Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of computer mice, each row containing four visible and clearly distinguishable mice arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear and stable horizontal arrangement of microwave ovens, forming two distinct rows with 3-4 microwaves per row. The objects are visibly grouped left-to-right in each row, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows stop signs arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative y positions, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible stop signs arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of microwaves on a shelving unit, with four visible microwave instances that are clearly recognizable as separate objects. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of polar bears, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible bear instances fitting the criteria.


The bears are arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows, and the row count is not visually evident.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal bands of bears, with three in the front row and two in the back, forming a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 visible parking meters, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of parking meters, each row containing 2-3 visible units arranged left-to-right in a stable, recognizable pattern. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances and aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with parking meters receding into the background, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible parking meters aligned left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinct fire hydrants arranged left to right on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays six clearly visible plastic spoons arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a patterned cloth, matching the reference's grouping principle of a real left-to-right group.


Image 2 shows spoons hanging from a rack, creating an apparent row due to depth and perspective rather than distinct horizontal bands. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable left-to-right groupings or ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of spoon objects, each a clear left-to-right group. The spoons are visibly arranged in stable rows with ordinal left/right positions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible keyboards on a desk, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right object bands.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of five clearly distinguishable frisbees, each held by an individual in a left-to-right arrangement that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains frisbees, but they are scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The objects appear to be in a pile or group without clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a stable row.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible frisbees held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible keyboards, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and appears as a scattered arrangement rather than a structured layout.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible fire hydrants arranged in two horizontal rows of two, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains keyboards but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear in a scattered and irregular layout.


Image 2 contains only two visible keyboards, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement does not form clear horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 does not contain any visible fire hydrants and thus cannot meet the criteria for horizontal rows or any other layout type.


Image 2 contains fire hydrants but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of six visible keyboards, forming a single distinct row that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The keyboards are left-to-right grouped and recognizable as a cohesive unit without object boxes.


Image 2 contains scattered frisbees without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible frisbees, nor does it exhibit a structured horizontal row layout matching the reference.


Image 2 contains scattered objects with no clear horizontal grouping of spoons; the visible items do not form recognizable rows.


Image 2 contains only one visible spoon, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any clear horizontal grouping or layout resembling the reference's structured rows.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of ovens, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display multiple ovens arranged in horizontal rows; instead, it features a single Lego oven model with no additional ovens visible for comparison.


Image 2 does not contain any visible ovens. The horizontal bands present are of kitchenware and countertops, not ovens.


Image 2 shows ovens arranged in a vertical stack and depth perspective, not in horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right recognizable bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows a double oven in a kitchen layout, but the objects are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The 'rows' appear to be based on depth and perspective rather than a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a kitchen scene with ovens arranged vertically along the counter, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based and does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 6 visible refrigerators, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right alignment and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 shows vertical stacks of refrigerators, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays exactly two horizontal rows of distinct clocks, each row containing four clearly visible and recognizable clock instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or occlusion issues.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 visible refrigerators, forming a stable left-to-right group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of forks, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The forks are visibly arranged in stable rows with 6 distinguishable instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows clocks arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the wall and appear to be part of a control panel, lacking distinct left-to-right groupings that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of forks, each a clear left-to-right group. The forks are visibly arranged in stable rows with ordinal left/right descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of refrigerators along a wall, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are aligned vertically and viewed from depth, failing to meet the horizontal row grouping requirement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of refrigerators, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable units arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible clock, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks the horizontal band grouping principle observed in the reference image.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of forks. The forks are clustered together in a single group without distinct rows or ordinal left/right structure.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of visible forks, with each row containing 3 clearly identifiable and left-to-right grouped forks. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible clock faces arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row containing two clocks. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible refrigerators arranged in a single, stable horizontal row, matching the reference grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of clocks, with a total of five visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct clocks arranged in a clear, left-to-right horizontal band, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal rows. Each clock is separately distinguishable and supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains four refrigerators, but they are not arranged in any visible horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible fork, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks the horizontal banding or structured layout seen in the reference image.


Image 2 contains only two visible forks, insufficient for the required count of 4-8. The arrangement does not form clear horizontal bands or rows recognizable as distinct groupings.


Image 2 contains scattered forks at the bottom left, not forming any clear horizontal bands or groups.


