Image 2 displays four distinct cake-like objects arranged in two visible horizontal rows on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of cakes on a tray, which does not match the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The arrangement is based on depth and stacking rather than distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each row containing clearly recognizable cake objects arranged left-to-right. The cakes are visually grouped in a manner consistent with the reference's grouping principle, and there are five visible instances of cakes that meet the criteria.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of cakes. The cakes are scattered and partially consumed, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered cake pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains a single cake slice on a plate, not arranged in horizontal rows or groups. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of multiple distinct horizontal bands of cakes.


Image 2 contains only one visible cake instance and lacks any clear horizontal grouping or multiple distinct rows of cakes.


Image 2 contains a pile of cakes on a plate, which does not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right grouping required by the reference style.


Image 2 contains cakes but they are irregularly arranged on plates without clear horizontal rows, and the objects are not distinctly grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display multiple distinct horizontal bands of cakes; instead, it shows a single elongated cake train with no clear grouping into separate rows.


Image 2 displays four distinct cakes arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinct cake objects arranged left-to-right on a tray, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of cake-like objects, each row containing 2-3 clearly separable instances that a person would recognize as grouped left-to-right. The arrangement supports stable row and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 5 distinct cake objects, visually grouped left-to-right in a clear and recognizable manner, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not contain any visible instances of cakes. The objects present are snacks and food items, none of which match the 'cake' category.


Image 2 contains a single large cake and several smaller items on a table, but lacks the distinct horizontal bands of cakes required. The arrangement is irregular and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a single, vertically stacked cake with no visible horizontal bands or groups of cakes. It does not meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 shows a plate of assorted cakes in a scattered, irregular arrangement. There are no distinct horizontal bands or groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only three visible cakes, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of cakes and does not exhibit any horizontal bands or groupings that could be interpreted as rows of cakes.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of cakes; instead, it shows a single cake on a table with floral decorations, which does not match the required grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cakes arranged along a table in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable cake instances arranged left-to-right in each row.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with cakes on a table, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle; cakes are scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of cakes; the cakes are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly placed cakes on plates, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only one visible cake instance, which is not arranged in any discernible horizontal rows or groups. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows motorcycles in a scattered, non-uniform arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows motorcycles arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of motorcycles; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groupings suitable for stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping with 7 visible instances, matching the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping with 8 visible instances, matching the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of six visible motorcycles, each row a distinct left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality and no evidence of depth or irregular arrangement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The motorcycles are visibly separate and identifiable, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible instances.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of motorcycles; the objects are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows motorcycles arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are positioned along a road and appear to be in a single lane, lacking the distinct left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays six clearly visible motorcycles arranged in a single, stable horizontal row on a rocky surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows motorcycles arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the sidewalk and building facade, creating a linear arrangement viewed from depth rather than distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a clear single horizontal row of six distinguishable motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows motorcycles arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are grouped by relative y-position and perspective, not by clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains multiple motorcycles but they are scattered, occluded, and not arranged in clear horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows motorcycles scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle for acceptance.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of visible carrot chunks, each forming a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 distinguishable carrot instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six carrot pieces arranged left-to-right on a wooden surface, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered, occluded carrots within a plastic bag, lacking any clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a scattered and overlapping arrangement of carrots without clear horizontal bands or groupings that match the reference's row-based structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of carrot objects: one with whole carrots and another with flower-shaped carrot slices, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and thus does not match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered, chopped carrot pieces without any discernible horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinct carrot sticks, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and the objects are mixed with other fruits, making it an irregular layout.


