Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of sheep walking left to right, with 6 visibly distinct sheep that a person would recognize as a cohesive group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with a stable left-to-right ordinal description.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of orange objects, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges, with a total of eight visible instances arranged in a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered oranges without any clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows a pile of oranges and bananas without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges on a wooden surface, with 8 clearly visible and separately distinguishable orange instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of orange objects: the top row contains whole and halved oranges, while the bottom row features a single halved orange. The arrangement meets the criteria for horizontal rows with clear left-to-right groupings and 6 visible orange instances.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded orange objects without clear horizontal bands, failing to meet the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout requirement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible orange instances meet the criteria for recognizable rows and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible orange instances.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of orange objects: one row of oranges on the table and another in the bowl behind it, forming two distinct bands. The objects are visibly grouped left-to-right within each band, with 7 clearly distinguishable oranges present.


Image 2 contains only one visible orange, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and lacks the required number of distinguishable instances to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of orange objects (oranges), each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible orange instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of orange tomatoes in blue crates, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of orange slices, each a clear left-to-right group. There are 7 visible orange instances (slices and wedges) arranged in a stable, recognizable pattern that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of orange fruits, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges, with a total of seven visible instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered oranges without clear horizontal bands or groupings that match the reference's row-based structure.


Image 2 contains scattered oranges without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects are not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered orange objects (oranges in a bowl) without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of organized horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible giraffes, satisfying the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible giraffes.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of giraffes, with 7 clearly visible and distinguishable individuals. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows giraffes arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and distance, not a structured left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows scattered and overlapping pizzas without clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal banding.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas on a table, with each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable pizza instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with slices arranged in a circular pattern, not horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed pizza slices without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas, each containing 4 visible slices, forming a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal band principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas on the table, each row containing 3 visible pizzas. The arrangement supports clear left-to-right ordinal descriptions within each row, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of pizzas. The pizzas are placed in boxes on a table, with no distinct left-to-right groupings that would constitute visible horizontal bands. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the defined rows required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of pizza boxes, each containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable pizzas. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas on a kitchen counter, with each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable pizza instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizzas, each containing three clearly visible and separately distinguishable pizza instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective distortion, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six visible pizzas in boxes, arranged left to right on a table. This matches the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands and meets the criteria for row count (1) and visible instances (6).


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of pizzas on plates, clearly arranged left-to-right and visually distinct as separate items. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle with exactly one visible horizontal band of pizzas.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of pizzas. The pizzas are scattered and grouped in a way that does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the zebras are irregularly arranged without clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable zebra instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four distinct zebras, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 6 visibly distinguishable zebras fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable zebras present.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of zebras. The zebras are grouped closely together in a natural, irregular formation rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, with four and two visible individuals respectively, clearly arranged in left-to-right groups that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of zebras grazing in a field, with 6 visibly distinct zebra instances arranged left to right. This matches the reference's grouping principle of a genuine horizontal band.


Image 2 shows zebras scattered in a natural landscape without any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping that matches the reference's group portrait style.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of zebras in a natural setting, with 6 visible instances that form a recognizable left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout, with stable ordinal descriptions and no evidence of depth or irregular grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with six visibly distinguishable zebras present.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible zebras.


Image 2 shows cows in a scattered and irregular arrangement, with no clear horizontal bands or distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with six visibly distinguishable cow instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible elephants are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable cows, visually grouped from left to right in front of a fence, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with four and three visible instances respectively, clearly grouped left-to-right in a manner consistent with the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible elephant instances distributed across the two rows.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable cows in a field, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable cows, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable cows, consistent with the reference's grouping principle of genuine horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cows, each row containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable cow instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible elephant instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 shows elephants in a natural, irregular grouping near water, not in distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style. The arrangement lacks clear, stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly visible horizontal row of six elephants, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 shows a scattered group of cows without clear horizontal rows or structured grouping, thus failing to match the reference's horizontal row layout principle.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of cow objects, forming one distinct row with six visible instances. The cows are aligned left-to-right in a stable, recognizable group that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cows, each row containing 3-4 visible cows arranged left-to-right in a manner that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The grouping follows the reference's horizontal band principle without relying on depth or scattered arrangement.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the elephants are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cows, with 7 clearly visible and recognizable instances forming stable left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports ordinal descriptions within each row, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows elephants in a natural, irregular grouping with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal band of elephants walking left to right, with 7 visibly distinct instances that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable cows lying on grass, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of cows, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The cows are visibly distinguishable and arranged in a manner that supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


