Image 2 contains only three visible vase instances and lacks the required horizontal banding or stable row structure for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of vases, with 5 clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays six distinct vases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects with no clear horizontal rows of vases; the arrangement does not visually support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct glass vases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a wooden shelf, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays five distinct vases arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row against a plain background, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontal arrangement of vases. The objects are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of vase objects; the vases are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four distinct vases on the dining table, arranged left-to-right in a clear and recognizable group.


Image 2 contains scattered vases on a cabinet with no clear horizontal grouping, and the objects are not arranged in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of benches with 8 visible instances, arranged in a stable left-to-right group that supports ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wooden benches, each with clearly visible and separately distinguishable bench instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a single bench instance and lacks the horizontal row structure required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wooden benches, each row containing visible and recognizable bench instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible benches, arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single bench in the background, viewed from depth, not as a distinct horizontal row. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of red benches, each row containing three visible bench instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with each row being a stable and recognizable group without occlusion or irregular spacing.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of red benches with 8 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible wooden benches, matching the reference's grouping principle with distinct left-to-right arrangement.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of benches. The visible benches are irregularly shaped and clustered around a tree, lacking distinct horizontal rows or left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of visible benches, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of wooden benches, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible benches, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement does not form clear horizontal rows or a grid layout suitable for stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four visible benches, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 contains a single bench, not multiple horizontal bands of benches as required. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of five visible blue benches, arranged left-to-right in a stable and recognizable group. The layout supports ordinal descriptions within the row, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible benches arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of benches, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible bench instances are separately distinguishable and support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded benches without clear horizontal rows, failing to meet the grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of wooden benches, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains a single wooden bench that is not part of a clearly defined horizontal row structure. The visible 'bench' instance does not meet the criteria for a stable, recognizable horizontal band or group.


Image 2 shows stadium seating arranged in depth and perspective, not as distinct horizontal rows of benches. The 'rows' are not visually obvious left-to-right groups that a person would recognize without object boxes.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal arrangement of benches along a wall, but it arises from depth perspective rather than distinct left-to-right groups. The 'rows' are not visually separable as independent bands, and the overall layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of benches, each containing visible and distinguishable bench instances that align with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with benches arranged along the length of the train car, not in distinct horizontal rows. The 'rows' are defined by perspective and depth rather than clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains no visible benches; it depicts a soccer field with players and spectators, lacking the target category entirely.


Image 2 contains a single horizontal row of benches, but only 3 visible instances are present, falling short of the required 4-8. Additionally, the arrangement does not support stable within-row ordinal descriptions due to occlusion and perspective.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of benches, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The benches are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects, supporting stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered and non-horizontal arrangements of benches, with no clear left-to-right groups or stable row-number descriptions.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of bleachers, not distinct horizontal rows of separate benches. The arrangement does not meet the criteria for visible, left-to-right groups of 'bench' objects.


Image 2 shows scattered trucks with no clear horizontal rows; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinguishable food trucks along the street, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable trucks, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of six visible trucks, forming a single distinct row that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The objects are left-to-right recognizable as a cohesive group without occlusion or depth-based misinterpretation.


Image 2 contains no visible trucks; it features police motorcycles and other vehicles, none of which qualify as 'truck' in the COCO category.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible bicycles fitting the criteria.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right group, with 8 visible instances that meet the grouping criteria.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of bicycles, not distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement arises from relative positions and perspective rather than clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 contains bicycles that are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The bicycles appear scattered and grouped primarily by proximity rather than forming clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows bicycles scattered and in motion, not arranged in stable horizontal rows. The layout is irregular due to depth perspective and lack of clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of bicycles, not forming clear horizontal rows. The objects are occluded, piled, and lack distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of apples, lacking distinct horizontal bands or rows that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of apples in baskets, each row clearly left-to-right and visually grouped, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of apples, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable apple instances present.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of apples, each row clearly left-to-right and visibly grouped, with 7 distinguishable apple instances across the rows.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of apples, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 contains multiple apples, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The layout is irregular and resembles a pile or scattered group rather than a structured horizontal arrangement.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; apples are piled and scattered without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of apples, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are irregularly scattered and occluded by bananas, failing to form distinct horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 shows a pile of apples in a bowl, which does not form visible horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the distinct left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains oranges and peppers, not apples. The visible objects do not match the target category 'apple', and no horizontal rows of apples are present.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are not arranged in any visible horizontal rows. The apples appear scattered and clustered together without a clear left-to-right grouping that would constitute a row.


