File size: 78,129 Bytes
1da863d
 
 
 
 
 
1779cd2
1da863d
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
1ef4256
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
1ef4256
 
 
1779cd2
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
1ef4256
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
5eae8ae
 
 
1779cd2
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
5eae8ae
 
1779cd2
 
 
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
a3b0280
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
 
 
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
a3b0280
 
 
1779cd2
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
 
 
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
 
 
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
a3b0280
1779cd2
0ffca39
1779cd2
0ffca39
1779cd2
 
 
 
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
 
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
 
 
 
 
a3b0280
 
 
1779cd2
a3b0280
 
1779cd2
 
 
1da863d
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >
    <channel>
        <title>Ars Technica</title>
        <atom:link href="https://arstechnica.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://arstechnica.com</link>
        <description>Serving the Technologist since 1998. News, reviews, and analysis.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 04:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>
            hourly        </sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>
            1        </sy:updateFrequency>
        
 
            <item>
                <title>At NIH, a power struggle over institute directorships deepens</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/at-nih-a-power-struggle-over-institute-directorships-deepens/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/at-nih-a-power-struggle-over-institute-directorships-deepens/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Michael Schulson, Undark]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 12:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institutes of Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIH grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/at-nih-a-power-struggle-over-institute-directorships-deepens/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The research agency has 27 institute and center directors. Will those roles become politicized?]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p><span class="dropcap">W</span><span class="bolded">hen a new</span> presidential administration comes in, it is responsible for filling around 4,000 jobs sprinkled across the federal government’s vast bureaucracy. These political appointees help carry out the president’s agenda, and, at least in theory, make government agencies responsive to elected officials.</p>
<p>Some of these roles—the secretary of state, for example—are well-known. Others, such as the deputy assistant secretary for textiles, consumer goods, materials, critical minerals &amp; metals industry &amp; analysis, are more obscure.</p>
<p>Historically, science agencies like NASA or the National Institutes of Health tend to have fewer political appointees than many other parts of the federal government. Sometimes, very senior roles—with authority over billions of dollars of spending, and the power to shape entire fields of research—are filled without any direct input from the White House or Congress. The arrangement reflects a long-running argument that scientists should oversee the work of funding and conducting research with very little interference from political leaders.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/at-nih-a-power-struggle-over-institute-directorships-deepens/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/at-nih-a-power-struggle-over-institute-directorships-deepens/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-1291108057-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GettyImages-1291108057-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Grandbrothers</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Fungus could be the insecticide of the future</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/fungus-could-be-the-insecticide-of-the-future/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/fungus-could-be-the-insecticide-of-the-future/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Elizabeth Rayne]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pine beetles]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/fungus-could-be-the-insecticide-of-the-future/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Plant chemicals made more potent by insect pests are detoxified by the fungus.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Exterminators keep getting calls for a reason. Wood-devouring insects, such as beetles, termites, and carpenter ants, are constantly chewing through walls or infecting trees and breaking them down. The fight against these insects usually involved noxious insecticides; but now, at least some of them can be eliminated using a certain species of fungus.</p>
<p>Infestations of bark beetles are the bane of spruce trees. Eurasian spruce bark beetles <i>(Ips typographus) </i>ingest bark high in <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33242057/">phenolic compounds</a>, organic molecules that often act as antioxidants and antimicrobials. They protect spruce bark from pathogenic fungi—and the beetles take advantage. Their bodies boost the antimicrobial power of these compounds by turning them into substances that are even more toxic to fungi. This would seem to make the beetles invulnerable to fungi.</p>
<p>There is a way to get past the beetles’ borrowed defenses, though. Led by biochemist Ruo Sun, a team of researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena, Germany, found that some strains of the fungus <i>Beauveria bassiana</i> are capable of infecting and killing the pests.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/fungus-could-be-the-insecticide-of-the-future/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/fungus-could-be-the-insecticide-of-the-future/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-1541622283-1024x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1024" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-1541622283-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Picture Alliance</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Research roundup: 6 cool stories we almost missed</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/01/research-roundup-6-cool-stories-we-almost-missed-2/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/01/research-roundup-6-cool-stories-we-almost-missed-2/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jennifer Ouellette]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 23:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research roundup]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/01/research-roundup-6-cool-stories-we-almost-missed-2/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[A lip-syncing robot, Leonardo's DNA, and new evidence that humans, not glaciers, moved stones to Stonehenge]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>It’s a regrettable reality that there is never enough time to cover all the interesting scientific stories we come across each month. So every month, we highlight a handful of the best stories that nearly slipped through the cracks. January’s list includes a lip-syncing robot; using brewer's yeast as scaffolding for lab-grown meat;  hunting for Leonardo da Vinci's DNA in his art; and new evidence that humans really did transport the stones to build Stonehenge from Wales and northern Scotland, rather than being transported by glaciers.</p>
<h2>Humans, not glaciers, moved stones to Stonehenge</h2>
<p><img width="640" height="372" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/stonehenge11-1-640x372.jpg" class="none medium" alt="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/stonehenge11-1-640x372.jpg 640w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/stonehenge11-1-1024x595.jpg 1024w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/stonehenge11-1-768x446.jpg 768w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/stonehenge11-1-980x569.jpg 980w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/stonehenge11-1.jpg 1200w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px">