The elephants are arranged in a depth-based perspective, not in clearly defined horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' arise from relative positioning and depth rather than a stable left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered on top of each other, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered on top of each other, which does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a grid of suitcase contents but lacks visible horizontal bands of suitcases themselves; the arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered on top of each other, failing to meet the horizontal row requirement.


Image 2 shows a pile of suitcases with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 shows a disorganized pile of suitcases without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of suitcases. The suitcases are stacked vertically and appear in a scattered, irregular arrangement rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of suitcases, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are clustered by proximity and perspective rather than forming clear left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of suitcases, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 6 visible suitcases distributed across the rows.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of suitcases without clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of suitcases in the trunk of a vehicle, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are stacked vertically and appear to be viewed from depth, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of suitcases, with four visible in each row, forming a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal banding principle.


Image 2 shows vertical stacks of suitcases rather than horizontal rows, and the arrangement is not visually grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five visible suitcases, matching the reference's grouping principle with a left-to-right arrangement that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible suitcases on a conveyor belt, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded suitcases without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of suitcases on a conveyor belt, forming one distinct row with 8 visible instances that support stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in a depth-based layout typical of a baggage carousel, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands and appear scattered rather than organized into stable rows.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of suitcases, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are piled, touching, and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'horse' objects in a structured horizontal row format as per the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of horses, each row containing 3 visible horses. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions possible.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable horses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows horses grouped by depth and perspective, not by distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row layout of horses. The horses are scattered and occluded, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positions, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows horses in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is linear along the path, not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of horses, each row containing 3-4 horses that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible horses walking in unison on a road, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable horses, visually grouped from left to right as a cohesive unit, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows carousel horses in a circular arrangement, not horizontal rows. The horses are grouped by their position on the carousel rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning along the road, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows only two teddy bears, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and lacks visible horizontal bands or rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable teddy bears, matching the reference's grouping principle with no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of boats; instead, it shows a single boat with dogs on it, and other boats are in the background without clear grouping.


Image 2 shows teddy bears in a scattered, non-horizontal arrangement with no clear left-to-right grouping or visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of teddy bears; instead, the bears are arranged in a vertical stack and scattered around a central figure, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats on the beach, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are six visible and distinguishable boat instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 objects.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of boats; the vessels are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible teddy bears arranged in a single, stable horizontal row on chairs, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing three visible and distinguishable teddy bears, adhering to the grouping principle with clear left-to-right organization.


Image 2 shows teddy bears arranged vertically in a hanging display, not in horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to depth and vertical stacking, which does not match the reference's grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable teddy bears, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of boats. The boats are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable and separate instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable boats along the water's edge, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows teddy bears arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows, with objects appearing layered due to perspective and not forming clear left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of boats; the boats are arranged in a depth layout and appear irregularly clustered.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The objects appear in a scattered, irregular layout without clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sailboats, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are six visible and distinguishable boats, fitting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 instances.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of teddy bears; instead, the objects are piled together in an irregular manner without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows boats arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable boats aligned left-to-right on the water, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four visible boats arranged in two distinct horizontal rows on the water, matching the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right groupings without occlusion or depth-based arrangement.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats on the river, with clear left-to-right groupings that a person would recognize. The boats are visibly separate and countable (4-8 instances), and their arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single visible boat, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances or any horizontal grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sailboats, each row containing three visible boats arranged left-to-right in a clear, recognizable pattern.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of boats; the boats are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and occluded, failing to meet the grouping principle for acceptance.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. The objects appear to be in a pile or scattered arrangement, lacking the structured grouping required by the reference style.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 contains scattered teddy bears without a clear horizontal row structure; the objects are not grouped in left-to-right bands as required.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of boats arranged in horizontal rows. The boats are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of teddy bears. The objects are scattered, in columns, or part of a crowd, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of colorful umbrellas, each row containing 3 visibly separate and recognizable umbrella instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective distortion, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of potted plants; the plants are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of umbrellas; instead, the umbrellas are irregularly suspended and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows potted plants arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The plants are distributed vertically and horizontally throughout the scene, creating a dense, layered appearance rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable potted plants, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains potted plants but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and irregularly placed.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable potted plants, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of visible umbrellas, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of potted plants; the plants are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains potted plants but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they are part of Christmas tree decorations and other festive arrangements, making the layout irregular.


