Image 2 shows scattered cars in a parking lot with no clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows scattered cars along a street with no clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based perspective along a road, not in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' as required.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of 'car' objects. The cars are scattered and occluded, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'car' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The cars present are scattered and do not form a structured grouping that matches the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 shows cars arranged along a road viewed in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is linear and perspective-based, not matching the required horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are positioned along the background and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars scattered in a parking lot with no clear horizontal grouping. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars visible through windows, but they are arranged in a depth perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of five distinct bowl-like compartments, forming two visible rows that align with the reference's grouping principle. The objects are recognizable as separate and stable groups without reliance on depth or vertical stacking.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible bowls arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a woven placemat, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls, but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows. The bowls appear scattered and grouped by context (e.g., cooking ingredients) rather than a structured layout.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of four distinct 'bowl' objects, forming two visible rows. Each row consists of left-to-right groups that are easily recognizable without object boxes or clustering. The layout supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only three visible 'bowl' instances, and they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The objects appear scattered rather than grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without a clear horizontal row structure, and the visible instances do not form distinct left-to-right groups that support stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing visible food items. The arrangement supports clear left-to-right ordinal descriptions, and the total count of visible bowl instances (4) meets the criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 contains four visible bowls, but they are arranged irregularly without clear horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains four visible 'bowl' instances, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with objects scattered and overlapping, failing to meet the criteria for a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'bowl'.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible, horizontally aligned 'bowl' objects on a single, stable row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of 'bowl' objects. The visible bowls are part of a cooking scene with no clear left-to-right grouping or distinct horizontal bands, and they do not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls, but they are not arranged in clear horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with bowls placed at different heights and positions on the table, failing to meet the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls, but they are scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing clearly distinguishable food items. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains four bowls, but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows. The layout is irregular and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each row containing 3-4 clearly identifiable and left-to-right grouped bowl instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 has a single horizontal row of 3 visible bowls, matching the reference's grouping principle. However, it is rejected because the row count is below the minimum of 4 required instances.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls, but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with bowls placed at different heights and without a consistent left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible 'bowl' objects, each row containing 3 clearly recognizable and left-to-right grouped bowls, meeting the criteria for horizontal rows with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 contains only three visible 'bowl' instances, which is below the required minimum of four. Additionally, these bowls are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each row containing 2-3 clearly identifiable bowl instances arranged left-to-right in a stable, recognizable pattern.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls, but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with bowls placed at various positions on the table without a consistent left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of bowls and cakes along a table, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects, with no clear horizontal bands of bowls. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each row containing 3 clearly identifiable and left-to-right grouped bowl instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each containing a different food item. The bowls are clearly grouped left-to-right in each row, and there are six separately distinguishable bowl instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 contains only one visible bowl, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls, with no clear horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings that meet the specified criteria.


Image 2 contains bowls, but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and grouped by proximity rather than a structured layout.


Image 2 contains bowls, but they are scattered and not arranged in clear horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls, with no clear horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible 'bowl' objects on the table, each row containing 3-4 bowls arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable group. The layout meets the criteria for horizontal rows with 4-8 visible instances and aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only scattered objects and no visible horizontal bands of bowls. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered bowls without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 4 visible 'bowl' objects on the table, clearly arranged from left to right in a real group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of bowls on the table, with 6 distinguishable visible instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each row containing 4 clearly distinguishable items arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontal arrangement of bowls. The bowls are scattered and grouped irregularly around the table, lacking distinct left-to-right rows that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls on the dining table, with 6 clearly identifiable instances. The arrangement follows a left-to-right grouping principle that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with bowls arranged in a single, dense layer across the foreground, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are too scattered and occluded to support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each row containing 3 clearly distinguishable bowl instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'bowl' objects arranged in horizontal rows or any discernible grouping principle matching the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed bowls, lacking distinct horizontal rows or a grid layout. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without any clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible bowls arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only a few bowls placed irregularly on the window sill, with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a market scene with scattered bowls of various items, lacking any clear horizontal rows or structured groupings. The objects are irregularly placed and do not form recognizable left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing 2-3 visible instances, arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of 'bowl' objects; the bowls are scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows scattered cups with no clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four visible cups arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains cups, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The cups appear scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible cups, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and includes non-cup objects (e.g., toothbrushes, bottles) that disrupt any potential grouping.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains cups but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure, and the objects do not form recognizable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cups arranged in a depth-based layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative y positions, not clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four visible cups arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances do not form recognizable rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 contains scattered objects with no clear horizontal grouping of cups. The visible cups are not arranged in distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not contain any visible cups arranged in horizontal rows. The cups present are either partially obscured, occluded by food items, or not clearly distinguishable as separate objects.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered objects with no clear horizontal grouping of cups. The visible items do not form recognizable rows or columns suitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 contains four visible cups, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The cups appear scattered around the table and do not form a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible cups on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right object bands.


