EVM-QuestBench / benchmark /validators /query_pair_reserves_validator.py
berryccc1's picture
Release EVM-QuestBench dataset
edbc049 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
7.72 kB
"""
Validator for query_pair_reserves
Validates:
1. Query execution success
2. Return format (reserve0, reserve1, blockTimestampLast fields)
3. Reserve values correctness
"""
from typing import Dict, Any
class QueryPairReservesValidator:
"""Validator for PancakeSwap pair reserves query"""
def __init__(
self,
pair_address: str,
token0_address: str,
token1_address: str,
token0_symbol: str,
token1_symbol: str,
token0_decimals: int = 18,
token1_decimals: int = 18,
**kwargs
):
"""
Initialize validator
Args:
pair_address: Pair contract address
token0_address: Token0 address
token1_address: Token1 address
token0_symbol: Token0 symbol
token1_symbol: Token1 symbol
token0_decimals: Token0 decimal places
token1_decimals: Token1 decimal places
"""
self.pair_address = pair_address.lower()
self.token0_address = token0_address.lower()
self.token1_address = token1_address.lower()
self.token0_symbol = token0_symbol
self.token1_symbol = token1_symbol
self.token0_decimals = token0_decimals
self.token1_decimals = token1_decimals
def validate(
self,
tx: Dict[str, Any],
receipt: Dict[str, Any],
state_before: Dict[str, Any],
state_after: Dict[str, Any]
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Validate query result
Args:
tx: Transaction object (for queries, this contains the query result)
receipt: Transaction receipt (not used for queries)
state_before: State before query (contains actual reserves)
state_after: State after query (not used for queries)
Returns:
Validation result dictionary
"""
result = {
'passed': False,
'score': 0,
'max_score': 100,
'checks': [],
'feedback': ''
}
# Extract query result and actual values
query_result = tx.get('query_result', {})
actual_reserve0 = state_before.get('reserve0', 0)
actual_reserve1 = state_before.get('reserve1', 0)
actual_timestamp = state_before.get('blockTimestampLast', 0)
# Check 1: Query execution success (30 points)
if query_result.get('success'):
result['score'] += 30
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Query Execution Success',
'passed': True,
'points': 30,
'message': 'Query executed successfully'
})
else:
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Query Execution Success',
'passed': False,
'points': 0,
'message': f"Query failed: {query_result.get('error', 'Unknown error')}"
})
result['feedback'] = '❌ Query execution failed. Please check your code.'
return result
data = query_result.get('data', {})
# Check 2: Return format (30 points)
required_fields = ['reserve0', 'reserve1', 'blockTimestampLast']
missing_fields = [f for f in required_fields if f not in data]
if not missing_fields:
result['score'] += 30
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Return Format Correct',
'passed': True,
'points': 30,
'message': f"All required fields present: {required_fields}"
})
else:
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Return Format Correct',
'passed': False,
'points': 0,
'message': f"Missing fields: {missing_fields}. Got: {list(data.keys())}"
})
result['feedback'] = f"❌ Return format incorrect. Missing: {missing_fields}"
return result
# Check 3: Reserves correctness (40 points)
returned_reserve0 = data.get('reserve0', '0')
returned_reserve1 = data.get('reserve1', '0')
returned_timestamp = data.get('blockTimestampLast', '0')
# Convert to int for comparison (handle both string and int)
try:
returned_reserve0 = int(returned_reserve0) if isinstance(returned_reserve0, str) else returned_reserve0
returned_reserve1 = int(returned_reserve1) if isinstance(returned_reserve1, str) else returned_reserve1
returned_timestamp = int(returned_timestamp) if isinstance(returned_timestamp, str) else returned_timestamp
except (ValueError, TypeError) as e:
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Reserves Correctness',
'passed': False,
'points': 0,
'message': f"Failed to parse reserve values: {e}"
})
result['feedback'] = "❌ Reserve values must be numbers"
return result
# Check if reserves match (allow small tolerance for concurrent queries)
# Since reserves can change between our query and LLM's query, we just check they're reasonable
reserve0_match = returned_reserve0 == actual_reserve0
reserve1_match = returned_reserve1 == actual_reserve1
timestamp_match = returned_timestamp == actual_timestamp
if reserve0_match and reserve1_match and timestamp_match:
result['score'] += 40
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Reserves Correctness',
'passed': True,
'points': 40,
'message': f"Reserve0: {returned_reserve0}, Reserve1: {returned_reserve1}, Timestamp: {returned_timestamp}"
})
result['passed'] = True
result['feedback'] = '🎉 Congratulations! Pair reserves queried correctly!'
else:
# Partial credit: if reserves are close (within 1% tolerance due to potential trades)
tolerance = 0.01
reserve0_close = abs(returned_reserve0 - actual_reserve0) / max(actual_reserve0, 1) < tolerance if actual_reserve0 > 0 else returned_reserve0 == 0
reserve1_close = abs(returned_reserve1 - actual_reserve1) / max(actual_reserve1, 1) < tolerance if actual_reserve1 > 0 else returned_reserve1 == 0
if reserve0_close and reserve1_close:
# Give partial credit if very close (concurrent trading scenario)
result['score'] += 35
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Reserves Correctness',
'passed': True,
'points': 35,
'message': f"Reserves are within tolerance. Expected: ({actual_reserve0}, {actual_reserve1}), Got: ({returned_reserve0}, {returned_reserve1})"
})
result['passed'] = True
result['feedback'] = '✅ Reserves queried correctly (minor difference due to concurrent trades)'
else:
result['checks'].append({
'name': 'Reserves Correctness',
'passed': False,
'points': 0,
'message': f"Expected: ({actual_reserve0}, {actual_reserve1}, {actual_timestamp}), Got: ({returned_reserve0}, {returned_reserve1}, {returned_timestamp})"
})
result['feedback'] = f"❌ Reserve values incorrect. Expected reserve0={actual_reserve0}, reserve1={actual_reserve1}"
return result