Image 2 shows scattered umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of potted plants, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The plants are visibly distinguishable and arranged in a manner that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 lacks visible horizontal bands of potted plants; the plants are scattered and not arranged in discernible rows.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or a structured layout matching the reference.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly placed umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of colorful umbrellas, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 7 visible umbrella instances.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of potted plants; the objects are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants; the objects are irregularly arranged and do not form discernible rows.


Image 2 shows potted plants along a depth-based aisle layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the objects present are motorcycles, and no such plants are discernible.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of donuts, each containing 3 distinguishable donuts with visible left-to-right groupings, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing 3 visible donuts that form a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances and maintains a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of donuts with three distinct rows, each containing 2-3 donuts, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout. The visible count of donuts is 7, within the acceptable range of 4-8.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout, violating the requirement for visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, with 4-8 visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 contains a single donut and other unrelated items, failing to meet the criteria for horizontal rows or sufficient visible instances of the target category.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing 3-4 visible donuts that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts without any clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would match the reference's structural layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing 3 visible donuts that form a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a box of donuts with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not contain any visible instances of cakes. The objects present are sandwiches and a pastry, which do not match the target category.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each row containing clearly recognizable and separate cake instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single central cake surrounded by lamingtons, not distinct horizontal rows of cakes. The arrangement is circular and irregular, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each containing 3 visible instances. The cakes are clearly grouped left-to-right within each row, forming stable and recognizable horizontal bands that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains multiple cakes and muffins but lacks visible horizontal rows. The objects are irregularly arranged, including a large central cake surrounded by smaller items, which does not match the required 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of cakes; instead, it shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of various pastries and desserts.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of six visually obvious 'cake' objects, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cakes in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The visible instances are grouped in a way that does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each row containing clearly recognizable cake objects arranged left-to-right. The cakes are visibly separate and identifiable as individual items, satisfying the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of cakes, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based rather than left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinct cake objects arranged left-to-right on a countertop, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of cakes arranged in horizontal rows. The cakes are scattered and not grouped in a manner that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinct cake objects arranged in a left-to-right train-like formation, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row layout of cakes. The cakes are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings that would support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes and cupcakes, with 4 clearly visible cake-like objects in the front row and 4 more in the back row, satisfying the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows cakes arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are viewed from depth, creating an illusion of rows, but they do not form stable left-to-right groups that would be recognized as distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of cakes; the cakes are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of cakes arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily pastries and other items, not clearly identifiable as cakes, and they lack the structured horizontal grouping required by the criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each row containing 3 visible bikes. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues, and the objects are easily distinguishable as separate motorcycles.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of motorcycles parked along a sidewalk, with 8 visibly distinct instances. The arrangement follows the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands and supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a crowded scene with motorcycles scattered and occluded, lacking clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible motorcycle instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 shows motorcycles arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and viewed from depth, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of motorcycles. The motorcycles are scattered and occluded, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable motorcycles, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 8 visibly distinguishable motorcycles fitting the criteria.


