Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable motorcycles fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are six visible and distinguishable motorcycle instances, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinguishable motorcycles, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable motorcycles fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are six visible motorcycle instances, meeting the criteria for row count and object count. The layout matches the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The motorcycles are visibly separate and identifiable, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 instances.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible motorcycle instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are eight visible and distinguishable motorcycle instances arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right group. There are eight visible and distinguishable motorcycle instances, satisfying the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 objects.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of five distinct motorcycles, forming one visible row that aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands. The objects are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable, ordinal manner.


Image 2 shows a pile of carrots with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered carrot pieces around broccoli, lacking any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of carrots; instead, they are piled irregularly in a bowl.


Image 2 contains four visible carrot instances, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and irregularly placed on the cutting board.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of carrots without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout, thus failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible carrots, each forming a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 distinguishable carrot instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of visible carrot sticks, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots in a bowl, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces in a soup, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal band of 6 visible carrot instances, clearly arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces mixed with broccoli and other vegetables, lacking any clear horizontal bands or groupings that would match the reference's structured rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible carrot pieces, each row containing 3 carrots, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible carrot instances on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces mixed with rice and broccoli, lacking any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and thus does not match the reference's horizontal row layout principle.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot sticks without any clear horizontal grouping or stable row structure, disqualifying it from matching the reference's horizontal band principle.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces within a soup, lacking any clear horizontal grouping or rows that would match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot shreds without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, failing to match the reference's structured layout principle.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and thus does not match the reference's horizontal banding principle.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without clear horizontal grouping, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right bands of objects.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots in a single container without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, failing to match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces mixed with other vegetables and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and mixed food items with no clear horizontal bands of carrots; the visible carrot pieces are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of bananas with no distinct horizontal rows, and the objects are too closely packed to form recognizable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a pile of bananas without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows a pile of bananas with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout, and the objects are not arranged in distinct left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays 3 distinct horizontal rows of banana bunches, each a clear left-to-right grouping with 4-8 visible bananas, matching the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 shows a pile of bananas with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The objects are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single circular arrangement of bananas, not horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of bananas, not horizontal rows. The objects are clustered together in a way that does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of green banana bunches, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible banana instances.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas: one on the gorilla's head, one in front of it, and one to its left. Each band is a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bananas arranged in a large, dense pile viewed from above, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are occluded and clustered, failing to meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of bananas.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of bananas; instead, it shows a vertical cluster of banana bunches on a tree, which does not match the required horizontal row layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right group. The bananas are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling 7 visible bananas, which meets the criteria for horizontal rows.


The bananas are arranged in a circular pattern rather than horizontal rows, and do not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 shows bananas in a vertical bunch on a tree, not in horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the bananas are in scattered bunches held by individuals, lacking clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows a large pile of bananas without any clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and piled bananas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows bananas hanging in vertical bunches, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based and does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of bananas; instead, it shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of banana bunches on the ground.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular pile of bananas without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinct banana bunches on the counter, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered bananas on a table, not clearly organized into distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 6 visible banana instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows bananas hanging in a market stall, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, they appear scattered and clustered in groups, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of bananas, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible banana instances.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows. The bananas are piled together in a single, irregular cluster rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged in a depth-based perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are clustered together and viewed from an angle, making it unsuitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains only two visible wine glasses, which is below the required count of 4. The objects are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible wine glasses arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses, each row containing 3 visible instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 total visible objects and a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains scattered wine glasses without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible wine glasses on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right object bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible wine glasses on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of wine glasses. The objects are scattered and occluded, with no distinct rows visible.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 visible wine glasses, consistent with the reference's grouping principle. The objects are arranged left-to-right in a stable, recognizable group without occlusion or irregular spacing.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of wine glasses; the objects are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows wine glasses arranged along a long table viewed in depth, creating an apparent row only due to perspective. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct horizontal bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 visible wine glasses on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible wine glasses on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of wine glasses. The objects are scattered and occluded, inconsistent with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible sheep, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right alignment and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered and not arranged in visible horizontal rows, with some partially obscured or grazing, failing to meet the strict grouping criteria.


