Datasets:
File size: 9,526 Bytes
386a494 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 | ConceptID,ConceptLabel,Dependencies,TaxonomyID
1,Classical Computing,,FOUND
2,What Is a Qubit,1,FOUND
3,Superposition Explained,2,FOUND
4,Entanglement Explained,2,FOUND
5,Quantum Measurement Problem,3|4,FOUND
6,Theoretical Promise of QC,3|4,FOUND
7,What QC Could Supposedly Do,6,FOUND
8,What QC Cannot Do,7,FOUND
9,QC vs Classical Computing,1|7|8,FOUND
10,Decoherence Problem,5,BARR
11,Qubits Are Extremely Fragile,10,BARR
12,Error Rate Problem,11,BARR
13,Error Correction Overhead,12,BARR
14,1000 Physical per 1 Logical,13,BARR
15,Million Qubit Requirement,14,BARR
16,Engineering vs Physics Barrier,10|12,BARR
17,No Platform Has Solved It,16,BARR
18,Cryogenic Cooling Requirement,11,BARR
19,Near Absolute Zero Temps,18,BARR
20,Cryogenic Cost and Scale,19,BARR
21,Wiring and Control Problem,18,BARR
22,Energy Consumption Problem,20|21,BARR
23,Infrastructure Cost,20|22,BARR
24,Hardware Scaling Wall,15|23,BARR
25,Connectivity Limitations,11,BARR
26,Superconducting Approach,18|25,HARD
27,Trapped Ion Approach,11|25,HARD
28,Photonic Approach,11,HARD
29,Topological Approach,11,HARD
30,Neutral Atom Approach,11,HARD
31,Platform Comparison,26|27|28|29|30,HARD
32,Each Platform Has Fatal Flaws,31|16,HARD
33,Shor's Factoring Algorithm,6,ALGO
34,Grover's Search Algorithm,6,ALGO
35,Quantum Supremacy Defined,7,ALGO
36,Quantum Advantage Defined,35,ALGO
37,Contrived Benchmarks,35|36,ALGO
38,No Real-World Advantage Yet,36|37,ALGO
39,Narrow Problem Applicability,8|33|34,ALGO
40,Classical Computers Keep Up,9|38,ALGO
41,Feynman's 1981 Idea,6,HIST
42,Shor's Algorithm 1994,33,HIST
43,First Lab Demos 1998-2001,42,HIST
44,"D-Wave ""Commercial"" QC 2007",43,HIST
45,D-Wave Sale to Lockheed 2011,44,HIST
46,Google Buys D-Wave 2013,45,HIST
47,IBM Cloud Access 2016,43,HIST
48,Google Sycamore Claim 2019,35|47,HIST
49,IBM 127-Qubit Chip 2021,47,HIST
50,IBM 1121-Qubit Chip 2023,49,HIST
51,Zero Commercial ROI by 2025,48|50,HIST
52,Timeline Pattern Analysis,41|42|43|44|48|50|51,HIST
53,3-5 Years Away Pattern,52,HIST
54,40 Years of Promises,52|53,HIST
55,Catalog of Broken Promises,54,HYPE
56,D-Wave Exaggerated Claims,44|45|55,HYPE
57,Google Supremacy Overhype,48|55,HYPE
58,IBM Roadmap Revisions,49|50|55,HYPE
59,Startup Pitch Exaggeration,55,HYPE
60,Consultant Hype Reports,55,HYPE
61,McKinsey $450B Projection,60,HYPE
62,Media Amplification Effect,55,HYPE
63,Moving Goalposts Pattern,53|55,HYPE
64,Unfalsifiable Timelines,53|63,HYPE
65,Redefining Success,63|64,HYPE
66,Fusion Energy Parallel,54,HYPE
67,Flying Cars Parallel,54,HYPE
68,Public Key Encryption Basics,1,CRYP
69,Could QC Break Encryption?,33|68,CRYP
70,Massive Qubits Needed,15|69,CRYP
71,Post-Quantum Crypto Exists,68,CRYP
72,NIST Already Has Standards,71,CRYP
73,Harvest Now Decrypt Later,69,CRYP
74,Window Is Already Closing,70|72,CRYP
75,Crypto Threat Is Overstated,70|74,CRYP
76,Return on Investment,,ECON
77,Net Present Value,76,ECON
78,Risk-Adjusted Returns,76|77,ECON
79,Expected Value Framework,78,ECON
80,Probability of Success,79,ECON
81,Opportunity Cost,76,ECON
