File size: 18,514 Bytes
c3c7d87 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 |
# Replication File for Survey Analysis
# Figure 2: Individuals Living in Municipalities with a Higher Degree ofExcess MalesPerceiveMore Mate Competition
# Figure 3: List Experiment
# Table 1: Mate Competition Predicts Support for Hate Crime
# Figure 4: Estimated Effects of Mate Competition on Support for Hate Crimes
# R version 4.0.2 (2020-06-22)
# ##################
# Data Preparation
# ##################
rm(list=ls())
# Set the directly appropriately
# install.packages("readstata13") # readstata13_0.9.2
# install.packages("MASS") # MASS_7.3-51.6
# install.packages("sandwich") # sandwich_2.5-1
# install.packages("lmtest") # lmtest_0.9-37
# install.packages("pBrackets") # pBrackets_1.0
# install.packages("stargazer") # stargazer_5.2.2
require(readstata13) # readstata13_0.9.2
require(MASS) # MASS_7.3-51.6
require(sandwich) # sandwich_2.5-1
require(lmtest) # lmtest_0.9-37
require(pBrackets) # pBrackets_1.0
require(stargazer) # stargazer_5.2.2
source("Help.R")
dat <- read.dta13(file = "survey.dta")
# Subset to people in the wave 4
dat_use <- dat[dat$wave == 4, ]
# #######################
# Figure 2
# #######################
# Prepare Two data sets
dat_male <- dat_use[dat_use$gender == "Male" & dat_use$age <= 44 & dat_use$age >= 18, ]
dat_male_y <- dat_use[dat_use$gender == "Male" & dat_use$age <= 40 & dat_use$age >= 30, ]
# Overall Samples
dat_use$MateComp.cont_bin <- ifelse(dat_use$MateComp.cont >= 3, 1, 0)
dat_use$excess_c <- ifelse(dat_use$pop_15_44_muni_gendergap_2015 < 1.04, "1",
ifelse(dat_use$pop_15_44_muni_gendergap_2015 < 1.12, "2", "3"))
mean_all <- tapply(dat_use$MateComp.cont_bin, dat_use$excess_c, mean)
se_all <- tapply(dat_use$MateComp.cont_bin, dat_use$excess_c, sd)/sqrt(table(dat_use$excess_c))
# Male (18 - 44)
dat_male$MateComp.cont_bin <- ifelse(dat_male$MateComp.cont >= 3, 1, 0)
dat_male$excess_c <- ifelse(dat_male$pop_15_44_muni_gendergap_2015 < 1.04, "1",
ifelse(dat_male$pop_15_44_muni_gendergap_2015 < 1.12, "2", "3"))
mean_all_m <- tapply(dat_male$MateComp.cont_bin, dat_male$excess_c, mean)
se_all_m <- tapply(dat_male$MateComp.cont_bin, dat_male$excess_c, sd)/sqrt(table(dat_male$excess_c))
# Male (30 - 40)
dat_male_y$MateComp.cont_bin <- ifelse(dat_male_y$MateComp.cont >= 3, 1, 0)
dat_male_y$excess_c <- ifelse(dat_male_y$pop_15_44_muni_gendergap_2015 < 1.04, "1",
ifelse(dat_male_y$pop_15_44_muni_gendergap_2015 < 1.12, "2", "3"))
mean_all_y <- tapply(dat_male_y$MateComp.cont_bin, dat_male_y$excess_c, mean)
se_all_y <- tapply(dat_male_y$MateComp.cont_bin, dat_male_y$excess_c, sd)/sqrt(table(dat_male_y$excess_c))
mean_all ## 0.1835004 0.1970803 0.2244489
mean_all_m ## 0.2282609 0.2745902 0.3750000
mean_all_y ## 0.1743119 0.2818182 0.4705882
{
diff <- c(mean_all[2] - mean_all[1],
mean_all[3] - mean_all[2],
mean_all[3] - mean_all[1])
sd_d <- c(sqrt(se_all[2]^2 + se_all[1]^2),
sqrt(se_all[3]^2 + se_all[2]^2),
sqrt(se_all[3]^2 + se_all[1]^2))
diff_m <- c(mean_all_m[2] - mean_all_m[1],
mean_all_m[3] - mean_all_m[2],
mean_all_m[3] - mean_all_m[1])
sd_d_m <- c(sqrt(se_all_m[2]^2 + se_all_m[1]^2),
sqrt(se_all_m[3]^2 + se_all_m[2]^2),
sqrt(se_all_m[3]^2 + se_all_m[1]^2))
diff_y <- c(mean_all_y[2] - mean_all_y[1],
mean_all_y[3] - mean_all_y[2],
mean_all_y[3] - mean_all_y[1])
sd_d_y <- c(sqrt(se_all_y[2]^2 + se_all_y[1]^2),
sqrt(se_all_y[3]^2 + se_all_y[2]^2),