Image 2 shows clocks on the wall arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered tennis balls with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered sports balls with no clear horizontal rows, and the visible instances do not form a structured group as required.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable sports balls (petanque boules), visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a single horizontal band of 3 visible sports balls, matching the reference's grouping principle. However, it does not meet the minimum requirement of 4 objects for acceptance.


Image 2 contains only two sports balls, not the required 4-8 visible instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form any discernible horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of tennis balls, each row containing 2-3 visible instances. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping principle, with the balls clearly distinguishable and supporting stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible sports balls, each row clearly recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 distinguishable sports balls and maintains the reference-style grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a vertical arrangement of beds in a train compartment, not horizontal rows. The 'rows' are perceived only due to depth and perspective, not as distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of beds in a train compartment, not horizontal rows. The 'rows' are defined by depth and perspective rather than left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of 'bed' objects. The images depict a child on a bed, but the layout does not follow the required horizontal row structure for beds.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinct beds, each recognizable as a separate entity from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of beds, each row containing three clearly visible and recognizable bed instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, meeting all specified criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible beds arranged in a single horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands. The beds are evenly spaced and recognizable as separate instances without occlusion or clustering.


Image 2 contains four visible beds but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The beds are placed at varying depths and positions, forming an irregular layout rather than a structured grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of beds, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The four visible beds meet the criteria for recognizable rows with stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of beds, each row containing 3 visible beds arranged in a clear left-to-right grouping. The layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of cats without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's structured grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cats, each a clear left-to-right group. The cats are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, meeting the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


The knives are arranged vertically along the wall, not in horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of baseball gloves in three distinct rows, with each row containing 2-3 visible gloves that form recognizable left-to-right groups. The total count of visible gloves (7) meets the criteria of 4-8 instances, and the layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of baseball gloves, with 7 clearly visible and distinguishable instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of baseball gloves, with each row containing four clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands, allowing for stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cats, each row containing three clearly visible and separately distinguishable cats. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of knives, but only 3 are visibly distinct and countable. The arrangement meets the horizontal grouping principle, but the count is below the required minimum of 4.


Image 2 displays six visibly distinct scissors arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible  `knife` objects in a structured horizontal arrangement; instead, knives are seen vertically mounted on a magnetic strip and do not form discernible rows.


Image 2 contains no visible knives; it displays various vegetables and bottles, none of which are knives.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed knives, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects do not visually follow the grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains knives only in a knife block, not arranged in visible horizontal rows on the plate.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of baseball gloves, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The gloves are visibly separate and countable (7 instances), matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of five distinct scissors, clearly arranged left-to-right and visually obvious as a cohesive group.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of cats, with each row containing clearly recognizable groups of 2-3 cats. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of scissors, each a clear left-to-right group. There are eight visible, distinguishable scissors instances arranged in a stable row format, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of baseball gloves, with each row containing clearly recognizable left-to-right groups of 3 gloves. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects with no clear horizontal rows of knives.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of a child wearing a baseball glove, with six clearly visible instances across the frames. The arrangement follows a genuine left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues.


Image 2 shows knives mounted vertically on a wall, not arranged in horizontal rows. The objects do not form visible left-to-right groups that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal bands of cats, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows two cats in a single, irregular arrangement without distinct horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four visibly distinct scissors arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cats in a scattered and irregular arrangement without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows four distinct cats arranged in two visible horizontal bands, with clear left-to-right groupings that a person would recognize without object boxes. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of scissors, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible scissors meet the criteria for recognizable rows and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of cats, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The cats are visibly distinguishable within these rows, meeting the criteria for 4-8 visible instances and a stable row-based layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 visible scissors, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays four scissors arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a fabric surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains four separate instances of scissors, but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows. Instead, they appear in a grid layout with no clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible baseball gloves resting on a fence, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 does not contain cats; it shows dogs and cats in a scattered, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear rows.


