codewithdark commited on
Commit
8df1b88
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 8efb71d

Add files using upload-large-folder tool

Browse files
This view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.   See raw diff
Files changed (50) hide show
  1. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3094.txt +1355 -0
  2. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3095.pdf +0 -0
  3. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3096.txt +157 -0
  4. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3097.pdf +0 -0
  5. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3097.txt +285 -0
  6. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3098.pdf +0 -0
  7. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3099.pdf +0 -0
  8. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3100.pdf +0 -0
  9. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3100.txt +396 -0
  10. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3101.pdf +0 -0
  11. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3101.txt +251 -0
  12. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3102.txt +1355 -0
  13. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3103.pdf +0 -0
  14. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3103.txt +118 -0
  15. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3104.txt +197 -0
  16. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3105.pdf +0 -0
  17. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3105.txt +204 -0
  18. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3106.pdf +0 -0
  19. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3106.txt +149 -0
  20. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3107.pdf +0 -0
  21. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3107.txt +139 -0
  22. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3108.txt +1370 -0
  23. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3110.pdf +0 -0
  24. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3110.txt +99 -0
  25. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3111.txt +1375 -0
  26. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3112.pdf +0 -0
  27. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3112.txt +178 -0
  28. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3113.pdf +0 -0
  29. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3113.txt +201 -0
  30. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3114.pdf +0 -0
  31. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3114.txt +114 -0
  32. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3117.txt +1375 -0
  33. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3118.txt +1355 -0
  34. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3119.txt +1355 -0
  35. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3120.pdf +0 -0
  36. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3120.txt +513 -0
  37. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3121.txt +1355 -0
  38. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3122.pdf +0 -0
  39. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3122.txt +208 -0
  40. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3123.pdf +0 -0
  41. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3123.txt +145 -0
  42. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3124.txt +131 -0
  43. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3125.pdf +0 -0
  44. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3125.txt +702 -0
  45. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3126.txt +1355 -0
  46. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3127.txt +1355 -0
  47. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3128.txt +1355 -0
  48. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3129.pdf +0 -0
  49. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3129.txt +218 -0
  50. raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3130.pdf +0 -0
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3094.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Daniel H. Bayly, et al.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507351","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Daniel H. Bayly, et al.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Daniel H. Bayly, et al.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21361 / January 6, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3094 / January 6, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Daniel H. Bayly, et al., Civil Action No. H-03-0946 (S.D. Tex.) SEC SETTLES WITH FORMER MERRILL LYNCH EXECUTIVE FOR AIDING AND ABETTING ENRON FRAUD The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced today that, on December 31, 2009, the U.S. District Court in Houston entered a final judgment in the Commission's civil action against Daniel H. Bayly ("Bayly"), former global head of investment banking at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. ("Merrill Lynch"). On March 17, 2003, the Commission charged Bayly and three other former executives of Merrill Lynch with aiding and abetting Enron Corp.'s earnings manipulation. That action remains stayed against Bayly's co-defendants pending resolution of a parallel criminal prosecution. On March 17, 2003, the Commission also sued and simultaneously settled all of its Enron aiding-and-abetting charges against Merrill Lynch , which was enjoined from violating the federal securities laws and paid $80 million in financial sanctions for distribution to injured investors through the Commission's Enron Fair Fund. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, Bayly has now been permanently enjoined from violating the antifraud provisions, as well as from aiding and abetting violations of the periodic reporting, books-and-records, and internal controls provisions; barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company for five years; and ordered to pay $300,001 in disgorgement and civil money penalties for deposit into the Commission's Enron Fair Fund. As alleged in the Commission's complaint, Bayly substantially assisted Enron's sham sale of an interest in certain Nigerian barges during late 1999. Although the interest in these barges purportedly passed to a special purpose entity in which Merrill Lynch invested equity capital, Bayly had received an oral commitment from Enron's then-Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Fastow, that Merrill Lynch would be repaid within six months at a specified rate of return. In substance, this side agreement transformed what was supposed to be an equity investment into a bridge loan with a fixed interest rate. The complaint alleged that Bayly helped enable this sham "sale" on Enron's interest in the Nigerian barges so as to maintain favorable relations with Enron. By participating in the arrangement ¢€" which allowed Enron fraudulently to record $28 million in revenue and $12 million in pre-tax income ¢€" Bayly aided and abetted Enron's violations of the federal securities laws. For more information, see Litigation Release No. 18038 (March 17, 2003).
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3095.pdf ADDED
Binary file (26.5 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3096.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
5
+ before the
6
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
7
+
8
+
9
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
10
+ Release No. 61301 / January 6, 2010
11
+
12
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
13
+ Release No. 3096 / January 6, 2010
14
+
15
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
16
+ File No. 3-13737
17
+
18
+ :
19
+ :
20
+ :
21
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
22
+ : PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO RULE
23
+ SCOTT T. VEECH, CPA, : 102(e) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF
24
+ : PRACTICE, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
25
+ Respondent. : IMPO SING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
26
+ :
27
+ :
28
+ ____________________________________ :
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+ I.
33
+
34
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
35
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Scott T.
36
+ Veech (“Respondent” or “Veech”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s Rules of
37
+ Practice.
38
+ 1
39
+
40
+
41
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
42
+
43
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
44
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
45
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
46
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
47
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
48
+ thereunder.
49
+ 2
50
+ II.
51
+
52
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
53
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
54
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
55
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
56
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
57
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in paragraph III.B.3. below, which are admitted,
58
+ Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to
59
+ Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial
60
+ Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
61
+
62
+ III.
63
+
64
+ On the basis of this Order and Respon dent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
65
+
66
+ 1. Veech, age 47, has been a certified public accountant licensed to practice in
67
+ the State of Pennsylvania. He served as Chief Financial Officer of Merge Healthcare Inc., f/k/a
68
+ Merge Technologies, Inc. (“Merge”) from July 2002 until his resignation in July 2006.
69
+
70
+ 2. Merge was, at all relevant times, a Wisconsin corporation with its principal
71
+ place of business in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Merge develops medical imaging and information
72
+ management software and delivers related services. At all relevant times, Merge’s common stock
73
+ was registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
74
+ 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and traded on the NASDAQ Small Cap or National Market.
75
+
76
+ 3. On November 4, 2009, the Commission filed a complaint against Veech in
77
+ SEC v. Merge Healthcare, et al.
78
+ (Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-01036). On November 17, 2009, the
79
+ court entered an order permanently enjoining Veech, by consent, from future violations of Section
80
+ 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules
81
+ 10b-5, 13a-14, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 thereunder, and aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a),
82
+ 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13
83
+ thereunder. Veech was also ordered to pay $180,000 in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and
84
+ $50,000 in prejudgment interest; and a $50,000 civil money penalty. Veech neither admitted nor
85
+ denied the allegations of the complaint.
86
+
87
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alle ged, among other things, that Veech
88
+ participated in a fraudulent scheme which resulted in Merge filing materially false and misleading
89
+ financial statements in the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended
90
+ December 31, 2002, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004, and in the company’s quarterly
91
+ reports on Form 10-Q for the first three quarters of fiscal year 2005. The Complaint alleged that
92
+ Veech engaged in improper accounting practices that materially increased Merge’s annual and
93
+ quarterly revenue and net income in a departure from generally accepted accounting principles.
94
+ These practices included, among other things, causing Merge to recognize revenue improperly on
95
+ transactions in which Merge promised specified future software enhancements to customers.
96
+ 3
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+ IV.
101
+
102
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
103
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Veech’s Offer.
104
+
105
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
106
+
107
+ A. Veech is suspended fr om appearing or practicing before the Commission as an
108
+ accountant.
109
+
110
+ B. After three years from the date of this order, Respondent may request that the
111
+ Commission consider his reinstatement by submitting an application (attention: Office of the
112
+ Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the Commission as:
113
+
114
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation or
115
+ review, of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with the Commission. Such
116
+ an application must satisfy the Commission that Respondent’s work in his practice before the
117
+ Commission will be reviewed either by the independent audit committee of the public company
118
+ for which he works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the
119
+ Commission in this capacity; and/or
120
+
121
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
122
+ Commission that:
123
+
124
+ (a) Respondent, or the public accounting firm with which he is
125
+ associated, is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“Board”) in
126
+ accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and such registration continues to be effective;
127
+
128
+ (b) Respondent, or the registered public accounting firm with which he
129
+ is associated, has been inspected by the Board and that inspection did not identify any criticisms
130
+ of or potential defects in the respondent’s or the firm’s quality control system that would indicate
131
+ that the respondent will not receive appropriate supervision;
132
+ (c) Respondent has resolved all di sciplinary issues with the Board, and
133
+ has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the Board (other than
134
+ reinstatement by the Commission); and
135
+
136
+ (d) Respondent acknowledges his responsibility, as long as
137
+ Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent accountant, to
138
+ comply with all requirements of the Commission and the Board, including, but not limited to, all
139
+ requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality control
140
+ standards.
141
+
142
+ 4
143
+ C. The Commission will consider an application by Respondent to resume
144
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that his state CPA license is
145
+ current and he has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable state boards of
146
+ accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement by the
147
+ Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The
148
+ Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced
149
+ above, any other matters relating to Respondent’s character, integrity, professional conduct,
150
+ or qualifications to appear or practice before the Commission.
151
+
152
+ By the Commission.
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
157
+ S e c r e t a r y
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3097.pdf ADDED
Binary file (39.3 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3097.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
40
+ Before the
41
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
42
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
43
+ Release No. 61305 / January 7, 2010
44
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
45
+ Release No. 3097 / January 7, 2010
46
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
47
+ File No. 3-13738
48
+ In the Matter of
49
+ CHARLES A. GRAY, CPA,
50
+ Respondent.
51
+ ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
52
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
53
+ PURSUANT TO SECTION 4C OF THE
54
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
55
+ AND RULE 102(e) OF THE COMMISSION’S
56
+ RULES OF PRACTICE, MAKING
57
+ FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
58
+ SANCTIONS
59
+ I.
60
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that public
61
+ administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Charles A. Gray, CPA
62
+ (“Respondent”) pursuant to Section 4C
63
+ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)
64
+ and Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice. 2
65
+ 1 Section 4C provides, in relevant part, that:
66
+ The Commission may censure any person, or deny, temporarily or permanently, to any person the privilege
67
+ of appearing or practicing before the Commission in any way, if that person is found . . . (1) not to possess the
68
+ requisite qualifications to represent others . . . (2) to be lacking in character or integrity, or to have engaged in
69
+ unethical or improper professional conduct; or (3) to have willfully violated, or willfully aided and abetted the
70
+ violation of, any provision of the securities laws or the rules and regulations thereunder.
71
+ 2 Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) provides, in pertinent part, that:
72
+ The Commission may . . . deny, temporarily or permanently, the privilege of appearing or practicing before
73
+ it . . . to any person who is found . . . to have engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct.
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+
89
+
90
+
91
+
92
+
93
+
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+ II.
109
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
110
+ of Settlement (“Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of
111
+ these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to
112
+ which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as
113
+ to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are
114
+ admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative
115
+ Proceedings Pursuant to Section 4C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 102(e) of the
116
+ Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”),
117
+ as set forth below.
118
+ III.
119
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds3 that:
120
+ RESPONDENT
121
+ Charles A. Gray is a certified public accountant licensed by the state of Oklahoma. During
122
+ the period at issue here, he was a partner in Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co. PLLP, an accounting
123
+ firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”).4
124
+ FACTS
125
+ 1. Jerry D. Cash, the former Chief Executive Officer and chairman of Quest Resource
126
+ Corporation (“Quest Resource”) and the general partner of Quest Energy Partners, L.P. (“Quest
127
+ Energy” and, together with Quest Resource, “Quest”), with the aid of David E. Grose, Quest’s
128
+ former Chief Financial Officer, misappropriated millions from Quest through insider loans that
129
+ were also undisclosed related party transactions. Between 2005 and August, 2008, Cash
130
+ embezzled $10 million from Quest by transferring funds between Quest-related entities and
131
+ companies he owned and controlled. As a result of Cash’s and Grose’s activities, Quest failed to
132
+ disclose, or inadequately disclosed, the related party transactions in periodic filings, registration
133
+ statements, and proxy statements.
134
+ 5
135
+ 2. Respondent acted as the engagement partner on Murrell Hall’s (a) audits of Quest
136
+ Resource’s annual financial statements for years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007; (b)
137
+ reviews of Quest Resource’s quarterly financial statements during 2005, 2006, and 2007; (c) audit
138
+ of Quest Energy’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007; and (d)
139
+ 3 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent's Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other
140
+ person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
141
+ 4 Effective August 1, 2008, Eide Bailly LLP, a PCAOB-registered accounting firm, acquired Murrell Hall’s assets.
142
+ Following the acquisition, Respondent became a partner in Eide Bailly.
143
+ 5 See SEC v. Jerry D. Cash, et al., Lit. Rel. No. 21087 (June 17, 2009)
144
+ 2
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+ review of Quest Energy’s quarterly financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
163
+ These financial statements were included in the companies’ Forms 10-K and Forms 10-Q filed
164
+ with the Commission.
165
+ 3. During Murrell Hall’s audit of Quest Resource’s financial statements for the year
166
+ ended December 31, 2005, Respondent became aware of transfers totaling $2 million between
167
+ Quest Resource and Rockport Energy LLC, a company Cash controlled.
168
+ 4. At or near the time of the conclusion of Murrell Hall’s audits of Quest’s financial
169
+ statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, Respondent learned that Quest had engaged in a
170
+ circular series of funds transfers to and from Rockport totaling $10 million. When Respondent
171
+ learned of these transfers, $10 million was outstanding.
172
+ 5. In the course of providing these professional services, Respondent failed to
173
+ undertake adequate procedures to determine whether the transfers to Rockport were properly
174
+ recorded and disclosed in Quest’s annual and quarterly financial statements during 2005, 2006 and
175
+ 2007. Among other things, Respondent failed to undertake adequate procedures to ascertain the
176
+ terms and other details of the transactions; to determine whether the transactions were authorized
177
+ by Quest’s board of directors; or whether Quest had properly accounted for the transactions,
178
+ including whether it had established appropriate reserves against Rockport’s inability to repay the
179
+ amounts.
180
+ 6. Respondent also failed to adequately consider whether the transfers to Rockport
181
+ may constitute fraud or an illegal act. See PCAOB Standards and Related Rules, AU §§ 316 and
182
+ 722.32. Furthermore, Respondent failed to adequately consider whether the transfers to Rockport
183
+ violated Section 13(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which prohibits any issuer to make,
184
+ directly or indirectly, “personal loans” to any executive officer.
185
+ Violations
186
+ Section 4C of the Exchange Act and Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) provide that the Commission may
187
+ temporarily or permanently deny an accountant the privilege of appearing or practicing before it if
188
+ it finds, after notice and opportunity for hearing, that the accountant engaged in “improper
189
+ professional conduct.” In relevant part, Section 4C(b) and Rule 102(e)(1)(iv) define ‘improper
190
+ professional conduct’ to include either of the following two types of negligent conduct:
191
+ (1) A single instance of highly unreasonable conduct that results in a violation of applicable
192
+ professional standards in circumstances in which an accountant, or a person associated with
193
+ a registered public accounting firm, knows, or should know, that heightened scrutiny is
194
+ warranted, or
195
+ (2) Repeated instances of unreasonable conduct, each resulting in a violation of applicable
196
+ professional standards, that indicate a lack of competence to practice before the
197
+ Commission.
198
+ 3
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+ Findings
227
+ Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that Respondent engaged in improper
228
+ professional conduct pursuant to Section 4C of the Exchange Act and Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) of the
229
+ Commission’s Rules of Practice.
230
+ IV.
231
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
232
+ agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
233
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
234
+ A. Respondent is denied the privilege of appearing or practicing before the
235
+ Commission as an accountant.
236
+ B. After five years from the date of this Order, Respondent may request that the
237
+ Commission consider his reinstatement by submitting an application (Attention: Office of the
238
+ Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the Commission as:
239
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation or
240
+ review, of a public company’s financial statements that are filed with the Commission. Such an
241
+ application must satisfy the Commission that Respondent’s work in his practice before the
242
+ Commission will be reviewed either by the independent audit committee of the public company
243
+ for which he works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the
244
+ Commission in this capacity; and/or
245
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
246
+ Commission that:
247
+ (a) Respondent, or the public accounting firm with which he is
248
+ associated, is registered with the PCAOB in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
249
+ and such registration continues to be effective;
250
+ (b) Respondent, or the registered public accounting firm with which he
251
+ is associated, has been inspected by the PCAOB and that inspection did not identify any
252
+ criticisms of or potential defects in Respondent’s or the firm’s quality control system that would
253
+ indicate that Respondent will not receive appropriate supervision;
254
+ (c) Respondent has resolved all disciplinary issues with the PCAOB,
255
+ and has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the PCAOB (other
256
+ than reinstatement by the Commission); and
257
+ (d) Respondent acknowledges his responsibility, as long as
258
+ Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent accountant, to
259
+ comply with all requirements of the Commission and the PCAOB, including, but not limited to,
260
+ 4
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+
271
+ all requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality
272
+ control standards.
273
+ C. The Commission will consider an application by Respondent to resume
274
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that his state CPA license is
275
+ current and he has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable state boards of
276
+ accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement by the
277
+ Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The
278
+ Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced
279
+ above, any other matters relating to Respondent’s character, integrity, professional conduct,
280
+ or qualifications to appear or practice before the Commission.
281
+ By the Commission.
282
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
283
+ S e c r e t a r y
284
+ 5
285
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3098.pdf ADDED
Binary file (38.4 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3099.pdf ADDED
Binary file (37.9 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3100.pdf ADDED
Binary file (55.6 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3100.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,396 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
2
+ Before the
3
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
4
+
5
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
6
+ Release No. 61315 / January 7, 2010
7
+
8
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
9
+ Release No. 3100 / January 7, 2010
10
+
11
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
12
+ File No. 3-13489
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ In the Matter of
17
+
18
+ POLLARD KELLEY
19
+ AUDITING SERVICES,
20
+ INC. and TERANCE
21
+ KELLEY, CPA,
22
+
23
+ Respondents.
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
31
+ IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
32
+ PURSUANT TO RULE 102(e) OF THE
33
+ COMMISSION’S RULES OF
34
+ PRACTICE
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+ I.
39
+
40
+ On May 27, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”)
41
+ instituted public administrative proceedings against Pollard Kelley Auditing Services, Inc.
42
+ (“Pollard-Kelley”) and Terance Kelley, CPA (“Kelley”) (together, “Respondents”),
43
+ pursuant to Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice.
44
+ 1
45
+
46
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(1) provides, in pertinent part: “The Commission may censure a person or deny,
47
+ temporarily or permanently, the privilege of appearing or practicing before it . . . to any person who is
48
+ found . . . (ii) to be lacking in character or integrity or to have engaged in unethical or improper
49
+ professional conduct.”
50
+
51
+ With respect to persons licensed to practice as accountants, Rule 102(e)(1)(iv) provides that
52
+ “improper professional conduct” means:
53
+
54
+ (A) intentional or knowing conduct, including reckless conduct, that results in a violation
55
+ of applicable professional standards; or (B) either of the following two types of negligent
56
+ conduct: (1) a single instance of highly unreasonable conduct that results in a violation of
57
+ applicable professional standards in circumstances in which an accountant knows, or
58
+ should know, that heightened scrutiny is warranted. (2) repeated instances of
59
+ II.
60
+
61
+ The Respondents have submitted an Offer of Settlement (“Offer”), which the
62
+ Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any
63
+ other proceeding brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission
64
+ is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the
65
+ Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings, which
66
+ are admitted, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Making Findings and
67
+ Imposing Remedial Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of
68
+ Practice (“Order”), as set forth below.
69
+
70
+ III.
71
+
72
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondents’ Offer, the Commission finds that:
73
+
74
+ Summary
75
+
76
+ 1. These proceedings arise out of a deficiency in Respondents’ 2006 audit of
77
+ Pegasus Wireless Corporation’s financial statements. During the 2006 audit, Respondents
78
+ violated numerous professional standards by failing to obtain written representations from
79
+ Pegasus’ management and failing to exercise due care and professional skepticism. In early
80
+ 2008, nearly one year after completing the audit and after being sued by Pegasus investors
81
+ for securities fraud, Respondents added additional workpapers to their audit documentation,
82
+ which masked deficiencies in the audit. By adding workpapers after the fact and adding
83
+ them to their audit documentation, without identifying the date they were added or the
84
+ reason for adding them, Respondents violated Public Company Accounting Oversight
85
+ Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 3. Respondents’ conduct, as further described
86
+ below, constituted improper professional conduct within the meaning of Rule 102(e)(1)(ii)
87
+ and (iv).
88
+
89
+ Respondents
90
+
91
+ 2. Pollard Kelley Auditing Services, Inc. is a Colorado corporation licensed
92
+ to do business in Colorado and Ohio. Pollard-Kelley is a public accounting firm
93
+ registered with the PCAOB. According to corporate filings, its principal place of
94
+ business is Kelley’s Colorado home. Pollard-Kelley has five employees, including
95
+ Kelley. The firm served as Pegasus’ independent auditor from mid-2005 through
96
+ approximately November 2007. As auditor, Pollard-Kelley opined that Pegasus’ 2005
97
+ and 2006 financial statements were prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted
98
+ Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and that Pollard-Kelley had conducted audits in
99
+ accordance with the PCAOB’s standards.
100
+
101
+ 3. Terance Kelley, CPA, age 62, resides in Lake City, Colorado. He formed
102
+ Pollard-Kelley and is its vice president of audit services. He performs the vast majority of
103
+
104
+
105
+ unreasonable conduct, each resulting in a violation of applicable professional standards,
106
+ that indicate a lack of competence to practice before the Commission.
107
+ 2
108
+ the firm’s audits and performed the audits of Pegasus’ 2005 and 2006 financial statements,
109
+ as well as quarterly reviews of Pegasus financial statements through approximately
110
+ November 2007. He is licensed as a certified public accountant in Ohio.
111
+
112
+ Related Party
113
+
114
+ 4. Pegasus Wireless Corporation is a Nevada corporation formed in 2000.
115
+ After several failed enterprises, it became a shell company by 2003. In June 2005, through
116
+ a series of reverse mergers, it acquired OTC Wireless, Inc., a private company incorporated
117
+ in California that designs wireless networking devices. Pegasus had headquarters in
118
+ Fremont, California, until about January 2007. It currently maintains a mailbox in Palm
119
+ Beach, Florida. During the relevant period, its securities were registered pursuant to
120
+ Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Its shares most
121
+ recently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and briefly traded on NASDAQ in 2006.
122
+ Pegasus filed for bankruptcy in January 2008.
123
+
124
+ Respondents’ Improper Professional Conduct
125
+
126
+
127
+ Pegasus’ Fraud Scheme
128
+
129
+ 5. From 2006 through 2008, Pegasus officers defrauded investors by creating
130
+ backdated promissory notes memorializing a phony debt, which they used to issue
131
+ unrestricted shares of Pegasus stock to individuals and entities they controlled. Pegasus
132
+ issued nearly 480 million shares – 75% of its outstanding shares – based on the fake,
133
+ backdated promissory notes, resulting in massive dilution of the existing shareholders’
134
+ ownership interest. The individuals and entities who received shares dumped the stock on
135
+ the open market and funneled many millions in proceeds to Pegasus officers.
136
+
137
+ 6. Pegasus misled investor s about why it issued the shares. For example, in
138
+ the financial statements included in its quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
139
+ ended September 30, 2006, Pegasus stated: “During the third quarter the Company issued
140
+ 5,276,016 shares to satisfy $263,800 debt [sic] owed by the Company from prior to the
141
+ change in control [in 2005].” Similarly, in the financial statements in its annual report on
142
+ Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, Pegasus represented:
143
+
144
+ During 2006 the Company issued 7,376,016 shares of
145
+ common stock to satisfy $368,532 debt [sic] owed by the
146
+ Company from prior to the change in control. . . . The
147
+ Company is obligated on notes payable amounting to
148
+ $145,000 remaining balance which were undisclosed when
149
+ current management took control of the shell company.
150
+ These notes were entered into at various times in 2003 and
151
+ were 2 year notes, all of which have matured. The notes . . .
152
+ are convertible into common stock of the parent company at
153
+ the discretion of the holder. Management two steps back
154
+ 3
155
+ failed to disclose these notes to subsequent management,
156
+ thus current management was unaware of their existence.
157
+
158
+ In truth, Pegasus officers in 2006 concocted the debt as a means to enrich themselves.
159
+
160
+ Respondents’ Deficient 2006 Audit
161
+
162
+ 7. From mid-2005 through approximately October 2007, Respondents served
163
+ as Pegasus’ independent auditor, auditing the company’s 2005 and 2006 financial
164
+ statements and reviewing its quarterly statements through the second quarter of 2007.
165
+
166
+ 8. In March 2007, during field work fo r the 2006 audit, Respondents noted
167
+ Pegasus’ disclosures that it had issued stock to pay previously undisclosed debt. The
168
+ alleged debt described in the September 30, 2006 10-QSB had grown from $263,800 to
169
+ $368,532 at year-end, as had the number of shares issued. (Pegasus had additional debt,
170
+ which had been previously disclosed, on its balance sheet.) Moreover, the number of
171
+ shares issued by year-end based on the alleged debt (7,376,016) equaled more than one
172
+ third of Pegasus’ then-outstanding shares.
173
+
174
+ 9. Respondents advised Pegasus in writi ng that they needed copies of “all
175
+ agreements in connection with the conversion of $368,532 of debt into common stock.”
176
+ Pegasus’ CFO agreed to provide the information. Respondents also sent additional emails
177
+ seeking this information.
178
+
179
+ 10. Respondents also requested Pegasus to explain the “basis for the 7,376,016
180
+ shares of common stock issued to satisfy $368,532 of debt.” On March 28, 2007, Pegasus’
181
+ CFO replied in writing: “Huh? isn’t that rather obvious.” Kelley’s contemporaneous notes
182
+ reflect that he continued to have questions about the item.
