Physics World

Astronomers observe a coronal mass ejection from a distant star

Isabelle Dumé — Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:00:30 +0000

The Sun regularly produces energetic outbursts of electromagnetic radiation called solar flares. When these flares are accompanied by flows of plasma, they are known as coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Now, astronomers at the Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON) have spotted a similar event occurring on a star other than our Sun – the first unambiguous detection of a CME outside our solar system.

Astronomers have long predicted that the radio emissions associated with CMEs from other stars should be detectable. However, Joseph Callingham, who led the ASTRON study, says that he and his colleagues needed the highly sensitive low-frequency radio telescope LOFAR – plus ESA’s XMM-Newton space observatory and “some smart software” developed by Cyril Tasse and Philippe Zarka at the Observatoire de Paris-PSL, France – to find one.

A short, intense radio signal from StKM 1-1262

Using these tools, the team detected short, intense radio signals from a star located around 40 light-years away from Earth. This star, called StKM 1-1262, is very different from our Sun. At only around half of the Sun’s mass, it is classed as an M-dwarf star. It also rotates 20 times faster and boasts a magnetic field 300 times stronger. Nevertheless, the burst it produced had the same frequency, time and polarization properties as the plasma emission from an event called a solar type II burst that astronomers identify as a fast CME when it comes from the Sun.

+ +

“This work opens up a new observational frontier for studying and understanding eruptions and space weather around other stars,” says Henrik Eklund, an ESA research fellow working at the European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC) in Noordwijk, Netherlands, who was not involved in the study. “We’re no longer limited to extrapolating our understanding of the Sun’s CMEs to other stars.”

Implications for life on exoplanets

The high speed of this burst – around 2400 km/s – would be atypical for our own Sun, with only around 1 in every 20 solar CMEs reaching that level. However, the ASTRON team says that M-dwarfs like StKM 1-1262 could emit CMEs of this type as often as once a day.

Spotting a distant coronal mass ejection: An artist’s impression of XMM-Newton. (Courtesy: ESA/C Carreau)

According to Eklund, this has implications for extraterrestrial life, as most of the known planets in the Milky Way are thought to orbit stars of this type, and such bursts could be powerful enough to strip their atmospheres. “It seems that intense space weather may be even more extreme around smaller stars – the primary hosts of potentially habitable exoplanets,” he says. “This has important implications for how these planets keep hold of their atmospheres and possibly remain habitable over time.”

Erik Kuulkers, a project scientist at XMM-Newton who was also not directly involved in the study, suggests that this atmosphere-stripping ability could modify the way we hunt for life in stellar systems akin to our Solar System. “A planet’s habitability for life as we know it is defined by its distance from its parent star – whether or not it sits within the star’s ‘habitable zone’, a region where liquid water can exist on the surface of planets with suitable atmospheres,” Kuulkers says. “What if that star was especially active, regularly producing CMEs, however? A planet regularly bombarded by these ejections might lose its atmosphere entirely, leaving behind a barren uninhabitable world, despite its orbit being ‘just right’.

+ +

Kuulkers adds that the study’s results also contain lessons for our own Solar System. “Why is there still life on Earth despite the violent material being thrown at us?” he asks. “It is because we are safeguarded by our atmosphere.”

Seeking more data

The ASTRON team’s next step will be to look for more stars like StKM 1-1262, which Kuulkers agrees is a good idea. “The more events we can find, the more we learn about CMEs and their impact on a star’s environment,” he says. Additional observations at other wavelengths “would help”, he adds, “but we have to admit that events like the strong one reported on in this work don’t happen too often, so we also need to be lucky enough to be looking at the right star at the right time.”

For now, the ASTRON researchers, who report their work in Nature, say they have reached the limit of what they can detect with LOFAR. “The next step is to use the next generation Square Kilometre Array, which will let us find many more such stars since it is so much more sensitive,” Callingham tells Physics World.

The post Astronomers observe a coronal mass ejection from a distant star appeared first on Physics World.