Image 2 contains scattered, irregularly placed carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or row structure.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces without clear horizontal grouping, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right bands of carrots.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces in a bowl, lacking any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows that would match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains white radishes, not carrots. The visible objects do not match the target category.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot slices without a clear horizontal row structure, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible carrot sticks in the bottom-left compartment of the bento box, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without any clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly arranged carrots, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a few scattered carrot pieces within a dish, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 4 visible carrot instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible carrot instances arranged left-to-right on a cutting board, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces mixed with other vegetables, lacking distinct horizontal bands or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible carrot instances, which is below the required minimum of 4. Additionally, these carrots are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a few scattered carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, failing to match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 contains a single horizontal band of carrots, but the arrangement is irregular and lacks the structured, clearly defined rows seen in the reference image. The layout does not support stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 4 visible carrot instances, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots with no clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right group, with 8 visible banana instances that meet the grouping criteria.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a dense, irregular pile of bananas without distinct horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of banana slices without any clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible banana instances.


Image 2 shows a cluster of bananas in a natural, irregular arrangement. The objects do not form distinct horizontal rows or a grid layout suitable for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular pile of bananas without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of bananas; instead, it shows a single vertical bunch and another bunch in the background, which do not meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of green bananas, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible banana instances.


Image 2 contains scattered banana slices with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of bananas, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are piled together without clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display bananas arranged in distinct horizontal rows; instead, they are piled and scattered across the scene.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of banana bunches on a table, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal bands and distinguishable instances.


Image 2 shows bananas in a frying pan, which is not a horizontal row layout. The bananas are clustered together and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of bananas that meet the criteria for distinct, left-to-right groups. The bananas are either hanging in bunches or mixed with other fruits, lacking clear, countable rows.


Image 2 shows scattered bananas on the ground, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 6 visible banana instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right group, with 7 visible banana instances that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six wine glasses arranged left-to-right on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded wine glasses with no clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for structured rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible wine glasses on a wooden bar surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains wine glasses but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and do not follow the grouping principle of Image 1.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged along a wooden bar in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains multiple wine glasses, but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and grouped primarily by proximity rather than a structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible wine glasses, matching the reference's grouping principle with no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible wine glasses arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses, each row containing 4 clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible wine glasses on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains wine glasses but they are not arranged in any clear, distinct horizontal rows. The objects appear scattered and do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged along a table viewed in depth, creating an apparent row structure due to perspective rather than distinct horizontal bands. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right rows that would support stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains wine glasses but they are irregularly placed, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and do not meet the grouping principle of clearly defined left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered wine glasses without clear horizontal rows, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are positioned along a table viewed from the side, creating an apparent row only due to perspective, not a genuine left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the table's length rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains only two wine glasses, not the required 4-8 instances. The objects are not arranged in visible horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged along a table in depth, creating a perspective-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses, each row containing 4 visible and clearly distinguishable wine glasses arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses on the table, with 7 clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 contains scattered wine glasses without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


The wine glasses are arranged in a depth layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' arise from perspective and depth rather than a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are grouped along the counter and appear to be viewed from a side angle, making it unsuitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains only two sheep, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is not clearly grouped into horizontal rows and lacks the structured layout seen in the reference image.


Image 2 shows a close-up of sheep with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The arrangement is irregular, with overlapping and occluded sheep, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows sheep in a pile or scattered arrangement, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are occluded and lack clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains four sheep, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four sheep, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right organization and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 shows sheep in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. There are five visible sheep instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 6 visibly distinguishable sheep instances.


Image 2 shows sheep in a barn setting with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The sheep are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the sheep are irregularly scattered and lack clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. There are five visible sheep instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows.


Image 2 contains only two sheep, which is below the minimum of four required visible instances. Additionally, they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible despite visible instances.


Image 2 shows sheep in a tight, irregular cluster with no distinct horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. There are five visible sheep instances, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains sheep but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they are scattered and grazing without a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered across the field without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of organized horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows sheep in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains sheep but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with some sheep standing and one lying down, lacking a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows sheep in an irregular, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear left-to-right groups or distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four sheep arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on grass, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows sheep in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains sheep but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The visible sheep appear scattered and not grouped into clear left-to-right bands, failing the 'horizontal_rows' layout requirement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep grazing, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable sheep instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sheep are irregularly scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four sheep arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on grassy terrain, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of sheep on grass, with 5 visibly distinct sheep arranged left-to-right in a natural grouping that supports ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's horizontal band principle.