183
+
184
+ 11. Pegasus failed to provide the promis ed information or other substantiation
185
+ or explanation for the alleged debt. Pegasus also failed to provide additional requested
186
+ information to Respondents, including detail for prepaid expenses; a cash summary, bank
187
+ reconciliations, and bank statements; supporting invoices for research and development
188
+ purchases; a breakdown of the goodwill balance; and a copy of an acquisition agreement.
189
+ Despite these open items, Respondents rendered an unqualified opinion on Pegasus’ 2006
190
+ financial statements and affirmed its audit was in accordance with the PCAOB’s standards.
191
+ Pegasus included the opinion in its 2006 annual report on Form 10-KSB filed April 3,
192
+ 2007.
193
+
194
+ 12. Respondents also failed to obtain a signed management representation letter
195
+ from Pegasus for the 2006 audit.
196
+
197
+ 13. PCAOB auditing standards require auditors to exercise reasonable diligence
198
+ and due professional care in performing an audit. “Due professional care requires the
199
+ auditor to exercise professional skepticism. . . . [i.e.,] an attitude that includes a
200
+ questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence.” AICPA Codification of
201
+ 4
202
+ Statements on Auditing Standards, “Due Professional Care in the Performance of Work,”
203
+ AU § 230.07. “The auditor neither assumes that management is dishonest nor assumes
204
+ unquestioned honesty. In exercising professional skepticism, the auditor should not be
205
+ satisfied with less than persuasive evidence because of a belief that management is
206
+ honest.” AU § 230.09. Moreover, an auditor must obtain “sufficient competent
207
+ evidential matter” to provide “a reasonable basis for forming an opinion.” AU § 326.22.
208
+
209
+ 14. In addition, PCAOB auditing standard s establish a requirement that the
210
+ auditor obtain written representations from management as part of an audit. AU § 333.01.
211
+ The specific representations an auditor should obtain relate to, among other things,
212
+ management’s acknowledgement of its responsibility for the financial statements; its belief
213
+ that the financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP, and the
214
+ completeness of information provided. AU § 333.06. Management’s refusal to furnish
215
+ written representations constitutes a limitation on the scope of the audit sufficient to
216
+ preclude an unqualified opinion and is ordinarily sufficient to cause an auditor to disclaim
217
+ an opinion or withdraw from the engagement. AU § 333.13.
218
+
219
+ 15. Respondents departed from the sta ndards described above by failing to
220
+ obtain competent evidential matter for the alleged debt and other matters and failing to
221
+ exercise professional skepticism.
222
+
223
+ 16. Respondents further departed from these standards by failing to obtain a
224
+ written management representation letter from Pegasus for the 2006 audit.
225
+
226
+ 17. During reviews of Pegasus’ quarterly financial statements for the quarters
227
+ ended March 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007, Respondents continued to request information
228
+ about the alleged debt and other items, but received nothing regarding the debt or other
229
+ items.
230
+
231
+ Respondents Added Documents to Their Audit Work Papers After the Audit
232
+
233
+ 18. In late 2007, a Pegasus investor, seeking to represent a class of injured
234
+ shareholders, sued Pollard-Kelley and others for securities fraud. Pollard-Kelley was
235
+ served with the complaint on December 29, 2007.
236
+
237
+ 19. On January 1, 2008, Kelley e-mailed the Pegasus CFO and CEO, stating:
238
+ “We have been named defendants in [a lawsuit] against Pegasus, et al. Please give me a
239
+ call and bring me up to date concerning this matter.” The e-mail further stated: “ALSO,
240
+ THIS IS THE TIME TO GET THE FINAL SCHEDULES NEEDED FOR THE 2006
241
+ AUDIT TO ME!!!!!!”
242
+
243
+ 20. On February 19, 2008, in connection with its investigation relating to
244
+ Pegasus, SEC staff requested Pollard-Kelley to produce documents, including documents
245
+ relating to Pegasus’ disclosures about how and why it issued shares to pay the purported
246
+ convertible debt.
247
+
248
+ 5
249
+ 21. In early 2008, having received notice of a shareholder suit involving
250
+ Pegaus, Respondents added an unsigned, written management representation letter to the
251
+ audit work papers. The letter purported to reflect the CEO and CFO’s confirmation that the
252
+ 2006 financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP; that they made
253
+ available to Pollard-Kelley all financial records and related data; and that they had no
254
+ knowledge of fraud involving management. The letter was not signed by Pegasus’ CEO or
255
+ CFO. Rather, Kelley made a handwritten note on the last page of the letter: “Verbally
256
+ acknowledged & confirmed . . . by [Pegasus’ CFO] over the phone. Hard copy to follow.”
257
+
258
+ 22. Kelley, however, testified that he added the workpaper to the audit
259
+ documentation in 2008.
260
+ 23. In addition to adding the written management representation letter to the
261
+ audit documentation, Respondents added an undated memo to explain why they opined on
262
+ Pegasus’ 2006 financial statements despite numerous open items. The memo states:
263
+ At the time [Pegasus filed its 10-KSB] a request for
264
+ additional information and support was made to the client . .
265
+ . . [W]e were told the materials requested would be
266
+ provided. The 45 day period of wrapping up audit
267
+ documentation passed on May 13, 2007 without the receipt
268
+ of the requested materials.
269
+ At that time the firm considered what it should do.
270
+ Provisions of AU 390 were considered. The firm knew of
271
+ no reason to suspect the accuracy of the filed financial
272
+ statements. [The] CFO is a knowledgeable, competent
273
+ experiences [sic] accountant, with many years experience.
274
+ Past audits have shown a consistent accuracy of the
275
+ Company’s records under [the CFO’s] leadership. We did
276
+ not know or have any reason to believe the statements as
277
+ filed were misleading . . . .
278
+ We concluded that even with the omitted procedures our
279
+ audit work papers still supported our opinion. However, we
280
+ will continue to try to obtain the information requested the
281
+ complete the additional audit procedures for the items
282
+ requested on [the 10-KSB filing date].
283
+ 24. When Kelley created the document in early 2008 and added it, he was still
284
+ being told by the CFO of Pegasus that documentation was forthcoming, but he was
285
+ suspicious whether the CFO would ever provide the requested documents.
286
+ 25. PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 3 provides that “[a] complete and final set
287
+ of audit documentation should be assembled for retention as of a date not more than 45
288
+ days after the report release date” (i.e., the “date the auditor grants permission to use the
289
+ auditor’s report in connection with the issuance of the company’s financial statements”).
290
+ 6
291
+ ¶¶ 14-15. Although the standard recognizes that “[c]ircumstances may require additions to
292
+ audit documentation after the report release date,” it states that “[a]ny documentation added
293
+ must indicate the date information was added, the name of the person who prepared the
294
+ additional documentation, and the reason for adding it.” ¶ 16.
295
+ 26. Respondents departed from this sta ndard by adding the written management
296
+ representation to the audit documentation in early 2008 without indicating when it was
297
+ added or the reason for adding it.
298
+ 27. Respondents further departed from this standard by adding the undated
299
+ memo to the audit documentation without indicating when it was added.
300
+
301
+ Violations
302
+
303
+ 28. Rule 102(e)(1) provides, in pertinen t part: “The Commission may censure a
304
+ person or deny, temporarily or permanently, the privilege of appearing or practicing before
305
+ it . . . to any person who is found . . . (ii) to be lacking in character or integrity or to have
306
+ engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct.” With respect to persons licensed
307
+ to practice as accountants, Rule 102(e)(1)(iv) provides that “improper professional
308
+ conduct” means:
309
+
310
+ (A) Intentional or knowing conduct, including reckless conduct, that results
311
+ in a violation of applicable professional standards; or (B) Either of the
312
+ following two types of negligent conduct:
313
+ (1) A single instance of highly unreasonable conduct that results in a
314
+ violation of applicable professional standards in circumstances in
315
+ which an accountant knows, or should know, that heightened
316
+ scrutiny is warranted.
317
+ (2) Repeated instances of unreasonable conduct, each resulting in a
318
+ violation of applicable professional standards, that indicate a lack of
319
+ competence to practice before the Commission.
320
+
321
+ Findings
322
+
323
+
324
+ 29. Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that Respondents engaged in
325
+ improper professional conduct pursuant to Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of
326
+ Practice.
327
+
328
+ IV.
329
+
330
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the
331
+ sanctions agreed to in Respondents’ Offer.
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+ 7
336
+
337
+
338
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that :
339
+
340
+ A. Respondents are each denied the privilege of appearing or practicing
341
+ before the Commission as an accountant.
342
+
343
+ B. After five years from the date of th is order, Respondents may each request
344
+ that the Commission consider his or its reinstatement by submitting an application
345
+ (attention: Office of the Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the
346
+ Commission as:
347
+
348
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation
349
+ or review, of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with the
350
+ Commission. If submitted by Kelley, such an application must satisfy the Commission
351
+ that Kelley’s work in his practice before the Commission will be reviewed either by the
352
+ independent audit committee of the public company for which he works or in some other
353
+ acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the Commission in this capacity; and
354
+
355
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
356
+ Commission that:
357
+
358
+ (a) Respondents, or the public accounting firm with which
359
+ Kelley is associated, are registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
360
+ Board (“Board”) in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and such
361
+ registration continues to be effective;
362
+
363
+ (b) Respondents, or the regi stered public accounting firm with
364
+ which Kelley is associated, have been inspected by the Board and that inspection did not
365
+ identify any criticisms of or potential defects in Kelley’s or the firm’s quality control
366
+ system that would indicate that Kelley will not receive appropriate supervision;
367
+
368
+ (c) Respondents have resolved all disciplinary issues with the
369
+ Board, and each has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by
370
+ the Board (other than reinstatement by the Commission); and
371
+
372
+ (d) Respondents each acknowledge his or its responsibility, as
373
+ long as either Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent
374
+ accountant, to comply with all requirements of the Commission and the Board, including,
375
+ but not limited to, all requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner
376
+ reviews and quality control standards.
377
+
378
+ C. The Commission will consider an a pplication by either Respondent to
379
+ resume appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that his or its state CPA
380
+ license is current and he or it has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable
381
+ state boards of accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement by
382
+ 8
383
+ 9
384
+ the Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The
385
+ Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced
386
+ above, any other matters relating to either Respondent’s character, integrity, professional
387
+ conduct, or qualifications to appear or practice before the Commission.
388
+
389
+
390
+ By the Commission.
391
+
392
+
393
+
394
+ Elizabeth M. Murphy
395
+ S e c r e t a r y
396
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3101.pdf ADDED
Binary file (68.6 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3101.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
24
+ Before the
25
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
26
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
27
+ Release No. 61325 / January 11, 2010
28
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
29
+ Release No. 3101 / January 11, 2010
30
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
31
+ File No. 3-13742
32
+ :
33
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-DESIST
34
+ : PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
35
+ NATCO GROUP INC. : IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
36
+ : PURSUANT TO SECTION 21C OF THE
37
+ : SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
38
+ Respondent. :
39
+ :
40
+ I.
41
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that
42
+ cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the
43
+ Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against NATCO Group Inc. (“Respondent”
44
+ or “NATCO”).
45
+ II.
46
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
47
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
48
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
49
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the
50
+ findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over Respondent and the subject
51
+ matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order
52
+ Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist
53
+ Order Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Order”), as set forth
54
+ below.
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+
62
+
63
+
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+ III.
86
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
87
+ Summary
88
+ 1. In this Foreign Corrupt Practices Act case, TEST Automation & Controls, Inc.
89
+ (“TEST”), a wholly owned subsidiary of oil field services provider NATCO Group Inc., created
90
+ and accepted false documents while paying extorted immigration fines and obtaining
91
+ immigration visas in the Republic of Kazakhstan. NATCO’s system of internal accounting
92
+ controls failed to ensure that TEST recorded the true purpose of the payments, and NATCO’s
93
+ consolidated books and records did not accurately reflect these payments.
94
+ Respondent
95
+ 2. NATCO Group Inc., a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in Houston,
96
+ Texas, designs, manufactures, and markets oil and gas production equipment and systems that
97
+ are used worldwide. At the time of the events discussed in this Order, NATCO’s common stock
98
+ was registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and was
99
+ listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
100
+ 2
101
+ Other Relevant Entities
102
+ 3. TEST Automation & Controls, Inc. is a Louisiana corporation and, at all relevant
103
+ times, was headquartered in Harvey, Louisiana. TEST is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
104
+ NATCO.3 TEST fabricates and sells control panels and packaged automation systems, as well as
105
+ providing field services associated with repair, maintenance, inspection and testing of onshore
106
+ and offshore control systems. TEST, at all relevant times, maintained a branch office in
107
+ Kazakhstan (“TEST Kazakhstan”).
108
+ Facts
109
+ A. Background
110
+ 4. In June 2005, TEST Kazakhstan won a contract to provide instrumentation and
111
+ electrical services in Kazakhstan. To perf orm the services, TEST Kazakhstan hired both
112
+ expatriates and local Kazakh workers. Kaza khstan law required TEST to obtain immigration
113
+ 1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any other
114
+ person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
115
+ 2 The registration of NATCO’s common stock, and its listing on the NYSE, ended on November 18, 2009, when
116
+ NATCO became a subsidiary of Cameron International Corporation (“Cameron”), a publicly held reporting
117
+ corporation listed on the NYSE.
118
+ 3 TEST also became a subsidiary of Cameron, following NATCO’s acquisition by Cameron.
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+ documentation before an expatriate worker entered the country. Kazakhstan immigration
141
+ authorities periodically audited immigration documentation of TEST Kazakhstan and other
142
+ companies operating in Kazakhstan for compliance with local law.
143
+ B. Cash Payments to Kazakh Immigration Prosecutor
144
+ 5. In February 2007 and September 2007, Kazakh immigration prosecutors
145
+ conducted audits and claimed that TEST Kazakhstan’s expatriate workers were working without
146
+ proper immigration documentation. The prosecutors threatened to fine, jail or deport the
147
+ workers if TEST Kazakhstan did not pay cash fines.
148
+ 6. Believing the prosecutor’s threats to be genuine, employees with TEST
149
+ Kazakhstan sought guidance from TEST’s senior management in Harvey, Louisiana, who
150
+ authorized making the payments. TEST Kazakhstan employees used personal funds to pay the
151
+ prosecutors $25,000 in February and $20,000 in September, and then obtained reimbursement
152
+ from TEST.
153
+ 7. For the February 2007 payment, TEST made a $25,000 wire transfer to the
154
+ affected employee. TEST inaccurately described the transfer as “an advance against his [the
155
+ paying employee's] bonus payable in March.” Moreover, the email noted the bonus would be
156
+ “substantial,” to further disguise the true reason for the transfer. In addition, TEST’s letter to the
157
+ bank providing the wire instructions inaccurately described the payment as a “Payroll Advance.”
158
+ After the wire transfer was transmitted, TEST inaccurately recorded the payment in its books and
159
+ records as a salary advance.
160
+ 8. TEST made a $20,000 wire transfer to reimburse the September 2007 payment.
161
+ The wire transfer and journal entry in TEST’s books described the purpose of the transfer as
162
+ “visa fines.”
163
+ C. Inaccurate Consultant Invoices for Visa Services
164
+ 9. TEST Kazakhstan used consultants to assist it in obtaining immigration
165
+ documentation for its expatriate employees. One of these consultants did not have a license to
166
+ perform visa services, but maintained close ties to an employee working at the Kazakh Ministry
167
+ of Labor, the entity issuing the visas. On tw o instances, the consultant requested cash from
168
+ TEST Kazakhstan to help him obtain the visas. Because Kazakh law requires companies seeking
169
+ to withdraw cash from commercial bank accounts to submit supporting invoices, the consultant
170
+ provided TEST Kazakhstan bogus invoices for “cable” from third-party entities he controlled.
171
+ TEST Kazakhstan knew these invoices were false, but nonetheless presented them to Kazakh
172
+ banks to withdraw the requested cash.
173
+ 4 TEST Kazakhstan later submitted the false invoices –
174
+ which totaled in excess of $80,000 – to TEST for reimbursement. TEST reimbursed these
175
+ requests despite knowing the invoices mischaracterized the true purpose of the services rendered.
176
+ 4 It is not known how the consultant used these funds, or to whom they were paid.
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+
192
+
193
+ D. Discovery of Payments, Internal Investigation, and Remediation
194
+ 10. During a routine internal audit review in late 2007, NATCO discovered potential
195
+ issues involving payments at TEST. NATCO conducted an internal investigation, and
196
+ voluntarily disclosed the results to Commission staff. NATCO undertook numerous remedial
197
+ measures, including employee termination and disciplinary actions. The company also created a
198
+ revised form document for agent agreements and established new due diligence procedures
199
+ regarding the vetting and retention of third-party intermediaries; increased staffing in its global
200
+ compliance department, including the appointment of a full-time Chief Compliance Officer;
201
+ joined a non-profit association specializing in anti-bribery due diligence that, among other things,
202
+ screens potential partners and other third parties that work with multinational corporations;
203
+ improved its FCPA compliance training worldwide, investing heavily in software to assist in
204
+ enhancing internal controls and compliance; and restructured its internal audit function and
205
+ enhanced its monitoring and auditing process for the compliance program.
206
+ 11. In light of the weaknesses uncovered at TEST, the company expanded its
207
+ investigation to examine TEST’s other worldwide operations, including Nigeria, Angola and
208
+ China, geographic locations with historic FCPA concerns. NATCO’s expanded internal
209
+ investigation of TEST uncovered no wrongdoing.
210
+ E. Legal Discussion
211
+ 12. The FCPA, enacted in 1977, added Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(A) to require
212
+ public companies to make and keep books, records and accounts, which, in reasonable detail,
213
+ accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer, and
214
+ added Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(B) to require such companies to devise and maintain a
215
+ system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: (i)
216
+ transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization;
217
+ and (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
218
+ conformity with generally accepted accounting principles or any other criteria applicable to such
219
+ statements, and to maintain accountability for assets. 15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(b)(2)(A) and
220
+ 78m(b)(2)(B).
221
+ 13. As detailed above, NATCO’s books, records, and accounts did not properly
222
+ reflect TEST’s reimbursement of payments to the Kazakhstan immigration prosecutor or the
223
+ immigration consultant. As a result, NATCO violated Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(A).
224
+ 14. In addition, NATCO failed to devise or maintain sufficient internal controls to
225
+ ensure that TEST complied with the books and records provisions of the FCPA and to ensure
226
+ that the payments TEST made were accurately reflected on its books and records. As a result,
227
+ NATCO violated Exchange Act Section 13(b)(2)(B).
228
+ 5
229
+ 5 NATCO also has agreed to pay a $65,000 civil monetary penalty.
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ NATCO’s Remedial Efforts
241
+ In determining to accept the Offer, the Commission considered the remedial efforts
242
+ undertaken by NATCO and the cooperation afforded the Commission Staff.
243
+ IV.
244
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to accept the
245
+ Respondent’s Offer.
246
+ Accordingly, pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, it is hereby ORDERED that
247
+ NATCO cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of
248
+ Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
249
+ By the Commission.
250
+ Elizabeth M. Murphy
251
+ Secretary
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3102.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | NATCO Group Inc.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507421","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ NATCO Group Inc.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ NATCO Group Inc.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21374 / January 11, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3102 / January 11, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. NATCO Group Inc. , Civil Action No. 4:10-CV-98 (S.D. Tex.) SEC Files Settled Civil Action Charging NATCO Group Inc. with Violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act On January 11, 2010, the Commission filed a settled civil action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas charging NATCO Group Inc. (NATCO) with violations of the books and records and internal controls provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act. According to the complaint, TEST Automation & Controls, Inc. (TEST), a wholly owned subsidiary of oil field services provider NATCO Group Inc., created and accepted false documents while paying extorted immigration fines and obtaining immigration visas in the Republic of Kazakhstan. NATCO's system of internal accounting controls failed to ensure that TEST recorded the true purpose of the payments, and NATCO's consolidated books and records did not accurately reflect these payments. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, NATCO agreed to pay a $65,000 civil penalty. In a related administrative proceeding, the Commission today issued a settled cease-and-desist order against NATCO finding that NATCO violated the books and records and internal controls provisions of the Exchange Act in connection with the improper payments made by TEST. Without admitting or denying the Commission's findings, NATCO consented to the issuance of an order that requires NATCO to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act. [SEC v. NATCO Group Inc., Civil Action No. 4:10-CV-98(S.D. Tex.)] (LR-21374; AAE Rel. 3102); Administrative Proceeding In the Matter of NATCO Group Inc. ¢€" (Rel. 34-61325; AAE Rel. 3101; File No. 3-13742).
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3103.pdf ADDED
Binary file (19.2 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3103.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+ ___________________________________
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
23
+ Before the
24
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
25
+ Washington, D.C. 20549
26
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
27
+ Release No. 61344A /January 13, 2010
28
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
29
+ Release No. 3103A/January 13, 2010
30
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
31
+ File No. 3-13707
32
+ In the Matter of :
33
+ APPLIED WELLNESS CORPORATION
34
+ :
35
+ :
36
+ :
37
+ :
38
+ :
39
+ CORRECTED ORDER MAKING
40
+ FINDINGS AND REVOKING
41
+ REGISTRATION BY DEFAULT
42
+ ___________________________________
43
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) initiated this proceeding on
44
+ December 10, 2009, with an Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Section 12(j) of the
45
+ Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) . The OIP alleges that Respondent Applied
46
+ Wellness Corporation (Applied Wellness), is a co rporation with common stock registered with
47
+ the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, which has repeatedly failed to
48
+ file required periodic reports.
49
+ The Division of Enforcement has provided evidence that Applied Wellness was served
50
+ with the OIP in a manner that complies with 17 C.F.R. § 141(a)(2)(ii) by December 18, 2009.
51
+ Applied Wellness’ Answer was due twenty days from the date of service and no Answer has
52
+ been received. See 17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b); OIP at 2. Applied Wellness was put on notice, by
53
+ Order dated January 5, 2010, that failure to file an Answer could result in default. Thus, Applied
54
+ Wellness has failed to answer or otherwise de fend the proceeding within the meaning of 17
55
+ C.F.R. § 201.155(a)(2). Accordingly, Applied Wellness is in default, and the following
56
+ allegations in the OIP are deemed to be true. See 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f); OIP at 2-3.
57
+ Applied Wellness, CIK No. 0001134011, is a Neva da corporation located in San Diego,
58
+ California. Pursuant to its Form 10-KSB filed on April 15, 2008, it purported to distribute
59
+ “devices for non-invasive therapeutic applications based on the latest adva nces in the field of
60
+ ionic therapies” through its s ubsidiary, Energy Balance Resources , Inc. The common stock of
61
+ Applied Wellness has been regi stered with the Commission unde r Exchange Act Section 12(g)
62
+ since April 8, 2001. Applied Wellness common stock (symbol AWLL) 1 is quoted on the Pink
63
+ 1 The OIP lists the common stock symbol of Applied Wellness as AAWL. However, Applied
64
+ Wellness’ common stock symbol is AWLL. All ot her references to Applied Wellness set forth
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+ Sheets, operated by Pink OTC Markets Inc., and is eligible for the “piggyback” exception of
87
+ Rule 15c2-11 of the Exchange Act.
88
+ While its common stock was registered with the Commission, Applied Wellness failed to
89
+ comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rule s 13a-1 and 13a-15 thereunder in that it failed
90
+ to make disclosures in its Form 10-KSB for th e fiscal year ended D ecember 31, 2007, filed with
91
+ the Commission on April 15, 2008, concerning its inte rnal control over financial reporting and
92
+ disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Items 307 and 308T of Regulation S-B.
93
+ While its common stock was registered with the Commission, Applied Wellness failed to
94
+ comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Ru les 13a-1 and 13a-13 ther eunder in that it has
95
+ failed to file periodic or quarterly reports on Fo rm 10-Q since its fiscal quarter ended March 31,
96
+ 2008, and failed to file an annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
97
+ Exchange Act Section 13(a) and the rules promulgated thereunder require issuers of
98
+ securities registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12 to file with the Commission current
99
+ and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under Section
100
+ 12(g). Specifically, Exchange Act Rule 13a- 1 requires issuers to fi le annual reports and
101
+ Exchange Act Rule 13a-13 requires issuers to file quarterly reports. Exchange Act Rule 13a-15
102
+ requires issuers, with limited exceptions, to maintain disclosure controls and procedures, and, if
103
+ such an issuer either had been required to file an annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d)
104
+ of the Exchange Act for the prior fiscal year or had filed an annual repo rt with the Commission
105
+ for the prior fiscal year, internal control over financial reporting.
106
+ As a result of the conduct described above, A pplied Wellness has failed to comply with
107
+ Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1, 13a-13, and 13a-15 thereunder. Considering
108
+ its delinquencies, it is necessary and appropriate for the protec tion of investors to revoke the
109
+ registration of each class of registered securities of Applied Wellness.
110
+ IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of
111
+ 1934, the registration of each class of registered securities of Applied Wellness Corporation, is
112
+ revoked.
113
+ ____________________________
114
+ Robert G. Mahony
115
+ Administrative Law Judge
116
+ in the OIP are correct, including its CIK number, 0001134011, which uniquely identifies Applied
117
+ Wellness within the Commission’s EDGAR database.
118
+ 2
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3104.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
32
+ before the
33
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
34
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
35
+ Release No. 61375 / January 19, 2010
36
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
37
+ Release No. 3104 / January 19, 2010
38
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
39
+ File No. 3-13751
40
+ :
41
+ :
42
+ :
43
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
44
+ : ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
45
+ DIANE BJORKSTROM (CPA), : PURSUANT TO RULE 102(e) OF THE
46
+ : COMMISSION’S RULES OF PRACTICE,
47
+ Respondent. : MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
48
+ : REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
49
+ :
50
+ ____________________________________ :
51
+ I.
52
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
53
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Diane
54
+ Bjorkstrom (“Respondent” or “Bjorkstrom”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s
55
+ Rules of Practice.
56
+ 1
57
+ II.
58
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
59
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
60
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
61
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
62
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
63
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
64
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
65
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
66
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
67
+ thereunder.
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+
89
+
90
+
91
+
92
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
93
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over her and the subject matter of these
94
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.3 below, which are admitted, Respondent
95
+ consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule
96
+ 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial
97
+ Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
98
+ III.