Sterile neutrinos: KATRIN and MicroBooNE come up empty handed

Hamish Johnston — Wed, 10 Dec 2025 16:49:58 +0000

Two major experiments have found no evidence for sterile neutrinos – hypothetical particles that could help explain some puzzling observations in particle physics. The KATRIN experiment searched for sterile neutrinos that could be produced during the radioactive decay of tritium; whereas the MicroBooNE experiment looked for the effect of sterile neutrinos on the transformation of muon neutrinos into electron neutrinos.

+ +

Neutrinos are low-mass subatomic particles with zero electric charge that interact with matter only via the weak nuclear force and gravity. This makes neutrinos difficult to detect, despite the fact that the particles are produced in copious numbers by the Sun, nuclear reactors and collisions in particle accelerators.

Neutrinos were first proposed in 1930 to explain the apparent missing momentum, spin and energy in the radioactive beta decay of nuclei. The they were first observed in 1956 and by 1975 physicists were confident that three types (flavours) of neutrino existed – electron, muon and tau – along with their respective antiparticles. At the same time, however, it was becoming apparent that something was amiss with the Standard Model description of neutrinos because the observed neutrino flux from sources like the Sun did not tally with theoretical predictions.

Gaping holes

Then in the late 1990s experiments in Canada and Japan revealed that neutrinos of one flavour transform into other flavours as then propagate through space. This quantum phenomenon is called neutrino oscillation and requires that neutrinos have both flavour and mass. Takaaki Kajita and Art McDonald shared the 2015 Nobel Prize for Physics for this discovery – but that is not the end of the story.

One gaping hole in our knowledge is that physicists do not know the neutrino masses – having only measured upper limits for the three flavours. Furthermore, there is some experimental evidence that the current Standard-Model description of neutrino oscillation is not quite right. This includes lower-than-expected neutrino fluxes from some beta-decaying nuclei and some anomalous oscillations in neutrino beams.

One possible explanation for these oscillation anomalies is the existence of a fourth type of neutrino. Because we have yet to detect this particle, the assumption is that it does not interact via the weak interaction – which is why these hypothetical particles are called sterile neutrinos.

Electron energy curve

Now, two very different neutrino experiments have both reported no evidence of sterile neutrinos. One is KATRIN, which is located at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in Germany. It has the prime mission of making a very precise measurement of the mass of the electron antineutrino. The idea is to measure the energy spectrum of electrons emitted in the beta decay of tritium and infer an upper limit on the mass of the electron antineutrino from the shape of the curve.

If sterile neutrinos exist, then they could sometimes be emitted in place of electron antineutrinos during beta decay. This would change the electron energy spectrum – but this was not observed at KATRIN.

“In the measurement campaigns underlying this analysis, we recorded over 36 million electrons and compared the measured spectrum with theoretical models. We found no indication of sterile neutrinos,” says Kathrin Valerius of the Institute for Astroparticle Physics at KIT and co-spokesperson of the KATRIN collaboration.

Meanwhile, physicists on the MicroBooNE experiment at Fermilab in the US have looked for evidence for sterile neutrinos in how muon neutrinos oscillate into electron neutrinos. Beams of muon neutrinos are created by firing a proton beam at a solid target. The neutrinos at Fermilab then travel several hundred metres (in part through solid ground) to MicroBooNE’s liquid-argon time projection chamber. This detects electron neutrinos with high spatial and energy resolution, allowing detailed studies of neutrino oscillations.

+ +

If sterile neutrinos exist, they would be involved in the oscillation process and would therefore affect the number of electron neutrinos detected by MicroBooNE. Neutrino beams from two different sources were used in the experiments, but no evidence for sterile neutrinos was found.

Together, these two experiments rule out sterile neutrinos as an explanation for some – but not all – previously observed oscillation anomalies. So more work is needed to fully understand neutrino physics. Indeed, current and future neutrino experiments are well placed to discover physics beyond the Standard Model, which could lead to solutions to some of the greatest mysteries of physics.

“Any time you rule out one place where physics beyond the Standard Model could be, that makes you look in other places,” says Justin Evans at the UK’s University of Manchester, who is co-spokesperson for MicroBooNE. “This is a result that is going to really spur a creative push in the neutrino physics community to come up with yet more exciting ways of looking for new physics.”