Image 2 displays five sheep arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the frame, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered in a natural setting with no clear horizontal rows or structured grouping. The arrangement does not match the reference's horizontal band principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sheep are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible despite visible instances.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the sheep are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four sheep arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sheep; the animals are grouped irregularly and do not form distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based ordinal description.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible sheep, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and lacks the structured grouping principle seen in the reference image.


Image 2 contains four sheep but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular, with two adult sheep and two lambs scattered across the frame without a discernible left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The five visible sheep are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row structure.


Image 2 contains four sheep, but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The layout is irregular and lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 has only one visible horizontal band of sheep, with 3 distinguishable instances. While the layout matches the reference's horizontal grouping principle, it does not meet the minimum requirement of 4 visible sheep instances.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered across the field without any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows; the layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered sheep with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows, failing the grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered sheep without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered orange slices without a clear horizontal row structure, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular pile of oranges without any visible horizontal bands or structured rows.


Image 2 contains only a few scattered oranges with no clear horizontal bands or groupings that match the reference's structured rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the defined left-to-right groups required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of oranges without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded orange objects without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of orange slices, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are eight visible orange instances, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows four oranges arranged in a circular pattern, not in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and overlapping orange instances without clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded oranges without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered and piled oranges without clear horizontal rows, failing the grouping principle.


Image 2 contains four visible oranges, but they are arranged irregularly on a single horizontal line without distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute separate bands. The layout does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of multiple horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of orange objects: sliced peels in the foreground and whole/peeled oranges in the background, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of oranges, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects, including whole oranges and a pomegranate, but lacks clearly defined horizontal bands or rows that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered orange instances without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered orange objects (slices and whole) without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of orange objects, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of orange objects: a top row with three mandarins and a bottom row with three more, forming a clear left-to-right grouping. The objects are visibly distinguishable, meet the count requirement (4-8), and follow the reference's horizontal band principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of oranges; instead, the oranges are clustered in a pile-like arrangement without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains four visible orange instances but they are irregularly scattered without any clear horizontal grouping or row structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible orange fruits (likely oranges or tangerines), each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows two oranges in a single horizontal row, but the count is below the required minimum of 4 visible instances.


Image 2 contains scattered orange fruit pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects (whole and sliced), with no clear horizontal bands or groupings that match the reference's structured rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges, with a total of seven visible instances. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded orange objects with no clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded orange objects without a clear horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows. The orange objects (lemons) are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of orange objects: the top row contains four oranges, and the bottom row has one orange. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with each orange visibly distinguishable and supporting stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered orange slices with no clear horizontal grouping. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions, and the objects are not visibly organized into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 6 visible orange instances.


Image 2 contains scattered orange objects (pineapple chunks) without a clear left-to-right horizontal grouping, and thus does not match the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 contains scattered oranges on a table, but they do not form any visible horizontal bands or groups that would constitute distinct rows. The arrangement lacks the structured horizontal layout required by the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered orange objects (oranges) without a clear horizontal row structure. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects (eggs) without any clear horizontal grouping or bands. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects (strawberries and marmalade), not forming any clear horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 shows a blurred market scene with scattered and occluded orange objects, not forming distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects (tomatoes) in the background, not forming any clear horizontal bands or groups that would match the reference's structured row layout.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with slices arranged in a circular pattern, not horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with no visible horizontal rows of multiple pizzas, thus failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with irregularly arranged toppings and no clear horizontal rows of distinct pizza objects.


Image 2 shows a single, irregularly arranged pizza with no distinct horizontal rows of objects. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with irregularly placed toppings, not distinct horizontal rows of pizzas. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered pizzas without clear horizontal rows, with some overlapping and occlusion, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single plate with pizza slices and toppings, but lacks the horizontal rows of distinct pizzas required. The arrangement is irregular and does not meet the grouping principle for 'pizza' objects.