Image 2 shows scattered apples among grapes, with no clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows apples scattered on a table without any clear horizontal grouping or rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows apples scattered on a cutting board and in a bowl, but they do not form any clear horizontal rows or bands that would match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of apples on decorative cakes, with 7 clearly visible and separately distinguishable apple instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of irregularly stacked items without any clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings that would match the reference's structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each containing visible and distinguishable sandwich instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains a single sandwich with no visible horizontal rows or multiple distinct instances of the target category.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible sandwich instances arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, matching the reference's grouping principle of left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows a pile of sandwich pieces on a plate, not clearly arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are touching and occluded, making it impossible to identify stable left-to-right groups that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each a clear left-to-right grouping with 4-8 visible instances, matching the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwich slices, each row containing 3 visible sandwiches. The arrangement supports clear left-to-right ordinal descriptions and meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of three distinct sandwiches, matching the reference's grouping principle. However, it does not meet the minimum requirement of 4 visible instances for acceptance.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable sandwich pieces arranged left-to-right on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible sandwich instances arranged left-to-right on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable sandwich pieces. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible sandwich halves arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwich pieces on a plate, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances that follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible sandwich instances, not the required 4-8. They are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwich pieces on a white plate, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable sandwich instances arranged in a stable left-to-right order.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of six clearly distinguishable sandwich slices, visually grouped left-to-right on a wooden surface. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with a stable ordinal description and no evidence of depth or irregular grouping.


Image 2 contains sandwiches but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they are grouped together on a plate without clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of four clearly distinguishable sandwich halves, each skewered and arranged left-to-right on a plate, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains four visible sandwich instances but lacks a clear, stable horizontal row structure. The arrangement is irregular and does not follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each with two clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches, each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable sandwich instances arranged left-to-right.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches on a checkered cloth, with four clearly visible and separately distinguishable sandwich instances that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible sandwich instances, not the required 4-8. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of sandwiches on plates, with 5 clearly visible and separately distinguishable sandwich instances arranged in a left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains 4 visible sandwich instances but they are arranged irregularly on a plate, not in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of wrapped sandwiches, each row containing 3-4 clearly separable instances that align with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct sandwich-like items arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a wooden board, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only a single horizontal band of sandwiches, but it is not clearly distinguishable as a group and lacks the stability required for ordinal descriptions. The arrangement does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sandwiches are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed sandwich instances without clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the required layout criteria.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of sandwiches on a griddle, with 8 clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping in each row, matching the reference's horizontal banding principle.


Image 2 shows scattered sandwiches without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sandwiches; the items are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sandwiches; the objects are irregularly arranged and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of sandwich instances on plates, forming one distinct row with 8 visible sandwiches that support stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible sandwiches on plates, with each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 contains only a single visible vase instance, lacking the required multiple horizontal bands or groups of vases to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only three visible vase instances and lacks any clear horizontal grouping or rows. The objects are not arranged in a manner that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four distinct vases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only three visible vases, which is below the required minimum of four. The arrangement does not form clear horizontal rows and appears irregular rather than structured.


Image 2 contains only two visible vase instances, insufficient for the required 4-8. The arrangement is not clearly organized into horizontal rows and lacks the structured grouping principle seen in the reference image.


Image 2 contains only two visible vase instances and lacks any clear horizontal grouping that would match the reference's row-based structure.


Image 2 displays four distinct vases arranged in a single, clear horizontal row on a shelf, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only three visible vase instances, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and lacks the distinct left-to-right grouping required to match the reference's horizontal banding principle.


Image 2 contains four visible vase-like objects, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The objects appear irregularly spaced and lack the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains only three visible vase instances and lacks any clear horizontal grouping or layout that matches the reference's structural principle of distinct, left-to-right rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinct glass vases holding flowers, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right organization.


Image 2 contains only three visible vases, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and lacks clear horizontal bands or groups that would support row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single horizontal row of five distinct blue vases, each clearly visible and left-to-right arranged on a table, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays four distinct vases arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on a flat surface, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only two visible vases, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and lacks the structured grouping principle seen in the reference image.


Image 2 contains only a single vase, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances or any horizontal grouping.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible vase instances, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays four distinct vases arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on a display platform, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct red vases arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on an ornate table, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 6 distinguishable vase-like objects on a wooden surface, matching the reference's grouping principle with no overlapping or depth-based arrangement.


Image 2 displays four distinct vases arranged in two visible horizontal bands, with clear left-to-right groupings that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only three visible vase instances, which is below the required minimum of four. The arrangement does not form clear horizontal rows and appears irregular.


Image 2 contains only a single visible vase, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances or form any horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded objects with no clear horizontal rows of vases; the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only one visible vase, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 instances. Additionally, it lacks any clear horizontal grouping or layout resembling the reference style.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible vase instances and lacks the clear, distinct horizontal bands of vases required to match the reference's grouping principle. The objects are irregularly arranged and do not form recognizable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered and occluded vases with no clear horizontal rows or within-row groupings, failing to meet the criteria for structured horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only one visible vase, which does not meet the requirement of 4-8 distinguishable instances. Additionally, it lacks any clear horizontal grouping or arrangement that would align with the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 contains only three vases placed irregularly on a shelf and table, with no clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural layout.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The trucks are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered trucks with no clear horizontal grouping. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions, and the objects are not visibly arranged in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of five distinguishable trucks, visually grouped from left to right on grassy terrain under a blue sky. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with a single, stable row and visible instances.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal row of six distinguishable trucks, visually grouped from left to right on a grassy field under a cloudy sky. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with a single visible band of trucks, each recognizable as a distinct object without occlusion or clustering.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged along a dirt track, with apparent rows arising from depth and perspective rather than distinct horizontal bands. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right rows that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of 'truck' objects. The vehicles are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The trucks are scattered and do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not contain any visible trucks. The objects present are people and a motorcycle, which do not match the target category of 'truck'.