Image 2 shows cups arranged along a depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains cups but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows; instead, they appear as a scattered group on the table.


Image 2 shows scattered cups without clear horizontal rows, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of cups. The cups are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of cups. The visible cups are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 contains four visible cups, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered on the table without a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects do not form distinct, recognizable bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible 'cup' objects on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The visible items are plates, spoons, and napkins, none of which qualify as 'cup'.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with cups appearing at different depths, not in distinct horizontal rows. The cups are not visibly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of cups, forming two distinct rows. The cups are visibly grouped left-to-right in each row, with 6 clearly distinguishable instances. This layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses (a type of cup) arranged left-to-right, with 8 clearly visible and distinguishable instances. The layout follows a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of cups. The visible cups are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily a cake with candles and wine glasses, which do not meet the criteria for 'cup' as defined by COCO.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The cups present are either occluded, scattered, or part of a crowded and irregular layout.


Image 2 does not contain any visible cups arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily bottles and a plate, with no clear grouping of cups as per the specified criteria.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 6 visible 'cup' objects arranged left-to-right on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 lacks visible instances of 'cup' objects and does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle demonstrated in Image 1.


Image 2 shows scattered cups on a table without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered cups on a table without any clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The cups present are either scattered, occluded, or part of a vertical stack, failing to meet the criteria for a clear horizontal grouping.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are scattered and do not form a structured layout suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows cups arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The cups are on a table and appear to be in a single line or scattered, not forming distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily people and miscellaneous items on the table, none of which qualify as distinct, left-to-right groups of cups.


Image 2 shows scattered cups on a table without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and the objects are not arranged in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible cups on the countertop, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed cups, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 shows cups arranged in a depth layout around a table, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning rather than a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four visible cups on the table, clearly arranged left-to-right and meeting the criteria for a distinct group.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are cans and plates, which do not match the target category or layout requirement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible cups on the table, with a total of six clearly distinguishable cup instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are scattered and do not form recognizable groupings that meet the specified criteria.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily food items and scattered personal belongings, none of which qualify as distinct cups grouped in a manner matching the reference style.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of cups. The cups are scattered and not organized into distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cups arranged along a table in depth, creating a perspective-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The cups are not grouped into clearly recognizable left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of airplane seats, not distinct horizontal rows of chairs. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a vertical stack due to depth perspective, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinct chairs, visually grouped from left to right in a stable and recognizable arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 visible chairs on a beach, matching the reference's grouping principle with a left-to-right arrangement that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not contain any visible chairs. The objects present are food items, drinkware, and cutlery on a table, with no discernible horizontal rows of chairs.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The visible chairs are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of chairs around a circular table, forming two distinct rows. Each chair is visibly separate and recognizable as part of a left-to-right grouping, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs: one row of adult chairs along the dining table and another row of child booster seats in front of it. The chairs are clearly left-to-right groups, with 7 visible instances that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing three visible chairs arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout follows the reference's grouping principle with clear, non-overlapping rows and no evidence of depth or scattered arrangement.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of airplane seats viewed from behind, not distinct horizontal rows of chairs. The arrangement is linear along the aisle, not grouped into left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with chairs arranged along a corridor, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible chairs are grouped by their relative positions along the depth of the scene rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows chairs stacked in vertical columns and arranged in depth, not as distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 visible chairs arranged left-to-right on a beach, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible chairs are grouped by relative y positions and perspective, not by distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and do not form distinct rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


The chairs are arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible chairs do not form distinct left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are aligned along the back wall and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'chair'.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of beach chairs, each a clear left-to-right group. The chairs are visibly distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 does not contain any visible chairs. The objects present are birds, a table with food and drink, and a basket, none of which qualify as chairs.


