--- language: - en license: cc-by-sa-4.0 pretty_name: Bactrainus HotpotQA Training Suite task_categories: - question-answering - text-generation tags: - multi-hop-question-answering - hotpotqa - evidence-selection - question-decomposition - chain-of-thought - supervised-fine-tuning - bactrainus size_categories: - 100K

Bactrainus HotpotQA Training Suite

COMPLETE RELEASE

One canonical HotpotQA source, eight clean and ID-aligned training views.

90,447 SOURCE IDs 8 CONFIGURATIONS SFT READY ID-ALIGNED CC BY-SA 4.0

The Bactrainus training suite turns the complete 90,447-example HotpotQA distractor/train split into a canonical structured dataset and seven ready-to-train chat-formatted SFT configurations. Every row keeps the official HotpotQA identifier as source_id, so the same example can be followed across paragraph selection, decomposition, sentence selection, evidence-grounded reasoning, and answer generation without relying on row order.

Traceable provenance Pinned upstream revision, machine-readable source manifest, and reviewed annotation patches.
Complete modular coverage Reader, CoT, paragraph selector, decomposer, sentence selector, and joint SFT data.
Strict integrity checks Schema, evidence bounds, task labels, row counts, ID equality, and 80 shard checksums.
![Bactrainus modular architecture](architecture.svg) ## At a glance | Property | Value | |---|---| | Upstream dataset | [`hotpotqa/hotpot_qa`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/hotpotqa/hotpot_qa) | | Upstream revision | `1908d6afbbead072334abe2965f91bd2709910ab` | | Upstream configuration | `distractor` | | Published split | `train` | | Source examples | 90,447 | | Candidate paragraphs | 2-10 as supplied upstream; 89,609 examples contain 10 | | Dataset configurations | 8 | | Identity key | `source_id` | | Storage | Sharded Parquet with Zstandard compression | | License | CC BY-SA 4.0 | ## Load the data ```python from datasets import load_dataset dataset = load_dataset( "bactrianus/bactrainus-hotpotqa", "cot-reader-sft", split="train", ) print(dataset.num_rows) # 90447 print(dataset[0]["source_id"]) print(dataset[0]["messages"]) ``` For a reproducible experiment, pin the dataset commit: ```python dataset = load_dataset( "bactrianus/bactrainus-hotpotqa", "structured", split="train", revision="7f3a1d4d21f22aad7262d8ffd6520f31186b284d", ) ``` ## Configurations Each configuration contains exactly 90,447 unique `source_id` values. | Configuration | What the model sees | Training target | |---|---|---| | `structured` | Canonical question and the complete candidate set | Answer, paragraph titles, and supporting facts as typed fields | | `reader-sft` | Question and gold supporting sentences | Final short answer | | `cot-reader-sft` | Question and gold supporting sentences | Ordered evidence trace followed by the answer | | `paragraph-selector-sft` | Question and the complete candidate set | Minimal supporting paragraph titles | | `question-decomposer-sft` | Question and selected supporting paragraphs | Ordered, paragraph-grounded sub-questions | | `sentence-selector-sft` | Question and selected supporting paragraphs | Supporting title/index pairs | | `decomposed-sentence-selector-sft` | Question, sub-questions, and selected paragraphs | Supporting title/index pairs | | `joint-selector-reader-sft` | Question and the complete candidate set | Supporting title/index pairs and final answer | The seven SFT views are deterministic transformations of `structured`. The CoT view is a traceable **evidence trace**: each step copies an annotated supporting sentence and records its exact title and zero-based sentence index. The decomposition view is generated from the paragraphs available after paragraph selection and is therefore complete, stable, and reproducible. ## Record formats ### Canonical `structured` record ```json { "source_id": "official-hotpotqa-id", "question": "...", "answer": "...", "question_type": "bridge", "difficulty": "hard", "candidate_paragraphs": [ {"title": "...", "sentences": ["...", "..."]} ], "supporting_facts": [ {"title": "...", "sentence_index": 1} ], "gold_paragraph_titles": ["..."] } ``` The candidate paragraphs preserve upstream count and order. Every supporting title must resolve to one of those paragraphs and every sentence index is checked against the corresponding sentence list. ### SFT record ```json { "source_id": "official-hotpotqa-id", "task": "cot_reader", "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "..."}, {"role": "user", "content": "..."}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "...training target..."} ] } ``` The data stores framework-neutral chat turns. Apply the native chat template of the chosen base model during tokenization; no tokenizer-specific control tokens are embedded in the Parquet files. ### CoT target shape ```text rationale: 1. [Paragraph title, sentence 0] Exact annotated evidence sentence. 