protocol.jsonl

{"id": "det-001", "criterion": "effectiveness", "predicate": "detects_own_marking", "question": "Given an asset marked by provider P, does P's own detector return DETECTED?", "labels": ["DETECTED", "NOT_DETECTED", "ERROR"], "why": "Baseline. A detector that cannot read its own marking fails before interoperability is in question."}
{"id": "det-002", "criterion": "interoperability", "predicate": "detects_foreign_marking", "question": "Given an asset marked by provider Q, does P's detector return DETECTED?", "labels": ["DETECTED", "NOT_DETECTED", "ERROR"], "why": "This is the Commitment 2 obligation. It is the one nobody currently measures."}
{"id": "det-003", "criterion": "interoperability", "predicate": "agrees_on_negative", "question": "Given an unmarked asset, do P and Q both return NOT_DETECTED?", "labels": ["AGREE", "DISAGREE", "ERROR"], "why": "False positives are the failure mode that destroys trust in a detector network."}
{"id": "det-004", "criterion": "robustness", "predicate": "survives_transform", "question": "After a declared transform (recompress, crop, resize, screenshot, re-encode), does the detector still return DETECTED?", "labels": ["SURVIVES", "DESTROYED", "ERROR"], "why": "Shares its transform ladder with GSPC provenance (ProvBench), so the two axes are comparable."}
{"id": "det-005", "criterion": "reliability", "predicate": "stable_across_runs", "question": "Across k repeated runs on the identical asset, is the verdict identical every time?", "labels": ["STABLE", "UNSTABLE", "ERROR"], "why": "A non-deterministic detector cannot support a compliance claim."}
{"id": "det-006", "criterion": "effectiveness", "predicate": "declares_absence_honestly", "question": "Where no marking is present, does the detector say so rather than guessing?", "labels": ["DECLARES_ABSENT", "GUESSES", "ERROR"], "why": "The UNMEASURED discipline, applied to detectors."}