Both groups report their results in papers in Nature: Katrin paper; MicroBooNE paper.

The post Sterile neutrinos: KATRIN and MicroBooNE come up empty handed appeared first on Physics World.

Bridging borders in medical physics: guidance, challenges and opportunities

Tami Freeman — Wed, 10 Dec 2025 14:00:03 +0000

Educational aid Global Medical Physics: A Guide for International Collaboration explores the increasing role of medical physicists in international collaborations. The book comes in paperback, hardback and ebook format. An open-access ebook will be available in the near future. (Courtesy: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis)

As the world population ages and the incidence of cancer and cardiac disease grows alongside, there’s an ever-increasing need for reliable and effective diagnostics and treatments. Medical physics plays a central role in both of these areas – from the development of a suite of advanced diagnostic imaging modalities to the ongoing evolution of high-precision radiotherapy techniques.

But access to medical physics resources – whether equipment and infrastructure, education and training programmes, or the medical physicists themselves – is massively imbalanced around the world. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), fewer than 50% of patients have access to radiotherapy, with similar shortfalls in the availability of medical imaging equipment. Lower-income countries also have the least number of medical physicists per capita.

This disparity has led to an increasing interest in global health initiatives, with professional organizations looking to provide support to medical physicists in lower income regions. Alongside, medical physicists and other healthcare professionals seek to collaborate internationally in clinical, educational and research settings.

Successful multicultural collaborations, however, can be hindered by cultural, language and ethical barriers, as well as issues such as poor access to the internet and the latest technology advances. And medical physicists trained in high-income contexts may not always understand the circumstances and limitations of those working within lower income environments.

Aiming to overcome these obstacles, a new book entitled Global Medical Physics: A Guide for International Collaboration provides essential guidance for those looking to participate in such initiatives. The text addresses the various complexities of partnering with colleagues in different countries and working within diverse healthcare environments, encompassing clinical and educational medical physics circles, as well as research and academic environments.

“I have been involved in providing support to medical physicists in lower income contexts for a number of years, especially through the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), but also through professional organizations like the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM),” explains the book’s editor Jacob Van Dyk, emeritus professor at Western University in Canada. “It is out of these experiences that I felt it might be appropriate and helpful to provide some educational materials that address these issues. The outcome was this book, with input from those with these collaborative experiences.”

Shared experience

The book brings together contributions from 34 authors across 21 countries, including both high- and low-resource settings. The authors – selected for their expertise and experience in global health and medical physics activities – provide guidelines for success, as well as noting potential barriers and concerns, on a wide range of themes targeted at multiple levels of expertise.

+ +

This guidance includes, for example: advice on how medical physicists can contribute to educational, clinical and research-based global collaborations and the associated challenges; recommendations on building global inter-institutional collaborations, covering administrative, clinical and technical challenges and ethical issues; and a case study on the Radiation Planning Assistant project, which aims to use automated contouring and treatment planning to assist radiation oncologists in LMICs.

In another chapter, the author describes the various career paths available to medical physicists, highlighting how they can help address the disparity in healthcare resources through their careers. There’s also a chapter focusing on CERN as an example of a successful collaboration engaging a worldwide community, including a discussion of CERN’s involvement in collaborative medical physics projects.

With the rapid emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, the book takes a look at the role of information and communication technologies and AI within global collaborations. Elsewhere, authors highlight the need for data sharing in medical physics, describing example data sharing applications and technologies.

+ +

Other chapters consider the benefits of cross-sector collaborations with industry, sustainability within global collaborations, the development of effective mentoring programmes – including a look at challenges faced by LMICs in providing effective medical physics education and training – and equity, diversity and inclusion and ethical considerations in the context of global medical physics.

The book rounds off by summarizing the key topics discussed in the earlier chapters. This information is divided into six categories: personal factors, collaboration details, project preparation, planning and execution, and post-project considerations.