Image 2 contains scattered scissors without clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one knife, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances. Additionally, it lacks the horizontal banding structure seen in the reference image.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible baseball gloves, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 contains a single knife partially visible at the edge of the frame, not forming any discernible horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of baseball gloves, with 6 clearly visible instances that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered scissors objects in a container and on the table, not arranged in distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sinks, each row containing 4 visible and recognizable sink instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded couches with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sinks, each containing two visibly separate and recognizable sink instances. The arrangement supports clear row-number and left-to-right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped layout of couches. The visible furniture includes scattered and irregularly placed items such as armchairs and a sofa, lacking the structured horizontal rows required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of couches, with 5 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows two sinks arranged in a single horizontal row, meeting the requirement for exactly one visible horizontal band of 'sink' objects. However, the count of visible 'sink' instances is only 2, which falls below the minimum threshold of 4 required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a single sink with no visible horizontal bands or groups of sinks, thus failing to meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of blue couches, each row containing two clearly visible and recognizable couch instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only one visible couch, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 separately distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks the horizontal row structure seen in the reference image.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible sinks arranged in a single, stable horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains a single horizontal row of couches, but only 3 visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, the layout does not fully match the reference's multi-row structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six visible sinks arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and non-horizontal couch instances, lacking a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of couches. Instead, it shows a depth-based arrangement with a single couch in the background and other furniture in the foreground, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of 4 distinct couches, forming a single visible row that aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible sinks, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of couches, each row containing visible and recognizable couch instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible sinks arranged in a single horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontal arrangement of couches. The visible objects are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of sinks. The objects are scattered and appear to be in a cluttered, non-uniform layout without distinct rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible sinks, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of toothbrushes, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible toothbrush instances, satisfying the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows toothbrushes in cups, not arranged in horizontal rows. The objects are grouped by container rather than forming a structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable toothbrushes, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows toothbrushes in a vertical stack within a cup, not arranged in horizontal rows. The objects do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of toothbrushes with no clear horizontal rows, and the objects are not arranged in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two toothbrushes, does not form visible horizontal rows, and lacks the structural grouping principle of Image 1.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four distinguishable toothbrushes arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows toothbrush heads in a circular, clustered arrangement rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two toothbrushes, does not form visible horizontal rows, and lacks the required number of distinguishable instances for acceptance.


Image 2 contains only a single toothbrush in the foreground, with no visible horizontal bands or groups of toothbrushes. The remaining objects are not toothbrushes and do not form any recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows a single person holding multiple toothbrushes, but they are not arranged in any visible horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of toothbrushes arranged in horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible toothbrushes arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right organization.


Image 2 contains scattered toothbrushes without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of remote controls, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 8 visible remote instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 distinguishable remote controls, visually grouped from left to right without occlusion or irregular spacing.


Image 2 displays seven clearly visible remote controls arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable cell phones, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains cell phones but they are scattered and not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The objects do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered remotes on a surface without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of organized horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible remote controls arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a carpeted surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible remote controls arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a colorful textured surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible Wii remotes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of real left-to-right groups without object boxes or clustering.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible cell phones arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of real left-to-right groups without occlusion or depth-based arrangement.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of cell phones, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are clustered in the center, with no clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded baseball bats without clear horizontal rows, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible remote controls arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible remote controls arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a carpeted surface. The objects are left-to-right grouped and recognizable as separate instances without clustering or occlusion.


Image 2 displays four visible cell phones arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four visible cell phones arranged in two distinct horizontal rows on a marble surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right groupings without occlusion or depth-based arrangement.


Image 2 contains only three cell phones, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of the target category 'remote' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are not distinguishable as remote controls, and there is no evidence of a structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 contains only three visible remote objects, which do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the distinct left-to-right bands required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains only three visible cell phones, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and the objects are not arranged in a stable left-to-right group that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct cell phones arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible cell phones, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are left-to-right grouped and recognizable without boxes or clustering.


Image 2 shows scattered cell phones held by individuals, lacking a clear horizontal row structure or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible cell phones arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered cell phones without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible cell phones arranged in a single horizontal row on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains cell phones, but they are scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with objects grouped by type rather than forming clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered Wii remotes without clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings, and the count of visible remotes is below the threshold.


Image 2 shows cell phones held by people at varying depths and heights, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is more depth-based than a structured horizontal layout.