Image 2 displays four pizzas arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each containing two pizzas. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with each pizza visibly distinguishable and supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single pizza cut into four slices, but the arrangement does not form distinct horizontal rows. The slices are arranged in a semi-circular pattern rather than left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible pizza slices, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement does not form any clear horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 shows scattered pizza slices and partial pizzas without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 does not display a horizontal row layout of pizzas; instead, it shows a single pizza with figurines placed on top, which does not meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 shows pizzas arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to perspective and depth, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows scattered pizza slices on plates without a clear horizontal row structure. The arrangement lacks the distinct, stable left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays multiple pizzas in a collage format with no clear horizontal rows or groupings that follow the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with slices, not distinct horizontal bands of pizzas. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of multiple visible rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of pizzas; instead, it shows scattered and overlapping pizza slices without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display any horizontal rows of pizzas; instead, it shows a single pizza with some slices missing and other food items in the background, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal grouping.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with no visible horizontal rows of distinct pizza instances. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizza slices, each row containing four clearly visible and recognizable pizza pieces arranged left-to-right.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of pizza objects, each a clear left-to-right group. The pizzas are visibly separate and recognizable without object boxes, meeting the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of pizzas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of pizzas, each a clear left-to-right group. The pizzas are visibly separate and recognizable as individual items within the rows, meeting the criteria for stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single pizza, not multiple distinct horizontal bands of pizzas as required. The layout does not visually follow the grouping principle of 1-4 horizontal rows with 4-8 distinguishable instances.


Image 2 does not contain any visible pizza objects and thus cannot meet the criteria for horizontal rows or any other layout type involving pizzas.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with slices arranged radially, not in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single pizza, not multiple distinct horizontal bands of pizzas. It lacks the required structure of 1-4 visible horizontal rows with 4-8 distinguishable instances.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible pizza slices, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement does not form any clear horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal arrangement of pizza slices, but it lacks the distinct, stable row structure required. The slices are closely packed and appear as a single group rather than clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays exactly two horizontal rows of pizza slices, each a distinct left-to-right group, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable pizza pieces.


Image 2 shows scattered pizza slices on plates without a clear horizontal row structure. The arrangement lacks the distinct, left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains scattered and partially occluded pizza slices with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas, each row containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable pizza instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with slices, not multiple distinct horizontal bands of pizzas. The arrangement is irregular and does not meet the criteria for horizontal rows or grid layout.


Image 2 contains scattered pizza slices and plates, not clearly defined horizontal rows of pizzas.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of pizzas. The items appear scattered and irregularly arranged, lacking the distinct left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays four distinct mini pizzas arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a wooden board, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle; it shows a scattered arrangement of pizzas without clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered pizza slices with no clear horizontal grouping or consistent row structure. The arrangement does not support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows pizzas in a display case but lacks the clear, distinct horizontal rows of 'pizza' objects required. The arrangement is irregular and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any horizontal rows of pizzas; instead, it shows a single pizza in a pan with no visible grouping or arrangement that matches the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows a single plate with three pizza slices, which do not form any visible horizontal rows or groups. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the structured horizontal bands required for acceptance.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; pizzas are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizza objects on the table, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of pizzas. The pizzas are scattered and partially obscured, lacking distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of pizza objects. The pizzas are scattered and not arranged in a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizza slices on a table, each row containing 3 visible and recognizable pizza pieces. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping principle, supporting stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizza slices on plates, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of pizza objects. The pizzas are scattered and not arranged in a clear left-to-right grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal band of pizzas on the table, but only 3 visibly distinct pizza instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle in terms of a horizontal row, but the count is insufficient.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of pizza objects on plates, with 6 clearly distinguishable pizzas arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a single visible pizza instance, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable objects. The layout is not structured into horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 shows pizzas in stacked boxes viewed from depth, not distinct horizontal rows of visible pizzas.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of pizza objects arranged in horizontal rows. The pizza slices are scattered and not grouped into distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered broccoli without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the broccoli appears scattered and lacks clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces without any visible horizontal grouping or distinct rows, failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 does not display broccoli in horizontal rows; the objects are irregularly scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows scattered broccoli pieces without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of broccoli objects; instead, it shows a close-up of broccoli with no clear grouping into distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces mixed with noodles and shrimp, lacking any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but the objects are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains broccoli but lacks visible horizontal rows; the objects are irregularly scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered broccoli pieces mixed with meat and other ingredients, lacking any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of broccoli; the objects are irregularly scattered and mixed with other vegetables.


