Datasets:
Add KRB benchmark reference — numbers, usage, cite, links to graphifymd.com/benchmark
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,191 +1,66 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
- rag
|
| 9 |
-
- retrieval
|
| 10 |
-
- benchmark
|
| 11 |
-
- llm
|
| 12 |
-
- knowledge-representation
|
| 13 |
-
language:
|
| 14 |
-
- en
|
| 15 |
-
pretty_name: CKG Benchmark
|
| 16 |
-
size_categories:
|
| 17 |
-
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 18 |
-
configs:
|
| 19 |
-
- config_name: domains
|
| 20 |
-
data_files:
|
| 21 |
-
- split: train
|
| 22 |
-
path: domains/**/*.csv
|
| 23 |
-
- config_name: queries
|
| 24 |
-
data_files:
|
| 25 |
-
- split: train
|
| 26 |
-
path: queries/*.jsonl
|
| 27 |
-
drop_labels: true
|
| 28 |
-
- config_name: results_macro_f1
|
| 29 |
-
data_files:
|
| 30 |
-
- split: train
|
| 31 |
-
path: results/table1_macro_f1.csv
|
| 32 |
-
- config_name: results_by_query_type
|
| 33 |
-
data_files:
|
| 34 |
-
- split: train
|
| 35 |
-
path: results/table2_by_query_type.csv
|
| 36 |
-
- config_name: results_tokenomics
|
| 37 |
-
data_files:
|
| 38 |
-
- split: train
|
| 39 |
-
path: results/table3_tokenomics.csv
|
| 40 |
-
- config_name: results_hop_degradation
|
| 41 |
-
data_files:
|
| 42 |
-
- split: train
|
| 43 |
-
path: results/table4_hop_degradation.csv
|
| 44 |
---
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
#
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
|--------|----------|-------------|-----|----------|
|
| 54 |
-
| **CKG** | **0.4709** | **269** | **0.00175** | **$7.81** |
|
| 55 |
-
| RAG | 0.1231 | 2,982 | 0.0000413 | $76.23 |
|
| 56 |
-
| GraphRAG | 0.1200 | 3,450 | 0.0000452 | $44.43 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
-
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
-
domains/{domain}/learning-graph.csv — structured DAG (ConceptID, ConceptLabel, Dependencies, TaxonomyID)
|
| 64 |
-
queries/queries_{domain}.jsonl — 11,031 benchmark queries (T1–T5 types)
|
| 65 |
-
results/ — per-system JSONL results + summary CSVs
|
| 66 |
-
```
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
#
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
| Domain | Category |
|
| 73 |
-
|--------|----------|
|
| 74 |
-
| algebra-1 | Mathematics |
|
| 75 |
-
| asl-book | Language |
|
| 76 |
-
| automating-instructional-design | Education Technology |
|
| 77 |
-
| bioinformatics | Life Sciences |
|
| 78 |
-
| biology | Life Sciences |
|
| 79 |
-
| blockchain | Computer Science |
|
| 80 |
-
| calculus | Mathematics |
|
| 81 |
-
| chemistry | Natural Science |
|
| 82 |
-
| circuits | Engineering |
|
| 83 |
-
| claude-skills | AI / LLM |
|
| 84 |
-
| computer-science | Computer Science |
|
| 85 |
-
| conversational-ai | AI / LLM |
|
| 86 |
-
| data-science-course | Data Science |
|
| 87 |
-
| dementia | Healthcare |
|
| 88 |
-
| digital-citizenship | Social / Civic |
|
| 89 |
-
| digital-electronics | Engineering |
|
| 90 |
-
| ecology | Natural Science |
|
| 91 |
-
| economics-course | Social Science |
|
| 92 |
-
| ethics-course | Philosophy |
|