99
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
100
+ 1. Bjorkstrom, age 53, is and has been a certified public accountant holding an
101
+ inactive license to practice in the State of Pennsylvania. She served as Chief Financial Officer of
102
+ Tvia, Inc. (“Tvia”) from September 2004 through October 2006.
103
+ 2. Tvia was, at all relevant times, a Delaware corporation with its principal
104
+ place of business in Santa Clara, California. Tvia is a fabless semiconductor company which
105
+ designs and develops digital display processors for use in LCD and other high-definition TVs. At
106
+ all relevant times, Tvia’s common stock was registered with the Commission pursuant to Section
107
+ 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and traded on the NASDAQ
108
+ Global Market.
109
+ 3. On November 17, 2009, the Commission filed a complaint against
110
+ Bjorkstrom in SEC v. Diane Bjorkstrom (Civil Action No. CV-09-5394-JW). On January 6, 2010,
111
+ the court entered an order permanently enjoining Bjorkstrom, by consent, from future violations of
112
+ Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act
113
+ and Rules 13a-14 and 13b2-1 thereunder, and aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a),
114
+ 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13
115
+ thereunder. Bjorkstrom was also ordered to pay a $20,000 civil money penalty.
116
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleged, among other things, that
117
+ Bjorkstrom agreed to ship product and recognize revenue for a sale that she knew or should have
118
+ known did not have the paperwork necessary to satisfy Tvia’s revenue recognition policy, resulting
119
+ in Tvia’s filing of materially false and misleading financial statements in the company’s annual
120
+ report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.
121
+ IV.
122
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
123
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Bjorkstrom’s Offer.
124
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
125
+ A. Bjorkstrom is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an
126
+ accountant.
127
+ 2
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+ B. After two years from the date of this order, Respondent may request that the
149
+ Commission consider her reinstatement by submitting an application (attention: Office of the
150
+ Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the Commission as:
151
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation or
152
+ review, of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with the Commission. Such
153
+ an application must satisfy the Commission that Respondent’s work in her practice before the
154
+ Commission will be reviewed either by the independent audit committee of the public company
155
+ for which she works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as she practices before the
156
+ Commission in this capacity; and/or
157
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
158
+ Commission that:
159
+ (a) Respondent, or the public accounting firm with which she is
160
+ associated, is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“Board”) in
161
+ accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and such registration continues to be effective;
162
+ (b) Respondent, or the registered public accounting firm with which
163
+ she is associated, has been inspected by the Board and that inspection did not identify any
164
+ criticisms of or potential defects in the respondent’s or the firm’s quality control system that
165
+ would indicate that the respondent will not receive appropriate supervision;
166
+ (c) Respondent has resolved all disciplinary issues with the Board, and
167
+ has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the Board (other than
168
+ reinstatement by the Commission); and
169
+ (d) Respondent acknowledges her responsibility, as long as
170
+ Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent accountant, to
171
+ comply with all requirements of the Commission and the Board, including, but not limited to, all
172
+ requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality control
173
+ standards.
174
+ C. The Commission will consider an application by Respondent to resume
175
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that her state CPA license is
176
+ current and she has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable state boards of
177
+ accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement by the
178
+ Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The
179
+ 3
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+ Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced
191
+ above, any other matters relating to Respondent’s character, integrity, professional conduct,
192
+ or qualifications to appear or practice before the Commission.
193
+ By the Commission.
194
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
195
+ S e c r e t a r y
196
+ 4
197
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3105.pdf ADDED
Binary file (67.4 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3105.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
32
+ before the
33
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
34
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
35
+ Release No. 61383 / January 20, 2010
36
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
37
+ Release No. 3105 / January 20, 2010
38
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
39
+ File No. 3-13754
40
+ :
41
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
42
+ : ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
43
+ : PURSUANT TO RULE 102(e)
44
+ THEODORE P. NONCEK, CPA: OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES
45
+ : OF PRACTICE, MAKING FINDINGS,
46
+ : AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
47
+ Respondent. : SANCTIONS
48
+ :
49
+ ___________________________________ :
50
+ I.
51
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
52
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against
53
+ Theodore P. Noncek, CPA (“Respondent” or “Noncek”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the
54
+ Commission’s Rules of Practice.
55
+ 1
56
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
57
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing, may, by order, . . .
58
+ suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has been by name:
59
+ (A) permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his or her
60
+ misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting the
61
+ violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations thereunder.
62
+
63
+
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+ II.
88
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
89
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
90
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
91
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
92
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
93
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.3 below, which are admitted, Respondent
94
+ consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule
95
+ 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial
96
+ Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
97
+ III.
98
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
99
+ 1. Noncek, age 51, was Vice-President and Controller of Bally Total Fitness
100
+ Holding Corporation (“Bally”) from 2001 to February 2005, when he was terminated. Prior to his
101
+ employment at Bally, Noncek was an auditor with Ernst & Young LLP. At all relevant times,
102
+ Noncek was a certified public accountant.
103
+ 2. Bally purported to be the largest, and only nationwide, commercial operator
104
+ of fitness centers. At all relevant times, Bally's common stock was registered with the Commission
105
+ pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and traded on
106
+ the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The NYSE delisted Bally's common stock on June 8,
107
+ 2007. After filing for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, on September 17,
108
+ 2007, Bally emerged as a privately held reorganized entity.
109
+ 3. On December 17, 2009, the Commission filed a complaint against Noncek
110
+ in SEC v. Theodore P. Noncek, 09-CV-2387 (CKK)(D.D.C.). On December 22, 2009, the court
111
+ entered an order permanently enjoining Noncek, by consent, from violating Sections 17(a)(2) and
112
+ (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, and from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a),
113
+ 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11 and 13a-13
114
+ thereunder.
115
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleges, among other things, that during the
116
+ relevant time period, Noncek violated various provisions of the federal securities laws. The
117
+ complaint also alleges that Noncek, with others, was responsible for Bally’s materially false and
118
+ misleading statements about its financial condition in filings with the Commission and in other
119
+ public statements. These materially false and misleading statements portrayed Bally's financial
120
+ condition (its net worth) and its performance (its income) as being materially better than they
121
+ actually were during the relevant period.
122
+ 2
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+ IV.
150
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
151
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Noncek’s Offer.
152
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
153
+ A. Respondent is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an
154
+ accountant.
155
+ B. After two years from the date of this order, Respondent may request that the
156
+ Commission consider his reinstatement by submitting an application (attention: Office of the
157
+ Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the Commission as:
158
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation or
159
+ review, of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with the Commission. Such
160
+ an application must satisfy the Commission that Respondent’s work in his practice before the
161
+ Commission will be reviewed either by the independent audit committee of the public company
162
+ for which he works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the
163
+ Commission in this capacity; and/or
164
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
165
+ Commission that:
166
+ (a) Respondent, or the public accounting firm with which he is
167
+ associated, is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“Board”) in
168
+ accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and such registration continues to be effective;
169
+ (b) Respondent, or the registered public accounting firm with which he
170
+ is associated, has been inspected by the Board and that inspection did not identify any criticisms
171
+ of or potential defects in the Respondent’s or the firm’s quality control system that would
172
+ indicate that the Respondent will not receive appropriate supervision;
173
+ (c) Respondent has resolved all disciplinary issues with the Board, and
174
+ has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the Board (other than
175
+ reinstatement by the Commission); and
176
+ (d) Respondent acknowledges his responsibility, as long as
177
+ Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent accountant, to
178
+ comply with all requirements of the Commission and the Board, including, but not limited to, all
179
+ requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality control
180
+ standards.
181
+ C. The Commission will consider an application by Respondent to resume
182
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that his state CPA license is
183
+ 3
184
+
185
+
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+
192
+
193
+
194
+ current and he has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable state boards of
195
+ accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement by the
196
+ Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The
197
+ Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced
198
+ above, any other matters relating to Respondent’s character, integrity, professional conduct,
199
+ or qualifications to appear or practice before the Commission.
200
+ By the Commission.
201
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
202
+ S e c r e t a r y
203
+ 4
204
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3106.pdf ADDED
Binary file (50.6 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3106.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
34
+ before the
35
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
36
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
37
+ Release No. 61384 / January 20, 2010
38
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
39
+ Release No. 3106 / January 20, 2010
40
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
41
+ File No. 3-13755
42
+ :
43
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC
44
+ : ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
45
+ : PURSUANT TO RULE 102(e)
46
+ JOHN W. DWYER, CPA : OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES
47
+ : OF PRACTICE, MAKING FINDINGS,
48
+ : AND IMPOSING REMEDIAL
49
+ Respondent. : SANCTIONS
50
+ :
51
+ ___________________________________ :
52
+ I.
53
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
54
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against John W.
55
+ Dwyer, CPA (“Respondent” or “Dwyer”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s Rules
56
+ of Practice.
57
+ 1
58
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
59
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing, may, by order, . . .
60
+ suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has been by name:
61
+ (A) permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his or her
62
+ misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting the
63
+ violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations thereunder.
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+ II.
87
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
88
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
89
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
90
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
91
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
92
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.3 below, which are admitted, Respondent
93
+ consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule
94
+ 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial
95
+ Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
96
+ III.
97
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
98
+ 1. Dwyer, age 57, was Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of Bally Total Fitness
99
+ Holding Corporation (“Bally”) from May 1994 to April 2004, when he was forced to resign. Prior
100
+ to his employment at Bally, Dwyer was an audit partner in the Chicago office of Ernst & Young
101
+ LLP. At all relevant times, Dwyer was a certified public accountant.
102
+ 2. Bally purported to be the largest, and only nationwide, commercial operator
103
+ of fitness centers. At all relevant times, Bally's common stock was registered with the Commission
104
+ pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and traded on
105
+ the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The NYSE delisted Bally's common stock on June 8,
106
+ 2007. After filing for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, on September 17,
107
+ 2007, Bally emerged as a privately held reorganized entity.
108
+ 3. On December 17, 2009, the Commission filed a complaint against Dwyer in
109
+ SEC v. John W. Dwyer, 09-CV-2386 (CKK)(D.D.C.). On December 22, 2009, the court entered
110
+ an order permanently enjoining Dwyer, by consent, from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities
111
+ Act of 1933, and Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1
112
+ thereunder, and from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B)
113
+ of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11 and 13a-13 thereunder.
114
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleges, among other things, that during the
115
+ relevant time period, Dwyer violated the anti-fraud provisions, and aided and abetted Bally’s
116
+ violations of the reporting, record-keeping, and internal controls provisions, of the Federal
117
+ securities laws. The complaint also alleges that Dwyer is responsible for Bally’s materially false
118
+ and misleading statements about its financial condition in filings with the Commission and in
119
+ other public statements. These materially false and misleading statements portrayed Bally's
120
+ financial condition (its net worth) and its performance (its income) as being materially better than
121
+ they actually were during the relevant period.
122
+ 2
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+ IV.
141
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
142
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Dwyer’s Offer.
143
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
144
+ Dwyer is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant.
145
+ By the Commission.
146
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
147
+ S e c r e t a r y
148
+ 3
149
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3107.pdf ADDED
Binary file (47.5 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3107.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
32
+ before the
33
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
34
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
35
+ Release No. 61385 / January 20, 2010
36
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
37
+ Release No. 3107 / January 20, 2010
38
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
39
+ File No. 3-13756
40
+ :
41
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
42
+ : PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO RULE
43
+ DEANNA J. SERUGA, CPA : 102(e) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF
44
+ : PRACTICE, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
45
+ Respondent. : IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
46
+ :
47
+ ____________________________________ :
48
+ I.
49
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
50
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Deanna
51
+ J. Seruga (“Respondent” or “Seruga”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s Rules of
52
+ Practice.
53
+ 1
54
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
55
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
56
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
57
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
58
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
59
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
60
+ thereunder.
61
+
62
+
63
+
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+ II.
83
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
84
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
85
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
86
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
87
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over her and the subject matter of these
88
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.3. below, which are admitted, Respondent
89
+ consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 102(e)
90
+ of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions
91
+ (“Order”), as set forth below.
92
+ III.
93
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
94
+ 1. Seruga, age 33, has been a certified public accountant licensed to practice in
95
+ the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. She served as Controller at World Health Alternatives, Inc.
96
+ (“World Health”) from 2003 until August 2005.
97
+ 2. World Health was, at all relevant times, a Florida corporation with its
98
+ principal place of business in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. World Health was engaged in the medical
99
+ staffing business. At all relevant times, World Health common stock was registered with the
100
+ Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”),
101
+ and traded on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board.
102
+ 3. On January 4, 2010, a final judgment was entered by consent against
103
+ Seruga, permanently enjoining her from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of
104
+ 1933, Sections 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1 and 13b2-2(b)
105
+ thereunder, and aiding and abetting violations of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-
106
+ 20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder, in the civil action entitled Securities and Exchange Commission
107
+ v. Richard E. McDonald, et al., Civil Action Number 09-CV-1685, in the United States District
108
+ Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
109
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleged, among other things, that Seruga, at the
110
+ direction of World Health’s former President and Chief Executive Officer and on her own
111
+ accord, engaged in a fraudulent scheme that resulted in World Health filing materially false and
112
+ misleading financial statements in the company’s annual and quarterly reports from the first
113
+ quarter of 2003 through the first quarter of 2005. The complaint alleged that Seruga falsified
114
+ World Health’s books and records by, among other things, understating expenses and liabilities
115
+ through numerous false and improper accounting entries. In addition, the complaint alleged that
116
+ Seruga knowingly provided false information to World Health’s auditors.
117
+ 2
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+ IV.
131
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
132
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Seruga’s Offer.
133
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that Seruga is suspended from
134
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant.
135
+ By the Commission.
136
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
137
+ S e c r e t a r y
138
+ 3
139
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3108.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1370 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | General Re Corporation
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507471","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"field_group":{"html_element":{"mode":"default","context":"view","settings":{"classes":"rightrail-list","show_empty_fields":false,"id":"","element":"div","show_label":true,"label_element":"h2","label_element_classes":"","attributes":"","effect":"none","speed":"fast"}}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ General Re Corporation
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ General Re Corporation
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21384 / January 20, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3108 / January 20, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. General Re Corporation , Civil Action No. 10 Civ 458 (S.D.N.Y.) SEC Charges General Re Corporation for Role in AIG and Prudential Accounting Frauds The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged General Re Corporation for its involvement in separate schemes by American International Group and Prudential Financial, Inc. to manipulate and falsify their reported financial results. The complaint alleges that a foreign subsidiary of Gen Re entered into two sham "reinsurance" transactions with AIG in 2000 to improperly allow AIG to reverse the declining reserve trend and falsely report additions to both loss reserves and premiums written. Senior officials at Gen Re helped AIG structure the two sham transactions. The contracts show reinsurance transactions that appeared to transfer risk to AIG, but the transactions did not transfer risk. The complaint further alleges that Gen Re separately entered into a series of sham reinsurance contracts with Prudential's property and casualty division from 1997 to 2002. The contracts had no economic substance and purpose other than to allow Prudential to build up and then draw down on an off-balance sheet asset or "finite bank" parked with Gen Re. As a result of the sham transactions, Prudential improperly recognized more than $200 million in revenues in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Gen Re received fees totaling $8.1 million for structuring and executing the scheme with Prudential. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Gen Re has consented to a judgment enjoining it from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and directing it to pay $12.2 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. The settlement is subject to court approval. In determining to accept Gen Re's settlement offer, the SEC took Gen Re's remediation efforts and cooperation into account. Among the efforts SEC considered: Gen Re's comprehensive, independent review of its operations conducted at the outset of the government's investigations the results of which were shared with investigators; Gen Re's substantial assistance in the government's successful civil and criminal actions against individuals involved in the scheme with AIG; and Gen Re's internal corporate reforms designed to strengthen oversight of its operations. Those reforms entail dissolving a subsidiary involved with the AIG transactions, appointing an independent director to its Board of Directors, forming a committee consisting of senior managers to review and approve complex transactions, requiring legal review of proposed finite or loss mitigation contracts, and fortifying its internal audit functions and underwriting rules. The SEC previously charged AIG with securities fraud and improper accounting, and the company settled the charges by paying more than $800 million among other remedies. The SEC also previously charged AIG former chairman Maurice R. "Hank" Greenberg and former chief financial officer Howard I. Smith, as well as former senior executives of Gen Re for their roles in connection with the scheme with AIG. The Commission separately charged Prudential with securities laws violations in 2008.
1120
+
1121
+ See Also: SEC Complaint
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+ Resources
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+ SEC Complaint
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+ Return to top
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+
1169
+ SEC homepage
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ About the SEC
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+ Budget & Performance
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+ Careers
1193
+
1194
+
1195
+ Commission Votes
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+ Contact
1199
+
1200
+
1201
+ Contracts
1202
+
1203
+
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Transparency
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Accessibility & Disability
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ Super Intelligence
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+ FOIA
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+ Inspector General
1225
+
1226
+
1227
+ No FEAR Act Data
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+ Ombuds
1231
+
1232
+
1233
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1234
+
1235
+
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+ Websites
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+
1247
+ Investor.gov
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+ Related Sites
1251
+
1252
+
1253
+ USA.gov
1254
+
1255
+
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+ Site Information
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+ Plain Writing
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+ Privacy & Security
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+ Site Map
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+
1283
+
1284
+
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+
1297
+ Your email address
1298
+
1299
+ Sign Up
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+ X
1312
+
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+ Facebook
1320
+
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+ Instagram
1328
+
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+ RSS
1336
+
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+ YouTube
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+ Email Updates
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
1356
+
1357
+
1358
+
1359
+
1360
+
1361
+
1362
+
1363
+
1364
+
1365
+
1366
+
1367
+
1368
+
1369
+
1370
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3110.pdf ADDED
Binary file (22.5 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3110.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
14
+ Before the
15
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
16
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
17
+ Release No. 61432 / January 27, 2010
18
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
19
+ Release No. 3110 / January 27, 2010
20
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
21
+ File No. 3-11911
22
+ : ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR
23
+ : REINSTATEMENT TO APPEAR AND PRACTICEIn the Matter of : BEFORE THE COMMISSION AS AN ACCOUNTANT
24
+ : RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OR Karen T. Baker, CPA : REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REQUIRED
25
+ : TO BE FILED WITH THE COMMISSION
26
+ On April 26, 2005, Karen T. Baker (“Baker”) was denied the privilege of appearing or
27
+ practicing as an accountant before the Commission as a result of settled public administrative
28
+ proceedings instituted by the Commission against Baker pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the
29
+ Commission's Rules of Practice.1 Baker consented to the entry of the April 26, 2005 order
30
+ without admitting or denying the findings therein. This order is issued in response to Baker’s
31
+ application for reinstatement to practice before the Commission as an accountant.
32
+ Baker served as the audit manager for Deloitte & Touche LLP’s audit of Just for Feet,
33
+ Inc.’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 30, 1999. The Commission found
34
+ that Baker reasonably should have known that the financial statements had not been prepared in
35
+ accordance with GAAP, but nonetheless issued, with others, an unqualified audit report that
36
+ represented that the financial statements were free from material misstatements and were fairly
37
+ presented in conformity with GAAP and that the auditors had adhered to GAAS when the audit
38
+ was performed. Baker did not comply with GAAS in the conduct of the audit and engaged in
39
+ improper professional conduct within the meaning of Rule 102(e)(1)(ii) of the Commission’s
40
+ Rules of Practice through repeated instances of unreasonable conduct.
41
+ In her capacity as a preparer or reviewer, or as a person responsible for the preparation or
42
+ review, of financial statements of a public company to be filed with the Commission, Baker
43
+ attests that she will undertake to have her work reviewed by the independent audit committee of
44
+ 1 See Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2238 dated April 26, 2005. Baker was permitted, pursuant
45
+ to the order, to apply for reinstatement after one year upon making certain showings.
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+
62
+
63
+
64
+ any company for which she works, or in some other manner acceptable to the Commission,
65
+ while practicing before the Commission in this capacity. Baker is not, at this time, seeking to
66
+ appear or practice before the Commission as an independent accountant. If she should wish to
67
+ resume appearing and practicing before the Commission as an independent accountant, she will
68
+ be required to submit an application to the Commission showing that she has complied and will
69
+ comply with the terms of the original suspension order in this regard. Therefore, Baker’s
70
+ suspension from practice before the Commission as an independent accountant continues in
71
+ effect until the Commission determines that a sufficient showing has been made in this regard in
72
+ accordance with the terms of the original suspension order
73
+ Rule 102(e)(5) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice governs applications for
74
+ reinstatement, and provides that the Commission may reinstate the privilege to appear and
75
+ practice before the Commission “for good cause shown.”
76
+ 2 This “good cause” determination is
77
+ necessarily highly fact specific.
78
+ On the basis of information supplied, representations made, and undertakings agreed to
79
+ by Baker, it appears that she has complied with the terms of the April 26, 2005 order denying her
80
+ the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, that no
81
+ information has come to the attention of the Commission relating to her character, integrity,
82
+ professional conduct or qualifications to practice before the Commission that would be a basis
83
+ for adverse action against her pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, and
84
+ that Baker, by undertaking to have her work reviewed by the independent audit committee of any
85
+ company for which she works, or in some other manner acceptable to the Commission, in her
86
+ practice before the Commission as a preparer or reviewer of financial statements required to be
87
+ filed with the Commission, has shown good cause for reinstatement. Therefore, it is accordingly,
88
+ ORDERED pursuant to Rule 102(e)(5)(i) of the Commission's Rules of Practice that
89
+ Karen T. Baker, CPA is hereby reinstated to appear and practice before the Commission as an
90
+ accountant responsible for the preparation or review of financial statements required to be filed
91
+ with the Commission.
92
+ By the Commission.
93
+ Elizabeth M. Murphy
94
+ Secretary
95
+ 2 Rule 102(e)(5)(i) provides:
96
+ “An application for reinstatement of a person permanently suspended or disqualified under paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(3)
97
+ of this section may be made at any time, and the applicant may, in the Commission’s discretion, be afforded a
98
+ hearing; however, the suspension or disqualification shall continue unless and until the applicant has been reinstated
99
+ by the Commission for good cause shown.” 17 C.F.R. § 201.102(e)(5)(i).
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3111.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1375 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Tsukuda-America Inc. et al.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507531","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"field_group":{"html_element":{"mode":"default","context":"view","settings":{"classes":"rightrail-list","show_empty_fields":false,"id":"","element":"div","show_label":true,"label_element":"h2","label_element_classes":"","attributes":"","effect":"none","speed":"fast"}}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Tsukuda-America Inc. et al.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Tsukuda-America Inc. et al.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21396A/ January 28, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3111A / January 28, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tsukuda-America Inc. et al. , Case No. 3:10-CV-00136-M (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division) SEC alleges anti-fraud violations by Tsukuda-America and John W. Petros The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action on January 26, 2010 against Tsukuda-America Inc., an Indiana corporation, and John W. Petros of Richardson, Texas, alleging fraud in connection with a $600,000 offering of Tsukuda common stock. Petros, the sole officer, director and shareholder of Tsukuda, prepared and submitted Tsukuda's Form S-1 registration statement for the offering, which, according to the complaint, contained false and misleading statements and forged documents. The Commission's complaint alleges that Tsukuda's registration statement, which was originally filed March 27, 2009, amended on April 10, 2009 and subsequently declared effective: (a) contained a forged audit report and consent; (b) falsely identified a stock transfer agent company as being the transfer agent for Tsukuda; (c) included a bogus legal opinion and geologist's report, and sham consents from an attorney and geologist who do not exist; and (d) contained fictitious financial information. The complaint also alleges that Petros caused four other companies to file registration or offering statements with the Commission that were false, misleading, and contained bogus documents. The complaint seeks civil money penalties and permanent injunctions against future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 by Tsukuda and Petros. The complaint also seeks orders barring Petros from acting as an officer or director of a public company, from participating in an offering of penny stock, and from filing or causing the filing of any registration or offering statements with the Commission. In a related action, the Commission also instituted administrative proceedings against Tsukuda, seeking to suspend the effectiveness of its registration statement.
1120
+
1121
+ See Also: SEC Complaint; SEC Rel. No. 33-9102 (January 26, 2010) and the related Division of Enforcement Statement .
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+ Resources
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+ Administrative Proceedings Release
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+ Division of Enforcement Statement
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+
1169
+ Return to top
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ SEC homepage
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+
1187
+
1188
+ About the SEC
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Budget & Performance
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+ Careers
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Commission Votes
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Contact
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ Contracts
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+
1213
+
1214
+ Transparency
1215
+
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+
1219
+
1220
+ Accessibility & Disability
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+ Super Intelligence
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ FOIA
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+ Inspector General
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ No FEAR Act Data
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Ombuds
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Websites
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Investor.gov
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Related Sites
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ USA.gov
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+ Site Information
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+ Plain Writing
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+ Privacy & Security
1276
+
1277
+
1278
+ Site Map
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+
1283
+
1284
+
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+ Your email address
1303
+
1304
+ Sign Up
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+ X
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+ Facebook
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+ Instagram
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+ RSS
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+ YouTube
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
1356
+ Email Updates
1357
+
1358
+
1359
+
1360
+
1361
+
1362
+
1363
+
1364
+
1365
+
1366
+
1367
+
1368
+
1369
+
1370
+
1371
+
1372
+
1373
+
1374
+
1375
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3112.pdf ADDED
Binary file (28.3 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3112.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
34
+ Before the
35
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
36
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
37
+ Release No. 61445 / January 29, 2010
38
+ INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
39
+ Release No. 2980 / January 29, 2010
40
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
41
+ Release No. 3112 / January 29, 2010
42
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
43
+ File No. 3-13770
44
+ In the Matter of
45
+ MARK EVAN BLOOM (CPA),
46
+ Respondent.
47
+ ORDER INSTITUTING
48
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
49
+ PURSUANT TO SECTION 203(f) OF THE
50
+ INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
51
+ AND RULE 102(e) OF THE
52
+ COMMISSION’S RULES OF PRACTICE,
53
+ MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
54
+ REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
55
+ I.
56
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
57
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to
58
+ Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) and Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of
59
+ the Commission’s Rules of Practice
60
+ 1 against Mark Evan Bloom, CPA (“Respondent” or “Bloom”).