Image 2 shows scattered broccoli pieces mixed with quinoa, lacking any clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows scattered broccoli florets without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains broccoli but lacks visible horizontal rows; the objects are scattered and not arranged in stable, recognizable bands.


Image 2 contains broccoli but lacks visible horizontal rows; the objects are irregularly scattered without clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains broccoli but does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the objects are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains broccoli but lacks visible horizontal rows; the objects are irregularly distributed and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but the objects are irregularly scattered and do not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces mixed with other vegetables and no discernible horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display broccoli in any discernible horizontal rows; the broccoli is scattered and not grouped into left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces without clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout requirement.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but they are irregularly scattered on the plate without forming distinct horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces without clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered books without any clear horizontal rows or groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible books arranged left-to-right on a window sill, flanked by stuffed animals. The layout meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with a stable ordinal description and no evidence of depth or irregular arrangement.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of books, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are piled and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded books, not clearly defined horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows books arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The books are stacked vertically on the left and right sides of the desk, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of books. The visible books are scattered, occluded, or part of a larger pile, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of books. The books appear in a vertical stack and are not distinctly grouped into visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows books arranged on shelves in a depth layout, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of 'book' objects.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'book' objects arranged in horizontal rows or a grid layout. The objects present are flowers and other miscellaneous items, none of which qualify as books.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of 'book' objects. The books are scattered, stacked, or placed in a manner that does not conform to the required grouping principle of distinct left-to-right rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'book' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The items present do not meet the criteria for a clear, left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of books on the coffee table, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The books are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of 'book' objects and does not follow the required horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only three zebras, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and lacks visible horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; it shows a close-up of zebras with no clear left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; it shows zebras in a scattered arrangement without clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible zebra instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The zebras are irregularly positioned, with no clear left-to-right groups that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are closely packed and occluded, lacking distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the zebras are scattered and not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a horizontal row layout of zebras; instead, it shows two zebras in a side-by-side arrangement that does not form a visible horizontal band or group.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of zebras, with 5 visibly distinct individuals arranged left to right in a stable, recognizable group.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in two distinct horizontal bands, each a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows two zebras in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The objects do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows zebras in a natural, irregular grouping with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows zebras in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows zebras in a natural, irregular grouping near a water source. The arrangement does not form distinct horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference's group portrait style.


The zebras are arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' arise from perspective and relative distance, not a structured left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are irregularly positioned and do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows zebras in a scattered, irregular arrangement without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows zebras in a natural, irregular formation with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout matching the reference.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the zebras are closely grouped and partially occluded, lacking distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows zebras in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout matching the reference group portrait.


Image 2 contains zebras but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows; instead, they are scattered and lying in various orientations.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are clustered together without clear left-to-right groupings or distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains zebras but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with one zebra lying on its back and others standing in a scattered formation.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the zebras are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The zebras are arranged in a scattered, irregular pattern without clear left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows zebras scattered without clear horizontal rows, with no more than two visible bands and insufficient distinct groupings to match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are irregularly spaced and do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on grass, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on a grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only three zebras, not the required 4-8 visible instances. The arrangement is scattered and lacks distinct horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The zebras are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible zebras, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured.


