taxpayer money are being wasted and they should take it from they're"
}
] |
What is your opinion on the rapid update cycle of electronic products, especially smartphones? Please answer briefly in 2–3 sentences.
|
[
{
"index": 0,
"comment": "The rapid updates cycle electronic products especially smartphones, can be both exciting and frustrating. On the other hand, it brings innovative features and improved perfomance frequently. On the other hand, it van make devices feel outdated quickly and put pressure on consumers to upgrade constantly,"
},
{
"index": 1,
"comment": "I think that the rapid update cycle will ultimately do more harm than good. Manufacturers are more so focused on rushing to get new products out, as opposed to perfecting existing products. Ultimately, we the consumers will get the short end of the stick."
},
{
"index": 2,
"comment": "The prices are young up.resources are not the same. Terrifs complicates shipping and production."
},
{
"index": 3,
"comment": "I think this will begin to slow down, although it is almost expected for a new flagship lineup to be produced year over year, we're greatly catching up to the bleeding edge of technology to where there is very little that can be changed and upgraded to a noticeable difference in quality between previous generations of lineups."
},
{
"index": 4,
"comment": "I think companies purposely force consumers to buy new models. When I was a kid, our family computer lasted nearly 15 years before they stopped pushing updates to it. Now my smartphones are no longer viable within 5 years. I have even had situations where I do a 2 year payment plan, and then once the plan is over, my phone stops charging or working and I have to buy a new one. Additionally, companies change the charger type with new models leading people to have to buy more accessories."
},
{
"index": 5,
"comment": "Sometimes I feel they are too quick but at the same time I feel they are necessary as for security and higher services"
},
{
"index": 6,
"comment": "I understand from a marketing standpoint of the release and updates of smartphones every 1-2 years, but I feel the best quality phones are ones that can last longer than that. I don't want to change and update my phone constantly."
},
{
"index": 7,
"comment": "Smartphones I believe is the new wave information at your fingertips when you need it. Not like the old times when you had to go to the library and wait for a computer to be available."
},
{
"index": 8,
"comment": "I think it's a good thing, it shows how innovative the world is and how fast we are progressing."
},
{
"index": 9,
"comment": "I think it’s ridiculous. The only thing that is nice is the cameras being upgraded. It would be much more beneficial if they waited 2.5 years or 3 years for a big update."
},
{
"index": 10,
"comment": "I think it’s expected considering the advancement of technology. I do worry it could get to advanced though"
},
{
"index": 11,
"comment": "I don’t understand the point of coming out with a new model every single year now. It’s like they want people to just buy and buy and buy constantly and so quickly too."
},
{
"index": 12,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of smartphones reflects impressive technological progress, but it also encourages unsustainable consumption and planned obsolescence. While frequent upgrades offer better performance and features, they can pressure consumers to replace devices prematurely, contributing to electronic waste and financial strain. A more balanced innovation rhythm could promote longevity and responsible tech use."
},
{
"index": 13,
"comment": "The update cycle for smartphones are primarily for security updates. They make me feel secure and reassured that my data is secure. However, some updates do allow the tracking and using of personal data in a way that is too observant and accessed."
},
{
"index": 14,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of smartphones drives innovation and gives consumers access to better technology, but it also creates pressure to upgrade frequently. This can lead to unnecessary spending and contribute to electronic waste. A slower, more sustainable cycle could balance innovation with environmental and economic responsibility."
},
{
"index": 15,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of smartphones drives innovation and offers consumers access to better technology, but it also contributes to environmental waste and planned obsolescence. While frequent upgrades can benefit tech enthusiasts, a more sustainable approach would balance innovation with longevity and repairability."
},
{
"index": 16,
"comment": "I think the rapid updates are a bit tiresome and always inconvenient because somethings always seem to happen. Whenever I update my phone something wrong always happens after the update due to a bug."
},
{
"index": 17,
"comment": "I don't like it because it promotes companies to focus on new products instead of older and existing products. It is a form of planned obsolescence and harms consumers."
},
{
"index": 18,
"comment": "I feel like it's extremely unnecessary and you can't really notice the changes from generation to generation. It takes at least 2-3 generations to notice much of a difference, at least for a layman. I also believe it's harmful to the environment by producing extra electronic waste."
},
{
"index": 19,
"comment": "I don’t like it because my older model iPhone won’t update to the newest iOS update and it shuts any ability to use my cell data that I pay for off."
},
{
"index": 20,
"comment": "I believe that companies of electronic companies are trying to rush to make money. Have different options, features, and different operating systems frequently just to make more money from the consumers. Take example Apple that comes with a new phone every year at 1200 or more per phone. It's insane."
},
{
"index": 21,
"comment": "Frankly, I hate it. It produces an enormous amount of waste, forces people into a constant cycle of consumerism and upgrading (at an expensive price too), and stifles meaningful innovation in exchange for rapid sales."
},
{
"index": 22,
"comment": "It is unnecessary. I believe that they create new phones and technology more than they should. It is a waste of our resources. It would be best to make better products that last a long time and that can be updated. Businesses don’t care about the environment or the consumers."
},
{
"index": 23,
"comment": "I think it’s ridiculous every year these new phones come out, but they’re basically the same phone with a higher price tag. The changes that are being made are not enough to explain the up charge. This is one trend I will not be participating in."
},
{
"index": 24,
"comment": "I think that they should only follow a two year period. So a big release every 2 years and a modified upgraded version in-between. This is for physical products only."
},
{
"index": 25,
"comment": "I'm unhappy with how they can't be easily repaired and damage to the environment. I feel like it's pushing people to constantly spend on products they don't need"
},
{
"index": 26,
"comment": "I believe the rapid update cycle of electronic products is only necessary when significant increases in hardware have been made. It seems as though this is not the case when it comes to smartphones, especially iphones. They seem to release a new one simply to get more money. These companies should focus on software updates rather than new phone releases."
},
{
"index": 27,
"comment": "I appreciate the fast pace that we advance technologically. Smartphones are an integral part of daily life now, and more performance, better security and innovative new apps are always welcomed."
},
{
"index": 28,
"comment": "I love it because it usually comes with better features such as storage space, cameras and RAM, but the only down side of it is that the new devises or updates are usually over priced for a very minimal change ."
},
{
"index": 29,
"comment": "I dislike how fast everything takes for updates because I feel like everyday there is new things I have to update my phone for. These updates themselves contain even more bugs which means more updates faster. I wish there was more thought out and tested updates that would reduce the frequency of them."
},
{
"index": 30,
"comment": "It does not bother me too much because as of the last 8 years or so, they have not been upgrading the phones to a significant extent. I still have an iPhone 14 and I am satisfied and do not plan on upgrading this year. Maybe next year."
},
{
"index": 31,
"comment": "i think its kind of a scam re introducing a product with one or two new updates or features under the guise its a brand new product. Its taking advantage of those who are gulliable in thinking its a brand new product."
},
{
"index": 32,
"comment": "Honestly, it kind of feels sometimes like the rapid update cycle of electronic products especially smartphones sometimes provides novelty over necessity. I think it's fun sometimes and sometimes necessary with the quick pace of sophistication in technology but other times it feels unnecessary and can lead to waste and consumer fatigue. I think innovation is very valuable, but many updates feel I guess incremental and maybe not as frequently justified and could be more sustainable."