| 93 |
-
| fft-benchmarking | Signal Processing |
|
| 94 |
-
| functions | Mathematics |
|
| 95 |
-
| genetics | Life Sciences |
|
| 96 |
-
| geometry-course | Mathematics |
|
| 97 |
-
| glp1-obesity | Healthcare / Pharma |
|
| 98 |
-
| infographics | Design / Communication |
|
| 99 |
-
| intro-to-graph | Computer Science |
|
| 100 |
-
| intro-to-physics-course | Natural Science |
|
| 101 |
-
| it-management-graph | IT Management |
|
| 102 |
-
| learning-linux | Computer Science |
|
| 103 |
-
| linear-algebra | Mathematics |
|
| 104 |
-
| machine-learning-textbook | AI / Machine Learning |
|
| 105 |
-
| microsims | Education Technology |
|
| 106 |
-
| modeling-healthcare-data | Healthcare Analytics |
|
| 107 |
-
| moss | Biology / Botany |
|
| 108 |
-
| organizational-analytics | Business Analytics |
|
| 109 |
-
| personal-finance | Finance |
|
| 110 |
-
| pre-calc | Mathematics |
|
| 111 |
-
| prompt-class | AI / LLM |
|
| 112 |
-
| quantum-computing | Computer Science |
|
| 113 |
-
| reading-for-kindergarten | Education |
|
| 114 |
-
| signal-processing | Engineering |
|
| 115 |
-
| statistics-course | Data Science |
|
| 116 |
-
| systems-thinking | Systems Science |
|
| 117 |
-
| theory-of-knowledge | Philosophy |
|
| 118 |
-
| tracking-ai-course | AI / LLM |
|
| 119 |
-
| unicorns | Business / Finance |
|
| 120 |
-
| us-geography | Geography |
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
### Enterprise Domains (5, unbenchmarked — community contribution)
|
| 123 |
-
|
| 124 |
-
| Domain | Category | Concepts |
|
| 125 |
-
|--------|----------|---------|
|
| 126 |
-
| payer-formulary | Healthcare Payer Analytics | 75 |
|
| 127 |
-
| drug-interactions | Clinical Pharmacology | 70 |
|
| 128 |
-
| icd10-metabolic | Medical Coding | 70 |
|
| 129 |
-
| cpt-em-coding | Medical Billing | 80 |
|
| 130 |
-
| hipaa-compliance | Healthcare Compliance | 75 |
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
-
## Query Types
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
| Type | Description | Example |
|
| 135 |
-
|------|-------------|---------|
|
| 136 |
-
| T1 | Entity lookup | "What is Composite Function?" |
|
| 137 |
-
| T2 | Direct dependency | "What are the prerequisites for Implicit Differentiation?" |
|
| 138 |
-
| T3 | Multi-hop path | "What is the prerequisite chain from Function to Taylor Series?" |
|
| 139 |
-
| T4 | Category aggregate | "List all FOUND concepts" |
|
| 140 |
-
| T5 | Cross-concept relationship | "How does Domain and Range relate to Inverse Function?" |
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
## Two-Track Design
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
**Track 1 — McCreary Intelligent Textbook Corpus**
|
| 145 |
-
44 open-source educational domains. Hand-authored learning-graph CSVs. STEM, Professional, Foundational.
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
**Track 2 — Pipeline-Generated Commercial Domain**
|
| 148 |
-
GLP-1/Obesity pharmacology assembled from ClinicalTrials.gov API in one session. No expert curation. CKG F1 = 0.5298 — exceeds hand-curated average.
