Create winequality.names
Browse files- winequality.names +72 -0
winequality.names
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
Citation Request:
|
| 2 |
+
This dataset is public available for research. The details are described in [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
| 3 |
+
Please include this citation if you plan to use this database:
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
|
| 6 |
+
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
|
| 7 |
+
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
Available at: [@Elsevier] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.05.016
|
| 10 |
+
[Pre-press (pdf)] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/winequality09.pdf
|
| 11 |
+
[bib] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/dss09.bib
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
1. Title: Wine Quality
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
2. Sources
|
| 16 |
+
Created by: Paulo Cortez (Univ. Minho), Antonio Cerdeira, Fernando Almeida, Telmo Matos and Jose Reis (CVRVV) @ 2009
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
3. Past Usage:
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
|
| 21 |
+
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
|
| 22 |
+
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
In the above reference, two datasets were created, using red and white wine samples.
|
| 25 |
+
The inputs include objective tests (e.g. PH values) and the output is based on sensory data
|
| 26 |
+
(median of at least 3 evaluations made by wine experts). Each expert graded the wine quality
|
| 27 |
+
between 0 (very bad) and 10 (very excellent). Several data mining methods were applied to model
|
| 28 |
+
these datasets under a regression approach. The support vector machine model achieved the
|
| 29 |
+
best results. Several metrics were computed: MAD, confusion matrix for a fixed error tolerance (T),
|
| 30 |
+
etc. Also, we plot the relative importances of the input variables (as measured by a sensitivity
|
| 31 |
+
analysis procedure).
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
4. Relevant Information:
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
The two datasets are related to red and white variants of the Portuguese "Vinho Verde" wine.
|
| 36 |
+
For more details, consult: http://www.vinhoverde.pt/en/ or the reference [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
| 37 |
+
Due to privacy and logistic issues, only physicochemical (inputs) and sensory (the output) variables
|
| 38 |
+
are available (e.g. there is no data about grape types, wine brand, wine selling price, etc.).
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
These datasets can be viewed as classification or regression tasks.
|
| 41 |
+
The classes are ordered and not balanced (e.g. there are munch more normal wines than
|
| 42 |
+
excellent or poor ones). Outlier detection algorithms could be used to detect the few excellent
|
| 43 |
+
or poor wines. Also, we are not sure if all input variables are relevant. So
|
| 44 |
+
it could be interesting to test feature selection methods.
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
5. Number of Instances: red wine - 1599; white wine - 4898.
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
6. Number of Attributes: 11 + output attribute
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
Note: several of the attributes may be correlated, thus it makes sense to apply some sort of
|
| 51 |
+
feature selection.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
7. Attribute information:
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
For more information, read [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
Input variables (based on physicochemical tests):
|
| 58 |
+
1 - fixed acidity
|
| 59 |
+
2 - volatile acidity
|
| 60 |
+
3 - citric acid
|
| 61 |
+
4 - residual sugar
|
| 62 |
+
5 - chlorides
|
| 63 |
+
6 - free sulfur dioxide
|
| 64 |
+
7 - total sulfur dioxide
|
| 65 |
+
8 - density
|
| 66 |
+
9 - pH
|
| 67 |
+
10 - sulphates
|
| 68 |
+
11 - alcohol
|
| 69 |
+
Output variable (based on sensory data):
|
| 70 |
+
12 - quality (score between 0 and 10)
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
8. Missing Attribute Values: None
|