},
{
"index": 33,
"comment": "Kind of unnecessary. I get that tech will evolve rapidly, but as of late, especially with phones the leap between years just isn't there anymore. The phone is just a bit faster a slightly better camera maybe an extra gig of ra,m but for the most part they're pretty similar to last year's phone.\n\nMy Pixel 6 from nearly 4 years ago still runs fine and works for everyday normal tasks, companies should do more to tell people that the previous year's devices are just as capable as this year's product"
},
{
"index": 34,
"comment": "I think it's unnecessary. Apple comes out with new iPhones every September, which promotes excessive overconsumption."
},
{
"index": 35,
"comment": "All the devices that change too quickly create too much waste, and those who fall behind are likely to be left behind."
},
{
"index": 36,
"comment": "I think it is very helpful information wise but damaging to the youth. A lot of kids have to deal with the damage it brings their brains"
},
{
"index": 37,
"comment": "I think it is fine if the features added are necessary security features or something worthwhile. I don't want older pieces of equipment to no longer be supported by companies."
},
{
"index": 38,
"comment": "I personally do not like the current cycle. It is very wasteful and the innovation of smartphones no longer occurs in each generation. I think it would be beneficial to update new phones every 2 years or so."
},
{
"index": 39,
"comment": "I think it’s good for innovation because they’re always working on something better. But I don’t buy a new phone every year. I only buy a new phone when the one I have doesn’t work."
},
{
"index": 40,
"comment": "With the rapid update cycle of electronic products like smartphones, it can help me to get different kinds of information I need and want."
},
{
"index": 41,
"comment": "Cash grab for the companies. Tweaking things here and there to get you to spend an extra 1,000 every year. Hate it and don't roll that way, rock a 150.00 Motorola G that I've had for years."
},
{
"index": 42,
"comment": "I think it's a necessary evil. All computers and phones need to be updated."
},
{
"index": 43,
"comment": "I think it's all marketing and a money grab. I don't think the phones improve much besides some cosmetic fixes, or a slight improvement in a couple of small insignificant areas. It feels unnecessary and over the top."
},
{
"index": 44,
"comment": "I think the rapid update of electronics has been massively dramatized by corporations like apple to come out with a new phone every 9-12 months that has barely any advances over the last model and they can always raise the price and stupid people always buy it"
},
{
"index": 45,
"comment": "i think its great all the new products work better and are faster the batteries last longer annd they help people get things done faster with the help of AI on the phones"
},
{
"index": 46,
"comment": "I think it has pros and cons. A major pro is we keep getting new updated products. A con is that they are incremental and it costs us a lot of money"
},
{
"index": 47,
"comment": "I think it's such a waste. The update cycle is too quick and the upgrades are not even worth it. I'm perfectly happy using an 8 year old phone."
},
{
"index": 48,
"comment": "I am not a fan of the rapid update because I get the impression that the companies only care about money without really offering much technological advantages to match these increase in prices. It has been awhile since I was impressed by any update offering by any brand."
},
{
"index": 49,
"comment": "My opinion of the rapidly updating electronics is people are not taking advantage of all of the abilities of what exists now, people seem to be wanting better equipment without learning how to master what they already have and as a result even though technology and equipment is getting better, projects are coming out worse and worse overtime."
},
{
"index": 50,
"comment": "I find it to be unnecessary and hard to keep up with. I dont particularly like it."
},
{
"index": 51,
"comment": "I think this is a good thing because the faster you can update the faster you can get back to your busy life"
},
{
"index": 52,
"comment": "I don't think that companies should be constantly releasing new models. I think it only promotes consumerism and materialism."
},
{
"index": 53,
"comment": "If we are talking about system updates I absolutely find them as irritating as needing to update/upgrade my actual phone. I think both processes are useful and have a purpose but do not like how often both seem to be needed so often."
},
{
"index": 54,
"comment": "I support the updates on my smartphone as it ensures that I have the latest technology apps and updated and enhanced security . That being said frequent updates can be time consuming and cause unnecessary hardships. I am fine with my phone updating once a month but more frequent updates can be a hassle. The accompanying policy updates can be a hindrance, too especially with smart devices."
},
{
"index": 55,
"comment": "I think that some are enticed to have the latest phone whether they can afford it, or not. Others forgo the latest and are happy to have a working device. Even the cheapest devices have better cameras than the first iPhone and Android."
},
{
"index": 56,
"comment": "I appreciate the updates, but sometimes it gets to be too much, too fast. It's as if I can't keep up with them."
},
{
"index": 57,
"comment": "I think it can be too rapid and unnecessary when current products are still working well. Perhaps other routes should be taken to make money such as accessories or apps or added functionality updates by subscription or on to improve security."
},
{
"index": 58,
"comment": "With the advancement of electronics it's better that every smart phone becomes more efficient and powerful than the last\n Its forces better competition between companies to look for ways to improve its product. The cameras from now are greatly better than cameras from a year ago."
},
{
"index": 59,
"comment": "I dislike the rapid update cycle because I think it's just a way to get people to buy new electronics more often. I prefer to buy electronics that stay up to date for a long time."
},
{
"index": 60,
"comment": "I think its very wasteful. Everybody keeping up with the Jones'. Most of the \"new \" features they are getting they dont even use..."
},
{
"index": 61,
"comment": "I'm neither for not against it. However, I can see why a rapid update might be good in some instances (improved quality) and bad in others (attempt at a cash grab)."
},
{
"index": 62,
"comment": "I think it's fine as long as it's spaced out. Too many updates too soon becomes overwhelming."
},
{
"index": 63,
"comment": "I believe the rapid update of electronic products is unnecessary and wasteful. I believe it is designed to take advantage of and exploit consumers. The updates are redundant and minimal but costs are large."
},
{
"index": 64,
"comment": "I think we're going through smartphones too quickly. The fact that we are on iphone 17 now is crazy. What they need to do is focus on improving the bugs using IOS updates in the phone we already have"
},
{
"index": 65,
"comment": "I think it is very wasteful to make so many electronics in such a short period of time. As well, it damages the environment."
},
{
"index": 66,
"comment": "I think it is too often in my opinion. You don't have enough time to get familiar with a new electronic product before a new one is brought to market."
},
{
"index": 67,
"comment": "It makes me feel like the smartphones' updates or newer versions aren't actually that impressive because of how fast the cycle runs. I don't buy the newest models because of that."
},
{
"index": 68,
"comment": "I think it is pretty ridiculous to say the least. Most of the time, I find with Android products, it will slow them down even more. Apple products seem to fare way better with updates."
},
{
"index": 69,
"comment": "I think that the world needs to pause technology and focus on health advances ,and other issues. A.I. uses a lot of power ,even more than fossil fuels.Smart phones are made to only be good for a few years until the next one comes out.The volume goes out ,the screen goes blank ,etc.It is a scam so you will always buy another one ,I have had 4.It is ridiculous , I am also constantly buying chargers."
},
{
"index": 70,
"comment": "It feels like new phones come out all the time. This makes older phones feel old very quickly. it can be hard to keep up with all the new models."
},
{
"index": 71,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of various electronic products is amazing yet terrifying because for example countries like China are much more advanced than technology in the USA. Technology should be considered a double edged sword."