Image 2 shows scattered chairs in a restaurant setting, not arranged in clear horizontal rows. The chairs are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning rather than clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right rows that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing 4 visible chairs arranged left-to-right in a clear and recognizable manner.


Image 2 shows a crowded arrangement of chairs that do not form distinct horizontal rows. The chairs are scattered and grouped around tables, lacking the clear left-to-right bands required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative y positions, not clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing 3 visible chairs that form a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The visible chairs are grouped by perspective and spatial proximity rather than forming clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are positioned along the length of the alleyway, creating a perspective-based arrangement rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The visible chairs are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and occluded, with no distinct rows visible.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are viewed from behind and appear to be aligned along the length of the table, which does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered chairs without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of chairs arranged in horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with scattered objects and no clear grouping of chairs.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The chairs are visibly distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows chairs in a restaurant setting, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and grouped by tables, which does not match the required 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of chairs. The visible 'chairs' are scattered, occluded, and part of a beach setting with umbrellas and people, lacking distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and grouped in ways that do not form distinct, recognizable rows suitable for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible 'chairs' are part of a dining setup viewed from depth, with no clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of 'chair' objects. The chairs are scattered and occluded, with no distinct rows or groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are aligned along the back wall and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of chairs arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are people and umbrellas, with no discernible grouping of chairs.


Image 2 visually follows the reference's grouping principle with exactly 4 horizontal bands of 'chair' objects, each a real left-to-right group, and contains 16 separately distinguishable visible 'chair' instances.


Image 2 shows scattered chairs in a picnic setting, not forming any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are aligned along the length of the table, creating a linear arrangement rather than distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of chairs in three distinct horizontal rows, each containing 2-3 visible chairs that form recognizable left-to-right groups. The layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of chairs on the beach, with a clear left-to-right grouping in each row. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged along a dining table, but their apparent 'rows' are due to depth and perspective rather than distinct horizontal bands. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of clearly defined left-to-right rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'chair' objects arranged in horizontal rows or a grid layout. The chairs present are either out of focus, partially obscured, or not clearly distinguishable as separate entities.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement includes 8 visible chair instances that are separately distinguishable and support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered chairs without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 visually follows the reference's grouping principle with exactly 3 horizontal bands of 'chair' objects. Each band is a real left-to-right group that a person would recognize without object boxes or coordinate clustering. There are 12 separately distinguishable visible 'chair' instances, supporting stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly placed chairs in the background, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are aligned along tables and appear to be receding into the background, which does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of chairs; the objects present are people and sports equipment, not furniture.


Image 2 shows stadium seating arranged in depth and perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows of chairs. The visible 'chairs' are part of a continuous structure viewed from depth, lacking the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible chairs arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of people and objects, with no clear horizontal bands of chairs. The visible 'chairs' are either occluded, part of a table setting, or not distinctly grouped in a way that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows stadium seating arranged in depth and perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows of chairs. The visible 'chairs' are part of a continuous seating structure viewed from depth, lacking the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows luggage arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows of chairs. The 'rows' are due to perspective and depth, not a left-to-right grouping of chairs.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning, not distinct left-to-right groups of chairs.