Image 2 displays four zebras arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, with clear left-to-right groupings that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are irregularly grouped and do not form distinct left-to-right rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras grazing on grass, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable zebra instances arranged in a stable left-to-right group within each row.


Image 2 contains only three zebras, which is below the required minimum of four. The arrangement does not form visible horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six zebras standing in a grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The five visible zebras are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row drinking at a waterhole, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows zebras in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The objects are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras in a single, clearly visible horizontal row drinking at a water source, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of zebras; the zebras are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 5 visible zebra instances.


Image 2 displays four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row within the grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows five zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the frame, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, with four in the front row and one slightly behind, forming a clear left-to-right grouping that aligns with the reference's horizontal arrangement principle.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five zebras in a natural setting, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right organization and no overlapping or depth-based arrangement.


Image 2 shows five zebras in a single, clearly defined horizontal row drinking at a water source, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


The zebras are arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. Their apparent 'rows' arise from relative distance and perspective rather than distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays four zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row crossing the road, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible zebra instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible and distinguishable elephant instances, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The layout aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cows in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, with a total of five clearly visible and separately distinguishable cow instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible elephants, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable elephants, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the elephants are clustered closely together without distinct left-to-right groupings, and the arrangement lacks the stable ordinal descriptions required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with a total of five visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible and distinguishable cow instances, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The layout supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows feeding, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable cow instances arranged in a stable left-to-right group within each row.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the elephants are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows elephants in a scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands, and the layout does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cows in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The visible instances are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands as required.


Image 2 shows four distinct cows arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row against a blue sky, matching the reference's grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The five visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with four and two visible instances respectively, clearly grouped from left to right in a manner consistent with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct elephants arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains four visible elephants but lacks a clear, stable horizontal row structure. The arrangement is irregular, with the elephants positioned in a natural, non-structured grouping that does not support consistent row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of 5 clearly distinguishable cows, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right ordinal arrangement.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the elephants are arranged in a scattered, irregular formation without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows elephants arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are grouped by perspective and depth rather than a clear left-to-right horizontal arrangement.


Image 2 shows cows in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The visible cows are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cows in a scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows, and the visible instances do not form stable left-to-right groups as required.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable elephants, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable cows, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with a clear left-to-right grouping in each. The four visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row structure that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of cows without clear horizontal bands or groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the elephants are arranged in a natural, irregular formation rather than distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cows in a natural, irregular grouping with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 contains only a single cow and does not display any horizontal rows or groups of cows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with six visibly distinguishable cow instances.


Image 2 contains elephants but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The elephants appear scattered and grouped by proximity rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands, failing to meet the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout requirement.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable cows, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, with four and two visible instances respectively, clearly grouped from left to right in a natural field setting.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The four visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; cows are scattered and lack clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal row layout of elephants. The elephants are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinct elephant sculptures arranged on cloud-shaped bases, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with a clear left-to-right grouping in each. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows elephants arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positions along the path, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of cows; instead, it shows a single cow with people around it, lacking the structured grouping principle required.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable cows, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows five distinct cows arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable elephants walking left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cows scattered without clear horizontal rows, with some overlapping and occlusion, failing to meet the structured grouping criteria.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible elephants, does not display clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured into distinct bands.


Image 2 contains multiple cows but they are not arranged in any clear, stable horizontal rows. The cows appear scattered and grouped by proximity rather than a structured layout.