61
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
62
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
63
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
64
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
65
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+
89
+ II.
90
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
91
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
92
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
93
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
94
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
95
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Sections III.2 and III.4 below, which are admitted,
96
+ Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to
97
+ Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules
98
+ of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
99
+ III.
100
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
101
+ 1. Bloom, 58 years old, is a resident of New York, New York. He was the principal
102
+ and 100% owner of North Hills Management, LLC (“North Hills”), an unregistered investment
103
+ adviser that served as Manager and General Partner of North Hills, L.P. (the “Fund”). Bloom is
104
+ also a certified public accountant and was licensed to practice in the State of New York.
105
+ 2. On February 25, 2009, the Commission filed a complaint against Bloom in SEC v.
106
+ North Hills Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-1746 (JGK). On October 22,
107
+ 2009, the Court entered an order permanently enjoining Bloom, by consent, from future violations
108
+ of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
109
+ 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) of the Advisers Act and
110
+ Rule 206-4(8) thereunder.
111
+ 3. The Commission’s complaint alleged that, from on or before July 2001 to February
112
+ 2009, in connection with the offer, sale and purchase of limited partnership interests in the Fund,
113
+ Bloom misused and misappropriated investor funds, falsely stated to investors that their funds were
114
+ invested as represented in the offering materials, sent out false account statements indicating that
115
+ investor funds were fully invested and earning returns, and otherwise engaged in a variety of
116
+ conduct which operated as a fraud and deceit on investors.
117
+ 4. On July 30, 2009, Bloom pled guilty to one count of securities fraud in violation of
118
+ Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff, Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations,
119
+ Section 240.10b5 and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2; one count of mail fraud in violation
120
+ of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 2; one count of wire fraud, Title 18, United
121
+ States Code, Sections 1343 and 2; one count of money laundering, Title 18, United States Code,
122
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
123
+ thereunder.
124
+ 2
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+
145
+
146
+
147
+ Sections 1957 and 2; and one count of corruptly endeavoring to obstruct and impede the due
148
+ administration of the internal revenue laws, Title 26, United States Code, Section 7212(a), before
149
+ the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in United States v. Mark
150
+ Evan Bloom (Criminal Information No. S1:09-CR-367).
151
+ 5. The counts of the criminal information to which Bloom pled guilty alleged, inter
152
+ alia, that Bloom defrauded investors and obtained money and property by means of materially false
153
+ and misleading statements, that he used the United States mails to send false account statements,
154
+ that he caused commercial interstate carriers to deliver investors’ checks to him via wire,
155
+ transferred investor funds to unlawfully renovate his home and purchase artwork and jewelry and
156
+ obstructed the internal revenue laws by, among other things, promoting tax shelters.
157
+ IV.
158
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
159
+ impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
160
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
161
+ Pursuant to Section 203(f) of the Advisers Act, Respondent Bloom be, and hereby is barred
162
+ from association with any investment adviser;
163
+ Pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Respondent Bloom is
164
+ suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant.
165
+ Any reapplication for association by the Respondent will be subject to the applicable laws
166
+ and regulations governing the reentry process, and reentry may be conditioned upon a number of
167
+ factors, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any or all of the following: (a) any
168
+ disgorgement ordered against the Respondent, whether or not the Commission has fully or partially
169
+ waived payment of such disgorgement; (b) any arbitration award related to the conduct that served
170
+ as the basis for the Commission order; (c) any self-regulatory organization arbitration award to a
171
+ customer, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order;
172
+ and (d) any restitution order by a self-regulatory organization, whether or not related to the conduct
173
+ that served as the basis for the Commission order.
174
+ By the Commission.
175
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
176
+ S e c r e t a r y
177
+ 3
178
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3113.pdf ADDED
Binary file (65.3 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3113.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
29
+ before the
30
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
31
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
32
+ Release No. 61516 / February 12, 2010
33
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
34
+ Release No. 3113 / February 12, 2010
35
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
36
+ File No. 3-13781
37
+ :
38
+ :
39
+ :
40
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING
41
+ : ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
42
+ : PURSUANT TO RULE 102(e) OF THE
43
+ Michael J. Byrd, CPA : COMMISSION’S RULES OF PRACTICE,
44
+ : MAKING FINDINGS, AND IMPOSING
45
+ Respondent. : REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
46
+ :
47
+ :
48
+ ____________________________________ :
49
+ I.
50
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
51
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Michael
52
+ J. Byrd (“Respondent” or “Byrd”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s Rules of
53
+ Practice.
54
+ 1
55
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
56
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
57
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
58
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
59
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
60
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
61
+ thereunder.
62
+
63
+
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+ II.
84
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
85
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
86
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
87
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
88
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
89
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.3 below, which are admitted, Respondent
90
+ consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 102(e)
91
+ of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions
92
+ (“Order”), as set forth below.
93
+ III.
94
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
95
+ 1. Byrd, age 49, is and has been a certified public accountant licensed to
96
+ practice in the State of California, and his license has lapsed. From approximately May 1999 until
97
+ May 2001, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.
98
+ (“Brocade”), and then became Brocade’s Chief Operating Officer from May 2001 until January
99
+ 2003.
100
+ 2. Brocade has been, at all relevant times, a Delaware corporation which
101
+ develops and sells storage networking products, with its principal place of business in San Jose,
102
+ California. Since May 1999 when it completed its initial public offering of stock, Brocade had
103
+ common stock registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange
104
+ Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and traded on the NASDAQ National Market.
105
+ 3. On August 17, 2007, the Commission filed a complaint against Byrd in the
106
+ United States District Court for the Northern District of California. SEC v. Byrd, No. C-07-4223-
107
+ CRB. On February 3, 2010, the Court entered an order enjoining Byrd, by consent, from future
108
+ violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), Sections
109
+ 13(b)(5) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 13b2-1, 13b2-2, and 16a-3 thereunder, and
110
+ from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the
111
+ Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. Byrd was also ordered to pay
112
+ disgorgement of $225,000 plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $24,843, for a total
113
+ amount of $249,843, and a $175,000 civil money penalty.
114
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleged, among other things, that Brocade
115
+ concealed millions of dollars in expenses from investors and overstated its income through a
116
+ scheme executed by its Chief Executive Officer to backdate employee stock options. The
117
+ complaint further alleged that at various times during his tenure at Brocade, Byrd was consulted
118
+ on options grants, and, as a result, should have fully investigated to determine whether Brocade’s
119
+ financial statements accurately reflected the necessary compensation expenses, as required under
120
+ generally accepted accounting principles.
121
+ 2
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+ IV.
149
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
150
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
151
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
152
+ A. Byrd is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an
153
+ accountant.
154
+ B. After three years from the date of this Order, Respondent may request that the
155
+ Commission consider his reinstatement by submitting an application (Attention: Office of the
156
+ Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the Commission as:
157
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation or
158
+ review, of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with the Commission. Such
159
+ an application must satisfy the Commission that Respondent’s work in his practice before the
160
+ Commission will be reviewed either by the independent audit committee of the public company
161
+ for which he works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the
162
+ Commission in this capacity; and/or
163
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
164
+ Commission that:
165
+ (a) Respondent, or the public accounting firm with which he is
166
+ associated, is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“Board”) in
167
+ accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and such registration continues to be effective;
168
+ (b) Respondent, or the registered public accounting firm with which he
169
+ is associated, has been inspected by the Board and that inspection did not identify any criticisms
170
+ of or potential defects in the Respondent’s or the firm’s quality control system that would
171
+ indicate that the Respondent will not receive appropriate supervision;
172
+ (c) Respondent has resolved all disciplinary issues with the Board, and
173
+ has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the Board (other than
174
+ reinstatement by the Commission); and
175
+ (d) Respondent acknowledges his responsibility, as long as
176
+ Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent accountant, to
177
+ comply with all requirements of the Commission and the Board, including, but not limited to, all
178
+ requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality control
179
+ standards.
180
+ C. The Commission will consider an application by Respondent to resume
181
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that his state CPA license is
182
+ 3
183
+
184
+
185
+
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ current and he has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable state boards of
192
+ accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement by the
193
+ Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The
194
+ Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced
195
+ above, any other matters relating to Respondent’s character, integrity, professional conduct,
196
+ or qualifications to appear or practice before the Commission.
197
+ By the Commission.
198
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
199
+ S e c r e t a r y
200
+ 4
201
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3114.pdf ADDED
Binary file (23.9 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3114.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
11
+ Before the
12
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
13
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
14
+ Release No. 61518 / February 16, 2010
15
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
16
+ Release No. 3114 / February 16, 2010
17
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
18
+ File No. 3-12326
19
+ : ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR
20
+ : REINSTATEMENT TO APPEAR AND PRACTICEIn the Matter of : BEFORE THE COMMISSION AS AN ACCOUNTANT
21
+ : RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OR Nevanna Sacks, CPA : REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REQUIRED
22
+ : TO BE FILED WITH THE COMMISSION
23
+ On June 7, 2006, Nevanna Sacks, CPA (“Sacks”) was denied the privilege of appearing
24
+ or practicing as an accountant before the Commission as a result of settled public administrative
25
+ proceedings instituted by the Commission against Sacks pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the
26
+ Commission's Rules of Practice.1 Sacks consented to the entry of the order without admitting or
27
+ denying the findings therein. This order is issued in response to Sacks’s application for
28
+ reinstatement to appear and practice before the Commission as an accountant responsible for the
29
+ preparation or review of financial statements required to be filed with the Commission.
30
+ The Commission alleged that Sacks engaged in improper professional conduct with
31
+ respect to certain audits and reviews of Peregrine Systems, Inc.’s (“Peregrine”) financial
32
+ statements by Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”). Sacks served as audit manager on
33
+ Andersen’s audit of Peregrine’s fiscal year 2001 financial statements and review of the
34
+ company’s quarterly financial statements for the third quarter of 2001 and the first, second and
35
+ third quarters of 2002. Sacks engaged in imprope r professional conduct by repeatedly engaging
36
+ in unreasonable conduct, resulting in a violation of applicable professional standards that
37
+ indicated a lack of competence to practice before the Commission. Sacks (i) failed to adequately
38
+ audit Peregrine’s accounts receivable; (ii) did not obtain sufficient competent evidential matter to
39
+ conclude that Peregrine had a history of collecting on certain sales; (iii) failed to make adequate
40
+ inquiries into Peregrine’s agreements with customers; (iv) failed to obtain sufficient competent
41
+ evidential matter to afford a reasonable basis for Andersen to issue a report on the financial
42
+ 1 See Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2441 dated June 7, 2006. Sacks was permitted, pursuant
43
+ to the order, to apply for reinstatement after two years upon making certain showings.
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ statements of Peregrine, which consolidated the financial statements of Peregrine Germany, a
62
+ material subsidiary, after Arthur Andersen Germany refused to provide an audit report on the
63
+ financial statements of Peregrine Germany; (v) failed to exercise due professional care in
64
+ connection with Peregrine’s false and misleading response to a Commission Comment Letter;
65
+ and (vi) failed to exercise due professional care in connection with the audit and reviews.
66
+ In her capacity as a preparer or reviewer, or as a person responsible for the preparation or
67
+ review, of financial statements of a public company to be filed with the Commission, Sacks
68
+ attests that she will undertake to have her work reviewed by the independent audit committee of
69
+ any company for which she works, or in some other manner acceptable to the Commission,
70
+ while practicing before the Commission in this capacity. Sacks is not, at this time, seeking to
71
+ appear or practice before the Commission as an independent accountant. If she should wish to
72
+ resume appearing and practicing before the Commission as an independent accountant, she will
73
+ be required to submit an application to the Commission showing that she has complied and will
74
+ comply with the terms of the original order, which denied her privilege of appearing and
75
+ practicing before the Commission as an accountant, in this regard. Therefore, the denial of
76
+ Sacks’s privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an independent
77
+ accountant continues in effect until the Commission determines that a sufficient showing has
78
+ been made in this regard in accordance with the terms of the original order.
79
+ Rule 102(e)(5) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice governs applications for
80
+ reinstatement, and provides that the Commission may reinstate the privilege to appear and
81
+ practice before the Commission “for good cause shown.”
82
+ 2 This “good cause” determination is
83
+ necessarily highly fact specific.
84
+ On the basis of information supplied, representations made, and undertakings agreed to
85
+ by Sacks, it appears that she has complied with the terms of the June 7, 2006 order denying her
86
+ the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, that no
87
+ information has come to the attention of the Commission relating to her character, integrity,
88
+ professional conduct or qualifications to practice before the Commission that would be a basis
89
+ for adverse action against her pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, and
90
+ that Sacks, by undertaking to have her work reviewed by the independent audit committee of any
91
+ company for which she works, or in some other manner acceptable to the Commission, in her
92
+ practice before the Commission as a preparer or reviewer of financial statements required to be
93
+ filed with the Commission, has shown good cause for reinstatement. Therefore, it is accordingly,
94
+ 2 Rule 102(e)(5)(i) provides:
95
+ “An application for reinstatement of a person permanently suspended or disqualified under paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(3)
96
+ of this section may be made at any time, and the applicant may, in the Commission’s discretion, be afforded a
97
+ hearing; however, the suspension or disqualification shall continue unless and until the applicant has been reinstated
98
+ by the Commission for good cause shown.” 17 C.F.R. § 201.102(e)(5)(i).
99
+ 2
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+ ORDERED pursuant to Rule 102(e)(5)(i) of the Commission's Rules of Practice that
107
+ Nevanna Sacks, CPA is hereby reinstated to appear and practice before the Commission as an
108
+ accountant responsible for the preparation or review of financial statements required to be filed
109
+ with the Commission.
110
+ By the Commission.
111
+ Elizabeth M. Murphy
112
+ Secretary
113
+ 3
114
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3117.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1375 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Verint Systems Inc.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507691","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"field_group":{"html_element":{"mode":"default","context":"view","settings":{"classes":"rightrail-list","show_empty_fields":false,"id":"","element":"div","show_label":true,"label_element":"h2","label_element_classes":"","attributes":"","effect":"none","speed":"fast"}}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Verint Systems Inc.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Verint Systems Inc.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21428 / March 3, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3117 / March 3, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Verint Systems Inc. , United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Civil Action No. 10-CV-0930-LDW-WDW (E.D.N.Y. March 3, 2010) In the Matter of Verint Systems Inc. SEC SUES VERINT FOR IMPROPER ACCOUNTING PRACTICES AND INSTITUTES EXCHANGE ACT SECTION 12(j) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed a civil action against Verint Systems Inc. ("Verint") alleging a fraudulent scheme involving certain improper accounting practices. The Complaint alleges the misconduct began as early as 1998, when Verint was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Comverse Technology, Inc. ("Comverse"), and continued after Verint became a publicly traded company, while still majority-owned by Comverse, in 2002. In addition, the Commission today instituted administrative proceedings against Verint to determine whether the registration of each class of its securities should be revoked or suspended for a period not exceeding twelve months for its failure to file required periodic reports for over four years. In its settled Complaint, filed today in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the Commission alleges: From 1998 through at least January 2003, Verint improperly established and maintained and/or released reserves as necessary to (i) meet its financial objectives, (ii) build a stockpile of reserves prior to becoming a public company for future earnings management purposes, and (iii) to ensure greater public demand and a better price for its follow-on offering in June 2003. These improper accounting practices did not conform to generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). On May 16, 2002, Verint commenced its initial public offering ("IPO") of 4.5 million shares of common stock at a price of $16 per share. Its balance sheet held approximately $6.5 million excess reserves at the time. Its Form S-1 registration statement reported historical earnings and loss figures that had been materially altered by its historically improper reserve accounting. On June 13, 2003, Verint commenced a follow-on offering for 5 million shares of common stock at a price of $23 per share. Its Form S-3 registration statement reported materially misleading earnings and loss figures, including for the period after the IPO, as a result of its improper accounting for reserves. In the two years subsequent to its follow-on offering, Verint overstated its pre-tax income and would not have met Wall Street analysts' consensus earnings estimates but for its improper reserve accounting. The Complaint alleges that as a result of this misconduct, Verint's books and records falsely and inaccurately reflected, among other things, the Company's liabilities, expenses, net income, and general financial condition through at least the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005. The Complaint also alleges that Verint failed to maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide assurances that its reserve activity was recorded as necessary to permit the proper preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's Complaint, Verint has consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining it from violating the antifraud, reporting, record-keeping, and internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws. Specifically, the proposed final judgment against Verint would permanently enjoin it from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Exchange Act Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13. In accepting the settlement offer, the Commission considered, among other things, Verint's remediation and cooperation in the Commission's investigation. The settlement is subject to the approval of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Separately, the Commission today issued an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings and Notice of Hearing Pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Verint, to determine whether the registration of each class of its securities should be revoked or suspended for a period not exceeding twelve months based on its failure to file required periodic reports. The Division of Enforcement alleges that Verint has failed to comply with Exchange Act Section 13(a) and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder by failing to file an annual report on either Form 10-K or Form 10-KSB since April 25, 2005, or quarterly reports on either Form 10-Q or Form 10-QSB since December 12, 2005. A hearing will be scheduled before an Administrative Law Judge to determine whether the allegations of the Division contained in the Order are true, and to provide Verint an opportunity to respond to these allegations. For further information, see Litigation Release Nos. 19796 (August 9, 2006), 19878 (October 24, 2006), 19964 (January 10, 2007), 21090 (June 18, 2009), and 21091 (June 18, 2009).
1120
+
1121
+ See Also: SEC Complaint against Verint ; Order Instituting Proceedings
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+ Resources
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+ SEC Complaint against Verint
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+ Administrative Proceedings Release
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+
1169
+ Return to top
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ SEC homepage
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+
1187
+
1188
+ About the SEC
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Budget & Performance
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+ Careers
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Commission Votes
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Contact
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ Contracts
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+
1213
+
1214
+ Transparency
1215
+
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+
1219
+
1220
+ Accessibility & Disability
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+ Super Intelligence
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ FOIA
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+ Inspector General
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ No FEAR Act Data
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Ombuds
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Websites
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Investor.gov
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Related Sites
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ USA.gov
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+ Site Information
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+ Plain Writing
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+ Privacy & Security
1276
+
1277
+
1278
+ Site Map
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+
1283
+
1284
+
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+ Your email address
1303
+
1304
+ Sign Up
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+ X
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+ Facebook
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+ Instagram
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+ RSS
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+ YouTube
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
1356
+ Email Updates
1357
+
1358
+
1359
+
1360
+
1361
+
1362
+
1363
+
1364
+
1365
+
1366
+
1367
+
1368
+
1369
+
1370
+
1371
+
1372
+
1373
+
1374
+
1375
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3118.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Joseph Grendys et al.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507726","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Joseph Grendys et al.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Joseph Grendys et al.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21435 / March 4, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3118 / March 4, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph Grendys et al. , Civil Action No. 07-120 (D.D.C.) SEC ANNOUNCES SETTLEMENT WITH INDIVIDUAL CHARGED WITH AIDING AND ABETTING FINANCIAL FRAUD AT U.S. FOODSERVICE The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, on March 3, 2010, entered a settled Modified Final Judgment as to defendant Anthony Holohan.  In this previously filed Commission injunctive action against Holohan and three other individuals, the alleged misconduct arose from a financial fraud at U.S. Foodservice, Inc.   Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph Grendys et al. , Civil Action No. 07-120 (D.D.C. filed Jan. 18, 2007 ).  Holohan is a former employee of a vendor that supplied U.S. Foodservice. The Commission's complaint alleges that Holohan aided and abetted the financial fraud by signing and returning materially false audit confirmations.  The Commission's complaint further alleges that U.S. Foodservice personnel contacted Holohan and urged him to sign and return the false confirmation letters to the auditors for U.S. Foodservice.  At the time, U.S. Foodservice was a subsidiary of Royal Ahold (Koninklijke Ahold N.V.).  The letters clearly stated that the confirmations were being used in connection with the annual audit of the financial statements of U.S. Foodservice, and the letters directed Holohan to return them directly to U.S. Foodservice's independent auditors.   Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, Holohan agreed to settle the action against him by consenting to a Final Judgment permanently enjoining him from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B), and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 13b2-1 thereunder and imposing a $25,000 civil penalty.  Two other defendants settled previously.   The Commission acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. For further information, see Litigation Release No. 19975 (Jan. 22, 2007).
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3119.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Jay Lapine
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507771","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Jay Lapine
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Jay Lapine
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 21444 / March 10, 2010 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT RELEASE NO. 3119 / March 10, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jay Lapine Case No. C-01-3650 WHA (N.D. Cal.) SEC Settles Civil Fraud Injunctive Action Against Former McKesson Corporation Attorney On March 1, 2010, a consent and final judgment against Jay Lapine was entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Lapine was charged in a previously-filed action with securities fraud in connection with a financial reporting fraud at McKesson HBOC, Inc. (now, McKesson Corporation), a Fortune 100 company headquartered in San Francisco, California. Lapine consented to the entry of judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's complaint except as to jurisdiction. The Commission's Complaint The Complaint, filed September 27, 2001, alleged that Lapine, together with other senior executives, participated in a long-running fraudulent scheme to inflate the revenue and net income of HBO & Company (HBOC), an Atlanta, Georgia-based vendor of health care technology that merged with McKesson in 1999. As part of this scheme, Lapine, the General Counsel of HBOC and later, of the health care technology unit of McKesson HBOC, took part in negotiating two large backdated transactions with side agreements containing cancellation contingencies that enabled the companies to recognize revenue in earlier reporting periods. Both of these practices failed to comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The fraud enabled HBOC and McKesson HBOC to report falsely in press releases and in periodic reports HBOC filed with the Commission that the companies were having an unbroken run of financial success and had continually exceeded analysts' expectations. However, when McKesson HBOC announced in April 1999 that the company was conducting an internal investigation into financial reporting irregularities, its shares tumbled from approximately $65 to $34, a drop that slashed its market value by more than $9 billion. The Commission also alleged that Lapine failed in his gatekeeper role during the multi-year long scheme. The Settlement The final judgment against Lapine permanently enjoins him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-13 and 13b2-1 thereunder. In addition, Lapine was barred him from acting as an officer or director of a public company for a period of five years and was ordered to pay a civil penalty of $60,000. Lapine was acquitted on November 19, 2009 of criminal charges related to the fraud at HBOC and McKesson HBOC.
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3120.pdf ADDED
Binary file (55.9 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3120.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,513 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
26
+ Before the
27
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
28
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
29
+ Release No. 61688 / March 11, 2010
30
+ INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
31
+ Release No. 29173 / March 11, 2010
32
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
33
+ Release No. 3120 / March 11, 2010
34
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
35
+ File No. 3-13543
36
+ In the Matter of
37
+ ROBERT JOHN HIPPLE,
38
+ Respondent.
39
+ ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING
40
+ REMEDIAL SANCTIONS AND A CEASE-AND-
41
+ DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 21C OF
42
+ THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
43
+ SECTIONS 9(b) AND 9(f) OF THE INVESTMENT
44
+ COMPANY ACT OF 1940, AND RULE 102(e)(1) OF
45
+ THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF PRACTICE
46
+ I.
47
+ On July 9, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) instituted
48
+ public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
49
+ Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), Sections 9(b) and 9(f) of the Investment Company Act
50
+ of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”), and Rule 102(e)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
51
+ against Robert John Hipple (“Hipple” or “Respondent”).
52
+ II.
53
+ In connection with these proceedings, Respondent Hipple has submitted an Offer of
54
+ Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose
55
+ of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to
56
+ which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as
57
+ to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are
58
+ admitted, Hipple consents to the entry of this Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial
59
+ Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of
60
+ 1934, Sections 9(b) and 9(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, and Rule 102(e)(1) of the
61
+ Commission’s Rules of practice (“Order”), as set forth below.
62
+
63
+
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+ III.
86
+ On the basis of this Order and Hipple’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
87
+ A. SUMMARY
88
+ Robert Hipple, a lawyer and the former CEO and CFO of now-defunct business
89
+ development company (“BDC”)2 iWorld Projects & Systems, Inc. (“iWorld”), overstated the
90
+ value of iWorld’s primary asset – its investment in several portfolio companies – in three
91
+ consecutive quarterly filings in 2005. Hipple, who personally performed iWorld’s accounting
92
+ and financial reporting functions, also misled iWorld’s auditors into believing that the company
93
+ had independently evaluated the worth of its portfolio companies. As a result of his conduct,
94
+ Hipple i) violated the antifraud provisions of the Exchange Act, filed false Sarbanes-Oxley
95
+ executive certifications, misled iWorld’s auditors, falsified books and records, and knowingly
96
+ circumvented internal controls; ii) violated Section 57(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act;
97
+ and iii) aided and abetted and caused iWorld’s violations of the reporting, books and records, and
98
+ internal controls provisions of the Exchange Act, and iWorld’s violations of the BDC books and
99
+ records provision of the Investment Company Act.
100
+ B. RESPONDENT
101
+ Robert John Hipple, age 64, resides in Cocoa, Florida. He is an attorney licensed in
102
+ Florida and Georgia. Hipple a nd an associate controlled the management and operations of
103
+ iWorld Projects and Systems, Inc. (“iWorld Florida”), a private Florida company, when it was
104
+ acquired in early 2005 by iWorld Projects & Systems, Inc. (“iWorld”), a business development
105
+ company. At the time, Hipple was the CEO of iWorld Florida. After the acquisition, Hipple
106
+ formally became iWorld’s CEO and remained in that position until he resigned in March 2006.
107
+ He also acted as iWorld’s principal financial officer.
108
+ C. RELEVANT ENTITIES
109
+ iWorld Projects and Systems, Inc. (“iWorld”) is a BDC that, during all relevant
110
+ periods, was incorporated in Nevada and headquartered in Addison, Texas. iWorld has not filed
111
+ a periodic report with the Commission since it filed its third quarter 2005 Form 10-Q in
112
+ November 2005. The Nevada Secretary of State revoked iWorld’s corporate charter on January
113
+ 1, 2006 for failure to pay franchise taxes. iWor ld filed for voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy in
114
+ May 2008. In March 2009, the bankruptcy court cl osed the case because iWorld had no assets.