sqrt(se_all_y[3]^2 + se_all_y[1]^2))
diff_l <- c(diff, diff_m, diff_y)
se_l <- c(sd_d, sd_d_m, sd_d_y)
p_value <- 2*(1 - pnorm(abs(diff_l/se_l)))
diff_table <- cbind(diff_l, se_l, p_value)
}
pdf("figure_2.pdf", height= 15.5, width = 6.5)
par(mfrow = c(3, 1), mar = c(6,5,5,2), oma = c(0,4,0,0))
plot(seq(1:3), mean_all, pch = 19, ylim = c(0.1,0.4),
xlim = c(0.5, 3.5),
main = "All", xaxt = "n", xlab = "", ylab = "",
cex.axis = 2.25, cex.main = 2.5, yaxt = "n",
cex = 2.25, cex.lab = 2.5)
segments(seq(1:3), mean_all - 1.96*se_all,
seq(1:3), mean_all + 1.96*se_all, pch = 19, lwd = 3)
Axis(side = 1, at = c(1,2,3), labels = c("1st tercile", "2nd tercile", "3rd tercile"), cex.axis = 2.25)
Axis(side = 2, at = c(0.1,0.2,0.3, 0.4), labels = c("0.1", "0.2", "0.3", "0.4"), cex.axis = 2.25)
brackets(x1 = 1.1, y1 = 0.3, x2 = 1.9, y2 = 0.3, h = 0.01, type = 4)
brackets(x1 = 2.1, y1 = 0.3, x2 = 2.9, y2 = 0.3, h = 0.01, type = 4)
brackets(x1 = 1, y1 = 0.37, x2 = 3, y2 = 0.37, h = 0.01, type = 4)
# text(x = 1.5, y = 0.33, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[1],digits=3)), cex = 1.95)
text(x = 1.5, y = 0.33, paste0("pv = 0.40"), cex = 1.95)
text(x = 2.5, y = 0.33, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[2],2)), cex = 1.95)
text(x = 2, y = 0.40, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[3],2)), cex = 1.95)
mtext("Excess Males", side = 1, cex = 1.75, line = 3.75)
mtext("Proportion Perceiving\nMate Competition", side = 2, cex = 1.75, line = 3.75)
plot(seq(1:3), mean_all_m, pch = 19, ylim = c(0.1,0.6),
xlim = c(0.5, 3.5),
main = "Male (18-44)", xaxt = "n", xlab = "", ylab = "", cex.axis = 2.25, cex.main = 2.5,
cex = 2.25, cex.lab = 2.5)
segments(seq(1:3), mean_all_m - 1.96*se_all_m,
seq(1:3), mean_all_m + 1.96*se_all_m, pch = 19, lwd = 3)
Axis(side = 1, at = c(1,2,3), labels = c("1st tercile", "2nd tercile", "3rd tercile"), cex.axis = 2.25)
brackets(x1 = 1.1, y1 = 0.48, x2 = 1.9, y2 = 0.48, h = 0.01, type = 4)
brackets(x1 = 2.1, y1 = 0.48, x2 = 2.9, y2 = 0.48, h = 0.01, type = 4)
brackets(x1 = 1, y1 = 0.53, x2 = 3, y2 = 0.53, h = 0.03, type = 4)
text(x = 1.5, y = 0.51, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[4],2)), cex = 1.95)
text(x = 2.5, y = 0.51, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[5],2)), cex = 1.95)
# text(x = 2, y = 0.58, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[6],2)), cex = 1.95)
text(x = 2, y = 0.58, paste0("pv = 0.00"), cex = 1.95)
mtext("Excess Males", side = 1, cex = 1.75, line = 3.75)
mtext("Proportion Perceiving\nMate Competition", side = 2, cex = 1.75, line = 3.75)
plot(seq(1:3), mean_all_y, pch = 19, ylim = c(0.1,0.75),
xlim = c(0.5, 3.5),
main = "Male (30 - 40)", xaxt = "n", xlab = "", ylab = "", cex.axis = 2.25, cex.main = 2.5,
cex = 2.25, cex.lab = 2.5)
segments(seq(1:3), mean_all_y - 1.96*se_all_y,
seq(1:3), mean_all_y + 1.96*se_all_y, pch = 19, lwd = 3)
Axis(side = 1, at = c(1,2,3), labels = c("1st tercile", "2nd tercile", "3rd tercile"), cex.axis = 2.25)
brackets(x1 = 1.1, y1 = 0.62, x2 = 1.9, y2 = 0.62, h = 0.03, type = 4)
brackets(x1 = 2.1, y1 = 0.62, x2 = 2.9, y2 = 0.62, h = 0.03, type = 4)
brackets(x1 = 1, y1 = 0.7, x2 = 3, y2 = 0.7, h = 0.03, type = 4)
text(x = 1.5, y = 0.67, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[7],2)),cex = 1.95)
text(x = 2.5, y = 0.67, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[8],2)), cex = 1.95)
text(x = 2, y = 0.75, paste0("pv = 0.00"), cex = 1.95)