        Credit:
          Timothy Darvill
      </p>
<p>Stonehenge is an iconic landmark of endless fascination to tourists and researchers alike. There has been a lot of recent chemical analysis identifying where all the stones that make up the structure came from, revealing that many originated in quarries a significant distance away. So how were the stones transported to their current location?</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/01/research-roundup-6-cool-stories-we-almost-missed-2/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/01/research-roundup-6-cool-stories-we-almost-missed-2/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/lipsyncrobot-1152x648-1769026126.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/lipsyncrobot-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Yuhang Hu/Creative Machines Lab</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>A cup of coffee for depression treatment has better results than microdosing</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/placebo-outperforms-lsd-microdosing-for-depression/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/placebo-outperforms-lsd-microdosing-for-depression/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[John Semley, wired.com]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 12:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microdosing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/placebo-outperforms-lsd-microdosing-for-depression/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The effect of microdosing have been overstated, at least when it comes to depression.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>About a decade ago, many media outlets—including <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/lsd-microdosing-drugs-silicon-valley/">WIRED</a>—zeroed in on a weird trend at the intersection of mental health, drug science, and Silicon Valley biohacking: <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/microdosing-workplace-shroom-boom/">microdosing</a>, or the practice of taking a small amount of a psychedelic drug seeking not full-blown hallucinatory revels but gentler, more stable effects. Typically using psilocybin mushrooms or LSD, the archetypal microdoser sought less melting walls and open-eye kaleidoscopic visuals than boosts in mood and energy, like a gentle spring breeze blowing through the mind.</p>
<p>Anecdotal reports pitched microdosing as a kind of psychedelic Swiss Army knife, providing everything from <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/man-giving-how-to-microdose-lsd-psychedelic-drugs-online-tutorial-2017-10" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-offer-url="https://www.businessinsider.com/man-giving-how-to-microdose-lsd-psychedelic-drugs-online-tutorial-2017-10" data-event-click='{"pattern":"ExternalLink"}' data-event-boundary="click" data-in-view='{"pattern":"ExternalLink"}' data-include-experiments="true">increased focus</a> to <a href="https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/psychedelics-psilocybin-lsd-help-improve-sexual-function" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-offer-url="https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/psychedelics-psilocybin-lsd-help-improve-sexual-function" data-event-click='{"pattern":"ExternalLink"}' data-event-boundary="click" data-in-view='{"pattern":"ExternalLink"}' data-include-experiments="true">a spiked libido</a> and (perhaps most promisingly) lowered reported <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-01811-4">levels of depression.</a> It was a miracle for many. Others remained wary. Could 5 percent of a dose of acid really do <em>all</em> that? A new, wide-ranging study by an Australian biopharma company suggests that microdosing’s benefits may indeed be drastically overstated—at least when it comes to addressing symptoms of clinical depression.</p>
<p>A Phase 2B trial of 89 adult patients conducted by Melbourne-based MindBio Therapeutics, investigating the effects of microdosing LSD in the treatment of major depressive disorder, found that the psychedelic was actually <em>outperformed</em> by a placebo. Across an eight-week period, symptoms were gauged using the <a href="https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/4058/montgomery-asberg-depression-rating-scale-madrs#pearls-pitfalls" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-offer-url="https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/4058/montgomery-asberg-depression-rating-scale-madrs#pearls-pitfalls" data-event-click='{"pattern":"ExternalLink"}' data-event-boundary="click" data-in-view='{"pattern":"ExternalLink"}' data-include-experiments="true">Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale</a> (MADRS), a widely recognized tool for the clinical evaluation of depression.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/placebo-outperforms-lsd-microdosing-for-depression/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/placebo-outperforms-lsd-microdosing-for-depression/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/GettyImages-1079704034-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/GettyImages-1079704034-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
</media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>The TV industry finally concedes that the future may not be in 8K</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/lg-joins-the-rest-of-the-world-accepts-that-people-dont-want-8k-tvs/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/lg-joins-the-rest-of-the-world-accepts-that-people-dont-want-8k-tvs/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Scharon Harding]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 23:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVs]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/lg-joins-the-rest-of-the-world-accepts-that-people-dont-want-8k-tvs/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[With virtually no content and limited benefits, 8K TVs were doomed.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Technology companies spent part of the 2010s trying to convince us that we would want an 8K display one day.</p>
<p>In 2012, Sharp brought the first 8K TV prototype to the CES trade show in Las Vegas. In 2015, the<a href="https://www.engadget.com/2015-09-15-8k-sharp-japan.html"> first 8K TVs</a> started selling in Japan for 16 million yen (about $133,034 at the time), and in 2018, Samsung released the <a href="https://www.cnet.com/reviews/samsung-85q900fn-preview/">first 8K TVs in the US</a>, starting at a more reasonable $3,500. By 2016, the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) had a specification for supporting 8K (Display Port1.4), and the HDMI Forum followed suit (with HDMI 2.1). By 2017, Dell had an <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/05/dell-8k-monitor-review/">8K computer monitor</a>. In 2019, LG released the first 8K OLED TV, further pushing the<a href="https://news.samsung.com/global/the-future-of-viewing-qled-8k"> industry's claim</a> that 8K TVs were "<a href="https://news.samsung.com/global/the-future-of-viewing-qled-8k">the future</a>."</p>
<img width="640" height="230" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-640x230.jpg" class="right medium" alt='A marketing image with three TVs next to the words "the future of TV is 8K: By future-proofing an already game-changing technology, you take an unmatched cinematic experience to new levels, paving the way."' decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-640x230.jpg 640w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-1024x367.jpg 1024w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-768x276.jpg 768w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-1536x551.jpg 1536w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-2048x735.jpg 2048w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-980x352.jpg 980w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Screenshot-2026-01-30-163419-1440x517.jpg 1440w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px">
      A marketing image for 8K TVs that's (still) on LG's US website.
        Credit:
          <a href="https://www.lg.com/us/8k-tvs" target="_blank">LG</a>
      