Image 2 shows two Wii remotes held by individuals, but they do not form any visible horizontal bands or rows. The objects are not arranged in a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 lacks visible instances of the target category 'remote' and does not exhibit a horizontal row layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of 'remote' objects; the remotes are held by individuals in various positions without forming distinct, stable rows.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of visible Wii remotes, with four clearly distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or occlusion issues.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of baseball bats; instead, it shows a single player with one bat and scattered bats in the background, which do not form recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of baseball bats resting on a bench, with 6 visibly distinct instances. The arrangement supports stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions and aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four clearly visible baseball bats, arranged left-to-right on the ground. The objects form a distinct group that supports stable ordinal descriptions and matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered baseball bats without a clear horizontal row structure, violating the requirement for visible horizontal bands of objects.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of baseball bats, with each row containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable bats held by players in a structured group pose.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded baseball bats, not clearly arranged in distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible baseball bats arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible baseball bats held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of baseball bats. The visible objects are scattered and do not form discernible rows or groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of baseball bats, with each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible baseball bat, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal grouping or rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of baseball bats. The bats are scattered and not organized into distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display visible instances of 'baseball bat' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The bats are scattered and not grouped into discernible left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of baseball bats along the bench, forming one distinct row with 6 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible baseball bats held by individuals arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible baseball bats, which do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups. The objects are scattered and not arranged in a structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'baseball bat' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The bats are scattered or held by individuals, failing to meet the criteria for a structured horizontal grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of dogs, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable dogs.


Image 2 shows dogs in stacked crates viewed from depth, not as distinct horizontal rows. The 'rows' are a result of vertical stacking and perspective, not a genuine left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle; dogs are scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered dogs with no clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows dogs in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable groupings that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only three visible dogs, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured into distinct bands.


Image 2 contains four distinct dogs but they are arranged in a grid layout rather than horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, thus failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable dogs viewed through a mesh screen, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows dogs in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows dogs in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped left-to-right in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows dogs in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not meet the criteria for a structured 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 shows dogs in a scattered, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear left-to-right groups or distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered group of dogs without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows four distinct dogs arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a surfboard, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a grid layout of dogs, but the arrangement does not form stable horizontal rows as per the reference style. The dogs are positioned in a scattered and irregular manner across the four quadrants.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dogs lying on the floor, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or occlusion issues.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of dogs: one row with a golden retriever in the foreground and another row with three dogs (two huskies and one golden retriever) on a bench in the background. The arrangement meets the criteria for horizontal rows, with clearly distinguishable dogs in each row.


Image 2 shows dogs in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible dogs, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured into distinct bands.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible dogs, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement is irregular and not clearly grouped into horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays six snowboards arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row against a wooden slat background, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable snowboards held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of 5 distinct snowboards, clearly arranged left-to-right and visually recognizable as a cohesive group.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinct snowboards, visually grouped from left to right in a stable and recognizable manner.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinct snowboards, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of snowboards, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 5 visible snowboards in total.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of snowboards, each row containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable snowboards held by individuals. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of snowboards, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The five visible snowboards meet the criteria for recognizable, non-overlapping instances within stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays six clearly visible snowboards held by individuals in a single, distinct horizontal row. The objects form a real left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions and matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of snowboards held upright by individuals, forming a cohesive left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 6 distinguishable snowboards visible, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of snowboards, with 5 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of snowboards, with each row containing clearly recognizable left-to-right groups of 4-5 snowboards. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display snowboards arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The snowboards are scattered and occluded, with no clear left-to-right groupings that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of snowboards; instead, it shows a single snowboard in the foreground with other equipment scattered around, lacking clear left-to-right groups or rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible snowboards held upright by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of snowboards, with four visible in the front row and two in the back, meeting all criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows snowboards arranged vertically in a depth layout, not in horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of snowboards, with 5 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal banding style.


Image 2 shows snowboarders in a dynamic, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear left-to-right groupings that match the reference's horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and not visually organized into distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows traffic lights arranged vertically on poles, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based, with objects appearing at different distances rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of traffic lights, each a clear left-to-right group, with 8 visible instances that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 distinct ties, visually arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout follows the reference's grouping principle with no evidence of depth, columns, or irregular spacing.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of kites; the kites are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows ties hanging vertically and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The visible ties are irregularly placed, with no clear left-to-right grouping that supports a stable row-based layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of kites, each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable kite objects. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal banding style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of kites, with 4-8 visible instances in each row, clearly organized from left to right without overlapping or occlusion.


Image 2 contains multiple traffic lights but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. The objects appear scattered and do not form stable, recognizable left-to-right groups that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of kites, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible kite instances are separately distinguishable and arranged in a way that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of colorful kites, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The kites are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling 7 within the image.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of colorful kites, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable kite instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of colorful kites flying in the sky, each band containing multiple clearly visible and distinguishable kite instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered kites on a beach without clear horizontal rows, making it不符合要求的布局.