# text(x = 2, y = 0.75, paste0("pv = ", round(p_value[9],3)))
mtext("Excess Males", side = 1, cex = 1.75, line = 3.75)
mtext("Proportion Perceiving\nMate Competition", side = 2, cex = 1.75, line = 3.75)
dev.off()
# ############################
# Main Models (Table 1)
# ############################
lm1 <- lm(hate_violence_means ~ MateComp.cont, data=dat_use)
summary(lm1)
lm2 <- lm(hate_violence_means ~ MateComp.cont + JobComp.cont + LifeSatis.cont, data=dat_use)
summary(lm2)
lm3 <- lm(hate_violence_means ~ MateComp.cont + JobComp.cont + LifeSatis.cont +
factor(age_group) + # age group
factor(gender) + # gender
factor(state) + # state
factor(citizenship) + # german citizen
factor(marital) + # marital status
factor(religion) + # religious affiliation
eduyrs + # education
factor(occupation) + # main activity
factor(income) + # income
factor(household_size) + # household size
factor(self_econ), # subjective social status
data=dat_use)
summary(lm3)
lm4 <- lm(hate_violence_means ~ MateComp.cont + JobComp.cont + LifeSatis.cont +
factor(age_group) + # age group
factor(gender) + # gender
factor(state) + # state
factor(citizenship) + # german citizen
factor(marital) + # marital status
factor(religion) + # religious affiliation
eduyrs + # education
factor(occupation) + # main activity
factor(income) + # income
factor(household_size) + # household size
factor(self_econ) + # subjective social status
factor(ref_integrating) + # Refugee Index (National-level; Q73) 8 in total
factor(ref_citizenship) + factor(ref_reduce) + factor(ref_moredone) + factor(ref_cultgiveup) +
factor(ref_economy) + factor(ref_crime) + factor(ref_terror),
data=dat_use)
summary(lm4)
lm5 <- lm(hate_violence_means ~ MateComp.cont + JobComp.cont + LifeSatis.cont +
factor(age_group) + # age group
factor(gender) + # gender
factor(state) + # state
factor(citizenship) + # german citizen
factor(marital) + # marital status
factor(religion) + # religious affiliation
eduyrs + # education
factor(occupation) + # main activity
factor(income) + # income
factor(household_size) + # household size
factor(self_econ) + # subjective social status
factor(ref_integrating) + # Refugee Index (National-level; Q73) 8 in total
factor(ref_citizenship) + factor(ref_reduce) + factor(ref_moredone) + factor(ref_cultgiveup) +
factor(ref_economy) + factor(ref_crime) + factor(ref_terror) +
factor(ref_loc_services) + # Refugee Index (Local, Q75)
factor(ref_loc_economy) + factor(ref_loc_crime) + factor(ref_loc_culture) + factor(ref_loc_islam) +
factor(ref_loc_schools) + factor(ref_loc_housing) + factor(ref_loc_wayoflife), ## end
data=dat_use)
summary(lm5)
# Add More Variables
# lrscale Q21 Left-Right Scale
# afd, Q23 Closeness to AfD
# muslim_ind, afd_ind, contact_ind
# distance_ref Q71. Distance to refugee reception centers
# settle_ref Q72. Settlement of refugees living in area
formula.5 <-
as.character("hate_violence_means ~ MateComp.cont + JobComp.cont +
LifeSatis.cont + factor(age_group) + factor(gender) +
factor(state) + factor(citizenship) + factor(marital) +
factor(religion) + eduyrs + factor(occupation) +
factor(income) + factor(household_size) + factor(self_econ) +
factor(ref_integrating) + factor(ref_citizenship) + factor(ref_reduce) +
factor(ref_moredone) + factor(ref_cultgiveup) +
factor(ref_economy) + factor(ref_crime) + factor(ref_terror) +
factor(ref_loc_services) + factor(ref_loc_economy) + factor(ref_loc_crime) +