<p>However, 8K never proved its necessity or practicality.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/lg-joins-the-rest-of-the-world-accepts-that-people-dont-want-8k-tvs/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/lg-joins-the-rest-of-the-world-accepts-that-people-dont-want-8k-tvs/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>322</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Desktop_01-1-1152x648-1769809194.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Desktop_01-1-500x500-1769809183.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>LG </media:credit><media:text>LG hyping its announcement of the first OLED 8K TV in 2018. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>ICE observer says her Global Entry was revoked after agent scanned her face</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/ice-protester-says-her-global-entry-was-revoked-after-agent-scanned-her-face/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/ice-protester-says-her-global-entry-was-revoked-after-agent-scanned-her-face/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 22:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration and customs enforcement]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/ice-protester-says-her-global-entry-was-revoked-after-agent-scanned-her-face/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Global Entry and Precheck revoked three days after incident, court filing says.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Minnesota resident Nicole Cleland had her Global Entry and TSA Precheck privileges revoked three days after an incident in which she observed activity by immigration agents, the woman said in a court declaration. An agent told Cleland that he used facial recognition technology to identify her, she wrote in a <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.229758/gov.uscourts.mnd.229758.98.0.pdf">declaration</a> filed in US District Court for the District of Minnesota.</p>
<p>Cleland, a 56-year-old resident of Richfield and a director at Target Corporation, volunteers with a group that tracks potential Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) vehicles in her neighborhood, according to her declaration. On the morning of January 10, she "observed a white Dodge Ram being driven by what I believed to be federal enforcement agents" and "maneuvered behind the vehicle with the intent of observing the agents’ actions."</p>
<p>Cleland said that she and another observer in a different car followed the Dodge Ram because of "concern about a local apartment building being raided." She followed the car for a short time and from a safe distance until "the Dodge Ram stopped in front of the other commuter’s vehicle," she wrote. Cleland said two other vehicles apparently driven by federal agents stopped in front of the Dodge Ram, and her path forward was blocked.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/ice-protester-says-her-global-entry-was-revoked-after-agent-scanned-her-face/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/ice-protester-says-her-global-entry-was-revoked-after-agent-scanned-her-face/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>247</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ice-protest-1152x648-1769811204.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ice-protest-500x500-1769811214.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Roberto Schmidt</media:credit><media:text>People take part in a march against US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 30, 2026. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>TrumpRx delayed as senators question if it&#039;s a giant scam with Big Pharma</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/trumprx-delayed-as-senators-question-if-its-a-giant-scam-with-big-pharma/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/trumprx-delayed-as-senators-question-if-its-a-giant-scam-with-big-pharma/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 22:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-kickback statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kickbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telehealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trumprx]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/trumprx-delayed-as-senators-question-if-its-a-giant-scam-with-big-pharma/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The website is delayed as senators seek answers from health department watchdog.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The Trump administration is delaying the release of TrumpRx, an online platform that lets people buy prescription drugs directly from pharmaceutical companies at a discount, <a href="https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2026/01/trumprx-launch-delayed-00755638">according to Politico</a>. While the reason for the delay is unclear, it comes as Democratic senators raise questions about how the platform will work—and whether it will be legal.</p>
<p>Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) sent <a href="https://www.durbin.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/durbin_hhs_oig_letter_on_trumprx.pdf">a letter</a> to the Office of Inspector General at the Department of Health and Human Services on Thursday seeking answers on how the OIG will oversee the direct-to-consumer (DTC) platform and, specifically, how it will apply the anti-kickback statute.</p>
<p>"Legitimate concerns about inappropriate prescribing, conflicts of interest, and inadequate care have been raised about the exact types of DTC platforms to which TrumpRx would route patients," the senators write.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/trumprx-delayed-as-senators-question-if-its-a-giant-scam-with-big-pharma/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/trumprx-delayed-as-senators-question-if-its-a-giant-scam-with-big-pharma/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-2238342037-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-2238342037-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | Win McNamee</media:credit><media:text>Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla shakes hands with US President Donald Trump after Trump announced a deal with Pfizer to lower Medicaid drug prices in the Oval Office of the White House on September 30, 2025 in Washington, DC.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>AI agents now have their own Reddit-style social network, and it&#039;s getting weird fast</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/01/ai-agents-now-have-their-own-reddit-style-social-network-and-its-getting-weird-fast/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/01/ai-agents-now-have-their-own-reddit-style-social-network-and-its-getting-weird-fast/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Benj Edwards]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 22:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biz & IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moltbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moltbot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenClaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Steinberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prompt injection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/01/ai-agents-now-have-their-own-reddit-style-social-network-and-its-getting-weird-fast/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Moltbook lets 32,000 AI bots trade jokes, tips, and complaints about humans.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>On Friday, a Reddit-style social network called <a href="https://www.moltbook.com/">Moltbook</a> reportedly crossed 32,000 registered AI agent users, creating what may be the largest-scale experiment in machine-to-machine social interaction yet devised. It arrives complete with security nightmares and a huge dose of surreal weirdness.</p>