Image 2 shows traffic lights arranged vertically along a pole, not in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows traffic lights arranged vertically along a street, not in horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to depth and perspective, not a genuine left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows traffic lights arranged vertically on poles, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based, with objects aligned along a vertical axis rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of traffic lights, each a left-to-right group recognizable without object boxes. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal band of six visible traffic lights, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered kites without clear horizontal rows, and the visible instances do not form stable left-to-right groups as required.


Image 2 displays six visible ties hanging in a single, clear horizontal row on a rod, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of kites, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The kites are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects, totaling 7 instances. The layout matches the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cow-shaped kites, each a clear left-to-right group. The kites are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling 7 visible 'kite' objects, matching the required criteria for horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered kites in the sky with no clear horizontal rows or structured grouping. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered kites in the sky without any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of kites, each a clear left-to-right group. The kites are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects, totaling 7 visible instances. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains a single traffic light object, not multiple visible instances arranged in horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains only two traffic lights, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form any clear horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 contains four visible traffic lights, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear vertically stacked and grouped together, which does not match the reference's horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 contains a single traffic light object, not multiple visible instances arranged in horizontal rows as required.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of traffic lights, each containing two clearly visible and recognizable objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single traffic light against a building, viewed from below. It does not contain multiple horizontal bands or groups of traffic lights that would align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of traffic lights; it shows a single vertical stack of traffic lights with no additional instances forming rows.


Image 2 shows traffic lights arranged vertically on a pole, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a single visible traffic light, not meeting the requirement of 4-8 instances. The layout is also irregular and does not follow a horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a single traffic light, not multiple visible instances arranged in horizontal bands as required.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of traffic lights, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The four visible traffic lights meet the criteria for recognizable rows, supporting stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a single traffic light visible on the left, which does not form any horizontal rows or groups. The layout is not consistent with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible traffic lights, not within a structured horizontal row layout as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains only one visible traffic light, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, it does not exhibit a clear horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of kites, with 5 visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row arrangement of ties; instead, the ties are laid out in a scattered and irregular manner without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of kites. The kites are clustered together in a single, irregular group without distinct left-to-right bands or rows.


Image 2 displays four distinct ties hanging in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of kites, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The kites are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects within these rows, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of ties without any clear horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of kites, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The kites are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects within these rows, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible instances.


Image 2 is a crowded scene with ties visible but not arranged in clear, distinct horizontal rows. The ties appear scattered and mixed within the crowd, lacking the structured grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 visible ties, arranged left-to-right in a stable and recognizable group, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows teddy bears with scarves, not ties. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows of the target category.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bow ties, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with six visible, distinguishable tie instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays exactly four distinct ties arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains multiple 'tie' objects, but they are scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of colorful kites, with 4-8 visible instances in each band, clearly arranged in left-to-right groups that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of kites. The kites appear scattered and are not organized into distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of kites; the kites are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered kites on snow without any clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 displays a single individual with multiple ties held in his hands, not arranged in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct ties arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, each visibly separate and identifiable without object boxes or clustering. The arrangement supports stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions and meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows only two ties, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is not horizontally grouped into visible bands.


Image 2 shows a single tie being held by a child, with no visible horizontal rows or groups of ties. The arrangement is not consistent with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered kites in the sky without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, and thus does not match the reference's structural principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible ties, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right alignment.