“Hopefully, the book will provide an awareness of factors to consider when involved in global international collaborations, not only from a high-income perspective but also from a resource-constrained perspective,” says Van Dyk. “It was for this reason that when I invited authors to develop chapters on specific topics, they were encouraged to invite a co-author from another part of the world, so that it would broaden the depth of experience.”

The post Bridging borders in medical physics: guidance, challenges and opportunities appeared first on Physics World.

Can we compare Donald Trump’s health chief to Soviet science boss Trofim Lysenko?

Wed, 10 Dec 2025 11:00:15 +0000

Is materials science the new alchemy for the 21st century?

Honor Powrie — Mon, 06 Oct 2025 12:00:15 +0000

For many years, I’ve been a judge for awards and prizes linked to research and innovation in engineering and physics. It’s often said that it’s better to give than to receive, and it’s certainly true in this case. But another highlight of my involvement with awards is learning about cutting-edge innovations I either hadn’t heard of or didn’t know much about.

One area that never fails to fascinate me is the development of new and advanced materials. I’m not a materials scientist – my expertise lies in creating monitoring systems for engineering – so I apologize for any over-simplification in what follows. But I do want to give you a sense of just how impressive, challenging and rewarding the field of materials science is.

- -

It’s all too easy to take advanced materials for granted. We are in constant contact with them in everyday life, whether it’s through applications in healthcare, electronics and computing or energy, transport, construction and process engineering. But what are the most important materials innovations right now – and what kinds of novel materials can we expect in future?

Drivers of innovation

There are several – and all equally important – drivers when it comes to materials development. One is the desire to improve the performance of products we’re already familiar with. A second is the need to develop more sustainable materials, whether that means replacing less environmentally friendly solutions or enabling new technology. Third, there’s the drive for novel developments, which is where some of the most ground-breaking work is occurring.

On the environmental front, we know that there are many products with components that could, in principle, be recycled. However, the reality is that many products end up in landfill because of how they’ve been constructed. I was recently reminded of this conundrum when I heard a research presentation about the difficulties of recycling solar panels.

Green problem Solar panels often fail to be recycled at their end of their life despite containing reusable materials. (Courtesy: iStock/Milos Muller)

Photovoltaic cells become increasingly inefficient with time and most solar panels aren’t expected to last more than about 30 years. Trouble is, solar panels are so robustly built that recycling them requires specialized equipment and processes. More often than not, solar panels just get thrown away despite mostly containing reusable materials such as glass, plastic and metals – including aluminium and silver.

It seems ironic that solar panels, which enable sustainable living, could also contribute significantly to landfill. In fact, the problem could escalate significantly if left unaddressed. There are already an estimated 1.8 million solar panels in use the UK, and potentially billions around the world, with a rapidly increasing install base. Making solar panels more sustainable is surely a grand challenge in materials science.

Waste not, want not

Another vital issue concerns our addiction to new tech, which means we rarely hang on to objects until the end of their life; I mean, who hasn’t been tempted by a shiny new smartphone even though the old one is perfectly adequate? That urge for new objects means we need more materials and designs that can be readily re-used or recycled, thereby reducing waste and resource depletion.

As someone who works in the aerospace industry, I know first-hand how companies are trying to make planes more fuel efficient by developing composite materials that are stronger and can survive higher temperatures and pressures – for example carbon fibre and composite matrix ceramics. The industry also uses “additive manufacturing” to enable more intricate component design with less resultant waste.

Plastics are another key area of development. Many products are made from single type, recyclable materials, such as polyethylene or polypropylene, which benefit from being light, durable and capable of withstanding chemicals and heat. Trouble is, while polyethene and polypropene can be recycled, they both create the tiny “microplastics” that, as we know all too well, are not good news for the environment.

Sustainable challenge Material scientists will need to find practical bio-based alternatives to conventional plastics to avoid polluting microplastics entering the seas and oceans. (Courtesy: iStock/Dmitriy Sidor)

Bio-based materials are becoming more common for everyday items. Think about polylactic acid (PLA), which is a plant-based polymer derived from renewable resources such as cornstarch or sugar cane. Typically used for food or medical packaging, it’s usually said to be “compostable”, although this is a term we need to view with caution.