2. [Second title, sentence 2] Exact annotated evidence sentence. answer: ***FINAL ANSWER*** ``` ### Decomposition target shape ```text sub-questions: 1. What information in "First paragraph" is needed to answer the original question? 2. How does the relevant information in "Second paragraph" combine with the previous evidence to determine the answer? ``` ## How the suite is built The release builder downloads the immutable upstream revision by default, normalizes the Hugging Face feature layout, constructs every view from the same typed record, writes Parquet shards in a private staging directory, and installs them only after strict validation succeeds. ```bash git clone https://github.com/Iman998/bactrainus.git cd bactrainus python -m pip install -e ".[data]" # From the dataset-package directory: python scripts/build_release.py --root . python scripts/validate_release.py --root . ``` A complete official JSON or JSONL export can also be used: ```bash python scripts/build_release.py hotpot_train_v1.1.json --root . ``` `SOURCE_MANIFEST.json` records the upstream repository, immutable revision, configuration, split, row count, identity key, and published configurations. `CHECKSUMS.sha256` records every Parquet shard digest. The pinned upstream split contains 22 supporting-fact entries whose sentence indices are outside their annotated paragraphs. `SOURCE_PATCHES.json` records each affected `source_id`, original index, action, and replacement when needed. This reviewed repair covers 0.010% of supporting-fact entries, retains all 90,447 questions, and is applied before any SFT view is constructed. ## Integrity guarantees The validator enforces: - exactly 90,447 rows and 90,447 unique IDs in every configuration; - identical `source_id` sets across all eight configurations; - the exact upstream two-to-ten paragraph distribution, including 89,609 ten-paragraph records; - valid evidence titles and zero-based sentence bounds; - exact task identifiers and ordered `system` / `user` / `assistant` messages; - the documented 17,972 easy, 56,814 medium, and 15,661 hard examples; and - SHA-256 coverage for every published Parquet shard. No development examples, model predictions, score tables, notebooks, credentials, or checkpoints are bundled with the training suite. ## Recommended use Use `structured` when designing a new task representation or auditing evidence. Use an SFT configuration when training the corresponding modular component. The IDs make it straightforward to combine configurations without fuzzy joins: ```python reader = load_dataset( "bactrianus/bactrainus-hotpotqa", "reader-sft", split="train" ) decomposer = load_dataset( "bactrianus/bactrainus-hotpotqa", "question-decomposer-sft", split="train" ) assert set(reader["source_id"]) == set(decomposer["source_id"]) ``` This repository is training data, not an independent held-out benchmark. Follow the official HotpotQA protocol for benchmark reporting and disclose preprocessing, prompt, retrieval, and answer-normalization choices. ## Limitations - The suite inherits factual, coverage, annotation, and social biases from Wikipedia and HotpotQA. - The distractor setting supplies a bounded candidate set and does not measure open-corpus retrieval. - Supporting facts are dataset annotations and may not exhaust every relevant sentence. - Gold-grounded CoT and decomposition targets favor traceability and reproducibility over stylistic diversity. - Prompt wording is one clean task formulation and may need adaptation for a different model family. ## License and attribution This dataset is released under [CC BY-SA 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), consistent with the upstream HotpotQA license. Redistributions and adaptations must preserve attribution and use a compatible ShareAlike license. See [`ATTRIBUTION.md`](ATTRIBUTION.md) for the complete attribution statement. ## Citation If you use this training suite, cite both Bactrainus and HotpotQA: ```bibtex @article{barati2025bactrainus, title = {Bactrainus: Optimizing Large Language Models for Multi-hop Complex Question Answering Tasks}, author = {Barati, Iman and Ghafouri, Arash and Minaei-Bidgoli, Behrouz}, journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06286}, year = {2025}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06286} } @inproceedings{yang2018hotpotqa, title = {{HotpotQA}: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering}, author = {Yang, Zhilin and Qi, Peng and Zhang, Saizheng and Bengio, Yoshua and Cohen, William W. and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan and Manning, Christopher D.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing}, year = {2018}, pages = {2369--2380}, doi = {10.18653/v1/D18-1259} } ``` ## Links - Models: - Clean code: - Article archive: For the full method, experiments, and interpretation, read the [Bactrainus article on arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06286).