Image 2 shows sheep in a confined space with no clear horizontal rows; they are clustered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sheep are irregularly scattered without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable individuals arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 5 visibly distinguishable sheep instances.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of sheep into two distinct rows, with 5 visible instances that are easily distinguishable and follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped layout of sheep. The sheep are scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six sheep walking left to right on a grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. There are five visible sheep instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five sheep, each visibly distinct and arranged left-to-right in a manner consistent with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the sheep are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains sheep but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they are clustered together in a group without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sheep are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only 4 visible sheep, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. Instead, they appear in a scattered and irregular layout across the grid, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six sheep, each distinct and aligned left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement includes 6 visible sheep instances that are separately distinguishable and support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The five visible sheep are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row structure with ordinal left/right descriptions.


Image 2 does not display sheep in clearly defined horizontal rows; the sheep are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sheep; the sheep are scattered and not visibly grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sheep; the animals are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of orange objects in exactly four distinct horizontal bands, each forming a left-to-right group that is visually recognizable without object boxes. The count of visible orange instances is eight, and the layout supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered orange slices without a clear horizontal row structure, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains 4 visible orange instances but they are irregularly arranged, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and overlapping oranges without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 contains scattered orange objects without a clear horizontal row structure, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded oranges with no clear horizontal bands or groupings that match the reference's row-based structure.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible orange objects, which is below the required minimum of 4. The objects are also irregularly placed rather than forming distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows a pile of oranges in a bowl, which does not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded orange objects without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded oranges without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered orange slices and tomatoes, but lacks visible horizontal bands of oranges that follow the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement is irregular and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered orange objects (lemons) without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges, with four and two visible instances respectively, clearly grouped from left to right.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of orange objects (orange slices), each forming a clear left-to-right group. The six visible orange slices are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable, recognizable row structure.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of orange objects in two distinct rows, with 6 visible and distinguishable oranges that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of oranges in two distinct rows, with 5 visible instances that are easily recognizable as separate objects. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only three visible orange instances, not enough to meet the 4-8 requirement. The objects are scattered and lack a clear horizontal grouping.


Image 2 contains only a few scattered orange objects without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and non-horizontal arrangements of orange objects, including apricots, tomato slices, and carrot sticks, which do not form clear left-to-right horizontal bands as required.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects (fruits) without clear horizontal bands or groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal band of orange objects (carrots and orange segments) that form a clear left-to-right group, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 6 visible instances.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects (carrot sticks and possibly small candies) without clear horizontal bands or groupings that match the reference's structured rows.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of fruits, not distinct horizontal rows of oranges. The arrangement is along a long aisle, and the 'rows' are not visually obvious or stable for ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows giraffes in a depth layout, with apparent rows arising from perspective rather than distinct horizontal bands. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal bands, each a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 5 visible giraffes.


Image 2 shows giraffes in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible giraffes are positioned behind fences and appear to be in a vertical arrangement rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4 visible giraffes.


Image 2 shows only two giraffes, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and lacks visible horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 shows four distinct giraffes arranged in a single, clear horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the giraffes are grouped irregularly and lack distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal bands, with clear left-to-right groupings that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a group of giraffes that are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The animals appear to be clustered together in a natural, irregular formation rather than a structured layout suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the giraffes are scattered and not arranged in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the giraffes are scattered and do not form clear left-to-right groups.


Image 2 has a single horizontal band of giraffes, but only 3 visible instances, falling short of the required 4-8.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row a clear left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with five visibly distinguishable giraffes present.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the giraffes are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows giraffes arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The visible giraffes are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered giraffes with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows five giraffes arranged in a single, clear horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, with clear left-to-right groupings that match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal rows of giraffes. The giraffes are clustered together in a group, with no clear left-to-right arrangement that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the giraffes are arranged in a scattered, irregular formation without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal bands, with clear left-to-right groupings that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinct giraffes, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands. The arrangement supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows four distinct giraffes arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal bands, with clear left-to-right groupings that align with the reference's row-based structure.


Image 2 shows five giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible giraffes and lacks any clear horizontal rows or structured layout matching the reference.


Image 2 contains only a single giraffe, not the required 4-8 instances, and lacks any visible horizontal grouping of giraffes.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, with clear left-to-right groupings that align with the reference's grouping principle. The visible instances are separately distinguishable and support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, with 5 clearly visible and recognizable individuals forming stable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows five giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The row is left-to-right recognizable without object boxes.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the giraffes are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays 5 visible giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal bands, clearly recognizable as left-to-right groups without object boxes or clustering. The layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows giraffes in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is based on relative y positions and perspective, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, with a total of five visible instances. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping in each row, matching the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains only one visible giraffe, does not exhibit horizontal rows or a structured layout, and lacks the required number of distinguishable instances for acceptance.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row a clear left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are visibly grouped left-to-right and meet the criteria for row count and instance visibility.


