Image 2 shows a single plate with hot dogs arranged in a compact, irregular cluster rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not visibly grouped into 1-4 clear left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of hot dogs on a plate, with 8 visible instances that are left-to-right recognizable as a group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout and matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains hot dogs but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear as a scattered group on plates, with no clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains hot dogs but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows; instead, they appear as a single group on the grill without distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows birds within a cage, with no visible horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups. The arrangement is vertical and depth-based, not matching the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows birds scattered on the ground without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of birds, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible bird instances.


Image 2 displays four distinct skateboards arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered skateboards on the ground without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four distinct skateboards, each recognizable as a separate object in a left-to-right arrangement, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible skateboards, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The objects are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered skateboard instances with no clear horizontal rows or groupings, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains skateboards but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they are scattered among individuals and do not form a structured layout.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of skateboards arranged in horizontal rows or a structured layout. The skateboards are scattered and not grouped in a manner that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a few skateboards, not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible skateboard instances, insufficient for the required 4-8. The arrangement is not horizontal rows or a grid and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible skateboards, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form clear horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible skateboards, each distinctly placed left-to-right on the ground. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with a count of 4-8 objects, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered skateboard instances with no clear horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible skateboards arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row along the ground, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows skateboarders arranged in a depth layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single skateboarder in action with scattered skateboards in the background, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinct skateboards held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 has only one horizontal band of skateboards, with 3 visible instances. While it visually follows a horizontal grouping principle, the count (3) is below the required minimum of 4 for acceptance.


Image 2 does not display visible instances of skateboards arranged in horizontal rows; the skateboards are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered skateboard instances without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of skateboards. The objects are scattered and not organized into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of people holding tennis rackets, with each row clearly identifiable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout, with 8 visible and distinguishable tennis rackets distributed across the rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly visible horizontal row of 8 distinct tennis rackets held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains only three visible handbags, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and the objects are not arranged in a stable left-to-right group that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered handbags without clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible handbags carried by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle with no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 contains only a single hot dog and does not exhibit any horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible hot dogs, each distinct and left-to-right arranged, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a single hot dog, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances or form any recognizable horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four clearly distinguishable hot dogs, visually forming a stable left-to-right group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains four hot dogs, but they are arranged in a single horizontal row without distinct left-to-right grouping that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout does not visually follow the reference's multi-row grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of hot dogs, each row containing 2 clearly visible and separately distinguishable hot dogs. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or occlusion issues.


Image 2 contains only two visible hot dogs, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of hot dogs on a grill, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible hot dogs, does not form 1-4 distinct horizontal bands, and lacks the structured row layout seen in the reference image.


Image 2 contains hot dogs but they are not arranged in any clear, distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and mixed with other food items on plates, failing to meet the criteria for a structured horizontal grouping.


Image 2 shows birds in a scattered and irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of seagulls, each a clear left-to-right group. The birds are visibly arranged in stable rows with ordinal left/right positions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of the target category 'bird' objects arranged in horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of birds on a cobblestone surface, with each band being a clear left-to-right grouping. The five visible birds are separately distinguishable and arranged in a way that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows birds scattered across the ground without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows scattered birds on the ground without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and thus does not match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered birds flying or standing in a natural landscape, not arranged in visible horizontal rows that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered birds on the ground with no clear horizontal grouping, and they do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 8 visible laptop instances distributed across 2 stable rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of laptops on desks, with each row containing 2-3 visible laptops that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of tennis rackets, with three distinct rows of players holding rackets in a left-to-right group formation. The rackets are visibly grouped and recognizable as separate instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible objects.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with four rackets in each row. The arrangement clearly follows the reference's grouping principle of real left-to-right groups, and the objects are visibly distinguishable as tennis rackets.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of tennis rackets, with each row containing clearly visible and recognizable objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered handbags without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows handbags primarily in a depth layout, not as distinct horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and occluded, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of luggage and bags, lacking any clear horizontal bands or groupings that would match the reference's structured row layout.


