Added EDA plots, video, and final README

devoir data/Mon film.mov

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:adb2d6957530b146c48a24f90de58bb56089b09d4d033788b4ca7b838700437c
+size 165123907

devoir data/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# CDC Diabetes Health Indicators Analysis
+
+## Project Overview
+This project aims to explore the CDC Diabetes Health Indicators Dataset to identify key health, lifestyle, and socio-economic factors associated with diabetes prevalence.  
+We perform **exploratory data analysis (EDA)**, **data cleaning**, and **Logistic Regression modeling** on balanced data.  
+The goal is to extract actionable insights, understand class imbalances, and identify the most influential predictors of diabetes.devoir
+
+
+## Dataset
+
+- **Name**: CDC Diabetes Health Indicators Dataset  
+- **Source**: Downloaded from Kaggle using `kagglehub`  
+- **Content**: Over 250,000 observations of health and lifestyle factors  
+- **Format**: CSV, with multiple columns corresponding to health indicators, lifestyle choices, and socio-economic factors  
+
+**Initial Verification**: The dataset contains `df.shape[0]` rows and `df.shape[1]` columns.
+
+
+## 2.2 Data Cleaning
+
+- **Duplicate Handling**: Checked for exact duplicate rows across all features and removed them to ensure each observation is unique.  
+- **Missing Values Check**: Verified that there are no missing values in the dataset.  
+- **Result**: The dataset is clean, complete, and ready for analysis.
+
+
+## 2.3 Target Variable Analysis: Class Imbalance
+
+- **Objective**: Assess the distribution of the target variable `Diabetes_binary` to detect potential class imbalance.  
+- **Quantification**: Calculated counts and percentages of each class.  
+- **Visualization**: Bar plot illustrating the number of non-diabetic vs diabetic/pre-diabetic individuals.  
+
+**Observation**: The dataset exhibits a class imbalance, which is common in health datasets and must be considered for model training.
+
+**Class Imbalance Visualization**:  
+![Class Imbalance](classibalance.png)
+
+
+## 4.1 Socio-Economic Factor: Income vs. Diabetes
+
+- **Objective**: Explore the relationship between income levels (1 = lowest, 8 = highest) and diabetes prevalence.  
+- **Calculation**: Average diabetes rate per income category.  
+- **Visualization**: Bar plot showing diabetes prevalence across income levels.
+
+**Observation**:  
+- Diabetes prevalence decreases steadily with increasing income.  
+- Low-income categories (1 and 2) show ~25% diabetes prevalence, while the highest income category (8) shows ~10%.  
+- Confirms the hypothesis that socio-economic status strongly affects diabetes risk.
+
+**Income vs Diabetes Visualization**:  
+![Income vs Diabetes](income.png)
+
+
+## 4.2 Socio-Economic Factor: Education vs. Diabetes
+
+- **Objective**: Assess how education level (1 = lowest, 6 = highest) correlates with diabetes prevalence.  
+- **Calculation**: Average diabetes rate per education level.  
+- **Visualization**: Bar plot comparing prevalence across educational attainment.
+
+**Observation**:  
+- Lowest education levels (1 and 2) have the highest diabetes prevalence (~30%).  
+- Highest education levels (5 and 6) show significantly lower prevalence.  
+- Reinforces the finding from the income analysis: socio-economic factors are strong, interconnected predictors.
+
+**Education vs Diabetes Visualization**:  
+![Education vs Diabetes](education.png)
+
+
+## 4.3 Lifestyle Factors: Smoking and Physical Activity
+
+- **Objective**: Evaluate how key lifestyle factors affect diabetes prevalence.  
+- **Factors Analyzed**: Smoking status and regular physical activity.  
+- **Visualization**: Side-by-side bar plots comparing diabetes prevalence by smoking status and physical activity.
+
+**Observations**:  
+- Smokers have a higher diabetes rate than non-smokers.  
+- Physically active individuals have a substantially lower diabetes rate.  
+- Confirms that harmful habits increase risk while healthy behaviors are protective.
+
+**Visualization**:  
+![Smoking and Physical Activity](smokingandphysical.png)
+
+
+## 4.4 Physiological Factor: Body Mass Index (BMI)
+
+- **Objective**: Examine BMI distributions by diabetes status.  
+- **Visualization**: Box plot comparing BMI between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.  
+- **Reference**: Horizontal line at BMI = 30 (obesity threshold).
+
+**Observations**:  
+- Diabetic individuals have a substantially higher median BMI than non-diabetics.  
+- Most diabetic individuals lie above BMI 30, confirming BMI as a high-impact predictor.  
+- The distributions are well separated, indicating BMI is highly discriminative.
+
+**Visualization**:  
+![BMI Distribution](BMI.png)
+
+
+## 4.5 Physiological Factor: Age
+
+- **Objective**: Compare age distributions between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.  
+- **Visualization**: Box plot of age by diabetes status.
+
+**Observations**:  
+- Diabetic individuals are older on average, with a wider upper quartile.  
+- Non-diabetics are younger, with a tighter distribution.  
+- Age is an important demographic predictor of diabetes.
+
+**Visualization**:  
+![Age Distribution](Age.png)
+
+
+## 5.1 Logistic Regression: Balanced Training
+
+- **Objective**: Train a Logistic Regression model on **balanced and scaled training data** to address class imbalance.  
+- **Evaluation**: Tested on the original (unbalanced) test set.  
+- **Metrics**: Confusion matrix, classification report (precision, recall, F1-score), and ROC AUC score.
+
+**Key Insights**:  
+- Balancing the training data improves recall for the diabetic class, reducing false negatives.  
+- F1-score shows improved balance between precision and recall for minority class.  
+- ROC AUC confirms strong discriminative power of the model.  
+- Suggests Logistic Regression is an effective baseline; further exploration with non-linear models could improve performance.
+
+
+## 5.2 ROC Curve and AUC Analysis
+
+- **Objective**: Visualize model performance and evaluate discriminative power using the ROC curve.  
+- **Visualization**: Orange line = model performance; Blue diagonal = random classifier baseline (AUC = 0.50).
+
+**Observation**:  
+- The model’s ROC curve lies well above the baseline, confirming strong discriminative ability.  
+- Final AUC score quantitatively supports model effectiveness.  
+- Confirms that balancing the training data yields a robust baseline model for diabetes prediction.
+
+**Visualization**:  
+![ROC Logistic Regression](ROC_Logistic_Regression.png)
+
+
+## Final Insights
+
+- Socio-economic factors (Income, Education) are strongly correlated with diabetes prevalence.  
+- Lifestyle factors such as Smoking and Physical Activity significantly influence diabetes risk.  
+- Physiological factors (BMI, Age) are dominant predictors.  
+- Logistic Regression trained on balanced data provides a robust and interpretable baseline model.  
+- Future work could include testing non-linear models, ensemble methods, or feature engineering to further improve predictive performance.
+
+
+## How to Use This Dataset and Notebook
+
+- The dataset can be used to explore health, lifestyle, and socio-economic predictors of diabetes.  
+- The notebook provides step-by-step EDA and visualization examples.  
+- Logistic Regression serves as a baseline classification model.  
+- All plots are included and can be reused in reports or presentations.