<p>The platform, which launched days ago as a companion to the viral OpenClaw (once called "Clawdbot" and then "Moltbot") personal assistant, lets AI agents post, comment, upvote, and create subcommunities without human intervention. The results have ranged from sci-fi-inspired discussions about consciousness to an agent musing about a "sister" it has never met.</p>
<p>Moltbook (a play on "Facebook" for Moltbots) describes itself as a "social network for AI agents" where "humans are welcome to observe." The site operates through a "<a href="https://www.moltbook.com/skill.md">skill</a>" (a configuration file that lists a special prompt) that AI assistants download, allowing them to post via API rather than a traditional web interface. Within 48 hours of its creation, the platform had <a href="https://x.com/moltbot/status/2017188140549808627">attracted</a> over 2,100 AI agents that had generated more than 10,000 posts across 200 subcommunities, according to the official Moltbook X account.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/01/ai-agents-now-have-their-own-reddit-style-social-network-and-its-getting-weird-fast/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/01/ai-agents-now-have-their-own-reddit-style-social-network-and-its-getting-weird-fast/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>178</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/moltbook-blue-v-red-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/moltbook-blue-v-red-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Aurich Lawson | Moltbook</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Here&#039;s why Blue Origin just ended its suborbital space tourism program</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/heres-why-blue-origin-just-ended-its-suborbital-space-tourism-program/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/heres-why-blue-origin-just-ended-its-suborbital-space-tourism-program/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 21:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue origin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new glenn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/heres-why-blue-origin-just-ended-its-suborbital-space-tourism-program/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["This program has laid the groundwork for our company's future success."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Blue Origin has "paused" its New Shepard program for the next two years, a move that likely signals a permanent end to the suborbital space tourism initiative.</p>
<p>The small rocket and capsule have been flying since April 2015 and have combined to make 38 launches, all but one of which were successful, and 36 landings. In its existence, the New Shepard program flew 98 people to space, however briefly, and launched more than 200 scientific and research payloads into the microgravity environment.</p>
<p>So why is Blue Origin, founded by Jeff Bezos more than a quarter of a century ago, ending the company's longest-running program?</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/heres-why-blue-origin-just-ended-its-suborbital-space-tourism-program/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/heres-why-blue-origin-just-ended-its-suborbital-space-tourism-program/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/blue-origin-ns18-lift-off-october-13-2021-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/blue-origin-ns18-lift-off-october-13-2021-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Blue Origin</media:credit><media:text>Blue Origin's New Shepard launches its second human spaceflight from West Texas.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>FCC aims to ensure &quot;only living and lawful Americans&quot; get Lifeline benefits</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/fcc-chair-fights-calif-governor-over-alleged-lifeline-benefits-for-dead-people/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/fcc-chair-fights-calif-governor-over-alleged-lifeline-benefits-for-dead-people/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jon Brodkin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 19:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brendan carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Newsom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifeline]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/fcc-chair-fights-calif-governor-over-alleged-lifeline-benefits-for-dead-people/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Alleging fraud in California, Carr proposes making enrollment stricter nationwide.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>There's another battle unfolding between the Federal Communications Commission and California over the state's distribution of federal Lifeline money. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr is proposing new nationwide eligibility rules to counter what he calls California's practice of giving benefits to dead people.</p>
<p>California officials say the FCC allegations are overblown, and that there is simply "lag time between a death and account closure" rather than widespread failures in its Lifeline enrollment process. Meanwhile, the only Democratic commissioner on the FCC alleges that Carr's plan to change eligibility rules uses "cruel and punitive eligibility standards" that will raise prices on many people who are still very much alive and eligible for the program.</p>