Image 2 shows handbags placed on steps, which is a depth-based arrangement rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered handbags without clear horizontal rows or consistent left-to-right groupings, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded handbags with no clear horizontal rows or within-row groupings, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of hot dogs, each row containing three distinct and recognizable hot dogs with visible toppings, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains hot dogs but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four distinct hot dogs, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of hot dogs, each a clear left-to-right group, with a total of six visible instances that meet the grouping criteria.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinct hot dogs, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or occlusion.


Image 2 contains only a single hot dog, not meeting the requirement of 4-8 visible instances or a horizontal row structure.


Image 2 contains only two visible hot dogs, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The objects are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows and appear irregularly placed.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible hot dogs, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form clear horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains only burgers and no visible hot dogs, thus it cannot meet the criteria for 'hot dog' objects in horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains hot dogs but they are piled together in an irregular, non-horizontal arrangement without distinct rows.


Image 2 visually follows a grid layout with multiple horizontal rows of sandwiches, but it does not contain hot dogs. The reference style match is true as the grouping principle is followed, but the target category is incorrect.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible hot dogs on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are left-to-right recognizable as a group without clustering or occlusion.


Image 2 does not display hot dogs arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, it shows a single plate with multiple hot dogs clustered together without clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible hot dogs, which is below the required minimum of 4. The objects are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows four clearly visible hot dogs held by individuals in a single, distinct horizontal row. The objects are left-to-right grouped and recognizable as separate instances without clustering or occlusion.


Image 2 shows birds in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable birds perched on a railing, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows birds in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The birds are grouped closely together and appear to be interacting or feeding, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows five distinct birds arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on a wooden surface, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the birds are scattered and do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of birds: one group on the ground in front of the seated individuals and another near the bench. Each band consists of clearly distinguishable birds arranged left-to-right, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of birds, each a clear left-to-right group. The birds are visibly separate and recognizable within these rows, totaling 8 visible instances, matching the required criteria for horizontal row layout.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal band of laptops, but only 3 are clearly visible and distinguishable. The arrangement does not meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The six visible laptops meet the criteria for count and layout.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible laptop instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible laptops on a counter, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality and no evidence of depth or irregular arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible tennis rackets held by children, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right ordinal arrangement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of tennis rackets, with four visible in the front row and four in the back, clearly forming real left-to-right groups that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible tennis rackets held by individuals standing in a line. The objects are arranged left-to-right in a stable, recognizable group that meets the criteria for 'horizontal rows' and supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with each row containing clearly identifiable and separately distinguishable rackets. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of tennis rackets, each row containing four clearly visible and recognizable objects. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of people holding tennis rackets, with each row clearly identifiable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with each row containing 2-4 clearly recognizable objects. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with each row containing clearly recognizable left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four women holding tennis rackets, with one additional racket visible in a bag. The objects are arranged left-to-right in a stable, recognizable group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of seven visible tennis rackets, each held by an individual in a left-to-right arrangement that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of handbags. The objects are scattered and occluded, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four women, each visibly holding or wearing a handbag. The arrangement forms a stable left-to-right group with six distinguishable handbags, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of handbags. The objects are scattered, piled, and occluded, with no distinct rows visible.


Image 2 shows a cluttered arrangement of luggage and bags without clear, distinct horizontal rows of handbags. The objects are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only three visible handbags, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and the objects are not arranged in a stable left-to-right group as required.


Image 2 contains only one visible handbag, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular due to depth perspective and scattered objects.


Image 2 depicts a crowded scene with people carrying luggage and handbags, but no clear horizontal rows of handbags are visible. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for distinct left-to-right groups forming stable rows.


Image 2 shows scattered handbags among people, not in stable horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support clear row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible handbags, nor does it exhibit a structured horizontal row layout suitable for the target category.


Image 2 shows birds scattered without clear horizontal rows, with no distinct left-to-right groups that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of birds, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows only two birds with no clear horizontal grouping or rows, and they are not arranged in a structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the birds are irregularly scattered without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct birds arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on the grass, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains four visible birds, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The birds appear scattered and do not form a structured grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


The birds are arranged in a scattered manner on the grass, lacking clear horizontal rows or a structured layout that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows only three birds with no clear horizontal grouping or rows, and the arrangement does not match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pelicans, each row containing 3 birds arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable group. The birds are visibly separate and identifiable as individual instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays four distinct birds arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the sand's edge, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow a horizontal row layout; the birds are perched at varying heights and positions, not forming distinct left-to-right groups.