115
+ 1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement and are not binding on any
116
+ other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
117
+ 2 A BDC is a closed-end investment company authorized by Congress for the purpose of making capital
118
+ more readily available to certain types of companies. Under the Investment Company Act, a closed-end company
119
+ meeting certain eligibility criteria may elect to be regulated as a BDC by filing a notification with the Commission
120
+ on Form N-54A. A company filing such a notification is regulated under Sections 55 through 65 of the Investment
121
+ Company Act. These sections set forth rules governing the investments BDCs may make, transactions BDCs may
122
+ enter into, and the governance of BDCs, as well as various other rules governing BDCs.
123
+ 2
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+ On August 14, 2009, the Commission, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act, revoked
140
+ the registration of each class of iWorld’s registered securities.
141
+ iWorld Florida was, prior to its acquisition by iWorld, a privately-held Florida
142
+ corporation formed by Hipple in May 2004. iWorld Florida was dissolved on September 15,
143
+ 2006.
144
+ D. FACTS
145
+ 1. Hipple Postures iWorld Florida for Acquisition by iWorld as BDC
146
+ a. Shortly after forming iWorld Florida in May 2004, Hipple and others
147
+ caused it to acquire two small private companies in the project management services industry:
148
+ Applied Management Concepts, Inc. (“AMC”) and Process Integrity, Inc. (“PII”) (together, “the
149
+ subsidiaries”). iWorld Florida acquired the subsidiaries for a total of $285,000 in working
150
+ capital payments, $200,000 in assumed liabilities, and 1.1 million shares of iWorld Florida
151
+ common stock. This stock was not publicly trad ed and had no readily ascertainable market
152
+ value.
153
+ b. When iWorld Florida acquired the subsidiaries, AMC had no operations,
154
+ while PII had only limited revenues from sales of its only product, a piece of project
155
+ management software. Specifically, during the six months before the acquisition, PII had total
156
+ revenues of $89,000 and was not profitable. Hipple knew these facts at the time.
157
+ c. Notwithstanding the subsidiaries’ poor performance and negligible
158
+ operations, Hipple accepted and adopted the financial forecasts presented to him. According to
159
+ those forecasts, AMC and PII would generate $2.4 million in revenue in the six-month period
160
+ after their acquisition by iWorld Florida, and would generate in 2005 a total of $5.5 million in
161
+ revenue. Hipple had no objective information in his possession to support these forecasts.
162
+ d. In December 2004, Hipple initiated and directed a series of transactions to
163
+ form iWorld. He first obtained two public, blank-check shell companies, Silesia Enterprises, Inc.
164
+ (“Silesia”) and Organic Solutions, Inc. (“Organic”). He then caused Silesia to file a Form N-54
165
+ election to become a BDC.
166
+ e. Hipple then directed and caused Silesia’s merger into Organic. Among
167
+ other things, Hipple caused Organic to issue convertible preferred shares to four of his designees,
168
+ including his wife and a college-aged employee of one of his business partners. Hipple oversaw
169
+ the conversion of the designee’s preferred shares into common shares – which gave them control
170
+ over Organic – and the voting of those shares to approve actions related to merging Organic with
171
+ Silesia, with Organic as the surviving corporation. At the conclusion of these transactions,
172
+ Hipple effectively controlled the post-merger company (a BDC), which, as part of the merger,
173
+ changed its name to iWorld. Hipple thereafter obtained a new CUSIP number and trading
174
+ symbol for iWorld’s common shares so they could be publicly traded.
175
+ 3
176
+
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+ 2. Hipple Causes iWorld to Acquire iWorld Florida
202
+ and Prepares False Filings Overstating iWorld Florida’s Value
203
+ a. On February 25, 2005, iWorld filed a current report on Form 8-K
204
+ announcing that it had agreed to acquire iWorld Florida through a merger. Hipple drafted the
205
+ filing and caused it to be filed. The Form 8-K stated that the transaction was “valued at $10
206
+ million, based on the number of shares issued, the market price of the shares, and the assets and
207
+ businesses acquired.” It then described iWor ld Florida and the subsidiaries’ business,
208
+ concluding that “combined revenues from [iWorld Florida’s] subsidiaries . . . for 2005 are
209
+ expected to be in the range of $25 to $30 million, provided sufficient working capital is
210
+ obtained.”
211
+ b. The purported $10 million valuation was materially false and misleading.
212
+ Among other things, the Form 8-K failed to disclose that Hipple controlled both iWorld and
213
+ iWorld Florida at the time of their merger. Consequently, and contrary to the Form 8-K’s
214
+ description of the transaction, the merger did not involve arms-length negotiation and was in fact
215
+ a related-party transaction. Furthermore, the Form 8-K failed to disclose that, because Hipple
216
+ controlled both sides of the transaction, he was able to reverse-engineer the number of shares
217
+ exchanged between iWorld and iWorld Florida to lend legitimacy to the $10 million figure. In
218
+ addition, there was no disclosure that iWorld Florida’s sole asset – its investments in the
219
+ subsidiaries – had been acquired during the summer of 2004 for only $285,000 cash, $200,000 in
220
+ assumed liabilities, and 1.1 million shares of iWorld Florida’s non-public stock – consideration
221
+ that was worth, at best, only a fraction of $10 million.
222
+ c. The Form 8-K’s representations about the subsidiaries’ prospects were
223
+ also materially false and misleading, since they were wholly speculative and unsupported. As
224
+ noted above, at the time iWorld Florida acquired them in the summer of 2004, PII and AMC had
225
+ generated meager revenues over the preceding six months. Their performance after their
226
+ acquisition by iWorld Florida was no better; indeed, as Hipple knew from internal company
227
+ reports he received, PII and AMC consistently fell far short of their forecasted performance.
228
+ Accordingly, Hipple knew or recklessly disregarded that the Form 8-K’s assertions of subsidiary
229
+ revenues of $25 million to $30 million were baseless.
230
+ 3. Hipple Prepares and Certifies iWorld’s False Quarterly Filings
231
+ a. After iWorld acquired iWorld Florida, Hipple became iWorld’s Chairman,
232
+ CEO and CFO and performed the company’s accounting and financial reporting functions. In
233
+ this capacity, he maintained iWorld’s books and records, was responsible for its system of
234
+ internal controls, and drafted and filed with the Commission its periodic reports.
235
+ b. In 2005, iWorld filed three quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q: on May 20,
236
+ 2005, August 12, 2005 and November 15, 2005. Hipple prepared, signed and certified each of
237
+ the filings.
238
+ c. Each of these quarterly reports contained financial statements and other
239
+ disclosures representing that the subsidiaries (AMC and PII) – including two additional start-up
240
+ 4
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+
259
+
260
+
261
+ operating companies iWorld had acquired – were valued at $10 million. These subsidiaries –
262
+ which the quarterly reports referred to as “portfolio companies” – comprised, as reported in the
263
+ quarterly reports, approximately 96% of iWorld’s total assets.
264
+ d. The reported $10 million valuation was materially false and misleading.
265
+ As described above, iWorld’s initial valuation of the subsidiaries at $10 million was itself false
266
+ and misleading since it was not the product of arms-length negotiation, was far in excess of what
267
+ iWorld Florida had paid to acquire the subsidiaries roughly six months earlier, and was
268
+ unsupported by the subsidiaries’ poor financial performance. None of these circumstances had
269
+ changed by the time Hipple prepared and filed the quarterly reports. To the contrary, he had
270
+ continually received information, including reports from the subsidiaries, demonstrating that
271
+ their performance was deteriorating. For instance, by the time iWorld filed the first quarter Form
272
+ 10-Q on May 20, 2005, Hipple knew from internal reports that all of the subsidiaries had
273
+ continued to fall far short of internal projections, with some subsidiaries producing no revenues
274
+ whatsoever. He also knew that iWorld’s working capital – which was critical to the subsidiaries’
275
+ survival – was rapidly diminishing. From these facts alone (which were not publicly disclosed),
276
+ Hipple knew or recklessly disregarded that the subsidiaries’ reported valuation was grossly
277
+ overstated.
278
+ e. By the time iWorld filed its second quarter Form 10-Q on August 12,
279
+ 2005, Hipple knew from internal reports the additional fact that, not only were the subsidiaries
280
+ far below their financial projections, they were in fact deeply unprofitable. Indeed, only PII still
281
+ had operations by August 2005, due in part to the fact that iWorld had exhausted its working
282
+ capital, on which the subsidiaries depended. As iWorld’s CEO and CFO, Hipple knew the
283
+ subsidiaries were dependent on iWorld for working capital and that, without working capital, the
284
+ subsidiaries would cease operations.
285
+ f. By the time iWorld filed its third quarter Form 10-Q on November 15,
286
+ 2005, Hipple knew that meaningful subsidiary operations had ceased and that there was no
287
+ prospect of iWorld’s reviving them, since iWorld itself had no cash. Moreover, by December
288
+ 2005, Hipple learned that PII’s president had previously pledged PII’s sole asset – rights to its
289
+ software product – to a third party as security for a loan to PII to make payroll.
290
+ g. Hipple never revealed the subsidiaries’ dire circumstances in iWorld’s
291
+ 2005 quarterly filings. To the contrary, each of the filings repeated the $10 million valuation,
292
+ which the second and third quarter filings amplified by asserting that “the Company’s
293
+ Investment Committee [has] determine[d] that the portfolio investments should be valued at $10
294
+ million.” This was false: iWorld’s investment committee never considered the valuation of the
295
+ subsidiaries. Moreover, each of the quarterly filings represented that the subsidiaries were
296
+ projected to earn tens of millions of dollars of revenue through the end of 2006. In view of the
297
+ circumstances described above – including the subsidiaries’ continuous unprofitability and the
298
+ depletion of iWorld’s working capital – these representations were completely unfounded and,
299
+ consequently, were materially false and misleading.
300
+ h. Even after learning that PII’s president had pledged PII’s software to
301
+ secure a loan to PII, Hipple made no effort to amend iWorld’s third quarter Form 10-Q.
302
+ 5
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+ 4. Hipple Materially Misleads iWorld’s Auditor
325
+ a. As a BDC, iWorld was required under Section 2(a)(41) of the Investment
326
+ Company Act (which applies to BDCs pursuant to Section 59 of that Act) to determine in good
327
+ faith the fair value of the securities of its portfolio companies, since market quotations for those
328
+ securities were not readily available. iWorld never made a good faith determination, either when
329
+ it acquired iWorld Florida and its subsidiaries, or thereafter. Hipple knew, or was reckless in not
330
+ knowing, that no such determination had been made.
331
+ b. Hipple, however, told iWorld’s auditor – in connection with the auditor’s
332
+ review of iWorld’s first quarter 2005 Form 10-Q – that an “independent investment board” had
333
+ approved the $10 million valuation. Hipple knew, or was reckless in not knowing, that this
334
+ statement was false.
335
+ 5. Civil Penalty
336
+ Respondent has submitted sworn Statements of Financial Condition, dated October 2,
337
+ 2009 and October 9, 2009, and other evidence, and has asserted his inability to pay a civil
338
+ penalty.
339
+ E. VIOLATIONS
340
+ 1. Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that Respondent Hipple willfully
341
+ violated:
342
+ a. Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, which
343
+ prohibit fraudulent conduct in connection with the purchase or sale of securities;
344
+ b. Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act, made applicable to BDCs
345
+ through Section 59 of the Investment Company Act, which provides, among other things, that in
346
+ any registration statement, application, report, account, record, or other document filed or
347
+ transmitted by iWorld pursuant to the Investment Company Act or kept by iWorld pursuant to
348
+ Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act, it shall be unlawful for any person so filing,
349
+ transmitting or keeping any such document to make any untrue statement of material fact or to
350
+ omit to state therein any fact necessary in order to prevent the statements made therein, in the
351
+ light of the circumstances under which they were made, from being materially misleading;
352
+ c. Rule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act, which required Hipple, as iWorld’s
353
+ principal executive and financial officer, to certify in each quarterly and annual report filed or
354
+ submitted by iWorld under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, that: (1) he had reviewed the
355
+ report; and (2) based on his knowledge, the report did not contain any untrue statement of
356
+ material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in
357
+ light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
358
+ to the period covered by the report;
359
+ 6
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+ d. Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, which provides that no person shall
381
+ knowingly falsify any book, record, or account of an issuer that has a class of securities
382
+ registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or is required to file reports pursuant to
383
+ Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or knowingly circumvent the registrant’s system of internal
384
+ accounting controls;
385
+ e. Rule 13b2-1 under the Exchange Act, which provides that no person shall,
386
+ directly or indirectly, falsify or cause to be falsified any book, record, or account subject to
387
+ Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act;
388
+ f. Rule 13b2-2(a) under the Exchange Act, which prohibits an officer or
389
+ director of an issuer from, directly or indirectly: (1) making, or causing to be made, a materially
390
+ false or misleading statement; or (2) omitting, or causing to be omitted, a statement of a material
391
+ fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were
392
+ made, not misleading to an accountant in connection with a required audit, or the preparation or
393
+ filing of a required document or report;
394
+ g. Section 57(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, which prohibits persons
395
+ “related” to a BDC, as defined in Section 57(b) of the Investment Company Act, from acting as
396
+ principal knowingly selling to the BDC any securities in another company unless at least one of
397
+ two conditions applies. The first condition is that the sale involves solely securities of which the
398
+ buyer is the issuer. See Section 57(a)(1)(A). The second is that the sale involves solely
399
+ securities of which the seller is the issuer and which are part of a general offering to the holders
400
+ of a class of its securities. See Section 57(a)(1)(B). Section 57(b)(2) defines a “related person
401
+ of a BDC,” in pertinent part, as any person directly or indirectly “controlling” a BDC. Section
402
+ (2)(a)(9) of the Investment Company Act, in turn, defines “control” as “the power to exercise a
403
+ controlling influence over the management or policies of a company.” Hipple controlled iWorld
404
+ when he sold, as a principal, his iWorld Florida shares to iWorld in iWorld’s acquisition of
405
+ iWorld Florida. Hipple’s sale of his shares did not satisfy either of the two conditions set forth in
406
+ Section 57(a)(1)(A) or (B). Thus, Hipple violated Section 57(a)(1);
407
+ 2. Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that Respondent Hipple willfully
408
+ aided and abetted and caused iWorld’s violations of:
409
+ a. Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-11, 13a-13, and 12b-20
410
+ thereunder, which required iWorld to file information and documents as prescribed by the
411
+ Commission, including current and quarterly reports, and to include in those reports any material
412
+ information as may be necessary to make the required statements in those reports not misleading
413
+ in light of the circumstances under which the statements were made;
414
+ b. Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act, which required iWorld, as a
415
+ reporting company, to make and keep books, records, and accounts which, in reasonable detail,
416
+ accurately and fairly reflected its transactions and dispositions of its assets;
417
+ c. Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act which required iWorld, as a
418
+ reporting company, to devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to
419
+ 7
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+ provide reasonable assurances that transactions were recorded as necessary to permit preparation
440
+ of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles; and
441
+ d. Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act made applicable to BDCs
442
+ by Section 64 of the Investment Company Act, and Rule 31a-1 thereunder, which required
443
+ iWorld to make and keep certain books and records, including, among other things, ledgers of all
444
+ assets, liabilities, reserve capital, income and expense accounts reflecting account balances on
445
+ each day, and corporate documents such as minutes from shareholder and board meetings.
446
+ IV.
447
+ In view of the forgoing, the Commission deems it necessary and appropriate in the public
448
+ interest to impose the sanctions agreed to in Respondent Hipple’s Offer.
449
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
450
+ A. Hipple shall cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any
451
+ future violations of Secti ons 10(b) and 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 13b2-1,
452
+ 13b2-2, and 13a-14 thereunder, and Sections 34(b) and 57(a) of the Investment Company Act,
453
+ and from causing any violations of and any future violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and
454
+ 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-11, and 13a-13 thereunder and Section
455
+ 31(a) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 31a-1 thereunder;
456
+ B. Pursuant to Section 21C(f) of the Exchange Act, Hipple is prohibited, for a period
457
+ of five years, from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities
458
+ registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or that is required to file reports pursuant
459
+ to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
460
+ C. Pursuant to Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act, Respondent Hipple is
461
+ prohibited from serving or acting as an employee, officer, director, member of an advisory board,
462
+ investment adviser or depositor of, or principal underwriter for, a registered investment company
463
+ or affiliated person of such investment adviser, depositor, or principal underwriter, with the right
464
+ to reapply for association after five (5) years to the appropriate self-regulatory organization, or if
465
+ there is none, to the Commission;
466
+ D. Pursuant to Rule 102(e)(1)(iii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Hipple is
467
+ denied the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant;
468
+ E. The Division of Enforcement ("Division") may, at any time following the entry of
469
+ this Order, petition the Commission to: (1) reopen this matter to consider whether Respondent
470
+ provided accurate and complete financial information at the time such representations were
471
+ made; and (2) seek an order directing payment of the maximum civil penalty allowable under the
472
+ law. No other issue shall be considered in c onnection with this petition other than whether the
473
+ financial information provided by Respondent was fraudulent, misleading, inaccurate, or
474
+ incomplete in any material respect. Respondent may not, by way of defense to any such petition:
475
+ 8
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+ (1) contest the findings in this Order; (2) assert that payment of a penalty should not be ordered;
496
+ (3) contest the imposition of the maximum penalty allowable under the law; or (4) assert any
497
+ defense to liability or remedy, including, but not limited to, any statute of limitations defense;
498
+ and
499
+ F. Any reapplication for association by the Respondent will be subject to the
500
+ applicable laws and regulations governing the reentry process, and reentry may be conditioned
501
+ upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any or all of the
502
+ following: (a) any disgorgement ordered ag ainst the Respondent, whether or not the
503
+ Commission has fully or partially waived payment of such disgorgement; (b) any arbitration
504
+ award related to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order; (c) any self-
505
+ regulatory organization arbitration award to a customer, whether or not related to the conduct
506
+ that served as the basis for the Commission order; and (d) any restitution order by a self-
507
+ regulatory organization, whether or not related to the conduct that served as the basis for the
508
+ Commission order.
509
+ By the Commission.
510
+ Elizabeth M. Murphy
511
+ S e c r e t a r y
512
+ 9
513
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3121.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Exotics.com, Inc., et al.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507831","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Exotics.com, Inc., et al.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Exotics.com, Inc., et al.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21456 / March 19, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3121 / March 19, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Exotics.com, Inc , Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-00531-PMP-GWF, United States District Court, District of Nevada Final Judgments Entered Against Certified Public Accountants Stephen P. Corso and Brian K. Rabinovitz in Market Manipulation and Financial Fraud Case The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that a federal district court in Nevada has entered final judgments, by consent, against Stephen P. Corso, of Las Vegas, Nevada, and Brian K. Rabinovitz of Oak Park, California, in connection with an enforcement action filed in 2005 concerning a stock manipulation and accounting fraud scheme. The judgment against Corso, entered on March 18, 2010, permanently enjoins him from violating the antifraud and auditor independence provisions of the federal securities laws. The judgment against Rabinovitz, entered on March 15, 2010, permanently enjoins him from violating the auditor independence provisions of the federal securities laws and orders him to pay a civil penalty of $30,000. The Commission's civil injunctive action was filed on April 25, 2005, against Exotics.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and 12 additional principal defendants and one relief defendant. The Commission's complaint alleged that, between at least 1999 and 2002, Exotics.com, which was then an Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board company in the business of operating adult Web sites, was the subject of a stock manipulation and accounting fraud perpetrated by, among others, its officers, attorneys and outside auditors. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Corso, Rabinovitz, and others engaged in conduct that resulted in Exotics.com filing materially false and misleading financial statements in its Commission filings. The complaint further alleged that audit staff under the supervision of Corso and Rabinovitz committed acts and/or omissions that caused them to become non-independent during audits of Exotics.com and that Corso and Rabinovitz approved the issuance of audit reports that were incorporated in Exotics.com's Commission filings. According to the complaint, the audit reports, among other things, falsely stated that the audits had been conducted by an independent auditor and in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS). The Complaint also alleged that Rabinovitz and audit staff under his supervision engaged in a number of improper accounting practices that caused Exotics.com's financial statements to depart from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, Corso and Rabinovitz consented to the entry of final judgments against them. The final judgment against Corso enjoins him from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and Rule 2-02 of Regulation S-X. The final judgment against Rabinovitz enjoins him from violating Rule 2-02 of Regulation S-X and orders him to pay a civil penalty of $30,000. Rabinovitz also consented to the entry of an Administrative Order, pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, suspending him from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, with a right to apply for reinstatement after three years. Corso was previously forthwith suspended, on April 14, 2009, from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant. The Commission previously obtained judgments by default against two defendants and judgments by consent against two additional defendants. The action remains pending against the remaining seven defendants and a relief defendant. For further information, see Litigation Release Nos. 19207 (April 28, 2005) [civil injunctive action filed], 19645 (April 7, 2006) [judgment by default against Exotics.com], 19699 (May 15, 2006) [judgment by consent against Barry Duggan], 19957 (January 4, 2007) [judgment by default against Gary Thomas], and 21028 (May 7, 2009) [judgment by consent against Edward James Wexler], and Exchange Act Release No. 59766 (April 14, 2009) [forthwith suspension of Stephen Corso].
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3122.pdf ADDED
Binary file (33.3 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3122.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
34
+ before the
35
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
36
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
37
+ Release No. 61771 / March 24, 2010
38
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
39
+ Release No. 3122 / March 24, 2010
40
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
41
+ File No. 3-13832
42
+ :
43
+ :
44
+ :
45
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
46
+ : PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO RULE
47
+ BRIAN K. RABINOVITZ, CPA, : 102(e) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF
48
+ : PRACTICE, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
49
+ Respondent. : IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
50
+ :
51
+ :
52
+ ____________________________________ :
53
+ I.
54
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
55
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against Brian K.
56
+ Rabinovitz (“Respondent” or “Rabinovitz”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s
57
+ Rules of Practice.
58
+ 1
59
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
60
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
61
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
62
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
63
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
64
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
65
+ thereunder.
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+ II.
87
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
88
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
89
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
90
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
91
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
92
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III.3 below, which are admitted, Respondent
93
+ consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 102(e)
94
+ of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions
95
+ (“Order”), as set forth below.
96
+ III.
97
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
98
+ 1. Rabinovitz, age 41, is and has been a certified public accountant licensed to
99
+ practice in the State of California as of 2007. He also was or is licensed to practice in the State of
100
+ New York. Rabinovitz was employed by Merdinger, Fruchter, Rosen & Corso, P.C. (later
101
+ Merdinger, Fruchter, Rosen & Company, P.C.)(“MFRC”) as a senior manager and, later, as a non-
102
+ equity partner from 1995 until August 2002. In the latter capacity, he supervised MFRC’s audit and
103
+ other engagements concerning Exotics.com, Inc. (“Exotics.com”) in 2001 and 2002.
104
+ 2. Exotics.com was, at all relevant times, a Nevada corporation with its
105
+ principal place of business in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Exotics.com was engaged in
106
+ the business of owning, operating, and licensing adult-oriented websites. At all relevant times,
107
+ Exotics.com’s common stock was registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
108
+ Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and was approved for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.
109
+ 3. On March 15, 2010, a final judgment was entered against Rabinovitz,
110
+ permanently enjoining him from future violations of Rule 2-02 of Regulation S-X in the civil
111
+ action entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Exotics.com, Inc., et. al, Civil Action
112
+ Number 2:05-cv-00531-PMP-GWF, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
113
+ Rabinovitz was also ordered to pay a $30,000 civil money penalty.
114
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleged, among other things, that Rabinovitz
115
+ and others participated in a scheme that resulted in Exotics.com filing materially false and
116
+ misleading financial statements in its Commission filings, including, among others, an amended
117
+ current report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2001, a quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for
118
+ the quarter ended September 30, 2001, and an annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
119
+ ended December 31, 2001. The complaint further alleged that Rabinovitz and audit staff under his
120
+ supervision committed acts and/or omissions that caused them to become non-independent during
121
+ audits of Exotics.com and that Rabinovitz approved the issuance by MFRC of audit reports which,
122
+ among other things, falsely stated that the audits had been conducted by an independent auditor
123
+ 2
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+ and in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (“GAAS”). The Complaint also
149
+ alleged that Rabinovitz and audit staff under his supervision engaged in a number of improper
150
+ accounting practices that caused Exotics.com’s financial statements to depart from generally
151
+ accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
152
+ IV.
153
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
154
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Rabinovitz’s Offer.
155
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
156
+ A. Rabinovitz is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an
157
+ accountant.
158
+ B. After three years from the date of this order, Respondent may request that the
159
+ Commission consider his reinstatement by submitting an application (attention: Office of the
160
+ Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the Commission as:
161
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation or
162
+ review, of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with the Commission. Such
163
+ an application must satisfy the Commission that Respondent’s work in his practice before the
164
+ Commission will be reviewed either by the independent audit committee of the public company
165
+ for which he works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the
166
+ Commission in this capacity; and/or
167
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
168
+ Commission that:
169
+ (a) Respondent, or the public accounting firm with which he is
170
+ associated, is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“Board”) in
171
+ accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and such registration continues to be effective;
172
+ (b) Respondent, or the registered public accounting firm with which he
173
+ is associated, has been inspected by the Board and that inspection did not identify any criticisms
174
+ of or potential defects in the respondent’s or the firm’s quality control system that would indicate
175
+ that the respondent will not receive appropriate supervision;
176
+ (c) Respondent has resolved all disciplinary issues with the Board, and
177
+ has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the Board (other than
178
+ reinstatement by the Commission); and
179
+ (d) Respondent acknowledges his responsibility, as long as
180
+ Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent accountant, to
181
+ comply with all requirements of the Commission and the Board, including, but not limited to, all
182
+ 3
183
+
184
+
185
+
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+
192
+
193
+
194
+ requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality control
195
+ standards.
196
+ C. The Commission will consider an application by Respondent to resume
197
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission provided that his state CPA license is
198
+ current and he has resolved all other disciplinary issues with the applicable state boards of
199
+ accountancy. However, if state licensure is dependent on reinstatement by the
200
+ Commission, the Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The
201
+ Commission’s review may include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced
202
+ above, any other matters relating to Respondent’s character, integrity, professional conduct,
203
+ or qualifications to appear or practice before the Commission.