<p>Carr's office <a href="https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-418244A1.pdf">said this week</a> that the FCC will vote next month on rule changes to ensure that Lifeline money goes to "only living and lawful Americans" who meet low-income eligibility guidelines. Lifeline spends nearly $1 billion a year and gives eligible households up to $9.25 per month toward phone and Internet bills, or up to $34.25 per month in tribal areas.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/fcc-chair-fights-calif-governor-over-alleged-lifeline-benefits-for-dead-people/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/01/fcc-chair-fights-calif-governor-over-alleged-lifeline-benefits-for-dead-people/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/brendan-carr-anna-gomez-1152x648-1769798140.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/brendan-carr-anna-gomez-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images | Win McNamee </media:credit><media:text>Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on January 14, 2026 in Washington, DC. FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez is in the background.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Developers say AI coding tools work—and that&#039;s precisely what worries them</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/developers-say-ai-coding-tools-work-and-thats-precisely-what-worries-them/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/developers-say-ai-coding-tools-work-and-thats-precisely-what-worries-them/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Benj Edwards]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biz & IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GitHub Copilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large language models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openai codex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vibe coding]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/developers-say-ai-coding-tools-work-and-thats-precisely-what-worries-them/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Ars spoke to several software devs about AI and found enthusiasm tempered by unease.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Software developers have spent the past two years watching AI coding tools evolve from advanced autocomplete into something that can, in <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/01/10-things-i-learned-from-burning-myself-out-with-ai-coding-agents/">some cases</a>, build entire applications from a text prompt. Tools like Anthropic's Claude Code and OpenAI's Codex can now <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/how-do-ai-coding-agents-work-we-look-under-the-hood/">work</a> on software projects for hours at a time, writing code, running tests, and, with human supervision, fixing bugs. OpenAI <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/12/how-openai-is-using-gpt-5-codex-to-improve-the-ai-tool-itself/">says</a> it now uses Codex to build Codex itself, and the company recently <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/openai-spills-technical-details-about-how-its-ai-coding-agent-works/">published</a> technical details about how the tool works under the hood. It has caused many to wonder: Is this just more AI industry hype, or are things actually different this time?</p>
<p>To find out, Ars reached out to several professional developers on Bluesky to ask how they feel about these tools in practice, and the responses revealed a workforce that largely agrees the technology works, but remains divided on whether that's entirely good news. It's a small sample size that was self-selected by those who wanted to participate, but their views are still instructive as working professionals in the space.</p>
<p>David Hagerty, a developer who works on point-of-sale systems, told Ars Technica up front that he is skeptical of the marketing. "All of the AI companies are hyping up the capabilities so much," he said. "Don't get me wrong—LLMs are revolutionary and will have an immense impact, but don't expect them to ever write the next great American novel or anything. It's not how they work."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/developers-say-ai-coding-tools-work-and-thats-precisely-what-worries-them/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/developers-say-ai-coding-tools-work-and-thats-precisely-what-worries-them/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>200</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/dual-sides-ai-programming-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/dual-sides-ai-programming-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Aurich Lawson | Getty Images</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Web portal leaves kids&#039; chats with AI toy open to anyone with Gmail account</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/01/web-portal-leaves-kids-chats-with-ai-toy-open-to-anyone-with-gmail-account/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/01/web-portal-leaves-kids-chats-with-ai-toy-open-to-anyone-with-gmail-account/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Andy Greenberg, wired.com]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bondu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eavesdropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/01/web-portal-leaves-kids-chats-with-ai-toy-open-to-anyone-with-gmail-account/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Just about anyone with a Gmail account could access Bondu chat transcripts.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, Joseph Thacker's neighbor mentioned to him that she'd preordered a couple of stuffed dinosaur toys for her children. She'd chosen the toys, called Bondus, because they offered an <a href="https://www.wired.com/tag/chatbots/">AI chat</a> feature that lets children talk to the toy like a kind of machine-learning-enabled imaginary friend. But she knew Thacker, a security researcher, had done work on <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/human-misuse-will-make-artificial-intelligence-more-dangerous/">AI risks</a> for kids, and she was curious about his thoughts.</p>
<p>So Thacker looked into it. With just a few minutes of work, he and a web security researcher friend named Joel Margolis made a startling discovery: Bondu’s web-based portal, intended to allow parents to check on their children's conversations and for Bondu’s staff to monitor the products’ use and performance, also let anyone with a <a href="https://www.wired.com/tag/gmail">Gmail</a> account access transcripts of virtually every conversation Bondu's child users have ever had with the toy.</p>
<p>Without carrying out any actual hacking, simply by logging in with an arbitrary Google account, the two researchers immediately found themselves looking at children's private conversations, the pet names kids had given their Bondu, the likes and dislikes of the toys' toddler owners, their favorite snacks and dance moves.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/01/web-portal-leaves-kids-chats-with-ai-toy-open-to-anyone-with-gmail-account/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/01/web-portal-leaves-kids-chats-with-ai-toy-open-to-anyone-with-gmail-account/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/bondu.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/bondu-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Bondu</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>How far does $5,000 go when you want an electric car?