The birds are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows; they are scattered across the water with no clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow a horizontal row layout; the birds are positioned irregularly around the child, with no clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows birds in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal bands of birds: one on the roof and another in flight above, each forming a clear left-to-right group.


Image 2 shows birds flying in a scattered, irregular pattern with no clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 does not follow a horizontal row layout; the birds are perched at varying heights on branches, forming an irregular vertical and depth-based arrangement rather than distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows birds in a scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows, and the visible instances are fewer than the required 4.


Image 2 shows birds flying in an irregular, scattered pattern without any clear horizontal rows or stable groupings that match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 displays four distinct birds arranged in a single, clear horizontal row across the foreground, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular distribution of birds, lacking distinct horizontal bands or rows that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows laptops scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle based on visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of four visible laptops on a table, forming a single distinct row. The objects are left-to-right grouped in a manner that supports ordinal descriptions and meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row containing visible and recognizable left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible laptop instances.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The laptops are scattered and lack clear, distinct horizontal bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with laptops arranged along a table viewed from the side, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clearly defined left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of airplanes, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible airplane instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of airplanes, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The visible instances meet the criteria for clear, stable rows with 4-8 distinguishable objects.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible tennis rackets held by individuals seated side-by-side, matching the reference's grouping principle with no ambiguity.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of people, each holding a visible tennis racket. The objects are clearly arranged in left-to-right groups within each row, with 8 distinguishable rackets overall, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible tennis rackets held by children on a court, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible tennis rackets, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with 6 clearly identifiable instances. The arrangement follows a genuine left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with 6 clearly distinguishable instances. The objects are arranged in stable left-to-right groups that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of tennis rackets; the objects are held by individuals and do not form a stable, left-to-right group as required.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible tennis rackets held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only one visible handbag, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, it lacks the structured horizontal rows present in the reference image.


Image 2 contains scattered handbags without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded handbags without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows handbags placed in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of handbags.


Image 2 contains only two visible handbags, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and the objects are irregularly placed rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 is crowded and lacks clearly defined horizontal rows of handbags; the visible handbags are not arranged in a structured left-to-right group as required.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal arrangement of handbags. The objects are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support ordinal row descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible handbag, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, it lacks any clear horizontal grouping or layout structure.


Image 2 contains scattered handbags without a clear horizontal row structure; some are carried, others placed on the ground, failing to meet the 'horizontal rows' requirement.


Image 2 shows a single, scattered handbag instance among people walking, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of handbags. The handbags are scattered among people and do not form distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 contains no visible handbags; it depicts a group of people at a dining event with food and plates, not horizontal rows of handbags.


Image 2 contains scattered handbags without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered handbags without clear horizontal rows, and the visible instances do not form a structured left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with handbags carried by people at varying distances, not forming clear horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of handbags. The visible handbags are scattered among people and lack the distinct, recognizable left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded objects without clear horizontal bands of handbags; it lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 does not contain any visible handbags; it features people and seating, but no handbags are discernible in a horizontal row arrangement.


Image 2 contains scattered handbags among a crowd, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with handbags visible only as carried or worn by people, not arranged in distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows scattered handbags among a crowd, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal structure. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of scooters with people, not horizontal rows of handbags. The arrangement is linear and recedes into the distance, not forming distinct left-to-right bands of handbags.


Image 2 does not display any visible handbags, nor does it exhibit a clear horizontal row structure suitable for the target category.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of handbags. The single visible handbag is carried by a person and does not form part of a distinct row or group that meets the specified criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 shows scattered handbags among people walking, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a crowded scene with scattered objects and no clear horizontal rows of handbags.


Image 2 contains no visible handbags; it features sheep and a crowd, none of which qualify as the target category.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of laptops, with a total of five visible instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row containing visible and recognizable laptop instances arranged from left to right. The arrangement supports clear row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. There are six visible laptops, meeting the criteria for count and layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible laptops, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality and no evidence of depth or scattered arrangement.