},
{
"index": 72,
"comment": "The updates cycles of phones has gotten less and less radical as phones have plateaued with their very fast processors, good cameras, and high-resolution 120hz oled displays. The biggest advancement for mobile technology in recent years has been with foldables and the Samsung Z fold 7 released this year is a lot thinner than its predecessor. There are even tri-fold phones now in development."
},
{
"index": 73,
"comment": "Smartphones are like mini computers in your hands, and with all of its purposes, no one can live without it. New smartphones are so expensive, and the best thing to do is to invest in a good reliable smartphone that will last a few years. Also, with the tariffs, I believe that smartphones will double in price within the next year."
},
{
"index": 74,
"comment": "While I appreciate the rapid update cycle of electronic products, especially for the updated camera phones, it can be overwhelming. However, it's a learning curve and eventually, people will get accustomed to the new features of electronic products."
},
{
"index": 75,
"comment": "I feel that electronics manufacturers do not make things to last. They want consumers to have to spend more money every few years to buy new products, so they create garbage products that need to be replaced often. It is taking advantage of consumers."
},
{
"index": 76,
"comment": "I think that electronic products, especially smartphones, are advancing too rapidly. Although I strongly appreciate my phone, I wish that I spent less time on it."
},
{
"index": 77,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of smartphones pushes innovation but also fuels waste and consumer pressure to upgrade more often than needed. While yearly releases bring better cameras, chips, and features, most improvements are incremental. A slower, more sustainable cycle could balance progress with environmental responsibility."
},
{
"index": 78,
"comment": "I hate it. Every update something gets messed up and then they have to push out other updates to fix it. It's extremely irritating and I usually put off updates for as long as I can, especially on my Windows pc."
},
{
"index": 79,
"comment": "I think that phone brands should wait longer than they do to come out with new models. It makes people want to upgrade their phones even though they just bought the newest phone a couple months ago."
},
{
"index": 80,
"comment": "My opinion of these updates is that I'm not a fan of how frequent it is taking place. I feel as if we are being forced to adapt to something that not everyone is wanting to do. I prefer the days of old when smartphones did not feel mandatory."
},
{
"index": 81,
"comment": "I think it's unnecessary. Most of the time there is no difference. Sometimes the new version is worse."
},
{
"index": 82,
"comment": "I don't mind the updates. They help protect our devices and provide better features. I would rather frequently update my device than not. That tells me that it is constantly improving protection."
},
{
"index": 83,
"comment": "they are quick and easy to use and thus makes life to be bit smooth or easier"
},
{
"index": 84,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of electronic products, especially smartphones, is unnecessary and bad for the environment. Phones do not change much year after year."
},
{
"index": 85,
"comment": "I think it is amazing. Technology is surely advancing as the years progress. I grew up in the 90's so this is an exciting time to see the different type of electronic products being created today. With anything in life use caution and the same applies to this."
},
{
"index": 86,
"comment": "The updates are often times pointless with limited product improvement. Often times they are ways to implement bloatware to my phone."
},
{
"index": 87,
"comment": "I think that it is ridiculous how often new smartphone models are introduced and how quickly the old models become obsolete. The changes between models are not that impressive to me and I think it encourages mass consumerism which is unnecessary and costly."
},
{
"index": 88,
"comment": "Its positive to add functionality to the devices. Its negative to updae devices to hasten their obselesence and force people to invest into a replacement."
},
{
"index": 89,
"comment": "I think it's just a way to pressure people to spend money they don't have on things they don't need. People are often misled into believing their existing tech isn't adequate."
},
{
"index": 90,
"comment": "A new model comes out every year! I feel it makes my phone seem older quicker. The new smart phones have so many new features and upgrades."
},
{
"index": 91,
"comment": "I hate how often new phones are constantly pushed on the market. They make it seem like the previous years tech is obsolete, and the worst part about is with even older tech they stop giving these devices updates. Which forces you to eventually but a more recent or newer product."
},
{
"index": 92,
"comment": "i think a lot of the time, it is uneccessary. especially with making smartphones, its just an update and a lot of time its also adding a new camera or placing it somewhere else"
},
{
"index": 93,
"comment": "I do agree that tech companies are making people change their technology more than we like. I don't like when they stop upgrading your software and than the device becomes obsolete forcing you to upgrade."
},
{
"index": 94,
"comment": "I often think it's too much, as though it's done just for the sake of doing them. It's one of the things that has held me back from getting a cell phone, honestly, from seeing what my friends go through with that stuff."
},
{
"index": 95,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of electronic products especially smartphones is a double edged sword and my perspective reflects both the benefits and drawbacks"
},
{
"index": 96,
"comment": "I do like how smartphones will update the time when you go to different time zones and for Daylight Savings Time. I worry about privacy. I also hope I can keep up with rapidly changing technologyl"
},
{
"index": 97,
"comment": "I think it’s cool how fast phones improve but also kind of wasteful. since new ones come out before the old ones even feel outdated."
},
{
"index": 98,
"comment": "I think it's primarily a way for the companies promoting and producing them to make more money, in predictable yearly cycles; I think it's also marketing to appeal to a certain demographic nd niche market; I think it's a way to ensure planned obsolescence; I think it's a way to entice new customers; and I think it's a way to test-market new features, while having customers pay for the trial."
},
{
"index": 99,
"comment": "As long as the updates don't require me to purchase a new smartphone, then I'm okay with it. Software updates are fine. Otherwise, as long as my current phone works well, then I'll just keep using it for as long as I can."
},
{
"index": 100,
"comment": "I believe it is an effort for electronic manufacturers to outdate equipment sooner to increase their profits. By requiring updates frequently and then withdrawing update support before a device is at the end of its usefulness is purely for company profit."
},
{
"index": 101,
"comment": "It allows cell phone companies to make more money and causes consumers to routinely buy new phones because the companies stop supporting the software in the older phones or stop sending a 2G signal. Welcome to capitalism."
},
{
"index": 102,
"comment": "I think most of the updates are not really necessary. My phone is 5 years old and I don't notice any performance issues"
},
{
"index": 103,
"comment": "release products less often with more significant tech improvements."
},
{
"index": 104,
"comment": "I think it's great that innovation happens at such a quick rate. It is unecessary to update your phone everytime a new one comes up."
},
{
"index": 105,
"comment": "its annoying and seems unneccesary. also they take up so much space on the phone for no reason."
},
{
"index": 106,
"comment": "I think the update cycle happens far too frequently and I don't feel there's a reason to have to do it every year, like most people like to do, when their phones still work perfectly fine and normal."
},
{
"index": 107,
"comment": "I am sort of against the rapid update cycle. I think it is very capitalist and encourages people to spend more money and waste more resources than necessary. It is also worsened when combined with the fact that many electronic products' systems and hardware are only designed to work for certain periods of time, intentionally, to encourage consumers to buy more or better options."
},
{
"index": 108,
"comment": "I think the update is too rapid"
},
{
"index": 109,
"comment": "i think it is perfectly fine"
},
{
"index": 110,
"comment": "I think it's a crazy ripoff, at least when you buy a thousand dollar phone it should easily make it longer than a couple of years before you have to get a new one."
},
{
"index": 111,
"comment": "I think it is good for security issues but I don't like when they push new features and apps that I can not uninstall and I did not ask for. Security and stability are good. Forced downloads are not."
