REPRO-Bench / 21 /replication_package /Tables /B9_mal_tmt_het_nc.tex
anonymous-submission-acl2025's picture
add 21
7694c07
\begin{table}[ht!] \begin{adjustbox}{max width=.8\textwidth} \begin{threeparttable} \caption{Impacts on Malaria Treatment Outcomes - Heterogeneity by Predicted Malaria Risk, No Additional Controls} \label{mal_tmt_het_new_nc} {\begin{tabular}{l*{6}{C{0.12\linewidth}}} \toprule \toprule & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) \\ & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Any Malaria Treatment} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Severe Malaria Treatment} \\ \cmidrule(lr){3-4} \cmidrule(lr){5-6} \\ & Used Voucher& Prescribed& Purchased& Prescribed& Purchased \\ \toprule
$\delta_{PH}$: Patient Voucher $\times$ High Risk& 0.34\sym{***}& 0.038 & 0.12\sym{***}& -0.056\sym{*} & -0.021 \\
& (0.041) & (0.037) & (0.040) & (0.033) & (0.033) \\
$\delta_{DH}$: Doctor Voucher $\times$ High Risk& 0.33\sym{***}& 0.029 & 0.088\sym{**} & -0.13\sym{***}& -0.12\sym{***}\\
& (0.039) & (0.033) & (0.037) & (0.034) & (0.031) \\
$\delta_{PL}$: Patient Voucher $\times$ Low Risk& 0.36\sym{***}& 0.095\sym{**} & 0.18\sym{***}& -0.013 & -0.0063 \\
& (0.042) & (0.038) & (0.043) & (0.026) & (0.027) \\
$\delta_{DL}$: Doctor Voucher $\times$ Low Risk& 0.21\sym{***}& 0.0067 & 0.087\sym{**} & 0.00089 & 0.0096 \\
& (0.032) & (0.040) & (0.036) & (0.030) & (0.025) \\
$\theta$: High Malaria Risk& 0.0078 & 0.26\sym{***}& 0.26\sym{***}& 0.28\sym{***}& 0.26\sym{***}\\
& (0.028) & (0.041) & (0.042) & (0.038) & (0.036) \\
\emph{P-values and theory-driven tests}& & & & & \\
\enspace $\delta_{PH}=\delta_{DH}$& 0.719 & 0.810 & 0.400 &0.085\sym{*} &0.008\sym{***} \\
\enspace Test for mechanism:& GC/DD & -- & -- & DD & DD \\
\enspace Significant evidence of mechanism:& No & -- & -- & No & No \\
& & & & & \\
\enspace $\delta_{PL}=\delta_{DL}$&0.000\sym{***} &0.021\sym{**} &0.011\sym{**} & 0.670 & 0.594 \\
\enspace Test for mechanism:& GC/PD & PD & PD & -- & -- \\
\enspace Significant evidence of mechanism:& Yes & Yes & Yes & -- & -- \\
& & & & & \\
Mean (Control, Low Risk)& 0.000 & 0.486 & 0.329 & 0.154 & 0.116 \\
N & 2055 & 2053 & 2053 & 2053 & 2053 \\
\hline \end{tabular} } \begin{tablenotes}[flushleft] \small \item \emph{Notes}: Robust standard errors clustered at the clinic level in parentheses. All regressions control for clinic visit date fixed effects. Standard errors based GC, PD, and DD indicate tests of gatekeeping costs, patient-driven, and doctor-driven demand respectively. *, **, and *** denote statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1 percent levels respectively. \end{tablenotes} \end{threeparttable} \end{adjustbox} \end{table}