Image 2 shows motorcycles arranged along a road in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are viewed from a perspective that creates a linear arrangement but does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a pile of shredded carrots mixed with other vegetables, lacking distinct horizontal bands or groups that would constitute recognizable rows. The arrangement is irregular and does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly arranged carrots, not forming distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains visible carrot instances but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of carrots, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The carrots are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible carrot instances in the top-left compartment, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible carrots, each a clear left-to-right group, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 instances.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots among other vegetables, not forming distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots with no clear horizontal grouping or recognizable rows, thus failing to meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot slices without any clear horizontal grouping or row structure.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, failing to match the reference's structured layout principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of sliced carrots on a cutting board, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable carrot pieces.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces mixed with other ingredients, lacking distinct horizontal bands or groups that would constitute visible rows.


Image 2 shows scattered carrots in a market setting, not clearly defined horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses, each containing four visible and separately distinguishable instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses, each row containing 3 visible glasses, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 instances and clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains wine glasses but they are not arranged in distinct, left-to-right horizontal bands. Instead, they appear scattered and grouped by proximity rather than a clear row structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible wine glasses, matching the reference's grouping principle with no ambiguity.


The wine glasses are arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' arise from relative depth and perspective rather than distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible wine glasses on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle with a real left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of wine glasses; the objects are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of wine glasses. The objects are scattered and occluded, with no distinct left-to-right rows visible.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped layout of wine glasses. The objects are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of wine glasses. The objects are scattered and occluded, with no distinct rows visible.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wine glasses on a dining table, with 6 clearly visible and distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping that supports ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 visible wine glasses on the table, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains no visible wine glasses; the objects in the background cabinet are not clearly identifiable as wine glasses and do not form any discernible horizontal rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of wine glasses; instead, they are scattered and grouped by proximity rather than forming distinct rows.


Image 2 shows sheep in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups. The objects are not visually organized into stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows sheep in a tight, irregular cluster with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings. The arrangement lacks the structured, visible bands required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains sheep but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear irregularly clustered and partially occluded.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The five visible sheep are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row format, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sheep are arranged in a scattered, irregular pattern without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, with 4-8 visible instances forming clear left-to-right groups that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the sheep are irregularly scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of sheep, not clearly defined horizontal rows. The objects are clustered together without distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows sheep in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming clear horizontal rows. The objects are not distinctly grouped into 1-4 visible bands as required.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four sheep, matching the reference's grouping principle. The sheep are visibly distinct and arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows sheep being held by people, not arranged in horizontal rows. The objects are clustered due to physical holding rather than a deliberate layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable sheep instances.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of sheep, not clearly defined horizontal rows. The objects are held by individuals and lack the stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions required.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible sheep instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in a stable row structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of sheep, with 7 visibly distinct sheep forming a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible sheep instances, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains sheep but they are scattered and not arranged in visible horizontal rows; the layout is irregular.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered across the scene without clear horizontal rows, and they are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a close-up of oranges in a net bag, with no visible horizontal rows or distinct groupings that would match the reference's structural layout. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right bands required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a pile of oranges without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 contains scattered orange slices and a whole orange, but lacks clearly defined horizontal rows or a grid layout. The arrangement does not support stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered orange slices without a clear horizontal row structure; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded orange instances without clear horizontal rows, failing the grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded oranges without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of oranges, each a clear left-to-right group, with 6 visible instances that meet the criteria for stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered orange slices without a clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects without clear horizontal grouping, failing to match the reference's structured row layout.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects without clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains scattered oranges in a bowl and on a plate, but they do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed orange objects (oranges, juice), with no clear horizontal bands or groupings that match the reference's structured rows.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of oranges in a bowl, not clearly forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of giraffes, each a clear left-to-right group. There are 7 visible giraffes, meeting the criteria for row count and object count. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal rows of giraffes, each with clearly recognizable left-to-right groupings. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows five giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. The objects are recognizable as separate individuals within the group.