},
{
"index": 112,
"comment": "I think it’s going to be our downfall"
},
{
"index": 113,
"comment": "My opinion is that i really appreciate the growth of technology updates in smartphones. This is so because of the new features that are recently built into smart phones."
},
{
"index": 114,
"comment": "I think it’s a little materialistic honestly, and the USA has a pretty unhealthy relationship with Consumerism. Buy the latest trends until the next ones come out. It’s ridiculous in my opinion."
},
{
"index": 115,
"comment": "It has really caused innovation to stall. It is now training those about planned obsolecence and that we are stuck with it. Nothing is truly built to last unless you learn how to make it last."
},
{
"index": 116,
"comment": "I believe that it is too rapid as the changes each year are minimal and it's a money grab by these companies. A lot of the updates aren't even necessary in my opinion."
},
{
"index": 117,
"comment": "I think that it promotes a lot of overconsumption. I think that there doesn’t need to be new phones updated that frequently. I think they should just wait until technology advances a lot more."
},
{
"index": 118,
"comment": "It feels really unnecessary, theres hardly any quality improvements to then. And theres no gimmicks either now that everythings been done. It just feels like the make things bigger or smaller and call it next generation."
},
{
"index": 119,
"comment": "I’m assuming you mean the constant software updates. They are annoying and manage to mess up my swagger within my phone."
},
{
"index": 120,
"comment": "Not really familiar with what exactly that is. Would probably need to be shown exactly what it is."
},
{
"index": 121,
"comment": "The technology has become so sophisticated that there are new features offered for phones in very quick fashion. You see AI becoming a standard now with phones, as the expectation for generative AI becomes more prevalent"
},
{
"index": 122,
"comment": "It feels like it incentivizes cheap physical products and that they are focusing on small upgrades as opposed to making a long lasting device. Companies, such as Apple have been found limiting the speeds of older models to encourage upgrades. We aren't getting the best product possible."
},
{
"index": 123,
"comment": "I believe it's a waste of time, data, and announcement. They need to release big updates less frequently."
},
{
"index": 124,
"comment": "Obsolencence means you have to replace your phone every few years. That makes it seem like you are always paying for your phone, over and over."
},
{
"index": 125,
"comment": "It seems to definitely be unnecessary. The phones aren't that much different after each new release."
},
{
"index": 126,
"comment": "Not good - they make them this way on purpose to just keep you buying new ones. Sometimes they work fine but the battery goes out so you have to replace the whole phone."
},
{
"index": 127,
"comment": "I think it's overwhelming. And I think it's unrealistic to keep up with rapid updates of any electronic products/devices, especially smartphones."
},
{
"index": 128,
"comment": "I believe it’s not very necessary. It is only an existing thing because it helps bring phone manufacturers money, but there are not very many new features in these new devices."
},
{
"index": 129,
"comment": "I feel annoyed about the rapid update cycle of electronic products. It makes me feel like my product becomes obsolete very quickly."
},
{
"index": 130,
"comment": "I feel like companies do it deliberately to cater to people's desire to have the latest new 'toy', by making some slight styling changes and very little substantive changes to their product. We are being marketed to. We don't need a new phone every year."
},
{
"index": 131,
"comment": "I believe the update cycle is too fast and mostly unnecessary. It is creating a lot of electronic waste that is bad for the environment. Also, these new upgrades are costly and costing users too much money."
},
{
"index": 132,
"comment": "I feel like with smartphones updating as often as they do, you sort of miss out on the chance to really get to use all the features on your current phone like you would in years past. You end up having to move on more quickly to a newer phone just because it's something new instead of making the most of the phone that you have."
},
{
"index": 133,
"comment": "It is definitely scary and belligerent. Technology has gotten way out of hand."
},
{
"index": 134,
"comment": "Sometimes it is too much, features aren;t even that much of a upgrade and the newest thing is out"
},
{
"index": 135,
"comment": "New updates that keep a device working are good. Having to change to a new device after just a short time seems extremely wasteful."
},
{
"index": 136,
"comment": "I like the fact that we are improving technology. I don’t like the ways it is being used."
},
{
"index": 137,
"comment": "I was born into technology being cool and helpful so I'm into it. I just dont want the human society to rely on technology or have it be our down fall."
},
{
"index": 138,
"comment": "I’m ok with it if they are secure"
},
{
"index": 139,
"comment": "It seems continuous and unnecessary as a consumer but i can understand it."
},
{
"index": 140,
"comment": "I think it's impressive how you compare the technology that we had back in the day to nowadays. i think the sky is the limit when it comes to devoloping these products."
},
{
"index": 141,
"comment": "I think many electronic products like smartphones get updated way too often,. Most of the time, these updates don't even come with much revolutionary changes to show for it."
},
{
"index": 142,
"comment": "I think they do it on purpose to sell more."
},
{
"index": 143,
"comment": "it is updating so fast, and expensive to update so often. i hope the price can be lower."
},
{
"index": 144,
"comment": "I don't like the rapid update cycle on electronic products because it forces you to buy something new when the item you have is still perfectly fine. This is difficult for people on a tight budget."
},
{
"index": 145,
"comment": "I don't like it, most of the updates are unnecessary and are forced at a bad time, i use my phone for work and there's nothing like not being able to do anything because my phone is updating the emoji app."
},
{
"index": 146,
"comment": "I think it is keep growing more modern day by day, The technology is growing so fast."
},
{
"index": 147,
"comment": "It is not clear to me that the newest phones have any significant benefits over older models. The key uses for smartphones are making phone calls, texting, doing email, and loading web pages. All phones made in the last 5 years do these things very well."
},
{
"index": 148,
"comment": "Unnecessary upgrades are pushed forward faster required to keep people chasing the latest and greatest new device. Most people would be well served by older technology."
},
{
"index": 149,
"comment": "I think it be to many to early"
},
{
"index": 150,
"comment": "It is annoying how often electronics gets updated. Sometimes certain apps and software doesn't work if your device isn't updated. There is no need to update nearly every two weeks."
},
{
"index": 151,
"comment": "I believe the updates are necessary, but if the software in the phones were done correctly, updates would not be needed. l think they move too quickly and don't get all of the bugs out of the software before they install in the phone."
},
{
"index": 152,
"comment": "I feel that these are intentional and meant to create product obsolescence. This is strictly a marketing ploy designed to force consumers to buy new products more often and increase company profits and sales."
},
{
"index": 153,
"comment": "It's a great technology but can be said to be wasteful and expensive. It also have some negative impact on our environment."
},
{
"index": 154,
"comment": "I am not a fan of the rapid update cycle of electronic products. I try to keep my electronics as long as possible until they no longer work. For example, I have had my current phone for 6 years and my current laptop for 5 years."
},
{
"index": 155,
"comment": "I have a fairly mixed opinion on the rapid update cycle of electronics. On one hand, making things better at a fast rate is a good thing. However, a lot of the updates feel arbitrary and could be pushed out a year or two."
},
{
"index": 156,
"comment": "It needs to be slowed down. The planned obsolesence of phones is a bad mark on the industry of electronics."
},
{
"index": 157,
"comment": "its horribe and unecessary . ebrytime thos eupdates happen the phones that ar enot the newaest start breaking ,"
},
{
"index": 158,
"comment": "I think the rapid update cycle of smartphones encourages innovation but also fuels unnecessary consumerism. While exciting, it creates e-waste and pressures people to upgrade more often than truly needed."