Image 2 shows laptops arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The six visible laptops meet the criteria for count and layout, aligning with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of laptops. The laptops are scattered across the room and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a depth layout, with objects appearing to recede into the background rather than forming distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable airplanes, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 8 distinguishable instances.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible tennis rackets held by individuals in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four clearly visible tennis rackets held by individuals in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with four clearly distinguishable instances in each row. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal banding style.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of individuals holding tennis rackets, with each row clearly identifiable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, and there are eight visible tennis rackets distributed across the rows.


Image 2 shows four visible tennis rackets held by individuals standing in a single, clear horizontal row along the net, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible tennis rackets, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The objects are not arranged in any discernible horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible tennis rackets held by individuals standing in a left-to-right arrangement. The objects form a stable, recognizable group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows two instances of tennis rackets, but they are not arranged in horizontal rows. Instead, they appear as part of individual players' poses, with no clear grouping or alignment that supports a row-based layout.


Image 2 contains only two visible tennis rackets, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The objects are not arranged in horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 shows four clearly visible tennis rackets held by individuals in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered objects and lacks a clear, stable horizontal row structure of tennis rackets. The visible instances are not grouped in a way that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible tennis rackets, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right alignment.


Image 2 contains only two visible tennis rackets, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The objects are not arranged in horizontal rows or any structured layout.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of tennis rackets; instead, it shows two instances of a single object in different poses, lacking the required grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible tennis rackets, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the objects are irregularly placed rather than forming structured bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of tennis rackets arranged in horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible tennis rackets, with 6 clearly distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a genuine left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of 'tennis racket' objects arranged in horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains only two visible tennis rackets, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The objects are not arranged in horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible tennis rackets held by individuals standing in a line. The arrangement supports stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions and visually matches the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


The laptops are arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' arise from perspective and relative y positions, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays four visible laptops arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row being a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four visible laptops arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible laptops arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a desk, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands. The objects are left-to-right recognizable as a group without clustering or occlusion.


The laptops are arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are clustered by perspective rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a clear 2x2 grid layout of laptops, with two distinct horizontal rows and four visible instances that are easily recognizable as separate objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of laptops on a desk, forming two distinct rows with 4-8 visible instances. The objects are recognizable as laptops and arranged in a stable left-to-right grouping that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four visible laptops arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows laptops arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows laptops arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows laptops arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands and appear scattered rather than organized into stable rows.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of four visible laptops on a desk, forming two distinct left-to-right groups that align with the reference's grouping principle. The objects are recognizable as separate laptops without clustering or occlusion.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible laptops, does not form clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular with overlapping cables and objects.


Image 2 displays four visible laptops arranged in two distinct horizontal rows on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops, each row containing visible and recognizable laptop instances arranged left-to-right. The layout supports clear row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four visible laptops arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a desk, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are left-to-right recognizable as a group without clustering or occlusion.


Image 2 shows four clearly visible laptops arranged in a single horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four visible laptops, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 shows a single laptop in a depth-based layout, not a clear horizontal row grouping.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible laptops arranged in a single, stable horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of laptops on a long table, with each row containing 3 visible laptops. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows laptops arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are positioned at different depths and do not form clear left-to-right groups that would be recognized as distinct horizontal bands.


The laptops are arranged in a depth-based layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are viewed from an angle and appear to be on a single surface, lacking the clear left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of 5 visible laptops, arranged in a clear left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 4 visible laptops, arranged left-to-right on a table. The objects form a clear, stable group that supports ordinal descriptions and matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible laptops, which is below the required minimum of four. The objects are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows and appear scattered on the coffee table.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects, with no clear horizontal bands of laptops. The visible instances are not arranged in a stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal structure.