Image 2 shows five giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, with clear left-to-right groupings that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the giraffes are irregularly spaced and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of giraffes, with a total of five clearly visible and separately distinguishable giraffes. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable giraffes, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows five giraffes arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows giraffes arranged along a road in depth, creating a perspective-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays 5 visible giraffes arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, with clear left-to-right groupings that match the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a group of giraffes that are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The visible giraffes appear to be clustered together in a loose, irregular formation rather than forming clear left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image; the giraffes are clustered together in a group rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows giraffes in a natural, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout matching the reference group portrait.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of pizza slices in three distinct horizontal rows, each containing 2-3 visible and recognizable pizza pieces. The layout supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows pizzas in boxes arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is based on relative y positions and perspective, not distinct left-to-right groups of pizzas.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with two visible slices, which does not form any of the required horizontal bands or rows. The layout is irregular and lacks the structured grouping principle defined for acceptance.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of pizzas. The pizzas are arranged in a scattered and irregular manner, with no distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single pizza with no visible horizontal bands or groups of pizzas. The layout is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of pizzas, each a clear left-to-right group. The pizzas are visibly separate and recognizable as individual items within each row, meeting the criteria for stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of pizzas; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of pizza objects on a table, with each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable pizzas. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered pizzas in boxes and on plates, not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of pizza slices and whole pizzas in boxes, clearly arranged left-to-right. The layout supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible pizza instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with pizzas arranged along a long table, not in distinct horizontal rows. The 'rows' are primarily defined by relative y positions and perspective, not clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows scattered pizza slices and whole pizzas on plates, not clearly defined horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinct books, visually forming a stable left-to-right group that supports ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows books arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are stacked and viewed from an angle, making it unsuitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with books arranged vertically and horizontally within a shelf, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of books, each containing 4 clearly visible and left-to-right grouped instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of books, not horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


The books are arranged vertically along a wall, not in horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of books and papers, lacking any clear horizontal bands or groupings that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear grid layout of books with four distinct horizontal rows, each containing 4-8 visible and recognizable book instances arranged in stable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'book' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The items present are primarily cats, a laptop, and other miscellaneous desk objects, none of which qualify as books.


Books are arranged vertically on shelves, not in horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows books arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The books are stacked vertically on shelves and appear to be viewed from depth rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of books arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are scattered and do not form recognizable groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows a cluttered desk with books scattered and stacked in no discernible horizontal rows, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered books on a table, not clearly organized into distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows zebras in a tight, irregular cluster with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings. The arrangement is too crowded and lacks the stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions required.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable zebras present.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of Image 1; the zebras are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible and distinguishable zebra instances, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 objects.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras drinking at a water source, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable individuals arranged in stable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains zebras, but they are not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. The zebras appear in a scattered and irregular formation, lacking the structured horizontal bands required by the criteria.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of zebras; the zebras are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The zebras are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable cows, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains multiple elephants but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows; instead, they appear in a scattered and irregular layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with a clear left-to-right grouping in each. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows elephants in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups. The objects do not meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout types.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 8 visible elephant instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 shows elephants in a natural, irregular grouping with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The arrangement is not consistent with the reference's horizontal banding principle.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable cows walking left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible elephant instances fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly visible horizontal band of 8 distinct elephants standing in a left-to-right group, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows cows scattered without clear horizontal rows, with some occluded and others in varying depths, failing to meet the strict grouping criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with four and two visible instances respectively, clearly grouped left-to-right in a natural outdoor setting.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of elephants, with a total of seven visible instances forming clear left-to-right groups that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable cows, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinguishable cows, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows cows scattered across the landscape without clear horizontal rows, making it不符合要求的水平排列原则。


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, which is classified as 'depth_layout'. The arrangement does not follow the required horizontal rows or grid structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five distinguishable suitcases arranged left-to-right on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows, with objects stacked vertically and occluded by others.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of suitcases without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, not aligned in left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered on top of each other, failing to meet the horizontal row requirement.


Image 2 shows a pile of suitcases and bags without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible 'suitcase' objects, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The six suitcases meet the criteria for recognizable bands with stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable suitcases, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases and bags, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered in front of each other, which does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of suitcases, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or scattered elements.