204
+ By the Commission.
205
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
206
+ S e c r e t a r y
207
+ 4
208
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3123.pdf ADDED
Binary file (28.7 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3123.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+ _______________________________________
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
31
+ before the
32
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
33
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
34
+ Release No. 61827 / April 1, 2010
35
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
36
+ Release No. 3123 / April 1, 2010
37
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
38
+ File No. 3-13840
39
+ _ _
40
+ :
41
+ :
42
+ :
43
+ In the Matter of : ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
44
+ : PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO RULE
45
+ J. MICHAEL BROULLIRE : 102(e) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF
46
+ (CPA), : PRACTICE, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
47
+ : IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
48
+ Respondent. :
49
+ :
50
+ :
51
+ I.
52
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
53
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against J.
54
+ Michael Broullire (“Respondent” or “Broullire”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the
55
+ Commission’s Rules of Practice.
56
+ 1
57
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
58
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
59
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
60
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
61
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
62
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
63
+ thereunder.
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+ II.
87
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
88
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
89
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
90
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
91
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
92
+ proceedings, and the findings contained in Section III below, which are admitted, Respondent
93
+ consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 102(e)
94
+ of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions
95
+ (“Order”), as set forth below.
96
+ III.
97
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
98
+ 1. Broullire, age 56, is and has been a certified public accountant licensed to
99
+ practice in the State of Maryland. During the relevant period, 2003-2006, Broullire practiced
100
+ accounting with a small accounting firm in Maryland and then with his own accounting business.
101
+ 2. TVI Corporation is a Maryland corporation headquartered in Glenn Dale,
102
+ Maryland. TVI’s business includes selling emergency response equipment to the government and
103
+ other purchasers. During the relevant period, TVI’s common stock was registered with the
104
+ Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).
105
+ After July 2006, TVI’s stock was registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) and
106
+ traded on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under the symbol “TVIN,” and then was registered
107
+ pursuant to Section 12(g) and quoted on the Pink Sheets under the symbol “TVINQ.PK.” In
108
+ September 2009, TVI’s stock registration was revoked.
109
+ 3. On March 25, 2010, the Commission filed a complaint against Broullire in
110
+ SEC v. Richard V. Priddy, et al. (Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-00739 (BEL)(D. Md.). On March 26,
111
+ 2010, the court entered an order permanently enjoining Broullire, by consent, from aiding and
112
+ abetting future violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 12b-
113
+ 20, and 13a-1 thereunder.
114
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleged, among other things, that Broullire
115
+ participated in fraudulent schemes with TVI’s former President and CEO and former Executive
116
+ Vice President by which they created two companies to purchase products and resell them to
117
+ TVI at approximately a 100% or greater markup. The Complaint also alleged that TVI paid one
118
+ of these companies a fictitious finder’s fee in connection with a corporate acquisition. The
119
+ Complaint alleged that these fraudulent schemes enriched Broullire and the former TVI
120
+ executives and materially reduced the net income that TVI reported in its 2004 Form 10-KSB
121
+ and 2006 Form 10-K.
122
+ 2
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+ IV.
137
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
138
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent Broullire’s Offer.
139
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that Broullire is suspended
140
+ from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant.
141
+ By the Commission.
142
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
143
+ S e c r e t a r y
144
+ 3
145
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3124.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
5
+ Before the
6
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
7
+
8
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
9
+ Release No. 61833 / April 2, 2010
10
+
11
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
12
+ Release No. 3124 / April 2, 2010
13
+
14
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
15
+ File No. 3-13843
16
+
17
+
18
+ In the Matter of
19
+
20
+ MICHAEL DEGENNARO
21
+
22
+ Respondent.
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+ ORDER INSTITUTING CEASE-AND-DESIST
28
+ PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION
29
+ 21C OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
30
+ OF 1934, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
31
+ IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
32
+
33
+
34
+ I.
35
+
36
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate that cease-
37
+ and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities
38
+ Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), against Michael DeGennaro (“DeGennaro” or
39
+ “Respondent”).
40
+
41
+ II.
42
+
43
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
44
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
45
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
46
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
47
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
48
+ proceedings, which are admitted, Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-
49
+ and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making
50
+ Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), as set forth below.
51
+
52
+ 2
53
+
54
+ III.
55
+
56
+ On the basis of this Order and Res pondent’s Offer, the Commission finds1 that:
57
+
58
+ 1. DeGennaro, age 44, resides in Long Is land, New York. DeGennaro at all relevant
59
+ times was Senior Vice President of Finance of Symbol Technologies, Inc. (“Symbol”).
60
+
61
+ 2. Symbol was at all relevant times (a) a Delaware corporation with principal offices
62
+ in Holtsville, New York; (b) engaged in the design, manufacture, marketing and servicing of
63
+ mobile information systems using bar code scanners and similar devices; and (c) a public company
64
+ whose common stock was traded on the New York Stock Exchange and registered with the
65
+ Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act. On January 9, 2007, Symbol was
66
+ acquired by Motorola, Inc.
67
+
68
+ 3. As described below, Symbol violated the financial recordkeeping and internal
69
+ control provisions of Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act due to its failure to maintain the
70
+ requisite accounting records and implement adequate internal accounting controls.
71
+ 2
72
+
73
+ 4. In 2000 and 2001, Symbol created and used certain restructuring charges and
74
+ related reserves in contravention of GAAP. As a result, Symbol misstated, inter alia, its operating
75
+ expenses and net income on its books and records and in its financial statements.
76
+
77
+ 5. During the relevant period, Symbol recorded non-recurring charges in connection
78
+ with, inter alia, Symbol’s: (i) acquisition of Telxon Corporation, which resulted in a $185.9
79
+ million restructuring charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000; and (ii) Symbol’s relocation of
80
+ manufacturing operations to new facilities, which resulted in a $59.7 million restructuring charge
81
+ recorded in the third quarter of 2001 (collectively the “Charges”). The Charges were later reversed,
82
+ in part, because they did not comply with GAAP. Symbol also incorrectly used certain reserves
83
+ created in conjunction with some of the Charges. The Charges and certain associated reserves
84
+ were not recorded in accordance with GAAP because, inter alia, they misclassified certain
85
+ expenses, included amounts unrelated to the purpose of the Charge and, in some cases, were used
86
+ in later periods for unrelated purposes.
87
+
88
+
89
+ 1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondent's Offer of Settlement and
90
+ are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.
91
+ 2 Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act requires registrants to make and keep books,
92
+ records and accounts which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and
93
+ dispositions of assets. Section 13(b)(2)(B) requires registrants to devise and maintain a system
94
+ of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that transactions are
95
+ recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
96
+ accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and to maintain accountability for assets.
97
+
98
+ 3
99
+ 6. As Senior Vice President of Finance at Symbol, DeGennaro was one of the Symbol
100
+ executives who determined how Symbol accounted for and recorded transactions on its books and
101
+ records and in its financial statements. As such, DeGennaro was one of the Symbol executives
102
+ who had responsibility for implementing internal accounting controls at Symbol, the purpose of
103
+ which controls was to provide reasonable assurances that relevant transactions were recorded as
104
+ necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. DeGennaro,
105
+ together with others, determined how the Charges were recorded and accounted for on Symbol’s
106
+ internal books and records and in its financial statements. DeGennaro failed to take requisite steps
107
+ to ensure that Symbol’s internal books and records and financial statements accurately reflected
108
+ each element of the Charges and the uses of associated reserves, and that the Charges and the uses
109
+ of associated reserves were accounted for in accordance with GAAP.
110
+
111
+ 7. By reason of the foregoi ng, DeGennaro was a cause of Symbol’s violations of
112
+ Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+ IV.
117
+
118
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions
119
+ agreed to in Respondent DeGennaro’s Offer.
120
+
121
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act,
122
+ Respondent DeGennaro cease and desist from causing any violations and any future violations of
123
+ Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
124
+
125
+ By the Commission.
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
130
+ S e c r e t a r y
131
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3125.pdf ADDED
Binary file (73.1 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3125.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,702 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
21
+ Before the
22
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
23
+ SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
24
+ Release No. 9116 / April 7, 2010
25
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
26
+ Release No. 61856 / April 7, 2010
27
+ INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940
28
+ Release No. 3009 / April 7, 2010
29
+ INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940
30
+ Release No. 29203 / April 7, 2010
31
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
32
+ Release No. 3125 / April 7, 2010
33
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
34
+ File No. 3-13847
35
+ In the Matter of
36
+ MORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.;
37
+ MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC.;
38
+ JAMES C. KELSOE, JR.; and
39
+ JOSEPH THOMPSON WELLER, CPA,
40
+ Respondents.
41
+ ORDER INSTITUTING
42
+ ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-
43
+ DESIST PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO
44
+ SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT
45
+ OF 1933, SECTIONS 4C, 15(b) AND 21C
46
+ OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
47
+ OF 1934, SECTIONS 9(b) AND 9(f) OF
48
+ THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF
49
+ 1940, SECTIONS 203(e), 203(f) AND 203(k)
50
+ OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT
51
+ OF 1940 AND RULE 102(e)(1)(iii) OF THE
52
+ COMMISSION’S RULES OF PRACTICE
53
+ I.
54
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in
55
+ the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby
56
+ are, instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), Section
57
+ 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and Sections 9(b) and 9(f) of the
58
+ Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) against Morgan Asset
59
+ Management, Inc. (“Morgan Asset”); Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (“Morgan Keegan”);
60
+
61
+
62
+
63
+
64
+
65
+
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+ James C. Kelsoe, Jr. (“Kelsoe”); and Joseph Thompson Weller, CPA (“Weller”) (collectively
82
+ “Respondents”); pursuant to Section 15(b)(4) of the Exchange Act against Morgan Keegan;
83
+ pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act against Morgan Asset, Kelsoe and Weller;
84
+ pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”)
85
+ against Morgan Asset and Morgan Keegan; pursuant to Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of the Advisers
86
+ Act against Kelsoe and Weller; and pursuant to Section 4C1 of the Exchange Act and Rule
87
+ 102(e)(1)(iii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice against Weller.2
88
+ II.
89
+ After an investigation, the Division of Enforcement alleges that:
90
+ A. RESPONDENTS
91
+ 1. Morgan Asset , incorporated in Tennessee on April 10, 1986, has been an
92
+ investment adviser registered with the Commission at all relevant times. Morgan Asset’s principal
93
+ place of business is in Memphis, Tennessee. Morgan Asset is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MK
94
+ Holding, Inc., which in turn is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Regions Financial Corporation.
95
+ 2. Morgan Keegan , incorporated in Tennessee on June 27, 1969, has been registered
96
+ with the Commission as a broker-dealer at all relevant times and as an investment adviser since
97
+ July 27, 1992. During the relevant time period, Morgan Keegan served as the principal
98
+ underwriter and sole distributor of shares of the open-end Funds. Morgan Keegan’s principal place
99
+ of business is in Memphis, Tennessee.
100
+ 3. Kelsoe , 46 years of age, is a resident of Memphis, Tennessee. During 2007, Kelsoe
101
+ was a senior portfolio manager for Morgan Asset. He also was a Managing Director of Morgan
102
+ Keegan. Kelsoe is a Chartered Financial Analyst and previously held Series 7 and 65 licenses.
103
+ 1 Section 4C provides, in relevant part, that:
104
+ The Commission may censure any person, or deny, temporarily or permanently, to any
105
+ person the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission in any way, if that person
106
+ is found . . . (1) not to possess the requisite qualifications to represent others . . . (2) to be lacking
107
+ in character or integrity, or to have engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct; or (3)
108
+ to have willfully violated, or willfully aided and abetted the violation of, any provision of the
109
+ securities laws or the rules and regulations thereunder.
110
+ 2 Rule 102(e)(1)(iii) provides, in pertinent part, that:
111
+ The Commission may . . . deny, temporarily or permanently, the privilege of appearing or
112
+ practicing before it . . . to any person who is found . . . to have willfully violated, or willfully
113
+ aided and abetted the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or the rules and
114
+ regulations thereunder.
115
+ 2
116
+
117
+
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Kelsoe was associated with Morgan Keegan at all relevant times, and was a registered
132
+ representative of the firm from August 1994 through November 2008.
133
+ 4. Weller , 44 years of age, is a resident of Memphis, Tennessee. Weller has been
134
+ employed by Morgan Keegan since 1992. During the relevant period, he was Morgan Keegan’s
135
+ Controller and head of its Fund Accounting Department. He holds Series 7, 27, and 66 licenses
136
+ and is a CPA who was previously licensed in the State of Tennessee. That license is currently
137
+ lapsed. Since at least January 1, 1993, Weller has been associated with the investment adviser arm
138
+ of Morgan Keegan. Additionally, from at least December 1997 through the present, Weller has
139
+ been a registered representative associated with the broker-dealer arm of Morgan Keegan.
140
+ B. OTHER RELEVANT ENTITIES
141
+ 5. Helios Select Fund, Inc., formerly known as Morgan Keegan Select Fund, Inc.
142
+ (“Select Fund”), incorporated in Maryland on October 27, 1998, has been an investment company
143
+ registered with the Commission since its inception. In 2007, the Select Fund contained three open-
144
+ end portfolios: the Select High Income portfolio, the Select Intermediate Bond portfolio, and the
145
+ Select Short Term Bond portfolio.
146
+ 6. Helios High Income Fund, Inc., formerly known as RMK High Income Fund, Inc.,
147
+ a closed-end fund incorporated in Maryland on April 16, 2003, has been an investment company
148
+ registered with the Commission since its inception.
149
+ 7. Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc., formerly known as RMK Multi-
150
+ Sector High Income Fund, Inc., a closed-end fund incorporated in Maryland on November 14,
151
+ 2005 and has been an investment company registered with the Commission since its inception.
152
+ 8. Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc., formerly known as RMK Strategic Income
153
+ Fund, Inc., a closed-end fund incorporated in Maryland on January 16, 2004 has been an
154
+ investment company registered with the Commission since its inception.
155
+ 9. Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc., formerly known as RMK Advantage Income
156
+ Fund, Inc., a closed-end fund incorporated September 7, 2004, has been an investment company
157
+ registered with the Commission since its inception.
158
+ 10. Morgan Asset, through Kelsoe, managed the Helios Select Fund, Inc., the Helios
159
+ High Income Fund, Inc., the Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc., the Helios Strategic
160
+ Income Fund, Inc., and the Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc. (collectively, the “Funds”) from
161
+ at least November 2004 through July 29, 2008.
162
+ 3
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+
177
+ C. THE FRAUDULENT SCHEME
178
+ Overview
179
+ 11. During various periods between at least January 2007 and July 2007, the daily net
180
+ asset value3 (“NAV”) of each of the Funds was materially inflated as a result of the fraudulent
181
+ conduct of Respondents. Kelsoe, an employee of Morgan Asset and Morgan Keegan, was the
182
+ portfolio manager for the Funds. Weller was an officer and treasurer of the Funds and signed and
183
+ certified their periodic reports to the Commission.
184
+ 12. Respondent Morgan Keegan, a registered broker-dealer and registered investment
185
+ adviser, was the principal underwriter and exclusive distributor of the Funds’ shares. Morgan
186
+ Keegan was designated in each of the Funds’ prospectuses as authorized to consummate
187
+ transactions in the securities of the respective Fund. The Funds’ Boards of Directors were
188
+ responsible for pricing the Funds’ securities in accordance with the Funds’ valuation policies and
189
+ procedures. Each Fund’s Board of Directors delegated this pricing responsibility to Morgan
190
+ Keegan, by contract. Morgan Keegan priced each portfolio’s securities and calculated its daily
191
+ NAV through its Fund Accounting Department (“Fund Accounting”). Weller, Morgan Keegan’s
192
+ Controller and Head of Fund Accounting, along with other Morgan Keegan personnel, staffed a
193
+ “Valuation Committee” that purportedly oversaw Fund Accounting’s processes and evaluated the
194
+ prices assigned to securities. Morgan Keegan and Weller failed, despite multiple red flags, to
195
+ adequately fulfill Morgan Keegan’s responsibilities, as delegated to it by the Funds’ Boards of
196
+ Directors, to price the Funds’ securities in accordance with their valuation policies and procedures
197
+ regarding valuation. For example, Fund Accounting accepted unsubstantiated “price adjustments”
198
+ submitted by Kelsoe that inaccurately inflated the price of certain securities, contrary to the Funds’
199
+ policies and procedures. Fund Accounting failed to document justifications for such pricing
200
+ adjustments.
201
+ 13. The Funds’ valuation policies and procedures required that dealer quotes be
202
+ obtained for certain securities. Unbeknownst to Fund Accounting and the Funds’ independent
203
+ auditor (“Independent Auditor”), Kelsoe actively screened and manipulated the dealer quotes that
204
+ Fund Accounting and the Independent Auditor obtained from at least one broker-dealer. Kelsoe
205
+ also failed to advise Fund Accounting or the Funds’ Boards of Directors when he received
206
+ information indicating that the Funds’ prices for certain securities should be reduced.
207
+ 14. Each Fund held securities backed by subprime mortgages, and the market for such
208
+ securities deteriorated in the first half of 2007. Kelsoe’s actions fraudulently forestalled declines in
209
+ the NAVs of the Funds that would have occurred as a result of the deteriorating market, absent his
210
+ intervention. Morgan Keegan fraudulently published NAVs for the Funds without following
211
+ procedures reasonably designed to determine that the NAVs were accurate.
212
+ The “net asset value” or “NAV” of an investment company is the company’s total assets
213
+ minus its total liabilities. An investment company calculates the NAV of a single share (or the
214
+ “per share NAV”) by dividing its NAV by the number of shares that are outstanding.
215
+ 4
216
+
217
+ 3
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+ Acting Contrary to Disclosures
233
+ 15. Each Fund held, in varying amounts, securities backed by subprime mortgages.
234
+ Many of these securities lacked readily available market quotations and, as a result, were to be
235
+ internally priced by the Funds’ Boards of Directors, using “fair value” methods. Under Section
236
+ 2(a)(41)(B) of the Investment Company Act, the Funds must use market values for portfolio
237
+ securities with readily available market quotations and determine fair value for all other portfolio
238
+ assets. The fair value of securities for which market quotations are not readily available is the
239
+ price the Funds would reasonably expect to receive on a current sale of the security.
240
+ 4
241
+ 16. The Funds adopted valuation procedures for pricing the Funds’ portfolio securities
242
+ and, by contract, assigned the task of following those procedures to Morgan Keegan. The Funds’
243
+ valuation procedures for fair-valued securities mandated that such securities should be valued in
244
+ “good faith” by the Valuation Committee, considering a series of general and specific factors
245
+ including “fundamental analytical data relating to the investment,” “an evaluation of the forces
246
+ which influence the market in which the securities are purchased or sold” and “events affecting the
247
+ security.” The procedures, as set forth in the prospectus, required the Valuation Committee to
248
+ maintain a written report “documenting the manner in which the fair value of a security was
249
+ determined and the accuracy of the valuation made based on the next reliable public price
250
+ quotation for that security.” The procedures also required that prices assigned to securities be
251
+ periodically validated through, among other means, broker-dealer quotes. The procedures
252
+ specified that prices obtained from a broker-dealer could only be overridden when there was “a
253
+ reasonable basis to believe that the price provided [did] not accurately reflect the fair value of the
254
+ portfolio security.” Whenever a price was overridden, the procedures mandated the basis for
255
+ overriding the price to be “documented and provided to the Valuation Committee for its review.”
256
+ 17. In filings with the Commission, the Funds stated that the fair value of securities
257
+ would be determined by Morgan Asset’s Valuation Committee using procedures adopted by the
258
+ Funds. In fact, the responsibility was delegated to Morgan Keegan, which primarily staffed the
259
+ Valuation Committee. Morgan Keegan and the Valuation Committee failed to comply with the
260
+ Funds’ procedures in several ways. Among other things: (1) the Valuation Committee left pricing
261
+ decisions to lower level employees in Fund Accounting who did not have the training or
262
+ qualifications to make fair value pricing determinations; (ii) Fund Accounting personnel relied on
263
+ Kelsoe’s “price adjustments” to determine the prices assigned to portfolio assets, without obtaining
264
+ any basis for or documentation supporting the price adjustments or applying the factors set forth in
265
+ the procedures; (iii) Fund Accounting personnel gave Kelsoe excessive discretion in validating the
266
+ prices of portfolio securities by allowing him to determine which dealer quotes to use and which to
267
+ ignore, without obtaining documentation to support his adjustments; and (iv) the Valuation
268
+ 4 See AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide - Investment Companies (Sect. 2.35-2.39), which
269
+ incorporates Accounting Series Release No. 118 (“ASR 118”). The Commission has provided
270
+ interpretative guidance related to financial reporting in the Accounting Series Releases, which is
271
+ included in the Codification of Financial Reporting Policies. Thus, conformity with the ASR 118
272
+ is required by Commission rules and complies with GAAP. See also Articles 1-01(a) and 6.03 of
273
+ Regulation S-X.
274
+ 5
275
+
276
+
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+
289
+
290
+ Committee and Fund Accounting did not ensure that the fair value prices assigned to many of the
291
+ portfolio securities were periodically re-evaluated, allowing them to be carried at stale values for
292
+ many months at a time.
293
+ 18. Morgan Asset adopted its own procedures to determine the actual fair value to
294
+ assign to portfolio securities and to “validate” those values “periodically.” Among other things,
295
+ those procedures provided that “[q]uarterly reports listing all securities held by the Funds that
296
+ were fair valued during the quarter under review, along with explanatory notes for the fair values
297
+ assigned to the securities, shall be presented to the Board for its review.” Morgan Asset failed to
298
+ fully implement this provision of its pricing policy.
299
+ 19. Between at least January 2007 and July 2007, Kelsoe had his assistant send
300
+ approximately 262 “price adjustments” to Fund Accounting. These adjustments were contained in
301
+ approximately 40 emails sent by the assistant to a staff accountant in Fund Accounting who
302
+ calculated the Funds’ NAVs. The adjustments were communications by Kelsoe to Fund
303
+ Accounting concerning the price of specific portfolio securities. In many instances, these
304
+ adjustments were arbitrary and did not reflect fair value.
305
+ 20. Kelsoe’s price adjustments were routinely entered upon receipt by the staff
306
+ accountant into a spreadsheet used to calculate the NAVs of the Funds.
307
+ 21. Kelsoe knew his prices were being used to compute the Funds’ NAVs. Among
308
+ other things, he received bi-weekly reports on the Funds’ holdings and their prices which, by
309
+ comparison with previous reports, indicated that his price adjustments were being used and were
310
+ directly affecting the NAVs.
311
+ 22. Fund Accounting did not request, and Kelsoe did not supply, supporting
312
+ documentation for his price adjustments. Fund Accounting and the Funds did not record which
313
+ securities had been assigned prices by Kelsoe.
314
+ 23. As part of the Funds’ valuation procedures, Fund Accounting sometimes requested
315
+ third party broker-dealer quotes as a means to validate the prices it had assigned to the Funds’
316
+ securities. The Funds’ Independent Auditor used similar requests for third party broker-dealer
317
+ quotes as part of its annual year-end audits of the Funds. Fund Accounting or the Independent
318
+ Auditor would periodically send such requests to broker-dealers asking them to provide quotations
319
+ for various portfolio securities.
320
+ 24. When month-end dealer quotes were received by Fund Accounting, an employee of
321
+ Fund Accounting performed a cursory review to estimate whether they contained any securities
322
+ prices that varied from current portfolio prices by more than five percent. If so, then Kelsoe
323
+ determined whether the current price should be maintained or a new price—which may or may not
324
+ have been the price given by the broker-dealer—should be assigned to the security. Thus, Fund
325
+ Accounting routinely allowed Kelsoe to determine whether dealer quotes were used or ignored.
326
+ 6
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ 25. Fund Accounting did not record which dealer quotes had been overridden at
344
+ Kelsoe’s instruction.
345
+ 26. Weller was the head of Fund Accounting and a member of the Valuation
346
+ Committee. He knew, or was highly reckless in not knowing, of the deficiencies in the
347
+ implementation of valuation procedures set forth above, and did nothing to remedy them or
348
+ otherwise to make sure fair-valued securities were accurately priced and the Funds’ NAVs were
349
+ accurately calculated. Among other things, Weller knew that: (i) the Valuation Committee did not
350
+ supervise Fund Accounting’s application of the valuation factors; (ii) Kelsoe was supplying fair
351
+ value price adjustments for specific securities to Fund Accounting; (iii) the members of the
352
+ Valuation Committee did not know which securities Kelsoe supplied fair values for or what those
353
+ fair values were, and did not receive supporting documentation for those values; and (iv) the only
354
+ pricing test regularly applied by the Valuation Committee was the “look back” test, which
355
+ compared the sales price of any security sold by a Fund to the valuation of that security used in the
356
+ NAV calculation for the five business days preceding the sale. The test only covered securities
357
+ after they were sold; thus, at any given time, the Valuation Committee never knew how many
358
+ securities’ prices could ultimately be validated by it. Weller nevertheless signed the Funds’
359
+ annual and semi-annual financial reports on Forms N-CSR, filed with the Commission, including
360
+ certifications pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
361
+ 27. Morgan Keegan, acting through Weller and Fund Accounting, failed to employ
362
+ reasonable procedures to price the Funds’ portfolio securities and, as a result of that failure, did not
363
+ calculate accurate NAVs for the Funds. Despite these failures, Morgan Keegan recklessly
364
+ published daily NAVs of the Funds which it could not know were accurate and, as distributor of
365
+ the Funds’ shares, sold shares to investors based on those NAVs.
366
+ Kelsoe’s Fraudulent Manipulation of the Funds’ Securities Prices
367
+ 28. Between at least January 2007 and July 2007, Kelsoe manipulated the dealer quotes
368
+ obtained from at least one broker-dealer (“the Submitting Firm”). At about the time Fund
369
+ Accounting or the Independent Auditor sent requests for dealer quotes to the Submitting Firm,
370
+ Kelsoe would confer by e-mail or phone with his contact there (the “Salesman”) regarding the
371
+ quotes. Among other times, Kelsoe had such conversations concerning the month-end quotes for
372
+ December 31, 2006, February 28, 2007, and March 31, 2007.