Image 2 shows ties worn by people in a depth layout, not as distinct horizontal rows of visible objects. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of kites. The kites are scattered across the beach, with no distinct left-to-right groupings that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered ties among people in a crowd, not forming clear horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four boys wearing ties arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row. The ties are distinct and left-to-right recognizable as a group, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible ties, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right alignment and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of ties, with two distinct rows of 3-4 individuals each, forming recognizable left-to-right groups. The ties are visibly distinct and countable (7 instances), matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible ties, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of trains, each forming a clear left-to-right grouping that aligns with the reference's row-based structure. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of trains, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of trains, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of trains, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of train objects, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains three visible 'tv' objects, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The objects appear irregularly placed on the desk and do not form a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly placed monitors without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of toilet objects, each a clear left-to-right group. There are eight visible and distinguishable toilet instances arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six visibly distinct toilets arranged left-to-right along the floor, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a crowded scene with backpacks scattered and occluded, not forming distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of people wearing backpacks, not distinct horizontal rows of visible backpacks. The arrangement is vertical and based on relative positions along the boat's length, not clearly defined left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of trains, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible train instances are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of trains, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible train instances.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of TVs, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are stacked vertically and appear to be in a pile or scattered layout, failing to meet the criteria for clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single TV mounted on a wall, viewed from depth. It does not exhibit the required horizontal rows of TVs or any left-to-right groupings that would constitute a valid layout for the target category.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of donuts in a display case, not horizontal rows of TVs. The 'TV' objects are menu screens mounted on the wall above the display, but they do not form visible horizontal bands or groups that match the reference's row-based structure.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; toilets are scattered without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct train locomotives arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single train with no visible horizontal bands or groups of trains, and the arrangement is not consistent with the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal band of train objects, forming a left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of train cars, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the perspective of the scene rather than forming clear left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a single train with no visible horizontal bands or groups of trains, failing to meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 shows trains arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are aligned along the tracks (depth perspective) rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of train objects, forming a single distinct row with multiple visible train instances aligned left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct trains arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of train cars, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of train objects, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of train objects, with two distinct left-to-right groups visible along the tracks. The trains are recognizable as separate entities within these rows, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4 visible instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of train objects, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal band of trains, but only 3 visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, the arrangement does not support stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of trains, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows trains arranged along a depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows trains arranged along a depth perspective and tracks, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of trains, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible train instances meet the criteria for recognizable rows and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with monitors stacked vertically and placed at different depths, not forming clear horizontal rows of 'tv' objects.


Image 2 contains multiple monitors and laptops, but they are not arranged in clear, distinct horizontal rows of 'tv' objects. The layout is irregular, with devices placed at various depths and orientations, lacking the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with TVs placed along the left side of the room, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is linear along the wall and does not meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of 'tv' objects.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 visible portable toilets, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right alignment and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of toilets, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The toilets are visibly separate and countable (8 instances), adhering to the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows toilets in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible toilets, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of luggage and backpacks, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is primarily vertical and lacks the clear left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a crowded scene with backpacks scattered and occluded, not forming clear horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered backpacks without clear horizontal rows, making it irregular rather than structured.


Image 2 shows a large projection screen and smaller displays, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows of visible 'tv' objects. The layout appears to be depth-based with a central display and side monitors, not conforming to the required horizontal band structure.


Image 2 shows monitors arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is based on relative y positions and perspective, not distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains three visible monitors but lacks any clear horizontal grouping that would constitute distinct rows. The arrangement is irregular and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of TVs. The objects appear irregularly placed, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinct TVs arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible 'tv' objects arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on the desk, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a cluttered desk with multiple monitors and keyboards, but the 'tv' objects are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered or grouped by proximity rather than forming clear, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four clearly visible TVs, each a distinct object arranged left-to-right on a shelf. The arrangement supports stable ordinal descriptions and visually matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains a single computer monitor, which does not form visible horizontal bands or groups of 4-8 'tv' instances as required by the reference layout.


Image 2 displays a clear 2x2 grid of four TVs, forming two distinct horizontal rows with left-to-right groupings that match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of illuminated signs and billboards, not distinct horizontal rows of 'tv' objects. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible 'tv' object, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal bands or groupings that would qualify as rows.


Image 2 contains a single computer monitor, which does not form any visible horizontal bands or groups of 'tv' objects as required by the reference layout.


Image 2 lacks visible instances of 'tv' objects and does not exhibit a horizontal row layout.


Image 2 shows a single TV repeated in four identical frames, not distinct horizontal bands of TVs. The layout is not grouped into rows but rather duplicated across the image.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of computer monitors, not distinct horizontal rows of TVs. The arrangement is linear along the depth of the room, not left-to-right groups forming visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with TVs mounted at varying heights, not horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'tv'.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of toilet objects; the toilets are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five urinals, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of toilets, each containing 4 visible instances. The objects are clearly grouped left-to-right within each row, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances and a clear reference-style match.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six urinals, visually matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible toilets, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality and no evidence of depth or irregular arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 urinals arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered backpacks without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 shows scattered backpacks without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth view of sinks, not toilets, and the arrangement is not horizontal rows but rather a perspective-based layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible backpacks, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right alignment.