Image 2 shows bicycles in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout along a sidewalk, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The visible bicycles are grouped by perspective and location on the street rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged along a road in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is linear and perspective-based, not matching the reference's grouping principle of clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout along a sidewalk, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are grouped by relative y-position and perspective rather than forming distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not contain any visible bicycles arranged in horizontal rows; it shows a parking area with bicycles in the background, but they are not grouped in a manner matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable teddy bears, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, with 4 red and 4 white visible, forming clear left-to-right groups that match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats, with each band containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable boat instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of boats; the arrangement is irregular and lacks distinct, left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats, each a left-to-right group recognizable without object boxes. The arrangement includes 7 clearly visible and distinguishable boat instances, adhering to the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of teddy bears without clear horizontal rows, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 does not follow a horizontal row layout; the teddy bears are in a basket and appear irregularly grouped, not forming distinct left-to-right rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of teddy bears, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each with 3-4 visible instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable and separate instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The boats are visibly separate and recognizable without object boxes, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped layout of boats. The boats are irregularly arranged, with some appearing in the foreground and others partially obscured or clustered together, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The boats are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling 7 visible examples within the defined rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The boats are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling 7 visible examples. The layout matches the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 displays exactly two horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing four distinct and clearly visible teddy bears. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 shows boats arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The boats are aligned along the marina's length, creating a perspective effect rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of boats. The boats are scattered and occluded, with no distinct left-to-right rows that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing 2-3 visible and recognizable teddy bears, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows boats arranged along a canal, creating a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The boats are scattered and do not form clear, distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The boats are visibly arranged in stable rows with ordinal left/right positions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of apples without distinct horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains only two visible apples, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and lacks clear horizontal bands of apples.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of apples, each row clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The six visible apples meet the criteria for count and layout.


Image 2 contains six visible apples, but they are scattered and not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The visible instances do not meet the criteria for a structured horizontal grouping.


Image 2 contains a pile of apples and oranges in a bowl, which does not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of apples, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are piled together without clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. Instead, the apples are part of a scattered and irregular layout with other fruits and vegetables, failing to meet the criteria for a clear horizontal grouping.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable trucks, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible fire trucks arranged in a single horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible orange trucks arranged in a single, stable horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a clear, single horizontal row of 8 distinguishable trucks aligned left-to-right along a road, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged along a street in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative positioning and distance, not clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows three trucks arranged in a single horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle. However, it only contains three visible instances of the target category, falling short of the required 4-8.


Image 2 contains only two visible trucks, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is not clearly grouped into horizontal bands and lacks the structured row layout matching the reference.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows, and does not meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands of 'truck' objects.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth-based layout due to perspective, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not contain any visible trucks arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are aircraft and ground support vehicles, none of which qualify as trucks.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with trucks arranged along the tarmac, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would constitute visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth-based layout on an airport tarmac, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and do not form clear left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows trucks in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The trucks are positioned at varying distances and do not form visible left-to-right groups that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows scattered trucks without clear horizontal rows; the arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are six visible bicycles, meeting the criteria for row count and object count. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of bicycles parked side-by-side on a sidewalk, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal grouping with 6 distinguishable bicycles.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable bicycles, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative positioning and depth, not a clear left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal band structure.


Image 2 shows bicycles scattered and not arranged in clear horizontal rows; they are grouped by proximity rather than a structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible bicycles meet the criteria for recognizable instances within stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of bicycles with 6 visible instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of bicycles. The bicycles are scattered and occluded, lacking distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of bicycles; the bicycles are clustered together in a small group on the sidewalk, lacking distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles parked along a sidewalk, but they are not arranged in visually obvious horizontal rows. The layout is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visible bicycles fitting the criteria.


Image 2 does not display any visible bicycles arranged in horizontal rows. The bicycles are scattered and not grouped into discernible left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are aligned along the background and appear to be in a single line behind the skateboarder, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 does not display a clear, left-to-right horizontal arrangement of bicycles. The bicycles are scattered and occluded, lacking distinct rows or groups that would support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout along a street, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single horizontal row of three suitcases, matching the reference's grouping principle. However, it does not meet the minimum requirement of 4 visible instances for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of suitcases, each row containing 4 clearly visible and separately distinguishable suitcases. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal banding style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of suitcases, with 7 clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of suitcases on a conveyor belt, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are stacked vertically and appear to be viewed from an angle, making it unsuitable for the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' criteria.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row layout of suitcases; instead, it shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of luggage.


Image 2 shows suitcases arranged on a shelf in a depth layout, not as distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable horses, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality.


Image 2 displays a clear and stable arrangement of teddy bears in three distinct horizontal rows, each containing 2-3 visible instances. The objects are left-to-right grouped, recognizable as separate entities without clustering, and meet the criteria for row-based layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sailboats, each a clear left-to-right grouping. There are six visible and distinguishable boats, meeting the criteria for row count (1-4) and object count (4-8). The layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered boats in a harbor with no clear horizontal rows or structured grouping, failing to match the reference's horizontal band principle.