Image 2 shows a cluttered and irregular arrangement of suitcases in the trunk of a vehicle, with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are stacked and placed on a cart, creating a vertical and scattered appearance rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered on top of each other, which does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of suitcases. The objects are scattered and lack the distinct left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded suitcases without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in depth perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row arrangement of suitcases; the objects are scattered and lack distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of suitcases, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is along a path or aisle, not in clearly defined left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains multiple suitcases, but they are not arranged in clear horizontal rows. Instead, they are scattered and piled together, with some partially occluded or touching each other, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of 'suitcase' objects. The items are piled and scattered, lacking distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged along a conveyor belt, which is a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded suitcases without clear horizontal rows, making it unsuitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly placed suitcases without clear horizontal rows, making it unsuitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in depth and perspective, not in clear horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and grouped by proximity rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded suitcases without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle.


Image 2 shows horses in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The visible instances are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups. The visible instances are not organized into stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows horses in a scattered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows or structured grouping. The objects do not form distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable horses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains horses but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and in motion, failing to meet the grouping principle for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 shows four distinct horses arranged in a single, clear horizontal row behind a fence, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row structure. The horses are scattered and grazing without forming distinct left-to-right groups that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows two distinct horizontal bands of horses running side-by-side, clearly recognizable as separate groups from left to right. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 5 visible horse instances.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows horses arranged in a single depth-based line along a path, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and depth, not a true left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains only a single horse, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances. Additionally, it lacks any horizontal bands or groupings that would align with the reference's structural grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of horses on a sandy beach, with six clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows; instead, they are part of a single large display with overlapping and stacked elements.


Image 2 shows panda teddy bears arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the teddy bears are closely packed and occluded, lacking distinct left-to-right groupings that support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible boats arranged in a single, stable horizontal row along the shoreline, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows boats in a harbor with no clear horizontal rows; they are scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of boats arranged in horizontal rows. The primary subject is a horse on a beach, with only one boat partially visible in the background.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of teddy bears; instead, it shows a single or scattered arrangement without clear grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of teddy bears, with each band forming a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible and distinguishable teddy bears, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct teddy bears arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on the floor, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 has only one horizontal band of teddy bears, but it contains only 3 visible instances, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, the layout does not match the reference's multi-row structure.


Image 2 shows four teddy bears arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row with distinct left-to-right positioning, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows boats arranged in a depth-based perspective rather than distinct horizontal rows, and the objects are not clearly separable into stable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they are stacked vertically and occluded, failing to meet the grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of boats. The visible boats are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute recognizable rows.


Image 2 shows four distinct boats arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the water's edge, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of boats; instead, it shows a single boat with two individuals, lacking the required multiple distinct horizontal bands of boats.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of 'boat' objects. The boats are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 contains only two teddy bears, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is not horizontally grouped into visible bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The four visible boats are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only a single boat, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four teddy bears, matching the reference's grouping principle with a stable left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure; the teddy bears are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows boats arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct teddy bears arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a cobblestone surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible boats arranged in a single, stable horizontal row on the sand, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six teddy bears, each distinctly visible and arranged left-to-right in a stable, recognizable group.


Image 2 shows scattered teddy bears without a clear horizontal row structure; they are piled and touching, not forming distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains four teddy bears, but they are arranged in a collage format with no visible horizontal rows or grid layout. The arrangement does not support stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible boats arranged in a single, stable horizontal row along the shoreline, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four teddy bears arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row a clear left-to-right grouping of separately distinguishable objects.


Image 2 displays four teddy bears arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on the car roof, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows boats scattered across the water without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'boat' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The seagull is perched on a boat, but the boats themselves are not clearly grouped or aligned horizontally.


Image 2 contains four teddy bear instances, but they are arranged in a scattered and irregular collage format without any clear horizontal rows or groupings that follow the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of boats; instead, it shows a single boat with people around it, lacking distinct left-to-right groups suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows a single boat with no visible horizontal rows of boats; the layout is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible boats, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows of boats.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of boats; instead, it shows a single boat with scattered debris and equipment around it, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal grouping.