Sadly, PLA does not degrade readily in natural environments or landfill. To break it down, you need high-temperature, high-moisture industrial composting facilities. So whilst PLAs come from natural plants, they are not straightforward to recycle, which is why single-use disposable items, such as plastic cutlery, drinking straws and plates, are no longer permitted to be made from it.

Thankfully, we’re also seeing greater use of more sustainable, natural fibre composites, such as flax, hemp and bamboo (have you tried bamboo socks or cutlery?). All of which brings me to an interesting urban myth, which is that in 1941 legendary US car manufacturer Henry Ford built a car apparently made entirely of a plant-based plastic – dubbed the “soybean” car (see box).

The soybean car: fact or fiction?

Crazy or credible? Soybean car frame patent signed by Henry Ford and Eugene Turenne Gregorie. (Courtesy: Image in public domain)

Henry Ford’s 1941 “soybean” car, which was built entirely of a plant-based plastic, was apparently motivated by a need to make vehicles lighter (and therefore more fuel efficient), less reliant on steel (which was in high demand during the Second World War) and safer too. The exact ingredients of the plastic are, however, not known since there were no records kept.

Speculation is that it was a combination of soybeans, wheat, hemp, flax and ramie (a kind of flowering nettle). Lowell Overly, a Ford designer who had major involvement in creating the car, said it was “soybean fibre in a phenolic resin with formaldehyde used in the impregnation”. Despite being a mix of natural and synthetic materials – and not entirely made of soybeans – the car was nonetheless a significant advancement for the automotive industry more than eight decades ago.

Avoiding the “solar-panel trap”

So what technology developments do we need to take materials to the next level? The key will be to avoid what I coin the “solar-panel trap” and find materials that are sustainable from cradle to grave. We have to create an environmentally sustainable economic system that’s based on the reuse and regeneration of materials or products – what some dub the “circular economy”.

Sustainable composites will be essential. We’ll need composites that can be easily separated, such as adhesives that dissolve in water or a specific solvent, so that we can cleanly, quickly and cheaply recover valuable materials from complex products. We’ll also need recycled composites, using recycled carbon fibre, or plastic combined with bio-based resins made from renewable sources like plant-based oils, starches and agricultural waste (rather than fossil fuels).

Vital too will be eco-friendly composites that combine sustainable composite materials (such as natural fibres) with bio-based resins. In principle, these could be used to replace traditional composite materials and to reduce waste and environmental impact.

Another important trend is developing novel metals and complex alloys. As well as enhancing traditional applications, these are addressing future requirements for what may become commonplace applications, such as wide-scale hydrogen manufacture, transportation and distribution.

Soft and stretchy

Then there are “soft composites”. These are advanced, often biocompatible materials that combine softer, rubbery polymers with reinforcing fibres or nanoparticles to create flexible, durable and functional materials that can be used for soft robotics, medical implants, prosthetics and wearable sensors. These materials can be engineered for properties like stretchability, self-healing, magnetic actuation and tissue integration, enabling innovative and patient-friendly healthcare solutions.

Medical magic Wearable electronic materials could transform how we monitor human health. (Shutterstock/Guguart)

And have you heard of e-textiles, which integrate electronic components into everyday fabrics? These materials could be game-changing for healthcare applications by offering wearable, non-invasive monitoring of physiological information such as heart rate and respiration.

Further applications could include advanced personal protective equipment (PPE), smart bandages and garments for long-term rehabilitation and remote patient care. Smart textiles could revolutionize medical diagnostics, therapy delivery and treatment by providing personalized digital healthcare solutions.

Towards “new gold”

I realize I have only scratched the surface of materials science – an amazing cauldron of ideas where physics, chemistry and engineering work hand in hand to deliver groundbreaking solutions. It’s a hugely and truly important discipline. With far greater success than the original alchemists, materials scientists are adept at creating the “new gold”.

Their discoveries and inventions are making major contributions to our planet’s sustainable economy from the design, deployment and decommission of everyday items, as well as finding novel solutions that will positively impact way we live today. Surely it’s an area we should celebrate and, as physicists, become more closely involved in.