Image 2 shows four giraffes but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and irregularly spaced against the sky.


Image 2 does not display visible horizontal bands of giraffes; the arrangement is irregular and lacks a clear left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of Image 1. The giraffes are scattered and lack clear, distinct horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the giraffes are scattered and do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, with each band forming a clear left-to-right group. The five visible giraffes are separately distinguishable and arranged in a manner that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of Image 1. The giraffes are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of Image 1; the giraffes are scattered and lack clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, each a clear left-to-right group. There are five visible giraffes, satisfying the count requirement, and the arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows giraffes at different depths and positions, not in clearly defined horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the giraffes are scattered and do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible giraffes arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row across the frame, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of Image 1. The giraffes are scattered and do not form clear, left-to-right horizontal bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows giraffes arranged along a depth perspective on a dirt path, not in distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 shows giraffes scattered without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows giraffes scattered across the frame without clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of giraffes. The giraffes are scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display giraffes in distinct horizontal rows; instead, they are scattered across the scene without a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of Image 1; the giraffes are scattered and lack visible left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows four giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row against a sunset background, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a group of giraffes that are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The animals appear to be clustered together in a natural, irregular formation rather than a structured layout matching the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The visible instances are separately distinguishable and support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of Image 1. The giraffes are clustered together in a small group without clear, distinct horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 shows three giraffes scattered across the frame without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, failing to match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 shows giraffes scattered across the scene without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 shows giraffes arranged along a depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative distance and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains only three visible giraffes, not within any clear horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's structured grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of giraffes; the animals are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with no visible horizontal rows of distinct pizza instances; it is a single object, not a group following the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of pizza slices in two distinct horizontal rows, each containing four visible and distinguishable pizza pieces. The layout supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with slices arranged in a circular pattern, not horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single, irregularly shaped pizza with no distinct horizontal rows or bands of objects. The arrangement does not follow the reference's grouping principle of clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows pizzas arranged on oven racks, which is a depth-based layout rather than horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of pizzas, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible and distinguishable pizza instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 objects.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of pizzas, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible and distinguishable pizza instances, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The layout supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a single pizza with no visible horizontal bands or groups of pizzas, thus failing to meet the criteria for horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of pizzas; instead, it shows a single flatbread pizza with toppings and two slices on a plate, which do not form recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas, each row containing 3 visible pizzas that form a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 6 total visible pizza instances, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas on a dining table, with each row containing clearly recognizable pizza objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays five distinct pizzas arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a countertop, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas, each containing 2-3 visible instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle without occlusion or irregular spacing, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible objects.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of pizza objects. The pizzas are scattered and not arranged in a structured row format.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of pizza objects arranged in horizontal rows. The items shown are primarily sandwiches and other food items, with no clear grouping of pizzas that meets the specified criteria.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows. The pizzas are arranged in a scattered and irregular manner, with no clear left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas, each row containing 3 visible pizzas arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable group. The layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of pizza objects arranged in horizontal rows. The items present are pies and other food, but none meet the criteria for 'pizza' as defined by COCO.


Image 2 contains only a few pizza slices on a tray, not forming any clear horizontal rows or groups that match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single plate with three pizza slices, which does not form distinct horizontal rows or bands. The arrangement lacks the required structure of 1-4 clearly defined horizontal groups of 4-8 visible pizza instances.


