Download raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3386.txt from codewithdark/SEC-RPT-Panel: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.73 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/codewithdark/SEC-RPT-Panel/resolve/main/raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3386.txt
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/codewithdark/SEC-RPT-Panel/raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3386.txt
-
curl -L -o AAER-3386.txt https://huggingface.co/datasets/codewithdark/SEC-RPT-Panel/resolve/main/raw/aaer/2012/AAER-3386.txt
5.73 kB
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Before the | |
| SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |
| SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
| Release No. 67048 / May 23, 2012 | |
| ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT | |
| Release No. 3386 / May 23, 2012 | |
| ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING | |
| File No. 3-10415 | |
| In the Matter of | |
| Charles P. Morrison, CPA | |
| : | |
| : | |
| : | |
| : | |
| : | |
| : | |
| ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR | |
| REINSTATEMENT TO APPEAR AND PRACTICE | |
| BEFORE THE COMMISSION AS AN ACCOUNTANT | |
| RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OR | |
| REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REQUIRED | |
| TO BE FILED WITH THE COMMISSION | |
| On January 31, 2001 Charles P. Morrison, CPA (“Morrison”) was suspended from | |
| appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant as a result of settled public | |
| administrative proceedings instituted by the Commission against Morrison pursuant to Rule | |
| 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission's Rules of Practice. | |
| 1 | |
| The Commission found that Morrison had been permanently enjoined by the United | |
| States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania from future violations of Section | |
| 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The | |
| Commission’s complaint alleged that, from at least December 1996 through July 1998, Morrison | |
| violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by creating, reviewing | |
| and approving false financial statements and Disclosure Reports of the Allegheny Health, | |
| Education and Research Foundation (“AHERF”) and certain subsidiaries. The complaint further | |
| alleged that Morrison falsely certified to the bond trustee of certain AHERF subsidiaries and | |
| others that the 1997 audited financial statements fairly presented the consolidated financial | |
| position and the results of operations for AHERF as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, | |
| 1997 and that they were prepared in accordance with GAAP. | |
| Morrison consented to the entry of the | |
| order without admitting or denying the findings therein. This order is issued in response to | |
| Morrison’s application for reinstatement to appear and practice before the Commission as an | |
| accountant responsible for the preparation or review of financial statements required to be filed | |
| with the Commission. | |
| 1 See Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1364 dated January 31, 2001. Morrison was permitted, | |
| pursuant to the order, to apply for reinstatement after three years upon making certain showings. | |
| 2 | |
| In his capacity as a preparer or reviewer, or as a person responsible for the preparation or | |
| review, of financial statements of a public company to be filed with the Commission, Morrison | |
| attests that he will undertake to have his work reviewed by the independent audit committee of | |
| any company for which he works, or in some other manner acceptable to the Commission, while | |
| practicing before the Commission in this capacity. Morrison is not, at this time, seeking to | |
| appear or practice before the Commission as an independent accountant. If he should wish to | |
| resume appearing and practicing before the Commission as an independent accountant, he will | |
| be required to submit an application to the Commission showing that he has complied and will | |
| comply with the terms of the original suspension order in this regard. Therefore, Morrison’s | |
| suspension from practice before the Commission as an independent accountant continues in | |
| effect until the Commission determines that a sufficient showing has been made in this regard in | |
| accordance with the terms of the original suspension order. | |
| Rule 102(e)(5) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice governs applications for | |
| reinstatement, and provides that the Commission may reinstate the privilege to appear and | |
| practice before the Commission “for good cause shown.” | |
| 2 | |
| On the basis of information supplied, representations made, and undertakings agreed to | |
| by Morrison, it appears that he has complied with the terms of the January 31, 2001 order | |
| suspending him from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, that no | |
| information has come to the attention of the Commission relating to his character, integrity, | |
| professional conduct, or qualifications to practice before the Commission that would be a basis | |
| for adverse action against him pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, | |
| and that Morrison, by undertaking to have his work reviewed by the independent audit | |
| committee of any company for which he works, or in some other manner acceptable to the | |
| Commission, in his practice before the Commission as a preparer or reviewer of financial | |
| statements required to be filed with the Commission, has shown good cause for reinstatement. | |
| Therefore, it is accordingly, | |
| This “good cause” determination is | |
| necessarily highly fact specific. | |
| ORDERED pursuant to Rule 102(e)(5)(i) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice that | |
| Charles P. Morrison, CPA is hereby reinstated to appear and practice before the Commission as | |
| an accountant responsible for the preparation or review of financial statements required to be | |
| filed with the Commission. | |
| By the Commission. | |
| Elizabeth M. Murphy | |
| Secretary | |
| 2 Rule 102(e)(5)(i) provides: | |
| “An application for reinstatement of a person permanently suspended or disqualified under paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(3) | |
| of this section may be made at any time, and the applicant may, in the Commission’s discretion, be afforded a | |
| hearing; however, the suspension or disqualification shall continue unless and until the applicant has been reinstated | |
| by the Commission for good cause shown.” 17 C.F.R. § 201.102(e)(5)(i). | |