Image 2 shows stadium seating arranged in depth and perspective, not distinct horizontal rows of chairs. The 'rows' are not visually obvious groups left-to-right that a person would recognize without object boxes.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based perspective, not horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to relative positioning and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a crowded street scene with cars, buses, and motorcycles in a depth layout. The arrangement does not form clear, distinct horizontal rows of cars that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars parked along a street in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is linear and viewed from a side perspective, which does not match the required horizontal band grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are positioned at varying distances and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cars in a parking lot with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible cars parked along the side of a road, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cars parked in a scattered, irregular arrangement without clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to perspective and depth, not distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows cars in a scattered, non-horizontal arrangement typical of traffic on a road. The objects do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 visible cars parked along a residential street, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded cars without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are positioned along a road viewed from depth, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of cars; instead, it shows a scattered arrangement with a motorcycle in the foreground and cars parked in various positions without clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of cars; instead, it shows a single car in the foreground with pedestrians and other vehicles in the background, lacking any clear left-to-right grouping suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable cars, visually forming a stable left-to-right group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not a structured left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows scattered cars with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable cars parked along the curb, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not form a stable left-to-right grouping suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row layout of cars. The vehicles appear scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings that would support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a busy street scene with cars and motorcycles in various positions. The arrangement does not form clear, distinct horizontal rows of cars that would support stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions. Instead, the vehicles are scattered and occluded, making it impossible to identify a consistent horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are behind the horses and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout due to perspective, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly recognizable left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows cars arranged along a street in depth, creating a perspective-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows cars in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The vehicles are arranged along the road and viewed from a side angle, which does not meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands of 'car' objects.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in depth perspective, not distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and distance, not a stable left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of cars; the vehicles are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not a left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are aligned along the parking lot's depth perspective rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows, and does not meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of 'car' objects.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'car' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The vehicles are scattered and do not form a structured grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of cars along a street, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is linear and recedes into the distance, violating the requirement for clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cars in a scattered, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear left-to-right groups or distinct horizontal bands. The objects are not organized into stable rows suitable for ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars arranged along a road in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not a structured left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded cars in the background, with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups of visible cars.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded cars with no clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not a structured left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows cars scattered across the parking lot without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and thus does not match the reference's structural principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered cars with no clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances do not form stable rows for ordinal description.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout due to perspective, not distinct horizontal rows. The visible cars are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are positioned behind the motorcycles and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of cars, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible cars meet the criteria for row-based layout and are separately distinguishable.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal band of cars traveling on a road, with 6 visibly distinct vehicles that align with the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows cars in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The cars are arranged along the street and appear to be in a single line rather than distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'car'.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with cars appearing behind motorcycles, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars arranged along a road viewed in depth, creating an apparent row only due to perspective. The objects are not grouped into distinct horizontal bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars scattered across the scene without clear horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of 'car' objects. The cars are scattered and occluded, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct rows.


Cars are arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is linear along the fence and does not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of 'car' objects. The cars are scattered and do not form a structured left-to-right grouping that would support row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars in the background arranged by depth and perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The cars are not grouped into clearly recognizable left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of 'car' objects. The cars are scattered and do not form a structured left-to-right grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are positioned along the road and appear to be receding into the distance, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth layout due to perspective on a road, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of cars. The vehicles are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative positioning and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping that would match the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows cars in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The cars are arranged along the road in perspective, not in distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped layout of cars. The vehicles are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right rows that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of the target category 'car' arranged in horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows scattered cars along a road viewed in depth, not clearly grouped into distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars reflected in a bicycle mirror, arranged by depth and perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not visibly grouped into stable left-to-right bands that support clear row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows vehicles arranged along a road in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The 'cars' are part of a traffic scene with buses and motorcycles, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of cars, each forming a left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The cars are aligned along the parking lot's depth, not forming distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered cars in a parking lot with no clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows cars in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The cars are arranged along the road and vary in distance from the camera, making it impossible to identify distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered cars in a depth layout, not clearly defined horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of cars along the street, with 8 distinguishable vehicles that form a stable left-to-right grouping. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with a count of visible cars within the acceptable range.


Image 2 shows scattered cars with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a reflection of cars in metallic spoons, not actual visible instances of cars arranged in horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows cars in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The cars are positioned along a road and appear to be at varying distances from the camera, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative distance and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible cars are scattered and occluded by trees and distance, failing to form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'car' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The vehicles present are scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that would qualify as a row.


Image 2 shows cars arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not a left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of the target category 'car' and thus cannot meet the criteria for horizontal rows or any valid layout type.