Image 2 shows pizzas held by individuals, not arranged in horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of pizzas; instead, it shows a scattered arrangement of pizzas on a table with people around them.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of pizzas. The visible pizza slices are irregularly placed and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single pizza on a table, not arranged in horizontal rows or groups. The layout is depth-based, with the pizza in the foreground and people and objects receding into the background.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal arrangement of pizza slices on two trays, but it lacks the distinct, stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions required. The pizzas are grouped together in a way that resembles a pile or scattered objects rather than clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas on a table, with 5 clearly visible and separately distinguishable pizza instances. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle of real left-to-right groups recognizable without object boxes.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizza objects, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. There are six visible, separately distinguishable pizzas, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 instances.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of pizzas on a table, with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups. The pizzas are part of a buffet setup and do not visually follow the grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered pizza slices on plates, not a structured horizontal row layout. The arrangement lacks clear, distinct horizontal bands of pizzas and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered broccoli with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the broccoli appears in a scattered, irregular arrangement without distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but the objects are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces without clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout requirement.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli instances without clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of broccoli objects arranged in horizontal rows. The green leafy vegetables present are irregularly distributed and do not form discernible left-to-right groups suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains broccoli but does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the broccoli is irregularly scattered and lacks clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of broccoli, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 8 visibly distinguishable broccoli instances.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 contains broccoli but they are irregularly scattered within a pasta dish, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not meet the grouping principle of clearly defined left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains broccoli but lacks visible horizontal rows; the objects are irregularly scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but they are irregularly scattered across the plate without forming distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but the objects are irregularly scattered and do not form any clear horizontal rows or bands that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered broccoli pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of broccoli, each a clear left-to-right group. The broccoli instances are visibly separate and recognizable without object boxes, totaling 6 visible examples, meeting the criteria for horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains broccoli, but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of books, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered on top of each other, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of books, not distinct horizontal rows. The visible 'rows' are due to perspective and depth rather than a left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 shows books stacked vertically, not arranged in horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with books stacked vertically, not horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'book' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The items present are scattered and do not form recognizable left-to-right groups suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains books only in the background, which are not visually grouped into distinct horizontal bands of 4-8 visible instances. The books appear as a dense, irregular collection without clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows books arranged vertically on shelves, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of books. The books are stacked vertically in a bookshelf and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows books arranged in vertical stacks on shelves, not in horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to depth and perspective, not a left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 shows books stacked vertically on a nightstand, not arranged in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based and does not visually support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows books arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible instances are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'book' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The items present do not meet the criteria for a clear, left-to-right grouping that would be recognized as distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows books in a bookshelf in the background, which appears as a depth layout rather than distinct horizontal rows of visible books in the foreground.


Image 2 shows books arranged in vertical stacks and along a depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded books on shelves, not a clear horizontal row layout.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded books without any clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of 'book' objects.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of zebras; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct, left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 5 visibly distinguishable zebras present.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The zebras are clustered together in a natural, irregular formation without distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible zebra instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows zebras in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows zebras scattered in a natural setting without any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of zebras drinking at a waterhole, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable zebra instances arranged in stable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six zebras drinking water, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right ordinal arrangement.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal band of zebras grazing left to right, with 5 visibly distinct individuals that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of zebras, with 5 visibly distinct individuals arranged left-to-right in a natural setting. The grouping follows the reference's horizontal band principle without ambiguity.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with five visibly distinguishable zebras present.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are scattered and lack clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 6 visibly distinguishable zebras fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five zebras standing side-by-side in a left-to-right arrangement, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of zebras, with 6 visibly distinct individuals arranged left to right in a stable, recognizable group.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible zebras are separately distinguishable and arranged in a way that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four distinct zebras, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or occlusion.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows zebras in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups. The objects do not follow the reference's grouping principle of structured horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras grazing in a natural setting, with 5 clearly visible and separately distinguishable zebra instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are scattered and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable individuals. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of zebras. The zebras are grouped irregularly among trees and grass, lacking distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays five zebras arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the frame, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with four and two visible instances respectively, clearly arranged in left-to-right groups that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a dense, irregular cluster of cows with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings. The arrangement lacks the structured, stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable elephants, each adorned with ornate decorations. The arrangement forms a stable left-to-right group that supports ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row structure, matching the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cows in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with a clear left-to-right grouping in each row. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of 5 distinguishable cows, visually forming a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows only two cows in an irregular, non-horizontal arrangement. There are no visible horizontal bands or rows of cows that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered cows without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and the visible instances do not form a structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row structure, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cows scattered across the field without clear horizontal rows or groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of 5 distinguishable cows, visually forming a left-to-right group on the beach, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible cows lying on hay, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants walking left to right, with 5 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable cows in an open field, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains elephants but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The elephants appear to be grouped together in a single, irregular cluster within the water, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cows scattered across the field without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants in a water body, with six clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable cows lying on grass, matching the reference's grouping principle of a left-to-right group.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable cows, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable elephants, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, with four visible in the foreground and two in the background, forming a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cows in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The visible instances are grouped closely together without clear left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, with a clear left-to-right grouping in each row. The cows are visibly distinguishable as separate instances, and the arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable cows on a grassy slope, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The cows appear scattered and occluded, lacking clear left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal band of 5 visible elephants in a natural grassland setting, clearly forming a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, with four visible in the front row and two in the back, forming a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with a total of five visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands of 'cow' objects. The cows are scattered and lack clear, recognizable left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with four visible in the foreground and two in the background, meeting the criteria for clear left-to-right grouping and ordinal description.


