darcook commited on
Commit
5a7debc
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): eb3b55e

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +76 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - image-classification
5
+ - tabular-regression
6
+ - reinforcement-learning
7
+ tags:
8
+ - active-learning
9
+ - bayesian-deep-learning
10
+ - out-of-distribution
11
+ - uncertainty-estimation
12
+ pretty_name: DCPV Experimental Artifacts
13
+ size_categories:
14
+ - 100M<n<1G
15
+ ---
16
+
17
+ # DCPV: Density-Clustered / OOD-Aware Predictive Variance Artifacts
18
+
19
+ This repository contains the experimental artifacts, results, and datasets for the paper **"Mitigating the Density Paradox in Bayesian Active Learning"** (DCPV).
20
+
21
+ These artifacts support the reproducibility of our findings, demonstrating that standard Bayesian Active Learning methods (like Predictive Variance) often fail in Out-of-Distribution (OOD) settings, and that our proposed method (**Robust PV**) effectively mitigates this issue.
22
+
23
+ ## Repository Structure
24
+
25
+ The repository is organized into three main directories:
26
+
27
+ ### 1. `results/` (Experimental Metrics)
28
+ Contains raw `.npy` files recording the performance metrics for every round of Active Learning (up to 50 rounds).
29
+ - **Structure**: `results/{metric}_{method}.npy`
30
+ - **Key Metrics**:
31
+ - `ood_rate_*.npy`: Percentage of selected samples that were OOD (Lower is better).
32
+ - `rmse_*.npy`: Root Mean Squared Error on the Test Set (Lower is better).
33
+ - **Methods**:
34
+ - `random`: Random Sampling (Baseline).
35
+ - `predictive_variance`: Standard PV (Fails in OOD).
36
+ - `robust_pv`: Our proposed method (Weighted by Mahalanobis density).
37
+ - `robust_pv_gmm`: Our proposed method (Weighted by GMM density).
38
+
39
+ ### 2. `plots/` (Visualizations)
40
+ Generated figures illustrating the "Density Paradox" and the effectiveness of our solution.
41
+ - **Key Figures**:
42
+ - `ood_composite_2x4.png`: Comprehensive view of OOD selection rates and RMSE across all datasets (MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, SVHN).
43
+ - `summary_tradeoff_v2.png`: Trade-off analysis between OOD robustness and ID performance.
44
+
45
+ ### 3. `data/` (Source Datasets)
46
+ Contains the processed datasets used in the experiments to ensure exact reproducibility of splits and preprocessing.
47
+ - **Datasets**:
48
+ - `CIFAR-10` / `CIFAR-100` (Python version)
49
+ - `SVHN` (Format 2, 32x32)
50
+ - `MNIST` / `Fashion-MNIST` (Raw binaries)
51
+
52
+ ## Usage
53
+
54
+ You can download these artifacts directly or use the `huggingface_hub` library.
55
+
56
+ ### Option 1: Download via Python
57
+ ```python
58
+ from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
59
+
60
+ # Download the entire repository
61
+ path = snapshot_download(repo_id="darcook/DCPV-Artifacts", repo_type="dataset")
62
+ print(f"Artifacts downloaded to: {path}")
63
+ ```
64
+
65
+ ### Option 2: Load Results with `datasets`
66
+ (Example for listing files)
67
+ ```python
68
+ from huggingface_hub import list_repo_files
69
+
70
+ files = list_repo_files(repo_id="darcook/DCPV-Artifacts", repo_type="dataset")
71
+ print(files)
72
+ ```
73
+
74
+ ## Citation
75
+
76
+ If you use these artifacts, please cite our work (Anonymized for Blind Review).