Image 2 is a grid layout of food containers, not horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle for 'bowl' instances.


Image 2 contains four distinct containers, but they are arranged in a grid layout rather than horizontal rows. The 'bowl' instances do not form visible left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains four separate containers, but none are arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The layout is irregular and does not meet the criteria for horizontal banding or row-based recognition.


Image 2 contains four bowls, but they are arranged in an irregular, non-horizontal layout. The bowls do not form distinct left-to-right horizontal bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains four separate containers, but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The layout is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains four visible bowls but lacks a clear, stable horizontal row structure. The bowls are arranged in an irregular, scattered layout without distinct left-to-right groupings that would support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a single bowl with no visible horizontal rows or groups of bowls.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of four distinct 'bowl' objects, forming two visible rows with 2-3 items each. The layout follows the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands, and the objects are easily recognizable as separate groups without occlusion or depth-based rowing.


Image 2 contains four visible bowls, but they are arranged in an irregular, non-horizontal layout. The bowls do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible bowls arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each containing a recognizable food item. The layout supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains four separate containers, but they are not arranged in horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The layout is irregular and does not visually follow the grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only a single visible bowl, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any clear horizontal grouping or arrangement suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains four separate containers, but none display a clear horizontal arrangement of 'bowl' objects. The items are grouped by food type rather than forming visible rows of bowls.


Image 2 contains four bowls arranged irregularly, not in horizontal rows. The layout does not follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains multiple compartments with food items, but these do not form visually obvious horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains four visible bowls, but they are arranged in an irregular, non-horizontal layout. The objects do not form distinct left-to-right horizontal bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible 'bowl' instances, each containing 2 clearly distinguishable items. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls with no clear horizontal grouping, and the objects are not arranged in stable rows.


Image 2 contains only a single visible bowl in the foreground, with no additional bowls arranged in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of multiple distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of visible bowls, each containing distinct food items. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference grouping principle.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The bowls appear scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible bowls, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and lacks the structured grouping principle defined by the reference image.


Image 2 contains a single large bowl with shrimp and vegetables, not multiple distinct horizontal bands of bowls. The objects are not arranged in rows that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains bowls, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The bowls are placed at varying heights and positions on the table, with no consistent left-to-right grouping that would qualify as a stable row layout.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects do not form recognizable left-to-right groups suitable for stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two bowls, both irregularly placed and not forming any clear horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible 'bowl' instances, which do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups that match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of four distinct bowls, each forming a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a grid layout of four containers, not horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The containers are arranged in two rows and two columns, which does not match the reference's horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible bowls arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row containing two bowls. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains a single large bowl with no additional visible bowls arranged in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of multiple distinct horizontal bands of 'bowl' objects.


Image 2 contains hotdogs and fries in paper containers, not bowls. The objects are not arranged in horizontal rows of bowls.


Image 2 contains four separate compartments, but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The layout is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible bowls arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each containing different food items. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single bowl, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal banding.


Image 2 contains only a single visible bowl and lacks any horizontal rows of bowls. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each containing identifiable contents. The arrangement supports clear left-to-right ordinal descriptions within each row, and the total count of visible bowl instances is four, meeting the criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 contains a single large bowl with fruit, but no distinct horizontal rows of bowls are visible. The arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only three visible 'bowl' instances, which is below the required minimum of four. Additionally, they are not arranged in a clear horizontal row structure as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls of varying sizes and contents, with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single visible bowl, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances or any discernible horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls, but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered on the table without a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only three visible 'bowl' instances, which is below the required minimum of four. Additionally, the arrangement does not form distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls in various unrelated contexts, none forming a clear horizontal row layout as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays four clearly distinguishable bowls arranged in a single, stable horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing 2 visible instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with a total of 4 clearly distinguishable bowl objects.


Image 2 contains a bowl, but its layout is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The visible instances are scattered and do not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single visible bowl, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances or form any recognizable horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing visible food items. The arrangement supports clear left-to-right ordinal descriptions and meets the criteria for a stable row-number layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing visible instances of the target category 'bowl'. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of 'bowl' objects. The primary subject is a pizza, and no distinct bowl-like objects are discernible in the layout.


