dariakern commited on
Commit
1074e84
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 1385c7e

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +7 -20
README.md CHANGED
@@ -387,13 +387,9 @@ Do not use for re-identification of roosters or ducks.
387
 
388
  <!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
389
 
390
- The Chicks4FreeID dataset was created specifically for the task of chicken re-identification - i.e., recognizing the identity of an individual chicken in an image.
391
- There were two primary motivations for developing this dataset.
392
- First, there is a significant need for publicly available and well-annotated datasets in the field of animal re-identification.
393
- Second, there was a notable gap, as no such dataset existed for chickens prior to this effort.
394
 
395
- However, the dataset is multipurpose and can also be used for semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or even anomaly detection.
396
- It was structured, annotated, and prepared to support these additional tasks effectively.
397
 
398
 
399
  ### Source Data
@@ -405,13 +401,7 @@ It was structured, annotated, and prepared to support these additional tasks eff
405
  <!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, -->
406
  <!-- filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
407
 
408
- Data was collected manually using two models of cameras: the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 VI”130 and the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 I".
409
- The identities of the subjects were meticulously studied prior to photography, closely monitored throughout the image capture process,
410
- and ultimately assigned by a human annotator. No algorithms were used.
411
- During photography, the focus was always on a single chicken (the chickens were photographed sequentially, not randomly),
412
- while other individuals were able to enter the frame as well. The data collection took approximately one year.
413
- However, all images of a coop where always taken within a single day.
414
- In other words, all photos of an individual were taken on the same day.
415
 
416
 
417
  #### Who are the source data producers?
@@ -447,7 +437,7 @@ uniquely identifiable names or aliases, racial or ethnic origins, sexual orienta
447
  religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.).
448
  If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
449
 
450
- [More Information Needed]
451
 
452
  ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
453
 
@@ -479,14 +469,11 @@ Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset.
479
 
480
  [More Information Needed]
481
 
482
- ## More Information [optional]
483
-
484
- [More Information Needed]
485
 
486
- ## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
487
 
488
- [More Information Needed]
489
 
490
  ## Dataset Card Contact
491
 
492
- [More Information Needed]
 
387
 
388
  <!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
389
 
390
+ The Chicks4FreeID dataset was created specifically for the task of chicken re-identification - i.e., recognizing the identity of an individual chicken in an image. There were two primary motivations for developing this dataset. First, there is a significant need for publicly available and well-annotated datasets in the field of animal re-identification. Second, there was a notable gap, as no such dataset existed for chickens prior to this effort.
 
 
 
391
 
392
+ However, the dataset is multipurpose and can also be used for semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or even anomaly detection. It was structured, annotated, and prepared to support these additional tasks effectively.
 
393
 
394
 
395
  ### Source Data
 
401
  <!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, -->
402
  <!-- filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
403
 
404
+ Data was collected manually using two models of cameras: the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 VI”130 and the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 I". The identities of the subjects were meticulously studied prior to photography, closely monitored throughout the image capture process, and ultimately assigned by a human annotator. No algorithms were used. During photography, the focus was always on a single chicken (the chickens were photographed sequentially, not randomly), while other individuals were able to enter the frame as well. The data collection took approximately one year. However, all images of a coop where always taken within a single day. In other words, all photos of an individual were taken on the same day.
 
 
 
 
 
 
405
 
406
 
407
  #### Who are the source data producers?
 
437
  religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.).
438
  If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
439
 
440
+ The dataset does not contain any personal or sensitive information. It contains images of free-range chickens.
441
 
442
  ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
443
 
 
469
 
470
  [More Information Needed]
471
 
472
+ <!--## More Information [optional] -->
 
 
473
 
474
+ <!-- ## Dataset Card Authors [optional] -->
475
 
 
476
 
477
  ## Dataset Card Contact
478
 
479
+ Chicks4FreeID@dariakern.com