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
## Key Finding: CKG improves with hop depth, RAG plateaus
|
| 151 |
-
|
| 152 |
-
| hop depth | CKG F1 | RAG F1 |
|
| 153 |
-
|-----------|--------|--------|
|
| 154 |
-
| 0 | 0.374 | 0.073 |
|
| 155 |
-
| 1 | 0.519 | 0.066 |
|
| 156 |
-
| 2 | 0.573 | 0.226 |
|
| 157 |
-
| 3 | 0.671 | 0.138 |
|
| 158 |
-
| 4 | 0.751 | 0.166 |
|
| 159 |
-
| **5** | **0.772** | 0.170 |
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
## Novel Metrics
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
- **RDS** (Retrieval Density Score) = F1 / tokens_consumed — intelligence per token
|
| 164 |
-
- **Hop-Depth F1** — multi-hop reasoning quality vs. chain length
|
| 165 |
-
- **CPCA** — cost per correct answer
|
| 166 |
-
|
| 167 |
-
## Citation
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
-
|
| 170 |
-
|
| 171 |
-
title={Benchmarking Knowledge Retrieval Architectures Across Educational
|
| 172 |
-
and Commercial Domains: RAG, GraphRAG, and Compact Knowledge Graphs},
|
| 173 |
-
author={Yarmoluk, Daniel and McCreary, Dan},
|
| 174 |
-
year={2026},
|
| 175 |
-
note={Pre-print in preparation. v0.6.2. Patent pending.}
|
| 176 |
-
}
|
| 177 |
```
|
| 178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 179 |
## Links
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
-
-
|
| 182 |
-
-
|
| 183 |
-
-
|
| 184 |
-
-
|
| 185 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
-
##
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
-
|
| 190 |
-
- Source learning graphs: MIT (McCreary Intelligent Textbooks)
|
| 191 |
-
- Enterprise domains: CC BY 4.0
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# KRB — Knowledge Retrieval Benchmark v0.6.2
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
> **CKG outperforms RAG by 4× F1 at 11× lower token cost.**
|
| 4 |
+
> Full reference: [graphifymd.com/benchmark](https://graphifymd.com/benchmark)
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
An open benchmark comparing **Compressed Knowledge Graphs (CKG)**, RAG, and GraphRAG across 45 domains and 7,928 queries. Measures accuracy, token cost, and dollar cost — all three.
|
| 7 |
+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
## Results
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+
| Metric | CKG | RAG | GraphRAG |
|
| 13 |
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14 |
+
| Macro-F1 | **0.471** | 0.123 | 0.120 |
|
| 15 |
+
| Tokens / query | **269** | 2,982 | 3,450 |
|
| 16 |
+
| Cost / 1K queries | **$7.81** | $76.23 | $44.43 |
|
| 17 |
+
| 5-hop F1 | **0.772** | 0.170 | — |
|
| 18 |
+
| Hallucination | **0 by construction** | uncontrolled | uncontrolled |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+
CKG F1 improves with reasoning depth (0.374 @ hop 0 → 0.772 @ hop 5). RAG plateaus and declines.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
+
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+
## Use the dataset
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
```python
|
| 27 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
+
ds = load_dataset("danyarm/ckg-benchmark")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
+
for row in ds["train"]:
|
| 32 |
+
query = row["query"]
|
| 33 |
+
hop_depth = row["hop_depth"] # 0–5
|
| 34 |
+
ground_truth = row["answer"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
+
# Run your system, compute F1 + token count + cost
|
| 37 |
+
# Submit results → huggingface.co/spaces/danyarm/krb-leaderboard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38 |
```
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
---
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
## Links
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
- **Full benchmark reference** → [graphifymd.com/benchmark](https://graphifymd.com/benchmark)
|
| 45 |
+
- **Live leaderboard** → [huggingface.co/spaces/danyarm/krb-leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/danyarm/krb-leaderboard)
|
| 46 |
+
- **Paper** → [github.com/Yarmoluk/ckg-benchmark/blob/main/paper/main.pdf](https://github.com/Yarmoluk/ckg-benchmark/blob/main/paper/main.pdf)
|
| 47 |
+
- **DOI** → [10.5281/zenodo.21222965](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21222965)
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
---
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
## Cite
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 54 |
+
@dataset{yarmoluk2026krb,
|
| 55 |
+
title = {KRB: Knowledge Retrieval Benchmark v0.6.2},
|
| 56 |
+
author = {Yarmoluk, Daniel},
|
| 57 |
+
year = {2026},
|
| 58 |
+
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21222965},
|
| 59 |
+
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/danyarm/ckg-benchmark},
|
| 60 |
+
license = {CC BY 4.0}
|
| 61 |
+
}
|
| 62 |
+
```
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
---
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
**License:** CC BY 4.0 · **Domains:** 45 benchmarked · **Queries:** 7,928 · **Patent pending**
|
|
|
|
|
|