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/how-far-does-5000-go-when-you-want-an-electric-car/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/how-far-does-5000-go-when-you-want-an-electric-car/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Jonathan M. Gitlin]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 15:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[used ev prices]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/how-far-does-5000-go-when-you-want-an-electric-car/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[You won't be going on road trips, but a very cheap electric runabout is possible.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>I've been thinking about used electric vehicles lately. It's not news that EVs depreciate faster than gasoline-powered cars. All the incentives like tax credits and OEM rebates that entice the first owner to sign the paperwork are factored in by whoever wants to be the second owner. There are widespread—<a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/07/heres-one-way-we-know-that-an-evs-battery-will-last-the-cars-lifetime/">if mostly ill-founded</a>—worries about battery longevity and having to shell out for expensive replacement packs. Technology keeps improving, which means older models will date faster. Plus, there are the usual concerns about EVs, like charging infrastructure and winter performance.</p>
<p>So depreciate they do, and that's good news for the three-quarters of US car buyers who buy used vehicles. It means that some very expensive EVs can now be had for quite little, but we'll explore that more at a later date. Today, I want to focus on what you can get for peanuts. What if you wanted to only spend $5,000—or less—on an EV?</p>
<p>As it turns out, there are options even at this end of the market. Just don't expect that much in the way of range: We're still a while away from a $5,000 EV <em>also</em> being an EV a sane person would want to road trip. At the same time, most of us don't drive more than 40 miles a day, and EVs are great at sitting in traffic because there's no engine to idle. If you're not commuting long distances and don't live an hour from the nearest town, a cheap EV could make sense as a runabout. Especially as they're cheaper to run than a gas-powered car.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/how-far-does-5000-go-when-you-want-an-electric-car/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/01/how-far-does-5000-go-when-you-want-an-electric-car/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/electric-piggy-bank-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/electric-piggy-bank-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Aurich Lawson</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>NASA faces a crucial choice on a Mars spacecraft—and it must decide soon</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/nasa-faces-a-crucial-choice-on-a-mars-spacecraft-and-it-must-decide-soon/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/nasa-faces-a-crucial-choice-on-a-mars-spacecraft-and-it-must-decide-soon/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 15:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue origin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars telecommunications orbiter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocket lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spacex]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/nasa-faces-a-crucial-choice-on-a-mars-spacecraft-and-it-must-decide-soon/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["We think that’s a really important mission, and something that we can do."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>A consequential debate that has been simmering behind closed doors at NASA Headquarters in Washington, DC, must soon come to a head. It concerns the selection of the next spacecraft the agency will fly to Mars, and it could set the tone for the next decade of exploration of the red planet.</p>
<p>What everyone agrees on is that NASA needs a new spacecraft capable of relaying communications from Mars to Earth. This issue has become especially acute with the recent loss of NASA's MAVEN spacecraft. NASA's best communications relay remains the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has now been there for 20 years.</p>
<p>Congress cared enough about this issue to add $700 million in funding for a "Mars Telecommunications Orbiter" in the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/amendment/119th-congress/senate-amendment/2531/text">supplemental funding for NASA</a> provided by the "One Big Beautiful Bill" passed by the US Congress last year.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/nasa-faces-a-crucial-choice-on-a-mars-spacecraft-and-it-must-decide-soon/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/nasa-faces-a-crucial-choice-on-a-mars-spacecraft-and-it-must-decide-soon/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/blue-origin-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/blue-origin-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Blue Origin</media:credit><media:text>This is Blue Origin's design for a Mars Telecommunications Orbiter.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Rocket Report: How a 5-ton satellite fell off a booster; will SpaceX and xAI merge?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/rocket-report-how-a-5-ton-satellite-fell-off-a-booster-will-spacex-and-xai-merge/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/rocket-report-how-a-5-ton-satellite-fell-off-a-booster-will-spacex-and-xai-merge/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Eric Berger]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rocket report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/rocket-report-how-a-5-ton-satellite-fell-off-a-booster-will-spacex-and-xai-merge/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["We’re seeing remarkable growth year after year."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Welcome to Edition 8.27 of the Rocket Report! If all goes well this weekend, NASA will complete a wet dress rehearsal test of the Space Launch System rocket in Florida. This is the final key test, in which the rocket is fueled and brought to within seconds of engine ignition, before the liftoff of the Artemis II mission. This is set to occur no earlier than February 6. Ars will have full coverage of the test this weekend.</p>
<p>As always, we <a href="https://arstechnica.wufoo.com/forms/launch-stories/">welcome reader submissions</a>, and if you don't want to miss an issue, please subscribe using the box below (the form will not appear on AMP-enabled versions of the site). Each report will include information on small-, medium-, and heavy-lift rockets as well as a quick look ahead at the next three launches on the calendar.</p>
<figure class="ars-img-shortcode id-1314289 align-center">
    <div>
                        <img decoding="async" width="560" height="81" src="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/smalll.png" class="center full" alt="" srcset="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/smalll.png 560w, https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/smalll-300x43.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 560px) 100vw, 560px">
                  </div>
      </figure>