82,Sunk Cost Trap,76,ECON
83,Total $100B+ Invested,76,ECON
84,Zero Revenue Generated,83,ECON
85,VC Funding Frenzy,83,ECON
86,Corporate R&D Burn Rate,83,ECON
87,Government Funding Pressure,83,ECON
88,Revenue Model Problem,84,ECON
89,Who Pays for QC?,88,ECON
90,Customer Demand Evidence,89,ECON
91,No Paying Customers,90,ECON
92,Classical Alternatives Cheaper,9|91,ECON
93,Cost Per Computation,23|92,ECON
94,Total Cost of Ownership,93,ECON
95,IonQ IPO and Stock Decline,85,ECON
96,SPAC Risks in QC,85,ECON
97,Rigetti Financial Struggles,85,ECON
98,D-Wave Revenue Reality,56|84,ECON
99,Market Valuation vs Revenue,95|96|97|98,ECON
100,Comparable Company Analysis,99,ECON
101,Exit Strategy Problem,99|91,ECON
102,Acqui-Hire as Only Exit,101,ECON
103,Venture Capital Loss Rates,85|99,ECON
104,When to Cut Losses,82|103,ECON
105,Technology Readiness Levels,,TECH
106,TRL Scale Explained,105,TECH
107,QC Stuck at TRL 2-3,106|38,TECH
108,Technology Adoption Curves,105,TECH
109,Crossing the Chasm,108,TECH
110,Gartner Hype Cycle,108,TECH
111,Peak of Inflated Expectations,110,TECH
112,Trough of Disillusionment,111,TECH
113,Technology Forecasting,108,TECH
114,Base Rate of Tech Failure,113,TECH
115,Prediction Track Records,113|114,TECH
116,Science vs Engineering Gap,16|105,TECH
117,Dot-Com Bubble Parallel,118,TECH
118,Technology Bubble Dynamics,110|114,TECH
119,General Purpose Technology,,GPT
120,GPT Characteristics,119,GPT
121,Must Be Broadly Applicable,120,GPT
122,Must Improve Over Time,120,GPT
123,Must Enable New Innovations,120,GPT
124,Steam Engine as GPT,121|122|123,GPT
125,Electricity as GPT,121|122|123,GPT
126,Transistor as GPT,121|122|123,GPT
127,Internet as GPT,121|122|123,GPT
128,AI/ML as Emerging GPT,121|122|123,GPT
129,QC Fails Every GPT Test,121|122|123|39,GPT
130,QC Is Narrowly Applicable,129,GPT
131,QC Cannot Replace Classical,9|130,GPT
132,Cognitive Bias Overview,,BIAS
133,Sunk Cost Fallacy,132,BIAS
134,Confirmation Bias,132,BIAS
135,Anchoring Bias,132,BIAS
136,Bandwagon Effect,132,BIAS
137,Dunning-Kruger in QC,132,BIAS
138,Optimism Bias,132,BIAS
139,Authority Bias,132,BIAS
140,FOMO in QC Investment,132,BIAS
141,Survivorship Bias,132,BIAS
142,Narrative Fallacy,132,BIAS
143,Groupthink,132,BIAS
144,Motivated Reasoning,132,BIAS
145,Information Asymmetry,132,BIAS
146,Bias in Tech Forecasting,132|113,BIAS
147,How Biases Compound,133|134|135|136|138|140,BIAS
148,Systems Thinking,,SYST
149,Causal Loop Diagrams,148,SYST
150,Reinforcing Feedback Loop,149,SYST
151,Balancing Feedback Loop,149,SYST
152,Hype Reinforcement Loop,150|62|87,SYST
153,Sunk Cost Escalation Loop,150|82|133,SYST
154,Career Incentive Loop,150|175,SYST
155,Geopolitical Arms Race Loop,150|87,SYST
156,Missing Balancing Loop,151|152,SYST
157,Leverage Points,149|156,SYST
158,Self-Sustaining Hype Cycle,152|153|154|155,SYST
159,Breaking the Hype Loop,157|158,SYST
160,Gil Kalai's Math Arguments,13,SKEP
161,Dyakonov's Physics Arguments,16,SKEP
162,Controlling 2^1000 Parameters,161,SKEP
163,Levin's Complexity Doubts,39,SKEP
164,Laughlin on Coherence Limits,10,SKEP
165,Goldreich's CS Perspective,39,SKEP
166,Skeptics Have No Funding Bias,145,SKEP