Image 2 contains scattered backpacks on the snow without any clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows scattered backpacks on the ground without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains four visible toilet instances, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The objects appear scattered and lack the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of three toilets, matching the reference's grouping principle. However, it contains only 3 visible instances, falling short of the required 4-8 for acceptance.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of backpacks. The objects are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible urinals (a type of toilet), arranged left-to-right along the wall. The objects form a stable, recognizable group that supports ordinal descriptions and matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains multiple backpacks, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear as a scattered group on the floor, with no clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of toilets, each with 3-4 visible units arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable grouping. The objects are clearly identifiable as toilets, and the layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four urinals arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows urinals arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the wall and appear to be in a single vertical column viewed from an angle, which does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 contains four visible toilets but they are arranged in a scattered, non-horizontal layout without clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of visible backpacks, with four clearly distinguishable instances that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible toilet objects arranged left-to-right on the ground, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows urinals arranged vertically along a wall, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based and does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows toilets arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible portable toilets, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible backpacks on the ground, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are left-to-right recognizable as a group without clustering.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible backpacks, each row containing 3 clearly identifiable backpacks. The arrangement follows a genuine left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective distortion, aligning with the reference's horizontal band structure.


Image 2 displays four urinals arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains scattered backpacks without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered backpacks on the ground without any clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of toilets, each row containing 3 visible toilet instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 total visible objects.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of backpacks. The objects are scattered, piled, and occluded, lacking distinct rows or groups that support stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible backpacks, each row containing 3 backpacks that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered backpacks without clear horizontal rows or stable groupings that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows backpacks arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and perspective, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows toilets arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are grouped by perspective rather than distinct left-to-right bands, and do not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible backpacks, both are scattered and not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The objects do not form a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible backpacks, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and the arrangement is irregular rather than grouped into distinct bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded backpacks, not forming clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable surfboards, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinct surfboards, visually grouped from left to right in a stable and recognizable arrangement.


Image 2 shows surfboards arranged vertically and stacked, not in horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to depth perspective, not a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable surfboards standing upright, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays six surfboards arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinct surfboards on the sand, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands. The arrangement is stable and recognizable as a left-to-right group without object boxes.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of surfboards, each row containing 3 visible surfboards that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinct surfboards held upright by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right organization and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontal row-based layout of surfboards. The surfboards are scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of surfboards, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of surfboards, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The five visible surfboards meet the criteria for row count and category instance count, and the layout supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of 7 distinct surfboards held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle with a single, stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 shows surfboards arranged vertically against a wall, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based, with objects positioned at different distances from the camera, which does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 shows surfboards scattered on the sand without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of organized horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows surfboards carried by people in a depth layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains surfboards scattered in a dynamic, non-horizontal arrangement; no clear left-to-right horizontal bands are visible.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of surfboards; instead, it shows a single surfboard in use and others placed vertically or scattered.


Image 2 contains four surfboards, but they are vertically stacked and not arranged in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four surfboards arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row against a wall, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four surfboards held by individuals in a single, clearly defined horizontal row on the beach, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct surfboards arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on the sand, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of surfboards, each clearly left-to-right and recognizable as separate groups. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible surfboards, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of surfboards on the beach, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a left-to-right grouping principle, supporting stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains surfboards scattered in a dynamic, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear left-to-right groupings that match the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of four distinct surfboards held by individuals, clearly forming a left-to-right group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows surfboards arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands and appear to be placed on a vehicle rather than forming a structured row arrangement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of surfboards on the sand, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues.