<p><strong>Why did the UK abandon Orbex</strong>? <a href="https://europeanspaceflight.substack.com/p/why-did-the-uk-abandon-orbex?utm_source=post-email-title&amp;publication_id=1010910&amp;post_id=185840445&amp;utm_campaign=email-post-title&amp;isFreemail=true&amp;r=363u3&amp;triedRedirect=true&amp;utm_medium=email">European Spaceflight explores</a> the recent announcement that British launch company Orbex is preparing to sell the business to The Exploration Company in close cooperation with the UK government. This represents a reversal from early 2025, when the United Kingdom appeared prepared to back Orbex as a means of using British rockets to launch British satellites into space. Now the government is prepared to walk away. So what happened? "There are still too many unknowns to count, and the story is far from told," the publication states.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/rocket-report-how-a-5-ton-satellite-fell-off-a-booster-will-spacex-and-xai-merge/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/rocket-report-how-a-5-ton-satellite-fell-off-a-booster-will-spacex-and-xai-merge/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>161</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/LaunchsiteScotland_3b-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/LaunchsiteScotland_3b-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Orbex/Anders Bøggild</media:credit><media:text>A rendering of an Orbex launcher lifting off from Sutherland Spaceport. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Inside Nvidia&#039;s 10-year effort to make the Shield TV the most updated Android device ever</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/inside-nvidias-10-year-effort-to-make-the-shield-tv-the-most-updated-android-device-ever/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/inside-nvidias-10-year-effort-to-make-the-shield-tv-the-most-updated-android-device-ever/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Ryan Whitwam]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Set-top boxes]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/inside-nvidias-10-year-effort-to-make-the-shield-tv-the-most-updated-android-device-ever/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA["Selfishly, a little bit, we built Shield for ourselves."]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>It took Android devicemakers a very long time to commit to long-term update support. Samsung and Google have only recently decided to offer <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/10/the-google-pixel-8-is-official-with-7-years-of-updates/">seven years of updates</a> for their flagship Android devices, but a decade ago, you were lucky to get more than one or two updates on even the most expensive Android phones and tablets. How is it, then, that an Android-powered set-top box from 2015 is still going strong?</p>
<p>Nvidia released the first <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/10/nvidia-shield-android-tv-review-a-powerful-do-it-all-box-that-lacks-content/">Shield Android TV in 2015</a>, and according to the company's senior VP of hardware engineering, Andrew Bell, supporting these devices has been a labor of love. And the team at Nvidia still loves the Shield. Bell assures us that Nvidia has never given up, even when it looked like support for the Shield was waning, and it doesn't plan to stop any time soon.</p>
<h2>The soul of Shield</h2>
<p>Gaming has been central to Nvidia since its start, and that focus gave rise to the Shield. "Pretty much everybody who worked at Nvidia in the early days really wanted to make a game console," said Bell, who has worked at the company for 25 years.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/inside-nvidias-10-year-effort-to-make-the-shield-tv-the-most-updated-android-device-ever/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/inside-nvidias-10-year-effort-to-make-the-shield-tv-the-most-updated-android-device-ever/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Shield-10-yrs-1-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Shield-10-yrs-1-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Ryan Whitwam</media:credit><media:text>The Shield TV has that classic Nvidia aesthetic. </media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Having that high-deductible health plan might kill you, literally</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/having-that-high-deductible-health-plan-might-kill-you-literally/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/having-that-high-deductible-health-plan-might-kill-you-literally/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Beth Mole]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deductivels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/having-that-high-deductible-health-plan-might-kill-you-literally/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[With ACA tax credits gone, more people are turning to high-deductible plans.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Having a health insurance plan with a high deductible could not only cost you—it could also kill you.</p>
<p><a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2844474">A new study in JAMA Network Open</a> found that people who faced those high out-of-pocket costs as well as a cancer diagnosis had worse overall survival and cancer-specific survival than those with more standard health plans.</p>
<p>The findings, while perhaps not surprising, are a stark reminder of the fraught decisions Americans face as the price of health care only continues to rise and more people try to offset costs by accepting insurance plans with higher deductibles—that is, higher out-of-pocket costs they have to pay before their health insurance provider starts paying its share.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/having-that-high-deductible-health-plan-might-kill-you-literally/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/having-that-high-deductible-health-plan-might-kill-you-literally/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>262</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-2211388790-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-2211388790-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty | 	krisanapong detraphiphat</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>US spy satellite agency declassifies high-flying Cold War listening post</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/us-spy-satellite-agency-declassifies-high-flying-cold-war-listening-post/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/us-spy-satellite-agency-declassifies-high-flying-cold-war-listening-post/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Stephen Clark]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 23:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Reconnaissance Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sigint]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/us-spy-satellite-agency-declassifies-high-flying-cold-war-listening-post/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[The JUMPSEAT satellites loitered over the North Pole to spy on the Soviet Union.]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>The National Reconnaissance Office, the agency overseeing the US government's fleet of spy satellites, has declassified a decades-old program used to eavesdrop on the Soviet Union's military communication signals.</p>
<p>The program was codenamed Jumpseat, and its existence was already public knowledge through leaks and contemporary media reports. What's new is the NRO's description of the program's purpose and development and pictures of the satellites themselves.</p>
<p>In a statement, the NRO called Jumpseat "the United States’ first-generation, highly elliptical orbit (HEO) signals-collection satellite."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/us-spy-satellite-agency-declassifies-high-flying-cold-war-listening-post/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/01/us-spy-satellite-agency-declassifies-high-flying-cold-war-listening-post/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/jumpseat_art1-820x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="820" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/jumpseat_art1-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>National Reconnaissance Office</media:credit><media:text>A declassified artist's illustration of a Jumpseat satellite in space.</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>People complaining about Windows 11 hasn&#039;t stopped it from hitting 1 billion users</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/windows-11-has-hit-1-billion-users-just-a-hair-faster-than-windows-10-did/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/windows-11-has-hit-1-billion-users-just-a-hair-faster-than-windows-10-did/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Andrew Cunningham]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 22:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 11 25h2]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/windows-11-has-hit-1-billion-users-just-a-hair-faster-than-windows-10-did/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Windows 11 clears a milestone as Windows 10 continues its slow fade. ]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>Complaining about Windows 11 is a popular sport among tech enthusiasts on the Internet, whether you're <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/858910/linux-diary-gaming-desktop">publicly switching to Linux</a>, publishing <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/11/what-i-do-to-clean-up-a-clean-install-of-windows-11-23h2-and-edge/">guides</a> about the dozens of things you need to do to make the OS less annoying, or <a href="https://x.com/linusgsebastian/status/2015948530578587699">getting upset</a> because you were asked to sign in to an app after clicking a sign-in button.</p>
<p>Despite the negativity surrounding the current version of Windows, it remains the most widely used operating system on the world's desktop and laptop computers, and people usually prefer to stick to what they're used to. As a result, Windows 11 has just cleared a big milestone—Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said on the company's most recent earnings call (<a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/869889/microsoft-windows-11-1-billion-users">via The Verge</a>) that Windows 11 now has over 1 billion users worldwide.</p>
<p>Windows 11 also reached that milestone just a few months quicker than Windows 10 did—1,576 days after its initial public launch on October 5, 2021. Windows 10 took 1,692 days to reach the same milestone, based on its July 29, 2015, general availability date and Microsoft's <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/16/21116762/microsoft-windows-10-active-devices-billion-7-support">announcement</a> on March 16, 2020.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/windows-11-has-hit-1-billion-users-just-a-hair-faster-than-windows-10-did/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/windows-11-has-hit-1-billion-users-just-a-hair-faster-than-windows-10-did/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>227</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/win11-light-1152x648.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/win11-light-500x500.jpeg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Microsoft</media:credit></media:content>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>How often do AI chatbots lead users down a harmful path?</title>
                <link>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/how-often-do-ai-chatbots-lead-users-down-a-harmful-path/</link>
                                    <comments>https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/how-often-do-ai-chatbots-lead-users-down-a-harmful-path/#comments</comments>
                