Image 2 displays four teddy bears arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on a cobblestone surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows boats in a single horizontal arrangement but lacks the structured, clearly defined multiple rows of 'boat' objects required. The visible instances are too few and irregularly spaced to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only one visible boat, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks multiple horizontal bands of boats.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable left-to-right groups. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with a total of six visible teddy bears.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of boats in two distinct rows, with 5 visible instances that are easily distinguishable and recognizable as separate groups from left to right.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible boats, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of boats, each row containing 2 visible boats that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct teddy bears arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of boats; instead, it shows a single boat with a bicycle on it, alongside other boats in the background without any distinct horizontal grouping.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear as a scattered group on the bed.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of boats; instead, it shows a single prominent boat with additional boats in the background, lacking distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display a horizontal row layout of teddy bears; instead, it shows a vertical arrangement with only two visible teddy bears that are not clearly grouped into distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four visible boats arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the shoreline, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four teddy bears arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of boats; instead, it shows a single prominent boat with smaller ones in the background, lacking the required distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows boats in a docked arrangement with no clear horizontal rows; the objects are grouped by proximity and docking rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing multiple visible and distinguishable teddy bears arranged left-to-right in a clear group formation.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of teddy bears; instead, the bears are stacked vertically within a basket, failing to meet the specified grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four visible boats arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the water's edge, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains only a single boat visible in the background, with no clear horizontal bands or groupings of boats. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of multiple distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular, with some bears on top of a refrigerator and others around it, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of boats. The boats are scattered and occluded, with no distinct rows or within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays four distinct boats arranged in a single, clear horizontal row along the cobblestone ground, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of boats; instead, it shows a single boat with scattered objects and people, lacking the distinct left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 does not contain visible instances of 'boat' objects; it features people and towels on a beach.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of teddy bears; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains only a single visible boat, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances or any discernible horizontal grouping.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of boats, but only 3 visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, while the row follows a left-to-right grouping, it does not meet the minimum instance count.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of boats; instead, it shows a single boat in the foreground with another partially visible in the background, lacking any clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'boat' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The boats are scattered and do not form a clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of teddy bears; the objects present are umbrellas and other stuffed animals that do not match the target category.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of boats. The boats are scattered and appear in a depth layout rather than distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 contains boats, but they are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined horizontal rows. The layout does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two people and no visible boats, thus failing to meet the criteria for the target category.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects, with no clear horizontal rows of teddy bears. The visible items are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of 8 distinct, left-to-right visible umbrellas, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows umbrellas arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative y positions, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of potted plants arranged in horizontal rows as per the reference style. The objects present are citrus trees, which do not meet the specified grouping criteria.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 7 distinguishable umbrellas, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinguishable potted plants arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of thatched umbrellas, each row containing 2-3 visible instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with stable ordinal descriptions for both rows.


Image 2 does not follow a clear horizontal row structure; the potted plants are irregularly arranged on shelves and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible umbrellas, with four to eight clearly distinguishable instances in total. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or perspective issues.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are irregularly distributed around a bench, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 does not contain any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the plants are scattered and not grouped in a way that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows umbrellas scattered on the ground and walls, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement arises from depth perspective and placement rather than a structured horizontal layout.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable potted plants arranged along a railing, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a crowded scene with multiple overlapping and occluded umbrellas, lacking clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains scattered and overlapping umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and not arranged in a structured, recognizable row format.


Image 2 contains scattered and overlapping umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, making it unsuitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible umbrellas, with clear left-to-right groupings that align with the reference's structural grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a beach scene with thatched umbrellas arranged in a depth layout, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and occluded, lacking clear left-to-right groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured grouping that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains four visible umbrellas but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. Instead, they appear as a scattered group near the entrance, lacking the structured left-to-right grouping required by the reference style.


Image 2 contains potted plants but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear as a scattered group on a windowsill.


Image 2 contains scattered potted plants without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows umbrellas arranged in a depth-based layout along a waterway, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of potted plants along the top edge, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal rows. The plants are clearly left-to-right grouped and recognizable as separate instances, with a total of six visible potted plants.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The potted plants are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 contains no visible potted plants and does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 6 visible umbrellas, each distinctly recognizable as a separate object in a left-to-right arrangement. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle with no overlapping or occluded instances.


