Bingran You
Mirror SkillsBench v1.1 as a benchmark task-tree dataset
d03762b
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
1.41 kB
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Library.Tactic.Rel.Attr
import Mathlib.Tactic.SolveByElim
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
/-! # Extension to the `rel` tactic for the relation `↔`
The Mathlib `rel` and `gcongr` tactics don't work for the relation `↔` because the congruence lemmas
for `∃`, `∀` and `→` can't be tagged `@[gcongr]`. (It is possible to write a suitable variant for
`∃` but apparently not for the others.) So this is a quick-and-dirty implementation in that
setting.
-/
open Lean Elab Tactic
open Mathlib Tactic
syntax (name := IffRelSyntax) "iff_rel" " [" term,* "] " : tactic
elab_rules : tactic | `(tactic| iff_rel [$t,*]) => do
liftMetaTactic <| fun g =>
let cfg : SolveByElim.Config := { backtracking := false, maxDepth := 50 }
SolveByElim.solveByElim.processSyntax
cfg true false t.getElems.toList [] #[mkIdent `iff_rules] [g]
-- not sure where to hang error message
-- | throwError "cannot prove this by 'substituting' the listed relationships"
macro_rules | `(tactic| rel [$t,*]) => `(tactic| (repeat (intros; iff_rel [$t,*])); done)
attribute [iff_rules]
Iff.refl
not_congr
and_congr_left and_congr_right and_congr
or_congr_left or_congr_right or_congr
imp_congr
iff_congr
exists_congr forall_congr'