Image 2 shows benches arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible benches are aligned along the depth of the space rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of benches, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible bench instances.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of benches, not distinct horizontal rows. The 'rows' are formed by perspective and relative y positions, not clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of airplanes, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible and distinguishable airplane instances.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of airplanes, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible airplane instances.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sandwiches are irregularly arranged in a circular or clustered fashion without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 sandwich slices arranged neatly on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of sandwiches, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each a clear left-to-right grouping with six visible instances, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable sandwich pieces on a glass tray, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible sandwich instances.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sandwiches; instead, it shows a scattered arrangement on a grill and table.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of 'sandwich' objects. The items appear as a scattered pile on the grill, lacking distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of sandwiches on a tray, with 8 distinguishable instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 distinguishable buses, visually forming a stable left-to-right group that supports ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and containing 3-4 visible dining tables. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and visually recognizable as separate entities. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 distinguishable buses aligned left-to-right along the road, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of buses, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The buses are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, supporting stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly recognizable as a left-to-right group. The tables are visibly arranged in a stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal structure, with 8 separately distinguishable dining table instances present.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of 7 visible buses, forming a single distinct row that aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The tables are evenly spaced, with 8 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear and stable arrangement of dining tables in three distinct horizontal rows, each containing 2-3 visible tables that form recognizable left-to-right groups. The layout supports ordinal descriptions and meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The tables are visibly separate and recognizable as individual dining surfaces, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of vases, each row containing 3-4 clearly visible and recognizable vase instances arranged left-to-right on a tiled floor. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows vases arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of vases, each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable vase instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinguishable vases with flowers, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed vases, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of blue metal benches, each row containing three visible instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions possible.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of benches, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wooden benches with green legs, each row containing 3 visible bench instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, allowing for stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of 'airplane' objects, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are positioned at different depths and perspectives, making it unsuitable for the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout requirement.


Image 2 contains only a single airplane, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of airplanes, each row containing two clearly visible and recognizable aircraft, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of airplanes on the tarmac, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 6 clearly visible and distinguishable airplane instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of airplanes, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of airplanes, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible airplanes meet the criteria for recognizable bands, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each row containing 3-4 visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each a clear left-to-right grouping with 4-8 visible instances, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sandwiches; instead, it shows a vertical stack and scattered arrangement.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sandwiches; instead, it shows a scattered arrangement on a food stall counter.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and visually recognizable as separate dining areas. The tables are checkered-patterned and contain visible dining items, confirming their category. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and containing 2 visible dining tables, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4 total visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 6 distinguishable buses, visually forming a stable left-to-right group under a structured canopy, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows six buses arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinct buses, visually forming a stable left-to-right group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and recognizable as separate dining areas. The tables are visibly distinguishable within each row, supporting stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows buses in a scattered, non-uniform arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a clear horizontal arrangement of six visible buses in a single row along the road, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The tables are visibly separate and identifiable within the rows, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 6 distinguishable buses aligned left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains multiple vases but lacks clearly defined horizontal rows. The objects are irregularly arranged, with some overlapping and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains multiple vases, but they are not arranged in clear, distinct horizontal rows. The objects appear scattered and lack the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows vases arranged in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 distinct vases with flowers, matching the reference's grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only one visible vase, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible bench instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of benches, each row a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 8 visibly distinguishable bench instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of benches, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 5 visible bench instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 shows a single bench with two people, not multiple horizontal bands of benches. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly placed benches without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of spectators in bleachers, not distinct horizontal rows of 'bench' objects. The arrangement is not suitable for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of benches with 7 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of benches, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is primarily vertical and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of six visible United States Air Force airplanes, each row forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of airplanes. The visible aircraft are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands suitable for the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the z-axis (distance from camera), not in left-to-right bands as required.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of airplanes, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The visible instances (5) meet the count requirement, and the layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in depth and perspective, not in clear horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and depth, not a stable left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of airplanes on a tarmac, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable aircraft. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative positioning and distance, not a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal banding principle.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The airplanes are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of airplanes, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The visible instances (7) meet the count requirement, and the layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of airplanes; instead, it shows a single airplane with no visible grouping into distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of airplanes, with a total of six visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays five visible airplanes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows, and the apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positions, not clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of airplanes on the tarmac, each forming a clear left-to-right grouping that aligns with the reference's horizontal row structure. The visible instances are separately distinguishable and meet the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are grouped by relative y positions and perspective, not by distinct left-to-right bands that would constitute recognizable horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of airplanes, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The visible instances (8) meet the count requirement, and the layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four airplanes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row containing two planes. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with visible separation and alignment that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single airplane on a runway, not arranged in horizontal rows or groups as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays four airplanes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row containing two planes. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with visible spacing and alignment that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of airplanes, each with clearly visible left-to-right groupings. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of airplanes on the tarmac, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays four visible airplanes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row being a clear left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct airplanes arranged in two visible horizontal bands, consistent with the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right rows.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable airplanes on the tarmac, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable airplanes flying in formation, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of airplanes, forming one distinct row with 5 visible instances that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of airplanes: one on the ground in the foreground and another in flight above, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal rows with 5 distinguishable airplane instances.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are primarily in the foreground and background, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; it features scattered and non-uniformly arranged airplanes.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of airplanes on the tarmac, each row containing multiple clearly visible and distinguishable aircraft instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of airplanes, with four visible in the foreground and two in the background, meeting the criteria for horizontal rows with clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in a diagonal formation, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to depth and perspective, not a left-to-right grouping that would match the reference's horizontal band structure.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged by depth and perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative distance and angle, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of airplanes; instead, it shows scattered and non-uniformly arranged aircraft and ground vehicles.