Image 2 displays four visible bowls arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each containing separate and recognizable food items. The layout supports clear row-number and left-to-right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible 'bowl' objects, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible 'bowl' objects, each row containing 3 bowls that form a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible bowls, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and lacks the structured grouping principle defined by the reference image.


Image 2 contains only one visible bowl, which is out of focus and not part of a clear horizontal grouping. It does not meet the criteria for distinct rows or sufficient count.


Image 2 contains multiple trays of food, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows of 'bowl' objects. The items are scattered and grouped by type rather than forming clear, left-to-right bands suitable for the target layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing 3 visible bowls, satisfying the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 total instances and clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows bowls arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative y positions, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains multiple bowls, but they are irregularly arranged in a scattered and non-horizontal manner, failing to meet the requirement for distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a cluttered sink with bowls and cups scattered without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 visible 'bowl' objects arranged left-to-right on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects are irregularly placed and do not form distinct, recognizable bands.


Image 2 contains scattered objects and lacks clearly defined horizontal rows of 'bowl' instances. The visible bowls are not arranged in a structured left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal arrangement of 'bowl' objects. The bowls are part of a cluttered table setting with no distinct left-to-right groups, and their placement is irregular rather than forming discernible rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each row containing 3 separately distinguishable bowls arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible bowls on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 contains bowls but they are irregularly placed, not forming clear horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without a clear horizontal row structure, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains only two visible 'bowl' instances, insufficient for the required 4-8. The arrangement is not horizontally grouped into distinct rows and lacks the structural clarity of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four visible white bowls arranged left-to-right on a counter, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only one visible bowl, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal banding or grouping that would align with the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains bowls, but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing 4 visible instances. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four visible bowls on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls and plates without a clear horizontal row structure, and the visible instances do not form distinct left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible bowls, not within a structured horizontal row layout. The objects are irregularly placed and do not form discernible left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains a stack of bowls but lacks the horizontal banding and distinct left-to-right grouping required to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains only three visible 'bowl' instances, which is below the required minimum of four. Additionally, these objects are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible 'bowl' instances, insufficient for the required 4-8. The arrangement is irregular and lacks clear horizontal bands of bowls.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls on the table, each row containing 3 bowls that form clear left-to-right groups recognizable without object boxes.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible bowls, each row containing 3-4 clearly identifiable and left-to-right grouped instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered objects with no clear horizontal rows of bowls; the visible items do not form recognizable left-to-right groups suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed bowls, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered objects and lacks clearly defined horizontal bands of 'bowl' instances. The visible items do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each row containing visible and distinguishable bowl instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal banding.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls, with no clear horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings that meet the specified criteria.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of 'bowl' objects, and the layout does not follow a horizontal row structure.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded bowls without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of bowls, each containing a visible dog eating. The arrangement supports clear row-number and left-to-right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows objects arranged in depth and perspective, not in clear horizontal rows. The 'bowl' instances are part of a larger load on a donkey, appearing scattered and occluded rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with objects arranged along the length of the boat, not in distinct horizontal rows. The bowls are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'bowl' and does not follow the required horizontal row layout.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'bowl' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present do not meet the criteria for a structured layout of the target category.


Image 2 contains scattered bowls without clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible bowl, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any clear horizontal grouping or layout resembling the reference.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains only one visible cup, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal grouping or layout resembling the reference style.


Image 2 contains only a single cup, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 contains four visible cups, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with cups placed at different heights and no discernible left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 4 visible cups, clearly arranged left-to-right on a tray, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without any clear horizontal grouping or visible rows, and thus does not match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible 'cup' objects, which do not form any discernible horizontal rows or structured layout. The arrangement lacks the required number of cups and fails to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, insufficient for a valid horizontal row layout. The arrangement is irregular and does not meet the criteria for structured grouping.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without any visible horizontal grouping, and the objects do not form distinct left-to-right rows.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances do not form recognizable rows.