373
+ 29. In some instances, even after causing the Submitting Firm to increase its quotes,
374
+ Kelsoe subsequently provided price adjustments to Fund Accounting that were higher than even
375
+ the Submitting Firm’s increased quotes. These adjustments were not consistent with the Funds’
376
+ procedures. Kelsoe and the Salesman also discussed, and the Submitting Firm frequently
377
+ provided, interim quotes that were lower than the prices at which the Funds were valuing certain
378
+ bonds, but higher than the initial quotes that the Submitting Firm had intended to provide. The
379
+ interim quotes were accommodations to Kelsoe to enable him to avoid marking down the securities
380
+ to the fair value in one adjustment. Kelsoe knew that the interim quotes did not reflect fair value,
381
+ that the Submitting Firm would provide lower quotes in response to future pricing validation
382
+ requests, and that he would be required to mark down the securities over time, but he did not
383
+ 7
384
+
385
+
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+
404
+ disclose that information to Fund Accounting, the Funds’ Boards of Directors or the Independent
405
+ Auditor.
406
+ 30. For example, on April 25, 2007, the Salesman and Kelsoe spoke by phone about
407
+ dealer quotes that would be submitted in connection with the March 31, 2007 audit by the
408
+ Independent Auditor. The Salesman then told Kelsoe that the Submitting Firm’s trading desk had
409
+ priced down many of the bonds in the Funds. Kelsoe asked the Salesman not to provide low dealer
410
+ quotes that reflected actual bid prices.
411
+ 31. As a result of the conversation, on April 30, 2007, the Submitting Firm provided
412
+ quotes to the Independent Auditor reflecting interim prices for certain bonds, which were higher
413
+ than the quotes the Submitting Firm originally intended to supply, but lower than the Funds’ then
414
+ current values. For example, the Submitting Firm priced down one bond (“the Long Beach bond”)
415
+ from the previous confirmation price of $81 to $65 as an “interim” step. This interim reduction to
416
+ $65 was approximately half of the mark-down to $50 that the Submitting Firm’s trading desk
417
+ initially had told the Salesman to communicate to the Independent Auditor for the Long Beach
418
+ bond. On April 26, 2007, Kelsoe sent a price adjustment to Fund Accounting marking down the
419
+ price of the Long Beach bond from $78, the price at which the Funds’ were valuing the bond at
420
+ that time, to $72. Fund Accounting promptly entered the $72 price, which was substantially higher
421
+ than fair value, into the spreadsheet used to calculate the Funds’ NAV.
422
+ 32. The Submitting Firm also refrained from submitting certain quotes to Fund
423
+ Accounting, where the quotes would have been lower than the current valuations being used by the
424
+ Funds, as the result of conversations between Kelsoe and the Salesman.
425
+ 33. Kelsoe did not disclose to Fund Accounting or the Funds’ Boards that he had
426
+ received quotes from the Submitting Firm which were lower than the current valuations recorded
427
+ by the Funds, and that the Submitting Firm had refrained from submitting quotes to Fund
428
+ Accounting or had submitted quotes at higher prices than it had originally planned. Kelsoe also
429
+ did not disclose that he caused the Submitting Firm to alter or withhold quotes.
430
+ The Knollwood Bonds
431
+ 34. In July 2006, Kelsoe purchased from the Submitting Firm, for one or more of the
432
+ Funds, a Knollwood Collateralized Debt Obligation (“Knollwood bond”), with the guarantee that
433
+ the Submitting Firm would make a “locked market” and buy it back in six months at the same
434
+ price, less two coupon payments that the Funds were to receive in the interim. In January 2007,
435
+ Kelsoe agreed with the Submitting Firm to continue holding the Knollwood bond. On March 30,
436
+ 2007, the Independent Auditor requested quotes from the Submitting Firm on a number of the
437
+ Funds’ bonds, including the Knollwood bond, for its year-end audit. On April 30, 2007, the
438
+ Submitting Firm returned the requested quotes to both the Independent Auditor and Kelsoe;
439
+ however, it did not provide a quote for the Knollwood bond. Consequently, the Knollwood bond
440
+ continued to be maintained at $92, a price higher than fair value, in the NAV of the relevant Funds.
441
+ 8
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+
460
+ 35. On May 16, 2007, when Morgan Keegan was still valuing the Knollwood bond at
461
+ $92, Kelsoe and the Salesman discussed the fact that Morgan Keegan would be requesting another
462
+ quote for it from the Submitting Firm. Kelsoe told the Salesman not to provide a quote to Morgan
463
+ Keegan unless it was $87.50 or higher. On May 18, 2007, the Salesman advised Kelsoe that he
464
+ had obtained a $65 quote from the Submitting Firm’s trading desk for the Knollwood bond. On
465
+ June 5, 2007, Kelsoe communicated his unhappiness about the $65 quote to the Submitting Firm,
466
+ and threatened to stop doing business with it. On June 7, Kelsoe provided a price adjustment for
467
+ the Knollwood bond at $88, which was not consistent with fair value. On June 22, as a result of
468
+ Kelsoe’s comments, the Submitting firm provided a list of requested quotes to Morgan Keegan, but
469
+ left the space for the Knollwood quote blank. As a result, the Funds continued to price the
470
+ Knollwood bond at $88, substantially higher than fair value. Kelsoe did not advise Fund
471
+ Accounting, the Independent Auditor or the Funds’ Boards of Directors that the Submitting Firm
472
+ had provided to Kelsoe a quote lower than the price at which the Funds were holding the bonds, or
473
+ that he had prevailed upon the Submitting Firm not to supply the quotes to Fund Accounting or the
474
+ Independent Auditor.
475
+ The Terwin Bonds
476
+ 36. In addition to engaging in affirmative misconduct to inflate the NAVs of the Funds,
477
+ Kelsoe also failed to inform Fund Accounting in March 2007—in br each of his fiduciary duty as
478
+ portfolio manager to the Funds—that he had become aware that seven Terwin Mortgage Trust
479
+ bonds (“Terwin bonds”) held by the Funds had declined substantially in value.
480
+ 37. On or about March 15, 2007, Kelsoe placed a call to a broker-dealer that was the
481
+ issuer, distributor, and market maker for the Terwin bonds, to discuss a swap transaction. In
482
+ discussing the terms of the swap, Kelsoe learned that the values of the Terwin bonds had decreased
483
+ substantially and that the Submitting Firm would be lowering its dealer quotes in response to a
484
+ request that would shortly be sent out by Fund Accounting in connection with the Funds’ audit, for
485
+ prices as of March 31, 2007.
486
+ 38. Despite receiving this news in mid-March 2007, Kelsoe’s first communication with
487
+ Fund Accounting concerning reducing the price of certain Terwin bonds came in the form of a
488
+ price adjustment submitted to Fund Accounting by Kelsoe’s assistant via e-mail on Thursday,
489
+ March 29, 2007. Over the next day and weekend, Kelsoe informed Fund Accounting of the news
490
+ he had heard two weeks earlier. On April 2, 2007, before the market opened, Fund Accounting
491
+ lowered the value of all seven of the Terwin bonds effective as of March 31, 2007.
492
+ 39. As the result of Kelsoe’s delay, the bonds were materially overvalued by the Funds
493
+ during the last two weeks of March 2007.
494
+ Misrepresentations to Investors and the Funds’ Boards of Directors
495
+ 40. Kelsoe also made fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions of material fact
496
+ directly to the Funds’ investors concerning the Funds’ performance. Specifically, in each of the
497
+ Funds annual and semi-annual reports filed with the Commission on Forms N-CSR during the
498
+ 9
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+ relevant period (including, among others, the Annual Report for the Morgan Keegan Select Fund,
521
+ Inc. for the year-ended June 30, 2007 filed with the Commission on October 4, 2007), Kelsoe
522
+ included a signed letter to investors reporting on the Funds’ performance “based on net asset
523
+ value.” Given his actions to manipulate the Funds’ NAVs, Kelsoe knew the performance he
524
+ reported was materially misstated. Kelsoe and, through him, Morgan Asset made untrue
525
+ statements of material fact concerning the Funds’ performance in the Funds’ annual and semi-
526
+ annual reports filed with the Commission on Forms N-CSR. Morgan Asset, through Kelsoe, also
527
+ defrauded the Funds by providing a quarterly valuation packet reflecting inflated prices for certain
528
+ securities to the Funds’ Boards, failing to disclose to the Funds’ Boards information indicating that
529
+ the Funds’ NAVs were inflated, and that Kelsoe was actively screening and manipulating dealer
530
+ quotes and providing Fund Accounting with unsubstantiated price adjustments. In addition, the
531
+ prospectuses described Morgan Asset as responsible for fair valuation of the Funds’ portfolios.
532
+ D. VIOLATIONS
533
+ 41. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents Morgan Asset, Kelsoe,
534
+ Morgan Keegan and Weller willfully violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act; Section 10(b) of
535
+ the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, thereunder; which prohibit fraudulent conduct in the offer and
536
+ sale of securities and in connection with the purchase or sale of securities.
537
+ 42. Alternatively, Morgan Asse t and Morgan Keegan willfully violated Section 17(a)
538
+ of the Securities Act; Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and
539
+ Respondents Kelsoe and Weller willfully aided and abetted and caused violations of Section 10(b)
540
+ of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, thereunder.
541
+ 43. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent Morgan Asset willfully
542
+ violated, and Respondent Kelsoe willfully aided and abetted and caused violations of, Section
543
+ 206(4) and of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder; which prohibit fraudulent, deceptive
544
+ or manipulative practices or courses of business by an investment adviser, and requires investment
545
+ advisers to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
546
+ violation of the Advisers Act and the rules thereunder by their supervised persons, respectively.
547
+ 44 As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent Morgan Asset willfully
548
+ violated, and Respondents Kelsoe and Morgan Keegan willfully aided and abetted and caused
549
+ violations of, Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act; which prohibit fraudulent conduct
550
+ by an investment adviser.
551
+ 45. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents Morgan Asset, Kelsoe and
552
+ Weller willfully violated, and Respondent Morgan Keegan willfully aided and abetted and caused
553
+ violations of, Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act, which prohibits untrue statements of
554
+ material fact or omissions to state facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light
555
+ of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, in any registration statement,
556
+ report or other document filed pursuant to the Investment Company Act or the keeping of which is
557
+ required pursuant to Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act.
558
+ 10
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+ 46. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondent Morgan Keegan willfully
578
+ violated, and Respondents Morgan Asset, Kelsoe and Weller willfully aided and abetted and
579
+ caused violations of, Rule 22c-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act, which makes it
580
+ unlawful for registered investment companies issuing redeemable securities, persons designated in
581
+ such issuer’s prospectus as authorized to consummate transactions in such securities, and principal
582
+ underwriters of or dealers in such securities, to sell, redeem, or repurchase such securities except at
583
+ prices based on their current net asset values.
584
+ 47. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents Morgan Asset, Morgan
585
+ Keegan, Kelsoe, and Weller willfully aided and abetted and caused violations of Rule 38a-1
586
+ promulgated under the Investment Company Act, which requires that a registered investment
587
+ company adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
588
+ violation of the federal securities laws, including policies and procedures that provide for oversight
589
+ of compliance by the investment company’s investment adviser.
590
+ III.
591
+ In view of the allegations made by the Division of Enforcement, the Commission deems it
592
+ necessary and appropriate in the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist
593
+ proceedings be instituted to determine:
594
+ A. Whether the allegations set forth in Section II are true and, in connection therewith, to afford
595
+ Respondents an opportunity to establish any defenses to such allegations;
596
+ B. What, if any, remedial action is appropriate in the public interest against Respondent
597
+ Morgan Keegan pursuant to Section 15(b)(4) of the Exchange Act and against Morgan Asset,
598
+ Kelsoe and Weller pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, including, but not limited to,
599
+ disgorgement and civil penalties pursuant to Section 21B of the Exchange Act;
600
+ C. What, if any, remedial action is appropriate in the public interest against Respondents
601
+ Morgan Keegan and Morgan Asset pursuant to Section 203(e) of the Advisers Act, and against
602
+ Respondents Kelsoe and Weller pursuant to Section 203(f) of the Advisers Act, including, but not
603
+ limited to, civil penalties pursuant to Section 203(i) of the Advisers Act;
604
+ D. What, if any, remedial action is appropriate in the public interest against Respondents
605
+ Morgan Keegan, Morgan Asset, Kelsoe and Weller pursuant to Section 9(b) of the Investment
606
+ Company Act, including, but not limited to, civil penalties pursuant to Section 9(d) of the
607
+ Investment Company Act;
608
+ E. Whether, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act, Section 21C of the Exchange Act,
609
+ Section 203(k) of the Advisers Act, and Section 9(f) of the Investment Company Act, Respondents
610
+ Morgan Asset, Kelsoe, Morgan Keegan and Weller should be ordered to cease and desist from
611
+ committing or causing violations of and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act,
612
+ Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder;
613
+ 11
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+ F. Whether, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act, Section 21C of the Exchange Act,
635
+ Section 203(k) of the Advisers Act, and Section 9(f) of the Investment Company Act, Respondents
636
+ Morgan Asset, Morgan Keegan, and Kelsoe should be ordered to cease and desist from committing
637
+ or causing violations of and any future violations of Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) of the
638
+ Advisers Act, Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder, and Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act;
639
+ G. Whether, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act, Section 21C of the Exchange Act,
640
+ Section 203(k) of the Advisers Act, and Section 9(f) of the Investment Company Act, Respondents
641
+ Morgan Asset and Kelsoe should be ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing
642
+ violations of and any future violations of Sections 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7
643
+ thereunder;
644
+ H. Whether, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act, Section 21C of the Exchange Act,
645
+ Section 203(k) of the Advisers Act, and Section 9(f) of the Investment Company Act, Respondents
646
+ Morgan Asset, Morgan Keegan, Kelsoe and Weller should be ordered to cease and desist from
647
+ committing or causing violations of and any future violations of Rule 22c-1, promulgated under the
648
+ Investment Company Act;
649
+ I. Whether, pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act, Section 21C of the Exchange Act,
650
+ Section 203(k) of the Advisers Act, and Section 9(f) of the Investment Company Act, Respondents
651
+ Morgan Asset, Morgan Keegan, Kelsoe and Weller should be ordered to cease and desist from
652
+ committing or causing violations of and any future violations of Rule 38a-1, promulgated under the
653
+ Investment Company Act;
654
+ J. Whether, pursuant to Section 4C of the Exchange Act and Rule 102(e)(1)(iii) of the
655
+ Commission’s Rules of Practice, it is appropriate to censure or deny Respondent Weller the
656
+ privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission; and
657
+ K. Whether Respondents should be ordered to pay disgorgement pursuant to Section 8A(e) of
658
+ the Securities Act, Section 21C(e) of the Exchange Act, Section 203(i) of the Advisers Act and
659
+ Section 9(e) of the Investment Company Act.
660
+ IV.
661
+ IT IS ORDERED that a public hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on the questions
662
+ set forth in Section III hereof shall be convened not earlier than 30 days and not later than 60 days
663
+ from service of this Order at a time and place to be fixed, and before an Administrative Law Judge
664
+ to be designated by further order as provided by Rule 110 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17
665
+ C.F.R. § 201.110.
666
+ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an Answer to the allegations
667
+ contained in this Order within twenty (20) days after service of this Order, as provided by Rule 220
668
+ of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.220.
669
+ 12
670
+
671
+
672
+
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+ If Respondent fails to file the directed answer, or fails to appear at a hearing after being duly
684
+ notified, the Respondent may be deemed in default and the proceedings may be determined against
685
+ him upon consideration of this Order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true as
686
+ provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 221(f) and 310 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R.
687
+ §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f), 201.221(f) and 201.310.
688
+ This Order shall be served forthwith upon Respondent personally or by certified mail.
689
+ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an initial
690
+ decision no later than 300 days from the date of service of this Order, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of
691
+ the Commission’s Rules of Practice.
692
+ In the absence of an appropriate waiver, no officer or employee of the Commission engaged
693
+ in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in this or any factually related
694
+ proceeding will be permitted to participate or advise in the decision of this matter, except as witness
695
+ or counsel in proceedings held pursuant to notice. Since this proceeding is not “rule making” within
696
+ the meaning of Section 551 of the Administrative Procedure Act, it is not deemed subject to the
697
+ provisions of Section 553 delaying the effective date of any final Commission action.
698
+ By the Commission.
699
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
700
+ S e c r e t a r y
701
+ 13
702
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3126.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Symbol Technologies, Inc., et al.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/507951","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Symbol Technologies, Inc., et al.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Symbol Technologies, Inc., et al.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 21480 / April 7, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3126 / April 7, 2010 SEC v. Symbol Technologies, Inc., et al. , 04 CV 2276 (SJF)(EDNY) TWO MORE FORMER EXECUTIVES OF SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SETTLE SEC ACTION, CONCLUDING LIABILITY PROCEEDINGS IN THE 12-DEFENDANT ACCOUNTING CASE The Honorable Sandra J. Feuerstein, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, has entered final consent judgments against Frank Borghese and Michael DeGennaro, the last two defendants in the Commission's enforcement action against Symbol Technologies, Inc. ("Symbol") and its former executives. The Commission's settlement with DeGennaro also included the issuance of an administrative cease-and-desist order. The Commission's federal court complaint, filed on June 3, 2004, alleges that from 1998 until early 2003, Symbol and the eleven individual defendants engaged in fraudulent accounting practices aimed at falsifying Symbol's reported financial results. The judgments and the administrative order imposed the following relief, to which both Borghese and DeGennaro consented without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's complaint and, in DeGennaro's case, the findings in the administrative order: Frank Borghese, formerly Symbol's Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Services, consented to a judgment, entered on February 22, 2010, that requires him to disgorge a total of $450,000 and waives imposition of a civil monetary penalty based on his demonstrated financial inability to pay additional amounts. The consent judgment also prohibits him from acting as an officer or director of a public company and permanently enjoins him from violating the relevant antifraud, corporate reporting, books and records and internal control provisions of the federal securities laws. Specifically, Borghese is permanently enjoined from violating, or aiding and abetting violations of, Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-13, and 13b2-1. The complaint alleges that, as head of sales, Borghese spearheaded Symbol's various "channel stuffing" and other fraudulent revenue recognition practices. Michael DeGennaro, formerly Symbol's Senior Vice President of Finance, consented to a final judgment, entered on April 6, 2010, that requires him to pay a civil penalty of $40,000. In addition, on April 2, 2010, the Commission issued an order finding that DeGennaro was a cause of Symbol's violations of Sections 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act -- the corporate books and records and internal control provisions of the Exchange Act -- and directing DeGennaro to cease and desist from causing such violations in the future. The Commission's order finds that: (i) In 2000 and 2001, Symbol created and used certain "restructuring" charges and related reserves in contravention of generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), causing Symbol to misstate its operating expenses and net income on its books and records and in its financial statements; and (ii) DeGennaro was one of the executives who determined how these charges were recorded, and he failed to take the requisite steps to ensure that the charges and the uses of associated reserves were properly recorded and accounted for in accordance with GAAP. Consent judgments were previously entered against each of the other ten defendants, with the exception of Tomo Razmilovic, Symbol's former Chief Executive Officer. On December 23, 2009, the Court entered a default judgment against Razmilovic as a sanction for his refusal to appear for his court-ordered deposition in the United States. Razmilovic currently resides in Sweden and has been a fugitive from justice since being indicted on parallel criminal charges in the Eastern District of New York. The Court has commenced an evidentiary hearing to determine the relief to be imposed against Razmilovic pursuant to the default judgment. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctive relief, an officer-and-director bar, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalties. The hearing is scheduled to resume on May 10, 2010. The Commission's complaint alleges that Razmilovic orchestrated the fraud at Symbol to create the false appearance that Symbol was achieving the aggressive financial performance targets imposed by Razmilovic. The Commission acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in this matter.
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3127.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Collins & Aikman Corporation, et al.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/508006","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Collins & Aikman Corporation, et al.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Collins & Aikman Corporation, et al.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 21491 / April 19, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3127 / April 19, 2010 SEC v. Collins & Aikman Corporation, et al. Civil Action No. 07-CV-2419 (S.D.N.Y.) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin) SEC SETTLES WITH FIVE DEFENDANTS IN SEC V. COLLINS & AIKMAN; DAVID A. STOCKMAN CONSENTS TO INJUNCTION IN CONNECTION WITH COLLINS AND AIKMAN FRAUD AND AGREES TO PAY $7.2 MILLION IN CIVIL PENALTIES, DISGORGEMENT, AND PREJUDGEMENT INTEREST The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that it reached settlements in SEC v. Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. , No. 07-CV-2419 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) with defendants David A. Stockman ("Stockman"), J. Michael Stepp ("Stepp"), Elkin B. McCallum ("McCallum"), David R. Cosgrove ("Cosgrove"), and Paul C. Barnaba ("Barnaba"), all former executives or board members of Collins & Aikman Corporation ("C&A"), an auto parts supplier that went bankrupt in 2005. The proposed settlements are subject to Court approval. Stockman, C&A's former CEO and Chairman of the Board, Stepp, C&A's former CFO and Vice Chairman of the Board, McCallum, a former C&A Board member, and Cosgrove, C&A's former Corporate Controller, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, would each consent to entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining them from violating the antifraud provisions of Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and the reporting, recordkeeping, internal controls, and lying to auditors provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). Stockman and Stepp also would be permanently enjoined from violating the Sarbanes-Oxley certification provisions. Barnaba, C&A's former Vice President and Director of Purchasing-Plastic Division, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, would consent to entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violation of the reporting, recordkeeping, internal controls, and lying to auditors provisions of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the settlement, Stockman has agreed to pay $7.2 million, comprised of $400,000 in civil penalties, disgorgement of $4,424,000, and prejudgment interest of $2,376,000, with the disgorgement and prejudgment interest obligations subject to an offset of up to $4.4 million for payments Stockman makes to settle two securities class action lawsuits against him seeking recovery of the same money as the Commission. Stepp and McCallum have each agreed to pay a civil penalty of $75,000, Cosgrove has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $40,000, and Barnaba has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $20,000. Upon motion to the Court, the civil penalties paid by Stockman may be distributed pursuant to the Fair Funds provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, based upon the anticipated entry of a permanent injunction against him, Cosgrove has offered to consent, without admitting or denying the Commission's findings, to the issuance of an administrative order pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, suspending him from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant with a right to apply for reinstatement after three years. The SEC's complaint alleges that Stockman participated in fraudulent rebate transactions, joined by Stepp, McCallum, Cosgrove, and Barnaba, to inflate C&A's reported income between 2001 and 2004. The complaint alleges that Stockman and other defendants obtained false documents from suppliers designed to mislead C&A's external auditors. The complaint also alleges that Stockman and other defendants caused C&A to file financial statements with the SEC that materially misrepresented C&A's financial results. According to the complaint, during the time Stockman was engaged in this conduct, he was collecting millions of dollars in management fees C&A paid Stockman's private equity fund, Heartland Industrial Partners. As part of the settlement, the Commission has submitted proposed stipulated dismissals of its fraud charges under Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act against Stockman, Stepp, McCallum, Cosgrove, and Barnaba. In addition, the Commission has submitted proposed stipulated dismissals of all claims against defendants John G. Galante, C&A's former Treasurer, Christopher M. Williams, C&A's former Executive Vice President of Business Development, Gerald E. Jones, C&A's former Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Fabrics, and Thomas V. Gougherty, C&A's former Controller-Plastics Division. C&A, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, previously consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining it from, among other things, violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The SEC's civil enforcement action will be concluded if the Court approves the proposed settlements and dismissals. For additional information, see Litigation Release No. 20055 / March 26, 2007.
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3128.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1355 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+ SEC.gov | Exotics.com, Inc., et al.
