/- Copyright (c) Heather Macbeth, 2023. All rights reserved. -/ import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity def Prime (p : ℕ) : Prop := 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m : ℕ, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p theorem prime_test {p : ℕ} (hp : 2 ≤ p) (H : ∀ m : ℕ, 1 < m → m < p → ¬m ∣ p) : Prime p := by refine ⟨hp, fun m hmp => ?_⟩ have hp' : 0 < p := by positivity obtain hm | hm_left := eq_or_lt_of_le (id (Nat.pos_of_dvd_of_pos hmp hp') : 1 ≤ m) · left exact hm.symm obtain hm' | hm_right := eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.le_of_dvd hp' hmp) · right exact hm' have : ¬m ∣ p := H m hm_left hm_right contradiction lemma better_prime_test {p : ℕ} (hp : 2 ≤ p) (T : ℕ) (hTp : p < T ^ 2) (H : ∀ (m : ℕ), 1 < m → m < T → ¬ (m ∣ p)) : Prime p := by apply prime_test hp intro m hm1 hmp obtain hmT | hmT := lt_or_le m T · exact H m hm1 hmT rintro ⟨l, hl⟩ apply H l · apply lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (a := m) linarith positivity · apply lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (a := T) calc T * l ≤ m * l := mul_le_mul_right' hmT l _ < T ^ 2 := by linarith _ = T * T := by linarith positivity · use m linarith lemma not_prime_one : ¬ Prime 1 := by rintro ⟨h, _⟩ norm_num1 at h lemma prime_two : Prime 2 := by apply prime_test · norm_num intro m hm1 hm2 interval_cases m lemma not_prime {p : ℕ} (k l : ℕ) (hk1 : k ≠ 1) (hkp : k ≠ p) (hkl : p = k * l) : ¬(Prime p) := by rintro ⟨_, hfact⟩ obtain hk1' | hkp' := hfact k ⟨_, hkl⟩ · exact hk1 hk1' · exact hkp hkp' theorem exists_factor_of_not_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬ Prime p) (hp2 : 2 ≤ p) : ∃ m, 2 ≤ m ∧ m < p ∧ m ∣ p := by have H : ¬ _ := hp ∘ prime_test hp2 push_neg at H exact H theorem exists_prime_factor {n : ℕ} (hn2 : 2 ≤ n) : ∃ p : ℕ, Prime p ∧ p ∣ n := by by_cases hn : Prime n . refine ⟨n, hn, 1, ?_⟩ ring . obtain ⟨m, hmn, _, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_factor_of_not_prime hn hn2 obtain ⟨p, hp, y, hy⟩ := exists_prime_factor hmn refine ⟨p, hp, x * y, ?_⟩ zify at * linear_combination hx + x * hy