Image 2 shows cows arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The 'rows' are an artifact of perspective and distance, not a deliberate left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows elephants arranged in a depth layout along a road, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows cows scattered in a field without any visible horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of cows, each a left-to-right group recognizable without object boxes. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of suitcases, each row containing 2 clearly visible and recognizable suitcases. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of suitcases, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with each suitcase appearing behind the other from the viewer's perspective, rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of suitcases, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are stacked and viewed from above, lacking the clear left-to-right groupings required for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 displays four visible red suitcases arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible blue suitcases arranged in a single, stable horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible 'suitcase' objects, with a total of six clearly distinguishable items arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows four clearly visible suitcases arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on the ground, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of suitcases, with a total of eight visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of suitcases. The arrangement is irregular, with objects piled and scattered rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows scattered suitcases without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains visible  `suitcase` objects but they are not arranged in distinct, left-to-right horizontal bands. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear row structure required by the reference style.


Image 2 displays four distinct red suitcases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a sidewalk, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible suitcases arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of suitcases, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are piled and stacked in various orientations, failing to meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered vertically rather than arranged in distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded suitcases with no clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible suitcases arranged in a single horizontal row within the car's trunk, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


The suitcases are arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' arise from perspective and relative positioning rather than distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged on a wooden cart, creating a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of suitcases, with a total of seven visible instances that form clear left-to-right groupings on a wooden bench. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of suitcases, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are stacked and piled, making it impossible to identify stable left-to-right groups that would constitute clear rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinguishable suitcases, visually grouped from left to right without occlusion or irregular spacing, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases viewed from depth, not horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded suitcases without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible 'suitcase' objects arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of suitcases; the objects are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings.


The suitcases are arranged on a cart, creating a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows suitcases on a conveyor belt, which is a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for visible, left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in a depth-based layout within a vehicle's trunk, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of suitcases without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible suitcases arranged in a single horizontal row, consistent with the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 lacks visible horizontal bands of 'suitcase' objects; the items are scattered and not arranged in discernible rows.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are grouped by proximity and perspective rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of 'suitcase' objects. The visible items are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings that would constitute recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with suitcases arranged along a vertical stack and scattered positions, not forming clear horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 shows suitcases along a depth perspective of a train platform, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is linear but does not form visible left-to-right groups that would constitute stable rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal arrangement of suitcases. The objects are scattered, occluded, and lack distinct left-to-right groupings that would support ordinal row descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses in a tight, irregular cluster with occlusion and no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four horses arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row structure. The horses are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings that would support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single horse, not meeting the requirement of 4-8 visible instances or multiple distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct horse statues arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row across the field, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows horses in a dynamic, irregular formation with no clear horizontal rows. The arrangement is not stable for row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the horses are arranged in an irregular, scattered manner without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the street, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positions rather than distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of horses, each a clear left-to-right group. The four visible horses are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


The horses are arranged in a depth-based layout due to perspective, not distinct horizontal rows. The visible instances do not form stable left-to-right groups recognizable as separate bands.


Image 2 shows horses in a scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows, and the visible instances do not meet the criteria for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning, not a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 contains horses but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they are scattered and dynamically positioned, making it impossible to discern stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and depth, not a left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a single horse, not meeting the requirement of 4-8 visible instances. The layout is also irregular and does not follow a horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of horses. The horses are scattered and occluded, with no distinct left-to-right bands that would constitute recognizable horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows horses in a dynamic, scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands as required.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the horses are scattered and do not form clear, distinct left-to-right groups.