Image 2 shows a clear horizontal row of five distinguishable elephants walking left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the cows are scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of 5 distinct cows, clearly arranged left-to-right in a natural field setting, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows in a grassy field, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable cow instances arranged in stable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible cows arranged in a single, stable horizontal row behind metal bars, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct elephants arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable elephants, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows four distinct cows arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the elephants are scattered and do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable elephants, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with four visible in the foreground and two in the background, forming clear left-to-right groupings that match the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 shows cows scattered across the field without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows five distinct cows arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable cows in an open field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the elephants are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the elephants are scattered and grouped irregularly, not forming clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows five distinct cows arranged in a single, clear horizontal row across the grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal band of cows walking left to right, with 7 visibly distinct cows forming a stable group that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows elephants arranged along a road viewed in depth, creating a linear perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of clearly defined left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible umbrellas, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular and clustered rather than structured into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible potted plants, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible umbrellas, each row containing 2-3 clearly recognizable umbrella instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinguishable straw umbrellas arranged left-to-right on a gravel surface, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only one visible umbrella, which does not form any discernible horizontal rows or groups. The single umbrella is not part of a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of umbrellas, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible umbrella instances.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of potted plants with no clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four distinct umbrellas, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right organization.


Image 2 contains only a single potted plant, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row structure of umbrellas. The umbrellas are scattered and partially occluded, with no distinct left-to-right groupings that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows umbrellas arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are clustered under the umbrellas rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured, recognizable row layout.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; it features a single kitten with some greenery and pots in the background, but no clear grouping of potted plants as required.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of potted plants; the plants are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the potted plants are scattered and do not form a structured layout.


Image 2 contains scattered umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible umbrellas, with each row containing clearly recognizable left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of thatched umbrellas, each row containing 3 visible instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with stable ordinal descriptions for both rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows or a grid layout. The objects present do not meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout types.


Image 2 shows scattered umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only three visible potted plants, not within a clear horizontal row structure. The arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of red and white umbrellas, with each row containing clearly recognizable groups of 3 umbrellas. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single potted plant, not meeting the requirement of 4-8 visible instances. It also lacks any horizontal grouping or rows.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible potted plants, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement does not form distinct horizontal rows and appears irregular.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of potted plants; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of white umbrellas, each row containing 3 visible instances, aligning with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows potted plants along a depth perspective on steps, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clearly defined left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible umbrellas, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and the arrangement is irregular rather than following a distinct left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of potted plants; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four distinct umbrellas held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured row layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible umbrellas, with four clearly distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 has only one visible horizontal band of umbrellas, but it contains fewer than 4 instances and does not match the reference's multi-row structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of potted plants: one along the top wall and another on the lower left side, each forming a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of potted plants; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects, with no clear horizontal rows of umbrellas. The visible 'umbrellas' are part of a market stall canopy and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows potted plants arranged along a depth perspective on a sidewalk, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows potted plants along a depth perspective aisle, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 does not display any horizontal bands of potted plants; the plants are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows. The plants present are either not clearly identifiable as potted or do not follow the required grouping principle.


Image 2 has a single horizontal band of potted plants, but only 3 visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. The arrangement is clear and stable, but the count does not meet the criteria.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 contains scattered potted plants without any visible horizontal grouping or distinct rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of colorful umbrellas, each row containing 4 visibly separate and recognizable umbrella instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 visible umbrellas, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and do not form a structured grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the potted plants are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible umbrellas, with 5 clearly identifiable instances. The arrangement follows a genuine left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective distortion, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 shows scattered and overlapping umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, making it不符合要求的水平排列原则。


Image 2 contains no visible potted plants and does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference.


Image 2 shows scattered umbrellas among a crowd, lacking distinct horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered potted plants with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 lacks visible potted plants and does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 shows orange umbrellas arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not a left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered potted plants with no clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinct thatched umbrellas on a beach, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured row layout.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants present are either singular, scattered, or part of a vertical arrangement and do not form the required structured rows.


Image 2 contains potted plants but they are scattered and not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants; the plants are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with people walking on a tiled path, not distinct horizontal rows of umbrellas. The umbrellas are carried by individuals and do not form stable, left-to-right groups as required.


Image 2 has only one visible horizontal band of potted plants, and the count is below the required 4-8 instances. The layout does not meet the criteria for multiple distinct rows.