Image 2 shows boats stacked irregularly and not arranged in visible horizontal rows; the objects are occluded and lack clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of teddy bear-shaped objects in three distinct horizontal rows, with 8 visible instances that form recognizable left-to-right groups, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of teddy bears, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 8 visibly distinguishable teddy bears fitting the specified criteria.


Image 2 shows a pile of teddy bears with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings, making it unsuitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 6 distinguishable teddy bears, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats, with four and two visible instances respectively, clearly arranged left-to-right in a manner consistent with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of teddy bears in bags, lacking distinct horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable and separately distinguishable objects. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The boats are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling six visible examples within the defined rows.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular pile of teddy bears without any discernible horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of boats, each row containing 3 visible boats that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each clearly recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 8 visible teddy bears distributed across the two rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats, with four visible vessels in each row, clearly arranged from left to right and easily recognizable as separate groups.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats along the waterline, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of boats arranged in horizontal rows. The boats are scattered and occluded, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of teddy bears. The plush toys are scattered, piled, and occluded, with no clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct rows.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with boats in the background, not clearly defined horizontal rows of visible boat instances.


Image 2 shows a claw machine with teddy bears inside, but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The bears are piled together and viewed through glass, making it impossible to discern distinct left-to-right groups that would qualify as horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 8 distinguishable boats on the beach, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a mix of oranges and apples in a scattered, irregular arrangement without clear horizontal rows or distinct groupings suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 shows a pile of apples without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of apples, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible apple instances.


Image 2 contains 6 visible apples but they are arranged irregularly, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not follow the grouping principle of genuine horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a pile of apples in a bowl, which does not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of apples, not forming distinct horizontal rows as required by the reference style.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible apples, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement is irregular and not clearly grouped into horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of apples with no clear horizontal rows, and the objects are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains apple slices, but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The apples are grouped within a compartment of a bento box and do not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are arranged in a scattered and irregular manner without clear horizontal rows. The objects do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a large pile of oranges, not apples. The layout is irregular and lacks distinct horizontal rows of the target category.


Image 2 contains scattered apples on a table, not clearly grouped into distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement lacks the structured grouping principle required for acceptance.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of apples arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are not identifiable as apples, and there is no discernible grouping principle matching the reference style.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of apples; instead, the apples are arranged in a scattered and irregular manner within the market stall.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each row containing 2-3 clearly visible and recognizable cake instances with consistent left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each containing 3-4 clearly visible and recognizable cake instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each containing 3 visible instances. The arrangement clearly follows a left-to-right grouping principle, with stable row and within-row ordinal descriptions. This matches the reference's grouping style and meets all acceptance criteria.


Image 2 shows donuts, not cakes, and they are arranged in a scattered, irregular manner without clear horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each row containing clearly separable and recognizable cake instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows cakes arranged in a depth layout, with apparent rows arising from perspective and depth rather than distinct horizontal bands. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of cakes. The cakes are arranged in a vertical stack and scattered layout, not forming distinct left-to-right groups suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of cakes and instead shows plates of food, which do not match the target category or layout requirements.


Image 2 shows a disorganized display of pastries and cakes with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups, making it unsuitable for the specified layout criteria.


Image 2 contains sushi rolls, not cakes. The arrangement is irregular and does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes on plates, with 8 clearly visible and separately distinguishable cake instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display cakes arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, the cakes are clustered together on a single plate without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The sheep are visibly distinguishable, totaling seven in number, and the arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of four sheep, arranged left-to-right in a stable and recognizable group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with visible, distinguishable instances.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The sheep are scattered and not arranged in clearly defined horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable sheep instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 sheep, visually grouped from left to right in a stable and recognizable arrangement. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 sheep, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or depth-based arrangement.


Image 2 does not contain sheep; it shows cattle. The layout is irregular and lacks visible horizontal rows of the target category.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 8 visibly distinguishable sheep objects.


Image 2 shows three trucks but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The layout is irregular, with the trucks positioned side by side rather than forming distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains only a single truck, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal banding.


Image 2 displays four green trucks arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row on grass, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands. Each truck is separately distinguishable and forms a stable left-to-right group.


Image 2 does not visually follow the horizontal row grouping principle of the reference image. The trucks are arranged in a depth layout, with one truck prominently in front and others partially visible behind it, rather than forming distinct left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of trucks arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are primarily emergency vehicles and construction equipment, none of which qualify as trucks in the specified layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of trucks, with a clear left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 contains only a single truck, not multiple visible instances forming horizontal rows as required.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 distinguishable yellow trucks, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged along a road in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning, not a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 shows two trucks but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear side-by-side in a single horizontal alignment without distinct groupings or bands.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of trucks; instead, it shows a scattered arrangement of vehicles and objects in an airport setting.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of trucks, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The trucks are visibly separate and recognizable as individual objects within each row, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 contains only three visible 'truck' instances, which is below the required minimum of four. Additionally, these trucks are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of 5 distinguishable trucks, visually grouped from left to right without occlusion or irregular spacing.