The post Is materials science the new alchemy for the 21st century? appeared first on Physics World.

Perovskite detector could improve nuclear medicine imaging

Isabelle Dumé — Mon, 06 Oct 2025 08:30:28 +0000

A perovskite semiconductor that can detect and image single gamma-ray photons with both high-spatial and high-energy resolution could be used to create next-generation nuclear medicine scanners that can image faster and provide clearer results. The perovskite is also easier to grow and much cheaper than existing detector materials such as cadmium zinc telluride (CZT), say the researchers at Northwestern University in the US and Soochow University in China who developed it.

Nuclear medicine imaging techniques like single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) work by detecting the gamma rays emitted by a short-lived radiotracer delivered to a specific part of a patient’s body. Each gamma ray can be thought of as being a pixel of light, and after millions of these pixels have been collected, a 3D image of the region of interest can be built up by an external detector.

- -

Such detectors are today made from either semiconductors like CZT or scintillators such as NaI:TI, CsI and LYSO, but CZT detectors are expensive – often costing hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. CZT crystals are also brittle, making the detectors difficult to manufacture. While NaI is cheaper than CZT, detectors made of this material end up being bulky and generate blurrier images.

High-quality crystals of CsPbBr₃

To overcome these problems, researchers led by Mercouri Kanatzidis and Yihui He studied the lead halide perovskite crystal CsPbBr₃. They already knew that this was an efficient solar cell material and recently, they discovered that it also showed promise for detecting X-rays and gamma rays.

In the new work, detailed in Nature Communications, the team grew high-quality crystals of CsPbBr₃ and fabricated them into detector devices. “When a gamma-ray photon enters the crystal, it interacts with the material and produces electron–hole pairs,” explains Kanatzidis. “These charge carriers are collected as an electrical signal that we can measure to determine both the energy of the photon and its point of interaction.”

The researchers found that their detectors could resolve individual gamma rays at the energies used in SPECT imaging with high resolution. They could also sense extremely weak signals from the medical tracer technetium-99m, which is routinely employed in hospital settings. They were thus able to produce sharp images that could distinguish features as small as 3.2 mm. This fine sensitivity means that patients would be exposed to shorter scan times or smaller doses of radiation compared with NaI or CZT detectors.

Ten years of optimization

“Importantly, a parallel study published in Advanced Materials the same week as our Nature Communications paper directly compared perovskite performance with CZT, the only commercial semiconductor material available today for SPECT, which showed that perovskites can even surpass CZT in certain aspects,” says Kanatzidis.

“The result was possible thanks to our efforts over the last 10 years in optimizing the crystal growth of CsPbBr₃, improving the electrode contacts in the detectors and carrier transport and nuclear electronics therein,” adds He. “Since the first demonstration of high spectral resolution by CsPbBr₃ in our previous work, it has gradually been recognized as the most promising competitor to CZT.”

- -

Looking forward, the Northwestern–Soochow team is now busy scaling up detector fabrication and improving its long-term stability. “We are also trying to better understand the fundamental physics of how gamma rays interact in perovskites, which could help optimize future materials,” says Kanatzidis. “A few years ago, we established a new company, Actinia, with the goal of commercializing this technology and moving it toward practical use in hospitals and clinics,” he tells Physics World.

“High-quality nuclear medicine shouldn’t be limited to hospitals that can afford the most expensive equipment,” he says. “With perovskites, we can open the door to clearer, faster, safer scans for many more patients around the world. The ultimate goal is better scans, better diagnoses and better care for patients.”

The post Perovskite detector could improve nuclear medicine imaging appeared first on Physics World.

Radioactive BEC could form a ‘superradiant neutrino laser’

No Author — Sat, 04 Oct 2025 12:48:53 +0000

Radioactive atoms in a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) could form a “superradiant neutrino laser” in which the atomic nuclei undergo accelerated beta decay. The hypothetical laser has been proposed by two researchers US who say that it could be built and tested. While such a neutrino laser has no obvious immediate applications, further developments could potentially assist in the search for background neutrinos from the Big Bang – an important goal of neutrino physicists.

