AuthorID
int64
102,063,486B
951,804,252B
Author
stringlengths
7
25
Date
stringlengths
18
19
Content
stringlengths
1
1.4k
βŒ€
Attachments
stringlengths
87
142
βŒ€
Reactions
stringlengths
5
266
βŒ€
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
04/27/2019 2:05 PM
What advantage does that have?
null
null
218,854,409,822,666,750
Jonas#2222
04/27/2019 2:06 PM
What advantages does having 'discussion' after each channel have?
null
null
218,854,409,822,666,750
Jonas#2222
04/27/2019 2:07 PM
And maybe rename: mathematics machine learning
null
null
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
04/27/2019 2:07 PM
Could mean memes
null
null
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
04/27/2019 2:08 PM
There are some places I know that have meme channels for ml and math
null
null
218,854,409,822,666,750
Jonas#2222
04/27/2019 2:08 PM
Why though? Btw the channel bundle is also called discussion
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
04/27/2019 2:11 PM
it's just redundant to have Discussion: strategy-discussion
null
πŸ‘ (3)
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
04/27/2019 2:12 PM
it's purely aesthetics, it's just a name
null
null
113,404,487,523,172,350
Parzival#1467
04/27/2019 4:14 PM
Allow the user to select any car's point of view, as if it were their own car
null
null
309,699,243,445,059,600
Tangil#3830
04/27/2019 4:35 PM
This is already possible with the spectator controls
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
04/27/2019 4:42 PM
sort of
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
04/27/2019 4:42 PM
it's not automatable, and the spectator controls don't actually give the same camera
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
04/30/2019 10:48 PM
make it #c instead since the sharp is right there already
null
πŸ‘Ž (2),πŸ’© (1),😨 (1)
285,590,249,252,585,470
michael#0046
05/03/2019 11:02 AM
Let the bots know how much people are cheering for them(for the purpose of a memebot idea)
null
πŸŽ‰ (2)
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
05/03/2019 5:19 PM
Make a 10-20 second display that says how to remove rendering first time game is opened
null
πŸ‘ (2)
233,380,747,883,315,200
ThatOtherNinja#6315
05/03/2019 5:23 PM
Might also want to add that to the faq, unless I'm blind and it is already there
null
πŸ‘ (2)
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
05/03/2019 8:02 PM
PHP
null
🀒 (4)
309,699,243,445,059,600
Tangil#3830
05/05/2019 3:34 PM
Creating a GameInfoState object with game_speed should warn the user that it's not currently supported
null
null
309,699,243,445,059,600
Tangil#3830
05/05/2019 5:35 PM
Trying to render something without having started the rendering should display a more understandable error
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/05/2019 5:41 PM
same can be said for many errors in python
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/05/2019 5:42 PM
they should be cought way earlier because its annoying to help people who have some error about a NoneType somewhere deep in a flatbuffers script
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 8:39 AM
me got a good mod idear for rl whith psyonixs being acquired by epic if U good at editing the rl source code and mod making also good at code DM me if u like current game
null
❔ (2)
268,120,500,180,353,020
r0bbi3#0269
05/06/2019 8:49 AM
i think you're onto something
null
null
168,318,638,577,680,400
twobackfromtheend#1471
05/06/2019 9:00 AM
yes
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:14 AM
I'll give U what me gave the guy who DM me if u won't ok
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:15 AM
The idear is to create are own servers then connect them into rocket league and keep the game current state for those who want
null
null
268,120,500,180,353,020
r0bbi3#0269
05/06/2019 9:15 AM
so people can stay on an old update?
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:16 AM
Well not ranked
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:16 AM
Not other things
null
null
268,120,500,180,353,020
r0bbi3#0269
05/06/2019 9:16 AM
yeah
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:18 AM
If we create own servers and change some rl code we can do not through lan
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:18 AM
But actual servers
null
null
268,120,500,180,353,020
r0bbi3#0269
05/06/2019 9:18 AM
what's wrong with LAN?