Image 2 contains only one visible cup, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 separately distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal banding or grouping that would align with the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible cups, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement does not form any clear horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, which is below the minimum requirement of four. The arrangement does not form any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only three visible 'cup' objects, which is below the required minimum of four. The arrangement does not form any clear horizontal rows or structured layout suitable for ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains cups but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows. The cups appear scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct horizontal bands of cups.


Image 2 contains cups but they are irregularly placed and do not form distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not visually support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four visible 'cup' objects arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on the plate, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible cups, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The cups are identifiable as separate objects within the rows, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The only cups present are partially visible and do not form a structured grouping.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of cups. The visible cups are part of a cluttered table setting with other objects, lacking distinct horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily plates, glasses, and a pitcher, none of which qualify as 'cup' under the COCO category.


Image 2 contains only one visible cup, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 separately distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal bands or groupings that would align with the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains cups but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The cups present are either occluded, part of a scattered arrangement, or not clearly distinguishable as separate entities.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'cup'.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not visually support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cups in a depth layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The cups are on the table in front of the man and do not form visible left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cups arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The cups are grouped by proximity on the table rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only one visible cup, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable cups. Additionally, there is no clear horizontal grouping or layout resembling the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure, and the visible instances do not meet the criteria for distinct, left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances do not form recognizable rows.


Image 2 contains only scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible cup, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances or form any horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered cups on a table without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only a single visible cup, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 separately distinguishable cups. Additionally, there are no clear horizontal bands or groupings of cups to qualify as 'horizontal rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 contains only one visible cup, which is too few to meet the criteria of 4-8 cups. Additionally, it does not display any horizontal bands or groupings that would qualify as rows.


Image 2 shows scattered cups in a pile, not forming any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, not meeting the minimum of four. The cups are not arranged in any discernible horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily plates, bottles, and other dining items, none of which qualify as 'cup' in the COCO category.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of cups. The visible cups are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right rows that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present do not meet the criteria for a valid grouping under the specified rules.


Image 2 contains only scattered cups without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and the visible instances do not meet the criteria for a structured layout.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of white cups, each row containing 2-3 cups arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable group. The cups are visibly separate and identifiable as individual objects, meeting the criteria for horizontal rows with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four distinct cups (yellow, orange, blue, and green) arranged left-to-right on a table. The cups are visibly separate and form a stable, recognizable group that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered cups on a table with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a tiered tray with cups placed at different heights, creating a depth-based arrangement rather than distinct horizontal rows. The cups are not organized into clearly defined left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, which is below the minimum requirement of four. The arrangement does not form any clear horizontal rows or grids suitable for ordinal description.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, which is below the minimum requirement of four. The objects are also irregularly arranged and not in distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are unrelated to the target category.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, not meeting the minimum of four. The cups are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with scattered items and no clear grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered objects and no clear horizontal rows of cups; the visible items do not meet the criteria for structured horizontal banding.


Image 2 contains scattered cups with no clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances do not form recognizable rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 5 visible cups on the table, arranged left-to-right in a clear and recognizable group. The cups are evenly spaced and distinct, meeting the criteria for a stable horizontal band.


Image 2 lacks visible horizontal bands of cups; the objects are scattered and not arranged in discernible rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The cups present are scattered and do not form a structured grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure, and the visible instances are fewer than 4.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without clear horizontal rows, and the visible instances do not form a stable left-to-right grouping that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and not grouped into distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows cups arranged in a depth layout around a table, not in distinct horizontal rows. The cups are visible but do not form the required left-to-right groups for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of cups on the table, but only three visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, the arrangement does not fully match the reference's group portrait style with multiple distinct rows.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 4 visible cups on the dining table, arranged left-to-right in a clear and recognizable group. The cups meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with a count of 4, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered cups without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible cups on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered objects and no clear horizontal rows of cups. The visible items are primarily pizza boxes, with only a few small containers that may or may not be cups, but they lack the structured grouping required.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of cups. The visible objects include scattered cups and other items on the table, but they lack the distinct left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of cups. The cups are scattered and not organized into distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with people seated at a long table, not distinct horizontal rows of cups. The cups are scattered and occluded by people and other objects, failing to meet the criteria for visible, stable horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered cups without a clear horizontal row structure, and the visible instances do not form recognizable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 lacks visible horizontal bands of cups; the cups present are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The cups present are scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains only two visible cups, not meeting the minimum of four. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows cups arranged along a table in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The cups are visually grouped by proximity on the table rather than forming clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of cups on the table, with 6 visible instances that are left-to-right grouped and distinguishable. The arrangement supports stable ordinal descriptions within the row.