Image 2 shows airplanes arranged in depth and perspective, not in clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of airplanes on the tarmac, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of airplanes arranged in horizontal rows. The airplanes are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows two airplanes in a single horizontal row, but only two are visible, falling short of the required 4-8 instances. The layout matches the reference's horizontal grouping principle, but the count is insufficient.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of sandwiches, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are stacked vertically and appear to be viewed from above, lacking the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains scattered and overlapping sandwich pieces without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable sandwich slices on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches on a plate, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands, allowing for stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each clearly recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 8 visible sandwich instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each a clear left-to-right group. There are eight visible sandwich instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sandwiches; instead, it shows a scattered arrangement of various food items on a tablecloth.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 6 distinguishable buses aligned left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a collage of food items on plates, but no distinct horizontal rows of dining tables are visible. The arrangement is irregular and does not meet the criteria for clear, left-to-right groupings of dining tables.


Image 2 shows a clear horizontal arrangement of buses, forming one distinct row with 6 visible instances that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered buses with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable buses, visually grouped left-to-right as a single band, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains multiple buses but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The buses appear scattered and do not form a structured left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and containing 4 visible 'dining table' instances (cakes on stands). The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of dining tables, each with multiple visible and distinguishable dining table instances arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows buses in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible buses arranged in a single, stable horizontal row on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows buses in a parking lot with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's group portrait style.


Image 2 is a collage with no consistent horizontal rows of dining tables; objects are scattered and unrelated.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each containing 4-6 visible dining table instances arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of dining tables with 6 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and recognizable as separate dining areas. The tables are visibly arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4 visible dining table instances.


Image 2 displays four distinct buses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the road, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows dining tables arranged in depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The tables are viewed from a side angle, creating an illusion of rows based on relative y positions rather than clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinct yellow buses, visually forming a stable left-to-right group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable buses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and containing 3-4 visible tables. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single dining table with no visible horizontal rows of similar objects. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 5 visible buses, clearly arranged left-to-right on the street, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each row containing 3 visible tables. The tables are clearly grouped left-to-right in each row, forming stable and recognizable horizontal bands that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of buses, each row containing 3 visible buses. The buses are clearly grouped left-to-right in each row, forming stable and recognizable horizontal bands that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The tables are evenly spaced and visually grouped, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible instances.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of dining tables arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are people and an umbrella, with no clear grouping of dining tables.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and containing 4-8 visible dining tables, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of dining tables arranged in horizontal rows. The layout consists of scattered objects and people, with no clear left-to-right groupings of dining tables.


Image 2 contains only two visible vase instances and lacks any clear horizontal grouping or rows. The objects are not arranged in a manner that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of six visible white vases, each row a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 instances and matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible vases, with 6 clearly distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays six distinct vases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a shelf, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains multiple vases, but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. Instead, the objects appear in a cluttered, irregular layout with no distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of vases, with four visible instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of six visible vases, each row forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains visible vases but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and grouped by proximity rather than a clear left-to-right row structure.