Image 2 shows a single truck in the foreground with aircraft and other airport elements in the background, forming a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows of trucks.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged along a road in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged along a road viewed in depth, not in distinct horizontal rows. The layout is linear and perspective-based, not matching the required horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 shows trucks in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The trucks are viewed from the side and appear to be in a single line or scattered, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would constitute distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 does not contain any visible trucks and lacks the horizontal row structure required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are positioned along the z-axis (distance from camera), creating an apparent row structure due to perspective rather than distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands suitable for row-based analysis.


Image 2 displays five clearly visible trucks arranged in a single, distinct horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of five distinguishable red trucks, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four clearly visible trucks arranged in a single, stable horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of trucks arranged in horizontal rows. The vehicles present are cars and motorcycles, and the layout does not meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 shows a depth layout with trucks and other vehicles aligned along the road, not in distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is based on perspective and relative positions rather than clear, left-to-right groupings of trucks.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of trucks; the vehicles are scattered and lack a clear left-to-right grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of trucks, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The six visible trucks meet the criteria for obvious horizontal rows, with stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of 'truck' objects. The trucks are scattered and do not form distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays four distinct trucks arranged in a single, clear horizontal row from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle of visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of vehicles, including trucks, arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions. The layout meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances of the target category.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of 'truck' objects arranged in horizontal rows. The trucks present are scattered and do not form recognizable left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The trucks are scattered and not grouped into clearly defined left-to-right bands, failing to meet the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' criteria.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of trucks, each forming a clear left-to-right grouping that aligns with the reference's structural grouping principle. The trucks are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances within these rows.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of trucks; instead, the trucks are scattered and do not form a structured grouping.


Image 2 does not contain any visible trucks; it depicts a street scene with people and buildings.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of trucks; instead, it shows a scattered arrangement of various airport ground support vehicles and equipment.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of trucks arranged in horizontal rows. The objects present are airport ground support equipment and aircraft, none of which qualify as trucks.


Image 2 shows trucks arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The objects are scattered and occluded, lacking clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of orange objects in four distinct horizontal bands, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The count of visible oranges (7) meets the criteria of 4-8 instances, and the layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of oranges in crates, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 6 visible orange instances across the rows.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of orange objects in three distinct horizontal bands, each recognizable as a left-to-right group. The count of visible orange instances is eight, fitting the criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal rows of oranges, each row clearly left-to-right and visually recognizable as a group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear arrangement of oranges in two distinct horizontal bands within a colander, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal rows with 4-8 instances and stable left-to-right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges in bowls, with 4-8 clearly visible and recognizable instances per band. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle without depth or scattered object issues.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of orange slices, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular pile of oranges without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 contains scattered oranges with no clear horizontal grouping, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of oranges without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges in a bowl, with 8 clearly visible instances forming stable left-to-right groups that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains orange slices, but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of clear, left-to-right horizontal bands.


Image 2 shows a pile of oranges in a bowl, which does not form distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the clear left-to-right groupings required for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of oranges: one in a bowl and another group on the table, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal rows with 4-8 instances.


Image 2 contains scattered orange pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or stable row structure.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of orange objects (oranges and carrots), each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal band of 8 visible orange fruits, consistent with the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal band of orange objects (carrot slices and orange segments) arranged left-to-right, meeting the criteria for visible horizontal rows with 4-8 distinguishable instances.


Image 2 contains scattered oranges in a bowl, but they do not form any visible horizontal bands or groups that would constitute distinct rows. The arrangement lacks the structured horizontal layout required by the criteria.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows. The oranges are scattered and not arranged in distinct, recognizable horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of pizzas, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible pizza instances.


Image 2 displays two clear horizontal rows of pizzas, each containing four distinct and recognizable pizza instances arranged left-to-right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positions along the z-axis, not distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The visible bicycles are occluded and clustered together, failing to meet the criteria for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows bicycles in a scattered and irregular arrangement, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are occluded, overlapping, and lack clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible bicycles, does not form clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured into distinct bands.


Image 2 contains only three visible bicycles, not the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and does not form distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains bicycles scattered in a non-uniform arrangement, with no clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands as required.


Image 2 shows bicycles only in a mirror reflection, creating an apparent depth-based layout rather than distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not visibly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a vertical stack, not horizontal rows. The layout is depth-based, with the closest bicycle in front and others behind it, which does not match the required horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged along a depth perspective on a sidewalk, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible bicycles, does not display a clear horizontal row structure, and the arrangement is irregular rather than grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows bicycles and a motorcycle arranged in depth, not in clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows; the layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains bicycles but they are not arranged in visible horizontal rows; instead, they appear scattered and occluded, failing to meet the grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right grouping with 5 visible instances, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 shows bicycles scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows; they are grouped by proximity to the train and people, not by a clear left-to-right horizontal layout.


Image 2 shows bicycles scattered and not arranged in clear horizontal rows; the layout is irregular and does not match the reference's structured grouping principle.