Image 2 contains scattered cups on a table, not clearly grouped into horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured, left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 lacks visible instances of 'cup' objects and does not exhibit a horizontal row layout.


Image 2 shows scattered objects and no clear horizontal bands of cups; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible cups on the tables, each row is a clear left-to-right group, and there are 4-8 distinguishable cup instances that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The items shown are doughnuts, not cups.


Image 2 does not contain any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'cup' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The cups present are scattered and not grouped into discernible left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with cups placed at varying depths, not forming clear horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of 'cup' objects.


Image 2 shows cups placed on a coffee table in front of people seated on a couch. The arrangement is not organized into distinct horizontal rows and appears to be a depth-based layout rather than a structured grouping.


Image 2 lacks visible instances of the target category 'cup' and does not follow the required horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of wooden chairs, each row clearly left-to-right and visibly separate. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable chair instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs around a dining table, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable chair instances arranged in a stable left-to-right group that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of blue beach chairs, each row containing three visible instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions possible.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right rows that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The visible chairs are scattered and do not form clear left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing four clearly visible and left-to-right grouped chairs, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed chairs, including a high chair and regular dining chairs, with no clear horizontal rows or consistent groupings that match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are viewed from the side and appear to be aligned along a single line of perspective rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains four visible chairs, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and grouped irregularly around the living room space, failing to meet the criteria for a clear 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs: one row with a white chair and another with wooden chairs, all arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable pattern.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The chairs are visibly arranged in stable rows with ordinal left/right positions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible 'chairs' are part of a single booth and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are grouped by their relative positions in the background rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and occluded, lacking distinct rows or groupings that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded chairs without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the criteria for structured layout.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with chairs arranged around tables, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is more consistent with a dining setting rather than a structured horizontal grouping of chairs.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded chairs without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'chair' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The furniture present is scattered and lacks the structured grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of 'chair' objects arranged in horizontal rows; it features a single child and dining table setting without distinct chair groupings.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to relative y positions and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only 4 visible chairs, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The chairs appear to be placed irregularly around a table and on a platform, lacking the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing 3 visibly separate and recognizable chair instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of 7 clearly distinguishable chairs, arranged left-to-right in a stable and recognizable group, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed chairs without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal banding.


Image 2 shows scattered chairs without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The visible chairs are scattered or grouped in ways that do not form distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are viewed from behind and appear as a continuous background rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of chairs arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present do not meet the criteria for a structured layout of the target category.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing three visible chairs arranged left-to-right in a clear and recognizable group. The chairs are evenly spaced and identifiable as separate instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of chairs. The visible chairs are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing 3 visible chairs arranged left-to-right in a clear and recognizable manner.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 5 clearly distinguishable chairs, arranged left-to-right in a stable and recognizable group.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured arrangement of chairs in horizontal rows. The chairs are scattered and do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed chairs without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each a clear left-to-right group. There are 7 visible chair instances arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing 3 visible chairs arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle with clear, non-overlapping rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of chairs, each row containing 3 visible chairs arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable group. The layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of chairs. The visible chairs are scattered and occluded, lacking distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible chairs are scattered and occluded by pizza boxes, failing to form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and not organized into distinct rows or groups.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are aligned along the table and appear to be viewed from a side angle, making it difficult to discern distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows chairs arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The chairs are visible but do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of chairs. The chairs are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded chairs in the background, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'chair' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The furniture present includes sofas, tables, and a fireplace, but no distinct chair groupings matching the required criteria are observed.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of chairs. The visible chairs are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable rows that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.