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+ !function(){var e=navigator.userAgent,a=document.documentElement,n=a.className;n=n.replace("no-js","js"),/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(e)&&!window.MSStream&&(n+=" ua-ios"),a.className=n}();
25
+ {"path":{"baseUrl":"\/","pathPrefix":"","currentPath":"node\/508041","currentPathIsAdmin":false,"isFront":false,"currentLanguage":"en"},"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"gtag":{"tagId":"","consentMode":false,"otherIds":[],"events":[],"additionalConfigInfo":[]},"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxdT0GOwzAI_JBdn_oei2DkeINNZLC22devlaZS2wtiBhhmcKNUTPo97jxyaXEH3GJpiZrFhQW38A4cMqgeYQGlV19JFTKpQ-kUmvQKXP7I0cO4tC2kPnbg2wVdFslM0SCHPMs3vsEPPD7J6hgOGdPCKJyoRxxqUuePHjLLAuzVjimenRJGSLW08NoBK9LUn6SHlrytVOlcpJShB63QLSpBx_WkOzHNePol4fRQo_qMPvQ36ZXsAmd99lMNr2t_GUR9n60EyX9a_wePd5ns","theme":"uswds_sec","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"gtm":{"tagId":null,"settings":{"data_layer":"dataLayer","include_classes":false,"allowlist_classes":"","blocklist_classes":"","include_environment":false,"environment_id":"","environment_token":""},"tagIds":["GTM-TD3BKV"]},"data":{"extlink":{"extTarget":false,"extTargetAppendNewWindowDisplay":true,"extTargetAppendNewWindowLabel":"(opens in a new window)","extTargetNoOverride":false,"extNofollow":false,"extTitleNoOverride":false,"extNoreferrer":false,"extFollowNoOverride":false,"extClass":"0","extLabel":"(link is external)","extImgClass":false,"extSubdomains":true,"extExclude":".*\\.gov|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/utr\/2013-05-17\/utr.xml|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/numeric-2009-12-16.xsd|http:\/\/www.xbrl.org\/dtr\/type\/nonNumeric-2009-12-16.xsd|https:\/\/secir.secure.force.com\/ombudsman\/OMMSForm","extInclude":"","extCssExclude":".data-exempt","extCssInclude":"","extCssExplicit":"","extAlert":true,"extAlertText":"You are now leaving the SEC Website. The link you have selected is located on another server. Please click on the OK button below to proceed to the selected site. The SEC does not endorse this web site, its sponsor, or any of the policies, activities, products, or services offered on the site or by any advertiser on the site.","extHideIcons":false,"mailtoClass":"0","telClass":"","mailtoLabel":"(link sends email)","telLabel":"(link is a phone number)","extUseFontAwesome":false,"extIconPlacement":"append","extPreventOrphan":false,"extFaLinkClasses":"fa fa-external-link","extFaMailtoClasses":"fa fa-envelope-o","extAdditionalLinkClasses":"","extAdditionalMailtoClasses":"","extAdditionalTelClasses":"","extFaTelClasses":"fa fa-phone","allowedDomains":null,"extExcludeNoreferrer":""}},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"e506dfd1572f94bd1f339f1a7483bfbded31d4a9d2bdfdca3fdbc235153380ee"}}
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+
37
+
38
+
39
+ Skip to search field
40
+
41
+
42
+
43
+ Skip to main content
44
+
45
+
46
+
47
+
48
+
49
+
50
+
51
+
52
+
53
+
54
+
55
+
56
+
57
+
58
+
59
+
60
+
61
+ An official website of the United States government
62
+ Here’s how you know
63
+
64
+
65
+ Here’s how you know
66
+
67
+
68
+
69
+
70
+
71
+
72
+
73
+
74
+
75
+
76
+ Official websites use .gov
77
+
78
+
79
+ A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+ Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
89
+
90
+
91
+ A lock
92
+ ( Lock A locked padlock )
93
+ or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+
98
+
99
+
100
+
101
+
102
+
103
+
104
+
105
+
106
+
107
+
108
+
109
+
110
+ SEC homepage
111
+
112
+
113
+
114
+
115
+
116
+
117
+ Menu
118
+
119
+
120
+
121
+
122
+
123
+
124
+
125
+
126
+
127
+
128
+
129
+
130
+
131
+ Close
132
+
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+ Search
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+
165
+
166
+
167
+ Search Filings
168
+
169
+
170
+
171
+
172
+
173
+
174
+
175
+
176
+ Search Filings
177
+
178
+
179
+
180
+
181
+
182
+
183
+
184
+
185
+ Full Text Search
186
+
187
+
188
+
189
+
190
+
191
+ Latest Filings
192
+
193
+
194
+
195
+
196
+
197
+ Mutual Fund Search
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+ Variable Insurance Products Search
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+
209
+ SIC Codes
210
+
211
+
212
+
213
+
214
+
215
+ CIK Lookup
216
+
217
+
218
+
219
+
220
+
221
+ Public Dissemination Service (PDS)
222
+
223
+
224
+
225
+
226
+
227
+ Search Assistance
228
+
229
+
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+
234
+
235
+
236
+
237
+
238
+
239
+
240
+ Submit Filings
241
+
242
+
243
+
244
+
245
+
246
+
247
+
248
+
249
+ Submit Filings
250
+
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+
255
+
256
+
257
+
258
+ EDGAR Filer Management Portal
259
+
260
+
261
+
262
+
263
+
264
+ EDGAR Filing Portal
265
+
266
+
267
+
268
+
269
+
270
+ Online Forms Management Portal
271
+
272
+
273
+
274
+
275
+
276
+ EDGAR Next
277
+
278
+
279
+
280
+
281
+
282
+ Forms Index
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ Filer Support & Resources
289
+
290
+
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+
295
+
296
+
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+
301
+ Data & Research
302
+
303
+
304
+
305
+
306
+
307
+
308
+
309
+
310
+ Data & Research
311
+
312
+
313
+
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+ Data Library
320
+
321
+
322
+
323
+
324
+
325
+ Statistics & Data Visualizations
326
+
327
+
328
+
329
+
330
+
331
+ Structured Data
332
+
333
+
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ Investment Management Data
338
+
339
+
340
+
341
+
342
+
343
+ Open Data at the SEC
344
+
345
+
346
+
347
+
348
+
349
+
350
+
351
+
352
+
353
+
354
+
355
+
356
+ Rules, Enforcement, & Compliance
357
+
358
+
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+
363
+
364
+
365
+
366
+
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+
373
+
374
+
375
+
376
+ Rules & Regulations
377
+
378
+
379
+
380
+
381
+
382
+
383
+
384
+
385
+ Rulemaking Activity
386
+
387
+
388
+
389
+
390
+
391
+ Submit Public Comments
392
+
393
+
394
+
395
+
396
+
397
+ Staff Guidance
398
+
399
+
400
+
401
+
402
+
403
+ No-Action, Interpretive, and Exemptive Letters
404
+
405
+
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Self-Regulatory Organization Rulemaking
410
+
411
+
412
+
413
+
414
+
415
+ Public Petitions for Rulemaking
416
+
417
+
418
+
419
+
420
+
421
+
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+
426
+
427
+
428
+
429
+
430
+
431
+
432
+ Enforcement & Litigation
433
+
434
+
435
+
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+
440
+
441
+ Litigation Releases
442
+
443
+
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+ Administrative Proceedings
448
+
449
+
450
+
451
+
452
+
453
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
454
+
455
+
456
+
457
+
458
+
459
+ Trading Suspensions
460
+
461
+
462
+
463
+
464
+
465
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
466
+
467
+
468
+
469
+
470
+
471
+ Receiverships
472
+
473
+
474
+
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+
479
+
480
+
481
+
482
+
483
+
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+ Compliance
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+
493
+
494
+
495
+
496
+
497
+ Examination Priorities
498
+
499
+
500
+
501
+
502
+
503
+ Risk Alerts
504
+
505
+
506
+
507
+
508
+
509
+ Compliance Outreach Program
510
+
511
+
512
+
513
+
514
+
515
+
516
+
517
+
518
+
519
+
520
+
521
+
522
+
523
+
524
+
525
+
526
+
527
+
528
+
529
+
530
+
531
+
532
+ Proposed Rules
533
+
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+ What's New
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ Whistleblower Program
545
+
546
+
547
+
548
+
549
+
550
+
551
+
552
+
553
+
554
+
555
+
556
+
557
+
558
+
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+ Featured Topics
564
+
565
+
566
+
567
+
568
+
569
+
570
+
571
+
572
+ Featured Topics
573
+
574
+
575
+
576
+
577
+
578
+
579
+
580
+
581
+ Crypto Task Force
582
+
583
+
584
+
585
+
586
+
587
+ Cybersecurity
588
+
589
+
590
+
591
+
592
+
593
+ Market Structure Analytics
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+
598
+
599
+ Saving and Investing for Military Personnel
600
+
601
+
602
+
603
+
604
+
605
+ Saving and Investing for Teachers
606
+
607
+
608
+
609
+
610
+
611
+ SEC-CFTC Harmonization Initiative
612
+
613
+
614
+
615
+
616
+
617
+ Treasury Clearing Implementation
618
+
619
+
620
+
621
+
622
+
623
+
624
+
625
+
626
+
627
+
628
+
629
+
630
+ About
631
+
632
+
633
+
634
+
635
+
636
+
637
+
638
+
639
+ About
640
+
641
+
642
+
643
+
644
+
645
+
646
+
647
+
648
+ Mission
649
+
650
+
651
+
652
+
653
+
654
+ Commissioners
655
+
656
+
657
+
658
+
659
+
660
+ Divisions & Offices
661
+
662
+
663
+
664
+
665
+
666
+ Division & Office Directors
667
+
668
+
669
+
670
+
671
+
672
+ Advisory Committees
673
+
674
+
675
+
676
+
677
+
678
+ Budget & Performance
679
+
680
+
681
+
682
+
683
+
684
+ Reports & Publications
685
+
686
+
687
+
688
+
689
+
690
+ Commission Votes
691
+
692
+
693
+
694
+
695
+
696
+ Contact the SEC
697
+
698
+
699
+
700
+
701
+
702
+ Careers
703
+
704
+
705
+
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+ Submit a Tip or Complaint
716
+
717
+
718
+
719
+
720
+
721
+
722
+
723
+
724
+
725
+
726
+
727
+
728
+
729
+
730
+
731
+
732
+ Newsroom
733
+
734
+
735
+ |
736
+
737
+
738
+ Investors
739
+
740
+
741
+ Small Businesses
742
+
743
+
744
+ Whistleblowers
745
+
746
+
747
+
748
+
749
+
750
+
751
+
752
+
753
+
754
+
755
+
756
+
757
+
758
+
759
+ Newsroom
760
+
761
+
762
+ |
763
+
764
+
765
+ Investors
766
+
767
+
768
+ Small Businesses
769
+
770
+
771
+ Whistleblowers
772
+
773
+
774
+
775
+
776
+
777
+
778
+
779
+
780
+
781
+
782
+
783
+
784
+
785
+
786
+
787
+
788
+ Search SEC.gov & EDGAR
789
+
790
+
791
+
792
+
793
+
794
+ Search
795
+
796
+
797
+
798
+
799
+
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+
804
+
805
+
806
+
807
+
808
+
809
+
810
+
811
+
812
+
813
+
814
+
815
+
816
+
817
+
818
+
819
+
820
+
821
+
822
+
823
+
824
+
825
+
826
+
827
+
828
+ More in this Section
829
+
830
+
831
+
832
+
833
+
834
+
835
+
836
+
837
+
838
+
839
+
840
+
841
+ Enforcement & Litigation
842
+
843
+
844
+
845
+
846
+
847
+
848
+ Litigation Releases
849
+
850
+
851
+
852
+
853
+ Administrative Proceedings
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
859
+
860
+
861
+
862
+
863
+ Trading Suspensions
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
869
+
870
+
871
+
872
+
873
+ Receiverships
874
+
875
+
876
+
877
+
878
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
879
+
880
+
881
+
882
+
883
+ Rules of Practice
884
+
885
+
886
+
887
+
888
+ Applications for Reentry
889
+
890
+
891
+
892
+
893
+ Reports of Investigations
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+ Whistleblower Program
899
+
900
+
901
+
902
+
903
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+
908
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
909
+
910
+
911
+
912
+
913
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
914
+
915
+
916
+
917
+
918
+ Small Businesses
919
+
920
+
921
+
922
+
923
+ Appellate Briefs
924
+
925
+
926
+
927
+
928
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
929
+
930
+
931
+
932
+
933
+
934
+
935
+
936
+
937
+
938
+
939
+
940
+
941
+
942
+
943
+
944
+
945
+
946
+
947
+
948
+
949
+
950
+
951
+
952
+
953
+
954
+ Enforcement & Litigation
955
+
956
+
957
+
958
+
959
+
960
+
961
+ Litigation Releases
962
+
963
+
964
+
965
+
966
+ Administrative Proceedings
967
+
968
+
969
+
970
+
971
+ Administrative Law Judge Orders and Initial Decisions
972
+
973
+
974
+
975
+
976
+ Trading Suspensions
977
+
978
+
979
+
980
+
981
+ Distributions to Harmed Investors
982
+
983
+
984
+
985
+
986
+ Receiverships
987
+
988
+
989
+
990
+
991
+ Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP)
992
+
993
+
994
+
995
+
996
+ Rules of Practice
997
+
998
+
999
+
1000
+
1001
+ Applications for Reentry
1002
+
1003
+
1004
+
1005
+
1006
+ Reports of Investigations
1007
+
1008
+
1009
+
1010
+
1011
+ Whistleblower Program
1012
+
1013
+
1014
+
1015
+
1016
+ Public Alert: Unregistered Soliciting Entities (PAUSE)
1017
+
1018
+
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ SEC Action Lookup - Individuals (SALI)
1022
+
1023
+
1024
+
1025
+
1026
+ Enforcement Data Delivery Standards
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+
1030
+
1031
+ Small Businesses
1032
+
1033
+
1034
+
1035
+
1036
+ Appellate Briefs
1037
+
1038
+
1039
+
1040
+
1041
+ Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+
1047
+
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+
1056
+
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+
1060
+
1061
+
1062
+
1063
+
1064
+
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+
1069
+
1070
+
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+
1079
+ Home
1080
+
1081
+
1082
+ Enforcement and Litigation
1083
+
1084
+
1085
+ Litigation Releases
1086
+
1087
+
1088
+ Exotics.com, Inc., et al.
1089
+
1090
+
1091
+
1092
+
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+
1096
+
1097
+
1098
+
1099
+
1100
+ Exotics.com, Inc., et al.
1101
+
1102
+
1103
+
1104
+
1105
+
1106
+
1107
+
1108
+
1109
+
1110
+
1111
+
1112
+
1113
+
1114
+
1115
+
1116
+
1117
+
1118
+
1119
+ U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21498 / April 22, 2010 Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3128 / April 22, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Exotics.com, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-00531-PMP-GWF, United States District Court, District of Nevada CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT MARLIN R. BRINSKY SETTLES SEC ENFORCEMENT ACTION IN EXOTICS.COM, INC. LITIGATION The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that a federal district court in Nevada has entered a final judgment, by consent, against Marlin R. Brinsky of Santa Monica, California, in connection with an enforcement action filed in 2005 concerning a penny stock manipulation and accounting fraud. The final judgment against Brinsky, a certified public accountant, was entered on April 21, 2010. It permanently enjoins him from violating provisions of the federal securities laws governing accountant's reports and orders him to pay a $20,000 civil penalty. Separately, Brinsky also consented to an administrative order suspending him from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, with a right to apply for reinstatement after two years. The Commission's civil injunctive action was filed on April 25, 2005, against Exotics.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and 12 additional principal defendants and one relief defendant. The Commission's complaint alleged that, between at least 1999 and 2002, Exotics.com, which was then an Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board company in the business of operating adult Web sites, was the subject of a stock manipulation and accounting fraud. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Brinsky and others engaged in conduct that resulted in Exotics.com filing materially false and misleading financial statements in its Commission filings. The complaint further alleged that the staff of Exotics.com's outside auditor, of which Brinsky was a member, committed acts and/or omissions that caused them to become non-independent during audits of Exotics.com and that their firm thereafter issued audit reports falsely representing that the audits had been conducted by an independent accountant. Those audit reports were incorporated in Exotics.com's Commission filings. According to the complaint, the audit reports, among other things, falsely stated that the audits had been conducted by an independent auditor and in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS). The complaint also alleged that Brinsky and other members of the audit team engaged in a number of improper accounting practices that caused Exotics.com's financial statements to depart from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, Brinsky consented to the entry of final judgment against him. The final judgment against Brinsky enjoins him from violating Rule 2-02 of Regulation S-X and orders him to pay a civil penalty of $20,000. Brinsky also consented to the entry of an Administrative Order, pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, suspending him from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, with a right to apply for reinstatement after two years. The Commission previously obtained judgments by default against two defendants and judgments by consent against six additional defendants. The action remains pending against the remaining four defendants and a relief defendant. For further information, see Litigation Release Nos. 19207 (April 28, 2005) [civil injunctive action filed], 19645 (April 7, 2006) [judgment by default against Exotics.com], 19699 (May 15, 2006) [judgment by consent against Barry F. Duggan], 19957 (January 4, 2007) [judgment by default against Gary Thomas], 21028 (May 7, 2009) [judgment by consent against Edward James Wexler], 21456 (March 19, 2010) [judgments by consent against Stephen P. Corso and Brian K. Rabinovitz], 21490 (April 16, 2010) [judgments by consent against Ingo W. Mueller and Firoz Jinnah] and Exchange Act Release Nos. 59766 (April 14, 2009) [forthwith suspension of Stephen P. Corso, CPA] and 61771 (March 24, 2010) [suspension of Brian K. Rabinovitz, CPA].
1120
+
1121
+
1122
+
1123
+  
1124
+
1125
+
1126
+
1127
+
1128
+
1129
+
1130
+
1131
+
1132
+
1133
+
1134
+
1135
+
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+
1139
+
1140
+
1141
+
1142
+
1143
+
1144
+
1145
+
1146
+
1147
+
1148
+
1149
+ Return to top
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+
1153
+
1154
+ SEC homepage
1155
+
1156
+
1157
+
1158
+
1159
+
1160
+
1161
+
1162
+
1163
+
1164
+
1165
+
1166
+
1167
+
1168
+ About the SEC
1169
+
1170
+
1171
+
1172
+
1173
+
1174
+ Budget & Performance
1175
+
1176
+
1177
+ Careers
1178
+
1179
+
1180
+ Commission Votes
1181
+
1182
+
1183
+ Contact
1184
+
1185
+
1186
+ Contracts
1187
+
1188
+
1189
+
1190
+
1191
+
1192
+
1193
+
1194
+ Transparency
1195
+
1196
+
1197
+
1198
+
1199
+
1200
+ Accessibility & Disability
1201
+
1202
+
1203
+ Super Intelligence
1204
+
1205
+
1206
+ FOIA
1207
+
1208
+
1209
+ Inspector General
1210
+
1211
+
1212
+ No FEAR Act Data
1213
+
1214
+
1215
+ Ombuds
1216
+
1217
+
1218
+ SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance
1219
+
1220
+
1221
+
1222
+
1223
+
1224
+
1225
+
1226
+ Websites
1227
+
1228
+
1229
+
1230
+
1231
+
1232
+ Investor.gov
1233
+
1234
+
1235
+ Related Sites
1236
+
1237
+
1238
+ USA.gov
1239
+
1240
+
1241
+
1242
+
1243
+
1244
+
1245
+
1246
+ Site Information
1247
+
1248
+
1249
+
1250
+
1251
+
1252
+ Plain Writing
1253
+
1254
+
1255
+ Privacy & Security
1256
+
1257
+
1258
+ Site Map
1259
+
1260
+
1261
+
1262
+
1263
+
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+
1271
+
1272
+
1273
+
1274
+
1275
+
1276
+ Stay connected. Sign up for email updates.
1277
+
1278
+
1279
+
1280
+
1281
+
1282
+ Your email address
1283
+
1284
+ Sign Up
1285
+
1286
+
1287
+
1288
+
1289
+
1290
+
1291
+
1292
+
1293
+
1294
+
1295
+
1296
+ X
1297
+
1298
+
1299
+
1300
+
1301
+
1302
+
1303
+
1304
+ Facebook
1305
+
1306
+
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+
1310
+
1311
+
1312
+ Instagram
1313
+
1314
+
1315
+
1316
+
1317
+
1318
+
1319
+
1320
+ RSS
1321
+
1322
+
1323
+
1324
+
1325
+
1326
+
1327
+
1328
+ YouTube
1329
+
1330
+
1331
+
1332
+
1333
+
1334
+
1335
+
1336
+ Email Updates
1337
+
1338
+
1339
+
1340
+
1341
+
1342
+
1343
+
1344
+
1345
+
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+
1349
+
1350
+
1351
+
1352
+
1353
+
1354
+
1355
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3129.pdf ADDED
Binary file (31.9 kB). View file
 
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3129.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
+
12
+
13
+
14
+
15
+
16
+
17
+
18
+
19
+
20
+
21
+
22
+
23
+
24
+
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+
30
+
31
+
32
+
33
+
34
+
35
+
36
+ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
37
+ before the
38
+ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
39
+ SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
40
+ Release No. 61976 / April 23, 2010
41
+ ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING ENFORCEMENT
42
+ Release No. 3129 / April 23, 2010
43
+ ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
44
+ File No. 3-13870
45
+ In the Matter of
46
+ DAVID R. COSGROVE, CMA
47
+ Respondent.
48
+ ____________________________________ :
49
+ :
50
+ :
51
+ :
52
+ :
53
+ :
54
+ :
55
+ ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE
56
+ PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO RULE
57
+ 102(e) OF THE COMMISSION’S RULES OF
58
+ PRACTICE, MAKING FINDINGS, AND
59
+ IMPOSING REMEDIAL SANCTIONS
60
+ I.
61
+ The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) deems it appropriate and in the
62
+ public interest that public administrative proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted against David
63
+ R. Cosgrove (“Respondent” or “Cosgrove”) pursuant to Rule 102(e)(3)(i) of the Commission’s
64
+ Rules of Practice.1
65
+ II.
66
+ In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondent has submitted an Offer
67
+ of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
68
+ purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
69
+ Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
70
+ 1 Rule 102(e)(3)(i) provides, in relevant part, that:
71
+ The Commission, with due regard to the public interest and without preliminary hearing,
72
+ may, by order, . . . suspend from appearing or practicing before it any . . . accountant . . . who has
73
+ been by name . . . permanently enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction, by reason of his
74
+ or her misconduct in an action brought by the Commission, from violating or aiding and abetting
75
+ the violation of any provision of the Federal securities laws or of the rules and regulations
76
+ thereunder.
77
+
78
+
79
+
80
+
81
+
82
+
83
+
84
+
85
+
86
+
87
+
88
+
89
+
90
+
91
+
92
+
93
+
94
+
95
+
96
+
97
+ herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over him and the subject matter of these
98
+ proceedings and the findings contained in paragraph 3 of Section III below, which are admitted,
99
+ Respondent consents to the entry of this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to
100
+ Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial
101
+ Sanctions (“Order”), as set forth below.
102
+ III.
103
+ On the basis of this Order and Respondent’s Offer, the Commission finds that:
104
+ 1. Cosgrove, age 51, is a certified management accountant ("CMA") licensed
105
+ to practice in Canada. At all times relevant to this matter, he was employed by Collins & Aikman
106
+ Corporation ("C&A") in Troy, Michigan. From February 2002 until August 2002, Cosgrove was
107
+ the Vice President of Finance in the North American Plastics Division. From August 2002 until
108
+ October 2004, Cosgrove was the Vice President for Financial Planning and Analysis. From
109
+ October 2004 until September 2005, Cosgrove was the Corporate Controller.
110
+ 2. C&A, a Delaware corporation headquartered in Michigan, manufactured
111
+ and assembled parts used in automobile production. Prior to May 2005, C&A's common stock was
112
+ registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
113
+ ("Exchange Act") and was traded on the New York Stock Exchange. C&A entered bankruptcy in
114
+ May 2005. On June 29, 2005, the Commission deregistered C&A's common stock and granted a
115
+ New York Stock Exchange petition to delist C&A. C&A has subsequently dissolved.
116
+ 3. On March 26, 2007, the Commission filed a complaint against Cosgrove
117
+ and others in SEC v. Collins & Aikman et al (S.D.N.Y.) Civil Action No. 07-2419. On April 20,
118
+ 2010, the Court entered an order permanently enjoining Cosgrove, by consent, from future
119
+ violation of Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 13(b)(5) of the
120
+ Exchange Act, and Rules 13b2-1 and 13b2-2 under the Exchange Act, and from aiding and
121
+ abetting violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, and Rules
122
+ 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. The Court also required Cosgrove to
123
+ pay a civil penalty of $40,000.
124
+ 4. The Commission’s complaint alleged, among other things, that from the
125
+ second quarter of 2002 through the third quarter of 2004 C&A and several of its officers and
126
+ employees, including Cosgrove, engaged in accounting fraud by improperly accounting for rebates
127
+ demanded from suppliers in exchange for future business from C&A. The Commission also
128
+ alleged that C&A induced suppliers to provide false or misleading documentation regarding the
129
+ rebates. The Complaint asserts that Cosgrove advised C&A employees on the language to be used
130
+ in false documents regarding the rebates, knowing that these documents would be used to
131
+ improperly account for the rebates.
132
+ 2
133
+
134
+
135
+
136
+
137
+
138
+
139
+
140
+
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+
145
+
146
+
147
+
148
+
149
+
150
+
151
+
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+
156
+
157
+
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+ IV.
163
+ In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to
164
+ impose the sanction agreed to in Respondent’s Offer.
165
+ Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, effective immediately, that:
166
+ A. Respondent is suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an
167
+ accountant.
168
+ B. After three years from the date of this order, Respondent may request that the
169
+ Commission consider his reinstatement by submitting an application (attention: Office of the
170
+ Chief Accountant) to resume appearing or practicing before the Commission as:
171
+ 1. a preparer or reviewer, or a person responsible for the preparation or review,
172
+ of any public company’s financial statements that are filed with the Commission. Such an
173
+ application must satisfy the Commission that Respondent’s work in his practice before the
174
+ Commission will be reviewed either by the independent audit committee of the public company for
175
+ which he works or in some other acceptable manner, as long as he practices before the
176
+ Commission in this capacity; and/or
177
+ 2. an independent accountant. Such an application must satisfy the
178
+ Commission that:
179
+ (a) Respondent, or the public accounting firm with which he/she is
180
+ associated, is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“Board”) in
181
+ accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and such registration continues to be effective;
182
+ (b) Respondent, or the registered public accounting firm with which
183
+ he/she is associated, has been inspected by the Board and that inspection did not identify any
184
+ criticisms of or potential defects in the Respondent’s or the firm’s quality control system that
185
+ would indicate that the Respondent will not receive appropriate supervision;
186
+ (c) Respondent has resolved all disciplinary issues with the Board, and
187
+ has complied with all terms and conditions of any sanctions imposed by the Board (other than
188
+ reinstatement by the Commission); and
189
+ (d) Respondent acknowledges his/her responsibility, as long as
190
+ Respondent appears or practices before the Commission as an independent accountant, to comply
191
+ with all requirements of the Commission and the Board, including, but not limited to, all
192
+ requirements relating to registration, inspections, concurring partner reviews and quality control
193
+ standards.
194
+ C. The Commission will consider an application by Respondent to resume
195
+ appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant provided that he is in
196
+ possession of an accounting license in good standing and he has resolved any disciplinary
197
+ 3
198
+
199
+
200
+
201
+
202
+
203
+
204
+
205
+
206
+
207
+
208
+ issues with any applicable licensing authority. However, if the resolution of any disciplinary
209
+ action by a licensing authority is dependent on reinstatement by the Commission, the
210
+ Commission will consider an application on its other merits. The Commission’s review may
211
+ include consideration of, in addition to the matters referenced above, any other matters
212
+ relating to Respondent’s character, integrity, professional conduct, or qualifications to appear
213
+ or practice before the Commission.
214
+ By the Commission.
215
+ E l i z a b e t h M . M u r p h y
216
+ S e c r e t a r y
217
+ 4
218
+
raw/aaer/2010/AAER-3130.pdf ADDED
Binary file (36.2 kB). View file