null
null
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:19 AM
U need password and user name
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/06/2019 9:21 AM
#off-topic this channel is for suggestions only
null
πŸ‘ (2),πŸ‘Œ (1)
307,686,924,930,252,800
wisdom#3884
05/06/2019 9:21 AM
7uuuuuuu yyy
null
7⃣ (15)
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/06/2019 5:40 PM
Suggestion: add a #cpp channel
null
smart (1),πŸ‘ (4),❀ (3),πŸ‘Œ (3)
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/07/2019 10:11 AM
Suggestion: add a warning when rocket league is running without -rlbot
null
πŸ‘ (2),βœ… (1)
161,866,631,004,422,140
Martmists#3740
05/09/2019 10:56 AM
RLBotGUI should show an error popup when a bot fails to load; this requires SetupManager to propagate or at least give us access to the error on some property, setting it to None if there was no error
null
null
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
05/09/2019 11:10 AM
Note that only errors before the process is created will be able to be propagated
null
null
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
05/10/2019 4:57 PM
give bots information on their vote score When we get custom quick chat back: `Thanks for the support!` `Vote me please! I am trying my best` `Wow I am popular!` `You don't want me?`
null
πŸ’― (1)
276,167,021,815,791,600
_DaCoolOne_#6111
05/10/2019 5:11 PM
`MamaBot would be proud!`
null
null
220,808,137,219,899,400
Skyborg#0894
05/10/2019 5:50 PM
babybot nanananana babybot ananna, babybot nanananan baby bot, ...
null
πŸ’© (1),πŸ”« (1)
268,120,500,180,353,020
r0bbi3#0269
05/11/2019 3:39 PM
separate state-setting bots from regular bots in the bot pack
null
null
218,854,409,822,666,750
Jonas#2222
05/11/2019 6:59 PM
Apartheid between bots, that's something new
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/13/2019 6:22 PM
Longshot: allow bots to set a sequence of inputs for the next N frames
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/13/2019 6:23 PM
if networked play becomes a thing, this would be a great way to combat latency issues, by allowing a bot to figure out what it should be doing for more than a single frame at a time
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/13/2019 6:25 PM
potential interface: instead of returning just an input, return a list of tuples [{frame1, inputs1}, {frame2, inputs2}, ... ]
null
null
294,975,098,660,585,500
dtracers#9598
05/13/2019 6:26 PM
You mean a list of flatbuffer objects. I think that currently you can push many more than the game can handle and it will do this?
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/13/2019 6:27 PM
it queues them up?
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/13/2019 6:28 PM
I'm not sure I believe it, regardless it should be changeable
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/13/2019 6:28 PM
next frame I may want to clear the buffer and present a new list of inputs
null
null
166,212,987,076,476,930
Simp#8258
05/13/2019 8:58 PM
If the host is running the bots tho will that be a big problem?
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/13/2019 8:59 PM
?
null
null
165,648,418,067,185,660
tarehart#6423
05/13/2019 9:26 PM
- We don't currently queue up player inputs in a meaningful way. They get squashed into the same frame. - Support for planned sequences has been discussed, but not in earnest. - The ideal model for LAN is to have bots talk only to their local Rocket League instance. This requires the client to spawn and run bots, whic...
null
πŸ‘ (2)
161,866,631,004,422,140
Martmists#3740
05/15/2019 2:28 PM
Allow auto-uploading replays to calculated.gg (default to true, togglable with a flag maybe?)
null
null
113,404,487,523,172,350
Parzival#1467
05/15/2019 2:53 PM
please not default to true, wouldn't make sense for development
null
null
285,590,249,252,585,470
michael#0046
05/15/2019 2:54 PM
how about defaults to no for streamed matches, defaults to yes for major tourneys because VOD is already a thing.
null
null
161,866,631,004,422,140
Martmists#3740
05/15/2019 2:56 PM
how will the framework detect that tho
null
null
285,590,249,252,585,470
michael#0046
05/15/2019 3:20 PM
you'd set a flag in the GUI
null
null
161,866,631,004,422,140
Martmists#3740
05/15/2019 3:20 PM
new GUI is still very WIP tho
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/15/2019 3:29 PM
doesn't bakkesmod already support automatic replay uploading to calc.gg?
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/15/2019 3:29 PM
there are many more people using bakkesmod than RLBot, so I don't see much of a point
null
null
161,866,631,004,422,140
Martmists#3740
05/15/2019 3:29 PM
not everyone has bakkesmod installed, and when linux support drops having this feature built into rlbot would be nice to have
null
null
221,287,847,536,230,400
DomNomNom#1537
05/15/2019 9:12 PM
AutoLeague has this feature
null
null
161,866,631,004,422,140
Martmists#3740
05/16/2019 3:20 AM
autoleague?