Image 2 does not display any visible potted plants arranged in horizontal rows; the objects present do not match the target category.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of umbrellas. The umbrellas are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands, failing to meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 shows potted plants along a windowsill, but their arrangement is depth-based and not a clear horizontal row grouping. The objects are not visibly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of potted plants arranged in horizontal rows. The plants are scattered and not grouped in a manner that supports row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants; the plants are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays six clearly visible donuts arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of real left-to-right groups without object boxes or clustering.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings, making it不符合要求的布局类型.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing three clearly visible and recognizable donuts, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains multiple donuts but they are not arranged in clear, distinct horizontal rows. The objects appear scattered and lack the structured grouping required by the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing 3 visible donuts with clear left-to-right grouping, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each containing three clearly visible and separately distinguishable donuts, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays six donuts arranged in two clear horizontal rows, each containing three distinct donuts. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of donuts in two distinct rows, with 7 visible and distinguishable donuts that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of six distinct donuts, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays six distinct donuts arranged in two clear horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands. Each row is a recognizable left-to-right group, and the objects are individually distinguishable.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing 3 visible donuts that form a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances and supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible donuts, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured into distinct bands.


Image 2 displays six donuts arranged in two clear horizontal rows, each containing three distinct donuts. The layout supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a close-up of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout; the objects are clustered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows donuts in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are closely packed and occluded, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded donuts without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear grid layout of six distinct donuts, arranged in two horizontal rows with three items each. The objects are visibly grouped left-to-right within each row, meeting the criteria for a stable and recognizable horizontal arrangement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing three clearly visible and recognizable donuts. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a clear and stable arrangement of donuts in three distinct horizontal rows, each containing 2-3 visible donuts. The layout supports ordinal descriptions (left to right within each row), and the objects are clearly distinguishable without clustering or occlusion.


Image 2 contains donuts, but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. Instead, they appear as a single group on the left side of the image and two more inside a toaster oven, which does not meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains a pile of donuts without clear horizontal rows, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing three visible instances, totaling six. The arrangement follows a clear left-to-right grouping that supports ordinal descriptions and meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 shows donuts arranged in a vertical stack, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to depth and perspective, not a left-to-right grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single donut held by a person, with no visible horizontal rows or groupings of multiple donuts. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinct donuts, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands. The objects are left-to-right recognizable as a group without clustering.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of donuts; the visible donuts are part of a mixed pastry arrangement with no distinct left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 contains donuts but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows; instead, they are grouped on plates and appear irregularly placed.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal arrangement of donuts, but it lacks the structured, distinct rows seen in the reference image. The donuts are grouped together without clear left-to-right separation into multiple bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, making it unsuitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes (cupcakes) with clear left-to-right groupings, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout. There are six visible cake instances, and the arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The cakes are arranged in a scattered, irregular pattern without clear left-to-right groups or distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of cakes, not horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows. The cake is a single, irregularly shaped object with no distinct left-to-right groups or bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cakes, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The top row contains three separate cakes, and the bottom row has two visible cakes, totaling six distinguishable cake instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cakes in a vertical stack and scattered slices, not in horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal band of cake objects, forming a cohesive left-to-right group resembling a train. The arrangement includes 8 distinguishable cake components (wheels, body, cab, etc.) that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered cake pieces with no clear horizontal grouping, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right bands of cakes.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The cakes appear scattered and lack distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a single vertical stack of cakes, not horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of cakes. The cakes are scattered across the table without distinct left-to-right groupings that would constitute recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of cakes. The cakes are scattered and not organized into distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of cakes. The cakes are arranged in a depth layout within wooden crates and a refrigerated display, lacking distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of cakes. The cakes are placed on a table in a scattered manner without distinct left-to-right groupings that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of cakes. The items present are pizzas, dumplings, carrots, celery, and a tub of dip, none of which qualify as cakes.


Image 2 shows motorcycles in a cluttered, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of motorcycles, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The motorcycles are visibly arranged in a stable, countable layout with 8 distinguishable instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.