},
{
"index": 159,
"comment": "I think it is unnecessary and with smart phones in particular it feels like they are getting more ways to track us like what we type and do and using this data to advertise to us but all of this tracking stuff drains your battery faster. So in my opinion the updates are coming too fast and are more about the companies making money than giving the customers a better product."
},
{
"index": 160,
"comment": "I like it but I think it is a bit much. They don't need to be doing it often. With advanced technology that we have it shouldnt update that much."
},
{
"index": 161,
"comment": "It’s all a gimmick.some of the older phones work better than the newer ones."
},
{
"index": 162,
"comment": "I dislike it greatly. It causes so much E-waste. Causes an increase in unnecessary spending natural. Results in unoriginal creations as well"
},
{
"index": 163,
"comment": "It's fast paced as companies compete with each other in an attempt to increase their profits."
},
{
"index": 164,
"comment": "I think it is unfair and an example of how annoying and unethical consumerism is. I say this because often technology like iphones upgrade and the older models are \"killed\" forcing people to buy newer phones. It is manipulative and just wrong."
},
{
"index": 165,
"comment": "I think it's a bit annoying, but it could have its advantages. On one end, I feel like my phone is always up to date with the most current features. On the other hand, I feel like these smaller updates are more likely to have bugs and minor fixes than large updates that occur less frequently."
},
{
"index": 166,
"comment": "As the updates usually are user beneficial, I generally support them. Particularly because the older versions don’t become obsolete until much later if at all. Then, when the time comes that the older product begins to wear out, you can choose a newer version with the attributes desired if the cost/benefit ratio is appropriate"
},
{
"index": 167,
"comment": "New technology is intriguing, but buying a new phone too often isn’t."
},
{
"index": 168,
"comment": "I feel like they need to slow down. I don’t like that there’s a new iPhone every year and the old ones begin to start breaking or glitching so people can buy the newest ones."
},
{
"index": 169,
"comment": "I think the rapid update cycle of smartphones is a marketing strategy to entice people to upgrade every couple of years. To me, this shows the greed of manufacturers and believe that these upgrades are staged to occur every couple of years."
},
{
"index": 170,
"comment": "i think the rapid update cycle of electronics is HIGHLY annoying... it improves lots of things, don't get me wrong, but overall i feel like it's just a race to make older devices obsolete to make people keep paying for upgrades."
},
{
"index": 171,
"comment": "I feel that electronics especially phones, update too fast and cost too much. If someone wants to have the newest phone, at all times, that means that they have to spend over $1000, every six months it seems, for a new device. Not to mention, when new devices come out, the rapid decline of updates for the older model causes various issues for the users."
},
{
"index": 172,
"comment": "I think it is wasteful and makes people spend too much money on things they don't need. Older devices are mostly fine, but non-replaceable batteries make people think it's a must that you buy a new phone. I think phones should have replaceable parts, like batteries, so they can be used for a much longer time."
},
{
"index": 173,
"comment": "It's an advancement but learn all the tech issues can be tacking."
},
{
"index": 174,
"comment": "It's annoying and expensive, but I have learned that it's possible to opt out of the cycle. My old smartphone holds up surprisingly well. I tend to ignore the upgrades until my phone has died."
},
{
"index": 175,
"comment": "It’s sort of scary that technology is moving so fast. I feel uncertain about the future of technology and who to trust."
},
{
"index": 176,
"comment": "I think the rapid update cycle of smartphones pushes innovation forward, but it also creates unnecessary pressure on consumers to upgrade frequently. While new features are exciting, the constant turnover contributes to electronic waste and makes devices feel disposable rather than long-lasting investments. A more balanced cycle could benefit both users and the environment."
},
{
"index": 177,
"comment": "I think it's wonderful that technology is progressing so quickly, but given the price of smartphones (& other devices) these days, I would like them to be more upgradeable. I would like to get at the very least 3 years out of a phone before it is totally obsolete and no longer supported."
},
{
"index": 178,
"comment": "We need a better system for the collection of electronic products. The current process is not accessible to many."
},
{
"index": 179,
"comment": "Advances, especially with AI activity on phones, is unavoidable in the short term. But there is just so much that can be achieved in a small portable memory that is a smartphone. There will be a balance point where advancement will slow and major breakthroughs will become more rare."
},
{
"index": 180,
"comment": "innovation and more features push manufactures to improv technology quickly giving access to better features\r\nthe fast cycle keeps companies competitive\r\nincreases and betters security and performance"
},
{
"index": 181,
"comment": "I feel like it can be great because a lot of the time the updates have security fixes that protect us consumers and keeps the devices functioning longer. With automatic updates, it seems effortless to keep electronic products up to date."
},
{
"index": 182,
"comment": "I think it's good that they update the smartphones often. This allows the phones to maintain high speed and functionability. Which prevents lagging and keeps everything as it should be"
},
{
"index": 183,
"comment": "It is completely manufactured by the tech companies to make people upgrade perfectly good devices. The culture of upgrading smartphones every years is incredibly wasteful."
},
{
"index": 184,
"comment": "I think it's annoying to have so many updates. It's like every other week, I reach for my phone in the morning, and it says Update was successful. I'm like WHAT UPDATE?"
},
{
"index": 185,
"comment": "I really don't know but I figure because they always want new and different products the customers."
},
{
"index": 186,
"comment": "For me it doesn't apply as much as it might to someone who is more tech-savvy. I think if I were a teenager or a CEO it might cause me to be more concerned over the rapid cycle of smartphones and their features."
},
{
"index": 187,
"comment": "I think that it is important that technology advances. This is because it is something that is going to happen anyway and it will be important to see that transition in my perspective."
},
{
"index": 188,
"comment": "I think the rapid change is difficult to catch up on"
},
{
"index": 189,
"comment": "I think the rapid update of smartphones is unnecessary. There will always be people who are anxious for updates but I think more people find it frustrating."
},
{
"index": 190,
"comment": "Smartphones are a competitive market. Smartphone Technology keeps adding new features so updates are required."
},
{
"index": 191,
"comment": "Honestly, I think the fast update cycle of smartphones is a bit overwhelming. While it’s cool to see new features come out so often, most of the time the changes aren’t big enough to justify getting a new phone every year. It feels wasteful, both for our wallets and the environment."
},
{
"index": 192,
"comment": "In my opinion the high updating rate is unsustainable to the environment and costly to the consumers. At times, it seems as though manufacturers are focusing on planned obsolescence instead of actual innovation."
},
{
"index": 193,
"comment": "I hate it. We are plateauing in computer advancements yet somehow we can only make phones that work for a year, two if your lucky. We should only support businesses that make future proof products"
},
{
"index": 194,
"comment": "I think it's a marketing ploy for manufacturers to make people believe that newer is always better. That's why they invest so much in marketing especially in using popular endorsers to convince consumers to keep buying new mobile phones."
},
{
"index": 195,
"comment": "I appreciate having the latest information related to possibly any topic that i need to research, view or share. Additionally, the benefit of having quick access to the updates further enhances the ability to be one step ahaed at all times."
