Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -387,13 +387,9 @@ Do not use for re-identification of roosters or ducks.
|
|
| 387 |
|
| 388 |
<!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
|
| 389 |
|
| 390 |
-
The Chicks4FreeID dataset was created specifically for the task of chicken re-identification - i.e., recognizing the identity of an individual chicken in an image.
|
| 391 |
-
There were two primary motivations for developing this dataset.
|
| 392 |
-
First, there is a significant need for publicly available and well-annotated datasets in the field of animal re-identification.
|
| 393 |
-
Second, there was a notable gap, as no such dataset existed for chickens prior to this effort.
|
| 394 |
|
| 395 |
-
However, the dataset is multipurpose and can also be used for semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or even anomaly detection.
|
| 396 |
-
It was structured, annotated, and prepared to support these additional tasks effectively.
|
| 397 |
|
| 398 |
|
| 399 |
### Source Data
|
|
@@ -405,13 +401,7 @@ It was structured, annotated, and prepared to support these additional tasks eff
|
|
| 405 |
<!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, -->
|
| 406 |
<!-- filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
|
| 407 |
|
| 408 |
-
Data was collected manually using two models of cameras: the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 VI”130 and the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 I".
|
| 409 |
-
The identities of the subjects were meticulously studied prior to photography, closely monitored throughout the image capture process,
|
| 410 |
-
and ultimately assigned by a human annotator. No algorithms were used.
|
| 411 |
-
During photography, the focus was always on a single chicken (the chickens were photographed sequentially, not randomly),
|
| 412 |
-
while other individuals were able to enter the frame as well. The data collection took approximately one year.
|
| 413 |
-
However, all images of a coop where always taken within a single day.
|
| 414 |
-
In other words, all photos of an individual were taken on the same day.
|
| 415 |
|
| 416 |
|
| 417 |
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
|
@@ -447,7 +437,7 @@ uniquely identifiable names or aliases, racial or ethnic origins, sexual orienta
|
|
| 447 |
religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.).
|
| 448 |
If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
|
| 449 |
|
| 450 |
-
|
| 451 |
|
| 452 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 453 |
|
|
@@ -479,14 +469,11 @@ Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset.
|
|
| 479 |
|
| 480 |
[More Information Needed]
|
| 481 |
|
| 482 |
-
|
| 483 |
-
|
| 484 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 485 |
|
| 486 |
-
## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
|
| 487 |
|
| 488 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 489 |
|
| 490 |
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 491 |
|
| 492 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 387 |
|
| 388 |
<!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
|
| 389 |
|
| 390 |
+
The Chicks4FreeID dataset was created specifically for the task of chicken re-identification - i.e., recognizing the identity of an individual chicken in an image. There were two primary motivations for developing this dataset. First, there is a significant need for publicly available and well-annotated datasets in the field of animal re-identification. Second, there was a notable gap, as no such dataset existed for chickens prior to this effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 391 |
|
| 392 |
+
However, the dataset is multipurpose and can also be used for semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or even anomaly detection. It was structured, annotated, and prepared to support these additional tasks effectively.
|
|
|
|
| 393 |
|
| 394 |
|
| 395 |
### Source Data
|
|
|
|
| 401 |
<!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, -->
|
| 402 |
<!-- filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
|
| 403 |
|
| 404 |
+
Data was collected manually using two models of cameras: the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 VI”130 and the “Sony CyberShot DSC-RX100 I". The identities of the subjects were meticulously studied prior to photography, closely monitored throughout the image capture process, and ultimately assigned by a human annotator. No algorithms were used. During photography, the focus was always on a single chicken (the chickens were photographed sequentially, not randomly), while other individuals were able to enter the frame as well. The data collection took approximately one year. However, all images of a coop where always taken within a single day. In other words, all photos of an individual were taken on the same day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 405 |
|
| 406 |
|
| 407 |
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
|
|
|
| 437 |
religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.).
|
| 438 |
If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
|
| 439 |
|
| 440 |
+
The dataset does not contain any personal or sensitive information. It contains images of free-range chickens.
|
| 441 |
|
| 442 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 443 |
|
|
|
|
| 469 |
|
| 470 |
[More Information Needed]
|
| 471 |
|
| 472 |
+
<!--## More Information [optional] -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 473 |
|
| 474 |
+
<!-- ## Dataset Card Authors [optional] -->
|
| 475 |
|
|
|
|
| 476 |
|
| 477 |
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 478 |
|
| 479 |
+
Chicks4FreeID@dariakern.com
|