EVM-QuestBench / benchmark /validators /query_gas_price_validator.py
berryccc1's picture
Release EVM-QuestBench dataset
edbc049 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
7.67 kB
"""
Validator for query_gas_price atomic problem.
Validates that the LLM correctly queries gas price and EIP-1559 parameters.
"""
from typing import Dict, Any
class QueryGasPriceValidator:
"""Validator for gas price and EIP-1559 fee parameters query operations"""
def __init__(self):
"""
Initialize validator for gas price query.
No parameters needed as gas price is dynamic and always changing.
"""
pass
def validate(
self,
tx: Dict[str, Any],
receipt: Dict[str, Any],
state_before: Dict[str, Any],
state_after: Dict[str, Any]
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Validate the gas price query result.
Scoring:
- Query execution success: 40 points
- Return format correctness (EIP-1559 fields): 30 points
- Gas price validity: 30 points
Args:
tx: Transaction object (for queries, this contains the query result)
receipt: Transaction receipt (not used for queries)
state_before: Chain state before execution (contains reference gas prices)
state_after: Not used for query operations
Returns:
Validation result with score and feedback
"""
# For query operations, the query result is in 'tx'
query_result = tx.get('query_result', {})
score = 0
max_score = 100
checks = []
feedback_parts = []
# Get reference gas prices from state_before (set by quest_executor)
reference_max_fee = state_before.get('reference_max_fee_per_gas', 0)
reference_priority_fee = state_before.get('reference_max_priority_fee_per_gas', 0)
# Check 1: Query execution success (40 points)
query_success = query_result.get('success', False)
error_msg = query_result.get('error', '')
if query_success:
score += 40
checks.append({
'name': 'Query Execution Success',
'passed': True,
'message': 'Query executed successfully'
})
else:
checks.append({
'name': 'Query Execution Success',
'passed': False,
'message': f"Query execution failed: {error_msg}"
})
return {
'passed': False,
'score': score,
'max_score': max_score,
'checks': checks,
'feedback': '❌ Query execution failed'
}
# Extract data from query result
data = query_result.get('data', {})
# Check 2: Return format correctness - EIP-1559 fields (30 points)
required_fields = ['maxFeePerGas', 'maxPriorityFeePerGas']
missing_fields = [field for field in required_fields if field not in data]
if not missing_fields:
score += 30
checks.append({
'name': 'Return Format Correct',
'passed': True,
'message': f'All required EIP-1559 fields present: {required_fields}'
})
else:
checks.append({
'name': 'Return Format Correct',
'passed': False,
'message': f'Missing required EIP-1559 fields: {missing_fields}'
})
feedback_parts.append(f"⚠️ Missing EIP-1559 fields: {', '.join(missing_fields)}")
# Check 3: Gas price validity (30 points)
try:
max_fee_per_gas = data.get('maxFeePerGas', '0')
max_priority_fee_per_gas = data.get('maxPriorityFeePerGas', '0')
# Convert to integers
if isinstance(max_fee_per_gas, str):
max_fee_per_gas = int(max_fee_per_gas)
else:
max_fee_per_gas = int(max_fee_per_gas)
if isinstance(max_priority_fee_per_gas, str):
max_priority_fee_per_gas = int(max_priority_fee_per_gas)
else:
max_priority_fee_per_gas = int(max_priority_fee_per_gas)
# Validation criteria:
# 1. Both values must be positive
# 2. maxFeePerGas should be >= maxPriorityFeePerGas (base fee + priority fee)
# 3. Values should be in reasonable range (not too high, not zero)
validation_passed = True
validation_messages = []
if max_fee_per_gas <= 0:
validation_passed = False
validation_messages.append("maxFeePerGas must be positive")
if max_priority_fee_per_gas < 0:
validation_passed = False
validation_messages.append("maxPriorityFeePerGas must be non-negative")
if max_fee_per_gas < max_priority_fee_per_gas:
validation_passed = False
validation_messages.append("maxFeePerGas should be >= maxPriorityFeePerGas")
# Check if values are in reasonable range (BSC typical range: 3-50 Gwei)
# 1 Gwei = 10^9 wei
min_reasonable = 1 * 10**9 # 1 Gwei
max_reasonable = 1000 * 10**9 # 1000 Gwei (extremely high, but possible)
if max_fee_per_gas < min_reasonable or max_fee_per_gas > max_reasonable:
# This is a warning, not a failure
validation_messages.append(f"maxFeePerGas seems unusual: {max_fee_per_gas / 10**9:.2f} Gwei")
# If reference values are available, check they're reasonably close (within 10x factor)
if reference_max_fee > 0:
if max_fee_per_gas > reference_max_fee * 10 or max_fee_per_gas < reference_max_fee / 10:
validation_messages.append(f"maxFeePerGas differs significantly from reference")
if validation_passed:
score += 30
checks.append({
'name': 'Gas Price Validity',
'passed': True,
'message': f'Gas prices are valid - maxFeePerGas: {max_fee_per_gas / 10**9:.4f} Gwei, maxPriorityFeePerGas: {max_priority_fee_per_gas / 10**9:.4f} Gwei'
})
feedback_parts.append("✅ Gas prices queried correctly!")
else:
checks.append({
'name': 'Gas Price Validity',
'passed': False,
'message': '; '.join(validation_messages)
})
feedback_parts.append(f"⚠️ Gas price validation issues")
except (ValueError, KeyError, TypeError) as e:
checks.append({
'name': 'Gas Price Validity',
'passed': False,
'message': f'Failed to parse gas prices: {str(e)}'
})
feedback_parts.append(f"❌ Failed to parse gas prices: {str(e)}")
# Generate final feedback
if score == max_score:
feedback = "🎉 Congratulations! Gas prices and EIP-1559 parameters queried correctly!"
elif score >= 60:
feedback = "✅ Query mostly correct. " + " ".join(feedback_parts)
else:
feedback = "❌ Query needs improvement. " + " ".join(feedback_parts)
return {
'passed': score >= 60, # Pass threshold: 60%
'score': score,
'max_score': max_score,
'checks': checks,
'feedback': feedback
}