Image 2 shows vases placed on a shelf at varying depths, creating a perspective-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of benches, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible bench instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible benches, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible benches arranged along a stone pathway, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only a single visible bench instance and lacks any horizontal bands or groups of benches to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible wooden benches along a park pathway, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wooden benches, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of benches, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is linear along the y-axis and lacks visible left-to-right groupings that would constitute recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed benches without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not contain any visible benches. The scene shows a pizza on a table with no discernible horizontal bands of bench objects.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of benches, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 5 visible bench instances.


Image 2 shows benches arranged in depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows stadium seating arranged in depth and perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows of benches. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of red benches, each row containing multiple visible and recognizable bench instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of benches, each row forming a clear left-to-right group. The benches are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling six visible benches that meet the criteria for horizontal grouping.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded benches without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the strict visual grouping criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'bench'. The scene depicts a tennis player on a court with benches in the background, but they are not clearly discernible as distinct, grouped objects following the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible trucks, each forming a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinguishable bicycles, visually grouped from left to right in a stable and recognizable manner, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible bicycles, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of bicycles; the bicycles are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and occluded, with no clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right group of visible cyclists. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bicycles, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of bicycles, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is based on relative y positions and perspective, not clearly defined left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a single hand holding an apple with scattered apples in the background, lacking any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the apples are irregularly scattered without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of apples; instead, it shows a single apple and slices in a vertical stack, which does not match the required layout.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of apples in baskets, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 8 visible apple instances distributed across the rows.


Image 2 shows a pile of apples and oranges without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows a pile of apples and oranges in a bowl, which does not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 is a grid layout with apples visible, but it does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The apples are arranged in a structured grid rather than distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered apples with no visible horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of apples, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible apple instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of apple slices, each a clear left-to-right group. The apples are visibly arranged in stable rows with ordinal left/right descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows scattered apples without clear horizontal rows, making it不符合要求的布局.


Image 2 contains scattered apples on a table, not clearly grouped into horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured, left-to-right groupings required by the reference style.


Image 2 contains cherry tomatoes, not apples. The objects are scattered and do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwich pieces, each row containing 3 visible sandwiches. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping principle, with each sandwich clearly distinguishable and supporting stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sandwiches are stacked vertically and lack clearly defined left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains multiple sandwiches but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear as a scattered or irregular layout on plates, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sandwich objects; instead, the sandwiches are irregularly arranged and lack distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four clearly distinguishable sandwich halves on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of sandwiches. The sandwiches are part of a plate with fries and condiments, arranged in a single, irregular group without distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of sandwiches arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are plates with various food items, but no distinct sandwich groupings are evident.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible sandwich instances, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured into distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered objects and lacks clearly defined horizontal rows of sandwiches. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of dining tables with visible place settings, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of five distinguishable buses, visually grouped from left to right in a single band that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each with 2 visible tables, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout. The tables are clearly grouped left-to-right in each row, and there are 4 distinguishable dining table instances.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of dining table objects, with two distinct rows of food items and tableware. Each row is a recognizable left-to-right group, and there are 7 visible dining table instances (plates, bowls, steamers) that meet the criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 contains only a single bus, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances or any discernible horizontal grouping.


Image 2 shows buses in a scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands, and the layout does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows buses in a scattered, non-uniform arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of five distinct buses, forming a single visible row that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The buses are left-to-right recognizable as a cohesive group without object boxes or clustering.


Image 2 shows two buses in a single horizontal row, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout. However, the count of visible buses (2) is below the required minimum of 4.


Image 2 shows buses arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The buses are aligned along the road's length, creating a linear perspective rather than distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows buses in a parking lot with no clear horizontal rows; they are arranged in a scattered, irregular pattern without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows two buses parked side by side, but they do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's structural grouping principle. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the distinct left-to-right bands required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable buses, visually grouped left-to-right with stable ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows buses in a parking lot with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's group portrait style.


Image 2 shows buses in a depth layout with varying distances and perspectives, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of buses, but only three visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, while the buses form a left-to-right group, the count does not meet the threshold.