- -

Neutrinos – the ghostly particles produced in beta decay – are notoriously difficult to detect or manipulate because of the weakness of their interaction with matter. They cannot be used to produce a conventional laser because they would pass straight through mirrors unimpeded. More fundamentally, neutrinos are fermions rather than bosons such as photons. This prevents neutrinos forming a two-level system with a population inversion as only one neutrino can occupy each quantum state in a system.

However, another quantum phenomenon called superradiance can also increase the intensity and coherence of the radiation from photons. This occurs when the emitters are sufficiently close together to become indistinguishable. The emission then comes not from any single entity but from the collective ensemble. As it does not require the emitted particles to be quantum degenerate, this is not theoretically forbidden for fermions. “There are devices that use superradiance to make light sources, and people call them superradiant lasers – although that’s actually a misnomer” explains neutrino physicist Benjamin Jones of the University of Texas at Arlington and a visiting professor at the University of Manchester. “There’s no stimulated emission.”

In their new work, Jones and colleague Joseph Formaggio of Massachusetts Institute of Technology propose that, in a BEC of radioactive atoms, superradiance could enhance the neutrino emission rate and therefore speed up beta decay, with an initial burst before the expected exponential decay commences. “That has not been seen for nuclear systems so far – only for electronic ones,” says Formaggio. Rubidium was used to produce the first ever condensate in 1995 by Carl Wiemann and Eric Cornell of University of Colorado Boulder, and conveniently, one of its isotopes decays by beta emission with a half-life of 86 days.

Radioactive vapour

The presence of additional hyperfine states would make direct laser cooling of rubidium-83 more challenging than the rubidium-87 isotope used by Wiemann and Cornell, but not significantly more so than the condensation of rubidium-85, which has also been achieved. Alternatively, the researchers propose that a dual condensate could be created in which rubidium-83 is cooled by sympathetic cooling with rubidium-87. The bigger challenge, says Jones, is the Bose–Einstein condensation of a radioactive atom, which has yet to be achieved: “It’s difficult to handle in a vacuum system,” he explains, “You have to be careful to make sure you don’t contaminate your laboratory with radioactive vapour.”

If such a condensate were produced, the researchers predict that superradiance would increase with the size of the BEC. In a BEC of 10⁶ atoms, for example, more than half the atoms would decay within three minutes. The researchers now hope to test this prediction. “This is one of those experiments that does not require a billion dollars to fund,” says Formaggio. “It is done in university laboratories. It’s a hard experiment but it’s not out of reach, and I’d love to see it done and be proven right or wrong.”

If the prediction were proved correct, the researchers suggest it could eventually lead towards a benchtop neutrino source. As the same physics applies to neutrino capture, this could theoretically assist the detection of neutrinos that decoupled from the hot plasma of the universe just seconds after the Big Bang – hundreds of thousands of years before photons in the cosmic microwave background. The researchers emphasize, however, that this would not currently be feasible.

Sound proposal

Neutrino physicist Patrick Huber of Virginia Tech is impressed by the work. “I think for a first, theoretical study of the problem this is very good,” he says. “The quantum mechanics seems to be sound, so the question is if you try to build an experiment what kind of real-world obstacles are you going to encounter?” He predicts that, if the experiment works, other researchers would quite likely find hitherto unforeseen applications.

- -

Atomic, molecular and optical physicist James Thompson of University of Colorado Boulder is sceptical, however. He says several important aspects are either glossed over or simply ignored. Most notably, he calculates that the de Broglie wavelength of the neutrinos would be below the Bohr radius – which would prevent a BEC from feasibly satisfying the superradiance criterion that the atoms be indistinguishable.

“I think it’s a really cool, creative idea to think about,” he concludes, “but I think there are things we’ve learned in atomic physics that haven’t really crept into [the neutrino physics] community yet. We learned them the hard way by building experiments, having them not work and then figuring out what it takes to make them work.”

The proposal is described in Physical Review Letters.

The post Radioactive BEC could form a ‘superradiant neutrino laser’ appeared first on Physics World.