The horses are arranged in a depth-based perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows, and the layout does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning, not clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of horses, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible horses are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows horses in a dynamic, scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses grazing in a single, clearly visible horizontal row along the water's edge, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row across the grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows horses in a scattered, non-uniform arrangement on the beach. The objects do not form clear horizontal rows or bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses scattered without clear horizontal rows, with some in the foreground and others in the background, lacking a stable left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 shows horses in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured grouping. The visible instances are scattered and not organized into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal band of horses, but only three are visibly distinct and clearly grouped left-to-right. The row count is insufficient (must be 4-8 visible instances) to meet the criteria.


Image 2 shows horses scattered across the field without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses arranged in a single, left-to-right horizontal band that is visually obvious and recognizable without object boxes. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the horses are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth-based perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows. The visible instances are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative y positions, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of horses, each row containing two clearly visible and separately distinguishable horse instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth-based perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of four distinct horses, visually grouped left-to-right as a cohesive unit on a track, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows horses in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses grazing in a single, clearly visible horizontal row across the grassy field, matching the reference's grouping principle of a simple left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 shows horses scattered across the field without any clear horizontal rows or groupings that would match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 contains only a single horizontal band of 'horse' objects, which is insufficient to meet the requirement of 1-4 distinct horizontal bands. Additionally, the objects are not visibly distinguishable as separate instances within the band.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the horses are scattered and do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable horses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


The horses are arranged in a depth-based perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' arise from relative positioning and distance, not from a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses in a dynamic, scattered arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable horses on a beach, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses grazing in a single, clearly visible horizontal band across the field, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row layout of horses. The horses are scattered and occluded, with no distinct left-to-right groupings that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible horse, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 separately distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks multiple horizontal bands or rows of horses.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the beach, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four horses in a single, clearly visible horizontal row running left to right across the frame, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth-based perspective, not distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative distance and depth, not a structured left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows horses on a screen in the background, but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows and do not meet the grouping criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a crowded and irregular arrangement of umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of potted plants, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The plants are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling seven visible potted plants. This layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible umbrellas, with four in the foreground and two in the background, forming a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded umbrellas without clear horizontal grouping, failing to match the reference's structured row layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of umbrellas, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with six visible umbrella instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2's potted plants are arranged in a depth-based layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects appear scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of potted plants. The objects are vertically stacked and appear to be decorative items rather than distinct, horizontally grouped potted plants.


Image 2 contains scattered potted plants without any visible horizontal grouping or rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible umbrellas, with a total of five clearly distinguishable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded umbrellas in the background, not forming clear horizontal rows or groups that match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants; it contains glass vases with flowers, which are not classified as potted plants in COCO.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants; the plants are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of umbrellas, each row a clear left-to-right grouping of 3 visible umbrellas, matching the reference's structured horizontal arrangement principle.


Image 2 shows scattered and hanging umbrellas without a clear horizontal row structure. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows umbrellas suspended at varying heights in a depth layout, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the plants are background elements and do not meet the grouping criteria.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of potted plants; the plants are irregularly placed along the side of the boat without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible umbrellas, with a total of five clearly distinguishable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible umbrellas, which do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups. The arrangement lacks the structured, left-to-right grouping required by the reference style.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'umbrella'. The scene depicts a market with bananas and other goods, but no umbrellas are present.


Image 2 contains scattered umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinct umbrellas, visually forming a stable left-to-right group that matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded umbrellas with no clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for structured 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 shows a crowded street scene with multiple people holding umbrellas. The arrangement lacks clear, distinct horizontal rows of umbrellas and instead appears as a scattered, dense group, failing to match the reference's structured horizontal banding.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and do not form a structured left-to-right grouping that would support row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single potted plant, not meeting the requirement of 4-8 visible instances. The layout is also irregular and does not follow a horizontal row structure.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row structure of umbrellas. The umbrellas are part of mannequin heads and appear irregularly placed without forming distinct left-to-right groups that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly placed umbrellas, not forming clear horizontal rows or a structured layout.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right group that would constitute a row.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and not arranged in discernible rows.


Image 2 does not contain any visible horizontal bands of potted plants; the plants are scattered and do not form a structured row layout.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured row layout.


Image 2 does not display any clear horizontal rows of potted plants. The objects are scattered and lack the structured grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four clearly visible red umbrellas, each mounted on an elephant. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right ordinal description and no evidence of depth or scattered objects.