factor(ref_loc_culture) + factor(ref_loc_islam) +
factor(ref_loc_schools) + factor(ref_loc_housing) + factor(ref_loc_wayoflife)")
formula.6 <- paste(formula.5, "factor(distance_ref) + factor(settle_ref)",
"lrscale + afd + muslim_ind + afd_ind + contact_ind",
sep="+", collapse="+")
lm6 <- lm(as.formula(formula.6), data=dat_use)
summary(lm6)
lm.list.table1 <- list(lm1, lm2, lm3, lm4, lm5, lm6)
# Table 1
star_out(stargazer(lm.list.table1,
covariate.labels = c("Mate Competition","Job Competition","Life Satisfaction"),
keep=c("MateComp.cont","JobComp.cont","LifeSatis.cont"),
star.char = c("\\dagger", "*", "**"),
notes = c("$^{\\dagger}$ p$<$0.1; $^{*}$ p$<$0.05; $^{**}$ p$<$0.01"), notes.append = FALSE),
name = "table1.tex")
## #################
## Figure 4
## #################
# with Difference Outcomes
# hate_pol_message (v_320): "82. Support for Hate Crime_Attacks against refugee homes are somet"
# hate_prevent_settlement (v_319): "82. Support for Hate Crime_Racist violence is defensible if it lea"
# hate_polcondemn (v_316): "82. Support for Hate Crime_Politicians should condemn attacks agai"
# hate_justified (v_315): "82. Support for Hate Crime_Hostility against foreigners is sometimes justified"
formula.7.means <- paste("hate_violence_means ~ ", as.character(as.formula(formula.6))[3], sep = "")
formula.7.message <- paste("hate_pol_message ~", as.character(as.formula(formula.6))[3], sep = "")
formula.7.prevent <- paste("hate_prevent_settlement ~", as.character(as.formula(formula.6))[3], sep = "")
formula.7.condemn <- paste("hate_polcondemn ~ ", as.character(as.formula(formula.6))[3], sep = "")
formula.7.justified <- paste("hate_justified ~ ", as.character(as.formula(formula.6))[3], sep = "")
# output
lm7.means <- lm(as.formula(formula.7.means), data=dat_use)
lm7.justified <- lm(as.formula(formula.7.justified), data=dat_use)
lm7.message <- lm(as.formula(formula.7.message), data=dat_use)
lm7.prevent <- lm(as.formula(formula.7.prevent), data=dat_use)
lm7.condemn <- lm(as.formula(formula.7.condemn), data=dat_use)
# Figure 5
point <- c(coef(lm7.means)["MateComp.cont"],
coef(lm7.justified)["MateComp.cont"], coef(lm7.message)["MateComp.cont"],
coef(lm7.prevent)["MateComp.cont"], coef(lm7.condemn)["MateComp.cont"])
se <- c(summary(lm7.means)$coef["MateComp.cont", 2],
summary(lm7.justified)$coef["MateComp.cont", 2], summary(lm7.message)$coef["MateComp.cont", 2],
summary(lm7.prevent)$coef["MateComp.cont", 2], summary(lm7.condemn)$coef["MateComp.cont", 2])
pdf("figure_4.pdf", height = 4, width = 8)
par(mar = c(2,4,4,1))
plot(seq(1:5), point, pch = 19, ylim = c(-0.05, 0.25), xlim = c(0.5, 5.5),
xlab = "", xaxt = "n", ylab = "Estimated Effects",
main = "Estimated Effects of Mate Competition", cex.lab = 1.25, cex.axis = 1.25, cex.main = 1.5)
segments(seq(1:5), point - 1.96*se,
seq(1:5), point + 1.96*se, lwd = 2)
Axis(side=1, at = seq(1:5), labels = c("Only Means", "Justified", "Message",
"Prevent", "Condemn"), cex.axis = 1.25)
abline(h =0, lty = 2)
dev.off()
## Table C.5 (in Appendix C.5)
# lm.list_d <- list(lm7.means, lm7.justified, lm7.message, lm7.prevent, lm7.condemn)
# stargazer(lm.list_d,
# covariate.labels = c("Mate Competition","Job Competition","Life Satisfaction"),
# keep=c("MateComp.cont","JobComp.cont","LifeSatis.cont"))
## #############################
## Figure 3: List Experiment
## #############################
rm(list=ls())