Image 2 contains bicycles but they are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows. The bicycles appear scattered and not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands, failing to meet the 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid' layout requirement.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged along a depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of bicycles; the bicycles are scattered and not visually grouped into distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right group. The six visible bicycles meet the criteria for recognizable rows with stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged in a depth layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and relative positioning rather than distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains only two visible bicycles, which is below the minimum of four required instances. The bicycles are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal row layout of bicycles; instead, it shows a single bicycle in the foreground with others scattered in the background without clear grouping.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of bicycles, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 5 visible bicycle instances.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged vertically along a depth perspective, not in horizontal rows. The objects are not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged along a depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains bicycles but they are irregularly scattered, not forming clear horizontal rows. The arrangement does not match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains bicycles but they are scattered and not arranged in clear, distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle of structured horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains bicycles scattered across the scene without clear horizontal rows, and they are not grouped in a way that supports stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only two visible bicycles, which is below the required count of 4. The bicycles are not arranged in any clear horizontal rows and appear scattered within a crowd.


Image 2 contains only three visible bicycles, not the required 4-8 instances. The bicycles are scattered and do not form any clear horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only scattered bicycles without any clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows bicycles arranged along a depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into left-to-right bands that would constitute visible horizontal rows.


Image 2 shows bicycles along a market path, but their arrangement is depth-based and not clearly grouped into distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 zebras standing side-by-side on grass, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of zebras, with four and two visible individuals respectively, clearly arranged in left-to-right groups that support stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly visible horizontal row of 6 zebras, matching the reference's grouping principle with stable left-to-right ordinality and no depth or occlusion issues.


Image 2 shows a pile of suitcases under a net, with no clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groups. The arrangement is irregular and lacks the structured layout required for acceptance.


Image 2 shows a vertical stack of suitcases, not horizontal rows. The arrangement is depth-based, with objects layered on top of each other, which does not match the reference's horizontal grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six visible suitcases on a baggage carousel, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of suitcases, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 8 visible suitcase instances.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of suitcases on a conveyor belt, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable suitcases.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular pile of suitcases without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of suitcases, with a total of eight visible instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a single suitcase in the foreground with other indistinct objects in the background, lacking any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping of suitcases.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of suitcases, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows scattered and occluded suitcases without clear horizontal rows, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable horses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not follow the reference's horizontal row grouping principle; the horses are arranged in a scattered, irregular pattern without clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows horses in a chaotic, irregular arrangement with no clear horizontal rows. The objects are not grouped into distinct left-to-right bands and appear scattered, making it impossible to identify stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of six distinguishable horses running together on a street, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable horses, visually grouped from left to right as a cohesive unit without occlusion or irregular spacing.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of horses, each row containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable horse instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's structural grouping style.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 distinguishable horses, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows horses scattered across the field without clear horizontal rows or groupings that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of horses, each row containing clearly visible and separately distinguishable horses from left to right, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, with 6 clearly visible and recognizable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping principle, matching the reference's horizontal row structure.


Image 2 has a single horizontal band of teddy bears, but the count is only 3, which is below the required minimum of 4. Additionally, while the layout follows a horizontal grouping principle, it does not meet the visible instance requirement.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing 3-4 visible and recognizable objects. The arrangement supports clear left-to-right ordinal descriptions within each row, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a depth layout of boats in the background, not distinct horizontal rows on the same level. The visible 'boats' are distant and part of a marina scene, not clearly grouped into left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 7 distinct teddy bears, visually matching the reference's grouping principle of horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, with 6 clearly visible and separately distinguishable instances arranged in a left-to-right grouping that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays four teddy bears arranged in two distinct horizontal rows, each row containing two clearly visible and recognizable teddy bears. The layout follows a clear left-to-right grouping principle without depth or occlusion issues.


Image 2 shows a scattered and occluded pile of objects, including teddy bears, but lacks any clear horizontal rows or structured layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable and separate instances, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows boats in a scattered and irregular arrangement, with no clear horizontal bands or left-to-right groups that would constitute distinct rows. The objects are not organized into stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of six distinct boats, forming a single visible row that aligns with the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays a single, clear horizontal row of six distinct teddy bears and related stuffed animals, matching the reference's grouping principle with visible left-to-right order and no overlapping or scattered elements.


Image 2 displays a clear grid layout with three horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing two distinguishable objects, meeting the criteria for 'grid' layout and reference-style matching.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each row containing clearly recognizable and left-to-right grouped teddy bears, totaling six visible instances that meet the grouping criteria.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of boats, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The boats are visibly separate and recognizable within their respective rows, meeting the criteria for horizontal row layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 shows boats along a dock and in the water, but their arrangement is primarily depth-based and not clearly organized into distinct horizontal rows. The objects do not form stable left-to-right groups that would be recognized as separate rows.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats, each a clear left-to-right grouping. The boats are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling six visible examples. The layout aligns with the reference's horizontal row principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, structured horizontal arrangement of boats. The boats appear scattered and are not organized into distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute visible horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains teddy bears but they are arranged in a grid-like display case, not in horizontal rows. The objects are grouped within compartments, which does not match the reference's horizontal row grouping principle.