Image 2 shows buses arranged along a road, with depth and perspective creating an apparent row structure. This does not match the horizontal band grouping principle of the reference image.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each containing multiple visible dining table instances arranged left-to-right in a clear group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows buses parked in a parking lot, not arranged in horizontal rows. The buses are scattered and do not form any visible left-to-right groups that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows buses scattered across the frame with no clear horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible buses arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows only two buses, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is not clearly structured into horizontal rows and lacks the group recognition criteria.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable buses, visually grouped from left to right without occlusion or irregular spacing.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'dining table' objects arranged in horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of dining tables, each row containing 3 distinguishable tables arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable red buses aligned left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable buses aligned left-to-right along the street, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable red buses aligned left-to-right along the street, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows buses arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable buses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows dining tables arranged in depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The tables are viewed from a side angle, creating an illusion of vertical stacking rather than clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows a single dining table in the foreground with no visible horizontal rows of similar objects. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of multiple distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of dining tables arranged in horizontal rows. The foreground contains a single table with food items, but it lacks the required multiple, clearly defined horizontal bands of dining tables.


Image 2 shows a single dining table arrangement viewed in depth, not distinct horizontal rows of tables. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each row a clear left-to-right grouping. The tables are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects, totaling six visible instances, matching the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 shows buses arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are positioned along a road viewed from a perspective angle, making it unsuitable for the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout requirement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each with 2 visible tables, meeting the criteria for clear left-to-right groupings and a total of 4 distinguishable dining tables.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with buses arranged along a road, not in distinct horizontal rows. The buses are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would constitute visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display any visible dining tables. The scene shows people seated at a table, but no distinct dining tables are discernible as horizontal bands or groups.


Image 2 shows a single dining table viewed in depth, not horizontal rows of tables. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows buses arranged along a street in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of dining tables arranged in horizontal rows or grids. The visible objects are primarily plates and glasses, with no clear grouping of dining tables as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains only two visible buses, not within a clear horizontal row structure matching the reference's grouping principle. The buses are part of a street scene with cars and pedestrians, lacking distinct left-to-right groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each with multiple visible tables arranged left-to-right in a clear group. The tables are recognizable as separate objects within each row, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinguishable buses, visually forming a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with an appropriate number of visible instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of dining tables, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The tables are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinguishable buses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only a single bus visible in the background, with no additional buses forming horizontal rows or groups. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of multiple distinct horizontal bands of 'bus' objects.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of dining tables with multiple visible instances of the target category, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a crowded and irregular arrangement of vehicles, including buses, but lacks the clear, distinct horizontal rows of 'bus' objects required by the reference style. The buses are mixed with other vehicles and do not form stable, recognizable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays four distinct buses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the street, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands. The buses are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects within the row.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of dining tables with 6 visible instances, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The six visible tables meet the criteria for count and layout.


Image 2 shows a single dining table in the background, not arranged in horizontal rows or groups. The visible tables do not form distinct left-to-right bands that would qualify as rows.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of dining tables, but only two visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, the arrangement does not support stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly recognizable as a left-to-right group. The tables are visibly arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure, with 8 separately distinguishable dining tables present.


Image 2 shows dining tables arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The tables are viewed from an angle, creating a perspective that does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows dining tables arranged in depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The tables are viewed from a side angle and appear to recede into the background, making it impossible to identify clear left-to-right groups that would qualify as horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows dining tables arranged in depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The tables are viewed from an angle and overlap visually, failing to meet the criteria for clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded buses without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The tables are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of dining tables, each clearly left-to-right grouped and containing 2-3 visible tables, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 total visible instances.


Image 2 does not display any visible dining tables arranged in horizontal rows. The tables are either obscured, out of focus, or not clearly identifiable as distinct objects in a structured layout.


Image 2 shows a dining table arrangement viewed in depth, with objects appearing in vertical stacks and scattered groups rather than clear horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly arranged dining tables without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of dining tables arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present do not meet the criteria for 'dining table' as per COCO, and there is no discernible grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable vase objects arranged left to right on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct vases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a shelf, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible vases, with 5 clearly distinguishable instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct blue and white vases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along a pathway, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable vase objects arranged left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of six distinguishable mason jars (vases) arranged left-to-right, visually matching the reference's grouping principle.