# install.packages("readstata13") # readstata13_0.9.2
# install.packages("MASS") # MASS_7.3-51.6
# install.packages("sandwich") # sandwich_2.5-1
# install.packages("lmtest") # lmtest_0.9-37
# install.packages("list") # list_9.2
require(readstata13) # readstata13_0.9.2
require(MASS) # MASS_7.3-51.6
require(sandwich) # sandwich_2.5-1
require(lmtest) # lmtest_0.9-37
require(list) # list_9.2
dat <- read.dta13(file = "survey.dta")
data.u2 <- dat[dat$wave == 2, ]
# Means: When it comes to the refugee problem, violence is sometimes the only means that citizens have to get the attention of German politicians
data.list.u2 <- data.u2[data.u2$list == "1",]
data.direct.u2 <- data.u2[data.u2$list == "2",]
data.list.u2 <- data.list.u2[is.na(data.list.u2$treatment_list)==FALSE,]
data.list.u2$List.treat <- ifelse(data.list.u2$treatment_list == "Scenario 2", 1, 0)
## Difference-in-Means
## with Mean = 0.15401 sd = 0.03358
diff.in.means.results2 <- ictreg(outcome_list ~ 1, data = data.list.u2,
treat = "List.treat", J=3, method = "lm")
summary(diff.in.means.results2)
## Compare to All People who answered Direct Question (n = 2170)
data.u2.all.direct <- data.u2[is.na(data.u2$hate_violence_means) == FALSE, ]
data.u2.all.direct$hate.direct.bin <- ifelse(data.u2.all.direct$hate_violence_means >=3, 1, 0)
point_dir2 <- mean(data.u2.all.direct$hate.direct.bin) ## 0.181
se_dir2 <- sd(data.u2.all.direct$hate.direct.bin)/sqrt(length(data.u2.all.direct$hate.direct.bin)) # 0.0083
# Compare Questions within Wave 2
# Direct Questions
data.u2$message.bin <- ifelse(data.u2$hate_pol_message >= 3, 1, 0)
data.u2$condemn.bin <- ifelse(data.u2$hate_polcondemn >= 3, 1, 0)
data.u2$justified.bin <- ifelse(data.u2$hate_justified >= 3, 1, 0)
message.mean2 <- mean(data.u2$message.bin)
condemn.mean2 <- mean(data.u2$condemn.bin)
justified.mean2 <- mean(data.u2$justified.bin)
message.se2 <- sd(data.u2$message.bin)/sqrt(length(data.u2$message.bin)) # 0.0070
condemn.se2 <- sd(data.u2$condemn.bin)/sqrt(length(data.u2$condemn.bin)) # 0.0079
justified.se2 <- sd(data.u2$justified.bin)/sqrt(length(data.u2$justified.bin)) # 0.0074
# plot
point <- c(summary(diff.in.means.results2)$par.treat, point_dir2, justified.mean2, message.mean2, condemn.mean2)
se_p <- c(summary(diff.in.means.results2)$se.treat, se_dir2, justified.se2, message.se2, condemn.se2)
base <- barplot(point, ylim = c(0, 0.20))
bar_name_u <- c("Only Means\n(List)","Only Means\n(Direct)", "Justified", "Message", "Condemn")
bar_name <- rep("",5)
pdf("figure_3.pdf", height = 4.5, width = 8)
par(mar = c(4, 5, 2, 1))
barplot(point, ylim = c(0, 0.3), names.arg = bar_name,
col = c(adjustcolor("red", 0.4), "gray", "gray", "gray", "gray"), cex.axis = 1.3,
ylab = "Proportion of respondents", cex.lab = 1.45)
arrows(base[,1], point - 1.96*se_p, base[,1], point + 1.96*se_p,
lwd = 3, angle = 90, length = 0.05, code = 3,
col = c("red", "black", "black", "black", "black"))
mtext(bar_name_u[1], outer = FALSE, side = 1, at = base[1], cex = 1.2, line = 2.4)
mtext(bar_name_u[2], outer = FALSE, side = 1, at = base[2], cex = 1.2, line = 2.4)
mtext(bar_name_u[3], outer = FALSE, side = 1, at = base[3], cex = 1.2, line = 2.4)
mtext(bar_name_u[4], outer = FALSE, side = 1, at = base[4], cex = 1.2, line = 2.4)
mtext(bar_name_u[5], outer = FALSE, side = 1, at = base[5], cex = 1.2, line = 2.4)
text(x = base[1], y = 0.275, "Estimate from \nList Experiment", col = "red", font = 2)
text(x = (base[3] + base[4])/2, y = 0.275, "Direct Questions", font = 2)
dev.off() |