Image 2 displays six teddy bears arranged in a single, clearly visible horizontal row, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 shows boats arranged along a dock in depth perspective, not in distinct horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to relative y positions and perspective, not clear left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of boats along the riverbank, each forming a clear left-to-right grouping. The boats are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, meeting the criteria for horizontal rows with 4-8 visible objects.


Image 2 shows scattered boats without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 shows a crowded and scattered arrangement of teddy bears, lacking distinct horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions. The objects are not grouped in clear left-to-right bands.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of boats; instead, the boats are scattered and viewed from a perspective that does not support clear row-based ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of teddy bears, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are piled together and lack clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear, horizontally grouped arrangement of teddy bears. The objects are scattered and not organized into distinct left-to-right rows.


Image 2 contains scattered teddy bears without clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of teddy bears, each clearly left-to-right grouped and visibly distinguishable, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 7 visible instances.


Image 2 shows a scattered pile of teddy bears without any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 displays a clear horizontal arrangement of boats along the waterfront, forming one distinct row with 6 visible instances. The layout matches the reference's grouping principle of horizontal bands and supports stable ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of teddy bears, not forming distinct horizontal rows or groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of teddy bears arranged in horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 contains boats, but they are scattered and not arranged in visible horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows umbrellas arranged in a depth-based layout, not horizontal rows. The apparent 'rows' are due to perspective and vertical stacking, not a genuine left-to-right grouping that matches the reference's horizontal band structure.


Image 2 shows scattered and overlapping umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or distinct left-to-right groupings, failing to match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of red and yellow umbrellas, each row clearly recognizable as a left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 6 visible umbrella instances distributed across 2 stable rows.


Image 2 shows scattered and overlapping umbrellas without clear horizontal rows, making it不符合要求的水平排列.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of visible umbrellas, with 7 clearly identifiable instances. The arrangement follows a stable left-to-right grouping in each row, matching the reference's horizontal banding principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants. The plants are scattered and do not form a structured row layout.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of umbrellas, with no clear horizontal bands or left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear, stable horizontal row layout of umbrellas. The umbrellas are scattered and grouped in ways that do not support consistent row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'umbrella'. The scene depicts a market stall with oranges and other produce, but no umbrellas are present.


Image 2 contains scattered and irregularly placed umbrellas without clear horizontal rows or groupings that match the reference's structural principle.


Image 2 does not display any visible horizontal bands of potted plants; the plants are scattered and do not form recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of potted plants. The objects are irregularly arranged, with some appearing in vertical stacks or scattered without distinct left-to-right groupings.


Image 2 shows a depth-based arrangement of potted plants along a wall, not distinct horizontal rows. The objects are aligned linearly but appear as a single depth layer rather than multiple left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows apples in a bowl and stacked above, but lacks visible horizontal bands of distinct apple objects that would constitute rows. The arrangement is irregular and does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains multiple apples, but they are irregularly scattered and not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The layout does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of apples without any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 does not visually follow the reference's grouping principle of distinct horizontal bands of apples. The apples are scattered and piled, lacking clear left-to-right groups that would support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows apples scattered without clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands of objects.


Image 2 does not contain apples; it shows oranges, limes, and mangoes. The layout is irregular with no visible horizontal rows of the target category.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of apples, each forming a clear left-to-right group that aligns with the reference's grouping principle. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not contain any visible apples; it shows bananas, peaches, and limes instead.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible apples, does not exhibit clear horizontal bands or rows, and the arrangement is irregular and scattered rather than structured into distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 shows a pile of fruits with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout. The apples are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands, failing to meet the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' or 'grid'.


Image 2 contains only two visible apples, insufficient for the required 4-8 instances. The arrangement is irregular and lacks clear horizontal bands of apples.


Image 2 shows apples scattered without clear horizontal grouping, with some occlusion and no distinct left-to-right bands that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains only a few apples scattered among bananas, lacking any clear horizontal rows or structured layout.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of apples, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 4-8 visible instances.


Image 2 contains apples but they are irregularly scattered within a bowl, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows scattered and irregularly arranged apples, not forming distinct horizontal rows as per the reference style.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible apples, which is below the required minimum of 4. The arrangement does not form clear horizontal rows and appears irregular.


Image 2 contains only a single apple, failing to meet the requirement of 4-8 visible instances and horizontal band grouping.


Image 2 shows apples scattered without a clear horizontal grouping, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands of 'apple' objects.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible apple instances, does not display 4-8 distinguishable apples, and lacks clear horizontal rows of apples. The arrangement is irregular and does not match the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of apples; the visible apple slices are irregularly placed and do not form distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are arranged in a scattered and irregular manner on a fruit platter. There is no clear horizontal row structure that would match the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains visible apples but they are not arranged in distinct horizontal rows. The apples appear scattered and irregularly placed on the plate, failing to meet the requirement of forming clear left-to-right groups that support stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains apples, but they are not arranged in any discernible horizontal rows. The apples appear in a scattered and irregular layout, with no clear left-to-right grouping that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains a disorganized assortment of fruits without any visible horizontal rows of apples. The arrangement is irregular and does not meet the criteria for distinct, left-to-right groups of apples.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of apples, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are mixed with other fruits and lack the clear left-to-right grouping required for acceptance.