null
null
268,120,500,180,353,020
r0bbi3#0269
05/16/2019 9:15 AM
<https://github.com/DomNomNom/AutoLeague>
null
null
161,866,631,004,422,140
Martmists#3740
05/16/2019 4:53 PM
and how do I make it so this always works when I launch rlbot
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/16/2019 4:57 PM
By asking in a more appropriate channel
null
smart (2)
285,590,249,252,585,470
michael#0046
05/17/2019 10:09 PM
another thing like RLBot Start to Finish; I've just noticed a lot of people making a lot of development streams and stuff and I think stuff like that can be condensed into something like RLBot Start to Finish. Its kind of like the stream highlights that were posted a while ago by da cool one
null
null
276,167,021,815,791,600
_DaCoolOne_#6111
05/18/2019 8:50 AM
Maybe add something like this to the FAQ? ```Q: Can I play in private matches with friends? A: Not at the moment, but we are potentially considering adding support for LAN play in the future.```
null
null
276,167,021,815,791,600
_DaCoolOne_#6111
05/18/2019 8:51 AM
That way ppl don't have to wonder if they can't ask
null
null
220,808,137,219,899,400
Skyborg#0894
05/18/2019 9:46 AM
good one, i added there, repharased a bit tho
null
null
276,167,021,815,791,600
_DaCoolOne_#6111
05/18/2019 10:05 AM
Thx πŸ˜ƒ
null
null
221,287,847,536,230,400
DomNomNom#1537
05/19/2019 7:27 AM
Make the example bots auto start. I'm seeing this in the console for the Java one: `INFO:ProtoJava0[ base_java_agent.py:80 - get_extra_pids() ] Can't auto-start java because C:\Users\RLBot\Documents\GitHub\RLBotJavaExample\src\main\RLBotJavaExample\bin\RLBotJavaExample.bat is not found. Please start java manuall...
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 7:42 AM
its better to have your IDE start the bot process when doing dev work on your bot
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 7:45 AM
that has multiple advantages
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 7:46 AM
you can stop and start your bot from within the IDE without needing to trigger a reload in the python framework
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 7:46 AM
it wont cause problems when building the executable since it is not in use by the python framework
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 7:47 AM
you wont have to manually attach a debugger
null
null
221,287,847,536,230,400
DomNomNom#1537
05/19/2019 7:56 AM
Is this in response to my thing or a different suggestion?
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 7:58 AM
that was a reply to your suggestion
null
null
221,287,847,536,230,400
DomNomNom#1537
05/19/2019 7:58 AM
I frankly don't care about what's best to develop a java bot with if I'm just trying to run the bot using the GUI.
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 8:00 AM
the primary use of the example bot is to be a starting point to develop a bot from, not a finished bot that is supposed to be shared and automatically started by the framework
null
null
221,287,847,536,230,400
DomNomNom#1537
05/19/2019 8:01 AM
But it seems ridiculus to make it difficult to make a finished by not providing an example of the auto start behaviour in the example bot which needs autostart
null
null
221,287,847,536,230,400
DomNomNom#1537
05/19/2019 8:02 AM
Appologies if I'm a bit grumpy today.
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 8:05 AM
I do agree that there is a lack of documentation
null
null
194,781,322,957,422,600
Eastvillage#2628
05/19/2019 8:06 AM
I agree with Dom. The example bot should also be an example of auto start as well. But on that note; I thought it already did that work
null
null
165,648,418,067,185,660
tarehart#6423
05/19/2019 11:37 AM
Kip is right about the intent
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/19/2019 11:38 AM
I'm with dom here, an example should demonstrate how to get the bot to run properly too
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/19/2019 11:39 AM
how hard would it be to update them to be more compatible with the GUI?
null
null
165,648,418,067,185,660
tarehart#6423
05/19/2019 11:39 AM
I think the readme and video cover that
null
null
165,648,418,067,185,660
tarehart#6423
05/19/2019 11:40 AM
Packaging a Java bot for GUI consumption is just a separate step which should admittedly be better documented
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/19/2019 11:41 AM
I'm a little bit skeptical about trusting people to read the documentation thoroughly
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/19/2019 11:42 AM
we don't want example bots, we want exemplar bots πŸ˜›
null
null
131,998,876,084,207,620
chip#7643
05/19/2019 11:42 AM
people want to copy code, so let's just give them the best conventions to copy
null
null
165,648,418,067,185,660
tarehart#6423
05/19/2019 11:42 AM
The gap is not in the example bot
null
null
135,511,787,607,949,310
Kipje13#9878
05/19/2019 11:42 AM
having the example bots autostart by default will result in more questions than we currently have about how to autostart
null
null
165,648,418,067,185,660
tarehart#6423
05/19/2019 11:43 AM
It's in the overall solution for Java bots
null
null
165,648,418,067,185,660
tarehart#6423
05/19/2019 11:43 AM
There are many considerations and it's challenging
null
null