},
{
"index": 196,
"comment": "Some of the updates are meaningless or small, yet the trend of getting the newest products persist. I think just having a good working electronic with what you need is fine, you don't need to constantly overconsume the new things."
},
{
"index": 197,
"comment": "Electronic products are changing how we live, esoecially how we interact with others. There are definitely positives especially how instantly we can communicate with others remotely and stay abreast of current happenings in the world. The downside is that interpersonal contact seems to be reduced, a type of contact that benfits everyone."
},
{
"index": 198,
"comment": "I think its great that technology updates so much and so quickly, I prefer things to update fast than slow so even though you might not get the new one you still have the option too."
},
{
"index": 199,
"comment": "It seems obscene to have to constantly update our phones especially when they don't seem to be having any issues. I know that cellphone manufacturers want consumers to buy sa new phone at least every year because they say the dogyesteuos outdated \r\n I believe it's marketing trick to sell more PR."
},
{
"index": 200,
"comment": "I think it's quite stupid to be honest. There are no significant upgrades or changes made between models. It's just a way to get people to spend more money."
},
{
"index": 201,
"comment": "I think it is a good money-making move for companies to constantly produce new models. The advancement of technology also drives this, advancements such as faster processors, smaller chips, etc. I think the rapid update cycle is good for the economy as well as technological advancements."
},
{
"index": 202,
"comment": "I think it has made consumers less willing to upgrade as often since most of the updates are not as significant. This is why people update cellphones and computers less often than they did 20 years ago."
},
{
"index": 203,
"comment": "Smartphones keep improving fast, which is exciting but also wasteful. I think longer-lasting models would be better for everyone."
},
{
"index": 204,
"comment": "I,think it reflects the rapid advance of the technology behind smartphones. It also is due to the desire of consumers for additional features"
},
{
"index": 205,
"comment": "New phones are coming out in a dizzying short time per update. The problem is the prices keep getting higher and higher. Are there really THAT many new things and upgrades all the time??"
},
{
"index": 206,
"comment": "If you mean having to upgrade to a new version every year or so, I think it's a waste of consumers' money and of environmental resources. But it makes the companies that sell the new smartphones a lot of money."
},
{
"index": 207,
"comment": "It's scary how fast technology is growing. Afraid humans will fall behind"
},
{
"index": 208,
"comment": "I think it’s absolutely ridiculous. Americans are always chasing the latest greatest thing, but in a year that new phone will be outdated."
},
{
"index": 209,
"comment": "I think it's a money grab for companies. Normal people don't need so many updates and probably aren't even aware of what's on their phone."
},
{
"index": 210,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of electronic products, especially smartphones have both advantages and disadvantages. Among its advantages include security and software support and innovative features. On the other hand, its disadvantages include consumer pressure, economic inequality, E-waste and sustainability."
},
{
"index": 211,
"comment": "It seems there are constant updates to phones as well as constant updates to phone plans."
},
{
"index": 212,
"comment": "It is a good thing when updates solve issues, such as fixing a known bug, and when they include new features that users want. At the same time, changing the UI too often or without notice can make it confusing, especially for older adults."
},
{
"index": 213,
"comment": "I enjoy getting a new upgraded phone every year. I enjoy the new technology. I also feel like I’m ahead of everyone else who chooses not to upgrade to the newest technology."
},
{
"index": 214,
"comment": "I think it's economically wasteful to produce a new line of phones every year and add to the cycle. It's corporate greed at work."
},
{
"index": 215,
"comment": "I think it would be great if it could be a higher recycling with electronics. Like having to have a trade in or like a core charge if no trade in."
},
{
"index": 216,
"comment": "I think it is ridiculous. Being 55 years old, I think smartphones are way over priced and over-rated. I think ~$500 to 1,000 USD to have to buy a new phone with every two years is just not sustainable, for one. The resources it takes to make these phones are not infinite. I am not aware of a centralized place to recycle or sell old phones. I have the same opinion of Automobile companies that insist on needed a new model each year, when really, a new model every two years would serve the planet and available resources much better."
},
{
"index": 217,
"comment": "I find it a bit interesting that rapid updates of electronic products, especially smartphones, have become so frequent and normalized. Apple seems to release a new iPhone every year, and it makes me wonder how different and improved each new version actually is."
},
{
"index": 218,
"comment": "I honestly can't keep up with all the updates. Nowadays, smartphones can pretty much do anything."
},
{
"index": 219,
"comment": "I rarely update immediately when a new phone comes out. Generally the improvements are incremental. Also, there are frequently bugs. Updating less frequently might make the updates more enticing to users."
},
{
"index": 220,
"comment": "i like them but there hard to use sometimes, but i do like the apps on the phone, and i like the nice pictures it takes, also how clear stuff is, and how you can get news quick and sports"
},
{
"index": 221,
"comment": "I think its bad. We have a limited amount of resources on this planet and we should try to use every product until it can't be used anymore."
},
{
"index": 222,
"comment": "It seems that too many peoiple feel the need to buy the most recent version of each smart phone. The manufacturers try to make it appear that there are significant improvements even thought it may just be a new design."
},
{
"index": 223,
"comment": "I don't think that these devices need to be upgraded every year. I think updates can be made to software, but the devices themselves can wait two years between updates."
},
{
"index": 224,
"comment": "My opinion is smartphones have become such a part of our daily lives. I do feel parents should take the electronics away & send the kids outside."
},
{
"index": 225,
"comment": "We receive better enhancements and security in each. update it is better to keep updating the phone to keep up with the changes."
},
{
"index": 226,
"comment": "Tech is advancing like we have never seen before. For some it is exciting. For others it creates anxiety and fear.\r\nIt doesn’t bother me."
},
{
"index": 227,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of smartphones drives impressive innovation and give consumers more choices.it also contributes to electronic waste and pushes people to spend more frequently. companies should balance technological process with sustainability"
},
{
"index": 228,
"comment": "I find that the updates happen too often and usually cause some sort of issue requiring bug fixes. It would better serve the custome to do these in batch updates and after sufficient testing to ensure that bugs have been found and resolved."
},
{
"index": 229,
"comment": "I believe the technology is evolving in ways that are good and bad.\r\nSome of the features are great."
},
{
"index": 230,
"comment": "I think consumers don’t fully understand the individual updates. Some people think updates contain software to capture data without proper permissions. Some think the rapid updates are unnecessary."
},
{
"index": 231,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of smartphones pushes innovation and gives users access to new features quickly, but it also creates pressure to upgrade and contributes to e-waste. While I value the improvements, I think companies should focus more on sustainability and supporting older devices longer."
},
{
"index": 232,
"comment": "I think the rapid update cycle of electronic products, especially smartphones is unnecessary and costly. I usually choose to wait to purchase new products."
},
{
"index": 233,
"comment": "rapid update cycles are necessary to keep up with all security updates."
},
{
"index": 234,
"comment": "I think it is a money grab. They make it seem as if you don't have the latest up grade your phone will not be as accurate"
},
{
"index": 235,
"comment": "If it keeps my phone safe from security risks, it's worth it. I do hate that they keep downloading games I don't want."
},
{
"index": 236,
"comment": "I believe the update cycle of electronic products are not necessary. The constant rollout of new devices shows me that companies want more money and are not focusing on fixing previous issues with their previous devices."