Image 2 shows surfboards scattered on the beach without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of organized horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows surfboards carried by people, not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontal arrangement of surfboards. The surfboards are scattered among people and lack the distinct, left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains only scattered surfboards on the water, not clearly grouped into horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of skis, each a clear left-to-right group, with 8 visible and distinguishable ski instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of skis, each a clear left-to-right group recognizable without object boxes. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows skis arranged vertically against a railing, not in horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based and does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display skis arranged in distinct horizontal rows; instead, they are scattered and mixed with other objects and people.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of skis, with each row containing clearly recognizable left-to-right groups of skis. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout, with 8 visible skis instances distributed across 2 stable rows.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of 5 distinct skis, each held by a person standing side-by-side in a left-to-right group that clearly forms a recognizable horizontal band.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skiers, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible skis, meeting the criteria for 4-8 instances and stable row/ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of skis with 7 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of skis. The skis are scattered and not organized into visible rows or groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skis, with each band forming a clear left-to-right group that is visually recognizable as a row. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows skiers in a scattered, non-uniform arrangement with no clear horizontal bands of skis. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right rows as required by the reference style.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of skis, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five skiers standing side-by-side on snow, each with visible skis. The arrangement forms a stable left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of skiers, each a left-to-right group recognizable without object boxes. The arrangement includes 7 visible skis, meeting the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of skiers with visible skis, meeting the criteria for distinct left-to-right grouping and 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows scattered skiers with skis in various orientations, not forming clear horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of skis with 6 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of skiers, each holding visible skis. The arrangement supports stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions, and the skis are distinctly recognizable as separate objects within the group.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinct skateboards hanging side-by-side, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or occlusion.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of hot dogs on a grill, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered hot dogs without clear horizontal grouping, and the visible instances are mixed with other food items, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows a cluttered and irregular arrangement of skis, not forming distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skis, with four visible instances arranged in a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skis, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible skis, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skis on the snow, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The skis are visibly separate and identifiable as individual objects, meeting the criteria for 4-8 visible instances in 1-4 horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skis, with each band containing 3 visible and recognizable ski sets. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 shows skis arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands and appear scattered rather than organized into stable rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skiers, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible skis, meeting the criteria for 4-8 instances. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display skis arranged in horizontal rows; instead, the skiers are positioned in a scattered formation with no clear left-to-right grouping of skis.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of skiers with visible skis, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 5 distinguishable skis.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skis, each a clear left-to-right group. The skis are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, meeting the criteria for horizontal rows with 4-8 visible objects.


Image 2 shows skiers standing in a depth layout, not distinct horizontal rows of skis. The arrangement is irregular and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of skis, each clearly left-to-right and recognizable as separate groups. The skis are visibly distinguishable within these rows, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four distinct skis, visually grouped from left to right as a person would recognize without object boxes. The arrangement supports stable ordinal descriptions and matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows four skiers arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row with distinct left-to-right positioning, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of skiers on a snowy slope, with 6 visible and distinguishable skis arranged left-to-right. The grouping follows the reference's horizontal band principle without ambiguity.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of skis, with 6 visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups recognizable without object boxes. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible skateboards arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of real left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of skateboards, not forming clear horizontal rows or a structured layout as required.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of skateboards, each row containing 3 visible skateboards that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible skateboards arranged left-to-right on the ground, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of skateboards arranged in horizontal rows; instead, it shows a single skateboard in use during a trick.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of skateboards, not forming distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of hot dogs, each clearly left-to-right grouped and visually recognizable as separate instances. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of hot dogs on a grill, with 7 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands, allowing for stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of hot dogs without any clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 visually follows the reference's grouping principle with exactly one horizontal band of hot dogs, each a real left-to-right group, and contains 9 distinguishable visible hot dog instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of hot dogs on the table, with 5 visibly distinct instances that support stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays 7 visible birds arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, with clear left-to-right groupings that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of birds, each a clear left-to-right group. The birds are visibly arranged in stable rows with ordinal left/right descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows birds scattered across the frame without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows. The birds are scattered and lack a clear, stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of skateboards: one row with three skateboards held or placed on the ground, and another row with two skateboards being held aloft. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with each skateboard visibly distinguishable and contributing to a stable row-number and within-row ordinal description.


Image 2 contains multiple skateboards, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and held by individuals, failing to meet the criteria for a structured horizontal grouping.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinct skateboards, visually grouped from left to right in a manner consistent with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped layout of skateboards. The skateboards are held by individuals in a scattered and irregular arrangement, lacking distinct horizontal bands or rows that would support stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single visible skateboard, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, it lacks any discernible horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible skateboards, each distinct and left-to-right arranged, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinct skateboards held by individuals, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible skateboards, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 distinguishable skateboards.


Image 2 shows scattered skateboard instances without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of skateboarders seated on a ledge, with 8 visible skateboards forming a distinct left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout, with stable ordinal descriptions and no evidence of depth or irregular grouping.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of skateboards. The skateboards are scattered and appear in motion, lacking distinct left-to-right rows or stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of skateboarders and skateboards, with 8 visible instances arranged left to right in a stable, recognizable group.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of hot dogs, each row containing three clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal banding style.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible hot dogs on a grill, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of hot dogs on a plate, not forming distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered hot dogs with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The hot dogs are held together in a single cluster, not arranged in distinct horizontal bands.