Image 2 contains only two visible umbrellas, which are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The umbrellas appear scattered and do not form a structured layout matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows potted plants in a classroom setting, but their arrangement is primarily vertical and depth-based rather than forming distinct horizontal rows. The plants are scattered across the room and do not form recognizable left-to-right groups that would constitute stable horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and do not form a structured left-to-right grouping that would qualify as a row.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the plants are on a balcony and do not form a structured layout.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the plants are mounted on the facade and do not form a structured grouping.


Image 2 shows umbrellas in the background but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows; instead, they appear as a depth-based layout along a building facade.


Image 2 shows potted plants along a balcony railing, which is a depth-based arrangement rather than distinct horizontal rows. The plants are not visually grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains colorful umbrellas, not potted plants. The arrangement is irregular and does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 displays four visible donuts arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row being a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains a scattered arrangement of donuts without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 contains donuts but they are irregularly arranged, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are clustered together without clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a few donuts with no clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, and they are not arranged in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains 5 visible donuts but they are arranged irregularly without clear horizontal rows, making it unsuitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 contains donuts but they are irregularly arranged in a bowl, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are clustered together and lack the clear left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings, thus failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a small pile of donuts in a bowl, which does not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains a pile of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the distinct, stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains scattered donuts without clear horizontal rows, violating the requirement for visible left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts in a box, not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are clustered together and lack the clear, stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions required.


Image 2 contains a mix of various baked goods, including cookies and pastries, but no clearly defined horizontal rows of donuts. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the structured grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts in a box, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains donuts, but they are irregularly arranged in a pile within a box, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are occluded and lack clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly visible horizontal row of five donuts in a box, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are left-to-right recognizable as a group without clustering or object boxes.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of donuts; instead, the donuts are in a single tray with no distinct left-to-right grouping that would constitute a visible horizontal band.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable bottles, matching the reference's grouping principle with no overlapping or depth-based arrangement.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the bottles are irregularly arranged without clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered bottles without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a single bottle in the foreground, with no visible horizontal rows or groups of bottles. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row arrangement of bottles; the bottles are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'bottle'.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row arrangement of bottles; instead, the bottles are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 visible bottles on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable bottles arranged left-to-right on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of bottles; the bottles are grouped in a scattered and irregular manner without distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only a single visible bottle, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances or form any horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of bottles; the bottles are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered bottles without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, and thus does not match the reference's structural principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered bottles with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bottles arranged on shelves in a depth layout, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of clearly defined left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only a single bottle visible in the background, which does not form any horizontal rows or groups. The layout is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a long line of bottles along a table viewed in depth, creating a single apparent row due to perspective rather than distinct horizontal bands. The objects are not arranged in clearly defined left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bottles arranged along a bar counter, creating a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would constitute visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains multiple bottles, but they are irregularly scattered and do not form any clear horizontal rows or bands. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of cakes; instead, it shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of cake pieces with no distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of cakes without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of cakes without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a few scattered cakes without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, failing to match the reference's structural principle of organized horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cakes arranged in a depth-based layout with no clear horizontal rows, and the objects are not distinctly separable into left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows scattered cake slices without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows four cake slices arranged in a cross pattern, which does not form genuine horizontal rows or a grid layout. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the left-to-right grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a single cake with slices cut, but the arrangement does not form distinct horizontal rows of separate cake instances. The visible 'rows' are merely vertical cuts and do not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cakes under glass domes in a cluttered, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear left-to-right groupings or distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows four separate instances of cakes, but they are arranged in a grid and not in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct cakes arranged in two clear horizontal rows on a gold tray, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the cake instances are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable cake objects arranged left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only three visible cake instances, none of which are arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a single cake object without any visible horizontal bands or groups of cakes, thus failing to meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 shows a single, irregularly placed cake slice on a tray, with no clear horizontal rows or structured grouping. The arrangement does not match the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of cakes. The cakes are part of a larger assortment of food items, including pies and snacks, arranged in an irregular manner without distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of five distinct cake objects, visually grouped left-to-right on a tray, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not contain multiple horizontal bands of cakes; it features a single prominent cake with no additional visible cakes arranged in rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed cake instances with no clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows.


Image 2 contains only a single cake slice, not multiple distinct horizontal bands of cakes as required by the reference style.


Image 2 displays four distinct cake slices arranged in two visible horizontal rows on plates, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of heart-shaped cakes, each a left-to-right group recognizable without object boxes. The cakes are clearly visible and countable (8 instances), supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of cakes and does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle.