Datasets:
File size: 7,397 Bytes
6c0bfac | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 | # Competitive roadmap — accurate status vs competition
**Law:** \(S=K(T_1+T_2+T_3)\) pin **D1D38A** (unchanged; never fitted to BLEU).
**Measured:** 2026-07-21 SOTA push (`m6_sota_push_report.json` / v0.2.0 metrics).
---
## 1. Two competitions (do not mix them)
| Arena | Competitor definition of “win” | PFLT status |
|-------|--------------------------------|-------------|
| **A. Inventory / form→gloss** | Coverage + sense under offline densify | **Winning our catalog** (~99.99% on 113 langs) |
| **B. Sentence MT** | sacreBLEU / chrF / COMET on held-out sentences | **Chat: competitive**; **News: trailing DeepL-class** |
Google/DeepL/NLLB are judged almost entirely on **B**.
We already win parts of **A** (especially classical / offline / FSOT). Beating them “accurately” means closing **B** without lying about A.
---
## 2. Scoreboard (measured)
### A — Catalog
| Metric | Us | Google-ish | DeepL-ish | NLLB-ish |
|--------|---:|-----------:|----------:|---------:|
| Lang count | **113** | ~249 | ~30–100 | ~200 |
| Form→gloss on our catalog | **~99.99%** | N/A (not their product metric) | N/A | N/A |
| Classical / dead / hieroglyph | **Strong** | Weak | Weak | Weak |
| FSOT law pin | **Yes** | No | No | No |
**Verdict A:** Competitive / leading on **our** product definition. Not “more languages than Google.”
### B1 — Chat / easy parallel (Tatoeba-style open-set)
| System path | sacreBLEU (mean) | Notes |
|-------------|-----------------:|-------|
| Neural best-of (opus/mul/NLLB) | **50.19** | Fair open-set |
| Hybrid oracle densify\|neural | **53.58** | Product upper bound |
| Staged internal bar | 45 | **Passed** |
| Strong open MT chat (rough) | ~45–65+ | We sit mid/high |
**Per-lang neural highs:** it 68 · es/pt 61 · de/ru ~57–58 · hi 55
**Gaps:** ja 37 · zh 32 · la neural 13 (densify wins classical)
**Verdict B1:** **Competitive** on chat open-set. Not SOTA vs every commercial pair, but past mid bar.
### B2 — News (WMT14 de→en test, n=3003) — the hard public bar
| System | sacreBLEU | Gap to 40 mid | Gap to 48 stretch |
|--------|----------:|--------------:|------------------:|
| Densify-only | ~0.4 | — | — |
| **opus-mt-de-en beams=5** | **33.88** | **−6.1** | **−14.1** |
| NLLB-600M beams=5 | 33.37 | −6.6 | −14.6 |
| DeepL-class mid (staged) | ~40 | 0 | — |
| Strong commercial stretch | ~45–55 | — | 0 |
**Verdict B2:** **Near mid open-MT**, **not** DeepL-class yet. This is the main gap if “beat the competition” means news fluency.
---
## 3. Stage ladder (honest)
```text
S0 Dict ████████████ DONE
S1 Phrase ████████████ DONE
S2 Chat strong ████████████ DONE (neural ~50)
S3 Mid news ████████░░░░ HERE (~34 / need ~40)
S4 DeepL-class ████░░░░░░░░ (need ~45–55)
```
---
## 4. What is left to be competitive / beat them (priority order)
| # | Lever | Closes | Effort | Expected gain |
|---|-------|--------|--------|----------------|
| **1** | **Ship hybrid router** (densify short/classical; neural long/news/CJK) | Product accuracy vs single-path | Low | Realizes measured **~53.6** chat hybrid; better UX |
| **2** | **WMT student finetune** (opus or NLLB on WMT train; law fixed) | News −6 gap | Med–High | Often **+2–6+** sacre if done right |
| **3** | **Stronger student** (NLLB-1.3B / more beams / length / ensembling) | News + chat CJK | Med | **+0.5–3** sacre (varies) |
| **4** | **CJK order** always neural SPM path (no EN-dep densify for ja/zh) | ja/zh chat | Low | Lift ja/zh from ~32–37 toward EU band |
| **5** | **FLORES** same-file public bar | Comparable claim vs NLLB papers | Blocked until Hub access | Credibility, not training |
| **6** | **Breadth** more Kaikki langs toward 150–200 | Catalog vs Google count | Med | Count game only |
| **7** | **COMET / human** spot checks | Beyond BLEU honesty | Med | Avoid BLEU-only overclaim |
### What will **not** beat DeepL alone
- More form→gloss densify on chat templates (product ceiling ≠ news SOTA)
- Refitting the FSOT law scalar to BLEU (forbidden / false)
- Claiming product densify BLEU-4 ~83 as open-set MT
---
## 5. Definition of “we beat the competition” (accurate)
Pick a claim level:
| Claim level | Criteria | Distance now |
|-------------|----------|--------------|
| **L1 Product unique** | Offline FSOT + classical + catalog depth | **Met** |
| **L2 Chat competitive** | Mean chat sacre ≥45 open-set multi-lang | **Met** (~50) |
| **L3 News mid-parity** | WMT14 de-en sacre ≥40 | **~6 pts short** |
| **L4 News strong** | WMT14 de-en sacre ≥45–48 | **~11–14 pts short** |
| **L5 Broad DeepL-class** | Many pairs FLORES/WMT mid-40s+ | **Not started** (FLORES gated; multi-pair news unrun) |
**Accurate one-liner:**
We **beat / own** unique offline+classical+law. We **match mid open-MT on chat**. We **do not yet beat** commercial systems on **news full-sentence fluency** — need roughly **+6 sacre** for mid-parity and **+14** for stretch SOTA on de→en.
---
## 6. Immediate execution plan (this push)
1. Implement **product hybrid router** + measure non-oracle (feature rules, not ref peeking)
2. **WMT decode push**: higher beams, dual-system sentence-level ensemble upper bound
3. Write measured gaps into `reports/COMPETITIVE_PUSH.md`
4. Keep law pin D1D38A fixed
Optional next session: WMT finetune loop under densify law wrap.
---
## 7. Measured this push (2026-07-22 competitive run)
| Track | Result | Notes |
|-------|-------:|-------|
| Product hybrid chat sacreBLEU | **40.64** | No ref peeking; densify-heavy (2800) + neural CJK (400) |
| WMT opus-mt beams=8 | **33.79** | Slightly under prior beams=5 33.88 |
| WMT NLLB-600M beams=8 | **33.49** | |
| **WMT oracle dual ensemble** | **37.61** | Best of opus/nllb per sentence (upper bound) |
| Gap ensemble → mid 40 | **2.39** | Was ~6.1 for single student |
| Gap ensemble → stretch 48 | **10.39** | Still needs finetune / larger model |
**Insight:** Beams alone do not close news. **Dual-student ensemble** recovers ~+3.7 sacre toward bar 40 without finetune. Remaining ~2.4 points need quality model upgrade or WMT finetune.
---
## 8. Beat levers run (2026-07-22)
| Lever | Result | Clears bar? |
|-------|-------:|:------------|
| L2 Neural-first hybrid chat | **48.74** sacre | **Yes** (≥45) |
| L1 Product NLL ensemble WMT | **34.54** | No (gap 5.46 to 40) |
| L1 Oracle ensemble upper | **37.13** | No (gap 2.87) |
| L3 Aggressive FT | 32.2 | No (regressed) |
| L3b Safe FT freeze-enc | 33.86 | No (flat) |
| Base opus-mt-de-en | 33.88 | No |
**Still required to beat news mid-parity (40):** better ensemble selection (~2.6 pts headroom to oracle), multi-epoch WMT FT with validation early-stop, or larger NLLB.
---
## 9. News push v3 (2026-07-22)
| System | sacreBLEU |
|--------|----------:|
| Product cross-NLL ensemble | **34.11** |
| Base opus | 33.88 |
| FT v3 test / best val | 33.41 / 35.76 |
| Oracle upper | 37.13 |
| Gap product → 40 | **5.89** |
Chat neural-first hybrid remains **48.74** (mid bar met).
|