--- annotations_creators: - crowd-generated language: - de - en - fr license: cc-by-sa-4.0 task_categories: - object-detection - image-classification pretty_name: 'ARTigo: Social Image Tagging' tags: - lam dataset_info: features: - name: id dtype: int64 - name: hash_id dtype: string - name: titles struct: - name: id list: int64 - name: name list: string - name: creators struct: - name: id list: int64 - name: name list: string - name: location dtype: string - name: institution dtype: string - name: source struct: - name: id dtype: int64 - name: name dtype: string - name: url dtype: string - name: path dtype: string - name: tags struct: - name: id list: int64 - name: name list: string - name: language list: string - name: count list: int64 - name: regions list: - name: x list: float64 - name: y list: float64 - name: width list: float64 - name: height list: float64 - name: image dtype: image splits: - name: train num_bytes: 5905082165 num_examples: 60633 download_size: 11451421751 dataset_size: 5905082165 configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: train path: data/train-* --- # ARTigo: Social Image Tagging 60,633 digital reproductions of artworks with crowdsourced tags, from [ARTigo](https://www.artigo.org/) — a citizen-science project run since 2010 by the Institute of Art History and the Institute of Informatics at LMU Munich. Players are shown an image and type tags against a clock, scoring when a tag matches one their anonymous opponent gives or one recorded in an earlier session. The aggregate of those game rounds is this dataset. Built from the [v1.5 Zenodo deposit](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8202331) (1 August 2023), whose `data.jsonl` holds 60,981 records; the deposit is refreshed monthly, so current versions on Zenodo are larger than this build. Measured on that deposit: 270,024 distinct tags, 4.9M tag–image pairs, and just under 10M individual taggings, at a median of 61 distinct tags per image. Images come from nine sources, named in `source.name`: Artemis (26,402), Koeln (21,055), Rijksmuseum (5,633), Mkg-Hamburg (3,965), Kunsthalle-Karlsruhe (2,145), Amherst-College (1,365), and small contributions from Albertina, Stadt-Land-Bild and Streetart. ## Fields | field | notes | | --- | --- | | `id`, `hash_id` | integer id; content hash used as the image filename | | `titles`, `creators` | lists of `{id, name}`; 8,769 distinct creator names | | `location`, `institution` | holding place and institution, where known | | `source` | `{id, name, url}` — one of the nine collections above | | `path` | URL of the image on the ARTigo API | | `tags` | list of `{id, name, language, count, regions}` | | `image` | the reproduction itself | Metadata coverage is partial: `creators` is empty on 12,182 records (20%), `institution` on 13,687 (22%), `location` on 17,795 (29%). Tags are unedited — the depositors deliberately left player spelling errors uncorrected rather than risk mangling specialist art-historical vocabulary. ```python from datasets import load_dataset ds = load_dataset("biglam/artigo", split="train") row = ds[0] row["image"] # the artwork row["tags"]["name"] # tags are stored column-wise, not as a list of dicts row["tags"]["language"] # tag language, mostly de ``` ## The tags are overwhelmingly German By tag–image pair: German 4,378,382 (89%), English 472,028 (9.6%), French 68,557 (1.4%). Anything trained on this without filtering learns a German tag vocabulary. `language` is also a weaker signal than it looks. It records which language version of ARTigo the tag was collected on, not the language of the tag: the data paper notes that "English tags created in the German version of ARTigo are labelled as German". ## `regions` is almost always empty Visual annotation — tagging a rectangle rather than the whole image — only started in 2022. In this deposit 521 records out of 60,981 (0.9%) carry any region at all, across 1,935 tag–image pairs. The `object-detection` task tag in the metadata is not supported at usable scale; in practice this is an image-tagging dataset. Where regions exist, the data paper describes them as normalised bounding boxes given by the x and y of the bottom-left corner plus width and height. ## Use - Training or evaluating image tagging and text-to-image retrieval on art-historical images, in German. - `count` is a per-image agreement signal — head tags were given by many players, the long tail by one. It is the obvious weight or threshold for filtering noise. - Comparing player vocabulary against curatorial vocabulary, using `titles` and `creators` as the institutional description of the same object. ## Licence The Zenodo record is CC BY-SA 4.0. That covers the deposit as a whole, including the aggregated annotations; the record does not break out rights per source institution for the reproductions themselves, which come from nine third-party collections. Check the source before redistributing images, and note that share-alike propagates to derivatives. ## Citation ``` @dataset{bry_et_al_artigo, author = {Bry, François and Kohle, Hubertus and Krefeld, Thomas and Riepl, Christian and Schneider, Stefanie and Schön, Gerhard and Schulz, Klaus}, title = {{ARTigo}: Social Image Tagging (Aggregated Data)}, publisher = {Zenodo}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.8202331}, url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8202331}} ``` Data paper: Schneider, Stefanie (2024). "ARTigo: Data from Social Tagging with Art-historical Images", *Journal of Open Humanities Data* 10, [10.5334/johd.247](https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.247). Code: [arthist-lmu/artigo](https://github.com/arthist-lmu/artigo).