Image 2 contains only 3 visible apples, does not exhibit clear horizontal rows, and the arrangement is irregular rather than structured into distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains no visible instances of the target category 'apple'.


Image 2 shows a scattered and irregular arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 contains scattered donuts without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible despite visible instances.


Image 2 contains donuts but they are irregularly arranged in a pile, not forming distinct horizontal rows. The objects are occluded and lack clear left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 shows a pile of donuts with no clear horizontal rows or structured layout, violating the requirement for visible horizontal bands of objects.


Image 2 shows a scattered arrangement of donuts without clear horizontal rows, making it ineligible for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each row containing 4 visible donuts, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains pepperoni pizza slices, not donuts. The toppings are irregularly distributed and do not form visible horizontal rows of the target category.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The count of visible donuts (7) meets the criteria of 4-8, and the layout supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each clearly left-to-right and recognizable as a group. The arrangement meets the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' with 4-8 visible instances and maintains a stable row-number and within-row ordinal structure.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of donuts, each clearly left-to-right grouped and visually recognizable as separate bands. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with a total of eight visible donuts.


Image 2 contains a mix of cakes and cookies but lacks clearly defined horizontal rows of cakes. The objects are arranged in a scattered, non-uniform manner without distinct left-to-right groupings that would support stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the cakes are arranged in a circular pattern rather than distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of cakes, with four visible instances in the top band and two in the bottom, meeting all criteria for acceptance.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal rows of cakes, each row containing clearly recognizable and separate cake instances. The arrangement supports stable row-number and within-row left/right ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal arrangement of cakes. The visible cakes are part of a scattered assortment on a tiered stand, lacking distinct left-to-right groups that would constitute recognizable rows.


Image 2 does not display a structured horizontal arrangement of cakes. The cakes are scattered and not organized into distinct, recognizable rows.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of roasted carrots, each a clear left-to-right group. The carrots are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, totaling 8 visible carrots, matching the required criteria for horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays four distinct horizontal bands of carrots, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement meets the criteria for stable row-number and within-row ordinal descriptions, with 8 visible carrot instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of visible carrots, each forming a clear left-to-right group that supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays three distinct horizontal bands of diced carrots, each forming a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, meeting the criteria for 'horizontal_rows' layout with 6 visible carrot instances.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces within sushi rolls, not a clear horizontal row layout matching the reference style.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of carrot sticks, each a clear left-to-right group. The carrots are visibly separate and recognizable as individual instances, meeting the criteria for 4-8 visible objects in 1-4 horizontal rows.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 8 visible carrot instances, matching the reference's grouping principle of distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal row of 5 visible carrot instances arranged left-to-right on a cutting board, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 contains a single horizontal band of carrots, but it is not clearly separated from other elements and lacks the distinct left-to-right grouping required. The arrangement does not support stable row-number or within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display horizontal rows of carrots; the visible carrot pieces are irregularly distributed within jars and do not form discernible left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without clear horizontal grouping, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot strips not forming distinct horizontal rows or a grid layout.


Image 2 contains scattered carrots without a clear horizontal row structure, violating the requirement for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or distinct rows, thus failing to match the reference's structural principle of horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces within a mixed vegetable dish, not forming distinct horizontal rows or groups.


Image 2 contains visible carrots, but they are irregularly scattered within a dish and do not form any discernible horizontal rows or stable groupings that support ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 does not display any visible instances of carrots arranged in horizontal rows or a grid layout. The carrots are mixed with celery and appear scattered within the bowl, failing to meet the criteria for distinct horizontal bands.


Image 2 contains scattered carrot pieces without any clear horizontal grouping or stable row structure.


Image 2 shows a dense, irregular cluster of sheep without clearly defined horizontal rows or stable within-row ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. There are six visible sheep instances that are separately distinguishable and arranged in stable rows, matching the reference's grouping principle.


Image 2 does not follow the horizontal row grouping principle; the sheep are scattered and occluded, with no clear left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row layout of sheep; instead, it shows scattered sheep in individual pens with no discernible grouping principle matching the reference style.


Image 2 shows sheep in a cage with no clear horizontal rows; they are clustered together and occluded, failing to meet the criteria for distinct left-to-right groups.


Image 2 does not display a clear horizontal row structure of sheep; the animals are scattered and not grouped in distinct left-to-right bands.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The sheep are visibly separate and recognizable within these rows, totaling six instances that meet the criteria for stable row-number and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, with a total of seven visible sheep instances that form clear left-to-right groups. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 7 visibly distinguishable sheep instances.


Image 2 shows sheep scattered in a natural field setting without any clear horizontal rows or structured grouping.


Image 2 displays a single, clearly defined horizontal band of sheep walking left to right on a road, matching the reference's grouping principle with 8 visible sheep instances.


Image 2 displays two distinct horizontal bands of sheep, each a clear left-to-right group. The arrangement supports stable row and ordinal descriptions, with 8 visible sheep instances fitting the criteria.