},
{
"index": 237,
"comment": "I feel like they are worried about adding too much new things to electronic devices when what they already have is good enough.\r\nEvery update usually makes the device run worse."
},
{
"index": 238,
"comment": "I think that as long as it makes the phone work better there is nothing wrong with updates. It will enhance user experience."
},
{
"index": 239,
"comment": "They lose value too quickly, it costs too much money and creates waste"
},
{
"index": 240,
"comment": "I think its wasteful and the most compelling evidence of planned obsolescence. What major differences are their from smart phones today and 5 years ago? AI integration? thats not running locally on devices? If it wasnt for software updates and lack of parts people would keep their devices longer if they were smart"
},
{
"index": 241,
"comment": "I am in favor of frequent updates to electronic products. It is good that electronic products are updated frequently. This leads to innovation and better products."
},
{
"index": 242,
"comment": "It is better to have the updates then to have to buy a new product to keep up. Once in awhile i can even see what has been updated."
},
{
"index": 243,
"comment": "There isn’t a need to update them so fast. I think it’s a way for companies to get people to buy new products because the old ones stop working as well"
},
{
"index": 244,
"comment": "It is a waste. It contaminates. It is not necessary"
},
{
"index": 245,
"comment": "Samsung for example, each phone the release is only a few centimeters bigger and or smaller then the last. So if you buy a new phone, you have to buy a new case to. Even tho it looks identical to the previous phone, they make sure it will not fit in the pervious phones case"
},
{
"index": 246,
"comment": "I think it's overwhelming. It's also kind of sad that such amazing technology is just constantly traded in for an upgrade or thrown out."
},
{
"index": 247,
"comment": "First your check quality and than life long working capacity and than cost and should be everything and must be watch careful to buy"
},
{
"index": 248,
"comment": "I think it is a good thing for the cycle of electronics to be as rapid as it is nowadays. People rely heavily on their smart devices so why not have them being constantly updated."
},
{
"index": 249,
"comment": "I think it is a bit excessive. I think it could be more beneficial for companies to slow down and invest more time and quality into better upgrades rather than rushing to push new technology at such a fast rate."
},
{
"index": 250,
"comment": "My opinion on rapid update cycle of electronic products, especially smartphones is that it’s wasteful. \r\nI think we have the technology to keep a phone for 5 or more years."
},
{
"index": 251,
"comment": "I think that most tech companies push out new products too fast, especially phones, in order to maximize profits. It's not good for the environment, it's not worth it for the average customer to buy every iteration of a new product, and it probably incentivizes companies to intentionally shorten the lifespan of their products."
},
{
"index": 252,
"comment": "I find the need to replace smartphones every 2 or 3 years to be expensive and somewhat annoying. It is not only expensive for me, the phone buyer, but it also creates a good deal of waste. I would almost prefer a situation where batteries could be easily replaced."
},
{
"index": 253,
"comment": "Is it really needed ay thos point. It seems like a lot of money."
},
{
"index": 254,
"comment": "I'm not exactly sure what the update cycle of electronic products refers to in this case. I think it means pushing new products out every year even though they might not be updated enough to be worth it. If that is the case then it is a very poor environmental policy."
},
{
"index": 255,
"comment": "I think instantaneous and constant updates are helpful and cool. I think it would be great if the user had more of a say whether they want to update or not, as opposed to the updates being mandatory and forced."
},
{
"index": 256,
"comment": "I am not affected by the rapid update cycle as I am not compelled either professionally or personally to have the \"latest and greatest\" features. Smartphones that I have are about two years old and have more than sufficient capabilities to meet my work and personal needs. I do, however, appreciate the camera upgrades that have occurred in the last 5 or so years."
},
{
"index": 257,
"comment": "I think that they just do it to make more money. It makes me angry that my phone becomes obsolete so quickly."
},
{
"index": 258,
"comment": "I feel that the rapid updating of electronics is not good for the environment. People are so influenced by consumerism, that they would rather waste a perfectly good phone to have the latest model. It’s superficial at best. Beyond that, many people do not dispose of their electronics properly. If we want to help the environment, we need to stop consuming electronics so rapidly."
},
{
"index": 259,
"comment": "the rapid update of electronic products has increased and is selling us the same products at higher rates"
},
{
"index": 260,
"comment": "I feel for me it's hard to keep up .. updating yearly to try to get getting the newest phone.. and it seems like my battery life declines so fast almost making it impossible to keep a phone any longer then two years..almost forcing us to keep buying the newest latest item"
},
{
"index": 261,
"comment": "Personally, I feel thet the cycles have been extremely short and forceful. I don't accept these updates because I don't trust them, especially since they all claim to fix bugs and protect, but never fully do the job. I also don't trust them because I feel as though I am giving away my right to conceal private information because of misunderstandings with the language and wording of those user agreements."
},
{
"index": 262,
"comment": "This is a great feature. It helps to minimalize and save time as well as make it easier to save time."
},
{
"index": 263,
"comment": "I think it is ultimately wasteful. Working cell phones and other electronics are constantly tossed out in favor of newer models. I think we're eventually just going to see more and more huge landfills of old electronics, lest there's a recycling initiative."
},
{
"index": 264,
"comment": "Smartphones dont last long; they are constantly being updated They become obsolete too quick"
},
{
"index": 265,
"comment": "I think it’s a great marketing strategy on behalf of the companies manufacturing the products. I find that there aren’t large difference in features. I also think it breeds a culture of wastefulness and excess."
},
{
"index": 266,
"comment": "I admit that rapid updating annoys me. I am a thrifty person who likes to use a device as long as it is working well. I don't really want the cost and trouble of buying a new phone every year. And its not environmentally sound, either."
},
{
"index": 267,
"comment": "I think the rapid update cycle of electronic products, especially smartphones, is a double-edged sword it fuels innovation and pushes exciting new features into our hands, but it also creates a culture of disposability where perfectly good devices are cast aside long before their potential is exhausted. It’s a bit like upgrading cars every year just because the headlights got shinier—flashy, but unsustainable. Ideally, companies should focus on longer-lasting devices, modular upgrades, and eco-friendly design so that progress doesn’t come at the expense of our wallets or the planet."
},
{
"index": 268,
"comment": "I think it waters down the urge for someone to buy another one as the features are similar with the new series. Most buyers are realizing that there are no notable value additions and improvements."
},
{
"index": 269,
"comment": "I think it's necessary because of all the feature enhancements that are always been being made for new models. That doesn't necessarily mean though that you have to purchase every new model \r\n But if the new model has new and unique capabilities that really could be useful to you then updating might be quite beneficial. Innovation really drives constant churn."
},
{
"index": 270,
"comment": "I feel as if constantly releasing updates lowers the life expectancy for most phones. Of course, there is a good chance that this is intentional, as the sooner your phone runs out, the quicker you can lend money over to phone companies for a new one."
},
{
"index": 271,
"comment": "I feel that smartphones provide contemporary access to necessary lifestyle connections. However, I also feel that overuse can isolate individuals and cause a sense of detachment from surroundings. They are good, necessary, but need to be used in some form of moderation. The rapid update cycle of these products appears to provide some new features, it also seems to be a marketing plan amongst all companies to cause consumers to replace perfectly good slightly older units with expensive new models on a repeating basis."
},
{
"index": 272,
"comment": "I am not very familiar with this topic. I don't feel like I know enough to have an opinion about it either way."