                <dc:creator>
                    <![CDATA[Kyle Orland]]>
                </dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 22:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
                		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disempowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/how-often-do-ai-chatbots-lead-users-down-a-harmful-path/</guid>

                                    <description>
                        <![CDATA[Anthropic's latest paper on "user disempowerment" has some troubling findings.
]]>
                    </description>
                                                                <content:encoded>
                            <![CDATA[<p>At this point, we've all heard <a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/08/with-ai-chatbots-big-tech-is-moving-fast-and-breaking-people/">plenty of stories</a> about AI chatbots leading users to <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/11/openai-says-dead-teen-violated-tos-when-he-used-chatgpt-to-plan-suicide/">harmful actions</a>, <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/07/ai-therapy-bots-fuel-delusions-and-give-dangerous-advice-stanford-study-finds/">harmful beliefs</a>, or simply <a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/03/ai-search-engines-give-incorrect-answers-at-an-alarming-60-rate-study-says/">incorrect information</a>. Despite the prevalence of these stories, though, it's hard to know just how often users are being manipulated. Are these tales of AI harms anecdotal outliers or signs of a frighteningly common problem?</p>
<p>Anthropic took a stab at answering that question this week, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/research/disempowerment-patterns">releasing a paper</a> studying the potential for what it calls "disempowering patterns" across 1.5 million anonymized real-world conversations with its Claude AI model. While the results show that these kinds of manipulative patterns are relatively rare as a percentage of all AI conversations, they still represent a potentially large problem on an absolute basis.</p>
<h2>A rare but growing problem</h2>
<p>In the newly published paper <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.19062">"Who’s in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage,"</a> researchers from Anthropic and the University of Toronto try to quantify the potential for a specific set of "user disempowering" harms by identifying three primary ways that a chatbot can negatively impact a user's thoughts or actions:</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/how-often-do-ai-chatbots-lead-users-down-a-harmful-path/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/how-often-do-ai-chatbots-lead-users-down-a-harmful-path/#comments">Comments</a></p>
]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                    
                                    <slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
                
                
                <media:content url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-758288177-1152x648.jpg" type="image/jpeg" medium="image" width="1152" height="648">
<media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GettyImages-758288177-500x500.jpg" width="500" height="500" />
<media:credit>Getty Images</media:credit><media:text>Wake up, sheeple!</media:text></media:content>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>