167,Proponents Have Funding Bias,145,SKEP
168,Why Skeptics Are Ignored,166|167|139,SKEP
169,Ethics of QC Education,171|172,ETHI
170,PhD Career Risk in QC,172,ETHI
171,QC Job Market Reality,91|84,ETHI
172,Almost All Jobs Are R&D,171,ETHI
173,What If the Field Contracts?,172|104,ETHI
174,Transferable Skills Debate,170,ETHI
175,Professor Grant Conflicts,87|144,ETHI
176,String Theory Career Warning,170,ETHI
177,Cold Fusion Career Warning,170,ETHI
178,Student Advising Ethics,169|170,ETHI
179,Informed Consent for Careers,178,ETHI
180,Ethical Investment Duty,76|145,ETHI
181,Fiduciary Responsibility,76|80,ETHI
182,FOMO Drives Bad QC Decisions,140|180,ETHI
183,Quantum Sensing,,ALT
184,Atomic Clocks,183,ALT
185,Quantum Magnetometers,183,ALT
186,Quantum Gravimeters,183,ALT
187,Sensors Already Make Money,184|185|186,ALT
188,Sensing Needs Few Qubits,183|15,ALT
189,Quantum Key Distribution,68|183,ALT
190,Risk-Adjusted QS Returns,78|187|188,ALT
191,Classical AI Hardware,1,ALT
192,Alternative Tech Investments,190|191,ALT
193,Portfolio Diversification,78|192,ALT
194,Successful Physics Bets,,PARA
195,Transistor Investment Payoff,194,PARA
196,Laser Investment Payoff,194,PARA
197,Fiber Optics Payoff,194,PARA
198,GPS Atomic Clock Payoff,194|184,PARA
199,MRI Investment Payoff,194,PARA
200,Failed Physics Bets,194,PARA
201,Cold Fusion Losses,200,PARA
202,Theranos Lessons,200|145,PARA
203,Concorde Economics Failure,200|81,PARA
204,Charismatic Founder Risk,202|145,PARA
205,When Scientists Mislead,145|204,PARA
206,The 10 Required Breakthroughs,24|32|38,BREAK
207,Error Rates Must Drop 100x,12|206,BREAK
208,Need 1000x More Qubits,15|206,BREAK
209,Coherence Must Improve 100x,10|206,BREAK
210,Connectivity Must Improve,25|206,BREAK
211,Cryogenics Must Scale,20|206,BREAK
212,New Algorithms Needed,39|206,BREAK
213,Cost Must Drop Dramatically,23|206,BREAK
214,All Must Happen Together,207|208|209|210|211|212|213,BREAK
215,Joint Probability Problem,80|214,BREAK
216,Independent vs Coupled Risks,215,BREAK
217,Each Breakthrough Is Uncertain,80|216,BREAK
218,Critical Thinking Skills,,CRIT
219,Hype Detection Checklist,218|63|64,CRIT
220,Red Flags in Tech Claims,218|65,CRIT
221,How to Read a Press Release,220|62,CRIT
222,Science Journalism Problems,62|221,CRIT
223,Base Rate Reasoning,114|218,CRIT
224,Extraordinary Claims Rule,218|223,CRIT
225,Technology Due Diligence,107|218,CRIT
226,Risk Assessment Framework,79|218,CRIT
227,Bayesian Reasoning Basics,80|218,CRIT
228,Applying Skepticism Broadly,219|220|223|224,CRIT
229,Fusion Hype Comparison,66|228,CRIT
230,AGI Hype Comparison,228,CRIT
231,Autonomous Vehicle Comparison,228,CRIT
232,Writing an Executive Brief,75|131|217|226,APPLY
233,Conducting Red Team Analysis,206|217|220,APPLY
234,Building a Claims Tracker,55|219,APPLY
235,Evaluating a Pitch Deck,147|220|226,APPLY
236,Writing a Critical Review,222|224|226,APPLY
237,Portfolio Allocation Analysis,193|217,APPLY
238,National QC Strategy Critique,87|190|217|237,APPLY
239,Board-Level QC Questions,104|181|235,APPLY
240,Skeptical Inquiry Method,147|159|228,APPLY
241,Making Better Tech Bets,192|217|240,APPLY
|