},
{
"index": 273,
"comment": "its a good thing because it keeps me updated all the time and makes me to be aware of the latest brands and good products"
},
{
"index": 274,
"comment": "Ridiculous. It seems like they just want to keep you buying new phones or plans."
},
{
"index": 275,
"comment": "A waste of resources. Also a waste of money,"
},
{
"index": 276,
"comment": "The improvements are not always major so for the most part I don't think it is necessary. However I know some want the new updates."
},
{
"index": 277,
"comment": "It’s way too much. I understand that technology changes quickly but it’s overwhelming to have to be updating everything all the time."
},
{
"index": 278,
"comment": "My smart phone is five years old. So it's hard for me to make an opinion on the rapid update cycle of electronic products when I hold on to my things forever. I only recently gave up cable TV."
},
{
"index": 279,
"comment": "Planned obsolescence is out of control. Costs have skyrocketed for everything. Electronics included. If you are talking about software, I can understand it a bit due to advances. But for hardware? We have to be smarter. Ultimately, we are in control. No one is forcing us to buy each upgrade."
},
{
"index": 280,
"comment": "I think development is wonderful. It can be financially challenging to keep purchasing new technology to stay current."
},
{
"index": 281,
"comment": "I want whatever version of tech I buy to last and be relevant for several years. Any software to be updated along the way."
},
{
"index": 282,
"comment": "It's tiresome and wasteful. More often than not, these products have nothing new of value that makes them worth purchasing."
},
{
"index": 283,
"comment": "I think it's a good thing. Technolgoical invoation has provided many benefits for society."
},
{
"index": 284,
"comment": "I think it is unfair for consumers and just feeds the capitalist mindset. And it is contributing to our huge waste problem."
},
{
"index": 285,
"comment": "At times it seems a bit odd/ suspicious. the constant updates are concerning. What is the reason for it. Are they changing the policies based on client inquires ect."
},
{
"index": 286,
"comment": "On one hand, I like the appeal of always having new things. On the other hand, it makes me less likely to upgrade because it always feels like I'm so close to the next generation, and what if that generation has significant improvements?"
},
{
"index": 287,
"comment": "I think it’s a bit too often. I don’t think it’s necessary. You can tell by the fact that not many changes are made to each new phone update"
},
{
"index": 288,
"comment": "seems like everythings moving a little too quickly. I thought i had a super new phone with my iphone 13 now it seems like its already slowing down. its dumb how planned obsolescence is just normalized."
},
{
"index": 289,
"comment": "I think those companies push new techs forward so they can profit by customers buying updated equipment. It's constantly being updated."
},
{
"index": 290,
"comment": "I believe it is wasteful. I believe it is useless consumerism."
},
{
"index": 291,
"comment": "I feel like the rapid update cycle (if I'm understanding it correctly) seems too often. I prefer updates farther apart than what is currently happening."
},
{
"index": 292,
"comment": "I don't feel as though it is exactly necessary. Some updates are not really drastic at all, just minor changes. I feel updates should be spread apart longer time grind annually is okay."
},
{
"index": 293,
"comment": "Updating of electronic products particularly smartphones is moving way too fast in my opinion. I just get one update and then there is another right after that. I haven't even figured out one, when another shows up."
},
{
"index": 294,
"comment": "there is so many update on cell phones each year that you can hardly keep up with especially all different types of new phones and designs"
},
{
"index": 295,
"comment": "I h lonely think it's easy to fast having to upgrade every year is to much. Especially since the next one is hundreds of dollars more. That's why I still use the one I have from 2 years ago that was nearly 2k in price."
},
{
"index": 296,
"comment": "I know that phones change very fast. I do not need a new one every year. I would rather keep using mine as long as it works well."
},
{
"index": 297,
"comment": "Smartphones have been around for over a decade and have become a way of life for the users. The smartphone has revolutionized ordinary conversations and communication in other formats such as video. There is no doubt it has been a positive influence."
},
{
"index": 298,
"comment": "I think the rapid update cycle of smartphones drives innovation but also encourages unnecessary consumption. Many devices become outdated too quickly, which adds to electronic waste and pressures consumers to upgrade often. A slower cycle focused on durability and sustainability would be more beneficial in the long run."
},
{
"index": 299,
"comment": "As long as it’s for the good of the phone and user it’s cool!"
},
{
"index": 300,
"comment": "First i would say its very necessary to keep us up to date but frequent updates may mean losing value or sense."
},
{
"index": 301,
"comment": "I think they need to slow down a little. Their are too many choices and upgrades every time you turn around."
},
{
"index": 302,
"comment": "I think that in that space of smartphones, specifically Iphone and samsungs, the manufacturer's intentionally make them obsolete after a time to force the sale/purchase of a newer version. It's corporate greed"
},
{
"index": 303,
"comment": "It is going way too quick, I can not keep up with what we have going on in the world. I heard the IPhone 17 was being released this week, I still have an IPhone 11. It seems technology advances almost every day."
},
{
"index": 304,
"comment": "The rapid update cycle of smart phones drives innovation, and improved features but it also drives excessive consumerism and electronic waste. While frequent upgrades benefit tech enthusiasts a slower more sustainable pace would better serve, environmental and economic concerns."
},
{
"index": 305,
"comment": "It makes me nervous. I feel like people are really reliant on their phones. I am scared they are taking over."
},
{
"index": 306,
"comment": "Im fearful of the amount of natural resources we are burning through. We do not need new devices every 3 months."
},
{
"index": 307,
"comment": "It is a beautiful disaster to witness. I see how beneficial life is with advanced technology but it’s also leaving so many behind"
},
{
"index": 308,
"comment": "I think the advancement on technology could go both ways. We are producing electronics so fast that the public cannot adjust to the use of the product. It is not only tech that needs constant updates but people need them as well just to be able to have the \"know how\" of how to use the electronic device. On the other hand with the knowledge of said product, electronics have proven to be a useful tool and has brought that knowledge and current information to our fingertips."
},
{
"index": 309,
"comment": "The speed of technology improvements is amazing. Just having tha ablity to come up with the ideas by a person or grop of people boggles the mind. Starting out with the portable phone of the early 1990's to what I have today, what can a person say."
},
{
"index": 310,
"comment": "I like advance smartphones and it’s nice to get the newest one."
},
{
"index": 311,
"comment": "I Think its a good thing. It keeps us safe and makes sure we have the latest updated."
},
{
"index": 312,
"comment": "I find it very annoying. I hate that with each update they change everything. In fact I am considering going with a standard phone for this very reason."
},
{
"index": 313,
"comment": "I personally like it. I used to get things when they first came out, iPhone, iPad, Switch, etc.but no longer do due to financial limitations. I have installed the the beta iOS 26 on my phone."
},
{
"index": 314,
"comment": "If it gives frequen good updates then I am ok with it. However, I am skeptical of that. Things such as planned obsolescence exist to make sure companies can make a buck. This may also be one of those things."
},
{
"index": 315,
"comment": "I think it is a good idea to upcycle electronic products so they do not end in the landfills"
},
{
"index": 316,
"comment": "Honestly I am confused what this means 100%. I wish I had more of an input."
},
{
"index": 317,
"comment": "I think it’s fine. I would like to have a phone that I could customize completely."
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.