Image 2 lacks visible instances of the target category 'umbrella' and does not exhibit a horizontal row layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of umbrellas; the umbrellas are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered potted plants without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects are not grouped in left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 does not display any horizontal rows of potted plants; instead, it features a vertical arrangement with scattered objects and no clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and not arranged in a structured, recognizable row format.


Image 2 shows potted plants arranged along a depth perspective near a window, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered potted plants without any visible horizontal grouping or distinct rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of people holding umbrellas, with 5 clearly visible instances. The arrangement follows a genuine left-to-right grouping principle without depth or scattered elements.


Image 2 shows umbrellas carried by people in a depth layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered red umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the plants are scattered and not grouped in a manner matching the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present do not match the target category or layout requirements.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible umbrellas, with 6 clearly distinguishable instances forming stable left-to-right groups that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible umbrellas, not enough to meet the 4-8 instance requirement. The arrangement is irregular and scattered, not forming clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded umbrellas in the background, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that match the reference's layout principle.


Image 2 contains only three visible umbrellas, not the required 4-8. They are scattered and do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and do not form a structured left-to-right grouping that would support row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the single potted plant present is not part of a structured grouping that meets the specified criteria.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible potted plant, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The single potted plant does not form any horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 contains no visible potted plants and does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects with no clear horizontal rows of umbrellas; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows. The only plants present are small decorative arrangements on the dining table, which do not meet the criteria for 'horizontal bands' or 'real left-to-right groups' of potted plants.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'umbrella'.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows. The plants present are either individual or part of a larger decorative setup without clear grouping into distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows potted plants along a wall in a depth layout, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows potted plants at varying depths and positions, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows potted plants arranged along a window sill, which is a depth-based layout rather than horizontal rows. The plants are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would constitute visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered donuts without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible despite visible instances of the target category.


Image 2 displays four distinct donuts arranged in two clear horizontal rows, each row containing two donuts. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping that supports ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's horizontal band principle.


Image 2 contains only 3 donuts, which is below the required minimum of 4. Additionally, they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows that would support stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct donut objects arranged in two clear horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands. Each row is a recognizable left-to-right group, and the objects are visibly distinguishable within the specified count range.


Image 2 contains four donut pieces but they are irregularly scattered without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, failing to match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 displays four donuts arranged in two clear horizontal rows, each containing two distinct donuts. The layout follows a stable left-to-right grouping within each row, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances and matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows donuts in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four donuts arranged in two clear horizontal rows, each containing two distinct donuts. The layout follows a simple left-to-right grouping principle, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances and a stable row structure.


Image 2 shows donuts in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 contains four donuts but lacks any clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The arrangement is irregular, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible donuts, does not form 1-4 distinct horizontal bands, and lacks a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows a close-up of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The objects are clustered together without distinct left-to-right groupings, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows four donuts but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, making it不符合要求的水平排列原则。


Image 2 contains only a single donut, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of donuts, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based and does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing 4 clearly visible and recognizable donuts, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains a single large donut with three smaller ones, but they do not form any clear horizontal rows or bands. The arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the donuts are irregularly scattered without clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains only two visible donuts, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and lacks the structured grouping principle seen in the reference image.


Image 2 displays four visible donuts arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right groupings. The objects are separately distinguishable and support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings, making it不符合要求的水平排列.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible donuts, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four clearly distinguishable donuts with candles, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows donuts in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is along a conveyor belt, which does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains a single horizontal band of donuts, but the arrangement is not visually obvious as a distinct row separate from the packaging and background clutter. The objects are not clearly left-to-right grouped in a way that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of donuts, which does not match the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image.


Image 2 contains four visible donuts but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The objects are scattered across two plates without a stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal structure.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows donuts arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the z-axis (depth), not the x-axis (horizontal bands).


Image 2 contains a single, irregularly shaped basket of donuts without any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 does not contain visible donuts; it shows bread-like items and other food, none of which match the target category.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible donuts, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement does not form clear horizontal rows and appears irregular.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each clearly recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible donuts that are separately distinguishable.